< Back to Front Page Text size +

Palin, Huckabee lead GOP field in new poll

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor December 5, 2008 02:11 PM

It's not too early to start handicapping the Republican presidential field for 2012, apparently.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released this afternoon put Sarah Palin, the GOP vice presidential nominee, and Mike Huckabee, who contested the presidential nomination, at the head of the pack.

According to the survey, 67 percent of Republicans said they would be very or somewhat likely to support Palin, the Alaska governor, if she ran, while 65 percent said so of Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor.

Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney comes in third at 61 percent, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani gets 57 percent, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has 52 percent, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has 44 percent, and Florida Governor Charlie Crist gets 32 percent.

Romney and Giuliani ran this time, and along with Gingrich probably benefit from pure name recognition. Jindal and Crist, while popular in the party, are lesser known.

The survey, conducted Monday and Tuesday, has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points among Republican respondents.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

Palin and Huckabee will never become the Republican nominees. I like Palin, but both her and Huckabee are stupid. Really. They both have ver low IQs compared to Romney and the others in the pack, and there's just no way they'll be either the Pres. or VP.

Posted by Steven Rinehart December 5, 08 02:22 PM
.

Now there is a scary threesome!

Posted by tprussik December 5, 08 02:32 PM
.

Couple of observations....

1. Absolute stupidity. Wasnt the election a complete rejection of extreme right wing pandering, and christian craziness? Go ahead and put them up, Dem's will coast to a victory yet again.
2. Is this really the best the Republican party has got?
3. Sarah Palin is still the STUPIDEST politician out there; her stance on everything including Global Warming, Predator Management, etc is nothing short of idiotic.

Posted by Chuck December 5, 08 02:38 PM
.

We haven't started Obama"s term. They can poll all they want but in this rapidly changing world many challenges have yet to be experienced.

I think it's ludicrous to have any discussions about the GOP of the future. Instead of being so concerned about getting back into power,(Isn't that what it's all about?) why don't they ruminate about the mess we're in and try to be constructive.

We're in the biggest mess in our history. Power must be used to solve our crisis.
Huckabee and Palin are irrelevant.

Posted by JJo107 December 5, 08 02:40 PM
.

America deserves better than that.

Posted by WTF December 5, 08 02:40 PM
.

Puh-leeze! One thing we DON'T need is to start the next presidential campaign before the winner of this one even takes office! Everyone just calm down and do the jobs you were elected to do.

Posted by ramona December 5, 08 02:49 PM
.

This has got to be the most depressing news since this morning's jobs report.

Posted by Sam December 5, 08 02:54 PM
.

And of course Romney leads overall when the question is asked of all people, Republican, Independent or Democrat. (Says Zogby.)

My money is on Mitt to come out on top with Palin a likely VP.

Posted by Jed Merrill December 5, 08 03:02 PM
.

Who listens to CNN(Communist News Network).

Posted by PJ December 5, 08 03:30 PM
.

If these creationists, including Jindal, are the best the party has to offer, the party is over. I was a Republican until Nixon and Bush W (unquestionably two of the worst presidents in history). These people are so out of touch with reality, it's scary. Republicans no longer represent America unless you are a religious fanatic, a gun-hugger, a war-monger, global-warming denier, or a hate-filled bigot. Sad to see my former party, revert to the point of absolute embarrassment.

Posted by Rudderman December 5, 08 03:32 PM
.

Are they that desperate ??
It looks like the cast of HEE HAW

Posted by Jake December 5, 08 03:36 PM
.

As a republican I can't stand any of the aforementioned.

How about Ron Paul?

Posted by Frank December 5, 08 03:38 PM
.

i love liberals. Republicans are "stupid" because they do not believe in the global warming hoax? you find me one scientist in favor of it and i will find one that is against it. In the 1970s it was global cooling. now all the nuts have lined up behind global warming...2008 coldest year on record? i must be stupid then.

mccain lost the race, not Palin. He is part of the left leaning "republicans" that we can do without. look at GA. she went down there and helped keep the fillabuster alive. it is time the republicans got back to basics and when we say fiscal conservative, they better be that. crist, jindhal and palin are the future of the party.

i agree, lets hold off on all this...before we get to 2010 or 2012, obama and his 3rd term clinton cabinet havent starting adding fuel to the fire yet.

Posted by ryan December 5, 08 03:50 PM
.

Let Palin just continue to shoot Moose from Helicopters, that is what she is best at it seems. Her strong suit is not talking about current events, since she still can't tell you newspapers she reads.

Posted by Riocard Liathain December 5, 08 04:16 PM
.

