Congress
Would-be Democratic Senate nominees blast GOP's Brown
Glen Johnson/Globe Staff
About 3,000 Massachusetts Democrats gathered in Lowell this morning for their annual state convention.
LOWELL The six Democrats who so far have declared they want to unseat US Senator Scott Brown next year blasted the Republican and mocked his service in "the people's seat" as they rallied delegates today at their party's annual convention.
"Scott Brown didn't make a mark in the Massachusetts Legislature and he isn't leaving any footprints in the United States Senate,'' said City Year co-founder Alan Khazei. ""We need a senator who leads."
Newton Mayor Setti Warren accused Brown of voting against the interests of Massachusetts men, women, and children.
"This is our senator, who even questions the science of global climate change," Warren said. "Is that someone who represents the values of our state?"
The crowd of roughly 3,000 delegates gathered at the Tsongas Center at UMass Lowell replied with a robust "no."
Democrats holding state convention in Lowell
Massachusetts Democrats are converging on Lowell this afternoon for the fun part of their annual convention: the convention-eve parties.
Lieutenant Governor Timothy Murray is throwing a bash, while Senate candidates such as Alan Khazei and Marisa DeFranco are holding smaller receptions. The host committee is also having a party organized by former Lowell City Councilor Curtis LeMay.
In addition, there's a Young Democrats bash at the Brewery Exchange.
Mass. Democrats to focus on Brown at convention
Massachusetts Democrats plan to focus on Republican Scott Brown and the record he has compiled in the US Senate during their annual convention in Lowell on Saturday.
According to an agenda released this afternoon, the party will also focus on building upon its 2010 achievements, including repelling a national GOP tide by reelecting an all-Democratic congressional delegation, as well as President Obama's 2012 reelection campaign.
The convention gavels to order at 10 a.m. at the Tsongas Center at UMass Lowell.
It will include remarks by Governor Deval Patrick and the state's other constitutional officers, as well as the four Democrats who have already declared their candidacy against Brown.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
For Kennedys, legacy preservation becomes life's work
Bryan Snyder/Reuters
Caroline Kennedy (center) stands in front of a model of the newly-named USS John F. Kennedy with Navy Secretary Ray Mabus (third from left), daughters Rose and Tatiana (first and second from left), husband Edwin Schlossberg (second from right), and son Jack (far right), during a ceremony Sunday.
While the dates of Kennedy deaths have been seared into the nation’s consciousness, the famed political family itself has a practice of focusing on birthdays.
It’s a more uplifting orientation, one that allows relatives to remember John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Edward M. Kennedy, and other departed family members on the terms in which they entered and served the world not the tragic events or illness that took them from it.
And so it was on Sunday, while many in the public were enjoying a round of golf, digging into a trashy beach novel, or breaking into provisions for the first barbeque of the summertime season.
JFK’s only daughter, Caroline, traveled to the presidential library named for her father to witness an announcement: The US Navy is going to name its next aircraft carrier in honor of the nation’s 35th president.
Senate candidate Warren marks birth of son
In less than 140 characters, Newton Mayor Setti Warren made a big announcement.
Just after 1 p.m. today, the Democratic Senate candidate announced he and his wife had a son.
"My wife Tassy and I are proud & excited to welcome our son, John David Warren into the world," said the mayor.
The couple already has a daughter, Abigail.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown reveling in local Democratic issues
Aram Boghosian for The Boston Globe
Senator Scott Brown listens as General Peter Chiarelli speaks to the crowd before the May 22 "Run to Home Base" event for wounded veterans and families at Fenway Park.
Republican Scott Brown may be a US senator now, but that hasn't stopped him from rekindling his roots as a state senator as he tries to stoke support for his 2012 reelection campaign.
Twice in recent weeks, Brown has issued statements condemning local Democrats amid the ongoing federal corruption trial of former House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi.
Yesterday, he did so after Governor Deval Patrick appeared on the witness stand, though Brown was careful not to single out the most powerful Democrat in the state by name.
State, national Democrats at odds over Brown challenger
Massachusetts Democrats and their counterparts in Washington are at odds over how best precisely to field a challenger to Republican Senator Scott Brown next year.
Governor Deval Patrick, who controls the Massachusetts Democratic Party, favors an organic process, with the candidate rising from a contested primary field.
The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which is charged with ensuring President Obama has the party majority he needs to pass his legislative agenda, is pointed toward landing a big-name candidate who can clear the field and take on Brown with maximum resources and minimum infighting.
Some of them haven't forgotten that Massachusetts Democrats took the blame when Brown surprised the 2010 state nominee, Martha Coakley, and cost the national Democrats their filibuster-proof majority in the US Senate.
Washington colleague Mark Arsenault and I looked at the dispute for a story in today's Globe.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Republicans prevent Senate vacation to block possible recess appointments
This is a corrected version of an earlier post. A correction is embedded in the story text below.
WASHINGTON – Despite weeks of speculation and lobbying by consumer groups, there will be no recess appointment of former Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren to head the newly formed Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
That's because, technically, there will be no recess.
Through parliamentary maneuvering this week, Republicans were able to prevent the Senate from officially shutting down during its Memorial Day vacation next week. During the so-called "pro-forma'' session during vacation, President Obama will not have the power to circumvent Senate confirmation proceedings and make appointments to key posts.
FULL ENTRYMcGovern leads effort to pass measure for faster Afghanistan withdrawal
WASHINGTON -- Democrats and some Republicans in the US House of Representatives sought to buck the White House today over the war in Afghanistan, illustrating growing impatience in Congress over the military’s role there since the death of Osama bin Laden earlier this month.
Representative James McGovern, a Worcester Democrat, spearheaded an effort with Republican co-sponsor Walter B. Jones of North Carolina to pass a measure that would require planning for a speedier withdrawal of troops from the nation where bin Laden plotted the Sept. 11 terror attacks.
The amendment to the defense authorization bill failed 204-215, but it gained far more than the 162 votes that it received last year when Democrats controlled the House. Both of the chamber’s Democratic leaders, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California and Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland , supported it, along with 26 Republicans.
FULL ENTRYNational Democratic Party in talks with potential candidates to run against Brown
WASHINGTON — National Democratic Party leaders are talking to “a number” of potential candidates about running against Republican Senator Scott Brown, and expect a frontline candidate to emerge soon, said the Democratic senator in change of recruitment.
“We believe that the state is one that we will win, and we expect to have a good strong candidate within weeks,” US Senator Patty Murray, Democrat from Washington, told reporters this morning in a briefing. Murray is head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which works to elect Democrats to the US Senate and to protect the party’s incumbents.
Brown, who won the Massachusetts seat in a special election in 2010, is a top political target of Democrats, who hold 53-47 advantage in the US Senate. Several Democratic seats could be in jeopardy next year, and the party hopes to defeat Brown to cushion losses elsewhere and maintain its majority.
Several Democrats have announced campaigns against Brown, though most of the state’s big names have passed on the race, such as Governor Deval Patrick. Democratic operatives worry about the ability of lesser-known candidates to compete against Brown, a national political figure with more than $8 million in his campaign account.
Murray declined to disclose names this morning, but speculation has been rampant about a possible campaign by Harvard professor and presidential advisor Elizabeth Warren, who has not ruled out a run.
Brown pushes job creation in op-ed
Senator Scott Brown pushed a multi-pronged approach to job creation today in an op-ed column for the Worcester Telegram & Gazette.
The Massachusetts Republican called for congressional approval of trade agreements, boosting education, and promoting job re-training are all elements of the plan.
"This year, I have worked across the aisle on a targeted approach to boost our economy," Brown wrote. "As your senator, and a member of the Senate’s Manufacturing Task Force, I will continue to look for common sense economic policies that help create jobs. With the passage of these trade agreements, we can start to tear down some of the barriers holding us back."
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Book: Frank helped partner get Fannie Mae job
WASHINGTON Representative Barney Frank helped his then-companion land a job at mortgage giant Fannie Mae in the early 1990s at the same time Congress was writing legislation to improve oversight of the lender, according to New York Times reporter Gretchen Morgenson, who recently wrote a book examining the financial crises.
Frank was a member of the House Financial Services Committee in 1991 when he "actually called up the company and asked them to hire his companion, who had just gotten an MBA from the Amos Tuck School of Business," Morgenson said during a recent appearance on National Public Radio.
"Of course the company was happy to provide a job for his companion and rolled out the red carpet in a series of interviews with a variety of executives, and it ultimately did hire the man," she said. "And he stayed there for I believe seven years."
Biden: US can be 'too incremental' after moon-shot goal
Stephan Savoia/AP
Vice President Joe Biden today marked the 50th anniversary of President Kennedy's moon-shot speech by complaining that that the US has sometimes become 'too incremental' in its pursuits and needs similar big dreams.
Vice President Joe Biden today marked the 50th anniversary of President Kennedy's speech about reaching the moon by complaining the United States has occasionally become "too incremental" instead of pursuing similarly big dreams.
The Democrat, speaking at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, recalled being an 18-year student at a Catholic boys school when the newly inaugurated president addressed Congress and laid down a monumental challenge.
"I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth," Kennedy declared on May 25, 1961.
That goal was achieved in July 1969, nearly six years after Kennedy was assassinated, when the crew of Apollo 11 visited the moon and successfully returned home.
Gingrich health care speech mum on Ryan plan
DERRY, N.H. Representative Paul Ryan’s plan to overhaul Medicare is causing controversy in Congress and likely contributed to yesterday’s defeat of a Republican House candidate in New York’s special election.
But speaking at Derry Medical Center in New Hampshire today, presidential candidate Newt Gingrich delivered an entire speech about health care without mentioning the overhaul, and then declined to take press questions about it.
Gingrich had previously criticized Ryan’s plan to turn Medicare into a voucher program, but the former House speaker backtracked after taking flak from his fellow Republicans.
Kerry pays tribute to father of state director
When Senator John Kerry is in Washington or traveling the country and the world, his state director, Drew O'Brien, presides over his office back in Massachusetts.
Earlier today, Kerry had a chance to recognize his aide of nearly a decade, noting the passing of O'Brien's father Edward L. O'Brien of Marshfield earlier this month.
"Edward O'Brien was an extraordinary blessing to his family and to his friends, but also to the country he loved, when he served in the US Navy in World War II," Kerry said in remarks televised by C-SPAN.
He said Drew O'Brien perpetuated that example by "living the spirit of public service that his father instilled in him and all his family."
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Warren does not rule out a run
WASHINGTON — Elizabeth Warren is a Harvard professor and presidential adviser, but will she be a US Senate candidate, too?
Warren fever has ticked up a few degrees with this morning’s New York Times story reporting that Democratic Party officials are trying to persuade Warren to run against Republican US Senator Scott Brown next year. The law professor is currently working to set up a new federal regulatory agency to protect consumers, as called for in Wall Street reform laws.
In a brief interview yesterday, as she was rushing down a hallway after testifying on Capitol Hill, Warren offered the standard non-denial of interest in a Senate run: “I’m working on the consumer protection agency, that’s 14 hours a day, that’s what I’m working on,” she said.
Correction
A Political Intelligence entry on Sunday incorrectly attributed to Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown a statement about the House Republican budget that appeared on a left-leaning news and opinion website, Talking Points Memo. The entry inaccurately presented the Talking Points Memo statement as a direct quotation by the Republican senator, while the statement was actually Talking Points Memo's interpretation of the senator's position.
Kerry: 'Too much at stake' to abandon US-Pakistani alliance
Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters today in Pakistan that "there is too much at stake" for the United States and Pakistan to abandon their alliance.
He said he and Pakistani officials have agreed on a series of steps that each side would take to improve relations, but declined to detail what those steps were.
"There are real differences between our two countries, but the bonds that tie us together in the fight against the threat of extremists is stronger than those differences," he said during a news conference in Islamabad.
Kerry mission highlights Senate straddle
Mian Khursheed/Reuters
Senator John Kerry meets today with Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani at the prime minister's residence in Islamabad.
There's never been a shortage of people willing to lampoon Senator John Kerry, or who have delighted in him being roasted.
Kerry has inflicted some of the damage himself, from trying to register a yacht in Rhode Island in an apparent Massachusetts tax dodge, to heading out windsurfing when presidential campaign advisers said it would underscore the elitist image they were trying to overcome.
Other damage has come from piling-on, all too easy with a person who can spend nearly as much time deciding what brand of beer to drink as it takes to down the first pint.
But those thoughts, emotions, or memories can seem petty when considering the duties he undertook today: representing the United States and delivering its complaints in the aftermath of the May 2 raid that found and killed Osama bin Laden while he hid amid a Pakistani military garrison.
Brown: DiMasi case shows danger of one-party rule
Jane Flavell Collins
In this artist's rendering, former House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi, left, listens as a prosecutor addresses the jury in his federal corruption trial.
Senator Scott Brown said yesterday the federal corruption trial of former House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi highlights the dangers of one-party dominance in Massachusetts and a "go-along-to-get-along" political culture.
Injecting politics into a normally celebratory moment, Brown said in remarks delivered at the Lasell College commencement ceremony: "I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican, just as one political party can't be right 100 percent of the time, it shouldn't have 100 percent of the power. Unchallenged power grows arrogant over time. It is what has given us one case of graft after another."
The lone Republican in the Massachusetts congressional delegation, Brown is seeking reelection next year in what has historically been a Democratic state. Democrats have begun lining up to challenge him, and Brown opponents have already started pounding him with advertising campaigns.
Warren: I will campaign outside Fenway - in cold
Newton Mayor Setti Warren has outlined how far he is willing to go to become the next US senator from Massachusetts: He will shake hands in the cold outside Fenway Park, if need be.
“I love the Red Sox they're doing pretty well," he told former Globe reporter Rick Klein when he appeared on "Top Line," the ABC News online program he now hosts each weekday. "I was at a game a few weeks ago. I’m gonna be out there, and across the state. We've been to cities and towns that's the kind of campaign I'm going to run, and that's the kind of campaign that will win.”
The comment harks back to January 2010, when fellow Democrat Martha Coakley mocked her then-Republican rival, then-state Senator Scott Brown, for pressing the flesh outside the ballpark when it hosted the NHL's "Winter Classic" on a frigid New Year's Day.
Brown went on to win the campaign and replace the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
Coakley went back to being attorney general.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Romney responds to Journal criticism
"Mitt Romney, Belmont, Mass." penned a Letter to the Editor that appeared in today's Wall Street Journal, responding to a scathing editorial on the newpaper's conservative editorial page the day before.
In it, Romney sought to address some criticisms of the universal health care law he signed while governor of Massachusetts, a measure the Journal had argued raised questions about his fitness to be president.
The 2006 Massachusetts law became the template for the federal universal health care law signed last year by President Obama, which the Journal and others deride as "ObamaCare."
"While I have had my disagreements with the Journal's editorial board, where we find common ground is on the need to repeal ObamaCare and replace it with reforms that empower states to craft their own solutions," Romney wrote. "A one-size-fits-all plan that raises taxes and ignores the very real differences between states is the wrong course for our nation."
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
House votes to expand offshore drilling
WASHINGTON -- The US House of Representatives passed legislation today to expand offshore gas and oil exploration to New England coastal waters and other areas where drilling is now banned.
The measure, which passed 243-179, is unlikely to advance beyond the House and would garner a veto from President Obama regardless. But the legislation highlights how energy and fuel prices have become one of the biggest political battlegrounds in the sharply divided Congress.
The bill makes no bones about its intent. Entitled the “Reversing President Obama's Offshore Moratorium Act,” the legislation countered a seven-year moratorium President Obama imposed last year on new offshore drilling. The bill would require the federal government to offer offshore leases in areas believed to have substantial oil and natural gas reserves.
“This legislation ensures that the Obama Administration can no longer withhold valuable energy resources necessary to increase American energy production here at home,” House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican, said in a statement. Cantor was among nine House members who didn’t vote on the bill.
FULL ENTRYRomney: No apology for state health plan
J.D. Pooley/Getty Images
Expected Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney tries to address conservative concerns about his Massachusetts universal health care law with a speech and PowerPoint presentation today in his native Michigan.
ANN ARBOR, Mich. Mitt Romney this afternoon tried to rebut conservative criticisms of his Massachusetts health care law as he called for abolishing President Obama’s national plan and replacing it with a new, more state-based reform of the US health care system.
In his first and perhaps most significant policy speech of his budding presidential campaign, he gave the strongest defense to date of his signature Massachusetts health care plan.
“A lot of pundits around the nation are saying that I should just stand up and say this whole thing was a mistake, that it was a boneheaded idea and I should just admit it, it was a mistake, and walk away from it,” Romney said. “And I presume that a lot of folks would conclude that if I did that, that would be good for me politically. But there’s only one problem with that: it wouldn’t be honest. I, in fact, did what I believed was right for the people of my state.”
Kerry bill would let Libyan opposition access to Khadafy funds
Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, a Democrat who heads the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is drafting legislation that would allow the opposition in Libya to access about $180 million in funds that have been frozen in Moammar Khadafy's overseas bank accounts, according to Libyan opposition leader Mahmoud Jibril.
Kerry announced the legislation Wednesday after a meeting with Jibril, but did not give a dollar amount.
But Jibril, who is being referred to as prime minister of the self-appointed opposition government that has taken charge of the effort to bring down Khadafy, told an audience at the Brookings Institution in Washington the amount of money Kerry is offering might be too little, too late.
He said the rebels need about $3 billion to avert a humanitarian catastrophe in cities besieged by Khadafy's forces and camps of fleeing refugees.
FLASHBACK: Romney, WSJ talk health care, circa 2006
ANN ARBOR, Mich. The topic: health care. The concern: It could undermine Mitt Romney's run for president. A key critic: The Wall Street Journal. The response: A speech and a PowerPoint presentation.
That was the tack the former Massachusetts governor took today as he tried to address a key vulnerability in his expected presidential campaign. But it's also the exact tack Romney took in 2006, while he still was governor, as he geared up for his first White House campaign.
In each instance, he tried to mollify conservative critics who argued universal health care cut against their free-market and libertarian beliefs.
The following article was published in The Boston Globe on April 26, 2006:
Brown: 'No comment' on seeing real bin Laden photos
A spokesman for Senator Scott Brown refused to say if he will travel to the CIA to see photos of a dead Osama bin Laden, after the agency offered today to show them to members of a congressional committee upon which the Republican serves.
The only other member of the Massachusetts congressional delegation who would qualify under the same offer, Democrat Niki Tsongas, will decline.
“The congresswoman is convinced that Osama bin Laden was killed and will not be requesting to see the photos,” said spokesman John Noble.
Brown spokesman Colin Reed said, “No comment on this.”
Frank expects Obama to make recess appointment of new consumer agency director
WASHINGTON -- Representative Barney Frank said today that he expects President Obama to bypass Congress and do a recess appointment to install the director of the new consumer protection agency for financial products.
The prediction follows a threat from Senate Republicans last week that they will block the confirmation of any director unless several measures to limit the agency's power are instituted.
Frank said such measures would allow Republicans to cripple the agency's power to protect consumers and possibly defund it altogether, eliminating one of the cornerstones of the financial regulation overhaul law passed last year. He said they were "acting like thugs" and forcing Obama to bypass the confirmation process.
FULL ENTRYDemocrat Tolman weighing challenge to Brown
Democrat Warren Tolman is considering a campaign to unseat Republican Senator Scott Brown next year.
Tolman refused to say if those people are dissatisfied with the current field, which doesn't include any of the better-known politicians in Massachusetts. Those who have already declared include Newton Mayor Setti Warren, City Year co-founder Alan Khazei, former lieutenant governor candidate Bob Massie, and Salem immigration attorney Marisa DeFranco.
Kerry jumps into cable fight
Senator John F. Kerry in joining Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino in seeking answers today about cable rate increases in the city.
Kerry, the chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, wrote to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski for a report on rate changes in Boston and other Massachusetts towns.
“I hope to ascertain whether rate hikes are specific to Boston or systemic, if the hikes are justified, and what the factors are that can effectively check those rate hikes,” the Massachusetts Democrat wrote.
Menino has petitioned the FCC for the right to regulate cable rates after a city-funded study found that monthly rates had gone up 60 percent in the last three years. The city lost its ability to set cable prices in 2002.
Comcast claims its rates are fair, and that satellite TV services, free broadcast TV, and the city’s second cable provider, RCN Telecom Services LLC, makes for a “highly competitive’’ market in Boston.
“We believe we continue to offer the most affordable options and best values for consumers,” the company has said in a statement.
Theo Emery can be reached at temery@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @temery.
Kerry: Bin Laden death 'game-changing' chance in Afghanistan
Senator John Kerry today labeled Osama bin Laden's death "a potentially game-changing opportunity" for a political solution in war-torn Afghanistan.
Kicking off the third of six hearings on Afghanistan and Pakistan this month by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in Washington, Kerry said that could "bring greater stability to the region and bring our troops home." The Massachusetts Democrat serves as chairman of the committee.
"Let me be very clear: A precipitous withdrawal from Afghanistan would be a mistake and I, for one, would take that option off the table," Kerry said in his prepared remarks. "Instead, we should be working toward the smallest footprint necessary, a presence that puts Afghans in charge and presses them to step up to that task at the same time that it secures our interests and accomplishes our mission of destroying Al Qaeda and preventing Afghanistan from ever again becoming a terrorist sanctuary.
"But make no mistake, it is unsustainable to continue spending $10 billion a month on a massive military operation with no end in sight and the good news is, we don’t have to. I am convinced that we can achieve our core goals at a more sustainable cost, in both lives and dollars," he added.
President Obama has pledged to begin removing some of the 130,000 US troops by July 31.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Breaking down the Brown race - by the numbers
Matthew J. Lee / Globe Staff
Senator Scott Brown, speaking in February at the induction ceremony for US District Court Judge Denise Jefferson Casper, is the focus of Democratic calculations as he heads toward his reelection campaign in 2012.
(Editor's Note: This post contains math and, even more ominously, math performed by a journalist with guidance from politicians.)
Newton Mayor Setti Warren was set this morning to personally declare what he stated yesterday in a slick movie: He is a candidate for US Senate next year.
With City Year co-founder Alan Khazei, Somerville activist Bob Massie, and Salem immigration attorney Marisa DeFranco already declared candidates, that all but guarantees a contested Democratic primary in September 2012, even with some dropouts.
Newton Mayor Warren announces US Senate candidacy
Pat Greenhouse / Globe Staff
Mayor Setti Warren, right, marches last year in Newton's Memorial Day parade alongside its grand marshal, Senator Scott Brown, second from left. Warren announced today that he will seek the Democratic nomination to challenge Brown for re-election next year.
Newton Mayor Setti Warren announced today that he will seek the Democratic nomination to challenge Senator Scott Brown for re-election next year.
In a heavily produced video, complete with stirring music, the former Kerry and Clinton aide said: "Many of you don't know me; I'm probably about as well known as Scott Brown was at this point two years ago."
Nonetheless, Warren said the race should reduce to a debate about party values.
Mass GOP files complaint over LWV Brown ad
Massachusetts Republican Party leaders today filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission against the League of Women Voters, alleging the nonprofit organization failed to properly file paperwork after it launched a television ad campaign criticizing Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown.
"We are calling on the League to immediately reveal their secret donors as the law requires, and to live by the same standards of openness and transparency they have encouraged others to adopt," Massachusetts Republican Party Chairwoman Jennifer Nassour said in a written statement.
The ads criticized Brown as well as Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill, a Democrat, for votes related to the Clean Air Act. Responding to the complaint, Elisabeth MacNamara, the organization's president, defended the ad, saying the ad targeted one particular issue, not the upcoming elections.
"Our ad will stand up to scrutiny because it is about Senator Scott Brown's vote to weaken the Clean Air Act and endanger public health," McNamara said in a statement issued Sunday. "It is not about an election that is 18 months away or a politician who may or may not be on the ballot in that election. The allegation to the FEC is simply a charade, designed to deflect attention away from Senator Brown's vote to block the Clean Air Act."
Transcript of Senator Brown’s response to Obama's weekly address
“Hello, I’m Scott Brown, and I have the honor of representing Massachusetts in the United States Senate.
“Last Sunday night, we heard President Obama deliver the message that Americans have been waiting for since September 11, 2001. It’s a very rare thing when so many people across the world observe the loss of life with something other than regret. But this man, the late Osama bin Laden, had chosen his fate long before in a life filled with cruelty. If he expected mercy when our forces found him that was asking much more than he was ever known to give.
“This was a man who rejoiced in the suffering and death of others, who set in motion all the horror and grief of 9/11 and considered it just a start. He was a teacher of evil, and now, for him, the lesson is over. It ends not in the fulfillment of some fanatical vision, but in the depths of the
Arabian Sea.
Brown to deliver Republican response to Obama's weekly address
WASHINGTON — US Senator Scott Brown will deliver the Republican response to President Obama’s weekly address this week, focusing on the killing of Osama bin Laden, American’s continued fight against terrorism and the ongoing war in Afghanistan. Brown’s remarks will be released tomorrow morning, according to the senator’s office.
Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, is a 31-year member of the Massachusetts Army National Guard and currently holds the rank of lieutenant colonel in the Judge Advocate General (JAG) Corps. He had to backtrack earlier this week from comments he made in a TV interview, in which he claimed to have seen a photo of bin Laden’s corpse, which turned out to be a fake.
League of Women Voters won't reveal funding for TV ads attacking Brown
WASHINGTON — The League of Women Voters has offered strong support in the past for disclosing who pays for political advertising, but the voter education group this morning would not name the donors funding its TV ads attacking Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown—at least not this year.
“We comply with the spirit and the letter of the law and report all contributions in our annual reports,” said Elisabeth MacNamara, national president of the League of Women Voters, in a phone interview.
The group’s annual report covering 2011 will be out early next year, she said.
FULL ENTRYKerry to meet with constituents in Fanueil Hall tomorrow
US Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, will meet with constituents tomorrow, May 7, at a town hall meeting in Boston’s Faneuil Hall to discuss national security, job creation, and other key issues affecting Massachusetts and the nation, according to a statement from Kerry’s office.
Doors open at noon. Kerry will begin the meeting at 1 p.m.
Mass. Democrats want Brown to explain photo comments
The Massachusetts Democratic Party issued a statement today saying Senator Scott Brown "owes" Massachusetts residents an explanation after the Republican asserted and then retracted that he had seen postmortem photos of Osama bin Laden.
“As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Brown owes the people of Massachusetts more details as to what led him to believe that he was shown an authentic photo, and then what led him to feel comfortable enough to speak out publicly about the photo," party Chairman John Walsh said in a statement.
"He needs right away, today to provide answers to the following questions: who showed him the fake photo; who told him it was genuine when it wasn’t; and what are the procedures he uses to make sure he has reliable information before he gives voters that information?" Walsh added.
The chairman said the senator needs to “understand that his words matter, and his assertions are taken at face value because of his position."
Brown spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom replied: "With the Sal DiMasi corruption trial going on, I'm surprised that John Walsh has the time to criticize Republicans."
Delegation: Don't cut community services
WASHINGTON -- Members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation are urging House appropriators not to support cuts to grants that pay for a range of community services for the poor, the disabled and the elderly.
Nine House members from Massachusetts are among 84 Democrats who sent a letter to the top members of the House Appropriations Committee saying that cuts to Community Service Block Grants would harm vulnerable citizens when the services are most needed. Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat, provided the letter's first signature.
"Severe cuts to CSBGs – the source of funding for community action programs - would hinder, rather than help, our nation’s economic recovery while devastating critical support services for the poor, disabled, children and the elderly," the letter read.
The only Massachusetts member who did not sign was John Olver of Amherst. Olver is a member of House Appropriations and as a policy does not sign letters to the committee, according to a spokeswoman.
Theo Emery can be reached at temery@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @temery.
Brown: Don't show bin Laden corpse to 'sell newspapers'
UPDATED
WASHINGTON Having seen unreleased photos of Osama bin Laden’s corpse, US Senator Scott Brown does not believe pictures of the dead terrorist leader should be made public, the Massachusetts Republican said in an interview on NECN.
“Let me assure you that he is dead, that bin Laden is dead I have seen the photos,” Brown said hours before President Obama declared he would not release the images.
During an interview with "60 Minutes," the president told the CBS News program that "we don't trot out trophies."
Asked directly if the pictures, which have been described as bloody and gruesome, should be made available for everyone, Brown told NECN: “If it’s to sell newspapers or just have a news cycle story, no, I don’t think they should be released. We’re still dealing with the sensitivities of the Muslim and Arab world. And we still have men and women serving throughout the world.”
Warren books same hall where he announced for mayor
UPDATED
Newton Mayor Setti Warren, a prospective candidate for US Senate, has booked the same American Legion Post where he announced his mayoral run for an unspecified event next Tuesday.
Aaron Goldman, who handles constituent services for the mayor, said Warren had reserved Post 440 in Newton for a “service breakfast,” but declined to elaborate.
"No comment," Warren told the Newton Tab, which first reported the booking, when the paper asked Warren if he planned to announce he is running against Republican Senator Scott Brown.
Deborah Shah, the mayor’s political director, said, “The mayor is hosting a service breakfast with people in his life who have done things for the community and he wants to honor them. I can’t say anything further at this time.”
Warren is a Navy veteran and a former aide to Senator John F. Kerry. City Year co-founder Alan Khazei and Somerville activist Bob Massie have already announced campaigns.
Michael Levenson can be reached at mlevenson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @mlevenson.
Former Kennedy chief to lead UAW's DC office
Mary Beth Cahill, once Senator Edward M. Kennedy's chief of staff, has been named director of the United Auto Workers' Washington office, as well as director of its UAW Community Action Program.
In both jobs, she will oversee the UAW’s political program nationally. She will also serve as a senior adviser to UAW President Bob King.
Cahill formerly served as assistant to the president and director of the Office of Public Liaison in the Clinton White House, as well as Kennedy's chief of staff and director of Senator John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign.
She also spent five years at EMILY’s List, a PAC that supports female candidates and supports abortion rights.
“We are thrilled to have Mary Beth join the UAW leadership team especially in light of the difficult challenges ahead for our union,” King said in a statement. "As we navigate the tough political environment in this era of attacks on American working families and the middle class, and head into national contract talks for the domestic automakers, I’m confident that she will help us elect officeholders who are allies in the battle to save the American middle class."
Cahill is a Massachusetts native and the daughter of a UAW autoworker. She graduated from Emmanuel College with a degree in English and political science, and held a fellowship at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government in 2005.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Kerry holding hearing on Pakistan, Afghanistan
WASHINGTON Massachusetts Democrat John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is seeking to refocus the nation's focus on Pakistan and Afghanistan in the run-up to a scheduled withdrawal of some US forces from Afghanistan, set to begin in July.
On Tuesday morning, Richard N. Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Princeton University Professor Anne-Marie Slaughter, Ronald E. Neumann, president of the American Academy of Diplomacy will appear before the committee.
It has already conducted 14 oversight hearings on the war, including the first congressional hearings on reconciliation and the mission in Marja.
The latest hearing was planned before Sunday's surprise announcement about the killing Osama bin Laden.
“The killing of Osama bin Laden closes an important chapter in our war against extremists who kill innocent people around the world." Kerry said in a statement. "A single death does not end the threat from al Qaeda and its affiliated groups and highlights the need to thoroughly evaluate our strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan. We need to make certain we are asking tough questions about the direction and effectiveness of our policy/"
Farah Stockman can be reached fstockman@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @fstockman.
Brown requests summer training in Afghanistan
Senator Scott Brown just issued a statement saying he requested his annual summer Massachusetts National Guard service period in Afghanistan.
“As a lieutenant colonel in the Massachusetts Army National Guard, I have service obligations that I fulfill each year."Following in the tradition of other lawmakers who have completed their military service requirements overseas, this year I have requested to conduct my annual training in Afghanistan.
"Doing so will help me to better understand our ongoing mission in that country, and provide me first-hand experience for my duties on the Senate Armed Services, Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs committees," he said.
Brown has been in the Guard since 1979, but he has never been deployed to a war zone. His service this summer will come around the July set by President Obama for beginning to start removing some of the 132,000 US troops stationed in Afghanistan.
Typically such training periods last two weeks. It would not be considered a formal activation of his JAG unit.
The statement was issued about 90 minutes after Brown spoke with the Globe about heading to the war zone.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown heading for Afghanistan
UPDATED
Senator Scott Brown issued a statement this morning saying he has requested to conduct his annual National Guard training in Afghanistan.
“As a lieutenant colonel in the Massachusetts Army National Guard, I have service obligations that I fulfill each year."Following in the tradition of other lawmakers who have completed their military service requirements overseas, this year I have requested to conduct my annual training in Afghanistan.
"Doing so will help me to better understand our ongoing mission in that country, and provide me first-hand experience for my duties on the Senate Armed Services, Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs committees," he said.
Brown has been in the Guard since 1979, but he has never been deployed to a war zone. His service this summer will come around the July set by President Obama for beginning to start removing some of the 132,000 US troops stationed in Afghanistan.
Typically such training periods last two weeks. It would not be considered a formal activation of his JAG unit.
About 90 minutes before issuing his statement, Brown said in a telephone interview with the Globe, "I’m going to be going over at some point to do some missions.”
White House briefing on Bin Laden death
After President Obama told the nation last night about the death of Osama bin Laden, senior members of his administration held a conference call to brief reporters on the details of the mission.
Following is a transcript of that call, as provided by the White House, with all but one of the speakers identified as "senior administration officials."
It was led by Tommy Vietor, the chief spokesman for the National Security Council:
Obama, Kerry, Brown statements on Bin Laden
Following are the full texts of statements issued last night by President Obama and Massachusetts Senators John Kerry and Scott Brown after the death of Osama bin Laden:
Presidents Bush, Obama take special pride in bin Laden death
Jason Reed / Reuters
President Obama strides to the lectern to deliver news already coming into view on the TelePrompTer: Osama bin Laden has been killed.
President Bush started the search for Osama bin Laden on Sept. 11, 2001, and President Obama ended it yesterday, and each man took special pride in the accomplishment.
Bush, in a statement posted on the Facebook page of his wife, former first lady Laura Bush, said: "The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done."
Obama, meanwhile, wore an American flag pin on his lapel as he strode to a lectern in the East Room of the White House to make the official announcement.
"Justice has been done," the president said in remarks that began at 11:35 p.m.
Obama also went to lengths to detail the circumstances that led to bin Laden's death, as well as his leadership of it, starting with him saying he made it his top terrorism priority since shortly after taking office in 2009.
"Then, last August, after years of painstaking work by our intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly with my national security team as we developed more information about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside of Pakistan. And finally, last week, I determined that we had enough intelligence to take action, and authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice," said the president.
Then, in his crescendo, he added: "Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan."
Obama's backers will surely argue that the achievement validates his effort to shift the focus from the war on terror from insurgents and Saddam Hussein's loyalists in Iraq to the Taliban in Afghanistan, part of a campaign pledge he made to target bin Laden, the culprit of the 9/11 attacks.
As a senator, Obama declared he would authorize US forces to go into Pakistan to get bin Laden if that was where he sought refuge. In the end, that is what happened, with uncertain diplomatic repercussions for the country.
The president himself did not have to gloat, the facts potent enough to speak for themselves.
Brown: ad over EPA vote "reeks of political demagoguery"
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Scott Brown is hitting back at a voter education group that began running a critical television spot today, saying the ad "reeks of political demagoguery."
The League of Women Voters’ television spot features a young girl on a respirator, and accuses Brown of siding with polluters when he voted this month for a measure that would have stripped the EPA of its ability to regulate greenhouse gases. A similar ad aimed at Democrat Claire McCaskill is airing in her home state of Missouri.
"It is outrageous for an allegedly non-partisan group to use sick children to misrepresent a vote about jobs and government over-regulation. These type of over-the-top distortions have no place in our political discourse,” Brown, a Republican, said in a statement.
Brown and McCaskill's states are the only ones where the ads are playing; both are up for re-election in 2012. The spots have the appearance of issue ads that typically pop up during election seasons that point out how candidates voted on particular issues.
Before Brown's comments, League of Women Voters President Elisabeth MacNamara said the spots were not attack ads, and did not target Brown and McCaskill because of their upcoming elections. She said that “there is an accountability piece” to running them, but said it was not related to their elections. The votes of all 100 senators are available at an accompanying Web site.
“These are not intended to at all attack these particular senators. They are designed to draw attention to the votes that were made by these two particular senators," she said.
Theo Emery can be reached at temery@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @temery.
Ad hits Brown for EPA vote
WASHINGTON – A voting rights advocacy group is taking to the airwaves today with a campaign-style ad criticizing Senator Scott Brown for a vote to curb the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulatory power.
The League of Women Voters’ television spot accuses Brown, a Republican, of siding with polluters with his vote earlier this month that would have stripped EPA of its ability to regulate greenhouse gases. A similar ad aimed at Democrat Claire McCaskill will air in her home state of Missouri.
Brown and McCaskill are the only senators being targeted, and both are up for re-election in 2012. The spots have the appearance of issue ads that typically pop up during campaigns pointing out how candidates voted on particular issues. The ad buy is significant, costing over a million dollars, according to the company that produced it.
FULL ENTRYCapuano to Brown: take a tour of my district
WASHINGTON -- Congressman Michael Capuano took aim today at Senator Scott Brown's advocacy for a reconfigured Suffolk County voting district aimed at empowering minority voters, saying his current district already fits that criteria.
"Senator Brown is entitled to share his opinion on redistricting. But he is not entitled to his own facts and the facts could not be clearer," the Somerville Democrat wrote in an email newsletter to constituents and supporters.
FULL ENTRYGuinta faces rowdy crowd in NH
EXETER, N.H. – Members of Congress have talked about the hard choices that must be made to get the country’s debt under control. Now, they’re figuring out just how difficult those decisions are going to be – and the political price that could be paid for making them.
Representative Frank Guinta, a first-term Republican from Manchester, faced a feisty crowd tonight at a town hall meeting in a high school in this quiet town near the seacoast.
The crowd booed at some responses, hissed at others. Audience members yelled and pointed at the congressman, and they yelled and pointed at each other.
Guinta was swept into office last year with a wave of Tea Party-fueled anger – largely over the economy and health care – and, constituents seemed to remind him tonight, he could just as easily be swept out.
It was an indication of the unrest going on throughout the country, as House Republicans attempt to defend their votes to implement drastic budget cuts and curb long-cherished entitlement programs.
FULL ENTRYKerry and Brown praise nominees Petraeus and Panetta
WASHINGTON -- President Obama’s nomination of Leon Panetta as his next secretary of defense and General David Petraeus as CIA director are getting high marks today from both Massachusetts senators.
John Kerry, a Democrat, and Scott P. Brown, a Republican, praised the two men on the day that the president announced the nominations in a reshuffling of his national security team.
“While the country will miss the service of Secretary (Robert) Gates, Leon Panetta and General Petraeus are first-rate public servants whose reputations and records transcend party, and I expect broad approval and swift confirmations,” Kerry, the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement.
Petraeus and Panetta have both served "admirably," Brown said of the two men. As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he will participate in Panetta's hearing and vote on his nomination it goes to the full senate for confirmation.
"I look forward to learning more about their views and goals for the future during their confirmation hearings," Brown said in a statement.
FULL ENTRYPatrick: 'Birther' questions 'new low' for politics
John Tlumacki/Globe Staff
President Obama came to Boston on Oct. 16 to campaign for his personal friend and political ally Governor Deval Patrick.
Governor Deval Patrick, a close personal and political friend of President Obama, today said questions about the authenticity of his birth certificate and thus his legitimacy as the country's leader represent "a new low in American politics."
“I hope and I believe that the American people are bigger and better than this," the Democrat said during his monthly appearance on WTKK-FM, his most free-wheeling regular public engagement.
Asked whether he felt race was motivating questions not only about Obama's birthplace but also his academic record, Patrick like Obama the first African-American to hold his job said: “I have no idea, but whatever is motivating it, it feels like a new low in American politics, particularly when you consider the extraordinary challenges facing this country and this president, that we would spend our time on stuff like that and attempts to marginalize our president.”
Twenty years from Boarding House Park
Jim Wilson/Globe Staff
Paul Tsongas acknowledges the crowd as he announces his candidacy for the 1992 Democratic presidential nomination during an April 30, 1991, speech in Lowell's Boarding House Park.
Listening to Donald Trump yesterday, speaking caustically and bombastically against the backdrop of a gleaming helicopter emblazoned with the name "Trump," I was struck by the contrast between him and the late Senator Paul Tsongas.
The Massachusetts Democrat announced his candidacy for the presidency 20 years ago Saturday, on April 30, 1991, and the approaching anniversary had prompted me to reminisce in recent weeks about the first White House campaign I covered.
The difference between Tsongas and Trump could not be more pronounced.
Brown: Legislature should create majority-minority district in Boston
WASHINGTON -- Senator Scott Brown is throwing himself into the redistricting fight in Massachusetts, urging the creation of a voting district in Boston that could help a non-white candidate be elected to Congress.
Brown, a Republican, wrote today to state Senator Stanley Rosenberg and Representative Mike Moran, the co-chairs of the legislature’s Special Committee on Redistricting, in support of a Suffolk County Congressional district that is majority non-white, which are known as majority-minority districts.
“It is my hope that any redistricting for congressional or state legislative seats will result in districts that avoid diluting the voting strength of citizens based on the color of their skin,” he wrote.
Caroline Kennedy to open new JFK Library wing
Caroline Kennedy will open a new wing next week at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum.
The daughter of the slain president will join Director Tom Putnam for a ribbon-cutting ceremony at 12:30 p.m. on May 4.
In 2001 the National Archives conducted a program review of the library that concluded that "storage problems seen at the Kennedy Library are the worst in the entire presidential library system.”
Congress approved the funding to design and build a 30,000-square-foot addition to the library building on Columbia Point to ensure the appropriate preservation and security of President Kennedy’s papers and historical artifacts.
JFK was born 94 years ago on May 29.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Khazei seeking 2012 Democratic Senate nomination
Alan Khazei today officially declared he is running for the Democratic nomination for the seat currently held by Republican US Senator Scott Brown.
On his website, through Twitter and Facebook, the co-founder of City Year sent out the same message.
"It's official,'' he wrote. “I’m in.''
A two-and-a-half minute announcement video posted on his website offered a more detailed look at his campaign themes.
“As I’ve traveled across our state, I’ve heard from many people who are concerned that opportunity is drying up, that the American dream is in trouble and the system is failing too many Americans,” Khazei says in the video. “It’s stacked in favor of powerful special interests and designed for a time long gone by.”
Trippi signs on to help Massie Senate campaign
Veteran Democratic political strategist Joe Trippi has signed on with Somerville activist Bob Massie in his campaign against US Senator Scott Brown.
Massie has already declared his candidacy for next year's Democratic nomination. City Year co-founder Alan Khazei also announced today that he was running.
In a statement, Trippi noted he began his career on the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy's 1980 presidential campaign. The strategist also was instrumental in Howard Dean's surprise showing in the 2004 Democratic presidential primary campaign.
“Bob Massie has a remarkable story in which he has demonstrated insight, courage, and tenacity," Trippi said in a statement. "He will defend the American Dream, excite the Democratic base, draw in independents, and take the seat back from Scott Brown, who simply does not represent the values of Massachusetts."
Massie campaign manager Matt Wilson said: “Joe Trippi’s history motivating and engaging the grassroots is second to none. His experience in local, national, and international politics complements Bob’s vision of a better life for all.”
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Romney learns even op-eds not safe
Live by the op-ed, die by the op-ed.
Expected Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney learned that today, when he made an apparent gaffe in what has become the favored form of communication in his carefully choreographed pre-campaign run-up: the newspaper op-ed column.
The former Massachusetts governor found that when you virtually limit your media exposure to written columns, as opposed to unrestricted media questions, you can control your message but you also leave no one else to blame when there's trouble.
Obama: Public distracted from broader, thematic debate
President Obama didn't exactly blame the American people for missing the point last night as his poll numbers have plunged, but he did state they have been so focused on their daily lives they haven't focused deeply enough on the broader, more thematic underpinnings of the great recent congressional debates.
Addressing a star-studded fundraiser audience at the Tavern restaurant in Los Angeles that included actors Tom Hanks and George Clooney, Obama said he expected the majority of voters to end up siding with him when they focus their attention on the candidates, the policies they propose, and their personal values during next year's campaign.
Massachusetts listeners can't but hear the echoes of the "values" focus that Governor Deval Patrick offered during his successful reelection campaign last fall, and which he has continued amid his recent book tour.
Kerry recalls photographer killed in Libya
Those of us who covered the Kerry for President campaign in 2004 felt a special horror in yesterday's news about the two photographers who were killed in Libya.
The more widely known to the world, perhaps, was Tim Hetherington, who received an Academy Award nomination for "Restrepo," his documentary about a US platoon in an Afghanistan valley.
The more closely known to the campaign travelers, though, was Chris Hondros of Getty Images. He rode the Kerry plane often and brought his combat photography skills to the political arena.
Senator John Kerry just issued a statement in which the Massachusetts Democrat recounts many of Hondros's traits and campaign moments:
Markey rallies in Brighton against GOP plan to change Medicare and Medicaid
Congressman Edward Markey, a Malden Democrat, and a group of “seniors, working families, and health care providers” will rally in Brighton today against a US House Republican plan to dramatically change Medicare, the health care program for the elderly, and Medicaid, which provides health care to low income people. The rally is 1 p.m. at the Veronica Smith Senior Center.
“Republicans in the House of Representatives are advocating dangerous cuts to Medicare and Medicaid that do nothing to address skyrocketing health care costs or the real causes of federal deficits,” according to a notice for the event sent out by organizers. “Their proposal will cut benefits for seniors, increase premiums and end guaranteed coverage.”
The GOP budget plan would replace the current Medicare system with a program to provide seniors money to buy their own private health insurance, and would transform Medicaid into a Block Grant program for states.
Mark Arsenault can be reached at marsenault@globe.com.
Patrick says he is not interested in running for US Senate seat
Governor Deval Patrick, pressed about his aspirations for higher
office during an appearance on national television today, said he would
not run against US Senator Scott Brown, even if President Obama urged
him to do so.
"That conversation is not going to happen, and I've been very clear I
do not want to serve in the United States Senate," Patrick said during
a five-minute interview with Matt Lauer on the "Today" show.
Patrick was appearing on the show to promote his memoir, and Lauer,
who introduced the governor as a "rising star," asked several times
whether the book was a precursor to a run for national office. Patrick
insisted it was not.
Brown: energy status quo "not acceptable"
Senator Scott Brown, who has been sharply criticized by environmentalists for a recent vote on air pollution control, wants to reduce energy costs, wean the nation off foreign oil and increase domestic energy production.
With gas prices soaring and families preparing to fill their tanks for summer vacations, the Massachusetts Republican plans to introduce bipartisan legislation in coming weeks intended to decrease gas use, increase efficiency and require energy audits of federal projects.
A video press release from Brown accompanied the announcement, in which Brown said “the status quo is not acceptable when it comes to our energy policy.”
“We must start to develop more of the domestic sources of energy here at home in an environmentally-friendly manner. We need to take an all-of-the-above approach, and this includes wind, solar, hydro, geo-thermal, clean coal, natural as, biofuels, conservation, R & D tax credits -- everything must be on the table,” he said.
He did not mention drilling, which was included in the prepared script of the video.
The raft of three bills will include legislation giving tax-credits to businesses that retrofit their vehicles with hybrid technology; another bill would provide more disclosure of home energy use; and a third would require energy audits of federally funded projects.
Environmental groups criticized Brown after he voted earlier this month in favor of a budget amendment that would have stripped the EPA of its authority to regulate greenhouse gases. In addition, Brown was recently caught on camera asking for a campaign donation from billionaire David Koch, whom critics accuse of bankrolling opposition to greenhouse gas regulation. Brown later received a $2,500 donation from Koch Industries’ political action committee.
Asked about the timing of Brown’s legislative announcement, a spokesman said in an email that “Senator Brown believes these proposals are positive first steps toward addressing skyrocketing energy costs.”
Theo Emery can be reached at temery@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @temery.
Brown: Those urging me to name abuser 'have no clue'
Senator Scott Brown says people demanding he name the former counselor who allegedly sexually abused him when he attended a Cape Cod summer camp as a 10-year-old "have no clue" about working through such an episode.
The Massachusetts Republican made the allegation in mid-February when released his new book, "Against All Odds." But since then, he has refused to name the camp where the alleged abuse occurred, the counselor he says abused him, or provide authorities with information for a possible prosecution.
The senator has explained that he wants to move on with his life, even as critics suggest remaining silent has allowed an abuser to go unpunished and possibly victimized others.
Tierney: end tax expenditures
U.S. Representative John Tierney wants an end to government tax breaks and loopholes that he says cost the government billions of dollars a year, and is hoping that fiscal conservatives will join him in the effort.
The Salem Democrat plans to file legislation in coming weeks called the Tax Equity and Middle Class Fairness Act of 2011 which would end over two dozen so-called “tax expenditures” which divert revenues out of treasury coffers.
Those expenditures include subsidies, tax credits, exclusions and exemptions for individuals and corporations that are difficult to root out of the tax code.
While Tierney calculates that there are some 250 such expenditures in all, the bill targets only about 30 of them; the General Accounting Office would review the rest and report to Congress.
“We found what we though were some obvious ones that we could address in the short term,” he said.
The legislation, which is still being finalized and does not yet have co-sponsors, would eliminate tax breaks for oil, gas and coal companies; write-offs for corporate meals and entertainment; and agribusiness and timber subsidies.
Tierney said that he hopes deficit hawks among House Republicans will join him in the effort, although he doesn’t have any commitments yet.
“I would hope that we’ve get some support on the fiscally conservative side, because it certainly is as fiscally conservative a measure as anything that’s going to be proposed on that,” he said.
Columbia University economics professor Joseph E. Stiglitz, a former chief economist for the World Bank who joined Tierney on a conference call about the legislation, said that the current debate the proposal is timely amid ongoing debate over spending and the deficit.
“Now that the budget issue has come to the fore, this is precisely a good time to address this long-standing problem in our whole fiscal situation,” he said.
Theo Emery can be reached at temery@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @temery.
Brown asked Koch for another campaign donation, and he received
WASHINGTON — US Senator Scott Brown took some ribbing after a liberal blog last month posted video of the Massachusetts Republican asking conservative billionaire David Koch for support in his next campaign—but Brown’s request apparently worked.
Shortly after his conversation with Koch, Brown received a $2,500 donation to his campaign fund from Koch Industries through its political action committee, according to campaign finance reports made public yesterday.
The blog, Think Progress, shot the video of Brown and Koch at a March 4 event at the David H. Koch Integrative Cancer Institute at MIT. In the video, Brown is seen telling Koch, “Your support during the election, it meant a ton. It made a difference and I can certainly use it again.”
The video was posted March 7. Brown’s campaign reported it received Koch’s contribution on March 11.
Mark Arsenault can be reached at marsenault@globe.com.
Brown tells RemDawg of congressional sports jealousy
Senator Scott Brown threw out the first pitch before the Patriots Day game between the Red Sox and Toronto Blue Jays.
Then he headed to the NESN broadcast booth and described the jealousy some fellow members of Congress feel over the success of his hometown teams.
"People don't realize when you're in a state where they have no chance of ever winning anything, the amount of jealousy amongst the senators and the congressmen, 'Oh, my gosh, you're from Boston? The Red Sox, the Celtics, the Bruins,' everyone's always in the playoffs, always in the hunt," Brown to play-by-play man Don Orsillo and color commentator Jerry Remy.
"If you're down in Washington or Baltimore, they're not quite there," said the senator, who was dressed in a Red Sox warm-up jacket for the occasion.
Nonetheless, Brown said he has attended some Washington Nationals games with his family and staff, to relax with the former and work on team-building with the latter.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown to tour Somerville hybrid engine factory
Senator Scott Brown is taking a tour tomorrow of XL Hybrids, a Somerville-based company that converts standard gasoline engines into hybrids.
The tour will occur from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m.
Afterward, Brown will hold a press conference to discuss his proposed legislation for reducing energy costs.
The Republican is up for re-election. He is back in Massachusetts during the congressional recess.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Khazei holding first Senate exploratory event
Potential US Senate candidate Alan Khazei has announced the first event for his campaign exploratory committee.
In a Facebook posting, the Democrat said he would meet with supporters at 6 p.m. on April 26 at the Old South Meeting House in Boston.
"I would love the opportunity to share with you my thoughts on how to get our country back on the right track and also hear your ideas and thoughts," said Khazei. "I look forward to meeting and listening to the voters of the commonwealth to hear their concerns and ideas about the challenges and opportunities facing our state and country."
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Patrick: Obama deficit speech framed values debate
President Obama's deficit-reduction speech wasn't just about numbers but what kind of country America will become, Governor Deval Patrick said this morning during an appearance on ABC's "This Week" news program.
While Republicans have criticized the partisan nature of last week's address, in which Obama proposed cutting $4 trillion over 12 years, Patrick said the critics glossed over its overarching theme.
“It’s a fiscally responsible but also mutually responsible kind of community, and I support that," the governor told host Christiane Amanpour.
White House launches "Taxpayer Receipt" site
Amid rancorous debate in Congress over spending and taxes, the White House flipped the switch today on an online system for calculating where tax revenues are being spent.
The White House launched its “Federal Taxpayer Receipt” site on what is typically the deadline for Americans to file their tax returns, although this year taxes are due on April 18. The administration said the site was an effort to increase government openness and transparency.
“Today, we’re hopeful that with this tool for regular Americans, everyday Americans, they can actually see these dollars flowing as easily as one can click a mouse,” said Aneesh Chopra, the White House chief technology officer.
By plugging in the amounts of federal taxes deducted from paychecks, taxpayers can see how much of their taxes go to different parts of the federal government, such as defense, health care and veterans services.
President Obama had called for such a system in his State of the Union speech this year. Senator Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, co-sponsored legislation last month with Democrat Bill Nelson of Florida that would require the IRS to send a receipt to every person who files a tax return.
"I believe that providing Americans with an itemized receipt of how the government is spending their money will help improve transparency and accountability as we work to rein in federal spending and deal with our record debt,” Brown said.
Pete Sepp, a spokesman for the National Taxpayers Union, a free-market group that seeks lower taxes, said the site could be helpful in showing how the federal tax system is what he called "one big transfer payment."
"Yes, they'll see considerable amounts for the military and smaller ones for things like highways but many folks will likely see for the first time that much of the money coming out of their paychecks is winding up in someone else's check," he said.
Theo Emery can be reached at temery@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @temery.
Markey criticizes nuclear inspections in letter
WASHINGTON -- U.S. Representative Edward J. Markey accused the Nuclear Regulatory Commission today of concealing inspection results at U.S. nuclear power plants and limiting the scope and length of reactor inspections.
In a letter to commission Chairman Greg Jaczko, the Malden Democrat protested what he said were limits on inspectors checking U.S. nuclear reactors in the aftermath of the earthquake and tsunami that badly damaged the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan.
“We should stand prepared to learn from the catastrophe in Japan and plan ahead to address what was unforeseen but occurred anyway, rather than attempting to hide our vulnerabilities from public view,” he wrote.
Commission spokeswoman Prema Chandrathil said the ongoing review of safety at U.S. plants goes "far beyond" physical inspections at plants, and is looking for problems other than just design flaws. Moreover, she said, a report on safety at U.S. plants will be made public at the end of a lengthy review process.
While some findings at plants are generally not made public because of post-Sept. 11 security measures, she said the commission always takes action when warranted.
“In response to the events in Japan, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will take any regulatory action deemed necessary, she said.
After last month’s disaster, the commission announced increased inspections of all U.S. nuclear plants to ensure their safety. It has also sent inspectors to aid Japanese authorities.
Markey alleged that the commission’s review of domestic plants is inadequate, and conceals vital information from the public. Inspectors are limited to 40 hours for single-reactor plants and 50-60 hours for multi-reactor plants, according to Markey, which is not enough to full inspect plants.
In addition, inspectors were initially not allowed to look for safety vulnerabilities to unanticipated catastrophic events, he claimed. An outcry from inspectors allowed them to do so, but they were not permitted to note them in writing, putting them instead in a secret database and shielding them from public scrutiny, he said.
“The fact that they plan to keep the most serious vulnerabilities secret raises questions about whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is more interested in public relations than public safety,” Markey said.
Markey, who has held his seat since 1976, cast his 20,000 vote yesterday on the House floor.
Theo Emery can be reached at temery@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @temery.
Kerry, Brown vote against Planned Parenthood funding ban
Both Massachusetts senators voted against a budget amendment today that would have banned federal funds from going to Planned Parenthood, a measure that was part of a bargain struck last week to avoid a government shutdown.
Scott Brown, a Republican, and John Kerry, a Democrat, were among those voting against the Planned Parenthood resolution, which was defeated 58-42. Both senators went on to vote for the six-month budget measure funding the government through September.
"As I've said before, I believe this particular cut goes too far," Brown said in a brief statement.
Brown’s vote earned praise from Dianne Luby, president of the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, who said the amendment would have cut off federal funds for a range of women’s health services, from breast cancer screening to HIV testing.
“Clearly, Senator Brown was listening to his constituents when he cast his vote to protect women’s health,” Luby said in a statement. “He understands that Planned Parenthood is an essential community provider and that cutting off access to critical preventive health services is not smart public health or fiscal policy.”
The vote was included in a pact that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio and President Obama reached late last week just before a midnight deadline to fund the government.
During the tense budget talks, House Republicans had sought to ban the use of federal funds for Planned Parenthood because the organization provides abortions, although federal law already prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for most abortions. The issue became a major obstacle to a budget deal long after spending reductions and disagreement over other social issues had been decided.
The Planned Parenthood amendment allowed the measure to receive a debate and a vote in the Senate, where the Democrats have a majority, and its defeat was expected.
Theo Emery can be reached at temery@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @temery.
Kerry condemns Iraqi military for violence at Camp Ashraf
The United Nations confirmed today that last week’s Iraqi army raid of Camp Ashraf resulted in the deaths of 34 Iranian exiles. Camp Ashraf is home to many members of the People's Mujahedeen Organization of Iran, a group in opposition to Iran’s clerical leaders that had found refuge in Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s regime. The Iraqi government has announced an investigation into the incident.
"The current situation at the camp is untenable,” Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts said in a statement that condemned the Iraqi military’s “massacre.” Kerry also called on the United States, the United Nations, the European Union, to help all parties find "a peaceful and durable solution," and permanent homes for the Camp Ashraf residents.
Read Kerry’s full statement below.
McGovern highlights costs of Afghan war
Representative James McGovern, a Worcester Democrat, joined a bipartisan effort to link the escalating budget deficit with the on-going costs of the Afghan war.
"This week we are debating a budget that purports to represent new fiscal restraint, yet continues to borrow tens of billions of dollars for the war in Afghanistan," McGovern said Thursday at an event on Capitol Hill organized by Brave New Foundation, a California-based social justice organization. "I'm tired of being told that we don't have enough money for education or infrastructure or medical research, but we can afford to spend billions of dollars propping up a corrupt regime in Kabul."
McGovern has been working with Representative Walter Jones, a North Carolina Republican, to introduce legislation as early as May that would require exit strategy from Afghanistan.
"President Obama has said that we will begin to withdraw our troops in July of this year. We must hold him to that promise," McGovern said. "Rather than nation-building in Afghanistan, we need to do some more nation-building right here at home."
The event was part of a Brave New Foundation's Rethink Afghanistan campaign, which seeks to highlight the costs of the war by building a web site that calculates how much an American citizen has contributed to the war's cost.
Farah Stockman can be reached at fstockman@globe.com.
Gun shop visit underscores Barbour's pitch
Glen Johnson/Globe Staff
Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, guided by New Hampshire Republican operative Michael Dennehy, walks through Riley's Gun Shop in Hooksett on the second day of his visit to the lead primary state as a prospective presidential candidate.
HOOKSETT, N.H. With a 22-person media contingent outside, and only a handful of prospective voters inside, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour wasn't trying to conceal the message he was sending to New Hampshire voters as he wound down his first visit of the year as a prospective presidential contender.
I'm one of you, he said with deeds as much as words nonetheless spoken with a Southern drawl.
Mississippi governor roots for Red Sox
Glen Johnson/Globe Staff
Prospective Republican presidential contender Haley Barbour talked guns, the Boston Red Sox, and political issues during a visit this morning to the Chez Vachon restaurant in Manchester, N.H.
MANCHESTER, N.H. Who knew?
Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour claimed a New England connection this morning as he confessed to being a Boston Red Sox fan on the strength of his longtime friendship with a former team catcher.
Stopping by a frequent political haunt, the Chez Vachon on the west side of Manchester, Barbour told a table that included Mayor Ted Gatsas that he played on a two-time state high school championship team with future Red Sox player Jerry Moses.
Barbour: Southern charm vs. N.H. questions
Glen Johnson/Globe Staff
Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour works with room last night as he stopped by the Bow home of Jayne and Shawn Millerick during his first visit to New Hampshire this year as a prospective presidential candidate.
BOW, N.H. Southern charm collided with Yankee skepticism last night as Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour made his first visit of the year to New Hampshire as a prospective presidential candidate.
With his trademark drawl and affable demeanor, Barbour worked a crowd of about 30 people at the home of former New Hampshire Republican Party chairwoman Jayne Millerick, introducing himself by saying simply, "Hi, I'm Haley."
(See my earlier post here.)
Then he was peppered with questions about everything from his views on spending cuts and entitlement reform to US intervention in Libya, as voters in the lead presidential primary state upheld their tradition as vetters-in-chief of would-be commanders-in-chief.
Tsongas bill takes aim at sexual assault in the services
Women who are sexually assaulted while serving in the armed services would receive greater legal rights and protections under legislation that US Representative Niki Tsongas introduced today.
Tsongas, a Lowell Democrat, introduced the legislation with Mike Turner, an Ohio Republican, to address a problem that as many as one in three women report experiencing while serving in the military. The number could be higher, as only about 13 percent of sexual assaults in the military are reported, according to the Pentagon.
"We ask our men and women in uniform who serve in the military to put their lives on the line for our country, and they shouldn't fear or experience harm from their fellow soldiers," said Tsongas, who serves on the House Armed Services Committee.
The legislation would guarantee assault victims the right to a military lawyer, a transfer to another base, and a right to confidentiality when speaking with victim advocates and counselors.
The legislation would also provide more training to prevent and respond to sexual assault in the armed services. The legislation also creates new record-keeping requirements around sexual assault.
Sexual assault in the military has become a subject of litigation in recent years. The American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut and the Service Women's Action Network filed a lawsuit late last year seeing data on sexual assault cases within the military judicial system. In addition, more than a dozen women and two men have filed suit against the military in February.
Tsongas has a track record of advocating on behalf of sexual abuse victims in the military. In 2010, she was successful in adding language to a defense spending bill that forced the military to adopt a new reporting and documentation system for sexual assault, among other measures.
Kerry, McCain soothe 2008 campaign rift
Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images
Senator John Kerry gestures while Senator John McCain listens on Capitol Hill yesterday as the two introduced legislation aimed at protecting consumer information during commercial transactions.
During the 2004 presidential campaign, Senator John Kerry thought so highly of Senator John McCain that the Democratic presidential nominee broached the idea of joining forces with the Arizona Republican on a bipartisan White House ticket.
McCain politely declined, swallowed his pride, and made up that year with George W. Bush, who had savaged him during the 2000 GOP South Carolina primary en route to the presidency.
Bush ended up beating Kerry for a second term.
2011 funding bill released with $38 billion in cuts
Congress begins a new scramble today to pass a budget bill cutting billions of dollars in spending this year, resetting the clock on the next deadline to keep the federal government running.
Early this morning, aides completed work on an appropriations bill that cuts nearly $40 billion in spending. The committee staff have been working around the clock on the bill since House Republicans, Senate Democrats, and the White House shook hands on a deal that averted a government shutdown last Friday at midnight.
The bargain makes about $27 billion in new cuts on top of roughly $12 billion that have been previously agreed to. While the Obama administration and others have described the broad outlines of the agreement, details only emerged with the release of the bill this morning.
Fifth anniversary health care fodder for Romney
David L. Ryan, Globe Staff
Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney shares a laugh with House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi and other Democrats as the Republican signs the state's universal health care law at Faneuil Hall on April 12, 2006.
Northeast Democrats will be at their most creative today and tomorrow, as they aim to tweak Republican Mitt Romney in conjunction with the fifth anniversary of the Massachusetts universal health care law.
New Hampshire Democrats are sending out an email at 9 a.m. today, urging their supporters to flood Romney's official Twitter handle, @MittRomney, with thanks and congratulations for a piece of legislation that is anathema to many of his fellow conservatives across the country.
The 2006 Massachusetts law, signed while Romney was governor of the state, became the model for the 2010 federal universal health care law signed by President Obama, the Democrat he hopes to face in next year's presidential race.
Patrick's 'Today' appearance is postponed
Governor Deval Patrick's planned appearance Monday on NBC-TV's "Today" show is being postponed until later this week.
The date still has yet to be set, but spokesman Steve Crawford said the Democrat fell prey to the crush of recent news, including the near-government shutdown that finally was resolved just before midnight Friday.
Instead, the governor will spend Monday in Boston.
This week is the launch of the book tour for the governor's memoir, "A Reason to Believe."
Patrick is still slated to head to New York on Tuesday for a series of stops, including Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" with Jon Stewart.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
DVR/VCR/Live TV alert: Patrick on 'Today' Monday
Governor Deval Patrick embarks on his booktour Monday, with a pretty good first stop: A time slot in the 7 a.m. hour on NBC-TV's "Today" show.
It's shown locally on WHDH-TV (Channel 7).
It's still unclear who will interview him, but the governor is expected to talk about his memoir, "A Reason to Believe."
As a friend and political ally of President Obama, he could also expect questions about any government shutdown, the fifth anniversary of the Massachusetts health care law (on Tuesday), and his dust-up with Senator Scott Brown at today's groundbreaking for the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate.
The governor is coming back to Massachusetts after the show, but heading back to New York on Tuesday for a series of stops, including Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" with Jon Stewart.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
White House garden tour in jeopardy
Several readers have written in the aftermath of my recent post about the wonderful annual spring White House Garden Tour being offered this weekend.
Maybe.
They have asked whether the tours would be affected by a federal government shutdown, and the answer is yes.
A White House official told me that all tours of the president's home would be cancelled during a shutdown, including garden tours.
President Obama and his family were supposed to vacate the premises this weekend and visit Colonial Williamsburg in Virginia, but that trip has been scotched as the administration tries to avert a shutdown at midnight.
If one were avoided, the silver lining for anyone on a garden tour is that they would apparently gain a chance to see the president.
The White House also offers garden tours each fall, typically in October assuming any shutdown doesn't last that long.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Kerry laments lack of compromise on federal budget, invokes spirit of Kennedy
WASHINGTON -- Senator John Kerry today lamented the inability of Washington politicians to reach a compromise on the federal budget and avert a shutdown, invoking the spirit of a great compromiser, the late Edward M. Kennedy.
He said he had planned to be in Boston to attend today's groundbreaking for the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate but was unable to leave the Capitol because of the ongoing negotiations.
Kerry called the budget showdown and threat of a government shutdown an "embarrassing moment" for the Senate.
"Generations of young Americans will come to the Kennedy Institute to understand what the United States Senate was intended to be," Kerry said on the Senate floor today. "But 100 Senators don’t need to wait that long. We can do what Ted Kennedy and so many other Senators of both parties used to know how to do – which is find common ground and insist on common sense.”
The full text of Kerry's prepared remarks is below.
FULL ENTRYUS Chamber of Commerce head says short government shutdown may not upset economic growth much
The U.S. Chamber Of Commerce President Thomas Donohue told a group of reporters at a breakfast organized by the Christian Science Monitor on Friday that the brinksmanship over a tiny slice of the federal budget -- 1.7 percent of total federal outlays -- will press Congress to reluctantly grapple with the bigger issues of entitlements.
"It will be ugly, it will take time, but we will do some good amount of the things on the table for our survival," he said.
The Chamber of Commerce has been urging members of Congress to avoid a government shut down, arguing that it could damage the economy if it lasts more than a few days by delaying the pay checks of federal employees. Donohue said a short shutdown may ultimately not have a negative effect.
"I think we've had shutdowns starting in 1975, about 15 or 20 times to this point. Most of them were very short. One of them was 21 days, but most of them were a day and a half, two days, three days, five days. So, no, I don't think it upsets economic growth that much," said Donohue. "It certainly upsets the people that have to run our government."
The Chamber of Commerce, under R. Bruce Josten, Executive Vice President For Government Affairs, is putting together a coalition to raise the debt limit, but with conditions attached that would reign in federal spending in other ways.
"We have been telling people 'Work it out. Get it done,'" Josten said. "We appreciate the theatrics [of the threatened shut-down]. . .Eventually we are going to get there."
Ground broken for Kennedy Senate Institute
Glen Johnson/Globe Staff
Vicki Kennedy tosses dirt for the ceremonial groundbreaking of the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate. Joining her are, from left, Senate President Therese Murray, House Speaker Robert DeLeo, Governor Deval Patrick, and Treasurer Steve Grossman.
The words and spirit of Senator Edward M. Kennedy were evoked this morning at the groundbreaking ceremony for the educational institute that will bear the late Democrat’s name.
Under glorious skies, hundreds of former staffers, local and national political figures, as well as average citizens, flocked to the groundbreaking for the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate. It will be built, starting later this summer, on Columbia Point next to the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum.
Among those in attendance were the senator’s widow, Victoria Reggie Kennedy; children, Edward Jr., Kara, and Patrick; as well as relatives Caroline Kennedy, Joseph P. Kennedy II, and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend.
Kennedy Institute groundbreaking live blog
Glen Johnson/Globe Staff
Architect Rafael Vinoly, left, laughs as he shows a mockup of his design for the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate to some of the attendees at today's groundbreaking ceremony.
12:09 p.m. - Speechmaking over, the family is now heading outside to toss dirt.
Thanks for reading.
---
12:04 p.m. - Vicki Kennedy asked the whole family to join her on stage, and standing right in front, in brilliant red, is the senator's first wife, Joan.
Vicki Kennedy said she wants the center to be exciting and dynamic, and cutting-edge, because her late husband was all three.
Among the two dozen family members is Amy Petigout, who recently became engaged to former Representative Patrick Kennedy, the senator's youngest child.
She leaned against her fiance.
Pelosi speaking today at Tufts
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is delivering the inaugural Alan D. Solomont Lecture at Tufts University today.
The California Democrat, who served as the first female speaker of the House, planned to reflect on her career and the importance of public service during a 2 p.m. address in the school's Cohen Auditorium.
This lecture is part of the 10th anniversary celebration of the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Live-blogging Kennedy Institute groundbreaking
Yoon S. Byun/Globe Staff
Vicki Kennedy looks out over UMass-Boston and the site of the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate. The groundbreaking is this morning, and she hopes the center named for her late husband will teach about civic engagement in general and his beloved Senate in particular.
Before Boston sports fans tune into the Red Sox-Yankees Opening Day game this afternoon, Boston political fans will gather this morning for a groundbreaking ceremony at the site of the future Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate.
While much of the pre-ceremony attention has focused on Victoria Reggie Kennedy's efforts to preserve her late husband's legacy, she is far from the only member of the famous political family who will be on hand.
The senator's three children Edward Jr., Kara, and Patrick will attend, as will their aunt, Jean Kennedy Smith, the last surviving child of Rose and Joseph Kennedy, and his two stepchildren, Curran and Caroline Raclin.
Vicki Kennedy speaks of Institute, 'Teddy'


After Senator Edward M. Kennedy died in August 2009, one of the most wrenching tasks for his wife, Victoria Reggie Kennedy, was dismantling his office on Capitol Hill.
As much history museum as workspace, its family and political mementos included a letter hanging on the wall from a 14-year-old John F. Kennedy to his mother, Rose. In it, the future president asked if he could be godfather to the family’s final child, whom they would call “Teddy.”
One by one, Vicki Kennedy packed up each item and tucked away the memories attached to it.
Within the next three years, she plans to hang that letter up again this time in a replica of her husband’s office that will be part of the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate.
“It was such a special thing, to go into that office and see that history on the wall and to just feel, really the magic of that, and so we are going to recreate that,” she said during an interview Wednesday.
Caroline Kennedy signing books at JFK Library
Mike Coppola/Getty Images
Caroline Kennedy on Tuesday in New York City for the signing of, "She Walks in Beauty," a poetry collection she edited. She will be doing the same tomorrow at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum.
Caroline Kennedy will promote a book containing a collection of poems she edited tomorrow afternoon at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum.
The daughter of President Kennedy will deliver an introduction before poets Naomi Shibab Nye and Elizabeth Alexander read from her collection, "She Walks in Beauty: A Woman's Journey Through Poems."
Afterward, Kennedy will be signing copies of the book.
Public seating for the readings is now closed, but the book-signing will be available to all.
The forum will be webcast live at www.jfklibrary.org/webcast.
The event will run from 4-5 p.m. in the Stephen Smith Hall.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Kerry holds second Libya hearing, this time with skeptics
Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, held a second hearing on Libya today, this time with skeptics of the intervention.
After prodding by ranking member Richard Lugar, an Indiana Republican, Kerry called on Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, who told the committee: "We cannot be confident in the agenda of the Libyan opposition."
Today's hearing follows a hearing last week with Under Secretary of State James Steinberg, who painted an upbeat picture of the intervention.
But today, Haass portrayed the intervention as ill-advised. He told the committee that the only sure way to replace the regime of Moammar Khadafy is to introduce ground troops and do nation-building, but that US interests in Libya do not warrant such an investment.
Haass said in his testimony that his views were his own, and not those of the Council on Foreign Relations.
FULL ENTRYRomney gives $45,000 to GOP committees
Expected Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney is giving $45,000 to GOP election committees in the aftermath of President Obama announcing his re-election campaign.
Romney's Free and Strong America PAC is giving $15,000 apiece to the Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, and the National Republican Congressional Committee.
The latter two are charged with electing Republicans to the US Senate and US House, respectively. The RNC, meanwhile, is ultimately charged with helping elect a Republican president.
The former Massachusetts governor said in a statement this afternoon: “President Obama and his big spending allies in Congress have confused priorities for our nation. Instead of focusing on putting unemployed Americans back to work, they have raised taxes, expanded the size and scope of government, and prolonged the recession. I believe that by electing Republicans, we will make America strong and prosperous again.”
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown has $8.3 million cash on hand
Senator Scott Brown plans to report over $8.3 million cash on hand for his 2012 re-election campaign when he files a federal finance report on April 15, an aide said today.
The tally includes $1.7 million raised during the first quarter of the year.
By some estimates, Brown may spend up to $25 million on his campaign, in which he is seeking his first full term after replacing the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy in February 2010.
"Finally, Senator Brown, like other senators from Massachusetts and elsewhere, is registering a political action committee, 'ScottPAC,' which will allow him to respond to requests for financial support from other candidates," said spokeswoman Gail Gitcho.
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, an expected candidate for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination, has the "Free and Strong America PAC,'' while former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, another potential candidate next year, has the similarly named "SarahPAC."
Such so-called leadership committees allow politicians to travel the country and build their national political base, while also developing chits by sprinkling donations on like-minded candidates.
Earlier today, Salem Mayor Kim Driscoll announced she would not seek the Democratic nomination to challenge Brown, citing her current job and young family.
But all the potential challengers have cited the money they have to raise as a potentially decisive factor in their ultimate decision to run.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Salem Mayor Driscoll skipping 2012 Senate race
Joanne Rathe/Globe Staff
Salem Mayor Kim Driscoll worked in her City Hall office on Feb. 9, 2010. She announced today she would not run for the US Senate next year, citing her work in the city and her young family.
Salem Mayor Kim Driscoll released a statement this morning saying she will not seek the Democrats' 2012 US Senate nomination in Massachusetts.
She had explored a run against the Republican incumbent, Senator Scott Brown, but also been upfront about her concerns over running while leading a city and raising three young children.
Driscoll had been the most prominent woman to publicly express interest in a campaign.
"Plain and simple, I do think the seat is winnable, but there is a time and place for everything," she said in her statement.
Delahunt joins law firm in Boston
Former US Representative William Delahunt has joined the Boston office of a Pittsburgh-based law firm as special counsel.
Eckert Seamans Cherin and Mellott LLC announced Monday the Quincy Democrat started Friday and will "provide strategic counsel to firm clients on complex regulatory issues such as healthcare, financial services, and energy and environmental matters."
"After serving in the House for 14 years, Bill Delahunt brings to Eckert Seamans incomparable insight and connections at the busy intersection of business and politics, as well as insight, experience, and seasoned judgment to our clients and their business affairs," Timothy P. Ryan, the firm's chief executive officer, said in a statement.
Last month, the Mashpee Wampanoag Indian tribe announced Delahunt will represent the group and its interests including its ongoing efforts to host casino gambling at the state and federal level.
Delahunt stepped down in January as 10th District congressman. Previously, he served as Norfolk district attorney.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Tea Party Nation leader lambastes Brown
For at least one leader of the Tea Party movement, when it comes to Scott Brown, the party’s long over.
“Brown is a politician, and that is meant in the worst sense of the word,’’ Judson Phillips, leader of Tea Party Nation, writes on a blog today. “He knows self-preservation and self-promotion. He has aligned himself with the [Republicans in name only] crowd, which has no beliefs, other than getting reelected and appeasing whatever base he thinks will help him get reelected.”
The source of Phillips’ anger? Brown delivered a speech yesterday from the floor of the Senate in which he worried aloud about how steep budget cuts could hurt programs for elderly and poor Massachusetts residents. He also wrote in a letter to GOP leaders that the poor and elderly could bear the brunt of the $61 billion in cuts they’re seeking.
FULL ENTRY
Brown has pair of Mass. events this weekend
Senator Scott Brown has a pair of public events in Massachusetts this weekend.
Tonight, he's joining Governor Deval Patrick and other local politicians for the annual “Banned in Boston” benefit for Urban Improv. It describes itself as "an interactive program for young people that uses improvisational theater workshops to teach violence prevention, conflict resolution, and decision-making."
The show starts at 7:45 p.m. at the House of Blues on Lansdowne Street.
Tomorrow, the Republican is the keynote speaker at the annual Pioneer Valley USO fundraiser dinner.
It takes place at 8:15 p.m. at Delaney House in Holyoke.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Not your typical job application
Between representing Massachusetts in Congress, serving as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and acting as a semi-official diplomatic envoy of the Obama administration, Senator John Kerry has an additional duty.
In his new capacity as senior US senator from the state, he helps shape the vetting and recommendation process for any new federal judges nominated by the president to serve in Massachusetts.
It is a role held for decades by his former colleague, the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy, and it helped him shape not only the local federal bench, but also who served as US attorney and US marshal for Massachusetts.
In a statement yesterday, Kerry announced that the selection committee that will formally recommend candidates for the two upcoming judicial vacancies at the US District Courts in Springfield and Worcester is now accepting applications.
The committee leader is traditionally appointed by the senior senator, and last month Kerry announced he had selected Boston attorney Joan Lukey to serve as chairwoman. He pledged the panel "will reflect the broader geography of Massachusetts."
Kerry added in his statement: “Joan is already at work beginning a thorough search that will identify the best and brightest legal minds in Massachusetts which will be the basis for a recommendation to President Obama."
He urged citizens across the state to provide input "to make this non-partisan process succeed."
Interested candidates should contact Lukey at Joan.Lukey@ropesgray.com.
All applications must be completed by May 16.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Senators broach idea of Khadafy paying for campaign
WASHINGTON Can the $30 billion Libyan leader Moammar Khadafy has squirreled away in foreign bank accounts be used to reimburse the very nations making war on him right now?
That was a question that came up repeatedly today at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as members from both parties seized on the idea of using Khadafy's nest egg to finance the no-fly zone over his country imposed by the United States and an international coalition.
Dick Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, started it all by asking Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg about the costs of the military operation in Libya.
Kerry offers statement on Libya situation
Massachusetts Democrat John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, today presided over a congressional hearing focused on future steps in Libya.
The North African nation has been under assault by an international coalition after its leader, Moammar Khadafy, began using military force against protestors opposed to his authoritarian regime.
Kerry called for institution a no-fly zone, which President Obama initiated.
Kerry: I misspoke regarding Google privacy commitment
WASHINGTON — US Senator John Kerry misspoke yesterday in saying that the Internet giant Google was on-board with the senator’s efforts to craft an Internet privacy bill, his office said this morning.
The Massachusetts Democrat has discussed the bill with Google officials but those talks are still ongoing, according to Kerry’s office.
Kerry’s Internet privacy bill has been in the works for months. The official language has not been released, but the goal of the bill is to give consumers more say in how their on-line browsing habits are recorded and used by advertising companies.
Companies on-board with the legislation include eBay, Intel, Microsoft, and HP, Kerry’s office said this morning. Talks with Facebook are also ongoing.
A Google spokesperson declined to comment today.
Mark Arsenault can be reached at marsenault@globe.com.
Brown to speak about book at Kennedy Library
"Or, as I like to call it, the 'People's Library,'" the Republican quipped at the South Boston St. Patrick's Day political roast.

The joke referred to the mantra of Brown's campaign to win the 2010 special election held after the death of Senator Edward M. Kennedy, brother to the slain president for whom the library is named.
Brown argued he wasn't filling Kennedy's seat, but "the people's seat."
He will discuss his new memoir, "Against All Odds: My Life of Hardship, Fast Breaks, and Second Chances," with NECN correspondent Alison King.
This forum will be held from 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. Reservations are no longer available to the public.
The forum will also be webcast live at www.jfklibrary.org/webcast.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Obama poll standing rises among 'Millennials'
A Harvard University poll released this morning found President Obama's approval rating rising among the so-called "Millennials" or "Generation Y" that spans from 18 to 29 years old.
The president had an approval rating of 55 percent, up 6 percentage points from a similar survey last fall. Both were conducted by Harvard’s Institute of Politics, which is part of the John F. Kennedy School of Government.
Among students at four-year college campuses, Obama's approval rating rose even more, from 51 percent last fall to 69 percent now.
SIGTARP: Dodd-Frank "not a magic wand"
In a final warning to Congress, the outgoing watchdog for the Troubled Asset Relief Program said today the financial reform legislation that Barney Frank helped shepherd to passage has not ended the threat that banks could require future bailouts.
Neil M. Barofsky, the TARP’s special inspector general, spoke about the Dodd-Frank bill to a House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee on his last day in the position. He cautioned lawmakers that the nation’s largest banks are “bigger and more concentrated and even more dangerous to the system” than before the 2008 crisis.
“The big ticket question that we’re talking about today, does it solve ‘too big to fail?’” Barofsky said of Dodd-Frank. “The answer is certainly not yet, and by all indications… I’m not entirely optimistic that it will.”
Brown, Klobuchar form medical tech caucus
Senator Scott Brown is joining forces with a liberal colleague from Minnesota to form a new U.S. Senate caucus focused on medical technology and device makers, a powerful industry in Massachusetts.
Brown, a Republican, and Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat, will co-chair the bipartisan Senate Medical Technology Caucus to focus legislative attention on the medical technology sector, which in Massachusetts includes over 200 medical devices companies and many more biotech and pharmaceutical companies.
“It is critical that we provide a business environment for them to innovate, grow and thrive," Brown said.
Like Massachusetts, Minnesota also has a large medical technology industry -- some 400 medical device companies that support over 50,000 jobs in the state.
Obama fuels talk of Kaine Senate candidacy
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine shakes President Obama's hand last night after introducing him at a party fundraiser at the Studio Museum in Harlem.
President Obama has once again borrowed from Governor Deval Patrick, this time when it comes to nudging along prospective US Senate candidates.
Patrick created a stir in February when he bluntly told a National Journal reporter that City Year cofounder Alan Khazei, Somerville activist Bob Massie, and Newton Mayor Setti Warren were "in, for sure" for next year's US Senate race against Republican Scott Brown.
That left Khazei and Warren scrambling to clarify that they had not made any final decision. Massie had already declared his candidacy.
Delegation: Don't cut HUD vouchers
The eleven Democrats in the Massachusetts delegation are urging congressional leaders to leave intact rental housing programs for the elderly and disabled, poor families, and veterans.
The letter this week urged leaders in both chambers to spare the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, saying that proposed House cuts would result in current tenants becoming homeless, halt needed renovations, and deny housing to homeless veterans.
“We request your support of full funding of these vital HUD programs to house the most vulnerable Americans and urge you to pursue alternative strategies to reduce the deficit and to avoid inflicting disproportionate costs on the backs of the poor,” the letter read.
Frank brings back gay, lesbian workplace protection bill
U.S. Representative Barney Frank revived a signature piece of legislation today that bars workplace discrimination against gays, lesbians and transgender people, but acknowledged that the bill has little chance of passing this session.
The Newton Democrat has introduced the Employment Non-Discrimination Act every session for decades. Today’s announcement was subdued, given the bill’s near certainty of failure.
“I will acknowledge at the outset that the likelihood of the Republican Congress adopting it in the House is small, but it is still very important to have it introduced,” he said.
The bill seemed to see its best chance for passage last session when Democrats controlled both chambers, but Democratic leaders made repeal of the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy a priority, along with a hate crimes bill that included penalties for violence against people who identify with the opposite sex. But last November’s election doomed the workplace bill to at least two more years of limbo.
In recent years, Frank has insisted that the workplace bill retain language protecting transgender workers along with gay and lesbian workers, a provision that caused some more conservative lawmakers to drop their support.
"We have reduced the resistance on the trangender issue, but that's still in play," he said.
Brown's book reportedly has sold 15,500 copies
Politico has an interesting story this morning looking at the recent wave of political book authors, with a special focus on US Senator Scott Brown.
The story reports that Brown’s book, "Against All Odds," had sold 15,534 copies as of last week, according to Nielsen BookScan. It tracks bookstore sales but not bulk purchases that can be made by politicians and their campaign committees, as Brown and fellow Republican Mitt Romney have done.
The story notes that President Obama seemed to start the wave, selling the rights to "Audacity of Hope" just 46 days after being elected to the Senate.
Former Kennedy aide considering Senate run
One of the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy's top aides is thinking about challenging Republican Scott Brown for re-election.
Gerry Kavanaugh worked for Kennedy from 1993 to 2001, the bulk of the time as his chief of staff. He has since worked for the Democratic National Committee, Senator John Edwards and his presidential campaign, and, most recently, as the owner of two software companies and the co-founder of a nonprofit.
In an interview with the Globe for a story today, Kavanaugh cited the high cost of a campaign as one of the key factors for any of the possible Democratic challengers.
He'd also have to work on name recognition, with a campaign being his first run for elective office.
Kavanaugh would have something of a built-in field operation: The Dartmouth native and New Bedford resident has five of six siblings still living in Massachusetts.
Read the full story here.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Patrick Kennedy following 'true compass' to wed teacher
Kennedy family
Former US Representative Patrick Kennedy of Rhode Island and his fiancee, New Jersey school teacher Amy Petitgout.
WASHINGTON Longtime bachelor Patrick Kennedy, the former Rhode Island
congressman, is engaged to marry Amy Petitgout, a New Jersey public school
teacher he has been dating for some two years, Kennedy confirmed today.
Kennedy, 43, the youngest child of the late Massachusetts Senator Edward M.
Kennedy, did not run for re-election last fall after representing Rhode
Island in the US House for 16 years.
He asked Petitgout to marry him over the weekend in Rhode Island, according
to Sean Richardson, a former aide who is one of Patrick Kennedy’s
closest friends.
"My father spoke about his 'True Compass,' guiding him through his journey of
life,” Kennedy said in a brief statement, referring to the title of his
father’s book. “I have found mine with Amy. She has helped me navigate the
uncharted waters of life beyond politics and given me the reason to look
forward to a personal life with family and friends.”
Petitgout, who has a 3-year-old daughter, Harper, from a previous marriage,
said in a statement that Kennedy “has become part of my family and loves my
daughter as his own.”
The couple originally met in New Jersey at a political event, said
Richardson.
Kennedy said in a text message that a Cape Cod wedding is planned. No date
has been revealed.
Mark Arsenault can be reached at marsenault@globe.com.
Kerry, Lugar have first big policy rift over Libya
Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and the committee's top Republican member, Richard Lugar of Indiana, have a long history of agreement on how to approach international issues. But Lugar is fuming about how President Obama went into Libya without congressional approval, an intervention that Kerry has championed.
Lugar, who is up for re-election, wrote a letter to his colleague demanding prompt hearings on Libya in their committee.
"I believe hearings not only would provide some important answers to senators and to the American people," he wrote, "they would induce the Obama administration to conduct in-depth contingency planning that does not seem to have occurred."
Kerry spokesman Frederick Jones said in response: "Senator Kerry understands the importance and complexity of our role in protecting the people of Libya and the committee will hold public hearings in the near future. He has been traveling in the region over recess to get information firsthand from our allies."
He noted Kerry and other senior congressional leaders from both parties have been briefed by the Obama administration during the past two weeks.
Jones also said the conflict in Libya was explored on March 17 when Undersecretary of State Bill Burns testified in public for more than two hours about the uprisings in Libya and elsewhere in North Africa and the Middle East.
Here is the full text of Lugar's letter:
FULL ENTRYA silver lining to GE's engine trouble?
Delays to the Pentagon's new state-of-the-art fighter jet, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, may have given a boost to General Electric Aviation, which has been on the losing end of a battle over an engine for the new jet.
The U.S. Navy announced this week that it would buy 68 engines from GE for new F-18 Hornets. The Pentagon announced the $246 million addition to the GE engine contract on Tuesday; almost half of the work will be done at GE's Lynn plant.
The engine buy is part of the Pentagon's expected yearly aircraft procurement, as the armed services must regularly replace aging aircraft. But GE Aviation spokesman Rick Kennedy said the Navy procurement is larger than usual because of the delays to the Joint Strike Fighter, which is also known as the Lightning II.
Though Kennedy didn't know how many of the engines were ordered due to delays in the F-35 program, he said delays to the Joint Strike Fighter program "have benefited the Lynn plant, no question." A Navy spokeswoman could not immediately confirm that the F-35 delays resulted in a bigger order of the F-18 engines.
"To continue to fill up the fleets, the Navy have ordered additional Hornets because they weren't getting the Joint Strike Fighter," Kennedy said.
Some 45 percent of the F-18 engine work is done at GE Aviation's Lynn plant, with the rest done in Kentucky, Ohio, New Hampshire, Vermont and other states. The contract modification doesn't mean new jobs, because the contracts are already in place.
“I’m glad to see the United States Navy continue to depend on the skilled, dedicated work force in Lynn," Senator John Kerry said in a statement.
The engine contract came on top of another GE Aviation contract the Pentagon announced the same day worth up to $453 million for repairs to existing aircraft engines being used across the armed services, including those used by the Apache and Blackhawk helicopters.
The new F-18 engines represent a silver lining of sorts to GE travails over the F-35. Since the 1990s, the Pentagon has paid GE to develop an alternate engine for F-35, but both the Bush and Obama administrations soured on the alternate engine program, calling it a waste and urging Congress to defund it.
Budget-conscious GOP freshman -- some from districts with ties to GE's competitors -- bolstered the ranks of the engine's opponents, and House members bucked their leaders by stripping $450 million for the engine from this year's budget.
The Senate didn't include the engine in its version either, but senators voted down both versions, leaving the GE engine program in limbo. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has said he will continue to fund it in deference to Congress despite his opposition.
Romney, Brown, and advisers walking tightrope
Jim Davis/Globe Staff
Mitt Romney shakes Scott Brown's hand after he won the Massachusetts US Senate special election on Jan. 19, 2010.
As Senator Scott Brown skewered leading Massachusetts Democrats with a joke-filled routine during a St. Patrick's Day political roast over the weekend, one of his top advisers delighted in a moment he helped script.
"Scott Brown at St. Patty's Day breakfast says he doesn't think John Kerry is an elitist ... and 'neither do his butlers,'" communications consultant Eric Fehrnstrom said via Twitter.
"Ha! Scott Brown says Southie parade only one where (House) speaker rides in a car for which previous speaker made the license plate," Fehrnstrom said in another of his series of tweets.
Yet as the crowd roared when Brown displayed a bipartisan flair, telling another joke that tweaked fellow Republican Mitt Romney for owning not one but three houses, Fehrnstrom's Twitter feed went silent.
No re-tweet of that dig at Fehrnstrom's original, and ongoing, boss. No basking in the glory enjoyed by his subsequent, and continued, boss.
The decision illustrates the challenge confronting Romney and Brown and some of the key men and women who have helped both reach their high stations in national politics.
Fehrnstrom and business partners Peter Flaherty and Beth Myers not only served Romney as governor of Massachusetts; they were top staffers for his unsuccessful campaign for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination.
They then branched out on their own, formed the Massachusetts-based Shawmut Group, and directed Brown's upset win in the 2010 Massachusetts US Senate special election.
Now, the trio is assisting Romney as he plots a second presidential campaign and Brown as he seeks re-election to his first full Senate term.
The men's political fates could be decided the same day, Nov. 6, 2012, but the candidates and their advisers will face a challenge until then working in such close proximity to each other.
Romney was extraordinarily popular in Massachusetts when, in 2002, he returned from his successful leadership of the Olympic Winter Games and was elected governor. His star dimmed, though, as he began laying the groundwork for his presidential campaign with a move to the right, jokes before conservative audiences about his liberal homestate, and heavy out-of-state travel.
Such was his station that he was a virtual no-show for his running mate, Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey, as she ran to succeed him in the 2006 gubernatorial race.
Healey was happy to have it that way.
Romney also dropped out of sight during Brown's 2010 campaign, only to take the stage on election night after voters had already cast their ballots.
Brown was happy to have it that way, too.
Today, both men are complimentary but not necessarily complementary toward each other.
Brown declared early and often that Romney has his endorsement in the race for the GOP's 2012 presidential nomination. Romney has reciprocated, highlighting Brown's success as proof a strong Republican message can penetrate even the bluest of Democratic states.
Yet there is potential for future tensions.
First of all, there is time and focus for their mutual advisers. Romney will face a hydra-headed challenge for the nomination, confronted simultaneously by rivals such as Tim Pawlenty and Haley Barbour and Newt Gingrich. Or Sarah Palin.
That will occur this fall and next spring, well before Brown's re-election campaign begins (he almost assuredly won't face a Republican challenger for the GOP's Senate nomination). So far, so good.
But if Romney wins the nomination, and Democrats succeed in their effort to recruit a challenger to Brown, both of their campaigns will reach their peaks the following fall.
Who gets the Shawmut Group's best effort? Best commercial ideas? Debate prep? Political roast jokes?
Secondly, as Romney veers rightward nationally to win the nomination, while Brown moves to the center to win re-election in Massachusetts, conflicting views are inevitable. Each is his own man, but it's only natural for two people with similar political pedigrees to face questions about the other's policy views.
After all, if Romney and Brown were to win their campaigns, Brown would have to vote on Romney administration programs.
Currently, both men express similar views about Libya: They say US air strikes were justified because Moammar Khadafy was slaughtering his own countrymen.
Recently, though, they differed on the New START Treaty: Romney vehemently opposed the pact President Obama signed with Russia, while Brown voted for its ratification.
Both will also have to stage an artful dance as they call for repealing Obama's universal health care program, which was modeled after a 2006 Massachusetts bill that then-state Senator Brown voted for and then-Governor Romney signed into law.
Advisers argue that despite their shared party, geographical roots, and team of advisers, Romney and Brown are individual candidates with their own views. On some points they agree; on others, they don't.
You can also argue that Brown will benefit if Romney is at the top of the Massachusetts ballot come the fall of 2012, or, perhaps more likely, that Romney will benefit from being on the same ballot as a senator consistently polling as the most popular politician in Massachusetts.
And should Romney run, Fehrnstrom, Myers, and Flaherty are not expected to be paid staff members again but consultants. Fehrnstrom, for example, doesn't plan to be on Romney's plane again as traveling press secretary; rather, he intends to work from the home office and focus on message development and television commercials.
In Massachusetts, a relatively shallow Republican talent pool also doesn't give Brown many other options with Shawmut's breadth of local experience or national contacts.
Finally, Fehrnstrom and the other advisers note that they are hardly the only political consultants with more than one client. Their roster includes other politicians and businesses they prefer not to name.
"Our consulting business is not unlike other firms that have more than one client," said Fehrnstrom, readying himself for another Democratic tweak. "In this economy, we’re just thankful to have any clients at all."
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Romney: 'If president, I would waive 'Obamacare''
Former Governor Mitt Romney is marking the first anniversary of President Obama's universal health care law by vowing to dismantle it state-by-state.
"If I were president, on Day One I would issue an executive order paving the way for Obamacare waivers to all 50 states," the would-be Republican presidential candidate said Tuesday night in a blog post for the "National Review."
Former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, who announced Monday he was forming a presidential exploratory committee, released his own statement this morning saying he would support the law's repeal. While governor last year, he joined a lawsuit seeking to do just that.
"The law infringes on individuals' and states' rights by forcing individuals to purchase a good or service," he said. "If courts do not do so first, as president, I would support the immediate repeal of 'Obamacare' and replace it with market-based health care reforms."
Romney's statement used his most aggressive language yet regarding a potential presidential campaign. He insists publicly he has yet to decide whether to seek the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, yet nearly all of his actions for the past two years have been geared that way.
A formal kickoff is expected later this spring.
Romney presided over Massachusetts when, in 2006, it enacted the nation's first universal health care law. Now over 98 percent of state residents have private, government, or government-subsidized private coverage.
Last year, Obama signed a federal law modeled on the same principles, including a mandate that all residents obtain whatever coverage they can afford, as well as penalties for not doing so.
Romney said in his blog post that his executive order would direct the secretary of Health and Human Services and all relevant federal officials "to return the maximum possible authority to the states to innovate and design health-care solutions that work best for them."
The former governor argues states should be free to enact what Democrats have countered is "Romneycare."
He said in his statement: "As I have stated time and again, a one-size-fits-all national plan that raises taxes is simply not the answer. Under our federalist system, the states are 'laboratories of democracy.'"
Romney said his ultimate goal is to repeal the Obama program "and replace it with free-market reforms that promote competition and lower health-care costs."
Acknowledging such a repeal would take time, "an executive order is the first step in returning power to the states," he said.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
NARAL praises Brown for opposing full defunding of Planned Parenthood
WASHINGTON — The abortion-rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America today praised US Senator Scott Brown for pledging to oppose a House Republican effort to eliminate federal grants and contracts that benefit the women’s health services provider Planned Parenthood.
“Today’s report that Senator Scott Brown has said he will oppose efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and other family-planning centers is a positive first step, and we look forward to seeing his name appear in the ‘no’ column when this vote comes to the Senate floor,” said Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America and Andrea Miller, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts, in a joint statement. “We also call on Senator Brown to stand up for the Commonwealth’s women and oppose other far-reaching and intrusive anti-choice policies as they move from the House to the Senate.”
Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, issued a statement this morning in support of family planning services, and said that an effort by House Republicans to eliminate federal funding for Planned Parenthood goes too far. Brown voted for the House budget plan earlier this month, though he said at the time he did not support all of the proposed cuts. The plan failed to pass the Senate.
Menino disputes Galvin's Census figures for Boston
The Menino administration is disputing US Census figures released today by Secretary of State William F. Galvin that purported to show that Boston lost population during the past decade.
Galvin released the figures this morning at a widely attended State House news conference, where the figures were immediately broadcast by reporters from a number of media outlets.
Moments later, Menino's office reached out to reporters, saying Galvin was mistaken about the Census numbers and that Boston had actually gained population, growing to 617,594 from 589,141, a 4.8 percent increase.
"We are confident that our population continues to grow," said Dot Joyce, a Menino spokeswoman. "Boston is a growing, vibrant city." Joyce said city officials are reviewing the new figures.
The official Census figures are due to be released this afternoon.
The data will be used to determine the shape of legislative districts, as well as to remap the congressional districts in Massachusetts.
Earlier figures already showed that the state would lose one of its 10 congressional districts.
Brown says to cut all federal funding of Planned Parenthood 'goes too far'
WASHINGTON — US Senator Scott Brown opposes a House Republican plan to cut all federal funding for Planned Parenthood, the womens' health service provider, and today urged budget negotiators to reach a compromise.
“I support family planning and health services for women,” Brown, a Bay State Republican, said in a statement. “Given our severe budget problems, I don't believe any area of the budget is completely immune from cuts. However, the proposal to eliminate all funding for family planning goes too far. As we continue with our budget negotiations, I hope we can find a compromise that is reasonable and appropriate.”
House Republicans have sought to eliminate all federal grants and contracts with Planned Parenthood, some $300 million, because the agency provides abortion services. By law, none of the federal money can be used to pay for abortions, but abortion-rights opponents have argued that any financial support for Planned Parenthood frees up other money that could be used for abortions.
The argument comes as part of an ongoing budget fight: Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill have been unable to agree on a budget to fund the federal government for the rest of the fiscal year; Congress has recently passed two short-term stopgaps to allow more time to reach a long-term deal.
Earlier this month, Brown voted in favor the House GOP proposal that would have made the cuts, though he said at the time that he “would have had different priorities” in cutting spending. The Senate defeated the House plan, and a Democratic alternative, in a set of votes orchestrated by Senate leaders to force both sides back into negotiations.
Potential Senate candidate flubs SF mayor question
Massachusetts Republicans are branding Newton Mayor Setti Warren as "not ready for primetime" after the potential US Senate candidate incorrectly labeled a potential colleague as dead.
During a weekend broadcast of WCVB-TV's "On the Record," Warren was asked to name the San Francisco mayor assassinated in 1978 along with city supervisor Harvey Milk.
"Dianne Feinstein," Warren said after a brief pause, providing the name of the future mayor.
Making the mistake all the worse is that Feinstein is a fellow Democrat who has served alongside Warren's former boss, John Kerry, in the US Senate since 1992.
Co-host Ed Harding laughed at the reply, prompting Warren to backtrack.
"Dianne Feinstein became mayor after, and then became US senator, after Harvey Milk was assassinated," Warren replied.
For the record, the mayor who was assassinated was George Moscone.
Even as it tweaked Warren in a press release, the Massachusetts Republican Party raised questions about its own readiness for the spotlight.
Both times the release incorrectly spelled Moscone's name as "Mascone."
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Biden visiting Hancock tonight for 'friend-raiser'
Vice President Joseph Biden is visiting the Hancock tower in Boston this evening for a pair of events, including one that Governor Deval Patrick says is a "friend-raiser" ahead of the 2012 presidential election.
One of the two meetings is taking place in the personal offices of Jack Connors, the local advertising executive who has been spearheading the fundraising effort for the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, according to a Connors assistant and a top local Democrat who saw the invitation.
"Massachusetts has been good to the Obama-Biden ticket, and was the last time around, and the administration has been good to Massachusetts, and the vice president is here to refresh those relationships and rally some of the organizers for the coming election," Patrick told reporters at the State House.
The trip is coming almost exactly two weeks after President Obama visited the city for a fundraiser on behalf of the committee charged with helping elect Democrats to the US House of Representatives.
The back-to-back visits underscore the party's emphasis on strengthening itself in the aftermath of the mid-term election, when the Democrats lost their House majority. Obama and Biden also are gearing up for what The Washington Post projected in December could be the first $1 billion presidential campaign.
Obama himself met last week with top donors in Washington, although he did not directly solicit contributions at that time.
Instead, the president told the group: "As 2012 unfolds, I expect that we’re going to have a lot of questions and there are going to be vigorous debates, but I don’t want us to lose sight of the huge opportunities we have to seize the moment and make sure that America is not just changed, but is changed for the better."
He added: "And my hope is that the same spirit that helped change this country in 2008, that that spirit is still in each and every one of you.”
Massachusetts was one of former President Bill Clinton's most reliable fund-raising states, but two area Democrats who helped him raise money Steve Grossman and Alan Solomont are now in different roles.
Grossman was elected state treasurer in November and just started his term in January; Solomont is serving as US ambassador to Spain and Andorra after an appointment from Obama himself.
"My understanding is it's a 'friend-raising' meeting getting ready for the 2012 elections," said Patrick.
Earlier in the day, Biden joined US Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, Delaware Governor Jack Markell, US Senator Chris Coons, and other officials from his home state of Delaware to tour the Howard High School of Technology in Wilmington.
According to a pool report, "they visited a classroom of students who were learning about physical science."
Biden told reporters he is hopeful that Howard High School's turnaround plan will help students, saying that "part of it is believing in them and setting the bar high," the report said.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Pelosi delivering Solomont lecture at Tufts
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who previously served as the first female speaker of the US House of Representatives, will deliver the inaugural Alan D. Solomont Lecture at Tufts University on April 8.
The California Democrat will reflect on her career and the importance of public service during a 2 p.m. address in the school's Cohen Auditorium, according to a university statement.
This lecture is part of the 10th anniversary celebration of the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service.
It is intended to serve as a catalyst for active citizenship at Tufts and is the only university-wide program of its kind. Serving undergraduate, graduate, and professional school students, the goal is to prepare young people to be lifelong active citizens.
Pelosi's speech will be followed by a question-and-answer session with Alan D. Solomont, for whom the lectureship is named.
A prominent Democratic fundraiser and activist from Massachusetts, the former nursing home executive now serves as US ambassador to Spain and Andorra. He also is a member of Tufts' Class of 1970.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown shows how to work Southie roast
Dina Rudick/Globe Staff
Governor Deval Patrick told a few jokes before singing a song yesterday for those attending the annual St. Patrick's Day breakfast and political roast in South Boston.
The South Boston St. Patrick's Day political roast has long had the reputation as the preeminent place to hear political wit, but lately it's also veered toward a cross between "American Idol" and a politicians' gag slide show.
