< Back to Front Page Text size +

Obama brags on energy measures

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor June 29, 2009 01:19 PM

President Obama held an event this afternoon to trumpet one of his biggest legislative victories so far -- the narrow House passage late Friday of the first-ever bill to tackle global warming.

The sweeping legislation, passed on a 219-212 vote, would rewrite US environmental policy in the most significant way since the 1970s Clean Air Act and would create a controversial cap-and-trade system that would limit carbon emissions and under which the government would sell or give away permits to emit limited amounts.

Obama said it is time for bold action to build on what he called more action on clean energy in the last few months than in the past few decades, including new fuel efficiency standards for all vehicles and green jobs in the economic stimulus plan. He also announced new efficiency standards, including compact fluorescent light bulbs. (His full remarks are below, followed by the White House release.)

He called the climate change bill "extraordinary," saying it will open the door to a clean energy economy, end US dependence on foreign oil, and create thousands of jobs. but he also has quibbles with the House version.

During his campaign, Obama called for all the pollution permits to be sold to help raise money for other priorities, but went along with House Democrats' plan to give many of them away to help lower the cost to industry.

On Sunday, Obama also acknowledged reservations about a provision that would punish trading partners that don't work to curb pollution. "At a time when the economy worldwide is still deep in recession and we've seen a significant drop in global trade, I think we have to be very careful about sending any protectionist signals out there," he told reporters.

House Republicans railed against the bill, saying it amounted to an energy tax on Americans -- and Senate Republicans quickly indicated they will use the same line of attack to try to stop the bill.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said on "Fox News Sunday" that the measure would lead to "significant increases" in electricity costs across the country.


But in his weekly Internet and radio address on Saturday, Obama urged the Senate not to listen to the naysayers. "We cannot be afraid of the future," he said. "And we must not be prisoners of the past. Don’t believe the misinformation out there that suggests there is somehow a contradiction between investing in clean energy and economic growth. It’s just not true."

While Obama and supporters say the bill is a historic advance, some liberal allies say it doesn't go far enough.

MoveOn.org, the major advocacy group, sent a fund-raising missive to members today asking for a vote whether to fight the bill in the Senate.

"The US House passed a huge energy bill Friday. Lots of good people are applauding the passage of this legislation. But here's the ugly truth: Big Oil and Coal lobbyists, working in cahoots with some conservative Blue Dog Democrats, weakened the bill terribly—it now falls far short of President Obama's campaign vision to transition America's economy to clean energy and create millions of new jobs," the email said.

"In fact, the bill repeals a key part of the Clean Air Act and doesn't do nearly enough to shift America to renewable energy -- so instead of a boom in solar and wind, the bill locks us into dirty coal power for another generation.... o win in the Senate, we need to make sure everyone understands that the Clean Air Act is under attack and highlight the other big problems with the bill. If we decide to proceed with this campaign together, we'll boost progressive champions like those who fought in the House, and expose conservatives who do the bidding of the oil and coal industry."

OBAMA'S REMARKS

THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon, everybody. Since taking -- excuse me -- since taking office, my administration has mounted a sustained response to a historic economic crisis. But even as we take decisive action to repair the damage to our economy, we're also working to build a new foundation for sustained and lasting economic growth.

And we know this won't be easy, but this is a moment where we've been called upon to cast off the old ways of doing business, and act boldly to reclaim America's future. Nowhere is this more important than in building a new, clean energy economy, ending our dependence on foreign oil, and limiting the dangerous pollutants that threaten our health and the health of our planet.

And that's precisely what we've begun to do. Thanks to broad coalitions ranging from business to labor; investors to entrepreneurs; Democrats and Republicans from coal states and coastal states; and all who are willing to take on this challenge -- we've come together to achieve more in the past few months to create a new, clean energy economy than we have in decades.

We began with historic investments in the Recovery Act and the federal budget that will help create hundreds of thousands of jobs doing the work of doubling our country's supply of renewable energy. We're talking about jobs building wind turbines and solar panels; jobs developing next-generation solutions for next-generation cars; jobs upgrading our outdated power grid so it can carry clean, renewable energy from the far-flung areas that harness it to the big cities that use it.

