< Back to Front Page Text size +

Obama seeks more GOP backing in Senate

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor January 29, 2009 01:54 PM


After failing to win any Republican backing for his economic recovery package in the House, President Obama turns his attention to the Senate.

The $819 billion measure passed Wednesday by a 244-188 vote, with 177 Republicans unanimous in opposition. A different Senate version is already well under construction, which has more GOP support, but which is also more expensive.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said on NBC's "Today" show this morning that Obama will continue to work with Republicans to get a package that can win bipartisan support. "The president knows it's going to take longer than a few days to change the ways Washington works," Gibbs said.

UPDATE: But at a news conference today held by Republican senators, Jon Kyl of Arizona echoed the critique of House Republicans that while Obama has been reaching out, the same can't be said of Democratic leaders in Congress.

"Republicans have appreciated the president's outreach to present ideas, but we are too often met with this response: 'We won, and therefore we're going to do it our way,' " Kyl said.

"They can cram down a stimulus package without Republican support, but if that happens, then when, as we believe, in six months or so, when the American people say, 'Wait a minute. We're not better off; in fact, we're worse off than we were six months ago. Who was responsible for this and what can be done to fix it?' Republicans then are going to be in the position to say, 'We didn't have the input into this that we needed, and that's why it hasn't worked.'

"The problem is, nobody's a winner, because all of us lose if this package is not successful. So it's a bittersweet thing to say at that point. We'd rather have the input now to make sure that this package works," Kyl added, noting that the Finance and Appropriations committees rejected every Republican amendment to the Senate version of the package.

If arm-twisting by the administration, gentle or otherwise, doesn't work, a coalition of liberal and labor groups plans to run TV ads promoting the bill in the home states of some key Republicans in the Senate, including Judd Gregg of New Hampshire and Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine. Snowe, however, said Wednesday on MSNBC that she cannot support the current version of the bill.

The spot shows scenes of empty plants and offices filling up with workers as Obama talks about his plan.

"Tell Congress to support the Obama plan for jobs, not the failed policies of the past," the announcer concludes.

Part of a $4 million to $5 million campaign, the ads are funded by a coalition of progressive and labor groups, including Americans United for Change, MoveOn.org Political Action, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, and Service Employees International Union.

"The House vote in favor of President Obama’s plan to revitalize our economy and protect American jobs was good news for our economy and for all Americans,” AFSCME President Gerald McEntee said in a statement. “As we face the greatest fiscal crisis since the Great Depression, Democrats in the House acted boldly to protect jobs and create opportunity. With 11 million workers unemployed, with home values declining at an alarming rate and the need for vital public services growing rapidly, it is time for Republicans to put partisanship behind them and stand with President Obama. In the days ahead, thousands of AFSCME members will contact their senators, urging them to act responsibly and support President Obama’s plan to put people to work and get our economy back on track.”

Anna Burger, International Secretary-Treasurer of SEIU, added in a statement: “It was the get rich quick greed of Wall Street that got us into this hole and it will take the long-range vision of President Obama, Congress and the American people to pull us back out. The millions of working people reeling from the severe economic recession are counting on our leaders to show the political backbone to pass a recovery package that not only addresses the crisis and relieves the pain, but also lays the groundwork for a stronger and fairer future. We need change that works – now and in the long-term so we can start building a stronger American economic future by investing in infrastructure and green projects to create new jobs for the 21st Century.”


The Laborers’ International Union of North America also started running TV ads in support of the bill on Wednesday and says it will continue them until the package moves out of Congress.

The ads call on senators to support money to build America’s roads, bridges, schools, and new energy systems. They target Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, John Ensign of Nevada, Bob Corker and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Jim Bunning of Kentucky, and Charles Grassley of Iowa, and are running in Washington, DC, that mention Congress generally.

The labor group announced today that the ads will also start running Saturday in New Hampshire to influence Senator Judd Gregg.


  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

well i support his version of the bill, because we taxpayers will be getting a check too which we should be getting. 500 is not enough though, make it at least 3,000 to singles that are making 75,000 and under and married couples 150,000 and under would be 6,000 and people who are on social security give them 1500. Now that will help with the bills and etc. From, pam in lynn, mass

Posted by samoy2e January 29, 09 10:33 AM
.

Going further into debt to fix the national debt problem. Sounds like a smart plan to me.

Posted by Dave G January 29, 09 10:39 AM
.

obama has NO GOP backing, your headline is a LIE

Posted by james January 29, 09 10:41 AM
.

The biggest problem for the American economy are the Unions and their Democrat allies. If we can't compete in the global economy, we are doomed to fail.

Posted by Hank January 29, 09 10:42 AM
.

Democrat Michael Capuano was on the radio this morning saying that 40% of the bailout he would like to have voted against, but that's the cost of politics. ~$300 BILLION dollars of non stimulus is the price for what even a Democrat acknowledges is ~$500 Billion of stimulus?

Posted by Mike S January 29, 09 10:57 AM
.

Good for them. Hope this works.

Posted by Elaine G January 29, 09 11:14 AM
.

