< Back to Front Page Text size +

Kennedy promotes national service bill

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor March 10, 2009 06:30 PM

By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON -- A national service bill aimed at drawing Americans from elementary school children to retirees won bipartisan plaudits today from key senators, who said they are hoping to get the measure passed before Easter.

The measure -- a joint effort by Senators Edward M. Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican -- would provide $5 billion over five years to fund 250,000 volunteers in energy, the environment, healthcare, and education. President Obama mentioned the Serve America Act in his address to Congress last month.

While US soldiers are serving overseas, "Americans should be able to serve on the homefront as well, addressing the national problems of our times,'' Michael Brown, CEO of the Boston-based City Year community service program, told the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Kennedy was not present at the hearing, but several of his colleagues -- as well as those who testified in favor of the measure -- lauded the Massachusetts lawmaker for his authorship of the bill. Senator Barbara Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat who presided at the hearing, said she would push to get the bill approved before the Easter-Passover break, which begins April 6.

Kennedy did have a statement entered into the record.

"Many years ago, on the fifth anniversary of the Peace Corps, I asked one of those young Americans why they had volunteered, and I will never forget the answer: 'It was the first time someone asked me to do something for my country,' " Kennedy said in the statement.

"Now it’s time to ask again. Americans young and old are looking for new ways to serve their communities and give back to their country."

The full statement and summary of the bill, provided by Kennedy's office, is below:

Many years ago, on the fifth anniversary of the Peace Corps, I asked one of those young Americans why they had volunteered, and I will never forget the answer: “It was the first time someone asked me to do something for my country.”

Now it’s time to ask again. Americans young and old are looking for new ways to serve their communities and give back to their country. This hearing will enable us to learn of new and better ways to provide those opportunities to serve.

Service has always been a bipartisan goal, and the legislation we’ll hear about today continues that tradition. From President Kennedy’s creation of the Peace Corps to President George H.W. Bush’s Points of Light to President Clinton’s AmeriCorps, presidents of both parties have contributed their own ideas about how best to ask the American people to serve their own communities. I commend President Obama for making it an early priority of his Administration to expand service opportunities across the country to involve many more Americans in meeting our most pressing challenges.

In 1990, working with the first President Bush, our Committee approved the original National and Community Service Act. Many of those who worked on that legislation are - leading the way again today. Senator Hatch has committed so much of his life to the causes he believes in. Senator Mikulski planted the seed for AmeriCorps and has never stopped fighting.

I’m proud to work with both of them again on the bipartisan Serve America Act. And I commend Senator Enzi for his support as we guide this bill and the reauthorizations of the National and Community Service Act and the Domestic Volunteer Service Act through our Committee. As always, he’s an excellent partner.

The Serve America Act draws on some of the lessons of the past two decades of service programs—

· Service can make a greater difference in tackling problems if we focus on specific challenges;
· Service opportunities early in life can put young people on a path to a lifetime of service;
· More and more older Americans are interested in putting their skills and experience to work for their communities; and
· Forward-thinking social entrepreneurs are coming up with their own effective ways of tackling some of our greatest challenges.

Now is the time to act on what we’ve learned. The Serve America Act will create new volunteer corps with specific missions. For example, as the major national debate about climate change goes on, a Clean Energy Service Corps will take steps to conserve our resources. As the dropout crisis continues to plague so many of low-income schools, an Education Corps will tutor, teach, and mentor students.

The legislation will also increase service opportunities for senior citizens, to draw on the many skills that older Americans have to offer. It will support part-time volunteering through a Volunteer Generation Fund to increase volunteer management and capacity. It will also increase the Eli Segal Education Award, the value of which has remained stagnant while college costs have skyrocketed.

National service has been a cause of mine for many years, and the time is right today to do much more. I look forward to working closely with my colleagues on the Committee and the President to strengthen service opportunities for all Americans.

A summary of the legislation is below.

THE SERVE AMERICA ACT
A Legislative Initiative to Expand and Improve
Domestic and International Service Opportunities for All Americans
Senator Edward M. Kennedy and Senator Orrin Hatch

Themes
· Expand opportunities for people to serve at every stage of life.
· Use service to meet specific national challenges. Put service to work to solve our most pressing challenges, such as tackling the dropout crisis and strengthening our schools; improving energy efficiency; safeguarding the environment; improving health care in low-income communities; expanding economic opportunities for low-income individuals; and preparing for and responding to disasters and emergencies.