And thanks to a remarkable partnership between automakers, autoworkers, environmental advocates, and states, we created incentives for companies to develop cleaner, more efficient vehicles -- and for Americans to drive them. We set in motion a new national policy aimed at both increasing gas mileage and decreasing greenhouse gas pollution for all new cars and trucks sold in the United States. And as a result, we'll save 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold in the next five years -- the projected equivalent of taking 58 million cars off the road for an entire year.

And we know that even as we seek solutions to our energy problems at home, the solution to global climate change requires American leadership abroad. That's why I've appointed a global climate envoy to help lead our reengagement with the international community as we find sustainable ways to transition to a global low-carbon economy.

And, now, just last Friday, the House of Representatives came together to pass an extraordinary piece of legislation that will finally open the door to decreasing our dependence on foreign oil, preventing the worst consequences of climate change, and making clean energy the profitable kind of energy. Thanks to members of Congress who were willing to place America's progress before the usual Washington politics, this bill will create new businesses, new industries, and millions of new jobs, all without imposing untenable new burdens on the American people or America's businesses. In the months to come, the Senate will take up its version of the energy bill, and I am confident that they too will choose to move this country forward.

So we've gotten a lot done on the energy front over the last six months. But even as we're changing the ways we're producing energy, we're also changing the ways we use energy. In fact, one of the fastest, easiest, and cheapest ways to make our economy stronger and cleaner is to make our economy more energy efficient. And that's something that Secretary Chu is working every single day to work through.

We know the benefits. In the late 1970s, the state of California enacted tougher energy-efficiency policies. Over the next three decades, those policies helped create almost 1.5 million jobs. And today, Californians consume 40 percent less energy per person than the national average -- which, over time, has prevented the need to build at least 24 new power plants. Think about that. California -- producing jobs, their economy keeping pace with the rest of the country, and yet they have been able to maintain their energy usage at a much lower level than the rest of the country.

So that's why we took significant steps in the Recovery Act to invest in energy efficiency measures -- from modernizing federal buildings to helping American families make upgrades to their homes -- steps that will create jobs and save taxpayers and consumers money. And that's why I've asked Secretary Chu to lead a new effort at the Department of Energy focusing on implementing more aggressive efficiency standards for common household appliances -- like refrigerators and ovens -- which will spark innovation, save consumers money, and reduce energy demand.

So today, we're announcing additional actions to promote energy efficiency across America; actions that will create jobs in the short run and save money and reduce dangerous emissions in the long run.

The first step we're taking sets new efficiency standards on fluorescent and incandescent lighting. Now I know light bulbs may not seem sexy, but this simple action holds enormous promise because 7 percent of all the energy consumed in America is used to light our homes and our businesses. Between 2012 and 2042, these new standards will save consumers up to $4 billion a year, conserve enough electricity to power every home in America for 10 months, reduce emissions equal to the amount produced by 166 million cars each year, and eliminate the need for as many as 14 coal-fired power plants.

And by the way, we're going to start here at the White House. Secretary Chu has already started to take a look at our light bulbs, and we're going to see what we need to replace them with energy-efficient light bulbs.

And if we want to make our economy run more efficiently, we've also got to make our homes and businesses run more efficiently. And that's why we're also speeding up a $346 million investment under the Recovery Act to expand and accelerate the development, deployment, and use of energy-efficient technologies in residential and commercial buildings, which consume almost 40 percent of the energy we use and contribute to almost 40 percent of the carbon pollution we produce.

We're talking about technologies that are available right now or will soon be available -- from lighting to windows, heating to cooling, smart sensors and controls. By adopting these technologies in our homes and businesses, we can make our buildings up to 80 percent more energy efficient -- or with additions like solar panels on the roof or geothermal power from underground, even transform them into zero-energy buildings that actually produce as much energy as they consume.

Now, progress like this might seem far-fetched. But the fact is we're not lacking for ideas and innovation. All we lack are the smart policies and the political will to help us put our ingenuity to work. And when we put aside the posturing and the politics; when we put aside attacks that are based less on evidence than on ideology; then a simple choice emerges.

