< Back to Front Page Text size +

McCain suspending campaign due to US economic crisis

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor September 24, 2008 06:31 PM

Saying that the Wall Street bailout plan is in jeopardy and the US economy at stake, John McCain said today that he is suspending his presidential campaign on Thursday and called for postponing the first presidential debate on Friday night.

"It has become clear that no consensus has developed to support the Administration’s proposal," he said in New York. "I do not believe that the plan on the table will pass as it currently stands, and we are running out of time.

"Tomorrow morning, I will suspend my campaign and return to Washington after speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative. I have spoken to Senator Obama and informed him of my decision and have asked him to join me.

"I am calling on the President to convene a meeting with the leadership from both houses of Congress, including Senator Obama and myself. It is time for both parties to come together to solve this problem."

"We must meet as Americans, not as Democrats or Republicans, and we must meet until this crisis is resolved. I am directing my campaign to work with the Obama campaign and the commission on presidential debates to delay Friday night’s debate until we have taken action to address this crisis."

The McCain campaign clarified that in addition to suspending campaign events, it is also putting advertising and fundraising on hold.

But Obama told reporters that he believes the debate is "more important than ever."

"It's my belief that this is exactly the time the American people need to hear from the person in approximately 40 days will be responsible for dealing with this mess," Obama said.

UPDATE: The candidates, along with congressional leaders, were invited to a White House meeting Thursday on the bailout, Obama's camp said tonight.

“A few moments ago, President Bush called Senator Obama and asked him to attend a meeting in Washington tomorrow, which he agreed to do. Senator Obama has been working all week with leaders in Congress, Secretary Paulson, and Chairman Bernanke to improve this proposal, and he has said that he will continue to work in a bipartisan spirit and do whatever is necessary to come up with a final solution. He strongly believes the debate should go forward on Friday so that the American people can hear from their next President about how he will lead America forward at this defining moment for our country,” said Obama spokesman Bill Burton.

A McCain spokesman also confirmed tonight that the Arizona senator will be at the White House meeting, noting it was what McCain proposed today.

Obama said he called McCain this morning after he said he determined that McCain had adopted many of his principles -- a point McCain would dispute.

This afternoon, Obama said, they talked again about issuing a joint statement on principles such as creating an independent oversight board, protecting taxpayers, and demanding more transparency. They agreed on the need for bipartisanship and talked about having a meeting in Washington.

UPDATE: Tonight, the two campaigns issued that joint statement:

“The American people are facing a moment of economic crisis. No matter how this began, we all have a responsibility to work through it and restore confidence in our economy. The jobs, savings, and prosperity of the American people are at stake.

“Now is a time to come together – Democrats and Republicans – in a spirit of cooperation for the sake of the American people. The plan that has been submitted to Congress by the Bush Administration is flawed, but the effort to protect the American economy must not fail.

This is a time to rise above politics for the good of the country. We cannot risk an economic catastrophe. Now is our chance to come together to prove that Washington is once again capable of leading this country.”

McCain mentioned suspending the debate, but Obama said he didn't know McCain had made up his mind.

"Presidents are going to have to deal with more than one thing at a time," Obama added in his news conference.

Later, Obama's campaign honed in on the critique of a president being able to do more than one thing at a time, sending a rather snarky list of crises and big news events close to other debates, going all the way back to 1960 and saber-rattling by the Soviet Union.

Before the first debate in 2004, the list noted, North Korea admitted progress on a nuclear weapons program.

In his news conference, Obama said he believed the joint statement would go out first, before any press conferences or announcements.

Obama wouldn't directly answer questions about whether he believed McCain was playing politics with the suggested debate delay.

But other Democrats weren't as circumspect.

Senator Charles Schumer of New York said McCain acted "unilaterally" in a "very strange political move.

"This was seeking political one-upsmanship," Schumer said on CNN. "....He could upset some very delicate negotiations."

"It's the longest Haily Mary pass in the history of either football or Mary's," Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, who leads one of the committees scrutinizing the bailout, told reporters on Capitol Hill.

Republicans, on the other hand, praised McCain for taking a maverick stand, yet again.

"He's willing to risk being president to help the country," Senator Orrin Hatch said on MSNBC.

Responding to Obama, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, McCain's economic adviser, wouldn't say whether McCain will skip the debate and let it proceed with an empty chair in his place.

"That's getting ahead of where we are," Holtz-Eakin said on MSNBC.

Holtz-Eakin said the focus should be on resolving the bailout. "It's time to stand down from partisan politics," he said.

The debate host, the University of Mississippi, issued a statement saying it's still planning on the debate. "The University of Mississippi is going forward with the preparation for the debate. We are ready to host the debate, and we expect the debate to occur as planned," the statement said. "At present, the University has received no notification of any change in the timing or venue of the debate. We have been notified by the Commission on Presidential Debates that we are proceeding as scheduled. We will keep you posted as information becomes available."

The debate organizers also said they're moving forward for now.

The Commission on Presidential Debates said in a statement: "The plans for this forum have been underway for more than a year and a half. The CPD’s mission is to provide a forum in which the American public has an opportunity to hear the leading candidates for the president of the United States debate the critical issues facing the nation. We believe the public will be well served by having all of the debates go forward as scheduled."

Obama spokesman Bill Burton issued a statement on the timeline: "At 8:30 this morning, Senator Obama called Senator McCain to ask him if he would join in issuing a joint statement outlining their shared principles and conditions for the Treasury proposal and urging Congress and the White House to act in a bipartisan manner to pass such a proposal. At 2:30 this afternoon, Senator McCain returned Senator Obama’s call and agreed to join him in issuing such a statement. The two campaigns are currently working together on the details."

The McCain campaign issued its own statement on the timeline: "Senator Obama phoned Senator McCain at 8:30 am this morning but did not reach him. The topic of Senator Obama’s call to Senator McCain was never discussed. Senator McCain was meeting with economic advisers and talking to leaders in Congress throughout the day prior to calling Senator Obama. At 2:30 pm, Senator McCain phoned Senator Obama and expressed deep concern that the plan on the table would not pass as it currently stands. He asked Senator Obama to join him in returning to Washington to lead a bipartisan effort to solve this problem."

White House press secretary Dana Perino issued a statement welcoming McCain's announcement, saying that the support of the presidential candidates would help a deal be reached.

But Harry Reid, the top Democrat in the US Senate, issued a statement that it would not be helpful for McCain and Obama to return for the negotiations because that would risk "injecting presidential politics" into the process.

And, of course, independent Ralph Nader and Libertarian Bob Barr had to get their two cents in. They're not invited to the presidential debates because neither has reached 15 percent in the national polls.

In a joint statement, they said, "The fact that a candidate can call for changing the date of the debate only two days before it is scheduled indicates how easy it would be for the candidates to also call for the inclusion of the leading third party and independent candidates, which would bring fresh ideas to the table on how our country can truly tackle this heavy challenge."

394 comments so far...
  1. McCain jumps the Shark!

    We have elections during wars...This is america. We don't stop democracy for convience sake or crisis.

    Posted by HKK September 24, 08 03:16 PM
  1. Someone's VP isn't ready

    Posted by Brent September 24, 08 03:19 PM
  1. Group hug

    Posted by Dave September 24, 08 03:20 PM
  1. I don't trust McCain...what kind of a ploy is this? It's the Re.publicans who got us in this mess to begin with

    Posted by Linda September 24, 08 03:22 PM
  1. Well...could it be that Sen. Obama contacted Sen. McCain FIRST, in an effort to work together and address this issue, and Sen McCain then issued a statement in an attempt to use this to his political advantage? Kind of an "I thought of it first" situation? It wouldn't surprise me a bit.

    Posted by backlineguy September 24, 08 03:23 PM
  1. NO!

    No way should the FEC delay the debate!

    This is a power grab, pure and simple. (We never had debates, guess we'll have to postpone the election now...)

    In other times of crisis, the US elections marched on and took their natural course; there is no reason we should do anything different now.

    Posted by David M. September 24, 08 03:26 PM
  1. McCain doesn't want to debate now that the polls are not in his favor? Hopefully he is telling the truth and the crisis is the real reason he is suspending his campaign. I hate to doubt the guy, especially at a time like this, but with all the lies that have come out of his camp, it's hard not to.

    Posted by Sandy September 24, 08 03:26 PM
  1. no

    Posted by AB September 24, 08 03:27 PM
  1. This is real leadership. Now watch the Obama campaign fall all over themselves calling this a campaign tactic.

    Posted by A.Non.E.Mous September 24, 08 03:27 PM
  1. I guess he has to at least pretend to care about the common man

    Posted by d September 24, 08 03:27 PM
  1. The debate should go on. We need to see the candidates debate before the election.

    Posted by spk September 24, 08 03:27 PM
  1. sounds like someone is affraid to lose the debate!

    Posted by Jason September 24, 08 03:27 PM
  1. Wow, responsible citzenship!! From a Republican? I am shocked, this must be the beginning of the end.

    Posted by Ken O September 24, 08 03:28 PM

  1. the debates should not be delayed.
    this is pure political bull. McCain knows his campaign is floundering and is about to choke under the weight of it's own lies.

    Posted by skott daltonic September 24, 08 03:29 PM
  1. No, the debate should not be postponed. I think the time is right for people to see what the candidates believe or propose for the economy. Neither candidate has much effect on the current problem, but I would like to hear what they propose for the future.

    Posted by Paul September 24, 08 03:30 PM
  1. They both should have been in Washington since last week. This just looks like a cheap political trick now. Too little, too late.

    What, does McCain think the reason why the bailout issue hasn't been resolved yet is because he hasn't been there to bring everyone together?

    This morning's news announces that Obama is ahead in some of the polls again and all of a sudden McCain is scared to debate...

    Posted by Cait September 24, 08 03:30 PM
  1. Call me cynical, but this is just another attempt by McCain and company to grab headlines and seem presidential and above the fray, especially since he is behind in the polls. This is the time when America needs to hear from our future leaders. This country is going to be in crisis for many more months, so according to McCain logic, maybe we should delay all the debates and even the presidential election!

    Posted by Interested Party September 24, 08 03:30 PM
  1. It's all politics.

    Posted by Mike M September 24, 08 03:31 PM
  1. Did McCain steal Obama's thunder? The title of news piece suggests it was Senator McCain alone who initiated this.

    Posted by Cynthia September 24, 08 03:31 PM
  1. No, it is more important than ever to hear them debate. This is a crisis that needs to be dealt with wisely, and Obama and McCain need to tell us how they would handle it. Also, there are other issues that I have been waiting for weeks to hear them debate.

    Posted by Mary Costello September 24, 08 03:31 PM
  1. NO. What a coward.

    Posted by tjwells September 24, 08 03:31 PM
  1. These issues will continue well beyond the election. Postponing the debate(s) and/or suspending campaigns will have no real impact on solving them. McCain's proposal seems impulsive and should make voters question his judgements even more.

    Posted by Wendy Lindsay September 24, 08 03:31 PM
  1. Definitely not. I think this is a stalling tactic used because Senator McCain does not have a believable response to the economic crisis. This would buy him some more time to develop one. I think that the American people have a right to know what the candidates would do to handle the different issues and it especially important for them to show us now in the middle of a crisis. We need to know how they can think on their feet. The one who should be concentrating on the actual crisis right now is George Bush and his administration since he is the President.

    Posted by Susan September 24, 08 03:31 PM
  1. Really?

    Really?

    Of all the transparent, pathetic, crybaby, look at me cheap stunts to

    1) draw attention to himself, and make it look like he wants to solve the crisis

    2) magnify the "crisis" and ramrod the bailout through Congress...

    Wow. I'm amazed. Just when I didn't think McCain could outdo himself, he does. And Obama is going along with this?

    Wow.

    Posted by Ken September 24, 08 03:31 PM
  1. Unbelievable; if this is such a crisis that needs to be addressed immediately he should skip the Clinton Global Initiative, take Gov. Palin down to Washington and give her a crash course in crisis management. Unfortuately, that's not what this is about. It's an obvious political stunt to appear bipartisan and to look like a "leader" on the issue. Good way to change the conversation from the latest polling data I guess...

    Posted by Aaron September 24, 08 03:31 PM
  1. NO. What a coward.

    Posted by tjwells September 24, 08 03:32 PM
  1. Of course not. Mr. Straight Talk is slipping in the polls and with public sentiment squarely against the Republicans and this massive bailout he doesn't want to get hammered in Friday's debate. Classic stall tactic. What a "maverick". Run and hide Senator.

    Posted by Luke September 24, 08 03:32 PM
  1. Congratulations! Senator McCain...this is a monumental crisis that needs to be addressed.

    We know we will be electing a new president who will be inherting this crisis. I would think that most people have made up their minds at this pont. Do we need to watch you spend millions more dollars to prove your points, while many many people in this country stand to loose millions

    Posted by Joanne Pacheco September 24, 08 03:32 PM
  1. There is not a chance in hell that the debate should be delayed.

    McCain sees the results in the polls and knows that if he goes into this debate and performs poorly when it comes to questions regarding the economy, he will see his chances of winning this race slip away very quickly.

    Posted by Mike from Canada - via Attleboro September 24, 08 03:32 PM
  1. There is no legitimate reason why these two candidates should not debate as planned for a few hours on Friday night. This is a copout.

    Posted by Me September 24, 08 03:32 PM
  1. Good grief...
    McCain has shown up for fewer votes than any other Senator. Even less than Tim Johnson of SD (the one who had the stroke). Sometimes, he was the only senator who didn't bother to show up; the 2008 energy bill failed by one vote, and McCain was the only Senator didn't vote.

    NOW-- when he's behind in the polls-- he suddenly decides to start doing his job as Senator??

    Looks like desperation to me. Reminiscent of Bob Dole's desperate move to resign from the Senate. And look how well that worked out for him.


    Posted by alex macgregor September 24, 08 03:33 PM
  1. No. This is what a president does; reacts to crisis'.

    Posted by MAG September 24, 08 03:33 PM
  1. Yes, give them some time to prepare for a debate that no one cares about.

    Posted by Hojo September 24, 08 03:33 PM
  1. This is ridiculous. Less than 45 days until the election. We have a President (such as it is) who was elected to handle these crisis (of his own making) and until January 20th he is still in charge. I am sure that consensus can be reached without John McCain's vast knowledge of the credit markets. He's never had anything important to add before, why stop campaigning now that his poll numbers have dropped. What a stunt!

    Posted by LawyerfromMass September 24, 08 03:33 PM
  1. Ooooh, John McCain is scared of Barack. Boo-hoo!

    Posted by JJ September 24, 08 03:33 PM
  1. That's odd, I thought he said the fundamentals of the economy are strong. Hmmm....

    Posted by Dave September 24, 08 03:33 PM
  1. Absolutely not.

    Posted by Janine D. September 24, 08 03:34 PM
  1. No are you kidding me......what a joke.. the people want to here from these two, face to face... enough of these attack adds on T.V... I for one cann't take much more of it.. I want to see the both of them talk about real issues facing the American people, and I want to see it now...

    Posted by jd September 24, 08 03:35 PM
  1. no way in hell!!
    he wants it delayed so he doesnt have to talk about it.
    he knows the deregulation that the repubs and mccain have been touting for the past 20 years led to this!
    he makes me sick...

    Posted by mike September 24, 08 03:36 PM
  1. Absolutely not. He hasn't done anything about this issue in the past, what's two more days?

    Posted by Fran Hession September 24, 08 03:36 PM
  1. its all a campaign ploy

    Posted by ben September 24, 08 03:36 PM
  1. Sure, let's delay the election, too! Things can only get better, right?

    Posted by floridagirl25 September 24, 08 03:36 PM
  1. When we were kids we called it chickening out.

    Posted by peter September 24, 08 03:36 PM
  1. Debating on Friday in the midst of this meltdown would be a disaster for McCain, not that he wasn't going to get waxed anyway. He and his cronies (Rick Davis, Phil Gramm, et al.) are all wrapped up in this financial mess. There would be a bulls-eye on him for Obama, like shooting ducks on a pond. While he asserts that this is "not the time for politics," post-poning the is politics at its most pathetic. A clever, yet seemingly desperate ploy, to try and divert attention away from the matters at hand. Rovian tactics, plain and simple. At the end of the day, pretty chicksh*t behavior for a war hero, if you ask me.

