< Back to Front Page Text size +

Kennedy, Baucus say 'common ground' on healthcare

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor June 1, 2009 01:38 PM

Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Max Baucus are trying to rebut several media reports of dissension on a healthcare overhaul.

They and their staffs have been working for months on a healthcare overhaul, but according to the reports, Kennedy is pushing a version that would includes a government-run insurance plan that would compete with private plans, while Baucus is reportedly leaning toward a bipartisan measure without such a public plan.

President Obama also favors a public plan, but the insurance industry vehemently opposes it.

Over the weekend, however, Kennedy, chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee, and Baucus, chairman of the Finance Committee, issued a joint statement "affirming their commitment to seek common ground on health reform legislation, despite some media reports to the contrary:"

"For both of us, reforming the nation's health care system to cut cost, improve quality and provide affordable coverage remains the top priority on our two committees. We have worked together closely over many months and will continue to do so. We intend to ensure that our committees report similar and complementary legislation that can be quickly merged into one bill for consideration on the Senate floor before the August recess."

UPDATE: Meanwhile, a coalition of liberal and labor groups announced this afternoon that they plan to spend as much as $82 million to lobby for universal healthcare.

The effort includes the AFL-CIO and Change To Win labor federations, MoveOn.org, and more than other 1,000 other groups representing more than 30 million members.

"Over the past few years, we have worked together to build a progressive infrastructure and a movement that helped to elect President Obama and begin to undo the damage of the last eight years. But it was just the beginning," said Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor and chairman of the Democratic National Committee during last year's campaign. "As the health care reform debate makes clear, America needs a strong progressive movement; now is not the time to become complacent."

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

I'm all for putting the government's finger on the scale here. The only parties making money are insurance companies and pharmaceutical firms. Maybewith a public alternative, they'll have to be a little less greedy to compete.

Posted by Kathleen Hussein in Maine June 1, 09 11:22 AM
.

I'm not greedy, I'll take the equivalent of the Congressional healthcare benefit. I mean hey, if it's good enough for them...

Posted by Johnny Whistle June 1, 09 12:35 PM
.

I'm all for putting the government's finger on the scale here. The only parties making money are insurance companies and pharmaceutical firms. Maybewith a public alternative, they'll have to be a little less greedy to compete.

Posted by Kathleen Hussein in Maine June 1, 09 11:22 AM

=========================

If the government starts up its own it will bankrupt the private sector. Nothing good can come from it. Do you really think companies will keep their own private stuff if they just shove it off on the taxpayer? People grow up!

Posted by tictoc02026 June 1, 09 12:49 PM
.

I agree with Kathleen's comment. Private insurers, like Blue Cross/Worst Shield only care about profit at the expense of lives. As for the pharmaceutical giants, they are too busy working on male enhancement, pattern baldness, and eyelash length to give a damn.
e.-

Posted by keesh June 1, 09 01:07 PM
.

Universal Healthcare is a cruel hoax! Perhaps Teddy would like to donate his trust fund to offset the costs. Will John and Jane Doe get the same care as Teddy?
Between Universal Healthcare and "Global warming" the inmates are running the asylum

Posted by XENOPHONIC June 1, 09 01:40 PM
.

Putting this article under "Political Intelligence" is an oxymoron. Anything that Kennedy thinks up is destined for failure. Think Immigration Bill of the 80's.

Please Ted, for the sake of the country, go gently into retirement.

Posted by paulrevere1947 June 1, 09 01:51 PM
.

I agree with #1. If we are to move forward on this "overhaul," we cannot have more of the same! A public component is the very least we must have. Tough if the insurance companies and the pharmaceuticals don't like it [what are they afraid of -- that they'll lose their billions in profits? Please.] Why should citizens have to sacrifice while these behemoths trample over us -- e.g., crushing the drug component in Congress, etc. Of course, Congress MUST NOT CAVE this time!!

Posted by Raffaela June 1, 09 02:03 PM
.

As for the pharmaceutical giants, they are too busy working on male enhancement, pattern baldness, and eyelash length to give a damn.
e.-

Posted by keesh June 1, 09 01:07 PM

=====================

Male enhancement and Viagra are the engines that drive the profits for the development esoteric cures. Where do you think the money comes from? Some people here are just so ignorant and have no idea how business works. Like government run health care and a bureaucrat adding up your societal value before you get a transplant will be so much more fairer. Rationed health care is the only way a single payer system can work, your parents and grand parents will become cheaper when dead, and I quote from HHS nominee's book Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis, he states that old people should just accept the conditions of their age. He was going to be HHS secretary, now he is on the board of Healthymagination for GE, look up that on Google if you were mad about Dick Cheney and Haliburton this one will make your head spin.

