< Back to Front Page Text size +

A key vote for business

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor March 24, 2009 03:14 PM

Big business won a key ally today in its high-stakes fight against the "check-card" bill that would make it easier for unions to organize workplaces.

Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who was the only Republican to support the bill two years ago, told business groups that he will oppose the measure.

Unions were counting on him as the 60th vote to overcome an expected GOP filibuster. Democrats and two independents who usually vote with them control 58 seats.

“We applaud the Senator for taking a principled stand to support Main Street employers and workers in Pennsylvania," Thomas J. Donohue, president and CEO of the US Chamber of Commerce, said in a statement.

“There will likely be many attempts to push other forms of labor law reform with similar goals, and we urge the senator to continue to oppose these misguided efforts. We also urge all senators to oppose any efforts that would take away the protection of the private ballot, impose binding interest arbitration on America’s small businesses and other employers, or create one-sided remedies."

The bill would allow workplace organizers to form a union by signing up a majority of employees -- without allowing companies to demand a secret ballot.

Earlier today, the AFL-CIO released a poll it commissioned that showed 72 percent of Americans favoring the bill, including majorities of both Democrats and Republicans.

UPDATE: AFL-CIO president John Sweeney called Specter's decision "frankly a disappointment and a rebuke to working people, to his own constituents in Pennsylvania and working families around the country."

"We do not plan to let a hardball campaign from Big Business derail the Employee Free Choice Act or the dreams of workers," Sweeney added in a statement.

"There are deep flaws in our labor laws, as Sen. Specter acknowledged today. The freedom to join together and bargain with employers for fair wages and better benefits is critical to rebuilding our middle class – and now is exactly the time to do it, as we begin to revive our economy in a way that works for everyone. In the coming weeks, we will be escalating our campaign and finding the best ways forward to a balanced, strong economy."

Anna Burger, chairwoman of the Change to Win labor coalition, said in a statement, “The Employee Free Choice Act is a vital component to restoring our economy, rebuilding the middle class and renewing the American Dream for America’s workers. Allowing workers the choice to join together, free from intimidation and harassment, to bargain for job security, better wages and health care will stimulate our economy and put working families back on the path of prosperity. We will continue to work with Democrats and Republicans, including Sen. Specter, to pass this critical legislation and make our economy work for everyone.”

In a speech on the Senate floor, Specter called it a "very emotional issue with labor looking to this legislation to reverse the steep decline in union membership and business expressing great concern about added costs, which would drive many companies out of business or overseas," according to the Associated Press

Specter called the secret ballot "the cornerstone of how contests are decided in a Democratic society."

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

The current law protects the RIGHTS of WORKERS by requiring a secret ballot.

The union thugs are trying to TAKE AWAY that right so they can threaten and intimidate workers into forming unions that the workers don't want.

Posted by Raj K March 24, 09 04:11 PM
.

Republicans are not for workers and the chamber of commerce is not for small business. They are both shills for big business. Follow the money.
Republicans have the American people fooled into thinking they are one of them. What fools we have been.

Posted by ottokar March 24, 09 04:13 PM
.

The current law protects the RIGHTS of WORKERS by requiring a secret ballot.

The union thugs are trying to TAKE AWAY that right so they can threaten and intimidate workers into forming unions that the workers don't want.

Posted by Raj K March 24, 09 04:14 PM
.

Pure poppycock, Mr. Specter. You continue the business lie that the bill obviates the secret ballot. No, this is a snow job by the Republican minority that somehow controls all things in Washington by requiring a super-majority on every single piece of legislation. Who made up this rule and why do the Dems continue to allow this obstructionism? The Republican party is indeed the party of NO and the party of the rich corporations. We hope soon that the Republican party will be so small that we can drown it in the bathtub.

Posted by Victor Edwards March 24, 09 04:14 PM
.

After seeing the debacle the unions created in the automobile industry they need to be disbanded. They are an entity that has outlived their use. The government under the Messiah will make them irrelevant anyway He wants to dictate everything.

Posted by Dale Parker March 24, 09 04:16 PM
.

Excellent !

Posted by Randy March 24, 09 04:16 PM
.

This is just outright irresponsible. EFCA doesn't block or ban secret ballots, it merely introduces an alternative method to form unions. Employees may still use secret ballots if they choose to do so.