    Posted by Kevin September 24, 08 03:37 PM
  1. This is such a transparentally political move on McCain's part. McCain has stated repeatedly that economics is not his strong suit and now he is going to rush to save the economy for us. He's trying to dig his way out of the hole he's in. It hasn't worked on me but I guess it is worth a shot. He had to do something.

    Posted by Jake September 24, 08 03:37 PM
  1. As usual, John McCain brings intelligent,proactive response to any situation, including the debate. Why pretend there is a real deadline for talking about foreign affairs, instead of recognizing its artificiality and probing the current crisis. This kind of tactic demonstrates why we need a leader who's not afraid to step outside the box as President.

    Posted by Erindog September 24, 08 03:37 PM
  1. McCain should not suspend his campaign and neither should Obama. The determination of the next President of the United States is more important than two Senators participating in the negotiations for the bail out.

    I think this is more of a ploy for McCain to avoid facing tough questions (and facts) during the debate about Republican policies that led to the financial crisis.

    Posted by Ben September 24, 08 03:38 PM
  1. Absolutely not. He's not the President and I think he needs to stand there and explain to everyone what his position on this mess is.

    Posted by Aaron Eilers September 24, 08 03:38 PM
  1. This is just a political ploy. He is thinking only of how well this ploy will benefit him in the polls.
    Which, I guess is all that we can expect of any politician.

    Posted by denisohainle September 24, 08 03:38 PM
  1. It's much more important that the two candidates debate this Friday (and on a different topic, foreign affairs) than it is to suspend the campaign, which is fast coming to an end without much clarity on many issues. We really should get a better idea of how both look at foreign affairs head on, so to speak. Obama's idea of a joint statement is just fine and may prode the others to find a solution faster, but let's face it, neither is now in charge of anything except their own campaign.

    Posted by DA2 September 24, 08 03:39 PM
  1. Typical McCain showboating. No substance, just theatrics, and a handy diversion from the damning news this morning about his campaign manager.

    Posted by Stewart September 24, 08 03:39 PM
  1. NO WAY. We need to see how Mr McCain preforms under pressure.

    Posted by Johnny T September 24, 08 03:39 PM
  1. On second though, I think McCain is trying to stall the debates. The only thing that has changed is the polls in Obama's favor. The debate only takes a couple of hours. Why not suspend his compaign today, do what he has to do and be ready for the debate on Friday?

    Posted by Sandy September 24, 08 03:39 PM
  1. No, it should not be delayed. McCain and Obama cannot fix the current crisis. They are campaigning to show us who our next leader will be. Let the current leaders wallow in the mess they have made, and let McCain and Obama make the case for our future. The future is coming - Jan 20, 09 is coming, and McCain cannot put it off. So show us how he will be ready and what he will do then, don't go hide because he doesn't know what to say.

    Posted by Jen September 24, 08 03:39 PM
  1. Seems like all the more reason to debate. Stop running John.

    Posted by amy c September 24, 08 03:40 PM
  1. McCain and his crew are obviously worried that they're careening toward defeat and aren't quite sure how to deal not only with the financial crisis but also, and above all, with the erosion of their support due to the Palin implosion and the critical response to their lie-based political advertising campaign. It's a smart move on their part to do to try to take a "timeout" and, perhaps, develop a new campaign strategy, but using the financial crisis as an excuse to delay the first debate on foreign policy should be recognized as the self-serving political maneuver it obviously is.

    Posted by Jeff Sluyter-Beltrao September 24, 08 03:40 PM
  1. The debate should absolutely not be postponned. Why not debate what strategies both candidates feel need to be implemented immediately to address the dire situation. They could also weigh in on their feelings regarding a possible bail out and how that should or should not be implemented.

    Have both candidates look America in the eye and say this is what we need to do !

    Posted by Keith Buohl September 24, 08 03:40 PM
  1. It's 3:00 AM. A phone rings in the White House. It's an international crisis. John McCain answers the phone and says, "Not now.. Call me back in the morning."

    Posted by LJC September 24, 08 03:40 PM
  1. Yes, and NOT on a Friday night

    Posted by Jaine Donelan September 24, 08 03:40 PM
  1. Good call by McCain, besides him and Obama should be in D.C. doing their jobs. All politics should cease before we spend 700 billion in a matter of minutes!

    Posted by Medford September 24, 08 03:40 PM
  1. To me this is just an attempt by the McCain campaign to appear as though they are taking a stong and informed stance on the economy as a way to try and recovery from McCain previously admitting that the economy was not one of his strong points and other statements in recent months about the soundness of the economy. I think that postponing the debate will likely only add to the histeria and scare tactics that are already being employed to fast track a major piece of policy before fully analyzing its implications and addressing the lack of oversight. I think that the debate should not be postponed and that McCain should show how well informed and concerned he has apparently become now that this is a centeral issue for the election by debating Obama.

    Posted by adlag19 September 24, 08 03:40 PM
  1. Another gimmick from McCain...his polling numbers are sinking so he calls for delaying a debate...he looks like a coward.

    Posted by Joe B September 24, 08 03:40 PM
  1. Brilliant move by McCain. If Obama agrees, he's perceived the follower to McCain's show of leadership. If he disagrees, then he's perpetuating the partisan politics of Washington. Not sure if postponing the debate helps McCain or not.

    Though it does look Obama saved face by asking for the joint statement to be issued. Hmmm.

    Posted by Jeff Foley September 24, 08 03:41 PM
  1. Absolutely not!!!!!!! I want to hear what Grandpa McCain's Ideas are on this subject and just how he is going to defend the deregulation he has advocated, help write, supported and voted for his entire life.

    Posted by Ed Q September 24, 08 03:41 PM
  1. Yes, because the House is going on a break this Friday until the election is over. Everything, including breaks, should be set aside until this situation is resolved, including debates and campaigns. This is the time for the Reps and Dems to get together as one for our country and this is why we vote for them...to work for us. they are our public servants.

    Posted by Sharon September 24, 08 03:42 PM
  1. No, the debate is more important than ever.

    Change the topic to the economy - and let us hear from both candidates.

    McCain should not be able to get away with this ploy. political b.s.

    Posted by Susan September 24, 08 03:42 PM
  1. WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a brazen stunt!!! Who can respect such a vile manipulation on the same day the WP poll shows McPalin down by 9?

    Posted by Andy September 24, 08 03:45 PM
  1. "to delay the debate until we have taken action, McCain, or until you can figure out some talking points to absolve yourself of the blame for being so anti-regulation and are admittedly baffled on how to fix this issue, except maybe use the ol' Bush trick of diverting attention to the immigrants and gays.

    McCain has hinted he wont even vote on the bill to solve the issue, probably since he knows he will flip flop in a few weeks.

    Posted by sean September 24, 08 03:45 PM
  1. this is just a ploy to get votes. he's just trying to make himself look good. first sarah palin and now this. whats next?

    Posted by jody September 24, 08 03:45 PM
  1. Why not...delay it. Election talk has taken a back seat...we need to find out of the mess we have been put in. I do feel the Statement is a little bit self serving...but thats what I expected from both of these knuckleheads.


    Posted by Tim September 24, 08 03:46 PM
  1. Do not postpone debate - let's see what they each have to say

    Posted by SRF September 24, 08 03:46 PM
  1. Obama took the initiative to call McCain campaign this morning and he asked him to put out a joint bipartisan statement on the economy. McCain turned it around on him and put out his own statement. McCain saw he was behind in the polls. He got scared and felt that he had to do something drastic, and this is it. The debate should not be put off just to help out McCains' campaign.

    Posted by Sara September 24, 08 03:46 PM
  1. Good move by McCain. He is putting his country first, once again. Obama will likely do more fund raising with his liberal pals while important decisions are being made without him.

    Posted by heynow98 September 24, 08 03:46 PM
  1. No. I'd like to hear their responses to this crisis.

    Posted by Joe Donovan September 24, 08 03:46 PM
  1. What about the American people, the war, global warming, poverty, the elderly, education, pollution, health care and the list goes on and on and on ....
    We are being driven by the crooks in the white house and wall street, not by the PEOPLE!

    The debate SHOULD go on!

    Posted by Elaine Daley September 24, 08 03:47 PM
  1. Sounds like the debate may not happen Friday after all.

    Posted by Annie G September 24, 08 03:47 PM
  1. NO.

    What a wuss. Talk on the economy. Are you scared?

    Posted by HKK September 24, 08 03:47 PM
  1. NO! Given the current state of affairs, the debate should focus on the economic situation instead of national security.

    Posted by L in Watertown September 24, 08 03:47 PM
  1. I did feel like it was a conflict of interest to be campaigning during this crisis. They need to get to work at their jobs. Both of them.

    Posted by Roberta September 24, 08 03:48 PM
  1. How about putting Palin up against Obama? That seems to be how the campaign has been running anyway...

    Posted by Jim September 24, 08 03:48 PM
  1. No reason to delay the debate. Maybe just change the focus of the debate a bit. As voters, we need to see these people debate now. The election is in less than 2 months. I don't think Obama was looking to delay the debate.

    Posted by Kathleen September 24, 08 03:48 PM
  1. No...

    Posted by thinkingdem September 24, 08 03:48 PM
  1. Smart, but cynical move by McCain, askiing to delay the debate and asking Obama to join him in a "joint approach". Since McCain is closely linked with the Republicans who are seen as being largely responsible for the economic mess, he wants to wiggle out by being able to say that he and Obama are in it together, etc.

    Posted by Steve September 24, 08 03:49 PM
  1. whatever...the debates are completely useless...they say the same crap....

    all elections are about which bowl of sh*t stinks less...because they all stink...

    I think Obama's stinks less. I would rather have a candidate promise less and not get into great specifics because they don't know ALL the intricacies of the situation and as we all know, no candidate actually ever delivers on their campaign "promises" so I would just rather not hear them...

    Posted by the_smell_from_washington September 24, 08 03:49 PM
  1. At such an uncertain time in our economy, the need for intelligent debate over possible course of action has never been so important.

    While this need extends far beyond the two candidates currently posturing for our votes, I cannot think of a better time to hear these candidates debate their economic policies -- to see not only the way they handle themselves in a crisis, but to see both their openness and resolve.

    Posted by BosLegal September 24, 08 03:49 PM
  1. Dear Barack Hussein Obama,

    Take copious notes as your lessons learned:

    This is what's called LEADERSHIP.

    This is called putting COUNTRY FIRST.

    You have no choice but to follow or get the hell out of the way.

    You have been out-maneuvered by a pro.

    You are a rookie.

    Check and soon to be Checkmate.


    Sincerely,

    The American Voter

    Posted by McCain-Palin '08 September 24, 08 03:50 PM
  1. Well, they ARE senators/congressmen--they probably DO their job when they NEED to...

    Posted by window September 24, 08 03:50 PM
  1. Translation of quote from Bill Burton "No fair! It was our idea!" So childish

    Posted by Sluggo September 24, 08 03:50 PM
  1. The debate shouldn't be delayed - we need to hear these candidates talk about a true crisis while it's happening, in real time.

    Posted by Matt B. September 24, 08 03:50 PM
  1. Absolutely Both Senators are elected officials who should be in Washington doing their job at this time not campaigning.

    Posted by Joe R September 24, 08 03:50 PM
  1. No, the debate should not be delayed. What exactly are the senators going to do that will make such a large difference on a Friday night? It is important for the American people to hear from the two men who may next lead our nation and their vision for foreign policy in a post-Bush world

    Posted by Kim Mahoney September 24, 08 03:50 PM
  1. Suspend the campains and all nominees, including Palin, should work on the issue. However, no there is no need to suspend the debate

    Posted by James E Stevenson September 24, 08 03:51 PM
  1. How can he go from saying the "fundamentals of our economy are strong" one week to suspending his campaign and wanting to postpone the debate the next? Sounds like he's getting nervous about his poor polling...

    Let the debate go on as scheduled!

    Posted by tufts10 September 24, 08 03:51 PM
  1. Like they will actually be doing work instead?

    Posted by coachk25 September 24, 08 03:51 PM
  1. No, the debate has been long awaited and should take place. This is more about slippage in the polls than anything else. Many people are already working on the financial situation and there are crucial issues of foreign policy to be covered in the debate. What next, postpone the election ?
    His very act of wanting to postpone the debate is politicking.

    Posted by P. Gaylord September 24, 08 03:51 PM
  1. The 90 minute debate should go on as scheduled. I would think that the job of President would require the sucessful applicant to be able to mulit-task. This comes from the same man who called for a "9/11-type" comission to look into Wall Street's meltdown, but when it came time to vote on the reccomendations of the actual 9/11 Committee, he skipped the vote but did make time to attend a Republican fund raiser in California.

    Posted by KeithBoston September 24, 08 03:51 PM
  1. No. Rather than cancelling the debate, the subject should be changed from foreign policy to the economy.

    Posted by Jeff Pyle September 24, 08 03:51 PM
  1. If McCain is a real leader, he should be able to participate in a debate on Friday night and also tend to business in DC. There is no need for a delay in the debate! The debate does not need to be "political" unless McCain wants it to be. It is more important that Americans hear what the candidates have to say on the economy in an open debate/discussion as soon as possible since one of them will be leading the country in a few short months. A presidential candidate should be prepared to debate and legislate whenever necessary!

    Posted by Diane Webber September 24, 08 03:52 PM
  1. no, it shouldn't be delayed. mccain is desperate.

    Posted by j boy September 24, 08 03:52 PM
  1. No. McCain says the fundamentals of the economy are strong last week but now it's the biggest crisis ever? Will the real John McCain please stand up?

    McCain is doing this because of the shift in the polls. He's playing games because that's all he has to offer. He's clueless and we need to see that in the debate. It was the Obama campaign that contacted the McCain campaign this morning with the bipartisan approach -- for McCain to try and take credit for it this afternoon is just one more in a long pack of lies that he calls a campaign.

    Posted by denheels September 24, 08 03:53 PM
  1. McCain is terrified he will be crucified on the economy in this debate and will not recover before the election. It is all he can do to stay in the race and he is running out of options. I sense the tactics of one Carl Rove behind all this scheming. Politics as usual!

    Posted by Donal Coomey September 24, 08 03:53 PM
  1. NO

    Posted by debateaway September 24, 08 03:53 PM
  1. Absolutely not!! It should be changed however, from a 30 second sound bite format to an actual discussion of 1) how we got into this mess 2) how to get OUT of this mess and 3) how to avoid this from happening again.

    It should FOCUS on the economy, and the candidates should HAVE TO explain to us what they will do differently as president.

    Posted by Karen September 24, 08 03:54 PM
  1. half of this article is blocked by your advertsing. Please fix.

    Posted by ajones05 September 24, 08 03:54 PM

  1. I think the McCain proposal to delay the debate is all smoke and mirrors. If anything, we would benefit from hearing our two main Presidential candidates discuss the economy face-to-face, perhaps devoting a good portion of the debate to the economic crisis as instead a "discussion and analysis." I see it as much of a tactic as McCain keeping Sarah Palin from meeting with the press, having her views widely and freely questioned and parsed.

    Posted by MFH September 24, 08 03:54 PM
  1. No. Just political grandstanding by McCain. They don't need him in town to get a bill ready. Just a wild stab at trying to look presidential after ricocheting from one point to another the last 10 days. And don't forget the Rick Davis thing. Lets go for another distraction.

    Posted by Craig September 24, 08 03:54 PM

  1. I think the McCain proposal to delay the debate is all smoke and mirrors. If anything, we would benefit from hearing our two main Presidential candidates discuss the economy face-to-face, perhaps devoting a good portion of the debate to the economic crisis as instead a "discussion and analysis." I see it as much of a tactic as McCain keeping Sarah Palin from meeting with the press, having her views widely and freely questioned and parsed.

    Posted by MFH September 24, 08 03:54 PM
  1. What a COWARD

    Posted by F September 24, 08 03:55 PM
  1. Of course not! Delaying the debate is a cowering move to avoid being in public during this crisis. Leaders should stand up and be heard, not duck and cover in Washington.

