< Back to front page Text size +

Study builds case for repealing 'don't ask, don't tell'

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor November 9, 2009 02:48 PM

By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration today has more research to help make its case for allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces.

A survey of troops who served in Iraq and Afghanistan has found that having gay or lesbian soldiers in fighting units has no significant impact on unit cohesion or readiness. (Read it here.)

The data raises new doubts about the underlying assumption of the congressional ban, namely that military discipline will fall apart if gays and lesbians were permitted to serve openly.

"Service members said the most important factors for unit cohesion and readiness were the quality of their officers, training, and equipment," said Laura Miller, a sociologist at the government-funded RAND Corp. that conducted the study along with the University of Florida. "Serving with another service member who was gay or lesbian was not a significant factor that affected unit cohesion or readiness to fight."

The study, which was commissioned by the Palm Center at the University of California, Santa Barbara -- whose researchers have advocated lifting the ban -- is the latest high-profile assessment to question the validity of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, which requires gays and lesbians to keep their sexual orientation secret or risk discharge.

RAND and the University of Florida found that "40 percent of the military members surveyed expressed support for the [current] policy, while 28 percent opposed it and 33 percent were neutral -- less support than seen in previous surveys," according to a release this morning by RAND, which also advises the Pentagon on a host of security matters.

It added: "About 20 percent of those polled said they were aware of a gay or lesbian member in their unit, and about half of those said their presence was well known. In addition, three-quarters of those surveyed said they felt comfortable or very comfortable in the presence of gays or lesbians."

The study comes a few weeks after a scholarly journal published for the Joint Chiefs of Staff included an article by an Air Force colonel calling for repeal of the 1993 law, arguing that forcing gay soldiers to live a lie actually undercut the honor and integrity that are central to military service.

President Obama has vowed to press Congress to repeal the ban on gays -- a key campaign pledge -- but has yet to begin lobbying lawmakers to take action. A bill to repeal the law in the House has been sponsored by Representative Patrick Murphy, a Pennsylvania Democrat, but no Senate sponsor has come forward.

The latest survey, which appears in the journal Armed Forces and Society, found no significant differences in the attitudes towards gays and lesbians among the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.

Other findings in the RAND announcement:

-- Compared to previous studies of military members, support for "don’t ask, don’t tell" continues to decline. The earliest polls in 1993 showed 75 percent agreed with the ban, 16 percent against, and 8 percent unsure.

-- The important factors for cohesion and readiness were officer/noncommissioned officer quality, training quality, and equipment quality. Beyond these factors, knowing a gay or lesbian person in the unit was not associated significantly with ratings of unit cohesion or readiness.

-- The most frequently endorsed arguments in support of integrating gays and lesbians were those that prioritized performance and qualifications over exclusionary practices.

  • CommentComment
  • Email E-mail

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Support wanes for curbs on credit-card interest rates

Efforts in Congress to cap credit-card interest rates are faltering because of opposition from Democrats and a lack of specific support from the White House, despite growing consumer outrage over a rush by banks to impose rates as high as 30 percent. (Globe Staff, 11/19/09)

Obama domestic agenda largely a one-party effort

Despite early pleas for bipartisanship, President Obama is forging ahead with his domestic agenda with a largely single-party strategy, unable to corral more than a handful of Republicans on a wide range of major legislation before Congress. (Globe Staff, 11/17/09)

Beirut attack victims’ families face new hurdle

On Veterans Day, Christine Devlin stood in the cold in Westwood for the unveiling of a new memorial to local soldiers lost overseas, including her son Michael, one of the 241 servicemen killed in the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983. (Globe Staff, 11/14/09)

Powerful health care groups offer optimism on overhaul

Two leading health care interest groups, representing insurers and big business, struck a more conciliatory, even optimistic tone on the health care overhaul yesterday, emphasizing their support of the overall goal of increasing coverage and containing costs even as they warned that the wrong bill could cause great harm. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

FHA runs low on cash, fueling bailout concerns

The Federal Housing Administration, which propped up the collapsing housing market last year, acknowledged yesterday that it has drained its cash reserves to dangerously low levels, heightening concerns that it might need a taxpayer bailout. (Globe Staff, 11/13/09)

Earmarks’ cash flow lifts firms, lobbyists, lawmakers

16 defense-related firms in Massachusetts have secured nearly $30 million in federal funding in next year's defense appropriations bill pending in Congress. The tally offers a lesson in the practice known as congressional earmarking, in which lawmakers direct federal money to specific projects, usually in their districts. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Afghanistan wary of US plan to send more advisers

Afghan officials have begun to push back from the Obama administration's plans to send hundreds of advisers to the country, complaining the Americans are often overpaid, underqualified, and unfamiliar with the culture of the country. (Globe Staff, 11/12/09)

Mass. keeps an eye on US bill’s funding ban

Massachusetts officials are closely monitoring an abortion funding ban in the sweeping health care legislation before Congress to make sure that it does not restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the state. (Globe Staff, 11/11/09)

Survey raises new doubts on military’s ‘don’t ask’ policy

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration received more research yesterday to help make its case for allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces. (Globe Staff, 11/10/09)

Lieberman’s threat of filibuster looms large

When a recent conversation among Senate centrists turned to insurance company antitrust concerns, Joe Lieberman boasted of his bona fides: As Connecticut attorney general in the 1980s, he sued the industry. (Globe Correspondent, 11/9/09)
archives

browse this blog

by category