Nobel laureates line up behind Obama's science policy
By Carolyn Y. Johnson, Globe Staff
Barack Obama's campaign today laid out a detailed science policy, including a commitment to double funding for major science agencies over the next decade. The campaign also announced that 61 Nobel laureates -- including many current and former Bay State scientists -- are endorsing Obama.
Calling the Bush Administration's science policy "disastrous," MIT professor and Nobel laureate Robert Horvitz joined a conference call to speak in support of Obama's science policy, which includes elevating the role of White House science adviser to a senior-level position and reversing the ban on using federal funds for human embryonic stem cell research on cell lines created after August 9, 2001.
"Instead of shutting scientific knowledge out of the White House, Senator Obama will engage top scientists," Horvitz said. "Instead of blocking groundbreaking efforts to use embryonic stem cell research to find cures for diseases like Parkinson's disease... Senator Obama will provide strong support to these efforts."
In a letter of endorsement, the Nobel laureates wrote that visionary science and technology policy would be essential to maintain US competitiveness. They ranged from Sheldon L. Glashow, the Harvard physicist who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1979, to Craig C. Mello, the University of Massachusetts Medical School at Worcester biologist who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2006.
"Our once dominant position in the scientific world has been shaken and our prosperity has been placed at risk," the letter states. "We have lost time critical for the development of new ways to provide energy, treat disease, reverse climate change, strengthen our security, and improve out economy."







What a refreshing change this will be when President Obama is sworn in on January 20, 2008. Instead of the "science is bad juju" as promoted by the Bush administration... Obama will deal with science, industry, and foreign relations with an open government that is willing to listen and perhaps support ideas that can revolutionize our world.
Not very scientific of a group claiming to offer "political intelligence" not to have a denominator in the article. I doubt this is even close to a majority.
I don't know what proportion of nobel laureates this represents, but it is the largest group of them that have ever endorsed any president. The world is passing us by and we've wasted at least eight years because of Bush's religion. I am a Christian too, but to halt the nation's scientific advance because you're an ideologue is unpatriotic and wrong. Bush has even been working to get Health and Human Services to classify birth control pills as abortion--which could be pretty important if McCain should win an choose the next Supreme Court Justices. And if you think that's nuts, Sarah Palin doesn't believe in birth control pills or condoms, even for married couples. And Huckabee just did a video interview saying that he would always support laws for life and birth control pills were against life. These people want to own my bedroom. They're scary and they make me ANGRY!
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com
browse this blog
by category