    Posted by Nick September 24, 08 03:55 PM
  1. Absolutely not. Now, more than ever we need to hear the candidates' views on the economy.

    Posted by Diane September 24, 08 03:55 PM
  1. I think it's good that they're working together in this time of need but I doubt any campaign is being "suspended" for the time being. Just look at the statements from both sides. There seems to be a difference in who initiated with who first.

    Posted by DI$CO September 24, 08 03:56 PM
  1. This is ridiculous! Not only does he try to make it look like it was his idea to issue joint support for himself and Obama but he's trying to get out of the ONLY event voters have been looking forward to re: substantive answers!! What a joke.

    Posted by Btown September 24, 08 03:56 PM
  1. The debate absolutely should not be delayed. McCain and Obama could go back to DC to make their votes and still make the debate. A discussion between the two candidates is more important than empty gestures and attempts to manipulate public sentiment. McCain's call to reschedule is strategic and nothing else.

    Posted by CCB September 24, 08 03:56 PM
  1. This is ridiculous! Not only does he try to make it look like it was his idea to issue joint support for himself and Obama but he's trying to get out of the ONLY event voters have been looking forward to re: substantive answers!! What a joke.

    Posted by Btown September 24, 08 03:56 PM
  1. NO --McCain is stalling because he is a novice on the economy. His poll numbers are in the toilet, and Obama is surging so this a stall tactic to delay further damage to his campaign.

    He should instead ask that the topic of the debate be economic issues, not foreign policy. Americans are looking for answers, not political stall tactics.

    McCain is a joke. Presidents are supposed to be able to MULTITASK.

    Posted by db September 24, 08 03:56 PM
  1. Do it in Washington then. Mccain is obviously ducking this debate. This is yet another hail mary pass from a desperate Mccain camp.

    Posted by Matt September 24, 08 03:56 PM
  1. How very lame. If the man can't plan for a debate and be a senator at the same time, how competant a president will he be?

    Posted by Heather September 24, 08 03:56 PM
  1. Sounds like he's just blowing smoke. I had a lot of respect for McCain before this presidential election, but after witnessing the Rove-ian style politics I've had enough. McCain and Obama have been preparing for this debate for ages now. I understand the bailout legislation needs to be revamped (add more oversight), but at this critical time it is also important for the nation to understand their policies. I can't imagine one debate with these two will have serious consequences on the bill.

    Posted by Ryan September 24, 08 03:57 PM
  1. Maybe the circus they call a campaign could stand to take a break so that they, both McCain and Obama, can really learn more about this crisis and help out. After all, they are elected, working Senators.

    Maybe move the VP debate up instead. After all, that is what people are waiting for.

    No, I do not think that McCain is scared. He is better with debates than Obama. But the liberals will use this to callhim a coward, just watch. Hello liberals, think again.

    Posted by JBN September 24, 08 03:57 PM
  1. What a cheap excuse on McCain's part to duck the debate, while his poll numbers plummet, his running mate continues to be sequestered from reporters, and his campaign manager skips town. Nice!

    Posted by Jack September 24, 08 03:57 PM
  1. No - if he can't multitask, he shouldn't be president.

    Posted by Bee September 24, 08 03:58 PM
  1. It would be a silly distraction for these two jokers to be having some television debates while the fate of the country is being decided behind closed doors. Whatever Congress decides to do, no decision they could make as president will be as important as what Congress is now being asked to do.

    Posted by Pat September 24, 08 03:58 PM
  1. McCain must be thinking about a post-November career in stand-up comedy.

    Although the prospect of debating Barack Obama while the Republican culture comes crashing down around his ears might be represent a fearsome crisis for McCain, I think the rest of us would prefer that the democratic process carry on as planned. McCain will just have to try to tune out the spoiled wailing and petulant tantrums from the Masters of the Universe while he responds to moderators' questions about economics, the mortgage crisis, and accountability.

    Nice try, though.

    Posted by Dan Farnkoff September 24, 08 03:58 PM
  1. I think if McCain wants to postpone the Presidential Debate, perhaps the VP debate should be held in its place? That way they save the venue, and we get to see a debate we have been waiting for...?

    Posted by Jilery September 24, 08 03:58 PM
  1. Personally, I would prefer mccain stay as far away from the financial healing process as possible. He clearly has no real sense of what needs to happen to fix this. And I don't trust his adviser Phil Gramm who's deregulation policies pushed us into this mess.

    Posted by Heath September 24, 08 03:58 PM
  1. Ever hear of multitasking?

    Nice one McCain. What other tricks have you brought with you?

    Posted by KDilkington September 24, 08 03:59 PM
  1. Very Presidential, McCain has taken charge of this issue, what can Obama do but agree. If Obama thinks its more important to prepare for his debate then go to Washington, everyone will understand as they know he needs more help. The next week is going to reshape this nation's economy for the next 50 yrs, the world is watching and we can't be paralyzed by inaction.

    Posted by massmoderatejoe September 24, 08 03:59 PM
  1. Absolutely not - there will be a new administration that will have to take over the management of this (supposed) crisis - we need to know how each candidate will act going forward. This is their opportunity to inform us.

    Posted by Liz September 24, 08 03:59 PM
  1. What McCain is trying to say is that he is not ready to debate Obama...does this come as a surprise? NOT AT ALL!

    Posted by Jack Ofalltrades September 24, 08 03:59 PM
  1. Non-cynically, it hardly matters. Both candidates look good being perceived as non-partisan and adult in the face of a huge burden to be absorbed by taxpayers. Who knows, maybe these candidates are indeed grown-up enough not to nurse this for their own benefit. Or more likely, they have no more idea to fix it than the ones who got us into it.
    The debates are a joke; I'd prefer all were canceled. --An Obama supporter who admits McCain has some positive qualites.

    Posted by Michael J September 24, 08 03:59 PM
  1. Are you Serious? If now is not the time to debate the issues that are most affecting the Americian way of life then when? Come on John get a back bone and step up to the plate, show the American public how you plan to fix this mess. Stop hiding behind Sarah's Apron strings and take charge!

    Posted by S. Bartley September 24, 08 04:00 PM
  1. of course not, there is not a valid reason to delay this debate and John McCain knows it. Why didn't he worry about the state of the economy last week or last month? this is just a stall tactic, the president is handling the crisis, show up on friday, Mr McCain.

    Posted by junorn September 24, 08 04:00 PM
  1. The debate must go on. We need our savior Obama. Obama is the Messiah

    So let it be written, so let it be said.

    Posted by Gary Ross September 24, 08 04:01 PM
  1. So, John "I know nothing about the economy" McCain wants to suspend the debate to help work out a solution for the economy. Makes perfect sense to me.

    Posted by John September 24, 08 04:01 PM
  1. No. The McCain campaign is attempting to pull off one of the biggest smoke-and-mirror plays in the history of the United States by steadfastly refusing to provide any actual face time--debate, interview, or otherwise. If this succeeds, the American people will have elected two individuals about which they know virtually nothing. I have to say I do admire the outright gall required to attempt such a move.

    Posted by Jeff Gould September 24, 08 04:02 PM
  1. No way!!! This is a sharp political move by him. He is trying to portray himself as the "good guy" how cares more about the country than Obama. But any knowledgeable person knows that this is a smart political move by him. He is trying to kill two birds with one stone by avoiding the debate!!!! This will give him more time to plan better what he is going to say on the debate whenever it happens.

    Posted by John September 24, 08 04:03 PM
  1. Since it's clear that Deregulation McCain is strongly associated in the public's mind with the Credit Crisis, he is trying to divert attention from his past and show that he can spell economy.

    Posted by Mikenh September 24, 08 04:03 PM

  1. Maybe McCain is suspending his campaign to make the market situation look more dire than it is.

    Bush, et al, are trying to scare us. We must pass this quickly, they say, or disaster ensues. Why not let the billionaires buy up this bad debt, the result of Washington and Wall Street greed and deregulation. Why not use the money, instead, to shore up the FDIC or make a minuscule dent in the national debt?

    Posted by conquistadora September 24, 08 04:03 PM
  1. Surely in light of the economic climate it would make much more sense to debate sooner rather than later so we know where each candidate stands on the economy and what they would do to fix it if they are elected. This is a cop out by McCain.

    Posted by Trisha September 24, 08 04:03 PM
  1. With McCain's total lack of performance in the financial/economic sector, he doesn't want to meet Obama on the national stage. But how disingenuous for him to discuss a joint statement with Obama, then moments later issue his own statement calling for a suspension of the campaigns. He's terrified to face Obama, especially with the news that his campaign manager, Rick Davis, was receiving 15K monthly from Fannie Mae-until last month. Maybe McCain also feels responsible for all the deregulations he voted for in the stock market. McCain stated that 'the fundamentals of the economy are strong' just last week, before the crap hit the fan. Why is a guy who hasn't shown up to vote in the Senate since early April 2008 all of the sudden rolling up his sleeves? Oh yeah-it's called political grandstanding.


    Posted by Kathy September 24, 08 04:03 PM
  1. Don't cancel the debate. We want to hear what the candidates have to say about economic policy and the role of congress in managing the turmoil.

    Posted by Thomas Lippart September 24, 08 04:04 PM
  1. This is ridiculous, and nothing more than a disgusting political move by McCain. Why not just make the first debate about the economy? Clearly McCain wants to be president, but doesn't have the multitasking skills necessary to do so!

    We need a president who doesn't need a nap halfway through the day.

    Posted by Robert O'Neill September 24, 08 04:04 PM
  1. Just like McCain used Hurricane Gustav as an excuse to cut back the Republican National Convention and distance himself from the current administration, he's using the current financial mess as an excuse to avoid public scrutiny of his abismal record and disinterest in the economic realities of life for most Americans. Instead of stopping the campaign and Friday's debate, he chould be calling for more debates focusing on economic issues! McCain's probably the only person in the country relieved about the crisis, since it gives him a chance to appear to be taking charge when the truth is that he's got nothing to say and no clue about how to lead this country in the 21st century.

    Posted by JP Gal September 24, 08 04:05 PM
  1. Boy does this sound like another "weapons of mass destruction" crisis. Sure, there's a big problem here, but coming from McCain at this point, and with Bush planning a "speech," this smells like a stunt. Sorry, the debates should run as planned.....

    Posted by taxpayer September 24, 08 04:05 PM
  1. It doesnt make any sense to cancel this debate...

    MCcain is only playing games.

    First he praised Obama's for his speaking skills and now trying to delay the debate. WOW

    Posted by Billy September 24, 08 04:05 PM
  1. Shouldn't a president be able to do more than one thing at a time? Shouldn't we insist on that? It sounds (to me) like McCain's cramming for the debate, and wants to put that off so he can better understand the economic situation.

    Hold the debate as scheduled!

    Posted by Mary September 24, 08 04:06 PM
  1. The debate should not be postponed. We Americans have the right to hear what John McCain and Barack Obama have to say about foreign policy. The debates are a large part of the data that we will be evaluating these two men on. A true leader ought to be able to participate in a debate on Friday and still spend a sufficient amount of time on a crisis. If one is elected to the highest office in the land he should be able to do some multi tasking. Shame on you, John McCain.

    Posted by Alice Gray September 24, 08 04:06 PM
  1. Morons, the scheduled debate is not about economics, it is about foreign policy.

    Posted by mrstuom September 24, 08 04:06 PM
  1. No, the debate should not be postponed, and John McCain “suspending” his campaign to return to Washington is not going to fix the economy.. The most important thing right now is to have these debates so the voters can see for themselves how weak McCain is on the economy so that we can hopefully avoid future economic problems that he would bring.

    This is just another publicity stunt by McCain... Just as he nominated Sarah Palin to distract attention from the important issues, he is now using the economy as an excuse to "suspend" his campaign.. This makes him look much better than if he had to make public campaign stops and field questions about the economy, a subject which he has already said he is very weak on.. He's pretty much doing anything he can to win the election without having to talk about the issues in front of the voters.

    Posted by Rick September 24, 08 04:06 PM
  1. Well, clearly McCain is a vital cog in the large wheel of government.

    The same cog that allowed this mess to boil over in the first place.

    Translation: He failed miserably in practice debates.

    Advice: Give it up and go home.

    Posted by Mark Richards September 24, 08 04:07 PM
  1. "Should the debate be postponed?"
    HELL NO... McCain's got an entire financial debate squad (advisers) helping to run his campaign (Okay these are the same idiots who helped create the financial crisis in the first place, along with his past votes, but they're his choice.) What's running off to DC gonna do for him that he can't phone in. (It's what he's gonna do anyway when it comes time to actually vote on this)... Does he think that when the supposed "Phone call" comes in at 3am it'll be just one crisis at a time. He's going to need to multi-task in the job he seeks. Why not show his stuff now? He wants to be a Mavarick and bring transparency to the workings of Washington? Well then lets start by discussing this crisis in the debate.

    Posted by Dragon Lensman September 24, 08 04:08 PM
  1. No! Do not cancel the debate. It is more important than ever with the collapse of Wall Street. I'd like to hear each candidate's proposals. Also, time is of the essance in debate over energy. And let us not forget Iran and N. Korea and Iraq and Afghanistan. How each candidate would address these international issues would be important to start debating NOW!!

    Lower taxes for the middle class, lower interest rates on old and new mortgages and lower interest rates on credit card debt ... NOT ONE CENT FOR WALL STREET BAILOUT!!!

    Posted by otis September 24, 08 04:08 PM
  1. He's running scared and this is just an excuse.

    Posted by Marie Walsh September 24, 08 04:08 PM
  1. HA! I guess since McCain wants to delay and take Obama with him, the VP's will just have to take their place and debate on Friday - wouldn't that be a hoot! Better get ready quickly, Sarah!

    Posted by btown September 24, 08 04:08 PM
  1. What a wimp!!!!! "Ooh, this is too hard..."
    McCain just jumped the shark.

    Posted by Richard September 24, 08 04:09 PM
  1. McCain/Palin = run and hide. These two are NOT the kind of leaders we need right now, or ever, for that matter.

    Posted by Sam September 24, 08 04:09 PM
  1. Not a good sign. Backpedaling and using the current crisis as an excuse to stall the debates rather than ADDRESS the issue tells me he is not ready for prime time. It is public knowledge that he is extremely weak when it comes to matters of the economy. McCain is no doubt more concerned about public opinion polls than he is the bailout. He may well have served to tilt the favor in Obama's direction.

    Posted by A Dingo Ate My Baby September 24, 08 04:10 PM
  1. Gotta love it how Obama was the one who approached McCain first about working together in a bipartisan matter to work on the bill, and then McCain announces the plan as though it was his idea to begin with. What a scumbag.

    Posted by KDilkington September 24, 08 04:11 PM
  1. Do not Cancel Please my vote will come from the outcome of the debates

    Posted by Jack September 24, 08 04:11 PM
  1. "This is real leadership. Now watch the Obama campaign fall all over themselves calling this a campaign tactic."

    What a bunch of B.S. This smacks of Karl Rove's twisted mind, pretend to do something while actually doing nothing. That's been the Republican mantra for the past eight years and frankly it sickens me. Man of honor my foot!

    Posted by John September 24, 08 04:11 PM
  1. This is just a stunt by McCain. Of course if it was Obama who suggested this then I would say it is leadership.

    Posted by Linda May September 24, 08 04:12 PM
  1. How about they just do the debate tonight? I mean, what else are they doing at the moment but kissing babies and repeating themselves for the 100th time at another rally?

    Seriously, though, I think both candidates can take 2-3 hours out of the day to speak to the american people in a debate. If the rest of our government can't handle the load we are in bigger trouble than anyone thinks.

    Posted by JDM September 24, 08 04:14 PM
  1. Then he'll say "Now we have to postpone the election because we postponed the debate; let George stay a year or so more."

    Posted by Fran September 24, 08 04:15 PM
  1. I want to see a debate Friday night

    Or let the VP's debate on friday night in case McCain is not ready.

    Is Palin ready ?

    Posted by Henry September 24, 08 04:15 PM
  1. No. Haven't you heard, the fundamentals are fine.

    Posted by rufus617 September 24, 08 04:16 PM
  1. Of course all you liberal losers are saying it is just a ploy, but if it was the second coming of Christ..ah I mean Obama that wanted to this you would be jumping and saying this was a great idea and it looks like McCain doesn't really care about the economy.