Please, please, please rally behind Palin. We need a candidate like her to really show what a joke the Republicans have become. I, for one, would love to see her face off with Obama.

Posted by Laraine December 5, 08 04:27 PM
.

"Palin and Huckabee will never become the Republican nominees. I like Palin, but both her and Huckabee are stupid. Really"

Of course, someone who says "her and Huckbaee" apparently flunked 5th grade English, but they can call people stupid.

What a shock, a bunch of liberals calling people who are popular with the GOP stupid. No different since Reagan. That's why we don't care what you think. Liberals think anyone who isn't a liberal is stupid, especially if conservatives love them.

Posted by Steve G December 5, 08 04:40 PM
.

Priceless.. After 8 years of Bush the republican party wants to select another couple of low-IQ religious twits. I actually don't mind Huckabee, he seems pretty reasonable, but Palin was just a poorly conceived Hail Mary by McCain.

The Republican love affair with stupid people continues. I know there is a brain to the Right, it just seems to get trampled on by the followers of Bush / Cheney / Palin.

Posted by Frank L, Boston December 5, 08 05:02 PM
.

Chuck,
Your comments bely your source of information, i.e., where are you getting it from...the liberal media? Surely you can think independently, or is that assumption incorrect? Despite the intense evangelization of global warming by the media, there are many reputable scientists who blow holes in the hysteria that is global warming. And I suppose your qualifications are greater than those who disagree with global warming?

The least brilliant politicians out there are:
1. Barack Obama - what is his record of accomplishments? Compare his to Palin's,and she's way ahead. So what he graduated from Harvard with a law school degree, big deal. He's a political pragmatist at best.
2. Barney Frank & Chris Dodd (tie) - thank you to these two for the subprime fiasco. And oh, by the way, if Barney had been a Republican with his shenanigans w/his male friend, he'd be LONG gone. So much for parity in the press.
3. Joe Biden - his FDR & TV comment, had he been Palin, would have sunk him. His comment about eating at a restaurant that hasn't been open for 20 years, he would have lost his Senate seat. And don't forget his brilliant comment about Obama being clean. That would have been knockout blow had he been a Republican.
4. Chuck Schumer - thank you to you for causing the run on Indy Mac bank
5. Harry Reid - thanks for comments about a major insurance company going down, and what it did to the value of those holding that stock in their 401K.
6. Charlie Rangel - or should I say wrangle, as in tax break. Corrupt!

I could go on, but clearly these are but a few. Palin is WAY smarter than all of them, and Romney, who is most qualified in my opinion, is on another planet. He'd eat all of their lunches at one time.

Posted by Dennis December 5, 08 05:09 PM
.

I agree with Jed Merrill, of 3:02pm. Not just to be a MA homer, and i as a conservative would have only given him a B as MA Gov, but I think Mitt would have made it much closer to Obama than McCain, better informed on the economy, more articulate, looks more dynamic than the sputtering mccain.

Giulinani, 0 chance, but i hope he runs and wins for Senate in NY.

Jindal: so far, excellent.

Palin: somehow needs to be elected to Senate, or be appointed to foreign policy post, to burnish her credentials, but her instincts for America are right on.

Again, on this thread, we have the elistist, smug, we're smarter than you lib crowd. Note to those commenters: most colleges are dropping SAT scores as a requirement (at which i was in the 700's), so stop thinking you have a corner on the market of political wisdom. Slightly above average intelligence, combined with excellent instincts, executive experience and a winning personality are far more important than mere brains. (see Einstein, Albert, President)

Posted by gaudete December 5, 08 05:19 PM
.

Chuck,
Your comments bely your source of information, i.e., where are you getting it from...the liberal media? Surely you can think independently, or is that assumption incorrect? Despite the intense evangelization of global warming by the media, there are many reputable scientists who blow holes in the hysteria that is global warming. And I suppose your qualifications are greater than those who disagree with global warming?

The least brilliant politicians out there are:
1. Barack Obama - what is his record of accomplishments? Compare his to Palin's,and she's way ahead. So what he graduated from Harvard with a law school degree, big deal. He's a political pragmatist at best.
2. Barney Frank & Chris Dodd (tie) - thank you to these two for the subprime fiasco. And oh, by the way, if Barney had been a Republican with his shenanigans w/his male friend, he'd be LONG gone. So much for parity in the press.
3. Joe Biden - his FDR & TV comment, had he been Palin, would have sunk him. His comment about eating at a restaurant that hasn't been open for 20 years, he would have lost his Senate seat. And don't forget his brilliant comment about Obama being clean. That would have been knockout blow had he been a Republican.
4. Chuck Schumer - thank you to you for causing the run on Indy Mac bank
5. Harry Reid - thanks for comments about a major insurance company going down, and what it did to the value of those holding that stock in their 401K.
6. Charlie Rangel - or should I say wrangle, as in tax break. Corrupt!