House Speaker Robert DeLeo showed yesterday and last week in an expletive-filled appearance in Salem he's among those who still get the drill. And so did Senator Scott Brown.
In a joked-filled routine, the Republican skewered both Democrats and the GOP alike, as well as himself.
Read my full story here.
In the first of two moments that triggered laughs but actually were full of meaning, Brown mentioned the state's traveling governor, Deval Patrick, and said of the Democrat: "Honestly, really, I’m so glad that the governor is here, because if he wasn’t here, he'd actually be out trying to recruit another candidate to run against me.”
At another point, as the crowd laughed at some of his tart criticism, Brown alluded to his coming re-election campaign as he said with a laugh himself: "I figured I might as well start. I’m going to get the you-know-what kicked out of me soon, so hey, why not?”
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Mass. congressional delegation on Libya
Goran Tomasevic/Reuters
Vehicles belonging to forces loyal to Libyan leader Moammar Khadafy explode Sunday after an air strike by coalition forces, along a road between Benghazi and Ajdabiyah.
The 12-member Massachusetts congressional delegation, all Democrats except for Republican Senator Scott Brown, offered an array of positions today in reaction to the launch of US air strikes on Libya over the weekend.
Here are the comments they or their spokesperson made to the Globe or, in Kerry's case, as well as on NBC's "Meet the Press."
Senator John Kerry, Democrat:
"Well, the goal of this mission ... is not to get rid of (Libyan leader Moammar) Khadafy, and that's not what the United Nations licensed. And I would not call it going to war. This is a very limited operation that is geared to save lives, and it was specifically targeted on a humanitarian basis. It is not geared to try to get rid of Khadafy. He has not been targeted. That is not what is happening here. So, in my judgment, we have to see where we go from here."
In an interview with the Globe, Kerry added: "I believe very, very deeply that America's strategic interests and our values require us to support people's aspirations. ...I think you have to have some faith in what the possibilities of diversity and pluralism can produce."
Senator Scott Brown, Republican:
"I support the administration's involvement at this point. Obviously, it gets to a point where you have to draw a line in the sand, and when innocent civilians are being killed, it's important for the world community to step forward, and we're doing it in a coalition manner, and I'm supportive of that."
Representative John Olver, Democrat, 1st District:
A spokeswoman said "he supports the steps the president, the UN, our European allies, and the Arab League are taking."
Representative Richard E. Neal, Democrat, 2nd District:
"I welcome the passage this week of UN Security Council Resolution 1973 implementing a no-fly zone over parts of Libya. I also support the establishment of an international coalition, working together with the Arab League, to prevent further atrocities from happening in flashpoints like Benghazi. It is clear that Colonel Khadafy and his regime were not going to stop the campaign of terror and violence against their own people. For the safety of innocent civilians, and to encourage the pro-democracy movements across the Middle East, I support the actions of the international coalition."
Representative James McGovern, Democrat, 3rd District:
"I just have this uneasy feeling in the pit of my stomach. . . None of us know who is really calling the shots in terms of the opposition. It's very dicey and very dangerous. I am hoping and praying for success. I am deeply worried."
Representative Barney Frank, Democrat, 4th District:
"If our role is limited to Tomahawk missiles from the ships, and the airplanes are French and British, I will support it. ...Our opposition is for America picking up the entire tab. The fact that you have such a multinational, multicultural support for this, I hope it is a new paradigm. "
Representative Niki Tsongas, Democrat, 5th District:
"I am concerned that our military action in Libya lacks a clear objective. It is critically important that our commitment there not extend beyond the scope of UN Resolution 1973 and under no circumstances should American ground troops be inserted into that country."
Representative John Tierney, Democrat, 6th District:
"These are the lingering questions: Why Libya? Why now? There are certainly other dictators acting badly toward the own citizens. And who is the opposition? If you're picking sides in a civil war you better know who you're siding with."
Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat, 7th District:
“The current government of Libya has lost all legitimacy. Left unchecked, Khadafy will commit unspeakable brutalities against his own people. ...The more nations involved in this multilateral effort, the more the people of Libya will know that the movement for democracy that is spreading throughout the Middle East has global support. We are watching a watershed moment not only in Libya but throughout the Middle East. History is on the side of these 21st century young, educated people who are calling for the end to this 20th century oil-fueled dictatorship. Seventy percent of Libya is young people, but they represent 100 percent of the future of the country. The message to Colonel Khadafy is clear: the entire world community is united in protecting the Libyan people. Libyans must be able to chart their own future, free from violence and intimidation.”
Representative Michael Capuano, Democrat, 8th District:
"So far, the only stated goal is to protect civilians, the civilian population, which is a laudable goal, but if that's the new measure of when military power's going to be put in play, well then I suspect we'll be going to the Congo and Sudan, Ivory Coast, Yemen, maybe Bahrain, very very soon, if that's the measure."
Representative Stephen Lynch, Democrat, 9th District:
"I was very troubled by the decision to use US forces and to do so without consulting with Congress. I don't believe that Libya presents a direct threat to the United States. Lacking those circumstances, I think it was incumbent upon the president to talk to Congress. We have got two wars going on right now. We are tremendously over-extended."
Representative William Keating, Democrat, 10th District:
"Since the humanitarian issues surrounding the non-engaged Libyan civilians have not been fully vetted to Congress, I'm forced to view this on a step-by-step basis. I feel strongly, however, that our involvement should not expand beyond that purpose."
Brown supports air strikes on Libya
Senator Scott Brown said this morning he supports the unfolding wave of U.S. air strikes on Libya, saying they are necessary to stop the killing of innocent civilians.
The Massachusetts Republican, confronting the first military action launched since he took office a year ago, said, "I support the administration's involvement at this point. Obviously, it gets to a point where you have to draw a line in the sand, and when innocent civilians are being killed, it's important for the world community to step forward, and we're doing it in a coalition manner, and I'm supportive of that."
Brown, who also is a JAG officer in the Massachusetts National Guard, refused to say if he would support the additional use of ground troops. President Obama has repeatedly said the action will be limited to air support in the form of an opening wave of cruise missiles attacks, as well as an overnight B-2 bombing run and the possibility of combat air patrols to enforce a UN-backed no-fly zone.
"That's a hypothetical I'm not really ready to comment on," Brown told a pair of reporters as he arrived at the Boston Convention & Exhibition Center for the annual South Boston St. Patrick's Day breakfast and political roast.
"But I think that we're going to follow the lead and work together with other countries to determine what the obstacles are and where it goes from here," he added. "I think it's a mission in progress and we'll know more in a day or two."
Brown also refused to say if he would support strikes on Yemen and Bahrain, two other Middle Eastern countries where pro-democracy forces have clashed with authoritarian regimes.
"You're starting to get into hypotheticals, but in this instance, it's clear that (Libyan leader Moammar Khadafy) was using his own forces to kill innocent civilians, and that's where I draw the line," Brown said.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown urges reconsideration of spending priorities at HUD
WASHINGTON – Updated, 12:29 p.m. -- US Senator Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, is urging President Obama and congressional leaders from both parties in a letter to reconsider spending priorities at the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Brown wrote that homelessness in the Bay State and across the nation is up due to the foreclosure crisis, and noted that families with children are the fastest-growing segment of new homeless.
“HUD Programs provide rental assistance for low income citizens and other homelessness programs,” Brown wrote. “These rental programs are vital to Massachusetts and should be protected at a time when the Massachusetts unemployment rate is about eight percent.”
But HUD continues to "waste taxpayer dollars by pushing a failed policy that seeks to subsidize and maximize home ownership opportunities,” Brown wrote. “For example, HUD’S HOME Investment Partnership program continues to spend taxpayer dollars promoting home ownership, even though rental programs have proven to be more effective in promoting stability in low income neighborhoods….
“As part of the effort to get our fiscal house in order, we should reform our housing policies and direct agencies to provide maximum protection for low income rental assistance recipients while also saving money by eliminating programs that we know do not work and in fact do harm.”
A wee disagreement over Ireland aid
WASHINGTON – A financial vestige of US efforts to encourage peace in Northern Ireland has disappeared after a quarter century, leaving disagreements that echo on both sides of the Atlantic and have divided two of the Bay State’s congressmen.
Congress recently eliminated nearly $20 million in an earmark for the International Fund for Ireland. The economic aid had been extended by the United States every year since the 1980s to help smooth the turbulence of the island’s deep conflicts. Once supported by Senator Edward M. Kennedy as an important element of the peace process, the accumulated payments reached a total of $450 million.
The debate over the money continues. Irish officials in Washington this week are asking members of Congress to restore the funds. And the Obama administration is seeking to put the money back into a future budget.
They have an ally in Representative Richard Neal of Springfield. In a statement emailed to the Globe, Neal spokesman William Tranghese said this week that Neal supports a move by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to restore aid to the International Fund for Ireland in the 2012 State Department budget.
"Mr. Neal supports continued funding for the IFI because he feels it is not the time to be sending a message to the people on the island of Ireland that the United States is no longer interested in their journey towards peace and reconciliation,’’ Tranghese said. "He hopes to work with his colleagues on both sides of the aisle to restore our contribution to the fund.’’
Yet the spending cut has its backers, including Representative Stephen Lynch. Steeped in South Boston politics, you would think aid for Northern Ireland would automatically win his support. But Lynch thinks the money could be better spent on scholarships, not on economic aid.
In a letter to House budget leaders, he is calling for $5 million a year, for four years starting in 2012, to be directed to an existing scholarship in the name of George Mitchell, the former US Senate majority leader and envoy who negotiated the lasting Northern Ireland peace in the 1990s. Lynch says using the money for scholarships instead of on aid for the International Fund for Ireland amounts to "building a future relationship based on contemporary realities rather than nostalgia.’’
The Mitchell scholarship is administered by the US-Ireland Alliance, a non-profit foundation that is headed by Trina Vargo, a former foreign policy advisory to Ted Kennedy. Vargo could not be immediately reached by phone this afternoon. But she has said that the US financial assistance to the International Fund for Ireland has created a dependency that Ireland needs to end, according to press accounts.
Writing in the Irish Echo last year, she said: "While the Fund did many good things in those early years, it became one of those taps that was never turned off. While I was still working with Senator Kennedy, he stopped requesting funding for the IFI. That was more than a decade ago. We had simply come to the conclusion that the IFI had served its purpose.’’
Kerry calls for repeal of Defense of Marriage Act
WASHINGTON — In a column published this week in the gay-issue newspaper Bay Windows, US Senator John Kerry called for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, and its replacement with legislation to make same sex couples eligible for federal benefits that would include family and medical leave, Social Security spousal and survivors’ benefits, and the ability to file joint federal tax returns.
The 1996 law, typically abbreviated DOMA, defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman, and says that no US state has to recognize same sex marriages performed in another state.
In his op-ed, Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, said the law is unconstitutional—a conclusion recently reached by the Obama administration, which has announced it would no longer defend challenges to DOMA in federal court.
“My vote against [DOMA] -- which some predicted would cost me reelection in 1996 -- is among my proudest votes as a United States Senator,” Kerry wrote. “But my job in 2011 isn’t to feel good about my vote -- or to boast that fifteen years later, I’m vindicated when at last an American president now agrees that DOMA is unconstitutional.
“No, my job -- and our job together," Kerry wrote, " is to work to undo the damage that DOMA has done in treating loving, committed couples like second class citizens."
Kerry said he is committed to repealing DOMA “as quickly as possible.” He has signed on to legislation seeking to repeal the law, though such a bill would have a difficult time winning approval this session in the Republican-controlled US House.
Could Kerry become the next secretary of state?
WASHINGTON — It’s the speculation US Senator John Kerry just can’t shake: Is he seeking to be the next secretary of state?
The conjecture grows more intense as the Massachusetts Democrat and chair of the Foreign Relations Committee has taken highly-public role in shaping US policy toward the political upheaval in the Middle East.
With Secretary of State Hillary Clinton acknowledging in a CNN interview that she would not serve another term if President Obama is reelected in 2012, could the stage be set for Kerry to take over? With his lengthy foreign policy experience, Kerry has long been considered by pundits a potential cabinet pick for Obama, whom Kerry strongly supported early in his presidential candidacy.
But does Kerry want to be secretary of state?
“No,” said the senator’s spokesperson, Whitney Smith, in a one-word answer by email.
Somehow that doesn't sound like the final word on the subject.
Kerry urges Obama to impose Libya no-fly zone
WASHINGTON US Senator John Kerry is urging the Obama administration to back a no-fly zone over Libya, calling for the United Nations to quickly approve a resolution to ground Libyan leader Moammar Kahdafi’s warplanes.
Kahdafi is using his air force to pound the rebels trying to overthrow him.
“The international community cannot simply watch from the sidelines as this quest for democracy is met with raw violence,” said Kerry, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, in a lengthy policy speech today.
The Massachusetts Democrat said the Arab League’s endorsement this weekend of a no-fly zone over Libya is unprecedented.
“The Security Council should act now, in my judgment, to heed the Arab League’s call” and to avert a humanitarian disaster, said Kerry, in remarks to a room packed with foreign journalists at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington think tank.
Kerry’s call for action on a no-fly zone marks an evolution in his view on the subject. He did not start out calling for immediate imposition of a no-fly zone; rather, he urged diplomatic and logistical preparation for the zone.
His call also puts him at odds with Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who has said attacking Libya's planes and air defenses would be an act of war.
The speech is the latest of Kerry’s high-profile efforts to guide US policy through the chain of popular uprisings in the Middle East. He urged preparations for a no-fly zone on the CBS News program “Face the Nation” two weekends ago.
Also, at the height of the unrest in Egypt last month, the senator penned a New York Times column encouraging embattled Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak’s to give up power.
President Obama has not endorsed a no-fly zone, though he has “not taken any options off the table,” the president said on Friday.
Another option under consideration is for the US to give some $32 billion in frozen Libyan government assets to the rebels, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said on Tuesday.
Markey: Nuclear loans will be "toxic assets"
U.S. Representative Edward J. Markey is comparing the federal government’s loan guarantee program for new nuclear power plants to the much-aligned federal bailout program that bought up bad loans after the 2008 financial collapse.
The Malden Democrat, speaking today at a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing, warned that the loans will put taxpayers on the hook much as the Troubled Asset Relief Program took over defaulted loans after the financial collapse of 2008.
“They’re just like a toxic asset,” Markey said
Energy Secretary Steven Chu was present to testify at the hearing on the department’s 2012 budget, as well as that of the Nuclear Regulatory Agency. Much of the discussion centered on the disaster in Japan, and specifically on the damaged reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.
The president has asked for $36 billion for 2012 to provide loan guarantees, which Chu said would fund six to eight new projects. The administration has already made about $8 billion in loan guarantees available, which will help build a new plant in Georgia.
Committee member Joe Barton, a Texas Republican, asked Chu if the administration still supported nuclear power.
Chu hedged, saying: “The present budget is what it is. We’re asking for loan guarantees, and for small modular reactors.”
“So that’s a yes?” Barton said. “That’s a yes,” Chu responded.
Committee holds first redistricting hearing
The process to redraw the state's legislative and congressional districts reaches the public arena today, when the Special Joint Committee on Redistricting holds its first meeting.
Senator Stanley C. Rosenberg of Amherst and Representative Michael J. Moran of Boston, the committee co-chairmen, will preside over the panel's first organizational meeting at 1 p.m.
The session will take place in Gardner Auditorium at the State House.
Afterward, the chairmen will unveil a redistricting website, as well as a schedule for their proposed public hearings.
The release of the US Census each decade triggers redistricting, since both legislative and congressional districts much reflect population apportionment.
Massachusetts lost residents during the past decade, so it is losing one congressional seat, going from 10 seats in the US House to nine. Those remaining districts much be expanded to accommodate.
Districts for both the state House and Senate must also be adjusted to accommodate population and demographic shifts.
The new districts must be establish for the 2012 elections.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
###
Keating appointed ranking member of House Homeland Security subcommittee
WASHINGTON -- Representative William R. Keating scored a minority leadership post on a homeland security subcommittee, a position he plans to use to further investigate airport security breeches that allowed a North Carolina teen to stow away on a passenger jet before falling to his death last year in Massachusetts.
Keating's office announced today that the freshman Democrat has been appointed ranking member of the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Management, part of the House Homeland Security Committee.
"I relish the opportunity to delve deeper into the many issues plaguing our national security and believe this position is a natural transition from my background as a prosecutor," Keating said in a statement.
Keating served as Norfolk District Attorney before winning a seat in Congress last November. It was in that position that he oversaw the death investigation of 16-year-old Delvonte Tisdale, who fell from the wheel well of a Boeing 737 that was traveling from Charlotte, N.C., to Boston last Nov. 19.
"I know his experience as a District Attorney will be invaluable in his new capacity and I look forward to working with him on the issues that affect the Department of Homeland Security,” said Representative Bennie G. Thompson, ranking member of the Homeland Security Committee, according to the statement from Keating's office.
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @DonovanSlack.
Kerry proposes infrastructure bank bill
Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts and Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas proposed legislation today that would create a new infrastructure bank to help finance roads, bridges and other projects, an idea that has percolated for years but has never gained widespread support.
"Reliable, modern infrastructure isn't a luxury -- it's the lifeblood of our economy, the key to connecting our markets, moving people, products, information and energy, and the key to generating and sustaining millions of jobs for American workers," he said.
The legislation would provide loans and loan guarantees for bridges, rails, roads and other infrastructure projects through an independent entity called the American Infrastructure Financing Authority, which would be similar to the Export-Import Bank.
The concept is hardly new. Almost 20 years ago, a Congressional commission recommended a similar concept; the chairman of that panel sat in the front row, holding a worn copy of the commission's 1993 report. Lawmakers have pushed similar infrastructure funds over the years, and President Obama promoted it during the 2008 presidential campaign.
But the new proposal is different, Kerry said. With only loans and guarantees, and no grants, the bank will not be a drain on the treasury beyond the original investment. It would also be far smaller than other proposals, reflecting the political reality of the day, he said.
"We have been supersensitive to all of the kinds of hurdles that traditionally this kind of an effort would have to get over," he said. "It will not be appropriated money, because we don't have that money today, because of the debt and deficit we have and the other priortities."
The authority would initially be financed with $10 billion from the federal government but would become self-sustaining, leveraging as much as $640 billion in private funds over 10 years. It would not be allowed to finance more than 50 percent of the costs of projects.
Kerry announced his plans to propose the infrastructure bank last fall, telling the Senate Banking, House and Urban Affairs Committee that "well functioning infrastructure is not a luxury." He reiterated that call in January at a speech at the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress, saying that growth was tied to infrastructure.
Illustrating the breadth of political support for such a plan, the noon press conference include two men who are often adversaries, but occasional allies: U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue and Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO labor federation.
Donohue lamented the nation's decaying transportation infrastructure and its effect on the economy.
"We have a system that’s got to be updated, we’ve got a way to do it, and we came up here today to support the idea of the bank," he said.
No ink from Snowe, Collins on Senate GOP trade pact letter
Senate Republicans are threatening to hold up White House nominations unless the Senate passes trade deals with Columbia and Panama, but GOP moderates from New England aren’t of the same mind on the matter.
Forty-four Republicans signed a letter today telling Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada that they would block the administration’s nominees for commerce secretary and other positions until the Senate takes up the trade pacts.
Scott Brown of Massachusetts was among those signing the letter, but Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, the two Senators from Maine who have increasingly voted with Brown in a moderate GOP bloc in the Senate, did not sign. The third GOP abstainer was Rand Paul of Kentucky.
Spokespeople for Snowe and Collins did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The letter accused the president of “an apparent lack of interest in seeking approval of these free trade agreements.” Approval of the pacts would be beneficial to American workers, they wrote, and further delay is “unnecessary and inexcusable.”
“So important are these deals to our economy and our relations with these key allies in Latin America that, until the President submits both agreements to Congress for approval and commits to signing implementing legislation into law, we will use all the tools at our disposal to force action, including withholding support for any nominee for Commerce Secretary and any trade-related nominees,” the letter read.
Last week, Obama nominated Commerce Secretary Gary Locke to replace Jon Huntsman as ambassador to China, leaving the commerce chief position vacant and creating the opportunity for another high-profile nomination fight in the Senate.
Kerry: Nuclear safety 'always part of the discussion'
The disaster in Japan and the rising threat of nuclear meltdown from damaged reactors should trigger a “long overdue discussion of energy security” but does not raise new safety concerns about nuclear power, Senator John Kerry said today.
“A lot of folks took a new hard look at nuclear because it’s low carbon energy, but the safety questions about meltdowns and waste were always part of the discussion,” the Massachusetts Democrat said in a statement.
Kerry’s comments on nuclear energy came in response to the rising threat posed by the badly damaged Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, where worries of nuclear meltdown have been rising since last week’s massive quake and tsunami.
“We should absolutely know who is in charge in the United States if our existing nuclear plants are endangered by a natural disaster, and we should be looking hard at the siting issues, but again these aren’t new questions,” he said.
Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, a long-time supporter of nuclear energy who co-authored a climate change bill with Kerry lest year, called over the weekend for the United States to “put the brakes on” nuclear power until events unfolding in Japan are understood.
Kerry’s statement did not call for any kind of change in policy with respect to nuclear energy, but did provide a reminder of sorts for why skeptics came to support nuclear power as a flawed but necessary part of a national clean energy policy.
“In recent years, environmentalists and policy makers in both parties started taking a fresh look at nuclear power because none of our current energy options are without a downside,” he said.
“It’s up to all of us to make sure it’s a productive policy discussion that recognizes we have to get our energy from somewhere, and right now none of our options are entirely attractive.”
U.S. Representative Edward J. Markey, a Democrat from Malden, called on the Obama administration to distribute potassium iodide, which is ingested to protect the thyroid gland from radiation, to residents within 20 miles of nuclear plants.
Congress approved the requirement in legislation in 2002, but the federal government never instituted the policy proposed by Markey, who is a senior member of the Energy and Commerce Committee.
“We should not wait for a catastrophic accident at or a terrorist attack on a nuclear reactor in this country to occur to implement this common-sense emergency preparedness measure,” Markey wrote in the letter to John Holdren, the director of the Office of Science & Technology Policy.
Job posting seeks press secretary for Senate race
Massachusetts Democrats weighing a US Senate campaign next year against Republican Scott Brown are still acting coy publicly, but they're betraying themselves electronically.
Over the weekend, word broke about an e-mail showing a supporter of Newton Mayor Setti Warren was trying to stockpile talent for a campaign starting in late April.
Today, an e-mail surfaced showing local communications strategist Dorie Clark seeking a campaign press secretary.
"A Democratic US Senate campaign seeks a press secretary," Clark wrote in an e-mail dated March 11, dropping any question about whether her candidate would run. "The ideal candidate will have on-the-record experience with a federal or statewide campaign. The position in based in Boston, Mass."
She asked that resumes be sent to her company e-mail address.
The request is also being circulated on the "JobsthatareLEFT" Google chat group, which seeks positions for liberal Democratic workers moving between campaigns.
When Clark was contacted by the Globe, she refused to explain for whom she was working.
"No comment at this point, I'm afraid," she wrote.
Clark is based in Somerville, the same hometown as Representative Michael Capuano, a prospective candidate. When he ran in the primary preceding last year's US Senate special election, he relied on his own congressional staff namely spokeswoman Alison Mills for his campaign needs.
Meanwhile, Robert Massie of Somerville has also announced he's running for the Democratic nomination. His campaign manager sent out a press release today touting Massie's showing in a weekend straw conducted by the North Andover Democratic Town Committee.
Massie was first, with 30 of 74 votes, or about 41 percent. Driscoll, who joined Massie in attending the meeting, was second with 18. Capuano had 14; Representative Stephen Lynch had 4; City Year co-founder Alan Khazei and Representative Edward J. Markey had 3 apiece; and Warren and finance executive Robert Pozen each received no votes.
Massie's campaign manager, Matt Wilson, said the ad was not for their campaign.
Khazei supporters took the none-too-subtle step last week of filing papers with the IRS to create a Senate exploratory committee.
While he said the press secretary ad isn't his, another posting on "JobsthatareLEFT" sought campaign finance workers for his exploratory committee.
"Responsibilities include: traveling and working directly with the candidate, organizing and coordinating events, organizing and working directly with donors, compiling and analyzing data, and developing and implementing strategic finance plans," the post says.
It adds: "Applicants must have a strong desire to work in the intense environment of a political campaign."
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Potential Senate candidacy highlights chamber's omission
Essdras M. Suarez/ Globe Staff
Setti Warren embraces Governor Deval Patrick (back to camera) after being sworn in as mayor of Newton on Jan. 1, 2010.
Somerville resident Robert Massie has already said he's going to seek the Democratic nomination to run against Senator Scott Brown next year, and this past week, backers of City Year co-founder Alan Khazei filed papers with the IRS to form a campaign exploratory committee on his behalf.
Meanwhile, Salem Mayor Kim Driscoll continues to weigh the balance between work and family, questioning whether she can make the commitment to a campaign while both leading a city and serving as mother to three young children.
And then there is Newton Mayor Setti Warren, who is impersonating his former boss, Senator John Kerry, by preparing to campaign while saying he is not.
Back in 2001 and early 2002, Kerry said his only focus was on getting re-elected during the fall of 2002. That he made the comment during visits to Iowa, New Hampshire, and other early presidential-voting states prompted questions about the sincerity of the statement.
The senator ended up with a free pass in the 2002 election, propelling him into a 2004 presidential campaign that resulted in him becoming the Democratic presidential nominee but losing the election to the Republican incumbent, President George W. Bush.
Throughout that effort, Warren served as Kerry's trip director. He was in charge of keeping the trains running on time and making sure Kerry got to where he needed to be. After the campaign, Warren did a stint in Kerry's Boston office before heading overseas on a military deployment. In 2009, he won his his first campaign for elective office.
Now, after little more than a year as mayor of Newton, Warren is weighing a challenge to one of the hottest commodities in the US Senate, Brown himself.
Brown's surprise win the January 2010 special election to replace the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy has heartened longshots everywhere. That the lowest-ranking member of the minority party of the Massachusetts state Senate could suddenly become the make-or-break vote in the upper chamber of the US Congress is already the stuff of political legend.
Brown went from nobody to everyman in less than three weeks, riding a post-New Year's poll showing him running strong all the way to a victory on Jan. 19, 2010.
Guided by savvy advisers, he also stopped blowing money when he had ample advertising and it became clear he was going to win, seeding a warchest for the true test: winning re-election to a full term in 2012. Brown now has over $7 million in the bank, and the book tour to promote his new autobiography, "Against All Odds," is being used to introduce him to potential Republican backers across the country.
The recent video showing him hitting up billionaire David Koch for a donation belied Brown's claims that he won't be politicking until next year. As he told Koch on the hidden-camera video, "I'm in cycle right now. We're already banging away."
By some estimates, Brown may spend $25 million on his campaign.
Last month, Governor Deval Patrick revealed Warren was more than considering a race, saying the mayor was "in, for sure," along with Khazei.
That forced Warren to at least acknowledge he was considering a race, but also to temper any actual commitment to running. Last week, the dance continued, as he showed up for President Obama's speech at TechBoston Academy, only to bob-and-weave afterward about whether Obama had asked him to challenge Brown.
He ultimately said they discussed a race, but the president did not ask him to run. Then, two days later, Warren renewed speculation by using his very public Twitter account to criticize one of Brown's Senate votes.
Over the weekend, Gintautas Dumcius of the Dorchester Reporter had an intriguing story saying a political consultant had sent an e-mail saying she may be staffing a Warren campaign by the end of April.
On one level, it's hard to envision Warren having much of a shot against the Brown juggernaut. Warren is barely 40 and has only one year in office to his credit. Brown is over 50 and served in Wrentham town government before working his way up to the state House of Representatives and state Senate.
While members of the Tea Party lament Brown's move to the middle, there are plenty of Republicans nationally who love the idea that their party holds Ted Kennedy's former seat. They show their affection with donations to Brown.
A poll just released by Western New England College found 52 percent of respondents felt Brown should be re-elected. It also showed him leading Warren head-to-head by a margin of 51 percent to 34 percent, as well as over another potential challenger, Representative Michael Capuano, by 51 percent to 38 percent.
(The telephone survey of 472 registered voters, conducted March 6-10, had a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.)
Yet on another level, Warren's backers see a potent challenger.
Warren has proven an adept campaigner at multiple levels, winning election as class president at Newton North High School as well as his alma mater, Boston College. He has worked in federal office as both a Senate staffer and the New England director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
While Brown touts his service as a JAG officer in the Massachusetts National Guard, Warren can match it with his tenure an an intelligence officer in the US Navy Reserve. And when it comes to deployments, Warren can do one better: He did a year deployment in Iraq, a US combat zone, while Brown has not.
And though they don't publicly state it, Kerry, Patrick, and other Warren supporters make note of a simple fact: Warren is an African-American.
There currently are none in the US Senate. It's an omission they believe Massachusetts Democrats may want to address.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown named top GOP member of Senate subcommittee
Senator Scott Brown has been named the top Republican on a subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee
Working alongside Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, Brown will be his party's top representative on the Subcommittee on AirLand. He replaces John Thune, a South Dakota Republican who no longer serves on the committee.
Brown is one of three freshman Senators made ranking members of subcommittees, despite the fact that long-time senators serve on the committee. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire is ranking member of the Readiness and Management Support Subcommittee, and Rob Portman of Ohio is ranking member of the Emerging Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee
Brown's panel oversees Army and Air Force programs; Navy and Marine Corps tactical aviation programs; National Guard and Reserve equipment; and Army and Air Force research and development.
“As a 31-year member of the Massachusetts Army National Guard, I’m honored to be named ranking member of the Subcommittee on AirLand,” Brown said in a statement. “During my time on the Armed Services Committee, I’ve seen firsthand the incredible service and sacrifice our men and women in uniform make for our country. I look forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to address the security challenges facing the United States as well as our friends and allies around the world.”
In addition to the Armed Services Committee, Senator Brown serves on the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, and the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Donations show advancement of Romney campaign
While other potential Republican presidential candidates tried to grab the spotlight this week with a series of insider announcements about new staff hires, Mitt Romney claimed substantive ground for himself with a wave of campaign donations and a potent Florida endorsement.
In a statement yesterday, Romney's Free and Strong America PAC announced he had sent out another wave of contributions to 45 Republicans in Congress.
All told, they received $93,000. That follows the $208,000 that Romney’s PAC has given to 90 US Senate and House Republicans since the start of the year.
“There are many important issues facing Congress and the nation," the former Massachusetts governor said in the statement. "By showing our support for Republican candidates who are fighting for conservative principles in Washington, we hope to influence the national debate on jobs, taxes, the economy, and the budget."
The statement came amid a week in which Romney visited Texas to meet with key financial and campaign backers, and then aimed to visit Florida to meet with Republican Governor Rick Scott. Romney had campaigned for him last fall.
Their meeting ended up cancelled because of flight delays for Romney, but he nonetheless received the endorsement of state Senator John Thrasher. The St. Augustine Republican is a former House speaker who most recently served as chairman of the Republican Party of Florida.
“If Governor Romney decides to run for president in 2012, I will absolutely be supporting him and helping him in Florida,” Thrasher said an e-mail to Abel Harding, a columnist for The Florida Times-Union. “He would be a great GOP nominee.”
Due to population shifts, Florida will pick up two congressional seats and two Electoral College votes in the 2012 election. The state will also host the Republican National Convention, which is being held in Tampa.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Debate over greenhouse gas bill: temperature rising
Debate over a bill that would strip the Environmental Protection Agency of its power to regulate greenhouse gases turned into a rhetorical throwdown today over an issue that has become one of the fiercest political battlegrounds in Congress.
The meeting of the House Energy and Power Subcommittee was expected to be another angry confrontation between supporters of greenhouse gas regulations and climate change skeptics on the committee, and the members delivered.
Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat, opened his comments by saying that he wouldn’t stand to deliver his comments “because I’m worried that the Republicans will overturn the law of gravity, sending us floating about the room.”
“Arbitrary rejection of scientific fact will not cause us to rise from our seats today. But with this bill, pollution levels will rise. Oil imports will rise. Temperatures will rise,” he said.
He closed with the procedural conclusion of yielding back his unused time, then added: “That is, unless a rejection of Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity is somewhere in the chair’s amendment pile.”
Republicans on the committee who support the bill, the Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011, employed their own rhetorical flourishes in their condemnation of the EPA, which announced its plans to regulate greenhouse gases last year following a finding that the gases endanger the public.
“Today we take the first step to reassert legislative authority over EPA and to stop EPA’s effort to issue global warming regulations that would increase our electricity costs, our gasoline prices, send more jobs to china, and make America less competitive in the global marketplace,” said Ed Whitfield, a Kentucky Republican.
Joe Barton, a Texas Republican, called the legislation “the logical response to environmental overkill.”
“The EPA has been on a mission of political correctness and is trying to regulate something that shouldn’t be regulated,” he said.
Henry Waxman, a California Democrat, called the bill “extreme,” and said Republicans’ assertions that greenhouse gas regulation will inflate fuel prices “laughable.”
“History will not judge this committee kindly if we become the last bastion of the polluter and science denier when carbon emissions rise to record levels and our weather system goes hay-wire, the American people will ask why we acted so irresponsibly,” he said.
Six senators introduce legislation to revamp military detainee procedures
WASHINGTON — Six US senators, including Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown, today introduced legislation to revamp procedures for holding suspected terrorists, and to reaffirm the president’s constitutional authority to detain and prosecute suspects being held at the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, according to a statement from Brown.
Brown will co-sponsor the Military Detainee Procedures Improvement Act of 2011 with Republican senators John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire and independent Joe Lieberman of Connecticut.
The legislation would require that captured members of al-Qaeda, the Taliban or affiliated terror groups be held in military custody, unless the secretary of defense orders the prisoners transferred to civilian custody. It would prohibit the appropriation of money for an alternative prison to Guantanamo on US soil. The measure would also require the secretary of defense to scrutinize the transfer of detainees to other countries, and would establish as the position of the Congress that alleged members of al-Qaeda and affiliated groups should be tried by military commissions.
“Terrorists should be detained at Guantanamo Bay, and tried according to the laws of military justice,” Brown said in a statement. “Terrorists should not be allowed to enjoy the rights and privileges protected by the U.S. Constitution. These are not common street criminals, they are terrorists who have one stated purpose: to kill Americans and our allies.”
Brown, a lieutenant colonel and 31 year member of the Massachusetts Army National Guard, will visit Guantanamo Bay for a briefing on the detainee facilities later this month, according to his office.
Wampanoags hire Delahunt for casino push
The Mashpee Wampanoag Indian tribe today announced that former US Representative William Delahunt will represent the group and its interests including its ongoing efforts to host casino gambling at the state and federal level.
Delahunt stepped down in January as 10th District congressman. Previously, the Quincy Democrat served as Norfolk district attorney.
He has had a long history of working with the Wampanoags and advocating on their behalf.
The tribe had long pushed for authority to build a casino on land in Middleborough. When that plan stalled, it pushed for legislation to build in Fall River. That subsequently stalled, too, and the tribe has been seeking alternate venues.
In a statement, Tribal Chairman Cedric Cromwell said hiring Delahunt was "a natural extension" of his advocacy.
“Our tribe was fortunate to have him as our congressman, and we are excited to have his voice and continued advocacy on our behalf,"Cromwell said.
Delahunt said: “The history of this tribe’s dealings with our government is replete with bureaucracy, impasse, inertia, and sometimes outright hostility. The tribe has rights as a sovereign nation, and more importantly, treating them with respect and helping them achieve self-sufficiency is simply the right thing to do. I am proud to represent them.”
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Kerry, Crapo introduce legislation to help small brewers
Senators John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, and Mike Crapo, an Idaho Republican, today introduced legislation to help small brewers, by seeking to reduce beer excise taxes, Kerry’s office said in a statement.
The Brewer’s Employment and Excise Relief (BEER) Act will help create jobs at more than 1,600 small breweries nationwide, which collectively employ nearly 100,000 people, said Kerry. Massachusetts is home to approximately 38 small breweries, including Northampton Brewery, Haverhill Brewery, and Sam Adams, the country’s largest small brewery.
“The craft beer revolution started right here in Massachusetts and they’ve been going toe to toe with multi-national beer companies ever since,” said Kerry, in a statement. “This bill will help ensure that these small businesses keep people on the payroll and create jobs even during tight economic times.”
Currently, a small brewer that produces less than two million barrels of beer per year is eligible to pay $7.00 per barrel on the first 60,000 barrels produced each year. The legislation would reduce this rate to $3.50 per barrel, giving our nation's smallest brewers approximately $19.9 million per year to expand and generate jobs. This change helps approximately 1,525 breweries nationwide.
Under current law, once production exceeds 60,000 barrels, a small brewer must pay the same $18 per barrel excise tax rate that the largest brewer pays while producing more than 100 million barrels. The legislation would lower the tax rate to $16 per barrel on beer production above 60,000 barrels, up to two million barrels, providing small brewers with an additional $27.1 million per year, according to Kerry.
Live-blogging Obama speech
We used this live blog and tweets @globeglen to provide up-to-the-minute updates about President Obama's visit to TechBoston Academy in Dorchester.
4:06 p.m. - The president just wrapped up. No real rising close, no real oomph. But the kids are still thrilled he came.
---
4:04 p.m. - This has to be the most pastoral presidential event I have ever covered. Very sober atmosphere, very respectful crowd, very solemn president, despite his jokes.
---
4:02 p.m. - Obama concedes it will "cost money" to make changes he's proposed, but he immediately segues to budget cuts he has offered as means to support the education programs for which he wants to pay.
"We cannot cut back on job-creating investments, like education," he said. "There's nothing responsible about cutting back in our investment in these young people."
---
3:57 p.m. - Instead of pouring money "into a broken system," president says, Arne Duncan has launched "Race to the Top," which draws applause. Says if states show good programs, "we'll show you the money."
---
3:55 p.m. - Students answer with slow "y-e-e-s-s-s" when Obama asks if they come from tough neighborhoods. But then he notes their high achievement rates.
---
3:53 p.m. - Obama notes each student here gets laptop upon enrolling. They then have to take care of it, and use it to take core math and other classes, including forensic science. President jokes he's not even sure what that is.
---
3:50 p.m. - President laments USA falling to ninth in nations in terms of proportion with college degree. It used to be first.
---
3:47 p.m. - Cheer as president explains he came to TechBoston because "you are model of how it's done" for rest of country.
---
3:45 p.m. - Obama recalls time at Harvard Law and how Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard. Then he started a "modest" computer software company. When kids didn't laugh, president reminded them it was a joke. They laughed at that.
---
3:43 p.m. - Shriek from students as Obama takes stage.
---
3:39 p.m. - Melinda Gates says she and "Bill," as in Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, are happy they invested in school nearly a decade ago.
She is recalling excitement among students they just meant at knowing where they are going: to college.
---
3:37 p.m. - Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Melinda Gates are announced to stage. She is speaking first.
---
3:34 p.m. - They just announced "the event will begin momentarily."
---
3:28 p.m. - The president is running more than 15 minutes behind schedule, allowing the Boston city councilors in the room to work the crowd for votes.
Newton Mayor Setti Warren, a potential US Senate candidate, is also in the audience.
---
3:05 p.m. - Rotor noises above from a State Police helicopter signal the motorcade's arrival at TechBoston. The president was touring a classroom and meeting some students before speaking in the gym.
Former Boston newswoman Rehema Ellis is on-hand to live shots for MSNBC.
---
2:46 p.m. - There's a lull in the activities as the president tours the school and the audience waits in the gynmasium. It's a relatively small crowd in here, very controlled, unlike more rambunctious campaign events. Still, all the guests appear excited.
---
2:36 p.m. - HE must almost be here... presidential seal attached to "blue goose" armored presidential lectern.
---
2:34 p.m. - Two students just led Pledge of Allegiance and did heartfelt rendition of national anthem that left their classmates cheering. Then they hugged each other with ear-to-ear smiles. Nice start.
---
2:30 p.m. - TechBoston Academy JROTC color guard bringing in American flag.
---
2:23 p.m. - Inside TechBoston Academy, people being asked to take their seats. Behind podium, banner reads, "Winning the Future," the president's forward-looking slogan since State of the Union. Presidential seal, always a last-minute addition, still not affixed to podium.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Fellow Democrats to protest Obama
President Obama is getting an unruly reception as he heads for an education event and party fundraiser in Boston today from his fellow Democrats.
Former Representative Joseph P. Kennedy II, along with current Representatives Edward J. Markey, Michael Capuano, and James McGovern, have called a news conference to protest the administration's proposed cut in the LIHEAP program.
It provides assistance to people who cannot afford their heating bills.
To add drama to the event, it will be held at the East Boston home Joe and Katherine Oliveri, who saw their federal Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program benefit drop by 30 percent this year.
Their current allotment would be cut in half under the White House budget proposal. LIHEAP currently receives $5.1 billion under the federal budget; the president has proposed cutting it by $2.5 billion.
"Energy prices have now gone down but the cost of the program has stayed the same," the president said last month. "Let's go back to a more sustainable level."
The event is scheduled for 10:30 a.m., less that four hours before Air Force One touches down at Logan International Airport.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown thanks conservative billionaire David Koch for campaign donations
The liberal blog Think Progress has posted exclusive video of US Senator Scott Brown thanking conservative billionaire David Koch for supporting Brown’s campaign last year and asking him for help in his re-election.
“Your support during the election, it meant a ton,” the Massachusetts Republican is shown telling Koch. “It made a difference and I can certainly use it again.”
Koch and his brother, Charles, are known for multi-million dollar contributions to conservative and libertarian political causes. In what has become a well-publicized example of the power of the Koch brothers, a prankster calling the office of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker was recently able to get the embattled governor on the phone by pretending he was David Koch.
According to Think Progress: “David Koch directly gave the National Republican Senatorial Committee $30,400 in November 2009, [two months before Brown was elected] and the Koch Industries PAC threw in $15,000 to NRSC plus $5,000 more directly to Brown right before Brown’s special election.”
The video of Brown was shot on Friday by Think Progress blogger Brad Johnson, using a small Flip camera at the dedication of the David H. Koch Integrative Cancer Institute at MIT, Johnson said today by telephone.
An online biography says Johnson is the climate editor at American Progress. He graduated from both Amherst College and Massachusetts Institute for Technology. Before joining Think Progress, the bio says, the former Boston resident was a developer for Saatchi & Saatchi, Lextranet, and the Democratic National Committee.
The video also captures Brown appearing to contradict himself on the subject of politics.
In public appearances, the senator says that he's not interested in politicking right now, that there will be time for it in 2012 his re-election year.
Yet in the video, Brown tells Koch he's politicking right now.
“I’m in the cycle right now,” Brown tells Koch. “We’re already banging away."
Kerry asks Yale to follow Harvard's lead and allow military recruiters on campus
Senator John Kerry is asking his alma mater, Yale University, to follow Harvard's lead and allow military recruiters on campus once again following the repeal of the 'don't ask, don't tell' ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the armed services.
In a letter today to Yale President Richard C. Levin, Kerry invoked the university's history of civil rights activism as a reason to bring ROTC back to campus. Banning recruitment to protest one injustice, he said, "simply created another in its place."
"ROTC's presence again at Yale would remind all that we also have a stake in defending our nation and bring the Yale community closer to the price of decisions regarding war and peace," he wrote.
A Yale media spokesperson said this afternoon that, at Levin's direction, the college had already begun discussions with the military about returning to campus, though there is no timeline for a final decision. Levin has responded privately to Kerry's letter, according to Yale.
Hips replaced, Kerry to play in hockey game
After successful surgery to replace both hips, Senator John Kerry is suiting up for the 3rd Annual Congressional Hockey Challenge.
“It’s hard to believe that more than 40 years have passed since I took my first real cuts on Turkey Pond playing in high school,” Kerry said in a statement today, referring to his attendance at the hockey-crazed St. Paul's School in Concord, NH.
“I’m grateful to the doctors at Mass. General for the new hips that got me back on the ice, and I’m looking forward to the chance to do my Bruins proud and raise some money for a great cause," he said.
The game will be played next Thursday, March 10, at the Verizon Center in Washington.
Also participating in the event will be NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman, Hall of Fame hockey player Pat LaFontaine, former player Kevin Weekes, and Willie O’Ree, a former member of the Boston Bruins and the first African American player in the NHL.
The next day, Bettman will be accompanying the Chicago Blackhawks to the White House so President Obama, a former Chicago resident, can celebrate their Stanley Cup championship last season.
And afterward, first lady Michelle Obama will oversee a street hockey workout and clinic on a rink set up on the South Lawn, as part of her "Let's Move!" anti-obesity initiative.
Proceeds from the congressional event will benefit the Fort Dupont Ice Hockey Club, a developmental program that provides inner-city youth in Washington the chance to participate in an organized ice hockey program.
Kerry played in the first game, held in 2009, but missed last year because of his surgeries.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown's autobiography to appear on New York Times' best-seller list
WASHINGTON — US Senator Scott Brown can add “best-selling author” to his resume: the Massachusetts Republican’s autobiography, Against All Odds, will appear at No. 4 on the New York Times’ best-seller list on March 13, Brown’s staff confirmed today.
Brown’s book, released last month by HarperCollins, has received wide publicity in part due to its revelations from Brown’s troubled and violent youth, including instances of physical abuse by stepfathers and one instance of sexual abuse by a summer camp counselor.
Brown has promoted the book with a media blitz and nationwide book tour, which included a book-signing in the gift shop at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California.
Brown abstains from signing GOP letter on Berwick
Most Senate Republicans are asking President Obama to withdraw the nomination of the man central to implementing the sweeping national health care law passed last year, but Senator Scott Brown is not among them.
Forty-two GOP senators sent a letter to the White House today complaining of Donald M. Berwick’s past statements and lack of experience, and saying the president should start again with a candidate to head Medicare that Republicans could support and confirm.
“Withdrawing Dr. Berwick’s nomination would be a positive first step in rebuilding the trust of the American people,” the letter read.
Brown, who was elected in large part because of his opposition to the health care law, did not sign, and nor did the two moderate Republicans from Maine, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. The other two absent Republicans are Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Rob Portman of Ohio.
Brown spokeswoman Gail Gitcho said the Massachusetts Republican “has always been troubled” by Berwick’s recess appointment. Senators should have the chance to question the candidate, she said, and Brown would make up his mind about Berwick after doing so.
“The president can nominate the person he thinks is best for the job and Senator Brown looks forward to reviewing Dr. Berwick's credentials," she said in a statement.
The president temporarily appointed Berwick, a former Harvard professor, when the Senate was on recess, but he has never been confirmed. The head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has a key role in implementing the overhaul that Congress passed last year.
In response to the letter, the White House said that Berwick is “far and away the best person for the job.”
“He's already doing stellar work at CMS: saving taxpayer dollars by cracking down on fraud, and implementing delivery system reforms that will save billions in excess costs and save millions of lives. We won't be withdrawing the nomination,” the statement said.
Ryan criticizes Romney on health care
WASHINGTON – A top congressional Republican this morning tweaked Mitt Romney for his health care plan in Massachusetts, further illustrating the primary challenge Romney faces in his expected presidential bid.
Representative Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican and chairman of the House Budget Committee, criticized the Massachusetts health care plan by comparing it to President Obama’s national plan.
“It’s not that dissimilar to ObamaCare,” he reportedly said at a breakfast this morning. “And you probably know I’m not a big fan of ObamaCare.”
Ryan's comments were first reported by the American Spectator, which helped organize the breakfast along with Americans for Tax Reform.
Ryan, who has been mentioned as a potential vice presidential pick, could be an influential voice in the Republican presidential campaign. He is the latest to bring up the challenges Romney faces in explaining his health care plan at a time when many Republicans are focused on repealing President Obama’s plan.
Several potential Republican primary rivals have also been criticizing Romney over health care.
Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee panned the Massachusetts plan – and Romney’s role in approving it – in his new book. And yesterday, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, in testimony before a congressional committee, said he didn’t want any plan similar to the Bay State’s in his own state.
“Massachusetts has a state health insurance program that they’re obviously happy with. We think that’s their right,’’ Barbour said. “We don’t want that. That’s not good for us.’’
Romney has largely defended the plan in Massachusetts, while still criticizing the federal plan passed by Democrats. His chief argument has been that states should experiment with different approaches to health care, but that Obama’s national plan infringes on states’ rights and should be repealed.
“Mitt Romney is proud of what he accomplished for Massachusetts in getting everyone covered,” Romney’s spokesman, Eric Fehrnstrom, said last week in response to Huckabee’s criticism. “What's important now is to return to the states the power to determine their own healthcare solutions by repealing Obamacare. A one-size-fits-all plan for the entire nation just doesn't work.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Hudak running anew in Mass. 6th District
Hudak is back.
Bill Hudak, the Tea Party-backed Republican candidate in the Sixth Congressional District who lost to incumbent Democrat John F. Tierney in the fall, is going make another run at the seat in 2012, he said today.
“After conversations with numerous advisors and campaign volunteers throughout the district, it is clear that my support remains widespread and deep,” Hudak said in a statement. “In fact, since last November I have received hundreds of e-mails and phone calls from supporters urging me to continue the fight.”
Hudak's decision was not a surprise. In a sense, he had never stopped running.
Just days after the November election in which he garnered 41.4 percent of the vote to 54.7 percent for Tierney, Hudak sent a fund-raising letter to supporters, seeking contributions so he can "continue to stand" because, while he "lost the battle," the "war of 2012 is not over."
He signed the missive, "Future Congressman, 6th MA District.”
Hudak, a Boxboro lawyer, campaigned as a self-described "Reagan Republican" committed to a traditional platform of lower taxes and less spending. He was endorsed by US Senator Scott Brown, former Governor Mitt Romney, and and former presidential candidate Steve Forbes.
But he struggled to overcome controversy dating to the presidential election of 2008, when he placed a sign in his lawn that compared Barack Obama to Osama Bin Laden. He also fought accusations that he was sympathetic to the so-called birther movement, after he urged a reporter to look into allegations that Obama was born in Kenya.
Tierney, who has not said whether he will seek a ninth term in 2012, also battled controversy during the campaign.
Just weeks before Election Day, Tierney’s wife, Patrice, pleaded guilty to four counts of aiding and abetting the filing of false tax returns for her brother, a federal fugitive who has been indicted on charges of illegal gambling and money laundering. She was sentenced to 30 days in jail.
Kerry seeks new money for democratic transition in Middle East
Senator John Kerry today unveiled plans to offer financial assistance to promote democracy and reforms in the Arab world.
Although he did not put a dollar figure on the amount he is seeking, the Massachusetts Democrat called for "significant financial commitment" of new money to be earmarked for economists, election experts, and aid to people in the Arab world who are pushing for a historic transformation of their region.
“Events this powerful demand a response of equal power," Kerry said in remarks prepared for delivery in his capacity as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "Our commitment now to the ordinary people who are risking their lives to win human rights and democracy will be remembered for generations in the Arab world. We have to get this moment right. We are working here in the Senate with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to create a package of financial assistance to help turn the new Arab awakening into a lasting rebirth."
Kerry was speaking at a hearing about the State Department's budget at a time when Republicans have vowed to cut foreign aid funding. But he said the aid package has bipartisan support.
"We have not worked out the numbers or the details yet, but I am convinced a significant financial commitment by the US to assist in this monumental and uplifting transformation is key to its long-term outcome and our relationship to it," he said. “I understand that we face a budget crisis in our own country. But we can either pay now to help brave people build a better, democratic future for themselves or we will certainly pay later with increased threats to our own national security."
But Kerry did not say how the new fund would relate to programs that are already in the State Department budget for promoting democracy and reform in the Middle East, such as the Middle East Partnership Initiative and contributions to the National Endowment for Democracy.
It is unclear what impact US aid will have at this stage on people who have already toppled governments of Tunisia and Egypt, and appear to be on the verge of driving Libya's Muammar Qaddafi from power.
Kerry spoke before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton defended the State Department's 2011 budget request.
Kerry also urged consideration of a no-fly zone over Libya, where Qaddafi has attacked protesters with militias backed by helicopters and warplanes.
Brown and Nelson introduce 'Taxpayer Receipt Act'
WASHINGTON — US Senators Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, and Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat, today introduced the “Taxpayer Receipt Act of 2011,” which would provide every taxpayer an itemized receipt, similar to a grocery store receipt, from the IRS that lists where their payroll and income taxes are spent.
The bill is among several proposals Brown briefly outlined yesterday.
The taxpayer receipt would list federal spending in key categories, such as the interest on the national debt, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, national defense, education, veterans’ benefits, environmental protection, foreign aid, and the Congress. Taxpayers also would be directed to a website where they could get more detailed information.
Additionally, the receipt would provide taxpayers with the amount of debt per American – which currently is more than $45,000, according to Brown’s office.
“During this tough economy, American taxpayers deserve to know exactly how the government is spending their hard-earned dollars,” Brown said today in a statement.
“Our bipartisan legislation will help give Americans the tools they need to better understand federal spending. As we work together to rein in our spending and tackle our national debt, it is important that we provide transparency and accountability to the process to help us determine what spending we need and what we can live without.”
The bill will be reviewed by the Finance Committee, of which Nelson is a member.
Brown outlines initiatives with aim to reduce government spending
WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Scott Brown outlined this morning several initiatives he said would reduce government spending, increase transparency and reduce waste.
Brown’s plans include:
- The bipartisan Taxpayer Receipt Act, to be filed with US Senator Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat. The bill would provide an itemized taxpayer receipt showing taxpayers where all of the money paid to the Federal government is getting spent, and how much new debt "we’ve put on the national credit card," said Brown's office in a statement. The receipt would arrive when a taxpayer files their tax returns, on or before April 15th of each year.
- The bipartisan 48 Hour Spending Transparency Resolution, which Brown said he will file to increase transparency on spending bills. Under current law, the Senate has to wait 48 hours before considering a bill that includes a committee report, after a bill is reported out of committee. Brown’s bill would apply that 48 hour threshold before any consideration of a legislative matter by a subcommittee or committee, or on the floor of the Senate.
- To tackle the debt, Brown said he believes that “we should change the way we budget and spend – putting a system in place that helps the federal government prioritize what we really need, while eliminating what we can live without and balancing the budget.” On February 1st, Brown sent a letter to the Budget Committee calling for “responsible budget reform.” The letter asked Budget Committee leaders to ensure that priorities are established before the Senate holds any vote to increase the nation’s debt limit.
- Brown is a co-sponsor of the Reduce Unnecessary Spending Act to give the president additional tools, such as a constitutional line-item veto procedure, “to eliminate the kind of reckless spending that sticks taxpayers with the bill for congressional pork,” he said.
- Also in this Congress, Brown will introduce the Federal Acquisition Reform Act – comprehensive legislation that he says will potentially save billions by streamlining the way the federal government purchases goods and services. And as the new ranking member of the Federal Financial Management Subcommittee, Brown will hold hearings on the Social Security Program, the Medicare and Medicaid Programs, and federal agencies “to root out the problems within these programs and ensure they are operating efficiently.”
Brown also said he opposes to earmarks, which the Republican-controlled US House has pledged to eliminate.
House panel calls governor on health care
Governor Deval Patrick wrapped up a long weekend in Washington this morning with testimony about the Massachusetts health care plan before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
In a shortened version of prepared remarks, the Democrat noted the history of the Massachusetts legislation, highlighted it was passed in 2006 thanks to cooperation between then-Republican Governor Mitt Romney and the Democratic Legislature, and said it has achieved nearly universal care while only adding 1 percent to the state budget.
Following up, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, a potential Romney rival in the 2012 White House campaign, said bluntly, "We don't want that."
committee host, Representative
Edward Markey, today in
Washington D.C.
Setting a political dagger, he reiterated the Massachusetts plan was developed by Romney and the leading Democrat that Republicans used to hate, Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
Patrick has unique perspective on the Obama plan as governor of the state with a universal health care law that served as model for the federal program. But aides expected him to be challenged by committee Republicans seeking to repeal the national law.
The debate could be a proxy battle for an expected element of the 2012 presidential race, as Barbour indicated.
Nonetheless, Patrick was generally treated respectfully, as Democrats used their questions to coax answers supporting Obama's program, while Republicans tried to attack it.
On several occasions, the governor tried to build support for the president by noting that Massachusetts is already a way down the road the nation is set to travel.
"This is not so scary to us," he said.
His committee host, Representative Edward Markey, D-Mass., also got the governor to underscore that Massachusetts has a balanced budget, 98 percent insured, and unemployment below the national average even with its universal health law.
The dean of the congressional delegation told the governor he was doing "a great job."
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Patrick upends quiet Mass. Senate deliberations
Governor Deval Patrick seems more anxious to kick off next year's US Senate race in Massachusetts than some of the potential candidates, catching most off-guard yesterday when they found he had rattled off their names during an interview at the National Governors Association meetings in Washington.
Patrick told Jim O'Sullivan of the National Journal, a former reporter for the State House News Service in Boston, that four candidates had already chatted with him about a potential run, and he had traded calls with a fifth.
Then, breaching all manner of political protocol, he identified them: City Year co-founder Alan Khazei, who made a failed attempt for the Democratic nomination in last year's Senate special election; Newton Mayor Setti Warren, little more than a year in office; veteran Salem Mayor Kim Driscoll; and Democratic activist Robert Massie, a 1994 candidate for lieutenant governor.
Patrick also said Robert Pozen, a former executive at Fidelity Investments and MFS Investment Management, had reached out to him but they had failed to connect.
“My sense is that (Brown) is struggling a little bit to decide whether he’s going to work for the people of the commonwealth or work for the hard right,” Patrick said, previewing the Democrats' most likely line of attack against the man who left them thunderstruck when he won the seat held for nearly a half-century by a party icon, the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
In the aftermath of that race, the Democrats regrouped, helped Patrick win re-election last fall (albeit with less than 50 percent of the vote in what for all practical purposes was a three-way race), and repelled the GOP tide that swept the rest of the nation in the mid-term elections.
All 10 Massachusetts seats in the US House remained in Democratic hands, and local Democrats are feeling even more optimistic as they head toward 2012, when President Obama will be atop the ballot and Patrick is free to pile on against Brown and a potential GOP presidential nominee, former Governor Mitt Romney.
Brown himself is aware of the peril. He has already banked over $7 million in campaign cash and may spend up to $25 million to retain what initially proved to be a pivotal seat for his party: the 41st Senate vote to uphold a Republican filibuster, or the 60th vote the Democrats needed to ensure passage of any of their initiatives. Republicans gained Senate seats in the mid-terms but still remain a minority.
The senator has calibrated his votes with an eye toward maintaining hometown support and national viability, and he has been careful to cultivate national Republicans during his mid-term campaign appearances, as well as during the book tour to promote his autobiography, "Against All Odds." It took him as far away as Florida and the Reagan presidential library in California.
Against that backdrop, Massie has already announced a campaign, and Khazei, Warren, Driscoll, Pozen, and several sitting House members have been weighing challenges to Brown. That group includes Representatives Michael Capuano of Somerville and Stephen Lynch of South Boston.
Yet each has carefully demurred when asked about a campaign, including Lynch, who was repeatedly peppered on the point over the weekend at the outset of an interview with WCVB-TV's "OTR."
"I think that's just too far away at this point," Lynch said.
The program aired Sunday shortly before Patrick sat down with O'Sullivan and upended the conversation. When previously asked about potential Senate candidates, the governor had made two points: he would not be among them, but he would not reveal the names of those who had sought his counsel about a possible campaign.
That didn't stop him from lauding certain potential candidates, but he never spoke publicly for them. Now, whether he's floating trial balloons or trying to push fence-sitters, Patrick has changed tacks.
“Kim is not in; she has not made up her mind, but I know she’s thinking about it seriously. But Alan and Bob and Setti are in, for sure,” the governor told the National Journal.
As for Pozen, “I haven’t talked to Bob. We’ve traded phone calls, but I haven’t talked to him."
Warren upset a sitting state representative, Ruth Balser, to win the Newton mayor's race in November 2009. He was sworn in on Jan. 1, 2010, and has worked since then to cultivate the image of an engaged chief executive.
Asked earlier this month about Patrick including him in a list of potential Senate candidates, Warren told the Globe: "I consider the governor a friend, and I'm honored he thinks highly of me. But as I said before, I'm remaining focused on the issues that effect Newton."
Just two weeks later, after Patrick branded him a surefire candidate in a national publication, Warren was handed a live grenade.
“I am considering a run against Senator Brown,” the mayor said in a statement yesterday. "I have been disappointed by many of his votes, which I believe have hurt many cities and towns in Massachusetts, including my own community of Newton."
He said he had yet to make a final decision, "but in the final analysis, if I believe I can do a better job for Massachusetts, I’ll put my name on the ballot.”
Driscoll was similarly left scrambling.
She was out on the hustings last night, attending a fundraiser in Worcester and a women's event in Easthampton. Those are far from the Witch City, underscoring her possible interest in a Senate race, but Driscoll is also a deliberative politician and confessed she was not ready to commit to a race at least publicly.
“I’m looking at it. I’m trying to understand all the twists and turns. I’m trying to understand the potential impact on my family," she said in a phone call from the road.
Khazei was out at dinner and unavailable for comment.
Pozen was not immediately reachable.
Of the group, Khazei may have the broadest name recognition, thanks to his 2009 primary campaign. He also is an unabashed liberal who would almost certainly run from the left and be able to tap a national fundraising base.
Warren also represents a liberal city, but he has a conservative calling card: He served a year of duty in Iraq as an intelligence officer in the US Navy Reserve. Brown is a member of the Massachusetts National Guard, but he has never been deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan.
Like Patrick the first African American to hold his job, Warren previously served as an aide to the state's senior senator, John Kerry. He would have unimpeded access to the dossier Kerry and his staff are surely compiling against Brown.
Driscoll, meanwhile, is a second-term mayor who is experienced in community development. She also has been a leading voice for greater budgetary latitude from the state, particularly when it comes to reconfiguring public employee health insurance plans.
She is the first woman elected mayor of Salem, and could benefit in a statewide campaign as a lone female candidate. Yet as the mother of three, Driscoll expressed concern about how a campaign would affect her family.
"I have three young children, and I'm also trying to understand if I can run while also running a city," she said.
Pozen would offer his experience from the finance world, which includes a stint working for President George W. Bush on an aborted Social Security overhaul. He also worked in 2003 as Romney's secretary of economic affairs.
Massie is an Episcopal priest with a doctorate from Harvard Business School. Despite battling serious health problems for years, the Somerville resident announced his Senate candidacy in January.
Patrick has now pushed along the rest of the field.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
President endorses Brown proposal on health care
WASHINGTON — President Obama said Monday he now supports a plan by
Republican Senator Scott Brown that allows states to opt out of the health care overhaul’s key requirements early, a concession that positions the president as willing to compromise on his signature accomplishment.
Obama's shift was announced in an address to the nation’s governors, many of whom have sued the White House to prevent implementation of the health care law. While boosting the prospects of the Massachusetts senator’s bipartisan bill in the Senate, the new position is unlikely to placate the health care law’s detractors or gain approval in the GOP-controlled House. And such an endorsement will not win back support for Brown from Tea Party conservatives, who ferociously denounce the law as an overreach of federal power.
The senator has previously called for the repeal of the health care overhaul, but has shown a willingness to work within the existing rules to change the law for the benefit of Massachusetts residents.
Brown and Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon filed the bill earlier this year. The legislation would enable states to request permission to withdraw from the law’s mandates in 2014 rather than in 2017. To receive the exemption, the states must demonstrate that they could find other ways to cover as many people as the original law would — something Massachusetts has already accomplished — and do so without adding costs. The earlier date is when many of the act’s central provisions take effect.
The legislation is unlikely to significantly affect Massachusetts, which already has implemented many of the core elements of the national plan, but it would allow other states to forge their own plans.
The president said such a change would allow states to tailor the law to their own needs.
"Alabama is not going to have exactly the same needs of Massachusetts or California or North Dakota," Obama said in making the announcement. "We believe in that flexibility."
Brown said that he was pleased with the president's support but reiterated his opposition to the overall law. "(Senator Brown) strongly opposes the federal health care law, and believes states should have the ability to implement their own plans that provide quality care for all their citizens," his office said in a statement.
Tom Miller, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said that the legislation probably won’t earn Brown any additional support from conservatives; rather, he’s trying to earn support from moderates.
"People who think this bill is fundamentally flawed and the approach is the wrong one to begin with should not take much solace in saying that if you can come up with a slightly different approach to the basic system," he said.
Kerry: Fast-track rail funds to northeast
Senator John Kerry hopes that Florida’s decision to put the brakes on a high-speed rail project will be just the ticket for passenger rail in Massachusetts and other northeastern states.
The Massachusetts Democrat and nine other senators from northeastern states asked U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood late last week to steer $2.4 billion that Florida Governor Rick Scott rejected in mid-February to the heavily traveled northeast corridor instead.
“At a time when numerous states have rejected federal funding from the High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program to date, we note that high-speed rail’s potential on the Northeast Corridor is proven,” they wrote.
Scott rejected the money on Feb. 16, calling the Tampa-to-Orlando high-speed rail line a “boondoggle” would cost more than expected and would stick Florida with an extra $3 billion bill. In addition, he felt that estimates of its use were inflated, and that the project overall was a waste of money.
The announcement received a mixed reaction. Rail advocates pounced on Scott, accusing him of making a short-sighted decision, state senators wrote to LaHood asking him to send the money anyway, and the White House called the decision “unfortunate.”
But if history proves to be an example, it could be a boon for Massachusetts and its neighbors along the high-use rail corridor, where the nation's only high-speed train, the Acela Express, operates. In December, after Wisconsin and Ohio rejected $1.2 billion, the Obama administration divvied it up between Massachusetts and 11 other states.
Markey calls for action on hydrofracking
U.S. Representative Edward J. Markey is calling for swift action from the Environmental Protection Agency to ensure that a drilling process for extracting natural gas from deep under the earth is not polluting groundwater.
The Malden Democrat fired off a letter over the weekend to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson shortly after The New York Times published a lengthy piece about the process known as “hydrofracking.”
The process involves pounding underground rock with high-pressure water mixed with sand and chemicals to release trapped natural gas. A single well can produce over a million gallons of waste water that contains salts, carcinogens and radioactive elements, according to the Times. The number of hyrdofracking wells has almost doubled since 2000, to almost a half-million in 2009.
Markey, who sits on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, warned that the process could turn “our rivers and streams into this generation’s ‘Love Canals,’” a reference to the toxic waste disaster near Niagara Falls, New York in the late 1970s.
“I do not believe that the price for energy extracted from deep beneath the earth’s surface should include a risk to the health of those who live above it,” Markey wrote in his letter to Jackson.
Companies that drill for natural gas say that the process is safe and environmentally sound, but a vocal protest movement has arisen around the drilling process.
Actor Mark Ruffalo recently testified on Capitol Hill against the process, and was expected to wear a protest pin to the Academy Awards on Sunday night. Gasland, a documentary about hydrofracking, was nominated for an Oscar.
Meehan gives Patrick a political tweak
UMass-Lowell Chancellor Marty Meehan is sending Governor Deval Patrick a none-too-subtle message after his fellow Democrat quashed the former congressman's bid to become president of the entire University of Massachusetts system.
Meehan is planning to give an honorary degree this spring to Robert Manning, who quit as chairman of the UMass board of trustees late last year amid what he saw as meddling by Patrick in the presidential search.
The award was confirmed by a high-level university official; a UMass-Lowell spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.
Manning is a UMass-Lowell grad who has gone on to run one of the country's biggest financial services firms, Boston-based MFS Investment Management.
While he and his wife have no children, they have contributed and been devoted to the UMass system in general and UMass-Lowell in particular, leading to Manning's role atop the system's governing board of trustees.
Manning also was working with fellow Trustee James Karam to oversee the search to replace UMass President Jack Wilson. That search was trending toward Meehan, who members of the search committee made the strongest presentation among a group of semifinalists, before the governor and his top aides began to weigh in.
Patrick spoke generally of the need for diversity among the field of candidates, to conduct a search that not only looks but is open, and that would result in a pick with "broad wings" academically.
Meehan got the message, withdrew from the search after his name leaked, and went back to Lowell, where he has run his own alma mater since resigning from Congress in 2007.
Manning announced his board resignation a week later.
The university ended up hiring Robert Caret, president of Towson University in Maryland.
Cantor heads to Harvard to outline economic vision
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor is heading north of the Mason-Dixon Line tonight to visit the liberal environs of Harvard University and outline a conservative economic vision.
In a speech at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, which will be webcast live at 6 p.m., the Virginia Republican will speak of a country he sees at an economic crossroads, confronting two alternate visions.
One echoes the image of protests that swept Europe last year and continue in some places today, as members of the public and government workers rebelled against cuts in pension and other entitlement programs.
The other is the image of town hall meetings that played out across America in 2009, propelling the anti-government Tea Party revolution and helping the GOP reclaim the House majority this past November.
Cantor said one view is of a future dependent on government financing; the other is rooted in personal entrepreneurship.
“If you think about it, these were very young people worried about their retirement benefits before they’ve worked their career," Cantor told the Globe in reference to some of the participants in Greece, France, and other European nations.
The town hall participants, by contrast, "choose a future based on individual actions, opportunity not created by the government but by the private sector," he said.
Cantor, the top deputy to House Speaker John Boehner, insists his is not a partisan analysis, only a philosophical one. But his comments echoed a partisan opinion piece he recently wrote for Politico, in which he criticized President Obama's budget proposal and said "kicking the can down the road is no substitute for real leadership. Just ask Greece."
In the same column, he urged action to avoid "a European-style debt crisis."
Cantor said an relying too heavily on government support forces increased spending. That triggers tax increases that, in turn, sap capital from the private marketplace. Reducing business taxes and reducing government regulation, he argues, will help keep capital in the private sector.
As to why he's taking his message to an Ivy League institution oft-derided by conservatives, Cantor said: "Harvard is one of the premier institutions of higher learning in the world. We’ve been successful in America because we’ve been able to educate our population to think critically. It’s allowed America to become the crucible of innovation.’’
His deputy chief of staff, John Murray, said the visit is the leader's ongoing campaign to speak "beyond the base," including reaching out to young people, minorities, and university audiences.
Cantor has already spoken at William & Mary and had a speech at the University of Michigan snowed out. He's headed next for Stanford University.
The goal is to make "more of a vision statement than a political statement.”
Murray added: "We have a very systematic strategy to ensure that the work we are doing here inside the Beltway is being transmitted and translated in good venues," he said.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown critical of Obama's decision to stop defending DOMA
Senator Scott Brown joined other Republicans today in denouncing a decision by President Obama to drop all attempts to defend a law prohibiting the federal government from recognizing same sex marriages.
Brown did not indicate his position on gay marriage but rather lashed out at Obama, who announced today that he has concluded the federal Defense of Marriage Act is unconstititional.
"We can't have presidents deciding what laws are constitutional and what laws are not," Brown said in a statement. "That is a function of the judicial branch, not the executive."
The Bay State's other senator, meanwhile, hailed Obama's decision.
“DOMA was unconstitutional in 1996, and it’s unconstitutional today, and the Obama Administration made the right call to no longer defend it in the courts,” Kerry said. “The Defense of Marriage Act has never been about defending marriage. It’s been nothing more than an unconstitutional effort to deny same-sex couples basic rights and protections.”
The Defense of Marriage Act, passed in 1996, prohibits the federal government from granting benefits the same benefits to same-sex married couples as it does to opposite-sex couples, including social security and estate tax breaks. Until today, the Obama administration has defended the law's constitutionality in court cases around the country, including two in Massachusetts.
Patrick, Coakley back Obama decision to stop defending DOMA in courts
Attorney General Martha Coakley, who filed a 2009 lawsuit that helped persuade a federal judge in Boston to declare the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional in July, said she was “very pleased” with the president’s decision to no longer defend the law.
“Today’s decision…is another very important victory for the civil rights of same-couples and their families,” Coakley said at a press conference in her Boston office. “We think the reasoning, as expressed by General Holder is, in some ways, dependent on the extensive discovery and arguments that occurred in Massachusetts."
In a statement released by his office, Governor Deval Patrick threw his support behind the Obama administration.
“I am tremendously heartened today by President Obama’s decision to turn away from this divisive and unfair law,.'' he said. "In Massachusetts, we believe that every person ought to be able to marry whomever they love, and we believe the rest of the country is moving forward in that direction, too."
Coakley told reporters that the law has now been declared discriminatory and unconstitutional by the judge in Boston, Joseph L. Tauro, and by the Obama administration.
Capuano now says he regrets urging union protesters to get 'bloody'
US Representative Michael E. Capuano, who decried violent political rhetoric after last month’s fatal shooting rampage in Tucson, said today he regrets urging union workers at a rally in Boston yesterday to “get a little bloody.”
"I strongly believe in standing up for worker rights and my passion for preserving those rights may have gotten the best of me yesterday in an unscripted speech,” the Somerville Democrat said in a statement. “I wish I had used different language to express my passion and I regret my choice of words."
Capuano was referring to remarks he made at a raucous rally of about 1,000 union workers who were outside the State House, protesting Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin, and his plan to limit public employees' collective bargaining rights.
"I'm proud to be with people who understand that it's more than just sending an e-mail that gets you going," Capuano had declared. "Every once in a while you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary."
The union crowd greeted Capuano's exhortation with cheers, whistles, and applause.
But his remark raised eyebrows elsewhere because Capuano was among the lawmakers who were calling for cooler political rhetoric after his Democratic colleague, Gabrielle Giffords, was shot in the Tucson rampage that killed six other people last month.
At the time, Capuano had said the shooting was probably inevitable because of the nation's increasingly heated political rhetoric.
“Many of us were afraid for a long time that something like this would happen, with the level or the tone of the discourse over the last several years," Capuano told WGBH on Jan. 22. "It's gotten violent and personal.”
Capuano echoed that sentiment in a Jan. 9 interview with the Globe.
“Everybody knows the last couple of years there’s been an intentional increase in the degree of heat in political discourse,” he said. “If nothing else good comes out of this, I’m hoping it causes people to reconsider how they deal with things."
Capuano ran unsuccessfully for the US Senate in 2009, and is considering a run against Republican Scott Brown in 2012.
Thune decides against White House run
South Dakota Senator John Thune released a statement today saying he will not seek the presidency in 2012.
"There is a battle to be waged over what kind of country we are going to leave our children and grandchildren and that battle is happening now in Washington, not two years from now. So at this time, I feel that I am best positioned to fight for America’s future here in the trenches of the United States Senate,'' the Republican said in a statement.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Brown abuse comments recall Perry accuser statements
The multitude of revelations in Senator Scott Brown's new book "Against All Odds" and his "60 Minutes" interview last night underscore the degree to which he was largely unknown to Massachusetts voters when they nonetheless elected him to replace the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
More than a year later, some are only coming to learn that "Downtown Scotty Brown," as he was known on the basketball court, is a left-hander, or that he can chop mushrooms with the speed and precision of a professional chef, or that he shoplifted far more than just record albums during his wayward days as a teen-ager.
Beyond that, the book and the interview added fresh detail to the well-known story of his tough childhood, where, as the son of parents each married multiple times, he endured the beatings of some stepfathers and found refuge in schoolboy and college athletics.
Furthermore, they included a bombshell even to Brown's own family: his claim that he was sexually abused, as a 10-year-old, by a counselor at a Cape Cod summer camp.
The revelation prompted plaudits for Brown from both Governor Deval Patrick and Brown's senior colleague, Senator John Kerry, two Democrats who crossed party lines to laud the Republican for opening up about such a traumatic event. They said they hoped it would encourage other victims not feel ashamed or ostracized, and possibly take the same step themselves.
Brown himself is tough on his alleged tormentor, telling "60 Minutes" that "fortunately, nothing was ever fully consummated, so to speak, but it was certainly, back then, very traumatic.”
When interviewer Lesley Stahl noted the alleged abuser kept trying to get alone with Brown after the first incident, the senator added: “Yup, as predators do. He said, ‘If you tell anybody, you know, I’ll kill you.' You know, 'I will make sure that no one believes you,' and that’s the biggest thing, when people find people like me, at that young, vulnerable age, who are, basically, lost, the thing that they have over you is they make you believe that no one will believe you.’’
In Brown's case, though, the comments have another context: They reverberate through his decision last year to endorse a fellow Republican, state Representative Jeffrey Perry, in his bid to replace Democratic Representative William Delahunt in Congress.
The general election battle was defined by sharp and repeated exchanges between Perry and his Democratic challenger, then-Norfolk County District Attorney William Keating, over what, if any, solace Perry had provided to a fellow police officer who later pleaded guilty to charges surrounding the illegal strip searches to two young girls while the men served on the Wareham Police Department in the 1990s.
One victim, who allowed herself to be identified by her maiden name, Lisa Allen, said in a late-October statement opposing Perry's election that the then-Wareham sergeant "had to hear me screaming and crying" as Officer Scott Flanagan put his hand down the 14-year-old's pants and ordered her to lift her bra after he, Perry, and another officer came upon a group of teens suspected of using drugs near a cranberry bog in 1991.
Arguing Perry lacked the character to serve in such high office, Allen said: "Perry did not care about protecting teen-aged girls in Wareham from police officer Flanagan. Jeff Perry cared only about protecting police officer Flanagan."
During the campaign, Brown didn't offer the kind of personal perspective on sexual abuse he has as he kicks off his book tour; rather, he condemned Keating for what he viewed as the politicization of a past incident.
Brown said "it's horrible" what Allen went through. He also noted that Perry's fellow officer "was tried and convicted."
The senator went on to argue that Perry had run an issues-based campaign, while accusing Keating of fear-mongering.
"It's to the point: 'Bill, stop with the dirty politics,'" Brown said last October.
In a radio ad released at the same time, the senator said Keating "has decided to focus almost entirely on negative attacks concerning an incident that took place almost two decades ago and which didn't directly involve Jeff."
The senator has since said the two situations are not analogous, but juxtapose Brown's comments last night with Lisa Allen's complaints about her treatment, as a 14-year-old, at the hands of a uniformed police officer all while his supervisor allegedly stood by mute.
“Yup, as predators do," Brown said of his alleged attacker. "He said, ‘If you tell anybody, you know, I’ll kill you.' You know, 'I will make sure that no one believes you,' and that’s the biggest thing, when people find people like me, at that young, vulnerable age, who are, basically, lost, the thing that they have over you is they make you believe that no one will believe you.’’
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
House votes for budget cuts to financial regulators despite Frank's best efforts
Representative Barney Frank mounted a spirited defense in the House today of the Dodd-Frank Act, the financial reform legislation that bears his name, but fell short in his attempts to block cuts to financial oversight bodies.
Frank sought an amendment to plug a $131 million cut in funding to the Securities and Exchange Commission, but the amendment was voted down 270-160. Another amendment which would have transferred $63 million to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which Frank’s bill created, also failed, 265-163.
The amendments came up amid a whirlwind of short votes as lawmakers wrangled over the Republicans’ $1.2 trillion spending measure to fund the federal government through the rest of this year. GOP leaders want to cut $61 billion from the budget this year.
Frank, never one to shy from a fight, mixed it up with Republican adversaries on the floor today over the amendments. In his typically caustic manner, the Newton Democrat derided a Republican amendment to scrap several oversight positions that Republicans derisively call “czars.”
One was for the special master of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, whose job is to make sure that beneficiaries of bailout money don’t receive exorbitant bonuses or salaries.
“Why our colleagues decided that that position should be abolished and a high level person charged with that responsibility should not be there is baffling to me,” Frank said.
At one point during the exchange, a GOP lawmaker declared: “To the Czars, I say, Nyet!” To which Frank responded: “I will leave it to the gentleman to work out his Lenin fantasy.”
Despite Frank’s efforts, the amendment passed 179-249. A second, similar amendment cutting even more positions – including the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Harvard Law Professor Elizabeth Warren – had not gotten a vote by about 7 p.m.
Keating aims to stop use of US software by authoritarian governments to monitor citizens
Freshman Congressman William Keating, a Quincy Democrat, is jumping into the fray of foreign affairs. He is in the process of drafting a bill to prevent American technology companies from selling software that could allow authoritarian governments to monitor their citizens.
“It makes no sense at all that we would allow American companies to sell technology to governments that are using it for the very purposes that our country is constantly condemning. That is simply not what American innovation is all about,” said Keating, Massachusetts' newest member of Congress in a statement Wednesday. “I believe we are only on the cusp of seeing the negative effects when social media is misused by repressive governments. As we have seen in countries like Bahrain and Iran, these protests are growing and thus, this issue will only continue to be magnified.”
Keating's statement said that a California company recently sold Egypt "deep packet inspection" technology that could allow it to filter and monitor Internet users. His proposal of requiring "end-use agreements" for such technology comes as the United States government, including the Pentagon, is paying companies to develop technology that allows activists abroad to avoid such detection.
Keating, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, questioned Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg at a hearing last week about how the government is working with companies selling social media technology abroad.
Keating expects to file legislation on the issue in the coming weeks.
House rejects funding for jet fighter engine, dealing blow to Mass. military program that employs hundreds
The House rejected funding for a second engine for the armed forces’ new jet fighter on Wednesday, dealing a potentially lethal blow to a multi-billion dollar military program that employs hundreds of people in Massachusetts.
By a 233 to 199 vote, the House approved a budget amendment stripping funds for the F-35’s backup engine. The vote does not mean that the measure is dead; after the House votes on hundreds of other amendments, the temporary spending measure for this year goes to the Senate. That body rejected the funding last year, but the funding was restored in a compromise budget measure.
Still, the vote threw into sharp relief the power of the new GOP freshman in the House, many of whom were elected with Tea Party support on promises to end earmarks and cut spending. Many also saw the vote as a test of their willingness to reduce military spending.
Some of those freshman have aligned with opponents of the extra engine, which include President Obama and the Pentagon, in decrying the engine as a waste of taxpayer money. On Wednesday morning, Defense Secretary Gates reiterated his opposition to the House Armed Services Committee, calling it an “unnecessary and extravagant expense.”
Several of the GOP freshman have been actively wrangling opposition, circulating a letter to the White House praising the administration for urging rejection of the engine. A bipartisan group of lawmakers also announced their opposition, including several that have Pratt & Whitney operations in their districts.
Supporters of the program argue that competition will lower costs for the overbudget primary engine, which Connecticut-based Pratt & Whitney is building for the jet’s prime contractor, Lockheed Martin, and ensure that technical problems with the main engine won’t ground the entire air fleet.
Speculation over the engine’s fate has been increasingly intense in recent weeks as a lobbying war re-ignited on Capitol Hill, with the two contractors fighting ferociously for the votes of the freshman lawmakers, 87 of which were Republicans.
Congress first budgeted seed money for General Electric’s engine in 1996, and that funding continue even after Lockheed Martin won the contract in 2001 to build some 2,500 planes for the Air Force, Navy and Marines, and sell to foreign buyers.
The Pentagon continued to support the backup engine until President George W. Bush and the Pentagon soured on the backup. But Congress has continued to provide hundreds of million of dollars every year, totaling about $3 billion so far.
Brown to introduce bill encouraging small business to hire veterans
The bipartisan legislation, which is cosponsored by Democrat Kay Hagan of North Carolina, gives tax credits to businesses that put returning veterans and members of the National Guard and Reserves on their payroll.
“Our veterans sacrifice so much for us and ask for little in return. This bipartisan legislation will help put our heroes back to work, and I am proud to be introducing it along with my colleagues,” said Brown, a Republican.
Some 20 percent of Guard members are unemployed, and economic stress is a prime reason for suicide – which is on the rise -- among those that return, according to Brown.
The legislation also has a House companion bill, which has a sponsor in Representative Lynn Jenkins, a Kansas Republican.
The cost of the legislation has not yet been determined, according to a Brown spokesman.
Brown, Ayotte introduce bill to help curb flow of money from US contractors to Afghan warlords
WASHINGTON— Two New England Republican senators, Scott Brown of Massachusetts and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, this week introduced legislation to make it easier for U.S. contracting officials to void contracts with companies that funnel American tax dollars to Afghan warlords and strongmen, including the Taliban, in exchange for protection and other services, according to a statement from Brown’s office.
“It is absolutely unacceptable that our hard-earned tax dollars are being used by the enemy to harm our soldiers and undermine our efforts in Afghanistan,” said Brown, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. “While members of our military are risking their lives, we need to do everything possible to support their mission and protect their safety.”
Ayotte added in a statement: “Unfortunately, because of insufficient oversight, a significant portion of our contracting dollars in Afghanistan have ended up in the hands of powerbrokers and insurgents who undermine our interests and attack our brave troops…the U.S. is at war in Afghanistan, and our contracting laws and regulations need to reflect that reality.”
Fundraiser seeks big money for Patrick, party
Local Democrats and political insiders are holding a fundraiser for Governor Deval Patrick next month and seeking up to $5,500 per person despite the Democrat’s assertion he will not seek a third term in 2014 or challenge Republican Senator Scott Brown next year.
A spokesman said the event is to help retire campaign debts while simultaneously boosting the Massachusetts Democratic Party.
The first $500 of each donation would go to Patrick, the maximum allowable annual contribution for individuals under state law. The remainder of any contribution would go to the party, which can accept up to $5,000 annually from individuals.
The party spent over $2.5 million on Patrick’s behalf last year during his re-election campaign, primarily for mailings and television ads.
It spent another $712,000 on Patrick during the first three years he was in office. During his 2006 campaign, his first as a political candidate, the party spent $2.4 million helping Patrick get elected.
The party is led by John Walsh, who managed Patrick’s 2006 campaign.
The fundraiser is being organized by three members of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, a South Carolina law firm that has a Boston office and is active in government lobbying.
The invitation for the March 7 gathering at the office lists the co-hosts as Peter Haley, a partner specializing in commercial law; Robert Crowe, a Democratic fundraiser who is co-chairman of the firm’s Government Relations practice, and; Christopher Greeley, who is managing director of the firm’s public strategies group.
Greeley is a registered state lobbyist whose clients include the Boston Beer Co., maker of Sam Adams ale, and Bristol Community College, a public entity. He was in the public spotlight when he managed Senator John Kerry’s 1996 epic re-election campaign against Republican William F. Weld.
Greeley said today: "Bob, Peter, and I are longtime supporters of Governor Patrick, both when he ran in his first term and when he ran for re-election, and are happy to continue our support."
Greeley acknowledged he lobbies state government, as disclosed in annual filings with the secretary of state. But he said he had no idea if Patrick had any aspirations beyond eliminating his campaign debt.
"That's a question for the governor," he said.
Patrick would have to establish a federal fundraising account to run for the Senate, but the state party could help him whether he ran for state or federal office.
Patrick has ruled out seeking re-election or filling the Democratic void in what has the potential to be a high-profile Senate race.
Brown shocked the party in a special election last year and claimed the seat held for nearly a half-century by a liberal party icon, Edward M. Kennedy. Many political strategists say only Patrick or Kennedy’s widow, Vicki, has the stature to knock him out of the Senate.
A Patrick spokesman said the governor has over $200,000 in debts he is trying to repay and the fundraiser is for that purpose. The governor’s year-end campaign finance report showed a cash balance of $20,000 and nearly $88,000 in debts, including $20,000 to Doug Rubin, Patrick’s chief political strategist.
Strategists often delay fully billing a campaign until after an election, to preserve donations for campaign work and to avoid disclosing their fee while it could be problematic for a candidate.
Patrick’s campaign “left the re-election committee with a small debt,’’ spokesman Steve Crawford said in a statement. “The Massachusetts Democratic Party needs additional resources to meet its goal of continuing the strong neighbor-to-neighbor effort it undertook in the last election."
Despite Patrick’s public assertions, he has only heightened interest in his political intentions with his recent activities and travels.
He went to Washington last week to have dinner with Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine. He is charged with recruiting surrogate speakers for President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.
Patrick could be a particularly effective counter-puncher if his immediate predecessor as governor, Mitt Romney, wins the GOP’s presidential nomination.
Meanwhile, over the weekend, Patrick made an overnight trip to Chicago to meet with political strategist David Axelrod, who previously served as a Patrick political adviser and left the Obama administration last month to prepare for a re-election role.
Patrick was slated to see Obama himself today during a ceremony at the White House, but he cancelled his trip after falling ill.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Markey to offer amendment to restore proposed cuts to home energy assistance
US Representative Edward Markey, a Malden Democrat, will offer an amendment on the House floor to restore proposed cuts to the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, the congressmen said in a call with reporters today.
“Cutting off funds for this program now means that millions of families could have their heating cut off,” said Markey. “These families would be forced to decide once again between heating and eating.”
A draft of the House Republicans’ yearly spending bill proposed cutting $400 million from LIHEAP emergency funds that help low-income families meet home heating costs, according to Markey. More reductions could come now that Tea Party-backed Republicans have called for even deeper budget cuts. The White House is also expected to propose cutting the program back to 2008 levels, from $5 billion to about $2.6 billion, in their budget proposal set to be released Monday. “Targeting the poor is the wrong direction and I think President Obama is making a huge mistake in singling out the poor,” said Markey.
Markey said he is circulating a letter among his colleagues urging that the program be fully funded next year.
Snowe signs on to Brown's fishing bill
Scott Brown has a fishing partner, and she knows the waters.
Senator Olympia J. Snowe, ranking member of the Senate subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries, and Coast Guard, agreed to cosponsor Brown's bill requiring that analyses of fishing stocks be done annually and independently. Currently, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration files an analysis only when a new fisheries management plan is adopted or amended.
Fishing communities have struggled to adapt to stricter fishing regulations in recent months. Brown's bill, the Fishing Impact Statement Honesty (FISH) Act, would require updated justification for such rules.
“I could not be more pleased to support Senator Scott Brown’s legislation to strengthen the socioeconomic impact process and require an independent third party chosen by the GAO to handle the statement analysis,” said Snowe, a three-term senator, in a statement. “Fishermen in Maine and across the nation have already sacrificed a portion of their livelihood during these challenging economic times so it is critically important that we have clear and accurate data when imposing new or amended fisheries management measures on this vital community.”
Brown joins Kerry in denouncing cuts to heating aid program
Republican Senator Scott Brown has joined his Democratic counterpart John F. Kerry in opposing plans to cut by half home fuel aid to struggling Americans next winter.
In his budget proposal for the next fiscal year, President Obama is reportedly calling for a $2.5 billion cut in the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which has helped nearly a quarter million households in Massachusetts this year.
Such a cut is unconscionable, Brown said.
"I can point to countless items in the president's budget that should be cut before LIHEAP funding. With Massachusetts residents getting pounded by brutal winter storms, cutting LIHEAP funding is a non-starter for me,"’ Brown said in a statement today to the Statehouse News Service.
Yesterday, Kerry wrote a letter to the president, calling on him to keep funding at its current level of $5.1 billion.
"I’ve always supported serious efforts to restore fiscal sanity, but in the middle of a brutal, even historic, New England winter, home heating assistance is more critical than ever to the health and welfare of millions of Americans, especially senior citizens,"’ Kerry wrote.
Representative Edward Markey, Democrat of Malden, called on the House Appropriations Committee to resist paring the program.
"Cutting funding for LIHEAP so dramatically would have a devastating impact on millions of American families already suffering from the economic downturn," he said in a letter today.
Markey has been battling House Republicans who are considering immediate cuts to the program this winter, as part of their effort to slice $100 billion from President Obama's spending requests.
"It takes a frigid heart for Republicans to continue to defend tax breaks for oil and gas companies, while putting heating fuel assistance for America’s neediest on the chopping block," Markey said.
Berwick testifies before US House Ways and Means Committee, defends health care law
WASHINGTON — Republicans on the US House Committee on Ways and Means this morning pounded Donald Berwick, administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, on the effects of the new health care law on seniors, and Berwick’s past statements in praise of the publicly-funded British health care system.
Republicans argued throughout the hearing that cuts in Medicare called for by President Obama’s health care overhaul are leading to doctors dropping patients with Medicare, and denying seniors choices in their health care.
In more than two hours of testimony, Berwick staunchly defended the health care law, known as the Affordable Care Act, saying repeatedly that the law will control rising medical costs, reduce waste and abuse and provide security to seniors, and expand preventative care that will head off many expensive medical problems and save money.
Under pointed questioning, Berwick was unflappable and sounded enthusiastic, even while frustrating Republicans by refusing to offer a “yes” or “no” answer to many questions.
In one exchange, Committee Chairman Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican, pressed Berwick repeatedly on Berwick’s past praise for the British health care system.
“Is the British health care system a good model?” Camp asked.
“The American health care system needs an American solution,” Berwick replied.
Camp persisted, asking: Do you still think a government-run single payer system is the best option?
“I believe the Affordable Care Act is the right solution for America,” said Berwick.
“If I could have a simple yes or no answer?” said Camp.
He didn’t get one.
Before President Obama selected Berwick for his current post, Berwick was a professor at Harvard Medical School.
Keating questions Napolitano on airport security
Representative William Keating, a Quincy Democrat, questioned Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano about airport security on Wednesday, saying that the death of a teenage stowaway raised “enormous questions" about tarmac security.
Keating, in his inaugural appearance on the House Homeland Security Committee, said he was concerned about how the 16-year-old boy hid in the wheel well of a Boston-bound jetliner, then tumbled to his death as the plane passed over Milton, Mass.
“If it wasn’t this young man that just stowed himself for his own reasons, if that had been a person with more nefarious motivation, think of what would have happened with that 747 commercial airliner, or any of the other airliners that were there at that time,” he said.
Napolitano acknowledged that the teenager’s death represented a breach of security, and promised Keating the results of any review of the incident.
“Clearly, if somebody -- a 16-year-old -- is able to circumvent those standards and requirements and get into the wheelwell of a plane, there has been a breakdown,” she said.
Michael E. Leiter, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, said security officials have long-standing concerns about tarmac access, and promised to work with Napolitano to address any issues about perimeter security at airports.
Keating was Norfolk County District Attorney last November when the body of 16-year-old Delvonte Tisdale was found in Milton.
Initially thought to be a homicide, investigators eventually determined that Tisdale had hidden away in a wheelwell of a Boeing 747 that flew from Charlotte, N.C. to Boston, and tumbled to the earth when the plane’s landing gear lowered.
Brown releases newsletter, video on Senate goals
Senator Scott Brown today e-mailed a newsletter detailing his Senate goals.
The Massachusetts Republican included a video in which he outlines his agenda, a method becoming a favored means of communicating especially within the media blackout preceding the release of his new book in two weeks.
Brown's list includes a job-creation bill called the "Innovate America Act." He also favors legislation repealing a 2.3 percent excise tax on medical devices, as well as a bill repealing a 3 percent withholding tax on government contracts.
Noting he has now been in office a year, Brown writes: "Whether I’m speaking in person with constituents, via posts to my Facebook page or Twitter, or via letters, phone calls, and emails, the voters have asked me to do something about unemployment in Massachusetts (and rightfully so). I listened, and I have come up with several targeted ideas to boost Bay State jobs that I’m introducing at the start of this 112th Congress."
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Vermont's Sanders fundraising in Boston
Supporters of Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont are holding a fundraiser for him Sunday before he delivers a public speech in Jamaica Plain.
The independent, who caucuses with the Democrats, "is facing a tough race in the next election due to the GOP machine," said an e-mail encouraging attendance. "Therefore, he's coming to ask similar-minded folks for support."
Another e-mail said, "Here's a great opportunity to hear an important progressive voice in the US Senate and for us to develop ties and think about New England as a region."
The fundraiser will be held at 1:30 p.m. at First Church Parish Hall on Eliot Street in Jamaica Plain. It's not a big-donor affair: The suggested contribution is $100.
Sanders is speaking publicly in the church sanctuary at 3 p.m.
Glen Johnson can be reached at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
Kerry-McCain resolution calls on Mubarak to step down
Senator John F. Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Republican Senator John McCain are calling on embattled Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to immediately begin a peaceful transition to a new democratic government.
The two former presidential candidates, Kerry in 2004 and McCain in 2008, have been among the leading voices of their parties on international affairs in general and the violent unraveling of Egypt's power structure specifically. The two co-wrote a resolution, passed by the Senate on a voice vote tonight, that calls on Mubarak to hand over power to a caretaker government.
The resolution, which is nonbinding, also calls on all political parties to avoid violence, support the rule of law, and work toward free and open elections. It specifically mentions the Muslim Brotherhood, an outlawed Islamist group that has a significant power base, as a group that espouses "extremist ideology." Some Middle East watchers fear a power vacuum in Egypt would be filled by militants who would have no interest in enacting democratic reforms.
Protests against Mubarak have become increasingly violent as progovernment forces have tried to end the rallies and remove demonstrators from squares around Cairo.
“Stop the bloodletting,’’ McCain, a Republican from Arizona, said on the Senate floor. “Let's start a peaceful transition to a free and open society and a government that can regain and hold the trust of the people of Egypt.’’
In a statement after the vote, Kerry said: “Tonight, the United States Senate stands unanimously with the Egyptian people and speaks with a bipartisan voice in condemning the violence. ... The Egyptian people are demanding a new political structure and President Mubarak has a responsibility to respond with actions that will bring an end to the brutality on the streets of Cairo and elsewhere and put his country on a path to genuine political, economic and social reforms.”
Lynch lobbied Pakistani officials on behalf of arrested US State Dept. employee
WASHINGTON — U.S. Representative Stephen F. Lynch, a South Boston Democrat, is on his way back from a Congressional trip to Pakistan, in which Lynch and other members personally lobbied Pakistani officials on the behalf of a US State Department employee who was arrested and held after shooting two alleged robbers on January 27.
The employee, Raymond Davis, a staff person at the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, apparently thought he was about to be carjacked when approached by armed men on motorcycles, said Lynch, speaking by phone this morning from an airport in Madrid. Davis “shot through his own windshield” and killed two alleged attackers, said Lynch. US authorities say Davis has diplomatic immunity, but that claim is being contested.
Lynch said the incident has received inflammatory press coverage in Pakistan that has heightened tensions. “Politically, it’s a difficult situation,” he said.
Lynch and five other members of Congress urged Davis’ release in meetings with Pakistani Prime Minister Gilani, President Asif Ali Zardari and Army Chief of Staff, Ashfaq Parvez Kayani. “At each of these meetings, each of us hit this issue pretty hard,” said Lynch.
The Congressional delegation visited Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq. A planned stop in Egypt was canceled due to civil unrest there.
Pakistani authorities are continuing to review Davis' case, said Lynch.
Department of Defense report outlines contractor fraud
UPDATED, 5: 02 p.m. More than 100 military contractors providing everything from aircraft to wrist cuffs for gloves committed civil or criminal fraud between 2007 and 2009, according to a report from the Department of Defense, yet many continued to receive funds from the department – including some barred from contracting.
The Pentagon report found that 30 contractors had been convicted of fraud between 2007 and 2009, and 91 had been the subject of civil judgments over fraud claims; some companies appeared on both lists. In addition, 120 companies had reached settlements over claims. Forty-three companies were suspended, and 164 were debarred from contracting.
The information is not typically compiled in one place, but Senator Bernard Sanders, an Independent from Vermont, requested the information through a defense spending bill last year. Covering three of the 10 years worth of data requested, the report lists many cases that are already public, including some that have received widespread news coverage, and includes no details of the cases. Still, the report provides a window into contractor fraud, which Sanders said should be paramount as Congress wrestles cutting the federal deficit.
“The people of this country want to make sure that when they spend a dollar on defense, it’s going for defense, it’s not going to companies committing fraud,” said Sanders.
Billions of dollars continued to flow to contractors even after they were found to have committed fraud, and about a dozen had been barred from contracting altogether. Still, the report concluded that “existing remedies with respect to contractor wrongdoing are sufficient. Sanders bridles at that finding, saying “the DOD has got to be a lot more vigorous in terms of its investigations, and a lot more vigorous in prosecuting those people who have committed fraud.”
One of the companies named in the report is Raytheon Co.’s Integrated Defense Systems, which is based in Tewksbury. But the company said it was included in error; it had agreed to pay about $213,000 to settle a dispute over a Patriot missile component, but had not been the subject of a 2009 civil fraud judgment, as the report said.
"The Raytheon settlement referenced in the report did not relate to fraud and did not involve a civil judgment. It was a fair and amicable resolution of a dispute over contractual requirements for component testing," the company said in a statement.
Starting in mid-April, information about contractor fraud in all federal agencies will be publicly available through a database known as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System. The system was not intended to be public, but Sanders included a provision in another war spending bill making the information public.
Obama signs off on New START treaty in White House ceremony
WASHINGTON — In a ceremony at the White House today, President Obama signed the final ratification documents for the New START nuclear arms treaty with Russia. The United States and Russia are expected to exchange ratification documents this weekend, thereby bringing the treaty into force, according to Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Kerry was Obama’s point man in winning Senate ratification for the treaty.
“The new treaty represents an important milestone in arms control agreements between the United States and Russia,” said Kerry, in a statement issued after the signing ceremony.
“Anytime we reduce the number of nuclear weapons deployed by these two countries, we make the world a safer place for everyone. The agreement signed today by President Obama, which was ratified in a bipartisan Senate vote in December, means that American inspectors will once again be visiting Russian nuclear installations and the number of nuclear weapons deployed by both countries will be reduced. When the treaty enters into force this weekend, it will signal to other nations that the United States and Russia are working together to reduce their arsenals and stop the spread of nuclear weapons technology to other countries.”
Kerry urges Mubarak to help establish interim government
WASHINGTON – John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, responded to Egyptian President Mubarak’s announcement today that he would not seek reelection by urging Mubarak to “work with the military and civil society to establish an interim caretaker government.”
“It remains to be seen whether this is enough to satisfy the demands of the Egyptian people for change,” said Kerry, in a statement. “We arrived at this point because millions of Egyptians spoke with one voice and exercised fundamental rights we Americans hold dear. They made it clear the future they want is one of greater democracy and greater economic opportunity. Now, that future belongs to them to shape. The Egyptian people are writing the next chapter of Egyptian history.
“Much work remains to be done to turn this auspicious moment into lasting peace and prosperity,” said Kerry. “Egyptians must now prepare for elections and achieve a peaceful transition of power. The military must continue to show the restraint it has so admirably exercised these past days. And opposition leaders must come together to develop a process that will ensure that all of Egypt’s voices are heard.
“As friends of the Egyptian people, there is much that the United States can do as well. Egypt has been a close ally of the United States for many years, and it is my fervent hope that our relationship can grow stronger as the Egyptian people take control of their destiny.”
Kerry had urged Mubarak to step aside in a New York Times column published this morning.
Keating named to three House committees
By Mark Arsenault
WASHINGTON — US Representative Bill Keating, the newest member of the Bay State’s House delegation, has been named to three House committees: Small Business, Homeland Security and Foreign Affairs Committees, according to a statement from Keating’s office.
“Our top priority must be creating jobs,” said Keating, in touting his appointment to the Small Business Committee. “For the 15 years prior to the start of our current recession, small businesses created approximately sixty-four percent of the new jobs in this country. We need to recreate an environment where that is once again possible, and we can do that by creating tax incentives and making smart investments in areas such as clean energy. The local businesses on Massachusetts’ South Shore and Cape are an integral part of the fabric of our community, and I will fight on the Small Business Committee to make sure they are flourishing once again.”
The House Small Business Committee has jurisdiction over small business regulation and federal funding, and oversees the Small Business Administration, which provides loans, counseling and other assistance to small business owners throughout the country, said Keating.
Brown proposes package of six bills
Senator Scott Brown laid out his most ambitious legislative agenda yet on Monday, proposing a package of six bills – one of which already has a Democratic cosponsor – that address policy ranging from technology innovation to fishery regulation.
Brown, whose role last year as an occasional GOP ally of Democrats irked conservatives who helped elect him, admitted that it won’t be easy to pass the measures aimed at increasing jobs and encouraging innovation in Massachusetts.
But “bipartisanship is a two-way street,” he told the North Suburban Chamber of Commerce in Woburn, pledging to support good ideas regardless of sponsors’ political affiliation.
Speaking later in the day to the Globe, he said that “there’s plenty of time for partisanship,” but said that the parties must work together to solve the nation’s economic woes.
“Our country’s hurting, and we need to create jobs,” he said. “The way to do it is to work together… The people are demanding it.”
As of Monday evening, only one of the bills had been introduced, the Innovate America Act, which Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat, is cosponsoring. That bill would expand tax credits for university-funded technology, fund 100 new high schools that focus on science, technology and math, and lift regulator barriers for high-export industries.
The five other bills address a panoply of other measures that Brown said will create jobs in Massachusetts. One bill, the Medical Device Tax Relief Act, makes good on Brown’s promise to seek the repeal of a 2.3 percent excise tax on medical device manufacturers opposed by device makers.
The Expediting Lifesaving Medicines Act would streamline the Food and Drug Administration’s approval process for new medications, creating priority reviews for diseases that are rare or affect children – a bill that would also prove greatly beneficial to the state’s enormous biotech industry.
A bill overhauling how fishery analyses are conducted would make the reviews annual and independent – a proposal aimed at coastal fishing communities that have long chaffed under federal fishery regulations. Still another would expand tax credits for business that hire veterans.
Klobuchar is so far the only cosponsor of any of the bills; Brown will be seeking cosponsors from both parties for the other legislation, he said.
The financial implications of the legislation are unclear, as the bills have not been analyzed by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, but they will neither raise taxes nor add to the deficit, according to a Brown spokeswoman.
Kerry calls on Egyptian government to use retraint in dealing with protesters
WASHINGTON – Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, called on the Egyptian government to use restraint in dealing with a wave of protests across the country.
“The events unfolding across Egypt are cause for grave concern," Kerry said in a statement. "Egypt is an important American ally which took brave and bold steps to make peace with Israel, and we will never forget that President Sadat paid for that act of courage with his life. It was in that time of turmoil and challenge that Hosni Mubarak became President.