The talking point that EFCA stops employees from using secret ballots is just an outright lie designed to frighten the uninformed so that these execs don't have to tell the truth and say, "This law would cause more unions to be formed, and we are anti-union."

Posted by Rob March 24, 09 04:17 PM
.

The "secret ballot," Specter supports is that of the two wolves and one sheep deciding on what to have for dinner.

Posted by Arthur Martin March 24, 09 04:18 PM
.

This bill is a joke, and supporting it is a joke, and I'm glad I gave up my subscription to this rag of a newspaper, since they support it as well.

When 5 guys start showing up on our doorsteps to "convince" us to sign up for a union, I'll thank Obama, Congress, and this trash of a newspaper.

Posted by Disgusted Democrat in Mass. March 24, 09 04:18 PM
.

Your lead off sentence indicates your bias when you use the provocative "big business" that we have all heard used to describe the "big, bad guys".
That said, ALL businesses got an ally with Sen. Specter's change in support. Small businesses can least afford the extra costs associated with dealing with NLRB and another organization (the union) when competing for business. And, we need virtually every business to be successful today for jobs.
A fair, secret ballot is what everyone is entitled to, not the carnival that this bill would have created.

Posted by JD March 24, 09 04:23 PM
.

Your lead off sentence indicates your bias when you use the provocative "big business" that we have all heard used to describe the "big, bad guys".
That said, ALL businesses got an ally with Sen. Specter's change in support. Small businesses can least afford the extra costs associated with dealing with NLRB and another organization (the union) when competing for business. And, we need virtually every business to be successful today for jobs.
A fair, secret ballot is what everyone is entitled to, not the carnival that this bill would have created.

Posted by JD March 24, 09 04:23 PM
.

Poor Victor, he is such a victim, he just wants equal OUTCOME instead of equal OPPORTUNITY. Our constitution states "pursuit of Happiness" not guarnteed, get your own money the way we do, EARN IT!

Posted by anon March 24, 09 04:27 PM
.

Thank goodness that someone in Congress has some sense. Taking away the secret ballot is how the Soviet Union and Hitler's Germany controlled their unions.

Posted by hank_v March 24, 09 04:28 PM
.

I think it will be a sad day when Unions are no longer an effective tool for workers rights, workers safety and to keep the heads of large manufacturing bases form keeping all the wealth. The man power should be compensated for keeping the "Rich - Rich" and enabling future growth for fair wages and an ever growing need to better ourselves and our families. Please don't act hastely and take away the rights of working class families and our fight for fair wages and safe manufacturing.

Posted by Ray March 24, 09 04:30 PM
.

CORRECTION: The current law protects the EMPLOYERS by allowing the company to demand that the workers use a secret ballot. Then they intimidate the workers into making the decision they like best.
The unions are trying to GIVE THE RIGHT TO FORM A UNION to the WORKERS. The workers can choose to use a secret ballot if they wish, this does not eliminate that option.
SPECTER WAS BOUGHT!

Posted by TJPro March 24, 09 04:31 PM
.

UNION (Underperforming Nagging Inempt Ogranisation Nonsense) I hate unions. They are made for Lazy people. Since the formation of a union in our company we have go Bankrupt. Yea, we realy need overpaid under performing employees in this country. What a bunch of crock.

Posted by Cesar March 24, 09 04:33 PM
.

Pretty amazing that the Democarts want to eliminate the secret ballot which is the conerstone of the democracy. What happens next? do we eliminate secret ballots for the presidency?

Imagine if campainging was outlawed for public elections, much like the "camapinging" that goes on during union elections, from both sides. Does anyone really believe that Obama would be elected president if he hadn't spent $675 million on advertising and campaigning. Might as well send all our jobs to China if this bill becomes law!

Posted by Business guy in Ohio March 24, 09 04:33 PM
.

Big Business? Why does the Boston Globe have to editorialize? Sen. Specter specifically referenced small business in his quote and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce represents businesses of all sizes. It's also medium-sized and small businesses that would surely be adversely affected by the "forced choice" act. It's a membership grab by the unions to counter a steady decline in union membership. As a small business person, I am opposed to the card check legislation, it goes too far, and I applaud Specter standing up for small businesses around the nation.