I could go on, but clearly these are but a few. Palin is WAY smarter than all of them, and Romney, who is most qualified in my opinion, is on another planet. He'd eat all of their lunches at one time.

Posted by Dennis December 5, 08 05:41 PM
.

The brilliance of liberals is devastating...NOT. The love affair of liberals with themselves is hilarious. The thought is: we (liberals) are WAY smarter than you, so trust us to run what you've elected us to. We'll really take care of the little guy, that's us. More likely, you get a thinly veneer'd socialism akin to communist China or Russia where the ruling few get richer, and the rest get poorer. But no, trust us, they say. We've failed many times before, but we'll get it right now, because we're smarter. We'll talk to rogue nations directly, because we're smarter, more diplomatic, we're better than everyone else. Nationalized medicine has not worked in any country in the world, but no, we're smaerter than the rest of the world, trust us, we'll make it work. It's the big, bad corporations that are taking us down, flying in on their corporate jets, while we get flown around on government planes, despite their fiduciary responsibility to use their most valuable asset, time, in a way that benefits the corporation. I've figured it out: when these bombastic liberals point the finger at others for what they are doing wrong, it's to deflect attention away from what they are doing, which is the exact same thing they claim the others are doing. Or did we forget Harry Reid benefitting inappropriately from a land deal out in Nevada. Give me a break, liberals, if they have their way, are going to crash and burn badly. Sadly, we'll reap their consequences. What I'm looking to see if who their punching bag is going to be when Bush is gone. That ought to be a good one.

Posted by Dennis December 5, 08 06:04 PM
.

Poll is accurate. Piyush Jindal is a muslim who claims to have converted to Christianity. The media is pushing him like they did Obama, but Republicans won't fall for it.

Posted by nansee9 December 5, 08 07:19 PM
.

Dennis, you and Palin and the rest are delightful museum pieces. I know, like some ghastly version of Jurassic park you may rise again, but for the moment, thank god, you folks are out on your collective ears. The Republican strategy since FDR has been to appeal to the lunatic fringe. It worked until their complete incompetence drove the country into the ground. The better part of valor her is to just go to the woodshed and do some thinking. Not to write long and inane posts.

Posted by Criticabroad December 6, 08 01:55 AM
.

Speaking as a Republican who did not vote for McCain and who will be elated to see W gone, there's no way in hell I would ever consider voting for Caribou Barbie or Gomer Pyle (Palin & Huckabee). Mitt Romney is the only one qualified to get us out of the economic mess we're in now which the black Jimmy Carter is going to make tenfold worse over the next four years. The man knows more about economics and what it takes to make businesses run efficiently and productively so that they may create jobs than Caribou Barbie, Gomer Pyle, the black Jimmy Carter, Joe "I like to hear myself talk" Biden, John "now I have the best reason of all to hate the world" McCain and Hillary "I'll get that black *&^$ if it's the last thing I ever do" Clinton put together. evre

Posted by Mark December 6, 08 10:14 AM
.

Mitt Romney has already said that he's not running in 2012. If you want to make sure that the Democrats win the election in 2012, nominate Mitt Romney, a flip-flopping, 1 term governor of Massachusetts (of all places!) who is enormously wealthy and has no idea what the regular American goes through.
I hate it when people tell me that Romney could fix the economy. When this recession started happening, his solution for people was to tell them to buy high-yield stocks. "Let them eat cake" from Marie Antoinette, "Let them buy stocks" from Mitt Romney.
Huckabee is our best bet in '12. He's been a governor for 10.5 years, compared to 4 from Romney and Palin.

Posted by Paul December 6, 08 02:25 PM
.

GOPer's, just keep rationalizing that a spiritualism, gay bashing, amendment rights, and maverick is the answer. Don't even listen to me, just step back and look for yourself. The essence of your party has faded. That was easier that I thought.

Posted by markeyboy December 6, 08 06:59 PM
.

Jindal is the future of the GOP. Bright (Rhodes scholar), young, articulate and a fiscal conservative. Palin is a not ready for prime time and all of the others mentioned cannot draw any independants, like latins and the youth, which is needed for the GOP to have any chance. Jindal does not look like the typical GOP candidate, an old white guy with no clear vision.

Although 2012 may not be the best time to run, unless Obama totally screws up. Jindal is only 36, so he has plenty of time. He will be President one day, the question is when.

Posted by Neil Thomas December 7, 08 09:38 AM
.