    Also, The debate is about foreign policy and not the economy.

    Posted by T September 24, 08 04:16 PM
  1. The debate should go on. I'm an event planner and the organizers are probably sh*tting themselves. Not that that's the reason.

    From everything I've read on this subject it seems that Obama reached out to McCain first so they could issue a joint statement with common goals for the proposed legislature. Which was really nice of Obama considering McCain's gaffes on the economy over the last week. Then McCain jumps the shark and calls for postponing the debate so he can look all non-partisan and presidential? Puh-lease. This is a most outrageous political ploy.

    Posted by Bridget September 24, 08 04:16 PM
  1. duck the debate?
    - little understanding of economics
    - US economy in dire straights as lead by our current fearless leader he is tied to..
    - losing votes according to voter polls
    - emphasizing negative attack ads with many lies
    - attempts Hail Mary pass with little known VP candidate
    - campaign officials tied to economic scandal orgs
    - years of leading against appropriate economic regulations
    - fragmented messages derived with hypocritical messages
    - part of the problematic party that selected one of the worst presidents in history
    - effort to buoy lost campaign momentum
    - throwing any smoke to distract from real issues of the middle class
    Yep - time for a McCain timeout... but there might be a penalty flag thrown for intentional grounding from the passer who is in a grasp of defeat --- Why doesn't he want to talk with American people about the issues now? Perhaps its time for another hail Mary.... i.e. Maybe he should let his back up Palin take on the presidential debate in his stead.. after all she says she is ready to govern and now that she has immersed herself in foreign policy, she should do just great! any way, give her a shot, maybe she can do better...

    Anyway they should have the debate and lets hear about the issues and the solutions... maybe the straight talk express is really now the the no talk express

    Posted by Mack the knife September 24, 08 04:17 PM
  1. Of course the debate should be delayed. The darn things are useless - tell Obama to get his butt back to DC and do his job.

    Posted by NoNoNobama September 24, 08 04:17 PM
  1. As usual, John McCain is putting his country first.

    Posted by Shecky September 24, 08 04:18 PM
  1. no the debate should not be delayed. what a strategy for him! why cite the economic crisis? because he has to make sure all his doings are buried? is he concerned that one of his seven houses might be affected by a bad mortgage? i think his old keating-5 memories are coming back to haunt him. how ironic!

    Posted by susan September 24, 08 04:18 PM
  1. Can McCain not multi-task? As POTUS, there will be multiple crisis's as well as business as usual. Are we to expect him to not be able to handle more than one task at a time?

    Posted by sratter September 24, 08 04:18 PM
  1. Can you ask for a time out before the game even start ?

    Posted by Richardson September 24, 08 04:18 PM
  1. The debate should continue as planned and both candidates need to return to the Senate to do their "current" jobs. In my opinion, this is such a McCain "maverick" tactic. Yes, let's delay the debate so that I can show that I'm focused on the issue of the economy. Well who isn't! Shamless on McCain's part. It's not enough to take the high road and work with Obama, i.e. an immedate and collaborative response to his phone call -- no, he has to try to do a one-up.

    Posted by Lucy September 24, 08 04:19 PM
  1. This is a yet another STUNT (Palin being one of the first).

    Look, this old goat is a BIG reason why we're in this situation to begin with. If Obama were sharp, he would point out that McCain's policies were the genesis of this fiasco, and if he really put Country First, he would stay OUT OF WASHINGTON so he didn't break anymore china.

    And if McCain doesn't show up to the debate ... let Obama have a heart-to-heart with people that actually care about the issues.

    Posted by frankjcapp September 24, 08 04:19 PM
  1. The debates should go on, two senators are not going to make a difference. The citizens deserve to know both candidates views on the issues such as education, Iraq, etc. I just read that Obama has rejected the idea of postponing the debates. I think McCain is nervous with his drop in the polls.

    Posted by Tiffany September 24, 08 04:19 PM
  1. First let's straighten out the meltdown mess that congress is presently trying to resolve...The economy right now, which includes your retirement money is about to go down the tubes and people are worried about a frigging debate. This debate is NOT going to change anyones mind about who they are going to elect...And if you haven't decided yet, these debates are not going to do it....

    Posted by RD September 24, 08 04:20 PM
  1. Not the time for a foreign policy debate.
    Take care of business first. Obama can
    play with his pud on Friday, good move McCain.

    Posted by Freddy Blassie September 24, 08 04:21 PM
  1. How many times is McCain going to have to outsmart Obama before people realize Obama and his team are nothing more than a bunch of empty suits? Brilliant political stroke by McCain - he put Obama in a no win situation. By choosing to "not join" McCain, Obama took the worst of two undesirable alternatives, showing once again he is not up to the job. It's way above his pay grade!

    Posted by Jay September 24, 08 04:22 PM
  1. This is a financial decision of historical proportions.

    McCain is behaving "very presidential" here.

    As much as I want to see McCain mop the floor with Obama in a debate, they should both go to work on this bill instead of spending their time this week making promises.

    Posted by Don B September 24, 08 04:22 PM
  1. When I first read this headline I hoped that the crisis was something personal. THAT I could understand.

    This is just bull. The debate should not be postponed.

    Posted by Lisa September 24, 08 04:22 PM
  1. Absolutely not. This is another one of McCain's gimmicks, a transparent grasp at giving an impression of leadership. Why hasn't he been in Washington the past days trying to broker some solution? The reason: he has not a clue what to do about the 'crisis.' The crisis for him is the status of his campaign.

    Posted by Robert Innis September 24, 08 04:23 PM
  1. The Great McCain "Bailout"

    Posted by boston08 September 24, 08 04:23 PM
  1. How about they just do the debate tonight? I mean, what else are they doing at the moment but kissing babies and repeating themselves for the 100th time at another rally?

    Seriously, though, I think both candidates can take 2-3 hours out of the day to speak to the american people in a debate. If the rest of our government can't handle the load we are in bigger trouble than anyone thinks.

    Posted by JDM September 24, 08 04:24 PM
  1. McCain is worried about the imbalance of money going out the door between obama and himself. Mccain is subject to the public finance limits and obama is not. I am willing to bet this is the primary reason for the campaign suspension by mccain. It will be interesting to see how far they go with this. Will they be running ads? I would not think a suspended campaign would run any ads.

    Posted by Heath September 24, 08 04:25 PM
  1. I think, yet again, the McCain camp is using a national crisis to divert attention away from the fact that they are not as well equipped or prepared to answer real questions about the issues. Neither he nor Obama can more quickly fix this mess by skipping the debate. McCain has used national events to divert attention away from the issues once before during the RNC, and now again - it's all campaign tactics and total rubbish. If it favored him to participate in the debate, he certainly would. This is transparent and cowardly.

    Posted by Kristina September 24, 08 04:25 PM
  1. He's stalling the debate.

    Go OBAMA!!!

    Posted by Chico September 24, 08 04:26 PM
  1. They better debate... I clear my schedule just to see it!

    Posted by Mike B September 24, 08 04:27 PM
  1. No... Not that it will make a difference in the economy whether the debate goes on or not. I think that he is just stalling because he and his VP aren't ready! We will just get to see the kind of experience he really has, if he can remember and Palin will have to embellish a lot of hers because she really is not qualified to lead the nation.

    Posted by Joey D September 24, 08 04:28 PM
  1. First they choose a VP candidate for the mere reason that she taps into the heartstrings of million special interest groups (abortion, teenage pregnancy, working moms, military sons, women in the Whitehouse...the list goes on), then he scales back the convention because of a natural disaster, now he wants to postpone the debate because of the economic debacle HIS party created? As many others said...life goes on. We need to hear what they candidates have to say about this and many other things well BEFORE the election. If he doesn't have the ability (or maybe stamina) to perform regular duties of candidacy and handle crises at the same time then maybe he should reconsider that retirement home.

    Posted by RepublicansAreRidiculous September 24, 08 04:29 PM
  1. What does it say about McCain's view of the political process if it is somehow incompatible with showing political leadership? Does he think you can't do both? That people don't want to hear from the men who would be president how we should deal with this issue? For him, perhaps, because his campaign has been in the gutter for months and a majority of electoral votes are beginning to reflect that.

    McCain, go bone up on economics and leave the financial crisis to Barney Frank and Chris Dodd - we'll all be better off if you stay clear of DC.

    Posted by Josh September 24, 08 04:29 PM
  1. This is absurd. Maybe he should just stay in the Senate and deal behind the scenes. He certainly isn't saying that he thinks it's of value to the public to have him, as a presidential candidate, speak to us and stand in plain view. Presidents have often given speeches and taken part in active discussions while involved in crises, economic or otherwise. Take a few hours, Sen. McCain, to engage with Sen. Obama on camera, in public, in the open, live.

    Posted by DD September 24, 08 04:29 PM
  1. If they want to be performing their duties as senators then they should do that, full time. To run for president is a full time job and they both should have resigned from their posts months ago. This is a clear example of how while trying to do both, they can do neither effectively.

    Posted by pzos September 24, 08 04:30 PM
  1. Ofcourse the debates should be delayed - my god, we are in the worst economic crisis and people think Politics should come first??? HUH??

    Posted by Heidi B September 24, 08 04:30 PM
  1. Why, the world still has to move forward. No I dont think they should.....

    Posted by Linda September 24, 08 04:31 PM
  1. No way! Its called an airplane. Go back to Washington tomorrow and get to Mississippi by Friday night!

    Posted by Andrew September 24, 08 04:31 PM
  1. Obama has rejected delaying the debate. Also, it's subject is Foreign Policy, not the Economic Policy, so if your watching to hear what they think about the current crisis, your wasting your time. Like they will as members of the Senate as their colleagues hammer this out.

    Ya Obama wanted to make a joint statement, hey great ! McCain seems to want to roll up his sleeves while Obama talks about it ! Blind Elitists are interesting creatures ;-)

    Posted by BrianPat September 24, 08 04:33 PM
  1. They should go ahead and hold the debate but have the topic be THE ECONOMY instead of foreign policy. That's what is on everyone's minds. Let's hear what the condidates have to say about it.

    Posted by Ada September 24, 08 04:33 PM
  1. No, absolutely not!! We do not need another politician adding to the already screwed up mess they've made of the US financial arena. Why not step up to the podium and debate the ideas of how to fix this mess without involving the American middle/lower class taxpayer.

    Posted by Deb September 24, 08 04:33 PM
  1. Poor old McCain. I wouldn't want to go toe to toe with Obama either. Once people see them on stage together (a hobbly old stooge and an upright inspiring leader), it's over.

    Posted by Bostoprov September 24, 08 04:34 PM
  1. Obama should have immediately embraced this opportunity to silence his critics, to demonstrate his leadership and the brilliance of his ideas. What does he do instead? "Errr...ahh...ummm...They are going to write a speech for me and I will read it from the teleprompter tonight".

    Posted by NoNoNobama September 24, 08 04:34 PM
  1. Don't think they should delay the debate. Although McCain may be one of the only few people that
    can bring congress together as he has done in the past
    on topics such as ethics reform, economic stimulus pkg, etc.
    Obama is a nice guy but has never went against the
    democrates in a vote. He's a bit of a puppet for Pelosi
    and company. Not sure if that is a bad thing but it
    doesn't demonstrate that he can reach across lines
    and get things important done like this bail-out package.

    Posted by W. Jackson September 24, 08 04:35 PM
  1. Everyone, yes EVERYONE, on this board who claims this is a political stunt, gamesmanship, whatever by McCain is just jealous that their Messiah didn't have the smarts to think of it first. Or get it out to the press first.

    Obama, the Hahvahd Law Review intellectual, just got hoodwinked by a pro.

    Obama, the alleged better educated one, just got taken to the political cleaners.

    If the government is going to spend $700 BILLION of MY tax money then I want EVERYONE focused and involved. The debates can wait. The clear majority have already made up their minds anyway. Unbelievable there folks out there who claim they are allegedly undecided.

    Posted by Obama got burnt September 24, 08 04:35 PM
  1. I am disappointed that both McCain and Obama have offered up nothing concrete on how they would tackle the crisis. I was happy to see that McCain took a stand today to do whatever is needed from his part to work with the President and other Senators to find a solution. Now I am no fool, Obama wants us to believe that he was the one who initially suggested it, come on. I find that hard to believe. Why would he want to release a joint statement. No politician is a saint and he wants me to believe that he is one. Anyways it doesn't matter, both of them need to stop their bickering put aside personal differences and work on a solution. They can debate and insult each other after that.

    Now I got a question to all the Democrats on this forum....how would you guys have reacted if Obama had made this announcement couple of days back when he was behind in the polls.....am sure you guys would have said that this was true leadership...this was the change that undecided voters like me should believe and other stuff

    I have been watching both sides and I should say I don't see much change being offered by both sides. Just talking about it does not make you a medium change, shod it in your day to day activities. I as an unbiased third party would give an F to both candidates when it comes to this whole change hocus pocus.

    All I and my family is asking both parties to do is to not insult our intelligence. Talk about the real issues, lay out real plans and then talk about change. Change does not put food on my table or pay my bills.

    Posted by UndecidedVote September 24, 08 04:36 PM
  1. Newsflash to McCain --- whoever captures this job is going to inherit a wealth of problems from the current republican administration and will require attention to more than one problem at a time.

    This whole debacle is starting to remind me to when we absolutely positively had to go to war with Iraq because of WMDs ..... I fear that Bush and his cohorts are misleading us again.

    Posted by Faux News September 24, 08 04:36 PM
  1. Oh ya, let's let the guys responsible for the issue in the first place fix it, you people are cute. Let's see who was running Fanny Mae and Freddie Mack when these loans were allowed. What party begged then forced the banks to give risky loans.


    WAKE UP PEOPLE

    Posted by BrianPat September 24, 08 04:37 PM
  1. So Obama calls him to issue joint statement and he responds by unilaterally ceasing campaign. What a collaborative, high-minded move. Not political at all. Give me a break.

    Posted by JFS September 24, 08 04:37 PM
  1. NO, Nyet, Non..... Come on John and Sarah: be as confident as you want us to think! NO! Keep up the great fight.......and lose

    Posted by BD September 24, 08 04:38 PM
  1. The debate should certainly not be postponed or cancelled. If they'd like to talk about the economy at this debate and talk about foreign policy at a future debate that would be fine. But I agree with one of the early comments: democracy does not need to be postponed.

    Posted by kate September 24, 08 04:38 PM
  1. The action of a true leader. Obama has been left in the dust while eloquently "hoping" and "dreaming" that Congress has our interests as its priority.

    Posted by Mike F September 24, 08 04:40 PM
  1. The show must go on no matter what.

    Posted by Chui Yin Chan September 24, 08 04:41 PM
  1. I don't know what the problem is. Both Republicans and Democrats on the Hill are working together to hammer out a package in a methodical way. The nonsense Bush sent up there was justifiably DOA. Why McCain would want to stop campaigning to rescue the Bush plan when both parties agree it's horrible is beyond me.

    Posted by lnmonster September 24, 08 04:44 PM
  1. Oh Please - come on McCain - this is precisely why you SHOULD debate!

    Posted by DaveD September 24, 08 04:44 PM
  1. Obama wouldn't know what to do if he was in Washington anyway. I guess he would just vote "present."

    The debate will still happen, after they are done doing the job they are actually be paid for today.

    Posted by JDR September 24, 08 04:45 PM
  1. Absolutely not ! They can participate in Washington, take time off for the debate, and fly right back again. The debate must go on. McCain is scared and he should be.

    Posted by christine September 24, 08 04:46 PM
  1. Doesn't McCain know how to multi-task?

    Posted by lolipopp September 24, 08 04:46 PM
  1. It has always puzzled me how elected officials (Senators, Govenors etc) have no problems collecting a government salary, then fail to show up to work..They still get paid and collect all of their perks...They are fighting over CEO's excessive pay, but who is actually to blame? Now when their votes and voices are needed they are no where to be found. How about we split congress 50/50 so no one has a majority then maybe people would learn to work together and compromise.

    Posted by Peter Garland September 24, 08 04:47 PM
  1. In the midst of this crisis, what the candidates have to say is more important than ever! Tell McCain to show up!