We can remain the world's leading importer of oil, or we can become the world's leading exporter of clean energy. We can allow climate change to wreak unnatural havoc, or we can create jobs utilizing low-carbon technologies to prevent its worst effects. We can cede the race for the 21st century, or we can embrace the reality that our competitors already have: The nation that leads the world in creating a new clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the 21st century global economy.

That's our choice: between a slow decline and renewed prosperity; between the past and the future.

The American people have made their choice. They expect us to move forward right now at this moment of great challenge, and stake our claim on the future -- a stronger, cleaner, and more prosperous future where we meet our obligations to our citizens, our children, and to God's creation -- and where the United States of America leads once again.

That's the future we're aiming for. I've got a great Secretary of Energy who's helping us achieve it. I want to thank again the House of Representatives for doing the right thing on Friday, and we are absolutely confident that we're going to be able to make more progress in the weeks and months to come.

Thanks, guys.

WHITE HOUSE RELEASE

WASHINGTON – Building on the action by the U.S. House of Representatives in passing historic legislation that will pave the way for the transition to a clean energy economy, President Barack Obama and U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu today announced aggressive actions to promote energy efficiency and save American consumers billions of dollars per year.
Today’s announcement underscores how the clean energy revolution not only makes environmental sense, but it also makes economic sense – creating jobs and saving money.
“One of the fastest, easiest, and cheapest ways to make our economy stronger and cleaner is to make our economy more energy efficient,” said President Obama. “That’s why we made energy efficiency investments a focal point of the Recovery Act. And that’s why today’s announcements are so important. By bringing more energy efficient technologies to American homes and businesses, we won’t just significantly reduce our energy demand; we’ll put more money back in the pockets of hardworking Americans.”
“When it comes to saving money and growing our economy, energy efficiency isn’t just low hanging fruit; it’s fruit laying on the ground,” said Secretary Chu. “The most prosperous, competitive economies of the 21st century will be those that use energy efficiently. It’s time for America to lead the way.”
More Energy Efficient Lighting
Today’s announcement includes major changes to energy conservation standards for numerous household and commercial lamps and lighting equipment. Seven percent of all energy consumed in the U.S. is for lighting.
The final rule has numerous benefits, including:
Avoiding the emission of up to 594 million tons of CO2 from 2012 through 2042 – roughly equivalent to removing 166 million cars from the road for a year;
Saving consumers $1 to $4 billion annually from 2012 through 2042;
Saving enough electricity from 2012 through 2042 to power every home in the U.S. for up to 10 months;
Eliminating the need for up to 7.3 gigawatts of new generating capacity by 2042 – equivalent to as many as 14 500MW coal-fired power plants;
Decreasing the electricity used in GSFLs by 15%, saving consumers up to $8.66 per lamp over its lifetime; decreasing electricity used by IRLs by 25%, saving consumers $7.95 per lamp over its lifetime.
In February 2009, President Obama tasked the Department of Energy with quickening the pace of energy conservation standards for appliances, while continuing to meet legal and statutory deadlines. Today’s announcement – which takes effect in 2012 – focuses on General Service Fluorescent Lamps (GSFL), which are commonly found in residential and commercial buildings, and Incandescent Reflector Lamps (IRL), which are commonly used in recessed and track lighting. These fluorescent and incandescent lamps represent approximately 38 and 7 percent of total lighting energy use respectively.
The final rule, as issued by the Secretary of Energy on June 26, 2009, can be viewed and downloaded from the Office Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s website at: www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/incandescent_lamps.html.
Building Efficiency Initiative
President Obama and Secretary Chu today announced a $346 million investment from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to expand and accelerate the development, deployment, and use of energy efficient technologies in all major types of commercial buildings as well as new and existing homes.
Residential and commercial buildings consume 40 percent of the energy and represent 40 percent of the carbon emissions in the United States. Building efficiency represents one of the easiest, most immediate and most cost effective ways to reduce carbon emissions while creating new jobs. With the application of new and existing technologies, buildings can be made up to 80 percent more efficient or even become “net zero” energy buildings with the incorporation of on-site renewable generation.
Today's buildings consume more energy than any other sector of the U.S. economy, including transportation and industry. In addition, almost three-quarters of our nation's 81 million buildings were built before 1979. Some were designed and constructed for limited service, and many will eventually require either significant retrofits or replacement.
Innovations in energy-efficient building envelopes, equipment, lighting, daylighting, and windows, in conjunction with advances in passive solar, photovoltaic, fuel cells, advanced sensors and controls and combined heating, cooling, and power, have the potential to dramatically transform today's buildings. These technologies—coupled with a whole building design approach that optimizes the interactions among building systems and components—will enable tomorrow's buildings to use considerably less energy, while also helping to reduce emissions and increase energy security.
This funding includes:

