< Back to Front Page Text size +

'Voters' in Malden weigh candy against more firetrucks

Posted by Jason Tuohey November 4, 2008 07:45 AM


Video by Scott LaPierre / Globe Staff

MALDEN – After some initial chaos, the election went off without incident. One by one, the long line of little voters inched towards the booth.

Would it be Miss Froggy, or Mr. Lion?

The amphibian promised more candy and ice cream shops and more slides and swings at playgrounds. Her maned competitor promised more police and better fire engines and promised that everybody would feel safer in their homes. In the end, Miss Froggy prevailed, with 21 votes to Mr. Lion's 14.

The wonder isn't that Froggy won, but that Lion got any votes at all. These voters were 4 years old, after all: At that age, seeing beyond the candy requires immense maturity.

Amazingly, they show it every year, says Carol Wishoski, who runs the Rockland Montessori School in Malden. She has been holding these elections every November for 17 years, and she says that a lot of times, the public safety candidate even trumps the sugar-pusher.

"We all thought that a candidate who ran on their level would have a landslide every time," she says. "It's shocking, More often than not, they've voted responsibly."

--YVONNE ABRAHAM

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

STUPID

Posted by typical white person. November 4, 08 08:53 AM
.

Two candidates that are puppets of the same system--that was good training for actual American democracy!

Posted by j November 4, 08 09:42 AM
.

I wonder if the teacher has tried switching the animals' genders and making the contest between Miss Lion and Mister Froggy. I noticed her low voice and less hyper tone when Mr. Lion was "speaking," and couldn't help wondering if/how gender was at play.

Posted by AmyA November 4, 08 09:42 AM
.

"How happy are you?"
"...............ten happy"

hahaha, great piece!

Posted by Dan L. November 4, 08 09:46 AM
.

My daughter actually goes to Rockland and it is a GREAT preschool. She was very excited about voting. Let's not try to point out why the teacher talked in a different tone. Let's applaud the effort to make our children more aware of the life ahead of them and the important things that will impact their lives.

Posted by deweka621 November 4, 08 10:38 AM
.

I went there in 1977. It looks the same. I'm impressed with how the teacher did not try to proselytize the children into being liberal democrats. The Malden Public Schools waited until I was in 1st grade to do that.

Posted by PDiddy November 4, 08 11:01 AM
.

More kids want the kind of candidate they can have candy with.

Posted by Alexa November 4, 08 11:33 AM
.

What is wrong with this town? Gender roles in preschool puppet voting? It's a lion and lizard and the teacher is entertaining them...maybe we should use the voice of the lady on the T who announces which train is arriving next in the same monotone voice. Kids will throw themselves in front of the slide at recess but at least their votes won't be biased. If we're going to socially deconstruct four year olds voting then lets get to it: OK, so the lizard is obviously a symbol of islamic fundamentalism, and the lion is global warming. The "teacher" if any god fearing evolutionist has the temerity to call her/him/it self that is most likely a member of the union and this entire effort is most likely just the working class oligarchy trying to impose a narrative of Milton Keynes style Swiss Marxism in complicit collaboration with "firefighters" and "police officers" (read hippies and polygamists) all at the expense of big candy. I heard the candy they offered to those who voted before nap time was actaully four years old and had lost all its taste. The Reeses Peanut Butter Cups were all melted and the Skittles had all turned into the same color (orange). All this is beside the point as the whole exercise is just another example of false choices perpetually purported on the pliable minds of uneducated voters. Everyone knows that a sufficient candy supply is the number one deterent of violent crime and that gingerbread houses don't burn, they just turn a delicious golden brown.

Posted by Michael November 4, 08 12:05 PM
.

wait till the ones that voted for miss froggy all grow up and turn OBESE and go on disability and call the emergency services cause they cant get theyre FAT arse up off the floor.........

Posted by hhrth November 4, 08 06:20 PM
.

That is adorable, especially the very cute, amazingly smart kid in the orange shirt voting for Mr. Lion.

Posted by Michael's Grandma November 7, 08 04:40 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Afghanistan wary of US plan to send more advisers

Afghan officials have begun to push back from the Obama administration's plans to send hundreds of advisers to the country, complaining the Americans are often overpaid, underqualified, and unfamiliar with the culture of the country. (Globe Staff, 2:15 a.m.)

Mass. keeps an eye on US bill’s funding ban

Massachusetts officials are closely monitoring an abortion funding ban in the sweeping health care legislation before Congress to make sure that it does not restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the state. (Globe Staff, 11/11/09)

Survey raises new doubts on military’s ‘don’t ask’ policy

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration received more research yesterday to help make its case for allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces. (Globe Staff, 11/10/09)

Lieberman’s threat of filibuster looms large

When a recent conversation among Senate centrists turned to insurance company antitrust concerns, Joe Lieberman boasted of his bona fides: As Connecticut attorney general in the 1980s, he sued the industry. (Globe Correspondent, 11/9/09)

Health care headache for House Democrats

WASHINGTON - Democratic House leaders scrambled to round up enough support yesterday for their sweeping health care overhaul, getting last-minute help from White House advisers on the eve of a historic vote scheduled for today. (Globe Staff, 11/7/09)

Patrick wraps up two-day visit to Washington

WASHINGTON - Governor Deval Patrick swept through Washington yesterday, wrapping up a two-day tour to advance the state’s interests in health care, economic development, and transportation - a trip that also let him showcase his access to the city’s most powerful Democrats, including President Obama. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)

Health care opponents intensify late attack

WASHINGTON - The sweeping health care overhaul package before Congress is under an 11th-hour attack over a pair of emotional issues, abortion and immigration, that are complicating Democrats’ efforts to piece together the coalition they need to pass the bill. (Globe Staff, 11/6/09)

Public’s opinions of health care overhaul efforts have familiar ring

Americans’ opinion of the health care proposals now before Congress is eerily similar to public sentiment about the Clinton health reform initiatives in 1994, according to an analysis published online yesterday in The New England Journal of Medicine - and that may not bode well for Democrats. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)

Frank reconsiders legislation after worry raised on loopholes

House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, under fire from some fellow Democrats and consumer groups for carving out what they call loopholes in legislation designed to prevent another economic meltdown, said in a letter released last night that “there may be a problem here’’ and that he wants to reconsider. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)

Moderate Democrats fear shift to GOP

Democratic moderates who will determine the fate of much of President Obama’s domestic agenda heard an early warning from this week’s off-year elections: Congress had better do something about the economy, or sitting lawmakers will lose their jobs in 2010. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)
archives