Posted by Tanaman March 24, 09 04:35 PM
.

Atta Boy, Arlen. It's about time you did something Republican.

Posted by BubbaRight March 24, 09 04:35 PM
.

Some common sense from some Specter after foolishly having supported the 787bln bailout put up by the dems (along with the 2 Repub. senators of Maine).

I hope he gets voted out next time around, but then again I hope everyone gets voted out. Term limits for EVERY office.

Posted by no March 24, 09 04:35 PM
.

Present law allows any employees to sign cards saying they are interested in a union. It also requires a time period for all to become informed before voting on whether to have a union. This is called protecting the rights of ALL workers. The proposed legislation would promote the UNIONS, not the workers.

Posted by Dick March 24, 09 04:36 PM
.

Secret ballot is the only fair way to do it. Democrats support BIG BUSINESS too..UNIONS ARE BIG BUSINESS and they are running companies into the ground and reaping the rewards. Unions filled Democratic coffers this past election, this bill and the automakers bailout is just payback. Keep drinking the kool-aid. RepubliCons have their agenda too and Obama is looking like a fool. Where's my Centrist/Federalist representation? Everyone is too far left or too far right! What happened to the intelligent middle of the road people.

Posted by soames March 24, 09 04:38 PM
.

This is excellent news! One small brightspot in today's political nightmare.

Posted by Larry Douglas March 24, 09 04:42 PM
.

Union activists argue that government-supervised secret-ballot organizing elections are "inherently and intensely coercive" and that publicly signing a union membership card in the presence of union organizers, known as card-check organizing, is the only way that workers can freely choose to unionize. But due to union organizers' techniques, card checks often do not reflect workers' free and considered choice about union membership.
Even when organizers do not illegally threaten workers, card checks expose workers to organizers' psychological manipulations and give them only one side of the story. Card checks lead many workers to make impulse decisions and expose workers who wish time to consider their decision to harassment by union organizers. Cards signed in public simply do not represent workers' free and considered choice.
The privacy of the voting booth, however, protects workers from these abuses. Government-supervised elections ensure that workers can express their true decision after time for reflection and without pressure or fear of harassment.

Posted by hank_v March 24, 09 04:43 PM
.

Thank goodness we have a few senators like specter. We need to keep the secret ballot or the mafia owned unions will run over everyone. The employees would be afraid to vote against joining a union otherwise.

Posted by Josh Greenberg March 24, 09 04:44 PM
.

I'm ashamed that I ever voted for the Democrati party. They are EVIL . . .

Posted by Larry Latimore March 24, 09 04:46 PM
.

Unionization will make US workers more expensive and more problematic to work with than their offshore counterparts. Do the math.

Secret ballots are the cornerstone of all democratic elections/votes. You have to ask, why is it so important to know who voted how?

Posted by crypt2121 March 24, 09 04:51 PM
.

Why anyone would think that unions are good after the disaster they caused with the big 3 auto makers is beyond me. They demand, and demanded year after year and now the companies are essentially a wreck. Why would anyone think they would be good for any business is not understandable. Unions are an outdated concept and so is their business model (they really are in the business of collecting dues/revenues). Perhaps if exsisting unions truly would have the employees best in mind they would gain some support and the their operating model would grow not shrink.

Posted by JoeSmith March 24, 09 04:52 PM
.

If unions are such a great thing, why is legislation needed to prop them up?
Unions are a thing of the past. This latest maneuver is just a power grab, a money grab, and a payback by dems for all the campaign money channeled to them. There is no logical reason to otherwise change existing organization rules.
If unions were necessary, or even if they were a good thing, they could survive on their own.
Let common sense prevail here.

Posted by R Brown March 24, 09 04:54 PM
.

Arlen Specter is a fraud and a big business shill; he has been for for 46 years. The man with the "Magic Bulls-it Theory." He is part of a vicious right wing cabal that has successfully conspired to defraud you of your hard earned dollars by transferring the wealth of the common man to international mega-conglomerates, who have no loyalties to anyone, save themselves.

