< Back to Front Page Text size +

Romney stumping for McCain, not looking ahead

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor November 2, 2008 07:43 PM

By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff

MARION, Iowa -- Wherever he goes in the campaign's final days, Mitt Romney dismisses the pleas of supporters like Carmen Halverson, a white-haired Republican activist with a big Romney button pinned to her red corduroy blazer.

"We want you to run again," she said today as he pulled her in for a hug at the local McCain headquarters in this town near Cedar Rapids.

"Oh, no," Romney said with a practiced smile, patting her on the arm. "We're going to get John McCain elected, and then we're going to get him reelected, that's what we're going to do."

Romney has spent the last three days racing across the country, dispatched on a private Learjet by the McCain campaign to rally Republican ground troops and speak with local reporters in nine swing states, from Nevada to New Hampshire. It is an extension of the work the former Massachusetts governor has been doing since he lost the nomination to the Arizona senator in February -- headlining fund-raisers for McCain, Republican groups, and more than three dozen congressional candidates; donating more than $400,000 through his political action committee to McCain and other candidates; and serving as one of McCain's most active surrogates.

At each stop over the weekend, he warned that Barack Obama and congressional Democrats would further damage the country's economy with higher taxes, while McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin, would strengthen it by hewing to Republican principles of lower taxes, lower spending and a strong military.

"Barack Obama said he was only going to raise taxes on people earning over $250,000, then he slipped up and said $200,000, and then Joe Biden slipped up and said $150,000, and then I understand Governor Richardson slipped up and said yesterday $120,000," he told a boisterous crowd of about 300 outside Denver on Saturday night. "Do I hear $80,000? Do I hear $70,000?"

Many of his supporters were eager to hear about his future political plans, but Romney would not engage in the speculation. "I'm not thinking about that," he said, asked about the possibility he might try again in four years if McCain loses tomorrow. "I'm thinking about what's going to happen to the country."

This is partly good manners and partly, it seems, a genuine respect for the truth in the old cliche that timing is everything. He marvels at how the big campaign issues have changed over the last two years: immigration, Iraq, and now the economy.

Some of his supporters sigh at what might have been if the economic crisis had happened a year ago, or if Romney had been McCain's vice presidential choice.

"I've had a lot of people tell me they wish they had another name on the ticket," Tim Palmer, 47, a supporter from Cedar Rapids, told Romney as he drove his small entourage to lunch at a barbecue joint.

Palmer said later he hopes Romney will run again. "His economic toolbox is stronger than anyone's I can imagine."

But even if McCain loses Tuesday, the possibility of Romney running again has become more complicated now that Palin has emerged as a rival. Though polls show she is a drag on the Republican ticket, the Alaska governor has energized the Republican base, and even some of his strongest supporters say they have been charmed.

At Mr. Biggs Family Fun Center in deeply conservative Colorado Springs, Colo., where Romney beat McCain by 40 percentage points in the Republican caucus, hundreds of people turned out to hear him campaign for McCain in the middle of a beautiful Saturday afternoon. People cheered wildly when he walked out on stage and seemed to hang on his every word.

But the room was awash in Palin signs and stickers. Debbi Maser, who was selling political buttons in the back of the room, said while she'd sold only two Romney buttons, seven varieties of Palin buttons were going fast. "Everybody loves Palin," she said with a smile.

Her husband Jim Maser said he is a huge fan of Romney's and voted for him in the caucus, but he's now gunning for a Palin run in 2012 if the ticket doesn't win tomorrow.

"Sarah Palin -- she's one of us," he said. "Not that Mitt isn't, but to me, Palin has intangible characteristics that [Ronald] Reagan had."

Some supporters beg Romney to serve in a McCain cabinet -- perhaps as treasury secretary. But Romney puts them off, too; his father served unhappily as head of Housing and Urban Development in the Nixon administration, and he has no desire to follow in his footsteps.

Instead, Romney says he hopes to find a way to work from the outside, perhaps by working with think tanks, going on the lecture circuit, and writing opinion articles, on the issues he cares about such as reforming Medicare.

"I'd love to get my hands into it, I really would," he said in an interview.

He says he won't decide until after the election, but next week, he is going on a Caribbean cruise, sponsored by National Review magazine, where conservative thinkers will gather to talk about the party's future.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

I would like to comment on the raising of taxes by Dems.
- Let's talk about the national debt by Republicans. Let's talk of the devalue of the dollar . Paying taxes is bad, but the devalue of the dollar is worse. Everyone knows when they pay taxes cause you write out a check, but the devalue of the dollar is subtle. The American family income is so devalued that it is difficult to live, much less get ahead.
Why is it that the Republcans can't be financially accountable when they are in power. This seems to happen when the Pubs are in control. The Republicans don't raise taxes,but they drive us into enormous debt and then walk away from it to make the Dems try to balance it. The Republcans are not good managers of the tax dollar.

Posted by Ed Patrick November 2, 08 08:26 PM
.

To think McCain could have gotten the polygamist vote by choosing Romney. All those wives, all those votes!

Posted by ericmiami November 2, 08 08:42 PM
.

I'd like to see a man ( or woman ) run who is truly Conservative. Sorry but you can't hold liberal views anywhere and be considered Conservative with me. and that includes "handsome rich boy" Romney. Just another elete MT suit with no ethics...

Posted by Fred November 2, 08 08:43 PM
.

Oh, gee. Who really cares what Romney thinks? The election is Tuesday! He and his fans need to get over it. All that should be coming out of his mouth is "McCain/Palin".

Posted by R. Williams November 2, 08 08:55 PM
.

