< Back to Front Page Text size +

Do-over on oath, in case

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor January 21, 2009 07:56 PM

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. apparently got it right on the second try.

Privately tonight in the White House, Roberts administered the presidential oath of office to Barack Obama for a second time. In public in front of a worldwide audience on Tuesday, Roberts flubbed the oath a bit, causing Obama to repeat the wording differently than as prescribed in the Constitution.

"We believe that the oath of office was administered effectively and that the President was sworn in appropriately yesterday. But the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of an abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath a second time," White House Counsel Greg Craig said in a statement.

According to the press pool report, Obama and Roberts met in the Map Room in White House shortly after 7:30.

"We decided it was so much fun," Obama joked while sitting on a couch and Roberts donned
his black robe.

"Are you ready to take the oath?" Roberts asked.

"I am, and we're going to do it very slowly," Obama replied.

After a flawless recitation, Roberts smiled and said, "Congratulations -- again."

Obama replied, "Thank you, sir."

Unlike the first time, Obama did not use a bible -- on Tuesday, he placed his left hand on the bible that Abraham Lincoln used for his inauguration -- but the oath was binding anyway

Two other previous presidents have repeated the oath because of similar issues, Calvin Coolidge and Chester A. Arthur, according to the Associated Press.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

Does Obama have to do 10 more dances with his wife, or was that part OK?

Posted by TC January 21, 09 08:10 PM
.

It was Obama that flubbed the oath the first time. Amazing how the facts get twisted by the Globe.

Posted by Sparky January 21, 09 08:11 PM
.

Take that, wingnuts! President Obama!!!! Deal with it.

Posted by CBalco January 21, 09 08:12 PM
.

Cripes almighty, this is NOT an auspicious start to the Administration when they resort to Bush speak about how the believe they were legal...over the oath.

There is no leeway here folks -- the Constitution says you SHALL take the oath specifying the languague, allowing one option within it (whether you swear or affirm, depending if you're religous or not). You can add stuff before or after, but you better say the words as specified. Silly me, maybe that's one of those living constitution thing where words mean things other then what they mean.

Obama was President as of noontime, oath or no oath. However he can't execute the duties of the office until he takes the oath -- it's fine if you didn't want to re-do it during the ceremony, Obama should've been re-sworn once they left the stage.


Posted by Dal90 January 21, 09 08:18 PM
.

I'm glad he did it over. When I was watching I actually flinched during the awkward pause, interruption, and mess up. I was thinking "Didn't Roberts practice at ALL?" Then I thought, well maybe he was nervous or overly confident one or the other!

I wish he had just stopped right then and said "Let's start again".

Just one more thing to add to the memory book for Obama.

Posted by Lila January 21, 09 08:26 PM
.

I wouldn't put the blame completely on Roberts for adding a phrase or "flubbing" the oath. Obama was just as nervous and jumped the gun when Roberts was reciting the oath. It also seemed that Obama forgot what he was supposed to say. It was after all a repeat after me oath. Both men faltered.

Posted by gtobes January 21, 09 08:36 PM
.

dumb and dumber?

Posted by e1000 January 21, 09 08:39 PM
.

Let's face it: Republicans hate government so much, they can't do anything right.

Posted by Medford Mickey January 21, 09 08:42 PM
.

If at first you don't succeed....

Posted by vicole January 21, 09 08:46 PM
.

Wacky stuff!

I'm glad Mr. Obama wasn't too tired from the $170 million inaugaration festivities.

"Let's celebrate and blow a bunch of money! Yippee!!! I'll fix the economy another day...."

Posted by Hoss January 21, 09 08:53 PM
.

I was disgusted last night when I saw news reports related to this along the lines of "Is he or isn't he the president". With all of the momentous day's events to focus on, this seemed incredibly petty. I'd expect it to be part of Rush Limbaugh rant, but not an ABC interview question to Obama.

So I'm surprised that this was necessary, but it reflects the country that we've become and the difficult road ahead for our president. And like most of us, I'm thrilled to have a president that we will be proud of.

Posted by tcq January 21, 09 09:20 PM
.

Let's see if I get this right:
He got the oath wrong the first time (with fellow Harvard Alum Roberts as well)
The stocks go down the worst percentage of any President on first day
He signs order to help out terrorists at Gitmo
His far left liberal agenda is posted on the White House website
Issues Proclamation to "Remake America"?
My fellow Americans...what a shame.

Posted by Eyes Open January 21, 09 09:21 PM
.

