Joint chiefs chairman warns on speedy Iraq exit
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- President-elect Barack Obama's signature campaign promise to withdraw US troops from Iraq in 16 months appears to be on a collision course with the nation's top military brass if comments today from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are any indication.
In his first press conference since the election, Admiral Mike Mullen this afternoon said he believes the soonest all US forces could be safely withdrawn from Iraq is "two to three years."
"We have 150,000 troops in Iraq right now," the nation's top military officer told reporters at the Pentagon. "We have lots of bases. We have an awful lot of equipment that's there. And so we would have to look at all of that [and] the security conditions that are there. And clearly we'd want to be able to do it safely."
Mullen, who has completed the first year of a two-year term, has long supported drawing down US troops only as security improvements warrant and has repeatedly warned against setting a date certain to end the US military commitment.
Today's comments, however, indicate that he is preparing to caution the incoming president -- with whom aides say he has already held at least one conversation -- against a speedy withdrawal.
"I certainly understand there are other options," Mullen said. "And it's something that we look at all the time. But at the same time....from the military's perspective, I think it's best to be conditions-based."
On the campaign trail Obama said he would consult his top military advisers before ordering a withdrawal from Iraq, but also made withdrawing most US combat troops within 16 months of taking office a centerpiece of his presidential bid. Any backsliding on his pledge would likely provoke an outcry from anti-war Democrats -- one of his key political constituencies.
But Obama's own countrymen -- in or out of uniform -- may not prove to be the biggest roadblock to realizing his plan to end the war in Iraq and divert more military resources to Afghanistan.
A Status of Forces Agreement between the United States and Iraq recently approved by the Bush administration and the Iraqi cabinet calls for the removal of US troops by the end of 2011. Once approved by the Iraqi Parliament, which began debate on the measure today, it cannot be changed by either side for at least a year, according to Article 31 of the draft agreement.
Democratic lawmakers including Representative William Delahunt of Quincy fear the clause "may effectively tie the hands of the next administration." Delahunt plans to convene a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee to review the accord on Wednesday.
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
About Political Intelligence

News from the Washington Bureau








The first in a long string of undeliverable campaign promises??
Just like I'm still waiting for my deval promised property tax relieve....
Who cares what the brass say? They haven't told the truth yet. Get the troops home NOW!!!
The withdrawal is a political decision which is not in the purview of military commanders.
Can you just try, TRY not to be so damn cynical. Uggh. You just can't wait to be disappointed, can you? Life is complicated. We don't all get what we want instantaneously.
It's going to take years to get out of this quagmire. Obama voted against the war and now must clean up after Bush on numerous fronts, not just Iraq. What a disaster these last eight years have been. What a squandering of resources, innocent life and America's reputation as a leader of the free world.
Few presidents beside Lincoln and Roosevelt have inherited a bigger mess than Obama. We should be wishing the man well, yet millions on the Right are already calling for his head. For crying out loud, the man isn't even President. It's hateful, backward (racist in some cases) and pathetic. I thought we were a better country than that.
Sixteen months is the middle of 2010, plenty of time. If this guy can't do it, well, he serves at the President's pleasure. Find someone who can.
The status of forces agreement? Unless ratified by the Senate, it does not tie the President's hands.
....And if Iraq wants one of our soldiers after 2011 THEY can pay for it!!!!!
Calling this an "undeliverable campaign promise" is absurd. The Bush administration just gave away any bargaining position the United Stated and President-elect Obama might have had.
you wouldn't have enough space to put all the promises GW broke Neil. Just enjoy some new and competent government instead of crying before Obama even gets into office.