I. Ask Many More Americans to Give a Year to Solve Specific Challenges: Building on the success of AmeriCorps, the legislation will create new, effective “Corps” focused on areas of national need. It will ask 175,000 Americans to give a year of service through these corps as part of a new national commitment to solve these challenges, expanding the number of national service participants to 250,000.

II. Increase Opportunities to Serve by People of All Ages:
· For Students, Increase Service Early in Life: Service early in life will put more and more youth on a path to a lifetime of service. The legislation will improve opportunities for young people in low income, high-need communities to engage in service to improve their own communities.
· For Retirees, Value Their Skills and Make Service Work for Them. Many retiring citizens are ready, willing, and able to be involved in service and have skills the public needs, as evidenced by those who already serve through the current Senior Corps Programs. The legislation will build upon the existing framework and enhance incentives for retirees to give a year of service through the new Corps, and will establish “Encore Fellowships” that help retirees transition to longer-term public service.
· For Americans of All Ages, Increase Volunteering. Not all Americans can make a significant time commitment to service, but many volunteer in other ways. The legislation will expand the volunteer pool by establishing a “Volunteer Generation Fund” to help nonprofit organizations recruit and manage more volunteers.

III. Support Innovation in the Nonprofit Sector: Social entrepreneurs who have launched innovative nonprofit organizations such as Teach for America and Citizen Schools in Boston are experimenting with new solutions to pressing problems. The legislation will recognize and support the role of effective social entrepreneurs in solving our national challenges:
Establish a Commission to study and improve how the federal government, nonprofits, and the private sector work together to meet national challenges effectively.
Apply Effective Business Strategies to the Nonprofit Sector, by establishing a network of “Community Solution Funds” that are basically venture capital funds to help the nonprofit sector seek talent and put it to work.

IV. Improve and Expand International Service and America’s Respect in the World
Support for Short-Term International Service Opportunities: We must expand the Peace Corps so more Americans can provide critical assistance to people across the globe while promoting America’s international standing. But many skilled Americans are unable to give two years. The legislation will strengthen the current “Volunteers for Prosperity” program, which coordinates and supports short-term international service opportunities for skilled professionals to serve in developing nations.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

I guess the highest form of flattery is copying. JFk came up with the Peace Corp 40+ years ago. Nothing original Teddy Boy?

Posted by XENOPHON March 10, 09 04:05 PM
.

Of course Kennedy wasn't at the hearing. He's almost never in Washington. I understand he has cancer but if the Senator want's to help and serve the citizens of Massachusetts he should give up his seat or better yet, retire and volunteer.

Posted by jimmy fa March 10, 09 07:08 PM
.

5 billion dollars for volunteers, Gotta love it

Posted by repod March 10, 09 07:41 PM
.

Will Kennedy just retire and quit screwing things up. First immigration in the 70's; now national service at a mere pittance of $5 Billion.

Can't wait to see his health care proposal.

Oh and to show my bi- partisan spirit, Orrin Hatch can join him in retirment. GD Rhino!!

Posted by paulrevere March 10, 09 08:38 PM
.

5 billion dollars...for volunteers? Isn't that a contradiction? Oh no! It's the democratic definition of "volunteering"......Money for everything not necessary.

Posted by jane mcgregor March 10, 09 10:18 PM
.

Only in washington dc do you need to hand out money to get volunteers. Or maybe this isn't voluntary afterall.

Federal government is out of control. Why don't they just plan what schools we will go to, what occupation we'll have, who we can marry, and how many kids we can have.

The founding fathers are turning in their graves.

Posted by Boobis Americanus March 10, 09 10:58 PM
.

This is an excellent proposal which will enable a number of people to contribute their energy and brain power to many deserving projects. Funding is needed since the volunteers need to be recruited, trained, and managed and some equipment, materials, or other expenses are needed to enable them to do their jobs. 1 billion dollars for each of 5 years for 250,000 people is just $4,000 per person. Pretty good return on investment for 1 million and a quarter person-years of work.