The remainder of Kerry's statement:
“Now, President Mubarak faces a different kind of challenge. I call on the Egyptian government and security forces to exercise restraint in dealing with protesters and to respect the human rights of its citizens to seek greater participation in their own government. The Egyptian government also should immediately restore communications and access to social networking sites. I hope the people of Egypt will continue to remember the lessons and legacy of peaceful protesters from Gandhi to Dr. King and to exercise their right to be heard in that tradition, which will rally peaceful people everywhere in solidarity.“We know that repression will not remedy the problems that leave people in Egypt and across the Middle East feeling hopeless and frustrated. In the final analysis, it is not with rubber bullets and water cannons that order will be restored.
“The time has come for governments in the region to urgently improve governance and transparency, open the field to true opposition and new political identities, create real avenues for listening to and considering the wants and needs of their citizens, and demonstrate to younger generations that they will have better opportunities tomorrow than they do today. In the case of Egypt, President Mubarak has the opportunity to quell the unrest by guaranteeing that a free and open democratic process will be in place when the time comes to choose the country’s next leader later this year.”
Brown named to Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, has been named to the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
“Small businesses are the engines that drive our economy, and I look forward to fighting for policies that will help them grow,” Brown said in a statement. “During these challenging times, it is more important than ever that we implement commonsense initiatives to give entrepreneurs the confidence to expand and hire more workers. I am excited to work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to spur economic growth and put people back to work.”
The Small Business Committee reviews all proposed legislation and issues relating to the Small Business Administration, a federal agency charged with helping small companies.
Brown also serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee.
Romney criticizes Obama’s State of the Union address
WASHINGTON – Former Governor Mitt Romney today criticized President Obama’s State of the Union address, saying he lacked leadership and a clear direction to steer the country out of the economic downturn.
“President Obama knows where he wants to go, but he has no idea how to get there,” Romney wrote in a blog post on his website. “Under President Obama's economic leadership, more Americans have lost their jobs than any time in modern history.”
“The on-the-job economic education of the President has cost American families almost a trillion dollars in failed stimulus schemes and, unfortunately, he's still failing the course,” he added. “Rhetoric, however soaring, does not put pay checks in pay envelopes at the end of the week."
Romney also took a jab at one of Obama's proposals, to build more high speed rail projects as a way to put people to work.
"You can't build a high speed rail system fast enough to outrun the President's misguided regulations, higher taxes or lack of focus on jobs," Romney wrote. "Hopefully he is learning. American families are depending on him."
Romney has been weighing a second run for the Republican presidential nomination.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Markey's bill would ban BPA from bottles
Representative Edward Markey's BPA-bottle battle begins anew.
The Malden Democrat today introduced a bill that would prohibit use of BPA -- bisphenol-A -- in food and drink containers. The chemical, which is used to harden plastics, has been at the center of a contentious scientific debate on whether its overuse threatens the health of Americans, particularly children.
Studies in laboratory animals suggest the chemical might increase the risk of developmental problems in some fetuses and young children; other researchers say the evidence is too scant to draw assumptions.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say 90 percent of Americans have traces of the chemical in their urine.
Markey's bill would ban BPA in all reusable containers and in the plastic lining of canned food and other disposable containers. It would also require the Food and Drug Administration to review other substances in food and drink containers and limit their use if the agency determines they may pose health risks.
“Feeding time for babies should be laced with love not laced with chemicals. Parents have enough to worry about without wondering if the bottles they use to feed their children are safe or if the can of formula they have warmed up is harmful to their health,” Markey said in a statement. “This legislation will help keep BPA out of our bodies while also ensuring that all food and beverage containers are free from dangerous chemicals.”
In the last congressional session, the House passed a food safety bill that contained Markey's provision directing the FDA to study BPA, but the Senate stripped that provision from the bill.
Canada, France, and Denmark prohibit the use of BPA in baby bottles. Massachusetts is one of several states that limit its use.
A trade group rejected the need for a law restricting BPA.
“Regulatory agencies around the world, including FDA, have evaluated the science and support the safety of BPA in materials for food contact products, including products intended for use by children,'' said Steve Hentges in a statement. Hentges is with the American Chemistry Council's Polycarbonate/BPA Global Group.
Brown asks FEC for guidance on using book tour for reelection efforts
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown is seeking to leverage his upcoming book for maximum political gain, asking federal regulators whether he can co-mingle the activities related to his book tour with some of his reelection efforts.
Daniel B. Winslow, a lawyer for Brown’s campaign committee and a state representative from Norfolk, is asking the Federal Election Commission whether the Brown can tap his campaign account to buy thousands of copies of his soon-to-be-released book and distribute them to friends and political supporters.
"The committee proposes to use campaign funds to purchase up to several thousand copies of the book to be used solely in campaign related activities, such as distributing signed and unsigned copies to financial contributors and other 'political supporters' as 'thank you' gift," Winslow writes.
The campaign would either forgo royalties from the sales of the campaign-related purchases, or would donate the money to charity, Winslow wrote. That would allow Brown to avoid violating laws that prohibit candidates from using campaign funds for personal financial benefits.
Brown’s book – Against All Odds: My Life of Hardship, Fast Breaks and Second Chances -- is slated to be published Feb. 20 by Harper Collins, and the Massachusetts Republican is planning to launch a national book tour during the Senate’s February recess. The book contract has already been approved by the US Senate’s select committee on ethics.
Brown’s office declined to comment on the FEC request, but campaign finance watchdogs said it appeared to be fairly standard.
“It’s clear from the paperwork filed with the FEC that Senator Brown’s lawyers are taking this seriously and doing everything to stay on the right side of the law,” said Paul S. Ryan, an attorney at the Campaign Legal Center, which closely monitors campaign finance issues. “There’s some close calls here in terms of the nitty-gritty fine lines [of campaign finance law], but there are no major red flags here.”
Brown is also asking the FEC whether Brown can hold fundraisers in cities during his publisher-sponsored national book tour – and, if not, whether Brown could reimburse the publisher for certain portions of the trip that involved political fundraisers.
He also wants his campaign to be able to collect information during book events, and would like to use his campaign website, Facebook page, and Twitter account to promote the book. Brown’s campaign committee also has 8,000 phone numbers from supporters that it could send text messages to, the letter said.
“The Committee would like to maximize the political benefits of promoting Senator Brown's book by leveraging these social media sites,” Winslow wrote to the commission.
Using memoirs to advance a politician’s career is nothing new – President Obama’s books became best sellers and brought him financial and political fortunes -- nor are ethical requirements around them.
When Joseph Lieberman sought to give away copies of his memoir, In Praise of Public Life, in 2004, he declined to take royalties from books that were purchased through his campaign.
Sarah Palin also used her political action committee to buy thousands of copies of her book, “Going Rogue.” She then mailed copies to her donors. Her campaign spent more than $63,000 for “books for fundraising donor fulfillment,” according to ABC News.
Because she was not a candidate for office, and because she was using a leadership PAC for the funding, the legal requirements for her would have been looser, according to Ryan.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Frank lashes out at GOP efforts to cut federal spending to 2008 levels
WASHINGTON -- Representative Barney Frank lashed out today at Republican efforts to cut federal spending to 2008 levels, saying the move would deal a crippling blow to regulators' ability to oversee financial markets and implement the overhaul of financial regulations passed last year.
Frank warned that not only does funding need to be maintained at current levels, it needs to be increased so the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading can hire hundreds of employees to issue and enforce a slew of regulations under the new law.
"I had hoped it wouldn’t be this way," Frank said today at a press conference on Capitol Hill.
Republican Representative Scott Garrett of New Jersey, chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, responded in a statement that "a dramatic spending increase to fund the SEC and CFTC, as envisioned by the authors of the Dodd-Frank legislation, would further the mindset that our nation’s problems can be solved with more spending, not more efficiency."
“During our country’s current debt crisis, all branches of government – including Congress – have to tighten their belts and find ways to make their money go further," said Garrett who also chairs the budget task force of House conservative caucus Republican Study Committee. "Government agencies must learn to operate effectively within their budgets like American families and businesses do every day as we work to get our fiscal house in order.”
Frank, who co-authored the financial overhaul law that bears his name, said the amount of money needed to fund the overhaul is minuscule compared to the federal budget. And he pointed to a caveat in the rollback of spending levels that exempts security spending.
"We're arguing the security of the average American was far more endangered by the financial crisis than by a lot of other things that our military does," Frank said.
Frank, the ranking minority member on the Financial Services Committee, said this afternoon that Garrett's position "reinforces my fear that Republicans are attempting to cripple regulation by failing to fund it.
"The budgets he wants them to operate within are budgets which pre-date financial regulation, pre-date regulation of derivatives, and pre-date investor protection," he said.
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Kerry, Brown strategize to keep regional military bases open
WASHINGTON -- It is the political equivalent of a heavyweight boxing match: a round of military base closures that determines which military facilities around the country should be shuttered or consolidated and which ones should stay open.
And even though the next round is not slated to begin for another four years, Bay State pols are already huddling with fellow New England lawmakers and industry leaders to plot strategy on how to protect Hanscom Air Force Base, Natick Soldier Systems Center and other defense installations such as shipyards that are critical to the region's economy.
Tomorrow, Senators John Kerry and Scott Brown will host a meeting in Washington for a variety of New England's elected officials and industry leaders to begin coordinating their efforts to make New England's case in the face of powerful political blocs across the country who will be sharpening their arguments for why their bases are more important.
"We believe this is a valuable opportunity to sit down with interested parties in the technology industry to help formulate the regional strategy and to discuss specific and measurable actions that could provide greater [Department of Defense] access to, and visibility for, a growing innovation technology economy across New England," Brown, a Republican, and Kerry, a Democrat, wrote last week in inviting organizations like the Massachusetts High Technology Council to attend a briefing in Washington.
The last time Congress set up a bipartisan Base Realignment and Closure Commission, in 2005, Massachusetts fared quite well, ultimately seeing Hanscom and Natick's missions expanded. But that was only after a fierce struggle, including millions of dollars in lobbying expenses and consulting fees to make the right arguments to the panel.
And the next BRAC round, expected in 2015, is not likely to be any easier.
"The work in this sector in our respective states is not just critical to the future of our economy, but it is also critical to our national security," the senators wrote.
Brown to sit with Delaware Democrat Tom Carper at State of the Union speech
WASHINGTON — Massachusetts Republican Senator Scott Brown will sit with Delaware Democrat Tom Carper at tomorrow’s State of the Union speech, one of many across-the-aisle pairings planned by lawmakers to show civility and bipartisanship in the aftermath of the Arizona shootings earlier this month.
Brown and Carper bonded last year during a congressional trip to overseas war zones, shortly after Brown was elected last January. During the trip, the two senators worked out in military gyms and had a late-night dinner at a Marriott in Islamabad, where they discussed their own military service, how they met their spouses, and their children (Brown has two daughters, Carper two sons).
“One of the things that missed around here is lack of trust,” Carper said in an interview last May. “The ability to spend personal time and get to know each other a bit” helps build more bipartisan trust. The trip, which Carper led, included several other congressional members.
Brown’s office confirmed he would sit with Carper for the speech, but declined to elaborate this morning.
Congress pays tribute to 50th anniversary of JFK's inaugural address
WASHINGTON – Congressional leaders today paused to pay tribute to President John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address that motivated a nation 50 years ago.
In the rotunda of the US Capitol, congressional officials, aides, and Kennedy family members listened in silence to the 14-minute, 1,355-word speech that Kennedy delivered on a blustery day in 1961.
Top congressional leaders – including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Speaker John Boehner, and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi – attended the event.
“Sadly, this is the first congress to convene without a Kennedy since the Truman administration,” Boehner said, before looking over at the president’s daughter. “Caroline, there’s still time.”
Vice President Joe Biden and Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, both delivered remarks.
“It took President Kennedy just 1,355 words to summon a new generation and set in motion generations of service and sacrifice – to reignite the fires of idealism and patriotism in millions of Americans,” Kerry said.
Several Republians attended -- including Boehner and Representative David Dreier, a California Republican -- but Senator Scott Brown, the Massachusetts Republican, was not among them. Brown had used President Kennedy's image during an ad in his special election campaign last year. In the ad, grainy footage of Kennedy delivering a 1962 speech on using tax breaks to spur the economy then morphed into Brown. Democrats panned the ad, but Brown advisers said it marked a key moment that helped his campaign catch fire.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
House repeals health care
WASHINGTON – The House late this afternoon voted to repeal President Obama’s signature health care plan, the first major action of the Republican-controlled chamber but one that is almost certain to be stifled in the Senate.
The 245-to-189 vote helped fulfill an election promise that many Tea Party-backed Republicans made during the midterm elections that carried them into office.
“When I think of the 2,000-page bill, I think of a block of cheese out there, pretty tempting looking,” said Representative Billy Long, a newly elected Republican from Missouri. “Well the Americans I hear from, they don’t want that cheese. They want out of the trap of government-run health care.”
Three Democrats joined all 242 Republicans in voting for the repeal. The three Democrats who voted for the repeal were Mike McIntyre, of North Carolina; Dan Boren, of Oklahoma; and Mike Ross, of Arkansas.
The 10 members of the all-Democratic Massachusetts delegation voted against the repeal measure.
“Some may call it political catharsis, others may chalk it up to theater, pure and simple,” said Representative John Tierney, a Salem Democrat. “Let’s be clear: the positive impact that the existing health care reform law is having on millions of residents and families in all our districts is very real.”
Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat, spoke out against the repeal plan and held up a giant posterboard of two Lexington, Mass., parents holding a newborn baby. The woman, Markey said, had been denied coverage while she was pregnant because her husband switched jobs and the new plan said her pregnancy was a “preexisting condition.”
“It is just plain wrong,” Markey said. “New parents expect sleepless nights, not their insurance companies denying them coverage. New parents should worry about the baby, and not the medical bills.”
Several times during the debate, Democrats invoked the name of former Governor Mitt Romney, the Massachusetts Republican who helped pass the Bay State's landmark 2006 health care law. Romney’s advocacy of the Massachusetts law is seen as one of his chief hurdles in his expected presidential bid.
“This legislation is modeled after a modest, market-driven proposal offered by that left-winger, Mitt Romney,” said Representative Richard E. Neal, a Springfield Democrat. “But what do we hear? The usual scare tactics.”
Still, the debate through much of the day had few of the fireworks that have guided much of the debate over health care. There were no protesters outside the Capitol this morning, as there were last March when Democrats initially passed the legislation.
Both Republicans and Democrats appeared to tamp down their rhetoric in the wake of the shooting in Arizona. Republicans rarely referred to any “job killing” legislation, opting instead for terms like “job destroying”
Even Representative Joe Wilson -- the Republican from South Carolina who received national attention when shouting “You Lie” during President Obama’s address to Congress on health care – was subdued in his remarks.
“The takeover will cripple small businesses,” he said, without raising his voice. “The liberal health care takeover destroys jobs, limits freedoms, and expands big government.”
The passage of the repeal is largely symbolic, because the Senate, still controlled by Democrats, is highly unlikely to consider or pass the measure. President Obama would also veto any legislation, were it to reach his desk.
Senator John Kerry released a statement tonight saying the bill had no chance of passing the Senate.
"If the House bill became law, it would cost Massachusetts billions of dollars, erode Medicare for one million Bay State seniors, and effectively cripple the largest sector of the Massachusetts economy," Kerry said. "...The Senate now becomes the last line of defense for good public policy.”
But Republicans are hoping to keep the health care debate alive over the next election cycle, hoping it will lead to the ouster of President Obama and a majority in the Senate.
In the meantime, Republicans have started looking for an alternative course, scheduling hearings to grapple with reforming the medical malpractice insurance system and trying to repeal some specific provisions, such as a new tax on medical devices.
Democrats appear willing to make changes – but remained opposed to a wholesale repeal.
“If there is a problem with the bill, we should tweak it and change it, not repeal it,” said Representative Eliot Engel, a Democrat from New York. “This is political theater, it’s a charade, it isn’t going anywhere. Let’s put our heads together and see what makes sense…I’m willing to change the bill.”
Republicans are also laying plans to eliminate or reduce funding for certain agencies that will be in charge of enacting the new law, with one of the first targets being billions that the Internal Revenue Service will need to ramp up enforcement efforts.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Mass. slated to receive over $150 million in additional Medicaid funding
WASHINGTON -- Massachusetts, under a deal finalized today with the federal government, is slated to receive upwards of $150 million in additional Medicaid funding that will help shore up hospitals that treat many of the state's low-income patients, including Boston Medical Center and Cambridge Health Alliance.
The funding comes on top of roughly $300 million that the federal government already agreed to pay for the purpose last fall. Senator John F. Kerry helped lobby the Obama administration for the additional funding.
"It was really key that we do this, it was critical," Kerry said in an interview this afternoon. "We've got safety net hospitals that are on the brink. The lack of this (funding) would have been devastating to our hospitals."
The state's so-called safety net hospitals have been struggling since 2006, when the state's ground-breaking health insurance law phased out special payments to BMC and Cambridge Hospital for treating the poor. These payments are now being used to subsidize health coverage for thousands of newly insured residents.
According to the state Division of Health Care Finance and Policy, 98.1 percent of Massachusetts residents now have health insurance, including 99.8 percent of children. The new federal health care law will provide additional Medicaid funding for hospitals like Boston Medical Center, but not until 2014. The infusions of federal funding are intended to bolster those institutions in the meantime.
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Frank, Newton Mayor warn GOP may cut funds to community grant program
WASHINGTON -- US Representative Barney Frank and Newton Mayor Setti Warren are sounding alarm bells about possible cuts to federal community development block grant programs as Republican budget hawks begin looking for ways to trim federal spending.
The block grant program provided $4.4 billion to cities and towns across the nation last year for various programs targeted at low-income communities, including purchases of foreclosed homes, foreclosure counseling, job training and day care. Massachusetts communities received $36 million of that.
Frank and Warren, at a press conference on Capitol Hill today, said losing the funding would further cripple cities and towns that already are facing fiscal crises as they try to recover from the largest economic downturn since the Great Depression.
"This is what we are worried about," said Frank, who was flanked by congressmen and mayors from Rhode Island, New York, California, Minnesota and Pennsylvania.
Republicans, who have promised to cut $100 billion from the federal budget, so far have not publicly targeted the block grant program for reduction, but Frank said expects they will because GOP leaders have tried to cut the program before.
A spokesman for House Budget Committee Chair Paul Ryan did not immediately return messages left seeking comment.
In Massachusetts last year, the program gave $21 million to Boston, $4.9 million to Worcester and $4.4 million to Springfield. The funds are earmarked for community development, and can be used in a variety of ways, including small business assistance and job retention programs.
"It's a critical resource," said Warren, whose city of Newton received a little more than $2 million last year. "This gives mayors the ability to focus funds where they are most needed."
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Record warmth of 2010 concerns Kerry and Markey
Buffeted and buried by another potent noreaster, New Englanders are probably not expending much energy thinking about global warming. They should be, say a couple of lawmakers who had unsuccessfully spearheaded climate legislation last year.
Figures released today on the global climate are disturbing, say Senator John F. Kerry and Representative Edward Markey. NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said last year tied 2005 for the hottest year since scientists started tallying global temperatures in 1880. And government figures show it was the wettest year ever.
The data should prod action on Capitol Hill, Kerry and Markey say.
“How many times do we have to be smacked in the face with factual evidence before we address global climate change?,'' Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, said in a statement. "Report after report keep confirming it’s getting worse every year. Will we find common ground and adult leadership or keep piling the science on a shelf to collect dust?”
FULL ENTRYTop Pentagon official vows 'all-out pursuit' of child porn suspects
WASHINGTON _ The Pentagon's top investigator is vowing an "all-out pursuit" of any employees who may have downloaded child pornography after his agency acknowledged that 1,700 potential suspects who were referred to military investigators four years ago were never screened.
Gordon S. Heddell, the Department of Defense's Inspector General, said in a statement to the Globe today that his office, which oversees the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, is working aggressively to correct the mishandling of the cases and pursue any remaining suspects.
"I can assure those with questions that my office is conducting an aggressive pursuit of anyone implicated in Operation Flicker and that it is a key investigative priority," Heddell said in his first public statement on the matter.
"The sexual exploitation of any child is a tragedy," he added. "We are reviewing each and every Operation Flicker referral DCIS has received so as to ensure action is taken regarding allegations involving individuals with connections to the Department of Defense."
The Pentagon agency has come under fierce criticism in recent months for its role in the child pornography investigation that was spearheaded by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which has jurisdiction for such federal crimes under its customs mandate.
The Globe reported earlier this week the Pentagon checked only 3,500 out of 5,200 individuals who were suspected of downloading child pornography.
The partial screening, which was conducted in 2007, identified 302 individuals who were either military personnel, civilian employees, or private contractors. Some of those held high-level security clearances and worked at sensitive intelligence agencies such as the National Security Agency, which eavesdrops on enemy communications. Several also accessed the images on their work computers, a separate violation.
Out of the 302 cases, 70 were eventually pursued, while only a handful resulted in prosecutions. The agency said that many cases were dropped for lack of evidence, but also acknowledged that child pornography was not treated as one of the agency's investigative priorities at the time, when it was under different leadership.
"However," Heddell said today, "our re-investigative efforts are focused on determining the exact number" of Pentagon workers who may have been involved.
Sen. Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican and senior member of the Judiciary Committee, has disparaged the agency's approach to the matter since the cases were first reported by the Globe last summer. In addition to the potential exploitation of minors, Grassley has also expressed concern that individuals with access to secret information could be blackmailed or otherwise compromised by American enemies if they are in possession of child pornography, a crime that could bring up to 20 years imprisonment.
"We want a change in behavior in the Defense Department where things of this criminal nature are a top priority, even more than government employees at other agencies because of the national security connections," Grassley told the Globe in an interview earlier this week.
It was in response to Grassley's inquiries that officials reported late last year that the Pentagon had never followed up on all the individuals referred to the agency in the first place.
A spokesman for the Defense Criminal Investigative Service could not predict how many of the remaining names might have military connections, nor when the review would be complete.
Heddell said his office is working with ICE, along with investigators from the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, the Army's Criminal Investigative Division, and the Air Force Office of Special Investigations.
Grassley said that the statute of limitations has probably expired for criminal charges to be brought against any violators but said he would press for administrative punishment for anyone who is implicated.
Bender can be reached at bender@globe.com.
Brown to back bill for 9/11 first responders
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this afternoon said he would support legislation designed to help first responders who became sick from working at the World Trade Center after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Brown joined Republicans earlier in helping block the legislation, but there has since been a major campaign to get the bill approved. Several changes have also been made to win Republican support, including lowering the cost.
“The first responders on September 11th unselfishly risked their lives when our nation needed them the most,” Brown said this afternoon in a statement. “Their heroic efforts should never be forgotten. I am pleased that we were able to come together and agree upon a workable solution that provides care to these brave Americans. After many months of working on this effort, I am proud to vote for this bill."
Senator John F. Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, also supports the bill and voted in favor of it earlier this month when it was blocked by Republicans.
The legislation would aid first-responders whose illnesses are linked to the attacks, providing $4.2 billion for a fund to compensate those who became ill after being exposed to toxic chemicals at the World Trade Center site.
The Senate is expected to vote on the bill this afternoon, followed by the House.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Budget bill includes funding for ships, second engine
WASHINGTON – A large defense contract that could provide up to 400 jobs in Lynn made it into a spending bill that the Senate approved today, allowing a project on a controversial jet engine to continue for the next few months.
Although the legislation does not include a specific provision for a backup engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, a key interpretation from the Office of Management and Budget indicates that the project will continue to be funded. The budget office sent a letter today to several senators, including Senator John Kerry, saying that the legislation would allow funding for the project to continue.
The legislation, which is part of a temporary budget bill that keeps the federal government running until March 4, also includes a provision that allows the Navy to award 10 new Navy coastal ships. The combat ships would be built by a consortium including General Dynamics, which said it would add 500 jobs to an electronics plant in Pittsfield if the project is approved. The Pentagon has backed the move to increase the order of new ships from 10 to 20.
“When jobs come and go it can hollow out a community and we all worked our tails off to make sure that didn’t happen,” Kerry said in a statement. “We’ve been on pins and needles to see if we were successful and it ended up better than we could have hoped.”
“Bottom line, this means hundreds of good jobs in our state when every single one counts, and I’m proud that we fought every inch of the way,” he added. “This is the great part of being a Senator when you can get on the phone and advocate just like a good Mayor.”
The bill was approved today by the Senate, and the House is expected to follow later tonight.
That alternate engine, which would be built by General Electric and would result in 400 jobs in Lynn, has been criticized by taxpayer watchdogs for several years as a waste of defense dollars. The Pentagon has said it needs only one engine for the new fighter, and the Obama administration opposes the project.
Funding for the jet engine was set to run out Thursday, and GE officials had been desperately trying to get further authorization for it included in a stopgap budget bill.
Still, the funding will only continue for several months. Supporters of the project will then have to find a longer-term solution.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Senate moves to a full vote on New START treaty


WASHIGNTON -- After a bitter fight that threatened to upend a history of bipartisanship on arms control, the Senate has voted overwhelmingly to take up the the nuclear arms pact with Russia, marking a key victory for President Obama's agenda to reduce nuclear proliferation and a hard-won achievement for Sen. John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, who is shepherding the treaty over fierce opposition from Republican leaders.
By a vote of 67 to 28 -- including 11 Republicans -- the Senate moved to a full vote on the New START Treaty with the support of enough senators to reach a two-thirds majority that is required for treaty ratifiction.
The so-called "cloture" vote paves the way for the Senate to vote on the full treaty in the coming hours.
Kerry released the following statement on the occasion.
“Today’s bipartisan vote clears a significant hurdle in the Senate. We are on the brink of writing the next chapter in the 40-year history of wrestling with the threat of nuclear weapons. We’ve spent months building toward this moment. In these final hours of debate, Senator Lugar and I are joined by so many senators who understand the significance of this moment. Together, we will do our very best to convince those who remain undecided that ratifying New START is the right step for our national security.
“For nearly a week, we’ve been engaged in a healthy exchange of views. Those who are skeptical have voiced their concerns and we have listened carefully. They’ve made significant contributions to the dialogue. They are motivated by the same concern for our national security as those of us who see this agreement as vital to our national security. All eyes will be on the Senate in these last hours of debate and all will see a victory for common sense and the Senate act in its best traditions.”
Republican Senator Alexander to back New START treaty
WASHINGTON — Momentum is building in the US Senate toward the ratification of the New START arms control treaty with Russia, with the decision this morning of Republican Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee to back the treaty.
“I am convinced that Americans are safer and more secure with the New START treaty than without it,” Alexander announced in a floor speech this morning.
The treaty would reduce strategic warheads by about a third on each side, to 1,550, and set up protocols for inspections of each nation’s warheads.
The treaty needs 67 votes to be ratified. The entire Democratic caucus is expected to support it, meaning it needs at least nine Republican votes to be ratified. A rough count based on the public statements of Republican senators puts the treaty on the cusp of having enough votes to pass.
Massachusetts Republican Senator Scott Brown announced last evening that he will support New START.
Budget bill includes authorization for ships, leaves second engine in limbo
WASHINGTON – A large defense contract that could provide up to 500 jobs in Pittsfield is included in a spending bill that Congress is expected to vote on tomorrow, but a separate contract that could mean 400 jobs in Lynn is still in limbo.
The legislation, which is part of a temporary budget bill that the House and Senate will vote on tomorrow, includes a provision that allows the Navy to award 10 new Navy coastal ships. The combat ships would be built by a consortium including General Dynamics, which said it would add 500 jobs to an electronics plant in Pittsfield if the project is approved. The Pentagon has backed the move to increase the order of new ships from 10 to 20.
But the bill does not include any specific provision for another major defense contract with impacts on Massachusetts – a backup engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.
That project, which would be built by General Electric and would result in 400 jobs in Lynn, has been criticized by taxpayer watchdogs for several years as a waste of defense dollars. The Pentagon has said it needs only one engine for the new fighter, and the Obama administration opposes the project.
Funding for the jet engine will run out Thursday, and GE officials had been desperately trying to get $450 million authorized in a stopgap budget bill.
A spokesman for GE warned that the decision to not specifically include the project in the temporary budget bill might not mean the end of the project. The spokesman, Rick Kennedy, said it could come down to an interpretation of the law by the Office of Management and Budget.
Because the temporary budget bill continues funding at fiscal 2010 levels -- when the alternate engine was funded -- GE officials assume the project will continue to be funded.
The bill the House and Senate plan to vote on tomorrow would keep government running at previous levels through March 4.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry bill targeting shark delicacy passes
Senator John Kerry today won approval in the Senate of a bill that toughens regulations banning the removal of fins from sharks caught in US waters.
The bill, sponsored by the Massachusetts Democrat, closes a key loophole that allowed fishermen to remove the fin as long as it was done on land.
Shark fins are considered a delicacy in Far East cuisine and are sold for hundreds of dollars a pound. Overhunting of the sharks for their fins has decimated their population, with about 78 million sharks killed a year, according to the Pew Environment Group. About 30 percent of the world's species is close to the threat of extinction, said the group, which lauded Kerry's bill.
The United States is considered a major exporter of sharks.
"Some populations, such as scalloped hammerheads and dusky sharks along the Eastern US coast, have plummeted by as much as 80 percent since the 1970s,'' said Matt Rand, director of the Pew Environment Group’s Global Shark Conservation Campaign, in a written statement.
Often fishermen will remove the fins, then return the shark to the ocean for a slow death.
“Shark finning has fueled massive population declines and irreversible disruption of our oceans,” Kerry said. “Finally we’ve come through with a tough approach to tackle this serious threat to our marine life.”
The House passed a similar bill last year but will need to take it up again before the lame duck session ends because of changes made in the Senate version.
Senate votes to repeal 'don't ask, don't tell'
WASHINGTON -- Gays and lesbians will soon be able to serve openly in the United States military, after a US Senate vote today to end the "don't ask, don't tell" law that has led to the discharge of some 14,000 gay service members since its establishment during the Clinton administration.
US Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts was among six Republicans who broke ranks to help Democrats overcome a procedural hurdle put up by the GOP. The vote this morning against the Republican filibuster was 63-33; at least 60 votes were needed to move the measure ahead. Final passage came in a second vote this afternoon, which passed 65-31, with eight Republicans in favor.
The House had passed an identical version of the bill, 250-175, on Wednesday. The Senate vote gives President Barack Obama the chance to fulfill a campaign promise and repeal the 17-year policy. Obama was expected to sign it next week, although the change wouldn't take immediate effect. The legislation says the president and his top military advisers must certify that lifting the ban won't hurt troops' fighting ability. After that, there's a 60-day waiting period for the military.
A recent Pentagon study concluded the ban could be lifted without hurting the ability of troops to fight.
Repeal would mean that, for the first time in American history, gays would be openly accepted by the military and could acknowledge their sexual orientation without fear of being kicked out.
"I just posted on my Facebook: if you could only see the tears of joy in my eyes," said Travis Hengen of Weymouth, a 37-year-old former Army counterintelligence officer discharged under the "don’t ask" policy in 2003, minutes after the Senate took action.
"It is time to close this chapter in our history," President Obama said in a statement. "It is time to recognize that sacrifice, valor, and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed."
But the vote also outraged some Christian conservatives. "Today is a tragic day for our armed forces," said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a conservative Christian lobbying group, in a statement. "The American military exists for only one purpose -- to fight and win wars. Yet it has now been hijacked and turned into a tool for imposing on the country a radical social agenda."
Rounding up a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate was a historic victory for Obama, who made repeal a campaign promise in 2008. It also was a political triumph for congressional Democrats who struggled in the final hours of the post-election session to overcome GOP objections on several legislative priorities before Republicans regain control of the House in January.
"As Barry Goldwater said, 'You don't have to be straight to shoot straight,' " said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., referring to the late GOP senator from Arizona.
Sen. John McCain, Obama's GOP rival in 2008, led the opposition. The Arizona Republican acknowledged he didn't have the votes to stop the bill, and he blamed elite liberals with no military experience for pushing their social agenda on troops during wartime.
"They will do what is asked of them," McCain said of service members. "But don't think there won't be a great cost."
Advocacy groups who lobbied hard for repeal hailed the vote as a significant step forward in gay rights. The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network called the issue the "defining civil rights initiative of this decade."
Supporters of repeal filled the visitor seats overlooking the Senate floor, ready to protest had the bill failed.
"This has been a long fought battle, but this failed and discriminatory law will now be history," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign.
The Pentagon study found that two-thirds of service members didn't think changing the law would have much of an effect. But of those who did predict negative consequences, a majority were assigned to combat arms units. Nearly 60 percent of the Marine Corps and Army combat units, such as infantry and special operations, said in the survey they thought repealing the law would hurt their units' ability to fight.
The Pentagon's uniformed chiefs are divided on whether this resistance might pose serious problems.
Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos has said he thinks lifting the ban during wartime could cost lives.
"I don't want to lose any Marines to the distraction," he told reporters this week. "I don't want to have any Marines that I'm visiting at Bethesda (Naval Medical Center) with no legs be the result of any type of distraction."
Admiral Mike Mullen and Marine Gen. James Cartwright, the chairman and vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, respectively, have said the fear of disruption is overblown. They note the Pentagon's finding that 92 percent of troops who believe they have served with a gay person saw no effect on their units' morale or effectiveness. Among Marines in combat roles who said they have served alongside a gay person, 84 percent said there was no impact.
Brown to oppose spending bill that includes $213m in Mass. earmarks
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this morning said he would oppose a $1.1 trillion bill that includes at least $213 million for 174 earmarked projects for Massachusetts.
The Massachusetts Republican criticized the plan in large part because it includes earmarks, which are provisions added by a legislator to a bill that directs money to a specific project, instead of going through normal funding channels that typically are reviewed by government agencies.
"It is outrageous and inappropriate to jam a massive $1.1 trillion spending bill full of thousands of earmarks through a lame-duck Congress with almost no time to debate,” Brown said this morning in a statement. “Curbing out-of-control federal spending requires us to re-examine and re-evaluate our spending priorities and restore transparency and openness to the process by allowing full, fair and open debate on amendments. Unfortunately, this omnibus does neither and represents more of the business-as-usual mentality that was rejected by the American people last month.”
Brown also said he hopes President Obama, who has also been opposed to earmarks, would veto the bill if it reaches his desk.
Brown’s stance is in stark contrast to the other members in the Massachusetts delegation, who have long described themselves as proud backers of earmarks.
Brown is the only member of the delegation who did not submit any requests, although his name was erroneously included on the earmark list as a backer of an $8.7 million earmark that would benefit whaling and other museums, including ones in Salem and New Bedford.
His name is being formally removed today, according to an aide for the Senate Appropriations Committee.
The Globe reported this morning that the latest Senate budget bill, released earlier this week, includes $213 million for projects in Massachusetts.
The bill includes $400,000 for the Paul Revere House in Boston’s North End, $8 million for the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, and dozens of other earmarks that would be peppered throughout the Bay State.
But in addition to projects that congress considers earmarks, there are several other components in the bill that could impact the Massachusetts economy.
The bill includes $450 million for a program that is developing a second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, despite objections from the Pentagon and a veto threat from the Obama administration. That funding, considered wasteful by the White House, is supported by most of the Massachusetts congressional delegation – including Brown -- because it would help preserve jobs at a General Electric plant in Lynn.
The legislation also includes funding for the Navy to double an order of coastal combat ships — from 10 to 20 ships — that would dramatically expand the program and would bring 500 new jobs to a General Dynamics computer manufacturing plant in Pittsfield.
The House voted last week to continue federal spending at current levels through the remainder of this fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30. The Senate is instead trying to lump together several spending packages, with earmarks included. If backers succeed — which is far from certain, given that time is running out in the lame duck session — it would still need to be approved in the House. If they don’t, the Senate would probably follow the House and attempt to continue funding the federal government at current levels.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Reid takes aim at Obama, Republicans over earmark spending
WASHINGTON – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid this afternoon launched into a vociferous defense of congressional earmarks, branding Republicans “hypocrites” and pushing back against President Obama.
At one point, the soft-spoken Nevada Democrat pulled a copy of the Constitution out of his suit jacket and waived it in the air.
“The little Constitution that we have doesn’t have a lot of information in it, but what is in it is what runs this country,” he said. “And I am convinced that I do not want to give up more power to the White House, whether it’s George Bush or Barack Obama. And I’m going to fight as hard as I can against President Obama on these earmarks -- and my Republican colleagues who hate to vote for them but love to get them.”
Earmarks are provisions added by a legislator to a bill that directs money to a specific project, instead of going through normal funding channels that typically are reviewed by government agencies. President Obama and Republicans have criticized the funding practice in recent months.
Reid is pushing for a large spending bill to be approved before Saturday night -- one that includes more than $8 billion in earmarks -- when current funding authorizations expire. If Reid’s effort fails, the Senate would probably continue funding the federal government at current levels.
“People are saying, ‘Why should we vote for this, it’s got congressional directed spending in it?’” Reid said. “That’s our job. That’s what we’re supposed to do.”
He also took aim at Republicans who have criticized the bill, even after they had previously requested earmarks that are included in it. For example, Mitch McConnell, Senate minority leader, has said he would fight to kill the bill, even as he sponsored earmarks worth at least $112 million in the measure, according to the nonpartisan Taxpayers for Common Sense.
“Some of the people who speak out against congressionally directed spending, or earmarks, are people who have more earmarks than others,” Reid said. “They’re hoping, of course, it will pass and they can go home and do the press…saying, ‘Here I am, cut the ribbon, look what I did.’ You can’t have it both ways.”
“You can all look it up in the dictionary yourself,” he added. “But I bet if you went to H in the dictionary and found hypocrite, under that would be people who ask for earmarks but then vote against them.”
In the next breath, he said, “I would hope that we would cut down the mean-spirited talk about this, and just do our jobs.”
When asked later whether his own comment branding Republicans as hypocrites was a little mean-spirited, he said, “It could be.”
Reid also threatened to keep the Senate in session until early next year, when the next Congress officially begins, as a way to ensure votes on several other issues. Republicans have threatened to employ several delay tactics -- and they've criticized Reid for pushing to meet over the holidays.
“I hope that’s not necessary, but that’s the clock that my Republican colleagues have to run out,” Reid said. “It’s a long clock. I don’t want to be here. I’ve got a big family in Nevada, and I’d love to go back and visit with them. And I’m going to do that, but I’m not going to let the country’s work not be completed as a result of that. I get paid whether I’m here in Washington or in Nevada.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Markey chosen as top Democrat on Natural Resources Committee
WASHINGTON – Representative Edward J. Markey this morning was chosen to be the top Democrat on the Natural Resources Committee, providing the Malden Democrat with a key role that he says will allow him to block the Republican agenda.
The committee deals with issues involving the environment, energy, and public land.
“In the next Congress, Republicans will attempt to short-circuit the laws that keep our water clean, our air clear and our public lands pristine, while giving short shrift to emerging clean energy technologies that can create jobs and clean up our environment,” Markey said this morning in a statement. “With my fellow Democrats on the Natural Resources Committee, I believe we can chart a course that will continue the progress we’ve made on creating energy jobs here in America, without sacrificing our nation’s natural heritage.”
Markey, one of the most senior members in the House, has been chairing a select committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. That committee is being eliminated when Republicans take control of the House next month, and Democrats are going through a reshuffling in leadership roles.
The current chairman of the Natural Resources Committee, Representative Nick Rahall of West Virginia, is leaving to become the top Democrat on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.
Markey has served on the Natural Resources Committee since 1976.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Snowe backs repeal of "don't ask"
Republican Senator Olympia Snowe declared today she would support repeal of
the Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell'' policy against openly gay members
serving in the armed services.
“After careful analysis of the comprehensive report compiled by the
Department of Defense and thorough consideration of the testimony provided
by the secretary of defense, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and
the service chiefs, I support repeal of the 'don’t ask, don’t tell' law,”
Snowe said in a statement to the Portland Press-Herald.
Snowe is known as a champion of veteran's issues and has served on the
Senate Armed Services Committee, where she was the first female senator to
chair the Subcommittee on Seapower, which oversees the Navy and Marine
Corps.
She joins her Republican counterpart from Maine, Susan Collins, in the
effort to repeal the policy. Collins and Joseph Lieberman, independent of
Connecticut, have filed a stand-alone bill in the Senate to end "don't ask"
after the Senate failed to pass the repeal as part of a larger defense
policy bill.
Her decision helps Collins build momentum for the repeal, although time is
short and demands for action on other bills are high as the Senate's
lame-duck session winds down. With Collins and Snowe, Republicans Lisa
Murkowski of Alaska, Scott Brown of Massachusetts, and John Ensign of
Nevada have signaled they would vote for repeal. All the senators who caucus with
the Democrats back repeal, except West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin.
The push toward repeal gained a boost today when the House voted 250 to 175
to end the policy, potentially setting the stage for a Senate vote on the
Collins-Lieberman bill.
Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Newton and one of the House's few
openly gay members, was allowed to gavel the vote to a close. In a floor
speech, he said it was ‘‘bigoted nonsense [that] ‘‘the presence of someone
like me will so destabilize our brave young men and women that they will be
unable to do their duty.’’
Frank’s nine colleagues from Massachusetts, all Democrats, joined him
in voting for repeal.
Brown votes in favor of moving forward debate on new START treaty
WASHINGTON – US Senator Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, was among nine GOP senators to vote in favor of moving forward to debate on the ratification of the New START nuclear arms treaty with Russia, one of President Obama’s top priorities for the remainder of the lame-duck session of Congress.
“Senator Brown believes there are still flaws in the treaty, such as the modernization of our own existing weapons, verification and missile defense, and is hopeful these issues will be worked out in a full, fair, and open debate and amendment process,” Brown’s office said in a statement after the vote.
The White House and senior Democrats have expressed confidence that they have the 67 votes needed for ratification -- two-thirds of the Senate -- and Obama has said he is prepared to delay a planned holiday vacation until the treaty is completed.
"We believe we should stay here as long as it takes to get this treaty ratified, and we are prepared to do so," said Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat.
The treaty would cut warheads on both sides and set up procedures for inspections
Several Republicans have argued that the limited time available in the lame-duck session makes it difficult to give the treaty the consideration it deserved.
With material from the Associated Press.
Mass. congressmen urge withholding funds from fisheries until catch limits raised
Calling new regulations an economic disaster for New England fishermen, Massachusetts congressmen are urging the House and the Senate to withhold funds from marine fisheries officials unless they boost catch limits.
For two months, members of the Massachusetts delegation and Governor Deval Patrick have been pushing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Department of Commerce to issue an emergency order to help the industry. The lack of action on the part of the agency is devastating to the industry and frustrating to state leaders, they say.
"Repeatedly, these discussions appear to have led to little more than speeches and broken promises,'' according to a letter from the lawmakers. "Because we feel serious consideration of all available options has not occurred, it is imperative that Congress assert itself in order to protect the livelihood of fishing communities across the country."
The letter, addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, was signed by Democratic Representatives John Tierney of Salem, Barney Frank of Newton, and William Delahunt of Quincy. They were joined by Democratic Senator John F. Kerry and his counterpart, Republican Senator Scott Brown.
The focus of their effort is the government's new way to determine quotas for some waning stocks of fish. In May, the federal government shifted strategies, pushing fishermen to form cooperatives that would share annual quotas for each imperiled species of fish within a sector.
Under this program -- dubbed catch share -- once a group exceeds its limit on a particular kind of fish, all members must cease all fishing.
In their letter, the lawmakers cited research from the Mass. Division of Marine Fisheries and the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth that detailed the deleterious effects of the changes on Bay State fishermen. The research contends the changes made a handful of fishermen richer while hurting the bottom line on the vast majority plying the ocean. It also says the rules had idled two-thirds of the state's fleet chasing groundfish in the first five months of the season and half of the fleet seeking finfish.
The direct cost to the industry is $21 million, the letter says.
In response, the congressmen are asking Pelosi and Reid to withhold fiscal year 2011 funding for implementation of the catch share program until emergency relief is provided to the fishermen.
Frank will vote against Obama's tax compromise
WASHINGTON — US Representative Barney Frank, a Newton Democrat, will vote against the tax compromise deal that cleared the US Senate this afternoon, unless there are major changes, Frank told the Globe today.
The legislation, the result of a compromise hammered out by President Obama and Senate Republicans, would extend all of the Bush-era income tax cuts for two years, renew a federal program to extend unemployment benefits for the longtime jobless, cut the payroll tax, and retain or create a series of other tax cuts for businesses and individuals. Many Democrats object to extending the tax cuts to family income above $250,000 per year, and have criticized Obama for yielding to Republican demands that the cuts be extended to all income.
Frank said he is not wedded to the $250,000 figure, but does not believe the cuts should be extended to all income. He also objects to the deal’s more generous treatment of the estate tax, which he regards as a “pure giveaway” to the wealthy, and wants assurances Social Security would be made whole, by replacing money lost due to the proposed cut in payroll taxes.
Frank said it is likely the House will hold a vote on imposing a stricter estate tax in the deal, but said he could not handicap the amendment’s chances for passage.
Republicans have warned that the deal will fall apart if major changes are made.
“I don’t accept the notion that if I vote against this [deal] it would be scuttled,” said Frank, who argued that the Senate may accept “a more reasonable package.”
Frank said a House vote on the tax deal could come later today or tomorrow.
Senate approves extension of Bush tax cuts
WASHINGTON – The US Senate this afternoon gave its final approval to a sweeping tax and stimulus package that would extend tax cuts for all Americans and attempt to jolt the economy into revival.
The Senate voted 81-to-19 in favor of the deal, with broad bipartisan support. The legislation still needs the approval of the House, something that could come as soon as late today, despite continued angst from liberal Democrats.
The compromise united in opposition two odd bedfellows on opposite sides of the political spectrum: Senator Bernie Sanders, the Vermont socialist, and Republican Senator Jim DeMint, a Tea Party conservative from South Carolina. Each tried unsuccessfully to amend the package today, though with contradictory goals. Sanders wanted to strip temporary tax breaks from the wealthy from the deal, while DeMint wanted to make all the tax cuts permanent. Both proposals were knocked down, as proponents of the deal understood that any major changes probably would scuttle it. Both senators voted against the final deal.
The senators from Massachusetts, Democrat John Kerry and Republican Scott Brown, supported the compromise.
The focus of the debate now swings to the US House of Representatives. House Democrats held a closed-door caucus last night to discuss the proposal. Last week, the caucus objected – to chants of “Just say no!” – to scheduling a vote on the tax bill without major changes. But the objection came in a non-binding voice vote in the heat of emotion, and by this week House leaders began predicting that the compromise would ultimately pass.
"I think, frankly, that ultimately we will pass legislation," House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told reporters yesterday. "The vote in the Senate indicates an urgency that is felt by a broad spectrum that the middle income taxes not be increased come Jan. 1. In order to affect that, you've got to pass the bill.”
House Republican Leader John Boehner believes his members “are generally supportive, and will not insist on amendments,” Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said today.
The legislation, the result of a compromise hammered out by President Obama and Senate Republicans, would extend all of the Bush-era income tax cuts for two years, renew a federal program to extend unemployment benefits for the longtime jobless, cut the payroll tax, and retain a series of other tax cuts for businesses and individuals. Many Democrats object to extending the tax cuts to family income above $250,000 per year, and have criticized Obama for yielding to Republican demands that the cuts be extended to all income.
House Democrats have lately focused their ire on the estate tax, saying the deal’s proposed rate of 35 percent is too low and the thresholds of protected assets -- $5 million for individuals – are too high. Many Democrats prefer returning to 2009 rates: a 45-percent tax on assets above $3.5 million.
One option for House Democrats would be to vote on an amendment that would impose a higher estate tax, although Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, has warned that the agreement will fall apart if major changes are made.
All told, the tax and stimulus package would cost about $855 billion, according to preliminary projections by the Joint Committee on Taxation.
The parties had an incentive to work together to reach the deal, with a deadline approaching that could have dire political consequences: if Congress does not pass a bill before Dec. 31, taxes will rise for most Americans.
President Obama today urged Democrats and Republican to look past what they don’t like about the deal. “That’s the nature of compromise,” Obama said. “But we worked hard to negotiate an agreement that’s a win for middle-class families and a win for our economy, and we can’t afford to let it fall victim to either delay or defeat.”
$1.3 trillion spending bill includes earmark for Kennedy institute
WASHINGTON – Senate Democrats today released a $1.3 trillion spending bill that includes a host of earmark projects, including $8 million that would go toward the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate.
The so-called omnibus bill, clocking in a 1,924 pages, knits together multiple appropriations bills that have not passed this year. Top Republicans vowed today to block Democrats from passing the massive spending bill, but Democrats would only need a handful of Republicans to gain a filibuster-proof 60 votes. House Republicans have also said they would eliminate earmark requests next year when they take the majority, so this would be one of the last opportunities to approve any earmarks, which are provisions that are added to a bill to direct money to a specific project.
The Kennedy Institute earmark is just one of a long list that is included in the bill. It was submitted by Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat, and Senator John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat.
It would help fund an institute named for the late senator that is scheduled to open in Boston, next to the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library. The institute, which is also being funded through private donations, has so far received $38.3 million in funds through federal earmarks.
The omnibus bill also includes $450 million for a program that is developing a second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, despite objections from the Pentagon and a veto threat from the Obama administration. That funding, considered wasteful by the Obama administration, is supported by most of the Massachusetts congressional delegation because it would help preserve jobs at a General Electric plant in Lynn.
It also includes funding for the Navy to double an order of coastal combat ships -- from 10 ships to 20 -- that would dramatically expand the program and would bring 500 new jobs to a General Dynamics computer manufacturing plant in Pittsfield.
Senate Democrats are hoping to pass the bill by the end of the week, when the latest continuing resolution – which has kept federal spending going at last year’s levels – expires. The House passed a slightly less expensive spending bill last week.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Delahunt will be first of Mass. House delegation to support Obama's tax deal
WASHINGTON — US Representative William Delahunt, a Quincy Democrat, will support the tax compromise deal negotiated by President Obama and congressional Republicans, Delahunt said in an interview today.
He is the first member of the Massachusetts House delegation to embrace the deal, which would extend all the Bush-era income tax cuts for two years, renew a federal program to extend unemployment benefits for the longtime jobless, cut the payroll tax and establish or retain other tax cuts for businesses and individuals.
“I’m going to support it,” Delahunt said today. “We don’t have a choice, really.” The outgoing representative, who did not run for reelection this year, said that 2 million unemployed Americans would be financially devastated if their unemployment benefits were allowed to run out. “We can’t let that happen.”
The compromise, heavily criticized by liberals and some conservatives, cleared a key procedural vote in the Senate yesterday by an overwhelming 83-15 vote. The Bay State’s senators, Democrat John Kerry and Republican Scott Brown, voted in favor. Final Senate approval is expected as early as today, before the measure moves to the House.
Delahunt said he does not like extending tax breaks to wealthy Americans, but noted that the compromise extends the breaks for only two years. “I would encourage my colleagues to support it, with the understanding that in two years they have an opportunity to review what it has meant to the economy,” he said.
Other members of the delegation have received the compromise coolly. US representatives Stephen Lynch and James McGovern said yesterday that they intend to vote no on the package, absent major revisions.
House will introduce stand-alone bill to repeal 'don't ask, don't tell'
WASHINGTON — Opponents of the ban on openly gay soldiers in the US military are making one final push to repeal the policy during this lame-duck session of Congress.
The US House of Representatives today will introduce a stand-alone bill to repeal the 17-year-old “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. The bill will be identical to “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal legislation being pushed in the US Senate by senators Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut independent, and Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, among others.
The House bill will be introduced by US Representative Patrick Murphy, a Democrat of Pennsylvania and an Iraq war veteran, said Hoyer. The House has not yet scheduled a vote.
A proposed repeal of the policy contained within a large defense spending bill failed last week to clear a procedural hurdle in the Senate.
Romney criticizes Obama's tax compromise
WASHINGTON – Former Governor Mitt Romney this morning criticized the tax compromise that President Obama struck with congressional Republicans, saying his party’s legislative leaders were bargaining away too much.
“Given the unambiguous message that the American people sent to Washington in November, it is difficult to understand how our political leaders could have reached such a disappointing agreement,” Romney wrote in an op-ed in USA Today. “The new, more conservative Congress should reach a better solution.”
Romney joins a growing chorus of conservative criticism over the deal, which could become a major issue during the 2012 presidential race – both in the Republican primary, and in the general election. Former vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin and popular conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh have also criticized the plan.
The agreement would extend the tax cuts at all income levels for two years, though most Democrats, including the president, had wanted the cuts to extend only to families with incomes less than $250,000 a year.
Only five Senate Republicans voted nay yesterday in a key procedural vote. Senator John Thune, a Republican for South Dakota who is mulling a presidential run, was among those who voted for it.
Romney points out several aspects of the deal that he likes, including the reduction of payroll taxes, extending unemployment benefits, and keeping the current tax rates intact.
But he argues that the tax cuts should have been extended permanently for all brackets, saying such an approach would add more certainty to businesses making longer-term investment decisions.
Romney also criticized the package for adding to the deficit, although his approach – extending the tax cuts permanently – would add about $4 trillion to the deficit over 10 years.
“What some are calling a grand compromise is not grand at all, except in its price tag,” he added. “The total package will cost nearly $1 trillion, resulting in substantial new borrowing at a time when we are already drowning in red ink.”
“President Obama has reason to celebrate,” Romney added. “The deal delivers short-term economic stimulus, and it does so at the very time he wants it most, before the 2012 elections. But the long term health of our great engine of prosperity will remain very much in doubt.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Contractor extends bids for project that would bring jobs to Pittsfield defense plant
WASHINGTON -- The Navy said today that Lockheed Martin and shipbuilder Austal have agreed to extend a deadline for new bids on the next batch of Littoral Combat Ships, giving Sen. John F. Kerry more time to win Senate approval to expand construction of the new fleet of fast-attack boats to a second manufacturing team -- a move that could bring hundreds of new engineering jobs to a defense plant in Pittsfield.
"The extension provides time to process the LCS contract award if Congress provides authorization for the dual block buy," said Lt. Courtney L. Hillson, a Navy spokeswoman.
The vessels, called littoral combat ships, are designed for operations close to shore, including hunting submarines, sweeping for mines, and defeating terrorists and pirates in small boats.
The fleet is currently being built by a team led by Lockheed Martin, but the Navy -- with prodding by Kerry and others -- is pushing a last-minute proposal to award some of the work to a second team, which would likely benefit General Dynamics' Advanced Information Systems in Pittsfield.
Kerry has taken a leading role and hopes to get congressional approval before the congressional session ends at the end of the month.
The extension approved by Lockheed Martin and Austal will give them until the end of the month to pass the new plan, according to the Navy. "This extension does not allow the Navy to continue to work for the dual block buy authorization beyond Dec. 30, 2010," Hillson said.
Kerry will vote in favor of Obama's tax cut deal
Despite misgivings, US Senator John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, will vote today in favor of the tax and spending compromise negotiated by President Obama and congressional Republicans, Kerry said this afternoon in a statement.
The deal extends the Bush-era tax cuts for two years, though many Democrats have long opposed extending the lower rates on family income about $250,000 per year. Republicans insist that Congress shouldn't raise taxes on anyone in a weak economy.
“I oppose extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and have voted against them since day one, every time in between, and opposed them when I ran for president," said Kerry, who was the Democratic nominee for president in 2004. "But the unavoidable reality remains that week after week, vote after vote, Senate Republicans marched in lockstep to hold middle class tax cuts and unemployment insurance hostage to bonus tax cuts only for the wealthiest Americans."
The tax deal also provides for an extension of federal unemployment benefits for people who have exhausted their state benefits.
"I’m not going to stand by and see laid-off workers cut off from their lifeline or see working people take home less and less in their paychecks come January," said Kerry. "This isn’t the choice we should have to make, but it is the choice we do have to make, and governing is always about choices."
Brown will support Obama's tax deal with Republicans
WASHINGTON-- U.S. Senator Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, will support President Obama's tax deal with Republicans, which will come to the Senate floor for a critical procedure vote this afternoon, Brown said in a statement.
The full text of Brown's statement:
“I support the tax compromise because it will help get our economy back on track by allowing people to keep more of the money they earn. It is good for American families, for small businesses and for individuals in Massachusetts and across the country. Unemployment is still too high, and reports of ongoing job losses leave me very concerned. Creating a climate that is good for job growth remains my number one priority, and I will continue working with the administration and my colleagues on both sides of the aisle until there are more jobs for Americans.”
Kerry says START arms treaty is gaining bipartisan 'momentum'
WASHINGTON — Senator John Kerry claimed today there is a “growing bipartisan momentum” toward the ratification of the New START arms treaty with Russia, which Kerry has been pushing for months as head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
“Every single day there’s a new, respected, Republican voice urging the Senate to ratify New START, and every day that goes by without action is one more day without our inspectors on the ground in Russia,” said Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, in a statement. “We’re working across the aisle in good faith to ensure it happens before the end of the year, and we’ll keep pressing so the treaty can be fully debated on Senate floor in the coming days.”
Three Republican senators spoke out positively for the treaty today:
US Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both from Maine, issued statements supporting the treaty. And Arizona Republican John McCain said in a speech at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies that the Senate is “very close” to an agreement on START, according to a report by Politico.
An aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said today that Reid intends to bring the treaty to the floor for a ratification vote before the end of the year.
The office of US Senator Scott Brown, Republican from Massachusetts, said yesterday that Brown’s position on START is unchanged, and that Brown wants the Senate to deal with tax and spending issues before taking up other matters. The senator “continues to review START and is hopeful that before the vote on START happens, several flaws are worked out, including the modernization of our own existing weapons and assurances that it will not affect our missile defense,” according to a statement from Brown’s office.
Collins supports START; now both Maine senators stand behind arms treaty
WASHINGTON — Signs of momentum are growing behind the New START treaty with Russia, with another Republican senator pledging today to support the arms pact with Russia.
US Senator Susan Collins of Maine this morning announced her support for New START. Her Republican colleague from Maine, Senator Olympia Snowe, also announced support for the treaty this morning.
President Obama and US Senator John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts and chair of the Foreign Relations Committee, have been pushing to bring the treaty to a ratification vote before the end of the year.
In announcing her support for ratification, Collins said in a statement, “The New START represents a continued effort to achieve mutual and verifiable reductions in nuclear weapons. As the ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, I support the president’s commitment to reduce not only the number of strategic nuclear weapons through the New START treaty, but also to reduce, in the future, those weapons that are most vulnerable to theft and misuse – and those are tactical nuclear weapons."
Snowe announces suppport for New START nuclear arms treaty with Russia
WASHINGTON — US Senator Olympia J. Snowe, a Maine Republican, this morning announced her support for the New START nuclear arms treaty with Russia, a top priority of President Obama.
“I have worked with my colleagues to scrutinize this agreement and ensure any classified matters are properly vetted,” said Snowe in a statement. “Much has changed since the original START was first negotiated in 1991, and as a result I have supported efforts to make certain that questions regarding our ability to verify Russian compliance with the treaty’s limits, to develop and deploy effective missile defenses, and to modernize our nuclear weapons complex, have been satisfactorily resolved.
“I am confident that New START will provide predictability in our relationship with Russia and thus enhance global stability, and most importantly, our national security.”
The president has been pushing the Senate to take up ratification of the treaty before the end of the year, though time is running short and the Senate still has a full plate of spending and tax issues to sort out. Snowe pledged to support the treaty if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid brings it to the floor for a vote “under a framework that allows for sufficient debate and amendments.”
The treaty needs 67 votes in the Senate to be ratified.
Senate blocks vote on bill with 'don't ask, don't tell' repeal
WASHINGTON -- Senate Republicans this afternoon blocked legislation that would have repealed the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, likely dooming any chances of repealing the policy this year.
Democrats could not win a procedural vote on the issue, and it fell three votes shy of the 60 needed to advance, by a 57-to-40 vote. Senator Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, was among those who blocked the measure.
Brown was one of a handful of Republicans who had voiced support for repealing the 17-year-old policy, but he had also joined 41 other Republicans in saying he would filibuster any issue before a tax cut extension package and a budget proposal were addressed.
"Senator Brown has said we need to prevent the looming tax hike and fund the government before we move forward with other legislation," his press secretary, Colin Reed, said in a statement after this afternoon's vote. "He supports repealing don't ask, don't tell once those issues have been addressed."
The “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal was included in a much broader Senate bill that authorizes $726 billion in military spending next year. The defense authorization bill normally attracts broad bipartisan support and has passed every year for nearly a half-century. But this year partisan disagreements over the terms of the debate - as well as the inclusion of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal - have prompted Republicans to filibuster the measure.
“It’s disappointing, in a lot of different ways,” Senator John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, said in an interview after the vote. “I’m disappointed in it, but I’m not surprised because of the position the Republicans have taken on these legislative items.”
“It just continues unfairness, and just an institutionalized discrimination that’s unacceptable,” he added. “I think we’ll win it, I think we’ll get there. Like a number of things here, we’ve got to be patient and be willing to come back and fight another day. And we will.”
When asked whether it could be passed during the brief time left in the lame duck session, he said, “I think it’s going to be very, very difficult in the lame duck, given the fact that we’ve now got to do the taxes, we’ve got to do the spending, and we need to do START.”
These few weeks have been seen as advocates' best shot for a reversal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. If Congress doesn't take action, the measure would be much harder to pass next year, when Republicans take control of the House and Democrats have fewer votes in the Senate.
Senator Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, made a similar pledge as Brown -- to block the measure unless the tax package and budget were dealt with first -- but she still voted this afternoon to advance the "don't ask, don't tell" repeal.
She was the lone Republican to do so, but not before criticizing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for not doing more to accommodate Republican objections. She had requested last night that Reid hold off on a vote until the tax package had been completed, and she also wanted him to allow more time for debate.
"There was such a clear path for us to be able to get this done," she said this afternoon on the Senate floor. "I'm perplexed and frustrated that this important bill will become victim of politics."
Senator Joe Manchin, a West Virginia, was the only Democrat to vote with Republicans. Three senators – Blanche Lincoln, Democrat of Arkansas; John Cornyn, Republican of Texas; and Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas – did not vote.
Lincoln later said she did not arrive in the chamber in time, but would have voted yes.
“I have bent over backwards to find a way to get this bill done,” Reid said. “But it is clear that Republicans – led by a couple of Senators who simply do not want to have a vote on repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ – are doing everything they can to stand in the way.”
Mark Arsenault of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Neal loses bid for Ways and Means post
WASHINGTON – Representative Richard E. Neal this afternoon lost in his bid to become the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, failing to fend off a challenger and garner enough support among the full Democratic caucus.
Neal, a Springfield Democrat, had won a key endorsement last night, gaining support from the Steering and Policy Committee to become ranking member on the influential committee next year.
But his chief rival for the position – Representative Sandy Levin, a Michigan Democrat – successfully challenged that result before the full caucus.
Levin had been acting chairman of the committee since March, when Representative Charlie Rangel stopped aside amid ethics charges, and also had more seniority than Neal. But those close to Neal had been confident that, if everyone stuck by their pledges, he would win today’s caucus vote, which was cast by secret ballot.
"I congratulate my colleague Sandy Levin on his victory," Neal said this afternoon in a statement. "The election for ranking member of Ways and Means was a good reminder of how difficult it is to challenge the seniority system in Congress. But I look forward to continuing my work on the Committee, and working with the members of the Democtaic Caucus to regain the majority in 2012."
The Committee on Ways and Means has broad oversight of Social Security, Medicare, tariffs, and trade agreements. Every tax proposal that raises revenue begins in the committee. At a time when there is growing concern over the deficit and tax policies, the committee will be an extraordinarily active one. Under Republicans, the committee could also try to strip parts of President Obama’s signature health care legislation.
“I look forward to working with all of our Ranking Members and the new Republican committee chairmen to create jobs and reduce the deficit in a bipartisan way,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement announcing the vote.
As expected, the caucus also selected Representative Barney Frank, a Newton Democrat, to be ranking member of the Financial Services Committee.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
House Dems reject Obama's tax plan
WASHINGTON – The House Democratic caucus this morning voted to reject President Obama’s tax compromise, a stinging rebuke of the president that throws into question whether his plan will pass.
By a voice vote, Democrats passed a resolution saying that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi should not bring the negotiated package to the House floor, unless changes are made. The vote is nonbinding, but it demonstrates the growing rancor among House Democrats, and their desire to see key changes made to the package before they will vote on it.
“This is what’s called negotiations, and this is what many of us have been concerned about,” Representative Michael Capuano, a Somerville Democrat, said in an interview. “No one is trying to hurt or embarrass anybody. We’re just saying that we were independently elected and we have our own principles, and we don’t think many of those principles were met – or that a strong attempt was made at those principles.”
“It doesn’t assure victory,” he added, of the caucus vote. “But if I’m going down, I want to go down fighting. At least now I feel like I’d be going down fighting.”
The caucus did not vote on which changes should be made, but Democrats have been requesting several items, such as adding several billion dollars to extend renewable energy tax credits. Democrats have also opposed the proposed provision on the estate tax, contending that a rate of 35 percent is too low and the thresholds of protected assets — $5 million for individuals and $10 million for couples — are too high.
Several senators have also requested that credits for the ethanol industry be extended as part of the package.
The White House predicted that the package would ultimately pass.
“At the end of the day, this will get done,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said. He also said that there are elements of the plan that both parties don’t like – but will have to accept.
“If everybody took out what they didn’t like we would have nothing,” Gibbs said.
Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat and dean of the delegation, also voted today to reject the proposal.
“I have serious concerns about any package that continues tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires when they don't need them and we can't afford them,” he said in a statement. “I am also concerned that expiring tax credits for clean energy technologies are not being renewed, which could jeopardize tens of thousands of jobs in wind, solar and geothermal production.”
Markey also said he wanted to provide seniors with a one-time $250 Social Security payment.
“In its current form, I cannot support the proposal worked out with the Senate Republicans,” he said.
Representative Peter Welch, a Democrat from Vermont, has been circulating a letter saying that the plan is unwise. That letter has been signed by 53 House Democrats, including Representative Barney Frank, of Newton, and Representative Stephen Lynch, of South Boston.
If all 179 House Republicans vote in favor, they would still need 39 Democrats to vote in favor of the bill. That support would probably come from conservative Democrats who have not been as opposed to the package, but if Pelosi doesn’t even bring it to the floor for a vote, it would effectively kill the current plan.
The Senate, meanwhile, appeared to be moving toward debate on the issue. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid may bring the issue to the floor as early as today, which would set up votes on the matter for Saturday.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Neal wins key vote for Ways and Means post
WASHINGTON -- Representative Richard E. Neal tonight won a key endorsement to become the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, bucking the seniority system and paving the way for him to take one of the top leadership posts on Capitol Hill.
Neal, a Springfield Democrat, was endorsed by the Steering and Policy Committee tonight to become the ranking member of the committee next year. He won narrowly -- by a single vote, 23-to-22 -- to defeat Representative Sander Levin, a Michigan Democrat who has more seniority.
"Obviously I'm very pleased," Neal said in a brief interview. "I'm delighted."
Levin had been acting chairman of the committee since March, when Representative Charlie Rangel stopped aside amid ethics charges. In addition, five Democrats on the committee had more seniority than Neal, so his nomination was rare and significant.
He still has to be confirmed by the full Democratic caucus tomorrow, but those close to Neal have been confident that, if everyone sticks by their pledges, he would win the full vote. It is unclear whether Levin will challenge the committee's recommendation tomorrow in the full caucus.
If the full caucus confirms Neal, he would become the Democratic point man on one of the most pivotal committees in Congress -- and one that will likely see a lot of movement under a Republican House majority.
The Committee on Ways and Means has broad oversight of Social Security, Medicare, tariffs, and trade agreements. Every tax proposal that raises revenue begins in the committee. At a time when there is growing concern over the deficit and tax policies, the committee will be an extraordinarily active one. Under Republicans, the committee could also try to strip parts of President Obama’s signature health care legislation.
Neal, as ranking member, would be the chief Democrat attempting to challenge Republicans on those issues. He would also bring further clout to a delegation that has long had members in positions of power.
Neal for more than a year had been quietly preparing to make a run for the committee chairmanship. But since Republicans won the majority, he would instead be the ranking member of the committee. Still, the post of ranking member gives Neal a high-profile role, and he would also be positioned to seize the gavel, should Democrats win back the House majority.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Senate approves health care bill fix sought by Children's Hosptial Boston
WASHINGTON – The Senate tonight voted to fix an error in the federal health care law that could have cost Children’s Hospital Boston and others like it millions of dollars in added drug costs to treat children with rare diseases.
The change, which had already passed the House, was included as part of a broader bill that extended through next year a Medicare physician payment formula. The legislation ensures that Medicare and Tricare – the health program for military service members and retirees – would continue paying physicians at current levels.
But the legislation also made a much sought-after change benefiting children’s hospitals that had been pursued by both Massachusetts senators, which the Globe reported about two weeks ago.
Senator Scott Brown, the Massachusetts Republican, had filed a stand-alone bill to fix the error, while Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, had helped persuade top members in his party to make the change through an amendment to a bill addressing broader tax policies.
Making the change had proved controversial, though, because it involved President Obama’s landmark health care legislation. Republicans have been fighting to repeal the health care bill rather than fix it, and Democrats have been loath to acknowledge its flaws.
The change involved correcting an unintentional drafting error that was made in the final, frenetic days of drafting the controversial health care legislation. Congressional staff intended to allow children's hospitals continued access to the portion of a federal program that offers below-market prices on 347 specific medicines for rare, life-threatening conditions. But that language was accidentally altered, cutting the children’s hospitals out of that part of the program.
If the efforts to change the language had failed, Children’s Hospital Boston officials had said they would have been forced to find new ways to fund the drugs for poor children with rare diseases, such as neurological disorders and severe juvenile arthritis.
The Boston hospital, one of nearly 30 across the country with this problem, estimated that the mistake would have cost between $1.5 million and $3 million annually. Nationally, the problem would have cost children's hospitals about $100 million annually.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry backs Obama on tax deal
WASHINGTON – Senator John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, defended President Obama tonight from some of the intra-party fighting over the tentative agreement the president made with Republicans over extending the Bush-era tax cuts.
Kerry, who has been a top White House ally in that past, said that he did not agree with certain portions of the plan, but that it was a pragmatic realization of what is currently politically doable.
“It's a lot easier to deal in hypotheticals than it is to deal with the Senate as it is,” Kerry said. “We don't have 60 Senators who oppose the Bush tax policies the way I do, and the way Barack Obama and Joe Biden do, so how do you wrestle with that? Are you willing to say no to unemployment insurance if this is the only way to get it?”
“The truth is, the President got a lot of things here we've been fighting for that we haven't yet been able to win any other way,” Kerry added.
Kerry’s statement was distributed by the White House tonight as part of a daylong series of endorsements from various politicians, from Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle, a Democrat, to Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett, a Republican.
Senator Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, has so far not taken a firm position. His spokeswoman, Gail Gitcho, said yesterday that "He will review the compromise, and while the proposal may not be ideal, he wants to make sure that it is good for American families and a victory for taxpayers." Gitcho said tonight that his position had not changed.
Here is Kerry’s complete statement:
"It's no secret that I've opposed the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. I voted against them in 2001, 2003 and 2005, and I said I'd roll them back in 2004 if I was elected president. I take a backseat to no one when it comes to opposing George Bush's tax policy. They didn't create jobs and they dug an enormous deficit hole that was dumped on President Obama. President Obama knows that. He opposed the Bush policy every step of the way and as a Senator, Joe Biden was right here with me fighting against them.But don't forget for a second that when it came down to the votes in the Senate, the President was dealt a very tough hand. All 42 Senate Republicans voted in lockstep to hold the middle class tax cuts and unemployment insurance hostage, and our Democratic caucus wasn't unified.
The votes on Saturday were just the latest reminder when we lost a bunch of Democrats, and the math is clear our bargaining position was going to be even harder come January with all these new Republican Senators. So I think the President had a hard decision to make. He obviously decided that the best possible compromise was to get unemployment benefits, middle class tax cuts, and the Recovery Act provisions extended in exchange for these upper income tax extensions that he opposes, and he decided that in two years the fight over tax breaks for the wealthy will be rejoined.
This wasn't an easy call for him. It's a lot easier to deal in hypotheticals than it is to deal with the Senate as it is. We don't have 60 Senators who oppose the Bush tax policies the way I do, and the way Barack Obama and Joe Biden do, so how do you wrestle with that? Are you willing to say no to unemployment insurance if this is the only way to get it? That's what our caucus wrestled with today. Yes, it's a very steep price to pay for something the Senate should've done months ago as a matter of decency and common sense, but how do you cut off 52,000 people in Massachusetts who need those unemployment benefits? Are you really willing to walk away from these middle class benefits which we can't get otherwise when you know the tax cuts for the upper end are going to be extended come January anyways? The truth is, the President got a lot of things here we've been fighting for that we haven't yet been able to win any other way."
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Mass. delegation in House so far not embracing Obama's tax plan
WASHINGTON – The Massachusetts House delegation can normally be counted on by the White House to support President Obama’s priorities.
Not this time -- at least so far.
No one in the 10-member, all-Democratic delegation has embraced the compromise plan that Obama struck with Republicans, and some are outright opposed.
“I strongly disagree,” Representative Barney Frank, a Newton Democrat, said this morning. He said he would vote against the deal, although he also said it likely had enough votes to pass. “You have overwhelming Republican support and enough Democrats to do it,” he said.
Representative James McGovern, a Worcester Democrat, has called the compromise “a lousy deal” and said he would vote against it. “This deal is just not something I believe in,” he said.
Representative Stephen Lynch, a South Boston Democrat, signed onto a letter protesting the compromise.
“I don’t believe that caving in to the Republican position is in the best interest of the American people right now,” Lynch said last night in a statement. He said he is “inclined to vote against” the package.
“I’m not convinced,” said Representative Richard Neal, a Springfield Democrat and top member of the House Ways and Means Committee. “We’re paying a price for pushing the issue past the election.” He said he hadn't made a firm decision on how to vote but said, "Count me as a skeptic."
Representative Michael Capuano, a Somerville Democrat, said his office has received 500 phone calls on the deal, with about 5-to-1 voicing opposition to it.
He said he was still undecided, and did not want to cast a symbolic vote against the package if it were clear that it was going to pass.
“I’m not Don Quixote,” he said. “If I think that there is a critical mass of Democrats to do the right thing, I might vote no, but I haven’t settled on it yet…But I’ve made no bones about it: I don’t like the deal.”
But he also had harsh words for Obama, saying he proved to be an ineffective negotiator with Republicans.
“I’ve negotiated with people who are a lot tougher than [Senate Minority Leader] Mitch McConnell, I understand negotiations,” Capuano said, referencing his time as mayor of Somerville. “I don’t mean to be a jerk, but I don’t need a lecture from the President of the United States on how to do negotiations.”
“I do know one thing: you never get anything unless you fight,” he added. “And my analogy has been, I’m not going to bring President Obama with me to buy my next car. I’ll end up paying more, and it won’t have a radio in it.”
“Losing is one thing,” he said. “Losing without a fight is not a smart move.”
Several other members in the delegation have been critical of the plan, but have not yet hinted how they would vote.
Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat, said in a statement last night that he has “serious concerns about extending the Bush tax cuts for millionaires for two more years,” but did not say whether he would vote against the plan.
Representative John Tierney, a Salem Democrat, said he was still reviewing the plan, but he criticized several aspects of it.
"I share a general disappointment of many that the President did not refute untenable economic claims earlier and engage earlier with the public in order to gain the necessary support to avoid this poor choice," he said in a statement last night.
Representative Niki Tsongas, a Lowell Democrat, has remained noncommittal, saying through a spokesman that she “is still considering the compromise package at this time.” Representative John Olver, an Amherst Democrat, said through a spokeswoman that there are both good and bad components of the compromise but that he had not yet developed a firm position.
Representative Bill Delahunt, a Democrat from Quincy, is also continuing to review the plan and has not come out for or against it, according to a spokesman.
The two senators from Massachusetts seemed more open to voting in favor of the compromise.
Senator John F. Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat and a potential key vote, left open the possibility of supporting the measure. “We have a huge amount here that will go to working people, that goes to average Americans,’’ Kerry said yesterday after emerging from the Democratic meeting, noting a reduction in certain payroll taxes. “The middle class is going to get tax cuts that we never contemplated that we could get.’’
Senator Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, was noncommittal. “He will review the compromise, and while the proposal may not be ideal, he wants to make sure that it is good for American families and a victory for taxpayers,’’ said Gail Gitcho, the spokeswoman for the Massachusetts Republican.
Mark Arsenault of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown supports repeal of 'don't ask, don't tell'
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this afternoon announced that he would support repealing the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, providing key support for those who want the military to begin allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military.
The Massachusetts Republican, following two days of hearings before the Senate Armed Services Committee, said that he felt comfortable that top military brass would implement a new policy in a way that did not hinder the ongoing wartime efforts.
“I accept the findings of the report and support repeal based on [Secretary of Defense Robert Gates’] recommendations that repeal will be implemented only when the battle effectiveness of the forces is assured and proper preparations have been completed,” Brown said in a statement.
“I have visited our injured troops at Walter Reed and have attended funerals of our fallen heroes,” he added. “When a soldier answers the call to serve, and risks life or limb, it has never mattered to me whether they are gay or straight. My only concern has been whether their service and sacrifice is with pride and honor.”
Brown, who is a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, could be a significant supporter for those who want to repeal the policy during the lame duck session. His aides made clear, though, that Brown would not support addressing a repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” until the Senate first dealt with taxes and a federal budget.
Brown had previously not announced a position on the repeal, saying in May that he wanted to wait on a Pentagon study of how such a repeal would be implemented. That study came out this week, and found that ending the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy would not harm long-term military effectiveness.
The House has passed a bill overturning the policy, but a Republican-led threat of a filibuster halted a similar effort in the Senate in the fall. Democrats are planning to call for a vote on the issue over the next few weeks.
During today’s hearings, where the top uniformed Army and Marines generals testified, Brown offered few hints on whether he would support the repeal. He said both that “there are very real concerns” about implementing social change during two wars, but also said it would “potentially be detrimental” if the courts forced more immediate changes.
At the time, he did not say definitively whether or not he would support the repeal, and would not answer questions from a reporter after he left.
During the hearing, one concern Brown seemed to have was on the implementation of a repeal, and he wanted assurances that top military officials would be able to phase it in first with troops who are not on front battlelines.
“The only issue that’s the important issue in my mind right now, while we’re fighting two wars, is the safety and security of our men and women who are serving,” he said. “Regardless of their sexual orientation, I want to make sure we give them the tools and resources to do their job and come home safely.”
“To implement social change in the middle of two battles…there are very real concerns,” he added.
He also laid out a scenario in which the troops located in the United States would be the first to undergo changes.
“And with the battle units, we’re going to leave them as is,” Brown said. “They have just too much on their plates, we’re going to leave them as is. But when they come home, we’re going to implement them, and get the training, give them the education, we’re going to work it through and we’re going to cycle it in.”
One other concern that Brown and others have is that, if Congress didn’t make changes, ongoing court cases could force something more immediate.
A group called the Log Cabin Republicans has also been challenging the issue in court, arguing that the policy is unconstitutional and violates First Amendment rights. A federal judge ruled in their favor in September, but the government is appealing the decision. A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled last month that the policy had to stay in place during the appeal process.
“I think it would potentially be detrimental to just all of the sudden, if the courts in fact do something like that, to just go overnight,” Brown said. “I think it would be exceedingly disruptive to the force. I’m basing that on everything I’ve learned, forgetting my personal opinion, but everything that you, with your 100-plus years, of testimony have indicated.”
While Brown’s support could prove crucial in the coming days, there could also be debate over how to implement a new policy.
During their testimony today, some of the top generals told the panel that repealing the policy could be divisive and difficult during wartime.
"I would not recommend going forward at this time, given everything that the Army has on its plate," Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey told the committee.
Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos also warned that, while a repeal will likely come eventually, the military should be given time to prepare.
"My suspicions are that the law will be repealed," Amos said. "And all I'm asking is the opportunity to do that at a time and choosing when my Marines are not singularly tightly focused on what they're doing in a very deadly environment."
He added that "assimilating openly homosexual Marines into the tightly woven fabric of our combat units has strong potential for disruption at the small unit level, as it will no doubt divert leadership attention away from an almost singular focus of preparing units for combat."
Those arguments could play into the case put forward by Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican, and other Republicans who are trying to block the repeal
Read Brown's complete statement below:
“I have been in the military for 31 years and counting, and have served as a subordinate and as an officer. As a legislator, I have spent a significant amount of time on military issues. During my time of service, I have visited our injured troops at Walter Reed and have attended funerals of our fallen heroes. When a soldier answers the call to serve, and risks life or limb, it has never mattered to me whether they are gay or straight. My only concern has been whether their service and sacrifice is with pride and honor.
“I pledged to keep an open mind about the present policy on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. Having reviewed the Pentagon report, having spoken to active and retired military service members, and having discussed the matter privately with Defense Secretary Gates and others, I accept the findings of the report and support repeal based on the Secretary’s recommendations that repeal will be implemented only when the battle effectiveness of the forces is assured and proper preparations have been completed.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Romney urges Congress to hold off on vote to ratify New START treaty
For Mitt Romney, it's a non-starter.
The candidate for president in 2008 and possible candidate for 2012 is calling on Congress to hold off on a vote to ratify the New START pact signed by Russia and the United States to reduce their countries' nuclear stockpiles and to verify compliance.
"A treaty so critical to our national security deserves a careful, deliberative look by the men and women America has just elected,'' Romney said in an oped article in today's Boston Globe, referring to the half-dozen Republicans taking Democratic seats next month in the Senate. "The president is in a hurry for the same reason he has been in a hurry before: he knows that if his vaunted treaty is given a thorough review by the Senate, it will likely be rejected. And well it should be."
President Obama, Democratic Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, and his Republican counterpart on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Richard Lugar of Indiana, are pressing Republican senators to ratify the treaty during the last three weeks of the lame-duck session. Backers of the arms pact fear that the influx of Republican senators next month would stymie efforts to reach 67 votes for ratification.
Romney is counting on such a scenario. And he lists several reasons why he thinks the United States would be safer without the treaty, including the arguments that the United States would have to make steeper cuts in launchers and nuclear weapons than Russia would and that the treaty would also limit the conventional capability of US launchers.
He also contends the treaty is misguided because it does not address the vast superiority of Russian tactical nuclear forces. Arms control experts have said such tactical weapons, which are generally smaller and designed to target enemy troops in battlefield situations, have not traditionally been part of treaties dealing with strategic weapons, which are larger and target population and industrial centers.
He also insists the treaty would limit the United States' ability to install a missile defense program, a vital option given the emerging threat of Iran's nascent long-range ballistic program. Supporters of the treaty say no such limits are part of the treaty. The only language on missile defense is in the nonbinding preamble of the treaty, but opponents say the intent is ambiguous and contend the Russians believe such a limit would be binding.
That's a misreading of the treaty, says Daryl Kimball, executive director of Arms Control Association, a think tank that supports ratification. "Romney complains that New START's preambular language recognizes the interrelationship between strategic offensive arms and strategic defensive arms. This is neither new (similar language was in earlier US-Russian agreements) and most importantly, it did not lead to any numerical or qualitative limits on missile defenses in New START."
Kimball insists the treaty allows the United States to better counter the medium-range missile threats from Iran or North Korea.
Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, has written previous columns against the treaty in the Washington Post and the National Review.
President Obama's effort to corral enough votes to ratify the treaty this month has been gaining momentum. Republican senators Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker, both of Tennessee, and John McCain of Arizona have hinted they would be open to debating and voting on the treaty if Congress first passes extension of the Bush-era tax cuts, which are due to expire on Jan. 1.
The key obstacle against ratification has been a demand by Republicans, particularly Jon Kyl of Arizona, for more money and a stronger commitment to rebuild and modernize the United States' existing nuclear force.
Read a full response from Daryl Kimball, executive director of Arms Control Association, as follows:
FULL ENTRYBrown co-sponsors legislation targeting WikiLeaks
Senator Scott Brown, Senator John Ensign of Nevada and Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut have submitted legislation that would prohibit publishing names of informants to the US military and intelligence community. Known as the SHIELD Act, the senators believe it would allow the government to pursue and press charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
“The reckless behavior of WikiLeaks has compromised our national security and threatens the safety of our troops overseas, and this bipartisan legislation gives the Department of Justice a tool to prevent something like this from happening again,” said Brown in a statement. “While I strongly support government transparency, certain information must be kept classified in order to protect innocent American lives during this time of war and global terrorism.”
The bill comes just days after WikiLeaks' most recent release: over 250,000 classified US diplomatic cables.
Brown queries military brass on ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown today gave some of his most detailed comments on the military's current policy that prohibits gays and lesbians from serving openly, drawing on his own personal experiences since becoming a senator.
Brown, during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearings on the issue, recounted both attending services for fallen soldiers and visiting a soldier at Walter Reed Army Medical Center who had lost both legs, one arm, and part of another arm.
“I've been to many funerals, unfortunately, in my home state, for those soldiers,” said Brown, a Massachusetts Republican. “And one thing I never asked was: Are they -- are they gay or straight? It never even crossed my mind, to be honest with you. I just wanted to know if they -- if they gave their limb or their life, you know, with pride and with honor for our country.”
“So that being said, you know, this is very uncomfortable, this whole, you know, situation,” he added, apparently recognizing that some are uncomfortable talking about the issue. “But I know for a fact that there are good people on both sides of these issues. I see it each and every day, whether they're straight or gay.”
His spokeswoman, Gail Gitcho, declined to say whether Brown was now leaning toward a repeal of the policy, saying only that he would release a statement tomorrow after a second day of hearings.
The hearings are being held following a Pentagon report released earlier this week that said ending the ban on gays serving openly in the armed services would not harm long-term military effectiveness.
That call has shifted the focus to moderate members of the Senate, including Brown, who had said they wanted to read the report before voting on whether to end the policy. The House has passed a bill overturning the policy, but a Republican-led threat of a filibuster halted a similar effort in the Senate in the fall. Democrats are planning to call for a vote on the issue over the next few weeks.
Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican, spoke out strongly this morning against repealing the policy, saying the military’s study was flawed and letting openly gay service members would be dangerous during war.
"At this time, we should be inherently cautious about making any changes that would affect our military, and what changes we do make should be the product of careful and deliberate consideration," McCain said.
He was challenged by Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
"Repeal of the law will not prove unacceptable risk to military readiness," Mullen said. "Unit cohesion will not suffer if our units are well-led. And families will not encourage their loved ones to leave the service in droves."
"War does not stifle change; it demands it," he added. "It does not make it harder; it facilitates it."
The study, conducted over nine months, found that 70 percent of troops surveyed believed that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military would have mixed, positive, or no impact. The other 30 percent thought there would be negative consequences, with opposition strongest among combat troops.
The survey was based on responses from about 115,000 troops and 44,300 military spouses.
Brown today criticized the report’s authors for not directly asking service members whether they support repealing the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.
“You asked virtually everything else, but it almost -- like you're right there,” he said. “You never kind of went right for the jugular.”
He then referenced his own military experience – he’s currently a lieutenant colonel in the Massachusetts National Guard – and said, “I find sometimes in the military we kind of beat around the bush too much. We don't go and ask the real question. So I think we missed a good opportunity.”
During the hearing, Brown also questioned whether the response rate in the survey was enough to draw firm conclusions.
“The 28 percent overall response rate is well within the normal historical range of surveys of military personnel,” said Army General Carter Ham, a cochair of the report.
Brown later questioned Gates about implementing a repeal, and how quickly it would occur.
“A lot of concerns that I personally have as someone who is still serving in the military – and others that have confided in me privately – is that they want to make sure that the battle readiness and military effectiveness of our troops, of our men and women serving, is not affected,” Brown said.
“My personal approach to this would be that until all the training has been completed -- until the service chiefs are comfortable that the risks to unit cohesion and to combat effectiveness of a change had been addressed to their satisfaction, and to my satisfaction -- I would not sign the certification,” Gates said.
At one point, Brown also questioned Pentagon general counsel Jeh Johnson, a co-chair of the report, on whether he could be objective, given that he’s a presidential appointee and President Obama wants to repeal the policy.
“So if [President Obama] in fact says, hey, I want to do away with this policy, do you in fact -- are you zealously representing him in those actions to do that?” Brown said. “Because I know there was a line of questioning from a couple of senators saying, you know, I don't feel that you were zealous enough in actually defending the position of the -- of the present law right now. Do you have any comment on that?”
“Well, at the outset of this assignment, the secretary made it very clear to both of us that he was very concerned that before we move forward we have this comprehensive assessment to know what the views of the force were to systematically engage the force,” Johnson said in response. “That's in our terms of reference.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Early poll shows Brown leading potential opponents
WASHINGTON – A new poll shows that Senator Scott Brown is in a good position heading into his 2012 reelection, leading five potential opponents by at least 7 percentage points.
In hypothetical head-to-head matchups, the Massachusetts Republican leads against Vicki Kennedy, 48-to-41, and Governor Deval Patrick, 49-to-42, according to a poll conducted earlier this week by Public Policy Polling.
Brown also leads Representative Edward J. Markey by 10 points (49-to-39); Representative Michael Capuano by 16 points (52-to-36); and Representative Stephen Lynch by 19 points (49-to-30).
No Democrat has announced their intentions to run against Brown, however, and much can change in the next two years before the election.
Nonetheless, the poll found that Brown’s popularity in Massachusetts has remained strong. Fifty-three percent of those surveyed said they approved of his job performance, while 29 percent disapproved. His rating was particularly high among the independent voters who could decide an election, with 61 percent approving of his job performance.
The Raleigh, N.C.-based polling firm surveyed 500 Bay State voters between Nov. 29 and Dec. 1. The survey has a margin of error of 4.4 percentage points.
Two more commission members to back deficit commission report
WASHINGTON – Providing additional momentum to a deficit commission report, two Republican senators said this morning that they would support the plan when the 18-member commission votes tomorrow.
Senators Tom Coburn, of Oklahoma, and Mike Crapo, of Idaho -- two of the Senate's most conservative members -- said they did not agree with all aspects of the report but that Congress had to rapidly send a message that it is serious about slicing the ballooning deficit.
“We’re at a day of reckoning,” Coburn said. “The time for action is now. The threat is real. It’s urgent. We cannot wait…. We are really at war. We’re on three fronts: Iraq, Afghanistan, and the financial tsunami that is facing us.”
The commission report recommends prescription of spending cuts, tax increases, and massive changes in the tax code.
The plan, developed by the commission’s co-chairmen, will go to the full panel for a vote tomorrow. Fourteen of the 18 members would need to endorse the report in order to send it to the Senate.
Support from Coburn and Crapo means that nine members have announced their support. Another commission member, Representative John Spratt, Democrat of South Carolina, said he is likely to support the plan.
Two commissioners have said they will vote against it, while six have not announced their votes. Four of those six would need to back the report for it to force a vote in the Senate, a tally that is still seen as a high hurdle. If it does muster the 14 votes, Coburn said, it would likely be voted on by the Senate early next year, rather than during the lame duck session of Congress.
The plan comes amid a flurry of activity involving taxes and spending in Congress.
House Democrats are preparing today to vote on extending tax cuts, but only for those making $250,000 or less. Republicans are staunchly opposed to that approach, saying that the cuts should be extended for all.
“What’s going on today is just political theater,” Representative Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, told reporters this morning at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. “They still run the place, they’re trying to give their members something that they want and put Republicans in a box. It’s all for show, it’s not going to go anywhere.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Republicans to shut down House select committee on climate and energy
The House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, which has been chaired by Representative Edward Markey of Malden, is being abolished by incoming Republican leadership.
“I am disappointed that the Republican leadership is not prioritizing energy independence and climate change as important issues to tackle, but that will not stop my efforts to cut carbon pollution and create American clean energy jobs,” said Markey in a statement to the Globe.
Since taking control of the House in the midterm elections on Nov. 2, Republicans have vowed to curb government spending and reduce taxes. Some Republicans contend the committee was tinged by politics and served solely as a launching point for such Democratic proposals as the cap-and-trade program, what they dubbed a national energy tax.
“We have pledged to save taxpayers’ money by reducing waste and duplication in Congress,” said Michael Steel, a spokesman for incoming House speaker Representative John Boehner, according to Bloomberg News.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi created the committee as one of her first acts in office in 2007.
Read Markey’s statement at today’s final hearing here.
Brown gives feisty speech, attempts compromise on unemployment extension
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown tonight delivered a feisty floor speech, imploring his colleagues to put greater emphasis on the economy and chiding Democrats for what he considers to be unwarranted diversions.
“We spent seven days on food safety!” the Massachusetts Republican said, referring to a bill approved earlier in the day. “Listen, I love to eat like the next guy, but give me a break! We should have spent seven days working on the one thing that the people in November sent a very powerful message -- and that is getting our economy moving again. Focusing on jobs, jobs, jobs.”
Brown delivered the speech as he attempted a compromise on extending unemployment benefits that expire tomorrow. His compromise involved using unobligated federal funds to pay for the cost of extending the benefits – a proposal that was included yesterday in an unrelated bill that failed despite support from 21 Democrats.
But Democrats largely argue that the unemployment benefits are so dire that they should be extended without offsetting the cost. Republicans say they should only be extended if they don’t add to the deficit.
“I have complete and total sympathy and understanding, and I want to help,” Brown said of those whose unemployment benefits could expire. “More than anybody here, I want to help. But to just keep throwing money that’s not paid for at a problem…makes no sense to me.”
“Are we going to do it from the bank account, or are we going to put it on the credit card?" he added. "I know what I want to do. I’ll use the bank account. Let’s use money that’s already in the system and put it to good use immediately, by 12 o’clock tonight. Let’s do it!”
Under Senate rules, Brown’s proposal would have needed unanimous approval, but it failed because one senator – Jack Reed, a Democrat from Rhode Island – objected. Brown also cast the lone objection to Reed's motion to extend unemployment benefits without offsetting the cost.
“My colleague from Massachusetts has made a rather vigorous and passionate statement,” Reed said. “What I sense, though, is that he’s quite willing to put $700 billion of tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans on the credit card, but not extend unemployment benefits -- as we have done decade after decade -- without offsets.”
Brown supports extending tax cuts for everyone – and without including a method of payment for them – while Democrats want the tax cuts to continue only for those who make less than $250,000. Those tax cuts, approved under the Bush administration, are set to expire at the end of the year.
A Democratic proposal to extend the unemployment benefits failed tonight under Republican opposition. Democrats vowed to keep bringing the proposal up, and would make it retroactive to cover those whose unemployment checks run out.
“Small businesses and economists believe that extending unemployment insurance is smart policy that will help boost our economy,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said tonight in a statement. “The money gets spent, generating economic activity and helping create jobs. But that appears to be lost on my Republican colleagues, who would rather focus on passing massive tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans at the expense of everything else.”
Brown's speech was meandering at times, and included mentions that he eats "regularly" in Federal Hill section of Providence, and that "it's a good year to die" because there is no federal estate tax this year, due to a quirk in the law.
"I need to take a breath here," he said at one point. "I'm sorry."
Toward the end, he said more should be done on job creation, and said he was willing to stay in Washington.
“Hey, you want to stay here through the holidays and everything?” he said. “Hey, I’m here. Whatever. My kids are grown up, they do their own thing anyway. Do I want to stay here? Sure, I will stay here. Madam president, we’ll go out, we can celebrate Christmas here. Whatever. But we have so many things we need to do.”
The "madam president" was a reference to Senator Kay Hagan, a Democrat from North Carolina, who was controlling debate at the time.
Multiple times, he referenced the food safety bill that attempts to strengthen safety laws, as well as making it easier to find the source of food contamination outbreak. Brown supported the law, but said it was the wrong thing to focus on during a down economy.
"We do food safety? Are you kidding me?" he said. "People deserve better.”
“What’s next?” Brown continued. “Let me see. Hum. Just pick something. I’ll bet you, I’ll bet you -- I know betting is illegal around here -- but I bet you we won’t do anything that has to do with the economy. I bettcha.”
Watch Brown's remarks here, at 1:19.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown opts not to join GOP legal challenge on health care
WASHINGTON – Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell last week joined 20 attorneys general in a court case that is challenging the constitutionality of President Obama’s health care law.
McConnell convinced 31 other Republican senators to join him in fighting the new law, but Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts was not among them.
Brown’s spokeswoman, Gail Gitcho, reiterated that the Massachusetts Republican opposes the new health care law but would not say specifically why he did not sign onto a lawsuit challenging its constitutionality.
"Senator Brown remains opposed to Obamacare,” she said in a statement. “He is doing what he can to fix some of the worst parts of the law.”
The brief, filed in US District Court in Florida, takes aim at the law’s individual mandate, a controversial portion that would require citizens to obtain health care. The GOP senators argue that the federal government doesn’t have the authority to force citizens to purchase a product.
The suit is being led by Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum, and he has been joined by attorneys general from 19 other states, none of which are from New England states. Massachusetts already has a health care plan that includes an individual mandate; Brown supported that plan as a state senator, but has argued that states should be leading the charge on health care reform, not the federal government.
Earlier this month, McConnell began asking other senators to join him in filing an amicus brief in the Florida case. The vast majority of the Republican caucus – 31 of the 40 other senators – joined the case, including two New England moderates, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both Republicans from Maine.
Nine others did not. Those who, like Brown, did not sign on include senators Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska; Richard Lugar, of Indiana; Lindsay Graham, of South Carolina; Lamar Alexander, of Tennessee; Jeff Sessions, of Alabama; and Chuck Grassley, of Iowa. Three outgoing senators – Judd Gregg, of New Hampshire; Bob Bennett, of Utah; and George Voinovich, of Ohio – also did not join the suit.
The new health care law is expected to continue as a point of controversy as Republicans attempt to repeal it, either through lawsuits or through legislation.
Although Brown has said his goal is to kill the law, he has not joined several efforts to repeal it. In addition to not signing onto McConnell’s court filing, he also was not among the 22 Republicans who signed onto repeal legislation in March that was sponsored by Senator Jim DeMint, of South Carolina.
Instead, Brown has been attempting to make targeted changes to the health care overhaul.
Gitcho noted several things Brown wants changed in the health care law, including repealing a tax on medical devices, eliminating a so-called 1099 reporting requirement, and allowing children’s hospitals to continue purchasing certain medications at a discount.
Brown last week also filed legislation with Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, that would allow states to more quickly opt out of certain portions of the health care law as long as they met certain standards.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown files bill to keep shareholders of companies that do business with Iran out of US
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
UPDATED, 7:23 p.m. -- Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown has filed a bill that would keep executives and controlling shareholders of companies that do business with Iran out of the United States.
Dubbed the "No Entry for Supporters of the Iranian Regime Act of 2010," the bill would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny visas for foreigners who violate US sanctions on Iran, including the executives of foreign companies that have invested more than $20 million in Iran's oil or gas sector.
Brown's bill, which he quietly filed in September, would enable the Secretary of State to send letters to CEOs warning them that their access to the United States could be cut off if they continue their activities in Iran.
But some sanctions experts say the bill could cause outrage in Europe and Asia, like the Helms-Burton Act of 1996. That law, which applied to companies operating in Cuba, prompted bitter complaints from Mexican and Canadian officials. The European Union requested a World Trade Organization hearing about it.
"It's Helms-Burton revisited," said Robert Clifton Burns, a sanctions expert at Bryan Cave LLP, who said he did not expect the bill to pass. "Does it really accomplish anything to keep these executives out?" Burns asked."What are they going to say: I'm not going to make a $30 billion investment in Iran so that I can go to Disney world?"
But a statement posted to Brown's Web site lauded the bill as "another tool as we work to prevent the Iranian regime from crossing the nuclear threshold."
See Obama's to-do list for Congress before Republican majority arrives in House
WASHINGTON — President Obama has a long to-do list and high expectations for this lame-duck session of Congress, before Democrats must yield control of the US House of Representatives to a newly elected Republican majority.
The president’s to-do list begins with tax issues, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said in a briefing with reporters today. The most pressing tax issue is the Bush-era income tax cut that expires at the end of the year. The president wants to allow the cuts to expire on family income over $250,000 and extend it for income below that amount; Republicans want Congress to extend the cuts to all income.
Other priorities the president wants to see Congress address include:
* Renewal of a program to extend unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless.* Ratification of the New START nuclear arms treaty with Russia, which is “critically important to our national security,” Gibbs said.
* Ending the “don’t ask-don’t tell” policy that forbids openly gay people from serving in the US military.
* And the so-called Dream Act, which would provide a path to citizenship for certain young illegal aliens who go to college or serve in the military.
Frank accuses Republican lawmakers of joining 'broad attack by foreign central banks' on US economic policy
Representative Barney Frank issued a scathing statement today accusing Republican lawmakers of joining foreign leaders in "a broad attack" on the US Federal Reserve's plan to buy $600 billion in bonds in an effort to jumpstart the economy.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, incoming House Speaker John Boehner, Senator John Kyl and Representative Eric Cantor sent a letter last week to Fed chief Ben Bernanke expressing concerns that the infusion of cash would cause inflation and possibly generate an asset bubble that could do more damage to the economy.
Frank, chair of the House Financial Services Committee, said in his statement today that “Debating American economic policy is one thing; joining in a broad attack by foreign central banks, who insist that America somehow must subordinate our own legitimate economic needs to their currency requirements, is quite another."
Republican economists sent a separate letter to Bernanke last week criticizing the Federal Reserve bond-buying plan. Foreign leaders from China, Germany and Brazil have also signaled their displeasure.
“I was not surprised at the extreme hypocrisy of the Central Bank of China insisting that America – apparently alone among nations – has an obligation to subordinate its own legitimate economic needs to international currency movements, nor was I surprised that other central banks, including Germany’s, joined China," Frank said in his statement.
“What did disappoint me was to see conservative economists, high-ranking officials of previous Republican administrations, and Republican Congressional leaders share the attack by these foreign banks not simply on the substance of the Federal Reserve’s proposal, but on the very notion that America has a right to give a primary focus to our own economic need for growth at this time."
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Brown files bill to modify health care legislation
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this morning filed legislation that would allow states to opt out of certain portions of President Obama’s health care plan earlier than expected.
Brown, a Massachusetts Republican who rode into office on a wave of anger over the federal health care legislation, filed the bill with Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon.
The filing of the legislation is significant because it illustrates that Brown is trying to work with Democrats to make targeted changes to the health care law while top Republicans have largely focused only on repealing the entire law, not tinkering with it.
“We’re just going through it, trying to make it better. Trying to fix the problems,” Brown said in a brief interview earlier this week. When a reporter pointed out that many of his GOP colleagues wanted to scrap the whole thing, he said, “You should probably talk to them on that. Nice try.”
The bill Brown and Wyden filed this morning addresses a provision that allows states to obtain waivers that would exempt them from some of the requirements of the law, including the individual mandate and health care exchanges. In order to do so, states would have to prove that their state’s insurance plan is at least as competitive and affordable, and covers as many residents as the federal plan would.
Under the current law, states would be able to apply for those waivers starting in 2017, but the new measure would move that up to 2014, when most of the other aspects of the federal bill are implemented.
Closing that gap, proponents say, would allow states to begin to apply for waivers before implementing certain portions of the federal law.
“These…changes are good for Massachusetts,” Brown said this morning in a speech on the Senate floor. “They are good for other states who are trying to innovate and advance in the areas of health care reform, cost containment, and coverage.”
“We should be encouraging state innovation, not hampering it,” Brown said, adding that the bill is supported by the Massachusetts Hospital Association.
But Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, opposes the effort -- and says the Bay State won't need any waivers.
“The new health reform law includes billions of dollars in federal assistance for Massachusetts and strong protections for our health care system," Kerry said in a statement. "It is in our best interest to reconcile the new law with existing state requirements and implement it on time. I have every confidence that Governor [Deval] Patrick and the state legislature will do this with success and without the need for a waiver.”
A Patrick administration spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Brown's approach to make targeted changes to the health care law contrasts with the rhetoric of other Republicans, who are more focused on repealing the entire thing.
The incoming House Speaker, John Boehner, said last week that one of his first goals would be to "begin to repeal this monstrosity and replace it with common sense reforms."
“I think that what the American people were saying is, ‘We want it scrapped, we want a do-over,’” Senator John Thune, a South Dakota Republican and possible presidential candidate, said in a brief interview this week. “That’s what we’re going to try to do.”
Brown aides insist that he remains adamantly opposed to the health care law and still wants to repeal it. But in the meantime, he’s signing onto several pieces of legislation to make changes to the law.
"Like everyone else, he is waiting to see what the leadership in the Senate is going to propose,” said his spokeswoman, Gail Gitcho. “Right now he is doing what he can."
Brown on Monday also signed on as a cosponsor to legislation filed by Senator Max Baucus, a Montana Democrat, that would change a tax provision that small businesses have found burdensome because it requires too much paperwork.
Eight others have co-sponsored the bill, but Brown is the only Republican.
“He’s been a pleasure to work with,” Wyden said of Brown in an interview. “You see that our two states having been on the forefront of state innovation and flexibility. This provides another tool for cost containment and choice. It gives them more freedom to play to their own strengths.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Co-chair of bipartisan White House commission tasked to reduce deficit says US ready to make big budget cuts
Al Simpson, the former Republican senator from Wyoming who is co-chair of a bipartisan White House commission charged with recommending ways to cut the deficit, said today that there are no more sacred cows in the federal budget.
"Show me a sacred cow, and we'll step out into the field and god knows what we will do that cow," he said in a telephone interview with the Globe.
