< Back to Front Page Text size +

Joint chiefs chairman warns on speedy Iraq exit

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor November 17, 2008 04:48 PM

By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON -- President-elect Barack Obama's signature campaign promise to withdraw US troops from Iraq in 16 months appears to be on a collision course with the nation's top military brass if comments today from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are any indication.

In his first press conference since the election, Admiral Mike Mullen this afternoon said he believes the soonest all US forces could be safely withdrawn from Iraq is "two to three years."

"We have 150,000 troops in Iraq right now," the nation's top military officer told reporters at the Pentagon. "We have lots of bases. We have an awful lot of equipment that's there. And so we would have to look at all of that [and] the security conditions that are there. And clearly we'd want to be able to do it safely."

Mullen, who has completed the first year of a two-year term, has long supported drawing down US troops only as security improvements warrant and has repeatedly warned against setting a date certain to end the US military commitment.

Today's comments, however, indicate that he is preparing to caution the incoming president -- with whom aides say he has already held at least one conversation -- against a speedy withdrawal.

"I certainly understand there are other options," Mullen said. "And it's something that we look at all the time. But at the same time....from the military's perspective, I think it's best to be conditions-based."

On the campaign trail Obama said he would consult his top military advisers before ordering a withdrawal from Iraq, but also made withdrawing most US combat troops within 16 months of taking office a centerpiece of his presidential bid. Any backsliding on his pledge would likely provoke an outcry from anti-war Democrats -- one of his key political constituencies.

But Obama's own countrymen -- in or out of uniform -- may not prove to be the biggest roadblock to realizing his plan to end the war in Iraq and divert more military resources to Afghanistan.

A Status of Forces Agreement between the United States and Iraq recently approved by the Bush administration and the Iraqi cabinet calls for the removal of US troops by the end of 2011. Once approved by the Iraqi Parliament, which began debate on the measure today, it cannot be changed by either side for at least a year, according to Article 31 of the draft agreement.

Democratic lawmakers including Representative William Delahunt of Quincy fear the clause "may effectively tie the hands of the next administration." Delahunt plans to convene a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee to review the accord on Wednesday.

  • CommentComment
  • Email Email

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

.

The first in a long string of undeliverable campaign promises??

Just like I'm still waiting for my deval promised property tax relieve....

Posted by Neil November 17, 08 06:35 PM
.

Who cares what the brass say? They haven't told the truth yet. Get the troops home NOW!!!

Posted by ron November 17, 08 07:20 PM
.

The withdrawal is a political decision which is not in the purview of military commanders.

Posted by frank schmitz November 17, 08 08:04 PM
.

Can you just try, TRY not to be so damn cynical. Uggh. You just can't wait to be disappointed, can you? Life is complicated. We don't all get what we want instantaneously.

Posted by kds November 17, 08 08:45 PM
.

It's going to take years to get out of this quagmire. Obama voted against the war and now must clean up after Bush on numerous fronts, not just Iraq. What a disaster these last eight years have been. What a squandering of resources, innocent life and America's reputation as a leader of the free world.

Few presidents beside Lincoln and Roosevelt have inherited a bigger mess than Obama. We should be wishing the man well, yet millions on the Right are already calling for his head. For crying out loud, the man isn't even President. It's hateful, backward (racist in some cases) and pathetic. I thought we were a better country than that.

Posted by Rudderman November 17, 08 09:47 PM
.

Sixteen months is the middle of 2010, plenty of time. If this guy can't do it, well, he serves at the President's pleasure. Find someone who can.

The status of forces agreement? Unless ratified by the Senate, it does not tie the President's hands.

Posted by lovable liberal November 17, 08 10:44 PM
.

....And if Iraq wants one of our soldiers after 2011 THEY can pay for it!!!!!

Calling this an "undeliverable campaign promise" is absurd. The Bush administration just gave away any bargaining position the United Stated and President-elect Obama might have had.

Posted by Roger November 17, 08 10:49 PM
.

you wouldn't have enough space to put all the promises GW broke Neil. Just enjoy some new and competent government instead of crying before Obama even gets into office.

Posted by JB November 18, 08 10:13 AM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Afghanistan wary of US plan to send more advisers

Afghan officials have begun to push back from the Obama administration's plans to send hundreds of advisers to the country, complaining the Americans are often overpaid, underqualified, and unfamiliar with the culture of the country. (Globe Staff, 2:15 a.m.)

Mass. keeps an eye on US bill’s funding ban

Massachusetts officials are closely monitoring an abortion funding ban in the sweeping health care legislation before Congress to make sure that it does not restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the state. (Globe Staff, 11/11/09)

Survey raises new doubts on military’s ‘don’t ask’ policy

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration received more research yesterday to help make its case for allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces. (Globe Staff, 11/10/09)

Lieberman’s threat of filibuster looms large

When a recent conversation among Senate centrists turned to insurance company antitrust concerns, Joe Lieberman boasted of his bona fides: As Connecticut attorney general in the 1980s, he sued the industry. (Globe Correspondent, 11/9/09)

Health care headache for House Democrats

WASHINGTON - Democratic House leaders scrambled to round up enough support yesterday for their sweeping health care overhaul, getting last-minute help from White House advisers on the eve of a historic vote scheduled for today. (Globe Staff, 11/7/09)

Patrick wraps up two-day visit to Washington

WASHINGTON - Governor Deval Patrick swept through Washington yesterday, wrapping up a two-day tour to advance the state’s interests in health care, economic development, and transportation - a trip that also let him showcase his access to the city’s most powerful Democrats, including President Obama. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)

Health care opponents intensify late attack

WASHINGTON - The sweeping health care overhaul package before Congress is under an 11th-hour attack over a pair of emotional issues, abortion and immigration, that are complicating Democrats’ efforts to piece together the coalition they need to pass the bill. (Globe Staff, 11/6/09)

Public’s opinions of health care overhaul efforts have familiar ring

Americans’ opinion of the health care proposals now before Congress is eerily similar to public sentiment about the Clinton health reform initiatives in 1994, according to an analysis published online yesterday in The New England Journal of Medicine - and that may not bode well for Democrats. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)

Frank reconsiders legislation after worry raised on loopholes

House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, under fire from some fellow Democrats and consumer groups for carving out what they call loopholes in legislation designed to prevent another economic meltdown, said in a letter released last night that “there may be a problem here’’ and that he wants to reconsider. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)

Moderate Democrats fear shift to GOP

Democratic moderates who will determine the fate of much of President Obama’s domestic agenda heard an early warning from this week’s off-year elections: Congress had better do something about the economy, or sitting lawmakers will lose their jobs in 2010. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)
archives

browse this blog

by category