President Obama isn't getting the GOP support that he wants because there's too much pork in the package as it stands. Giving huge sums to the National Endowment for the Arts, STD awareness programs etc. etc. will do nothing to create jobs. I think we've seen enough "art" such as the Virgin smeared with elephant feces and for those that don't know how STDs are spread, if they haven't figured that out by now, they never will.Kathy

Posted by Kathy January 29, 09 11:15 AM
.

I think Obama is sincere about working with Republicans. I'm unsure if the GOP returns that sentiment. We will see. This ad campaign could be a good test. Will it promote debate on the merits of the plan and help fix a broken economy? I'm concerned that prominent conservatives in the media will focus on who funded the ads instead of what they're about in order to sabotage Obama's plan.

Posted by MG January 29, 09 11:20 AM
.

Ignore the wingnut whiners! They lost and, as they gloried in telling us for the past 8 years, elections have consequences. If they don't want to play, then it is time to move on without them. If they can't figure out by now that you cannot tax cut your way out of a bad economy, they never will.

Posted by Jamie dewolf January 29, 09 11:32 AM
.

Great, run those adds, who would want to support this bill. It is very bad for America. Our president is planning to spend money like a drunken sailor. I hope more members of Congress refuse to support this very bad plan. This bill is a true blue Democrat plan. Spend your way out of everything.

Posted by BobW1955 January 29, 09 11:45 AM
.

Want Republican cooperation? Offer them 10% cash, in small unmarked bills, in a plain brown wrapper, dead-dropped at a location of their choosing.
After all, they are only holding on to the bedrock of their values: "Where's my cut?"

Posted by Don B January 29, 09 12:47 PM
.

I was sad to hear that the vote on the measure was so divided by party lines. Hopefully the two sides can make compromises so there is more bipartisan support.

I must say the idea of running ads to convince Republicans to vote for it is not thrilling in my opinion. It might work - but seems manipulative. Can't both sides come up with some sort of a compromise instead?

Posted by CompromiseQueen January 29, 09 12:53 PM
.

The Republicans brought the problems confronting America through their pro-business, pro-rich policies. Now the chickens have come to roost. Unfortunately, those chickens are messing all over the middle class and poor while the rich are shielded and continue to be shieled by the Republicans.
However, the Republicans are so self serving that they would rather see the average American go down the tubes than see a Democratic President succeed where the previous Republican administration failed us terribly.

Posted by abby January 29, 09 12:58 PM
.

"The president knows it's going to take longer than a few days to change the ways Washington works," Gibbs said.

Seems like he's got it down pretty good already. Pork, pork. and more pork to his supporters and call it a "jobs" and economic stimulus bill. This country is so hosed

Posted by NHViewpoint January 29, 09 12:58 PM
.

I can not believe how Republicans "leaders" have absolutely no sense of reality. First off this was an orchestrated attempt at the Republican party to make a statement: yes in fact as Limbaugh stated, we want President Obama to fail. That's basically the message which came accross to me, my peers and colleagues. After President Obama met with them for several hours over several days, the party leaders basically instructed all Republicans to vote "nay" regardless of whether they want to or not. Also it came out that about 30 or so Conservatives had considered compromising and voting "yea" on the bill considering President Obama's concession in removing two controversial projects, and still they wouldn't budge. Now I don't feel this was a personal affront to the President, more so to Reid and Pelosi and their constituents...but how childish is that!? I mean President Obama set aside politics and held out a hand to the Republicans regardless of the shortcomings of his party, and rather then embrace change, the Republicans decided to clench the fists even tigther out of "principle", when in fact it was a grand gesture of obstructors if anything else. I say these United States are ready for another party in Congress, a progressive party, which cares more about the needs of the people, then doing things the way they've been done. You'd think the Republicans would have learned from their erroneous block of Clinton's 1990 bill, which was in fact very successful. Well in any case I truly hope Republicans continue on this path to becoming obsolete in the world of politics...it's time for change. In anycase congrats on passge of the bill, and thank you for not budging on assistance which the American people so desperately need such as foodstamps, healthcare, and support for the elderly and disabled.

Posted by Haitiana4Obama January 29, 09 02:05 PM
.

Can't believe I'm saying this, but maybe the republicans have a point. Only 5% for infrastructure? The bill as written is one huge give away, and just like the first one, the american people are not getting any equity back for the investment. What happened to "shovel ready" projects and the idea of putting people to work, getting a little sweat equity back for the investment? What happened to rebuilding roads, bridges, the electrical grid? The democrats really haven't done anything revolutionary with this bill --- they just pulled out their candy list which has been in their desk drawer for the last 50 years, and are intent on giving everyone on it a piece of sweet candy. This bill is not forward thinking, and most likely will not work. Shame.

Posted by remembermadison January 29, 09 02:42 PM
.

Let me get this straight-the last president/congress allowed the federal debt to reach $10T-so we voted for change. The new president/congress want to start with landmark legislation adding another $1T on the heap and call it hope and change.