Simpson, who is known for his colorful language, said that the federal budget deficit is "an indigestible lump on the table, and if they don't do something about it, it will just get worse every year."
After Simpson and his Democratic co-chair, Erskine Bowles, released draft recommendations last week that included $100 billion in cuts from both domestic and military spending over the next five years, many in Congress balked.
But Simpson said the American people are ready for drastic cuts.
"People walk by and give you the thumbs up, instead of another digit," he said. "They say, 'Somebody finally has put something on the table that's real, not watered down stuff. . .The people of American understand it. . . They have had tough times, their house was foreclosed, they had to cut up their credit cards, and there are millions out there are saying the government has got to do the same."
McConnell, Boehner postpone meeting with Obama on Bush-era tax cuts
WASHINGTON — President Obama’s high-stakes meeting with congressional leaders from both parties will have to wait until after Thanksgiving, due to scheduling conflicts, the White House announced today.
The president had been scheduled to meet with congressional leaders on Thursday, with hopes for finding a compromise on a vexing issue--what to do about the Bush-era tax cuts that expire at the end of the year. President Obama wants to let the tax cuts run out on family income above $250,000 per year; Republicans want to extend the cuts for all income.
“At the request of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader John Boehner due to scheduling conflicts in organizing their caucuses, the president’s meeting with bipartisan leaders will now take place at the White House on Tuesday, November 30th,” according to a White House statement.
Rangel case could pave the way for Neal bid
WASHINGTON – The ethics conviction today of Representative Charles Rangel paves the way for Representative Richard Neal to seek the top Democratic spot on the powerful Ways and Means Committee.
Neal, a Springfield Democrat, has been laying the groundwork for the past year to leap-frog several more senior Democrats to win the powerful chairmanship of the Ways and Means Committee. With Republicans winning the majority, the gavel will likely go to Representative Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican.
But Neal is now expected to make a bid for ranking member of the committee, which would put him as the Democratic point man on one of the most pivotal committees under a Republican House leadership – one that will deal with deficits, taxes, and potentially changes to social security or Medicaid.
Neal’s decision has hinged on the outcome of the ethics trial for Rangel, the New York Democrat who left his position as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee earlier this year amid the ethics allegations. Neal may have to challenge Representative Sander Levin, a Michigan Democrat who assumed the chairmanship after Rangel stepped down and has more seniority on the committee than Neal.
Neal last week sent a letter to colleagues announcing his candidacy, if Rangel is not returned to the post. Rangel was convicted today on 11 House ethics violations.
The issue is still sensitive because the ethics committee has not announced a punishment for Rangel, and the longtime Democrat has not announced his plans. Rangel also has significant support from the Congressional Black Caucus, whose backing could be key for Neal’s bid.
Neal declined to comment, but sources close to him said they expect him to make a run for the post and he has already started seeking commitments.
“As we chart our course forward after the election, I believe I will be the best candidate to lead the Ways and Means Committee Democrats, to contrast our message with House Republicans, and to articulate our values and beliefs as we move into the future,” Neal wrote last week in his letter, which was obtained by the Globe. “We will face many challenges in the 112th Congress that will require strong and effective leadership. If we are to return to the majority, our message to the American people must be coherent, emphatic and clear. We need to create jobs and strengthen the economy. We need to lower and simplify taxes. And we must preserve and protect Social Security and Medicare.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Biden urges Senate to ratify New START treaty
WASHINGTON -- Vice President Joe Biden today urged the US Senate to ratify the New START nuclear arms treaty with Russia before the end of the year. Biden's statement came hours after a key Republican senator said the vote should be put off.
"Failure to pass the New START Treaty this year would endanger our national security," Biden said in a statement. "Without ratification of this treaty, we will have no Americans on the ground to inspect Russia’s nuclear activities, no verification regime to track Russia’s strategic nuclear arsenal, less cooperation between the two nations that account for 90 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons, and no verified nuclear reductions."
The New START treaty, signed last April, would commit both sides to reduce strategic nuclear weapons from 2,200 warheads to 1,550, and set up a process for new inspections of each side's arsenal.
The treaty needs 67 votes in the Senate for ratification. President Obama has been pushing for a vote by the end of the year, before the new Congress is sworn in and the Democrat's advantage in the Senate shrinks from 59 seats to 53.
Earlier today, Senator Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona, considered influential among Republicans on nuclear issues, disappointed the White House by saying the Senate should not take up the treaty in the current lame duck session.
Biden said the treaty enjoys broad support from members of past administrations, from both parties, including former secretaries of state George Shultz, James Baker, Henry Kissinger, Colin Powell, Madeleine Albright, and Warren Christopher, and former defense secretaries James Schlesinger, William Cohen, William Perry, Frank Carlucci, and Harold Brown.
"Given new START’s bipartisan support and enormous importance to our national security, the time to act is now and we will continue to seek its approval by the Senate before the end of the year," said Biden.
Senate GOP leader backs earmark ban
WASHINGTON – Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell this afternoon endorsed plans for a moratorium on earmarks, a surprising reversal that could put a halt to the controversial federal spending practice.
McConnell, who over the past three years has sponsored $458 million in earmarks, said that the elections two weeks ago illustrated the electorate’s desire for changes in how federal tax dollars are spent.
"Nearly every day that the Senate's been in session for the past two years, I have come down to this spot and said that Democrats are ignoring the wishes of the American people," McConnell said in a surprise announcement in a Senate floor speech. "When it comes to earmarks, I won't be guilty of the same thing."
It also represents a recalibration by the Senate's top Republican following the midterm elections, when several Tea Party-backed candidates won by running on an anti-Washington platform and blasting federal spending.
John Boehner, an Ohio Republican and the presumptive new House speaker, has also said that earmarks must end, and President Obama said recently that “the earmarking process in Congress isn’t what the American people really want to see when it comes to making tough decisions about how taxpayer dollars are spent.”
As recently as yesterday, though, McConnell had continued to defend the earmark process. Senate Republicans are planning to vote tomorrow on a moratorium on earmarks and, with McConnell’s backing, it is now expected to pass. Senator Scott Brown, the Massachusetts Republican, has opposed earmarks and has not requested any since being sworn into office.
Earmarks are provisions added to a bill that direct money to a specific project. The Massachusetts delegation has proved particularly adept at securing funds for hospitals, road projects, and defense contractors across the Bay State. The state has received at least $200 million in each of the past three years.
The Globe reported last week that earmark requests submitted this year are also now in jeopardy, impacting projects throughout the Bay State. Congress has not yet approved any appropriations bills this year, and has limited time to pass those bills during a busy lame duck session.
Earmarks have been a Washington tradition, a way for Congress to pick specific causes it wishes to fund -- and giving local congressmen a way to deliver for their districts. But the projects have also become controversial, following pay-to-play scandals and several controversial earmarks, including Alaska’s so-called “Bridge to Nowhere.”
Congress responded by requiring greater transparency from those who are requesting the funds. This year, House Democrats also banned any earmark requests that would go to for-profit institutions.
With Republicans controlling the House starting in January, they would be able to block any earmark requests from being approved. Democrats still have a narrow majority in the Senate, but if Republicans all agree to stop filing earmark requests it could be politically dicey for Democrats to continue filing them.
Most Senate Democrats currently support filing earmarks, although Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri is an opponent.
“An earmark moratorium shows that elected officials are serious about restoring trust between the American people and those elected to represent them,” Boehner said this afternoon in a statement following McConnell’s speech. “We hope President Obama and Washington Democrats will show they are serious, and join us in this effort to restore the public trust.”
The reversal for McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky, was particularly striking given his long-held endorsement of earmarks. He is also a longtime member of the Appropriations Committee and helped steer funding to his home state.
"I know the good that has come from the projects I have helped support throughout my state," McConnell said today. "I don’t apologize for them. But there is simply no doubt that the abuse of this practice has caused Americans to view it as a symbol of the waste and the out-of-control spending that every Republican in Washington is determined to fight. And unless people like me show the American people that we’re willing to follow through on small or even symbolic things, we risk losing them on our broader efforts to cut spending and rein in government."
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Markey to seek top Democratic spot on Natural Resources Committee
WASHINGTON – Representative Edward J. Markey announced tonight that he would pursue the top Democratic post on the Natural Resources Committee, which deals with issues involving the environment, energy, and public land.
“The stakes have never been higher for creating new energy jobs, protecting our environment, and increasing our national security by properly managing our own natural resources,” Markey, a Malden Democrat, said in a statement. “Now is not the time to capitulate to an agenda that will allow China and the rest of the world to win the clean energy jobs race, all at the expense of the planet. Following the largest oil spill in our nation’s history, it is imperative that we have a cop on the beat policing the oil industry.”
Markey, one of the most senior members in the House, has been chairing a select committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. But as Republicans take over control, his bid for a new post is part of the reshuffling that Democrats are now undergoing. The current chairman of the Natural Resources Committee, Representative Nick Rahall of West Virginia, is leaving to become the top Democrat on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.
Markey will be challenged by Raul Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat who also announced his bid for ranking member of the Natural Resources Committee.
If Markey becomes ranking member, it would be less prestigious than a chairmanship but would still provide him with a broad platform and a key role in blocking the Republican agenda.
“I believe that as our party fights its way back from the losses we suffered in the recent election, it will be important for us to continue to advocate for policies that reduce our dependence on imported oil and address the challenges posed by global warming,” he wrote in a letter to colleagues.
In the letter, he also touts his work for the party.
“I have traveled, I have raised funds, and I have contributed to the [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee] and our candidates every year,” he wrote. “When you add it all up, I believe I have done as much as or more for the DCCC over the last 16 years than any other Member of the House who is not in the leadership.”
Markey said he plans to keep his senior status on the Energy and Commerce Committee, but intends to relinquish his right to serve a ranking member of the Energy and Environment Subcommittee in the next Congress.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
McGovern treated for thyroid cancer
WASHINGTON – Representative James P. McGovern, the Worcester Democrat, was treated today for thyroid cancer at Washington Hospital Center, his office announced this afternoon.
His wife, Lisa, said in a statement that the 50-year-old congressman had his thyroid gland removed. She said it was discovered during a routine examination, and a biopsy found it to be cancerous.
“This type of thyroid cancer grows very slowly, and is successfully treatable,” she said in a statement. “He’s feeling good, and his prognosis is excellent. Jim will take a few days off and is looking forward to being back at work next week for the lame-duck session. Until then, I’ll be trying to convince him to rest and stay off the phone!”
Dr. Brian P. Monahan, the congressional attending physician, said in a statement that McGovern completed the surgery without complications and would be discharged from the hospital “after a brief period of observation.”
“Congressman McGovern will take a daily thyroid medication to replace the functions of his thyroid gland,” Monahan said. “He will return to his usual duties next week after a brief convalescence.”
McGovern was reelected last week to an eighth term, representing the 3rd Congressional District.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
No New Englanders on GOP House transition team
WASHINGTON — A transition team that will guide the Republican takeover of the US House of Representatives contains more than 20 members from around the country, though none from New England, according to a statement from the GOP’s transition chairman, US Rep. Greg Walden, a Republican from Oregon.
The transition team will hold its first meeting today.
“Americans have sent a clear message that Congress must be run differently, and this team is ready to prove that we’re listening,” said Walden, in a statement. “Our transition team includes proven leaders who will meet our challenge to restore the House of Representatives as a great deliberative body that respects the will of the American people. The diverse mix of experience, backgrounds, and regions represented by this group will help to ensure this process brings meaningful reform to how Washington does business.”
The members of the GOP Majority Transition Team are:
Rep. Rob Bishop (UT-1)
Rep. John Campbell (CA-48)
Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (WV-2)
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (UT-3)
Rep. Tom Cole (OK-4)
Rep. Mike Conaway (TX-11)
Rep. David Dreier (CA-26)
Rep.-elect Cory Gardner (CO-4)
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (VA-6)
Rep. Doc Hastings (WA-4)
Rep. Jeb Hensarling (TX-5)
Rep. Jim Jordan (OH-4)
Rep.-elect Adam Kinzinger (IL-11)
Rep. Buck McKeon (CA-25)
Rep. Candice Miller (MI-10)
Rep.-elect Martha Roby (AL-2)
Rep. Mike Rogers (MI-8)
Rep. Paul Ryan (WI-1)
Rep.-elect Tim Scott (SC-1)
Rep. Pete Sessions (TX-32)
Rep. Pat Tiberi (OH-12)
Moderate Republican Susan Collins says she welcomes Republican sweep in the state
Collins: “In Maine, it's clear that citizens want a new direction for our state. This fall, I campaigned with Republican candidates for the Maine House and Senate all across our state, and everywhere we went, people told us they want more jobs, less spending, lower taxes, and more accountability in their state government. This is an historic win for Republicans in Maine, and it's an exciting opportunity to lead Maine to a new, more prosperous future.”
Pelosi to run for Minority Leader
WASHINGTON -- Ending several days of speculation, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced this afternoon that she would attempt to stay in control as the top Democratic leader in the House.
Some Democrats had speculated that Pelosi would step down from leadership, following the drubbing her party was dealt in Tuesday's elections. Throughout the country, Pelosi became a lightening rod of criticism and even some in her own party said they would not support her any longer.
But early this afternoon, she sent out a message on Twitter, saying, "Driven by the urgency of creating jobs & protecting [health care reform, Wall Street reform], Social Security & Medicare, I am running for Dem Leader."
"Our work is far from finished," Pelosi said in a letter to colleagues. "As a result of Tuesday's election, the role of Democrats in the 112th Congress will change, but our commitment to serving the American people will not. We have no intention of allowing our great achievements to be rolled back."
Pelosi will still have to earn votes from the Democratic caucus, but the position as House Minority Leader was widely considered hers if she wanted it. She would become the chief antagonist of the presumptive new House speaker, John Boehner.
Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat and dean of the Massachusetts delegation, immediately praised Pelosi’s decision and said he would vote for her.
"Nancy Pelosi is already an historic figure, and she is poised to make an even greater contribution to our countries' future,” Markey said in a statement. “If America is going to get back to work, we need the hardest working person in Congress leading the way, and that is Nancy Pelosi.”
Pelosi’s decision also set off a battle for the second highest job for Democrats, which is currently held by Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. The Maryland Democrat said today that he would consider running for House Minority Whip, a position that is currently held by Jim Clyburn of South Carolina. Clyburn, the House’s highest-ranking African American, also intends to run for the post.
Markey later today said he would support Hoyer "because I think that he and Nancy Pelosi will unify the Caucus and take us back to the Majority in two years."
Representative John Tierney, a Salem Democrat, said through a spokeswoman that he would support Pelosi.
Representative Michael Capuano, a Somerville Democrat, said the entire leadership team should step down – but that he’ll still support Pelosi, since the entire team isn’t stepping down.
“Congressman Capuano has already stated and continues to believe that the entire leadership team should step aside because blame for what happened Tuesday can't be placed with just one person,” said Capuano spokeswoman Alison Mills. “However, since that is clearly not happening, Congressman Capuano will support Nancy Pelosi for Democratic Leader.”
Several other members of the Massachusetts delegation -- including Representative Stephen Lynch of South Boston, who was at odds with Pelosi during the health care debate -- did not respond to requests for comment.
During the race for the Massachusetts 10th Congressional District, Republican Jeff Perry sought to tag Democratic nominee Bill Keating as someone who would be in lock-step with Pelosi.
Keating, who won on Tuesday night, was noncommittal during the campaign and did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown weighs in on election results
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown, in some of his first comments after the midterm elections, said today that the defeat Republicans were dealt in his home state should not be viewed as a prediction of his own fate in 2012.
“I did what I was asked to do,” Brown said, when asked whether he did enough to help top GOP candidates in Massachusetts. “I’m very proud of all our candidates. Governor [Deval] Patrick ran a great race, and he should be commended -- and I plan on doing just that later today.”
“An endorsement certainly is one thing, but the candidates will rise and fall on their own merits,” he told reporters, according to an audio recording released by his office. Brown made the comments in Boston, following an event at the State House paying tribute to female veterans.
Brown endorsed a slate of Republican candidates in Massachusetts that lost on Tuesday night, appearing to indicate that the Bay State was not shifting as far to the right as it appeared after Brown’s dramatic special election victory in January. That election foreshadowed much of the turmoil Democrats would have later in the year, but on Tuesday night Massachusetts returned to its role as a bastion of Democratic power.
When asked what happened, given that his victory in January seemed to usher in a new political era in Massachusetts, Brown said, “I’m not an analyst. You’ll have to ask the analysts about that.”
Yet under the new dynamics in national politics, Brown now finds himself having to balance the political persuasions of his party – which tugged to the right – and his home state, where he will have to win reelection from in just two years.
Brown today dismissed the notion that this week’s election results should be interpreted as early trouble for his chances in 2012.
“It’s no surprise that I’m the biggest target, I don’t know what all the surprise is,” he said. “I always have been -- and every race, I’ve won. I certainly welcome that race when it comes, but right now I’m focused on getting our country moving again. I’m going to continue to vote how I’ve always voted, looking at each and every bill in an independent manner and try to figure out if it’s good for Massachusetts. I’m looking forward to working with the delegation, as I have already, ‘cause we have some very real challenges. We’ve got to get our country moving again.”
Brown also downplayed suggestions that his election meant that Massachusetts had lurched far to the right.
“Well, this is Massachusetts, guys. Okay?” Brown said. “And the fact that we had a tremendous amount of people getting off their couches and out of their homes, engaged -- that was what I was most excited about. The fact that people got engaged, they worked for their favorite candidate, and they made their positions known. The election is over. My election back in January’s over, this election is over. We have a tremendous amount of work to do and I’m excited to go down to Washington and do it.”
Brown also decried Democrats for not being more willing to work with him.
“Well since I’ve been down there I’ve been reaching across the aisle,” he said, when asked about President Obama’s call for bipartisanship. “I’ve had many meetings with the president and the majority party, trying to work across party lines to get things done. I’ve voted with them probably about 29, 30 percent of the time. They’ve voted with me zero. So it’s a two way street.”
Brown said he plans to unveil a “very aggressive jobs agenda” sometime soon and would continue to pursue plans to lower taxes and decrease the deficit.
“Listen, I wasn’t on the ballot two days ago,” he said. “Two years is a long time, and I’m focused on doing my job now. I’m looking forward to running, obviously, in the future, but right now we have some very, very real, real problems we have to start working on.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry's candidates see varied results
By Matt Viser, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON – Senator John Kerry had a strong track record in his home state on Tuesday, but outside of Massachusetts the candidates that he supported lost more than they won.
Kerry had used his extensive fundraising network to raise money for candidates across the country, and he traveled to stump with several. Eight candidates he backed notched impressive victories – including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Senator Barbara Boxer, of California – but in 10 senate races his candidates came up short. The losses included two incumbents -- Russ Feingold, of Wisconsin, and Blanche Lincoln, of Arkansas.
In several instances, the Bay State's two senators, both competitive sportsmen, went head-to-head in well-contested US Senate races. Senator Scott Brown's candidates came out on top in three of those races (Illinois, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire), while Kerry's won in two (California and Connecticut).
Kerry fared better than Brown, though, in their home state. In Massachusetts, Kerry helped several congressional candidates -- Bill Keating, who ran in the 10th congressional district, and incumbents Niki Tsongas, Richard Neal, John Tierney, Barney Frank, and James McGovern – who all won. He also backed successful candidates Governor Deval Patrick, Attorney General Martha Coakley, Secretary of State William Galvin, Treasurer-elect Steve Grossman and state House Speaker Robert DeLeo. Two of Kerry’s Massachusetts candidates lost: state Representative Mark Falzone, and Dan Bosley, who was running for sheriff of Berkshire County but lost in the Democratic primary.
Here’s the list of Kerry's national candidates and the outcome on Tuesday:
WON
- Senator Harry Reid, of Nevada
- Senator Barbara Boxer, of California
- Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, of New York
- Senator Michael Bennet, of Colorado
- Senator Jeff Merkley, of Oregon
- Senator Chuck Schumer, of New York
- Senator-elect Richard Blumental, of Connecticut
- Senator-elect Chris Coons, of Delaware
LOST
- US Senator Russ Feingold, of Wisconsin
- US Senator Blanche Lincoln, of Arkansas
- US Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias of Illinois
- US Senate candidate Paul Hodes of New Hampshire
- US Senate candidate Kendrick Meek, of Florida
- US Senate candidate Joe Sestak, of Pennsylvania
- US Senate candidate Jack Conway, of Kentucky
- US Senate candidate Charles Melancon, of Louisiana
- US Senate candidate Robin Carnahan, of Missouri
- US Senate candidate Lee Fisher, of Ohio
- US Representative Scott Murphy, of New York’s 20th Congressional District
- Congressional candidate Ann McLane Kuster, of New Hampshire
UNDECIDED
- US Senator Patty Murray, of Washington state
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown's national endorsements yield mixed bag
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown’s coattails proved to be extraordinarily short in his home state, with his endorsements failing to carry other prominent Massachusetts Republican candidates to victory.
But nationally, the results were more of a mixed bag. Eight of the candidates he helped – through fundraisers and campaign rallies – won on Tuesday night, including several prominent new senators such as Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania, Marco Rubio in Florida, and Mark Kirk in Illinois.
Six candidates backed by Brown lost and two are in races where the tallies are still too close to call (Brown also wrote a fundraising letter earlier this year in support of Charles Djou, a congressional candidate in Hawaii; Djou won a special election in May but lost on Tuesday night).
The slate of Brown-backed candidates in Massachusetts did not fare well. All of the statewide GOP candidates he supported lost, as did all nine congressional hopefuls. Fifteen of the candidates he supported in state legislative races won.
Here’s the full lineup of Brown’s national candidates and how they fared:
WON
- Senator-elect Mark Kirk, of Illinois
- Senator-elect Marco Rubio, of Florida
- Senator-elect Kelly Ayotte, of New Hampshire
- Senator-elect Pat Toomey, of Pennsylvania
- Senator John McCain, of Arizona
- Congressman-elect Steve Stivers, of Ohio’s 15th Congressional District
- Congressman-elect Steve Chabot, of Ohio’s 1st Congressional District
- Representative Rob Wittman, of Virginia’s 1st Congressional District
LOST
- US Senate candidate Carly Fiorina, of California
- US Senate candidate Linda McMahon, of Connecticut
- Congressional candidate John Loughlin, of Rhode Island’s First District
- Congressional candidate Tim Burns, of Pennsylvania’s 12th Congressional District
- Gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman, of California
- Gubernatorial candidate John Stephen, of New Hampshire
STILL UNDECIDED
- Dino Rossi, Republican nominee for US Senate in Washington state
- Tom Foley, Republican nominee for governor in Connecticut
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Romney calls on Obama to use mid-term defeat as opportunity to curb spending
Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney called on President Obama to turn the humbling defeat of Democrats in the mid-term elections into an opportunity to wrangle and subdue government spending.
"Government is smothering the pioneering, entrepreneurial spirit that propelled our economy past those of older, larger nations,'' Romney wrote in an op-ed column in today's Washington Post, one day after Republicans seized control of the House of Representatives and state houses across the nation. "Ever higher taxes on small and big business, layers of red tape, onerous labor regulations, and punitive bureaucrats and lawsuits are suffocating US economic vitality. So far, the president and his fellow travelers in Congress have made things worse: If Obama is serious about changing the way things are done in Washington, he must slay the job-killing beast Washington has become.''
Since voters perceive the president and Democrats as being most responsible for increased spending, Obama is in a unique position to fix the problem, Romney contended, likening his role to a "Nixon to China" opportunity. President Nixon, with his pedigree as an arch anti-communist, was able to neutralize opposition from the right wing of his party to his rapprochement to China. Romney calls on Obama to do the same with the Democrats' liberal wing.
Specifically, Romney pushed the president to take on the burgeoning entitlement programs by changing how cost-of-living increases are given to Social Security beneficiaries and how Medicaid funds are disbursed to the states. He also called for the president to extend all of the Bush tax cuts, including those for the richest Americans.
On his website, Romney, considered a likely candidate for the presidential race in 2012, released a statement that lauded the efforts of his supporters and his political action committee to help propel Republican candidates to victory across the nation on Tuesday. The PAC contributed about $1.1 million to more than 500 candidates and he campaigned for about 60 candidates in more than 30 states, the statement said.
Kerry compares Harry Reid to Dracula and Lazarus
Buoyed by the excitement of a Democratic sweep in Massachusetts, and some key victories nation-wide, Senator John Kerry released the following statement following Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s victory in Nevada:
“Politico was wrong, Huffington Post was wrong, hell, all the pundits were wrong. Harry Reid isn’t just Dracula, he isn’t just Lazarus, he’s our Leader and our whole caucus is thrilled that he’s unbreakable and unbeatable."
McMahon gains on Blumenthal in US Senate race in Connecticut
WASHINGTON -- Attorney General Richard Blumenthal is maintaining a lead over wrestling executive Linda McMahon in the race for US Senate in Connecticut, but his margin has slipped back into the single-digits, according to a poll released today.
McMahon is now trailing Blumenthal by a nine-point margin, 53 to 44 percent, said the Quinnipiac University poll. That compares to a 54 to 42 percent deficit for McMahon in the Quinnipiac Poll released Oct. 26.
The two are engaged in a heated battle to succeed Democratic Senator Christopher Dodd. If McMahon pulls off a victory, it would be a big upset for Republicans in a traditionally blue state. She has spent at least $42 million of her own money on the race.
A key statistic for McMahon supporters: independent voters, who went 56 to 40 for Blumenthal last week, are now tipping toward McMahon, 49 to 44 percent. McMahon continues to struggle among women, however: women back Blumenthal by 61 to 36 percent, the poll found. Men support McMahon 50 to 46 percent.
“Linda McMahon’s mini surge may be too little, too late,” said Quinnipiac University Poll Director Douglas Schwartz, PhD.
State Senator Eldridge plans to file a bill to limit the impact of Citizens United ruling in state elections
As the uproar continues about unlimited corporate spending in campaigns, made possible in part due to Supreme Court ruling Citizens United that opened the door to unlimited corporate spending, several moves are afoot in Massachusetts to limit the ruling's impact.
State Senator, Jamie Eldridge, from Acton, is planning to file a bill that require that shareholders of companies give their permission before a company can spend money on an ad in a state election. The bill would also prohibit executives of any corporation or union that does business with the state from spending money on state elections, either as individuals or as a corporation.
Eldridge originally filed the bill this summer, but it did not get a hearing before the lawmaking session ended. He said increased awareness of the dangerous of the Citizens United ruling would spur the passage of the bill, which would only impact state elections. (States can't pass laws to influence federal elections.)
"I think after an election where you see the impact of Citizens United money being spent, there is a growing awareness from Massachusetts legislature that Massachusetts needs to do its part to stop the corrosive influence of money on politics," he said in a telephone interview.
One part of his law that did pass -- as an attachment to the budget -- was a requirement that CEOs of companies and groups that buy ads in state elections appear in the ads to tell the public they paid for it. That is happening in state ads now. Eldridge said Massachusetts was the first state to take action to limit the impact of Citizens United in state elections.
"The Supreme Court has said that massive corporations have the right to step on individuals, " said Avi Green, Executive Director of Mass Vote, a non-partisan non-profit voting rights organization. "Massachusetts can say, 'That's fine, but it can't happen in the dark.'"
An a separate effort, Jeff Clements, an attorney from Concord, is trying to start a nation-wide movement to amend the Constitution to clarify that corporations do not have free speech rights.
He has helped launch, freespeechforpeople.org, to collect signatures to convince Congress to act.
The Supreme Court ruling "cannot stand," the group's Web site reads. "The First Amendment was never intended to protect corporations. Free speech is for people, not corporations. We must act now."
He acknowledges that changing the Constitution is not easy.
"It is a long road, but traveling down that road is important too," he said. "It's like the Equal Rights Amendment. It never got ratified, but campaigning for it made the laws and society much more equal for women, but amendment campaigns have a very important role to play."
Romney heads to Rhode Island Monday
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney will be in Rhode Island on Monday, the day before the critical mid-term elections, to try to rally supporters of Republican State Rep. John Loughlin, who is running for the US House seat being vacated after eight terms by Democrat Patrick Kennedy.
Romney is the latest in a line of nationally-known political figures to try to influence the Rhode Island 1st District race. Bay State Senator Scott Brown has also appeared in Rhode Island for Loughlin, and last week President Obama was in the district for an event to boost the candidacy of Democrat David Cicilline, the sitting mayor of Providence and the current front runner in the House race.
The Romney appearance, at 2 p.m. Monday at Loughlin’s campaign headquarters in East Providence, is open to the public.
Read up on the West Virginia Senate race
The Globe Washington Bureau's Michael Kranish reports a hard shift to the right in West Virginia's Senate race today.
NEWELL, W. Va. — Governor Joe Manchin is running what seems to be a classic Republican campaign for the US Senate in West Virginia.He blasts “Obamacare,’’ files a lawsuit against environmental laws, and — literally — fires a bullet at a mock-up of climate-change legislation. He boasts of his endorsement by the US Chamber of Commerce, his A rating from the libertarian Cato Institute, and his conservative fiscal credentials.
The catch: Manchin is the Democratic nominee. And even this effort to distance himself from President Obama and his own party hasn’t assured him of victory in the Mountain State.
Tierney-Hudak race becomes more competitive
A Massachusetts congressional race that has been heating up in the courts and over the airwaves now may be warming in the polls.
The outcome of the Sixth Congressional District race between seven-term incumbent John F. Tierney, the Salem Democrat, and his Republican challenger Bill Hudak now ranks as "likely Democratic" instead of "solid Democratic," according to the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.
"I don't think Tierney is in serious danger, but he has had a rough couple of weeks in the press, and if he hadn't been able to take to the airwaves to counter Hudak, he'd be in more trouble,'' said David Wasserman, House editor of the Cook Political Report.
Tierney's campaign received a blow earlier this month when his wife, Patrice, pleaded guilty to abetting tax evasion in a case tied to her brother's offshore betting operation. The representative was not implicated in the crime, but the revelation boosted the candidacy of Hudak, a Boxford lawyer who is in his first race for office.
Earlier this week, some pointed television advertisements against the Republican nominee prompted his campaign to file a defamation lawsuit against Tierney in Essex Superior Court. In the campaign's request for an emergency restraining order, Hudak is seeking to halt ads that he says lie about his views on mortgage interest deductions and other issues.
The Tierney-Hudak race is the latest to become more competitive, according to Cook. Earlier this month, the report said the race between incumbent Barney Frank and Republican Sean Bielat in Southeastern Massachusetts also could be tighter, shifting its ranking to likely Democratic.
The contest in the Massachusetts Fifth District – between Democratic Representative Niki Tsongas and the Republican nominee Jon Golnik – is also considered likely Democratic.
Only one congressional race in the Bay State is considered by Cook to be competitive: In the challenge to replace the retiring Bill Delahunt in the Tenth District, Democrat William R. Keating is thought to have a slight edge over Republican Jeffrey D. Perry.
Vince McMahon sues Conn. Secretary of the State over WWE clothing at the polls
Connecticut’s McMahons make quite a tag team. Vince McMahon, World Wrestling Entertainment CEO and husband to current GOP candidate for US Senate (and former WWE CEO) Linda McMahon, has filed a lawsuit against Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz for censorship and discrimination in her instructions to election officials regarding voters in WWE garb next Tuesday.
“On behalf of myself, my company, WWE fans and any Connecticut citizen who wants to exercise their constitutional right to vote, I have filed a lawsuit today asserting that Susan Bysiewicz’s directive that allows poll workers to refuse registered voters wearing WWE merchandise the right to vote is a flagrant act of censorship and discrimination,” said McMahon in a press release today.
Bysiewicz advised Connecticut poll workers to use their discretion to determine whether voters in WWE apparel should be asked to cover their clothing or be turned away from the booth, as Connecticut law forbids campaigning within 75 feet of a polling place.
"Even though it doesn't say her name directly...the brand is so ubiquitously associated with the McMahons,'' said Av Harris, spokesman for Bysiewicz, told the Hartford Courant Friday.
Brown to appear at Providence fundraiser with Loughlin
WASHINGTON — Rhode Island will play host on Monday to some high-wattage political stars from both sides of the aisle.
Massachusetts Republican Senator Scott Brown has confirmed he will appear at a luncheon fundraiser in Providence on Monday with state Rep. John Loughlin, the GOP nominee for Congress in the 1st Rhode Island District.
The timing of the Brown visit is interesting, as the White House announced earlier this week that President Obama would also be in Rhode Island on Monday, for an event in Woonsocket.
Both parties are fighting hard for the congressional seat being vacated by US Rep. Patrick Kennedy after eight terms. The Democratic nominee is Providence Mayor David Cicilline.
The invitation to the Brown/Loughlin event doesn’t list the menu, but tickets run $250, $1,000 and $2,400, so the cuisine is likely to be more elaborate than the Rhode Island staples of Johnnycakes and a Del’s Lemonade.
Little-known PAC funds campaign to defeat Barney Frank and Jim McGovern
A little-known political action committee called "Western Representation" is funding the campaign to defeat Barney Frank of Newton and Rep. Jim McGovern, of Worcester.
The group's web site does not list contact information, and its source of funding and political backing could not immediately be determined.
According to the group's Web site, it is also funding campaigns to unseat Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, of Nevada, Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, and moderate Republican Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.
Harry Gural, a spokesman for Frank, said the group has put $200,000 into the two Massachusetts races. He said fears of a quick infusion of money from Tea Party supporters and others from around the country convinced Frank to loan his campaign $200,000 to counter a last-minute push.
Frank, the influential chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, is facing his best-funded opponent ever: Republican challenger Sean Bielat, a Marine reservist and businessman, who has a war chest of $462,914 to spend until election day, according to Bloomberg. Frank has $649,561 left to spend.
A poll by WPRI Eyewitness News shows Frank with a 12-point lead over Bielat. It's survey of 400 likely voters in the Massachusetts’ 4th Congressional District found that 49 percent backed Frank and 37 percent supported Bielat, with 12 percent still undecided less than two weeks before Election Day.
Gural said his campaign has an internal poll showing Frank ahead by 19 points. But he said that the campaign "doesn't take anything for granted, because there is money piled up ready to attack Barney."
Gural said that, in addition to Western Representation has put $200,0000, another group called the American Future Fund announced that it is going to spend money against him. He also said the Tea Party Express is planning a rally in Worcester, and that pro-life activists are mailing leaflets to people in Barney's district.
Gural complained about what he called "shadowy groups" influencing the election without having to disclose the source of their funds. He acknowledged that Frank has a sizable war chest of his own but said: "He has raised a lot of money over a large period of time, but there could be a bottomless well of money out there. We understand the power of money and it is an unfortunate part of the political system that this is still possible."
Kerry in Sudan to help ensure peace between North and South
Senator John Kerry Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee left Wednesday night for Sudan, where aides said he intends to "roll up his sleeves" to help ensure a peaceful referendum in the South in January. During his three-day trip, Kerry will meet with officials in Khartoum in closed-door meetings, and he will also briefly travel to Juba, the capital of the south.
“Sudan is at a pivotal moment. Every reliable source indicates that Southern Sudan will vote for separation, dividing Africa's largest country and taking with it some 80 percent of known Sudanese oil reserves. The critical choice that leaders in both North and South face is between a future of peaceful coexistence or a return to chaos and war in a place tragically familiar with both. January is rapidly approaching; the Sudanese in the North and the South must seize this moment and address the difficult issues that could seriously disrupt the fulfillment of the landmark Comprehensive Peace Agreement, which included provision for the referendum, and lead to unnecessary violence. America must help North and South Sudan find a peaceful path forward,” said Chairman Kerry.
This is Kerry's second trip to Sudan as chairman. He traveled to Khartoum in April 2009, during a trip that also took him to a camp for people displaced by violence in Darfur. Kerry is also the author of the bipartisan Sudan Peace and Stability Act of 2010, which reasserts the U.S. commitment to working toward peace throughout Sudan. Earlier this month, he published an op-ed titled, “Diplomacy Urgent As Vote To Split Sudan Nears.”
Head of DCCC Van Hollen predicts Dems will hold on to House majority
The architect of the Democratic Party’s strategy to hold power in the US House this morning dismissed gloomy forecasts from political prognosticators and predicted that Democrats will hold onto the House in the November mid-term election.
“When you ask voters if they see Republicans as a viable governing alternative, the answer is no,” said US Rep. Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat and head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
“We’re confident we’re going to retain the majority,” Van Hollen said, at a breakfast with reporters in Washington.
Few specialists agree with him.
The nonpartisan Cook Political Report, which follows congressional campaigns, predicts Republicans will gain some 50 House seats next month, well above the 39 they need to reclaim the majority.
But Van Hollen said he has faith in his party’s investment in on-the-ground voter turnout operations, and that recent polling suggests an awakening of Democratic voters who have been less enthusiastic than Republicans so far in the campaign.
He predicted victory even while claiming that Republican-leaning political groups are outspending Democratic groups by a 5 to 1 margin to influence the election.
“These are all tough races,” he said, “but we believe at the end of the day, our candidates will break through on the issues.”
Stumping in Illinois, Kerry denounces GOP tactics
John Kerry was in the Land of Lincoln today, but he spent much of his time hurling barbs at the first Republican president's descendants.
The Democrat senator from Massachusetts came to Chicago to stump for Alexi Giannoulias, the Democratic state treasurer who is running for President Obama's old US Senate seat in Illinois. While praising Giannoulias for his stance on climate change legislation, Kerry decried GOP nominee Mark Kirk for wobbling on key pieces of legislation and blasted behind-the-scenes groups that have solicited tens of millions of dollars through "secret funding'' and used them for attack ads against Democratic candidates.
In particular, Kerry took aim at an old nemesis, Karl Rove, who was a key player in the campaign to reelect President George W. Bush over Kerry in 2004. Rove now has a role coordinating television advertising campaigns against Giannoulias and other Democrats through American Crossroads, a nonprofit group he co-founded.
The attack ads are nothing short of disgraceful, Kerry said, comparing the campaign to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth ads during the 2004 elections. Those ads questioned Kerry's actions as a young Navy officer in Vietnam.
Kerry also denounced a landmark Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. FEC, that greatly expanded the ability of businesses and unions to spend money in elections. Many corporations are using nonprofit groups such as American Crossroads to channel their money anonymously.
"The Supreme Court decision is one of the worst decisions I've seen in all my public years," he said.
Kerry criticized Kirk, a five-term US representative, for flip-flopping on cap-and-trade legislation curbing carbon emissions, a signature issue for Kerry. Kirk initially supported such legislation but is now campaigning against it.
"Alexi understands that America's national security is at risk and our future economy is at risk if we don't get into this fight in a better way and begin to move to these new technologies," Kerry said. "His opponent represents more of the same. He's flipped and moved from one position to another."
Kerry vows to file a bill to prevent TV blackouts due to broadcaster and cable operator disputes
Sometimes politics transcends even bitter sports rivalries.
Commiserating with fans of the New York Giants, Massachusetts Senator John F. Kerry vowed today to file a bill that would seek to avoid television blackouts that result from disputes between broadcasters and cable operators.
Last weekend, a spat over how much to pay for programs prompted News Corp. to halt transmission of its Fox programs to Cablevision. That leaves 3 million subscribers in the New York and Philadelphia area scrambling for ways to view such programs as "American Idol" and "The Simpsons."
It also forced Giants fans to leave home Sunday and find bars that had either satellite TV or a cable system other than Cablevision to watch their team beat the Detroit Lions.
"The voices of angry consumers in this weekend’s news coverage speak volumes,'' Kerry said in a letter detailing his bill to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski. "Many football fans had to leave home, denied the service they faithfully pay for, and even bring their children to bars to watch the game.''
Such blackouts could become commonplace, said Kerry, chairman of the communications, Internet and technology subcommittee of the Senate Commerce Committee. He said upcoming negotiations between FOX and the DISH Network could threaten the programming for thousands of households in Boston and millions nationwide.
In response, Kerry's bill would call for the FCC to act as a referee when cable operators and broadcasters reach an impasse. The bill would provide the FCC with tools that could break an impasse, including imposing fines or ordering binding arbitration in cases when one or both companies are negotiating in bad faith. The bill also calls for more timely information for consumers.
Kerry said he would file the bill during the lame duck session after mid-term elections early next month.
"There are important equities and business interests at stake in these negotiations, and in this most recent case, both sides believe they’ve negotiated in good faith,'' Kerry wrote in his letter. "It’s not our job to take sides -- but it is clearly our responsibility to ask whether there’s a better way forward as these kinds of situations rise in frequency."
Markey calls on Facebook to explain privacy breaches
Representative Edward Markey wants Facebook to provide a full accounting of privacy breaches in its social-networking website that give advertisers and tracking firms access to the names and other identifying information of users.
Responding to a Wall Street Journal investigation that found tens of millions of users affected by the breaches, Markey and Representative Joe Barton requested that Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg answer a series of questions. Markey, a Democrat from Malden, and Barton, a Republican from Texas, are cochairmen of the House Bipartisan Privacy Caucus.
The security culprits, according to the Journal, are independent software applications, or apps, which allow users to play games together or share other common interests. The Journal found that the 10 most popular applications on Facebook transmitted users' IDs to outside companies. Advertisers and other companies could then use such information to build databases on the users and target advertisements to them or sell that information to a third party.
Even careful Facebook users who restricted access to their accounts were affected if they used these apps. It is unclear how long the problem has existed.
“Given the number of current users, the rate at which that number grows worldwide, and the age range of Facebook users, combined with the amount and the nature of information these users place in Facebook’s trust, this series of breaches of consumer privacy is a cause for concern,” Markey and Barton wrote.
The congressmen asked Zuckerberg how long Facebook has known about the breaches, whether data from minors were disseminated, whether users' medical and financial information were threatened, and whether Facebook received money for access to the information. The company was asked to respond by Oct. 27.
Markey and Barton are working on comprehensive privacy legislation that is before the Committee on Energy and Commerce. A subcommittee hearing is expected during the lame duck session next month.
In the Journal report, Facebook executives said the company would immediate take steps to "dramatically limit'' the exposure of personal information.
“We’re happy to work with Representatives Markey and Barton to answer any questions they may have,” Andrew Noyes, a Facebook spokesman, said in an e-mailed statement, according to Bloomberg News.
Brown's fundraising clip slows
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown’s fundraising tapered off during the latest cycle, with just over $500,000 flowing into his campaign account over a three-month period.
The fundraising haul comes after record-setting months leading up to and following his special election victory in January. His aides say that during recent months he has instead been focused on raising money for others, attending 50 fundraisers for candidates in Massachusetts and across the country. He still has $6.8 million in the bank, more than any other Massachusetts politician, two years ahead of a 2012 re-election campaign.
But it is a drop from his previous fundraising clip, with far more attention going to candidates running this year and with many of Brown's top donors being tapped out this year. Between April 1 and June 30, he brought in $1.1 million and during his special election campaign, he raised $15.2 million.
During the latest filing, which covers a period between July 1 and Sept. 30, Brown spent $278,000. Much of it went to campaign staff salaries, consulting fees, and travel expenses.
The latest figures are reflected in campaign finance forms that are due to the Federal Election Commission today.
Several members of the congressional delegation, and their campaign opponents, have also turned in their forms. Unlike Brown, who is not up for re-election, congressional members had to submit information prior to the primary election so their latest data only covers about a five week period, from Aug. 26 to Sept. 30.
Representative Barney Frank raised $315,600 during that period, including $43,675 that was bundled for him by the political action committee for Fidelity Investments. Frank, a Newton Democrat, is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee and was a chief architect of the financial overhaul legislation passed earlier this year.
Heading into the final weeks before the election, Frank had $1.1 million in his account. The forms for Frank’s Republican opponent, Sean Bielat, had not yet been posted this morning.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Robert Kennedy Jr. bypasses Democrats in Florida
Beleaguered Democrats in Florida have suffered a blow from an unlikely source -- a Kennedy
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a Democrat and noted environmentalist from New York, followed California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican and husband of Maria Shriver, Kennedy’s first cousin, in backing independent Charlie Crist over Democrat Kendrick Meek and the front-runner, GOP nominee Marco Rubio, for an open US Senate seat.
For Kennedy, the political calculus to endorse Crist had three factors: Crist's record as an environmentalist, particularly his support for solar energy, is exceptional; Rubio represents a right-wing threat to good governance; and Meek is confronted with an uncomfortable political reality -- he can't win.
“At some point it becomes clear in political life we all have to make choices that are bigger than ourselves,’’ Kennedy said at a Crist gathering in Deerfield Beach Wednesday, inferring Meeks should step aside. “I hope that Kendrick will look at the entire landscape as he assesses the future of this election.''
A Quinnipiac University poll shows Rubio with a commanding lead, taking 44 percent of the vote to Crist's 30 percent and Meek's 22 percent. A recent Public Policy Polling survey, however, has Rubio and Crist in a dead heat, if Meek were to drop out.
“The only person who can win this race and bring common sense to Washington is my friend Charlie Crist,” Kennedy told the group of about 100 supporters of Crist, the Republican governor of Florida who switched to independent after determining he could not beat Rubio in the GOP primary.
Meek's campaign said the congressman has no intention of quitting and called him a leader in saving the environment.
Meek's spokesman Nathan Click told Fox News that the congressman has his own Kennedy support.
The campaign has run an ad that included an image of the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy. The spot was approved by Kennedy's widow, Vicki, "who said she was honored to give Kendrick her family's blessing to use the photo in the commercial," Click said.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the son of former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of President John F. Kennedy and Senator Edward M. Kennedy, called the Florida Senate race the most critical in the country, one that is threatened by blind populist fervor. He did not mince his words:
“(Rubio), like other Tea Partiers has a very radical vision, a very narrow vision, an I-can-be-as-stupid-as-I-want vision of this country, and that has a little bit of appeal to people when they're angry - but it is not a good long-term plan.’’
Brown endorses full slate of Mass. GOP congressional hopefuls
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this morning announced that he was endorsing all nine Republican congressional candidates running in Massachusetts, and planned to contribute $1,000 to each of their campaigns.
Brown had been active previously in several of the campaigns, but had not endorsed the full slate of congressional hopefuls. There are nine contested races this year; the only incumbent without a challenger is Representative Michael Capuano, a Somerville Democrat.
“On November 2nd, the people of Massachusetts are ready to send another message to Washington,” Brown said this morning in a statement. “Right now, we need new independent voices in Washington who will fight for more jobs, lower taxes and stand up to the out-of-control government spending that has driven the national debt to record levels. I am proud to support these candidates.”
The endorsements include:
- Jeff Perry, a state representative, who is running to represent the 10th Congressional District. He is facing Bill Keating, the Democratic nominee and the Norfolk County District Attorney. They are running for an open seat, being vacated by the retirement of Representative Bill Delahunt.
- Vern Harrison, a businessman, who is running to represent the 9th Congressional District. He is facing Representative Stephen Lynch, a South Boston Democrat.
- Gerry Dembrowski, a physician and small business owner, who is running to represent the 7th Congressional District. He is facing Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat.
- Bill Hudak, an attorney and small business owner, who is running to represent the 6th Congressional District. He is facing Representative John Tierney, a Salem Democrat.
- Jon Golnik, a small business owner, who is running to represent the 5th Congressional District. He is facing Representative Niki Tsongas, a Lowell Democrat.
- Sean Bielat, a veteran of the Marine Corps, who is running to represent the 4th Congressional District. He is facing Representative Barney Frank, a Newton Democrat.
- Marty Lamb, a small business owner and attorney, who is running to represent the 3rd Congressional District. He is facing Representative James McGovern, a Worcester Democrat
- Tom Wesley, a Navy veteran and businessman, who is running to represent the 2nd Congressional District. He is facing Representative Richard Neal, a Springfield Democrat.
- Bill Gunn, a small business owner, who is running to represent the 1st Congressional District. He is facing Representative John Olver, an Amherst Democrat.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
John Kerry plans to go to Sudan, Clooney says
Massachusetts Senator John Kerry hopes to travel to Sudan before the high-stakes referendum on independence slated for January 9, according to actor and Sudan activist George Clooney, who had an hour-long conversation with Kerry this week.
"Senator Kerry has been very much involved and is very proud of how much he has been involved," Clooney told reporters Tuesday night at the Council on Foreign Relations. "He wants to go before the referendum and takes as many senators as he can."
Kerry's spokesman Frederick Jones could not confirm an upcoming trip, but said: "Of course Senator Kerry is very concerned about the situation on the ground and he'd like to do whatever he can to make sure the referendum is conducted fairly and peacefully,"
Clooney said Congressional support is key to ensuring that Sudan -- a country that has suffered from decades of war between the mostly Muslim and Arab north and the mostly African and non-Muslim south -- does not fall back into civil war. He said Congress was instrumental in getting an historic peace agreement in 2005, and holds the key now to making sure that Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir does not resume a war with the south if southerners vote to become an independent state.
.
Clooney, who just returned from a trip to Sudan with John Prendergast, co-founder of the Enough Project, is in Washington this week to lobby for greater involvement. On Tuesday, the pair met President Obama at the White House, several members of Congress and spoke at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Prendergast, who has previously been critical of the Obama administration's level of engagement on Sudan, said Obama impressed him with his detailed understanding of the conflict. He said he supports the administration's bid to offer incentives to Bashir to convince him that a resumption of war is not in his interest.
"Bashir doesn't want to be the guy that lost the south and got nothing out of it," Prendergast said.
The pair said that Obama talked to them about the punishments that he would be willing to use if Sudan chooses the path of war, but that the president said those should not be spoken about in public.
Kaine in N.H. for house party, opening remarks
WASHINGTON – Tim Kaine, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, will be in New Hampshire tonight as part of an ongoing effort to rally supporters for the midterm elections.
Kaine, who will be at a private home in Manchester, NH, is planning to deliver opening remarks to house parties across the country before President Obama begins a Town Hall at George Washington University. The remarks, and the town hall, will be broadcast live online at 7 p.m.
The gatherings, called “Commit to Vote” house parties, are part of a push by Democrats to close an enthusiasm gap that Republicans have been trying to take advantage of. The GOP has been far more active during the midterm election primaries, with their sights set on taking back the House and Senate majorities.
The Democrats are trying relying on techniques that worked during Obama’s 2008 presidential race to try and encourage their supporters to vote this year when Obama’s name is not at the top of the ticket.
Obama’s town hall tonight is the third in a series of events that he is doing to try and stoke his base. He held a rally last week in Madison, Wisconsin, and was in Philadelphia yesterday.
“With the November elections only 21 days away, President Obama is back on the campaign trail, barnstorming the country and talking about why this election matters,” Kaine, a former Virginia governor, wrote in an email to supporters.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Cook Report: Frank's race could get competitive
WASHINGTON – Representative Barney Frank’s race for re-election could be getting tighter, according to DC-based political prognosticators.
The race between the Newton Democrat and Republican nominee Sean Bielat was shifted over the weekend from a rating of “solid Democratic” to “likely Democratic” by the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.
The “likely Democratic” category is reserved for races that are not currently considered competitive but have the potential to move in that direction. Previously, the race the Massachusetts Fourth District, was considered so safe for Democrats that it didn't bear mentioning.
“Barney Frank is still a substantial favorite to win this race, but it’s now going to be a $2 million affair,” said David Wasserman, the House editor of the Cook Political Report. “This year is volatile, and the political dynamics might be worse right now than they were in January when Scott Brown won.”
Four other Democrats – most, like Frank, long-serving incumbents – also just joined the list races that could become competitive in the final weeks before voters go to the polls. Those races include: Raúl Grijalva of Arizona; Jim Oberstar of Minnesota; Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico; Soloman Ortiz of Texas.
The contest in the Massachusetts Fifth District – between Democratic Representative Niki Tsongas and the Republican nominee Jon Golnik – is also considered likely Democratic.
Only one congressional race in Massachusetts is considered by the Cook Political Report to be competitive. That race – for the Tenth District seat currently held by retiring Representative Bill Delahunt – is one where Democrats are deemed to have a slight edge.
The Bay State's other seven congressional seats, which all feature incumbent Democrats running for re-election, are considered safe for Democrats.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown continues his fight against medical device tax in health care law
Senator Scott Brown continues his fight against health care reform today at a medical industry conference by reiterating his commitment to killing a medical device tax provision in the law, according to trade publication Mass Device.
"I'm still on it. We're working on it daily. This isn't over, OK? The health care bill and its implementation and the way it affects your industry is not over," said Brown in opening remarks at the annual Medtech Investors Conference, an event held by the Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council. His previous effort to block the 2.3 percent tax on medical devices failed in the Senate.
"Massachusetts has more than 200 medical device manufacturers who employ tens of thousands of workers," said Brown in a March 30 Globe op-ed. "The medical device tax will not only cost our state good-paying jobs when we can least afford it, but it will be passed along to consumers, who will pay more for necessary medical equipment."
Obama signs bill to expand technology access for disabled
WASHINGTON – President Obama this afternoon signed legislation spearheaded by Representative Edward J. Markey that significantly expands the digital horizons of the disabled.
The bipartisan legislation increases access for the disabled to a panoply of high-tech devices and means of communications, from phones calls over the Internet to enhanced TV remotes and easier-to-use smartphones.
“The bill I’m signing today into law will better ensure full participation in our democracy and our economy for Americans with disabilities,” Obama said today in a ceremony at the White House attended by Markey and several other lawmakers.
The 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act mandates that remote controls have buttons to easily access closed captioning on broadcast and pay television; requires telecommunications equipment that makes calls over the internet to be compatible with hearing aids; and makes television program guides and selection menus accessible to those with vision loss. It also requires captioning on new TV programs that are offered online and improves the web accessibility of smartphones.
“We’ve moved from Braille to broadband, from tracing words in palms to navigating a Palm Pilot,'' Markey, a Democrat of Malden who introduced the legislation in June 2009, said in a statement. "Americans with disabilities need access to the latest 21st century communications and video tools to compete in the job market and engage in daily activities that increasingly rely on the latest technologies.”
The new law also provides $10 million annually for low-income Americans who are both deaf and blind to use for purchasing accessible internet access.
At the ceremony, Obama recognized Markey and several other members of congress. He also paid tribute to another attendee: Stevie Wonder.
“I happen to be listening to him this morning when I woke up,” Obama said. “He’s what I work out to. He’s what I sweet-talk Michelle to.”
Earlier in the week, Obama signed a bill that removes the phrase “mentally retarded” from all federal health, education, and labor laws. It replaces the phrase with “intellectual disability.”
National parties start spending in Mass. 10th race
WASHINGTON – In a sign that national Democrats are worried about losing a congressional seat in Massachusetts, they started taking out ads this week that criticize Republican nominee Jeffrey Perry.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spent more than $187,000 over the past week to produce and air ads in the Massachusetts 10th congressional race, according to Federal Election Commission records.
Perry, a state representative, is facing Democratic nominee Bill Keating, the Norfolk County district attorney. They are vying to replace US Representative Bill Delahunt, who is retiring, in the state’s most competitive congressional race.
The bulk of the DCCC spending is going to air a 30-second spot that criticizes Perry for a case involving strip searches while he was a police officer in Wareham.
Republicans also reported spending money on the race this week. The National Republican Congressional Committee spent $68,000. Most of that went to an ad criticizing Keating for his positions on taxes, earmarks, and term limits.
The national parties so far have not been involved in any other races in Massachusetts.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com
Michelle Obama rallies support, raises funds for mid-term elections
Democrats tapped First Lady Michelle Obama today to rally supporters and raise money in a mass e-mail just weeks before they could face losing majorities in the House and possibly the Senate in midterm elections.
"Barack can't keep making progress without strong allies in Congress," Obama wrote in the e-mail. "And now the same people who've opposed us at every turn are targeting the folks who voted to make change real."
The first lady mentions overhauls of healthcare and and financial regulations and asks for donations at this "critical moment."
The appeal appears to be part of a fund-raising initiative called Michelle Match in which contributions are matched by unidentified "grassroots donors." In the e-mail, Obama identifies them as "teachers and firefighters, truckers and nurses who have made pledges of support hoping to inspire you to take the next step. Because of them, a $3 contribution will become $6."
The e-mail links to a page that features Michelle Obama's picture and the plea, "answer Michelle's call."
The Democratic National Committee raised $16 million in September, making it the best month for Democrats during the current election cycle. Still, analysts are predicting a loss in the House of 40 seats for Democrats, which would give Republicans a majority. And in the Senate, according to the nonpartisan Cook Political Report, the Republicans are on track to gain between seven and nine seats, just shy of the 10 they would need for a majority.
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Kerry stumps for Hodes in Nashua tonight
Senator John F. Kerry may be known for his calm, cool demeanor, but Paul Hodes is looking to the Massachusetts Democrat to help spark his campaign to replace the retiring Judd Gregg, Republican of New Hampshire, in the US Senate.
Kerry will join Hodes, a two-term congressman, and a state firefighters group at a Nashua rally tonight to start Hodes’s “Turn Up the Heat on Washington’’ tour, according to Hodes’s campaign. Hodes plans to join the firefighters at a series of similar events around the state before the Nov. 2 election against the GOP nominee, former attorney general Kelly Ayotte.
Also today, Hodes’s campaign said the National Rifle Association has given him an "A" rating for backing Second Amendment rights. Hodes has long prided himself on being a guns rights advocate, a key quality in a state that's big on hunting and personal liberties.
Hodes has trailed Ayotte in the most recent polls, with a WMUR Granite State Poll late last month showing Ayotte holding a lead of 50 percent to 35 percent for Hodes.
Ayotte's campaign said the Kerry visit was another example of the "liberal Democratic establishment'' attempting to bolster Hodes.
"From insulting voters, to avoiding taxes on his yacht, John Kerry has consistently proven himself to be completely out-of-touch with reality,'' New Hampshire Republican Party Communications Director Ryan Williams said in a statement. "In the Senate, Hodes would stand with entrenched politicians like John Kerry, instead of standing up for the traditional New Hampshire values of limited taxation and smaller government."
Kerry pushes Pentagon to give dishonorable discharge to U.S. Navy sailor convicted in fatal shooting
BOSTON — John Kerry is pushing the Pentagon to give a dishonorable discharge for a U.S. Navy sailor convicted of the fatal shooting death of his ex-girlfriend, another Navy sailor, in Virginia in 2009.
“I want justice," Kerry said in a statement issued Thursday about Caitlin Trask, the 20-year-old Bradford woman. Darren Mackie, 22, of Wisconsin told authorities that he was horsing around with Trask, and that he did not know the gun was loaded when he shot her in the back of the head. He pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter, and was sentenced to 10 years in prison, but was never given a dishonorable discharge.
The case came to Kerry's attention in April of 2009, when Trask's family wrote asking Kerry to pressure the Pentagon to court martial Mackie instead of hand the case over to a civilian court. Ten days later, Kerry wrote a letter seeking a court martial and a military punishment, but he was rebuffed. Although Kerry failed to convince the Navy to prosecute the case in a military court, he has continued his crusade to give Mackie a dishonorable discharge, instead of the "other than honorable" discharge, which would allow him to apply to re-enlist in the Navy at a later date.
An aide said Kerry was continuing to highlight the issue to make sure the case gets the attention it deserves from the Navy. Kerry wrote a letter Thursday to Defense Secretary Robert Gates seeking a full investigation.
The text of the letter is as follows:
Secretary Robert M. Gates
1400 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1400
Dear Mr. Secretary:
On behalf of the family of deceased U.S. Navy sailor Caitlin Trask, who was killed by her former boyfriend on February 12, 2009, I respectfully request an investigation by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense into the conduct of the United States Navy.
The notion that an active duty sailor could shoot and kill another sailor and then manage to avoid a dishonorable discharge is beyond my ability to comprehend. I would ask that the investigation determine if any options remain to facilitate a dishonorable discharge for Darren Mackie and to identify what Navy procedures need to be changed in order to ensure that no such travesty is ever allowed to happen again. Additionally, the investigation should determine if any Navy personnel were derelict in their duty with regards to this case.
Mr. Secretary, I have been working closely with the Trask family for well over a year now in their pursuit of justice for their late daughter. I can attest that this is extremely important to the surviving parents of a young woman who was proudly serving her country. A thorough, objective investigation is absolutely essential.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
Sincerely,
John F. Kerry
United States Senate
Sebelius denounces anonymous campaign contributions
WASHINGTON -- Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius today denounced the flow of "anonymous money’’ in individual congressional races this year.
Speaking to reporters at a breakfast meeting, she echoed remarks by President Obama in his January State of the Union address, when he said the Supreme Court’s set a dangerous precedent with its decision to allow unlimited elections spending by corporations. Since that court ruling, Congress has not passed bills that would require disclosure of who is bankrolling election-season political commercials on television.
"I really think the untold story of 2010 is not the Tea Party or not the health care bill or a number of these issues. It is the amount of money that is flowing in districts around the country, and particularly the amount of anonymous money,’’ Sebelius said on a video released by the Christian Science Monitor, which sponsored the breakfast.
"I haven’t been any place where there aren’t dozens of ads now being run, and nobody knows who’s behind them.
"I’m used to a political system where people engage in battles, and you know who brought `em to the dance, and that becomes part of the discussion. … That becomes at least something that voters can talk about and think about.’’
But this year, she said, there is "money flowing in unbelievable ways.’’
"For constituents to try and figure out who is it that is behind this, whose friends are you, who is standing up for you – I think is difficult if not impossible right now, and I think that is pretty dangerous.’’
Kerry defends Obama on Don Imus show
WASHINGTON – Senator John Kerry this morning defended President Obama while trying to skirt questions over whether the Massachusetts Democrat would have done a better job if he were sitting in the White House.
“You would have been a better president than President Obama turned out, wouldn’t you?” asked Don Imus, whose show airs on FOX Business Network.
“Uh, no,” Kerry said. “What are you asking me to do? Make a stupid comment?”
“I have confidence I would have been a good president,” Kerry added. “I back President Obama. And I think he’s done a terrific job under very difficult circumstances.”
Imus then asked, “You wouldn’t have done better?” and Kerry replied, “I would have tried to do better.”
“Just trying to walk you into that,” Imus said.
“I know you are,” Kerry said. “And I’m trying like hell to stay away from it.”
During the appearance, Kerry also said Obama “has made some of the toughest decisions of any president in 50 or 60 years.” But he also said that health care “hasn’t been sold as effectively as it should be” and, on the economy, “we’ve missed some opportunities, frankly, to turn it around.”
He also stood by his recent comments that voters don’t pay attention and are influenced by “a simple slogan.”
“I don’t blame people for not paying attention,” Kerry said. “I think people are turned off by it. That’s why they’re angry today. They don’t think we’re dealing with the real problems. And I think they’re tired of the consultants and the money and everything reducing their lives to these very simplistic, non-factually based sloganeering campaigns that don’t create jobs and that don’t solve problems and don’t reduce the deficit and don’t find the compromise. I think that’s why the electorate’s so angry. I think it’s an accurate thing that people are turned off of Washington, they’re turned off of the process.”
At the end of the segment, Imus again chided Kerry about his former presidential aspirations.
"It's always a pleasure to have you on," Imus said. "You're like trying to book the president, I would remind you, because you're not."
"Thank you, I needed the reminder," Kerry said with a laugh. "Thank you."
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com
Kerry, Frank law permits parents to be buried in military cemeteries next to fallen children
WASHINGTON _ A new law sponsored by Sen. John F. Kerry and Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts will now allow some parents of fallen soldiers to be buried next to their children in national military cemeteries.
The Corey Shea Act, named for an Army specialist from Mansfield who was killed in Iraq in 2008, was approved by both houses of Congress late yesterday.
Shea's mother, Denise Anderson, had petitioned the Department of Veterans Affairs for the right to be buried next to her son in Bourne National Veterans' Cemetery. But the law stipulated that only veterans, their spouses, and minor children were eligible.
Shea, 21, had no spouse or children and his mother sought help from Kerry and Frank.
"No parent of a fallen soldier should have to worry about their child being buried alone," Kerry said in a statement this morning.
Frank said this was the least the nation could do for Anderson, a member of American Gold Star Mothers, the organization of mothers who have lost a son or daughter in service to the nation.
The bill, part of the Veterans Insurance and Health Care Improvement Act, covers all 131 national veterans' cemeteries. It is now awaiting President Obama's signature.
House expands access to disabled, initiative pushed by Markey
WASHINGTON – The House last night gave final approval to legislation that significantly expands access for the blind and deaf to technology such as the internet, smart phones, and video.
“Whether it’s a Braille reader or a broadband connection, access to technology is not a political issue - it’s a participation issue,” said Representative Ed Markey, a Malden Democrat and author of the legislation. “Two decades ago, Americans with disabilities couldn’t get around if buildings weren’t wheelchair accessible; today it’s about being Web accessible.”
The measure, which was previously approved by the Senate, is expected to be signed into law next week by President Obama.
The 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act will mandate that remote controls have buttons to easily access closed captioning on broadcast and pay television; require telecommunications equipment that makes calls over the internet to be compatible with hearing aids; and make television program guides and selection menus accessible to those with vision loss.
The new law also provides $10 million annually for low-income Americans who are both deaf and blind to use for purchasing accessible internet access.
“The [Americans with Disabilities Act] mandated physical ramps into buildings. Today, individuals with disabilities need online ramps to the Internet so they can get to the Web from wherever they happen to be,” Markey said. “Passage of this bill is a landmark achievement in the fight for equal access to technology for all Americans.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
House could adjourn today, Frank says
The US House of Representatives is expected to wrap up its business and adjourn today so lawmakers can go home and campaign, according to Massachusetts Representative Barney Frank.
Frank said at a Financial Services Committee hearing this morning that the House will be taking "a lot of votes" in an effort to adjourn.
Congress has a number of initiatives that would no doubt be left on the table without a vote if lawmakers go home, including the fate of Bush tax cuts which are scheduled to expire at the end of this year.
Democrats have been divided on whether to force a vote on the cuts before the midterm elections or to take them up when they return for a lame duck session afterward.
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Colbert’s report, revisited
Comedian Stephen Colbert’s now infamous testimony in front of the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law Friday has drawn mixed reactions on Capitol Hill and off.
Subcommittee chairwoman Zoe Lofgren, Democrat of California, invited Colbert to bring attention to the struggles of illegal immigrant farm laborers, based on his first-hand experience – a day spent as a migrant worker for a Colbert Report segment.
Today the Globe's editorial page weighed in:
“Colbert began his remarks in his persona as a Bill O’Reilly-style conservative commentator whose ideological blinders discredit everything he says. Colbert’s gags — his assertion that consumers should stop eating vegetables, his offer to enter a video of his colonoscopy into the congressional record — fell embarrassingly flat.”
Read more of the Globe’s “A little earnestness goes a long way” here.
Dept. of Justice calls on Congress to pass legislation to prosecute fraud by public officials
US Department of Justice officials called on Congress today to pass legislation to help them prosecute fraud by public officials and corporate executives, saying a recent Supreme Court decision "significantly eroded" federal law enforcement's ability to go after such crimes.
The court ruled that the federal "theft of honest services statute" applies only to bribery and kickback schemes and not to more general situations involving self-dealing. It was a decision cited by former Massachusetts House speaker Salvatore DiMasi in an unsuccessful attempt by his lawyer to have the corruption case against him dismissed. Prosecutors relied on other statutes instead.
"The Department believes that the Court’s decision has created a gap in our ability to address the full range of fraudulent and corrupt conduct by public officials and corporate executives, and we urge Congress to pass legislation to fill the void," Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer said today at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, according to a written copy of his remarks.
He said fraud isn't limited to bribery and kickbacks. There is also the act of depriving the public or shareholders of honest service with undisclosed self-beneficial actions.
"Such schemes did not always cause a tangible loss of money or property to the victims," Breuer said. "Instead, the harm was to the integrity of the decision-making process itself."
Breuer declined to give specifics about ongoing investigations they may have been affected or whether cases had to be dropped because of the Supreme Court decision, Skilling v. the United States, but gave a hypothetical example of the type of crime that could now slip by unprosecuted.
"As any prosecutor can attest, corrupt officials and those who corrupt them can be very ingenious," he said.
"For example, if a mayor were to solicit tens of thousands of dollars in bribes in return for giving out city contracts to unqualified bidders, that mayor could be charged with bribery. But if the same Mayor decides that he wants to make even more money through the abuse of his official position, he might secretly create his own company, and use the authority and power of his office to funnel City contracts to that company. Although this second kind of scheme is corrupt, and undermines public confidence in the integrity of their government, it is not bribery. Accordingly, after Skilling, it is no longer covered by the honest services fraud statute or any other federal statute."
DiMasi, who was indicted in June 2009, is awaiting trial on charges that he received nearly $60,000 in exchange for directing state contracts to a Burlington-based software company.
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Brown to file legislation on Arlington National Cemetery
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this afternoon announced that he was filing legislation to crack down on mismanagement at Arlington National Cemetery that has resulted in graves being mismarked and family members trying to determine whether their loved ones are buried in the right graves.
“Our nation is grateful for the sacrifices our veterans and their families have made to keep us safe and our citizens free,” the Massachusetts Republican said in a video press release. “The problems uncovered at Arlington National Cemetery have made national headlines and have tarnished a sacred trust with military families. This bill will ensure that Service members families will never have to endure such devastating and emotional turmoil ever again.”
Brownis planning to file the legislation today Senator Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat who chairs the subcommittee on contracting oversight. Other co-sponsors include Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, and Senator Richard Burr, Republican of North Carolina.
The legislation directs the Secretary of the Army to review and report to Congress on progress being made to fix the errors and improve the operations at the cemetery. It also calls for a review of the contracts associated with burial and management at the cemetery, and for better outreach to families of those buried at the cemetery.
The hallowed cemetery has been the source of controversy following a yearlong investigation by Salon reporter Mark Benjamin. The reports detailed cases in which officials found unknown remains in graves that were supposed to be empty, for example, or buried a service member on top of another.
The Army launched an investigation and in June two top officials resigned.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Dukakis shared his strategy for midterm elections at the White House
WASHINGTON -- Former Massachusetts Governor Michael S. Dukakis, the failed 1988 presidential nominee, recently visited the White House and delivered his strategy for the midterm elections: pound key precincts across the country with the message that Republicans want to implement the same policies that led to the Great Recession.
Dukakis, who said in a telephone interview that he "popped in" to the White House while on a trip here several weeks ago, said he told aides to President Obama that Republicans "want to go back and do exactly what got us in this mess in the first place."
"It seems to me there has to be a single message coming from Democrats, from the president on down," Dukakis said. "We've got to pound that message as hard as can from now until November."
Asked if the White House aides were receptive, he said, "I think they certainly get it." He declined to name the aides he met at the White House.
Dukakis said that it was also important for Democrats to remind voters that former President George W. Bush left the country with an increasing deficit.
Urging Democrats to focus the message through grassroots efforts in key precincts, Dukakis concluded: "If we do that and deliver this message over and over again, we are going to be OK."
Kerry, Brown laud help for fishermen
Both Massachusetts senators today lauded the Commerce Department for a series of efforts to improve the working relationship between beleaguered fishermen and their regulators. Those measures, revealed by Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, include creating a confidential email hotline for fishermen to report abusive and overly aggressive enforcement of fishing regulations and $3.35 million in research grants for New England fishermen and local researchers to boost conservation and reduce the amount of fish that are unintentionally caught and killed.
“We’ve sounded the alarm bells and Secretary Locke has responded,” said Kerry, a Democrat and member of the fisheries subcommittee in the Senate. “This investment is a down payment on rebuilding the trust our fishermen have lost in the system – it will give them a voice in the process, and promote cooperative research to prevent bycatch. Our fishermen have taken a pounding in this economy and we need to do everything we can to help them.”
His Republican counterpart concurred:
“I’m pleased Secretary Locke is working to improve the relationship between government officials and the fishing industry,'' Brown said. "There is no question that our fishermen are hurting right now and these funds will help provide fishermen the tools and resources they need to sustain the industry.''
The two joined Democratic representatives Barney Frank of Newton, William Delahunt of Quincy, and John Tierney of Salem in applauding the Commerce Department's actions.
Locke met with local fishermen and officials in Boston today to discuss the changes and the difficulties facing an industry battered by falling stocks, rising costs, and layers of evolving regulations.
In May, the government changed how the quotas for some waning stocks of fish are counted. New rules now encourage fishermen to organize into sectors that will be allocated a share of the annual quota for each imperiled species of fish. Once a group exceeds its limit on a particular kind of fish, all members must cease all fishing.
Some fishermen complained the new rules are drastic and unworkable. They have also complained about arbitrary and onerous enforcement of regulations by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, a claim backed in part by a recent government report.
"The problems identified by the inspector general are simply unacceptable, and they were allowed to persist for too long," said Locke. "Those problems will end on my watch."
New forecasts on redistricting still has Mass. on losing end
WASHINGTON – A new study of demographic data forecasts that 12 congressional seats affecting 18 states – including Massachusetts – will change hands for the 2012 elections as a result of shifting population bases throughout the country.
Massachusetts would lose one seat, as would seven other states – Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania – according to new projections from Election Data Services, Inc. New York and Ohio would each lose two seats.
There would be several beneficiaries, according to the estimates.
Six states -- Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah, and Washington – would each gain one seat. Florida would gain two seats, and Texas would gain four.
“We were most surprised at the shift of an additional district out of New York and down to Florida, even though that follows the population movement in this country since World War II,” said Kimball Brace, president of the election data firm.
There are 16 states that are on the cusp and could still change, according to the study, but Massachusetts is not among them. It is firmly in the category of states projected to lose a seat.
No other state in New England would be impacted, although Rhode Island is only narrowly expected to keep both of its current congressional districts; if the census numbers come in lower than expected, it could lose one of those seats.
The reapportionment process will begin shortly after the US Census numbers are released. Each state will then have to draw new congressional districts in time for the 2012 elections.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Biden tries to rally troops in Manchester, NH
WASHINGTON – Vice President Joe Biden this afternoon tried to rally about 200 Democratic activists and donors at a fundraiser in Manchester, N.H., filling the campaign coffers of candidates in key midterm races.
“Every one of these is winnable,” Biden said, according to a press pool report of the event.
Biden, speaking at Stoneyfield Farm, the producer of organic yogurt and ice cream, said he knows that voters are angry and will “take it out on those who are in office.”
"They should be able to be angry with us," Biden said. "If we make this a referendum on the current state of affairs, we lose. And so that’s why we’ve got to make this a choice."
"For us to say we’ve made things better is not enough,” he added. “They have a right to ask us, ‘Where do we go from here?’"
He also quoted Kevin White, the longtime mayor of Boston, as saying, "Don’t compare me to the Almighty. Compare me to the alternative."
Biden contrasted his party with the Republicans, saying their policies hurt the middle class. He also referred to the GOP’s new “Pledge to America” as calling “for the elimination of everything from the FBI to child care and everything in between, literally.”
New Hampshire, which has leaned toward the Democrats in recent years, has a several closely-contested races this year.
The fundraiser benefited Representative Paul Hodes, the Democratic nominee for US Senate; Representative Carol Shea-Porter, who is seeking reelection in the state’s 1st congressional district; and the New Hampshire Democratic Party.
Ann McLane Kuster, who is running for the 2nd District U.S. House being vacated by Hodes, and Senator Jeanne Shaheen, also spoke.
"We’re going to retain control of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate,” Biden said. "The biggest reason New Hampshire will stay blue in November is because of the quality of the candidates. Every single one of them knows what they believe and are committed to push for what they believe."
UPDATE, 7:29 p.m.: "After blindly supporting the White House’s tax-and-spend agenda, it’s no wonder Hodes and Shea-Porter are calling Washington for some outside help," said Parish Braden, Republican National Committee spokesman. "Unfortunately, today’s visit from the Vice President will only serve to remind voters that Paul Hodes and Carol Shea-Porter are in lock step with the Obama Administration’s failed economic policies that have hurt small businesses, raised taxes and put our country further into debt.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown endorses candidates in Fla., Conn., N.H., Pa.
- In Florida, he is backing US Senate hopeful Marco Rubio
- In Connecticut, he is supporting US Senate hopeful Linda McMahon and Tom Foley, who is running for governor in Connecticut
- In New Hampshire, he is supporting US Senate candidate Kelly Ayotte and John Stephen, who is running for governor.
Over the past month, Brown also traveled to Ohio, California, Washington state, and Illinois to help various candidates.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown blasts Harvard president for barring ROTC because of 'don't ask, don't tell'
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown today strongly criticized Harvard President Drew Gilpin Faust for comments published in the Globe in which Faust said the university would continue barring ROTC from campus unless the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy is revoked.
Brown contrasted Faust’s position on ROTC with her recent advocacy for looser immigration rules, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants who attend college or join the military.
“Harvard President Faust has been lobbying on Capitol Hill in support of the DREAM Act, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants attending college. Harvard has its priorities upside down,” the Massachusetts Republican said in a statement. “They should embrace young people who want to serve their country, rather than promoting a plan that provides amnesty to students who are in this country illegally.”
“I am extremely disappointed to learn of Harvard University’s decision to continue to ban ROTC from its campus,” he added. “It is incomprehensible to me that Harvard does not allow ROTC to use its facilities, but welcomes students who are in this country illegally.”
It was a rare broadside from one state’s highest-profile politicians, targeting its most prominent university.
A Harvard spokesman said this afternoon that the university “very much want[s] to make sure that all young people living in our communities can serve in the military.”
“President Faust has said many times that she very much looks forward to the day when the opportunity to pursue military service will be available to all our students who have the ability and the desire to serve,” said John Longbrake, an assistant vice president at the university. “Individual Harvard students continue to serve proudly in the ROTC through a longstanding consortium arrangement with MIT and other local colleges and universities, and President Faust is deeply grateful to them for their service to our country.”
Faust -- along with presidents of Tufts, Boston University, Northeastern, MIT, Boston College, UMass Boston, and the University of Massachusetts system – sent a letter this week to Brown and Senator John F. Kerry urging them to vote for the so-called Dream Act. Faust also came to Washington last week to advocate for the bill, bringing an immigrant student who was detained in June for being in the United States illegally from Mexico.
The legislation would create a path to legal residency for youths who arrived before they turned 16; have lived in the United States for five consecutive years; and have no criminal record. In order to become citizens, they would have to graduate from high school or obtain a GED, complete two years in college or the military, and be under 35 years old.
Critics say that it would reward immigrant families who came to the country illegally, and say it lacks the comprehensive provisions to crack down on illegal immigration.
Brown has been opposed to it, calling the plan “amnesty” and politically motivated. Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, has been a strong proponent.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was pushing to attach the Dream Act to a defense appropriations bill. The issue never came up for a vote because Republicans, including Brown, blocked the bill from coming to the floor. The defense authorization bill also included a repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.”
The “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy also came up earlier this year when Brown met with Elana Kagan, who moved to bar military recruiters when she was dean of Harvard Law School. Brown said he was satisfied with her explanation at the time, but later voted against her nomination as Supreme Court justice because he said she didn’t have enough judicial experience.
The university expelled the ROTC program from campus in 1969 amid protests against the Vietnam War. Faust said yesterday the only reason it is still barred is "entirely linked to 'don't ask, don't tell.'"
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Talking TARP? Thanks but no thanks
It was a bipartisan "thank you" for a job well done, followed by a partisan "your welcome."
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, testifying today before Representative Barney Frank's Financial Services Committee, praised the architects -- mainly Republicans -- of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which is winding down next month. He added that legislators, both Democrats and Republicans, showed courage in 2008 by voting for $700 billion in bailout loans for banks.
"Now, I know a lot of people who voted for TARP decided later that they had to distance themselves from that vote by disparaging the programs, but I think they should be proud of the votes they cast,'' he said, adding that about $640 billion of the loans are expected to be repaid. "They were on the right side of history."
Frank responded with a dig directed at John Boehner, the Ohio Republican who wants to become House speaker if the GOP regains control of the chamber in the 2010 mid-term elections.
"Thank you, Mr. Secretary. I will probably see the Republican leader, Mr. Boehner, later today, and I will pass along to him your thanks. He was, of course, one of the staunchest supporters of the TARP.''
The Newton Democrat continued: "I was just reading Secretary Paulson's book and noted his quote of that comment from Mr. Boehner, "We would be crazy not to rescue AIG." So I appreciate that."
American International Group's bailout reached $181 billion and many economists fear much of that will never be repaid.
A representative for Boehner's office declined to comment.
GLOBE STAFF
Dems bid to repeal 'don't ask, don't tell' fails
WASHINGTON – Senate Democrats attempting to repeal the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy were dealt a significant setback today, with Republicans, including Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts, blocking action on the issue.
Democrats fell four votes shy of the 60 they needed, making the chances for eventual passage of the repeal far more uncertain, with Republicans poised to gain strength in the midterm elections. Senate Democrats are planning to bring the issue up again during a lame duck session, likely in November or December, but the politics in Washington could be complicated after the election.
"It's a bad day for the country when you don't debate the things that are important issues before the country," Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, told reporters as he went in to cast his vote.
Before the vote, Brown strongly criticized the Democrats' plan to move forward on the repeal as part of a defense bill, saying it was an attempt to score political points.
"Unfortunately what has traditionally been a very open and bipartisan process has in fact evolved into a dynamic display of political grandstanding. My question is, 'What happened?'" Brown said in a speech on the Senate floor. "The majority party, I feel, is using our men and women in uniform as a tactic to pass politically expedient legislation entirely unrelated to the defense authorization. It is in my view not appropriate."
The repeal of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy is included in a much bill that authorizes $726 billion in military spending next year. The bill is normally not contentious, with both parties eager to support the military. It has been passed for 48 consecutive years. But this year, with the bill being introduced in a paralyzing atmosphere ahead of the midterm elections, both parties were attempting to use the bill to motivate their bases.
The House earlier this year approved a repeal of "don't ask, don't tell." The Senate's committee report also included the ban, so Republicans would need to pass an amendment to remove it. By using the filibuster, Republicans prevented Democrats from voting on the bill.
In addition, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who has called for repeal of the policy, has called for a Pentagon review on how such a repeal could be implemented. That review is due on Dec. 1. Several senators, including Brown, have said they want to wait until that review is completed before voting on the repeal.
Brown, who is on the Senate Armed Services Committee, voted against the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell," when the issue was before the committee in May, saying he wanted to wait until a Pentagon review was completed. Even with the repeal included, however, he supported the larger defense authorization bill when the committee voted on it and vowed not to join a filibuster to block it.
"No, no, no," he said when asked whether he would attempt to stop the measure from coming to a vote. "Filibusters never - it's not my style. I want to make sure that we have a full and fair debate on it."
Following the vote today, Brown said he was not joining the filibuster because of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, insisting it was because Reid was not planning to allow enough amendments.
"It wasn't really a concern," Brown said of the repeal on the military's ban on openly gay service members. "The bigger concern was the process. They were putting things into the bill that have nothing to do with our troops"
The issue failed by a 56-to-43 vote. All Republicans voted against the measure, and were joined by two Democratic senators from Arkansas, Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor. Reid also voted against the measure as a procedural tactic that will allow him to bring the issue up again.
"Obviously, we are disappointed. Senator Reid failed to reach a compromise with Republicans and our military service-members will need to wait until the November elections are over for the US Senate to vote on a repeal." said R. Clarke Cooper, executive director of Log Cabin Republicans. "This partisan arrogance is an example of why voters will be turning away from Democrats on November 2nd."
Democrats today were also hoping to pass an amendment to the bill that would provide illegal immigrants with a quicker pathway to citizenship through college or military service.
The so-called Dream Act would create a path to legal residency for youths who arrived before they turned 16; have lived in the United States for five consecutive years; and have no criminal record. In order to become citizens, they would have to graduate from high school or obtain a GED, complete two years in college or the military, and be under 35 years old.
Critics say that it would reward immigrant families who came to the country illegally, and say it lacks the comprehensive provisions to crack down on illegal immigration.
A group of somber-faced students demonstrating outside of Brown's office in Boston vowed to keep pushing for the Dream Act today.
"It is a disappointment, but it's not the end," said Deivid Ribeiro, spokesman for the Student Immigrant Movement, a group advocating for undocumented immigrant children. "It's tough to see the heartbreak on students' faces right now. We still have hope, because regardless of what happens with the bills, dreams are stronger than bills."
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown critical of Democratic plans for immigration bill
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this afternoon criticized Democrats for bringing up a proposal that would allow illegal immigrants with a quicker pathway to citizenship through college or military service, calling the plan “amnesty” and politically motivated.
“I am opposed to illegal immigration, and I am deeply disappointed that Washington politicians are playing politics with military funding in order to extend a form of amnesty to certain illegal immigrants,” the Massachusetts Republican said in a statement.
The Senate could vote as early as tomorrow on whether to add the so-called Dream Act to a defense appropriations bill. Brown’s statement came as a group of undocumented immigrants started an around-the-clock vigil outside of Brown’s Boston office to try and press him to support the proposal.
The legislation would create a path to legal residency for youths who arrived before they turned 16; have lived in the United States for five consecutive years; and have no criminal record. In order to become citizens, they would have to graduate from high school or obtain a GED, complete two years in college or the military, and be under 35 years old.
Critics say that it would reward immigrant families who came to the country illegally, and say it lacks the comprehensive provisions to crack down on illegal immigration.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wants to attach the act to a defense authorization bill that he is planning to bring to the Senate floor tomorrow. The bill also includes a repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.
Republicans have accused Democrats of posturing ahead of the midterm elections, and some are pledging to block it unless the provisions are removed.
“It’s a pure political act for Harry Reid, who is worried about his own re-election and that of the Democrats in the Senate,” said Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican. “So I intend to block it, unless they agree to remove these onerous provisions.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Delahunt co-hosts prescription drug abuse forum Wednesday
US Representative William D. Delahunt, making use of his bully pulpit before leaving office at the end of this year, is co-hosting a forum about prescription drug abuse and efforts to curb it through prescription monitoring and inter-state information sharing.
The forum on Capitol Hill Wednesday is an effort to educate lawmakers and the public about abuse and a recently completed draft compact that, if states sign on to it, will set out uniform monitoring, enforcement, information-gathering and sharing procedures.
"The important issue is we've got to get the states all on the same page," Delahunt said today in an interview.
He said he has been particularly concerned about the issue because of the rising tide of abuse in Massachusetts and across the nation. Delahunt's office said that between 2002 and 2007, Massachusetts lost 42 times as many residents to opioid-related overdoses than in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. And during the past year, Cape Cod and south shore communities have experienced a spree of bank robberies, other thefts and home invasions, and local police have noted that addiction to prescription drugs has played a role.
"The order of magnitude of how bad this crisis is, we can talk about war and peace and terrorism and the economy, and we're losing more of our citizens to the abuse of prescription drugs than we are in the wars we've fought," Delahunt said. "You extrapolate that to the rest of the country, and this is a form of terrorism that is really debilitating."
Speakers expected at this week’s forum, scheduled to begin at 10:30 a.m. in room 2226 in the House Rayburn building, include US Representative Stephen Lynch of South Boston and Massachusetts State Senator Steven A. Tolman of Boston, who chaired a state commission looking into oxycontin and heroin abuse last year. Also expected are John Eadie, executive director of Brandeis University’s Prescription Monitoring Program Center of Excellence, as well as top officials from the Drug Enforcement Agency, Office of National Drug Control Policy and the National Institute on Drug Abuse .
Delahunt is one of three co-chairs of the Congressional Caucus on Prescription Drug Abuse (The others are representatives Mary Bono Mack of California and Hal Rogers of Kentucky), and he said he is planning on championing the issue even after he leaves office. When pushed on his professional plans, Delahunt declined to discuss them but said, "I'm considering multiple options."
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Tierney calls for greater focus on aging GPS system
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON _ Rep. John Tierney today released a government report that he said raises questions about the integrity and accuracy of the GPS system, urging the Department of Defense, which originally developed the satellite navigation system, to shore up its aging infrastructure.
"The reliability of GPS impacts everyone from our military and civilian government agencies to our first responders and taxi drivers," the Salem Democrat, who chairs the National Security Oversight Subcommittee, said in a statement.
The report, by the Government Accountability Office, was requested by Tierney, whose committee has held hearings on the outdated GPS system.
President Clinton to stump for Frank
WASHINGTON – President Clinton is heading to Taunton, Mass., later this month to bolster Representative Barney Frank’s reelection campaign.
Clinton is scheduled to speak Sept. 26 at Taunton High School’s field house, according a spokesman for the Newton Democrat. The event will start at 2 p.m.
Frank is facing Republican challenger Sean Bielat.
“I think Barney is concerned about the middle of his district and is trying to shore up support,” Bielat told the Taunton Daily Gazette, which first reported Clinton’s planned visit. “I’m extremely flattered that Bill Clinton is coming.”
Frank deemed Bielat’s comment “nonsense” and said Clinton’s visit was part of any campaign.
“We’re pretty close,” Frank told the newspaper. “He said, ‘Let me know how I can help.’”
The former president has been on the road throughout the midterm elections, stumping for Democrats and, in some cases, repaying those who supported his wife, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, during her presidential primary campaign. Frank endorsed Clinton during that campaign, and she won the primary in Massachusetts.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry's panel sends START arms pact to full Senate
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON _ After months of haggling, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today voted to send the New START treaty to the full Senate, a key victory for the Obama Administration's arms control efforts and for the panel's chairman, Sen. John F. Kerry of Massachusetts.
Three Republicans joined 11 Democrats, passing the treaty with the level of bipartisan support that will be crucial as the full Senate takes up the treaty.
The treaty, which would require the United States and Russia to reduce their deloyed long-range nuclear weapons to 1,500 each, needs two-thirds of senators, or 67 votes, to be enacted, a tall order in today's rancorous environment on Capitol Hill.
“This is an historic vote that renews the bipartisan tradition that’s vital in tackling the grave threat posed by nuclear weapons," Kerry said in a statement. "This bipartisan vote sends an important signal that even in the most partisan, polarized season, ratifying this treaty is not a matter of politics, it’s a national security imperative.
A variety of arms control advocates hailed the development.
"Today's vote is an important step in making us all safer," said Nancy E. Soderberg, president of the Connect U.S. Fund, a nonprofit that promotes American engagement in ther world, urging the full Senate to ratify the treaty as soon as possible.
The vote depended on the crucial leadership of Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, the top Republican on the committee, who brought along other members of his party after several attempts by Kerry to get significant GOP support failed.
The vote "demonstrates the broad, bipartisan support for the New START Treaty in the Senate,” said Joe Cirincione, president of Ploughshares Fund, a global security foundation.
Kerry aides reported that the Massachusetts Democrat received congratulatory phone calls after the vote from President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden.
The New START Treaty, which replaces an arms control pact with Moscow that expired last December, is seen as a crucial first step in seeking a series of new agreements that the Obama administration hopes to negotiate with Russia and other nations to control nuclear material, end nuclear testing, and further reduce the size of nuclear arsenals around the world.
Kerry also called on the rest of the Senate to swiftly follow suit.
“The full Senate must quickly pass the resolution because the stakes are enormous.," he said. "When we ratify this treaty, we limit Russia’s nuclear arsenal, regain the ability to inspect their nuclear forces, and redouble international support for our nonproliferation efforts to counter the spread of nuclear weapons to rogue nations like Iran and North Korea."
President Obama put out a statement lauding the vote at 3:30 pm EST.:
"I want to acknowledge an important step forward today that will advance our national security. This afternoon, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted in favor of the New START Treaty, and I am pleased that it did so with strong bipartisan support. I called the committee chairman, Senator Kerry, and Senator Lugar, the ranking member, to express my gratitude for their leadership, and I commend the members of the committee for their thoughtful review of this treaty.
Leaders from across the political spectrum, including Secretaries of State and Defense from Republican and Democratic administrations have endorsed this Treaty. They recognize that it is in our national security interest. It reduces the deployed nuclear forces of both the United States and Russia, provides strong verification measures, and continues to improve relations between our two nations – the world’s two largest nuclear weapon powers, and key partners in global security. Indeed, ratification of this Treaty will reinforce our cooperation with Russia on a range of issues, including one of our highest priorities – preventing the spread of nuclear weapons.
Today, I urge the full Senate to move forward quickly with a vote to approve this Treaty. I encourage members on both sides of the aisle to give this agreement the fair hearing and bipartisan support that it deserves, and that has been given to past agreements of its kind. For like those efforts, this Treaty will advance American leadership in the world, while strengthening our national security in the 21st century.
like Iran and North Korea."
Biden chimed in after 4:00 pm:
“Today, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted to approve the New START Treaty with a strong bipartisan majority. I congratulate Senators Kerry and Lugar and all the members of the committee for their hard work and their thoughtful review. There is no question that the New START Treaty, once it takes effect, will protect our security and make the world a safer place. It will further improve our relationship with Russia and enable us to deepen our cooperation on a host of key issues, as well as further demonstrate America’s leadership in efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism. The President and I believe the full Senate should give this agreement the same broad bipartisan support shown today by the Foreign Relations Committee and that agreements of this kind historically have received from the United States Senate.”
Romney calls the GOP to rally behind O'Donnell, makes $5,000 contribution to her campaign
Mitt Romney, offering a maximum campaign contribution and a warm endorsement, was among the first Republican figures today to attempt to thaw the bitter and frozen relationship between the GOP and its Senate nominee from Delaware, Christine O'Donnell.
“Now is the time for Republicans to rally behind their nominee, Christine O'Donnell,'' said Romney, the former presidential candidate and former Massachusetts governor, in a statement.” She ran an impressive campaign. I believe it is important we support her so we can win back the US Senate,"
He backed his words with a $5,000 contribution to her campaign from his Free and Strong America political action committee.
O'Donnell, backed by Sarah Palin and figures of the Tea Party movement, shocked longtime GOP congressman Mike Castle, a moderate, in Tuesday's primary for the seat previously held by Vice President Joe Biden for 36 years. She will face Democratic nominee Chris Coons in November.
The victory, however, came with plenty of bruises and hard feelings. Republican leaders, both in Delaware and nationwide, pilloried O'Donnell, a substance abuse counselor, in the days leading up to the election, with one state party official calling her unfit to even run for dogcatcher. The party fiercely denounced her as reckless and repeatedly called attention to her history of personal financial problems, including unpaid taxes and a foreclosed home.
O'Donnell hit back, saying Castle, a two-term governor and nine-term congressman, represented the old, tired ways of a Washington that is deaf to the voters and incompetent for the citizens.
“A lot of people said we could not win the general election,’’ O’Donnell Tuesday night told supporters, who began chanting “Yes we can,’’ a staple of the Obama campaign trail. “It is the same so-called experts who said we had no chance of winning the primary. And if those people who worked so hard against me now work so hard for me, we will win.’’
As the votes were being counted Tuesday night and the tally tilted toward O'Donnell, some Republican insiders said the party was considering whether to withhold support for her campaign in the general election. Leaders had once thought the seat would be an easy win for the GOP, with Castle on the ballot, but O'Donnell represented too much of an unpredictable risk.
Yesterday, Senator John Cornyn of Texas stepped back from that intra-party chasm, vowing to vigorously support O'Donnell and sending a maximum contribution of $42,000 from the group he heads, the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
GLOBE STAFF
Tax break bill clears hurdle in Senate
A bill packed with tax breaks and other benefits for small businesses cleared a major hurdle in the Senate today, despite opposition from Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts.
The measure, which is now set for final passage later this week, creates a $30 billion government fund to encourage lending and eliminates capital gains taxes for long-term investors in some small businesses. President Obama touted it nationally last week as a much-needed salve for small businesses struggling to recover from the worst recession since the Great Depression.
The bill has been stalled by a filibuster since July, but two Republicans crossed the aisle today to break the stalemate: George LeMieux of Florida and George Voinovich of Ohio.
Brown called the bill another bailout and said he could not support it.
"This bill includes a provision just like TARP," he said after casting his vote in opposition. "Banks making lending decisions with government funds is not the way to get our economy moving again."
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Obama to stump for Attorney General Richard Blumenthal for US Senate seat in Connecticut
WASHINGTON – Looking to give a boost to a Democrat in a crucial Senate race, President Obama will travel to Connecticut’s Gold Coast to stump and raise money Thursday for Attorney General Richard Blumenthal.
The Blumenthal stop in Stamford will be followed by a Democratic National Committee fundraiser in nearby Greenwich.
Blumenthal is vying to succeed Democrat Chris Dodd, who is retiring from the Senate. But the 20-year attorney general faces an expensive and aggressive challenge from wrestling executive Linda McMahon.
A self-financed insurgent who defeated the GOP’s choice in a primary, McMahon has a shot at recapturing a seat that has eluded Republicans since Lowell Weicker won it in 1982. She has balanced her inexperience with a background in the brash world of pro wrestling and captured the anti-incumbent mood that is defining this political season.
A Quinnipiac University poll released today shows Blumenthal, a well-known and highly regarded political commodity in the state, with only a six-point lead. He is ahead 51 to 45 percent, in the poll of 875 likely Connecticut voters, which has a margin of error of 3.3 percentage points.
"For Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, an elected official with a 70 percent approval rating, this race is surprisingly close,’’ said Quinnipiac University Poll Director Douglas Schwartz.
"The question is whether Linda McMahon can ride the anti-establishment, anti-Democratic wave to victory in blue Connecticut,’’ he said.
Perhaps the macho world of World Wrestling Entertainment is not helping McMahon in one respect. Blumenthal still holds an advantage among women, according to the poll, 56 to 41 percent.
Brown opposed to allowing tax cuts for wealthy to expire
Senator Scott Brown remains opposed to President Obama's plan to allow tax cuts for the wealthy to expire while extending those for middle-income filers, even though the Republican leader in the House signaled yesterday that he is open to compromise.
House minority leader Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio said that if he had no other choice he would back Obama's plan, paving the way for the measure to pass the House and placing the focus squarely on the Senate, where Brown could once again be called on to cast the crucial swing vote.
A spokeswoman for Brown declined to comment on whether he would be willing to compromise but said his stance has not changed since last week.
"Tax increases will kill jobs and hurt the chances for an economic recovery," the spokeswoman Gail Gitcho said.
That stance puts him firmly in the camp of Republican Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, who told the Associated Press today that all 41 Republicans are opposed to Obama's plan but declined to say if they planned to filibuster. McConnell has said he won't pass it until cuts for the wealthy are also included.
The cuts, passed in 2001 and 2003, are set to expire at the end of this year unless Congress takes action.
Obama wants to eliminate the cuts for wealthier taxpayers -- individuals making more than $200,000 per year and families with income totaling more than $250,000.
If the sides cannot reach agreement and all the cuts are allowed to expire, families in Massachusetts whose total income is between $66,000 and $97,000 would see an average increase in their tax bill of $1,831.
Donovan Slack can be reached at dslack@globe.com.
Kerry says Bush tax cuts for highest wage-earners should expire
Senator John Kerry, among the wealthiest lawmakers on Capitol Hill, is falling in line behind the president and saying he believes tax cuts for the middle class should be extended but those for the highest wage-earners should be allowed to expire.
The Bush-era cuts are set to expire at the end of this year without action from Congress, setting the stage for a bitter partisan dispute about exactly what should be done.
Republicans say hiking taxes will hurt the already wobbly economy and that many small business owners fall within the targeted tax brackets -- individuals earning more than $200,000 annually and families with income totaling more than $250,000. They appear poised to block any measure extending the cuts unless it includes higher wage-earners.
Democrats have dismissed such assertions and Obama yesterday accused Republicans of holding middle-class cuts "hostage" in exchange for cuts for the rich.
Kerry, whose income puts him squarely in that category, said "under no circumstances do I believe we should give a blanket extension to the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans."
"It won't fix our economy and it will add billions to the long-term structural deficit," he said.
On the other hand, he said, "It makes perfect sense to protect tax cuts for the middle class Americans who bore the brunt of the Wall Street meltdown and are still digging their way out from under the recession."
His view puts Kerry in direct opposition with the state's other senator, Scott Brown, a Wrentham Republican whose spokeswoman said yesterday that he intends to fight for cuts for the wealthy, too, alongside his GOP colleagues.
"Raising taxes will kill jobs and slow down an economic recovery," the spokeswoman, Gail Gitcho, said.
The Globe reported today that for middle-class families in Massachusetts, keeping the cuts could mean $1,831 in their pockets each year. If Congress doesn't pass an extension, they can expect to pay that much more.
Follow @DonovanSlack on Twitter.
Frank debates 'dining room table' Democratic primary challenger
Last August, town hall protester Rachel Brown asked Representative Barney Frank why he supported President Obama’s “Nazi policy” of health care reform while holding a sign depicting the president with a Hitler-esque moustache. Frank minced no words in his retort: “Ma'am, trying to have a conversation with you would be like trying to argue with a dining room table. I have no interest in doing it.”
But because Brown is now Frank’s Democratic challenger for Massachusetts’ 4th Congressional District, he found himself doing something like that in an hour-long debate just a week before the Sept. 14 primary.
"[E]very time I've run for office I've debated every opponent," Frank, who has served 15 terms, told Politico.
Brown, a vocal proponent of economist Lyndon LaRouche and expedited space travel to Mars, once again relied on historical analogies to criticize the President. “President Obama is not in reality. He’s acting in a similar psychological manner to Emperor Nero, which ended in the collapse of Rome,” said Brown in her opening remarks.
Frank quickly addressed Brown’s points before offering his own. “No, I do not think that President Obama thinks like Nero, or like Hitler, as Brown has, in other contexts, portrayed him,” said Frank in his first response.
“I am also not for colonizing Mars, as my primary opponent is,” added Frank later.
Watch the entire debate here.
DNC chairman Tim Kaine rallies the party, casts Dems as underdogs
PHILADELPHIA – Democratic Party chairman Tim Kaine this afternoon sought to rally his party in the midterm elections, sharply attacking Republicans even while casting the Democrats as the underdogs.
Kaine, the former Virginia governor, sought to rekindle the excitement Democrats felt two years ago when they came out in droves to vote for President Obama.
“If you want the President to succeed, you have to make sure that he has good partners to work with,” Kaine told a crowd of about 200 students and union workers at the University of Pennsylvania. “The other guys want to take the country back. But we need to have the President’s back.”
Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell delivered a fiery introduction to Kaine, alternately referring to Republicans as "fruit loops" and "wackos," and disparagingly referencing House Minority Leader John Boehner as "the tan guy."
"It's a party that's slowly but surely being taken over by wackos," said Rendell, adding later, "they're nuts, they're flat out crazy."
With just two months before the crucial midterm elections, Democrats are desperately seeking a way to find their footing amid polls that indicate they could lose control of both chambers of Congress. Republicans, meanwhile, have been far more energized. They also have history on their side, with the party of the incumbent president typically losing seats during midterm elections.
"Tough is what Democrats do. We campaign tough, we win tough, we govern tough," Kaine said. "We have always been the underdog party and we always will be, speaking for regular everyday people throughout this great country."
UPDATE: “Once again the President’s top political chief is desperate to distract voters from the failed economic policies of the Obama administration and Washington Democrats," said RNC Spokeswoman Katie Wright in a statement. "But no amount of name-calling and fear-mongering will solve skyrocketing unemployment, erase record-breaking budget deficits, or cause voters to forget how their elected representatives rammed through Obamacare against their will. Democrat’s campaign solutions are quickly becoming as reckless and empty as the policies that got them into this mess in the first place."
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
The beard could be back in the US Senate
WASHINGTON -- Joe Miller upended the establishment this week by defeating incumbent Senator Lisa Murkowksi in the Republican primary.
But if he wins, he could also alter the august chamber in at least one other way: his facial hair. The beard could be back.
Miller sports a full beard, trimmed neatly, and if elected would be the only member of the US Senate with facial hair.
"Republican, Democratic, Independent, Smart People, Morons, Hippies, Rednecks, and even people who watch 'Jersey Shore' alike," said Mike Wszolek, at the Beard Association. "We support the beard."
Wszolek added that the group’s support of the beard did not necessarily mean it supports Miller and his platform.
A satirical Twitter account has been started called "Joe Miller’s Beard." "Speaking for hirsute-Americans, I think it’s about time for facial hair to make a comeback in the GOP," wrote a columnist for National Review Online (yet even if Alaska's Democratic nominee, Sitka Mayor Scott McAdams, prevails, facial hair will likely return: McAdams currently sports a goatee).
Senator John Kerry has grown a beard on occasion (eyebrows rose last year when he appeared at a swearing in ceremony with significant stubble; it was gone a few weeks later). So have Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, and Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York. Several former senators, including Jon Corzine of New Jersey and the late Paul Wellstone of Minnesota, had facial hair.
But while several House members are mustached and bearded, the look has taken a hiatus in the upper chamber.
One reason? While Abe Lincoln (pencil-thin beard) and Teddy Roosevelt (mustache) were known for their facial hair, the stubble these days is often seen as a political detriment.
The Hill, a Capitol Hill publication, noted in 2006 that "political consultants, image consultants and etiquette experts say research shows that politicians who wear mustaches and beards don’t poll well. Voters don’t trust a candidate with facial hair. Think Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Saddam Hussein and Genghis Khan."
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Hodes supports Warren for director of new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
As chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel that holds Wall Street accountable for the $700 billion dollar bailout, Harvard Law Professor and bankruptcy expert Elizabeth Warren has become a polarizing and visible consumer advocate in the post-housing bust era.
These days, Warren’s prowess and prominence makes her a leading candidate to become the director of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and in a letter to the President today, Representative Paul Hodes of New Hampshire voiced his support for her nomination.
“Middle class families and small business owners in New Hampshire are fighting hard to turn our economy around, but shady lenders, manipulative credit card companies, and Wall Street greed could turn our progress on its heels,” said Hodes in a statement. “Dr. Warren has been a fighter, protecting middle class families every step of the way.”
Find the full text of the letter after the jump.
Non-profit environmental group targets Brown with advertising campaign
A new advertising campaign by a non-profit environmental group is urging Massachusetts Republican Senator Scott Brown and several of his Senate colleagues to pass energy and climate legislation when Congress gets back from its August recess.