These corporations have defrauded American consumers, forced us into debt at the point of the international gun and rode off into the sunset with their Fu-king blood money. If you want to suck the vile puss from the anuses of these Scum-bags, just so you can suck up to them for "a job," you deserve their worst. If you make less than 250k per year and you are a Republican, you are a social and political retard; you are totally incompetent and completely unable to make an intelligent choice.

It is long past time for these vile scum to be rounded up! They need to be sent to jail RIGHT NOW!

Posted by Dark Horse March 24, 09 04:54 PM
.

If unions are such a great thing, why is legislation needed to prop them up?
Unions are a thing of the past. This latest maneuver is just a power grab, a money grab, and a payback by dems for all the campaign money channeled to them. There is no logical reason to otherwise change existing organization rules.
If unions were necessary, or even if they were a good thing, they could survive on their own.
Let common sense prevail here.

Posted by R Brown March 24, 09 04:55 PM
.

The legislation's goal is to pressure people to support a union by making petitions more public. People will be afraid to oppose the union this way.
It's not hard to understand.

Here's the deal: If you can't get a winning vote in a secret ballot, the workers obviously don't want a union. Too bleeping bad.

Posted by Lysis Strata March 24, 09 05:01 PM
.

I'm a Republican who supports this move by the unions. It has been the business leaders who have always used intimidation to beat back unionization of employees. They threaten individuals, or say, "I'll close the business down before we go union." Or they threaten anyone who attempts to organize with their jobs. Sometimes firing them for any other cause they can dream up, so they can say it wasn't because of their organzation attempts. I know, I used to work for one of those corporations. Unions are not anti-business. They benefit from businesses. Businesses are anti-union, because of nothing less than corporate greed. The business leaders are making millions off the backs of their minumum wage employees. Take Wal-Mart as an example.

Posted by Jerry March 24, 09 05:02 PM
.

How does a union help business serve the customer better? answer = it doesn't

Posted by tom pooley March 24, 09 05:07 PM
.

This bill would crush small business...if there is no profit to be had a company will just close its doors. So now what? You have your union but 100 workers are put to the street. The current Unions are the cause in the manufacturing decline in the US over the last two decades.

Posted by T.D. March 24, 09 05:12 PM
.

As Americans, we have always been able to vote in secrecy. Why should we give up this fundamental privilege to accomodate the union. If the workers want a union, they will vote it in. Secret ballot won't change that outcome.

Posted by Steve French March 24, 09 05:17 PM
.

In China police crush efforts to set up independent unions as threats to the Communist Party. Many workers say the sole legal state-run union is a charade, a feckless bureaucracy that has only the pretense of representing the proletariat.

As we adopt more and more of Communist China's policies the Chinese are telling us to mind our own business when we try to lecture them on human rights.

The right of a workers to unionize should be a fundamental right.


Posted by Norris Hall March 24, 09 05:25 PM
.

I'm happy with what Senator Specter has done. The EFCA does do away with the secret ballot. If more than 50 percent sign cards, under whatever persuasion that is applied, the union MUST be recognized with no election. What union organizer with any experience is going to ask for an election that they might lose when 51 percent means a union has to be recognized. It is disingenuous to say that the secret ballot is not abolished. By choosing to get 51 percent of cards signed, there can not be an election. It seems pretty plain to me............

Posted by Ken DJ March 24, 09 05:30 PM
.

Rob, your argument is baseless. The well-founded fear of unions intimidating workers into signing a public petition card is easily applied by extension to whether or not they'll "choose" to hold a secret ballot. Clearly, a worker inclined to publicly choose to hold a secret election would be subject to the same intimidation as if they wanted to publicly check 'NO' on the same petition.

Posted by Kyle M March 24, 09 05:32 PM
.

Well, all I can say is that I am glad that Dr Obama has revealed his agenda. I was almost supporting him there for a minute.

We need to get some more Republicans in Congress ASAP, and pray that he does only a limited amount of damage before then.

It does not look good, folks. Y'all will miss George W Bush before this is over.

.

Posted by Josh Geller March 24, 09 05:33 PM
.

President Obama and his gang of fools do not promote the freedoms that our founding fathers established for all of us. They are increasing big government and not giving hard working Americans the opportunity to prosper. Pretty soon it will be more profitable to sit home and collect cash from one of his social reform organizations. I want to work hard and prosper like every other decent, hard-working American. I'm sure those who voted for change are now wishing to change their votes for Obama. Good luck to all of us.