Posted by tictoc02026 June 1, 09 02:08 PM
.

I also agree with Kathleen. A government plan will promote competition and encourage private insurers to hold down administrative costs, a huge contributing factor to the health care crisis--more so than the actual costs of care. Enacting legislation or regulations to limit private administrative costs would be far less effective than having a public plan competing in the market.

Posted by Kathy Darling June 1, 09 02:25 PM
.

"RIDING THE RAILS OVER A CLIFF:" ( The latest and truly horrific description of the perilous journey of our nations uninsured.) A large portion of this unfortunate group falling through the cracks are middle class Americans. The non group premiums are so outrageously high that they could break the financial back of the family home. Even then there is no guarrantee that the for profit health insurance companies will even pay their claims especially vulnerable non group claims. I have a question for Senator Max Baucus: Senator do you have any idea of how many uninsured Ameicans suffering from untreated cancers,and thousands of other deadly afflictions have succumed to premature death? Some estimates put it in the millions since the Truman Administration. I firmly believe that it is God's will that you should join Senator Ted Kennedy and make available what you and fellow law makers possess for your own famillies duplicate in form ,affordable, guarranteed renewable, non denial of claims and including preexisting conditions.
They shoud not pay one penny more than what fortunate members of the House and Senate pay for the same coverage.

Posted by ED STEWART June 1, 09 03:19 PM
.

We have a single-payer government run health plan called Medicare, which currently has 33 trillion (with a "t") dollars in unfunded liabilities.

Name one government program that is cost effective, or even well run. What we'll end up with is a healthcare system that has Mass Pike managers and MBTA union workers.

Posted by rialto55 June 1, 09 03:51 PM
.

Medicare is a single payer system and costs 2-3% of claims to administer. Private insurance costs 25-28% of claims to administer. Look it up for yourself. With emergency room visits and no preventive care all of "those" people without insurance are being paid for by you and me anyway. All lobbyists and the pharmaceutical industry will fight single payer to the bitter end as their gravy train would come to an end. If you like lobbyists, high administration fees, high executive compensation, 20% increase/yr, no cooperative group pharmaceutical purchasing then keep saying that a govt. plan costs too much. I'll see all of you at the poor house in ten years, only the rich will be seeing your and my doctors. Viva no health care.

Posted by markeyboy June 1, 09 10:26 PM
.

Simple question... why does Edward "Silver Spoon (aka "Chappaquiddick") Kennedy keep getting elected? At the very least, term limits for everyone!

Posted by The Esquire June 6, 09 09:26 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

In N.E. governors’ races, GOP sees a chance to build on gains

Invigorated by state house victories earlier this month in Virginia and New Jersey, Republicans are turning their attention to governorships in New England, where they believe the retirement of four incumbents and a competitive race in Massachusetts has created wide-open opportunities. (Globe Correspondent, 1:03 a.m.)

Senators voice optimism on public option

WASHINGTON - Buoyed by their weekend victory on a vote beginning the health care debate, several Senate Democrats expressed optimism yesterday they could find a way to keep a government-run insurance plan in the sweeping bill. (Globe Staff, 11/23/09)

Health overhaul narrowly advances

The Senate narrowly overcame the first of two critical hurdles to passing sweeping health care legislation last night, mustering the minimum of 60 votes required to begin debate on the bill and opening a volatile floor fight likely to last weeks. (Globe Staff 11/22/09)

Some lawmakers push back Catholic church on health care bill

Representative Louise Slaughter has a consistent record advocating abortion rights. So the New York Democrat was stunned recently to receive, for the first time, a letter from a Catholic diocese in western New York, demanding that she explain her vote this month against a health care amendment prohibiting insurance companies from paying for abortions. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Latinos, blacks take harder hit amid recession

Latinos and African-Americans in Massachusetts and across the country are facing high unemployment rates that could spiral to levels not seen in decades as the jobless economic recovery drags on, analysts and urban community advocates say. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Support wanes for curbs on credit-card interest rates

Efforts in Congress to cap credit-card interest rates are faltering because of opposition from Democrats and a lack of specific support from the White House, despite growing consumer outrage over a rush by banks to impose rates as high as 30 percent. (Globe Staff, 11/19/09)

Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort

Despite early pleas for bipartisanship, President Obama is forging ahead with his domestic agenda with a largely single-party strategy, unable to corral more than a handful of Republicans on a wide range of major legislation before Congress. (Globe Staff, 11/17/09)

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 11/14/09)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)
archives