< Back to Front Page Text size +

Joint chiefs chairman warns on speedy Iraq exit

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor November 17, 2008 04:48 PM

By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON -- President-elect Barack Obama's signature campaign promise to withdraw US troops from Iraq in 16 months appears to be on a collision course with the nation's top military brass if comments today from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are any indication.

In his first press conference since the election, Admiral Mike Mullen this afternoon said he believes the soonest all US forces could be safely withdrawn from Iraq is "two to three years."

"We have 150,000 troops in Iraq right now," the nation's top military officer told reporters at the Pentagon. "We have lots of bases. We have an awful lot of equipment that's there. And so we would have to look at all of that [and] the security conditions that are there. And clearly we'd want to be able to do it safely."

Mullen, who has completed the first year of a two-year term, has long supported drawing down US troops only as security improvements warrant and has repeatedly warned against setting a date certain to end the US military commitment.

Today's comments, however, indicate that he is preparing to caution the incoming president -- with whom aides say he has already held at least one conversation -- against a speedy withdrawal.

"I certainly understand there are other options," Mullen said. "And it's something that we look at all the time. But at the same time....from the military's perspective, I think it's best to be conditions-based."

On the campaign trail Obama said he would consult his top military advisers before ordering a withdrawal from Iraq, but also made withdrawing most US combat troops within 16 months of taking office a centerpiece of his presidential bid. Any backsliding on his pledge would likely provoke an outcry from anti-war Democrats -- one of his key political constituencies.

But Obama's own countrymen -- in or out of uniform -- may not prove to be the biggest roadblock to realizing his plan to end the war in Iraq and divert more military resources to Afghanistan.

A Status of Forces Agreement between the United States and Iraq recently approved by the Bush administration and the Iraqi cabinet calls for the removal of US troops by the end of 2011. Once approved by the Iraqi Parliament, which began debate on the measure today, it cannot be changed by either side for at least a year, according to Article 31 of the draft agreement.

Democratic lawmakers including Representative William Delahunt of Quincy fear the clause "may effectively tie the hands of the next administration." Delahunt plans to convene a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee to review the accord on Wednesday.

  • CommentComment
  • Email Email

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

.

The first in a long string of undeliverable campaign promises??

Just like I'm still waiting for my deval promised property tax relieve....

Posted by Neil November 17, 08 06:35 PM
.

Who cares what the brass say? They haven't told the truth yet. Get the troops home NOW!!!

Posted by ron November 17, 08 07:20 PM
.

The withdrawal is a political decision which is not in the purview of military commanders.

Posted by frank schmitz November 17, 08 08:04 PM
.

Can you just try, TRY not to be so damn cynical. Uggh. You just can't wait to be disappointed, can you? Life is complicated. We don't all get what we want instantaneously.

Posted by kds November 17, 08 08:45 PM
.

It's going to take years to get out of this quagmire. Obama voted against the war and now must clean up after Bush on numerous fronts, not just Iraq. What a disaster these last eight years have been. What a squandering of resources, innocent life and America's reputation as a leader of the free world.

Few presidents beside Lincoln and Roosevelt have inherited a bigger mess than Obama. We should be wishing the man well, yet millions on the Right are already calling for his head. For crying out loud, the man isn't even President. It's hateful, backward (racist in some cases) and pathetic. I thought we were a better country than that.

Posted by Rudderman November 17, 08 09:47 PM
.

Sixteen months is the middle of 2010, plenty of time. If this guy can't do it, well, he serves at the President's pleasure. Find someone who can.

The status of forces agreement? Unless ratified by the Senate, it does not tie the President's hands.

Posted by lovable liberal November 17, 08 10:44 PM
.

....And if Iraq wants one of our soldiers after 2011 THEY can pay for it!!!!!

Calling this an "undeliverable campaign promise" is absurd. The Bush administration just gave away any bargaining position the United Stated and President-elect Obama might have had.

Posted by Roger November 17, 08 10:49 PM
.

you wouldn't have enough space to put all the promises GW broke Neil. Just enjoy some new and competent government instead of crying before Obama even gets into office.

Posted by JB November 18, 08 10:13 AM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Declassification of secret documents to be delayed

WASHINGTON - President Obama will maintain a lid of secrecy on millions of pages of military and intelligence documents that were scheduled to be declassified by the end of the year, according to administration officials. (Globe Staff, 12:25 a.m.)

Tax break on profits again in jeopardy

An effort in Congress to eliminate a generous tax break for hedge fund managers, private-equity specialists, and venture capitalists, which could be taken up next week in the House Ways and Means Committee, is being met with resistance by opponents who say the move would weaken the economy. (Globe Staff, 11/26/09)

In N.E. governors’ races, GOP sees a chance to build on gains

Invigorated by state house victories earlier this month in Virginia and New Jersey, Republicans are turning their attention to governorships in New England, where they believe the retirement of four incumbents and a competitive race in Massachusetts has created wide-open opportunities. (Globe Correspondent, 11/25/09)

Senators voice optimism on public option

WASHINGTON - Buoyed by their weekend victory on a vote beginning the health care debate, several Senate Democrats expressed optimism yesterday they could find a way to keep a government-run insurance plan in the sweeping bill. (Globe Staff, 11/23/09)

Health overhaul narrowly advances

The Senate narrowly overcame the first of two critical hurdles to passing sweeping health care legislation last night, mustering the minimum of 60 votes required to begin debate on the bill and opening a volatile floor fight likely to last weeks. (Globe Staff 11/22/09)

Latinos, blacks take harder hit amid recession

Latinos and African-Americans in Massachusetts and across the country are facing high unemployment rates that could spiral to levels not seen in decades as the jobless economic recovery drags on, analysts and urban community advocates say. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Some lawmakers push back Catholic church on health care bill

Representative Louise Slaughter has a consistent record advocating abortion rights. So the New York Democrat was stunned recently to receive, for the first time, a letter from a Catholic diocese in western New York, demanding that she explain her vote this month against a health care amendment prohibiting insurance companies from paying for abortions. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Support wanes for curbs on credit-card interest rates

Efforts in Congress to cap credit-card interest rates are faltering because of opposition from Democrats and a lack of specific support from the White House, despite growing consumer outrage over a rush by banks to impose rates as high as 30 percent. (Globe Staff, 11/19/09)

Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort

Despite early pleas for bipartisanship, President Obama is forging ahead with his domestic agenda with a largely single-party strategy, unable to corral more than a handful of Republicans on a wide range of major legislation before Congress. (Globe Staff, 11/17/09)

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 11/14/09)
archives

browse this blog

by category