    Posted by Richard in Boston September 24, 08 04:47 PM
  1. Did we stop elections in WW I? WWII, Korea, Vietnam, the Great Depression? The Civil War??

    Simple answer: NO

    We should not stop debate, or elections for business purposes and that is what is being proposed. It is Republican arrogance & Democratic inaction and Big business greed that got us into this problem. Let them sink. Time to cull the herd anyways. Is not evolution weeding out the weak so the strong survive? Let's see what happens? Politics and business gave us this mess, now they want the average Joe to fix it? C'mon we're not that niave

    Posted by Jim September 24, 08 04:48 PM
  1. Absolutely not. It's the Republicans who got us into this mess...sorry guys, too little too late and the debates must go on. The sooner we get a responsible president and vice president into the White House, the better, and be done with this fiscally irresponsible Republican debacle!

    Delaying the debates just smacks of political ploy, stalling to hide the fact that neither McCain nor Palin is prepared or qualified to run this country.

    I see this as yet another reckless and impetuous decision by McCain. Every day it seems his camp is changing its mind, bending the rules, sweeping things under the carpet. Enough of this nonsense! Face the fire McCain!

    Posted by JuliaH September 24, 08 04:49 PM
  1. While I am a McCain supporter I don't believe the debates should be delayed. There is nothing that these two men can do that is going to significantly influence what needs to be done. Also, if you can't deal with this kind of crisis (as big as it is) and prepare for a debate, really you have no business being in the Oval Office.

    Posted by 66que418 September 24, 08 04:50 PM
  1. I thought a joint statement was just that...Something issued by both candidates not one. McCain is clearly using politics here. The debate should go on and completely focus it on the financial crisis and what their plan would be.

    Debate or not, when will somebody say what we have all been hearing in our hallway conversations: who wants to give the feds $700 billion of our money to play with? A free market economy should be just that...you invest...you take a risk.

    Posted by DWJ September 24, 08 04:50 PM
  1. Absolutely not! McCain wants to stall to meet with Mitt who has all the answers about the ailing economy? Give me a break. McCain has been caught not knowing what to do, what to say, and where to hide from the blows he and other Republicans have earned and fully deserve. Sarah can't help. She is busy learning about foreign affairs by meeting available heads of State. This gives us a clear idea of how McCain would "lead."

    Posted by GJVoter September 24, 08 04:50 PM
  1. That's crazy! Why cancel the debate? Maybe the economy will be discussed at the debate and we'll actually get an idea how each of them would handle a situation like this if they are president (novel idea huh?) Does McCain plan to go home and crunch the numbers to solve this economic crisis if he has the night off? I doubt it. First Palin won't grant interviews and now this? Looks like the GOP is panicking.

    I love how Palin didn't discuss any issues during the convention and everyone in the GOP said "there will be time for that later" and now it's later and she's not talking! Hmmm...

    Posted by redoctober September 24, 08 04:50 PM
  1. The economic crisis is not going to be solved in time for the election, or for a long time after that. Let's get on with it and have the debates.

    Posted by KES September 24, 08 04:52 PM
  1. Next one of you leftwing AHs that calls McCain a coward - I'll shove a history book down your throat thru your vile mouth.

    Posted by GMan2 September 24, 08 04:53 PM
  1. McCain is desperate. This smacks of political opportunism and showboating in all the wrong ways. If he was serious about this, he would have suspended his campaign days ago to make sure tomorrow's deadline is met.

    McCain has pulled this straight out of the Bush playbook for starting the war in Iraq, and passing the Patriot Act before that. This is disgusting, vile, naked political ambition contrary to patriotic ideals. Bush's men, and McCain's actions today are nothing short of treason. A week ago there was no economic crisis according to them. Now there is, and it needs to be handled their way, right now, or America is doomed. That is tripe, and we Americans know it. Bush and McCain = Traitors to America.

    The debate is the opportunity for the American people to see these guys outside of their political adds. They can take a few hours out of one day of the week to handle that; even relocating the debate to DC. McCain is dodging the debate, and exacerbating the crisis that he refused to acknowledge as recently as this week. He is a complete fraud. Millions of voters were hurt by this over the last year as their mortgages crushed them, and their jobs were shipped overseas. McCain clearly only cares now because Cindy's vast fortune, and the fortunes of his top aids/lobbyists took a hit this week.

    Posted by Nick Collins III September 24, 08 04:56 PM
  1. Do not delay the debate, delay the rush to bail out the neo-cons and their greedy friends who have already gutted our treasury and want to use this crisis to grab some more. The "Shock Doctrine" is alive and well!

    Posted by Ray September 24, 08 04:57 PM
  1. Has ANYONE agreed that the debate should be postponed??? Ludicrous! This is also an indication of type of 'advisors' the McCain camp would listen too....I don't get it.

    Posted by Maureen Pena September 24, 08 04:57 PM
  1. To answer an ealier poster's question, if Barack Obama had suggested that the debate be cancelled in order to fully focus on the financial crisis, I would have thought that it was bone-headed, naive mistake made by a political lightweight. It would have made him look weak and incapable of dealing with multiple problems, and the Republican mouthpieces scattered throughout the media outlets in this country would have pummelled him for it. But when John McCain offers it up it's supposed to look like "true leadership"? Sounds like he sqwacked "BaWack!" to me. Obama's poll numbers and Palin's fading star have him running scared, if you ask me.

    Posted by Laurie September 24, 08 04:58 PM
  1. Interesting. Apparently McCain did his own Pearl Harbour on Obama. They had an agreement to issue a joint statement, but that fool McCain ran to the mics and announced prior to the "joint statement"

    What a sleeze bag. Then again, he's a Republicant

    Posted by frankjcapp September 24, 08 04:58 PM
  1. I also love how the folks who screwed the pooch on this are now saying "this isn't time to point fingers"

    WTF... if not now, when? You freakin' fools caused this (along with your Wall Street cronnies .... you did the crime ... you can do the time.

    Posted by frankjcapp September 24, 08 05:00 PM
  1. No - the debate must go on. This is a political ploy from McCain. McCain's weak on the economy and doesn't want to debate when it's a hot issue. This just makes McCain look scared.

    Posted by Sarah September 24, 08 05:00 PM
  1. Hello! All the more reason to hold the debate. Is McCain nuts? If this is a cheap election stunt to gain some knid of advantage then I think that the Republicans should pick a new candidate. Is it too late for that? Too bad. If there was a little chance I might vote for McCain it is gone now.

    Posted by David Tedesco September 24, 08 05:01 PM
  1. Is McCain really that frigthened of debates

    Posted by Pageflex Support September 24, 08 05:01 PM
  1. Jim (#219) -

    Who in the world said anything about "stopping the elections"???? No one said that November 4th General Election is to be postponed or cancelled.

    What kind of mindless Obama Drone are you?

    Actually your post is rather funny and sad at the same time. If your mentality is the kind that is worshipping Obama then this country is in really really bad shape.

    You're a complete moron.

    Posted by Jim's cousin from NYC September 24, 08 05:02 PM
  1. How would John McCain (who admits to not knowing enough about the financial market) be helpful in these negotiations? Does he know more about the situation than the finance committee members, Secretary of the Treasury, or Chairman of the Fed?

    It does indeed seem like a purely political move.

    The debates should go on!

    Posted by Jay M September 24, 08 05:04 PM
  1. Of course we should postpone the debate. America is an a financial crisis not seen since the Great Depression and Obama is concerned about scoring political points? I think it accuratly points to his priorities- himself. Anyone who thinks the Republicans got us into this mess hasn't been paying attention. As always McCain is the true candidate looking out for the American people. At least if the debates are postponed Obama and Biden will have more times to make up lies about the McCain/Palin ticket.

    BTW- someones presidential candidate isn't ready - hint (democrats)

    Posted by CW September 24, 08 05:06 PM
  1. Absolutely not! Guess what, being the President is a hard job, you may have to deal with two issues at once, oh the horror! If either is not prepared to debate because of this recent "bailout" nonsense then neither deserves to be president. Is this really going to get resolved in the amount of time the debate would take up? I'd like to see their exchange right now, as things stand, in the middle of the bailout process and maybe we'd get some genuine discussion rather than the spit-shined pre-packaged answers we'll get once the bailout is overwith. Maybe if they had paid more attention to what was going on the entire time it was happening we wouldn't need to delay debates. Maybe we should delay the election, or better yet call the whole thing off, I'm not looking forward to voting for either of them.

    Posted by Benjamin Dover September 24, 08 05:06 PM
  1. Lets do the debate- Who cares if we are on the verge of economic disaster. At the debate, everyone will see how Obama is without his teleprompter (dumber than dirt, oh sorry, Biden) He will be SQUASHED!!!

    Posted by Mia September 24, 08 05:07 PM
  1. "The action of a true leader. Obama has been left in the dust while eloquently "hoping" and "dreaming" that Congress has our interests as its priority."

    A true leader would figure out how to get to the Senate and vote and then get to Oxford Mississippi and debate. All in one day. Maybe it'll interfere with the nap schedule? This is the guy who wants to do to the health care system what his cronies did to the banking system. That's not change we can believe in!

    Posted by Jamesjr September 24, 08 05:07 PM
  1. Are these men both senators? Don't they have a job to do for the sake of the people that elected them? I think that says enough right there. I have been sick and tired of politicians not doing their jobs during elections for a long time. I personally hold the belief that when running for a new office one should have to vacate their current office so that their constituents are represented.

    Posted by Eric September 24, 08 05:11 PM
  1. Barney Frank, Harry Reid and several other Dems and Republicans played a big part in the debacle. McCain is right in his action and of course Obama would want the debate to continue, instead of being part of the solution he wants to continue throwing mud at everyone except people who truly need to share in the blame. Neither man is President right now-they are US Senators and at this time more than ever they need to fulfill responsibilities of that job-not campaigning for a future job in November. Even though I will be lambasted for this next comment I will make it anyway-the fundamentals of the economy are strong. The morals and ethics of several senators,congress people, executives and private citizens are solely lacking. Many in America don't want leadership as evidenced by those that continually win reelection. Reid, Pelosi, Frank, Spector, Stevens, Rangel, Clinton, Kerry, and several others from both sides of the aisle.

    McCain's action today will be derided as grandstanding but that's fine with me. He had my support early on and nothing has changed my mind. Obama and Biden are a dead weight ticket. McCain and Palin offer a real chance to shake things up and getting Congress doing what it's supposed to do. Represent their states and districts and pass legislation so the country can operate. Not get Federal money so that a building can be named after them or ridiculous projects can be thrown into the budget.

    Mobsters have been convicted of many of the same things Congress does right now. I guess if you do it as a Congressman you get to keep your job instead of going to jail.

    Posted by Kevin Luby September 24, 08 05:11 PM
  1. McCain has been praying for a snow day before the big exam.

    Posted by bdbd September 24, 08 05:11 PM
  1. There's something very tricky-dicky going on. The debate should go on. EIther McCain is not prepared or he thinks this makes him look more decisive/presidential.

    Posted by Candelaria Silva September 24, 08 05:12 PM
  1. The debate must proceed as scheduled. In any case, it must not be suspended or postponed because McCain has unilaterally decided so. This gesture adds to our sense of the kind of leader he might be--shooting from the hip again. This isn't patriotism or strength; it's political theater and deserves to be booed off the stage.

    Posted by Carolejean September 24, 08 05:13 PM
  1. It's pretty obvious to me that McCain wants to avoid a Friday debate while this so-called "crisis" looms. He has a 22 year history of arguing for deregulation of the financial markets and to enter a debate which would obviously be 90% about that specific topic would be disasterous to him.

    I, for one, will stick to my guns and continue to argue for deregulation. Anything less would simply be the death of the so-called "free market society" that we love to claim we have. In a free market people should be allowed to lose everything they decided to gamble with...and make no mistake about it, the stock market is nothing more than legalized gambling. I shouldn't have to foot the bill because you lost your 401k while I saved my money, just like I shouldn't have to foot the bill because you can't read a contract and recklessly bought a house you couldn't afford.

    Let the market crash because I've got news for you...it's going to anyway. Pumping $700billion of the governments money into the same securities that toppled ALL of the investment banks in our country seems like a ridiculously stupid idea on the face of it. Actually understanding it makes it look like we're being run by a bunch of friggin morons. If they don't learn from the history of the investment banks, they are just repeating their own failings.

    Don't buy the gov't cheese when they say that they'll buy them cheap and sell them for a profit either, because if you think the 150 year old banks were planning on buying them expensive and selling them cheap, then you're crazy.

    Posted by Jeff September 24, 08 05:14 PM
  1. Absolutely not. Let's just hope we would finally get straightforward answers and not politicking spin!

    Posted by florin September 24, 08 05:15 PM
  1. It's funny how Obama turned down McCain's call for more debates earlier in the campaign, but now his followers are accusing McCain of ducking him.

    McCain outfoxed him on this one, plain and simple. I'm sure the debate will go on as scheduled, but McCain will come off as looking like the leader he is. Maybe it will lower the expectations for him, too. It was a shrewd political move.

    Posted by Way, How, McCain September 24, 08 05:16 PM
  1. Hmmm...delayed RNC, now delaying debates...sounds like the spin doctors of the GOP are frantically trying to coach the candidates on the strategy of misdirection - as usual.

    Posted by sgbunny September 24, 08 05:16 PM
  1. Some of you need to stop the liberal politicking and look at the facts. This is not a stall tactic, our future leaders should be involved in the process and working this out until it is complete. Whoever wins will be responsible for leading us through this time - doesn't it make sense for them to be involved in this situation and go above the fray to focus on what's important. Our economy and livelihood. Good move by McCain. If Obama is ahead in the latest polls that's all the more reason for McCain to want to get this debate going.

    Posted by Jason Howarth September 24, 08 05:17 PM
  1. This little ploy makes McCain look weak, idiotic and just plain scared. Hiding behind that lipstick again....does he really think Americans are that stupid? And if Obama falls for this, I am going to change my voter registration from die-hard democrat to independent tomorrow

    Posted by Sanderbender September 24, 08 05:17 PM
  1. The only debate I want to see between two Senators is in Washington on how to respond to the immediate crisis. They may be candidates, but they also are active leaders in the Senate and thats where they need to be leading. Now. I would rather see them exemplify leadership in working out a bi-partisan solution which will show us far more then we'll see with them exchanging canned campaign rehtoric in a staged debate.

    Posted by JAH September 24, 08 05:19 PM
  1. Of course this debate should not be cancelled or delayed. If nothing else, this is the perfect time for them to have a discussion about how each would deal with this miserable mess one of them will inherit in January. This move on McCain's part will hurt him in the long run.

    Posted by Karoline September 24, 08 05:19 PM
  1. Without a doubt it should be delayed. This mindnumbing transfer of wealth should be discussed by all of the elected officials - Obama, McCain and Biden included. That's what they were elected to their current posts for. I always believed that anyone running for President should resign their current post, as you can't do both. Whoever wins is going to inherit this mess, so its in their own best interests to participate now. Contrary to the derisive hate on this board, this problem has been caused by the unelected Fed, controlled by foriegn bankers and answerable to no one.

    Posted by halcyonera September 24, 08 05:20 PM
  1. Looks like McCain can't multi task

    And McCain wants to be President. COME ON PEOPLE CLOSE YOUR EYES AND LET YOUR EARS LISTEN

    On November 4th Vote Obama for president!

    Posted by Alain Duchemin September 24, 08 05:27 PM
  1. I love the symbolism here. The republican wants to act upon the problem, the democrat wants to talk talk talk about it. McCain '08!

    Posted by Blogging RULES! September 24, 08 05:31 PM
  1. No- This is one of the lamest ploys I've ever seen. The debate must go on!! We have voted and debated thru wars, and other crisis's. McChicken isn't ready and everybody knows it.

    Posted by lallen September 24, 08 05:33 PM
  1. It's obvious that John McCain knows Obama will eloquently talk circles around him, and he has now decided he should try to look like he is helping in the economic crisis. Maybe he should ask Palin what she thinks.