Advanced Building Systems Research ($100 million). These projects will address research focused on the systems design, integration, and control of both new and existing buildings. Buildings need to be designed, built, operated, and maintained as an integrated system in order to achieve the potential of energy efficient and eventually net zero-energy buildings. These projects will move beyond component-only driven research and address the interactions in buildings as a whole, in order to progress development of integrated, high performance buildings and achieve net zero- energy buildings.

Residential Buildings Development and Deployment ($70 million). Expanded work in Residential Buildings will increase homeowner energy savings by supporting energy efficient retrofits and new homes while raising consumer awareness of the benefits of increased health, safety, and durability of energy efficiency. The projects will provide technical support to train workers and create jobs, developing a new workforce equipped to improve the Nation’s homes and will permit a major initiative to provide builders with technical assistance and training through states, utilities, and existing programs to increase the market share of new homes achieving substantial whole house energy savings. To address existing homes, DOE will work with municipalities with a variety of housing types and vintages as well as subdivisions with similar housing stock to encourage a large number of energy efficiency retrofits.

Commercial Buildings Initiative ($53.5 million). These Recovery Act funds will be used to accelerate and expand partnerships with major companies that design, build, own, manage, or operate large fleets of buildings and that commit to achieving exemplary energy performance. This funding will be used to expand the number of these partnerships from 23 to about 75 through a competitive process beginning in September, 2009.

Buildings and Appliance Market Transformation ($72.5 million). In order to achieve energy savings, and ultimately lead to zero energy buildings, the marketplace must be conditioned to accept the necessary advanced technologies and activities and ensure that the current technologies are performing as intended via current energy efficiency standards. Key activities include expanding ENERGY STAR to accelerate development of energy efficient products and expand the ENERGY STAR brand into new areas; preparing the design, construction, and enforcement community to implement commercial building energy codes that require a 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the 2004 code in 2010; and accelerating and expanding DOE’s Appliance Standards program to evaluate innovative technologies and develop new test procedures that are more representative of today's energy use and equipment.

Solid State Lighting Research and Development ($50 million). The objective of the solid state lighting activities is to advance state-of-the-art of solid-state lighting (SSL) technology and to move those advancements more rapidly to market through a coordinated development of advanced manufacturing techniques. This project will both aid in the development and reduce the first cost of high performance lighting products. Continuing advances can accelerate progress towards creating a U.S.-led market for high efficiency light sources that save more energy, reduce costs, and have less environmental impact than other conventional light sources.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
.

Do we really want to create "thousands of jobs" when he is going to eliminate entire industries--costing tens of millions?

Posted by Doug June 29, 09 01:35 PM
.

Global warming is a joke. This legislation is going to punish everyone. Thumbs down.

Posted by obama is killin me June 29, 09 01:46 PM
.

"We cannot be afraid of the future," he said. "And we must not be prisoners of the past." Is anyone else sick of these eloquent nothings. This guys excretes platitudes. His number is up once all his impending taxes hit us.

Posted by J.B. June 29, 09 01:49 PM
.

On Sunday, Obama also acknowledged reservations about a provision that would punish trading partners that don't work to curb pollution (BGlobe, 2009).

So, what's the strategy for punishing China? Let's face it: They will more than offset any gains that are made in the USA. Of course, individuals like Al Gore (e.g. HUGE carbon footprint, etc...) also don't follow the very rules that they would like to enforce on others. What is the plan to punish them? The hypocrisy cannot catch up to the ignorance that pervades the whole deal...shame and a sin.

Posted by anonymous June 29, 09 01:51 PM
.

