< Back to Front Page Text size +

Obama jumps on more bad jobs numbers

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor January 9, 2009 10:40 AM

The new jobs report out today could help President-elect Barack Obama make the case for his huge economic stimulus plan.

The Labor Department says that another 524,000 jobs were lost during December, increasing the unemployment rate to 7.2 percent and increasing the total job losses for last year to 2.6 million.

While the numbers were slightly lower than forecast, they show the challenge facing Obama, whose plan to save or create 3 million jobs in the next two years would basically just keep the economy treading water.

The unemployment rate is the highest in 16 years. And the annual job loss figure is the highest since 1945, coming out of World War II.

Obama said that the jobs report was a "stark reminder" of the need for his stimulus plan.

"Clearly the situation is dire," he said at a news conference to announce his intelligence team.

He is facing some opposition in Congress, but he said he is working well with lawmakers in crafting the package.

Asked about objections from some Senate Democrats about the proposed business tax cuts, Obama said he and Congress share the same goal and his team has provided a framework for the stimulus package.

"We'll continue to hone and refine over the next several weeks," he said, but insisted again, "We cannot delay."

"It's always hard," he said about the legislative process.

Obama also said he is more than happy to accept good ideas, including ones that are better than his, on tax cuts and job-creation programs. It's time, he said, to get past the old Washington habit of being too concerned about where on the ideological spectrum the idea originates.

"The American people are struggling," he said, adding that behind the numbers there are "real lives."

The job losses were widespread: 101,000 in construction, 149,000 in manufacturing, 113,000 in professional and business services, and 67,000 in retailing. A total of 11.1 million Americans were unemployed in December.

Both labor and business groups jumped on the jobs report.

The Laborers’ International Union of North America said that the unemployment rate in the construction industry is now 15.3 percent, and that the December losses marked the 18th consecutive month with significant job loss in the construction industry. In all, 893,000 construction jobs have been lost since the start of 2007.

"President-elect Obama’s plan to put millions of people back to work building America is exactly the leadership we hoped for when he promised earlier this year that he would be the 'build America President' and the half-million members of LIUNA stand ready to make sure his job creation plans succeeds. It’s time to build America, so America works," the union said in a statement.

The Alliance for American Manufacturing said nearly 800,000 manufacturing jobs have been lost in the last year.

“Only a substantial investment in infrastructure and in America’s productive enterprises, such as manufacturing, will ensure that this recession doesn’t become a 21st century Great Depression. Creating and preserving manufacturing jobs is essential to the recovery. Manufacturing jobs support four or five other jobs in America’s communities and ensure that local and state governments have adequate funding for critical services," Scott Paul, executive director of the alliance, said in a statement.

“Congress should act now to pass a robust and sustained stimulus that focuses on rebuilding America’s crumbling infrastructure using American-made products. In the coming months, Congress and the Administration should also take steps to reduce America’s trade deficit, which stands at over $700 billion and drives wealth and jobs offshore.”

AFL-CIO president John Sweeney said in a statement:

"We are encouraged by the leadership of President-elect Obama and quick action by Congress to prepare legislation for early passage in the new year. The economic recovery package should be large enough to restore sustainable growth. It should meet the immediate needs of struggling American families by extending and modernizing unemployment insurance and providing food stamps. The recovery plan should also provide immediate aid to state and local governments. And the plan should invest in information, communication, transportation and energy infrastructure we will need to succeed in the global economy of the 21st century.

"But short-term problems didn't create the crisis and short-term solutions won't end it. The way our country currently does business is backward - - putting the interests of corporations over working people. Broad-based economic changes must be made to ensure sustained economic growth and broadly shared prosperity. We must restore American competitiveness to deal with our country's unsustainable trade deficit. We must guarantee affordable, quality health care coverage for everyone. We must thoroughly reform our financial regulatory system to provide more transparency and effective government oversight and regulation. And to ensure that the middle class is rebuilt, we must pass the Employee Free Choice Act so workers can bargain collectively with their employers for better lives."

Brad Woodhouse, president of Americans United for Change, a coalition of progressive and labor groups, said in a statement: “With the U.S. economy sliding further and further into recession, waiting out this economic storm is simply not an option. A stunning 2.6 million jobs disappeared last year, and if nothing is done and done soon, millions more American jobs are at stake. With the economic news continuing to get worse, there is no time to spare to turn our economy around. Efforts by some to slow down the passing of President Elect Obama’s major jobs and economic recovery package could not be more misguided and inappropriate considering the dire situation the economy continues to face – a point underscored with the news today that unemployment is now at an alarming 7.2 percent. It is to put the nation ahead of politics and ideology and support President-Elect Obama’s economic recovery plan that will create or save 3 million jobs through solid and sound long-term investments in health care, energy efficiency, transportation and education.”

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

this is a bunch of government waste, led by someone who has a one page resume. but wait....the article says the plan is backed by the Unions, Afl-cio and progressive groups. I feel much better!

Posted by ryan January 9, 09 11:52 AM
.

Obama is using the "politics of fear" to try to gin up support for his trillion $ welfare + vote-buying plan.

Gee, a couple of months ago when the DOW fell, we were told this was another reason to support the Bush/Obama $700 billion bailout. That worked out, didn't it?

You are a shameless demagogue, Obama. NO!

Posted by Where's the Change? January 9, 09 12:46 PM
.

The problem with our situation is that unions have a strangle hold on every part of government and major business. When the employers can no longer control the work force directly by hiring and firing at will, they are not able to control the quality of their product. So instead of being able to hold on to the best workers, they are forced to get by on those with union seniority who only do enough to get by. The company/government suffers and potential is blocked for growth and advances in a global market.

Posted by george January 9, 09 12:49 PM
.