The Web and radio campaign by the Natural Resources Defense Council, launched today, addresses Brown directly: “Senator, when you've caught up with your summer reading, we'd like you to get back to work on passing a strong climate bill -- for American jobs, and for America's future.”
Similar ads will run in the home states of five other senators: Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, Republicans from Maine; George Lemieux, a Florida Republican; Claire McCaskill, a Democrat from Missouri; and Jim Webb, a Virginia Democrat, according to the group.
The six Senators were chosen because they “have acknowledged the reality of climate change and their votes are closely watched by their colleagues,” according to the NRDC.
“The Senate’s inability to pass meaningful clean energy and climate legislation has serious consequences for Massachusetts’s environment and economy,” said Franz Matzner, climate legislative director at NRDC, in a statement. “And each day we do not have a climate and clean energy bill, the U.S. falls further and further behind other countries that aren’t losing any time arguing about whether to invest in clean energy.”
A spokesperson for Brown could not be immediately reached for comment.
UPDATE: Brown spokesman Colin Reed released the following statement on the new ad:
"Left-leaning political groups have been attacking Senator Brown since day one. This particular attack ad is disingenuous and detached from reality. Senator Brown has been clear about his position on energy reform legislation – he opposes a national energy tax. Energy prices are already too high in Massachusetts."
Kerry meets with Karzai in Afghanistan
Senator John Kerry spent today in Afghanistan, meeting with Afghan government officials, US forces and tribal leaders in the southern city of Kandahar, which has been wracked by suicide bombings. Kerry, who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, dined with Afghan president Hamid Karzai on Tuesday night and left today for Pakistan. Last year, Kerry helped convince Karzai to accept the results of an international election commission, a diplomatic coup. This time, he told reporters in Kabul that he intended to warn Karzai that Americans were losing patience with corrupt governance.
Tonight, Kerry is dining with Pakistan's top general, Ashfaq Kiani and the troubled country's spy chief, Shuja Pasha. Tomorrow, he will tour the flood-affected areas of Pakistan.
Kerry has a difficult mission in Pakistan: convincing Pakistanis that the United States cares about their plight, despite the fact that aid has been slow to the flood-effected areas. The US has donated $90 million to flood relief, just a fraction of the nearly $500 million that the United Nations said is needed to keep millions of displaced people alive for the next three months.
Kerry was instrumental in getting an unprecedented $1.5 billion annually in civilian aid to Pakistan, a country that has been shaken by increasing insurgent attacks in recent years. But it is unclear whether any of those funds will be re-programmed to help the flood victims. Kerry's attempts to bolster civilian government in Pakistan have been complicated by the long-held suspicion among American military forces that Pakistan's spy agency has been helping to attack targets in neighboring Afghanistan, including US soldiers.
Vermont Senate candidate is on a cow
Look down. Back up. Where are you? You’re watching Daniel Freilich, a challenger to Senator Patrick Leahy in the Vermont Democratic primary next week, harness the power of Youtube with a campaign ad parody of this year’s now legendary Old Spice Man commercial.
Freilich, a U.S. Navy Reserve physician, opens the ad dressed in a white coat and clutching what appears to be a copy of Vermont Life with Leahy on the cover that he tosses aside to jog in front of a potpourri of blurry, green-screened Vermont vistas. In the fast-paced, lighthearted effort, he manages to pledge to serve only two terms (“because I am not a career politician”) and assert that he has spent no special interest money in his campaign.
With 19,390 views since it was posted Friday, the ad has made the rounds on prominent politics and pop culture blogs and garnered some criticism for its poor production values and a performance that falls somewhat short of the original. (In the words of the Old Spice Man himself: “Sadly, he isn’t me.")
House Democrats oppose using food stamp money to pay for child nutrition bill
The Senate’s $4.5 billion child nutrition bill, a recent milestone in Michelle Obama’s campaign to end childhood obesity, faces opposition from some Democrats in the House because it would take funds set aside for the food stamp program.
In a letter to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, written by Representatives James McGovern of Massachusetts and Keith Ellison of Minnesota, 106 Democrats ask that their version of the child nutrition bill be taken up for consideration instead of the Senate’s, as theirs does not slash food stamp funding.
Food stamp funds took a hit last week to help pay for a $26 billion state aid package to bolster Medicaid and education funding.
“[W]e are now forced to choose between jobs and health care or food for hungry people,” said the letter, signed by all 10 members of the Massachusetts delegation. “This is one of the more egregious cases of robbing Peter to pay Paul, and is a vote we do not take lightly.”
The Food Research and Action Center, an anti-hunger nonprofit in Washington, has condemned the legislation as a “raid” on food stamp benefits and called on the House to reject further food stamp cuts to cover costs for other programs. “It’s a child nutrition bill that will make children hungrier,” said FRAC in a statement.
Coalition for Massachusetts attack Brown's record on jobs
A new advocacy group made up of community organizations and local unions, including the powerful 1199 Service Employees International Union, are blasting Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown’s record on jobs.
The group has planned a demonstration tomorrow in Boston to deliver the Republican senator an unflattering “report card” on jobs after his first seven months in office.
The new organization, the Coalition for Massachusetts, is protesting Brown’s votes “against jobs, unemployment insurance, and federal aid for vital community services,” according to a statement from the group.
At noon tomorrow, members will deliver to Brown’s Boston office a six-foot tall report card, on which Brown “fails” in the jobs and education categories, but gets an A+ in “protecting the richest 2-percent” of Americans.
The group is particularly critical of Brown’s vote against a $26 billion package of federal aid to states, which passed without his support. The package will deliver $655 million to Massachusetts, which is expected to be used to restore cuts in the state budget.
Brown also voted in July against extending jobless benefits to the unemployed, while offering his own bill to pay for an extension with unspent money from the federal stimulus law.
“Protests are always apart of politics, but the fact is Senator Brown sponsored legislation that would have extended unemployment insurance and [provided the aid to states] without adding to the astronomical national debt,” said Brown spokeswoman, Gail Gitcho, in a statement.
The “report card” does not mention that in February Brown supported a $15 billion jobs bill pushed by Democrats.
Conservative radio talk show host says Frank exposed US to terrorists
Chuck Morse, a conservative radio talk show host in New England who ran against Barney Frank in 2004 as a write-in candidate, today accused Frank of exposing the United States to countless terrorists -- including the 9/11 hijackers -- by passing a 1989 amendment that made it more difficult for US government to bar people suspected of terrorism from entering the country.
"His stated reason for doing it, sponsoring a bill that struck the exclusion clause from the Immigration and Nationality Act in 1989, was to help left-wing poets, particularly his friend Gabriel Garcia Marquez, the author of 'My Melancholy Whores,' enter the country legally to sell books," Morse wrote in a statement sent to an undisclosed list of recipients. "Marquez was denied a visa by the State Department because of his ties to Fidel Castro. As a member of Congress, Frank could have chosen to sponsor a trip for the harmless Marquez himself. Instead he sponsored a law that made it possible for all visa applicants to enter the country legally unless there was "proof" they had been involved in "terrorist activities."
Morse went on to say that "any lawyer worth a damn would tell you that it would be difficult to prove that Osama bin Laden was involved in 'terrorist activities.'" He also claimed that the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers "entered the country with legal visas thanks to the Frank bill."
But Morse -- who is also the author of "Barney Frank and the Law of Unintended Consequences " -- might have had another reason for choosing this moment to raise the alarm about Frank's 1989 amendment: the promotion of his new book, the Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism, which was featured prominently in his email.
Frank could not immediately be reached for comment. Marquez is best known for his major literary work One Hundred Years of Solitude, published in 1967. Memories of My Melancholy Whores is a 2004 novella.
Kerry travels to Afghanistan and Pakistan
Senator John Kerry travels to Afghanistan and Pakistan next week, and will be the first member of Congress to visit Pakistan since floods triggered by a heavy monsoon season have washed away crops, affected 14 million, and claimed over 1,400 lives.
“Pakistan is facing its worst flooding in modern history. The destruction from these deadly floods could be worse than the 2005 earthquake. Next week, I plan to visit Pakistan for a firsthand look at the devastated areas,” said Kerry in a statement. “The United States has pledged $76 million to Pakistan for flood assistance so far, with an initial $10 million coming from Kerry-Lugar-Berman funds. We are committed to providing help for Pakistanis who have been afflicted by this tragedy.”
This is Kerry’s fourth visit to the region as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In Afghanistan, he will meet with U.S. troops, civilian leaders, and military commanders, as well as Afghan officials.
House approves $26 billion bill
WASHINGTON – House lawmakers today scurried back to Capitol Hill -- booking last-minute flights and canceling appearances at town halls -- to approve a $26 billion package that will provide aid to states.
The rare one-day session, interrupting a six-week congressional recess, was scheduled after the US Senate surprisingly passed the bill last week. The legislation would boost Medicaid and education funding to states, including $655 million for Massachusetts.
The bill approved this afternoon by a 247-to-161 vote, almost strictly along party lines. The 10-member Massachsuetts House delegation all voted in favor.
The legislation comes at a time when both parties are posturing for November’s midterm elections, attempting to get their messages across to voters. Republicans say it illustrates continued reckless spending with a giveaway to public employee unions, while Democrats say the added money is vital to protecting the fragile economy and preventing additional public employee layoffs.
“This special emergency session…is in fact Washington, DC, at its absolute worst,” said Representative David Dreier, a California Republican. “Everything that Americans have come to hate about the way their government works – the waste, the ineptitude, the cynicism, the lack of accountability, the utter disregard for the taxpayers – is all very vividly on display today.”
“At a time when states like Massachusetts are starting to see unemployment rates decrease, now is not the time to pull the rug out from under them,” Representative James McGovern, a Democrat from Worcester, said on the House floor.
The legislation would funnel $10 billion to school districts to rehire teachers who were laid off, or prevent additional cuts just before the school year begins. Advocates estimate the money would keep more than 160,000 public education positions.
The bill also provides $16 billion to extend increased Medicaid payments to states. The funding boost will free up money that can be redirected to other areas of the budget. Advocates estimate that more than 150,000 police officers, fire fighters, and other public employees would be kept on the payroll as a result.
Most governors, including Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, had included this funding in their initial proposals. Patrick later cut the funds when it became unclear whether Congress would approve the boost.
Patrick said last week that he would introduce legislation to spend the money on a range of state programs that were slashed in the $27.6 billion state budget for the current fiscal year, which he signed June 30.
The $26 billion in spending would be offset by several controversial changes. Republicans and businesses have objected to $10 billion that would come through raising taxes on some US-based multinational companies. Democrats and advocates for the poor are aggravated over a plan to phase out an increase in food stamp payments. Those added payments would end in 2014, five years earlier than expected, and would save nearly $12 billion.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown travels to Israel, Jordan
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown is traveling to the Middle East, embarking on his second trip abroad since being elected seven months ago.
The Massachusetts Republican is going to Israel and Jordan, according to his spokeswoman, and “will be exploring areas where our countries can further collaborate on homeland security issues.” Brown will be meeting with Jordanian and Israeli defense and foreign military leaders, as well as government officials.
The spokeswoman, Gail Gitcho, would not say whether Brown would travel to the West Bank or and Palestinian areas, citing security concerns.
Brown, who is a member of the Senate Armed Services and Homeland Security committees, is traveling with committee staff but he is the only senator on the trip, according to Gitcho.
Brown went to Afghanistan and Pakistan shortly after his election, and in June announced in a speech that he also wanted to travel to Israel. In that speech, he also launched into a strong defense of Israel, which at the time was under widespread criticism for raiding one of six ships that were bound for Gaza, filled with supplies, and attempting to break an Israeli blockade. Nine were killed after Israel commandos stormed aboard.
“I don’t need polling or political strategists to help define a nuanced stance on Israel,” Brown said June 6, at a dinner in Boston sponsored by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. “We are engaged in a worldwide struggle against radical, violent jihad. It is the defining issue of our time. Our best friends and the strongest allies in this fight are in the State of Israel.”
“Let’s remember – Israel is our ally. Israel is a democracy,” Brown added. “Hamas is a terrorist group with clear and genuine intentions of destroying Israel’s way of life.”
Brown also said that “the story of Israel made a distinct impression on me at a young age,” and said he would travel to Israel to further examine issues facing the country and attempt to strengthen ties between the two countries.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Senate confirms Kagan as 112th justice to Supreme Court
WASHINGTON — The US Senate confirmed former Harvard Law School Dean Elena Kagan as the fourth woman to serve on the Supreme Court yesterday, a position from which she could influence the nation’s laws and policies for decades.
Senator Scott Brown, the Massachusetts Republican who earlier this summer introduced Kagan to fellow senators as a “brilliant woman,’’ voted against giving her the lifetime job on grounds that she has limited courtroom experience.
“I believe nominees to the Supreme Court should have previously served on the bench,’’ Brown said in a statement. “Lacking that, I look for many years of practical courtroom experience to compensate for the absence of prior judicial experience. In Elena Kagan’s case, she is missing both.’’
Brown, through a spokesperson, declined to be interviewed about his decision, saying his statement spoke for itself.
FULL ENTRYMass. on track to receive $655 million in federal Medicaid and education funding
WASHINGTON — Massachusetts stands to receive some $655 million in federal Medicaid and education funding to prevent budget cuts, under a state aid package that narrowly cleared a key hurdle in the U.S. Senate this morning.
The money would save more than 2,400 public education jobs in Massachusetts, according to Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, who supported the measure.
“Governor Patrick, mayors, teachers, parents, and first responders are breathing a sigh of relief now that the Senate has finally thrown them a lifeline,” Kerry said in a statement after the vote.
Final approval in the Senate is expected later this week, before the measure goes to the U.S. House, where it would be expected to pass.
The legislation, a $26 billion national aid package, is paid for by spending cuts and a tax hike on multinational corporations. The bill prevailed over a Republican filibuster by a vote of 61-38. Sixty votes were required to overcome the GOP's procedural roadblock. Two Republicans broke ranks and supported the measure: Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, both of Maine.
The Bay State’s junior senator, Republican Scott Brown, voted against the bill, saying there were better options for paying for it. “We can pay for that by not increasing taxes in the middle of a two year recession,” said Brown, in an interview after the vote.
Reid pushes vote on off-shore drilling legislation to after August recess
WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid today pushed off a planned vote on legislation to reform rules for off-shore oil drilling, because the bill lacked the votes to overcome Republican opposition.
The Senate will take up the bill again after its August recess, Reid said in a news conference today. “It's a sad day when you can't find a handful of Republicans to support a bill that would create up to 700,000 clean energy jobs, hold BP accountable, and look at a future as it relates to what BP did,” said Reid.
The House last week approved a version of the legislation by a vote of 209-193. Democrats say the bill would make drilling safer for workers and help prevent spills, such as the BP Gulf disaster.
“Several key Republicans have said they need more time to consider a bill and its merits,” Reid said. “I accept that in good faith. We're giving them that chance, hope it will lead to a reasonable discussion and their support.”
Senator James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican and ranking minority member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, said in a statement that Reid’s decision not to hold a vote this week, “merely exposes what we already knew: this was an empty political exercise from the beginning."
Maxine Waters advised by Barney Frank not to help Boston-based bank
WASHINGTON -- Bay State Representative Barney Frank urged a Democratic colleague to keep away from a potential conflict of interest involving the Boston-based OneUnited bank, but the congresswoman, California Representative Maxine Waters, didn't heed his warnings, a House ethics panel reported Monday. Waters, whose husband had owned stock in the bank, now faces a possible trial before her colleagues.
The 79-page report by the Office of Congressional Ethics said Waters had confided to Frank that the minority-owned bank was coming to her for help, but that she felt conflicted because of the financial interest of her husband, Sidney Williams. It is against House rules to use one's power as a member for personal financial gain.
"She knew she should say no, but it bothered her,'' the report said, recommending that the House Ethics Committee take formal action.
Waters denied any wrong-doing, saying she was merely trying to help struggling minority-owned banks damaged by the financial crisis. "I simply will not be forced to admit to something I did not do, and instead have chosen to respond to charges made by the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct in a public hearing,'' Waters said in a statement, referring to the formal moniker for the Ethics Committee.
Frank, who chairs the powerful Financial Services Committee, said in an interview that he advised Waters to let his staff handle any efforts to make OneUnited eligible for Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) assistance, since the bank was in his district.
"I said, look, it's a Boston institution. You should stay out of it. It's a legitimate constituency thing for me. You should stay away from this. It's a legitimate thing for me to do, and you shouldn't be involved,'' Frank told the Globe, recounting his conversations with Waters.
Frank said he thought Waters would take his advice, but according to the ethics panel, she did not.
The Newton congressman asked his staff to help make OneUnited eligible for TARP funds, behavior Frank said was appropriate and implicitly sanctioned by the Office of Congressional ethics report.
"I was never a subject of the investigation,'' Frank said, adding that he turned over many documents and e-mails to assist the panel in its inquiry.
Bank officials declined to address the allegations. "OneUnited Bank and its executives cannot comment on the allegations facing Representative Waters before the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct due to the ongoing nature of the proceedings,'' the bank said in a statement. "The Bank continues to focus on providing critical financial products and services in a responsible manner to the underserved urban communities of Boston, Miami and Los Angeles that have been devastated during the current economic downturn.''
House approves oil spill bill, including several Markey provisions
WASHINGTON – The US House this afternoon narrowly approved legislation that would overhaul oil drilling regulations -- lifting a $75 million liability cap in accidents, imposing new oil rig safeguards, and adding new fees on oil companies wishing to expand drilling in the Gulf Coast.
The bill, passed 209-to-193 as House lawmakers leave for a six-week summer recess, is meant as a response to the oil spill in the Gulf Coast. Democrats are hoping they can capitalize on the legislation by appearing to crack down on oil companies.
Republicans warned, however, that the bill would add new taxes that would stifle the fragile economy. They also said the new regulations could discourage oil production in the Gulf, one of the chief domestic energy sources and one that creates jobs throughout the coast.
“This legislation will kill jobs, raise taxes, and increase federal spending,” said Representative Doc Hastings, a Washington Republican. “Democrats are exploiting the oil spill as an excuse to…increase greater bureaucratic regulations.”
Democrats argue that it would add new safeguards for workers, bring in additional federal revenue, and help prevent future spills similar to the one caused by BP.
"If you want to apologize for Big Oil, go right ahead, but the American people are not on your side on this one," Representative James P. McGovern, the Democrat from Worcester, said this morning on the House floor.
The Senate could take similar legislation up next week, although several provisions have met opposition from Republicans and some moderate Democrats, making its passage uncertain.
The House bill combines provisions from several separate bills that have passed since the oil spill. A few of the components were co-authored by Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat who has been one of the most outspoken Congressional members since the spill began. He has been a frequent presence on CNN and MSNBC, and helped force BP to make its “spill cam” public, a move that elevated the issue with near-constant footage of oil spewing into the Gulf Coast.
One component of the legislation Markey had a hand in would require dozens of oil companies to pay billions of dollars to continue drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
After a court challenge to a 1995, some companies stopped paying some royalties in exchange for the right to drill in the Gulf Coast. As part of that, the federal government refunded more than $2.1 billion in payments; about $240 million went to BP.
Under Markey's legislation, if companies continue to not pay royalties, they would not have access to new leases. The change would bring in an estimated $53 billion, and would go toward reducing the federal deficit.
Another provision would add new protections to whistleblowers. Currently there is no protection for oil and gas workers if they are retaliated against after speaking out on workplace or health and safety violations on drilling rigs. Several workers had criticized the conditions on the Deepwater Horizon rig.
The bill would also add new safety requirements for blowout preventers. The BP preventer failed to stop the Gulf Coast spill.
“BP said the rig could not sink. It did,” Markey said this afternoon on the House floor. “BP said they could handle an Exxon Valdez-sized spill every day. They couldn't. Early on in this disaster, BP was talking about using a ‘junk shot’ where they shoot golf balls into the well. When we heard the best minds were working on this problem, we thought they meant MIT, not the PGA.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Gregg announces his support for Kagan nomination
WASHINGTON -- U.S. Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire today became the fifth Republican to announce support for the Supreme Court nomination of former Harvard Law School Dean Elena Kagan.
Republican senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, and Richard Lugar of Indian have previously announced they will vote next week to confirm Kagan.
President Obama in May nominated Kagan, the U.S. solicitor general, to replace retiring justice John Paul Stevens.
“Ms. Kagan and I may have different political philosophies, but I believe that the confirmation process should be based on qualifications, not ideological litmus tests or political affiliation," Gregg said in a statement. "I will vote for her confirmation.”
Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown has not announced yet how he will vote on Kagan's nomination.
Snowe is fourth Senate Republican to support Kagan nomination
WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan picked up support from another Senate Republican today, as Olympia Snowe, of Maine, announced she would support Kagan's nomination.
Snowe is the fourth Republican to announce her support. Republicans Susan Collins, also of Maine, Richard Lugar of Indiana, and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, have already said they will vote to confirm Kagan.
“Throughout my tenure in the Senate, I have applied a uniform standard for evaluating nominees for the United States Supreme Court, under both Republican and Democratic administrations," Snowe said in a statement. "I find that Ms. Kagan has met that standard with the strong intellect, respect for the rule of law, and understanding of the important but limited role of the Supreme Court that I believe is required of any justice. "
President Obama in May nominated Kagan, former dean of Harvard Law School to fill the seat of retiring Justice John Paul Stevens.
A final vote on the nomination is expected next week.
Republican Scott Brown of Massachusetts has not yet announced how he will vote.
Republicans block campaign spending disclosure bill
WASHINGTON -- Republicans today blocked legislation drafted to require more disclosure in campaign spending by corporations and unions, voting as a bloc to stop the bill’s advancement in the U.S. Senate.
The bill has been a high priority for President Obama, who called for its passage as a counterweight to an expected flood of corporate spending in the fall campaign.
On a straight party-line vote after a hot debate, an effort to defeat a Republican filibuster fell two votes short of the 60 required to move the bill forward. All 40 Republicans voted against it.
Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, bemoaned the lack of bipartisanship that had carried campaign bills in the past. "It's like skins and shirts," he said of the two parties.
But Republicans portrayed the bill as a partisan power grab, designed by Democrats to stifle political speech and tilt campaign advantages toward unions that favor Democratic incumbents.
“This is a transparent effort to rig the fall elections,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican from Kentucky.
Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown, whom supporters of the legislation had hoped to persuade to move the bill forward, joined a united Republican caucus to block the bill.
“The 15 million unemployed across the country aren’t too concerned about political content of political ads during the middle of a political season,” Brown said in an interview after the vote. “To push something like this, when people are hurting...strictly to gain a tactical advantage for political purposes is wrong.”
But even in defeat, Democrats think they have a winning issue for the fall campaign -- a piece of a larger effort to portray Republicans as the servants of corporate America who are out of touch with the middle class.
“Just as quick as they ran to the side of big business and the insurance companies, the big banks and the oil companies, Senate Republicans are now running away from transparency and accountability in our elections,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
House to vote on war spending bill amid calls for change in strategy
WASHINGTON – House lawmakers this afternoon are planning to vote on a bill that would add $33 billion in spending for wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, a proposal that has stoked further controversy in the wake of new disclosures this week.
House rules will require a two-thirds majority to pass the bill, which includes several other spending items, and the vote is expected to be close.
Representative James P. McGovern, a leading anti-war Democrat, has been harshly critical of the additional funding.
“All of us are dedicated to defeating al Qaeda wherever they are, but our current policy in Afghanistan is deeply flawed,” the Worcester Democrat said this morning. “Occupying Afghanistan in support of a corrupt and incompetent government will continue to claim the lives of our soldiers, it will continue to bankrupt us, and it will not enhance our national security.”
Earlier this month, McGovern cosponsored an amendment calling for development of a plan to pull out troops from Afghanistan. It was defeated largely as a result of Republican votes, but the measure was supported by 153 Democrats. All 10 members of the Massachusetts delegation backed the amendment.
House rules will prevent amendments on today’s bill, so McGovern will be unable to bring the amendment up a second time and the vote will be strictly over whether or not to extend war funding.
McGovern and other opponents of the Afghan war have seized on new documents to argue anew that President Obama should begin withdrawing the troops. The classified documents, leaked Sunday night by the organization WikiLeaks, suggest the American-backed Pakistani government has been secretly helping the Taliban
Representative David Obey, a Wisconsin Democrat, formally brought the issue to the House floor this morning as chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations. But he said he was conflicted, and planned to vote against the bill because he opposes the war funding.
”I have the obligation to bring this supplemental before the House to allow the institution to work its will,” Obey said. “But I also have the obligation to my conscience to indicate, by my individual vote, my profound skepticism that this action will accomplish much more than to serve as a recruiting incentive for those who most want to do us ill.”
Obey said he would support the funding if Congress would also vote on whether to continue President Obama’s policy to keep troops in Afghanistan.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer this morning told reporters that the funding should be extended, with a debate on the war potentially coming at another time.
“The fact is, those troops are there now, and the money, as we have been told by the Pentagon, will be depleted as of the seventh of August,” Hoyer said.
“Whatever we decide on policy in the long-term does not affect our obligation today to make sure the troops, as long as they are there, have the resources they need.” he added.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Democrats push forward on campaign spending disclosure act
WASHINGTON — Facing a difficult climb to the 60 votes needed to overcome resistance by Republicans, Senate Democrats are pushing forward this afternoon toward a vote on legislation that would force more spending disclosure in federal campaigns.
Democrats had hopes that Senator Scott Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, could be persuaded to support the bill, known as the DISCLOSE Act, but Brown’s office confirmed this morning that he remains opposed.
The legislation is the Congressional response to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling last January, which said that corporations and unions must be treated the same as individuals in elections. The court struck down limits on union and corporate campaign advertising, though it upheld disclosure requirements.
The House of Representatives passed a version of the DISCLOSE Act last month.
The legislation would require union heads or corporate CEOs to appear on camera to take responsibility for their political advertising, and would require the names of top donors to appear on the screen. It would ban political ads by many government contractors and companies with substantial foreign ownership.
A vote to overcome a Republican filibuster is scheduled for 2:45 p.m. this afternoon.
Langevin becomes first person who uses a wheelchair to preside over a session of the House
WASHINGTON -- On the 20th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Rhode Island Congressman Jim Langevin today became the first person who uses a wheelchair to preside over a session of the U.S. House of Representatives, thanks to a series of mechanical lifts recently installed to make the speaker's rostrum accessible.
Langevin, a Rhode Island Democrat, was paralyzed from the chest down in a shooting accident in Warwick, Rhode Island when he was 16. He was working at the Warwick Police Department, when a gun accidentally discharged in the station locker room. The bullet damaged Langevin's spinal cord.
The Disabilities Act, signed into law by President George H.W. Bush on July 26, 1990, forbade discrimination and opened public places to people who had mental or physical disabilities.
At a Capitol Hill reception shortly before Langevin took the rostrum, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Langevin has inspired his colleagues, and that his taking a turn with the gavel is "the best possible way to commemorate the passage" of the ADA.
In brief remarks, Langevin recalled lying in the hospital after his accident, and taking inspiration from others who had overcome life-changing injuries. "I hope some other young person...will see that they can succeed, too," he said.
Langevin's family and dozens of friends and former staff members crowded the gallery to see Langevin take the rostrum. He used a special, lighter gavel crafted by House wood workers to be easier to wield, according to his staff.
In one of his first acts as speaker pro tempore, Langevin gaveled his Rhode Island colleague, U.S. Rep. Patrick Kennedy, for talking too long in a tribute to Langevin.
When Kennedy asked for more time, Langevin recognized him, "For 15 seconds."
Kennedy laughed, and shouted, "Well, look who's in charge now."
GOP Senator Collins backs Kagan
WASHINGTON -- Maine Republican Susan Collins added her name to the very short list of GOP senators who have thus far endorsed the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the US Supreme Court.
The Maine lawmaker said in a statement that Kagan has "the intellect, experience, temperament and integrity" to serve honorably on the high court, the Associated Press reported this afternoon.
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina was the first to get behind Kagan, voting in her favor as she won Judiciary Committee approval Tuesday. Richard Lugar of Indiana followed suit the next day.
Democratic incumbents bolster campaign coffers
Four months before election day, incumbents running for reelection in the fall -- all Democrats --have significantly larger campaign warchests than those of their opponents, according to figures from the Federal Election Commission.
Such fund-raising prowess dims the prospects of Republicans to unseat any of the incumbents. The GOP had hoped the upset win of Scott Brown over Democrat Martha Coakley in the special Senate election earlier this year would broaden its appeal -- and fatten its coffers -- statewide. It has not happened.
Even in the race with the smallest gap, Democratic Representative Niki Tsongas has five times the amount of money on hand ($567,997) than her nearest opponent, Jonathan Golnik, a Republican businessman, with $112,814.
In the only open seat in the Bay State, the 10th Congressional District, Norfolk County District Attorney William Keating has substantially more in his coffers than his Democratic opponent, state Senator Robert O’Leary, $411,152 to $164,145. Both have outraised Republicans Jeffrey D. Perry, a state representative with $139,653, former state treasurer Joseph Malone $63,399, and Raymond Kasperowicz $1,888. The candidates are seeking to replace Representative William Delahunt, who is retiring.
Some entrenched incumbents have prodigious amounts of money, including Edward Markey, a 17-term representative from Malden, with $3,341,366, and Richard Neal, a 11-term representative from Springfield, with $2,974,164. Neal has been using that money to parcel out contributions to embattled Democrats across the nation in his effort to build support for a possible candidacy for chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.
Totals for the amount of cash in each congressional candidate's campaign account as of the end of June:
First Congressional District:
(incumbent) Representative John Olver (D) - $348,189
William Gunn (R) - $2,846
Michael Engel (I) - $15,700
Second District:
(i) Representative Richard Neal (D) - $2,974,164
Jay Fleitman (R) - $15,899
Tom Wesley (R) - $23,431
Third District:
(i) Representative James McGovern (D) - $822,957
Brian Herr (R) - $23,347
Martin Lamb (R) - $2,883
Patrick Barron (U) - $1,254
Fourth District:
(i) Representative Barney Frank (D) - $981,168
Rachel Brown (D) - $1,131
Sean Bielat (R) - $95,076
Earl Sholley (R) - $11,153
Fifth District:
(i) Representative Niki Tsongas (D) - $567,997
Jonathan Golnik (R) - $112,814
Robert Shapiro (R) - $2,851
Sam Meas (R) - $1,075
Michael Clark (U) - $566
Edward Brown (I) - $180
Sixth District:
(i) Representative John Tierney (D) - $1,550,056
William Hudak (R) - $126,235
Robert McCarthy (R) - $26,261
Seventh District:
(i) Representative Edward Markey (D) - $3,341,366
Gerry Dembrowski (R) - $3,241
Eighth District:
(i) Representative Michael Capuano (D) - $15,243
Ninth District:
(i) Representative Stephen Lynch (D) - $1,311,266
Mac D'Alessandro (D) - $71,672
Keith Lepor (R) - $415
Philip Dunkelbarger (U) - $877
10th District:
William Keating (D) - $411,152
Robert O'Leary (D) - $164,145
Jeffrey Perry (R) - $139,653
Joseph Malone (R) - $63,399
Raymond Kasperowicz (R) - $1,888
Andrew Sheets (I) - $8,500
Source: Associated Press
Senate leaders abandon effort to pass climate change bill until fall
WASHINGTON -- Senate leaders acknowledged today they have no chance of passing a comprehensive climate change bill any time soon, saying they would abandon the effort for the time being and take it up again in the fall.
Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, standing with Majority Leader Harry Reid, and White House energy advisor Carol Browner, said a year of work had still not produced a deal that could gain GOP support.
"We've always known from day one that to pass comprehensive energy reform, you've got to have 60 votes," said Kerry, who has led the effort in the Senate on a "cap-and-trade’’ bill to limit greenhouse gas emissions. "As we stand here today we don't have one Republican vote."
The House passed an energy bill last year, but the Senate’s filibuster rules have prevented it from acting.
The Senate will consider a stripped down bill with provisions responding to the BP oil disaster in the Gulf, expanding the use of natural gas in long-haul trucks, and increase spending on land and water conservation, Reid said.
Here is an edited transcript of Kerry's remarks on the issue today:
“Over the past year and a half working with Leader Reid, we’ve had hundreds of meetings and negotiations and we have built an unprecedented coalition of support which has moved us further along in this process than at any time in this effort. Today, we have support from industries and stakeholders that have opposed previous bills, and that is a very, very important achievement.“But we’ve always known from day one, that in order to pass comprehensive energy/climate legislation, you’ve got to reach 60 votes, and to reach those 60 votes, you’ve got have some Republicans. And as we stand here today, we do not have one Republican. I think that it’s possible to get there.
“Even this morning, Senator Lieberman and I had a meeting with one Republican who has indicated a willingness to begin working towards something. Harry Reid, today, is committed to giving us that opportunity, that open door over the next weeks, days, months, whatever it takes to find those 60 votes.
“The work will continue every single day. In the meantime, as Senator Reid has just said, we have an obligation to the American people, we have an obligation to our country. And that is to respond to the oil spill in the Gulf. And that’s why Senator Reid is going to bring this admittedly narrow, limited bill to the floor because he’s determined to do what we can in the timeframe that we have before the August break that will address some of our energy independence and some of the oil spill issues.
“Now let me be crystal clear. As Senator Reid said, this legislation that he has proposed does not replace climate legislation. It does not replace comprehensive energy legislation. Now President Obama called me before this meeting and said point blank that he is committed to working in these next days at a more intensive pace together with Carol Browner and other members of the administration to help bring together the ability to find sixty votes for that comprehensive legislation. And the leader is committed to getting that comprehensive legislation to the floor as soon as possible, whenever that might turn out to be.
“Senator Lieberman and I will continue to work with our colleagues and the stakeholders in order to carve a path to sixty votes for comprehensive legislation that appropriately targets, in an appropriate way, carbon, so that we can send signals to the marketplace and change the direction and create jobs for America and improve our security. The work we’ve done over the last year and a half will remain a foundation for all of this effort.
“I just want to say to all of you on a personal level, that you know I watched Ted Kennedy over 26 years fight to get tough things passed. And in 1970 he began that effort to pass health care reform. We just got it this year. This is not going to take that long. This is not going to take close to that long. I am absolutely confident that as the American people make their voices heard and as our colleagues go home and listen to them we’re going to grow in our ability to pass this.
Langevin will preside over House to mark anniversary of Americans with Disabilities Act
By Mark Arsenault, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Rhode Island Congressman Jim Langevin, who is quadriplegic and uses a motorized wheelchair, will preside over the U.S. House of Representatives for the first time on Monday, in an event timed to coincide with the 20th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The Speaker’s rostrum on the House floor has recently been made wheelchair-accessible through a series of lifts.
“I have long said that I may be the first quadriplegic to serve in Congress, but I won’t be the last,” said Langevin, a five-term Democrat and co-chair of the Bipartisan Disabilities Caucus, in a statement. “On Monday, we will celebrate another major step in continuing efforts to make the Capitol complex accessible. This is an extremely proud moment for me and helps renew my spirit as we continue to remove barriers and strengthen the ADA for millions of Americans with disabilities in the decades to come.”
Langevin was paralyzed in a shooting accident when he was 16 years old.
Brown gets shout-out at financial regulation bill signing ceremony
WASHINGTON -- Senator Scott Brown, the Massachusetts Republican who played a vital role in passage of legislation to overhaul financial regulation, did not attend today's elaborate bill-signing ceremony -- but did get a shout-out from President Obama.
Brown joined with the two Maine Republican senators, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, as well as 57 Democrats, to provide the needed 60 votes to break a filibuster and approve the bill.
Yesterday, Obama told an audience of more than 400 people that while a "partisan minority" opposed the bill, he wanted to "thank the three Republican senators who put partisanship aside, judged this bill on the merits, and voted for reform. We’re grateful to them." He did not name the Republicans but their names had been well-publicized.
The audience, which included a host of Democratic leaders, applauded loudly.
Brown spokeswoman Gail Gitcho said that Brown did receive an invitation to the event, held at a federal conference center a short ride down Pennsylvania Avenue from the Capitol. She said he did not show up in part because he had a "packed schedule." But, she said, "more than that he believes that it's time to move on and finally turn the focus to creating jobs and fixing the economy."
Some of most sustained applause at the event went to House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank of Newton and Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, who shepherded the legislation through their respective chambers of Congress.
Senate Democrats break GOP filibuster on unemployment extension bill
WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats, with the help of a pair of Maine Republicans, broke a GOP filibuster this afternoon and set up an expected vote late tonight or tomorrow to approve an extension of unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless.
The 60 to 40 vote to move the bill ahead ended a Senate deadlock that has cost 2.5 million Americans their benefits, including tens of thousands in Massachusetts, since June 2.
The close vote and political drama highlighted how jobs and the economy will dominate debate in the upcoming Congressional elections.
The vote split the Massachusetts delegation, as Republican Scott Brown voted against allowing the bill to move forward, agreeing with his fellow GOP members that the $34 billion for the unemployment extension should only be approved if it does not add to the deficit; John Kerry and Democrats say the government needs to respond to an economic emergency, to avoid more people slipping into financial crisis and losing their homes.
Benefits would be good through November, and retroactive to June 2. The vote this afternoon was to begin 30 hours of debate, and will require another vote before it goes to the House, which is expected to approve the measure on Wednesday.
Democrats overpowered the Republican filibuster with the help of two moderate Republicans from Maine—Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins—and the vote of newly appointed Senator Carte Goodwin, of West Virginia, sworn in to fill the seat of Democrat Robert Byrd, who died June 28.
Barely 10 minutes after Vice President Joe Biden administered the oath of office to Goodwin, the Senate began the roll call vote.
Senate approves sweeping financial overhaul
WASHINGTON – The Senate this afternoon approved a massive financial overhaul proposal, capping more than a year of intense debate and delivering President Obama his second major legislative victory.
A trio of New England Republicans – Scott Brown, of Massachusetts, and Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, both of Maine – joined 57 Democrats in supporting the bill. One Democrat, Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, voted with 38 Republicans, saying the measure did not go far enough.
“This is a major undertaking, one that is historic in its proportions,” Senator Christopher J. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat and a primary author of the legislation, said this morning on the Senate floor.
The 2,300-page bill, meant to address the problems that led to the 2008 economic collapse, will add new regulators to try and foresee future financial problems; create a new consumer protection bureau designed to protect consumers from predatory lenders; and implement new regulations that will curb some of the risky practices that helped contribute to the economic downturn.
Brown, Snowe, and Collins provided crucial support for the legislation after gaining concessions from Democrats. In Brown’s case, he fought for protections that will minimize the impact of the new regulations on Massachusetts-based institutions such as State Street Corp. and MassMutual.
“It’s not perfect,” Brown said in an interview just after he voted. “But it does a lot of positive things.”
“It is a very important step forward in terms of redressing the balance of interest and power within the financial sector,” Senator John F. Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, said in an interview. “And I think it sets up some very important standards and requirements.”
The Senate passed the bill about two weeks after the House, led by Representative Barney Frank of Newton.
President Obama will likely sign the bill in a ceremony next week, giving Democrats a key boost heading into November’s midterm elections. The bill marks the second major legislative victory for Obama, following the hard-fought passage of an overhaul to the nation's health care system earlier this year.
Republicans plan to use the bill, too, as a political weapon. They say the bill reaches too far into private business practices, and doesn’t do enough to address some of the key economic problems, such as regulating mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
"All told, this bill would impose 533 new regulations on individuals and small businesses,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said this morning. “Once again, the administration and its Democrat allies in Congress have taken a crisis and used it, rather than solving it.”
Even Democrats have conceded that it is not clear whether the new regulations will prevent future problems. Much of that will depend on how the regulations are implemented in the coming weeks.
"It is not a perfect bill, I will be the first to admit that," Dodd said. "It will take the next economic crisis, as certainly it will come, to determine whether or not the provisions of this bill will actually provide this generation or the next generation of regulators with the tools necessary to minimize the effects of that crisis."
Brown’s vote was seen as crucial. He said this afternoon that he initially dismissed it, but got involved about several months ago when President Obama began criticizing Republicans for their ties to Wall Street.
“I wasn’t going to participate at all, but then the president started with the whole ‘Main Street, Democrats -- Wall Street, Republicans,’” Brown said in the interview. “And I’m like, what does that mean? We have an opportunity to make a good bill here, and the fact that he was trying to link us to being in bed with Wall Street was offensive. So I was kind of dragged into it. I’m not looking out for Wall Street. I’m looking out for Massachusetts.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown to oppose campaign finance bill
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown said this morning that he will oppose a new campaign finance overhaul that would require further disclosures of campaign contributions, creating major hurdles for the prospects of the bill.
The Massachusetts Republican had been a key target for Senate Democrats who are hoping to pass the so-called DISCLOSE Act. The measure comes in response to a Supreme Court ruling that lifted restrictions on corporate and union funding of political advertisements.
But Brown argues that the new legislation would help Democrats, and would be implemented several months before crucial midterm elections.
“Rather than reform our campaign finance laws and provide increased transparency, the DISCLOSE Act advances the political agenda of the majority party and special interests in an effort to gain a tactical and political advantage little more than 100 days before an election,” Brown wrote in a letter to organizations that had lobbied him to support the bill.
The measure was approved last month in the House, but it has yet to gain the 60 votes needed in the Senate to overcome a Republican filibuster.
Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, is the chief sponsor. Democrats currently control 58 votes, and have also been targeting two Maine Republican senators, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe.
This afternoon, Brown came under criticism from the League of Women Voters, which has advocated for the campaign finance changes.
"It is very disappointing that Senator Brown is repeating the same old Washington excuses after just a few months in office," Elisabeth MacNamara, national president of the League of Women Voters, said in a statement. "He says the legislation is partisan. This is the oldest dodge in Washington. As a non-partisan group, we in the League of Women Voters say that this bill is not partisan and requires disclosure fairly from all."
Marcia Hirshberg, president of the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts, also criticized Brown.
"His leaders in Washington are opposed to transparency, but he campaigned with the people of Massachusetts as a different kind of politician," she said. "He can't represent both the old ways of Washington and the new spirit of government responsibility and transparency."
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Here is the complete text of Brown’s letter:
Dear Members of the Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause, Democracy 21, League of Women Voters, and Public Citizen:
Thank you for your letter in which you urge me to support the DISCLOSE Act. As stated in your letter, my election to the U.S. Senate sent a message that the American people are tired of the politics-as-usual mentality, and want to restore real checks and balances in Washington. Unfortunately, the DISCLOSE Act does not do enough to require transparency, accountability and fair play. Therefore, I cannot support the DISCLOSE Act.
Rather than reform our campaign finance laws and provide increased transparency, the DISCLOSE Act advances the political agenda of the majority party and special interests in an effort to gain a tactical and political advantage little more than 100 days before an election. No matter how one feels about McCain-Feingold, at least that was an honest attempt to reform campaign finance laws that would not have gone into effect until after the next election cycle. The DISCLOSE Act does the opposite – it changes the rules in the middle of the game to provide a tactical advantage to the majority party.
Even more astonishing, this bill does not treat all organizations equally and does not apply to everyone. For example, not all the disclosure requirements apply to labor unions and other special interest groups – despite these groups being among the most active political organizations. Labor unions and their political action committees spent more than $450 million to help their allies in 2008, and they have already pledged to spend upwards of $100 million in the midterms. Yet they would be carved out of this legislation and not face the same regulations that would apply to everyone else.
A genuine campaign finance reform effort would include increased transparency, accountability and would provide a level playing field to everyone.
Furthermore, this bill is being pushed when our country has almost double digit unemployment. We must return our focus to job creation.
I understand that your five groups support this legislation, and I respect your opinion, but more than 450 other groups from across the political spectrum – ranging from such ideological opposites as the National Right to Life Committee and the ACLU – oppose this bill. They recognize that it is based on partisan politics instead of sound policy. I could not agree more. When dealing with rights guaranteed by the First Amendment, we should look to adopt a higher standard than the one in this bill. The American people expect and deserve better.Respectfully,
U.S. Senator Scott Brown
Brown to oppose campaign finance bill
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown said this morning that he will oppose a new campaign finance overhaul that would require further disclosures of campaign contributions, creating major hurdles for the prospects of the bill.
The Massachusetts Republican had been a key target for Senate Democrats who are hoping to pass the so-called DISCLOSE Act. The measure comes in response to a Supreme Court ruling that lifted restrictions on corporate and union funding of political advertisements.
But Brown argues that the new legislation would help Democrats, and would be implemented several months before crucial midterm elections.
“Rather than reform our campaign finance laws and provide increased transparency, the DISCLOSE Act advances the political agenda of the majority party and special interests in an effort to gain a tactical and political advantage little more than 100 days before an election,” Brown wrote in a letter to organizations that had lobbied him to support the bill.
The measure was approved last month in the House, but it has yet to gain the 60 votes needed in the Senate to overcome a Republican filibuster.
Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, is the chief sponsor. Democrats control 59 votes, and have also been targeting two Maine Republican senators, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Here is the complete text of Brown’s letter:
Dear Members of the Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause, Democracy 21, League of Women Voters, and Public Citizen:
Thank you for your letter in which you urge me to support the DISCLOSE Act. As stated in your letter, my election to the U.S. Senate sent a message that the American people are tired of the politics-as-usual mentality, and want to restore real checks and balances in Washington. Unfortunately, the DISCLOSE Act does not do enough to require transparency, accountability and fair play. Therefore, I cannot support the DISCLOSE Act.
Rather than reform our campaign finance laws and provide increased transparency, the DISCLOSE Act advances the political agenda of the majority party and special interests in an effort to gain a tactical and political advantage little more than 100 days before an election. No matter how one feels about McCain-Feingold, at least that was an honest attempt to reform campaign finance laws that would not have gone into effect until after the next election cycle. The DISCLOSE Act does the opposite – it changes the rules in the middle of the game to provide a tactical advantage to the majority party.
Even more astonishing, this bill does not treat all organizations equally and does not apply to everyone. For example, not all the disclosure requirements apply to labor unions and other special interest groups – despite these groups being among the most active political organizations. Labor unions and their political action committees spent more than $450 million to help their allies in 2008, and they have already pledged to spend upwards of $100 million in the midterms. Yet they would be carved out of this legislation and not face the same regulations that would apply to everyone else.
A genuine campaign finance reform effort would include increased transparency, accountability and would provide a level playing field to everyone.
Furthermore, this bill is being pushed when our country has almost double digit unemployment. We must return our focus to job creation.
I understand that your five groups support this legislation, and I respect your opinion, but more than 450 other groups from across the political spectrum – ranging from such ideological opposites as the National Right to Life Committee and the ACLU – oppose this bill. They recognize that it is based on partisan politics instead of sound policy. I could not agree more. When dealing with rights guaranteed by the First Amendment, we should look to adopt a higher standard than the one in this bill. The American people expect and deserve better.Respectfully,
U.S. Senator Scott Brown
Markey asks FDA to investigate BP spill's impact on food chain
WASHINGTON – Representative Edward J. Markey, saying the BP oil spill could cause arsenic to infiltrate the marine ecosystem in the Gulf, is asking the Food and Drug Administration to answer questions about how the food chain is being impacted.
“I am concerned that the mixture of oil, dispersants, arsenic and other toxic compounds are having effects on seafood that may not be detectable for months,” the Malden Democrat wrote today in the letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg.
Markey chairs the Energy and Environment Subcommittee in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which is leading the congressional investigation into the BP oil spill.
He also asked whether the FDA is tracking the possibility that contaminated fish may be swimming to areas not impacted directly by the spill, being caught, and entering the food system.
He cited that researchers have found droplets of oil inside crab larvae harvested from the Gulf of Mexico.
“Despite fishery closures in areas that are known to be contaminated by oil, contamination could still be spreading into the human food chain as predators eat oil-tainted species, and then travel to areas that are not themselves closed to fishing,” Markey wrote.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
At request of Republican senators, vote on Kagan put off to next Tuesday
At the request of Republican senators, the Senate Judiciary Committee will put off for one week the vote on the Supreme Court nomination of former Harvard Law School dean Elena Kagan. The vote on whether to recommend Kagan to the full Senate will be next Tuesday, said Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, the Vermont Democrat, who announced his support for Kagan this morning.
Ranking Republican member Jeff Sessions, of Alabama, made the request for the delay this morning, saying that there were "concerns about the nomination on a host of different areas." Any senator has the right to delay a committee vote for a week.
Senate leadership still expects to hold a final vote on the nomination before Congress leaves Washington for the August recess.
CBO report: Kerry's climate bill would cut deficit by $19b
WASHINGTON – Senator John F. Kerry’s signature energy and climate change legislation would cut the deficit by $19 billion, according to a new estimate released today by the Congressional Budget Office.
The legislation has uncertain political prospects, but the estimate gives proponents another argument at a time when there are rising concerns about adding to the deficit.
“There is no more room for excuses – this must be our year to pass comprehensive climate and energy legislation and begin to send a price signal on carbon,” Kerry said this afternoon in a statement with the legislation’s co-author, Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut. “Many of our colleagues have said they flatly oppose anything that adds a penny to the deficit, so we hope they look anew at this initiative which reduces it.”
The CBO report estimates that the deficit would be reduced by $19 billion over the first 10 years, and that it would also not increase the deficit over the following 40 years.
The cost of the legislation, which includes various tax credits, would be more than offset by revenues collected through a cap-and-trade system, according to the report. The bill, which was released in May, would put a price on carbon emissions that opponents have attacked as a carbon tax that would hurt businesses.
The report estimates that an allowance, representing a metric ton of carbon dioxide, would cost about $14 in 2012, and would rise to $25 in 2020.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Key Senate Finance Committee Democrats divided on Berwick's recess appointment
WASHINGTON -- Key Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee were divided in their reaction to President Obama’s recess appointment this morning of health care policy guru Dr. Donald Berwick to lead the agency that oversees Medicare and Medicaid.
For the Obama administration, the maneuver around the legislative branch’s usual confirmation process was driven by political necessity: the White House saw storm clouds on the horizon for Berwick, as Republicans prepared to hammer him in hearings over his support of the British health care system. Republicans also said they would use Berwick’s hearings to "re-litigate’’ the health care bill as November’s mid-term elections loomed.
Despite those tactical considerations, an objection came from the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Democrat Max Baucus of Montana, an Obama ally who would have led Berwick’s confirmation hearings.
Said Baucus: “I'm troubled that, rather than going through the standard nomination process, Dr. Berwick was recess appointed. Senate confirmation of presidential appointees is an essential process prescribed by the Constitution that serves as a check on executive power and protects Montanans and all Americans by ensuring that crucial questions are asked of the nominee – and answered.’’
Baucus qualified his complaint, however: “Despite the recess appointment, I look forward to working with (the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) as they implement health reform to deliver the better health care outcomes and lower costs for patients we fought to pass in the landmark health reform law,” Baucus added.
John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, diverged from that point of view. He strongly defended the White House circumvention of the legislative branch in this instance. Although Baucus had not even scheduled a hearing for Berwick, Kerry nonetheless blamed GOP "stalling’’ on his nomination -- an apparent reference to the GOP warnings of a GOP roasting and expected "holds,'' which allow single senators to put a freeze on nominees.
“Republican lockstep stalling of Don’s nomination was a case study in cynicism and one awful example of how not to govern. Republicans screamed that these federal programs were in trouble, then tried to deny the Administration the capable guy the President had chosen to oversee them,’’ Kerry said.
"The President did the right thing making this a recess appointment. He wasn’t going to let the Republicans thrive in a chaos of their own making. Instead, he put seniors, kids, and the disabled ahead of Republican gamesmanship, and he put a terrific public servant in place,’’ he said.
President Obama, also, in a brief statement today announcing his recess appointments of Berwick and two other officials in science and financial oversight roles, blamed Republicans for forcing his hand.
“It’s unfortunate that at a time when our nation is facing enormous challenges, many in Congress have decided to delay critical nominations for political purposes,” President Obama said.
The recess appointment lasts until the end of the session of Congress, in late 2011. So in 18 months or so, the debate over Berwick will undoubtedly begin again.
Talk turning to who would head Consumer Protection Bureau
WASHINGTON – With the Senate likely to approve a financial regulation overhaul next week, attention is starting to turn to one of the key new positions created in the legislation: head of the new Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.
One likely pick would be Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren, who proposed creating the bureau in the first place. Warren has declined to comment on whether she would accept the position.
“I think, frankly, that Elizabeth Warren would be a terrific head of that agency,” Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said yesterday on Fox Business Network, when asked if she herself would be interested in the new post. “She’s thought a lot about the consumer protection piece.”
(Separately, Coakley was how she thought Senator Scott Brown was doing. “He’s enjoying it, he’s working hard,” she said, adding that she had marched in a July 4 parade with the man who surprisingly defeated her for the senate seat. “You know, he’s dealing with what happens in Washington and trying to decide how you vote.”)
The new head would be appointed by the president, and confirmed by the Senate. Until the first director is confirmed, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner would have authority over the agency.
For average Americans, the bureau is likely to be one of the most visible aspects of the massive financial overhaul. The bureau is designed to protect consumers, and will oversee some of the everyday transactions involving credit cards, checking accounts, and mortgages.
This is not the first time Warren's name has surfaced for a prominent appointment: she was also mentioned among the possible nominees to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. That ended up going to one of Warren's former colleagues at Harvard, the former law school dean Elena Kagan.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
GOP, Brown block unemployment extension
WASHINGTON – For the third time in three weeks, Senator Scott Brown last night joined Republicans in blocking a vote on providing unemployment checks to millions of people across the country.
The measure failed by a single vote, with two Republicans – Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both of Maine – joining 57 Democrats in trying to advance a bill that would extend unemployment. Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska was the only Democrat who voted against the bill.
With the Senate off next week for a week-long break, the issue won’t come up again until the week of July 12. It seems sure to pass at that point, once a replacement is named for Senator Robert C. Byrd, the West Virginia Democrat who died Monday.
Democrats have scaled back their plans several times in recent weeks, scrapping plans to provide states with more Medicaid funds to offset budget cut. The measure last night would have cost $34 billion, and Republicans opposed it because it would add to the federal debt since there was no funding source to pay for it.
Brown has come under increasing pressure from Massachusetts advocates, unions, and unemployed residents for continuing to block unemployment benefit extensions, even as he held up a financial reform overhaul because he objected in a $19 billion tax on large financial institutions. Youth advocates earlier this week protested at Brown’s office in Boston, asking the Massachusetts Republican to vote for funding for summer jobs.
"Unfortunately Senator Brown is using his clout as a key vote to deliver a $19 billion break to the financial elites on Wall Street who crumbled our economy," Robert Haynes, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO, said today in a statement. "Real people are suffering and every week more will suffer without his vote on an unemployment extension. Wall Street is doing fine. He's chosen to help nameless, faceless businesses who are doing fine over real working class families who are truly suffering. It's unacceptable."
Earlier yesterday, Brown introduced legislation that would have used federal stimulus funding to pay for the unemployment assistance, as well as fund summer jobs and provide additional Medicaid funding.
“No one is disputing the value of these very important programs, especially in my home State of Massachusetts, but throughout the country as well,” Brown said yesterday on the Senate floor. “But we also have to make tough choices, and we have to live within our means.”
“I have been in Washington a little over 5 months now,” Brown added. “It seems that everybody is following my voting record. It speaks for itself in that I worked to work across party lines to solve problems. But the thing that is a problem is, it needs to be a two-way street. Bipartisanship is not just from the new Senator from Massachusetts. It needs to be with the majority party looking outside the box.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Despite changes, Brown still noncommital on financial reform bill
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown is assiduously avoiding any commitments on the financial overhaul legislation, despite repeated efforts by top House and Senate lawmakers to win his vote.
The 43-member House and Senate conference committee met for two hours late yesterday afternoon to scrap a $19 billion tax, after Brown threatened to vote against the bill unless it was removed.
This morning, Brown continued to hold out, saying he would not make a decision on the bill for at least another week, after the Senate returns from a weeklong recess. The House is planning to take up the issue this afternoon, but Senate Democrats say they won't have time and won't vote until the week of July 12.
“I appreciate the conference committee revisiting the Wall Street reform bill and removing the $19 billion bank tax,” Brown said in a statement. “Over the July recess, I will continue to review this important bill. I remain committed to putting in place safeguards to prevent another financial meltdown, ensure that consumers are protected, and that this bill is paid for without new taxes."
Several times Brown has made himself the focus in the debate, as Senate Democrats try to win enough Republican votes to pass the bill. Several changes have been made to address Brown's concerns, including provisions that will allow State Street Corp. and other large banks to continue investing a portion of their money in securities markets.
Nonetheless, Democrats say they may have the votes, even if Brown decides not to support it.
“I don’t know what his problem is,” Representative Barney Frank, a Newton Democrat and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said this morning. But, he added, “It also looks as if there are 60 votes without him.”
Democrats are counting on two Republicans from Maine – Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe – as well as Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington who has previously opposed the bill because she wants it to go further. Cantwell told reporters this afternoon that she was still studying the bill, while Collins said, "On balance, I am inclined to support it." Snowe hasn't yet commented on the changes.
The final vote that Democrats need would come when West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin, a Democrat, appoints a replacement to fill the seat of Senator Robert C. Byrd, who died on Monday. That appointment would likely not be made for at least several days.
The bill is lengthy and complex, but the overarching components have been debated for weeks. The changes made yesterday are three pages long, eliminating the bank tax and replacing it with $11 billion in funds saved by eliminating the 2008 bank bailout and a small increase in bank fees paid to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
The Senate version of the bill, which Brown voted for, did not include a method of paying for the new regulations. Instead, it would have added to the federal deficit – a spending approach that Brown has opposed in other instances, most notably to vote against extending unemployment insurance.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
After Brown threat, Frank, Dodd reconvene conference committee to remove bank tax
WASHINGTON -- Responding to a threat by Scott Brown to vote against the the massive Wall Street overhaul package, US Representative Barney Frank and Senator Christopher J. Dodd were planning to reconvene a conference committee today to revisit the bill and remove a $19 billion tax on big banks that would have paid for increased oversight.
Dodd told reporters that they were planning to scrap a $19 billion bank fee – which has been Brown’s latest objection – and that the 43-member committee would meet as early as this afternoon.
Brown declined to comment on the changes, telling a battery of reporters that he wanted to wait and see what the conference committee decided.
Earlier today, Brown said that he would vote against the Wall Street regulatory overhaul that was adopted by the committee last week, citing the last-minute addition of the $19 billion in bank taxes to pay for the bill. It was a switch in position for Brown, who had previously voted in favor of an earlier version in the Senate.
The Massachusetts Republican sent a letter this morning to the top House and Senate negotiators – Representative Barney Frank, of Newton, and Senator Chris Dodd, of Connecticut – to reiterate his strong opposition to the tax.
It was the second time that Brown has used the leverage of his swing vote in the Senate to influence the bill in ways that were beneficial to the financial industry. He previously had made his continuing support contingent on winning key provisions in the conference committee for State Street Corp. and other banks, allowing them to continuing using a percentage of their capital to invest in Wall Street securities.
Brown last week objected to the last-minute addition of the bank tax and then yesterday said he would vote against the conference committee compromise.
"If the final version of this bill contains these higher taxes, I will not support it,” Brown wrote, saying the new tax would be passed along to consumers and would hurt business during a shaky economy. Brown has indicated that he had problems with the tax, but until today had not said definitively that he would oppose it unless it is removed.
The tax would be spread over five years, and would help pay for the expenses of greater oversight duties by a variety of federal agencies. It would be assessed on banks with assets of more than $50 billion and hedge funds of more than $10 billion. Fees would vary, depending on how risky the institutions is.
Frank has argued that taxing the largest banks is a fair way to pay for implementing the bill.
“It’s a fairly small amount, it’s only for five years,” Frank said in an interview on Friday. “And it’s probably smaller than their bonus pool for their top executives.”
Brown so far has not said how he thinks the bill should be paid for. In his letter today, he requested that Dodd and Frank “find a way to offset the cost of the bill by cutting unnecessary federal spending.” Brown did not identify where those cuts should be made, but wrote, “There are hundreds of billions in unspent federal funds sitting around, some authorized years ago for long-dead initiatives. Congress needs to start to looking there first, and I stand ready to help.”
Brown was one of four Republicans to support the Senate package, but his new opposition complicates final passage of the final reform bill. President Obama has hoped to sign the bill by July 4, but that is growing increasingly unlikely as Senate Democrats scramble to round up votes.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Byrd upheld the Senate tradition of oratory
WASHINGTON – The television sets blared the sounds of the bombing of Baghdad as reporters in the Senate press gallery watched and listened to the opening of the “shock and awe” campaign, the massive aerial assault meant to scare Iraqi solders out of fighting a protracted war against US forces. It was March 21, 2003, a day that was meant to be a dramatic turning point in the war West Virginia Senator Robert C. Byrd had opposed from the onset.
But because it was March 21, Byrd was engaged in a different ritual, one he employed every year, rain or shine, war or peace. So while the rest of the nation watched the barrage of artillery on the Iraqi capital, Byrd addressed his colleagues on the Senate floor on the Rites of Spring.
“Mr. President, at long last, Spring has arrived. After a long gray winter made darker by the specter of war, and with that conflict now upon us, it is heartening to be reminded of the great rhythm of the seasons and the renewal of the earth and the life upon it,” Byrd said, beginning his annual address on the onset of the season.
And then, as usual, he quoted the poet Robert Burns:
“Now Nature hangs her mantle green, on every blooming tree,” Byrd recited, as the “boom!” and “kapow!” of the bombs could be heard on the other side of the chamber doors.
“And spread her sheets of daisies white, out o’er the grassy lea.”
Tradition was important to Byrd, who died early Monday morning at the age if 92. He knew the Senate rules inside and out -- and used them to his advantage when advancing or hindering a piece of legislation. He carried a copy of the US constitution in his pocket, ready with a constitutional argument to thorny questions.
And he was one of the chamber’s last great orators, a man whose career developed pre- C-SPAN, and who saw Senate floor debates not as opportunities to play to a political base, but as a place to have an actual debate. Visitors who closed their eyes and listened to Byrd’s booming voice, rising and pausing dramatically, could almost hear the voices of the old Senate – John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay and Daniel Webster.
And he didn’t let his deteriorating health interfere. When one of his closest friends in the Senate, the late Massachusetts Senator Edward M. Kennedy, was diagnosed with a fatal brain tumor in 2008, the ailing Byrd struggled through tears to give a tribute to his fellow Democrat and colleague. “Ted, I love you. And I miss you,” Byrd said, wiping his eyes with shaky hands.
Byrd, by then in a wheelchair, stationed himself right by the Senate doors in July of that year when Kennedy stunned his colleagues by showing up to cast a critical vote on Medicare funding, eager to be the first to greet his ill friend.
It looked dire for Byrd last year, when he was hospitalized for six weeks with a staph infection -- a serious malady, especially for an elderly person. But Byrd rallied, returning to the Senate to provide the necessary votes on the health care law Kennedy had sought for decades to achieve. On the day of the December Senate vote, Washington was paralyzed by a massive snowfall, and some lawmakers -- even those from northern climes -- were late getting to the chamber, missing unrelated, early votes. Byrd was there, on time.
On Monday, the desk of the longest-serving senator in history was unoccupied, draped, as is customary, in a black mourning cloth and adorned with a glass vase of white roses. Byrd, as he reminded everyone every spring, was a gardener himself, tending to forsythia, lilacs and hyacinths in his yard.
Speaking for the troops in Iraq that spring of 2003, Byrd bemoaned that they would not see a daffodil that season. “But God’s daffodils are there for them, just as we are, our support as eternal and dependable as the arrival of Spring,” Byrd said.
Byrd's death could impact financial reform vote
WASHINGTON -- The death of Senator Robert C. Byrd could significantly complicate plans this week to approve a major overhaul of financial industry rules, which has been a major priority for President Obama.
Senate Democrats, who were already dealing with a razor-thin margin, will have to convince up to four Republicans to help them fend off a GOP filibuster when the plan comes up for a vote.
That wouldn’t be a problem if all four Republicans who supported the Senate financial reform bill last month would also agree to support the final compromise bill, which was agreed upon Friday by House and Senate negotiators.
But Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts was one of those four, and he is far from supportive of the new bill. Although he won several provisions in the negotiations, on Friday afternoon he said he was opposed to $19 billion in new bank taxes that were inserted at the last minute. “I’ve said repeatedly that I cannot support any bill that raises taxes,” he said.
The three other Republicans who voted for the Senate bill – Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, both of Maine – have not yet said how they feel about the compromise legislation.
Byrd’s successor will be appointed by West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin, who is a Democrat, until an election is held (whether that election will be this fall or in 2012 is still under debate, subject to different interpretations of West Virginia election law). Manchin told the Associated Press this morning that there is no timetable for his appointment choice, making it unlikely someone new will be in place for votes this week.
For now, that means that Democrats control 58 votes in the Senate, two shy of the 60 they need to break a Republican filibuster.
On financial reform, two Democrats – Maria Cantwell of Washington, and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin – have consistently voted against the plan, saying it did not go far enough.
If Cantwell and Feingold continue to oppose the bill, Democrats would need four Republicans. One possibility would be to convince the two Democrats to vote to shut off debate – the procedural motion that requires 60 votes to prevent a filibuster – and then free them up to vote against its final passage. Even then, without a successor to Byrd, two Republican votes would be needed.
Byrd’s death could impact several other issues expected to come up. Senate Democrats have been trying for weeks to get enough votes to pass a bill that would extend unemployment, alter tax codes, and provide more Medicaid funding to states. Republicans have been united against the plan, saying it costs too much, and Democrats could bring the issue back up again this week.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry remarks on Senator Robert Byrd’s death
Flags at the Capitol fly half-mast today. Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, the Senate’s longest serving member, died at age 92 this morning. Senator John Kerry remembered his colleague in the following statement.
“This morning, the Senate lost its guardian, West Virginia lost a champion, and many of us lost a teacher. When I first came to the Senate, Robert Byrd was our Minority Leader. Our class of freshly minted Senators wasn’t lacking in ambition or agenda. We’d all campaigned on long lists of policy ideas we exuberantly believed we’d pass into law immediately. Leader Byrd took the time to meet with all the freshmen individually, listened to us, helped us with our Committee assignments, and took particular care to instruct us on something we’d thought very little about: our responsibility to be caretakers of the institution. He helped us see a bigger picture about this place. Much has been made about Robert Byrd’s habit of carrying a pocket-sized Constitution and delivering fabled exhortations about history. But those details don’t capture fully his deep commitment to an institution he loved deeply for 51 years. He saw reflected in every Senator the highest hopes of the Constitution’s framers.
“Robert Byrd did more thinking and reevaluating in his eighties and nineties than many Senators do in a lifetime. He surprised many with his fierce opposition to the war in Iraq and the evolving views about energy and climate change he articulated even in his last year in the Senate. On these and so many occasions, he was prescient. Whether you agreed or disagreed with his positions, he was one of a rare group of senior voices whose thoughtful speeches could bring the entire Senate to a halt as we learned in to listen. He cared immensely about his country and fought as proudly for his state as any Senator in our history. He leaves behind a remarkable example of what it means to be an engaged public citizen.
New ad urges Brown to support energy and climate legislation
WASHINGTON – Clean energy advocates are taking out new TV ads this week in Massachusetts, urging Senator Scott Brown to support energy and climate change legislation.
“The Gulf oil disaster makes one thing really clear,” Tim Healy, chief executive of Boston-headquartered energy company EnerNOC, says in the 30-second ad as images of an oil-covered bird flashes across the screen. “It’s time for America to clean up our energy act. Congress can no longer punt on energy and climate reform.”
The ad, which begins running today in the Boston media market, is sponsored by Clean Economy Network, a national advocacy association of clean energy businesses.
The latest ad is less pointed than one that began airing earlier this month. That spot, sponsored by Environment Massachusetts, shows seven residents criticizing Brown for supporting a resolution that would have limited federal regulations on greenhouse gas emissions, saying, “Senator Brown, you let us down.”
The more recent ad asks residents to contact both Brown and Senator John F. Kerry, although Kerry’s stance is more clearly defined. The Massachusetts Democrat is a chief author of a major climate change package, and has been lobbying his colleagues, including Brown, for support.
Brown has not signed onto Kerry’s plan, and following a meeting with President Obama earlier this month, the Massachusetts Republican said he would not back any climate-change measure that included a fee on carbon emissions. He left open the possibility of supporting “a comprehensive energy plan.”
Obama is planning to meet tomorrow with senators at the White House to discuss climate and energy legislation.
The ad being released today does not mention Kerry’s plan specifically, or address which approach should be taken, but the group that sponsored the ad has been supporters of the bill that Kerry filed with Senator Joseph Lieberman, the Connecticut independent.
The ad, the third spot in a $1 million campaign, points out that many clean energy companies are based in Massachusetts and would benefit by new federal emphasis on the industry.
“It's time to level the playing field for Massachusetts companies,” Healy says in the ad. “A clean energy and climate plan means real job right here.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry's good day, bad day
WASHINGTON – It was the best of times, the worst of times…
Or so it went yesterday for Senator John Kerry.
Yesterday afternoon, the Massachusetts Democrat emerged from a meeting on energy and climate change.
“I just left one of the most motivating, energized, and even inspirational caucuses that I’ve been a part of since I’ve been here in the Senate for 26 years,” he said, in a transcript sent out by his staff at 3:08 p.m.
About two and a half hours later, the tenor for the senator had changed dramatically.
“This is one of the worst moments I’ve seen in 25 years in the United States Senate,” he said in a statement. That comment came after Senate Democrats failed to break a Republican filibuster that would have extended unemployment benefits.
And for any noting the discrepancy over how long Kerry has been in the Senate, he was sworn into office in January 1985. So he’s been a senator for 25 1/2 years.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown targeted on unemployment extension bill - update
WASHINGTON – The Senate again failed to approve new extensions of unemployment benefits this afternoon, reaching an impasse on an issue that is preventing nearly 1 million laid off workers from getting unemployment checks.
Democrats several times have scaled back their proposal, but have yet to attract enough votes to overcome a Republican filibuster that has been joined onto by Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts.
“We can’t pass it unless we get some Republicans,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told reporters this afternoon. “It’s up to them.”
The proposal, which came three votes shy of the 60 needed to break the filibuster, would have extended insurance for long-term unemployed workers until Nov. 30. Those benefits had expired three weeks ago, and an estimated 30,000 laid-off workers in Massachusetts have already lost benefits.
The bill also would have supplied a $16 billion boost in Medicaid funding for states, which would mean about $500 million for Massachusetts, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. That figure is lower than an earlier proposal, which would have supplied a $24 billion boost, or $760 million for Massachusetts.
It also includes a variety of tax changes, and money for summer jobs programs.
The House had passed the extension legislation shortly before Memorial Day, but Senate Republicans have prevented the proposal from coming to a vote in the Senate.
“I have great compassion for those programs, and have kept everybody informed as to where everything stands so they can plan,” Brown said in an interview this morning. “The issue is it’s going to raise taxes, it’s going to increase the deficit and there’s no way to pay for it yet. But they’re working towards it. They’re doing better. We’ll just see.”
In an effort to attract more Republicans, the proposal has been scaled back. The latest proposal would add about $33 billion to the deficit, according to the Congressional Budget Office. By comparison, the initial proposal would have added more than $130 billion to the deficit.
"It is crucial that Senator Brown understands that extending the [Medicaid funding] will literally save lives of his constituents," Leo V. Sarkissian, executive director of The Arc of Massachusetts, said in a statement. "These may be numbers on a page in Washington, but in this state they drive decisions that can make lives better or worse, depending on how Senator Brown chooses to vote."
Labor groups have also targeted Brown. The AFL-CIO recently sent out an e-mail that read, "Tell Sen. Scott Brown to stop playing politics with people's lives."
"This is particularly outrageous given the challenges we face in trying to come out of this global recession,” John Walsh, chairman of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, said in a statement this afternoon. “Sen. Brown: Start joining others that represent us and start trying to help, not hurt the interests of people in our state."
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
High-stakes financial debate ongoing
WASHINGTON – House and Senate negotiators continue to wrangle over several key provisions in a proposal that would dramatically restructure the nation’s financial regulations.
A committee of House and Senate lawmakers, controlled by Representative Barney Frank of Newton, has been meeting for several weeks. They are attempting to wrap up tonight – or perhaps stretching to the early hours of tomorrow morning – but there are still major issues to resolve, including several that will determine the vote of Senator Scott Brown.
While the discussions are still ongoing, Brown and Frank both appeared confident that there would be an agreement that would satisfy Brown.
“They’re very close,” Brown said in an interview this morning. “I’m hopeful we’ll have a resolution today.”
“I told them that I need to see everything in writing,” he added. “Because I’ve had representations made before and then when we read it, they’re not in there. So I want to make sure it’s in there.”
Brown is one of the key votes – “I’m probably the deciding vote again,” he boasted – and as a result has wielded extraordinary sway over the negotiations, particularly for a senator who was sworn in just five months ago.
He also ran a campaign railing against the culture of Washington, and now has been engaged in high-stakes discussions to ensure that key businesses – and campaign contributors – in Massachusetts are taken care of, among them State Street Corp., Fidelity Investments, and MassMutual.
And while Republicans had hoped Brown would be the 41st vote to block the Democrats agenda, instead he has been working closely with top Democrats.
“He’s been terrific,” Senator Christopher J. Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat and chief negotiator for the Senate, said this afternoon. “He’s been great, we’ve had great conversations.”
Brown said the ongoing dialogue Dodd has been “refreshing.”
“I pick up the phone, I call him at home, I call him on the cell phone, the work phone,” Brown said. “He calls me back. We meet. I don’t know if it’s because I’m the 41st vote or the 60th vote, but more importantly I get the sense that Senator Dodd’s really trying to get a good bill.”
Brown backed the Senate bill last month, but only after gaining assurances from top lawmakers, including Frank, that several changes would be made. Without those changes, Brown could hold up the entire process.
Frank said things are “moving in the right direction.”
“We haven’t done anything for Massachusetts entities that would damage the whole thing,” Frank said in a brief interview. “It’s just, we tend to have the slow steady ones, like mutual funds and life insurance.”
Top aides to Frank and Brown have also been in frequent contact.
Brown has been focused on a series of exemptions from the so-called Volcker Rule, named after former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, who is now an economic adviser to President Obama and proposed the plan. The rule is designed to limit the investment options of large institutions, trying to crack down on the speculative activity that played a major role in the 2008 economic collapse.
But Brown has wanted two different changes to be made on how the Volcker Rule would be applied. First, he wants to exempt altogether financial institutions that use banks for limited purposes, such as MassMutual and its insurance business or Fidelity and its investment funds.
Second, he wants to let firms invest a limited amount of their top capital in hedge funds and private equity funds. Brown has called for a 5 percent cap, but negotiators appear to be settling on 3 percent. Those changes are wanted by Boston-based State Street Corp., and Bank of New York Mellon Corp., which has several thousand Massachusetts employees.
Debate on the Volcker Rule is expected to take place this afternoon.
While Brown appears poised to support the bill, there are larger questions looming over the regulations of derivatives, the financial product that many institutions use to speculate or hedge their investment strategies. Derivatives also carry risks that have been blamed for worsening the financial collapse.
The House and Senate bills each have restrictions on derivatives, and would require them to go through a clearinghouse with more disclosure. But the Senate bill goes further, and has been opposed by conservative House Democrats -- and many in the delegation from New York, where many of the firms that rely on derivatives are based.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown testifies on oil spill bill
By Matt Viser, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this morning criticized BP for its preparation for the oil spill as he testified on legislation that would require oil companies in the future to a have peer-reviewed plans to respond to a significant leak.
“BP was astonishingly unprepared and ill-equipped to deal with their leak,” Brown said. “While everyone understands that accidents can happen, Americans are rightly furious that there was neither a viable nor urgent response plan in place to stop the leak or to begin mitigating the damage. There should have been one on day one.”
Brown last week introduced legislation, written with Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California. In addition to requiring peer-reviewed plans for potential leaks, the bill would also use existing Department of Energy funds to assemble a team of specialists from the private sector and National Academy of Sciences to stop the current oil spill in the Gulf Coast.
Brown, who has been criticized in the past by environmentalists, has been trying to use his legislation to address what has been called the largest man-made environmental disaster in the country’s history.
The Massachusetts Republican wrote an editorial on the issue today in the Worcester Telegram and Gazette, and he is planning to appear on several Boston TV and radio stations today.
Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Malden, has been outspoken on the issue since the sill happened, pushing the company to release live video feeds of the spill and questioning its use of chemicals in the Gulf.
Following his testimony this morning, Brown seemed to distance himself from the controversial comments made by Representative Joe Barton, Republican of Texas, when he apologized to BP for the way they were treated by the Obama administration. Barton later apologized for apologizing.
“Well, BP should be apologizing to the families in the states that affected the oil spill,” Brown said this morning, when asked what he thought of Barton’s comments. “I ultimately have not heard, but I read what he said. He apologized, I take him at his word. I’m busy focusing on what we’re doing over here, not really worrying about what the House is doing.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown calls financial reform negotiations 'a work in progress'
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown, a pivotal vote on a dramatic overhaul to financial regulatory laws, said he is closely following the debate in a committee of House and Senate lawmakers but has yet to make any firm commitments.
The Massachusetts Republican said his support is contingent upon several changes that would benefit Massachusetts-based financial companies, including State Street Corp. and MassMutual. There has been a flurry of discussions throughout the day between Brown and Senator Christopher J. Dodd, the chief negotiator for the senate, and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.
“I've spoken with Dodd and Geithner and Dodd and Geithner and Dodd and Dodd and Geithner,” Brown told reporters this evening. “I've obviously been working on it and it's a work in progress. They're getting close. And I appreciate those efforts.”
When asked if those conversations happened recently, he looked at his watch and said, “Within the last 30 seconds.”
Still, Brown was noncommittal about whether he would support the final package.
“We're working through everything,” he said. “I want to see everything before I decide whether or not I'm voting for this.”
A 43-member committee of House and Senate lawmakers, lead by Representative Barney Frank of Newton, has been meeting for several weeks to resolve differences on the biggest overhaul to financial regulations since the Great Depression.
The new changes, strongly supported by the Obama administration, are meant to crack down on some of the risky practices that contributed to the economic meltdown of 2008.
The committee is aiming to wrap up its work by the end of the week, but several issues -- including those Brown is raising -- have stymied top negotiators.
Brown supported the Senate bill last month, but said there were a series of conditions that would have to be met for him to support the final package.
He has been focused on a series of exemptions from the so-called Volcker Rule, named after former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, who is now an economic adviser to President Obama and proposed the plan. The rule would limit the investment options of large institutions, trying to crack down on the speculative activity that played a major role in the 2008 economic collapse.
But Brown has wanted two different changes to be made on how the Volcker Rule would be applied. First, he wants to exempt altogether financial institutions that use banks for limited purposes, such as MassMutual and its insurance business or Fidelity and its investment funds.
Second, he wants to let firms invest a limited amount of their top capital in hedge funds and private equity funds. Brown has called for a 5 percent cap, but negotiators appear to be settling on 3 percent. Those changes are wanted by Boston-based State Street Corp., and Bank of New York Mellon Corp., which has several thousand Massachusetts employees.
“We're trying to address everybody’s concerns,” Brown said this evening. “Obviously it's important…for Massachusetts businesses and businesses throughout the country to continue to operate as they've done for many years.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown gets new digs in DC
WASHINGTON -- Senator Scott Brown, after several months of looking and occasional nights sleeping in his office, recently settled on a new home in Washington.
The Massachusetts Republican last month bought a 468-square-foot Capitol Hill condo for $290,000, according to DC property records. The condo has a total of two rooms, and one bathroom.
According to a listing for rental properties in the same building, there is little fancy about his new digs, in a four-story brick building built in 1959.
It does have this going for it: location. It's about two blocks from his office in the Russell Building.
Brown has an interesting neighbor, though: Representative Stephen Lynch, the South Boston Democrat, lives in the same building, two floors up.
“I haven’t seen him,” said Lynch, who had toyed with running in the US Senate special election that Brown won and has been mentioned as a possible challenger to Brown in 2012. “But I did send a broker to him.”
Lynch also said units in the complex are not known for their size.
“My parking space is bigger,” Lynch said. “My girls won’t even stay with me when they come down, it’s so tiny.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Senate confirms more than 60 of Obama's executive nominees
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Senate this morning unanimously confirmed more than 60 of President Obama's executive nominees, after deal between Democratic and Republican leadership ended an impasse that had held up the nominations for months.
The nominations fill vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board, the Council on Disability and in the Department of Labor, among other agencies.
Still waiting for confirmation are 23 Obama nominees to federal judgeships, which have already been recommended by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Boston Globe this morning described efforts in the Senate to move judicial nominees to confirmation votes and to and eliminate provisions in Senate rules that allow any senator to hold up nominations anonymously.
Among the nominations confirmed by the Senate today are:
- Benjamin B. Tucker, deputy director for state, local and tribal affairs for the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
- John H. Laub, director of the National Institute of Justice.
- James P. Lynch, director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- Daniel J. Becker, Board of Directors of the State Justice Institute.
- James R. Hannah, Board of Directors of the State Justice Institute.
- Gayle A. Nachtigal, Board of Directors of the State Justice Institute.
- John B. Nalbandian, Board of Directors of the State Justice Institute.
- Marsha J. Rabiteau, Board of Directors of the State Justice Institute.
- Hernán D. Ver, Board of Directors of the State Justice Institute.
- Kevin C. Harrison, U.S. Marshal for the Middle District of Louisiana.
- Henry L. Whitehorn, U.S. Marshal for the Western District of Louisiana.
- Thomas E. Delahanty, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maine.
- Wendy J. Olson, U.S. Attorney for the District of Idaho.
- James A. Lewis, U.S. Attorney for the Central District of Illinois.
- Donald J. Cazayoux, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Louisiana.
- Charles Dunne, U.S. Marshal for the Eastern District of New York.
Brown renews call for Terrorist Expatriation Act
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this afternoon renewed his call for Congress to pass a bill that would allow the United States to strip Americans of citizenship if the government determines that an individual supported or joined a terrorist group.
The bill, which Brown co-sponsored last month, quickly attracted considerable national controversy, with some deeming the bill unconstitutional.
Brown co-sponsored the bill with Senator Joseph Lieberman in the wake of the arrest of US citizen Faisal Shahzad in his role in the failed Times Square bombing. Brown renewed his call a day after Shahzad pleaded guilty in that plot.
“These recent events are a reminder that terrorists, both at home and abroad, are turning American streets and airports into battlefields as they plot their terror attacks,” Brown said this afternoon in a statement. “As elected officials, our single-most important job is taking every step possible to stop these attacks from happening and giving our law enforcement officials all the tools necessary to ensure our homeland security.”
Since the bill was filed on May 6, Brown and Lieberman have attracted only one other senate supporter, Senator Mike Johanns of Nebraska.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
US military supply contracts fund corruption, the Taliban, according to report
WASHINGTON - The system set up by the US military to supply its troops in Afghanistan fuels corruption, warlordism and the Taliban, according to a new report released today by an oversight committee headed by Congressman John Tierney of Salem, chairman of the House subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs.
The 79-page report, entitled "Warlord Inc," faults the US military for making trucking companies who deliver goods to US military bases in Afghanistan responsible for their own security. It details how eight trucking companies that share a $2.1 billion contract are forced to pay warlords and Afghan officials to pass unhindered with their convoys. In some cases, the companies pay as much as $150,000 a month for protection, or as much as $1,500 per truck, according to internal memos and other documents reproduced in the report. The report accuses the military of turning a blind eye to the problem.
"Originally, we were surprised, but as our investigation went, you go beyond the surprise to the outrage that something has to be done about this," Tierney said in a telephone interview.
The report comes after a six-month investigation the Host Nation Trucking contract which Tierney and his aides interviewed dozens of contractors, military officers, Afghan leaders and warlords, including two brothers and two cousins of Afghan president Hamid Karzai. Tierney has called military officials to appear at a hearing on the issue today.
Army criminal investigators are also examining allegations that Afghan security firms have been extorting as much as $4 million a week from US military trucking contractors, according to a document released by Tierney's office and an AP report.
Markey defends Obama's negotiations with BP - updated
Representative Edward Markey stridently defended President Obama and his negotiations with BP after a Republican congressman today apologized to the oil company and accused the administration of a “shakedown” of BP to extract a $20 billion fund for victims of the gulf oil disaster.
“This is not a shakedown of the company. This is the American government, President Obama, ensuring that this company is made accountable and sending a signal to all other companies that seek to treat ordinary American families in a way that can destroy their entire family's history,’’ the Malden Democrat said at a much-anticipated House energy subcommittee hearing with Tony Hayward, chief executive of BP. It was Hayward’s first appearance before a congressional committee since an explosion destroyed a BP-operated rig in April, killing 11 workers and creating the largest oil disaster in US history.
“This is, in my opinion, the American government working at its best,’’ Markey said, deviating from his prepared opening statement.
Markey was responding to the opening statement of Representative Joe Barton, Republican of Texas, who surprised the committee and onlookers by issuing his apology.
“I’m ashamed of what happened in the White House,” Barton said. “It is a tragedy of the first proportion that a private corporation can be subjected to what I would characterize as a shakedown, in this case, a $20 billion shakedown, with the attorney general of the United States, who is legitimately conducting a criminal investigation and has every right to do so to protect the interests of the American people, participating in what amounts to a $20 billion slush fund that's unprecedented in our nation's history, that's got no legal standing, and which sets, I think, a terrible precedent for the future.’’
Markey pounced on the apology.
“Not only is the compensation fund that was created yesterday at the White House in a agreement reached between BP and President Obama not a slush fund and not a shakedown, rather it was the government of the United States working to protect the most vulnerable citizens that we have in our country right now, the residents of the gulf.’’
Those whose lives and livelihoods have been ruined by the environmental catastrophe should not have to wait years or decades for help, Markey said.
“It is BP's spill, but it is America's ocean, and it is American citizens who are being harmed. We cannot wait as, unfortunately, so many citizens who were victims of the Exxon Valdez spill had to wait years in order to see those families compensated. We can't lose fact -- lose sight of the fact that the 1984 Bhopal disaster and the lawsuits that were related to it were only settled last week. We have to ensure that the citizens of the gulf are protected.’’
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, denounced Barton's remarks but said they were not isolated within the GOP caucus.
Pelosi noted that the chairman of the Republican study Committee, Representative Tom Price of Georgia, on Wednesday said BP's agreement to create the escrow fund indicated that the White House was "exerting it brand of Chicago-style, shakedown politics.''
"He is not alone in his association with sympathies for the oil companies,'' Pelosi told reporters Thursday.
The White House also attacked Barton for his comments.
“What is shameful is that Joe Barton seems to have more concern for big corporations that caused this disaster than the fishermen, small business owners and communities whose lives have been devastated by the destruction,” said press secretary Robert Gibbs.
By late afternoon, House Republicans were in political damage control, with Barton apologizing for his morning apology, and GOP leaders publically chastising their colleague for his BP-friendly statements.
"I apologize for using the term ‘shakedown’ with regard to yesterday’s actions at the White House in my opening statement this morning, and I retract my apology to BP,'' Barton said in a statement e-mailed to reporters by the office of Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio.
"As I told my colleagues yesterday and said again this morning, BP should bear the full financial responsibility for the accident on their lease in the Gulf of Mexico. BP should fully compensate those families and businesses that have been hurt by this accident. BP and the federal government need to stop the leak, clean up the damage, and take whatever steps necessary to prevent a similar accident in the future,'' Barton said.
"I regret the impact that my statement this morning implied that BP should not pay for the consequences of their decisions and actions in this incident.''
Boehner, joined with Republican leadership team members Eric Cantor of Virginia and Mike Pence of Indiana, issued their own statement dressing down Barton.
"Congressman Barton’s statements this morning were wrong. BP itself has acknowledged that responsibility for the economic damages lies with them and has offered an initial pledge of $20 billion dollars for that purpose,'' the GOP leaders' statement said.
"The families and businesspeople in the Gulf region want leadership, accountability and action from BP and the Administration. It is unacceptable that, 59 days after this crisis began, no solution is forthcoming. Simply put, the American people want all of our resources, time and focus to be directed toward stopping the spill and cleaning up the mess."
GLOBE STAFF
Read Markey and Barton's full opening statements after the jump.
FULL ENTRYMarkey tells BP to cooperate fully on workers' risks
WASHINGTON – Representative Edward J. Markey this afternoon raised new concerns that BP may be withholding key information that could indicate whether the health of workers and residents in the Gulf Coast is at risk as a result of the massive oil spill.
“BP is still not fully cooperating in providing all of the information necessary to have a full response of all of the health problems that would be created in the Gulf of Mexico area,” said Markey, a Malden Democrat and outspoken critic of BP’s response to the oil disaster. “People are still at risk, as long as BP refuses to understand that it has to fully cooperate.
“We cannot afford to run the risk of having a repetition of 9/11, where 10 years later we’re still talking about the kinds of protections given to workers and citizens exposed to toxic chemicals,” Markey added during a press conference. “That’s an area where BP still has to be made accountable.”
BP did not immediately respond to requests for comment about Markey's claim about health concerns.
Markey, joined by Representative Peter Welch, a Democrat of Vermont, commended BP for its announcement today that it was suspending dividends to shareholders for the rest of the year. That money will be used to help fill a $20 billion fund that will go toward compensating victims of the spill. BP’s chief executive, Tony Hayward, will be testifying tomorrow before a House committee for the first time since the spill.
“It must pay for the cleanup of the Gulf, and it must pay to compensate the countless victims of the disaster, including those oil workers who have been laid off,” Welch said at the press conference. “BP, not the taxpayer, must foot the bill for this disaster.”
Markey added the $20 billion fund was likely just the start. “BP has just made a down payment on insuring that every single claim, every single health-related harm which is done to the Gulf is paid for,” he said. “We have no way right now of knowing the full consequences.”Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Sessions attacks Kagan's record on Senate floor
In a sign that Republicans will not be conceding the Supreme Court nomination of former Harvard Law School Dean Elena Kagan, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday blistered Kagan’s record at Harvard in remarks from the Senate floor.
Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican from Alabama, charged that Kagan’s legal judgments appear to be “infected” by very liberal political views. He offered a preview of the attack points Kagan will have to negotiate in her confirmation hearings, which start June 28.
Sessions offered a new twist on a frequent Republican criticism of Kagan—that she restricted the access military recruiters had to Harvard Law students, because the ban on openly gay service members violates the school's policy on discrimination. Kagan defenders have noted that recruiters were only denied the services of the campus recruitment office, and were allowed access to students through a student veterans group.
But Sessions pushed the attack one step further, saying that the campus veterans group had complained at the time they lacked the resources to adequately replace the services of the recruitment office. Through her policies, Sessions said, Kagan relegated the military to second-class status.
“Perhaps to some in the elite, progressive circles of academia, it is acceptable to discriminate against the patriots who fight and die for our freedoms,” he said. “But the vast majority of Americans know that such behavior is wrong, it has arrogance about it, and really it is not ethical.”
White House officials disputed that characterization.
“Once again, Senate Republicans are demonstrating that they won’t let the facts get in the way of a political attack, one that the West Point Dean Patrick Finnegan called ‘ludicrous,’ " said Joshua Earnest, White House spokesman. "The truth is that, under Dean Kagan, the number of Harvard law school graduates who entered military service increased. Some of those students are now serving overseas and have expressed their belief that General Kagan should be confirmed to the Supreme Court.”
Later, Sessions summed up the narrative on which Republicans are likely to try to build opposition to Kagan, a former lawyer in the Clinton administration: “Ms. Kagan lacks experience as a judge, as a lawyer, and as a scholar. Much of her career has been spent actively engaged in liberal politics—not legal practice.”
Neal on 'Bloody Sunday' inquiry
WASHINGTON – Representative Richard E. Neal this morning hailed the recent developments Britain, where Prime Minister David Cameron apologized for the 1972 killings of 14 unarmed demonstrators in Northern Ireland.
The “Bloody Sunday” shootings was the subject of a recent judicial inquiry by a high-ranking British judge that called the event “both unjustified and unjustifiable.”
“If Bloody Sunday was a defining day in the history of the Troubles, let us hope the publication of the Saville Report will be a transformative and cathartic moment for the people of Northern Ireland,” Neal said this morning on the House floor.
Neal is chairman of the House’s Friends of Ireland group, and played a key role in brokering a peace agreement in Ireland.
“It was a historic day for the men and women of Derry, and it was another moment of vindication for the people who stood by their side during difficult times,” he added.
Here is Neal’s complete statement:
“Thirty eight years after 13 unarmed men were shot dead on the streets of Derry in the north of Ireland, on a day now known across the globe as Bloody Sunday, the families and relatives of the victims have found the justice that they have been seeking for decades. They learned the truth yesterday about what happened during a peaceful civil rights march in the Bogside community on January 30, 1972. And they heard British Prime Minister David Cameron say that their loved ones were innocent, and that the actions of the Parachute Regiment on that day were unjustified and wrong. If Bloody Sunday was a defining day in the history of the Troubles, let us hope the publication of the Saville Report will be a transformative and cathartic moment for the people of Northern Ireland.
Today we remember Jackie Duddy, Hugh Gilmour, Michael Kelly, Michael McDaid, John Young, William Nash, Kevin McElhiney, William McKinney, Jim Wray, Gerald Donaghey, Gerald McKinney, Barney McGuigan, Patrick Doherty and John Jonston who lost their lives marching near the Free Derry Corner and the Rossville Flatts. We also remember the Bloody Sunday wounded. But my thoughts return again to the families of the victims who waged a long and heroic campaign for the truth. I was a staunch supporter of their efforts for many years, and took great satisfaction watching them leave the Guildhall yesterday to thunderous applause. It was a historic day for the men and women of Derry, and it was another moment of vindication for the people who stood by their side during difficult times.”
Brown to meet with Obama tomorrow
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown tomorrow is planning to meet with President Obama in the oval office, his first formal meeting with the president since the Massachusetts Republican won his surprising election in January.
It is unclear what the two will discuss, although a Brown aide confirmed that they will meet and that Obama called the meeting.
A White House official said there was not one set topic for the meeting, and it would involve "a variety of issues of mutual interest." But Brown today has been critical of Obama’s response to the oil spill during a series of television interviews.
"Up to this point, I think there has been a lack of leadership on this issue," Brown said on NECN. "I think the time for the blame and finger-pointing is over, and I hope tonight will be a turning point."
He also indirectly criticized Representative Edward J. Markey, the Malden Democrat who today chaired a much-anticipated hearing with five major oil company executives.
"We want answers, but to hammer the entire industry just to get a photo opportunity I don't think is appropriate,” Brown said, when asked about Markey's hearing. “We need to work together to solve the problem and stop the name-calling and finger-pointing."
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown continues to be criticized on climate resolution
WASHINGTON – A liberal non-profit is continuing to hammer away at Senator Scott Brown for supporting an effort to limit federal regulation of greenhouse gases.
Americans United for Change is launching a new TV ad, which will air this weekend in the Boston market, including during Game 5 of the NBA Finals when many in Massachusetts will be tuning in for the Celtics-Lakers game. The $50,000 spot, called “Flow,” will also air on CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, ESPN, and USA.
“Even with disaster on our coast and Iran using oil money against us, Scott Brown voted to let big oil off the hook,” a deep-voiced narrator says, as images of handshakes, oil rigs, and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad flash across the screen. “Senator Brown: Next time, look out for America’s clean energy future, not big oil profits.”
Brown yesterday joined the push to limit powers given to the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act, saying it brings unwarranted regulations that would hurt businesses. The resolution, which was adamantly opposed by environmental groups, the Obama administration, and Senator John Kerry, ultimately failed by a vote of 47-to-53.
“It’s jobs for me,” Brown said after he voted yesterday. “Right now we’re in the middle of a two-year recession, we’re giving a government agency the ability to be able to create legislation that I think oversteps their bounds. And right now, more importantly, we can’t afford it.”
Brown also said that something should be done and, while declining to say exactly what, he suggested that Congress should attempt a smaller package.
“I think everybody here wants to get off our dependence on foreign oil,” he said. “And however we can…start and chip away at these things instead of just, it’s all or nothing, all or nothing, all or nothing. Let’s get our foot in the door and get something.”
He declined to say how he felt about the broad climate change bill that Kerry has been pushing, saying, “We’re still analyzing all the energy bills.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Mass delegation, sans Brown, lobbies for more stimulus money
WASHINGTON – The Massachusetts delegation sent letters this afternoon to House and Senate leaders urging them to support an extension of Medicaid funding that Massachusetts and other states say is vital to prevent drastic budget cuts.
The letters were missing one notable signature: Scott Brown, the newly elected Republican senator who opposes the current proposal for the funding because it would add to the federal deficit.
But the 11 Democrats in the delegation were adamant that the extension be approved, which would cost $24 billion over 10 years.
“The extension will provide a vital lifeline that will protect health programs serving vulnerable residents, mitigate the need for state layoffs of teachers and public safety employees, and preserve the social safety net for individuals and families still struggling to recover from the ongoing recession,” the lawmakers wrote in the letter. “If the extension is not enacted in the coming weeks, states will begin to initiate drastic cuts, layoffs, and tax increases which will endanger our national economic recovery.”
Governor Deval Patrick and state lawmakers have been counting on the extension to fund about $800 million of next year’s budget. Patrick this week announced that he would cut 3.6 percent from nearly every line item unless the funding comes through.
“Without this federal funding, our state’s fiscal health will be in serious jeopardy,” said Representative Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat and dean of the delegation. “This funding will not only protect critical medical programs in the Commonwealth, but will also help keep cops on the beat and teachers at work in our classrooms.”
The proposal would extend Medicaid reimbursements that had been helping states close budget gaps during the economic downturn. Those reimbursements expired this month, but the legislation would extend the funding for another six months.
“Initially they were supposed to be a one-time payment to the state,” Brown said in an interview this afternoon. “I remember when I was in the Legislature, we warned them. We told them, ‘Listen, it may not be here again.’ And a lot of cities and towns, and the state especially, didn’t make the proper decisions, the tough decisions. So now there’s even a bigger hole, as we said there would be.”
The Medicaid extension is included in a package that includes extending unemployment benefits, funding more summer jobs, and changing a variety of tax policies. The House passed a $112 billion bill two weeks ago, and the measure is currently before the Senate. The House bill stripped the Medicaid extension from the bill, but there is an effort in the Senate to put it back in.
Brown said that he would support the proposal only if it did not add to the federal deficit.
Still, Brown stopped just short of criticizing Patrick and the Democratic-controlled state Legislature for including the funding before Congress had approved it.
“The years of over-spending and not making tough decisions are coming to the forefront,” Brown said. “I don’t’ feel it’s appropriate to saddle our kids and grandkids with debt that they’re going to be responsible for. We need to make the tough decisions now.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Plan to limit EPA's regulation of greenhouse gases fails
WASHINGTON – The US Senate this afternoon defeated a bid to limit federal regulation of greenhouse gases, instead siding with the White House and environmentalists who said limiting regulators would harm efforts to fight climate change.
Senator Scott Brown this morning had joined the push to limit powers given to the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act, saying it brings unwarranted regulations that would hurt businesses.
The resolution, which was being pushed by Senator Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, was adamantly opposed by environmental groups, the Obama administration, and Senator John Kerry. Ultimately, it failed by a vote of 47-to-53.
"Why is it that the United States of America is more dependent today on foreign oil than we were before September 11?" Kerry said during a fiery floor speech. "Because we haven't done anything -- nothing -- to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. We have an opportunity to do it now. This is about that."
If the measure had passed, it would have disrupted a major argument for his climate change legislation. A key bargaining chip for Kerry has been that the EPA’s regulations would be more far-reaching than Congressional ones. Kerry’s bill would prohibit the EPA from developing its own rules, while instead putting a price on carbon emissions.
The EPA has ruled that greenhouse gases threaten public health, and has imposed new regulations set to take effect next year. Those regulations would require existing plants that increase greenhouse gas emissions by 75,000 tons annually to get a permit. New plants that emit more than 100,000 tons annually would also have to get permits.
“This action would give an unelected and unaccountable government agency the power to impose restrictive and damaging carbon dioxide regulations that will drive up energy prices and hurt job-creating small businesses in our country,” Brown wrote in an op-ed published this morning in the Cape Cod Times. “The bottom line is that we cannot have every restaurant owner or small farmer worried about the costs of complying with new carbon dioxide emissions restrictions.”
Murkowski's resolution had 40 co-sponsors, including three Democrats – Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, and Ben Nelson of Nebraska.
“Bay State businesses don't need is the federal government arbitrarily passing down restrictions that would dramatically restrict their potential for growth by saddling them with higher costs,” Brown wrote in the op-ed.
“Now is not the time to further increase energy prices, add to administrative costs for businesses, and create massive new layers of government bureaucracy,” he added.
He also said that unelected administration officials should not be deciding the policy, and that it should instead be debated in Congress.
Americans United for Change, a liberal, Washington-based non-profit, has been running ads in Massachusetts urging Brown to vote against the resolution.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Mass. lawmakers push to overturn ban on blood donations from gay men
WASHINGTON -- Massachusetts lawmakers are pushing the federal government to overturn a ban on blood donations from gay men, saying the policy adopted in the early days of the AIDS epidemic is outdated and discriminatory.
A federal advisory panel began hearings today that could result in the repeal of the ban, the first time the longstanding policy has been reviewed under the Obama administration.
The lifetime ban was enacted in 1983 before AIDS was widely understood and has long infuriated gay rights groups since it applies to all gay men regardless of their HIV status. Heterosexuals who engage in risky behavior, like having sex with prostitutes or HIV-positive partners, are only banned from giving blood for a year.
"The lifetime ban on gay and bisexual blood donors, unsupported by today's scientific understanding of HIV, unnecessarily stigmatizes gay and bisexual men and turns away healthy potential donors that our nation needs," said Joe Solmonese, the president of Human Rights Campaign, in a statement.
The Red Cross, American Medical Association, and American Association of Blood Banks are also opposed to the ban, which they say prevents much-needed blood donations. Donated blood is now tested for HIV before it is used in transfusions.
Senator John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, Representative Michael E. Capuano, Democrat of Somerville, and Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Newton -- along with 38 other lawmakers -- signed a letter this week urging the government to discard the policy.
"This is blood that could save lives," Kerry said in testimony on the first of two days of hearings by the committee at the Department of Health and Human Services that advises the department on blood donation policy.
The ban applies to any man who has had sex with another man since 1977. A study by the Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles, estimated that lifting the ban would result in between 70,000 and 219,000 pints of additional donations ever year.
Shelly Burgess, a spokeswoman for the Food and Drug Administration, said the ban was in place because HIV infection rates were much higher among gay men than the general population and HIV tests are not infallible.
"While today's highly sensitive tests fail to detect less than one in a million HIV infected donors, it is important to remember that in the US there are over 20 million transfusions of blood, red cell concentrates, plasma or platelets every year," she said in an email. "Therefore, even a failure rate of 1 in a million can be significant if there is an increased risk of undetected HIV in the blood donor population."
Under current rules, intravenous drug abusers, people who have received transplants of animal tissue, prostitutes, and people who have traveled to certain countries are also barred from giving blood because of higher prevalance of blood-borne diseases in those groups.
The ban on donations from gay men was upheld in 2007 after its last review. Burgess said that the Department of Health and Human Services would make a final determination on whether to change the rule after receiving the advisory committee's recommendation.
McGovern, Rachael Ray push for child nutrition programs
WASHINGTON – Representative James P. McGovern this morning led an effort to urge House lawmakers to reauthorize Child Nutrition Programs this year, and he was joined by a special guest: celebrity chef Rachael Ray.
Another guest who joined him? Bill Brady, a chef from the Sonoma Restaurant in Princeton, Mass.
The effort is to reauthorize nutrition programs that provide food and meals through school lunch programs, as well as others that help provide food for children and families living in poverty.
“The face of hunger in this nation is not the swollen bellies and sunken eyes we see in other countries,” McGovern, a Worcester Democrat and co-chair of the House Hunger Caucus, said at a press conference outside the Capitol. “It’s the little kid in Worcester, Massachusetts, who dreads a snow day because his school lunch is the only nutritious meal he gets.”
“Look, I know these are difficult budgetary times,” he added. “All of us agree that deficit reduction is essential. But we must not try to balance the budget on the backs of hungry children.”
Joining McGovern in leading the effort were representatives Jo Ann Emerson, a Missouri Republican, and Carolyn McCarthy, a New York Democrat. There were 221 bipartisan members who signed a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi expressing support for the programs.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
6 questions on financial regulations bill
About 20 months after the near-collapse of the world’s financial system, Senate and House negotiators began meeting (June 10) to complete their financial regulations bill. Led by Barney Frank, the Newton Democrat and chair of the House Financial Services Committee, the conferees will reconcile differences in the two chamber’s versions, which take on such thorny and complex issues as regulating derivatives, creating an agency to protect consumers, and deciding the tools government can use to dismantle a failing banking behemoth without damaging the financial landscape. Some of the proceedings will be televised, but much of the negotiating will be done behind closed doors; lobbying from financial groups has been intense.