    Posted by Fra Higgins September 24, 08 05:33 PM
  1. No, the debate should not be postponed. McCain should go on with it and ask Obama why Joe Biden thought that Roosevelt went right on TV during the great depression to address the nation. 1) Roosevelt was not yet president and 2) The television had yet to be invented. What a moron. For someone that old to be so removed from our own history is pathetic. Can someone find Ross Perot or Warren Buffet and ask them to run. PLEASE

    Posted by D. Jones September 24, 08 05:35 PM
  1. My hunch is that since McCain does not understand the economy, he needs more time
    preparing for the economic questions for the debate

    Posted by CA September 24, 08 05:37 PM
  1. a bunch of ignorant Dems who don't have any money to lose anyways. They could possibly be some of the poor souls with no credit who buried themselves with mortgages they couldn't afford. Where do I send my mortgage for payment?

    Posted by Tim September 24, 08 05:38 PM
  1. This wording is part of the bailout proposed by the Bush administration (according to Huffington Post):

    "Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."

    Cancel the bailout - it's corruption at it's worst. McCain should forget the bailout and get on with the debate. The Republicans have some explaining to do.

    Posted by something stinks September 24, 08 05:38 PM
  1. The debate should happen. The economy is clearly the most important issue, plus their are other areas of concern to American voters. It is time for a good old fashion debate where the candidates to state their opinions on a common ground about subjects that are import to voters that may be sensitive. The economy, war, global warming won't be resolved by 1/20/2009 so there is no need for either party to hide from discussion.

    Posted by Nancy September 24, 08 05:41 PM
  1. If this is a republican stunt why didnt the televison stations listen to Warren Buffets comments about the crisis in this country . It seems you lovely Democrats dont give adarn about the economy of this country. GROW UP

    Posted by Chris September 24, 08 05:43 PM
  1. They're both elected Senators and have a responsibility to help fix this mess quickly. Left unresolved, the last thing the country needs right now is to have the negotiations for this legislation be politicized by the candidate debate event. McCain is not saying to cancel the debate, only delay it until an agreement is reached. Crazy as it sounds, McCain may be right to say resolving this quickly is more important than the campaign right now. Democrats and Republicans both share blame for this financial mess.

    Posted by Dave September 24, 08 05:44 PM
  1. If this is a republican stunt why didnt the televison stations listen to Warren Buffets comments about the crisis in this country . It seems you lovely Democrats dont give adarn about the economy of this country. GROW UP

    Posted by Chris September 24, 08 05:44 PM
  1. WTF. McCain want to postpone debate this time. What's next. Postpone the election day.

    McCain knows that he can get smashed big time over the econmy crisis. He is such a donkin,

    Posted by Larry September 24, 08 05:45 PM
  1. And Obama is STRONG on economics? Like how? HIs Chicago "community project" is worse off now then before he started "milking millions" of tax payers dollars for so called improvements. Correction: He and Bill Ayers!

    Posted by Bernie Noster September 24, 08 05:46 PM
  1. The debate needs to go on. It is too important to hear the candidates views at this critical time. It looks like more sleazy tactics from McCain. Is this just a political ploy?

    Posted by BAE September 24, 08 05:46 PM
  1. I am astounded that McCain wants to duck out of the debate on Friday. This tells me that he's not ready and is just using the financial crisis (which I believe to be real) as an excuse. He's known about the crisis for a week. Why is he just waking up now and waiting until the last minute?

    This behavior reveals his true shoot-from-the-hip style and lack of judgment; it does not demonstrate leadership.

    DO NOT POSTPONE THE DEBATE!!!

    Posted by Carol September 24, 08 05:47 PM
  1. NO.. McCain has already said that he doesn't understand business as well as he should. Now is not the time to run and hide.

    Posted by Frank L, Boston, MA September 24, 08 05:48 PM
  1. Obama is going to lose anyway , so it doesnt really matter

    Posted by zen September 24, 08 05:49 PM
  1. Our best leaders don't allow a crisis to impair their intelligence and they maintain their dignity on the world stage. Obama makes me so damn proud! Give McCain hell on Friday -- if he's got the guts to show up.

    Go Obama/Biden!

    Posted by Lisa September 24, 08 05:50 PM
  1. What a bunch of pink commies most of you are. Mc is putting the country ahead and doing what a senator is supposed to do. I am so glad that only MA, CA and NY are the only states that think alike. I am gonna laugh so hard when Mc wins the election. Wahhhhhh!!!!

    Posted by Julius September 24, 08 05:51 PM
  1. Country first . Delay the debate a few days no big deal . That will give all you tree huggin lefties more time to run to whole foods & get some more Kashi Cereal

    Posted by gort September 24, 08 05:52 PM
  1. It's a good thing these Senators running for President don't already have jobs. Oh wait....

    Posted by Dave September 24, 08 05:52 PM
  1. NO. Now more than ever we need to hear from the candidates. This clinches it for me - Obama it is!!!

    Posted by Carol September 24, 08 05:56 PM
  1. Sorry folks, can't join the debate.
    Appears your Comrades have
    decided anything that is not
    pro-Democrat is illegal and
    won't be posted. The Kremlin
    strikes again!!!

    Posted by Bernie Noster September 24, 08 05:56 PM
  1. McCain's not prepared for the debate, and he's trying to hide. Talk about unpresidential!

    Posted by Obama Landslide Coming! September 24, 08 05:57 PM
  1. Debates are meaningless-they never say what they want to do anyway. Why does the majority of people on this topic feel that the Republicans are to blame for this mess. There are plenty of Democrats that made plenty of money out there. Give up the holier than thou crap. I am not a republican-they do not care about me, but to say that the Democrats will save this country and would not of let this mess happen is upsurd! Obama and McCain are SENATORS (getting paid for it) and should be in Washington pretending to work like the rest of Congress. We as a nation should demand all Congressman of both parties to stop running there mouths and do some work.

    Posted by AM September 24, 08 05:58 PM
  1. Neither McCain or Obama are going to be able to do anything regarding the passage of this 700Billion dollar package until it comes out of the committee with a recommendation for approval/disapproval first. In the meantime, he will only be meeting with members of his party devising a way to blame the dems one way or another, no matter how the bill comes out of the commission. Has anyone noticed the 2 major legislative bills that were passed out of the senate &/or congress today, even while the commission is holding the debate o the 700 billion dollar bailout? The largest financial package ever approved for the Defense Dept. & another bailout program w/ includes 25billion for the US Auto makers, and heating oil benefits as well as funding the Pell Grants. McCain's ploy that he needs to be in DC right now in order to resolve the bail out is baloney. He is not a member of the committee & will have no say. Another Republican/Rovian Ploy to distract the voters from the issues the nominees need to be debating on FRIDAY, September 26th.

    Posted by Dave Z September 24, 08 05:59 PM
  1. I suspect that Mr. McCain is very tired and stressed, a recipe for debate failure for someone with a reputation for hot-headed, angry responses even when in good shape.

    Posted by Sue September 24, 08 06:00 PM
  1. If McCain can't handle a crisis without taking a timeout he is not ready to be president. Have the debate on Friday whether or not McCain shows up.

    Posted by LJC September 24, 08 06:02 PM
  1. Is this the same John McCain who will be ready to serve as President on DAY1??
    Another political blunder by the GOP. Can we call "Time Out" when we face a military crisis?? I think not!!!

    Posted by David Callahan September 24, 08 06:02 PM
  1. I smell chicken feathers!!!!!!!!

    Posted by david a marcelli September 24, 08 06:04 PM
  1. I have a feeling there's not much John McCain could have done that would have pleased this general audience. Regardless of what he decides, McCain’s detractors will tear him apart (which is fine, one way to support your candidate is to highlight the other guy's flaws, I understand that). I'm not saying it's wrong to disagree with this recent proposal. Maybe it is in fact just a campaign ploy as many on this post are suggesting, but I speculate that if the McCain campaign had come out and said something along the lines of "Despite the economic crisis, we will continue with our campaign and conduct business as usual" there would be plenty of the same people deriding him for not exerting real leadership in a time of crisis. Sure it's ridiculous, but deep down you know that's the truth; unfortunately, that’s how this insane political game works. The fact is, this country is so polarized by party politics that solutions to major problems are near impossible to reach. When Hurricane Hanna hit the Gulf Coast earlier this year, I recall an Obama-supporting friend saying, "Where are you now John McCain?" It was a fair point, but I asked him, "Sure, but why wouldn't you ask the same thing of Barak Obama?" Regardless of who wins the upcoming election the country's obession with partisan politics needs to stop. Maybe you don't like McCain's proposal, fine, but it's hard to dispute that he's backing up his RNC speech in which he promised to cross party lines to solve the big problems. That says more to me than sticking to a debate schedule. Will he have to do more to continually make good on that promise? Absolutely. Will he and should he enter into several debates with Senator Obama. Of course and he will

    Posted by CW September 24, 08 06:07 PM
  1. Mr. McCain must really believe the American voters are stupid!

    Posted by leenan September 24, 08 06:12 PM
  1. I never thought I would quote George Will, but yesterday's column in the Washington Post led off with this, even before McCain grandstanding ploy of today:

    "Under the pressure of the financial crisis, one presidential candidate is behaving like a flustered rookie playing in a league too high. It is not Barack Obama."

    That, my friends, says it all!

    Posted by byrdland49 September 24, 08 06:15 PM
  1. The debate should go on...period...to cancel it now this late in the campaign smacks of stalling...

    Posted by Lou from CT September 24, 08 06:16 PM
  1. No, the debate should not be delayed. In case some of you missed it, North Korea is making a move to re-start their nuclear program. With Kim Jong-Il possibly having a stroke, North Korea might be trying to make a powerplay and do this under the radar. Also, Jong-Il might not be in power anymore. Foreign policy is just as important now as it was before this "crisis" hit.

    I'm disappointed in Sen. McCain, but moves like this have been a hallmark of his campaign. And if Sen. Obama had pulled this garbage, I would question his integrity.

    Posted by BostonVamp September 24, 08 06:18 PM
  1. They should change the topic of the campaign to domestic issues and economics ... let us all hear how they would approach the problem ... this is a time when i want straight-from-the-horse's-mouth answers on their plans and positions, outside the spin of the campaign and what better way to hear that in a debate? Make it a longer debate! Give the candidates more time to talk and respond. I mean, it's a big government. Are they all paralyzed without Obama and McCain in the room?

    Posted by Sean in West Roxbury September 24, 08 06:20 PM
  1. of course its a campaign tactic.. anyone who says it isnt is living in fantasy land.. where everyone has pure intentions and magical fairies hand out candies while you wait in the occassional traffic jam..

    mccain is setting up his "excuse" if he comes across as out of touch or just flat out loses the debate..

    "i was too busy to prepare (obamas preparation/cramming has been well documented) because i was worried about the american people.. etc.. etc.."

    its a fantastic move.. and might still work.. but i get the feeling its a little too transparent..

    almost as if there was little time to plan it..

    i mean.. how long has this debate been scheduled? how long have we been at a "crisis" stage?

    why wait until this afternoon?

    anyway.. thats my 2 cents.. i just know will at least be a somewhat better off in a few months..


    Posted by floodmatt September 24, 08 06:21 PM
  1. The debate should not be postponed, but it should be modified: This first of three debates is to be on foreign policy. The third debate is to be on the economy. At least a segment of Friday's debate should be devoted to the current economic crisis -- isn't that' what's on our minds? Shame on John McCain or anyone else who attempts to scuttle Friday's crucial forum. And shame on Barak Obama if he agrees to any delay.

    Posted by Florida Roy September 24, 08 06:24 PM
  1. Get to work Obama you are paid to serve your constituency not worrying about looking Presidential during the economic crisis.Oh boy! this guy is nothing else on his mind except running for president.Can anybody remind Obama he is still a Senator and he need to do his duty as a Senator he was elected for.Hellow there's a crisis and you still out there looking for vote,da heck what is this.This is unpatriotic to the people of America.

    Posted by skmj September 24, 08 06:24 PM
  1. 99% of the posts on here are from the same person! LOL!

    Posted by blueheaven1 September 24, 08 06:25 PM
  1. The smoke and mirrors campaign looks to divert its lack of intelligence on economics into a delay tactic.....Press-On with the debate!

    Posted by Pete September 24, 08 06:27 PM
  1. Of all the debates Mccain would try to 'duck' as some of you put it, it would not be the one this Friday.....the forum is foreign policy!!!! McCains strength. Yes the economy will be discussed, but will not be the focus this friday. And it was Obama who stated this was the worse financial crisis in the history of this country, so why wouldnt it be for the best if the compaign was suspended for a day or 2...it was done on 9/11! Truth is, obama got caught with his pants down on this one, and has to react the way he is to try and save face

    Posted by reverandwright September 24, 08 06:29 PM
  1. Talk is what Obama does BEST. Do is what McCain does best. Obama will get his butt wupped old-tymie style by McCain when they do debate.

    You liberals have your heads so far up your as**es you can see Cuba.

    Posted by Mary Cranston September 24, 08 06:29 PM
  1. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, Mr. McCain

    Posted by tesfa September 24, 08 06:30 PM
  1. Country first . Delay the debate a few days no big deal . That will give all you tree huggin lefties more time to run to whole foods & get some more Kashi Cereal

    Posted by gort September 24, 08 06:31 PM
  1. Idiots. He is suspedning his entire campaign. Not just the debate. Why?? There is a freaking crisis on hand. Hope you all love your commie state of Taxachusetts.

    I am sure a debate will chnage everyone's minds, anyway. WE ALL KNOW who we are voting for.

    Posted by ZerObama September 24, 08 06:32 PM
  1. I am disgusted. My opinion of McCain just goes down and down. I'm still trying to recover from the news that he hasn't managed mastering technology like a personal computer. I'm sorry, but I think I'd have to take my chances with someone who is smart, analytical and intellectually curious instead of McCain -- as I think Obama at least has those qualities. Even if McCain has more experience in government, his lack of intellectual curiosity and of mastery suggests that he probably gets one day's worth of learning and development for every twenty days spent in public service. At least Obama seems to show he can climb a learning curve and pick people to advise him and get people to follow him. While I am conservative in many respects and was undeclared until the spring, I don't see those self-identifying conservatives in government making sure we actually preserve the fundamental underpinnings of a fundamental form of social and fiscal conservativism: govt out of our business incl personal business, fostering the transparency and supply and demand relationships that provide for markets offering natural corrections and a weeding out of bad business plans and failed business models and offering pricing competition. The healthcare system? No idea as a consumer what anything costs. No direct supply and demand at work. My daughter had a tiny cut on her finger glued and the bill was $1,400. No stitches. Financial roulette when going into a hospital with insurance for anything major (and no right to know what the insurance companies pay for anything). Reagan's push to move student aid to loans instead of grants? Well that subsidization with a figure-out-how-to-pay later model helped drive up tuition -- like (hmmm) the housing prices that were driven up by subsidization of purchasing power with back-ended-and-hope-we-can-pay-later mortgage products. And on and on. We need transparency and supply and demand. We can no longer put policies cleanly in the buckets of "conservative" or "liberal."

    BRING ON THE DEBATES. WE ARE ALL EARS. NO, YOU DO NOT NEED TO REGROUP, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

    Posted by jenny September 24, 08 06:33 PM
  1. Typical Boston readers to respond in their typical liberal, cynical ways. Just as they did when they elected D. Patrick - and he's doing such a great job - NOT! Obama is an idiot...Biden is worse. The debates are a joke. If you are staying home on a Friday night to watch you have more things to be concerned with. I give McCain a lot of credit for this decision - leadership at its best! Obama could never make a bold decision like that - just look at his VP decision...

    Posted by Sole Republican in Boston September 24, 08 06:34 PM
  1. Yes...a crisis for sure...a crisis in his confidence in a course of action...a crisis in his competence...a crisis in senility

    Posted by Chuck September 24, 08 06:38 PM
  1. On the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, one Senator voted Present but Abstaining .... John McCain!

    This bill repealed the Glass-Stegal Act that kept commercial banks, investment banks and insurance companies separate.

    Even when present, McCain does not vote on important issues.

    Posted by Patriotic September 24, 08 06:39 PM
  1. Please- this is not a state funeral.
    Where respect might dictate a postponement.

    If McCain’s prepared, this is just a bit of multi tasking.