Posted by Anonymous Comment March 24, 09 05:36 PM
.

I've had the union thugs knocking on my door very late at night just to make sure that I was voting for the "right" union when two unions were competing for top dog where I worked. Doesn't matter. That company is long gone...It was a manufacturing plant. How quaint! I can only imagine that if I had to sign a card in public...in front of these union guys...yeah, right. Well, let 'em have it. Sure, why not? What plants/factories are left? None are around here. What ever they get their hands on they will destroy. The unions have already sent our manufacturing base to China. What more can they f**k up? Walmart? Then what's left? McDonalds? Produce pickers? Government workers? Why would government workers unionize? Is the government workplace a corrosive work environment? Do the workers for the people treat folks unfairly? We have a military base near here and the union folks there are always stopping work for something...always! They are down to about 20 minutes of work an hour. Wonder why our jobs are overseas?
The once mighty and proud union...Still ruled by thugs!

Posted by Land of the What March 24, 09 06:17 PM
.

God forbid something in favor of employees is offered. We are all seeing the result if you are left to the mercy of the employers. The percentage of the unionized workers in US is the lowest in history. And the misery out there is at the highest.
Go figure.

Posted by Mike March 24, 09 07:24 PM
.

IT IS ABOUT TIME SENATOR SPECTER BEGAN ACTING LIKE A CONSERVATIVE! WE WONDER WHY HE CALLS HIMSELF A REPUBLICAN?

STAND UP ARLEN AND IF YOU NEED HELP WE CAN SEE THAT YOU GET A BRACE TO SUPPORT YOUR BACK TO ASSIST YOUR BACKBONE! i HAVE VOTED FOR YOU MANY TIMES WHILE RESIDING IN LANCASTER COUNTY, BUT YOU CERTAINLY HAVE NOT REFLECTED IN THE PAST THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE POINT OF VIEW. YOU MAY STILL BE ABLE TO STAND UP TALL ON YOUR OWN FOR WHAT IS RIGHT.

tRY A LITTLE HARDER, YOU MIGHT STILL BE ABLE TO MAKE

Posted by David and Gertrud Kuhl March 24, 09 10:16 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

In N.E. governors’ races, GOP sees a chance to build on gains

Invigorated by state house victories earlier this month in Virginia and New Jersey, Republicans are turning their attention to governorships in New England, where they believe the retirement of four incumbents and a competitive race in Massachusetts has created wide-open opportunities. (Globe Correspondent, 11/25/09)

Senators voice optimism on public option

WASHINGTON - Buoyed by their weekend victory on a vote beginning the health care debate, several Senate Democrats expressed optimism yesterday they could find a way to keep a government-run insurance plan in the sweeping bill. (Globe Staff, 11/23/09)

Health overhaul narrowly advances

The Senate narrowly overcame the first of two critical hurdles to passing sweeping health care legislation last night, mustering the minimum of 60 votes required to begin debate on the bill and opening a volatile floor fight likely to last weeks. (Globe Staff 11/22/09)

Latinos, blacks take harder hit amid recession

Latinos and African-Americans in Massachusetts and across the country are facing high unemployment rates that could spiral to levels not seen in decades as the jobless economic recovery drags on, analysts and urban community advocates say. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Some lawmakers push back Catholic church on health care bill

Representative Louise Slaughter has a consistent record advocating abortion rights. So the New York Democrat was stunned recently to receive, for the first time, a letter from a Catholic diocese in western New York, demanding that she explain her vote this month against a health care amendment prohibiting insurance companies from paying for abortions. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Support wanes for curbs on credit-card interest rates

Efforts in Congress to cap credit-card interest rates are faltering because of opposition from Democrats and a lack of specific support from the White House, despite growing consumer outrage over a rush by banks to impose rates as high as 30 percent. (Globe Staff, 11/19/09)

Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort

Despite early pleas for bipartisanship, President Obama is forging ahead with his domestic agenda with a largely single-party strategy, unable to corral more than a handful of Republicans on a wide range of major legislation before Congress. (Globe Staff, 11/17/09)

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 11/14/09)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)
archives