We have asked one of the world’s foremost authorities on how economic crises affect financial markets and systems, Simon Johnson, to help untangle some of the key issues in the bill. Johnson, former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, is a professor at the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Q. Regarding financial institutions deemed "too big to fail," the House version calls for a $150 billion resolution fund, which would be financed in advance through fees on large institutions and used to seize and dismantle a failing firm whose demise threatens the US economy. In the Senate, there is no prepayment. The government would seize the firm much as it does with smaller banks and pay for its dissolution through its shareholders and debtholders, with other large institutions financing the remainder of the cost. Some critics contend that in an economic crisis both plans could eventually need taxpayer help. How are taxpayer funds protected and how are they exposed in each version? Would one afford more protection during a financial crisis such as the one that battered the economy in fall of 2008? This issue is a red herring. If a huge global bank gets into trouble (e.g., Citigroup, which failed or nearly failed in 1982, 1989-91, and again several times in 2008-09), the amounts of taxpayer funds involved in potential countermeasures are vastly in excess of $150 billion – and you will not be able to recoup the amounts involved through any kind of ex post levy. The crisis of 2008-09 required government actions to offset the cost of the banking collapse that amount, in total, to around 40 percent of GDP (roughly $6 trillion) – this is the increase in net government debt held by the private sector, relative to what it would have been otherwise. The amounts at stake due to reckless risk-taking by megabanks are enormous and beyond our ability to recoup through taxes or levies. Do not be deceived into thinking otherwise.
Q. Would either process increase or decrease moral hazard, in which corporate leaders take risks they would otherwise not assume because they have come to expect government rescues if investments go awry?
Moral hazard – the idea that you do not need to be careful, because someone else will pay for the downside – is pervasive in today’s financial system. The worst problem is at the top with “too big to fail” banks (particularly Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo.) The people who run these banks are convinced that, if they were to get into serious trouble, they would be rescued by the government – this is what happened as recently as March-April 2009. And the credit markets know this also, so investors are willing to lend money to these banks cheaper (by about 60-80 basis points, i.e., 0.6-0.8 percentage points). This is a huge funding advantage which enables the banks to become even bigger – in effect, this is an unfair, nontransparent, and very dangerous taxpayer subsidy.
Unfortunately, neither the House nor the Senate versions really address this core issue – for example, attempts to break up the biggest banks or limit their borrowings were defeated on the Senate floor (most notably the Brown-Kaufman amendment, which failed 33-61). Both bills have the same problem and the reconciliation process seems unlikely to adequately improve this situation.
Q. The Senate language on derivatives -- complex investments that were blamed for magnifying the financial crisis in 2008 -- is more far-reaching and essentially forces banking institutions to end such trading and spin off their derivatives trading divisions. Is such a provision necessary?
The Lincoln Amendment (named for Senator Blanche Lincoln) would require banks to set up separate subsidiaries for their derivatives trading operations, within which they would need to hold a great deal more capital against their trading books.
This approach would – if properly implemented by regulators – make derivatives trading substantially less risky. It would also make such trading less profitable – requiring more capital to be held against downside losses will also reduce the extent of upside profits. This would be most helpful. Naturally the Wall Street lobbyists are working hard to strip this language from the final bill. All the indications are that they will succeed (again).
Q. What element of the bill would have the most far-reaching effect on the fundamentals of the US economy and why?
The establishment of the Consumer Protection Agency for financial products, long championed by Elizabeth Warren (from Harvard Law School), would be a major achievement – and protect American families from an industry that has become downright nasty.
If the reconciliation process ends up including the Volcker Rule in any meaningful sense, that would be constructive. The administration has – mysteriously – drifted away from its own proposal of breaking out “proprietary trading” from big banks, i.e., forcing them to get out of the business of betting large amounts of their own capital. Senators Jeff Merkley and Carl Levin have taken up the cause – and pursued it doggedly against great opposition from the industry. They still have an amendment on the table that would implement the Volcker principles – and bring back some of the separation between risky/dangerous banking and relatively boring/safe banking that was central to Glass-Steagall (and part of why the financial reform legislation of the 1930s kept us safe for 50 or so years.) If Merkley-Levin prevails – and the odds are massively against them – that would be a major achievement.
The final bill will probably move some derivatives trading onto exchanges. Here the unsung hero is Gary Gensler, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (and former Goldman Sachs executive), who has pushed relentlessly for tougher rules. Unfortunately, even Gensler could not prevent big exemptions being granted – so “over the counter” derivatives trading will continue and again lead us into great danger.
Q. Are there unintended consequences of the bill that keep you up at night?
If the bill further confirms the existence of “too big to fail” banks and affirms their privileged status, this will only increase the already bad moral hazard problems at the heart of the financial sector. This would not be any kind of market system – instead, it would be a government subsidy scheme that encourages reckless risk-taking.
Q. This bill has been tagged the most dramatic remake of the financial sector since the Depression. Yet, it would not radically alter the sector's structure as did Glass-Steagall (which separated commercial banking and securities operations before it was repealed in 1999) nor would it limit the size of financial institutions. Much of the scope of the bill pivots on how the regulations are eventually written and enforced by a host of agencies. Is this the final word or is substantial legislation still needed?
Substantial legislation is still needed. This is not significant reform – although there are some baby steps in the right direction (and the consumer protection agency for financial products is a good idea.)
There was no meaningful strengthening of financial regulation since the Great Depression – just a wave of deregulation that made the financial system more dangerous. So the label of “best since the 1930s” is meaningless.
The legislation should be judged in terms of whether it substantially reduces the dangers posed by our financial system. And on this there is a growing consensus – from the left (e.g., Joe Stiglitz of Columbia University), center (Paul Volcker), and right (e.g., Gene Fama of the University of Chicago) – that this legislation does not really address all the problems associated with having banks that are “too big to fail.”
More complete reform – to rein in the economic and political power of our biggest banks – is sorely needed.
Simon Johnson is a professor at MIT Sloan, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute, and co-author of the bestseller "13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and The Next Financial Meltdown." He is also co-founder of BaselineScenario.com, a leading website on the global economy. From March 2007 through August 2008, he was chief economist at the International Monetary Fund.
C-SPAN to televise financial hearings
WASHINGTON – C-SPAN cameras will be allowed to broadcast the financial regulations committee hearings expected to begin this week, fulfilling a wish of Representative Barney Frank.
“We’ve asked to cover it, and they said we could get in,” Howard Mortman, a C-SPAN spokesman, said this afternoon. “As soon as we find out when, we’ll cover it. That’s based on the committee saying that cameras can come in.”
The conference committee, made up of House and Senate lawmakers from both parties, is expected to begin meeting on Thursday to reconcile the differences in bills already approved by the two chambers. The legislation, which President Obama wants on his desk within weeks, would dramatically reshape the nation’s financial regulations.
Frank, a Newton Democrat and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, has been talking for weeks about trying to televise the conference committee meetings so that the public can view the high-stakes debate.
Still, anyone expecting to witness the deals being cut will be disappointed: most of the negotiations will still take place behind closed doors. Only certain portions of the committee work – debate, and votes on amendments – are likely to be televised.
A congressional historian said the conference committee hearings, when they are held, have been open to the public for decades. Mortman said C-SPAN has covered such hearings in the past.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Anti-incumbent voters head to the polls
WASHINGTON -- An anti-incumbent, establishment-wary electorate goes to the polls today to choose nominees for a slew of state and federal offices, and the fates of prominent Washington lawmakers could be at stake.
In Nevada, Republicans will decide who will run against embattled Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in November, and a late surge by a Tea Party-endorsed candidate has Reid supporters believing the unpopular veteran Democrat could eke out a victory in the general election. In Arkansas, moderate Democratic Senator Blanche Lincoln is fighting for renomination in her own party, challenged by a more liberal contender backed by labor unions.
In California, Republicans will choose nominees for Senate and governor, with both races featuring strong bids by female corporate executives. Mainers went to the polls to choose nominees for governor, and opinion surveys ahead of the primary election showed no clear front-runners. And in South Carolina, Republicans are experiencing a sex scandal deja vu as they decides whom the party will nominate to replace Governor Mark Sanford, who was derailed by his own affair. Nikki Haley, the leading contender in the GOP primary for governor, also has been accused of having extramarital affairs, a charge she denies.
Nevada's Senate primary is the most closely-watched nationally, since the results will show the strength of the Tea Party movement, and could determine whether Reid keeps his job.
Sue Lowden, a former Republican state party chair, had been the front-runner in a crowded GOP field, and was considered a strong contender to beat Reid, who is suffering from low approval ratings. But in recent weeks, Republicans Sharron Angle, a former state legislator backed by Tea Party activists, has made a dramatic surge in opinion polls. Angle, who wants to close the Department of Education and phase out Social Security, would be easier to defeat in the fall, according to Democrats, who believe Angle's positions are too far out even for swing-state Nevada.
"I think they're as happy as anyone with a 38 percent approval rating can be,'' said Nevada-based political analyst Jon Ralston, describing the Reid camp's reaction to Angle's recent popularity spurt.
"Reid is still as unpopular as ever,'' because of his advocacy for health care overhaul, general support for the Obama agenda, and a perception that the leader has become a creature of Washington, Ralston said. "The only way for him to win is not to increase the love, but to lessen the hate,'' Ralston said. Running a campaign against someone who wants to get rid of Social Security -- a politically dicey suggestion in a state with many retirees -- is more appealing to Democrats.
In Arkansas, meanwhile, Lincoln is struggling to avoid becoming the third incumbent senator this year to be ousted in the primary by his or her own party. Utah Senator Bob Bennett was defeated for renomination in May, while Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter, who switched parties from Republican to Democrat last year, was bested in the Democratic primary last month by Representative Joe Sestak.
Lincoln was a target of conservatives during the health care debate, vowing to use a pro-overhaul vote against her in conservative Arkansas. But liberals were unhappy with her opposition to the public option, and recruited another contender, Lieutenant Governor Bill Halter, to run against her. Neither Halter nor Lincoln captured a majority of the vote in the May primary, and face a run-off today.
"Halter has proven himself to be a real economic populist willing to rail against Wall Street and the insurance companies,'' said Adam Green of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, one of the groups backing Halter. Green dismissed the notion that a more liberal candidate would have a harder time winning in November, saying Halter's populism would attract voters across the spectrum. Either Halter or Lincoln, however, would face a tough challenge from GOP nominee John Boozman, a congressman.
Brown launches defense of Israel
By Matt Viser, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown tonight launched into a strong defense of Israel, saying critics of the recent flotilla incident were downplaying the security threats against the country.
Brown, addressing a pro-Israel group in Boston, tied Israel and the United States together in fighting against terrorism. He also called for further sanctions on Iran, saying “there is no greater strategic threat facing the world than a nuclear-armed Iran.”
“I don’t need polling or political strategists to help define a nuanced stance on Israel,” Brown said, according to a copy of his prepared remarks. “We are engaged in a worldwide struggle against radical, violent jihad. It is the defining issue of our time. Our best friends and the strongest allies in this fight are in the State of Israel.”
“Let’s remember – Israel is our ally. Israel is a democracy,” Brown added. “Hamas is a terrorist group with clear and genuine intentions of destroying Israel’s way of life.”
Brown made the remarks at a leadership dinner sponsored by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. The event was closed to the press, but Brown’s staff released a copy of his prepared remarks.
Israel has received widespread criticism for raiding one of six ships that were bound for Gaza, filled with supplies, and attempting to break an Israeli blockade. Nine were killed after Israel commandos stormed aboard.
Tonight marked Brown's first comments on the incident, which occurred last week.
Brown, saying that “the story of Israel made a distinct impression on me at a young age,” also said he would travel to Israel to further examine issues facing the country and attempt to strengthen ties between the two countries.
“Their ability to maintain their identity and culture against enormous obstacles mirrors America’s own struggle for independence,” he said.
“Now I know I am still the new guy on the block, with a little more than 100 days in the Senate under my belt, but I have placed U.S. – Israeli security as one of the most significant and highest priorities on my agenda,” he added.
Brown also said that one of his first acts in the senate was to tell Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that “the senate could not take its eye off the ball in regards to the threat of Iran.”
“A safe, secure Israel, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States and its allies is essential to the continued liberty of our nations,” Brown said. “Our fates have never been more intertwined. May God continue to bless Israel and the United States of America.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com
Here is a complete copy of the text:Thank you, Howard. And on behalf of everyone in this room, thank you for your exceptional work in promoting and maintaining a strong U.S – Israel partnership.
Thank you for the warm welcome. I couldn’t be more honored to have this opportunity to address the AIPAC leadership dinner. I see a lot of familiar faces in the crowd, and I gotta tell you, it’s nice to be amongst friends again.
2010 promises to be a very busy political year. There are many candidates here tonight – Republicans, Democrats, independents – and while there may be stark differences in our political philosophies, we have shared beliefs in the fundamentals of freedom and a free society.
These are difficult times for our friends in Israel. Its enemies are emboldened by recent events, and the usual critics have been quick to condemn Israel’s right to defend itself.
I want you to know where I stand – I stand with the mothers, fathers, grandparents, brothers, sisters and the children of Israel.
I don’t need polling or political strategists to help define a nuanced stance on Israel. We are engaged in a worldwide struggle against radical, violent jihad. It is the defining issue of our time. Our best friends and the strongest allies in this fight are in the State of Israel.
The story of Israel made a distinct impression on me at a young age due to the unyielding faith and perseverance of the Jewish people. Their ability to maintain their identity and culture against enormous obstacles mirrors America’s own struggle for independence. It is something that we -- as citizens of this great nation – can all relate to. Regardless of political party or affiliation, Americans should always stand together in our unwavering commitment to Israel’s security because of who we are, what our two nations stand for, and what we stand against.
I was disappointed that, after the unfortunate loss of life on the sea outside Gaza, many rushed to condemn Israel before the facts of this situation became clear. Many conveniently ignored the fact that Israel is at war. Each and every day thousands of its innocent men, women and children face the threat of lethal rocket attacks out of Gaza. Some of the usual critics of Israel have used recent events to question the strong relationship between our countries. They clearly do not understand what makes these two countries special and unique sources of hope to the world.
I cannot emphasize this point enough: Israel is not a liability to the United States. Israel is unquestionably a strategic asset to America. Indeed, there is no greater U.S. ally in the critical area of the Middle East and perhaps no better strategic partnership in the world.
Let’s remember – Israel is our ally. Israel is a democracy. Hamas is a terrorist group with clear and genuine intentions of destroying Israel’s way of life.
Make no mistake – a strong and secure Israel is important to our own national security. Israel’s role as a friend of the United States goes far beyond geopolitical and military matters. Both of our nations benefit greatly from economic interdependence – a shared entrepreneurial spirit. When the United States sought a partner for its first bilateral free trade agreement it looked to its friend, Israel. Today, the United States and Israel enjoy vibrant free trade, with Israeli exports to the United States having grown 200% since the agreement went into force
However, with these shared values also come shared enemies. The violent, radical extremists who perpetrated the September 11 attacks, bombed our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and who continue to kill and injure US soldiers in the mountains of Afghanistan are examples of the radical ideologies that Israel has struggled against for decades. Hezbollah terrorists were the first to use suicide attacks in 1983, when they destroyed US Marine barracks in Beirut and killed 241 American soldiers. It took these unfortunate attacks for many US policymakers to comprehend these threats that were long ago contemplated by Israel. Americans are currently getting a better understanding of the challenges that Israel has faced for many years, namely terrorism that threatens our way of life.
While we must continue to hunt down and punish the terrorists at every turn. The real struggle is not only between America and al Qaeda it is also a struggle between radical Islamists on one side and moderate Muslims on the other side -- each battling for the future of Islam in a conflict where free societies, such as the United States and Israel, and our innocent citizens may be targeted for destruction. Indeed Israel, who has long been at the center of this scourge of terrorism and Islamic extremism, continues to be our greatest ally in this fight.
I have said this many times, but it bears repeating: There is no greater strategic threat facing the world than a nuclear-armed Iran. Elements of the Iranian government threaten both their own citizens and people in the region and throughout the world. With nuclear weapons, the power of those dangerous elements within the Iranian regime would grow immensely. The potential of Iran exporting terrorism throughout the region and the world is unacceptable. As a result, the remaining moderate countries and leaders in the Middle East would be severely weakened while the extremists are strengthened. As we have seen throughout history, other countries in the region would have no choice but to join the race for nuclear weapons, which is clearly a destabilizing factor for all.
Today, Iran's uranium enrichment and ballistic missile programs continue to develop. Also, Iran continues to sponsor global terrorism, undermine U.S. and coalition efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan and continues to transfer advanced weapons to its proxies in Syria and Lebanon.
However, I believe there is still hope to stop Iran’s march toward nuclear weapons.
If Iran's nuclear ambitions are thwarted, peaceful and moderate states in the Middle East will be emboldened. If Iran obtains nuclear weapons, we would instead see extremist groups like Hezbollah and Hamas emboldened to wreak havoc on Israel AND THE REGION ALL WHILE knowing the Iranian regime would have the power it had long sought—to threaten the existence of Israel, which Iran’s President Ahmadinejad openly suggested should be "wiped off the map."
Let me be clear, a unified and collective effort to counter this threat is the most important issue of our time. The fate of Iran's nuclear program will dramatically alter the fate of peace in the Middle East. Make no mistake about it.
Now I know I am still the new guy on the block, with a little more than 100 days in the Senate under my belt, but I have placed U.S. – Israeli security as one of the most significant and highest priorities on my agenda.
One my first acts in the Senate was to personally reach out to the Senate Majority Leader to express my unwavering commitment to ensuring that the Senate could not take its eye off the ball in regards to the threat of Iran, even as we tackled other pressing national concerns. Crippling and draconian sanctions represent the best alternative to military action. We must follow the money and insist that other countries and their companies that are doing business in Iran – think twice about it. If we do not get the support of France, Russia and other UN and EU partners then we will one day wake up and it will be too late. As we all know, the ambitions of the mullahs and Iranian leadership stand in stark contrast to the goals of the United States and the rest of the world.
Further, a nuclear armed Iran will create an arms race in one of the most unstable regions of the world. We must renew our political will to implement severe sanctions because the cost of inaction is that this state sponsor of terror would be armed with weapons that, for the first time, could make its president’s statement about “wiping Israel off the map” a realistic threat. Because of the deadly serious threat that Iran poses to Israel and all who seek peace in the region, I joined some of my Senate colleagues in signing a letter to the President—circulated by Senator Schumer and Graham-- that explains my view that time is not on our side, and that we must take bold action now by imposing crippling sanctions on Iran.
And when it comes to Iran sanctions, there is no doubt the Senate should get a powerful sanctions package to the President without further delay. And I am currently working across the aisle to add more powerful and targeted tools to this urgent effort to stop a terrorist state from gaining nuclear weapons. A key effort I have been exploring would deny visas to the worst of the worst offenders facilitating Iran’s nuclear and missile programs or enriching the regime through investments that violate existing sanctions. There is no way we should be welcoming the individuals who are enabling Iran’s nuclear and terrorist ambitions to be spread throughout the region and the world.
Simply put, the United States has long possessed the ability to apply tough sanctions against Iran, but we have not had the political will to use them. We must—as a nation—build a new seriousness of purpose that has as its mission nothing short of stopping one of the most dangerous regime on the planet from having the most dangerous weapons on the planet.
We cannot bring about real change with only force and sanctions. We must also encourage peace through economic means. The spread of trade ties, such as through U.S. Free Trade Agreements with Oman and Bahrain have been powerful tools, resulting in these nations dismantling all aspects of the Arab League Boycott of Israel in their countries.
Trade programs have brought together Israeli entrepreneurism with workers in cooperating nations such as Jordan and Egypt to create jobs in an initiative known as the Qualified Industrial Zone program. It is time for us to look to expand these efforts to promote peace through trade and I am exploring an initiative that would help companies in Israel—the most entrepreneurial country in the world—launch joint ventures with Arab partners to get free trade access to the United States and the world’s leading economies in the G8. While we take actions against our shared enemies we must also help plant seeds of peace with those across the region who are willing to reject radical propaganda and work with Israel to build a better future.
Finally, I want to show my personal commitment to these issues by travelling to Israel to explore with our Israeli allies these and other ways to deepen our strategic partnership and highlight the strategic asset Israel is to America.
It is up to us in this room, and the Obama administration, to ensure that our support for Israel is steadfast and unwavering – and never tepid.
Israel is the shining democracy in the Middle East and we must work together, across the political aisle, and without a political agenda, to ensure the security of Israel. A safe, secure Israel, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States and its allies is essential to the continued liberty of our nations. Our fates have never been more intertwined.
May God continue to bless Israel and the United States of America.
Thank you.
Delahunt releases statement on flotilla raid after meeting with Turkish president
Representative William Delahunt met with Turkish President Abdullah Gul today in Ankara following Israel’s raid of an aid flotilla headed for Gaza that left nine activists dead, some of them Turkish. Delahunt’s office released the following statement:
“I expressed my condolences to President Gul and to the Turkish people for the deaths and injuries of their citizens. It is absolutely essential that there be a thorough, independent, and impartial investigation into the exact facts of the incident. I have instructed my staff to get a full report on the circumstances surrounding the arrest and detention of two individuals reported to be constituents of mine.”Delahunt also noted that, “Turkey, a close NATO ally of the United States, has long been a moderating force in the Middle East, and I thanked the President – and by extension the Turkish people – for Turkey’s responsible leadership in the region.” The Congressman said that Turkey’s democratic Islamist government serves as an example for other Muslim countries seeking to blend their faith with democracy. “I also noted that Israel and Turkey have for years been strong allies, and that Turkey has traditionally opposed the anti-Semitism prevalent in other parts of the Middle East. In particular, Turkey has actively sought to promote peace between Israel and its neighbor Syria, and I urged that those efforts continue.”
Finally, Delahunt said, “The President and I agreed that continued strong U.S.-Turkish ties are essential and I pledged that I would do everything in my power to reinforce those bonds. I also praised Turkey’s aspirations to become a member of the European Union and promised to continue to work with my European colleagues to advance that goal.”
House approves unemployment extension
WASHINGTON – The House this afternoon voted to extend unemployment benefits and fund new summer jobs, while raising taxes on hedge fund managers and venture capitalists.
In a narrow, 215-to-204 vote largely along party lines, House lawmakers approved extending unemployment benefits through Nov. 30, which could help nearly 100,000 Massachusetts residents from falling off unemployment by the end of July. The measure still needs to be approved by the Senate, which has already left for a week-long Memorial Day break. That means some benefits will expire May 31, although they could be restored retroactively.
“I am pleased the House passed this bill extending a variety of job-creating programs and assistance to those who are still struggling to find work,” said Richard Neal, a Springfield Democrat and key member of the House Ways and Means Committee.
The unemployment extension was included in a $112 billion bill that included new spending and a variety of tax changes. The bill includes more than $1 billion to fund 300,000 summer jobs, including an estimated 8,000 in Massachusetts.
But in a potential blow, House Democrats dropped funding for cash-strapped states from the spending bill they approved today, leaving Massachusetts with a $700 million hole in its state budget. House lawmakers, trying to win over conservative Democrats worried about the size of the spending package, eliminated a $24 billion provision that would have boosted state Medicaid funding.
It’s possible that the spending can be added in later, or in a separate bill, but it will force governors across the country to lobby for more spending amid concerns of a ballooning federal deficit. It also adds uncertainty to whether the money will come just weeks before the state budget goes into effect, on July 1.
The bill also includes a provision that would dramatically raise taxes for venture capitalists and other investors. Massachusetts has the second-highest volume of venture capital investment in the country, surpassed only by California, and some in the venture capital community have been warning that the change would discourage the long-term investments that are vital to the growth of technology, biotech, and other companies.
Senators John Kerry and Scott Brown have been opposed to that provision and may seek to change it in the Senate next month.
According to Neal, there are a variety of other tax-related impacts that the House-approved bill has on Massachusetts:
- Extends tax deduction for out-of-pocket classroom expenses, claimed by 96,703 teachers in Massachusetts for a total of $24 million in expenditures. It also extends the tuition deduction for higher education costs, claimed by 115,251 families in Massachusetts and totaling $301 million in expenses.
- Extends a research and development tax credit that has been claimed by 2,043 businesses in Massachusetts.
- Extends an employment credit for hiring Native Americans that has been utilized by 233 Massachusetts business.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
In letter to State Department, Kerry calls for greater control of $1.45 in aid to Pakistan
WASHINGTON -- Senator John Kerry is urging the State Department to tighten controls over how $1.45 billion in aid is given to Pakistan this year, warning that if the money is squandered or stolen, a massive five-year effort to help the Pakistani people could collapse.
“Among the Pakistani population there is already a fear that the funds will merely enrich the corrupt elite,” the Massachusetts Democrat wrote in a May 25 letter obtained by the Boston Globe. “Channeling so much of the money through untested institutions so quickly could serve to confirm these suspicions.”
The aid is part of a landmark, five-year $7.5 billion assistance package to Pakistan that Kerry, chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, pushed through Congress last year. It is aimed at trying to roll back extremism by improving the lives of ordinary citizens through greater access to water, energy, education and health, as well as bolstering Pakistan’s fledging democratic government.
But the letter – Kerry’s most forceful statement yet on how he believes the money should be spent – is a sign of unease among some on Capitol Hill over the administration’s plans for the money.
Richard Holbrooke, the Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, intends to funnel more than 50 percent of the funds directly through Pakistan’s government or through local Pakistani organizations, bypassing the American organizations and companies that the US government usually hires to deliver aid abroad. Holbrooke has said US entities have higher overhead costs and relying on them creates the perception that US aid benefits Americans, rather than the intended recipients.
But Kerry, who has oversight responsibilities over the funds, fears that Pakistani organizations might not be ready yet to effectively spend so much money, and that incidents of corruption in Pakistan will make accountability a challenge.
“The danger is much greater than merely the possibility of a portion of funds being poorly spent,” he wrote in a letter addressed to Holbrooke. Referring to the aid bill that bears his name, he wrote: “lf significant portion of the Kerry-Lugar-Berman funds are, for example, siphoned off to private bank accounts, political support for continued appropriation of the money could evaporate in Washington and Pakistan.”
Dan Feldman, Holbrooke's deputy, said, "We are grateful for Senator Kerry's very constructive feedback and input on using this significant amount of money, which he spearheaded and shepherded. We are all seeking maximum impact from this assistance, and to do this most effectively, we're always open to ways to operate in a manner that enhances sustainability, transparency, and accountability, as Senator Kerry has called for, and which are already core precepts that we have been built into our assistance programs."
Senator Kerry’s office declined to comment on the letter, but Frederick Jones, a Kerry spokesman, said that Kerry “wants to work cooperatively with the Administration to think through the potential pitfalls that could occur.” He said Kerry does not oppose funding for Pakistani institutions, but wants to ensure that the right controls are in place for adequate monitoring, such as pre-award and post-award evaluations of development contracts.
The letter urges more attention on Pakistan’s criminal justice system, and greater coordination with World Bank and the Asian Development Bank, who have spent decades trying to build dams and improve water delivery systems in Pakistan. Kerry also suggested launching a website that tracks how the money is being spent.
“To date, this process is still largely opaque to the broader public, including our Pakistani friends and partners,” he wrote. “This lack of transparency can generate suspicion and distrust, defeating the core intent [of the aid.]”
Farah Stockman can be reached at fstockman@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter at fstockman.
Frank wants $100b cut from defense spending
WASHINGTON — Representative Barney Frank said today that President Obama made “a terrible decision” when he exempted the Pentagon from a discretionary spending freeze, as the Massachusetts Democrat led a bipartisan quartet of congressmen who are calling for cuts to military spending to help reduce the deficit.
Frank said that only national security spending should be exempted from the freeze, not the entire Pentagon budget, and his group is appointing a task force to identify where at least $100 billion a year of wasteful defense spending can be cut.
“I think that was a terrible decision by the president,” Frank said of the Pentagon exemption at a press conference today. “I think he has made a very grave error.”
Frank, along with Democratic Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon and Republican Representatives Ron Paul of Texas and Walter Jones of North Carolina, have assembled a range of experts to study how military spending can be trimmed. The congressmen are also calling for the president's deficit commission to examine defense spending cuts.
Earlier this month, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that the Pentagon would have to “take a hard, unsparing look” at its operations in order to cut its budget.
While making clear that he wasn't referring to Iraq or Afghanistan, Frank said the idea that the US is the world's superpower is unsustainable, and it was flawed to argue that the US gets pulled into global conflicts. “We don't get pulled into them — we jump,” Frank said.
Frank does not intend to target one military spending program that provides jobs in Massachusetts, however, which the Pentagon has said it does not want. Massachusetts congressmen have fought to save a $3 billion project for a backup F-35 Joint Strike Fighter engine, where thousands of jobs are at stake in the Lynn General Electric plant.
Frank said that while he would support having fewer F-35 planes, he will continue to vote with the Massachusetts delegation on the engine program. “They have my vote,” Frank said of the delegation, “not my head.”
Radio ads target Brown to support bill for $2 billion in transit funding
While Democratic senators attempt to steer a bill through Congress to deliver $2 billion in emergency funding to struggling public transit systems, transit unions are taking the wheel with a few radio ads targeted at specific lawmakers across the country, including Senator Scott Brown.
“Congress is voting on emergency funding to keep the buses and trains running. But will Senator Scott Brown support this effort? Right now he seems gridlocked,” says the ad, sponsored by the Amalgamated Transit Union and the Transport Workers Union’s “Save Our Ride” campaign.
The ads are just in time to remind frustrated drivers on the road for the long holiday weekend just how much they hate traffic while they might actually be stuck in it.
The Massachusetts version of the ad also makes sure to add a little local color: “Traffic is bad all the time. We can’t afford another Big Dig and we don’t have room for new roads and we don’t need any more cars or more pollution. If only more people took the T or the bus -- but our transit system is going broke.”
Senator Grassley looking into training costs at Harvard
WASHINGTON -- Senator Chuck Grassley is investigating the cost of training top federal employees -- at taxpayer expense -- at several institutions, including Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government.
The Iowa Republican, in a letter to the dean of the Kennedy School, noted that a recent graduate from the school’s “senior executive fellows” program reported that the federal government paid $17,500 for a four-week course, in addition to travel expenses. Tuition for the program has since been raised to $18,300.
“Recently, I learned that numerous agencies of the federal government are expending large amounts of taxpayer funds on executive education,” Grassley wrote in the letter, which was sent today to David T. Ellwood, dean of the Kennedy School. “Although I am a strong proponent of maintaining a well-trained, highly competent federal workforce, I am alarmed by what appears to be the excessive costs related to these programs.”
Grassley noted that the costs are much higher, on average, than undergraduates pay to attend the school.
Grassley is requesting that by June 16 the school provide more than three years worth of records, detailing the number of individuals who attended the course; the agency that paid for the course; and the total amount of funds involved.
Grassley, who is the ranking Republican on the Committee on Finance, is also looking into similar issues involving the Center for Creative Leadership and the US Office of Personnel Management’s Executive Institute.
“As a matter of good government, it ought to be determined how much the executive branch is spending in total for training for its Senior Executive Service,” Grassley said today in a statement. “And, federal officials are obligated to determine if there are more effective, efficient, and economical ways to train those serving in this category of federal worker.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry: criticism of Obama on oil spill 'ridiculous'
WASHINGTON – Senator John Kerry this morning aggressively defended President Obama’s handling of the oil spill in the Gulf Coast, and said the spill illustrated the need for Congress to act on the Massachusetts Democrat’s signature climate change bill.
“This is ridiculous folks,” Kerry said this morning at an hourlong breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. “From day one, this administration has had its top personnel all over this issue. They don’t drill wells, companies do. And the oil companies are the people who are supposed to have the technology to shut it down.”
“We’ve had this lack of oversight for years,” Kerry added. “The president’s been in office for a year and a half and suddenly a well blows out and everybody says, ‘Why can’t you plug it?’”
Kerry, along with Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, filed legislation earlier this month that aims to reduce reliance on foreign oil while putting a price on carbon emissions and providing billions of dollars in incentives for industry to drastically cut greenhouse gases.
Some critics have suggested that the oil spill has added to the political uncertainty of passing the legislation this year, although Kerry argues that it makes his case stronger that more alternative energy sources should be promoted.
“Drilling is not what this bill is about,” Kerry said. “This bill is about liberating us from drilling.”
In response to the oil spill, he bill also gives states more say over offshore drilling, allowing them to veto plans for drilling within 75 miles of their shores. In addition, they could veto plans for drilling off neighboring states if they can demonstrate significant impacts.
Still, Kerry said, it would be unrealistic to think that drilling for oil will be curtailed anytime soon.
“Clearly the rules have been laxly applied,” Kerry said of the regulations over offshore drilling. “But as I’ve said before, for better or worse, we’re stuck with having to drill for the next 20, 30 years unless there is some extraordinary breakthrough with a new fuel mechanism that will [change] where we are today.”
“We’re not going to stop drilling in the Gulf tomorrow, folks, let’s be realistic,” he added. “There are 48,000 wells out there, one of them went sour.”
Kerry also defended the bill from criticisms that it contains taxes on businesses.
“People want to talk about cost of energy and tax and so forth,” Kerry said. “We’re paying the [Iran President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad, Iran tax, every single day. We send $100 million a day to Iran. Does that make sense? Does it make sense, 9 years after 9/11 to be more dependent on foreign oil?”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said that he will decide within weeks whether to bring the climate change legislation to the Senate floor this year, or if instead he would push for a smaller package.
“Health care pushed us back. We’ve been dealt a difficult hand,” Kerry said. “I can’t tell you for certain what’s going to happen.”
“It’s the right policy,” he added. “And I’ll push for it, whether it’s now, or after the election, or next year. We’ve got to get this done for our country, and I’m not going to get hung up over the when. We’re going to try and do it as soon as we can.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown to vote 'no' on repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell pending Pentagon study
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Scott Brown will vote against repealing 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' when it comes up for a vote Thursday in the Senate Armed Services Committee, dealing a blow to gay rights advocates who were hoping the freshman Republican would support efforts to permit gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military, The Globe's Political Intelligence blog has learned.
Brown's highly anticipated decision comes after President Obama and Democratic leaders struck a deal Monday night to overcome Pentagon resistance to changing the law before a top level review of how to implement a new policy is completed by Dec. 1.
The deal, outlined in a letter to Congress from the White House Office of Management and Budget, stipulates that any congressional repeal would not go into effect until the Pentagon review is completed.
But Brown says that while he is keeping "an open mind" on future efforts, he believes any vote for repeal should be put off until the Pentagon has time to formulate a plan for implementing any new policy.
"I am keeping an open mind, but I do not support moving ahead until I am able to finish my review, the Pentagon completes its study, and we can be assured that a new policy can be implemented without jeopardizing the mission of our military," Brown said in a statement provided to the Globe.
Brown, who is also a lieutenant colonel in the Massachusetts National Guard, said he came to his decision after hearing the views of multiple officers and enlisted personnel.
"For some time now, I have been seeking the opinions and recommendations of service chiefs, commanders in the field, and, most importantly, our junior soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines," he said in the statement. "I believe we have a responsibility to the men and women of our armed forces to be thorough in our consideration of this issue and take their opinions seriously."
But it appears to buck the vast majority of Massachusetts voters, according to a poll released today. The poll of 500 registered voters, conducted by Brown's pollster, Neil Newhouse, for the Human Rights Campaign, found that 77 percent of Bay State voters supports repeal. Meanwhile, it found that 62 percent of voters who backed Brown in the January special election support overturning the current law, as do 67 percent of registered independents who voted for him.
Criticism from some gay rights groups was swift and unsparing. "The notion that the senator from Massachusetts -- the first state in the nation to have marriage equality and one of the first states to have an anti-discrimination law -- would oppose ending discrimination against gays military personnel is reprehensible," said Arline Isaacson, co-chair of the Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus.
She said she was particularly surprised at Brown's explanation because the proposals for repeal in Congress stipulate that the Pentagon review would have to be completed before a new policy would take effect.
"What possible excuse could he have other than brazen prejudice?" Isaacson declared.
Susan Ryan-Vollmar of MassEquality.org, a grassroots organization, said she, too, is puzzled by Brown's reasoning. "The Pentagon review is not studying whether to do this but how to do this."
R. Clarke Cooper, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans in Washington, the gay rights group that has been lobbying Brown for his support on the issue, said he believes the vote planned for this week "would support the work the Pentagon is doing."
"Log Cabin Republicans are disappointed that he will not support clearing this arcane policy off the decks," said Cooper, an Army Reserve captain and Iraq War veteran.
The Pentagon review, established by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates in March, is designed to determine any changes in personnel policies, benefits, and the military justice system that might be needed to ensure openly gay service does not disrupt military operations and gay troops are not discriminated against.
Gates has insisted it is not meant to gauge whether the troops support overturning the 1993 that only permits gays to serve if they keep their sexual orientation secret.
Gates' spokesman said earlier today that the Pentagon chief is relieved that Democrats have agreed that any repeal would not go into effect until after the Pentagon review, but said he remains concerned about moving too quickly.
"Secretary Gates continues to believe that ideally the DOD review should be completed before there is any legislation to repeal the Don't Ask Don't Tell law," Geoff Morrell said in a statement. "With Congress having indicated that is not possible, the Secretary can accept the language in the proposed amendment."
Brown's opposition makes Sen. Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, the only GOP member to express support for the repeal measure in the committee, which Democrats plan to attach to this year's defense spending bill.
Brown's position may be a preview to a fierce political fight leading up to the vote, with proponents on both sides of the issue pressing their case to lawmakers.
A new report out today from the Family Research Council, a conservative group, supports Brown's position, but goes even further by accusing the Obama administration of "drafting the military into the culture war."
On a conference call with reporters organized by the group this afternoon, several retired military officers expressed deep concern that repeal now would be a mistake and possibly disrupt military readiness.
"It would send a damaging message to the men and women in uniform," said retired Marine Corps Gen. Jack Sheehan -- namely that there is no need to solicit their views on the issue.
In addition to the Senate committee, a separate vote on repeal before the full House of Representatives is also scheduled for Thursday.
Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers' Legal Defense Network, which has represented some of the more than 13,000 troops that have been discharged under the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy since 1994, said he believes it is still possible for Brown to change his mind.
"It is very hard for me to see a senator from the Bay State voting against repeal," he said.
A Senate aide tells the Globe that a fellow member of the Massachusetts National Guard plans to meet with Brown later today to urge him to vote for repeal.
Activists look to Brown as key vote on 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' next week
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Gay rights groups anxious to see Congress move quickly toward repealing the law that bans gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military are training some of their lobbying energy on Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown today.
The Senate Armed Services Committee is planning to vote on a provision lifting the controversial Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy when it takes up the fiscal year 2011 defense spending bill next week.
The adoption of such a provision would be a key step in advancing the legislative goal first set out by President Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign and which many advocates say has languished.
Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she will also bring the issue to a floor vote in the House next week.
While many close observers believe the Democrats have enough votes to prevail, advocates for lifting the ban aren't taking any chances.
Some are looking to more moderate-leaning GOPers like Brown, a member of the Senate panel, for additional support.
For example, some activists scheduled a protest earlier this afternoon outside Brown's Boston office to urge him to lend his support.
But Jesse Ehrenfeld, a board member of the Log Cabin Republicans of Massachusetts, a gay rights organization, said he believes protest is not the right approach with Brown because he has not yet taken a public position on the issue.
"We feel that protesting against him for positions he does not hold are not productive and will only hamstring efforts by leaders in the [lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender] movement at gaining his critical support," Ehrenfeld said in an email.
In a subsequent telephone interview with Political Intelligence, Ehrenfeld expressed confidence that Brown will vote to overturn the ban, citing several meetings he has held with the freshman senator and his staff.
Ehrenfeld said the senator, who is also a lieutenant colonel in the Army National Guard, made a point to sit in on the sessions and engage in the discussion.
Ehrefeld said Brown described himself as "neutral "on the issue, but "I think he is moving in the right direction."
Brown's office declined to comment today on which way he is leaning on the pending committee vote.
"Will get back to you next week," emailed his spokesman, Colin Reed.
As Congress takes up the 1993 law, the Pentagon is urging lawmakers to wait until it has completed a review to determine what changes might be needed if gays are permitted to serve openly.
The review is slated to be completed by Dec. 1.
Brown switches vote to advance financial regulation overhaul
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown switched a key vote from yesterday and joined 57 Democrats and two Republicans this afternoon in advancing a massive financial regulation overhaul.
The Massachusetts Republican said that over the last 24 hours he received assurances – from the chief negotiators in the House and Senate, Senator Christopher J. Dodd, and Representative Barney Frank -- that changes he was seeking would be addressed. Those assurances came during a phone call with Frank last night, while the Newton Democrat was working out in the House members gym. Brown was further convinced during a 40-mile bike ride he went on this morning with Senator John Kerry.
“We recognize that there’s going to be some fixes here, more than likely, and the conference committee,” Brown said after voting. “I’m satisfied that all of our efforts – Senator Kerry and my efforts – will benefit and protect jobs in Massachusetts.”
“I spoke at length over a 40 mile bike-ride with Senator Kerry about it,” Brown added. “He’s a very good athlete.”
Brown’s vote was the key in making the difference after Democrats tried unsuccessfully yesterday to shut off debate and move toward a final vote. Brown was criticized, though not by name, by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for breaking his word and not voting for the measure. Reid and Brown met this morning.
Brown said yesterday that he opposed the measure to end debate because he did not have assurances that several changes would be made, including one that would ensure that some of the new regulations would not apply to certain financial institutions.
Brown has tried to protect some of the insurance and mutual fund companies in Massachusetts from falling under the so-called Volcker rule, which could restrict the investment options of large institutions, including preventing them from owning private equity funds.
Brown argues that those restrictions should be designed to curtail the risky bets placed by big Wall Street firms, not the more traditional practices of the Massachusetts-based companies.
One of the key difference-makers was assurances that Brown received from Frank, who told Brown last night that he would ensure that the changes were made in conference committee. Frank, chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, wrote legislation that the House passed last year and will be the top negotiator in reconciling differences between the House and Senate.
The financial overhaul legislation, which has been debated for several weeks, is designed to crack down on some of the risky practices that contributed to the financial downturn. It would create a consumer protection bureau that seeks to help people avoid trouble with mortgages and credit cards they cannot afford. The legislation would also establish a council that would be charged with monitoring the system for potential problems.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown, GOP block financial vote
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown this afternoon joined Republicans in temporarily blocking a massive overhaul of the financial industry.
Brown, who initially said he would vote with the Democrats, cast one of the decisive votes against the move, and appears to have drawn the ire of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
“I don’t know a lot about everything, but I know how to count votes,” Reid, who lost on the procedural vote, said at a press conference. “Now, I’m not going to be giving any names and verses, but a senator broke his word with me.”
That senator appears to have been Brown.
“I actually told the leader yesterday that I would support” ending debate, Brown said in an interview. “But that was when I thought, after having representation that the language was in there. And it turns out that it isn’t. I can’t do it. As much as I’d love to try and do it, I just can’t do it.”
Reid had buttonholed Brown on the Senate floor after the Massachusetts Republican cast his vote. Brown huddled with his staff just outside the chamber, and then went back in and met with Senator John F. Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, who voted in favor of moving to a final vote.
The vote to cut off debate was 57-to-42. The two senators from Maine – Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe – were the only Republican senators to vote in favor. Reid switched his vote at the last minute, a procedural move that will allow him to recall the vote later, and Senator Arlen Specter, who lost his primary election last night, was not in the chamber to vote. Two other Democrats voted against the measure.
Today's vote is likely to only be a temporary setback, with negotiations continuing and another vote coming as early as tomorrow.
"I remain very optimistic," Senator Christopher J. Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat and chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.
Brown said he opposed the measure because he did not have assurances that several changes would be made, including one that would ensure that some of the new regulations would not apply to certain companies. Brown has tried to protect some of the insurance and mutual fund companies in Massachusetts from falling under the so-called Volcker rule, which is designed to crack down on some of the practices that led to the economic collapse. Brown argues that the economic problems were caused by risky bets on Wall Street, not the traditional practices of the Massachusetts-based companies.
“The key thing that we’ve been working on for three weeks -- that directly affects MassMutual, Liberty Mutual, Fidelity – it’s not in there,” Brown said. “And so, how can I in good conscience vote for it right now? My hope is that it will come back later and we’ll get those guarantees.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Five questions on the nuclear arms reduction pact
Senator John F. Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Richard Lugar, ranking Republican member, will open hearings this week on the New Strategic Arms Reductions Treaty. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are scheduled to testify today. The treaty, signed by President Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in April, seeks to reduce the number of strategic nuclear warheads on each side to 1,550 and limit delivery systems. In order to be ratified, the treaty requires a two-thirds vote in the Senate.
We asked William Tobey, senior fellow at Harvard's Belfer Center and renowned expert on nuclear weapons and proliferation, to discuss the treaty.
Q. The Obama administration contends the number of nuclear warheads has been slashed by about one-third; others suggest that creative accounting methods make the cuts more symbolic than substantive. How extensive are the cuts?
Oddly, because of the counting rules for the New START Treaty, it is impossible to say precisely how many warheads will be eliminated, but a one third cut appears to be the outer limit of the reductions, which in all likelihood will be more modest. It's important to realize that since the end of the Cold War, the United States has reduced its nuclear stockpile by 80 percent, even before the cuts mandated under New START.
Q. Some senators have questioned whether language in the treaty’s preamble would hinder US efforts to develop and install missile defense systems. How are anti-ballistic missiles and missile-defense systems addressed in the treaty?
Russia wanted to link strategic arms reductions to limits on missile defenses. The United States opposed this linkage. The two sides compromised by referencing the relationship between offenses and defenses in the Treaty's preamble, and Russian officials have since claimed that the reference gives Russia the right to withdraw from the treaty, should the United States proceed with defenses in ways that Moscow opposes. This is an unfortunate point of ambiguity in the agreement, but in the final
analysis it is impossible to prevent a state from withdrawing from a treaty if it believes its supreme interests have been threatened by new developments.
Q. In addition to missile defense, what are likely to be the most contentious aspects of the treaty in the US Senate?
The Senate will undoubtedly also examine closely the Treaty's verification measures, as it has with every arms control agreement, and I imagine that there will be a separate discussion of the administration's proposed plans to maintain our national [nuclear] laboratory capabilities, with some in the Senate seeking assurances that the plan is sufficient and will go forward as a condition for their support of the Treaty.
Q. What happens to the warheads removed from deployment?
A curious aspect of arms control is that none of the agreements that the United States has entered into to date mandate or verify the destruction of nuclear warheads. The Moscow Treaty [2002] limited the total number of operationally deployed strategic warheads but was silent on reserve stockpiles. The original START [1991] and New START Treaties directly limit delivery vehicles -- missiles and their launchers, and aircraft -- and by implication the number of warheads deployed by ascribing counting rules to those delivery vehicles, but again do not require destruction of warheads.
Nonetheless, both the United States and Russia have destroyed thousands of warheads and will likely continue to do so. This has been facilitated by further agreements, such as the Highly Enriched Uranium Purchase Agreement. Under this arrangement, the United States has bought over 300 tons of uranium from Russia's weapons stockpiles downblended for use in power reactors. As half of all US reactor fuel comes from this program, and 20 percent of American electricity is from nuclear power, about 10
percent of our light bulbs are powered by material from weapons that were once aimed at us or our allies.
Q. Assuming the treaty is ratified both in the US Senate and Russian Duma, what is next for arms control talks involving US negotiators?
The Obama administration has expressed an interest in deeper cuts in strategic forces and addressing Russia's large tactical nuclear forces [lower yielding weapons intended for use on battlefields; not covered by strategic arms treaties], on the path toward the president's goal of eliminating nuclear weapons. Russia, however, has made clear that nuclear weapons are central to Moscow's national security strategy, and as the number of nuclear weapons gets smaller, the salience of complicating issues, such as verification measures to prevent cheating, nuclear arsenals held by other states, and
possible proliferation by states such as Iran or North Korea, grows. Thus, the next strategic arms reduction treaty is likely to take far longer than New START to negotiate.
William Tobey is a senior fellow at Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and was most recently deputy administrator for defense nuclear nonproliferation at the National Nuclear Security Administration. There, he managed the US government’s largest program to prevent nuclear proliferation and terrorism by detecting, securing, and disposing of nuclear material. He also served on the National
Security Council Staff in three administrations and has participated in international negotiations ranging from the START talks with the Soviet Union to the Six Party Talks with North Korea.
GLOBE STAFF
Brown to stump in PA race, Dems try to raise cash
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown is heading to Pennsylvania today to stump for a Republican candidate, but Democrats are hoping to use the visit for their own means: campaign cash.
Representative Debbie Wasserman Shultz, the Florida Democrat and vice chairwoman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, sent out a fundraising appeal this morning asking supporters to donate and counter Brown’s fundraiser today.
“Republicans will try to claim that a victory on Tuesday would, in the words of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, ‘reverberate through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January,’” the note reads. “But Scott Brown's visit isn't just about symbolism - he's there to rally the right-wingers and raise last minute cash.”
Brown is planning to hold a fundraiser and rally for businessman Tim Burns, who is running in a special election next week for the seat long held by the late John Murtha.
Like Brown’s surprising victory in January to win the seat formerly held by the late Edward M. Kennedy, a Republican win next Tuesday in Pennsylvania would give Republicans a big symbolic boost and could spell further trouble for Democrats in the mid-term elections.
Burns is running against longtime Murtha aide Mark Critz, who has former President Bill Clinton coming to stump for him on Sunday.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry defends Berwick against critics
WASHINGTON -- Senator John F. Kerry rose to the defense of Harvard professor Donald Berwick Thursday, deriding Republicans who have used what Kerry called ``phony assertions'' to damage Berwick's nomination to run the country's Medicare and Medicaid programs.
``It’s no secret that the national Republican Party has tried to crank up the attack machine and make his nomination a distorted referendum on reform,'' Kerry said in a statement after meeting with Berwick Thursday afternoon. ``I hope everyone will instead take a deep breath and look at the facts about this public servant who is beyond debate a dedicated pediatrician and nationally recognized expert on health care quality.''
Berwick, a professor at both Harvard Medical School and the Harvard School of Public Health, is President Obama's pick to head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which administer government health care programs for the elderly as well as the poor and disabled. The agency will play a pivotal role in the new health care law, which includes cuts in Medicare funding and an historic expansion of Medicaid to extend coverage to a broader group of Americans.
Berwick gave a private speech Wednesday in Washington to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a group with the stated mission of improving health care. There was no transcript of the speech, spokeswoman Jessie duPont said, adding that she did not know its content.
As president of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, a not-for-profit organization, Berwick has drawn praise from health care experts across the philosophical spectrum for his knowledge of the issue and approaches to solving the problem of increasing costs.
But some Republicans, eager to have another fight over the contentious health care law, are gunning for Berwick and plan to use his nomination hearings as a platform to relitigate the law Obama signed in March.
Several US senators took to the Senate floor Wednesday evening to criticize Berwick, suggesting that he endorsed ``rationing'' of health care. Berwick, as is typical for appointees, has declined to be interviewed ahead of his nomination hearings, but Kerry Thursday spoke for the doctor.
``We need better than phony assertions that he’d ever set up death panels in Medicare, or interfere in personal health care decisions made between patients and their doctors,'' Kerry said. ``Frankly, we need a more honest debate than we had over health reform itself, which didn’t serve anyone well. It’s time to permanently retire these ridiculous accusations from politics and thoughtfully consider our nominees so that first rate experts won’t shy away from public service.''
Kerry is a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, which will consider Berwick's nomination. The panel, whose members are now entrenched in a financial services regulation bill, has yet to set a date for the hearings.
Democrats expect that Berwick will be confirmed but believe the process will be an ugly one, with the doctor used as a dartboard for another health care overhaul battle. Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, the senior Republican on the panel, has not joined in the GOP attacks on Berwick. He is keeping an open mind and looks forward to questioning Berwick at the hearings, a Grassley aide said.
``I know he’s up to the challenge,'' Kerry said. ``His decades of experience in improving patient care and transforming the delivery of health systems will be a tremendous asset in overseeing federal programs that serve our children, individuals with disabilities, seniors, and low-income families.''
Kerry noted that Berwick was very familiar with the Massachusetts health care plan, and said, ``I think it’ll be a real asset to have someone like Don on board in Washington who has seen first-hand the lessons of the Massachusetts experiment. He knows how to build on those achievements.''
Brown satisfied with Kagan's view on military
Massachusetts Republican Senator Scott Brown said he was satisfied with Kagan’s explanation for why she restricted the access military recruiters had to students when she was dean of Harvard Law School.
“That was the first question I actually asked her,” Brown said after meeting with Kagan for 20 minutes. “Being in the military, I had concerns about that position at Harvard. She answered it, I felt, very honestly. And it was very clear to me, after we spoke about it at length, that she is supportive of the men and women who are fighting to protect us, and very supportive of the military as a whole.”
President Obama on Monday nominated Kagan, 50, the US solicitor general, to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens.
Kagan’s decision at Harvard to restrict recruiters, due to the prohibition against openly gay military service members, has become a primary line of attack against Kagan by Republican critics. Recruiters maintained access to students at the time through a student veterans group, and Kagan’s defenders have denied she holds any anti-military bias.
Brown said he was satisfied with Kagan's version of the matter. “I do not feel that her judicial philosophy will be hurting our men and women who are serving,” he said.
Brown stopped short today of saying he would support Kagan’s confirmation. “I’m going to learn about her,” he said. “Obviously you can’t do much in a 15, 20 minute meeting. So I’m going to continue to evaluate and I’m going to reserve my decision until” the vote.
Kagan also met today with Senator Susan Collins, a moderate Republican from Maine, who said afterward she was “very impressed” with Kagan, according to a Bloomberg report. Collins dismissed the argument of Republican leadership that Kagan, who has never been a judge, lacks the experience to sit on the nation’s highest court.
“I do not believe that her lack of judicial experience in any way disqualifies her,” said Collins, who also said she would not make up her mind until after the Judiciary Committee completes confirmation hearings this summer.
Frank will keep transgender rights in employment nondiscrimination bill
WASHINGTON — Representative Barney Frank has vowed to keep transgender rights in his bill to protect gays and lesbians in the workplace, despite opposition from some key moderates that could derail the proposal.
For decades, the Newton Democrat has led congressional efforts to help gay workers, and three years ago he similarly included transgender rights in the Employment Nondiscrimination Act. But he wound up removing that provision in order to get the legislation passed in the House, a move that divided the gay rights community. That bill died in the Senate.
Now Frank says he will keep transgender rights in the current bill, and gay rights activists appear united in support.
But some Republicans say they would back the legislation only if the transgender rights portion is dropped.
“If you include transgender rights, I think that just pushes the envelope too far,” said Representative John Campbell of California, a Republican who voted for Frank's bill in 2007. “It is seen by the populous as a very extreme procedure.”
Campbell is not the only previous supporter to object. Republican Representatives Jeff Flake of Arizona, Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, and Jim Gerlach of Pennsylvania also say they don't support the current version because it includes transgender rights. Also, some moderate Democrats have expressed concerns about voting on the transgender provision with the midterm elections approaching.
FULL ENTRYKerry, Lieberman unveil climate bill
Delegation encourages Obama administration to hike fishing stock
Representative Barney Frank, a
Democrat of Newton, has long made it a major focus for his district, which
includes the key fishing area of
The meeting was held with Gary
Locke, the secretary of the Department of Commerce, and Jane Lubchenco, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Among those from
Brown said this morning that the
four
"They’re talking about kind of
moseying along getting these things done," he said "And meanwhile, people are
losing their homes, they’re losing their boats."
Under new regulations, fishermen
have been divided into groups and must work together to manage their overall
catch allowances of groundfish. The system is intended to protect stocks with
rigid catch limits, but fishermen have said the regulations could allow large
companies to seize most of the shares.
Catch limits for certain fish
stocks have been greatly reduced, and congressional members are asking the
administration to review those limits and consider raising them again.
"We urged the secretary to recognize the negative economic impact of the new catch-share limits and immediately provide local fisheries with more flexibility," Tierney, who earlier this year spearheaded the first congressional hearing on NOAA issues in Gloucester, said this afternoon in a statement.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Tsongas returns from Afghanistan trip
Tsongas, who went on the
congressional trip with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, said the group focused on
both American women serving in the military, and on the quality of life for
“The contrast was stark,” Tsongas,
a Lowell Democrat, said in an interview. “You saw increasing commitment of
women in our military...and a willingness to put their lives on the line. Afghan
women, by contrast, have very limited opportunities in the government.”
“For us to achieve our goals
there and for the
Tsongas said the group received commitments
from
Tsongas was on the trip with Pelosi, as well as
representatives Susan Davis of
Tsongas and the other members also spent Mother’s Day
visiting with “military moms,” female soldiers who were separated from their
children.
Tsongas also said she had a brief interaction with someone
else with
Matt Viser can be
reached at maviser@globe.com.
Olver will not seek chairmanship of House Appropriations Committee
WASHINGTON -- Jockeying has begun over a looming vacancy in the House Appropriations Committee leadership, so Massachusetts residents may be permitted to daydream about the extra clout the state would wield if Representative John Olver of Holyoke, who is a subcommittee chairman, assumed the overall chairmanship of the powerful committee.
But Olver today gave a clear answer: Keep dreaming.
"Of course I'm interested in the chairmanship. I'm interested in who is the chairman," Olver said, declaring that he has no personal aspirations to succeed the retiring Wisconsin Democrat David Obey.
As tenth in seniority (including Obey), Olver, a 19-year House veteran, is a bit too far down the ladder to compete for the chairmanship, although House rules don't preclude it. But Olver is already a "cardinal,'' meaning he chairs an appropriations subcommittee on transportation, housing and urban development. Appropriations subcommittee chairmanship are unusually powerful, since the panels determined how much money the government spends on federal programs.
The Appropriations Committee itself is considered so powerful that its members are not allowed to serve on any other committees.
Olver noted that Massachusetts is already blessed with one chairmanship -- Representative Barney Frank heads the Financial Services Committee. And the number may well grow, he added. Representative Richard E. Neal,. Democrat of Springfield, is a strong candidate to take the House Ways and means Committee chairmanship next year. Representative James McGovern, Democrat of Worcester, is second in seniority on the House Rules Committee, which writes the final versions of all bills and determined what amendments, if any, may be offered on the floor.
Representative Louise Slaughter, Democrat of New York, currently chairs the panel and said Thursday she intends to run for re-election. While the 81-year-old lawmaker is known on the Hill for having more energy than many 20-something staffers, she presumably will retire before the 50-year-old Massachusetts congressman, giving McGovern a shot at the chairmanship once held by the late Representative Joseph Moakley of Boston. McGovern was once a staffer for Moakley.
Representative Edward Markey, meanwhile, already chairs the House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming, and is a subcommittee chair and senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Several other members of the delegation hold subcommittee chairmanships.
Brown and Lieberman file bill to strip terrorists of citizenship
Senators Scott Brown and Joe Lieberman filed a bill today that would strip any American - naturalized or native-born - of their citizenship if they are deemed by the State Department to have provided material support to a foreign terrorist organization. Some legal experts say the bill is perfectly constitutional, and a common-sense measure meant to update US protections in the war on terror. But others say the bill is an expansion of a McCarthy-era law that echoes that previous era of hysteria and will not pass Constitutional muster.
Check out the summary here.
Tsongas introduces bills to expand services for veterans and women servicemembers
The transition from the military life to the civilian can be fraught with frustration, but legislation introduced by Representative Niki Tsongas today aims to make the journey smoother.
The Improving Veterans’ Electronic Transition Services Act (iVETS Act) would ease the process by which veterans transfer their military records and benefit information to civilian life. The bill allows the Department of Defense and the Deparment of Veterans Affairs to assess the feasibility of a web-based program for veterans that builds upon the existing Defense Knowledge Online system currently limited to active duty military.
Veterans, familiar with this platform, would not only be able to access their records electronically; Tsongas’s bill also aims to connect veterans with each other via a ‘white pages’ directory, forums, and by providing e-mail addresses.
“This portal will provide unprecedented benefits to our veterans,” said Tsongas, who serves on the Armed Services Committee, in a statement.
Tsongas introduced a second bill today that recognizes the growing segment of female servicemembers, who represent more than 15 percent of the total force and who, by some reports, do not have the same access to health services as civilian women.
The Women’s Excellence of Care and Accessibility Review and Evaluation Act (WE CARE Act) calls for a comprehensive review of the availability and accessibility of women-specific medical care within the Department of Defense.
“Servicewomen, like all women, have specific health care needs and it is important to assess the Defense Department’s ability to provide women-specific health care services and ensure our women servicemembers have access to the care that they require,” said Tsongas in the statement.
Markey will lead delegation to Louisiana to investigate massive oil leak
WASHINGTON -- Representative Edward Markey, Democrat of Malden, will lead a bipartisan congressional delegation Friday to Louisiana to continue investigating the massive offshore oil leak that is threatening the Gulf region, the congressman's office said.
Markey, who chairs the Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming, will head a 10-person team from the House Energy and Commerce Committee, of which Markey is a senior member.
The group will be briefed by the Coast Guard and others monitoring the spill, the do a fly-over to examine the damage, said Markey spokesman Eben Burnham-Snyder. Markey's spokesman. They will also meet with fisherman, shrimpers, and others affected by the leak, which has already been deemed worse that the Exxon Valdez spill in 1989.
The spill occurred after a BP-run rig exploded April 20 and sank, killing 11 people on the crew. Workers are trying to contain the spill so it does not travel even further up the coast and damage fishing and tourism industries critical to coastal residents.
The Energy and Commerce Committee is conducting an investigation of the spill.
"It's one thing to conduct an investigation here, from Washington, DC, which obviously is what Representative Markey and others are doing," Burnham-Snyder said. "It always helps to go to the scene of an accident and see first hand" what is happening.
Markey and Representative Lois Capps, Democrat of California, introduced a bill Thursday to create a commission to stud the spill and its effect. A similar commission was established after the Three Mile Island nuclear accident in 1979.
Brown to co-sponsor terrorism bill
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown tomorrow is signing on to legislation that would strip naturalized Americans of their citizenship if they are found to have aided a foreign terrorist organization.
Brown is joining three other lawmakers in filing the legislation, which comes after Faisal Shehzad was accused of a plot to detonate a car bomb in Times Square on Saturday. Because the Pakistani-born Shehzad is a naturalized American citizen, he was read his Miranda rights and will be tried in a civilian court, rather than before a military tribunal.
The legislation is likely to trigger debate over what rights American citizens should be afforded if they are involved in acts of terrorism. Senator John McCain has called it a mistake to have read Shehzad his Miranda rights, while Fox News commentator Glenn Beck said, "He has all the rights under the Constitution. We don’t shred the Constitution when it’s popular.”
The others sponsoring the bill are Senator Joseph Lieberman, a Connecticut Independent; Representative Jason Altmire, a Democrat of Pennsylvania; and Representative Charlie Dent, a Republican of Pennsylvania.
The four will hold a press conference tomorrow to announce the legislation, called the Terrorist Expatriation Act.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Coakley targeted by 'Twitter bomb'
WASHINGTON – Martha Coakley’s record was attacked in television ads, she was criticized during televised debates, and came under heat for apparently not realizing that Curt Schilling was a pitcher for the Red Sox.
Apparently, she was also the subject of a more stealthy attack via Twitter.
A conservative group in Iowa was behind a viral attack on Coakley during her senate race against Scott Brown, according to a new study by Wellesley College professors that analyzed Twitter activity during the special election.
The authors, Panagiotis Takis Metaxas and Eni Mustafaraj, examined more than 185,000 campaign-related tweets and retweets during the week leading up to the election.
In the course of the research, they found that one of the more active accounts was one that was tied to the American Future Fund, a conservative organization based in Iowa that also ran television ads critical of Coakley. But because messages were done anonymously through a social networking site, it would have been difficult for any voter to tie the messages to the group.
The firm apparently set up nine accounts that sent 929 tweets over the course of about two hours – a method the study refers to as a “Twitter-bomb.” Those messages would have reached about 60,000 people, according to the authors.
The research paper, “From Obscurity to Prominence in Minutes: Political Speech and Real-Time Search,” was presented last week at a conference in Raleigh, N.C. The paper, which won the conference’s Best Paper Award, can be found here.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Sen. Brown to work with Laura Bush's collaborator
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown’s new book will be written with Lyric Wallwork Winik, the author who recently collaborated with former first lady Laura Bush.
Brown’s book contract has also been signed off on by the Senate Ethics Committee, according to a spokeswoman for the Massachusetts Republican.
His office would not release any further details about the book, and all proceedings by the ethics committee are done in private. Any advance that Brown received will be reflected in his 2010 financial disclosure forms, but those are not due until May 2011. The ethics committee reviews book contracts to ensure that they comply with all gift and ethics guidelines.
Winik, a former Washington correspondent for Parade magazine, most recently worked with Bush on her newly-released memoir, “Spoken From the Heart."
Brown’s book is scheduled to be released in early 2011 and will be published by HarperCollins. In the book, Brown is planning to write about his family, early career, and his surprising special election victory in Massachusetts.
According to spokeswoman Gail Gitcho, he would work on the book on the weekends and during personal time.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry opens hearings on arms treaty
Senator John F. Kerry opened hearings on the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty today with a call to put aside partisan politics and judge the treaty on its merits and on one essential consideration: Will it make the United States safer?
The Massachusetts Democrat, as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is considered the principal figure in President Obama's efforts to win ratification of the treaty he signed earlier this month with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. The pact seeks to limit each side to 1,550 warheads, about 30 percent below previous limits.
Although arms control treaties have historically attracted bipartisan support in the Senate, that's no sure bet in the highly charged atmosphere of Capitol Hill these days. Several Republican senators have already raised questions on the motivations of the treaty negotiators and on language in the preamble that they say could limit US efforts to install missile defense systems.
Kerry countered that while he welcomed the explorations of these and other potentially contentious issues, the treaty is sound and deserves support.
"This treaty improves our security because it increases certainty, stability and transparency between two countries that together hold 95% of the world's nuclear weapons -- and it does so while retaining for America the flexibility to protect ourselves and our allies in Europe and around the world," he said in his opening statement.
Since the previous START treaty expired in December, US inspectors have been losing the ability to verify compliance by the Russians.
"This new treaty will restore that capacity, and in some ways enhance it -- and the sooner we get that done, the better," he said.
Kerry told the Globe Wednesday he was confident that he would be able to overcome questions on particular aspects of the treaty and potential partisan posturing to win the two-thirds vote needed for ratification. The key, he said, is extensively examining the provisions of the treaty and providing a voice for all viewpoints.
"The way to ratify it is to fully explain it, vet it, and thoroughly address any kinds of concerns that people may have," he told the Globe.
Today's hearings included testimony from two titans of the intersection of defense and diplomacy: James Schlesinger, who served as CIA director for President Nixon, secretary of defense for Nixon and President Ford, and energy secretary for President Carter; and William Perry, who served as secretary of defense for President Clinton.
Hearings are expected through much of the summer, and the Obama administration hopes to have a vote on ratification by year's end.
GLOBE STAFF
Markey wants oil companies to testify
WASHINGTON – Representative Edward J. Markey sent formal notices today to the heads of the country’s five largest oil companies to testify before his committee, wanting them to address an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, rising prices at the pump, and current legislation on energy and climate change.
“From the health of our economy to the health of our environment, it’s time for the American public to hear from the oil companies,” Markey, a Malden Democrat and chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, said this afternoon in a statement. “Their opinions and answers on the issues of energy policy are vital given the push in Congress to construct a comprehensive energy independence strategy for our nation.”
Markey sent the letters to the five top oil companies -- Exxon Mobil, BP, ConocoPhillips, Shell and Chevron – but did not announce an exact date and time of the hearing.
The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has become an increasing matter of concern. It is now leaking at a rate of 5,000 barrels of oil per day and could soon exceed the size of the Santa Barbara oil spill in 1969.
Markey also wants executives from the companies to answer for the large profits disclosed in quarterly reports while prices continue to rise on consumers.
“Four dollar gasoline helped break our economy’s back,” Markey said. “And now, just as we are starting a recovery, the price of gas is creeping back towards three dollars, threatening the budgets of families and small businesses across the nation,” said Rep. Markey. “We need to craft a comprehensive strategy that protects consumers, and our nation’s oil companies must join us in that effort.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Senate Republicans will begin debate on legislation for financial regulation overhaul
WASHINGTON – Senate Republicans say they are ready to end their stalling tactics and begin debate on legislation designed to overhaul the nation’s financial regulations and prevent a repeat of the 2008 economic meltdown.
The movement came after Democrats pledged to meet through the night – an attempt to shame Republicans into debating the issue – and after Republicans said they had reached an impasse in private negotiations.
“It is now my belief that further negotiations will not produce additional results,” Senator Richard Shelby, chief negotiator for the Republicans, said in a statement.
Both sides are now girding for battle and ready for a significant fight on the Senate floor. Democrats were preparing to claim victory, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was planning to deliver a statement on the Senate floor.
“It is time for this debate to begin,” said Senator Christopher J. Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat and chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. “And it must be a serious, vigorous debate.”
It is initially unclear whether Senator Scott Brown will support moving debate to the Senate floor. He had previously said he would join a Republican filibuster unless certain conditions were met, but pro-financial reform groups have been targeting him with TV ads, press releases, and photo ops.
Shelby and Dodd had been locked in negotiations for several days. Shelby this afternoon criticized several major components of the bill, but also indicated that there had been a deal over a top Republican concern – that there would be no bailouts for big banks. Without offering specifics, Shelby said that Dodd made “significant and meaningful” concessions on that issue.
“Now that those bipartisan negotiations have ended, it is my hope that the majority’s avowed interest in improving this legislation on the Senate floor is genuine and the partisan gamesmanship is over,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said in a statement.
For the third time in three days, Republicans earlier in the day voted against bringing the measure up for debate. Without the 60 votes needed to avoid a filibuster, the legislation cannot come to the Senate floor for amendments and debate.
Democrats then began planning to meet through the night, in an effort to break the logjam on bringing financial reform to the Senate floor.
“We’re going to stay here,” Senator Ben Cardin, a Democrat from Maryland, told reporters this afternoon shortly before Republicans agreed to move toward a floor debate. “And if the Republicans are going to filibuster it, the American people are going to see that they’re filibustering this issue.”
Polls suggest the legislation is popular with the public, but it has drawn strong opposition from securities industry lobbyists.
The legislation is designed to crack down on practices that led to the economic collapse in 2008, when the federal government had to intervene with a $700 billion program designed to prop up failing financial institutions deemed "too big to fail.”
It would establish a system for shutting down failing firms without disrupting the entire financial system.
It would also establish a council that would be charged with monitoring the system for potential problems, and would establish a consumer protection agency to help prevent people from getting into trouble with mortgages and credit cards they can't afford.
The bill also aims to crack down on derivatives, which played a key role in the economic collapse. Financial firms, for example, bet on the direction of thousands of bundled home mortgages that later failed because the mortgages were issued without adequate credit.
Under the current legislation, the trading of such derivative products would have to be done on an open market, and some firms would be unable to continue their operations.
One of the main targets of Republican opposition has been the $50 billion fund to wind down failing institutions. Republican opponents have said that it could still allow for bailouts of large firms.
Republicans also oppose the so-called Volcker rule, named for former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker. The rule would put new investment restrictions on large institutions, including preventing them from owning private equity funds.
Massachusetts life insurance companies oppose the provision because it would force them to stop investing in the Massachusetts Capital Resource Company, a consortium formed in 1977 that has invested about $575 million in 300 businesses.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kaine: Massachusetts 'a ghost of Christmas future experience'
WASHINGTON – Democratic National Committee chairman Tim Kaine this afternoon said the Massachusetts election was a major wake-up call that has informed the strategy for the upcoming mid-term elections.
“The Massachusetts race, I think, was a ghost of Christmas future experience for us,” Kaine told reporters at a luncheon organized by the Christian Science Monitor. “Better to have that in January 2010 than in November.”
Kaine said that national Democrats did not get involved early enough, but that the shocking victory of Republican Senator Scott Brown has helped them since craft their message. Kaine today also outlined the Democratic Party’s message for the November elections, saying the party would bill itself “The Results Party” and suggest that progress would be halted if Republicans are elected.
“What we got in January 2010 was a 10 month advance on what November would be like unless we think very carefully about what we want to do in the mid-terms,” Kaine said. “The assessments that we’ve done on [what occurred in Massachusetts] have been key part of what we’re now presenting today as this midterm plan.”
“Independent voters in Massachusetts, they want results,” he added. “They want to see action.”
Kaine also said that national Democrats put too much confidence in the assessments of Massachusetts Democrats and, while he didn’t name her directly, Attorney General Martha Coakley, who was the party’s nominee.
“We’re not trusting anybody else’s statements of how they’re looking in the polls, or their confidence level,” Kaine said. “We’re going to have our own kind of validation and verification of where races are. And that’s very important for us to do. Because once we got in and made some realizations about, ‘Hum. This isn’t maybe going as swimmingly as some might suggest,’ we were able to generate an intense amount of activity from our people who really want to be engaged in elections. But just not soon enough. So that was on us, but I think we learned a valuable lesson.”
Kaine said the party was concentrating on the mid-term elections and had not started thinking about the 2012 election when Brown will have to run for re-election.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown's famous truck is a target for proponents of financial regulation overhaul
WASHINGTON – Proponents of a financial regulation overhaul are going after a familiar image: Senator Scott Brown’s truck.
Americans United for Change is launching a small TV ad campaign to urge Brown to vote in favor of starting debate on legislation designed to overhaul the nation’s financial regulations and prevent a repeat of the 2008 economic meltdown.
“When Scott Brown ran for Senate, he said he was a regular guy from Wrentham, Massachusetts, who drove a truck,” says a narrator, attempting to speak in a South Boston accent. “But now, he’s voting like a guy from Wall Street who drives around in a Limo.”
Images shift from Brown’s campaign ad of him in his green GMC truck, to one of a stretch limousine driving through Times Square.
The ad will run in the Boston media market starting tonight on CNN, MSNBC, and Fox.
Twice over the past two days, Brown has voted against bringing debate to the Senate floor. They will vote again this afternoon, although there are no indications that Brown will shift. He has said that he supports financial reform, but wants a bipartisan deal that takes into account several of his concerns.
“Senator Brown is an independent voice, not a rubber stamp for anyone,” Brown's communications director, Gail Gitcho, said in a statement. “Senator Brown believes that we need financial reform – and that it needs to be done in a bi-partisan way that protects the safety of our financial system, as well as the interests of taxpayers and consumers. He is standing with Massachusetts businesses that are opposed to the bill as written.”
President Obama’s campaign network, Organizing for America, has started sending out emails to Massachusetts supporters, encouraging them to contact Brown and urge him to switch his vote.
Others are also using the imagery of Brown’s truck -- which played a major role in his campaign -- juxtaposed to a limo. Another group, Americans for Financial Reform, sent a limousine to Brown’s office in Boston yesterday to “take him to Wall Street to huddle with his big banker buddies.”
“Does he plan on turning in his pickup for a limousine?” said Rich Rogers, of the Greater Boston Labor Council. “It’s hard to believe anyone could side with Wall Street given the pain they have inflicted on millions while lining their own pockets.”
They have also taken Brown to task for taking campaign donations from financial executives in the final days of his special election in January. Brown has said previously that he didn’t pay attention to where the money was coming from because he was focused on his job.
“After taking money hand over fist from Wall Street banks during his campaign, it doesn’t look very good that Senator Scott Brown is now shielding these same banks from accountability,” Tom McMahon, acting executive director of Americans United for Change. “The Wall Street banks got their money’s worth with Senator Brown and bonus checks are no doubt in the mail.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Financial bill heads to round two
WASHINGTON – Vote on financial reform, take two.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid this morning called for another vote after Republican united with a lone Democrat yesterday to block debate on legislation designed to overhaul the nation’s financial regulations and prevent a repeat of the 2008 economic meltdown.
The Senate is scheduled to vote at 4:30 p.m., although there is little indication that the outcome will be any different from yesterday. Democrats still need to muster support from at least one Republican, and convince Senate Ben Nelson, the Nebraska Democrat who voted no yesterday, to flip to an “aye.”
Democrats’ appear to be trying to force multiple votes – another is likely for tomorrow, if the one today fails – to continue pounding their theme that Republicans are in league with Wall Street bank executives.
“Republicans have a new standard,” Reid said this morning on the Senate floor. “Negotiate, negotiate, negotiate.”
Republicans, meanwhile, have argued that Democrats are pushing complicated legislation that isn’t “ready for prime time.”
“The bill isn’t ready,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said this morning just after Reid spoke. “It needs work. That’s what last night’s vote was about.”
The Globe reported this morning that Senator Scott Brown is willing to support a compromise, but also accused Democrats of pushing for a vote yesterday in a political bid to embarrass Republicans.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Republicans reject advancing financial regulations bill
WASHINGTON – Senate Republicans held firm today and rejected opening debate on a bill calling for comprehensive financial regulations, with Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown joining his GOP colleagues to send the bill back to behind-the-scenes negotiations.
The 57-to-41 vote -- which was three shy of the number needed to proceed without a filibuster -- is a temporary setback for Democrats who have been pushing for the biggest overhaul of financial regulations since the Great Depression. It could give Republicans, who oppose several key aspects of the proposal, more momentum in brokering a bipartisan compromise.
Brown for the first time detailed the provisions that would need to be altered in order to earn his vote, including the elimination of a $50 billion fund made up of new bank fees that would be used to liquidate failing firms. He also wants certain provisions of the bill to exempt insurance companies – something that several Massachusetts businesses, including MassMutual and Liberty Mutual, have been concerned about.
“The orders apparently have been given from higher above to just push it forward, score some political points,” the Massachusetts Republican said in a brief interview after he voted. "There’s no reason to go to a vote today except to spot the Republicans to say we’re in favor of Wall Street and they’re in favor of Main Street – yeah, I get it. But it’s time to move on.”
Brown said he "absolutely" could envision voting for a final package, if a series of changes were made.
It was a crucial vote for Brown, who came to Washington to stop health care but instead has helped give Republicans the ammunition they need to alter the Democrats’ plan for financial regulatory changes. He is also shifting from previous practice when he voted several times with Democrats to move a bill along, even though he opposed the final package.
Republicans were united in their opposition to allowing the debate to move forward. Senator Ben Nelson, of Nebraska, was the only Democrat to join Republicans in voting against it. Two Republican senators were not present for the vote and at the last minute, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid changed his vote to a "no," a procedural move that will allow him to bring the matter up again as early as today.
Senator John F. Kerry, who is a senior member of the Finance and Commerce committees, was critical of Republicans, saying "they should at least allow the debate to go forward."
Kerry, Graham, Lieberman to meet tonight to discuss climate bill
Kerry is scheduled to meet tonight with Graham, Republican of South Carolina, and Senator Joseph Lieberman, Independent of Connecticut, to discuss the legislation, according to a Senate source familiar with the discussions.
The meeting could prove crucial in providing an indication of whether the long-awaited climate change bill has any chance of success this year. Graham who had allied himself with Kerry on the issue, abruptly abandoned the effort on Saturday night, saying he was irate that the Senate’s Democratic leadership might proceed with a controversial immigration bill first.
His backing out apparently had little to do with the climate bill, which originally had been scheduled to be unveiled today at a press conference on Capitol Hill.
The sudden switch of priorities began late last week when Senate majority leader Harry Reid suggested to other congressional leaders that he might want to tackle immigrant legislation before the Senate deals with climate change.
Reid
is facing a tough reelection battle in
Kerry has been in discussions with Reid, as well as the White House, about how to proceed and keep the bipartisan coalition in tact. The issue has been one of the most important in Kerry’s long legislative career. He has held 234 meetings with 48 different senators, and met with President Obama 17 times to discuss the matter, according to records compiled by Kerry aides.
The Globe reported yesterday that the bill would create a system that puts a price on carbon emissions and direct most of the proceeds to the public in the form of rebates. It would also provide clean energy incentives worth $2 billion a year to the coal industry, and give tax credits to the nuclear industry, all with a goal of slicing carbon pollution 18 percent from 2005 levels by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050.
It
would also, however, halt a groundbreaking regional effort to curb emissions
from power plants in
Matt Viser can be reached at
maviser@globe.com.
Senate prepares for key financial bill vote
WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats and Republicans today braced for a showdown vote on legislation to impose sweeping new regulations on the nation's financial industry.
A vote scheduled for 5 p.m. could determine whether Republicans have enough votes to filibuster the bill, which could stop debate and force negotiators from both parties to go back to the bargaining table.
A key role could be played be Senator Scott Brown, the Massachusetts Republican who has said he would back the filibuster in hopes of forcing major changes in the legislation. Several other Republicans have been targets for Democrats, including the two senators from Maine – Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe.
But, at least for now, Republicans seem united in blocking the initial vote.
"I don’t believe we’ll have a deal today," Senator Richard Shelby, the top Republican negotiator, said this morning on ABC’s “Good Morning America." Still, he added, "I believe we’re going to get a good bill."
Shelby has been negotiating with Senator Christopher Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat and chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, for several weeks. The two are planning to meet again this afternoon, hours before the vote.
Democrats feel they will have a victory either way: by winning the vote, or by being able to portray Republicans as protectors of Wall Street greed.
The 5 p.m. vote is mostly a procedural one that would allow debate to begin. But it will also test overall support for the bill, and could set the stage for the next week or two of debate. The 59 Democrats, who are all expected to vote in favor, need at least one Republican to join them if they want to prevent a filibuster.
If the vote fails, Republicans would have more leverage to negotiate changes before Democrats could bring it up for another vote later in the week.
Brown, the newly-elected Massachusetts Republican, has said he would join a Republican filibuster unless changes are made to the bill.
"I haven’t been briefed by the teams," he said in a brief interview on Thursday. "But I’m encouraging everybody to stay at the table and try to come up with a real bill that we can all be proud of."
Brown has largely criticized the bill as one that would hurt some Massachusetts companies because they would be caught up in a “web” of new investing rules that would hamper their ability to do business. Several large insurance firms, including Massachusetts Mutual and Liberty Mutual, have been lobbying against the current bill for those reasons.
The legislation is designed to crack down on practices that lead to the economic collapse in 2008, when the federal government had to intervene and prop up failing financial institutions deemed "too big to fail."
It would establish a system for shutting down failing interconnected firms without disrupting the entire financial system. It would also establish a council that would be charged with monitoring the system for potential problems, and would establish a consumer protection agency to help prevent people from getting into trouble with mortgages and credit cards they can't afford.
The bill also aims to crack-down on a complex financial tool called derivatives. The trading of derivatives would have to be done on an open market, and some firms would be unable to continue their current operations.
At least two Republican senators – Snowe, and Charles Grassley of Iowa – support the current approach on derivatives.
One of the main targets of Republican opposition has been a $50 billion fund that would be used to wind down failing institutions. The fund would be comprised of fees from large financial institutions, but Republican opponents have said that it could still allow for bailouts of large firms.
But not all Republicans are united on that issue. Senator Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican and a key negotiator, last week defended the fund and criticized his own party and said their lines of attack "miss the point and I think take us off on a bunch of rabbit trails."
Republicans also oppose the so-called Volcker rule, named for former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker. The rule would put new investment restrictions on large institutions, including preventing them from owning private equity funds. That provision is opposed by Massachusetts life insurance companies, because it would force them to stop investing in the Massachusetts Capital Resource Company, a consortium formed in 1977 that has invested about $575 million in 300 businesses.
The House has already passed its bill, which was drafted by Representative Barney Frank of Newton, who is chairman of the Financial Services Committee.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Scott Brown would back Mitt Romney if he runs in 2012
Massachusetts Republican Senator Scott Brown said this morning that he was ruling out a presidential run in 2012 and that he supported former Bay State governor Mitt Romney in the race.
"Yes, absolutely, 2012, I'm ruling it out," Brown told interviewer Jamie Gangel on NBC-TV's "Today" show. When Gangel asked if he might run someday, Brown sidestepped, saying, "I'm not even going to jump at that. Nice try."
Brown's upset victory over Democratic Attorney General Martha Coakley in a Jan. 19 special election stirred turmoil in Washington, catapulted Brown into the national spotlight, and spawned speculation about his political future.
Brown told Gangel his foremost professional priority for the next two years would be to "make sure that we can continue to deliver top rate constituent services and solve problems for the citizens of Massachusetts."
Asked if he supported former Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin for president, Brown said he supported Romney. "Well, I'm going to support Governor Romney, and I'm going to see who's out there in the field and then make my decision," he told Gangel.
Colin Reed, a Brown spokesman, said Brown had supported Romney before and "will be with him again if he chooses to run."
The special election filled the seat of long-time Democratic Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
Asked what he thought the liberal senator would have thought of having him in his seat, Brown said, "I hope he would be proud that someone who started from nothing was able to achieve the American Dream."
Brown and other New England Republicans have reemerged as a pivotal political force in the US Senate, able to block bills they don't like while offering the Democrats their best chance of capturing the critical GOP votes needed to approve legislation in the deeply partisan body, the Globe reported this week.
Vicki Kennedy commemorates the one-year anniversary of the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act
WASHINGTON -- For many years before his death, Senator Edward M. Kennedy quietly made weekly visits to an inner-city Washington elementary school, where he would read to young students. Now, his widow, Vicki Kennedy, has taken over the volunteer sessions her husband started.
"His life was all about giving back," Mrs. Kennedy said after speaking Wednesday at a luncheon to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the passage of the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act.
The law, a pointedly bipartisan effort by a deeply divided Congress, provides seed money to encourage volunteer programs for people ranging from kindergarten aged to retired seniors. The program expands AmeriCorps, which is set to grow from 75,000 member to 250,000 members by 2017, and also provides $500 education awards for 6th-12th graders who participate in a Summer of Service.
Kennedy forged the bill with Senator Orrin Hatch, Republican of Utah, in 2008, as the Massachusetts Democrat was battling the brain tumor that took his life last August. President Obama signed the law last April at one of Kennedy's last public appearances.
"Teddy was really a bit embarrassed to have the act named after him," Vicki Kennedy said. "He felt that it was really not about him, not about the Congress, but about the people in the trenches."
In the past year, volunteer applications have grown from 90,000 to 250,000, according to officials at the Corporation for National and Community Service, which administers the law.
"Volunteerism is up. Momentum is strong. And a new vision for service is taking effect," said Patrick Corvington, CEO of the service corporation. "As Senator Kennedy often noted, Americans want to serve. All we have to do is ask," he said.
Obama calls Brown from Air Force One
WASHINGTON -- President Obama called Senator Scott Brown this afternoon to discuss immigration and financial regulatory reform.
Obama made the call from Air Force One, as the president was on his way back to Washington from a fundraising trip to California.
Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton told reporters this afternoon that Obama called to talk about the two issues, but did not elaborate. Brown is opposed to the current financial reform proposal that Democrats have been pushing, and has said he would join a Republican filibuster against it.
Immigration could come up later this year, with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid saying that it would be a focus.
"The senator spoke with the president today regarding immigration," said Gail Gitcho, Brown's communications director. "Senator Brown told the president that he would review any legislation if it came before the Senate, but he believes that the immediate focus should be on fixing the economy and creating jobs."
Brown has opposed driver's licenses and in-state tuition breaks for illegal immigrants, although he has said that reforms should be made to help make the process easier for those seeking citizenship.
As a state senator in 2006, he co-sponsored an amendment aimed at barring companies that hired illegal immigrants from doing business with the state of Massachusetts. Earlier this year, before he won the US Senate special election, he filed legislation that would require the state attorney general to document proof of citizenship when prosecuting wage enforcement cases.
"I welcome legal immigration to this country," Brown said in a press release last year, in response to a state-commissioned report that urged Governor Deval Patrick to push for driver's licenses and in-state tuition for illegal immigrants. "However, we are also a nation of laws and government should not adopt policies that encourage illegal immigration. Providing driver’s licenses and in-state tuition to illegal immigrant families will act as a magnet in drawing more people here in violation of the law and it will impose new costs on taxpayers. Government should strictly enforce the law, not ignore it with a wink and a nod or, even worse, pass laws that condone illegal behavior.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Tsongas brings in $307k in 1st quarter
Tsongas, who is also the incumbent currently facing most competitive re-election bid, raised $307,000 during the first three months of the year.
Representative Richard E. Neal raised $192,900 for his own campaign account, although he also raised $207,500 for his leadership political action committee.Combining the two accounts would make him the most prolific fundraiser in the delegation.
Representative John Olver
Contributions: $124,456
Expenditures: $34,183
Cash on hand: $299,542
Contributions: $7,863
Expenditures: $2,464
Cash on hand: $104,349
Representative Richard E. Neal
Contributions: $192,893
Expenditures: $82,938
Cash on hand: $2,792,544
Contributions: $207,513
Expenditures: $27,625
Cash on hand: $179,888
Contributions: $14,559
Expenditures: $10,262
Cash on hand: $14,246
Representative James McGovern
Contributions: $114,130
Expenditures: $57,986
Cash on hand: $659,526
Contributions: $21,351
Expenditures: $2,938
Cash on hand: $18,412
Representative Barney Frank
Contributions: $303,259
Expenditures $148,517
Cash on hand: $607,062
Contributions: $7,550
Expenditures: $6,826
Cash on hand: $1,962
Contributions: $50,135
Expenditures: $7,850
Cash on hand: $73,285
Contributions: $10,520
Expenditures: $18,562
Cash on hand: $2,695
Representative Niki Tsongas
Contributions: $307,094
Expenditures: $100,355
Cash on hand: $380,660
Contributions: $25,957
Expenditures: $26,176
Cash on hand: $133,396
Sam Meas (Republican challenger)
Contributions: $6,349
Expenditures: $32,198
Cash on hand: -$6,961
Representative John Tierney
Contributions: $62,019
Expenditures: $32,731
Cash on hand: $1,456,537
Contributions: $94,746
Expenditures: $103,651
Cash on hand: $88,487
SEVENTH DISTRICT
Representative Edward J. Markey
Contributions: $197,343
Expenditures: $78,154
Cash on hand: $3,215,415
EIGHTH DISTRICT
Representative Michael Capuano
Contributions: $30,139
Expenditures: $247,646
Cash on hand: $26,471
NINTH DISTRICT
Representative Stephen F. Lynch
Contributions: $20,890
Expenditures: $79,907
Cash on hand: $1,290,295
TENTH DISTRICT
Representative Bill Delahunt (Note: he is not seeking re-election)
Contributions: $4,531
Expenditures: $101,196
Cash on hand: $468,072
Contributions: $122,015
Expenditures: $1,130
Cash on hand: $120,600
Contributions: $151,073
Expenditures: $19,961
Cash on hand: $135,451
Contributions: $10,220
Expenditures: $9,513
Cash on hand: $706
Romney endorses Rubio for US Senate
Stepping into a primary battle that some are labeling a fight for the future of the Republican Party, Mitt Romney has endorsed surging conservative candidate Marco Rubio for US Senate over Florida Governor Charlie Crist, a moderate who entered the race last year as the overwhelming favorite.
"Marco Rubio’s meteoric rise – first to Florida speaker of the house, and now to a candidate for the US Senate – is the embodiment of the American Dream,'' Romney said in announcing the endorsement. "While I respect Governor Crist, Marco Rubio’s proven record of conservative, principled, and idea-driven leadership is what Florida needs now. Marco Rubio will be a reliable spokesman against the Washington culture of higher spending, higher taxes and higher debt.''
Romney's leadership political action committee donated the maximum amount, $5,000, to Rubio's campaign.
The endorsement is a blow to the campaign of Crist, who has tumbled in the polls. A survey released last week showed Rubio's lead over Crist had expanded to 22 percentage points -- 56 to 33 -- among a group of registered Republicans, according to Quinnipiac University researchers who took the poll. In January, Rubio clung to a 47-44 lead.
Crist's waning numbers have prompted some political analysts and GOP insiders to suggest he could drop out of the primary and run as an independent against Rubio and Democratic hopeful US Representative Kendrick Meek. A Quinnipiac poll showed such a move could favor Crist, who would be able to draw on more moderate independent voters. Crist would need to make such a decision by April 30.
At a rally in Tampa yesterday. Romney urged Crist not to follow that path and possibly undercut Rubio's chances. Romney, former Massachusetts governor who ran for the GOP nomination for president in 2008, said that Crist should either stay in the US Senate race as a Republican or step aside and support his opponent. He said he expects "Crist to do the right thing."
GLOBE STAFF
Brown says he would filibuster financial reform
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown said this morning that he would join a Republican filibuster to block a package of financial overhauls from coming to a vote in the Senate, providing GOP allies with further ammunition as they seek to stifle the Democrats’ hoped-for crackdown on Wall Street.
Brown, in his first Sunday morning talk show appearance since being sworn in three months ago, also accused President Obama of playing politics with the issue and said that Democrats were not doing enough to work with the other side of the aisle.
“I think the president's political arm is now taking over this debate,” Brown said during a 13-minute interview on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “And it's unfortunate because I, like many others in my state and throughout the country, want banks to be banks. They don't want them to be casinos. They don't want them to take risky bets on our money.”
Brown also said the bill would harm some Massachusetts companies because the “web” of new investing rules would sweep up insurance firms Liberty Mutual and MassMutual. Without elaborating or explaining where he got the estimate, Brown also claimed the bill would cost 25,000 to 35,000 jobs.
Attacking the legislation as a job-loser in a shaky economy would be a new approach for Republicans, who have been far more focused on portraying the financial overhaul as one that could provide further bailouts to big banks. Brown did not mention that leading attack, which was launched last week by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and has been pilloried by Democrats as “cynical” and “misleading.”
Financial regulatory reform is expected to grip Washington over the next several weeks as Senate Democrats determine whether they should alter their current plan to appease Republicans, or dare them to vote against a plan that is meant to crack down on unpopular Wall Street firms. The House has already passed its bill, which was drafted by Representative Barney Frank of Newton, chairman of the Financial Services Committee.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Biz Markie takes after Rep. Markey
If there's one thing Representative Ed Markey and rapper and one-hit-wonder Biz Markie have in common, it's their shared interest in climate legislation. (If there are two things, it might be a shared interest in climate legislation and names that sound quite similar.)
As the chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, Markey's a leading voice in Congress on climate and environmental issues, co-sponsoring 2009's American Clean Energy and Security Act, and recently declaring April Fuels' Day.
Teaming up with the Alliance for Climate Protection's Repower America campaign just in time for Earth Day, Biz Markie has re-released his iconic 1989 hit, "Just a Friend," with new lyrics on climate change and clean energy that explicitly ask the Senate for a bill.
"So I went to the Senate, asked for real change But when I sprung the question, they acted real strangeAll we need is a clean energy law
But all they're just hearing is 'blah blah blah'"
Those who are moved by these rhymes can submit their own rendition of the new lyrics on YouTube by April 18 and enter it in Repower America's Earth Day remix.
Geithner didn't sway Brown -- yet
By Matt Viser, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown said that his mind was not immediately changed after meeting this morning with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, but there appears to be room to negotiate on a proposal to overhaul the financial system.
“It didn’t change, yet,” Brown said this afternoon. “What I told him is people are hurting, businesses are hurting, and the bill that is being proposed would hurt community and local banks, and would also put more regulation on small businesses. There were certain things that he agreed on, and there are other things that he would take under advisement and let me know.”
Brown appears to be one of the Republican members the White House is targeting who could be convinced to vote for a large overhaul of the financial system.
Geithner met with Brown this morning, and left a message for him later in the afternoon. When asked if he was able to be swayed, Brown said, “I’m waiting to speak to the secretary.”
The Massachusetts Republican, though, has also signed a letter that has been circulating among Republicans saying he opposed the current bill and wanted a more bipartisan effort.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Frank loses top spot in Out Magazine influence rankings
WASHINGTON — US Representative Barney Frank is no longer the most influential gay person in the US, according to rankings released today by Out Magazine.
Frank swapped positions with talk show host Ellen DeGeneres in Out's “Power 50” list, dropping to No. 2 in the magazine's fourth annual rankings.
Awarding DeGeneres top honors, the magazine wrote that “since DeGeneres replaced Paula Abdul as a judge on American Idol in February, millions upon millions of viewers are getting a double dose of the hugely popular talk show host and 12-time Emmy winner. The American Express and CoverGirl pitchwoman’s reach is nearly unparalleled.”
Still, the runner-up spot isn't a bad showing for Frank, whom the magazine described as Washington's highest-ranking gay politician. Noting his bluntness, Out wrote that Frank has “emerged as a rare political creature: a progressive with a visible spine.”
Cable news personalities Anderson Cooper and Rachel Maddow and American Idol star Adam Lambert rounded out the top 5.
The magazine said its rankings were based on a person's ability to influence cultural and social attitudes, as well as political clout, individual wealth and media profile.
Brown to meet with Geithner
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown is meeting today with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, an indication that the Obama administration sees the Massachusetts Republican as someone who could be convinced to vote for the bill.
Brown yesterday said he would vote against the financial overhaul bill that Democrats are currently pushing as a way to curb the practices that contributed to the 2008 economic meltdown.
And while he left open the possibility that he could sign onto a compromise, he had pointed criticism for the administration.
Geithner coming to meet with Brown is also an indication of the administration’s push on the issue. Other likely targets are several New England Republicans, including Judd Gregg, of New Hampshire, and Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, both of Maine.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown could brush up on hockey
WASHINGTON -- Onetime Democratic Senate candidate Martha Coakley may have had some disastrous difficulty remembering who Curt Schilling plays for, but Scott Brown may need to brush up on his hockey knowledge.
The athletic Massachusetts Republican, asked in a Capitol hallway Wednesday afternoon if he was a hockey fan, nodded and responded yes. But when taunted by a reporter about the Bruins’ chances in their opening game tonight against the Sabres, Brown said, “Is that the Washington team?”
The Buffalo team, actually -- third seed in the NHL Eastern Conference and one of Boston’s rivals in the five-member Northeast Division.
In his defense, Brown was still jet-lagged from a trip to Pakistan and Afghanistan. And “Downtown Scotty Brown” is far more of a basketball guy. He played at Tufts, and his daughter plays hoops at Boston College.
Here’s a cheat sheet: The Buffalo Sabres have a better record (45-27-10, compared to the Bruins’ 39-30-13), but Boston beat the Sabres, 3-1, in their last meeting of the season. Further, the Bruins beat the top-ranked Washington Capitols -- in Washington -- Sunday.
Both have stellar goaltenders; the Bruins’ Tuukka Rask has the highest save percentage in the league, the Sabres’ Ryan Miller, the starting goalie for the US Olympic hockey team, is right behind him. Miller has played more games than Rask, which could give him an edge. Both teams have strong penalty-killing units, meaning that the games may hinge on who scores more often in power plays.
The teams face off in Buffalo at 7pm Thursday to begin the best-of-seven series.
Brown opposes current financial bill
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown said this afternoon that he would vote against a financial overhaul bill that Democrats are currently pushing as a way to curb the reckless practices that contributed to the 2008 economic meltdown.
“If it’s the present bill, I can’t support it,” Brown said, in his strongest statement yet on the financial legislation that is expected to grip Washington in the coming weeks. “It’s going to hurt community banks and small banks, it’s going to hurt small businesses. It’s going to be an extra layer of regulation, and it’s clearly being used by the administration to drive a wedge and use it for political fodder, and I think that’s wrong.”
Senator Christopher J. Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and chief author of the proposal, is planning to meet this afternoon with the ranking Republican on the committee, Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama.
Although Brown is opposed to the current bill, the Massachusetts Republican left open the possibility that he could sign on a compromise.
“I want to see when it’s going to come up, how it’s going to come up,” he said. “I’m always open to trying to work something through so it is truly bipartisan.”
Brown, whose vote could be critical as Democrats seek to find a GOP member to avoid a filibuster, assiduously avoided talking about any specifics of the legislation.
When asked what areas he thought should be fixed, he asked a reporter, “Well, what areas do you think should be fixed? I mean, you know, tell me. And then I’ll get a team and go fix it.”
When asked whether he favored a major component of the legislation – one that would create a consumer protection agency – he said, “If we have an area, if you or someone else said this is a real problem area, than let’s fix it. Period. Let’s fix it.”
Several minutes later, he seemed opposed to such an agency, at least somewhat.
“It’s more government, it’s more government regulation at a time when businesses are trying just to pay their bills,” he said. “Is that good? Is that an area we need to fix? If it’s an area we need to fix, then I’m certainly open to it. But I haven’t heard that that’s the biggest thing that’s problematic with it.”
He remains adamantly opposed to the White House approach to the legislation, saying the president is politicizing the plan.
“To take this bill and ram it down people’s throats and try to spot us with commercials and rhetoric is wrong,” Brown said. “We need to solve problems, to get jobs in this country, else we’re going to all have some very serious problems.”
Top Republicans have been arguing that the legislation would allow big banks to be bailed out using taxpayer funds – a claim that Democrats say is a disingenuous distortion.
“Listen, I think we need to stop that mentality of bailing everybody out,” Brown said today.
But when asked if the current legislation does that, he said, “I’m not sure yet. I’m not sure…I’m going to continue to do some research on that.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown's new constituency: pomegranate farmers
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown had a message that worked well for him during his election three months ago: job creation. Now, in the wake of a congressional trip to Afghanistan and Pakistan last week, Brown says the same formula will work in that war-torn region.
“The thing that I found the most fascinating is the one thing that they’re all talking about over there is jobs,” Brown said a press conference this morning. “Jobs, jobs, jobs. Every country, every person, every leader, whether it’s from the top leader in each country all the way down to the regular pomegranate farmer --- they want jobs.”
He returned to the pomegranate farmer several times, later discussing the need to cut back on poppy fields that are being used to produce opium.
“Take for example, you have a pomegranate farmer,” Brown said. “He loads his vehicle up, he toils over his crop, he loads it up in the truck and he sends it off to market. The truck gets blown up. So the farmer’s saying, ‘Gosh. What do I have to do? How am I going to support my family?’ So then the Taliban will come, and say, ‘Listen, plant the poppies, take care of ya, no problem, we’ll get ya to market it, we’ll get you the money.’ There’s a disincentive to do things legally, in my eyes, and be that pomegranate farmer.”
Brown praised work that is being done in Afghanistan to better secure the roads.
“Now,” he said, “that pomegranate farmer is able to in fact put that produce on the truck, get it to market, and get paid.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Markey continues to target chemical in most soaps
WASHINGTON – Representative Edward J. Markey today called on 13 manufacturers to stop using a chemical used in a variety of products -- including half of all hand soaps -- as he suggested that triclosan may be doing more harm than good.
While industry officials insist the chemical is safe in everyday applications, Markey last week released letters from the Food and Drug Administration that said it had concerns over evidence that it can disrupt animal hormones.
The FDA, which is continuing to study the chemical, last week released an advisory that said triclosan, when added to soaps, “provide no more health benefits than plain soap and water.”
“I’m calling on the companies that use this chemical to voluntarily remove it from products marketed specifically for children, consumer soaps, and products that will come into contact with food” Markey, a Malden Democrat and chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee, said today in a statement. “There are simply too many troubling questions about triclosan’s effectiveness and potentially harmful effects, for these products to remain in everyday use.”
Markey sent the letters to the chief executives of several major companies, including Rubbermaid, Colgate-Palmolive, and Procter Gamble.
“Bottom line is this ingredient has been reviewed, regulated, and researched here and around the world,” said Brian Sansoni, spokesman for the Soap and Detergent Association, which represents several of the companies Markey sent letters to. “It’s used safely and effectively, specifically in soaps and hygiene products…Consumers can continue to use these products with confidence.”
Triclosan, as well as its close cousin triclocarban, was originally used by health care professionals as a surgical scrub. But over the last decade, there has been a significant increase in its uses. It is also used in kitchenware, clothes, cotton swabs, and toys. Manufacturers also use it in certain clothing items, such as socks, to fight foul odors.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
McGovern continues to call for troop withdrawal
WASHINGTON – Representative James P. McGovern tomorrow is planning to file legislation that would require President Obama to provide a timetable for withdrawing troops from Afghanistan.
McGovern, a Worcester Democrat, has been a leading voice of opposition to the troop surge in the region. He is joining two others – Senator Russ Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat, and Representative Walter Jones, a North Carolina Republican – in filing the legislation. The trio also sent a letter to Obama four months ago warning that the build-up in troops could harm US efforts against Al Qaeda.
“Rather than engaging in a nation-building effort in Afghanistan, the United States should begin reducing troop levels in Afghanistan and transition to a sustainable counterterrorism policy,” reads the resolution that will be filed tomorrow.
If the bill passes, Obama would have three months to submit a plan “for the safe, orderly, and expeditious redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan, including military and security-related contractors.”
“After 8 long years, the loss of our brave soldiers, and $350 billion in deficit spending, it's long past time to reexamine this strategy and demand accountability,” McGovern said today in a statement. “Rather than nation-building in Afghanistan, we should do some more nation-building here at home. We absolutely need to focus on Al Qaeda and its allies wherever they are, but continuing to occupy Afghanistan in support of a corrupt, incompetent government is not in the national security interests of the United States.”
The resolution is the latest in an attempt by liberal lawmakers to withdraw troops. A House resolution, written by Representative Dennis Kucinich called for the US to remove all troops from Afghanistan by the end of the year, at the latest. The resolution failed last month by a vote of 65-to-356.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Congress has not yet released half of $1.5 billion for Pakistan
Members of Congress have only given a green light for about half of the Obama administration’s $1.5 billion-a-year assistance package to Pakistan, although the rest is expected to be released in the coming weeks after additional information from US and Pakistani officials.
John Kerry, the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Richard Lugar, the ranking Republican, pushed the aid bill through Congress but complained in a letter to the State Department in recent weeks that they had only been given 15 days - and very few details - to approve the administration’s plan for spending the massive amount of funds.
Both Kerry and Lugar put holds on the funds, as did some members of the House.
Kerry’s spokesman Frederick Jones said that Kerry has approved much of the plan.
“SFRC staff has been briefed by the Administration on how most of the funds for Pakistan will be spent for FY2010 (excluding any FY2010 supplemental request for Pakistan),” Jones said in a statement today. “Where we have been briefed, the majority side for Senator Kerry has released our hold on the funds though we plan to still follow up with the Administration on any areas of concern we may have. We hope to finish the remaining briefings in the coming weeks.”