    As the president he has to have as the ability to do two things or three things in one day- if not it may indicate that because of age, or simply inadequacy, he lacks the capacity to be president of the US. If so we have a serious problem, as much as if he had a stroke. Is like we only have on candidate unless you include Nadir, and Bob Barr.
    If we had a trustable supreme court we could pass the problem to them. But lets face it we don’t want "deal with it” Scalia’s hands on it this. time.
    Serota

    Posted by danel sirota September 24, 08 06:46 PM
  1. Do not reschedule the debate. We're all looking forward to it.

    Posted by Jan September 24, 08 06:50 PM
  1. It's Boston, the capital for screaming, whiney liberals....... Gee imagine a politican putting politics aside to address a financial disaster that may set us up for the next great depression . How many here think if Barack did something OTHER then self serving, all the left wingers here would be kissin his butt??

    Posted by SaveusfromBarack September 24, 08 06:52 PM
  1. This is just the opening act, guys. The main attraction happens about a month from now -- a week or two before the election -- when a "sudden emergency" erupts in the middle east. The US military will have "no choice" but to intervene, invading -- say -- Iran or Pakistan. It will be an urgent military crisis, it will threaten "the national security". That's why a month from now, McCain, Bush, and GOP will call for suspending the election. Either that, or there will be "terrible tragedy", and Obama will be assassinated (remember RFK, in 1968?).

    The criminals who control the GOP *will not* allow Obama to win and take office.

    Posted by Brookline Tom September 24, 08 06:53 PM
  1. And McCain will be doing what? Deciding to vote on the bailout or vote against it? Does he need to "get up to speed" on this little blip? Is he going straight to the Oval Office to find out the real deal? Who's helping Sarah on her uphill climb to full comprehension? Oh, right, Lieberman. No, that's foreign policy. Who's got her on Wall Street? How many timeouts do they get to huddle?

    Posted by Mary Lou Supple September 24, 08 06:53 PM
  1. OH, I FORGOT. My last comment won't even get posted. It was NOT a McCain, whiney liberal bashing post......;}

    Posted by SaveusfromBarack September 24, 08 06:54 PM
  1. Mc Cain is showboating once again - he is so Captain Obvious. I just heard him on CBS news- he said the bailout was $700 million - then corrected himself ..it was $700 trillion...man, it's $700 MILLION . And Pailin came on afterward with her less than intelligent antics. She speaks in rolling generalizations..it's embarrassing to watch.
    Let the debate be held- and I agree - move up the debate on the economy to Friday...If in 40 days we will have a new president- then let's hear what they have to say about solving these pressing issues. It's called multitasking - if Mc Cain needs help, ask a single working mom with 4 children how it's done.

    Posted by Miss Liza September 24, 08 06:57 PM
  1. Crisis??? We've been in a crisis for the last, oh, how many days since Bush was elected? If that's his rationale, we'd NEVER have a debate.

    Posted by LynahFaithful September 24, 08 06:59 PM
  1. I love all the "doom and gloom" scare tactics McPalin are using. These two are are pulling every tactic they can out of the out-dated Repub playbook. Just once, please, come up with something to HELP the average Joe out there who is about to lose his home.

    Debates bewteen candidates are what makes/breaks candidates, and McPalin are running and hiding from facing the American public. Shameful, really.

    Posted by Sam September 24, 08 07:01 PM
  1. Shall we postpone the election too? Why not just give Bush another 4 years? What (else) is McCain hiding that he doesnt want to come out in debate?

    Posted by Meg September 24, 08 07:03 PM
  1. Senators Obama and McCain gave their word to debate in Mississippi Friday night. Great men keep their word.

    Posted by rasputing September 24, 08 07:04 PM
  1. What exactly does McCain think he's going to accomplish by going to DC instead of the debate? The bailout is being handled by a committee that neither he or Obama are even on. WTF does he plan to "lead" other than the press on a wagon train back to the Capital.

    Posted by SeeDawg September 24, 08 07:08 PM
  1. Let the banks crash - pay for your sins. Don't Postpone the Debates

    Bailing out Freddie and Fannie will go down in history as the tipping point to official Socialism in the US. Whether BHO wins or not, history will show his, Barney Frank's, John Kerry's and Ted Kennedy's hands in the nationalizing of all the banks and the delinquent mortgages....just so the 4 harvard elites can retain their thrones.

    Posted by JoseWantFreeMortgage September 24, 08 07:09 PM
  1. That 10 point lead that opened up for Obama has gradaddy scared. Stop to solve the Wall Street crisis -- John while you are at it Cancer and AIDS too!

    Debate or get out of the race.

    Posted by DanK September 24, 08 07:11 PM
  1. Hey, turn around! LOOK OVER THERE! Lipstickonapig! Fielddressing! Lipstickonapig! Lipstickonapig!

    Posted by Mike September 24, 08 07:13 PM
  1. Oh Geez.... What a bonehead move.... FYI everybody, I'm a Republican and I too think that this Debate should NOT be postponed.

    Most importantly BECAUSE of this recent crisis!! And I am sure that the TV ratings would have been double what was expected because US Citizens, like myself, want to hear what BOTH of these candidates had to say in response to what was sure to be the main topic.

    I think he's looking foolish.....

    Posted by ElephantMan September 24, 08 07:16 PM
  1. McSame. Let's move the election until this wall street crisis is over!!!!

    Posted by TL September 24, 08 07:16 PM

  1. "Cut and run".

    McCoward.

    Posted by heyduke September 24, 08 07:17 PM
  1. NO. A simple NO.

    Posted by Harold Fitzgerald September 24, 08 07:18 PM
  1. skmj must be talking about McCain because McCain is the one who has not showed up for his job since April. He didn't bother to show up to vote on the budget that he is so worried about. And now he has to suspend his campaign so he can stop and think about something that, by his own admission, he has been dealing with during his entire Senate tenure. The simple fact is the guy is a doddering old fool who can't keep two thoughts in his head at once.

    Posted by Fran Taylor September 24, 08 07:18 PM
  1. If you think the debate should go on and you are pro Obama, you are fooling yourself. Obama is a train wreck away from a teleprompter, and the democrats are up to their eyeballs in our problems. It's not deregulation that is the problem. It's too much bad regulation.

    McCain just might bring up this 2003 NYT story:

    The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.
    Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.

    The new agency would have the authority, which now rests with Congress, to set one of the two capital-reserve requirements for the companies. It would exercise authority over any new lines of business. And it would determine whether the two are adequately managing the risks of their ballooning portfolios.

    The plan is an acknowledgment by the administration that oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- which together have issued more than $1.5 trillion in outstanding debt -- is broken. A report by outside investigators in July concluded that Freddie Mac manipulated its accounting to mislead investors, and critics have said Fannie Mae does not adequately hedge against rising interest rates. ...

    The proposal is the opening act in one of the biggest and most significant lobbying battles of the Congressional session. ...

    ''The current regulator does not have the tools, or the mandate, to adequately regulate these enterprises,'' Mr. Oxley said at the hearing. ''We have seen in recent months that mismanagement and questionable accounting practices went largely unnoticed by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight,'' the independent agency that now regulates the companies. ...

    Significant details must still be worked out before Congress can approve a bill. Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing.

    ''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."

    Posted by Niceguyeddy September 24, 08 07:23 PM
  1. I can't correct ALL the errors the obamaniacs on here are making. After all, you just can't fix STUPID. But I'll tackle a couple.

    First, for the morons who are saying McCain's afraid to debate obama Friday because he (McCain) doesn't know enuf about economics LISTEN UP -- this Friday's debate topic is FOREIGN POLICY, which should be McCain's strong suit. That's why obummer won't cancel - he's been studying SOOOO hard. He doesn't want the final postponed - he'll forget what his positions are this week.

    And for those of you who think the Republicans got us into this mess ...
    1) Bush called for reform of freddie and fannie in 2003. The DEMs killed it.
    2) McCain sponsored a bill in 2006 to fix fannie and freddie and other financial time bombs. The DEMs killed it.
    3) Who's in charge of oversight of fannie and freddie? BARNEY freakin FRANK
    4) Who made $100,000,000 while running freddie into the ground? Franklin Raines - one of obama's bros.
    5) Ditto for fannie - Johnson, another FOO.
    6)What was a MAJOR cause that precipitated this mess? DEMOCRAT politically correct but economically incorrect demands that loans be made to imbeciles who had little to no chance of paying them back. I'll leave it as an exercise who those imbeciles are/were.

    Posted by GMan2 September 24, 08 07:24 PM
  1. Dave if you look at both candidate's committee assignments you will see that neither of these senators is in a position to do anything about the financial situation unless they are elected president. This is precisely why the debates should go on as planned. This situation is the responsibility of the lawmakers who have been assigned to positions on committees related to finance. Let them do their jobs and let the candidates do their job, which is to convince us which of them we should vote for.

    Posted by Fran Taylor September 24, 08 07:26 PM
  1. YesmMCCANE is my man

    Posted by jtn September 24, 08 07:27 PM
  1. Hmmm 6% of our senators out campaigning when a debate roils over whether to spend $1T on bailing out those jackasses on Wall Street. I, for one, would not mind seeing them take a break.

    Posted by diamondcutter September 24, 08 07:29 PM
  1. Another smoke screen from the Republicans!

    Posted by Anthony September 24, 08 07:30 PM
  1. This is the perfect time for Obama to move ahead of McCain and address the american citizens. Thank you McCain. I think McCain is missing the boat and I can only hope that this will help to push Obama to election on 11/4.

    Posted by Sharon September 24, 08 07:35 PM
  1. As a voter and someone who has voted for more Republican presidents than Democrats, I have to say I am completely shocked and disheartened by the man John McCain has shown himself to be during this campaign and I guess during the last 7ish year. It's always shocked me that a decorated veteran like him would so wholeheartedly support an administration that sent our men and women to battle under false pretenses. There's just something fundamentally wrong in that. And he still supports it.
    Now the tactics he's used in this campaign have honestly been the dirtiest I have ever seen. This whole debate debacle is just another example of him trying to use a national crisis for his own pathetic politic gain. John McCain is a joke. Wake up America.

    Posted by Kelly G September 24, 08 07:35 PM
  1. Yes, of course should they delay. I am sick and tired of these presidential elections, I am much more worried about the economy. Why is Obama trying to hinder McCain from doing his job??

    Posted by Nutella September 24, 08 07:38 PM
  1. McCain won't debate. Palin won't interview.
    Cowards.
    Too close to the election for us to see just how uninformed they both are!!!!!

    Posted by Dan September 24, 08 07:42 PM
  1. One interesting thing that these blog entries tell is that no one trusts nobody anymore...We have entered the universe of paranoia, - evildoers everywhere. Hillary was slated, McCain is hated, and Obama not trusted by Millions. What are we left to do?

    Posted by Nutrient September 24, 08 07:43 PM
  1. Call off the election! Call in the Supreme Court - let them decide once again. In the unlikely event that they NOT decide for Mr. McCain then he can call for a “do over”. This smacks of caviling cowardice unbecoming an officer and gentleman, to say nothing of a supposedly straight talking war hero. What a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive! He has strayed so far from the “straight talk express” that he lacks any credibility whatsoever. A once upright maverick has mortgaged his soul to Mephistopheles and is facing spiritual foreclosure. While he’s apparently lost all sense of honor must he lose all sense of shame in the process? What a conniving codger he is!!!

    Posted by Kevin September 24, 08 07:46 PM
  1. Looks like Obama won't even vote present on this very important policy decision. What a surprise from this empty shirt.

    Posted by Big Jim September 24, 08 07:48 PM
  1. Do not believe for one second that Sen McCain has not been advised that an agreement is imminent. He arrives inWashington, agreement made, and he appears to be the hero. A pure political ploy.

    Posted by Leo Chabot September 24, 08 07:51 PM
  1. If Obama doesn't want to work, then he should give his Senate salary to help with the bailout.
    Here is the chance to show who really could do bipartisan work. John McCain has been doing it for years. Again, Obama can make speeches.
    I say McCain should let Obama debate himself - without his telepromter.

    Posted by Anne September 24, 08 07:58 PM
  1. The financial situation is much more serious than most people think. Fix the country first, then fix the administration...

    Posted by Murf September 24, 08 07:59 PM
  1. No delay! Learn to chew gum and walk at the same time McCain! Oh, I forgot, you can't teach an old dog new tricks.

    Posted by Jeff September 24, 08 08:02 PM
  1. Looks to be a strategy to postpone the VP debate. McCain camp is suggesting holding the first presidential debate on the night when the VP debate is scheduled. The VP debate will be postponed to a later date, which is yet to be determined. Looks like Sarah is having a hard time cramming up the Cliff notes.

    Posted by VA September 24, 08 08:06 PM
  1. Obama has basically demonstrated that he is everything the McCain campaign says he is. Instead of putting the country first and helping prevent us from tipping into a depression, he wants to be on TV with the cameras on him. Its pathetic.

    Posted by Paul September 24, 08 08:21 PM
  1. Six weeks until we choose a new president of the United States. This decision will affect us directly for the next four years and indirectly for many more to come.

    The debates must go on so the people can make a well informed decision.

    Posted by Shawn September 24, 08 08:24 PM
  1. A shocking idea. The shock being that the candidate of a major poliitcal party would try to pull off such an obvious stunt at the expense of the American voter. How the heck is McCain going to help anyway, he doesn't understand the first thing about the economy that the rest of us experience. Let him drive back to one of his seven homes in one of his thirteen cars. He isn't fit to be President.

    Posted by Catbert September 24, 08 08:29 PM
  1. The American public needs to know NOW what each candidate thinks about the economic crisis and what they would do to assist if elected.

    If McCain can't stand the heat, GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN.

    Posted by Miss Kris September 24, 08 08:31 PM
  1. I have a feeling a lot of people will be watching this debate now. Before, I thought, gee this has been an exhausting week, I think I'll skip this one, but now... It will get a lot more attention and given Mr. Obama's true lack of experience without a telepromter, his lack of experience on foreign policy (which is the focus of this debate) and now that Obama's people and the candidate are feeling more confident and whenever they feel confident the Obama people drop the ball, I think, I bet, Mc Cain will do well. History tends to repeat itself with these people.

    How scary are these people? I don't trust anybody.

    Posted by Annie September 24, 08 08:31 PM
  1. McCain has no shame to try to pull out of the debate now. This is exactly the time that we need honest debate on these issues and we need to see where these candidates stand. I used to respect the man but it is rapidly fading...especially after hearing his campaign manager was paid by Freddie Mac up until a month ago. Are you kidding me? What is going on?

    Posted by Zak September 24, 08 08:40 PM
  1. Whatever it takes to solve the most critical problem facing the future prosperity of Americans should be done.

    I am surprised that McCain would rather go to Washington and deal with Congress rather than ridding our country of this anti-American socialist Barack Obama.

    We've had enough socialism lately. The time has come to get rid of some of it. Obama has to be defeated.

    Posted by Richard September 24, 08 08:42 PM
  1. No,No,No Don't let John McCan't pull this off. Is this the type of underhanded move we can expect of a McCain President...you bet. Its his Party that got us into this mess and he does not have the courage to stand up to the people on Friday and explain why.

    Posted by John September 24, 08 08:43 PM
  1. Anyone who wants to be President should be able to deal with a crisis and debate at the same time.

    Posted by Richard September 24, 08 08:44 PM
  1. Obama won't go to Washington because he doesn't know how to vote "yes" or "no".
    Only "present".

    Posted by Shecky September 24, 08 08:45 PM
  1. Leo Chabot you are a shmoe.

    Dan - where are you so I can see how much of a coward YOU are.

    Posted by GMan2 September 24, 08 08:59 PM
  1. McCain grandstanding again - Mr. Politics.

    Posted by Barry September 24, 08 09:00 PM
  1. McCain-Palin's team need a bit more time to propose a Maverick plan to sell Wall Street in ebay

    Posted by Herb September 24, 08 09:01 PM
  1. What's the big deal? The financial crisis is more important than a debate right now, that should be obvious, unless you are an irrational, illogical, foaming-at-the-mouth liberal Dem, and there appear to plenty of them posting here today. Call off the election? Call in the supreme court? Who ever said anything about that? As long as the debate is rescheduled soon, what is the big deal? Obama just loves to talk and campaign, but McCain realizes that there are more important things to take care of right now. Yes this move is political, I mean, this is after all a political campaign, right? But that doesn't make it the wrong move in this situation.