The Government should do nothing. Let the economy shed jobs. Perhaps then the $82/ hour guy on the auto assembly line will go down to $40 or so.
We overexpanded and now the economy must constrict. That's OK. Let it happen. It isn't dire, it's the way it goes. The part-time professor and community organizer is showing his inexperience everytime he speaks. Remember people platitutes don't equal intelligence.

Posted by Smart Guy January 9, 09 12:54 PM
.

Now that we've bailed the banks, the Big Three, and are pondering a trillion for Big Steel - what exactly have been the results? It appears that the money has been poured down the drain and things are getting worse.

Posted by david wayne osedach January 9, 09 01:04 PM
.

Ryan, you are ignorant. its interesting how your almost blaming obama for the economy faliure? when it is bush's fault.

Posted by Robert January 9, 09 01:14 PM
.

"Unemployment jump could help Obama stimulus plan"

Only for the dimwitted. Obama's plan is a 100% failure out of the gate. No one with a brain supports it (without a personal finanical kick back).

Posted by oscarbozach January 9, 09 01:15 PM
.

Bill Clinton said we needed a economic stimulus to produce jobs ("The unemployment rate is the highest in 16 years") and it got shot down. We did just fine. Haven't we already spent 1 trillion? Let's get the 750 billion worth of TARP money back into the economy first. I may have voted for the guy but don't remember signing on to a 2 trillion dollar defecit (ya, defecit, not debt).

Just say no..

Posted by meet the new boss, same as the... January 9, 09 01:25 PM
.

Keep your stimulus $$$ and keep the gas prices low and bring down the food prices and everybody will be happier !!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by gina January 9, 09 01:56 PM
.

The quick fix needed here is to revoke all H1-B and L-1 visas and crackdown on employers hiring illegal immigrants. Millions of jobs will be available - from low to high income. And at a much lower cost than his proposed program. And the other benefit is that there will be less burden on schools and hospitals and other social programs.

Even with unemployment so high, the US is allowing 138,000 green cards and work permits every month. Help stop this insanity by supporting www.NumbersUSA.com

Posted by chris January 9, 09 02:31 PM
.

This is what happens when you have a government that supports the big/fat/stupid corporates over the small entrepreneurial businesses. The problem is the Republicans - they are completely in the pockets of the biggest and slowest businesses - the health insurance providers, the oil companies, the big banks and the Detroit auto companies. Like so many of their supporters, they've grown so big, fat and lazy they are collapsing under their own weight.
Bring back "creative destruction" and lets see this country return to one of small business. Its much better for us all. The fact is that this is far more likely to happen under a Demcrat president - thats why economically speaking, in the history of this country, we do so much better with Democrat presidents

Posted by stevef January 9, 09 03:14 PM
.

To Robert......get your facts straight. You are showing your ignorance. Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac started this entire financial crisis. Want to lay blame ? Start with Barney Frank, Chris "Countrywide" Dodd, Franklin Raines and all the other liberal social engineers that strong armed banks and lenders to give giant loans to people who didn't have a snowball's chance in hell of paying them back.

3 years ago the liberal Dems lined up to block oversight of Fannie and Freddie with dough boy Frank claiming "there is nothing wrong with Fannie and Freddie". Unbelievable. Yet you fools in Massachusetts voted that turkey right back into office.

Posted by ObamaTheMarxist January 9, 09 03:23 PM
.


I can't understand how people keep blaming Bush for all of this when it was all of them, both republicans and demarcates, both Bush and Congress. All of them. My question is who was minding the store? My answer is NO ONE. Period, end of sentence.

Posted by Ellen Dean January 9, 09 03:46 PM
.

People forget that Obama worked in government, before he ran for President. Ergo, he most certainly is partly to blame for the way things were allowed to unravel. He has also prospered financially, while working in public service.

Posted by anonymous January 9, 09 06:42 PM
.

stevef, comment 11, you've got it all wrong. corporations may be big and fat, but they are smart enough to line the pockets of the Republicans and Democrats, that way they win either way. look it up!

Posted by numbers January 9, 09 11:26 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Support wanes for curbs on credit-card interest rates

Efforts in Congress to cap credit-card interest rates are faltering because of opposition from Democrats and a lack of specific support from the White House, despite growing consumer outrage over a rush by banks to impose rates as high as 30 percent. (Globe Staff, 11/19/09)

Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort

Despite early pleas for bipartisanship, President Obama is forging ahead with his domestic agenda with a largely single-party strategy, unable to corral more than a handful of Republicans on a wide range of major legislation before Congress. (Globe Staff, 11/17/09)

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 11/14/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Earmarks’ cash flow lifts firms, lobbyists, lawmakers

16 defense-related firms in Massachusetts have secured nearly $30 million in federal funding in next year's defense appropriations bill pending in Congress. The tally offers a lesson in the practice known as congressional earmarking, in which lawmakers direct federal money to specific projects, usually in their districts. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Afghanistan wary of US plan to send more advisers

Afghan officials have begun to push back from the Obama administration's plans to send hundreds of advisers to the country, complaining the Americans are often overpaid, underqualified, and unfamiliar with the culture of the country. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Mass. keeps an eye on US bill’s funding ban

Massachusetts officials are closely monitoring an abortion funding ban in the sweeping health care legislation before Congress to make sure that it does not restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the state. (Globe Staff, 11/11/09)

Survey raises new doubts on military’s ‘don’t ask’ policy

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration received more research yesterday to help make its case for allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces. (Globe Staff, 11/10/09)

Lieberman’s threat of filibuster looms large

When a recent conversation among Senate centrists turned to insurance company antitrust concerns, Joe Lieberman boasted of his bona fides: As Connecticut attorney general in the 1980s, he sued the industry. (Globe Correspondent, 11/9/09)
archives