Lugar’s spokesman, Andy Fisher, said he still has a hold “on about half because there are still a number of briefings to go and we are still awaiting more information in that briefing.” House members have similar holds.
“This is not unusual,” Fisher said. “The only thing that is unusual is that this is a big request. It is just more complex to go through all the different aspects of it. It was made clear through the whole process the last couple of years that there would be a real desire on the part of the Congress to have a real understanding of the programmatic and funding issues with Af/Pak assistance generally. Everybody is just being careful to make sure they have a good understanding of what has been occurring.”
Richard Holbrooke, Obama’s special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, has expressed urgency about releasing the funds to cash-strapped Pakistan.
An additional complication for the funds lies in Pakistani politics. Opposition leader Nawaz Sharif, whose allies have criticized the assistance package, could become the ruling party before the funds are spent. The US government plans to give $1.5 billion to Pakistan every year for the next five years, with the possibility of an extension.
On Monday, Pakistani Foreign Minister Makhdoom Shah Mahmood Qureshi, told reporters that Sharif was on board with the aid package and that his input is being sought on the use of the funds, much of which will be spent on large-scale energy and water projects.
“It has to be multiparty,” Qureshi said. “ It has to be a consensus and there is one today.”
At a lunch with reporters on Monday, Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani went out of his way to highlight the fact that Pakistan’s parliament is returning most of the powers of the presidency to the prime minister - his own office - reducing the powers now held by unpopular president Asif Ali Zardari. Gilani said that former military leader Pervez Musharraf, who took power in a coup, inappropriately concentrated powers in the office of the presidency.
McConnell criticizes financial regulation plan
WASHINGTON –Senate Republican leadership appears to be settling on a line of attack for the financial regulation overhaul being pushed by Democrats: attempt to tie it to the unpopular bailout of Wall Street banks.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell this morning criticized a proposal that Senator Christopher J. Dodd, with strong backing from the White House, has been trying to weave through the Senate.
“We cannot allow endless taxpayer-funded bailouts for big Wall Street banks,” McConnell said. “And that’s why we must not pass the financial reform bill that’s about to hit the floor.”
“The American people have been telling us for nearly two years that any solution must do one thing — it must put an end to taxpayer funded bailouts for Wall Street banks,” the Republican leader added. “This bill not only allows for taxpayer-funded bailouts of Wall Street banks; it institutionalizes them.”
The argument is potentially politically treacherous – particularly given that many Republicans, including McConnell, voted for the bank bailouts nearly two years ago when the economy was on the verge of collapse.
That legislation, which allowed the treasury department to purchase up to $700 billion in “troubled assets,” was approved in October 2008 by a 74-to-25 vote in the Senate. There were 34 Republicans who voted for it.
Republicans are planning to meet this week to further hone their message.
The financial overhaul currently being debated would add further oversight to big banks and financial institutions, aiming to prevent another economic collapse by changing the rules on complicated financial tools such as derivatives and credit default swaps.
It would also create a new consumer protection agency to prevent average Americans from getting into trouble with mortgages they can't afford, or credit card applications that are loaded with fine print that no one reads. Banks would have to pay new fees that would go into an account that would be used if a large financial institution begins to fail.
Democrats argue that the new regulations are imperative to preventing another financial collapse.
"This is essential," Diana Farrell, a White House economic adviser, told reporters at a briefing last week. "We cannot take the risk of putting the economy, putting families, putting small businesses, large businesses at that kind of risk again."
"We still have a system that does not provide adequate consumer and investor protections," she added. "Serious flaws in the ways families got their mortgages, got their cars, got their credit card loans, got other kinds of loans...We have to fix that."
Republicans, meanwhile, have suggested that additional regulations may be unnecessary, and will only add to the federal bureaucracy.
“The question is, ‘Do we need to provide some change in the law relative to the financial sector in the economy?’” Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl, an Arizona Republican, said yesterday in an interview. “And, if we do, what do we have to do to make sure we don’t go too far and kill economic recovery in the cradle, so to speak? There’s a delicate balance there.”
A set of financial regulatory changes was approved in December by the House, lead by Representative Barney Frank, a Newton Democrat and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. After bipartisan negotiations bogged down in the Senate Committee on Banking, Dodd released his own proposal. That plan was approved by the committee last month, without a single Republican vote.
Since then, Dodd’s staff has been in discussions with Republicans about a compromise. But regardless, the Connecticut Democrat told reporters yesterday, he is planning to move forward soon.
“We’re going to have a bill up,” Dodd said. “If people come along and what to be a part of the bill, fine. If they don’t, fine. I mean, we’ll do it either way -- do it flat, do it round.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Sen. Brown to 'Face the Nation'
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown is planning to appear this week on “Face the Nation,” the CBS Sunday morning talk show, a further indication of the newly-elected senator’s effort to raise his national profile.
Brown will be interviewed by Bob Schieffer, the second time where the Massachusetts Republican agreed to face the Sunday morning talk show circuit. Just after his special election victory, Brown was interviewed by Barbara Walters for ABC’s “This Week.”
“Face the Nation” airs at 10:30 a.m. on Sunday on WBZ-TV.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown travels to Afghanistan, meets with Karzai
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown is wrapping up his first trip abroad as a freshman senator to Afghanistan, where he met face-to-face with American generals and with President Hamid Karzai.
Brown and four other congressional members met with Karzai for about an hour, in the wake of comments the Afghanistan president made that were heavily critical of the West and suggested he may join the Taliban.
“We held nothing back,” Brown said this afternoon in a conference call. “We were very direct in asking and having answers to every question.”
Brown said he was convinced that Karzai was misquoted in his comments about joining the Taliban.
“My personal opinion is that he was not quoted accurately,” Brown said.
Karazi made the comments in a private meeting with Afghan lawmakers, according to lawmakers who spoke to several news organizations after the meeting, some of whom dismissed the threat as hyperbole.
Senator Thomas R. Carper, a Delaware Democrat and the organizer of the trip, said they urged Karzai to make a prominent public appearance on an American television program such as 60 Minutes to further explain some of his comments.
“I will do it, I will do it,” Karzai told them, according to Carper.
“We had a very frank conversation and I think ultimately a constructive conversation,” Carper said. “We better understood what is weighing on him emotionally” because in his country many regard him as “our puppet” while others see his election as “not legitimate.”
Brown described the meeting as taking “a Jekyll and Hyde approach, good-cop, bad-cop, however you want to say it.” He declined later to say whether he was the good cop or bad cop.
On the trip, Brown and his colleagues also met with General Stanley A. McChrystal, the top military commander in Afghanistan, and Ambassador Karl Eichenberry. Brown also handed out Red Sox caps to soldiers from Massachusetts.
The volatile region was a logical stop for Brown, who is on several key committees that would require firsthand knowledge of the war-torn area.
His assignments include the Homeland Security, Armed Services, and Veterans Affairs committees. Brown, a Republican who is making his first trip abroad since being sworn in two months ago, is a lieutenant colonel in the Massachusetts National Guard and is expected to try to make a mark on military and veterans issues.
The trip was organized by Carper, a senior member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Also on the trip was Senator John Ensign, a Republican from Nevada; Senator Tom Udall, a Democrat from New Mexico; and Representative Rob Wittman, a Virginia Republican.
In the conference call, Ensign said that American troops will likely have to be in the region for about 10 years and it will cost about $10 billion a year to maintain the presence.
“We do need to be honest with the American people: this is not going to be short term,” he said. “We would all like to turn it over to the Afghan people as soon as possible...but the Afghan police force is not going to be up and ready for years.”
Brown, when asked whether he thought troops would be there for 10 years, said, “I don’t know what the time frame is…I think certainly for the next couple of years we’ll be in this tactical, strategic effort.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Frank appearing on Leno tonight
Can't get enough of Barney Frank's dining-room table barbs? Then you're in luck: The Newton Democrat will be on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno” this evening.
Frank is making his second appearance on a Jay Leno taping in the past year – his first was for Leno's short-lived primetime show. Frank is a guest tonight alongside actress Demi Moore and the band Train, and will be on-air between midnight and 12:10 a.m.
Frank said he doesn't know what he and Leno will discuss tonight, but he was flattered to be asked on the show. “It'll be fun,” Frank said. “It's light, and I like kidding around.”
Last September, Frank was Leno's guest via satellite for his “10 questions” segment. Leno — who grew up in Massachusetts — peppered the congressman with questions about what super power he would want and whether he could name the last 10 presidents in 15 seconds. Leno asked him one thing he had said to a president that he wished he could take back, which Frank responded: “Don't worry Mr. Clinton, they don't have the guts to impeach you.”
Will Frank be as funny the second time around with Jay? Here's a highlight reel from his first appearance via MSNBC.
Lynch primary challenger opts out
WASHINGTON – Representative Stephen F. Lynch’s reelection bid may have just gotten much easier.
A top primary challenger to the South Boston Democrat, who was planning to run against Lynch from the left, has opted out of the race.
Harmony Wu, a Needham resident, was heavily critical of Lynch’s vote against the health care plan pushed by President Obama and was considering challenging the South Boston Democrat in the primary on that very issue.
Her potential candidacy had generated excitement among progressive Democrats in the district Lynch has represented since 2001. A campaign website and twitter account had been set up and a Facebook page trying to draft her to run quickly garnered 963 supporters.
“The ability to maintain my family life during the campaign and as a member of Congress has always been an important factor for me, as it has been for so many women seeking and serving in office,” Wu said in a statement this afternoon. “In my case, it prevents me from launching what would be a vigorous campaign and if elected, committing to a life that would require far too much time away from family at this moment in our lives.”
“The support and excitement for my potential candidacy indicates very clearly that it is past time for Mr. Lynch to be held accountable for his decisions as our representative,” she added.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown travels to South Asia on delegation trip
WASHINGTON – Senator Scott Brown has traveled to South Asia on a congressional delegation trip, according to his office.
Brown’s spokeswoman would not get into details about his trip, citing “security reasons,” other than to say other members of congress are on the trip.
It is the first trip abroad for Brown since becoming senator two months ago. Brown sits on the Homeland Security and Armed Services committees.
Tsongas all a-Twitter
WASHINGTON – Representative Niki Tsongas recently joined the ranks of members of Congress trying to broadcast their views 140 characters at a time.
The Lowell Democrat has set up a Twitter account in an attempt to reach residents through the online social networking service. So far she has 41 followers and has posted five times, mostly about health care.
“Thrilled to be at the WH for historic health care bill signing. Long overdue reforms will benefit families across our country,” she wrote two weeks ago under her handle ntsongas.
“I am always looking for new ways to stay in close contact with those that I have the privilege of representing,” Tsongas said in a statement far too long to fit in a 140-character Twitter post. “Twitter offers an innovative way to do just that and I will be using it to provide real time updates on happening in Congress and the Fifth District. I also welcome peoples’ feedback and ideas on my posts.”
She is one of the only members of the Massachusetts House delegation to set up an account.
Representative Edward J. Markey is more prolific than Tsongas, given his head start on the technology. Markey has two accounts – one for his congressional office, and one for his reelection campaign
But anyone looking for some behind-the-scenes details, or a sense of what it’s like to walk in the corridors of power, will be sorely disappointed. Congressional accounts are typically scripted and often typed not by the elected official themselves but by a member of their staff.
Much of it is links to articles or a play-by-play on legislative minutia: “Home Star Markup - Scalise amendment on definition of 'certified workforce' did not pass 8-17,” Markey wrote two weeks ago.
Representative Michael Capuano had a lively account during his campaign for US Senate, but doesn’t have one for his congressional office.
Senator Scott Brown has one of the more active accounts, and has by far the most followers. There are more than 23,000 users following his feed, which is four times more than Senator John Kerry (whose most recent post read: “Truck Day for the Sox - always hits you with nostalgic feeling.”)
Representative Barney Frank does not have a twitter account himself, but there are several unofficial accounts put together for the sole purpose of mocking the Newton Democrat.
“I have now one ambition,” Frank told Politico last year. “To retire before it becomes essential to tweet.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kerry, Lugar scold State Dept. for providing few details on how to spend $1.4 bn in aid to Pakistan
John Kerry, the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had been repeatedly praised by the Obama administration for working so long and hard to bring billions of foreign aid dollars to Pakistan. The effort to increase aid to Pakistan - a key ally in the war in neighboring Afghanistan - began when Joe Biden and Barack Obama were Kerry's colleagues on the committee. But even among close colleagues and friends, disagreements arise. Kerry and Richard Lugar, the Indiana Republican who is the ranking member of the committee, sent this March 5 letter scolding the State Department for giving them only two weeks to look over plans for $1.4 billion in Pakistan - and few details. Since the letter was sent, the State Department has sent a series of officials to get grilled on Capitol Hill about the plan.
Delegation wants more IRS jobs
WASHINGTON – Congressional members once again are mobilizing to try and convince the federal government to pledge to add hundreds more jobs to an IRS facility in Andover.
“We write to encourage you in the strongest terms to fully utilize this state-of-the-art resource by expanding the number of employees at the facility and by taking advantage of the strong workforce already present in the community,” reads the letter, sent today to IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman.
The letter is signed by the 14 Democratic congressional members in Massachusetts and New Hampshire (missing are the two Republicans, Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts and Judd Gregg of New Hampshire).
A spokesman for Representative Niki Tsongas, who coordinated the letter, said Brown declined to sign and Gregg has declined in the past.
The IRS has cut the staff in Andover significantly, in part because paper-processing facilities like the one in Andover are being relied upon less as taxpayers increasingly have been filing their returns electronically.
About 1,200 jobs have been eliminated, leaving the facility with about 2,000 employees. Still, there are plans for a significant renovation of the facility using federal stimulus money.
The federal government in July awarded a $57 million contract to renovate the building, which is scheduled to be completed in 2012.
Congressional members want assurances that the IRS will increase the number of employees once the new facility is built, and they want those who previously lost their jobs are given priority for any new jobs created.
A spokeswoman for the IRS did not immediately return a phone message seeking comment.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Markey declares today 'April Fuels Day'
WASHINGTON – The Obama administration today finalized new fuel standards that will require manufacturers to make more energy-efficient cars by 2016, potentially a key step in cutting emissions and providing momentum for a broader climate change bill.
The new standards require cars to reduce their heat-trapping tailpipe emissions and run at 35 miles-per-gallon starting in 2016, which is about 10 miles higher than current regulations. The measures are projected to save 1.8 billion barrels of oil, as well as an estimated $3,000 for the average family in fuel costs.
“April Fools’ Day is usually reserved for practical jokes,” said US Representative Edward J. Markey, who is chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, and is also quite fond of puns. “But today’s April Fuels Day shows how a practical program can help America’s consumers and national security.”
Markey, a Malden Democrat who had pushed for the new standards, today also released a report by the Government Accountability Office that was supportive of a partnership between two federal agencies – the National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency – that will make it easier to coordinate regulatory changes in car manufacturing.
He also called on Obama to immediately move to make the fuel efficiency standards more aggressive after 2016.
“President Obama should take this success and build on it by extending new, aggressive fuel economy standards past the next half decade,” he said.
The new standards come at a critical time in the debate over climate change. Obama yesterday announced plans to allow new oil and gas drilling off certain US coasts and Senator John Kerry is also working to get a climate change bill through the Senate.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Frank criticizes former Financial Services Committee adviser for taking lobbying position
Representative Barney Frank harshly criticized a former senior adviser on the House Financial Services Committee for taking a lobbying position, adding that as long as he chairs the committee, the former staffer would be barred from contacting it.
Peter Roberson, who played a role in crafting provisions dealing with such derivatives as credit-default swaps as part of the House’s financial regulations legislation, left the committee in February to become vice president of government relations for Intercontinental Exchange Inc.
Intercontinental runs the world’s largest credit-default swap clearinghouse and would be regulated by any rules from a final regulations law. Frank, a Democrat from Newton, shepherded the House version to final passage late last year; the Senate Banking Committee last month passed its version of the overhaul bill along a party-line vote. The full Senate has yet to take up the bill.
“When Mr. Roberson was hired, it never occurred to me that he would jump so quickly from the committee staff to an industry that was being affected by the committee’s legislation,” Frank said in a statement released yesterday.
Ethics rules prevent any lobbyist who had worked for a House committee from contacting that committee for a year.
Frank said that in this case, one year is not long enough.
“Fortunately, examples of staff members doing what Mr. Roberson has done are rare, but even one example is far too much,” Frank said, “and that is why I wanted to make clear I share the unhappiness of people at this, and my intention to prohibit any contact between him and members of the staff for as long as I have any control over the matter.”
Roberson’s role as a lobbyist in a position to help a company influence final legislation angered government watchdog groups.
“This is a classic example of a revolving door abuse,” Craig Holman of the advocacy group Public Citizen told Bloomberg News, which first reported Roberson’s departure. “He will be instrumental for Intercontinental.”
The House bill would for the first time regulate privately traded derivatives, which are a group of complicated financial instruments that helped bring down Lehman Brothers in late 2008, leading to the nation’s worst financial crisis since the Depression. The use of credit-default swaps, a special kind of derivatives serving as insurance on an investment, nearly toppled American International Group, prompting tens of billions of dollars of US money to prop up the firm.
GLOBE STAFF
Mass. tries to keep congressional seats
Massachusetts is on pace to lose one if its 10 congressional seats unless it gains more than 71,000 residents in the 2010 Census.
The Bay State is in direct competition with nine other states trying to maintain its current levels, according to an analysis by the University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute. Others include Washington, Oregon, and Florida.
Civic groups are using the potential political loss as a rallying cry for residents to make sure they complete their census forms.
“It is not good enough for Massachusetts to run with the pack – we need to be aggressive if we are going to ensure a complete count,” said Marc Draisen, executive director of Metropolitan Area Planning Council. “What seems like a bureaucratic exercise will have profound effects on the political power of neighborhoods, and on the funds available to support both the services and infrastructure that are so critical to families and businesses.”
As of today, 53 percent of Massachusetts households have mailed their forms back, according to an MAPC analysis of the census counts. The highest response rate was Westwood (64 percent), while the lowest was Boston (40 percent).
Massachusetts is ahead of some of its competing states in the mail-in rate, tying Oregon and beating Washington (52 percent), Florida (51 percent), and Arizona (50 percent).
The 10-question Census form was mailed in March. If they are not returned by April 19, the federal government will send workers to uncounted homes.
After the Census data is compiled, new districts will be redrawn to reflect the population before the 2012 elections.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Massachusetts man arrested for heckling lawmakers in House gallery
WASHINGTON -- William Gunn is angry about big government, the bailouts, and especially the big health care package President Obama signed earlier this week -- so much so, that the Western Massachusetts resident came all the way to Washington, DC and got himself arrested Sunday night after heckling lawmakers in the House gallery.
Gunn, by the way, works for the town of Palmer and administers federal grants for a living.
“It’s sort of ironic,” said the 48-year-old Gunn, who is scheduled to come back for a court appearance in the nation’s capital next month.
Gunn said he did not regret having made a disturbance in the House chamber and isn’t worried about what his government employer may think of his arrest. “I’m very open about my politics in town,” Gunn said in an interview, adding that he writes occasional opinion piece for local newspapers.
Gunn, who lives in Ware, was arrested with David Sanders of Wilbraham after yelling “kill the bill!” from the visitors gallery into the House chamber on Sunday evening, when the House was enmeshed in a bitter debate over the health care package. The measure was approved just before midnight that night.
The two were charged with obstruction of Congress.
Gunn administers Community Development Block Grants (CDBGs), a federal program meant to spur local economic development.
“Absolutely, it is” a “big government” program, Gunn acknowledged. But “if I lost my job because they didn’t have it any longer, I’d be fine with that,” he said.
Gunn said he hadn’t been involved in politics at all until former President Bush initiated the bank bailout last year. President Obama’s election, the ensuing auto industry bailout and the health care package, aggravated Gunn’s anti-government ire.
“I was just lazy, dumb and happy, sitting at home and letting things take care of themselves,” Gunn said. But after seeing Representative Steven King, Republican of Iowa, encourage Americans to try to defeat the health care package, Gunn said he decided to come to DC and make a last-ditch stand against it.
He visited numerous congressional offices, including that of his own congressman, Representative Richard E. Neal, Democrat of Springfield. Gunn said Neal’s office was closed, but staffers opened it when they realized someone was on the other side of the door. He said they were “polite” but “dismissive,” and that he did not get a chance to speak directly to the lawmaker.
Neal declined to comment about the incident.
King said he was ``confident'' that he remembered Gunn in teh chgamber that evening, but wished Gunn had waited until he got outside to be so vocal.
King praised ``the people who came to Washington,'' but added, ``I just regret that his emotions got ahold of him at that time.'' King added that he plans a media blitz against the health care package in his home state of Iowa during the congressional break.
Gunn criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, for “arrogantly walk through” the crowd of anti-health care demonstrators on Sunday to go to the House chamber. “It’s almost as if she was trying to incite people to do something,” Gunn said, adding that it was “normal protocol” for lawmakers to travel through underground tunnels to the Capitol. In fact, in the warm weather, many lawmakers in both parties make the outdoor walk from their satellite offices to the House and Senate chambers.
Brown offers amendment to kill medical device tax
WASHINGTON—Senator Scott Brown filed an amendment today that would remove the 2.3 percent tax on medical device companies from the Senate reconciliation bill.
Brown, who is co-sponsoring the amendment with Senator Pat Roberts of Kansas, said the proposed tax would kill jobs in Massachusetts, where there are more than 200 medical device companies.
“Placing a tax on medical devices, in my opinion and in their opinion, would dramatically affect jobs — not only in Massachusetts but throughout the country,” Brown said today on the Senate floor. “I hope we will look twice about what we're trying to do here in order to pay for the so-called health care bill.”
It's unlikely that Brown's amendment will pass, as any change made to the Senate reconciliation bill — which the House passed on Sunday to amend the health reform bill President Obama signed into law yesterday — would force the House to re-vote on reconciliation. But Brown's amendment is one of a slew that Republicans have introduced to the reconciliation bill, which the Senate will begin voting on this evening.
Brown, Biden talk health care and basketball
WASHINGTON—Senator Scott Brown and Vice President Joe Biden talked sports and families —along with health care and jobs — during a lunch at the White House today.
Brown said he enjoyed his conversation and meal with the vice president, which took place after Brown followed up on Biden's offer when he swore the senator in last month.
“We talked about the Red Sox, women's basketball, our families,” Brown said. “It was a lot of fun.”
Brown and Biden got into a spat last month after Biden said on “Face the Nation” that the new Massachusetts senator did not understand the military tribunal system — and Brown responded that Biden's comments were “insulting.”
But that issue didn't come up today, Brown said.
“He knows I'm in the military,” Brown said. “He understands obviously I know what I'm talking about when it comes to terrorism and those sorts of things, and there was no conversation about that.”
While eating a grilled chicken salad, Brown said he laid out his problems with the health care bill that passed Sunday. He told the vice president he hoped the administration would now turn its attention to job creation.
“The conversation was very plain English, no inhibitions,” the senator said. “I enjoyed it very much.”
Delahunt: International Violence Against Women Act 'must pass' this session
With health care reform dividing Congress clearly, and sometimes belligerently, along party lines, the quiet re-introduction of the International Violence Against Women Act is the rare nod to bipartisanship.
Sponsors from both sides of the aisle – about 52, and counting – have lined up since the bill’s reintroduction in the House and Senate last month. Senator John Kerry, as well as Senator Susan Collins and Senator Olympia Snowe, both Republicans of Maine, were among those to introduce the bill on the Senate side, while Representative William Delahunt served as a lead sponsor in the House.
In a national teleconference organized by the nonprofit Women Thrive this afternoon, Delahunt emphasized the bill’s importance morally and as a national security priority.
“I consider [IVAWA] a must pass before the end of this congressional session,” said Delahunt.
The legislation is in step with the administration’s approach to integrating women’s rights into foreign policy. In a speech at the United Nations two weeks ago, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the subjugation of women a direct security threat to the United States.
“The suffering and denial of the rights of women and the instability of nations are linked,” Delahunt said, echoing Clinton. “They go hand in hand.”
Special guest, actress Ashley Judd, who is currently pursuing graduate study at Harvard, related her experiences with violence against women in her international relief work.
“I am incredibly proud that members of this Congress have drafted the bill, have gotten so many sponsors, consider it a nonpartisan issue,” said Judd. “I am fully committed to doing what I can to make this bill come to the floor this session and get it passed.”
Frank pushing for administration's plans on Fannie and Freddie
WASHINGTON — US Representative Barney Frank is pressing the Obama administration to explain how it intends to grapple with troubled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, is having Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner testify today to outline the administration's plans for the mortgage giants that the government seized in 2008 — despite Geithner's statements in February the administration wouldn't propose an overhaul until 2011.
“I'm forcing the pace here,” said Frank. “They said, 'Do we have to?' I said, 'yes,' so they're coming.”
Treasury spokeswoman Meg Reilly said the administration has made clear its commitment to reforming Fannie and Freddie and “will continue to provide updates on this issue as we go forward.”
Today's hearing is the first that Frank is holding to decide the best way to reform Fannie and Freddie, which Frank said he planned to abolish in their current form. Fixing the housing market is going to be one of the major issues his committee tackles this year, the Newton Democrat said.
But fixing Fannie and Freddie, which own or guarantee about half the country's mortgages, is a complicated subject, both politically and economically.
Everyone agrees that the current system Fannie and Freddie operate in must be reformed, as the government has already poured $125 billion into the mortgage giants to keep them afloat. But since the financial collapse, they have become nearly the only entities backing mortgages, so changes to the market that negatively affect the companies could have disastrous effects.
Republicans have hounded Democrats for ignoring Fannie and Freddie, and keeping their debt off the government budget. New Jersey Republican Scott Garrett introduced a bill that would require the administration to place $1.6 trillion in Fannie and Freddie debt onto the budget, and Texas Republican Jeb Hensarling introduced a bill last week that would eventually privatize the companies.
Frank said he didn't anticipate producing legislation before the end of the year, and did not want to discuss specific proposals until he heard from a wide range of groups in hearings. “It's a difficult issue to deal with,” he said, “so that's why my timetable was as soon as we got financial reform done, this is the next big issue under jurisdiction of my committee.”
Brown not ready to repeal health care yet
WASHINGTON – As Republicans are mounting plans to repeal the health care legislation -- and girding for battle in the Senate over a series of changes -- Senator Scott Brown is so far not immediately jumping on the bandwagon despite his well-established opposition to President Obama's health care overhaul.
Instead, Brown is keeping his options open in the wake of a Republican defeat, saying he wants time to study the bills and was noncommittal over whether he would vote against it.
When asked today if it was possible that he would vote for the so-called reconciliation package that the Senate will debate this week, Brown said, "I haven't read it yet. I want to be able to read it first."
The legislation was released on Thursday and has been virtually the only topic anyone in Congress has talked about for weeks.
Brown also said initially that he is not yet ready to join some of his Republican colleagues in an effort to repeal the health care bill that President Obama will sign today.
"I think that's a little premature," he said, when asked whether he would try to repeal the legislation. "I want to see what's going to be in play." A spokeswoman for Brown later said, "Brown believes that there should absolutely be an opportunity to repeal it."
Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina is already planning to file legislation to repeal the law, and Senator John McCain of Arizona sent out a plea to supporters today saying, "I assure you I am not quitting our fight. I believe we must repeal this bill immediately." Republican representatives Michele Bachmann, of Minnesota, and Steve King, of Iowa, both sent out messages on Twitter saying they planned to fight to repeal it.
"This bill is so deeply unpopular that the voters in the most liberal state in the country just elected a Republican to the Senate for the first time in nearly four decades in order to stop it," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said today on the Senate floor. "Democrats want to pretend this didn't happen…Well, they're living in a fantasy. And, today that fantasy becomes even more absurd."
While Brown may simply be trying to keep his options open ahead of a tumultuous week in Washington, his soft rhetoric is striking given that he campaigned so aggressively against the new law during his special election.
Brown's rheotric was sharper during an apperance on WEEI-AM, where he encouraged listeners to call their senators to complain, predicted that attorneys general would challenge the constitutionality of the bill, and aruged that it would hurt Massachusetts.
“This bill will clearly hurt our jobs,” Brown said on the radio show. “And we will lose a lot of jobs here in Massachusetts. We will have lesser coverage, and longer lines. And I just don’t know how we’re going to pay for all this.”
Brown made the remarks to the Globe at the Boston Fish Pier, after he and other lawmakers attended a meeting with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration chief Jane Lubchenco.
"I have to see what they're proposing," Brown said, when asked if he would fight it in the Senate. "I'm heading back to get briefed. I think everyone is fighting fiercely, and I'm going to fight fiercely for jobs in Massachusetts, and the medical device companies. We're talking about 22,000 jobs that could be severely affected in Massachusetts."
He then got into a rented red Chrysler Sebring (the truck, he said, was in Washington). Aides later said the comments did not represent a shift, saying he remained opposed to the health care plan but simply wanted to review the legislation.
"Senator Brown has been very clear that he opposes the trillion dollars in spending, the billions of dollars in tax increases and enormous financial burden it will put on Massachusetts businesses," Brown's communications director, Gail Gitcho, said in a statement. "Plain and simple, this bill will hurt jobs and the economy in the Commonwealth and Senator Brown believes that there should absolutely be an opportunity to repeal it."
The debate this week could also be an early test of the relationship between Brown and the state's senior senator, John Kerry.
Kerry is among those who signed a letter that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid delivered to House Democrats over the weekend, pledging to pass the fixes that the House wanted. That process could get messy, and Kerry's commitment could play an important role.
"Let's get the job done," Kerry said today at Fish Pier. "I believe this is an historic, critical moment for our country. We are now about to be no longer the only developed nation in the world that doesn't help provide affordable access and insurance to all of our citizens. We're doing so in a way that reduces the deficit, that will strengthen the Massachusetts system. No one in Massachusetts who receives healthcare today is going to be forced to do something different."
Kerry also said there has been an "enormous amount of misinformation and distortion," and that he planned to come back with the Democratic delegation to "present why this bill is good, and what we believe it does."
"I'm convinced it's good for Massachusetts and for this country," he said.
Romney denounces health plan, process
Mitt Romney took a moment his book tour to lambaste the new health care law, calling for a repeal and characterizing President Obama as an abuser of power and purveyor of fraudulent claims.
"President Obama has betrayed his oath to the nation — rather than bringing us together, ushering in a new kind of politics, and rising above raw partisanship, he has succumbed to the lowest denominator of incumbent power: justifying the means by extolling the ends. He promised better; we deserved better,'' Romney wrote in a statement on the website of his political action committee, Free and Strong America.
The former Massachusetts governor has been criss-crossing the country and doing a series of interviews on his recently released book, "No Apology,'' which premiered Sunday atop The New York Times' best-seller list for non-fiction books. Romney had actively supported and signed the 2006 bill that greatly expanded availability of health care in the Bay State. Many analysts have pointed to the Massachusetts plan as a model for Obama's and the Democrats' national package.
Romney disagreed.
"His health care bill is unhealthy for America. It raises taxes, slashes the more private side of Medicare, installs price controls, and puts a new federal bureaucracy in charge of health care. It will create a new entitlement even as the ones we already have are bankrupt. For these reasons and more, the act should be repealed. That campaign begins today.''
Romney, who ran for the GOP nomination for president in 2008 and is considered a possible candidate in 2012, did not specify if he would play a role in any repeal campaign. His PAC has been a top fund-raiser for Republican candidates across the nation and he could use his influence to back candidates that support a repeal.
GLOBE STAFF
Frank says Boehner should apologize for ‘punk staffers’ remark
WASHINGTON -- US Representative Barney Frank called on House Minority Leader John Boehner to apologize for a comment about “punk staffers” made at an American Bankers Association Conference yesterday.
While talking about lobbying against the banking bill proposed by Senator Chris Dodd, Boehner said to the audience: “Don’t let those little punk staffers take advantage of you and stand up for yourselves,” MarketWatch reported.
Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said Boehner's comments were an “inaccurate cheap-shot,” and told the minority leader that “ picking on members of the staff is unworthy of you.”
“I don't know what's worse for congressional staff, being tickled by Eric Massa or degraded by John Boehner,” Frank said in an interview with the Globe.
In response to Frank's letter, Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said, “Congressional staff should treat every American citizen with respect. Clearly, he was talking about any staff that don't.”
When asked if he was referring to members of Frank's staff, Steel declined to elaborate.
Frank said that as chairman of the Financial Services Committee, he felt Boehner was attacking his staffers. “If you've got a policy difference with me, come argue with me. But don't belittle the people who can't fight back,” said the Newton Democrat, who has not received a response from Boehner since sending the letter.
Boehner's comments referred to his and the banking industry's opposition to the financial reform bill proposed by Dodd on Monday. With a markup approaching, banking lobbyists are expected to push for changes to weaken the reforms in Dodd's bill, which is the Senate version of Frank's financial overhaul that passed the House in December.
Kirstin Brost, a spokeswoman for Dodd, said in an e-mail that “the insult is obnoxious, but it’s more troubling that the House Republican Leader thinks Wall Street needs to show Congress who’s boss.”
The full text of Frank's letter is after the jump.
FULL ENTRYMarkey report finds cancer treatment regulations may pose public health risk
Under rules set by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, some cancer patients who undergo radioactive iodine treatment are discharged from the hospital too soon -- while they may still pose a radiation risk to others, according to a staff report released by Representative Edward J. Markey today.
Markey, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, prepared the report after the reviewing NRC responses to his inquiry into regulations for patients treated with radionuclides and other materials.
In 1997 the NRC changed its standards such that patients treated with radiation could leave the hospital immediately; these patients, as a result, may expose the public to radiation when they return home or even when they attempt to isolate themselves in hotels to wait out the effects of their treatment.
“This puts the public at risk and places an unfair burden on cancer patients already battling a disease, all because the medical community felt that keeping these patients in the hospital while they recovered would cost too much,” Markey said in a statement.
The report recommends that the NRC ensure its regulations are consistent with International Commission on Radiological Protection, and to make hospitalization mandatory for patients who don’t fall within those limits.
“I call upon the NRC to immediately reverse its actions and stop gambling with public health and safety -- and if it won’t, I will introduce legislation that will direct it to do so,” Markey said.
Lynch will vote against President Obama's health care overhaul
WASHINGTON – Despite pressure from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats, Representative Stephen F. Lynch of South Boston said today that he will vote against President Obama’s health care overhaul when it comes to the House floor, contending that it doesn’t put enough pressure on insurance companies to reduce costs.
The move is a switch for Lynch, who voted in favor of the House health care bill in November. But he said the current version, which was approved by the Senate, is not as strong as that measure. Lynch’s decision makes passing health care more difficult for House leaders, who are trying to get commitments to vote yes from 216 representatives.
“We’ve paid the ransom, but at the end of the day the insurance companies are still holding the hostages,” Lynch said in an interview with the Globe early this afternoon. “This is a very good bill for insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies. It might be good for Nebraska, I don’t know. Or Florida residents…But it’s not good for the average American, and it’s not good for my district. Or for Massachusetts.”
He said he opposes the so-called Cadillac tax the Senate adopted that would put a surcharge on expensive health insurance plans, and he is also disappointed that the final bill doesn’t include proposals to allow states to adopt a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers.
“The insurers still rule,” he said. “Were just pumping subsidies into the current system, but that won’t drive down costs.”
Pressure on him is coming from the White House, House leadership, and members of the Massachusetts delegation, but Lynch said he didn’t see a scenario where he could support the bill.
Lynch is going to the White House this afternoon to hear a plea from President Obama. Vicki Kennedy has also spoken to him.
Lynch downplayed any notion that Obama’s presidency could be irreparably damaged if his signature health care reform package is defeated.
“This will not sink his presidency,” he said. “That fear is overstated.”
He also deflected questions about his political future and whether he is seeking to appease angry voters as a way of setting himself up for a run in 2012 against Republican Senator Scott Brown, who won his office with a steady assault on the Democrats’ health care plans. “These are questions for another day,” he said. “We have a lot of road to travel.”
A second Massachusetts lawmaker, Representative Michael Capuano of Somerville, said he remains undecided. “I want to vote YES, but I am still not certain that this SPECIFIC bill deserves my support,” Capuano said yesterday in an email to supporters.
Lynch had counted himself earlier this week as undecided. He said he decided to vote no within the last several days. He said he is also opposed to the parliamentary procedures Democrats plan to use. Because their numbers in the Senate have diminished, they are planning to pass changes through a budget reconciliation process, which restricts the types of changes that can be made to ones that have a budgetary impact.
"I agree with Congressman Lynch, and I was pleased to hear that he will vote against this health care bill that is bad for Massachusetts," US Senator Scott Brown said in a statement.
“There doesn’t appear to be any way to put reform into this bill,” Lynch said. “It’s a very poor bill.”
Lynch also criticized the procedure Democrats are considering using to pass the legislation – by “deeming” the Senate bill approved, instead of voting directly on the Senate bill itself. Repeating a comment reported by the Boston Herald today, he called the procedure “disingenuous.” Echoing Republican complaints, he also said it “may be unconstitutional” because it wouldn’t involve an up-or-down vote on legislation.
“It’s a stretch,” he said. “I think it hurts our credibility to try to pull a prank like that. We should stand up and tell voters where we stand.”
Nonetheless, Lynch predicted it would pass.
“I think the president and speaker Pelosi are fairly persuasive,” he said. “They wouldn’t call on a vote unless they had the votes.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown's picks for NCAA tourney teams
WASHINGTON -- President Obama released his NCAA brackets today, picking Kansas over Kentucky in the final. But US Senator Scott Brown provided his own brackets to the Globe and, like his political persuasion, he went a different way: Kentucky over Kansas.
In Brown's Final Four, he also has Syracuse and Duke -- meaning he picked all number one seeds to advance to Indianapolis, which in some circles is seen as the easy way out in bracketology (he doesn't predict any major upsets, and has all 1 and 2 seeds in the Elite Eight).
Obama has Kansas State and Villanova joining Kentucky and Kansas in his Final Four. Last year, the president picked the winning team: North Carolina.
Brown and Obama also filled out brackets for the women's tournament, and they picked the exact same Final Four. Both predict Connecticut will beat Stanford in the championship (and Tennessee and Notre Dame making the Final Four)
Brown, whose nickname when he played at Tufts University was "Downtown Scotty Brown" because of the number of jump shots he took, has been eager to play Obama on the court. They have not yet worked out a date, but Brown has brought it up multiple times.
Brown also did another gesture recently to get in Obama's good graces (even as he chastised his approach on health care): He sent a basketball to the White House signed by the women's team at Boston College, where Brown's daughter Ayla plays.
Check out Brown's brackets for the Men's and Women's tourneys here.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Phone lines in Congress jammed from health care calls
WASHINGTON -- Trying to call your congressman? Good luck not getting a busy signal.
The Globe made a round of calls to the 12 Massachusetts congressional offices in Washington before 4 p.m. today, and half of them did not go through. Of the six that were successful the first time, half of those offices also had a busy signal on a follow-up call.
The reason: health care. With Congress making its final push toward passing health reform, calls are pouring in to congressional offices urging members to either pass or kill the legislation.
“It's been on all sides: 'It goes too far.' 'It doesn't go far enough,'” said Michael Mershon, press secretary to US Representative James McGovern, who the Globe successfully reached by phone.
McGovern, a Worcester Democrat, is getting more calls because he's on the House Rules Committee, Mershon said. “Some people are calling all Massachusetts representatives, and some people are calling from all over the country.”
Activists and leaders on the right have helped push the phone-call avalanche, including Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh. Palin tweeted: “Phones ringing nonstop in DC; Keep it up! Contact Congress tell them NO to Slaughter Rule. Start over w/real healthcare & follow r Constitution.”
Markey wants to move 'from iPhones to iFridges'
WASHINGTON – US Representative Edward J. Markey has filed a bill to advance a far-reaching new Federal Communications Commission report that aims to spread broadband access to broad swaths of the country.
Markey’s legislation, called the Electricity Consumers’ Right to Know Act (or e-KNOW), would allow consumers to track their use of electricity for free and in real time by being connected to data from utility companies using mobile devices. That technology would only be useful, though, if broadband access becomes more widespread.
It could mean allowing consumers to turn off an air conditioner from work, or turn the heat on during the commute home.
“We really have to move conceptually from iPhones to iFridges,” Markey said in an interview. “That is the next step in the energy and electricity sector.”
The idea is to cut down on energy consumption by more easily showing people how much they are using and where.
“It will be like people who now look at their dashboard in their Prius or Camry Hybrid can monitor how many miles per gallon they are able to move on any one particular trip,” Markey said. “If they want, they’ll be able to access all of the information about how every appliance in their home – including air conditioning and heating – in real time, all day long.”
The FCC released the 376-page plan yesterday. The overarching goal is to make broadband, which enables high-speed internet access, available to more Americans. Some of the recommendations include expanding mobile broadband, which would help police and fire department stay better connected.
The FCC can make some of the changes without any congressional action, but many of the proposals will need supportive lawmakers to help shepherd legislation through.
Markey is one of the more likely to take up the cause, and he argues that broadband access is one of the key indictors for economic growth.
“We need a new plan. We need to think through what is the best way to insure that the United States -- and greater Boston – is a disproportionate beneficiary of broadband technology and its application,” Markey said. “We need to reboot the high-tech sector of our country by insuring that we have the highest speed, most affordable, ubiquitous broadband in the world.”
Markey was the congressman who put the mandate for the FCC to complete the broadband plan into the federal stimulus legislation that Congress passed last year.
Markey has long been a leading proponent of the national broadband movement and is a senior member and former chairman of the Energy and Commerce Communications, Technology and the Internet Subcommittee.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Kucinich provides key vote for Democrats on health care bill
WASHINGTON – US Representative Dennis Kucinich announced this morning that he would support the health care bill, potentially providing Democrats with a key vote as President Obama’s top domestic issues heads toward a potential final vote.
Kucinich, an Ohio Democrat, had opposed the health care bill the first time around because he didn’t think it went far enough, and he is the first of the 39 Democrats who voted against the previous legislation to announce that he is supporting the current iteration. Democrats will continue to focus on flipping the votes of moderate Democrats who voted no the first time, in an effort to cobble together the 216 votes needed for it to pass.
“Well, if I can vote for this bill, there’s not many people who shouldn’t be able to support it,” Kucinich told a packed room this morning at the Capitol.
Kucinich cast the issue in lofty terms, comparing it to the Civil Rights movement and saying nothing less than the presidency at stake.
“We have to be very careful that the potential of President Obama’s presidency not be destroyed by this debate,” he said at the end of a 26-minute press conference.
Kucinich had four meetings with the president on the legislation, the most recent aboard Air Force One on Monday as Obama traveled to Kucinich’s Cleveland area district to deliver a speech on health care.
But Kucinich, who vied with Obama for the 2008 presidential Democratic nomination, has been a frequent critic of the president, particularly on health care. While he said he would not retract any of his criticisms – and said several times that the bill was not one that he liked – he said there was enough in it for him to support. And if the Democrats didn’t move forward, it would stymie many other aspects of their agenda.
“This is a defining moment,” he said. “If we stay riveted on this health care debate and don’t get out of it at all, we’ve actually created a prison here of our own making. And I don’t want to be a part of that.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Administration identifies potential recipients of civilian assistance in Pakistan
The $7.5 billion that the US government has pledged to spend on civilian assistance in Pakistan over the next five years is slowly making its way to the troubled country, after months of debate over how the money should be spent and how to ensure that it is properly used.
At a hearing called by Rep. John Tierney, a Salem Democrat who chairs the House Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, administration officials reported that about 20 Pakistani organizations and government agencies have been screened by accountants as potential recipients of the funds. About 50 more organizations are expected to be declared eligible in the coming months.
The organizations that have already been screened include the Higher Education Council, the government of the North West Frontier Province, the Benazir Bhutto Support Fund and the FATA Secretariat, according to Dan Feldman, Deputy Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan.
But Tierney and others expressed concern that the checks on corruption and mismanagement may still be too weak in Pakistan to handle the influx of US cash.
“We must make certain the administration’s new strategy will not send more money through weaker systems – systems that lack the internal controls developed with time and experience,” Tierney said in his opening statement, although he made clear that he supports the aid. Tierney has previously complained that huge amounts of US aid to Pakistani military could not be accounted for.
Vermont Democrat Peter Welch echoed Tierney’s concerns.
“If there is not a mechanism that is solid, we are going to have Iraq all over again,” he said.
But attempts to mandate accountability for the funds have drawn a strong reaction from Pakistanis. Language in the bill caused a firestorm in the fall when some Pakistani institutions, particularly the military, took issue with what they claimed were provisions that eroded Pakistan’s sovereignty.
The aid, which is known in Pakistan as the “Kerry-Lugar” funds, after Massachusetts Senator John Kerry and Indiana Senator Richard Lugar who sponsored the bill, will make Pakistan among the top recipients of US economic aid. The $1.5 billion that Pakistan is authorized to receive annually in nonmilitary aid is about half of what Afghanistan is slated to receive this year, but more than the estimated $1 billion that the State Department expects to spend on aid to Iraq in 2010.
But spending the money effectively is a huge challenge, especially in the fiercely independent Federally-Administered Tribal Areas, where Pakistan’s government has made few inroads. In 2007, the Bush administration announced that it would spend $750 million in FATA, but so far, only $220 million of that money has been spent, James Bever, USAID Afghanistan Pakistan Task Force Director, told Tierney today after the hearing.
Gregg named to bipartisan presidential commission on national debt
WASHINGTON - Judd Gregg, the New Hampshire Republican who last year briefly was President Obama's nominee for Commerce Secretary, has long since become one of the president's harshest critics. Now he has a new job that will let him give him an even greater megaphone to say how poorly he thinks Obama is handling the nation's growing debt.
Gregg was named yesterday by his party to be one of three Republicans to serve on a bipartisan presidential commission that is supposed to come with ways to reduce the nation's cumulative $12.5 trillion debt. Gregg has said the growing annual deficit "will bankrupt our children and our children's children."
Obama has said that he agrees the deficit must be cut significantly, but he has stressed that the problem began under a Republican administration. The deficit has grown due to factors such as reduced government revenues during the recession, growth in entitlement programs, and spending on stimulus programs and bailouts that were designed to prevent the recession from turning into a depression.
Gregg last year proposed a bipartisan task force that would have had more teeth. But that proposal was rejected this year when some of the original Republican sponsors backed away from it, partly due to concern that it would pave the way for tax increases. Instead, Obama created his own task force and asked congressional leaders to appoint members to it. The commission will make non-binding recommendations to the president.
“Although I have reservations about the viability of this effort, the President’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform is the only game in town," Gregg said yesterday in a statement. He warned that without action, the United States would soon face a fiscal crisis similar to that now being experienced by Greece, which is considering massive cuts to its budget.
The other commission members from the Senate are Republican Mike Crapo of Idaho and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, and Democrats Dick Durbin of Illinois, Max Baucus of Montana and Kent Conrad of North Dakota. Obama appointed former Republican Senator Alan Simpson of Wyoming and former Clinton White House chief of staff Erskine Bowles as co-chairs. House members and congressional leaders will also be included.
The panel is expected to make its recommendation in December, which the White House hopes will take the volatile issue off the table during the November midterm elections. Gregg, whose term expires this year, is not seeking re-election.
Michael Kranish can be reached at kranish@globe.com
Brown to deliver GOP weekly response
WASHINGTON -- US Senator Scott Brown will deliver the response to President Obama’s weekly address tomorrow, a further sign of his rapid rise within the Republican Party.
Both addresses are likely to focus on health care at a key time, when the issue appears to be heading down the final stretch on Capitol Hill and both parties are making some of their closing arguments.
Earlier this week, Brown railed against the Democrats’ health care plan, criticizing them for considering using a budgetary reconciliation process to approve the overhaul. That process would require a majority vote instead of the 60 needed to overcome the expected Republican filibusters.
“I was sent here in a message almost, to the administration and people up on Capitol Hill that the American people expect us to do better,” Brown told a conference of the National Association of Health Underwriters on Tuesday. “You’re going to basically ram through something that is really unpopular and is clearly not good for the people in my state.”
Obama delivers the weekly address each Saturday, and the Republican leadership chooses someone to provide the response. Brown has taken an usually public role for a newly-elected US Senator, already campaigning in Arizona for US Senator John McCain in the former 2008 presidential nominee’s bid for a fifth term.
Aides say Brown’s address will also include some of his legislative priorities, such as jobs and the economy.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown lands HarperCollins for memoir
US Senator Scott Brown will release his memoirs in early 2011 and they will be published by HarperCollins, his new publisher announced this morning.
The terms of the deal were not disclosed, but Brown will soon have to file details about it with the Senate Ethics Committee. In the book, he is planning to write about his family, early career, and his surprising special election victory in Massachusetts.
"Scott Brown’s remarkable rise to the US Senate is merely one part of a life spent fighting for the values he believes in,” Jonathan Burnham, Harper’s senior vice president and publisher, said in a statement. “His own story is one of extraordinary courage, persistence, and hope – it is full of surprises and will make for a vitally important book that will inspire others to follow Senator Brown’s footsteps.”
Brown’s agent in the deal was Robert Barnett, a Washington attorney whose high-powered clients include President Obama and former president Bill Clinton, among other luminaries.
“I am humbled to have the opportunity to share my personal story in hopes to inform, encourage and inspire others,” Brown said this morning in a statement.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
70 percent of Mass. voters approve of Brown's performance
US Senator Scott Brown has just over a month in office under his belt and just a handful of significant votes in his pocket. So far, so good, says a healthy majority of Massachusetts voters, according to Rasmussen.
Rasmussen’s latest telephone survey of likely voters shows that 70 percent approve of Brown’s performance since he was sworn-in February 4, which includes 30 percent of those who “Strongly approve.”
These high marks come not long after Brown spurred a backlash with his vote in support of a $15 billion Democratic jobs bill in late February, when he and four other Republicans, including Senator Olympia Snowe and Senator Susan Collins, both of Maine, broke ranks to end debate on the bill and prevent a filibuster. The five were joined by 13 other Republicans in the final vote on the bill, which passed 70-28.
Rasmussen reports 26 percent who disapprove of Brown’s performance, which includes 11 percent who “Strongly disapprove.”
Fifty-eight percent say that the Kennedy dynasty is over in Massachusetts; 21 percent disagree, and 20 percent are not sure.
See Rasmussen's set of questions and responses here.
Brown: health care 'wrong'
WASHINGTON – US Senator Scott Brown this morning railed against the Democrats’ health care plan, saying they were failing to learn the lessons from his own surprising election in Massachusetts.
“I was sent here in a message almost, to the administration and people up on Capitol Hill that the American people expect us to do better,” Brown told a conference of the National Association of Health Underwriters. “You’re going to basically ram through something that is really unpopular and is clearly not good for the people in my state.”
Brown, in his most extensive public comments on health care since arriving in Washington, also criticized Democrats for considering using the budgetary reconciliation process to approve the health care overhaul. That process would require a majority vote instead of the 60 needed to overcome the expected Republican filibusters.
“Right now the health care plan they’re pushing -- in particular and the way they’re trying to do it -- is wrong,” Brown said during an 8-minute address, saying if reconciliation was used it would “be problematic for the next few years.” “We can do better. The administration can do better. And they say we have to do it now. With all due respect, what we need to do now is create jobs.”
“As I speak to people all across this country, they’re not really talking about health care,” he said. “…Enough of the backroom deals, enough of the parliamentary maneuvers. Enough, enough, enough. We need to focus on jobs, jobs, jobs.”
Brown said he believes that everyone should have health care, but it should be accomplished on individual state levels.
“Of course everybody deserves health care, a basic kind of health care. But why is there a one-size fits all for every single state in the country. We do it one way, Texas may do it another way, Oklahoma may do it another way. Why do we need this total domination of the government interference into our states? I’m a strong state’s rights believer.”
In a brief interview after the speech, Brown said there weren’t any components from the health care bill that was salvageable.
“What they’re trying to do is push something that really has no support,” he said. “When you have something that is clearly not done in an open manner, I don’t see how you push it through right now. I just don’t.”
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
For some, it's where Brown isn't
PHOENIX – In politics, you never know when controversy could come up.
US Senator Scott Brown’s appearance here with John McCain drew wild cheers in a basketball gymnasium. But in another part of the country it seems to be drawing some jeers – that he’s not in a different basketball gymnasium.
The Greensboro News & Record noted today that Brown is out campaigning in Arizona while his daughter is playing there in the ACC tournament.
“If my kid were playing in her final ACC tournament, I wouldn't miss it for anything,” writes Doug Clark of the News & Record. “But what do I know about politics?”
Brown, a doting dad, has been a frequent appearance on the sidelines at Boston College games, where his daughter Ayla plays. But his new schedule hasn’t allowed him to attend all the games that he used to (though Brown and his wife, WCVB-TV reporter Gail Huff, drove down to Virginia Tech last week to watch Ayla play; and Huff was at last night’s game in Greensboro).
“When I scheduled it, I scheduled it obviously not knowing when the ACC tournament was,” Brown said this afternoon in an interview. “I’d love to be there, but I get the tweets and the texts, and everyone keeps me informed. Spoke to her this morning, gave her a pep talk, obviously said I wish I could be there…She understands that I have a new role.”
“Listen. I’m the luckiest guy in the world. I have two great kids,” he said. “Just to play a role in their lives and know that they’re thinking of me and I’m thinking of them, that has value. Would I like to be there? Of course. But I’m also very honored to be here with a guy that I have just great respect for.”
What could make it worse, though, is if Boston College beats Florida State tonight, putting them in the semi-finals tomorrow. Around the time, Brown and McCain are planning to be in Tucson watching the University of Arizona Wildcats play the University of Southern California.
Brown may yet find a way to combine basketball and politics: he's been trying to secure a basketball game with President Obama -- Brown and his daughter, against the president and anyone of his choice.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Mass. Democratic Party Chairman thanks Delahunt for service
Massachusetts Democratic Party Chairman John Walsh released this statement on Congressman Delahunt’s announcement that he will not seek re-election:
“Since 1973 Bill Delahunt has served the people of Massachusetts with honor and distinction. As a State Representative from Quincy, as District Attorney from Norfolk County and, most recently as the Congressman from the 10th Congressional District, his commitment to the people he represents is unparalleled. As a member of Congress, Bill Delahunt has been committed to the best values of the Democratic Party. He has served on important committees where he fought for the people of Massachusetts and he has been an important voice to build relations for our nation around the world.“I have been personally proud to call Bill Delahunt MY congressman and I speak for all Massachusetts Democrats when I thank him for his service. There is much work to do over the next 10 months and we know Congressman Delahunt will never let up, but we wish him well as he makes this important announcement and looks forward to future challenges.”
Brown stumps for McCain in Grand Canyon State
PHOENIX – US Senator Scott Brown, driving past palm trees and American flags, brought his political star power to Arizona today to stump for the 2008 GOP standard-bearer, John McCain.
Brown received several standing ovations and loud applause from a group of Republicans who hailed his surprise victory in Massachusetts. Brown mostly shrugged and smiled.
“I’m honored to be in Antelope Country!” Brown told a crowd of about 1,500 at the Grand Canyon University gymnasium. “Wow. This is great. If you told me five months ago I would be standing here, I would have never believed you.”
McCain is locked in one of his toughest reelection fights of his career, and was hoping Brown could bolster his conservative credentials. McCain’s chief opponent in the Republican primary, former congressman and talk radio personality J.D. Hayworth, has been criticizing McCain as too liberal for Arizona.
Both Brown and McCain railed against President Obama’s health care plan, and the possibility that Congressional Democrats will attempt to pass it through a reconciliation budget process.
“Scott and I just returned form trying to do the Lord’s work in the house of Satan,” McCain told the crowd. McCain called the plan “Chicago-style sausage making,” and said, “We’re going to fight, and fight, and fight.” Brown accused the Democrats of engaging in “political chicanery and parliamentary maneuvers.”
“It’s going to affect the way we get health care, no only in my home state, but across the country,” Brown said.
FULL ENTRYCook Political Report: Delahunt's seat is a toss up
WASHINGTON -- The political punditry is already focusing on the Massachusetts Tenth Congressional District with Representative William Delahunt’s announcement today that he is retiring.
The verdict, at least from the Cook Political Report, one leading evaluator of congressional races around the country: Delahunt’s departure makes the seat a toss up.
The Cook rating points out that the coastal district, stretching from Cape Cod up to the South Shore, is the least Democratic in the state. President Obama won 55 percent of the district’s vote in 2008, but Republican Senator Scott Brown won 60 percent of the vote in his special election upset on Jan. 19.
“Delahunt’s decision to leave doesn’t make this district a lost cause for Democrats by any means, but credible Republicans including former state Treasurer Joe Malone and state Rep. Jeffrey Perry are likely to run, and no Democrat appears capable of clearing a primary field. In a normal year, Democrats would enjoy a considerable advantage in an open seat race in MA-10. But this year, Democrats’ initial advantage isn’t great enough to warrant rating this race more favorably than a Toss Up.”
Brown's victory reverberates in Arizona politics
TUCSON, Ariz. – Scott Brown’s surprising victory in Massachusetts six weeks ago had major impacts from Beacon Hill in Massachusetts to Capitol Hill in Washington.
But the win is still reverberating across the country, as was evident at a gathering a few nights ago here when a local precinct of Republicans gathered for a town hall meeting at an RV park.
“We only need to look at Massachusetts to show us the way,” said former state senator Jonathan Paton, who is running for Congress. He pointed out Brown was a little-known state senator (like him) who successfully went up against the establishment (like he hopes to do).
“That political machine crumbled,” he said from a podium, which had an American flag on one side and on the other a homemade sign that read, “Gov’t healthcare is poison!”
Paton is challenging US Representative Gabrielle Giffords, a Democrat from Tucson, and is hoping that he can ride the wave that Brown helped create.
Still, it didn’t go unnoticed in the crowd that Brown endorsed US Senator John McCain, and will be campaigning with him over the next two days. Many were there to hear J.D. Hayworth, who is running against McCain from the right.
Delahunt votes no on Armenian resolution
WASHINGTON -- The House Foreign Affairs Committee narrowly passed a nonbinding resolution today that calls the World War I-era killings of Armenians in Turkey "genocide" - despite the fact that administration officials warned that such a move would greatly anger Turkey, a key US ally in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
Congressman Bill Delahunt voted against the resolution, in part because of the fear that it will dispute recent reconciliation efforts between Turkey and Armenia.
"We all can appreciate the sensitivity of this, however this is a watershed moment in terms of the potential to affect reconciliation between Armenia and Turkey," he said.
His full statement is below:
Brown delivers first speech on tax relief amendment
Senator Scott Brown made his debut speech on the Senate floor today to introduce his new legislation, the “Immediate Tax Relief for America’s Workers” amendment. The amendment would put $80 billion in unobligated stimulus funds toward cutting payroll taxes.
Watch the video here, or read the full text below.
FULL ENTRYNeal faces uphill battle to become chairman
WASHINGTON — With US Representative Charlie Rangel giving up the gavel as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Springfield Democrat Richard Neal has been discussed as a possible replacement — but his odds are a long shot, according to Democratic staffers.
“Among the people that I've been hearing, I don't hear his name mentioned as frequently as others,” said one Democratic aide.
Four House Democrats have more seniority than Neal on Ways and Means: Pete Stark, Sandy Levin, Jim McDermott and John Lewis. In order for Neal to become chairman, the Democrats would have to break from choosing their chairman based on seniority.
Stark, who is 78 and battling health problems, said today he would accept the position on a temporary basis. After the midterm elections, a permanent successor would be chosen should Rangel not return to his post.
If Neal, who has been considered among potential candidates to take over as chairman, is eventually chosen, Democrats would have to pass over Levin, a 14-term Michigan Democrat, followed by McDermott, of Washington, and Lewis, a Georgia Democrat who like Rangel is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.
A spokesman for Neal declined to comment whether Neal was interested in the chairman position.
One senior Democratic congressman, who asked not to be named discussing internal party negotiations, said that Neal is well liked and could become chairman a few years from now, but he's still considered too young at this time.
Rangel stepped down temporarily as chairman today after the House ethics committee accused Rangel of violating House gift rules.
Brown assigned to Armed Services, Homeland Security, Veterans' Affairs
WASHINGTON – US Senator Scott Brown today scored three key committee assignments that could give him a boost as he seeks defense dollars for Massachusetts and political points for himself: Armed Services, Homeland Security, and Veterans’ Affairs.
For the new Republican senator, it’s a two-out-of-three success rate. He had asked Senate GOP leaders for Armed Services, Homeland Security, and Appropriations. But a coveted seat on appropriations was considered a long-shot. And landing a seat on the Veterans Affairs Committee gives the National Guard member a natural political platform as he looks ahead to a possible re-election bid in 2012.
The Armed Services and Homeland Security posts will put him in position to lobby for federal defense contracts for Massachusetts and New England – a task that was perfected by the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy, who funneled billions of defense dollars to the Bay State. Although Brown is a freshman in the minority party, the region's defense industry has a powerful Washington lobby and strong allies on both sides of the aisle. Homeland Security includes oversight of the Coast Guard.
The full Senate must ratify Brown’s assignments, which were announced this afternoon. The appointments were made by Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.
“As a 30-year member of the National Guard, I am honored to have received these appointments,” Brown said in a press release. “We are currently involved in two wars, and these committees are critical in keeping our country safe, as well as protecting the men and women who defend us.”
Massachusetts High Technology President Christopher R. Anderson released a statement this afternoon lauding the assignments:
"The CEO members of the Mass. High Tech Council and the Defense Technology Initiative congratulate Senator Brown on his prestigious committee appointments. This is terrific news for Massachusetts and New England, particularly for our defense technology sector. It also shows the immediate clout Senator Brown wields on Capitol Hill as the result of his game-changing campaign and pledge to address our nation's challenges in a bipartisan manner. We look forward to working with him in building the regional economy and defense sector."
Obama's health summit shows philosophical differences remain
WASHINGTON – A bipartisan health summit between President Barack Obama and congressional leaders began this morning with sharp disagreements, and that's how it ended. The meeting lasted six-and-a-half hours and at the end, there was no grand compromise, and seemingly no changed minds.
Republican Senator Lamar Alexander started the session by calling on Obama and Democratic leaders to renounce the use of reconciliation – a budget procedure that would allow Democrats to pass a comprehensive health care bill with just 51 votes.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid quickly refused. "Reconciliation isn’t something that’s never been done before," he said, citing Republican use of reconciliation to pass Bush tax cuts. And at the end of the day, Obama, Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi expressed resolve to act on a measure with or without Republican support.
Beyond the intense fight over strategy, the rare and engaging debate also highlighted the deep philosophical differences that remain -- a year after the health care debate began -- over how aggressively the federal government should intervene to expand insurance coverage and fix an insurance system that everyone at the historic meeting agreed is in need of repairs.
As expected, the summit did not live up to its billing as a forum for compromise. But it certainly proved to be riveting political theater, a radical and refreshing departure from business as usual in the capital. Instead of talking to empty legislative chambers on C-SPAN or through carefully crafted media sound bites, the nation’s elected leaders sat eyeball-to-eyeball and held a frank debate over their differences.
Meeting at Blair House, a historic building across Pennsylvania Avenue from the White House, Obama sat at the head of a square conference table, flanked by Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Alexander, Senator John McCain and other Republican senators sat to Obama’s left.
Obama called on participants to focus on areas of overlap in their proposals. But the divide over substance and process immediately dominated.
Alexander called on Democrats to scrap their comprehensive proposals and work with Republicans to pass smaller, less ambitious changes to health insurance markets using a “clean sheet of paper.”
The GOP accused Democrats of disingenuous posturing at the summit because they continued to seek a massive overhaul that Republicans have already rejected. Alexander likened the summit to the “Detroit Auto Show” where Democrats pushed “the same model we saw last year.”
“This is a car that can’t be recalled and fixed and we would like to start over,” Alexander said.
McCain, who is facing a primary challenge from a conservative Republican in his home state of Arizona, launched into an attack on a variety of special political deals packed into in the bill the Senate passed on Christmas Eve, including the so-called “Louisiana Purchase” and Nebraska's “Cornhusker Kickback” – which were generous Medicaid benefits designed to gain support of moderate Democrats from those states.
He also cited a deal Obama’s administration negotiated with the prescription drug industry behind closed doors. Under terms of the deal, which were reported last spring, the White House got an $80 billion commitment from drug companies over 10 years to reduce drug costs for seniors on Medicare. In exchange, the White House agreed to drop efforts to bargain for lower drug prices the government pays under Medicare. It also agreed not to seek importation of lower-cost prescription drugs from Canada.
“People are angry. We promised them change in Washington,” said McCain, who was Obama’s Republican opponent in the 2008 presidential election. Democrats, he said, have treated the public instead to “unsavory dealmaking.”
“John, we’re not campaigning any more. The election is over,” Obama told McCain, urging him to focus on policy, not political talking points that are better suited for split-screen debates on Fox or MSNBC. “My hope is we can focus on the issue of how we get a bill done … We can have a debate about process, or we can have a debate over how we’re going to help the American people.”
Republicans around the table said that Democratic proposals to insure about 30 million Americans who lack coverage require expensive subsidies and too many coverage mandates that drive up premium costs. They said the taxes and Medicare cuts that would be required to pay for $1 trillion overhaul sought by Democrats would hurt many of the middle-class people the program is supposed to help.
Obama responded, however, that minimum coverage requirements are needed to sufficiently protect consumers. And, he said, the assembled politicians in the room benefit from such provisions.
“The federal health insurance program has a minimum benefit that we all take advantage of,” he said.
Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma and a doctor, ticked off a litany of his top priorities, including preventing and managing chronic illness.
Representative Dave Camp, Republican of Michigan, outlined a litany of disagreements Republicans have with the Democratic bills’ approach to dealing with rising health care costs. First, he said, Republicans don’t want a bill that provides large subsidies to help the uninsured afford coverage.
“A lot of Americans say to me, ‘If you are really interested in controlling costs, maybe you shouldn’t be spending $1 trillion on (expanding) health care benefits,” he said.
Camp said a key element to cost control that is missing from the House and Senate bills is medical malpractice reform -- discouraging people from filing frivolous lawsuits against doctors, which encourage physicians to practice “defensive” medicine by prescribing tests that are probably unnecessary just to protect themselves from liability.
Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana, insisted the parties weren’t so far apart. He noted that setting up exchanges -- like the Massachusetts Health Insurance Connector Authority -- was a Republican idea.
But Republicans responded that the problem is with the way Democrats have constructed the exchanges -- the rules, they say, are too strict, requiring insurers to cover more than the basics, forcing premiums to go up. Representative Paul Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin, said the GOP would rather let business associations pool members independently -- with government leaving it up to them to find the best products for their members.
“We don’t think the answers lie in Washington regulating all of this,” he said.
But Obama said Democrats want to set national ground rules for what insurance policies should cover. He outlined the Democratic objection to Republicans’ call to let insurance carriers sell insurance across state lines. The fear, he said, is that insurers will go to the least restrictive, least regulated state and race to cherry-pick the healthiest people from all the states with offers of cheap coverage, leaving sick people in ever more costly plans.
“If you set a baseline, you can have interstate competition, but it’s not a race to the bottom,” the president said.
Christopher Rowland can be reached at crowland@globe.com
Health summit draws protesters outside Blair House
WASHINGTON -- It was a protest cry that could only be shouted in Washington, DC.
“Stop reconciliation now!” yelled a man outside of Blair House today, railing against a legislative process and concept generally not discussed -- let alone protested -- outside the wonky walls of the US Capitol.
The man, carrying a sign that said, “Jesus Loves All Babies,” was referring to the possibility that a health care package will be added to a budget reconciliation bill. Budget bills require just a majority vote to be approved, and cannot be filibustered, as Republicans are threatening to do if the health bill is brought back to the Senate floor.
Other played to historical fears, with signs depicting President Obama with a Hitler-esque mustache. A half-dozen others went with the office-poster look of a photograph of an actual pig in makeup. “You Can Put Lipstick on a Pig -- It's still a Pig. Barack Obama, 9-9-08,” the signs said.
The protesters -- who came out more than an hour before Obama and lawmakers were scheduled to show up for their day-long health care huddle -- said they wanted to urge the president and members of Congress to scrap the measure that's been developed over the past year and start all over again.
“We're not against reform. We're protesting what is really a charade, not a summit,” said Nancy Pfotenhauer, 46, of Virginia and a member of Americans for Prosperity, a conservative group. Americans “want a clean slate. They do not like the massive government takeover option,” Pfotenhauer said.
Police moved the demonstrators across the street mid-morning, and they were quickly met by counter-protestors who demanded universal health care. A fierce verbal confrontation ensued on the narrow sidewalk, but no physical battles occurred. “Kill the bill! Kill the bill!” a smattering of protestors yelled, seeking to drown out their counterparts.
The pro-health care overhaul team, meanwhile, argued for a single payer system, expanding Medicare to cover all people. “Why the Summit Stall? Medicare for All!” their signs read.
Estrella Chaules of Sudbury, Mass., said she was disappointed that Obama hadn't been stronger in pushing a single-payer system. [Obama promised in his campaign a health care overhaul to provide near-universal coverage, but said a single-payer system would be politically impossible and too disruptive.]
“I think we need health care for all, and I'm just sorry that president Obama has forgotten or reneged on his promise to give universal health care for all,” said Chaules, who is 67 and retired. Chaules said her sister lives in Canada and received “great” health care there.
“Why can't we do the same? Why shouldn't we even be better? There are people who need health care who can't get it any other way.” she said.
On-the-job training for Brown
WASHINGTON -- Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown voted today for a Democratic-driven $15 billion jobs package -- after he voted against it.
But unlike his senior colleague Senator John Kerry, who was derided during his presidential campaign for saying he voted for the Iraq war before he voted against it, Brown's flip was just a freshman accident.
``I voted too early. I just corrected it; that's all,'' Brown said after joining to pass, 70-28, a package meant to spur hiring by small businesses.
Senate voting procedures are complicated; in this case, the Senate first had to vote to waive the budget act to allow spending that had not specifically been paid for in the bill with revenues or other spending cuts. Then the Senate voted again to pass the entire jobs bill.
Brown -- who delivered a critical vote in favor of advancing the measure earlier this week -- first mistakenly voted “no” on the first item, then changed his vote and voted yes on both items.
``I'm an independent voice, I voted to put people back to work in Massachusetts and throughout the country, and work in a bipartisan manner to do so,’’ he said.
But if the measure comes back from the House full of ``pork and fraud,'' Brown warned, ``I reserve the right to vote against it.''
And mean it, this time.
The new senator confirmed that his office had been getting numerous calls from angry citizens -- many from outside Massachusetts -- complaining out Brown's vote Monday to advance the jobs bill, which many conservatives oppose.
The senator's response? ``You should read the bill,'' Brown said. ``Before people criticize votes, I think it's very important to read the bill.''
Democrats were thrilled to have Brown on board for the package. ``I believe this is the beginning of a trend, and I hope I'm right,'' said Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California.
Brown ``got the message better than anyone in Massachusetts -- it's jobs and the economy,'' said Senator Charles Schumer, Democrat of New York.
A job well done? Not for some conservatives on Brown's vote
Scott Brown's decision to buck GOP leadership and back Senate majority leader Harry Reid's stripped-down jobs bill Monday is playing to a mixed reaction and wildly mixed emotions among conservatives.
Dozens of angry messages filled his Twitter page and Facebook page, charging the Massachusetts senator with everything from being "another out-of-touch politician'' to "Benedict Brown."
On her blog, conservative commentator Michelle Malkin decried Brown's vote and those of the four GOP senators who joined him -- Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, both of Maine, Christopher Bond of Missouri, and George Voinovich of Ohio -- and gave readers Brown's Washington, D.C., office number, urging readers to call him to ask why he backed a "phony jobs boondoggle."
Other conservative analysts responded with more of a shrug.
“I am guessing that Scott Brown believes that he cannot simply join the (highly effective and admirable) ‘no’ chorus of Republicans, lest he be labeled a pure obstructionist and not an independent kind of guy who's just looking for effective solutions to get the working men and women of Massachusetts back to work," wrote Lisa Schiffren of National Review on her blog.
Brown arrived on Capitol Hill as something of a trophy for the Republican Party and a usurper for some in the Democratic Party. By taking the seat held by Edward Kennedy for so many years, he single-handedly redefined the political calculus in the Senate. The vote to close debate and reject calls for a filibuster in the jobs bill was only the third he has cast.
"It was a vote I felt comfortable making," he told WBZ-TV yesterday. “I got the bill, I analyzed it. We made our determination it was revenue-neutral. It wouldn't increase taxes. It would actually help job creation in Massachusetts."
Frank tackles additional stimulus
WASHINGTON -- While Republicans have continued to hammer Democrats over last year's stimulus bill, US Representative Barney Frank argued at a hearing today that the country needs additional stimulus to create jobs and avoid a double-dip recession.
Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, wasn't proposing new legislation at his hearing. But he turned to economists to testify why additional stimulus was necessary for curbing the unemployment rate.
“It's very important to be aggressive. If we go back into recession, we're not coming out,” Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, said at the hearing. “We have to err on the side of doing too much rather than too little.”
But Republicans said the first stimulus was a failure and additional measures wouldn't solve the country's job woes. “I'm really surprised that we're even debating the need for new stimulus in light of our experience with the old stimulus,” said Spencer Bachus of Alabama, ranking Republican on the committee. “The last thing America needs is a sequel to the so-called stimulus.”
Frank said Republicans were playing politics by opposing the stimulus but touting the jobs created in their districts. Without continued aid to states, the Newton Democrat said, vital services like police and fire would diminish.
Kevin A. Hassett, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, testified that the biggest problem with the stimulus bill was it failed to be cost-effective at about $100,000 per job created. Hassett and other economists suggested alternative measures, like extending unemployment benefits and federal aid to states for Medicaid costs.
Several Democrats on the committee said they were particularly interested in Hassett's idea of extending unemployment benefits to workers whose hours were cut. For example, if five employees' hours were reduced 20 percent -- rather than firing one -- each of the five would get 20 percent in unemployment.
Romney endorses McCain for fifth term
Former Governor Mitt Romney this morning endorsed his former political rival -- US Senator John McCain – as the Arizona Republican tries to fend off a primary challenge and win a fifth term.
Romney and McCain vied for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, exchanging several bitter barbs in debates. McCain is facing a primary challenge from former US Representative J.D. Hayworth, who says McCain has betrayed conservative values.
“For years, I've been an admirer of John McCain,” Romney said in a statement this morning. “Then we became competitors. Today, I'm proud to call him my friend.”
Romney also said, “It's hard to imagine the United States Senate without John McCain,” and added that the country needed McCain in troubling times.
“I am constantly reassured by Senator McCain's continued involvement in the affairs of our nation, and I am honored to support him,” Romney said.
“Governor Romney is among the brightest and most dynamic leaders in our Party, and I am proud to have his support,” McCain said. “I look forward to working with him to advance our shared vision for a stronger, safer and more prosperous America.”
Another Massachusetts Republican -- US Senator Scott Brown – has also endorsed McCain, and is planning to campaign with him next month in Arizona.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown's unauthorized image pops up in California primary
WASHINGTON -- An endorsement from Senator Scott Brown has become such a hot commodity in Republican primaries that GOP hopefuls have stopped waiting for the Massachusetts senator's approval before using his image.
Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, in the midst of a three-way Republican primary in California to challenge Senator Barbara Boxer, has created an Internet advertisement featuring Brown. The flash video shows a picture of the Wrentham Republican and says, “Thank you Massachusetts,” before fading out to Fiorina's picture and the phrase, “Now on to California.”
Brown has not made an endorsement in the California senate primary, and the ad has Fiorina's opponents crying foul.
“I think Scott Brown would be a prize endorsement for any campaign -- the problem is she doesn't have it,” said James Fisfis, a spokesman for Tom Campbell, one of Fiorina's opponents. Campbell's new media consultant Patrick Ruffini tweeted, “I don't know if she's claiming an endorsement, but man, that's up there in the @ScottBrownMA exploitation sweepstakes.”
Julie Soderlund, a spokeswoman for Fiorina, said the ad does not imply an endorsement from Brown, but simply thanks Massachusetts for electing a Republican. The ad “asks the people of California to do same thing by replacing Barbara Boxer with Carly Fiorina,” Soderlund said.
But Joshua Trevino, a spokesman for GOP candidate Chuck DeVore, said his campaign did ask for Brown's endorsement. The campaign was told “everyone on the planet wants Scott Brown's endorsement,” so he isn't getting involved in primaries.
Brown has agreed to campaign in one primary, Senator John McCain's, an early Brown supporter who now faces a challenger from the right, J.D. Hayworth. Calls to Brown's office for comment were not immediately returned.
The Brown ad isn't Fiorina's first to spark controversy: earlier this month, she released what's now called the “demon sheep” ad, which juxtaposes images of sheep with Campbell and says he's a “fiscal conservative in name only.”
See the Brown ad here.
Obama's healthcare proposal attempts a compromise between House and Senate bills
WASHINGTON -- President Obama's health care proposal, released this morning in advance of his bipartisan health care summit on Thursday, would attempt to protect consumers against large health insurance premium increases by allowing government regulators to review rate hikes and block any they deem unwarranted, administration officials said this morning.
The plan, which a spokesman called the president's "best shot" at working out a compromise between the House and Senate bills, is designed to provide a pathway for Congressional Democrats to pass a health care bill without any Republican votes, if necessary, using a process called "reconciliation" that allows the Senate to pass bills by a simple majority rather than the 60-vote threshold needed to avoid a filibuster by the minority party. The House would pass the Senate's health care bill and then both chambers would pass the White House's proposed fixes under reconciliation.
"The president believes the American people deserve an up-or-down vote on health reform," said White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer said in a conference call with reporters this morning. "Our proposal is designed to achieve that if the Republican Party decides to filibuster.... That was certainly a factor in how we put the proposal together."
Closely guarded by the administration as it was being constructed over the last week, the proposal arrives just at the moment Obama is ostensibly offering an olive branch to Republicans by providing a forum, at Thursday's summit, to exchange ideas on health reform. Republicans have long complained that the president and his party have not included them enough.
The White House proposal underscores that the president sees the summit as a chance to make the Democratic case for health reform to the American people and to argue that vision represents a stronger and more comprehensive solution than the ideas the GOP is offering. It also shows the president does not see bipartisanship as more important than passing a comprehensive health care bill.
Since Massachusetts voters elected Republican Scott Brown to replace the late Edward M. Kennedy in January, Democrats have been unable to pass a compromise version of the health care bills the House and Senate approved last year because they are one vote short of the 60 needed to prevent a Republican filibuster in the Senate.
The White House is trying to offer a way around that problem. Its plan is essentially a series of adjustments to the health care bill the Senate passed on Christmas Eve, meant to appeal to House Democrats who have balked at passing the Senate bill without any changes. Assuming no Republicans sign on, House Democrats could pass the Senate's health care bill, and then both chambers could adopt the White House's additional changes using reconciliation.
But it remains to be seen whether Congressional Democrats have the political stomach to pass a health care bill that polls show remains unpopular with the public. Some Senate Democrats are nervous about seeming to ram through major legislation -- even though Republicans have used the procedure to adopt sweeping tax and budget proposals in years past -- and House members wanted more concessions from the Senate.
Though the president has said he is interested in hearing Republicans' ideas for health reform and working with them on a bill, he has refused to agree to GOP demands that Democrats "start from scratch," which would probably mean no bill could pass this year. Most observers of the debate believe the parties are ideologically too far apart and appear politically unwilling to cooperate on a true compromise. Democrats want a bill that can cover 30 million or more of the 50 million uninsured, and Republicans say that's too expensive to do that right now.
Dan Pfeiffer characterized the president's proposal as an "opening bid" for the health care summit on Thursday and said the White House would be happy to post a Republican plan alongside it on the White House website.
Pfeiffer said the president's proposal contained many of the agreements House and Senate leaders made in January, before Brown was elected, when they met extensively with the president to negotiate a final compromise.
The underlying Senate bill in many ways mirrors the system Massachusetts enacted in 2006, setting up state-based "exchanges" -- like the Massachusetts Health Insurance Connector Authority -- to help the uninsured purchase insurance. It provides federally subsidized assistance to people earning less than 400 percent of poverty, or $88,000 a year for a family of four, to help purchase insurance. And it prohibits insurers from dropping or denying coverage based on preexisting conditions or gender.
The White House plan tries to find a middle ground on some of the most controversial differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. It requires individuals to obtain insurance or face a fine, unless they can't find a plan that costs less than 8 percent of income, in which case they would be allowed to purchase a basic catastrophic insurance plan. It requires employers with more than 50 employees to help offset the cost to the government if their uninsured workers apply for federally subsidized insurance.
It contains no provision to establish a government-run insurance plan.
Because parliamentary rules strictly limit the content of reconciliation bills to provisions affecting revenue, the White House plan includes no changes to the Senate bill's rules on abortion coverage or to the state-based exchanges it would set up. The abortion issue in particular could be a sticking point, since a contingent of House Democrats say they will not vote for a bill that does not contain the House's more restrictive abortion language.
Instead of a special Medicaid deal for Nebraska only, the White House proposal would provide even more help to states to expand Medicaid. It also contains additional money for states like Massachusetts that already have generous Medicaid programs and so would not otherwise qualify for expansion help.
White House officials said today the new plan costs about $75 billion more than the Senate bill; the total cost would be $950 billion over 10 years. But they said that cost would be more than offset by a combination of reductions in Medicare spending, cuts to the Medicare Advantage program, industry fees, taxes on high-cost health insurance and penalties for individuals who do not purchase insurance and employers whose uninsured employees enroll in government-subsidized insurance programs.
The tougher regulatory powers contained in the legislation are designed to add a new populist appeal at a time when Anthem Blue Cross of California has said it is raising rates by 39 percent.
Read the full proposal here.
Delahunt: I'm not really in a position to see any records
As questions swirl around his role as Norfolk district attorney in the handling of Amy Bishop's shooting case in 1986, US Representative William Delahunt is half a world away, on a fact-finding tour that's finding controversy in the Middle East.
Delahunt, Democrat of Quincy, told an Associated Press reporter in Tel Aviv he has limited memory of the shooting death of Seth Bishop by his sister, Amy, a case that Braintree Police called accidental and that the Norfolk District Attorney's Office declined to prosecute. Delahunt said his first assistant, John Kivlan, was in charge of the case.
''I understand I haven't had a real opportunity to get into the details of the case, but I suspect when I return I'll have an opportunity to become debriefed and I know there have been statements but I'm not really in a position to see any records,'' Delahunt said.
Amy Bishop, a biology professor, now faces murder charges in the shooting deaths last week of three faculty colleagues at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. Current Norfolk District Attorney William R. Keating said she could have been charged with three serious crimes in the death of her brother 23 years ago.
In Israel, Delahunt has become part of a diplomatic dustup. Saying he and his congressional delegation were snubbed by the country's foreign ministry, he demanded an explanation.
The delegation's trip is sponsored by J Street, a Jewish lobbying group that has backed the creation of a Palestinian state and that has been criticized by the Israeli government as anti-Israeli. Attempts by J Street representatives to set up a meeting between the delegation and ministry officials were rejected.
"We were puzzled that the deputy foreign minister has apparently attempted to block our meetings with senior officials in the prime minister's office and foreign ministry -- questioning either our own support of Israel or that we would even consider traveling to the region with groups that the deputy foreign minister has so inaccurately described as 'anti-Israel'," Delahunt said, according to the Associated Press.
"In our opinion this is an inappropriate way to treat elected representatives of Israel's closest ally who are visiting the country."
The ministry declared it did not need an intermediary to set up meetings with US officials. Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon, a hardliner, is a former ambassador to the United States.
Delahunt, a member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, is joined in Israel by Democrats Donald Payne of New Jersey, Lois Capps of California, Bob Filner of California and Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio.
GLOBE STAFF
Brown hires press secretary
WASHINGTON -- US Senator Scott Brown continues to fill out his new staff, formally announcing this afternoon that he has hired Colin Reed to be his press secretary.
Reed, who has been working for several days in Brown's temporary Senate office (and has been eagerly awaiting a Blackberry and an official email address), is originally from Norwell, Mass., and most recently was deputy press secretary for the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
“Colin is a talented communicator with good relationships in both Massachusetts and Washington, and I am proud to have him on my team,” Brown said in a statement. “As a Bay State native, he understands the issues facing Massachusetts, and will be a great asset as we serve the people of the Commonwealth.”
Brown's press shop also includes Gail Gitcho, who is his communications director. She previously worked for the Republican National Committee and for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney's presidential campaign.
Matt Viser can be reached at maviser@globe.com.
Brown heads back to Boston
WASHINGTON -- Less than a day after his swearing in, Senator Scott Brown has left for Boston for the weekend.
Staffers said Brown will be back Monday for Senate votes, including one on President Obama's nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Craig Becker, who Republicans hope to filibuster.
Brown's staff that remained in Washington settled into his temporary office today, a trailer that's connected to the Russell Senate Building. The trailer will be Brown's office for about two weeks, before he moves up two stories into what was once Senator Ted Kennedy's office.
Paul Kirk's name placard was already removed from that office door, which was locked shut. His staff cleared out yesterday.
Before Brown left Washington around 1 p.m., he began what is known as Senate orientation, a program for all new senators run by the Secretary of the Senate. Today, Brown was briefed on ethics and congressional accountability, said Beth Provenzano, the Secretary of the Senate's deputy chief of staff.
Brown will finish orientation next week with sessions on Senate rules, parliamentary procedure, history of the Senate and life in the Senate. Other senators lead some of the sessions, like life in the Senate, but Provenzano said there's no word yet on who will be talking to Brown.
Brown's swearing-in: live blog
By Jeremy Herb, Globe Correspondent
Senator Kirk will give his final address on the Senate floor in about a half hour at 3:45 p.m. Senator-elect Brown is scheduled to be sworn in at 5 p.m. by Vice President Joe Biden, and will then take his first questions from the media as a senator.
Keep checking back here throughout the day, as Political Intelligence will continue to bring you live updates from the swearing-in.
6:50 p.m. It won't be too much longer until we learn whether Scott Brown will filibuster Obama's nominee to the National Labor Relations Board, Scott Becker.
Majority Leader Harry Reid has called for a cloture vote on Becker's nomination for Monday at 5 p.m.
Following Reid's motion, Senator Chris Dodd gave a speech to an essentially empty Senate floor commending Senator Paul Kirk's service.
6:05 p.m. While Brown didn't tip his hand about filibustering Craig Becker's nomination to the National Labor Relations Board, he made clear he didn't support the Democrats' health-care plan.
At his press conference, he brought up his support for health-care reform that Massachusetts passed, calling it a bipartisan measure, but he said Congress needed to go back to the drawing board because the “one size fits all” reform approach currently proposed doesn't work.
When asked what specific ideas he wanted to work with Obama and the Democrats on, Brown said it was too soon for him to know.
“To pinpoint now as to what I will and won't veto -- I haven't even see the bills,” Brown said.
Brown's wife, Gail, attended his swearing-in ceremony, though his two daughters did not. One had a basketball game, and the other had to take a test, Brown said. He brought their two Bibles with him for the ceremony so they were there in spirit, he said.
5:40 p.m. Newly sworn-in Senator Scott Brown would not say whether he supports a filibuster of President Obama's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board.
Brown, who changed his mind yesterday about being sworn-in today instead of February 11, said he has not been asked to make a decision by either side on Obama's nominee, Craig Becker. Some Republicans have called for Brown to help block the nominee.
Brown asked to be sworn-in early because the election was certified and he wanted to get to work, he said at a press conference following the ceremony.
Brown said Obama's first stimulus did not create any jobs. He advocated for an across-the-board tax cut like John F. Kennedy's to help create jobs and boost the economy.
“It's getting to the point where people are just fed up, and they want some kind of relief,” Brown said.
5:15 p.m.Scott Brown is officially the junior senator of Massachusetts.
At 5:14 p.m., Brown was sworn in by Vice President Joe Biden. About half of the Republican senators came to watch the swearing in, and a handful of Democrats. Brown was accompanied by John Kerry and Paul Kirk, and after his swearing in he shook hands with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Majority Leader Harry Reid.
Brown is now going to re-enact the swearing in to allow for pictures, because pictures are not allowed on the Senate floor.
4:15 p.m. Senator Kerry said he was disappointed that no Republicans—including Senator-elect Scott Brown—came to hear Kirk's farewell speech.
“I couldn't help but look across the aisle and not see a senator here,” Kerry said.
Kerry spoke after Kirk finished his speech to thank Kirk for his service as Massachusetts' interim senator.
FULL ENTRYBrown hires new chief of staff
By Matt Viser, Globe Staff
Senator-elect Scott Brown, who expects to be sworn in this afternoon, has hired his new chief of staff.
Brown announced this morning that Steven Schrage will oversee the new offices in Washington and Massachusetts, acting as Brown’s top staffer as he fills the remaining two-and-a-half years of the late Edward M. Kennedy’s term.
Schrage most recently was the Scholl Chair in International Business at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. Some of his recent work focused on creating jobs in the economic downturn.
He also has a background in military issues, which could be an indication that Brown will attempt to make a mark in that area. Brown was known during his tenure in the Massachusetts State House for several pieces of legislation involving military veterans.
“Steven Schrage is a professional who knows his way around Washington,” Brown said in a statement. “He brings to the table expertise and background in a number of valuable areas – public policy, economic strategy, national security, business, counterterrorism, strategic planning and management.”
Schrage was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and acting Assistant Secretary under Colin Powell, and was the chief foreign policy and defense counsel for the late Senator Paul Coverdell, Republican from Georgia. Schrage also worked as foreign policy director for former governor Mitt Romney's presidential campaign.
Schrage grew up in a military family and did MBA and doctoral studies at Harvard Business School. He is an honors graduate of Duke University and of the University of Michigan Law School.
Frank announces hearing on Fannie, Freddie
By Jeremy Herb, Globe Correspondent
WASHINGTON -- After repeated calls from Republicans in the Financial Services Committee to hold hearings on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, US Representative Barney Frank announced today that they'll get their wish next month.
Frank, chairman of the Financial Services Committee, has lined up Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan to testify at the March 2 hearing, where they will explain the Obama administration's views on what role the government should play in the future of housing finance.
The hearing is likely to focus on Fannie and Freddie, the mortgage giants who own or guarantee nearly half the country's loans, worth $5 trillion. The federal government seized the companies in 2008 to keep them from failing. Frank said at a hearing on executive pay last month that he expected his committee would abolish Freddie and Fannie as they overhauled mortgage finance.
But the issue that Republicans have been most vocal about, executive pay at Fannie and Freddie, will not be part of the March 2 hearing. A committee spokeswoman said that a separate hearing is currently being scheduled on that issue.
In addition to Fannie and Freddie, the committee plans to examine government housing entities -- Ginnie Mae and the Federal Housing Administration -- as well as Federal Home Loan Banks and private lenders. A full witness list will be announced closer to the hearing date.
Senator-elect Scott Brown seeks to be sworn in Thursday
By Matt Viser, Globe Staff
Hoping to start work in Washington a week sooner than originally planned, US Senator-elect Scott Brown this afternoon asked Governor Deval Patrick and Secretary of State William Galvin to "certify without delay" the results of the Jan. 19 special election.
Read more details at the Globe's Metro Desk blog.
Brown staffers share digital tactics behind election win
By Jeremy Herb, Globe correspondent
WASHINGTON -- Scott Brown campaign staffers offered their digital election playbook to Republican strategists hoping to replicate Brown's successful online strategy, during an invitation-only event today at Google's Washington headquarters.
Brown's political director Peter Fullerton and new media director Robert Willington demonstrated how they used tools from Google and other online platforms to recruit volunteers, raise money, get out the vote, and ultimately win the online war that helped Brown upset Democrat Martha Coakley.
“The running joke in the campaign was when you go to Obama's Web site it says 'powered by hope,'” said Willington. “With how much we used Google, you could say, 'powered by Google' for the Brown campaign.”
Digital campaigning and social networking was largely considered a Democratic stronghold after 2008, with Barack Obama's presidential campaign leading the way. But Brown, along with newly elected Republican Governors Chris Christie and Robert McDonnell, used many of the same techniques as the Obama campaign, altering the digital political landscape.
Willington showed how Brown's campaign used Google programs like AdWords to make his Web site the top sponsored link when searching “Martha Coakley” on Google. The campaign used a technique called a “Google blast” in the days before the election, where Google floods popular Web sites in specific areas with ads. The Brown campaign, for example, ran ads in Wrentham, but not in Cambridge or on the liberal-leaning Web site The Huffington Post, Willington said.
Today's event was a networking opportunity for both Google and Brown's aides, with about two dozen Republican staffers attending. Fullerton and Willington have decided not to join Brown in Washington, but to ride their political successes and start a new consulting company, SwiftCurrent Strategies.
Chris Talbot, an account executive with Google's Elections and Issue Advocacy division, said the company's goal is to work with every campaign, whether Democrat or Republican. Google offers its consulting services to candidates for free—assigning separate people to work with opposing sides if both are interested—and makes its money from ads purchased by campaigns.
“We're evangelists for digital tools,” Talbot said.
Kerry calls for amendment to restrict corporate campaign spending
By Alan Wirzbicki
WASHINGTON -- As anger at last month's Supreme Court decision that gutted decades of campaign finance laws continues to build on Capitol Hill, Senator John Kerry joined calls for Congress and the states to amend the Constitution for only the 28th time in its history, a dramatic step he said was necessary to restore restrictions on corporate influence in politics that were struck down in the ruling.
"We need a constitutional amendment to make it clear once and for all that corporations do not have the same free speech rights as individuals," Kerry testified at a Senate hearing today.
Amending the Constitution is a daunting task, requiring a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate and the ratification of three-fourths of the states. Amendments have been extremely rare since the Constitutional Convention in 1787: the document was last amended in 1992, when states approved an amendment restricting members of Congress from raising their own salaries in the midst of a Congressional term.
Kerry's call for an amendment comes as members of Congress are hastily piecing together legislation to blunt the impact of the ruling in Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission. The 5-4 decision effectively outlawed limits on corporate donations to politics, ruling that such restrictions infringed on the free speech rights of corporations.
Capuano introduces bill to hinder corporate campaign spending
By Alan Wirzbicki, Globe Correspondent
WASHINGTON -- In a bid to limit the impact of a Supreme Court decision last week that allows corporations to spend unlimited amounts on political campaigns, Representative Michael E. Capuano has introduced legislation that would require companies to seek shareholder approval for most political donations.
"The money belongs to the shareholders," Capuano said in an interview this afternoon. "Let them make that decision."
The Court's ruling sparked outrage among campaign finance reform advocates and a rare rebuke from President Obama during his State of the Union address. Capuano's legislation, if enacted, would have the practical impact of making it more difficult and cumbersome for companies to use their newfound right to unfettered political activity.
The legislation would apply to any corporate donation of more than $10,000. Executives would have to convene a shareholder vote to get permission to spend money for any political purposes.
In a close 5-4 ruling in the case, the Court ruled in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that corporations had the same free speech rights as individuals, and that restrictions against corporate cash in politics were therefore an infringement of the First Amendment.
"Five justices have taken it upon themselves to give corporations the same constitutional rights given to human beings," said Craig Holman a lobbyist for the consumer group Public Citizen, which is backing Capuano's proposal. "The courts have held that one of those rights is to spend unlimited amounts of your own money in politics. The problem with granting this right to corporations is that the CEOs can spend unlimited amounts of other people’s money – money from shareholders."
Capuano said he had not discussed the bill with the Democratic leadership in the House but wanted to start the ball rolling on a legislative response to the Court's decision now. The bill is co-sponsored by two other New England Democrats, Representative John B. Larson of Connecticut and Representative Chellie Pingree of Maine. Representative Alan Grayson, Democrat of Florida, is also a co-sponsor. Although he is not among the sponsors, Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Newton, also supports the bill, according to spokesman Harry Gural.
Ultimately, Capuano said he views a system of public financing as the best way to remove corporate influence from politics, because it would allow elected officials to focus on legislating instead of fundraising.
"Public financing would get me off the treadmill of trying to raise money. Not just me -- any politician," he said. "I don't enjoy raising money, and I raise as much as anybody."
But he said the odds of Congressional action on public financing were remote. "I do not think there is sentiment for that in the House and Senate."
Pelosi says House and Senate still working on comprehensive health bill
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters this morning that the House is working on two tracks to pursue health reform. She said she hopes to announce soon a series of smaller health care bills, such as removing the antitrust exemption for insurance companies, that could pass relatively quickly. But she said House and Senate leaders are continuing to work on fashioning a series of changes to the nearly-complete comprehensive health care bill, which has been stalled since the Massachusetts special Senate election deprived Democrats of the 60th vote they needed to pass the legislation.
With Republican Scott Brown replacing the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy, the majority party has only 59 senators, one short of the number needed to prevent the GOP from using a filibuster to block the bill. To get around this problem, Democrats would use a special budget procedure known as "reconciliation," which allows certain legislation to pass the Senate by a simple majority of 51 votes.
Though some Senate moderates have expressed concern about using reconciliation to finish work on health care, Pelosi insisted today that Democrats will not abandon the health care bill and that leaders are working intensively on reviving the larger bill.
"We must take whatever time it takes to do it," she said.
The thinking is that the House and Senate would pass a series of agreed-upon changes to the Senate bill under reconciliation, and then the House would pass the Senate bill itself. That approach could reassure House members who are reluctant to vote for the Senate bill for fear that the Senate might later balk at the changes.
Because of the strict rules limiting the content of what can pass under reconciliation to provisions dealing with raising or spending revenue, the whole bill cannot be passed using that procedure. But fixes such as changing taxes raised to pay for the bill -- one of the main points of contention between the House and Senate -- could.
An aide to Pelosi said the series of smaller bills could be unveiled before the mid-February recess.
UPDATE: But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sounded far less urgent about health care when reporters asked him about Pelosi's statements a few minutes ago, saying only that Democrats would have to determine how to best to move the bill forward procedurally. Senator Dick Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, was similarly noncommittal about the hows and whens; he said it was up to Reid to decide.
Brown aide: Swearing-in eyed for February 11
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
US Senator-elect Scott Brown is hoping to be sworn in on February 11, according to Eric Fehrnstrom, his senior strategist. That's 23 days after the election, but the sense among his supporters that he must be seated immediately has eased somewhat now that President Obama and Congressional leaders have promised there will be no scramble to ram a health care bill through the Senate before he takes office.
The interim period will allow the requisite time for overseas military ballots to arrive, for town and city clerks to submit official vote counts to the Secretary of State's office, and for the governor's council to formally accept them. It also gives the senator-elect a brief window in which to assemble his staff.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has made no announcements on Brown's committee assignments, but Fehrnstrom said Brown expressed a preference for Armed Services, Homeland Security or Appropriations when he met with the Republican leader last week in Washington.
Brown will not attend President Obama's State of the Union address tomorrow, but Fehrnstrom said he will be watching back in Massachusetts, where he has been busy holding meetings with local leaders this week.
Kerry wants House to pass Senate health care bill
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Senator John Kerry said today his preferred route to completing health care reform is for the House to pass the Senate bill, and for the Senate to make it more digestible to the House by approving fixes through the reconciliation process, which allows legislation to pass the Senate by a simple majority instead of 60 votes.
House and Senate leaders believe this is the only realistic route left to passing a comprehensive health care bill this year, now that Massachusetts elected a Republican to fill the seat of the late Edward M. Kennedy, leaving Democrats without the crucial 60th vote they need to prevent a GOP filibuster of the final compromise bill. But it is not clear whether the House will agree to pass the Senate bill.
Kerry said he did not think voters would be angry about using the reconciliation process as long as the fixes remove the "completely egregious items" that were in the bill, such as a special Medicaid deal for Nebraska that was included to get the vote of Senator Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska.
Brown's victory, Kerry said, showed that voters were disturbed by the wheeling and dealing in the days leading up to the Senate vote, and that many people don't understand why certain things were done. He said removing the worst of those items, like Nelson's so-called "Cornhusker Kickback," and a Medicaid deal for Louisiana that has been dubbed "the Louisiana Purchase," would go a long way toward reassuring voters.
Kerry said, however, he would not include the $500 million he helped secure for Massachusetts' Medicaid program on that list of egregious items. That money, he said, was to fairly compensate taxpayers in Massachusetts who have already paid to expand their state's Medicaid program to the limit, and who would not otherwise receive any expansion money that other states would under the legislation.
The key, Kerry said, is to treat all states fairly, and do it up-front so that the public understands it clearly. "I'm not for a single-state fix," he said.
Kerry resolution calls for helping Haiti over the long haul
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON _ The US Senate today passed a resolution urging a long-term commitment to rebuilding Haiti after the devastating Jan. 12 earthquake killed tens of thousands of people and left the nation's already underdeveloped infrastructure in ruins.
Co-sponsored by Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, the resolution, in part, "expresses profound sympathy to, and unwavering support for, the people of Haiti" and "urges that all appropriate efforts be made to sustain assistance to Haiti beyond the immediate humanitarian crisis to help the Haitian people with appropriate humanitarian, developmental, and infrastructure assistance needed to overcome the affects of past disasters and the earthquake, and to secure a more stable and sustainable future."
Kerry, in a statement of after its passage, said "Haiti will need our support today, tomorrow, and in the years to come."
Wasting little time: group urging Brown to work for economic, immigration reforms
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
Even before Senator-elect Scott P. Brown is sworn in, Massachusetts political groups are starting to call on him to back specific policies in Washington.
The Springfield-based Alliance to Develop Power, a community organization that advocates social and economic justice, will hold a press conference Friday to call on Brown to support immigration reform that offers a path to citizenship, to back an "emergency public jobs" program to put people back to work in Massachusetts, and other policies designed to assist the most needy.
The group, which plans a noon-time press conference at its 130 Union Street headquarters in Springfield, provided a preview today in an announcement.
On immigration, Adrian Garcia, an ADP leader, said that "we are a nation of immigrants but our immigration system is broken. We need new laws that will enable our neighbors to come out of the shadows and be fully integrated into our communities."
On the economy, Keya Alvarez, the group's co-chair, said "massive job losses are causing racial and economic disparities to grow. Unemployment in the African American community is now double the official state unemployment rate and our cities are crumbling. We need an emergency public jobs program that will enable our friends and neighbors to work with dignity building our infrastructure, repairing our schools, and revitalizing our communities."
He specifically cited the "Put America to Work Act," cosponsored by Democratic Rep. John Olver, which proposes creating one million new jobs in the public sector nationwide.
Caroline Murray, the group's executive director, told Political Intelligence in an email that organizers will be urging Brown to "follow up on his promise of creating a 'big tent' by working collaboratively with those that are hurting the most."
Feds release $16.8 million to help heat Mass. homes
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
The federal government today released $16.8 million in home heating assistance for Massachussets -- money shaken loose from government coffers with the help of Rep. Edward J. Markey, a Malden Democrat.
The funds, part of a total of $490 million made available nationwide from the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, were released after Markey helped organize a letter to President Obama from 113 House members last week.
Markey believes the sagging economy, coupled with plunging temperatures, will require even more assistance in the coming weeks.
"I am very pleased that nearly $17 million in emergency funds will be heading to the Commonwealth to literally keep the home fires burning," Markey said in a statement released around 2 pm. "In these difficult economic times, this funding is needed more than ever to make sure that no one is forced to choose between heating and eating this winter. LIHEAP is a vital safety net for many families and as temperatures continue to plunge across New England, the remaining $100 million in emergency aid must be released as soon as possible. I will continue to push for the expeditious release of these remaining emergency funds
Leading progressive warns against drawing the wrong lessons from Brown win
A leading progressive voice in Washington is urging the Democratic party today not to move toward the center after Republican Scott P. Brown's victory in Tuesday's Massachusetts Senate race but to stick to their current policies.
In a political analysis, Robert Borosage, co-director of the Campaign for America's Future, warns that a more centrist approach will not appease the Republican right and only alienate the Democratic party's base.
On jobs, health care, reigning in Wall Street firms, and regulating the banks, Borosage says the Democrats' positions are more in line with disgruntled voters around the country than the Republicans' prescriptions.
"We got it right on jobs and banks and need to challenge Republicans," he told Political Intelligence. "At the end of the day they opposed regulating the banks and don't want to do anything about jobs."
"We can win the argument," he said. "But we have to wage it."
With Borosage's permission, here is his piece in its entirety:
Democrats just got mugged by voters in Massachusetts. What will the party learn from the beating?
Already, the conventional wisdom in congealing. Democrats, says the benighted Joe Lieberman, should move to the "center." Voters "don't like partisanship and deal-making."
Their "loud message?" "Get together and get some things done."
Obama got it wrong, argues lobbyist Vin Weber, consummate Republican insider. "They thought the country was at a very different place ideologically."
Swing voters, conservative commentator Gloria Borger tells us, are against "big government," like the intrusive health care plan. The deficits are too large, and voters doubt whether "all this new government is actually good for them."
And of course, the perpetually gaseous David Brooks warns against the president's "voracious pragmatism," suggesting that he spend the next year showing how "government can serve a humble, helpful and supportive role to the central institutions of American life."
And no doubt, Blue Dogs and New Dems like Evan Bayh and Kent Conrad are gearing up to use the defeat to rail about deficits, and demand the creation of a bipartisan commission to provide cover for an assault on Social Security and Medicare.
Stuff and nonsense. Republicans have profited too much from moving to the right and opposing Obama to join in bipartisan cooperation. And if they did, then there would be more backroom deal making, not less. Voters who don't want big government shouldn't want Congress to "get together and get things done."