This is great stuff but I suspect it does not pass in the Senate. That being said it is good we are doing anything as we may already be past peak oil production and since our entire life and society depend on tons of really cheap oil/gas we are in for major trouble 10+ years from now (if not sooner).

Posted by RideTheLightning June 29, 09 01:57 PM
.

Yes, and this is the same man who promised if we spend all this bail-out money we will have less than 8% unemployment. Well... we spent the money and now we are well on our way to 10% unemployment.

The point is he doesn't know what the true cost or impact will be from Cap-n-trade.

It will most likely end up costing companies more to make or sell their goods and services, and therefore cost us more to buy them. That is one huge risk.

Posted by rb June 29, 09 02:02 PM
.

Obama proves he's just another poster boy for liberalism with his rhetoric demanding that we 'not listen to the naysayers'. these liberals goons are so afraid of the truth getting out that the only methods they have are to silence both the facts, and those who express them. all this must be done without thought, without debate, but really on nothing more than 'faith' in the Messiah.

it's time the lunatic left started worshipping another false god; this one has run his course, and in just a mattter of months. taking a clue from the Obama handbook, "the next president will INHERIT quite the mess". let's just hope we still have a country worth saving in 4 years.


Posted by jake June 29, 09 02:18 PM
.

"We cannot be afraid of the future," he said. "And we must not be prisoners of the past." Is anyone else sick of these eloquent nothings. This guys excretes platitudes. His number is up once all his impending taxes hit us.

=============================
Unfortunately by the time most Americans know what hit them it will be Game, Set, Match for America. I thought the spending and the deficits would slow them down, I was wrong, I thought they could never take on so much, but they have. They have wasted no time after this to go right on to single payer health care. The people behind Obama, I say that because he IS being led down the path by some other force here know that if they get this into law 2010 will not matter if the DEMS take a beating, they will have what they want. Repubs may have the legislature then but the liberals will have the bureauocracy and that is all they need. Groups like "organizing for America" will protest and threaten to get what they want and gain more and control through social action. They will have this power because they will be able to mobilize the masses of unemployed becasue they will administrate their existence and healthcare through subsidies. I think this will run it course till enevitable destruction of our economy. Just too many people think they can get something for free.

Posted by tictoc01026 June 29, 09 02:24 PM
.

Why isn't the Globe covering the 98 page report from the EPA's Alan Carlin which states that the science is not settled and making rush legislation based on mere hypothesis is foolhardy at best?? You always covered it when Bush would strongarm scientists. Same tactics, different ideology, but the Globe will always look the other way when it is their Dear Leader doing the strongarming suppression of dissenting views.

Posted by J.B. June 29, 09 03:24 PM
.

Are you kidding me? THIS is the best the President of the United Stats can do? Light bulbs? What a joke!!! I would think that getting this country out of a recession would be a top priority....How about bringing back the jobs industries sent overseas? How about taking action with the wars at hand? No,,,,lets create a HUGE deficit, so that our GREAT-GREAT grandchildren can pay it....Is he out of his mind? And what about the people backing him...voting these crazy ideas in? IS this STILL The United States of America?
This sounds like a bunch of non-sense to me..

Posted by whatdoesitmatter June 29, 09 04:43 PM
.

Clean coal is a joke and if we don't address this in the energy bill we weaken a significant aspect of it. The grid has to be improved so we can move toward wind and solar in a meaningful way - is this being taken care of too with the bill?

At the end of the day, we have to get tough now and this bill is a step in that direction, but we have much more work to do. I hope and pray the Senate doesn't screw this up by voting it down.

Posted by HopefulRealist June 29, 09 05:12 PM
.

I'm not a tree hugger or a demorcat. Saying that we have to do something now or we will always be held at gun point by the opec group that hate us anyway. I hope that I live long enough to see all the opec countries pouring their black gold on a sand hill because no body wants it. Yes this energy bill is going to hurt but $4 gas did to and having to pay $4500 to heat my home this past winter did to. So we need to suck it up and make some changes for our children and there children if we donot we could be see $250 a barrle oil or more think that crazy well if I said we would be seeing $150 a barrle back in 07 you would thought I was crazy. To sum up I donot agree with mr Oboma on many things and didnot vote for him but he is my presdent and I respect him and pray that he leads our country in the right direction and I believe with the energy bill at least he is trying

Posted by harvey w June 29, 09 07:14 PM
.