    I think Obama supporters are just crying like little babies here, because their guy didn't think of this first, and they know that it is the smart and correct thing to do here, and it is going to help McCain and hurt Obama. Cry, cry, cry! Wahhhh!!!!

    Posted by DB September 24, 08 09:01 PM
  1. JOHN MCCAIN DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT STUFF TO LEAD OUR COUNTRY. HE IS IN IT FOR THE POWER AND NOT FOR THE PEOPLE. THERE IS NO WAY I WILL PUT MY TRUST IN HIM. HE HAD BETTER COME UP WITH A MUCH BETTER EXCUSE FOR WANTING TO POSTONE THE DEBATE.

    Posted by GOLDENGODDESS September 24, 08 09:03 PM
  1. The President of the United States needs to be able to multitask. How can McCain expect the country to elect him if he sends the message that he can't focus on more than one problem at a time? Any country as large as ours has more than one problem at a time and the President needs to be able to deal with those on a daily basis, while still making public appearances to inform the public what he or she is doing. McCain's refusal to appear on television during this time of crisis gives a sense of more of the behind the scenes tinkering without full disclosure that this country has experienced for a while.

    Posted by S.C. September 24, 08 09:25 PM
  1. Please explain to me what McCain and Obama can do to solve the financial problem? The impact of their presence in Washington this Friday instead of at the debate will be non-existent. On the other hand, the national presentation to the country on the issues will have a much greater impact on the future of the country. All this about McCain looking like a leader and placing the country before his campaign is exactly the same as what the bull leaves in the barnyard. I ask those who support this ridiculous idea to show me exactly what McCain has done in the past week about this crisis other than talk? So what is it going to hurt him to talk a little more? Probably a lot if it isn' t any better than what he has been saying lately.

    Posted by Don Miguel September 24, 08 09:26 PM
  1. We need leaders who are confident, ever-ready, honest, intelligent, and sincere. So far McCain and Palin have not demonstrated those qualities at all.

    Posted by BK September 24, 08 09:28 PM
  1. As a former resident of Mass. I am so pleased that I have moved out of the area and do not have to listen to or read the liberal nonsense that is being posted here and talked about in the socialist state of Mass. The more the government does the worse condition the country is in. I don't care if you are democrat or republican the only solution resides in the return to the principles that made our country great. Principles like personal responsibility, smaller decentralized government, lower taxes on corporations so that we can compete in the global marketplace, and fewer services from the government. The debate is meaningless - the presence of all of our leaders and their participation in a discussion of how to stablize the situation while we at least consider how to move towards these principles is what matters. The only thing the left cares about is power - winning the election - and then moving our country closer to socialism. They exhibit this focus in all they do and they are supported by the leftist media such as the Bostoon Globe.

    Posted by Richard Kain September 24, 08 09:29 PM
  1. McSame! Clearly not ready to be the President. In a time of crisis - people need a leader with ideas and the ability to move the country forward.

    Posted by BARCO September 24, 08 09:37 PM
  1. John McCain is an incredible American. I would never want to go through what he went through and I completely respect him for his sacrifice. However, I think that the lack of experience (both national as well as international) that Sarah Palin brings to the table is VERY concerning. I also think that John McCain is trying to avoid the debate because he thinks Obama will win. Obama is correct in stating that the debate should go on. The American people need to hear what both candidates will do to correct the problem should they get into office. Their impact will be minimal in the sea of hundreds of members of Congress in the next week, or so, that they are in session. We need to know where our presidential candidates stand. The economy is the most dominant issue in the campaign along with the war. The debate needs to happen.

    Posted by mahones2003 September 24, 08 09:41 PM
  1. It was a crisis last week, Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. McCain could have put "country first" last week. It's McCain first, party second, and country gets what's left over. Frankly, my president should be able to walk and chew bubble gum at the same time. It's only a 90 minute debate long after the congressional session is over. They own a jet - hop on it and attend the debate.

    Posted by pam September 24, 08 09:45 PM
  1. WE WANT THE DEBATE!! WE WANT THE DEBATE!!! WE WANT THE DEBATE!!!....

    Posted by Carol H.:) September 24, 08 09:50 PM
  1. GMan2, are you resorting to threats of violence this early in the game? It is no surprise that you support those that you do. And did I read you call someone a shmoe? That's priceless.

    Posted by PubliusK September 24, 08 09:51 PM
  1. The debate should be cancelled. The bail out should be addressed first .A couple of days more will not make difference in the dabate. After all Obliar has lied all along about his freindships with the terrorist and the racist and white hating rev who he says he did not know what he was saying in his church. Does he think the people are stupid. Him and his wife are racist to the core and if he gets in god help us because he will ruin the country.

    Posted by tony benedetti September 24, 08 09:59 PM
  1. Hey McCain, how about a little multi-tasking? It's a big part of what presidents do. There is absolutely no need for him to suspend his campaign or postpone a hugely-anticipated debate. It just makes him look flustered and unable to deal with too much at once.

    Does he think Congress will still be working at 9:00 on Friday night? Gimme a break! He could make the debate; he's just running scared. Cut the Karl Rove tactics and face the music old man! It's way too late for stall tactics.

    Posted by ShaneCo September 24, 08 10:02 PM
  1. How obvious is this? Schedule it over the VP debate then reschedule the VP debate?

    Has anyone seen Palin live yet? With Katie Couric?

    McCain will do all he can to have the election over, one way or the other, before he lets her in front of a live microphone, never mind with someone like Biden, who at least knows something about how the American government works.

    The woman acts and speaks like someone who went to five colleges before she got her B.A -- which is her history. There are probably 50 people in any office building in Boston or Worcester smarter than she is. His choosing her as a potential president is simply an abhorrent of cynicism. I expected more from McCain.

    Posted by Joe Earls September 24, 08 10:04 PM
  1. YOU MUST BE A LIBERAL BECAUSE THE COMMENTS ON THIS BLOG IS 4 TO 1 IN FAVOR FOR OBAMA . SO DONT ELL ME YOU ARE BEING FAIR. YOU ONLY PUT THE ONE THAT FAVOR OBAMA

    Posted by TONY September 24, 08 10:07 PM
  1. You have got to be kidding. What is it about Economic Commandment #1 "Thou shalt not Panic in a financial crisis" that McCain does not understand? Over reaching? I can't believe I'd ever say this, but George Will was spot-on right. Did Will knew this was coming yesterday when he wrote his op-ed piece on temperment? Surreal.

    Posted by Mike C. September 24, 08 10:11 PM
  1. Maybe McCain has something to hide? Hum, this reminds me more and more of the Keating 5 Scandal and that $500 billion bailout. Maybe McCain wants this cleaned up as quickly as possible so the questions don't start flying?

    Posted by M Anthony September 24, 08 10:16 PM
  1. McCain feels he can't attend the debate!! He should send his Vice-Presidental candidate instead!

    Posted by paul casperson September 24, 08 10:17 PM
  1. We are days away from financial armageddeon and all you can think of is a stupid debate? The debate will take place next week or the week after...who cares? If we are all queued up in the soup line it won't matter...

    Posted by DH September 24, 08 10:17 PM
  1. It's funny how you liberal morons blame the economic crisis on the Republicans when in fact it was former Preseident Clinton who passed a bill allowing the deregulation of major financial instituitons back in 1999. This bill was in place due to the result that the Great Depression had on the United States.

    So keep believing that McCain is running scared. Do any of you certifiable donkeys realize that the debates are focused upon national security and foreign policy not the economy ???? !!!!!

    This debate can take place anytime next week or more importantly, when this crisis has a plan in place. That takes more precedent than a debate. But alas, liberals always have to make excuses rather than putting their words into action.

    BTW, How's Obama's clone Deval doing? What great accomplishments has he bestowed upon Massachusetts yet? I mean come on, he is a liberal democrat, taxes and spends, great orator, and Harvard educated. We should all be living on easy street with his brilliant promises from his campaign speeches but then again, liberals are the stupidiest creatures on the earth who are easy manipulated with fancy words and lack of responsibilities.

    Posted by Libs_suck September 24, 08 10:26 PM
  1. The Democrats created this Socialist scheme using Fannie Mae
    Started with the Carter Administration - Community Redevelopment Act 1977

    Clinton Admin. - Legalized securitization of subprime mortgages 1995
    Franklin Raines/ Jim Johnson/ Barney Frank/ Chuck Schummer/ Chris Dodd

    Admit it - Democrats are Socialists

    Posted by Jonathan Lothrop September 24, 08 10:27 PM
  1. Jenny,

    McCain can't type. He can't tie his shoes or comb his hair, either. Why?
    The definition of can not is "unable to" , not stupid. McCain is highly intelligent and technologically very savy. Unfortunately, he is handicapped. Every single bone in both hands were broken by the North Vietnamese when he was a POW. He can't lift his arms or throw a baseball, either. Maybe you want him disqualified because he won't be able to throw out the first pitch on opening day. When he told people he couldn't email, he mentioned that his wife has to help him because he can't physically do these things.You and Obama should be ashamed of that bit of nastiness.

    Posted by Anne September 24, 08 10:28 PM
  1. One looks Presidential "The One" doesn't. One wants to be involved "The One" wants someone else to take care of it. One wants to vote and be on the record "The One" wants to most likely abstain like his State Senate record. One is ready to lead "The One" is in his Fl bunker boning up for the debate.

    Posted by moderatejoe September 24, 08 10:29 PM
  1. I am afraid I agree that McCain and Obama need to suspend their political campaigns and cancel the planned debate for this upcoming Friday. Our country is in critical shape and it is in danger from economic forces both outside and within. Don't kid yourselves guys, this is WAR and not to be taken lightly! Next will come the need to cancel our search for the next president. Bush, like Franklin Delano Roosevelt, will HAVE to step in and do a third term just to save us from this dire situation. The Patriot Act was put in place for just this sort of thing! And no one can really complain much except maybe Obama, McCain and Sarah Pallin (the third candidate since the Republicans seem to be running two this time instead of the usual one). Buzz, buzz, buzz as Kurt Vonnegut would say!

    Posted by XCL September 24, 08 10:39 PM
  1. All this shows is that McCain can only handle one thing at a time. He isn't much of a multi-tasker. The President can't just take on one issue or task at a time- it doesnt work this way. He can woek of the finacial problems during the day and later in the evening he can take an hour or two out of his day to debate Obama.

    Just another dog and pony show from Mccain now that the novelty of Palin has worn off.

    Posted by Vivalaselvis September 24, 08 10:44 PM
  1. The McCain campaign IS willing to debate next week and postpone the V.P. debate. The idea that this co-incidence is laughable. She is not ready and neither is John. He may be needed in the Senate but not in the White House.

    Posted by j adamson September 24, 08 10:45 PM
  1. We have had presidential debates during times of war, including the Civil War. McCain should just grow a pair. First he does not allow Sarah Palin to have a press conference and limits her to 2 softball interviews and now this. I want to see unscripted debates and true screening of the candidates!!!

    Posted by PW September 24, 08 11:01 PM
  1. The Republican leadership is a "train wreck". McCain is desperate because the uniqueness of Palin is wearing off and the reality of the issues is coming home to roost. The economy will sink his candidacy.

    This country is now a shadow of what it use to be. The lack of leadership from the corrupt elected officials and the corrupt CEOs have made us the laughing stock of the world. We are known as a corrupt, greedy and fat society that only cares about how much money "I"can steal. There is "zero" credibility in the Congress and even less in the White House. Once again, I will write in the name Thomas Jefferson in November because I know I will get more mileage from a dead President.
    bubut a

    Posted by BM September 24, 08 11:09 PM
  1. Wow, what's next? Is McCain about to pull a Ross Perot and say he's going to stop campaigning because of some conspiracy to disrupt his daughter's wedding?

    The cynical side of me thinks this is all about postponing (or better yet, canceling) the VP debate. The less cynical side of me thinks that McCain is simply losing his mind. Since about half of Americans are still OK with voting for him, I hope my cynical side is right.

    Posted by paul September 24, 08 11:09 PM
  1. Sure, McCain is going to ride into Washington on his white horse Friday and fix the economy. And WHAT exactly is he going to get done that day that won't get done without him? Hold a magical "leadership" conference? Please. Very weak. He postured for this debate all summer. His only goal here is to get everyone to do everything on HIS terms, for the sake of appearing to look like a real leader.

    Posted by E September 24, 08 11:26 PM
  1. Here we go again....another week of McBush and their low lying political tactics!
    The American people are now smarter than these two give us credit for. Their motives are transparent and their old reliable FEAR tactics that worked so well the last 8 years will not work this time. Yes, we have big problems however, for a sitting President to go on national television and use words like panick, and banks closing, creates FEAR and alarm, when the president is the one who is suppose do the exact opposite, this is strictly political.
    The reason he want to suspend his campaign, McCain slings all kinds of mud with a slew a new character assination ads and then he runs and trys to hide behind a rock (the white house and it's president, and a crisis) in hopes he can avoid mud coming back at him, well Mr. Mcain, there's a mud slide coming your direction and it can't miss you and you know it, that's why you want to hide.
    McCain has shown again he is no leader, infact when the game doesn't go his way, he want to take his ball and go home, he doesn't want to play at all. Well, you don't get to go home yet, we are only in the 3rd quarter.
    He is a sorry excuse of a politician, a senator, a reformer, and a maverick.
    THANKS BUT NO THANKS, YOU"RE ON PALIN"S BRIDGE TO NOWHERE!!!!

    Posted by DLV September 24, 08 11:43 PM
  1. John McCain wants to be president but can't multitask? Sarah Palin wants to be VP, but can barely stand up to an interview? How will she stand up to Putin? I just don't get it.

    The fact that a McCain's regional spokesman in Colorado accidentally emailed the campaign's talking points (in an email titled 'TALKING POINTS: SUSPENDING THE CAMPAIGN') to it's entire Colorado media list (you can read the story on the Colorado Independent's website) just proves how thought out this was.

    Posted by Christine Daly September 24, 08 11:59 PM
  1. Something sounds familiar here. Just before an election, Congress pressured to vote for a blank check for the Bush administration to avert a "crisis". Anyone else reminded of the Iraq War resolution?

    Economy is not gonna collapse if it takes another week to get this bill right. Is McCain gonna suspend campaigning to hang around the Senate and take photo ops so he can claim credit for a bill which is well underway already and has strong bipartisan support? He's sure gonna try!

    Posted by lnmonster September 25, 08 01:03 AM
  1. I don't want to hear any Presidential debate while the Wall Street bailout plan is not solved. Talking is useless when the financial crisis is at stake. We need real actions.

    Posted by sp5981 September 25, 08 01:30 AM
  1. McCain was basically at the 'scene of the crime', so to speak, and now he wants to run away from it. So much for the Repubs and their "personal responsibility" mantra.

    Posted by Harold September 25, 08 02:17 AM
  1. To all of you McCain supporters.......I wonder what you would be saying if Obama was the one who suggested that the campaigns be suspended and the debate delayed? You would be ALL OVER IT!!!! Calling him all kinds of names! But, it's different because it's your candidate....... you are all hypocrites!

    Posted by mb September 25, 08 09:57 AM
  1. What do you expect from McCain he went there and looked like a fool and now because of him everything is up in the air again. You can bet the stock market will go down again knowing that this is up in the air ' to no where" again. Now I am throughly convinced he should NOT be commander in chief. He has proven again that he can't stay focused or committed. He has done a terrible disserivice to the american people by showing up and causing more problems when the democrats and republicans were trying to get things starightened out from this mess we are in. And Bush who has been keeping a very low profile all this time has the ordacity to sit there and look important. HE caused this problem and did "Nothing"

    I didn't even want to see his face or hear his speech and so did a lot of other co-workers who said the same. Now McCain isn't going to show up for a debate boy that is why I will not vote for the guy. So you Mccain supporters keep thinking he is the "man" to do the job and see where it gets you, "nowhere". Shame on you McCain for your unethical behavior!

    Posted by #1reba September 25, 08 08:06 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category