< Back to Front Page Text size +

Obama, McCain put spin on job losses

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor October 3, 2008 03:00 PM


Both major-party presidential candidates have weighed in on the discouraging jobs reports for last month with their usual themes -- Democrat Barack Obama warning that his Republican rival John McCain would continue the Bush administration policies causing the damage, and McCain warning that Obama would raise taxes and worsen matters.

“Today, Americans woke up to the sad news that 159,000 jobs were lost last month alone, making September the ninth straight month of job loss. With three-quarters of a million jobs lost this year, and millions of families struggling to pay the bills and stay in their homes, this country can’t afford Senator McCain’s plan to give America four more years of the same policies that have devastated our middle-class and our economy for the last eight. Instead of Senator McCain’s plan to give tax breaks to CEOs and companies that ship jobs overseas, I will rebuild the middle-class and create millions of new jobs by investing in infrastructure and renewable energy that will reduce our dependence on oil from the Middle East. I also call on Congress to pass an immediate rescue plan for our middle-class that will provide tax relief, save one million jobs, and save our local communities from harmful budget cuts and painful tax increases,” Obama said in his statement.

And in a speech he is to give in Abington, Pa., Obama links the jobs report to Thursday night's vice presidential debate.

"You know, there were a lot of noteworthy moments in that debate, but there’s one that sticks out this morning. It’s when Governor Palin said to Joe Biden that our plan to get our economy out of the ditch was somehow a job killing plan," Obama plans to say, according to prepared remarks released by his campaign.

"I wonder if she turned on the news this morning. Because it was just reported that America has experienced its ninth straight month of job loss. Just since January, we’ve lost more than 750,000 jobs across America, 7,000 in Pennsylvania alone. This is the economy that John McCain said – just two weeks ago – was fundamentally strong. This is the economy that my opponent said made great progress under the policies of George W. Bush. And those are the economic policies that he proposes to continue for another four years.

"So when Senator McCain and his running mate talk about job killing, that’s something they know a thing or two about. Because the policies they’re supporting are killing jobs every single day."

McCain's statement: "Today's report of another 159,000 lost jobs confirms what America's working men and women have understood for months: our nation's economy is on the wrong track. It is imperative that Congress act to address the financial crisis while protecting taxpayers and being good stewards of their dollars. But we must do more. America's middle class needs help from a government that is truly standing on their side and not in their way. I am committed to getting to the roots of this crisis -- reforming Washington and cleaning up the mess created by the greed and crony capitalism of government-backed mortgage giants -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I will reverse out-of-control spending, end the wasteful and corrupting practice of earmarks, and get the government budget back to balance. I will reform health care to control costs and better serve American families, open markets around the globe for our products, cut taxes, and expand domestic production of energy to eliminate the ability of international oil markets to hold our economy hostage. I will create jobs and get the economy on the right track.

"Unlike Senator Obama, I do not believe we will create one single American job by increasing taxes, going on a massive spending binge, and closing off markets. Our nation cannot afford Senator Obama's higher taxes."


This afternoon, McCain's campaign launched a spot on accusing Obama of dishonesty calling himself a tax cutter.

"He's not truthful on taxes," the announcer says, citing the campaign's claim that Obama voted to raise taxes or voted against reducing them a total of 94 times.

That claim, however, has been declared misleading by independent fact-checking groups, who say it implies that Obama wanted to raise taxes across-the-board, when he has voted consistently to raise taxes on the wealthy but not on lower- and middle-income taxpayers.

“While the McCain campaign continues to feel no shame in repeating one of the most discredited lies of the election, their own candidate is offering a health care plan that will actually tax people’s benefits for the very first time. Barack Obama will cut taxes for 95% of workers and their families and make health care affordable and available for every single American,” said Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor.


UPDATE: This evening, the Obama campaign hit back with a web ad knocking down the 94 tax vote figure.

"McCain and his surrogates have continued to make this claim despite numerous independent fact checkers confirming that it is 'false' and 'phony,' " said a statement with the announcer-less ad. "What John McCain won’t tell you is that using the same absurd and dishonest method of calculation employed by his campaign, he voted for 105 tax increases since 2005 and at least 477 tax increases since he entered Congress."

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

All these politicians are scumbags. Barney Frank should be completely ashamed of himself. This election I will be voting every single incumbent out of office, EVERY ONE, no matter what party they belong to.

Posted by BostonResident October 3, 08 12:43 PM
.