Posted by John G March 10, 09 11:33 PM
.

I agree - why does volunteering cost $5 billion?

Posted by Mike S March 10, 09 11:45 PM
.

repod,

Of course! What kind of precedent would be set if we allowed people to give freely of their time and skills without making sure that $5,000,000,000 is spent on a bunch of political hack bureaucrats who do nothing while pretending to "supervise" them?

Washington politics at its FINEST!

Posted by REMITROM March 10, 09 11:49 PM
.

Hey Repod, the volunteers may be free, but the materials and supplies required are not.. or perhaps you missed that logical conclusion.. you must be a Republican, logic tends to escape them.

Posted by mtbr1975 March 10, 09 11:59 PM
.

As someone currently committing a year to full time community service with City Year, I can tell you where the money goes. It is not possible to serve for a full year without a stipend. The five billion dollars goes to fund stipends (which, by the way, are $200 a week before taxes for working 10 hour days.. far below minimum wage) so that committed and skilled people can put ALL of their energy towards worthy causes without going bankrupt. It may also help fund some supplies so that these programs can be successful. I am in a classroom all day and responsible for running two after school clubs, and certain supplies are necessary. Certainly volunteering on the weekends or after work is exemplary and important. But to serve full-time, which is what this bill is primarily addressing, funding is necessary.

Posted by id3alist March 11, 09 02:10 PM
.

Hey mtbr1975, We have private and government programs set up for volunteers that are funded as we speak. As Obama larger government by the minute, this new agency will employ many who will sit at a desk making salary and benefits as they decide how to decimate 5 billion dollars and send out volunteers who found the time to give their time for free. You must be a progressive wealth redistributionist to think that is a sound decision of tax dollars. The money could go to the programs already set up and get up and going more quickly.

But Obama needs more control and power over the people. This is not about service. This is about destroying the economy to a point everyone will need government intervention, namely socialism. This is about making the people raw and frightened saul alinsky style, when taxes are so extreme to pay for all these agencies and social programs that citizens will follow Obama off the cliff and beg for government socialism.

There is no money for these programs. We are enslaving our future generation to obama's evil marxist agenda of making America pay and for redistributing wealth. Obama will never be able to say he protected America as Bush did. Obama will never be able to say he had to pay for katrina, 9/11, twin towers, two wars and homeland security. Obama will have his own war but he plans on gutting funding for his war. Sending military to Afghanistan with less funding is a president bent on suicide missions of our forces.

Did you hear that government has already spent over a trillion in stimulus, not including interest, 410 billion for a year budget that will only be for 6 months, and 2 trillion to save the banks? 350 billion of that was under Bush of course which has been forgotten that Obama pulled 350 billion of the original TARP to use and then asked for up to 2 trillion more.

What is not mentioned in this article is there will be little choice whether you volunteer or not if you need help to go to college and/or need one of Obama's many, many new entitlements.

In this time of our economy being what Obama calls the worse since the depression, we do not need new government agencies. It is already well known as private employment is dropping consistently, government is growing leaps and bounds. One day you will wake up and everyone will be placing bricks in roads for government assistance as they do in communist China. Obama is pushing through programs that will have to be taken down once a sane, not revengeful President is placed back in office. Obama will be a Carter 1 term but not before he does as much damage as he can for 4 years.

If you cannot see this about Obama then you need to open up and read about who he is and what he is not. It's so obvious, Hugh Chavez (Bill Ayers comrade) is saying to Obama go all the way to socialism and join us. You know Venzuela where the poor are extremely poor with no help at all because Chavez controls the revenue and companies? While the New Zealand prime minister is saying Obama needs to stop with the spending on programs that will not create jobs or help and start working on the economy. When Russia's President warned to not go to communism because they had done that and it destroyed them. Everybody sees what Obama is doing but those too blind to look around.