Go Mitt GO

Posted by carl slicer, blog editor, www.VernonGop.com November 2, 08 08:59 PM
.

I am a diehard Hillary Rodham Clinton VOTER. On WEDNESDAY, I VOTED for John McCain and Sarah Palin, with honor. John McCain and Sarah Palin is the CANDIDATES that will turn America Around and Get America Back on Track with Opportunities for all People, Reform Washington Government, Keep America Safe, NOT SPREAD THE WEALTH and focus on the needs of All People.
GO--JOHN MCCAIN!!!
GO--SARAH PALIN!!!!!
ROMNEY IS A GREAT PERSON.......WONDERFUL SECRETARY OF STATE.

VOTE - JOHN MCCAIN and SARAH PALIN!!!!!!!

Posted by Blondshag November 2, 08 09:00 PM
.

If Sarah Palin turns on the republican party, then it is one sick party

Posted by GTTTRADES November 2, 08 09:08 PM
.

Your anecdotal stories seem to ignore the newsweek poll which had Romney beating Palin by large amounts of both traditional, total and family values Republicans.

Don't know why you would choose the anecdotal over the empirical.

Posted by Jason November 2, 08 09:08 PM
.

I have a feeling that Palinmania will subside as folks realize she simply isn't qualified. I also have a feeling that we are going to need Governor Romney more than ever by 2012.

There's just no way Palin can compete with Romney or Jindal in experience, intelligence, leadership, character, knowledge of the issues or articulation. Good looks and winks aren't going to cut it.

Posted by Pamela November 2, 08 09:17 PM
.

I tend to lean toward the Republican viewpoint in politics, and will vote for Romney; howver, I would have voted for a conservative Democrat if one had been to my liking. McCain it will be, for me!

At first I was going to vote for Barack Obama; then when I saw his liberal leanings I knew it wasn't for me. I can't understand why there's so many rats in that party.
On the other hand I guess that's why they are called DOMOC-RATS!

Posted by Paul E.Tooley Sr November 2, 08 10:53 PM
.

parentsagainstpalin.blogspot.com

–parents and guardians against palin unite!

(a non-partisan appeal)

Posted by notpalin November 2, 08 10:54 PM
.

Romney is terrific on the Today show. I wish he were the nominee, just as I wish Hilary Clinton were the nominee for the Democratice Party. Then we have real choices. Obama and McCain are both horrible candidates. We are choosing between a stone and a hard rock. I would consider McCain to be the lesser of two evils. The media said this is the most exciting election for a long time. I think this is the worse election I have ever seen. I hope this time the pendulum has swung far enough that the voters are disgusted enough that we have a real election the next time around, without Hollywood with its stinking culture and marketing machine.

Posted by mk November 3, 08 08:24 AM
.

THE BLONDSHAG COMMENTS ARE RIGHT ON--I DID THE SAME THING--A VOTE FOR MCCAIN -PALIN TICKET IS THE TRUE ANSWER FOR AMERICA AT THIS TIME. REMEMBER --PALIN IS MORE QUALIFIED THAN obama --SHE HAS BILLS FROM ALASKA WITH HER SIGNATURE.--HE WON THE SENATE SEAT AND DECIDED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT--WHERE IS HIS SIGNATURE--CHECKS TO ACORN???

Posted by FEEDBACK November 3, 08 10:26 AM
.

Romney/Jindal 2012!!!

The smartest men in ANY room.

Posted by SED November 3, 08 12:25 PM
.

With this economic mess right now, Romney's religion doesn't matter as much anymore, does it?
I still can't believe people voted for McCain over Romney. Do people even look at these guys on TV or know what they have done or stand for? I guess I will vote for McCain tomorrow b/c it's a vote against Obama, but I'm not that excited about it.

Posted by Jordan November 3, 08 04:58 PM
.

I should have said DEMOC-RATS!

Posted by Paul E.Tooley Sr March 15, 09 06:01 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 12:43 a.m.)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Afghanistan wary of US plan to send more advisers

Afghan officials have begun to push back from the Obama administration's plans to send hundreds of advisers to the country, complaining the Americans are often overpaid, underqualified, and unfamiliar with the culture of the country. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Earmarks’ cash flow lifts firms, lobbyists, lawmakers

16 defense-related firms in Massachusetts have secured nearly $30 million in federal funding in next year's defense appropriations bill pending in Congress. The tally offers a lesson in the practice known as congressional earmarking, in which lawmakers direct federal money to specific projects, usually in their districts. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Mass. keeps an eye on US bill’s funding ban

Massachusetts officials are closely monitoring an abortion funding ban in the sweeping health care legislation before Congress to make sure that it does not restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the state. (Globe Staff, 11/11/09)

Survey raises new doubts on military’s ‘don’t ask’ policy

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration received more research yesterday to help make its case for allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces. (Globe Staff, 11/10/09)

Lieberman’s threat of filibuster looms large

When a recent conversation among Senate centrists turned to insurance company antitrust concerns, Joe Lieberman boasted of his bona fides: As Connecticut attorney general in the 1980s, he sued the industry. (Globe Correspondent, 11/9/09)

Health care headache for House Democrats

WASHINGTON - Democratic House leaders scrambled to round up enough support yesterday for their sweeping health care overhaul, getting last-minute help from White House advisers on the eve of a historic vote scheduled for today. (Globe Staff, 11/7/09)

Health care opponents intensify late attack

WASHINGTON - The sweeping health care overhaul package before Congress is under an 11th-hour attack over a pair of emotional issues, abortion and immigration, that are complicating Democrats’ efforts to piece together the coalition they need to pass the bill. (Globe Staff, 11/6/09)
archives