Chief Justice Roberts just wanted the Bush presidency to live on.

Posted by Henry January 21, 09 09:26 PM
.

Bush 2 for 2, Obama 0 for 1.....

Posted by JT January 21, 09 10:45 PM
.

read it and weep! now he is president two times over. Obamanation.

Posted by venomiss January 21, 09 10:47 PM
.

"I've always been impressed that we are here, surviving, because of the indomitable courage of quite small people against impossible odds."

Posted by JT January 21, 09 10:55 PM
.

President Obama was over-anxious and he stepped on Judge Roberts' first line. This caused Judge Roberts to lose his concentration. They should have rehearsed it beforehand.

Just as well that it was repeated this evening.


Posted by PatsFanSicne'63 January 21, 09 11:04 PM
.

No, let me get it straight: The people who have yet to be tried at Gitmo are "terrorists": i.e., guilty until proven innocent.

My fellow Americans...what a shame that somebody who pretentiously terms themselves "Eyes Open" either does not understand, or holds in contempt, American jurisprudence.

Posted by jk January 21, 09 11:46 PM
.

WHO CARES????????????

Posted by Alex January 21, 09 11:58 PM
.

Flub or no flub, he WILL be a better president than GWB. Mark my words.

Posted by jermsy January 22, 09 01:39 AM
.

#17: Actually, Obama was reciting the oath as practiced---Roberts went on beyond where he was supposed to pause.

However, I'm glad they did it over. It would have been better to do it over right away, in front of everyone, but c'est la vie.

Posted by Kat January 24, 09 05:40 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Once again, Kerry is Obama’s go-to guy in Senate

John F. Kerry of Massachusetts has emerged as the White House’s ambassador in the Senate on a wide range of issues, a role the Democratic lawmaker will showcase in the coming weeks as he lobbies his wary colleagues to support President Obama’s Afghanistan war plan. (Globe Staff, 12:34 a.m.)

Worries grow that health overhaul could price out many

President Obama has promised that the nation’s health care overhaul will make medical insurance available - and affordable - for everyone. But while bills in Congress would make insurance more accessible for millions of Americans, advocates worry that the Senate bill would impose significant financial burdens on some of the families who will now be required to buy ... (Globe Staff, 12:33 a.m.)

Another McGovern takes on a war

Representative James P. McGovern, a political activist since he was a schoolboy in Worcester, walked into his congressional office yesterday and proudly pointed to a 1972 presidential campaign poster on his wall: “We’ve been misled too often. Demand Truth. George McGovern.’’ (Globe Staff, 12/5/09)

Obama team now talking surge

WASHINGTON - Three years after Barack Obama strongly rebuked President Bush’s surge of US troops to Iraq, Obama dispatched top administration officials to Capitol Hill yesterday to defend a surge of his own. (Globe Staff, 12/2/09)

Afghan war cost grips both parties

A day before he is scheduled to announce a new strategy in Afghanistan, President Obama is under increasing pressure to explain how his administration intends to pay the rising costs of military operations in Afghanistan, which average about $3.6 billion per month. (Globe Staff, 11/30/09)

Declassification of secret documents to be delayed

WASHINGTON - President Obama will maintain a lid of secrecy on millions of pages of military and intelligence documents that were scheduled to be declassified by the end of the year, according to administration officials. (Globe Staff, 11/29/09)

Tax break on profits again in jeopardy

An effort in Congress to eliminate a generous tax break for hedge fund managers, private-equity specialists, and venture capitalists, which could be taken up next week in the House Ways and Means Committee, is being met with resistance by opponents who say the move would weaken the economy. (Globe Staff, 11/26/09)

In N.E. governors’ races, GOP sees a chance to build on gains

Invigorated by state house victories earlier this month in Virginia and New Jersey, Republicans are turning their attention to governorships in New England, where they believe the retirement of four incumbents and a competitive race in Massachusetts has created wide-open opportunities. (Globe Correspondent, 11/25/09)

Senators voice optimism on public option

WASHINGTON - Buoyed by their weekend victory on a vote beginning the health care debate, several Senate Democrats expressed optimism yesterday they could find a way to keep a government-run insurance plan in the sweeping bill. (Globe Staff, 11/23/09)

Health overhaul narrowly advances

The Senate narrowly overcame the first of two critical hurdles to passing sweeping health care legislation last night, mustering the minimum of 60 votes required to begin debate on the bill and opening a volatile floor fight likely to last weeks. (Globe Staff 11/22/09)
archives