This country has no chance to reclaim it's past until the two-party sytem is declared a complete failure. In the mean tiime enjoy the huperinflation and debt you are passing along to the next generations.

Posted by Tom King January 29, 09 02:49 PM
.

Do you deliberately title your article with "...more GOP backing... ". Did you mean "more" than ZERO, since you did not listed any Republican backing Obama's economic recovery package? It looks as you are using "MORE" rather than "ANY" to create an FALSE impression of Obama's getting some GOP support. You know it isn't true but still putting the wrong fact in the title. Is that's your, Mr. Foon Rhee objectivity?

Posted by iSAAC January 29, 09 02:57 PM
.

Bad habits die hard or should I say will never die yes that's the reality America is facing generation after generation of intentional not conventional legislature.Who is to blame but each and every indiviual congressman or congresswoman that enter Washington D.C. the nations capitol.The Whitehouse,House of Representatives and the Senate from past to the present are all responsible for the nation and the worlds ailing economy thanks to party politics.I hope God is still around at least nearer to the least,the poor,the unemploy,low income earner,the fatherless,the motherless and many more poor living condition Americans and people that have done nothing to deserve such living condition in this promised land.

Posted by skmj January 29, 09 03:32 PM
.

Can't any of these dolts see that this is not an "economic plan" or a stimulus bill? It is simply an enormous appropriations bill to pay for earmarks. Pet projects all of these career pols have not been able to tack on to other bills or get past the various committees are being crammed into this huge pork fest. Our children and our childrens childres will be paying this off, little better than indentured servants to our so called representatives.

Posted by abu lafia February 1, 09 09:33 AM
.

Its Christmas in Washington! Hooray for Obama! Lets spend and give everyone whatever they want. I love America - everthing is free and the politicians are so nice to us. I think we all should be democrats because everyone loves to get presents and they always give so much to us. And then there would be no more fighting because no one would care about the budget.....but there would be no more money either.
But that's ok, we'll just print more.
I love this country.

Posted by Patrick February 12, 09 06:39 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Mass. congressmen push for monitoring of aid to Pakistan

Two Massachusetts representatives and witnesses at a House hearing yesterday said more safeguards may be required to make sure $1.5 billion a year in US development aid to Pakistan is not spent inappropriately or skimmed off in corruption. (Globe Staff, 12/9/09)

House votes to eliminate tax break for venture capitalists

The House voted by a wide margin and along party lines yesterday to eliminate a lucrative tax break for venture capitalists, private equity firms, and hedge funds. The measure moves to the Senate, which in past years has refused to eliminate the break. (Globe Staff, 12/9/09)

Senate health bill stalls as costs are weighed

Senator Patrick Leahy told reporters yesterday that he his wife have canceled their plans to spend Christmas at their farmhouse in Vermont, reluctantly concluding that the Senate would probably be stuck in Washington working on its massive health care package right up until the holiday. (Globe Staff, 12/9/09)

US’s long view in Afghanistan troubles many in Congress

Senior administration officials signaled yesterday that the United States will continue to commit a significant number of troops and substantial funding to Afghanistan for many years to come, despite a July 2011 deadline set forth by the president last week to begin a drawdown. (Globe Staff, 12/8/09)

Democrats reach agreement on public health insurance option

Senate negotiators reached a tentative deal last night to drop a full-fledged government-run insurance plan from the health care overhaul bill and replace it with a patchwork of new ideas to help people get coverage, according to a Democratic Senate staffer. (Globe Staff, 12/9/09)

Abortion dispute threatens accord on Senate health care bill

WASHINGTON - The battle over abortion is threatening to derail the health care overhaul package in the Senate, as liberals refuse to accept new abortion restrictions demanded by key moderates, who say that without the limits, they are inclined to vote against the overall bill. (Globe Staff, 12/8/09)

Debate on sending more US troops to Afghanistan becomes a war of words

WASHINGTON - When President Obama announced last week he would send 30,000 more US troops to Afghanistan, it sparked a war of words between supporters and opponents of the new strategy: whether it is a “surge’’ or an “escalation.’’ (Globe Staff, 12/8/09)

Obama prods Democrats on health care

WASHINGTON - President Obama made a rare Sunday visit to Capitol Hill yesterday, imploring Senate Democrats in a closed-door session to resolve their disagreements on health care and finish work on the sweeping legislation. (Globe Staff, 12/7/09)

Worries grow that health overhaul could price out many

President Obama has promised that the nation’s health care overhaul will make medical insurance available - and affordable - for everyone. But while bills in Congress would make insurance more accessible for millions of Americans, advocates worry that the Senate bill would impose significant financial burdens on some of the families who will now be required to buy ... (Globe Staff, 12/6/09)

Once again, Kerry is Obama’s go-to guy in Senate

John F. Kerry of Massachusetts has emerged as the White House’s ambassador in the Senate on a wide range of issues, a role the Democratic lawmaker will showcase in the coming weeks as he lobbies his wary colleagues to support President Obama’s Afghanistan war plan. (Globe Staff, 12/6/09)
archives