< Back to Front Page Text size +

Palin talks about oil drilling, economic reform

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor September 17, 2008 04:31 PM

PalinHannity1.jpg
(Fox News Channel)

Sarah Palin is interviewed by Sean Hannity of Fox News Channel


Sarah Palin, in her second national interview since becoming the Republican vice presidential nominee, says that she and running mate John McCain disagree on oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, but she's "going to keep working on him."

“Well, I'm very, very encouraged, as we all understand that John McCain knows, more so than any other leader in our nation today, that for national security reasons we must be an energy independent nation," the Alaska governor says in the interview, which will air at 9 p.m. EDT on Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes." "We must start taking the steps to get there. That's why he has embraced offshore drilling.That's why he has embraced the ideal of the alternative fuels also. And I'll keep working on him with ANWR.”

“It's a nice thing about him, too, is he is not asking me or anybody else to check our opinions at the door. He wants that healthy deliberation and debate with it.”

In other highlights released this afternoon of the interview, she talks about fixing the economy through reform, blames corruption and greed for the crisis on Wall Street, and highlights her maverick persona.

On fixing the economy: “Through reform, absolutely. Look at the oversight that has been lack, I believe, here at the 1930s type of regulatory regime overseeing some of these corporations. And we've got to get a more coordinated and a much more stringent oversight regime…government can play a very, very appropriate role in the oversight as people are trusting these companies with their life savings, with their investments, with their insurance policies, and construction bonds, and everything else. When we see the collapse that we're seeing today, you know that something is broken and John McCain has a great plan to get in there and fix it.”

On the danger of a presidential candidate using the economy for political gain: "Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we're talking about today…It is that profound and that important an issue that we work together on this, and not just let one party try to kind of grab it all or capture it all and pretend like they have all the answers. It's going to take everybody working together on this.”

On who is responsible for the failing financial institutions: “I think the corruption on Wall Street. That's to blame. And that violation of the public trust. And that contract that should be inherent in corporations who are spending, investing other people's money, the abuse of that is what has got to stop. And it's a matter, too, of some of these CEOs and top management people, and shareholders too not holding that management accountable, being addicted to, we call it, OPM, O-P-M, 'other people's money.' Spending that, investing that, not using the prudence that we expect of them. But here again, government has got to play an appropriate role in the stringent oversight, making sure that those abuses stop.”

On AIG getting government bailout: “Well, you know, first, Fannie and Freddie, different because quasi-government agencies there where government had to step in because of the adverse impacts all across our nation, especially with homeowners. It's just too impacting, we had to step in there. I do not like the idea though of taxpayers being used to bailout these corporations. Today it was AIG, important call there, though, because of the construction bonds and the insurance carrier duties of AIG. But first and foremost, taxpayers cannot be looked to as the bailout, as the solution to the problems on Wall Street.”

On reaction to Obama’s attack on McCain for saying that the “fundamentals” of the economy are strong: “Well, it was an unfair attack on the verbiage that Senator McCain chose to use because the fundamentals, as he was having to explain afterwards, he means our workforce, he means the ingenuity of the American people. And of course, that is strong and that is the foundation of our economy. Certainly it is a mess though, the economy is a mess. And there have been abuses on Wall Street and that adversely effects Main Street. It is, somebody was saying this morning, a toxic waste there on Wall Street, affecting Main Street. And we've got to cure this.”

On if there should be an investigation on relationships between political donations from Fannie and Freddie Mac and the bankruptcy and its impact on the economy: “I think that's significant, but even more significant is the role that the lobbyists play in an issue like this also. And in that cronyism -- it's symptomatic of the grade of problem that we see right now in Washington and that is just that acceptance of the status quo, the politics as usual, the cronyism that has been allowed to be accepted and then it leads us to a position like we are today with so much collapse on Wall Street. That's the reform that we've got to get in there and make sure that this happens. We've got to put government and these regulatory agencies back on the side of the people.”

On how she and McCain can follow through on their promises in a divided Washington: “Yes it is gridlock and that's ridiculous. That's why we don't have an energy policy, that's why there hasn't been the reform of the abuse of the earmark process. And real reform is tough, and you do ruffle feathers along the way. But John McCain has that streak of independence in him that I think is very, very important in America today in our leadership. I have that within me also. And that's why John McCain tapped me to be a team of mavericks, of independents coming in there without the allegiances to that cronyism, to that good ole' boy system. I'm certainly a Washington outsider and I'm proud of that because I think that that is what we need also.

On her family’s reaction to be picked as the VP nominee: “It was a time of asking the girls to vote on it, anyway. And they voted unanimously, yes. Didn't bother asking my son because, you know, he's going to be off doing his thing anyway, so he wouldn't be so impacted by, at least, the campaign period here. So ask the girls what they thought and they're like, absolutely. Let's do this, mom.”

On if the political attacks by Democrats will be effective: “You can't underestimate the wisdom of the people of America. They're seeing through the rhetoric, and they're seeing through a lot of the political cheap shots, also. And they're getting down to the facts and the voting records that are going to show that stark contrast.”

On if Republicans in Washington have lost their way in recent years: “I believe that Republicans in Washington have got to understand that the people of America are not fully satisfied with all the -- all the dealings within the party. The same -- it applies for the other party, also. Americans are just getting sick and tired of politics as usual, that embracing of the status quo, going with the flow and just assuming that the people of America are not noticing that we have opportunities for good change. We have opportunity for a healthier, safer, more prosperous and energy-independent nation at this time. People are getting tired of a process that's not allowing that process -- that progress to be ushered in."

On if she’s spoken to McCain about her role in a McCain administration: “Sure have. I'm very excited about the role that I will play as his partner. And I will focus on energy independence and reform overall of Washington and tax cuts for Americans and reigning in spending.”