I was born to and raised by moderate Republicans (I'm an independent who prefers a political life "on the fence"). My grandparents (both sets), uncles and aunts were/are all moderate Republicans; I didn't even know any conservative Republicans until I went off to college. To this day, the only Republicans I know are moderates (and I've worked in the corporate and legal sectors since 1990). I don't know anyone (and that's not an exaggeration) who thinks Sarah Palin is a viable candidate for ANY national office. My family, friends, colleagues and professional acquaintances must have been left out of this survey. I know that the conventional wisdom is that the Republican Party ignores its "base" -- the social conservatives -- at its peril. I propose that the Republican Party of 2008 needs to wake up to a new reality: they ignore moderates at their peril. After the incredibly toxic Republican presidential campaign of 2008, I believe that most Americans are no longer willing or able to "forgive and forget" and that the Republicans should expect a long time in the political wilderness if they are unwilling and/or unable to become a party of ideas and solutions instead of the craven and fraudulent character assassination a la Lee Atwater, Karl Rove, et al.

Posted by Palin is a Rube December 7, 08 04:24 PM
.

Go Rudy!!! I sure hope he gets his stuff together and runs :)

Posted by Alex December 7, 08 06:46 PM
.

2012 is not a good year for either the Republican or the Democrat Party, watch out for the signs of an emerging new power player in the political history of America.Our next President in the near future is a product of "break aways and unbelievers in the current system". It is going to be a super exciting election ever in the United States of America since it's birth as a nation.My take for the next President elect ( not Obama ) in 2016 is either a Hispanic,Asian,Liberatarian or an Independent candidate.I can't wait to see that history in the making.

Posted by skmj December 8, 08 02:22 PM
.

I would NEVER vote for any of the possible candidates mentioned here, ESPECIALLY Palin, for God's sake! She is a moron and should disappear into the tundra and leave us alone. I have been a lifelong Republican but that's over now too. The party is dying out and has nothing to offer in 2012 but a bunch of clowns. It should make smooth coasting for Obama's second term.

Posted by Jazz December 8, 08 03:34 PM
.

This is really funny and a bit scary. The Republican Party keeps leaning toward Sarah Palin because she pulled McCain ahead of Obama by 1 percentage point for a whole week after the election. Let's face it. The Party is falling apart and they will do anything to try to get support. No intelligent human being would ever vote for her, again, no intelligent human being would vote for her. She is a self-serving, dishonest bigot. If she does run for office in 2012 she had better watch her big stupid mouth about Obama! Oh my, why doesnt she just fade away????

Posted by Dionna Madden December 9, 08 03:22 AM
.

The Republican party has gone so far to the left that even (so called) Republicans fear conservative values.----GO SARAH 2012

Posted by John January 4, 09 01:15 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

In N.E. governors’ races, GOP sees a chance to build on gains

Invigorated by state house victories earlier this month in Virginia and New Jersey, Republicans are turning their attention to governorships in New England, where they believe the retirement of four incumbents and a competitive race in Massachusetts has created wide-open opportunities. (Globe Correspondent, 11/25/09)

Senators voice optimism on public option

WASHINGTON - Buoyed by their weekend victory on a vote beginning the health care debate, several Senate Democrats expressed optimism yesterday they could find a way to keep a government-run insurance plan in the sweeping bill. (Globe Staff, 11/23/09)

Health overhaul narrowly advances

The Senate narrowly overcame the first of two critical hurdles to passing sweeping health care legislation last night, mustering the minimum of 60 votes required to begin debate on the bill and opening a volatile floor fight likely to last weeks. (Globe Staff 11/22/09)

Latinos, blacks take harder hit amid recession

Latinos and African-Americans in Massachusetts and across the country are facing high unemployment rates that could spiral to levels not seen in decades as the jobless economic recovery drags on, analysts and urban community advocates say. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Some lawmakers push back Catholic church on health care bill

Representative Louise Slaughter has a consistent record advocating abortion rights. So the New York Democrat was stunned recently to receive, for the first time, a letter from a Catholic diocese in western New York, demanding that she explain her vote this month against a health care amendment prohibiting insurance companies from paying for abortions. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Support wanes for curbs on credit-card interest rates

Efforts in Congress to cap credit-card interest rates are faltering because of opposition from Democrats and a lack of specific support from the White House, despite growing consumer outrage over a rush by banks to impose rates as high as 30 percent. (Globe Staff, 11/19/09)

Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort

Despite early pleas for bipartisanship, President Obama is forging ahead with his domestic agenda with a largely single-party strategy, unable to corral more than a handful of Republicans on a wide range of major legislation before Congress. (Globe Staff, 11/17/09)

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 11/14/09)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)
archives