Posted by owen March 11, 09 05:43 PM
.

this is the scariest chain of comments I have seen. There are so many things going wrong in our country, one of them this childish need to point fingers. Those of you who complain about spending for volunteers, please, share what you do? I have worked at City Year for over 10 years, first as a volunteer where I made $155 a week before taxes, and have continued as a staff member. I have seen over 1300 young people come through here over my decade of service, all dedicated to serving their community. They serve roughly 50 hours per week, graduating having served over 1700 hours of service in 10 months. If we didn't give them a stipend and modest healthcare, we would not be able to do this. They serve in classrooms as tutors, in after school programs as mentors, and focus on our drop out crisis in America. Those of you who say this is a waste of money - i CHALLENGE you to go and volunteer full time for just a week in an urban school. I guarantee you will change your mind. Stop with the accusations and open your minds to the idea that so many young people want to serve their country! That is an amazing thing.

Posted by kdlucie March 12, 09 01:13 PM
.

forced volunterism is involuntary servitude ms. kducie dimwit.

Posted by bellek March 21, 09 09:44 AM
.

I don't believe that this bill forces service in any way. And, if it creates an atmosphere in which service is encouraged and apathy discouraged I see no problem with that. When I first started doing volunteer work I did not want to do it at all and I hated it but, because a very wise professor encouraged me to keep trying I stuck with it. Eventually, I came to enjoy service work very much and have now spent over 3,000 hours over 3 years tutoring grade school and high school kids at risk of dropping out. Those kids have all gone on to college and will, therefore, NOT be a tax burden upon the community, in all likelihood NOT commit violent crimes, and WILL become assets to this country. Furthermore, I did all of this work unpaid and completely uncompensated. If I had received money from the government I think I could have kept even more kids off the streets. I would have used it to buy ACT practice books, to help them pay their college application fees, and to enroll kids in camp programs like upward bound. I'm so glad that this passed and I hope we see more of the same. At the same time, it's depressing to see how little people know about volunteerism and how little they care.

Posted by Renee April 13, 09 07:13 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Senators voice optimism on public option

Buoyed by their weekend victory on a vote beginning the health care debate, several Senate Democrats expressed optimism yesterday they could find a way to keep a government-run insurance plan in the sweeping bill. (Globe Staff, 11/23/09)

Health overhaul narrowly advances

The Senate narrowly overcame the first of two critical hurdles to passing sweeping health care legislation last night, mustering the minimum of 60 votes required to begin debate on the bill and opening a volatile floor fight likely to last weeks. (Globe Staff 11/22/09)

Latinos, blacks take harder hit amid recession

Latinos and African-Americans in Massachusetts and across the country are facing high unemployment rates that could spiral to levels not seen in decades as the jobless economic recovery drags on, analysts and urban community advocates say. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Some lawmakers push back Catholic church on health care bill

Representative Louise Slaughter has a consistent record advocating abortion rights. So the New York Democrat was stunned recently to receive, for the first time, a letter from a Catholic diocese in western New York, demanding that she explain her vote this month against a health care amendment prohibiting insurance companies from paying for abortions. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Support wanes for curbs on credit-card interest rates

Efforts in Congress to cap credit-card interest rates are faltering because of opposition from Democrats and a lack of specific support from the White House, despite growing consumer outrage over a rush by banks to impose rates as high as 30 percent. (Globe Staff, 11/19/09)

Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort

Despite early pleas for bipartisanship, President Obama is forging ahead with his domestic agenda with a largely single-party strategy, unable to corral more than a handful of Republicans on a wide range of major legislation before Congress. (Globe Staff, 11/17/09)

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 11/14/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Earmarks’ cash flow lifts firms, lobbyists, lawmakers

16 defense-related firms in Massachusetts have secured nearly $30 million in federal funding in next year's defense appropriations bill pending in Congress. The tally offers a lesson in the practice known as congressional earmarking, in which lawmakers direct federal money to specific projects, usually in their districts. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Afghanistan wary of US plan to send more advisers

Afghan officials have begun to push back from the Obama administration's plans to send hundreds of advisers to the country, complaining the Americans are often overpaid, underqualified, and unfamiliar with the culture of the country. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Mass. keeps an eye on US bill’s funding ban

Massachusetts officials are closely monitoring an abortion funding ban in the sweeping health care legislation before Congress to make sure that it does not restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the state. (Globe Staff, 11/11/09)
archives