On how she thinks Americans will be impacted if the energy dependency isn’t solved: “In that $700 billion transfer of wealth, that's when the price of oil was up as high as it was there at the $140 mark. But, of course, that transfer of wealth, still, that imbalance of trade is something that we need to tackle also. Yes, those dollars should be circulating within our own economy. It's a matter of national security. It is a matter of our future prosperity. Energy is inherently linked to security and prosperity. We sort of have a 'do nothing Senate' right now where nobody's wanting to really pick up the ball and run with it and take the steps that we have to take to become more energy independent. And it's going to take…a change in leadership in order to really crush that gridlock and get going on this.”

11 comments so far...
  1. Go Sarah!!
    1. we all need to find out quickly, what is fastest ways to energy independence.
    Is it oil and gas, nucleur, wind, solar, biofuels? lets start with the cheapest and fastest way and get there now!
    2. Healthcare is becoming out of hand, we pay healthcare for people who can't pay for it, so we the taxpayer, pays 2X, once for our healthcare, and 1 for the havenots.
    3. Accountability of Government.- every agency needs a thorough housecleaning to see what we need and don't need in Big Gov't.
    3. Reduce all taxes, and have all State and Federal Employees start paying their way for their benefits, just like in the private sector. No free lunch, for anyone.

    Posted by Sarah Supporter September 17, 08 05:25 PM
  1. Dear Sarah Supporter:

    Do some real research and you will see that Sarah and John will not do any of the above. They have no plan, and no change will come from them.

    Posted by Thats Said September 17, 08 05:47 PM
  1. Palin's responses are CRITICALLY lacking in substance.

    On fixing the economy: People have construction bonds? What IS that "very appropriate governement role"? Insurance Policy protection will now be coming from the Federal Government? So, What IS the plan?

    On the failing financial instiutions: CEOs and their management to blame and "government has got to play an appropriate role in the stringent oversight, making sure that those abuses stop." So, what is being proposed?

    On the AIG bailout: Good that she now knows that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are quasi-governement backed mortgage lending agencies. She's not happy to bail out AIG. IS she proposing a quasi-government backed insurance agency? OR Federal Regulation of Insurance IN ADDITION to state insurance regulatiion? Where is the plan ... what are the details?

    On the attack on McCain saying US fendamentals are sound: If the economy is a mess, wouldn't that show up in the fundamentals - housing, mortgage rates, unemployment, Consumer Price Index, GDP,etc. Most people think of those as measures of the fundamentals. Can't remember hearing of an American People Ingenuity Index. All that aside, what is the plan to clean up the "toxic waste"?

    Republicans losing their way: People are getting tired of a process that's not allowing that process -- that progress to be ushered in. This all sounds a bit redundant. What process are you proposing?

    On not solving the eneergy crisis: How is the trade deficeit linked to a McCain policy for energy independance and how is related to a Senate gridlock?

    Such a mixing of buzzwords, facts, figures and (seemingly) unrelated (inter-related) spun into a ball of tangled thoughts. It reads like a elementary school paper prepared on a school bus on the way to class.

    Quite a sight to see all the work to prepare such responses that are devoid of any real substance.

    Mind-boggling! ...except for the a growing tendency to understand what ( or IF ) she is stating an actual solution, or even framing the concerns in order to resolve them.

    Posted by John S September 17, 08 06:41 PM
  1. The only way we get out of slavery to foreign countries that produces oil is start digging and drilling underneath us rather than just yelling and screaming infront of the camera for the whole world to see like Obama is doing.

    Posted by skmj September 17, 08 07:40 PM
  1. You sound very nervous. You remind me of the panicked liberal media when they initially learned of McCain's selection of Sarah Palin. They appeared beside themselves -- as if they had truly been overwhelmingly "snookered." Obama and they had appeared extremely confident that a win was "in the bag" and didn't even feel it was necessary to select Hillary as a running mate to increase the likelihood of a win greatly.

    Posted by Reg September 17, 08 07:43 PM
  1. What planet are you on? We're at war, with many parts of the world ready to explode, and you want this woman, who needs a crash course so they can present her to world leaders at the UN??? I want a person in the white house who excelled in school, will make sure that women aren't revictimized if they've been raped by a relative or a stranger and can choose what she wants to do, and a person who loved this country so much that they would never be married tow person who wants to secceed from it.

    Posted by roberta lewis September 17, 08 08:57 PM
  1. Hillary would have been the obvious and easiest choice, but like a true leader Obama didn't take the easy road, he set the country up with what he thinks will be the best leadership for the next four years. McCain rolled the dice. Don't EVER roll the dice when it comes to my country and my children's futures.

    Posted by mbee September 17, 08 08:59 PM
  1. Not a coherent thought from Palin in the article, sad really.

    Posted by Justin grimes September 17, 08 11:14 PM
  1. Why would America REWARD complete Republican failure ?

    We wont.

    Posted by PulSamsara September 18, 08 08:35 AM
  1. To skmj:

    Doesn't that sound familiar? Isn't that what the "Department of Interior" wanted to do? I am sure they are a credible source of information on what is is good for America.

    I also recall the Democrats recently passed a bill to allow off shore drilling within 50 miles of US Shores. I think that is doing something, rather than yelling and screaming as the Republicans are doing right now about why it needs to be 3 miles instead of 50 using information given to them by the, again, "Department of Interior"

    Posted by HBui September 18, 08 10:45 AM
  1. In reading this article, I really tried to find something of significance in her answers...something concrete, something inventive....an idea that would lead one to think, okay she isn't so bad after all. Sorry to say she remains that "Distasta from Alaska". I can't understand why anyone would vote for McCain with her on the ticket.

    Posted by CJ September 18, 08 05:22 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category