Are the Democrats and the Democratic Party willing to keep paying Unemployment Benefits for the rest of their lives to millions and millions of people now that the Green Mean Machine is slowly moving forward.I hope only Democrats suffer themselves,their children and grandchildrens but not the rest of American that didn't support this morturary bill.

Posted by skmj June 29, 09 07:28 PM
.

i am not american and reading the give-it-up-you've-already-lost theme in the (orchestrated?) comments section,all that can be said is if you put the energy you use in trying to stop this administration into helping your country instead of your caste,the problems would probably be half over.

Posted by may June 29, 09 10:28 PM
.

Led by commentary of Rush Limbaugh, conservative loyal listeners doubled over laughing at Obama's suggestion that Americans could save fuel expenses by topping off their car tire pressure. Americans burn 390 million gallons of gasoline per day. If fuel efficiency increased by an estimated 3% by increased tire pressure, the citizens of the USA could save 11.7 million gallons of gasoline per day....11.7 million gallons at 365 days per year equals 4,270,500,000,000 gallons or 4.2 billion gallons saved per year in the USA if Americans would monitor their tire pressure. At $2.50 per gallon the savings would would be $10.5 billion. Keep listening to Rush, he gets rich you get duped.


Posted by markeyboy June 29, 09 11:27 PM
.

Is no one concerned about the fact that Obama used California as a place that is "producing jobs, their economy keeping pace with the rest of the country, and yet they have been able to maintain their energy usage at a much lower level than the rest of the country." ? Are you kidding me? While Obama was giving the speech yesterday, one of the top news stories was California's need to issue IOU's because their state is bankrupt. Obama considers that economy "keeping pace with the rest of the country"?

Posted by Kat June 30, 09 10:01 AM
.

Consider the Connection to:
Environmental Communication
WHO-WHAT-WHERE-WHEN-HOW-WHY?
Please Google Search:
CTC123GREEN
CTC = Consider the Connection
123 = 3 PHOTOS = 3000 WORDS
GREEN = Going Green

Posted by Jerry Lee Mayeux July 3, 09 04:49 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

In N.E. governors’ races, GOP sees a chance to build on gains

Invigorated by state house victories earlier this month in Virginia and New Jersey, Republicans are turning their attention to governorships in New England, where they believe the retirement of four incumbents and a competitive race in Massachusetts has created wide-open opportunities. (Globe Correspondent, 1:03 a.m.)

Senators voice optimism on public option

WASHINGTON - Buoyed by their weekend victory on a vote beginning the health care debate, several Senate Democrats expressed optimism yesterday they could find a way to keep a government-run insurance plan in the sweeping bill. (Globe Staff, 11/23/09)

Health overhaul narrowly advances

The Senate narrowly overcame the first of two critical hurdles to passing sweeping health care legislation last night, mustering the minimum of 60 votes required to begin debate on the bill and opening a volatile floor fight likely to last weeks. (Globe Staff 11/22/09)

Some lawmakers push back Catholic church on health care bill

Representative Louise Slaughter has a consistent record advocating abortion rights. So the New York Democrat was stunned recently to receive, for the first time, a letter from a Catholic diocese in western New York, demanding that she explain her vote this month against a health care amendment prohibiting insurance companies from paying for abortions. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Latinos, blacks take harder hit amid recession

Latinos and African-Americans in Massachusetts and across the country are facing high unemployment rates that could spiral to levels not seen in decades as the jobless economic recovery drags on, analysts and urban community advocates say. (Globe Staff, 11/21/09)

Support wanes for curbs on credit-card interest rates

Efforts in Congress to cap credit-card interest rates are faltering because of opposition from Democrats and a lack of specific support from the White House, despite growing consumer outrage over a rush by banks to impose rates as high as 30 percent. (Globe Staff, 11/19/09)

Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort

Despite early pleas for bipartisanship, President Obama is forging ahead with his domestic agenda with a largely single-party strategy, unable to corral more than a handful of Republicans on a wide range of major legislation before Congress. (Globe Staff, 11/17/09)

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 11/14/09)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)
archives