< Back to Front Page Text size +

First in wave of healthcare policy proposals debuts

Posted by Lisa Wangsness, Political Reporter April 28, 2009 05:37 PM

WASHINGTON -- The first pieces of what will become sweeping legislation to overhaul the nation's healthcare system have arrived at last.

The proposals float a new payment system for doctors and a new focus on primary care and care coordination for patients.

Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus and Senator Charles Grassley, the committee's ranking Republican, released the first of three sets of policy "options" for reforming the healthcare system this afternoon, a day before the full committee meets to begin discussing them.

This first set of "options" focus on many of the less contentious aspects of the healthcare legislation -- improving quality of care and controlling soaring healthcare costs.

The big themes include changing the way doctors are paid by Medicare to reward quality care instead of quantity of care; providing bonuses for primary care doctors and general surgeons, who are in short supply; a major push for "care coordination" in Medicare by encouraging providers to work together in caring for patients; establishing quality performance measures and a national quality improvement plan; and reducing Medicare fraud.

The proposals also call for making a stronger committment to comparative effectiveness research -- a systematic effort to discover through coordinated scientific research which treatments work best for which patients. This was a hot-button issue in the stimulus package, which set aside $1 billion for such research; the new proposals leave open the contentious question of whether the body guiding that research would be within government or a separate non-profit entity.

These will be preliminary talks -- the Finance Committee will begin shaping the bill in earnest in early June. Still, after nearly a year of hearings and meetings behind closed doors, it's a big moment.

Also yesterday, Senator Edward M. Kennedy's Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions held a hearing on what lessons policymakers could learn from reform efforts in other states, including Massachusetts, Vermont, Utah and California. Witnesses from Massachusetts included Jon Kingsdale, executive director of the Massachusetts Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority, and Eileen McAnneny, senior VPof the Associated Industries of Massachusetts.

At the hearing, Kennedy said the federal government must learn from efforts going on in the various states and "constantly work so the states themselves have an opportunity for success."

Kennedy's committee, which also has jurisdiction over many healthcare issues, is working on what is expected to be separate but closely related healthcare legislation; Democrats hope to eventually merge the two bills.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

This is a massively complex proposal that promises to ensnarl doctors and nurses in a morass of bureaucracy that will not save money and will negatively impact patient care. The fine print must be read and understood in Talmudic fashion. It promotes managed care concepts which have failed for the past 30 years. It is a full employment act for the consultants, management gurus, and Inside the Beltway lobbyists who have gotten rich off telling doctors and nurses the right way to practice medicine - while patient care has suffered. It is probably a full employment act for health care lawyers like me.

Posted by Brant S Mittler MD JD April 29, 09 09:31 AM
.

It's become clear that the staus quo is no longer sustainable. The traditional model of relying solely on individual performance is no longer adequate. Improving care coordination from the patients perspective should a goal for all of us. Measuring our own outcomes creates a feedback loop from which we and others can learn. We must become a professional team not a group of professionals on a team. Rewarding excellence is basic to our value system. In the end the government needs us in healthcare to be creative in achieving these goals. Objecting only is not the solution.. . .

Posted by Marshall Steele MD April 30, 09 07:31 AM
.

Does the "soaring costs" of healthcare include the soaring costs of delivering care, or just of buying it? Are any efforts expended in bringing down the costs to the health care provider of his/her costs of rising malpractice insurance premiums, the costs of renting space, the costs of electricity, fuel, equipment, salaries for staff (who expect at least a cost of living increase every year) , the costs of education (medical schools now cost a minimum of 40-50k/yearx4years for each student, excluding living costs), of training and retraining, the costs of upgrading equipment and treatments, etc., etc.? Or do people want less medical care, or care at the level of the 1960's , when the "costs" for all were far less?

Posted by David Johnson April 30, 09 01:41 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

In N.E. governors’ races, GOP sees a chance to build on gains

Invigorated by state house victories earlier this month in Virginia and New Jersey, Republicans are turning their attention to governorships in New England, where they believe the retirement of four incumbents and a competitive race in Massachusetts has created wide-open opportunities. (Globe Correspondent, 1:03 a.m.)

Senators voice optimism on public option

WASHINGTON - Buoyed by their weekend victory on a vote beginning the health care debate, several Senate Democrats expressed optimism yesterday they could find a way to keep a government-run insurance plan in the sweeping bill. (Globe Staff, 11/23/09)

Health overhaul narrowly advances

The Senate narrowly overcame the first of two critical hurdles to passing sweeping health care legislation last night, mustering the minimum of 60 votes required to begin debate on the bill and opening a volatile floor fight likely to last weeks. (Globe Staff 11/22/09)

Some lawmakers push back Catholic church on health care bill

Representative Louise Slaughter has a consistent record advocating abortion rights. So the New York Democrat was stunned recently to receive, for the first time, a letter from a Catholic diocese in western New York, demanding that she explain her vote this month against a health care amendment prohibiting insurance companies from paying for abortions. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Latinos, blacks take harder hit amid recession

Latinos and African-Americans in Massachusetts and across the country are facing high unemployment rates that could spiral to levels not seen in decades as the jobless economic recovery drags on, analysts and urban community advocates say. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Support wanes for curbs on credit-card interest rates

Efforts in Congress to cap credit-card interest rates are faltering because of opposition from Democrats and a lack of specific support from the White House, despite growing consumer outrage over a rush by banks to impose rates as high as 30 percent. (Globe Staff, 11/19/09)

Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort

Despite early pleas for bipartisanship, President Obama is forging ahead with his domestic agenda with a largely single-party strategy, unable to corral more than a handful of Republicans on a wide range of major legislation before Congress. (Globe Staff, 11/17/09)

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 11/14/09)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)
archives