How can you say Americans just woke up to the job loss news this morning? Americans are the ones losing their jobs and homes. It is Washington that just woke up to the job loss, but there is nothing they can or will do to stop it. He says that McCain supports tax breaks for companies that send jobs overseas, but I would like to see Obama's voting record on those same breaks. He has wholeheartedly supported this bailout bill that many people don't realize will go to bailout companies who aren't even based in this country. We are giving money to foreign companies whose profits aren't reported here. Why are the American people paying for this? Where is the rest of the world? How do we get stuck with all their crap? We need real change and that can't just come with the president.

Posted by Revolution in the air October 3, 08 12:50 PM
.

I've emailed both about the job situation and neither has responded to me.

Posted by LittleEthel October 3, 08 12:56 PM
.

Clinton raised taxes and created more than 22 million new jobs.

Bush cut taxes and created 5 million new jobs (and falling).

Posted by lnmonster October 3, 08 01:41 PM
.

It boggles my mind that McCain continues to distort Obama's tax plan saying that it will " raise taxes". Yes, it will raise taxes, for the RICH! The rest of us get a break. McCain is lowering taxes, sure, for the big corporations that recklessly toss people's investments around like they were playing craps in Vegas.

Posted by democraddict October 3, 08 01:56 PM
.

Don't forget the large increase in job loss during September was caused by 2 hurricanes. Gustov alone created over $22 billion dollars in loss along the Gulf Coast

Posted by Dennis M October 3, 08 03:40 PM
.

But if Obama does win, then what? Surely it is not too early to ask.

Could Obama unify the country? During a crisis that Obama called the worst since the Great Depression, he said, "Call me if you need me." Is he The Fonz kind of leader who wants to breeze into a scene and - with appearing cool as his top priority - make a smooth speech and then float out the door, leaving the dirty, uncool work to others?

Would Obama appoint "rivals" to his cabinet? Would Obama ask Hillary Clinton to be secretary of something? Or would Michelle Obama veto that idea, as she reportedly did regarding Hillary for VP?


Obama wouldn't echo Bill Clinton in saying he wants his cabinet to "look like America." But would he appoint cabinet members who think like America - people of divergent views, including those who'd challenge liberal orthodoxy?


Posted by repubdad October 3, 08 04:05 PM
.

The change we need for Affirmative Action:
-Non-Blacks holding low level to mid level management jobs will be looking for new work when the new Obama Affirmative Action Program is enacted.
-Grades will no longer matter to get into college.
-No more Union Secret Ballot
-Racial Quotas for Union Jobs
Obama won't play the White Mans Game.

Posted by Larry Jenson October 15, 08 12:38 AM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 12:43 a.m.)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Afghanistan wary of US plan to send more advisers

Afghan officials have begun to push back from the Obama administration's plans to send hundreds of advisers to the country, complaining the Americans are often overpaid, underqualified, and unfamiliar with the culture of the country. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Earmarks’ cash flow lifts firms, lobbyists, lawmakers

16 defense-related firms in Massachusetts have secured nearly $30 million in federal funding in next year's defense appropriations bill pending in Congress. The tally offers a lesson in the practice known as congressional earmarking, in which lawmakers direct federal money to specific projects, usually in their districts. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Mass. keeps an eye on US bill’s funding ban

Massachusetts officials are closely monitoring an abortion funding ban in the sweeping health care legislation before Congress to make sure that it does not restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the state. (Globe Staff, 11/11/09)

Survey raises new doubts on military’s ‘don’t ask’ policy

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration received more research yesterday to help make its case for allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces. (Globe Staff, 11/10/09)

Lieberman’s threat of filibuster looms large

When a recent conversation among Senate centrists turned to insurance company antitrust concerns, Joe Lieberman boasted of his bona fides: As Connecticut attorney general in the 1980s, he sued the industry. (Globe Correspondent, 11/9/09)

Health care headache for House Democrats

WASHINGTON - Democratic House leaders scrambled to round up enough support yesterday for their sweeping health care overhaul, getting last-minute help from White House advisers on the eve of a historic vote scheduled for today. (Globe Staff, 11/7/09)

Health care opponents intensify late attack

WASHINGTON - The sweeping health care overhaul package before Congress is under an 11th-hour attack over a pair of emotional issues, abortion and immigration, that are complicating Democrats’ efforts to piece together the coalition they need to pass the bill. (Globe Staff, 11/6/09)
archives