Yet polls suggest voters are disappointed that Obama has been unable to get more things done rather than that he's done too much. Unlike Republicans, Obama actually believes in bipartisanship, to a fault. Yet the most bipartisan of his policies - the Wall Street bailout which in policy and personnel is virtually indistinguishable from the Bush administration - is by far the least popular.
Democrats are in trouble, but moving to a mythical "center," focusing on deficit reduction, abandoning health care won't help. Consider the three fundamental factors in the up-coming elections.
1. "The angry, the organized and the old"
Bi-elections are low turnout affairs. They are dominated by the angry, the organized, and the old, the seniors who vote in larger numbers. Clearly, the Republican right is angry - and mobilized, while the Democratic base is discouraged by the entrenched resistance to change, particularly by members of the President's own party.
The right is getting more organized, while the most potent organizations in the Democratic base, the labor unions, just watched the president push to tax their members' health care benefits. Union leaders were forced into concessionary negotiations with the president to try to limit the damage, a scene sadly evocative of union negotiations with corporations over the last decades. But that puts the president in the role of the corporate CEO trying to roll back worker benefits - not exactly the way to excite folks to get out and work.
Seniors weren't big supporters of Obama in 2008, and now they're worried about the so-called "cuts in Medicare" that they've heard about in the health care bill. Already enjoying America's largest single payer health care program, they are the least enthusiastic about reform that might sap funding from their coverage.
So Democrats are in trouble. But moving to the center won't placate the Republican right, nor mobilize the Democratic base. Deficit reduction won't excite workers who are concerned about jobs and health care, nor calm seniors worried about Medicare. Bipartisan support for the intervention in Afghanistan will cost Democrats more votes than it gains them.
2. Big government, big banks, big business
Voters are skeptical about big government - but they are furious at big banks and big business. And the growing populist anger on both right and left sees all in one stew. Washington has run up deficits to bail out the banks, while nothing has been done to create jobs. Credit card companies are abusing customers, while Congress and regulatory agencies sit on their hands. Big business ships jobs abroad, and enjoy a tax break for doing it. Big government is suspicious less because it is big, then because it is captured, controlled by the banks, the insurance companies, the corporate lobbies.
Moving to the "center" would only reinforce the sense that money rents both parties, and people get left in the cold. What is dangerous for Democrats isn't that the administration and Congress are seen as too left, but too establishment. People still want to have hope in Obama, but increasingly the right is framing him effectively as a Wall Street liberal, using taxpayer dollars to bailout Wall Street and to help "those people," [the poor, the Haitians, the minorities] while nothing is done for Main Street taxpayers.
3. 20 million unemployed
Jobs, jobs, jobs. Obama inherited the Great Recession. But with twenty million people unemployed or underemployed, by far the biggest worry for voters is about jobs. And jobs and the economy will be the biggest factors by far in driving votes in the fall elections. If the economy were creating jobs, the president's popularity would be soaring and Democrats would be rewarded this fall, no matter how big the deficit. If the economy stalls or the "recovery" comes without jobs, Democrats will face a far more difficult terrain - and cutting the deficit won't make a wit of difference.
So what are Democrats to do? Spike Lee had the best advice: Do the Right Thing.
To survive in this election year, Democrats have to get it right on the banks and on jobs.
On banks, nothing is more poisonous to the Democrats politically or the nation economically than the bailout that has left the big banks more concentrated, and still free to gamble with the now explicit promise that taxpayers cover their losses since they are "too big to fail."
Democrats should be driving reform, restructuring and accountability. The president's tax to repay the funds spent on the TARP is a belated first step. And led by Michael Steele, the bumptious head of the Republican National Committee, Republicans seem stupid enough to oppose the demand to "get our money back."
Democrats should join the British and French governments and push for a windfall profits tax on bloated banker bonuses, and let Republicans complain about higher taxes. They should champion the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, and let Republicans complain about regulation, supporting the big banks against consumers. Democrats should be pushing for a tax on speculation and for breaking up banks "too big to fail." They should be convening hearings publicly probing the frauds and abuses that contributed to the collapse. And the Justice Department should be rolling out "perp walks," prosecutions of the bankers and brokers who committed the frauds. Democrats would be smart to audit the Fed and block the nomination of Ben Bernanke for another term as chair of the Federal Reserve. Wall Street will respond by insuring that Republican candidates are well funded, but Massachusetts just demonstrated that Democrats are at risk against poorly funded Republican candidates, unless they get this right.
On jobs, barring a stunning turnaround, Democrats will head into the fall elections with unemployment in double digits. Republicans will argue that Obama has failed on jobs, even as he saved Wall Street and ran up massive deficits.
The only response to this is for Democrats to be actively, visibly and assertively pushing for jobs, making it clear that they will keep fighting until we dig our way out of the hole that conservatives left us in. A big jobs program - with spending on new energy and a modern 21st century infrastructure, with direct public service jobs for the young and the most impacted, with aid to states and localities to avoid debilitating lay-offs and much more - should be the lead initiative this year. Let Republicans rail about deficits; Democrats and the economy would benefit if the president and the Democratic Congress pushed hard for jobs.
Democrats won't benefit by blurring lines, or trimming their sails. They benefit if the election this fall is not simply a referendum on Obama's policies, but a choice of direction. And the country will benefit if Democrats frame that choice clearly. Obama and the Democrats inherited the full catastrophe - the Great Recession, two wars, broken health care and energy and education systems, Gilded Age inequality. In Obama's first year, against the resistance of the entrenched lobbies and the obstruction of the Republican Party, we've begun to dig ourselves out of the hole. Now voters have to decide - go back to the very policies and leaders that created this catastrophe, or continue to push for change, to keep trying until we build a new economy on the ruins of the old.
Republicans are now modeling ill-fitting populist garb. They will get away with the masquerade only if Democrats let them. In this case, good policy and good politics are the same. The country benefits if the administration and the Congress shackle Wall Street - and so will candidates running on that this fall. The country benefits if the administration and Democrats keep pushing to create jobs and build a new economy - and so will candidates this fall. Republicans will not doubt oppose these initiatives. And that will help make this fall's election a fight worth having.
House Republicans: Brown's win reflects angry tide
"People are tired of not being listened to,'' said House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, of Virginia, speaking at a breakfast meeting with reporters sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor.
Representative Kevin McCarthy, of California, who is coordinating GOP election efforts in the House, pointed out that Brown won majorities in seven out of 10 congressional districts in Massachusetts, including the district of liberal Democrat Barney Frank. That is an indicator of a fundamental shift away from the party in power, he said.
"I think this is a national campaign. I think this is a wave election,'' McCarthy said. "Can we win the majority? Yes we can.''
Bay State dems in DC fine-tuning message machine
"There is a lot of misinformation about what we are trying to do," Rep. James McGovern of Worcester, who is expecting a possible challenge from Martin Lamb, a Holliston attorney, tells Political Intelligence. "We need to do a better job of communicating that we are spending the people's money wisely."
In the wake of the surprise victory of Republican Scott P. Brown to fill the seat long held by liberal lion Ted Kennedy, McGovern is among several House Democrats from the Bay State who believe their positions on the economy, health care and other issues may not be well understood by Bay State voters.
"They want us to get spending under control, and fix health care -- but in a way that?s simple, transparent and understandable," said William Delahunt of Quincy, who is facing several possible GOP challengers, including former State Treasurer Joe Malone.
Meanwhile, Rep. Niki Tsongas, whose district centers around Lowell and is facing a well-financed challenge from Republican Jon Golnik, said she believes President Obama and his policies still have a strong base of support in her district that she hopes to tap into in the coming months.
But she acknowledges it's going to take some convincing. "One has to earn the voters' trust and earn every vote," she said.
Political analysts from both parties have indentifued all three lawmakers as potentially vulnerable this fall due to the outpouring of votes for Brown in their districts in Tuesday's election.
McGovern, like the others, said he will agressively campaign for re-election to bring those voters back into the Democratic fold.
He noted that his district, in central and southeastern Massachusetts, has a history of being competitive, noting that when it was drawn up under Republican Governor William Weld "it was designed in part to help a Republican get elected to Congress."
"Every two years, with or without a challenger, I run like I am 20 points behind," said McGovern. "I don't take anything for granted."
Obama sells benefits of health overhaul
Returning to domestic concerns, President Obama focuses on health care today after talking about jobs on Friday.
In his weekly Internet and radio address, the president says that as the economy recovers, his administration will build a new strong foundation for economic growth.
And besides education reform and investments in clean energy, a key element is fixing the nation's health care system, Obama says. Democrats in Congress are pushing to agree on a final bill that can go to Obama's desk before he delivers his first State of the Union speech next month.
"After a long and thorough debate, we are on the verge of passing health insurance reform that will finally offer Americans the security of knowing they’ll have quality, affordable health care whether they lose their job, change jobs, move, or get sick. The worst practices of the insurance industry will be banned forever. And costs will finally come down for families, businesses, and our government.
He addresses critics who point out that while some higher taxes and fees would start almost immediately after the bill becomes law while many benefits would not. "It’ll take a few years to fully implement these reforms in a responsible way. But what every American should know is that once I sign health insurance reform into law, there are dozens of protections and benefits that will take effect this year," Obama declares.
He goes on to list some of them: no more discrimination against uninsured Americans with a pre-existing illness or condition, young adults will be able to stay on their parents’ policy until they’re 26 or 27 years old, small business owners will get tax credits to help cover their employees, and seniors hit by the so-called donut hole in coverage will receive discounts on their prescriptions.
"In short," Obama says, "once I sign health insurance reform into law, doctors and patients will have more control over their health care decisions, and insurance company bureaucrats will have less. All told, these changes represent the most sweeping reforms and toughest restrictions on insurance companies that this country has ever known. That’s how we’ll make 2010 a healthier and more secure year for every American – for those who have health insurance, and those who don’t."
His full address is below and can be viewed here.
Markey prods Obama on screening cargo
In the aftermath of the nearly successful bombing of the Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day, the Obama administration has focused on beefing up the screening of airline passengers and stopping suspected terrorists from getting on board.
But Representative Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts reminded President Obama today that there's a deadline in August to screen all air cargo on passenger aircraft as well.
Markey, who authored a mandate to carry through the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission on cargo, sent a letter to Obama, urging him to intensify efforts to screen all inbound air cargo.
“As we have seen all too clearly with the attempted Christmas Day attack, dangerous holes remain in our security system that a terrorist can exploit,” Markey said in a statement. “While President Obama is working quickly to close these gaps, we must focus not only on the safety of passengers in airline seats, but of the cargo just beneath their feet. We must fully implement the 100 percent air cargo screening mandate and we must do it quickly.”
The Transportation Security Administration has indicated that it expects to meet the August deadline for screening all domestic air cargo carried on passenger planes, but agency officials have told Congress that they will not meet the deadline for inbound air cargo coming from overseas, and only plans to screen so-called "high-risk" cargo from overseas.
“The Christmas Day attempt is the must recent example of the shortcomings of this approach,” said Markey. “Just as international passengers entering the U.S. from abroad will be screened more thoroughly under the new guidelines, so too should the air cargo from overseas.”
Obama returns to job one -- jobs
President Obama hoped to put the Christmas Day terror scare behind him -- at least temporarily -- by saying Thursday that the "buck stops with me" and setting in motion a streamlining of intelligence efforts and a ramping up of passenger screening.
Today, he returned his focus to jobs after the latest unemployment report showed the jobless rate stuck in double digits.The Labor Department reported this morning that employers cut 85,000 jobs last month, more than most analysts expected. For all of 2009, employers slashed 4.2 million jobs, and the jobless rate averaged 9.3 percent -- compared to an average of 5.8 percent in 2008 and 4.6 percent in 2007. The economy has lost more than 8 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007.
Obama has warned repeatedly that job growth will lag the economic recovery, in part because many companies have figured out how to get by with fewer employees, often by making workers do more.
UPDATE: "The jobs numbers that were released by the Labor Department this morning are a reminder that the road to recovery is never straight and that we have to continue to work every single day to get our economy moving again," Obama said this afternoon.
"For most Americans, and for me, that means jobs. It means whether we are putting people back to work. Job losses for the last quarter of 2009 were one-tenth of what we were experiencing in the first quarter. In fact, in November we saw the first gain in jobs in nearly two years.
"Last month, however, we slipped back, losing more jobs than we gained, though the overall trend of job loss is still pointing in the right direction. What this underscores, though, is that we have to continue to explore every avenue to accelerate the return to hiring, which brings me to my announcement today." (His full remarks are below.)
He announced that the administration is awarding $2.3 billion in Recovery Act tax credits, for 183 "clean energy manufacturing projects" in 43 states that are supposed to create tens of thousands of jobs in areas including solar, wind, and efficiency and energy management technologies.
“Building a robust clean energy sector is how we will create the jobs of the future,” Obama said in a statement. “The Recovery Act awards I am announcing today will help close the clean energy gap that has grown between America and other nations while creating good jobs, reducing our carbon emissions and increasing our energy security.”
In advance of Obama's remarks, the White House sent out a statement from the chairwoman of his Council of Economic Advisers, Christina Romer, that reinforced his message that the recovery will not "be a straight line" and that cautioned against reading too much into any monthly unemployment report.
"Today’s employment report, though a setback from November, is consistent with the gradual labor market stabilization we have been seeing over the last several months," she said.
"Payroll employment declined 85,000 in December. To put this number in perspective, employment declined 139,000 in September and 127,000 in October. So, in a broad sense the trend toward moderating job loss is continuing. This trend is particularly obvious in the quarterly pattern: average monthly job loss was 691,000 in the first quarter of 2009, 428,000 in the second quarter, 199,000 in the third quarter, and 69,000 in the fourth quarter.
"Revised data now show that employment increased 4,000 in November. This is obviously welcome news and the first employment increase in 23 months. Compared with the unexpectedly good report for November, December’s job loss is a slight setback. Two industries where employment declined significantly were construction (-53,000) and wholesale and retail trade (-28,400). One continuing sign of labor market healing was that temporary help services, which is often a leading indicator of labor demand, added 46,500 jobs in December. Both the work week and aggregate hours remained stable, maintaining the significant improvement that occurred in November.
"The unemployment rate remained at 10.0 percent in December. This level reflected a proportional decline in the number of people unemployed and the number of people in the labor force. The unemployment rate remains unacceptably high, which underscores the need for responsible actions to jumpstart private-sector job creation.
"As the President has said for a year, the road to recovery will not be a straight line. The monthly employment and unemployment numbers are volatile and subject to substantial revision. Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative. It is essential that we continue our efforts to move in the right direction and replace job losses with robust job gains."
But the Republican National Committee got in the first shot.
“For close to a full year the American people have been forced to watch and in many cases bear the burden of our ever increasing national unemployment rate which unfortunately remained in the double digits throughout the month of December," Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said in a statement.
"More than 85,000 Americans lost their jobs in the month of December, meaning more than 2.8 million Americans have lost their jobs since the stimulus passed, and the national unemployment rate remains at 10 percent. The American economy is a powerful and amazingly resilient system that will always naturally return to balance because of the determination and unique ingenuity of the American worker," Steele added. "But President Obama’s singular focus on enacting his government-run liberal policies are single handily preventing this return. It’s time for President Obama to heed the recent words of Democrat Senator Ben Nelson and finally do what he should have been doing over the past year – put his full and undivided attention on fixing our economy.”
House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio piled on, warning of a "jobless recovery."
"Today’s disappointing report paints a picture of an economy in which employers and workers are stuck in the muck of higher taxes, job-killing policies and wasteful Washington spending. Republicans have repeatedly presented President Obama with better solutions to help small businesses create jobs, only to be rebuffed in favor of more of the same ‘stimulus’ programs that just grow government and pile debt on our kids and grandkids," Boehner said in a statement.
"A jobless recovery is a far cry from what the American people were promised last winter when Washington Democrats jammed through a trillion-dollar ‘stimulus’ that they said would create jobs ‘immediately.’ Instead, roughly three million Americans have lost their jobs since then, and joblessness remains in the double-digits.
“Instead of wildly pivoting from one issue to the next, the Obama Administration needs to listen to American families asking ‘where are the jobs?’ and employers calling on Washington to scrap these policies that are already costing jobs, starting with a government takeover of health care. The hard work and entrepreneurship of the American people will ultimately get us out of this mess, but unless Washington gets out of the way, that day will be longer in coming.”
Kerry defends tax on 'Cadillac' health plans
Senator John F. Kerry is aggressively defending the tax on so-called Cadillac health plans that is central to the health care bill passed by the Senate, but opposed by unions and many liberals and not in the House version.
President Obama reportedly told House Democratic leaders on Wednesday that they should accept the tax on the plans with the most generous benefits. And Kerry, who offered the idea of levying an excise tax on insurers that is incorporated in the bill, said today that it is essential to passing health reform.
Addressing fellow Democrats in an opinion piece posted on Huffington Post, the Massachusetts Democrat said that "striking this provision from the final bill will make it much more difficult to pass final health reform legislation in the Senate and that's a huge mistake when we're closer than ever to completing a journey that began with Harry Truman. If passing health care reform was easy, it would've happened decades ago. It's not. It requires tough choices. And it's worth it.
"Second, this is an idea that will help health reform succeed in the long run. It will create competition and place sunshine on the process of pricing health insurance premiums," he added.
"Third, it will help control future health care costs without -- I repeat without -- directly taxing employees. Unlike a cap on the existing tax exclusion of health insurance benefits, which I oppose, this provision will not require employees to include a portion of their employer provided benefits as part of their taxable wages."
UPDATE: Union leaders plan to meet Monday with Obama to lodge their protest against the tax, the Associated Press is reporting this evening.
They say the tax is both bad policy and bad politics -- bad policy because it would be passed along to already struggling workers and bad politics because those workers supported Obama and Democrats and are crucial for the party's prospects in November.
The meeting is expected to include leaders from the AFL-CIO, Service Employees International Union, and other labor organizations, the AP said.
Markey lauds stricter ozone rules
Representative Edward J. Markey, a key Capitol Hill lawmaker on environmental issues, today praised proposed new smog standards that would replace Bush administration rules criticized by scientists.
The Environmental Protection Agency today proposed the stricter health standards, which will likely mean hundreds more counties across the country will be in violation, forcing them to lower ozone levels or risk losing federal highway money.
“Our ozone standards have been in the danger zone for long enough, and these new pro-science standards encourage the adoption of cleaner, pollution-cutting technologies," said Markey, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee's subcommittee with oversight of EPA.
“The Bush administration set flawed standards that failed to protect public health. This new rule will save thousands of lives each year, decrease health care costs, and will continue America’s new push for cleaner energy, air and water," he added in a statement. "We can all breathe a little easier knowing that a pro-science Obama administration and EPA is back on the beat.”
Ozone, formed when emissions from cars and other factories mix in sunlight, has been an issue in the Northeast and the West Coast. The lower limits would likely hit Midwestern states, the Associated Press reports.
"EPA is stepping up to protect Americans from one of the most persistent and widespread pollutants we face," the agency's administrator, Lisa Jackson, said in a statement. "Using the best science to strengthen these standards is long overdue action that will help millions of Americans breathe easier and live healthier."
Dodd's decision another blow for Democrats
It took a party switch by Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania for Democrats to reach the magic 60 votes in the Senate -- a big enough majority to overcome procedural hurdles put up by Republicans and, for instance, to push through the health care overhaul bill.
But it will take a lot of hard campaigning and money to stay at 60.
Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut officially announced this afternoon that he won't seek a sixth term this year -- a change of heart that appears to be a nod to political reality that he would face a very tough campaign.
UPDATE: Less than three hours after Dodd spoke, Connecticut's popular Democratic attorney general, Richard Blumenthal, announced he would run to replace Dodd. Blumenthal, 63, told reporters he has had his eye on a Senate campaign for years, the Associated Press reported.
"People in Connecticut know I have never walked away from a fight, and I have always put them first," said Blumenthal, who praised Dodd.
Dodd, chairman of the powerful Senate Banking Committee, has played key roles on health care (where he carried the mantle for the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy, a close friend) and financial regulation. But his close ties to Wall Street have hurt him.
In a news conference in front of his Hartford home and surrounded by family, Dodd thanked the people of Connecticut. "You have honored me beyond words with your confidence," he said.
But he acknowledged that he has lost the confidence of some of his constituents, who have disagreed with him.
"I regret that," Dodd said. "But it's equally important that you know that I have never wavered in my determination to the best job -- to do the best job for our state and our nation."
"I love my job as your senator. I always have. Still do," he added, noting that he had led key committees and shepherded major legislation. have. "However, this past year has raised some challenges that insisted I take stock of my life."
Dodd said he was very aware of his precarious political situation. But he said he has been taking stock because over the last year, he lost a sister as well as Kennedy, and had a bout with cancer. He spoke movingly of Kennedy, saying that after the health care vote last month, he went to his friend's grave at Arlington National Cemetery on Christmas Eve.
"An hour later, I was standing on the Virginia hillside at Arlington Cemetery where Ted Kennedy rests along with his brothers in eternity, as he is in history, wishing that I could have seen the look in Teddy's eyes as the United States Senate took that historic step an hour before," Dodd said.
A lot of personal reflection followed over the holidays, he said.
"I came to the conclusion that in the long sweep of American history there are moments for each elected public official to step aside and let someone else step up. This is my moment to step aside," he said.
Both President Obama and Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts quickly issued statements praising Dodd.
"From his time as a young Peace Corps volunteer to his five terms in the United States Senate, Chris Dodd has devoted his life to public service. Over the years, he has worked tirelessly to improve the lives of our children and families, support good jobs for hard-working Americans, and keep our nation strong and prosperous, building a remarkable record of achievement for the people of Connecticut and our country. While his work in the Senate is not yet finished, his leadership in that institution will be missed. Michelle and I extend our thanks to Senator Dodd for his service to our Nation and offer our best wishes for the future to him and his family," Obama said.
Kerry's statement: “Too often in politics, words get thrown around like ‘good friend’ or ‘remarkable colleague.’ For those of us who have shared in Chris's laughter and stories, debated him, admired his progressive principles and moral core, or witnessed up-close his rare legislative skill learned from giants like his father and legends like Ted Kennedy, we know the full measure of those words when we talk about Chris Dodd, and we know this loss for the Senate will be felt a long time.
“Chris is just one hell of a Senator who exerted leadership across a number of vital issues. Rare is the Senator who could choose among the Chairmanships of the HELP, Foreign Relations, or Banking Committee. Connecticut will miss his voice in the Senate enormously. From family and medical leave to college affordability and health care, he leaves a legislative imprint that has made life better and the playing field more fair for millions of Americans.
“Chris brought to the Senate a grace, humility, and infectious sense of fun which he shared generously. His words today about fatherhood and family were especially poignant and real. That’s Chris. He treasures what he has been given in life, and we know today’s announcement marks a new chapter in a life he lives to the fullest. I know his life will continue to include public service. Teresa and I send Chris, Jackie, Grace, and Christina great wishes on this new start.”
Vice President Joe Biden, a former senator, added his tribute to Dodd.
“Senator Dodd is one of my best friends in life. We served together in the Senate for almost 30 years, and to every meeting, every hearing, every floor debate, he brought a keen intellect and a deep understanding of the subject matter on every issue. His knowledge and background in foreign policy are matched by few, and his expertise on matters relating to Latin and South America is respected worldwide. He’s one of the most skilled legislators I’ve ever served with. I doubt anyone else could have led two major committees simultaneously and had such an impact on two of the most important issues facing us: health reform and restoring economic stability," Biden said in a statement.
"I believe Chris will be long recognized as one of the most significant Senators of my generation. Every mother, every father, who has had to take medical leave to take care of a sick child or family member has Chris to thank. His commitment to the children of this country can be best understood by the landmark legislation he championed to protect their welfare. I believe the nation will miss his wisdom, wit and compassion. I count myself lucky because I know he’s not going too far and will always be source of advice and counsel. Jill and I wish Chris and Jackie the best as they move on to their next endeavors and know the future holds only great things for their family.”
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs called Dodd "a passionate advocate" of protecting consumers and reforming financial regulations so that the 2008 Wall Street meltdown isn't repeated. The senator and the White House will continue to push to pass the financial regulation overhaul this year, Gibbs said.
UPDATE: Republican Party chairman Michael Steele sought to put Dodd's decision in the context of other Democratic withdrawals and argued that those moves portend a GOP resurgence in November.
“In the past 24 hours, four major Democrat leaders, Michigan Lieutenant Governor John Cherry, North Dakota Senator Byron Dorgan, Colorado Governor Bill Ritter, and Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd, have announced their plans not to run for office in 2010, on top of the four House Democrats and the party switch of Dr. Parker Griffith in December. These should serve as a major wakeup call to Democrat leadership that members of their own caucus don’t want to be held accountable to the voters they have ignored for the past year," Steele said in a statement.
"Whether these Democrats want to admit it or not, President Obama’s government-run liberal agenda and their foolish decision to wholeheartedly embrace it has increased Republicans chances of regaining the majority and we are working hard to ensure this happens. The successes in Virginia and New Jersey combined with the last month of Democrat withdrawals, retirements, and switches, show that the Republican Party is solidly gaining momentum and is going strong into 2010. The real question is whether Harry Reid, now the Senate’s most vulnerable Democrat, will follow Chris Dodd’s lead and step aside.”
Dodd's announcement follows the one from Senator Byron Dorgan of North Dakota that he won't seek re-election this year, potentially opening the seat for popular Republican Governor John Hoeven.
That makes it more difficult for Democrats in the mid-term election, who will have to defend at least four open seats. The others are Delaware and Illinois, where Ted Kaufman and Roland Burris were appointed to the seats vacated by Vice President Joe Biden and President Obama, respectively, and aren't running for election to the seats.
“Senator Dorgan should be very proud of his more than 30 years of devoted service in the United States Congress and to the people of North Dakota," Obama said in a statement. "From fighting for our energy future to standing with North Dakota’s families through difficult economic times, Senator Dorgan has been a trusted leader for the people of his state. He has also been a champion for our family farmers and a powerful voice for Indian Country – particularly through his recent work to improve Indian health care services. Michelle and I extend our gratitude for his service to our nation and our very best wishes for the future for him and his family.”
A liberal group, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, is running a petition on its website urging Dorgan to change his mind, with more than 1,000 signers and counting. "Senator Dorgan -- don't retire! We need people like you in the Senate, fighting for the little guy against corporate power. Please keep fighting for us, and we'll fight for you," the plea says.
Dorgan not seeking return to Senate
In a surprise announcement, Senator Byron Dorgan of North Dakota said today he will not seek reelection this year, possibly imperiling Democrats' 60-vote majority needed to overcome GOP procedural roadblocks.
"Although I still have a passion for public service and enjoy my work in the Senate, I have other interests and I have other things I would like to pursue outside of public life," Dorgan, a moderate first elected in 1992, said in a statement.
Dorgan was trailing in early polls to Republican Governor John Hoeven, who is expected to seek the seat.
And the GOP, aggressively seeking to retake control of Congress in the midterm election, quickly suggested that Dorgan was withdrawing to avoid defeat -- and that his decision was a harbinger of more.
Dorgan's announcement “highlights just how vulnerable both Senate and House Democrats have become since deciding to walk in lockstep with President Obama’s government-run policies," Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said in a statement.
"For nearly a year congressional Democrats have been turning a deaf ear to the concerns of the American people and as the elections of 2010 approach, many of these same Democrats are deciding to simply leave office instead of risking certain defeat. While Senator Dorgan might be the first Democrat to announce his retirement this year, I predict he will not be the last as more and more Americans start moving away from the Democrat Party’s liberal agenda and towards the Republican Party’s core principles of less government, lower taxes, and greater personal responsibility.”
C-SPAN complains about private health talks
Democrats' apparent decision to come up with a final health care bill not only behind closed doors but within a very select group of negotiators is drawing criticism not only from expected quarters, but from the media.
Both C-SPAN and House Republicans are reminding President Obama that he once pledged to have the health care negotiations carried on the gavel-to-gavel cable network.
"As your respective chambers work to reconcile the differences between the House and Senate health care bills, C-SPAN requests that you open all important negotiations, including any conference committee meetings, to electronic media coverage," C-SPAN CEO Brian Lamb wrote in a letter to Obama and congressional leaders that the network released this morning.
"President Obama, Senate and House leaders, many of your rank-and-file members, and the nation’s editorial pages have all talked about the value of transparent discussions on reforming the nation’s health care system. Now that the process moves to the critical stage of reconciliation between the Chambers, we respectfully request that you allow the public full access, through television, to legislation that will affect the lives of every single American," Lamb added in the Dec. 30 letter.
"We hope you will give serious consideration to this request. We are most willing to employ the latest digital technology to make the cameras, lights and microphones as unobtrusive as possible."
The plan is not to appoint a conference committee of key members of the House and Senate, but to have House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, top White House officials, and a few others try to craft a compromise. That would be a more expeditious route, in hopes of getting a bill to Obama's desk before his first State of the Union speech.
The first of those private meetings is scheduled later today in the Oval Office as Obama huddles with Democratic leaders.
UPDATE: Asked this afternoon about the C-SPAN criticism, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said he had not seen the letter. He didn't answer further.
Obama grassroots army seeks marching orders
President Obama's grassroots group is taking the pulse of its members to decide its priorities for the new year.
Organizing for America, Obama's presidential campaign vehicle now housed within the Democratic National Committee, sent out an online survey today.
David Plouffe, Obama's former campaign manager, told supporters part of the agenda is set, including the crucial mid-term congressional elections in November: "2010 will be a year of new, exciting challenges. We'll be working hard with President Obama to finish the fight for health insurance reform, put more Americans back to work, and get our economy running strong. We'll fight to protect consumers and our economy from Wall Street abuses, improve transparency in Washington to elevate the voices of the American people, and create a vibrant, clean energy economy. And we'll stand up for the President's allies at the ballot box."
The survey, itself, asks how interested people are in health care, jobs, clean energy, financial regulation, and education. It also asks about immigration reform -- an issue that Obama put on the back burner during 2009 but has promised Latino and other groups he will tackle in 2010.
Party switcher's staff jumps ship
Representative Parker Griffith of Alabama made what he believed was the politically savvy move by joining the GOP.
But his staff isn't going with him.
Griffith's chief of staff announced this morning that she and the entire legislative and communications team are leaving his employ, and called his party switch a “mistake” for his constituents who have benefited from having a conservative Democrat represent them. Many of the staff members had worked for Griffith since before he arrived in Washington last year.
"Alabama's Fifth District has deserved and has benefited from great Democratic conservative leadership since Reconstruction. And until now they had it,” Chief of Staff Sharon Wheeler said in a statement.
“I appreciate Congressman Griffith's being a very dedicated congressman. But we believe he made a mistake – a well-intentioned but misguided mistake that is not in the interest of the great people of North Alabama who elected him a year ago as a Democrat. As his staff, we wish him only the best, and we all remain committed to the citizens of the Tennessee Valley. But we cannot, in good conscience, continue working for him. It is with deep sadness that we leave our work for the Fifth District. But because we are unwavering in our own principles, we have no choice but to move on. We do not know what the future holds, but we are taking a leap of faith with the belief we will soon find ourselves in the employment of principled public officials."
Key Republican calls for congressional inquiry on attempted bombing
With President Obama acknowledging that a "systemic failure" allowed a Nigerian with apparent links to Al Qaeda to nearly blow up a US airliner on Christmas Day, the top Republican on the congressional committee that helped investigate what went wrong before 9/11 is urging a similar inquiry.
After the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform helped push for creating the Department of Homeland Security and for revamping intelligence agencies.
"Recent events have exposed a sobering reality that the very failures that made us vulnerable before 9/11 still threaten our homeland security today,” Representative Darrell Issa of California, the ranking Republican on the committee, said today.
“When we created DHS, there was unanimous agreement here on the Hill and in the Executive that we must go from an atmosphere of need to know to need to share. It now appears that our various counter terrorist agencies are reverting to their pre-9/11 ways and there refusal to share information has put our nation at risk,” Issa added in a statement.
He called for an immediate series of bipartisan hearings and briefings "detailing the failure of agencies to share information and utilize databases that could have prevented this terrorist from boarding an aircraft bound for Detroit."
UPDATE: The Senate Intelligence Committee announced later today that it will hold hearings on Jan. 21, the Associated Press reports.
"We will be following the intelligence down the rabbit hole to see where the breakdown occurred and how to prevent this failure in the future," said Senator Kit Bond of Missouri, top Republican on the committee. "Somebody screwed up big time."
Obama received a preliminary report today on the terrorist watch lists and on passenger screening -- both of which apparently failed on Christmas Day. Leaders of the bipartisan Sept. 11 commission have said in recent days that the apparent communication and other lapses in US intelligence leading up to the attempted bombing of the Detroit-bound passenger yet were the exactly the flaws they pushed to fix.
"Our report documented again and again the failures and the problem this time, it's, you know, it's like reading the same script over again," Thomas Kean, the former New Jersey governor and co-chairman of the 9/11 Commission, said on CNN's "Larry King Live" on Wednesday night.
"They are talking about the fact that intelligence agencies didn't talk to one another. And that was the major fault we found in our report. We said if they had talked to each other, there was a possibility that 9/11 just wouldn't have happened. And here again, we were lucky this time but again, intelligence agencies didn't seem to be talking to one another," he added.
Asked whether the US is safer, Kean replied, "Yes, we're safer now but not, as we found out in this incident, not as safe as we should be. I mean, that's the problem, that we're safer now but these people are looking for new ways to attack and this was a new way they tried this time. And thanks to some brave people on the plane and perhaps some failure of their technology, we were a little lucky this time.
"But the technology is we've got to stop them at the airport before they get on the plane. This fellow should have been stopped at the airport. He should not have had a visa to come into this country. He was the profile of a terrorist, as you and I understand terrorism. Should have been identified, should have been stopped and we ought to do that to terrorists in the future."
Kerry says he's trying to save bowl game broadcasts
Senator John F. Kerry said today he's doing his best to make sure a dispute between Time Warner Cable and Fox doesn't deprive football fans of their New Year's Day bowl games.
The Massachusetts Democrat's office released a letter from Time Warner in response to one Kerry wrote last week urging Time Warner to continue carrying Fox even if the two media conglomerates don’t resolve their contract dispute.
Glenn Britt, chairman and CEO of Time Warner, said the company will agree to "whatever interim steps are necessary" -- including binding arbitration -- to make sure coverage is not interrupted when the current contract expires on Thursday.
Britt also wrote in his Tuesday letter that Time Warner will "work around the clock" for a deal and would agree to an interim agreement to preserve programming on New Year's Day. "As your letter recognizes, the goal of preventing disruption to viewer is more important than the particular means of doing so," he added.
Read Britt's full letter here.
In his Dec. 22 letter, Kerry warned that if Fox programming was removed from Time Warner cable systems, millions of viewers "could lose access to the Sugar Bowl, Cotton Bowl, Fiesta Bowl, and Orange Bowl, as well as NFL playoff games."
"Fox and Time Warner need to strike a deal -- millions of football fans are depending on it," Kerry, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee's subcommittee on communication, technology, and the Internet, said in a statement. "Having screens go dark because two parties couldn't come together in time is no solution. New Year's Day and football are synonymous in households across the nation. Private industry negotiations cannot disrupt a fundamental American tradition."
Liberals urge Sanders to hold out for public option
A liberal group is urging Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont to stick to his guns, "be a hero," and hold out for a public option government plan in the final version of the health care overhaul.
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee said today it is making 10,000 automated phone calls a day to Vermont voters. The calls feature AJ Van Tassel-Sweet of Northfield, who urges voters to call Sanders.
"I supported Senator Bernie Sanders in the past because I thought he would fight for us. But now the Senate is planning to pass a health care bill without the public health insurance option that most Americans support. Instead, it just mandates that people buy insurance from big insurance companies. That's not reform, that's a corporate giveaway. We need a hero right now who will stand up to Joe Lieberman and the insurance industry," Tassel-Sweet says.
The committee also said that it is running online ads in Vermont and other states and has collected more than 40,000 signatures since last week on an online "we need a hero" petition to Sanders.
Sanders, an independent, was one of the 60 votes that Democrats needed to move through the Senate health care bill -- which, unlike the House bill, does not include a public option. He also voted for the bill on final passage Christmas Eve, arguing that it would provide insurance for 31 million Americans, stop insurers from denying care for people with preexisting conditions, and not penalize Vermont and Massachusetts for taking steps to expand coverage on their own. He also noted that he helped secure $10 billion for community health centers.
But he still supports a full public option as a step toward a single-payer system that the political left wants.
"The congratulations that Democrats are giving themselves in Washington DC are not shared by voters across the country who overwhelmingly want a public option and oppose being required to buy insurance from companies that put profit ahead of people's health. Bernie Sanders can be a hero at this historic moment by declaring that any final bill must have a public option to win his support. That would change the entire calculus in House-Senate negotiations and force President Obama to finally fight back against Joe Lieberman's threats," Adam Green, co-founder of the committee, said in a statement.
Terror scare reveals another labor battle
The running battle between Big Labor and congressional Republicans now has a new front -- the attempted airliner bombing on Christmas Day.
That's because President Obama's nominee to lead the Transportation Security Agency -- which is in charge of airline safety -- has been put on hold by Senator Jim DeMint, a South Carolina Republican, who is concerned that the nominee would allow TSA screeners join a union.
DeMint's spokesman, Wes Denton, told Politico that the agency is better off without a permanent leader than with unions running the nation’s airports.
“This is an important debate because many Americans don't want someone running the TSA who stands ready to give union bosses the power to veto or delay future security measures at our airports,” Denton said.
That brought this reaction from Eddie Vale, a spokesman for the AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor federation:
"Now that this issue has been brought to the forefront the past few days you're going to hear a lot more of this slime and slander from DeMint against hard working Americans who are fighting every day to keep our country safe.... DeMint has no legitimate security concerns, he only cares about advancing a political and ideological agenda -- no matter what the risk or cost to our country."
Part of the delay is Obama's own fault -- it took him eight months to nominate former FBI agent and police detective Erroll Southers. But the hold means that an interim director is in charge of TSA as it takes part in the sweeping review of security policies Obama has ordered.
A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid now tells CNN that he will seek to force a confirmation vote when the Senate returns in January. It would take 60 votes to cut off debate, which Reid hopes to have with 58 Democrats and two independents who usually vote with Democrats.
UPDATE: DeMint hit back today at Democratic critics accusing him of obstructionism.
"The president has downplayed the threat of terror since he took office, and he waited eight months to even nominate Mr. Southers for this position. And then he wanted him approved in secret with no debate and no recorded vote in the Senate," DeMint said on Fox News Channel.
"And this is all in the context of the president promising the unions that he will submit our airport security to collective bargaining with union bosses. This is the last thing we need to do right now. Our airport security needs to have massive flexibility, the ability to move people around and change protocols. And it makes absolutely no sense to submit the security of our airports and the passengers here in this country to collective bargaining with unions."
Report says Kerry might be headed to Tehran
But Frederick Jones, Kerry's spokesman, said this afternoon, "John Kerry has no plan to travel to Iran."
Kerry, as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, has been a high-profile representative of President Obama, who is talking tough to Iran on what the US believes is a nuclear weapons program, while still offering dialogue.
For instance, Kerry personally persuaded Afghan President Hamid Karzai to accept a runoff election after fraud marred the first vote, though the runoff was later called off when the challenger withdrew.
The Journal reports that the White House would not oppose a Kerry trip. "This sounds like the kind of travel a chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee would -- and should -- undertake," it quotes a White House official saying.
But the Journal also said that the Obama administration hasn't decided whether to make Kerry its official representative to Iran, and it's not clear whether the Iranian regime would welcome him. It said Iranian officials have been dismissive of the possible trip since it was first raised on a Foreign Policy magazine blog.
Obama calls Senate vote 'historic'
His full statement, delivered at the White House:
"Good morning, everybody. In a historic vote that took place this morning members of the Senate joined their colleagues in the House of Representatives to pass a landmark health insurance reform package -- legislation that brings us toward the end of a nearly century-long struggle to reform America’s health care system.
"Ever since Teddy Roosevelt first called for reform in 1912, seven Presidents -- Democrats and Republicans alike -- have taken up the cause of reform. Time and time again, such efforts have been blocked by special interest lobbyists who’ve perpetuated a status quo that works better for the insurance industry than it does for the American people. But with passage of reform bills in both the House and the Senate, we are now finally poised to deliver on the promise of real, meaningful health insurance reform that will bring additional security and stability to the American people.
"The reform bill that passed the Senate this morning, like the House bill, includes the toughest measures ever taken to hold the insurance industry accountable. Insurance companies will no longer be able to deny you coverage on the basis of a preexisting condition. They will no longer be able to drop your coverage when you get sick. No longer will you have to pay unlimited amounts out of your own pocket for the treatments you need. And you’ll be able to appeal unfair decisions by insurance companies to an independent party.
"If this legislation becomes law, workers won’t have to worry about losing coverage if they lose or change jobs. Families will save on their premiums. Businesses that would see their costs rise if we do not act will save money now, and they will save money in the future. This bill will strengthen Medicare, and extend the life of the program. It will make coverage affordable for over 30 million Americans who do not have it -- 30 million Americans. And because it is paid for and curbs the waste and inefficiency in our health care system, this bill will help reduce our deficit by as much as $1.3 trillion in the coming decades, making it the largest deficit reduction plan in over a decade.
"As I’ve said before, these are not small reforms; these are big reforms. If passed, this will be the most important piece of social policy since the Social Security Act in the 1930s, and the most important reform of our health care system since Medicare passed in the 1960s. And what makes it so important is not just its cost savings or its deficit reductions. It’s the impact reform will have on Americans who no longer have to go without a checkup or prescriptions that they need because they can’t afford them; on families who no longer have to worry that a single illness will send them into financial ruin; and on businesses that will no longer face exorbitant insurance rates that hamper their competitiveness. It’s the difference reform will make in the lives of the American people.
"I want to commend Senator Harry Reid, extraordinary work that he did; Speaker Pelosi for her extraordinary leadership and dedication. Having passed reform bills in both the House and the Senate, we now have to take up the last and most important step and reach an agreement on a final reform bill that I can sign into law. And I look forward to working with members of Congress in both chambers over the coming weeks to do exactly that.
"With today’s vote, we are now incredibly close to making health insurance reform a reality in this country. Our challenge, then, is to finish the job. We can't doom another generation of Americans to soaring costs and eroding coverage and exploding deficits. Instead we need to do what we were sent here to do and improve the lives of the people we serve. For the sake of our citizens, our economy, and our future, let’s make 2010 the year we finally reform health care in the United States of America.
"Everybody, Merry Christmas, Happy New Year."
UPDATE: Obama also called Vicki Kennedy, the widow of Senator Edward M. Kennedy, after the bill's passage, the White House said.
He also called key senators and David Turner of Little Rock, Ark. Turner, who had his health insurance rescinded in January 2008, was the First Lady’s guest at Obama's health care address to the joint session of Congress in September.
"The president told Mr. Turner that stories like his motivate him every day to keep working on health insurance reform, and he assured Mr. Turner that he will continue to work to pass health legislation to ban rescission and other abusive practices," the White House said.
UPDATE: Obama also sent a message this afternoon to share "some exciting news" to his grassroots army, now under Organizing for America at the Democratic National Committee. He also asked for their help getting the bill over the finish line.
"Although it's Christmas Eve, I wanted to share some exciting news: The Senate just passed a historic health reform bill," he said in an email.
"In all the back and forth, it's easy to lose sight of what this incredible breakthrough really means. But consider this: This Christmas, there are millions of Americans without health insurance who risk losing everything if they get sick. There are mothers and fathers who wonder how they'll provide for their children because an illness has wiped out their savings. There are small business owners who worry that they'll have to lay off a long-time employee because the cost of insurance is rapidly rising.
"If we finish the job, all this can change. We will have beaten back the special interests who have for so long perpetuated the status quo. We will have enacted the most important piece of social policy since the Social Security Act in the 1930s, and the most important health reform since Medicare in the 1960s.
"In Decembers to come, millions more will have access to affordable coverage. Parents will have the security and stability of knowing their insurance can't be revoked at a moment's notice. And the skyrocketing costs plaguing our small businesses will be brought under control. When you make calls, write letters, organize, this is the change you're making -- a better life for your family and for men and women in every state.
"There is still more to do before I can sign reform into law -- a last round of negotiations and final votes in the Senate and the House -- and I'm counting on your help every step of the way. But for now, I hope that as you celebrate this holiday season, you remember that the work you are doing is making our union more perfect, one step at a time. For that, I am grateful to you."
Reaction from across political spectrum to health vote
Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List, said that the bill does not include enough limits on abortion coverage:
"On Christmas Eve, the U.S. Senate gave Americans a gift no one wants: abortion for all, at taxpayer-expense. Even more tragic, they can thank self-described ‘pro-life’ senators like Ben Nelson, Bob Casey, Jr., and Harry Reid for paving the way for legislation that will open the floodgates for the greatest expansion of government-backed abortion since Roe v. Wade.
"Today’s vote was a career-affecting vote. The senators who voted to advance this legislation should consider themselves on notice. Votes have consequences, and the Susan B. Anthony List will use all the resources at our disposal to educate their constituents about today’s result. As this debate moves forward, pro-life House members would do well to consider the impact of their own votes. Abortion is never good for women, and it should never be a legitimate aspect of any ‘health care’ debate.
"If this bill is signed into law, for the first time, federally funded and managed health care plans will cover elective abortions. Pro-life Americans in states that choose to ‘opt-out’ of abortion coverage will still be forced to foot the bill for abortions in California and New York.
"This is not ‘compromise’ or ‘middle ground.’ The only ones who support the senate abortion language are a handful of senators so far-removed from the consciences of their own constituents that it’s laughable. Discussions of ‘different accounts’ and ‘separate checks’ are just a smokescreen.
"This bill is a betrayal of conscience for millions of Americans. And it is a betrayal of the principles proclaimed by Reid, Nelson, and Casey. Today’s vote is exactly the type of ‘leadership’ that repels the American electorate. Americans are hungry for authenticity. They are hungry for leaders whose actions follow their principles, for stalwart representatives who will never abandon their convictions for a sweet deal. Unfortunately, on Christmas Eve 2009, as a result of that lack of real leadership, Americans received the gift of abortion in the name of ‘health care reform.’
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said he preferred the House bill, largely because the Senate bill would tax the most generous health plans -- ones that union members have bargained for in place of pay hikes.
"In the face of inexcusable partisanship, obstruction and gamesmanship, it is remarkable that Majority Leader Reid was able to move a health care bill through the United States Senate. Not since the passage of Medicare 44 years ago have we seen Republican scare tactics so blatantly contrary to the interests of the American people.
"At this historic moment, it is so important to the future of working Americans—and to our country—to get health care reform right. Despite doing some good things, the Senate bill remains inadequate. Substantial changes must be made in the final bill. Genuine reform must bring down health costs, hold insurance companies accountable, assure that all Americans can get the health care they need and be financed fairly. That’s why we have been steadfast in support of a public health insurance option. It is the way to break the stranglehold of the insurance industry that has led to skyrocketing health care costs that have especially penalized small business.
"Employers must pay their fair share. It makes no sense to tax the benefits of hard-working Americans to pay for health reform. The House bill curbs insurance companies and taxes the wealthy who benefited so richly from the Bush tax cuts. The Senate bill instead includes exorbitant new taxes on middle class health benefits that would affect one in five workers with employer-provided health coverage—or about 31 million people—in 2016. That’s the wrong way to pay for health care reform and it’s political suicide."
"The House bill is the right model for reform. It covers more people, takes effect more quickly and is financed more fairly. The AFL-CIO is ready to fight on behalf of all working families to produce a final bill that can be called genuine reform. Working people cannot accept anything less."
Tom McMahon, acting executive director of the liberal-labor coalition Americans United for Change, said that improvements are needed to the bill in the House-Senate negotiations:
“Today we are one another step closer to guaranteeing quality, affordable health care for all Americans. There is still a great deal of work to be done to ensure the best possible bill reaches President Obama’s desk. But when historians look back on this moment – and they will – it will mark a turning point in our long struggle to build a health care system Americans deserve. It may also leave a remarkable and indelible imprint on the Republican Party, whose decision to put political posturing before the needs of millions of Americans will tarnish the reputation of the GOP for years to come.
“Under the Senate bill, more than 30 million people will gain health coverage. The Medicare program will be stronger and the federal deficit smaller. People with pre-existing health conditions won’t be rejected or charged higher premiums by insurers, and women will no longer have to pay more than men for the same coverage. Seniors will have expanded prescription drug coverage and young adults will have easy access to health insurance. Americans from every corner of the country will have a reason to be thankful for the Senate’s action today.”
James Rohack, president of the American Medical Association, continued to offer his group's significant support:
“Today, the Senate took an historic vote to improve our nation’s health care system by expanding coverage to millions of Americans and strengthening the private insurance market to better serve the patients who rely on it. The AMA supported passage of the bill because it contains a number of key improvements for our health care system, which currently is not working for far too many patients or the physicians who dedicate their lives to patient care.
“The Senate bill will improve choice and access to affordable health insurance coverage and eliminate denials based on pre-existing conditions. It will increase coverage for preventive and wellness care that can lead to better disease prevention and management, and further the development of comparative effectiveness research that can help patients and physicians make informed treatment decisions. Patients will no longer face lifetime limits on health coverage or higher premiums based on medical conditions or gender.
“While this vote closes one chapter of the legislative process, the hard work is not yet done. The AMA will stay constructively engaged throughout the House and Senate conference process to continue to improve the final bill and assure the best outcome for patients and physicians. Important issues that need to be resolved in the House-Senate conference committee include the scope, authority, accountability and transparency of a payment advisory board. The details of several cost control and quality improvement initiatives also need to be refined so that they do not have unintended consequences for patients and physicians.
“Separate action is needed early next year to permanently repeal the current Medicare physician payment formula to preserve access to care for America’s seniors, baby boomers and military families by creating a stable physician payment system. We commend Senators Reid and Baucus for keeping the focus on a permanent solution to this problem, and we will continue to work closely with them to fix the flawed Medicare physician payment formula once and for all early in the new year.”
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele continued his assault on the bill:
“This morning, as millions of Americans prepared to gather with their families in celebration of Christmas, President Obama and Harry Reid gathered with their liberal allies in celebration of government. Mr. Reid and company honored President Obama’s Christmas wish for increased federal control and passed their government-run health care experiment out of the Senate.
"Immediately following this vote, in a telling and strangely ironic legislative move, the Democrats voted to increase America’s credit card limit because even they know their deficit reduction claims are false. If they were truly proud of this so-called ‘historic’ legislation then they should have stood by their pledge and allowed Senators and the American people 72 hours to read the full legislative text prior to voting instead of secretly rushing it through on Christmas Eve. In fact, most Democrats aren’t proud of this legislation and only voted for it after months of closed door meetings, back room deal making, and political compromise with Harry Reid and the White House. The Democrats have put a $2.5 trillion lump of coal in the stocking of every American knowing that their risky health care experiment still increases premiums, still cuts Medicare, and still enacts hundreds of billions of new taxes to pay for it. Scrooge would be proud. I know a majority of Americans are not. As we move forward, America can look forward to watching Nancy Pelosi conduct the arm-twisting needed to convince her most liberal colleagues that the Senate version is the best Trojan horse possible to hide a true single payer system, which is what this debate has always been about. This Christmas, the Democrats and President Obama have given America the one gift that keeps on taking.”
AARP CEO A. Barry Rand and Massachusetts State Director Deborah Banda praised the vote, but said the final bill needs to do more to close the so-called doughnut hole in Medicare drug coverage:
“This morning the Senate brought us closer to meaningful health care reform than we have ever been before. Passage of the Senate health care reform bill clears the way for Congress to enact legislation in the coming weeks that will protect and strengthen Medicare, ensure millions more Americans can get affordable health coverage and sharply curtail discriminatory insurance company practices that keep those most in need out of the system," Rand said in a statement.
“The bill passed by the Senate makes needed progress to prevent coverage denials due to health status and limit insurance companies from charging older Americans much more for coverage because of their age. It also begins to close the dangerous gap in Medicare drug coverage known as the doughnut hole, and Senate leaders have committed that a final bill will close the gap entirely by 2019, in keeping with the President’s pledge. In addition, the Senate bill adds important new Medicare benefits, like free preventive care, and encourages states to provide more home and community-based long-term care services and supports instead of costlier institutional care.
Banda added:
“AARP thanks the Senate for passing health care reform that protects guaranteed Medicare benefits and helps ensure older Americans can afford quality health services. The legislation is needed to lower drug costs, limit age discrimination by health insurance companies and strengthen long-term care.
“We believe this legislation can be improved even further, especially when it comes to the Medicare prescription drug coverage gap, called the doughnut hole. More then 300,000 Bay State seniors will likely fall into the Medicare doughnut hole next year, costing each up to $3,610 in added health care costs. Both the House and Senate versions of the health reform bill will bring them some immediate relief by narrowing the coverage gap. But some relief isn't enough. We urge the members of the Massachusetts Congressional Delegation to pass a final health reform bill that closes the dreaded doughnut hole completely over time – so seniors can afford to take the medicine that keeps them healthy and out of more expensive care.”
Kennedy invoked on cusp of health care bill passage
"We're all saddened and cognizant that the real author of this bill is not with us," Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa, who praised a longtime Kennedy staff director Michael Myers.
Democrats deserve praise for turning a blank piece of paper into legislation that would make real Kennedy's dream of health care reform, added Senator Christopher Dodd, a close friend and colleague of the late senator.
"We will always, always remember this day," Dodd said at a news conference.
He also used his time to hit back at Republicans, who said would be judged harshly by history for being obstructionists to a significant bill.
Mass. lawmakers seek energy office
The delegation delivered a letter (read it here) to Minerals Management Service Director S. Elizabeth Birnbaum trying to land a new regional renewable energy office for the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf. Earlier this month, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced the new office to manage the timely processing of permits, leasing and other renewable energy activities in federal waters offshore. The regional office will be established in 2010.
“The creation of this new office will help ensure that developing offshore wind and other renewable energy projects will be a breeze,” said Representative Edward J. Markey, a senior member of the Natural Resources Committee, which oversees the Interior Department. Markey also is chairman of energy panels in the House with jurisdiction over energy and the environment.
“Given the clean energy expertise in the Commonwealth and the vast renewable energy potential off the coast of New England, I can think of no better location for this office than right here in Massachusetts. The Department of Interior’s regional office will allow us to harness our tremendous offshore renewable potential and siting the office in Massachusetts will allow the Department to harness the tremendous ingenuity that we have in the Commonwealth,” Markey added in a statement.
President says he'll wait for health care passage
He had planned to go to Hawaii for the holidays, but said today that he'll stay until the Senate finishes its votes on health care.
"I will not leave until my friends in the Senate have completed their work. My attitude is if they are making these sacrifices to provide health care to all Americans, the least I can do is be around and provide them any encouragement and last-minute help," Obama told reporters.
UPDATE: After Majority Leader Harry Reid and GOP Leader Mitch McConnell announced that the final vote would be at 8 a.m. Thursday instead of as late as Christmas Eve night, the White House said Obama would leave Thursday morning.
With Republicans so far insisting on the every detail of the parliamentary procedures, the Senate took another key vote early this morning and has another today, and two more on Wednesday before final passage Thursday night.
Alabama congressman switching to GOP
Griffith, elected in November 2008 from a district that went heavily for Republican John McCain over President Obama, bucked his president and party on the economic stimulus bill and the health care bill.
His switch, which will give Republicans 178 seats in the House compared to 257 for Democrats, isn't near as big a get as Senator Arlen Specter's earlier this year -- which gave Democrats the 60 votes that are making much use of during this week's health care votes.
But it does give the GOP more momentum heading into the 2010 mid-term elections, when Republicans hope to retake control of Congress.
Representative Eric Cantor, the second-ranking Republican in the House, welcomed Griffith and got in a shot at Democrats.
"When a member of Congress decides to leave a 258-seat majority to join a deep minority, it is a sure sign that the majority party has become completely disconnected from seniors, young workers, and families in America," Cantor said in a statement.
"From the massive stimulus bill that wasted billions of dollars and failed to create jobs, to a job-killing cap and trade energy tax, to a government takeover of health care - the Democrat majority has pursued an agenda far outside the mainstream. Democrats are beginning to realize what most Americans did months ago - that their priorities are not in line with what Americans want right now – which is job growth, economic security, a safe and secure nation, and a fiscally sane Congress that doesn’t spend money that it doesn’t have," Cantor added.
House GOP leader John Boehner broadcast a similar message.
"All year long, Alabamians have been well-served by Congressman Griffith’s support for conservative principles and his rejection of Washington Democrats’ wrong-headed, liberal policies. Whether it was the trillion-dollar ‘stimulus,’ the national energy tax, or a government takeover of health care, Congressman Griffith has consistently sided with Republicans and the American people to call for better solutions rooted in common sense. He has also stood up to Speaker Pelosi by joining efforts to advance ‘read the bill’ reform and to ensure that not a single taxpayer dollar is used to fund abortions," Boehner said in a statement.
“With today’s decision, Congressman Griffith has added his voice to the growing chorus of Americans who have had it with Democrats’ wrong-headed policies and lack of leadership. Families continue to ask ‘where are the jobs?’ and all they are getting from out-of-touch Washington Democrats is more spending, more taxes, and more debt."
Kerry says health bill would help Mass.
Senator John F. Kerry returned in between votes to Massachusetts today to declare that the bill the Senate is about to pass would reward, rather than penalize, the state for leading by passing its own health reform in 2006.
"We are on the verge of passing health insurance reform legislation that will put patients ahead of profits and will protect rather than penalize Massachusetts for already having led the nation in reform. The Majority Leader has agreed to include a provision that will provide Massachusetts with additional federal funds for Medicaid for the next three calendar years -- roughly $500 million -- that's half a billion dollars more than we otherwise would have had. And our congressional delegation has worked closely with Senator Reid to make sure Massachusetts' reforms are not only protected, but are enhanced," Kerry said during a visit to Children's Hospital Boston.
Since Massachusetts passed its bill in 2006, requiring individuals to get health insurance, more than 400,000 residents have been added to the insured rolls, giving the state the lowest rate of uninsured at 2.7 percent. Several elements of the Massachusetts law have been incorporated into the bills working their way through Congress.
Kerry's full prepared remarks are below:
Tamil activists protest at Kerry's office
Ethnic Tamils in Boston protested today in front of Senator John F. Kerry's office against a report that Kerry's Senate Foreign Relations Committee released earlier this month that calls for friendlier relations between the United States and Sri Lanka.
Six months after the Sri Lankan army defeated a Tamil rebel army that had controlled the northern part of the island for decades, many Boston-area Tamils complain that the Sri Lankan government is still keeping more than 100,000 Tamils in camps for internally displaced people and not allowing them to leave. (The Sri Lankan government has pledged to close the camps next month.)
The Boston Tamil group has been encouraging Kerry and other US officials to open a war crimes investigation, charging that the Sri Lankan army shelled hospitals and killed civilians in their effort to defeat the rebels.
But two Senate Foreign Relations staffers who traveled to Sri Lanka in November say that the United States must improve its relations with the tiny island nation which is crucial to protecting shipping lanes in the region.
The report recommends resuming military training for Sri Lankan officials, reinstating the Peace Corps, and giving humanitarian assistance to all areas of the country, not just to Tamil areas in the north.
"The United States cannot afford to 'lose' Sri Lanka," the staffers wrote in their report, which noted that Sri Lanka is beginning to cultivate closer ties with non-democratic countries, including China, Iran, and Libya. (Read the report here.)
Today, members of the Boston Tamil group gathered outside Kerry's office in Bowdoin Square and handed over about 45 letters of complaint to one of Kerry's aides. The protesters claimed that the report was biased towards the Sinhalese ethnic majority that rules Sri Lanka, and against the Tamil minority that has been fighting for a separate homeland for decades.
"The report falls short on presenting the Tamil's grievances," said Siva Sivalogan, the association's secretary, who noted that one of the staffers who co-authored the report is of Sinhalese descent.
But Frederick Jones, Kerry's spokesman, said: "To question the objectivity and expertise of a Foreign Relations Committee staffer based on her ethnicity is deeply troubling."
The bipartisan report "does not take sides between the different ethnic groups," Jones said, noting that it also calls for the Sri Lankan government to begin efforts at political reconciliation with Tamils and to respect the basic rights of all citizens.
"The bipartisan Senate Foreign Relations report presents a balanced and pragmatic view of the steps all sides need to take to help the country transition to a real peace," he said.
AMA backs Senate health bill
"All Americans deserve affordable, high-quality health coverage so they can get the medical care they need – and this bill advances many of our priority issues for achieving the vision of a health system that works for patients and physicians," said AMA President-elect Cecil B. Wilson, who appeared with top Democrats at a Capitol Hill news conference.
He highlighted the bill's provisions that guarantee coverage for pre-existing conditions, better coverage for preventive and wellness care, and research on the comparative effectiveness of different treatments.
"Lifetime limits on health coverage will be a thing of the past -- as will higher premiums based on medical conditions or gender," Wilson said in a statement. "These are important benefits for those who have insurance now – and those who want it but have been unable to get it."
The AMA said it is pleased that the latest version of the bill increases payments to primary care physicians and general surgeons in underserved areas while no longer cutting payments to other physicians; eliminates the tax on physician services for cosmetic surgery; and drops the proposed physician enrollment fee for Medicare.
The doctors group also wants a separate bill to permanently repeal the current Medicare physician payment formula.
Obama praises latest Senate health vote
With exactly the 60 votes required, the Senate voted at 1 a.m. today to stop a threatened Republican filibuster, the latest in a series of procedural votes leading up to a final Senate vote scheduled for 7 p.m. Thursday.
As Vicki Kennedy, the late senator's widow, watched from the gallery, Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa declared that "today we are closer than we've ever been to making Senator Ted Kennedy's dream of universal health insurance coverage a reality."
In brief remarks, Obama this morning said the bill would give families more health care security by guaranteeing that pre-existing conditions will be covered and limiting out-of-pocket costs. The bill, he argued, encompasses a so-called "Patient's bill of rights" that never passed Congress.
Small businesses will also benefit, the president said. And critics' arguments that the bill represents a huge increase in government spending do not "hold water," he said, citing projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office that the bill, while costing $871 billion over the next decade, would eventually bring down federal deficits.
(His full remarks are below.)
Republicans, however, call that CBO report a "fig leaf" for a dangerous government expansion in health care. "While they claim victory, the American people will be faced with higher taxes, increased premiums, and cuts to Medicare," Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said in a statement. "They are ramming this government-run health care program through Congress - when Americans don't want it, and our country can't afford it."
FULL ENTRY
Senate rejects stricter abortion rules
As expected, the Senate this afternoon rejected a move to tighten the abortion restrictions in the health care overhaul.
Senator Ben Nelson, a key moderate Democrat from Nebraska, had proposed a provision similar to one that is in the House-passed bill, which would ban coverage for abortions under any insurance plan -- public or private -- that accepts federal subsidies.
But Senate liberals rallied against the amendment, saying it would be unfair to women and represent a rollback in abortion rights.
In the 54-45 vote against the Nelson amendment, seven Democrats joined most Republicans in voting for it, while two Republicans -- Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine -- voted with the Democrats.
“This vote is a positive step towards ensuring health care reform legislation moves forward without making women worse off after this process,” Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards said in a statement.
"The Senate did the right thing today by refusing to adopt an amendment that would prevent women from using their own funds to purchase abortion coverage," added Marcia D. Greenberger, Co-President of the National Women's Law Center.
“The National Women’s Law Center is working hard to ensure that health care reform is finally passed that works for all Americans – women included. To protect women’s health and their rights, it is essential that health care reform be enacted without the egregious restrictions on women’s ability to pay for needed abortion coverage with their own money.”
The abortion dispute, however, could fatally complicate efforts to cobble together 60 votes to pass the final version of the health care bill in the Senate, and if a bill is approved, have to be resolved in negotiations with the House.
Steele demands apology, delay on health care
The Republican Party's national chairman repeated his demand today that the top Senate Democrat apologize for comparing those obstructing health care reform to those who counseled a go-slow approach on freeing the slaves and giving women the right to vote.
But then again, GOP Chairman Michael Steele also sent a letter directly to President Obama urging him to put off the health care overhaul and focus on jobs and the economy.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid chided Republicans in a Senate floor speech on Monday. "Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all Republicans have come up with is this slow down, stop everything, let's start over," he said, then citing those who advised patience on emancipation and women's suffrage.
On CBS's "The Early Show" today, Steele called the remarks "an ignorant moment for Harry Reid" and said that when Democrats get in trouble, "they play that race card, that slavery card, that civil rights card."
UPDATE: Reid stood by his comments, telling reporters today, "Anyone who willingly distorts my comments is only proving my point."
Steele, the Republican National Committee's first black chairman, has been among the loudest voices calling for a go-slow approach on health care, which Reid is trying to push through the Senate before the holiday break.
Steele echoed his call in the letter today to the president.
"Whether you are a Democrat or Republican, all of us can agree on this: In this uncertain economy, growth and jobs have to be our priorities," Steele wrote. "The American people think of little else. Common sense tells us this is the worst possible moment for Congress to risk spending another trillion dollars we don't have.
"This is not the time to gamble a trillion dollars on a 2,000 page health care experiment Congress is stitching together by the seat of its pants," he added. "Washington's rescue efforts have already burdened our economy with the costs of huge bailouts and government takeovers. When Americans look for relief, they see record debt and deficits. If Americans are still looking for full-time work and employers are still shutting their doors next spring, Democrats and Republicans are going to wish they had that trillion dollars back to create jobs."
(The full letter is below.)
UPDATE: Brad Woodhouse, Democratic National Committee communications director, slapped back at Steele.
"Michael Steele and the GOP know full well that health care delayed is health care denied for the millions of Americans who lack insurance and live every day in fear of accident or illness. But, it’s also jobs denied for the millions of Americans who work for businesses, small and large, who have been forced to make cut backs or who have collapsed altogether under the burden of sky-rocketing insurance costs. It’s lost wages for the millions of American workers whose employers have to choose between providing health care or offering a raise. And, it’s money out of the pocket of every American family faced with rising co-pays and prescription drug costs," Woodhouse said in a statement.
"It doesn’t take an economics degree to understand that reforming our broken health insurance system is inextricability linked to our nation’s fiscal health and jobs - though most economists have said just that. Michael Steele and the Party of NO have been rooting for health reform to fail for months now. By ignoring all that American businesses stand to gain from health insurance reform, the Republicans are now rooting for our economy to fail. What will they do next?"
FULL ENTRYObama offers more jobs ideas
In a move as much as about the politics of the issue as the policy, President Obama this morning outlined a new plan to pump up hiring and avert a jobless economic recovery.
"There are more than seven million fewer Americans with jobs today than when this recession began. That’s a staggering figure and one that reflects not only the depths of the hole from which we must ascend, but also a continuing human tragedy," he said at the Brookings Institution in Washington.
Obama said the administration would focus on giving tax cuts to small businesses to encourage them to add workers; on promoting labor-intensive transportation projects; and on giving homeowners incentives to make houses more energy efficient.
The president also said he supports congressional efforts to extend unemployment benefits and federal health care subsidies for the jobless, and also proposed another $250 stimulus payment to seniors and veterans.
And he officially backed paying for the new plan by using money left over and repaid from the bank and Wall Street bailout -- known as TARP -- though he did not specify an amount. Republicans vehemently oppose the move, saying it runs counter to the purpose of the program and arguing that any savings should go to bring down the federal deficit.
"Launched hastily under the last administration, the TARP program was flawed, and we have worked hard to correct those flaws and manage it properly. And today, TARP has served its original purpose and at a much lower cost than we expected," Obama said. "This gives us a chance to pay down the deficit faster than we thought possible and to shift funds that would have gone to help the banks on Wall Street to help create jobs on Main Street," he added.
GOP Representative Darrell Issa of California responded in a statement: “The Obama administration apparently thinks TARP stands for the Taxpayer Asset Redirection Program. The use of taxpayer money for this purpose is clearly not what Congress intended. This development confirms the fears for those of us who opposed TARP – that taxpayer money would be used as $700 billion of walking around money. It now looks like that is exactly what the President is planning to do.”
Obama also reminded Americans how precarious the economy was, saying that a year ago his economic team briefed him on what he was about to inherit, an "unforgettable series of presentations" complete with "a chilling set of charts and graphs, predicting where we might end up."
He cited all the actions the administration has already taken to avert a "second Great Depression," including the $787 billion economic stimulus package that he championed, and chided Republicans for not helping fix a problem they helped create. "We can safely say that we are no longer facing the potential collapse of our financial system and we've avoided the depression many feared," he proclaimed.
While there are signs of economic recovery, unemployment -- even with a slight dip last month to 10 percent -- remains stubbornly high despite the economic stimulus package. During the recession, the president notes, many employers learned how to make do with fewer workers and are in no hurry to pad their payrolls again.
To boost hiring by small businesses, Obama called for a one-year moratorium on the tax on capital gains from new investments in small business stock. The earlier stimulus bill included a 75 percent exclusion from capital gains taxes on small business investments. He also called for an unspecified "short-term tax incentive" for small firms to add workers, the details to be worked out with Congress.
He also wants to extend through next year a recovery bill provision that eliminates fees and increases federal guarantees for Small Business Administration loans, and another that allows businesses to immediately expense up to $250,000 of qualified investment.
"Over the past 15 years, small businesses have created roughly 65 percent of all new jobs in America," Obama said. "These are companies formed around kitchen tables in family meetings, formed when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, formed when a worker decides its time she became her own boss. These are also companies that drive innovation, producing 13 times more patents per employee than large companies. And, it’s worth remembering, every once in a while a small business becomes a big business -- and changes the world. That’s why it is so important that we help small businesses struggling to open, or struggling to open in the first place, during these difficult times."
Obama closed his speech with a reprise of his broader critique of business as usual in Washington and of his call for change that captured the imagination of so many voters.
"In the end, the economic crisis of the past year was not just the result of weaknesses in our economy. It was also the result of weaknesses in our political system. For decades, too many in Washington put off hard decisions. For decades, we’ve watched as efforts to solve tough problems have fallen prey to the bitterness of partisanship, to the prosaic concerns of politics, to ever-quickening news cycles, and to endless campaigns focused on scoring points instead of meeting our common challenges," he said.
"We have seen the consequences of this failure of responsibility. The American people have paid a heavy price. And the question we’ll have to answer now is if we are going to learn from our past, or if – even in the aftermath of disaster – we are going to repeat it. As the alarm bells fade, and the din of Washington rises, as the forces of the status quo marshal their resources, we can be sure that answering this question will be a fight to the finish. But I have every hope and expectation that we can rise to this moment, that we can transcend the failures of the past, that we can once again take responsibility for our future."
UPDATE: Representative Edward J. Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat who co-authored the climate change bill passed by the House, praised Obama's focus on home energy efficiency and renewable energy.
“By embracing the vast clean energy jobs potential here in America, the president’s jobs plan will get people out of unemployment lines and back on assembly lines making wind turbines and solar panels,” Markey said in a statement. “By giving American families the opportunity to permanently reduce their energy bills through energy efficiency, we can ensure that new jobs and energy savings will literally start in the home.”
Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. of Massachusetts also lauded Obama's initiative.
“I commend President Obama for his continuing leadership in lifting our country out of the worst recession since the Great Depression. I look forward to working in Congress to implement his proposals to give tax breaks to small businesses, invest in much-needed and shovel-ready projects to improve infrastructure, and fund rebates for consumers who upgrade their homes to make them more energy efficient," Kirk said in a statement.
“These proposals will have far-reaching effects that will get more people back to work, make our environment cleaner, and strengthen the role of small businesses as an engine driving our modern economy. Although much still needs to be done, I’m confident that President Obama, Congress, and the American people are up to the challenge of accelerating job creation as an essential part of our economic recovery.”
The AFL-CIO blessed Obama's move to use the TARP cash to help create jobs.
"President Obama is right: We must take urgent steps to create jobs. And we must fundamentally rebuild our economy so we never again face the unnerving financial meltdown that confronted Pres. Obama and all of America when he took office in January. While Wall Street is busy cashing their bonus checks, now is the time for immediate action to stabilize the economy for struggling working Americans on Main Street," the labor federation's president, Richard Trumka, said in a statement.
"I am encouraged that President Obama and his team are proposing many of the same steps that we see as the most promising, efficient routes to job creation. The AFL-CIO has proposed a 5-point plan that includes putting TARP funds to work for Main Street by making it available to provide credit to small business; extending the lifeline of unemployment benefits, food assistance and COBRA benefits for jobless workers; rebuilding America’s schools, roads and energy systems; increasing aid to state and local governments to maintain vital services and prevent the layoffs of teachers, firefighters and police and putting people to work doing work that needs to be done."
But House Republicans bashed Obama, particularly for saying that the country needed to continue spending its way out of the recession. "Families cannot spend money that they do not have, and the Administration and the Democrat Congress need to be held to the same standard. The runaway spending and permanent bailout culture are dangerous and irresponsible," said the office of House Republican Whip Eric Cantor.
Obama's full remarks are below, followed by the White House summary of the plan:
FULL ENTRYKirk weighs in on health care
Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. of Massachusetts, along with 10 other first-term Democrats, is offering a package of amendments to the health care overhaul bill that are designed to encourage innovation and affordability.
UPDATE: “The health reform legislation now being considered by the Senate makes great strides in beginning to fix what is fundamentally broken in our present health care system -- but we believe that we can go even further,” the senators said in a joint statement today. “Our amendments encourage a broader, quicker shift toward a more innovative 21st Century health care system. Our goal is a health care system that is more efficient and affordable for consumers, and one which will hold health care providers and insurers more accountable.”
The amendments establish public-private arrangements to synchronize changes and prevent cost-shifting; reduce red tape and contain strong anti-fraud provisions; and strengthen the role of Medicare.
Kirk's floor speech and more detail on the amendments are below.
The amendments immediately drew praise from the AFL-CIO, the largest labor federation.
"We commend the package of amendments freshman Senators have developed that would strengthen the cost containment provisions of health reform legislation. These senators have their eyes on what’s most important to all Americans - affordable, high quality health care that will be there when we need it. We must transform our current health care system into one that rewards value -- constraining cost growth without compromising care," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said in a statement.
"A number of the amendments announced today would, individually, represent significant steps forward from the current draft Senate legislation. Taken together, however, they amount to a robust expansion of critically important provisions in the legislation," he added.
"But these measures alone will not fix a broken health care system. We need a strong public health insurance option to keep insurance companies honest and fair financing -- with employers shouldering their responsibility and no new taxes on health benefits."
Democrats: GOP lying like a rug on health care
The Democratic National Committee this afternoon released a new web ad that accuses Senate Republicans of making more than 100 misleading or false claims -- and counting -- in 11 days of floor debate.
The spot shows one GOP senator after another complaining that the Democratic bill would mean a government takeover of health care and would mean huge Medicare cuts. Some of the specific points within those broader proposals are subject to debate.
"Is there anything that will keep them from misleading the American public on health care?" the announcer asks, before Republican senators are show saying, "No."
EPA carbon finding sparks climate debate
The Environmental Protection Agency's expected announcement this afternoon that it is declaring carbon dioxide a health hazard allows it to limit emissions from sources such as power plants and factories, even without congressional action.
But on the opening day of an international climate summit in Copenhagen, the declaration is also rekindling the political fight over emails that, according to skeptics, show that scientists have massaged data to show that global warming is real.
Republican Representative Darrell Issa of California called on EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to conduct a “thorough and transparent investigation into the questions raised by the disclosure of emails from Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia” and to withdraw the "endangerment" finding, as well as previous rules covering cars and light trucks.
"The very integrity of the report that the Obama Administration has predicated much of its climate change policy upon has been called into question and it is unconscionable that this Administration and Congress is willing to abdicate responsibility of uncovering the truth to the United Nations. The administration’s 'Climategate' denials and refusal to acknowledge the need for a congressional investigation are a sad abdication of their responsibility to ensure that U.S. policies are not driven by corrupted science and data,” Issa said in a statement.
But Representative Edward J. Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat and key author of the climate change bill passed by the House, slammed what he and other supporters call global warming "deniers."
“Now that the U.S. government has officially ended its era of climate denial, the real endangerment to our planet comes from those who continue to deny the science and delay taking any action," Markey said in a statement.
“The finding that global warming pollution poses a threat to human health and our environment is based on mountains of data accumulated from thousands of scientists over the course of decades. The molehill recently manufactured by a few climate deniers does not change that. President Obama and the United States Congress can now travel to Copenhagen armed with regulatory credibility and emission reduction targets from the Waxman-Markey legislation. The world is watching, and the United States is acting.”
Senator John F. Kerry, who is leading the congressional delegation to Copenhagen, said Congress should heed the EPA and pass a bill.
“This is a clear message to Copenhagen of the Obama Administration’s commitment to address global climate change and a clear signal to Congress of the importance of passing comprehensive climate and energy legislation,” the Massachusetts Democrat, who is a main sponsor of the Senate bill, said in a statement. “The EPA has acted on the Supreme Court’s decision and made it clear that greenhouse gas emissions are a threat to public health in the United States and can be addressed under the Clean Air Act.
“The message to Congress is crystal clear: get moving. If Congress does not pass legislation dealing with climate change, the administration is more than justified to use the EPA to impose new regulations. Imposed regulations by definition will not include the job protections and investment incentives we are proposing in the Senate today. Given the potential for agency regulation, those who now aim to grind the legislative process to a halt would later come running to Congress to secure the kinds of incentives we can pass today. Industry needs the certainty that comes with Congressional action on this vital issue.”
UPDATE: A new poll released this afternoon found Americans more skeptical about global warming and about the US taking major steps to cut carbon emissions.
In the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey, 45 percent agreed that "global warming is a proven fact and is mostly caused by emissions from cars and industrial facilities such as power plants and factories" -- down from 54 percent in the same poll in June 2008.
Also in the poll, 58 percent said the "United States should reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases that may contribute to global warming even if it does so by itself" -- down from 66 percent in October 2007.
Reid compares health care delay to slavery, suffrage
Top Senate Democrat Harry Reid, frustrated with Republican intransigence on the health care overhaul, went as far today to compare the strategy of stall and scuttle to past efforts to stop women's suffrage and keep slavery alive.
And that analogy is raising eyebrows and hackles on Capitol Hill and beyond.
"Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all Republicans have come up with is this slow down, stop everything, let's start over," said Reid. "You think you've heard these same excuses before, you're right. When this country belatedly recognized the wrongs of slavery, there were those who dug in their heels and said, 'Slow down, it's too early. Let's wait. Things aren't bad enough.' When women spoke up for the right to speak up, they wanted to vote, some insisted, 'Slow down, there will be a better day to do that. The day isn't quite right,' " Reid said on the Senate floor.
"When this body was on the verge of guaranteeing equal civil rights to everyone, regardless of the color of their skin, some senators resorted to the same filibuster threats that we hear today," he continued. "History is repeating itself before our eyes. There are now those who don't think it is the right time to reform health care. If not now, when, madam president? But the reality for many that feel that way, it will never, never be a good time to reform health care."
That brought this broadside from, among others, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele.
“Today Harry Reid wandered far out of bounds with his absurd and offensive comments. Reid has now compared his quest to pass the Obama-Pelosi government takeover of health care to the effort to end slavery. This is inexcusable, deeply insulting and an arrogant abuse of the Democrat party's unchecked power in Congress. This is an elected official saying anything, doing anything, running roughshod over any citizen who opposes his left-wing effort to jam big-government run health care down our throats," Steele, who happens to be the first black GOP national chairman, said in a statement.
“Harry Reid is under immense pressure to pass this 2,000 page experiment on our nation’s health – an experiment that creates a new $1 trillion dollar federal entitlement program by cutting $500 billion from Medicare, all at a time when our country is in miserable debt and facing an extreme job crisis. The pressure has apparently led Senator Reid not only to make offensive and absurd statements, but also to lose his ability to reason.
“To suggest that passing this horrible bill is anything akin to ridding our country of slavery is terribly offensive and calls into question Mr. Reid’s suitability to lead. Having made this disgraceful statement on the floor of the United States Senate, Mr. Reid should immediately apologize on the Senate floor to his colleagues, to his constituents, and to the American people. If he is going to stand by these statements, the Democrats must immediately reconsider his fitness to lead them.”
Poll: Most Americans believe stalemate in Afghanistan
While nearly two-thirds of Americans agree with President Obama that the nation's security is at stake in Afghanistan, a clear majority also believe that stalemate -- not victory -- is the most likely outcome, according to a new poll.
The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey found that 64 percent of respondents believe that the "safety and security" of the United States are at stake in Afghanistan, where Obama announced last week he plans to dispatch 30,000 more troops.
But asked about the most likely outcome, only 29 percent picked victory, compared to 57 percent for a stalemate and 12 percent outright defeat.
While Obama was criticized by Republicans in particular for taking too long to make his decision, 57 percent said that amount of time was necessary for the president to make a thorough review. Also, 44 percent said they most trusted Obama to make the right decisions on Afghanistan, while 31 percent picked congressional Democrats (including many who oppose the increased troop presence), and 20 percent do not have confidence in either.
The poll, conducted Dec. 2-3, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Liberal group slams Lieberman
A liberal group is targeting Senator Joe Lieberman, the Connecticut independent who is holding out on health care, with a new tongue-in-cheek ad that accuses him of looking out for himself, not his constituents.
Lieberman has threatened to go along with a Republican filibuster to stop the Democratic bill if it includes a public option -- a government-run plan to compete with private insurers.
Unlike proponents who say it would help reduce costs, Lieberman and other foes oppose more government control of health care. Lieberman's critics also say he is carrying water for big health insurers that are based in Connecticut and who have been generous campaign contributors.
"It's not about you, it's all about Joe," the chairman of the fake "Connecticut for Lieberman Party" says.
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee said this morning that the ad will air this week in Washington and Connecticut.
"Joe Lieberman promised Connecticut voters in 2006 that he would support core Democratic issues like health care reform. This tongue-in-cheek ad holds Lieberman accountable for putting his own ego ahead of the overwhelming will of Connecticut voters who demand a public health insurance option," the committee's co-founder, Adam Green, said in a statement.
Kirk pushes health care program championed by Kennedy
Continuing to carry the mantle of his mentor, Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. took to the Senate floor today to speak up for a program -- part of the proposed Senate health care bill -- to help the disabled to stay in their homes.
The Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act, championed by the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy, would create a voluntary, self-funded insurance program that enables people who have disabilities to receive benefits for the care they need the most.
“Sadly, millions of seniors and persons living with disabilities struggle to obtain the services and supports they need to live fulfilling lives and to remain in their communities among their friends and families – in what they hoped would be their productive ‘golden years.’As Senator Kennedy understood, it is morally wrong for so many disabled men and women who need assistance to be forced to face these heart-breaking choices,” Kirk told his colleagues.
UPDATE: The Senate voted late this afternoon to keep the program in the bill. Republicans gathered 51 votes to kill the proposal, but they needed 60 votes to prevail, the Associated Press reports.
Kirk's full prepared remarks are below, followed by a summary of the program:
Labor lobbies against Senate health tax
The nation's largest labor federation announced this afternoon that it will start airing TV ads this weekend urging the Senate to jettison the current bill's main way to finance a huge expansion in coverage: a tax on the insurance plans with the most generous benefits.
While supporters say that the excise tax on insurers would not only pay for covering the uninsured but would also help drive down health care costs, labor leaders say it would be unfair to workers, who have given up pay raises in recent years in return for better health care benefits.
“Pass health care. Don’t tax benefits,” workers say in the ad, which will run in Washington starting Sunday then in key states to be announced on Monday.
The AFL-CIO, a powerful ally of President Obama and Democrats, also point to a study that says a tax on health benefits like the one included in the Senate health care bill would cause two-thirds of employers to shift the costs to workers by raising premiums and co-pays.
Jobless rate falls slightly as Obama starts jobs tour
As President Obama kicked off a "listening tour" today to reassure Americans he feels their economic pain, new numbers demonstrated how much pain still remains.
The Labor Department reported this morning that the national unemployment rate dropped slightly to 10 percent in November from 10.2 in October as employers slashed the smallest number of jobs since the recession began in December 2007.
But that still means 15.4 million Americans are out of work -- and millions more are working only part-time or have given up looking for now -- and many economists expect the jobless rate to rise next year.
Obama is starting his tour in Pennsylvania's Lehigh Valley, where he won nearly 60 percent of the vote in November 2008 and where the unemployment rate was 9.3 percent in October.
He said the lower unemployment is reason for optimism, though of the guarded variety, since it's rare good news and since "too many members of our American family have felt the gut punch of a pink slip" -- 8 million since the recession began.
"This is good news, just in time for the season of hope.... But I do want to keep this in perspective. We've still got a long way to go. I still consider one job lost one job too many. As I said yesterday at a jobs conference in Washington, good trends don't pay the rent. We've got to actually grow jobs and get America back to work as quickly as we can," Obama said at Lehigh Carbon Community College, after touring Allentown Metal Works.
"But Americans who have been desperately looking for work for months -- maybe even longer -- can't wait. And we won’t wait. We need to do everything we can, right now, to get our businesses hiring again so that our friends and neighbors can go back to work," he added.
He said that on Tuesday in a major speech in Washington, he will give more detail about the jobs ideas he'll send to Congress.
(His full remarks and question-and-answer session are below.)
He then invited questions from the audience, and before returning to Washington, the president plans to make several stops in Allentown to meet real people.
In advance of the president's trip, the White House posted a statement from Christina Romer, chairwoman of his Council of Economic Advisers, that saw hope in the new numbers.
"Today's employment report was the most hopeful sign yet that the stabilization of financial markets and the recovery in economic growth may be leading to improvements in the labor market. Payroll employment declined 11,000 in November. This is a dramatic improvement from the decline of 597,000 in November 2008 and 741,000 in January 2009. It is by far the closest we have been to stable employment since the recession began almost two years ago," Romer said in the statement. "Furthermore, the employment loss in both September and October was revised down substantially, with the result that employment as of October is nearly 160,000 higher than was reported last month. As was true in October, the largest employment gains in November were in temporary help services, which is often a leading indicator of labor demand. 21,000 jobs were also added in state and local public education. Both the work week and aggregate hours increased, another early sign of labor market healing.
"The unemployment rate, which had risen to 10.2% in October, declined to 10.0% in November. This decline primarily reflects an increase in the number employed, as measured by the household survey. Despite the welcome decline, the unemployment rate remains unacceptably high. This underscores the need for the responsible actions to jumpstart private-sector job creation that the President highlighted at yesterday’s Forum on Jobs and Economic Growth at the White House. There are many bumps in the road ahead. The monthly employment and unemployment numbers are volatile and subject to substantial revision. Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative. But, it is clear we are moving in the right direction."
On Thursday, Obama hosted a brainstorming session at the White House with CEOs, labor leaders, small business owners, academics, and others, looking for any good idea to create jobs.
But he's under sustained assault from Republicans.
“Yesterday, President Obama hosted a ‘jobs summit’ at the White House in an attempt to convince the media and the American public that his administration is concerned with unemployment. Unfortunately this so-called ‘jobs summit’ was not about creating jobs – it was about creating a distraction to hide the fact that President Obama has managed to create more bureaucracy in Washington than jobs for American families," Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said in a statement today. "More than 11,000 Americans lost their jobs in the month of November, meaning more than 2.8 million Americans have lost their jobs since the stimulus passed, and the national unemployment rate remains in double digits. If President Obama is truly interested in job creation, then he should stop campaigning for reelection, stop pushing ‘Stimulus II,’ and start working with Republicans on common-sense conservative solutions.”
House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio is greeting Obama in Allentown with an opinion piece in the local newspaper, the Morning Call, that slams the president and his Democratic allies in Congress for their economic policies -- and warns that the health care overhaul and sweeping climate change legislation would only do more harm.
"Having been promised much more than a 'jobless recovery,' the American people are right to wonder whether Washington Democrats can be trusted to turn things around, especially when their costly policies are only making matters worse," Boehner writes.
The Morning Call also has an opposing opinion piece from Representative Steny Hoyer, the second-ranking Democrat in the House.
He defends the $787 billion economic stimulus that Obama championed and Democrats pushed through, but concedes that Washington needs to do more, and welcomes ideas from Allentown.
"Though an honest look at the evidence shows that Democrats' recovery efforts are helping to put the country back on track, families in Pennsylvania and across the country continue to struggle. For their sake, we must do more," he writes.
"Democrats have worked to make unemployment benefits last longer for families facing long-term unemployment. That's important, especially because those benefits are quickly spent, boosting local economies. But there's no substitute for creating new jobs. That's why President Obama is in Allentown. And every idea -- from workers, business leaders, economists and from both parties -- is on the table," Hoyer continues. "Congress is working to shape the best ideas into a jobs bill, which might include incentives for small businesses to invest and create jobs, aid to states that will keep teachers and police officers on the job, and new infrastructure projects to make our country stronger. Ideas like those are still up for refinement and debate, and we're eager to hear Pennsylvanians' feedback."
Obama, Russian leader vow to renew nuclear weapons deal
President Obama and Russian President Dmitri Medvedev issued a joint statement today vowing to continue observing the spirit of a treaty, which expires Saturday, to reduce nuclear weapons stockpiles, as the countries continue to negotiate a replacement.
"Recognizing our mutual determination to support strategic stability between the United States of America and the Russian Federation, we express our commitment, as a matter of principle, to continue to work together in the spirit of the START Treaty following its expiration, as well as our firm intention to ensure that a new treaty on strategic arms enter into force at the earliest possible date," the leaders said.
As the Globe reported in October, the START treaty is expected to be the first of a series that Obama will ask the US Senate to ratify. "President Obama’s vision of global cooperation - symbolized by his surprise Nobel Peace Prize - is in for a crucial test in the months ahead when he begins sending a series of treaties to the US Senate, where skepticism among Republicans and some Democrats will make approval exceedingly difficult, according to government officials and specialists," the Globe reported.
The new nuclear weapons deal with Russia, designed to replace START II ratified in 1991, could reduce the number of warheads on each side to 1,500 and the number of missiles to carry them to 500, including those launched from underground silos, ships, or aircraft.
Obama gets back to jobs
Under fire from both Democrats and Republicans for the sluggish economic recovery, President Obama returns his focus to jobs today with a forum at the White House.
With more than 100 CEOs, labor leaders, academics, community activists, and others, the forum is meant to be an ideas generator. Administration officials have already downplayed the possibility of new policies actually being announced today, but say they are talking to Democratic allies about further extending unemployment benefits and COBRA health coverage subsidies for the jobless. (The run-down of the forum sessions and participants is below.)
In opening the forum this afternoon, Obama said the economy and Wall Street had been saved from ruin. But he didn't try to sugar-coat the remaining pain, noting that one in 10 Americans are unemployed and millions more are underemployed
"This is a struggle that cuts deep," Obama said.
The unemployed have not only lost a paycheck, but their "sense of identity and dignity."
In the Great Recession, cash-strapped businesses understandably have slashed jobs and made remaining workers increase their productivity. But that means that they are not adding employees.
"How do we get businesses hiring again?" he asked.
Obama said "we do not have enough public dollars" and cannot increase public hiring enough to boost a real recovery. Only the private sector can do that, he said. (His full remarks and preceding remarks from Vice President Joe Biden.)
UPDATE: At the close of the forum, Obama said he'd heard many "exciting ideas and proposals" and said he hoped some could be put into action quickly to help put millions of Americans back to work.
The president said there were some ideas that could be put to work almost immediately and other ideas that will become part of legislation for Congress to consider. He listed "energy efficiency and weatherization" as a prime candidate for moving quickly.
The White House also announced that he will give another speech on the economy Tuesday at the Brookings Institution in Washington.
"There is no bottom in sight for working families who are struggling to keep their jobs, health care and homes and they know that our leaders must take immediate action to create and save jobs," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said in a statement. "Our leaders must take immediate action to create and save jobs. Jobs -- good jobs -- are what it's all about. Now it's time for leaders in Washington to understand that too -- and thankfully many do. Today's jobs forum is an important opportunity to gather the best ideas for job creation. But it can't substitute for action. The summit will only mean something if it triggers an urgent round of actions to create American jobs. It's simply wrong that people who worked hard are paying for the sins of Wall Street with their jobs, and we can't sit back and hope it takes care of itself."
The Center for Community Change, an activist group, was in Washington today to demand a large-scale new jobs program.
"Government can no longer sit on its hands during this jobs crisis, nor expect a solution will come by putting all its eggs in the Wall Street basket. Main Street's unemployment levels have reached epic proportions and are far deeper than anyone could have imagined," Deepak Bhargava, the center's executive director, said in a statement.
"Our neighborhoods are economically distressed, and people need hope. Any conversation about fixing our nation's unemployment problem must include unemployed people at the table with business and labor interests. The need for jobs is immediate and urgent. America needs paychecks, not pink slips," he added. "A large-scale community investment jobs program would reduce unemployment faster than any other mechanism available to the government. The White House and Congress can immediately put 2.5 million Americans back to work revitalizing our communities, providing critical services and cleaning the environment. These jobs would be real jobs with living wages and have a long term impact on America's future."
Republicans, meanwhile, are holding a counter-summit and already warning against a second stimulus package, saying that the $787 billion plan that Obama championed has been a failure.
"This White House 'jobs summit' is just another example of President Obama’s PR presidency, where he stages photo-ops and events to distract citizens and the media from his administration’s failures," Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele wrote in an opinion piece in Politico today. "If this 'jobs summit' is anything like the previous 'fiscal responsibility summit' then Americans should expect nothing but vague political overtures and empty promises. The 'fiscal responsibility summit' didn’t decrease our national debt and this 'jobs summit' won’t bring back the jobs Americans desperately need. However, it might create the political cover needed to pass another government-growing and unnecessary stimulus package."
Obama follows up the forum on Friday with a visit to Allentown, Pa., as he kicks off a "White House to Main Street Tour" to hear first hand from struggling Americans.
The choice of location seems rather appropriate as a symbol of economic decline and pain. Billy Joel wrote a song about Allentown, released in 1982 -- the last time unemployment was this high.
The national rate was 10.2 percent in October, and the November number will also be released Friday.
In advance of Obama's visit to the Lehigh Valley, the GOP is running a radio ad in Pennsylvania mocking the first stimulus and warning of a second.
The ad is an imagined conversation between a man and a woman:
"Obama’s gonna have another stimulus plan," the woman says.
"Wait a minute," the man says. "I’m looking it up….The definition of the word stimulus."
"The Obama-Pelosi stimulus plan didn’t stimulate the economy," he adds.
"Nope. Unemployment has actually gone up 25 percent since then," the woman says.
"Nearly a trillion dollars and still we’re going in the wrong direction," the man chimes in.
"A lot of money. But half a million people in Pennsylvania still out of work," the woman says.
"Hey, if you see President Obama around town," the man concludes. "Let’s tell him one stimulus plan was too many," the woman adds.
Romney blasts Obama on jobs
Just before today's White House jobs summit, Mitt Romney minces no words in blasting President Obama's economic policies.
"Like other presidents before him, Barack Obama inherited a recession. But unlike them, he has made it worse, not better," Romney writes in an opinion piece published this morning in USA Today.
The former Massachusetts governor -- who made his name and fortune at Bain Capital, who ran for the GOP presidential nomination last year, and who could very well run again in 2012 -- derides Obama's economic know-how
"His failure to stem the unemployment tide should not have been a surprise. With no experience whatsoever in the world of employment and business formation, he had no compass to guide his path," Romney writes. "Instead, he turned over much of his economic recovery agenda to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, themselves nearly as inexperienced in the private sector as he. Congress gave him and them everything they asked for, including a history-making three-quarters of a trillion dollar stimulus. But it did little to stimulate the real economy -- where jobs are created."
Romney also joins in the GOP criticism of the White House claims of success for the $787 billion economic stimulus. "In an attempt to disguise the truth, the administration has touted inflated figures of jobs "created."But every month, in good times and bad, jobs are created and jobs are lost. What matters is the net difference between the two numbers. Focusing solely on jobs created while ignoring the far greater numbers of jobs lost is Harry Houdini economics," he writes.
Romney then lays out his own 10-point plan, including freezing stimulus money that hasn't been spent yet and redirecting it to the private sector, granting more business tax breaks, not allowing President George W. Bush's tax cuts to expire at the end of 2010, ditching the "cap-and-trade" climate change legislation, and approving free trade agreements with Colombia and other countries.
UPDATE: Democratic National Committee spokesman Hari Sevugan responded in kind to Romney:
“For months, the American people have been waiting for the 'Party of No' to offer a plan -- any plan -- to help fix the economy and create jobs. And for months, Republicans have done nothing. Now, instead of acknowledging, as leading economists and the independent CBO have, that the president's recovery act rescued this country's economy from the brink of disaster and has already saved or created 1.6 million jobs, Republican leaders like Mitt Romney and Eric Cantor are now offering 'plans' that are nothing more than a laundry list of the failed Bush-era economic policies that nearly destroyed our economy in the first place. Mitt Romney's allegiance to Bush economics is one policy position he'd do well to flip-flop on.”
Senate passes mammogram provision
Four days into its formal debate on the sweeping health care bill, the Senate took its first vote this afternoon, passing an amendment that protects coverage of mammograms and other screening tests for women.
Mammograms became a big issue after an advisory panel appeared to say that women under 50 did not need them and should not have them. Republicans immediately seized on the recommendation, saying it was a sign of the health rationing to come under the Democratic bill.
But the panel later said it had mishandled the communication, its leaders testifying at a congressional hearing on Wednesday that women in their 40s should start mammograms when they want, in consultation with their doctors.
The amendment from Senator Barbara Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat, and Olympia Snowe, a Maine Republican, would authorize the Health and Human Services secretary to require insurers to cover preventive health screenings free of charge. The Congressional Budget Office said the amendment would add $940 million over a decade to the cost of the bill, already nearing $1 trillion.
The amendment passed 61-39, with one vote more than needed. Senator Judd Gregg, a New Hampshire Republican, was the only New England lawmaker to vote against the amendment.
Several women's groups hailed the amendment's passage. “More than 90 percent of the care Planned Parenthood affiliate health centers provide is primary and preventive, and the doctors and nurses who deliver that care witness on a daily basis the real need to ensure that women have access to critical tests, screenings, and regular check-ups. That’s because preventive health care is life-saving health care,” Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards said in a statement. “Women of childbearing age spend 68 percent more in out-of-pocket health care costs than men, in part because of reproductive health-related needs. It is time that women’s health is made a priority, and providing affordable access to essential care is key. We applaud Senator Mikulski and her colleagues for working to make sure that women are better off under health care reform.”
Kerry issues warnings on troop surge
Senator John F. Kerry, a key ally for President Obama on his Afghanistan plan, offered guarded praise for the president's speech as he opened a hearing this morning on the troop surge plan.
"I believe the President appropriately narrowed the mission in Afghanistan. What he presented to the American people is not an open-ended nation-building exercise or a nationwide counterinsurgency campaign. Nor should it be," Kerry said as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, which is hearing today from Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Michael Mullen.
"The President was right to frame our commitment to Afghanistan in the context of all our national priorities, from the drawdown in Iraq to our urgent challenges at home. And he was correct to consider our mission there in terms of our enduring interest in Pakistan," he added.
But Kerry questioned the argument that US forces should continue fighting in Afghanistan because that's where the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attack was plotted.
"Eight years later, that’s simply not good enough. We have largely expelled Al Qaeda from Afghanistan. Today it is the presence of Al Qaeda in Pakistan, its direct ties to and support from the Taliban in Afghanistan and the perils of an unstable, nuclear-armed Pakistan that drive our mission," Kerry said. What happens in Pakistan, particularly near the Afghan border, will do more to determine the outcome in Afghanistan than any increase in troops or shift in strategy."
In fact, Kerry asserted, the planned withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan starting in July 2011 would help the US focus on Pakistan.
"I believe it is important for the Pakistanis to understand that our commitment to them and the region is long term even as troops are reduced in Afghanistan. In fact, the conditions that permit a reduction in American troops in Afghanistan are a benefit to Pakistan," he said.
To the arguments from Republicans -- notably Senator John McCain, the 2008 presidential candidate -- that the timing of any drawdown should only be based on conditions on the ground, Kerry posited this rebuttal about adding 30,000 troops: "I would hope that just as the exit strategy is based on conditions on the ground, so too should our strategy for escalation be based on conditions on the ground."
"I continue to believe that, absent an urgent security need, we should not send American troops in to clear places unless we are confident that we have the Afghan partners and resources in place to build on our victories and transfer both security and government functions to legitimate Afghan leaders," Kerry said. "Frankly, I am concerned that additional troops will tempt us beyond a narrow and focused mission. And, with 30,000 troops rushing into Afghanistan, I believe we will be challenged to have the civilian and governance capacity in place quickly enough to translate their sacrifice into lasting gains."
His full opening statement is below:
McGovern leads opposition to troop surge
Representative James McGovern is ramping up his leadership of members of Congress opposed to President Obama's troop surge in Afghanistan.
The Massachusetts Democrat joined Senator Russ Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat, and Representative Walter Jones, a North Carolina Republican, in writing Obama today to warn that the build-up could harm US efforts against Al Qaeda.
Sending more troops to Afghanistan is unlikely to help, and could hurt, our efforts to address Al Qaeda’s safe haven in Pakistan. Moreover, al Qaeda and its affiliates are located in Yemen, Somalia, North Africa and other places around the world. Rather than investing so many of our resources in Afghanistan, we should pursue a comprehensive, global counterterrorism strategy," the three lawmakers wrote.
"There is a serious danger that the ongoing, large-scale U.S. military presence will continue to provoke greater militancy in the region and further destabilize both Afghanistan and nuclear-armed Pakistan. The pursuit of unrealistic nation-building goals is making it harder to isolate members of al Qaeda from those who do not have an international terrorist agenda."
And they argue that the cost -- in casualties and taxpayers money -- is not worth it when the Afghan regime is not credible and not able to do its part so that US troops can start withdrawing by July 2011, as Obama envisions.
"While we support ongoing civilian engagement in Afghanistan and counterterrorism efforts in the region, we do not believe more American lives should be risked to support an illegitimate, corrupt government fighting what is largely a civil war," they say, adding, "At a time when our country faces record deficits, and many Americans are struggling to make ends meet, it simply does not make sense to spend tens of billions of dollars to escalate our military involvement in Afghanistan."
The full letter is below:
Kerry offers qualified support to Obama
Senator John F. Kerry, a key ally for President Obama on his new Afghanistan strategy, offered a qualified endorsement Tuesday night for the troop surge.
Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said in statement that he will support the 30,000 additional troops -- as long as responsibility for security is rapidly transferred to Afghan forces "because anything short of that will end in failure, no matter how many troops we send to Afghanistan."
He also praised Obama for laying out a narrower mission "not an open-ended nation-building exercise," and for focusing on Pakistan as the key battle against terrorists.
"I believe that the President defined a narrower mission tonight, not an open-ended nation-building exercise," Kerry said in his statement. "A key component of that mission is providing that the troops will only clear and hold in places where there is capacity to build and transfer beneath them and that there will be significant partnering with Afghans in all of these efforts. That includes finding reliable Afghan partners in governance. If these criteria are met, then there is a chance for success.
"The President is correct to say the essential focus must be on Pakistan. What happens in Pakistan, particularly in the west, will be more critical to the outcome in Afghanistan than the increase in troops or shift in strategy there. I will support additional troops, providing their deployment stays within the strict understanding of the need to transfer and build as well as partner with Afghans. The only way to be successful is to rapidly transfer responsibility to the Afghans and anything short of that will end in failure, no matter how many troops we send to Afghanistan. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will continue to examine our Afghan policy in public hearings in the coming days and beyond."
UPDATE: This afternoon, Kerry's office formally announced that the Foreign Relations Committee will hold its hearing Thursday morning on the Afghan plan.
Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Rear Admiral Michael G. Mullen are scheduled to testify. They spoke today to the Senate Armed Services Committee.
White House under fire on jobs
The White House is getting the business from both sides of the aisle today on the nation's rising unemployment -- and what some fellow Democrats and Republicans alike say is an inadequate response from the Obama administration.
Republicans have been railing against the $787 billion stimulus bill that Obama championed. In what his office is billing as a major speech, Representative Eric Cantor, the second-ranking House Republican, plans to outline before the conservative Heritage Foundation proposals "to remove what he will term government-imposed obstacles to economic growth, including targeting some proposed regulations that could have an economic cost.
“Let’s begin with a simple premise: An overactive government did not make America the land of promise, prosperity and opportunity," Cantor will say, according to advance excerpts released by his office.
He then will call for blocking any federal tax increases until unemployment drops below 5 percent. "Americans of all political stripes can agree that the government should never raise taxes during periods of high unemployment," says Cantor. He and other Republicans argue that the health care overhaul and the climate change legislation are full of tax hikes.
The Virginia Republican also plans to call on Congress to approve "three promising free trade agreements with Colombia, South Korea, and Panama that have stalled under the new administration."
Cantor also plans to repeat other GOP tenets, including stopping the "deluge of detrimental rules and regulations," and reducing regulatory and tax barriers, controlling record federal deficits and debts, reforming the unemployment system to help people out of work find jobs, and giving bank regulators incentives to deal responsibly with banks and their borrowers. (His full prepared remarks are below.)
On the eve of a White House jobs summit on Thursday, the Congressional Black Caucus is continuing to register its disappointment with the administration's efforts so far to help minority communities, where unemployment is significantly higher than the overall rate.
The House Financial Services Committee today approved a financial regulation overhaul bill that puts new limits on Wall Street firms and demands greater openness from the Federal Reserve, the Associated Press reports.
But the 31-27 party-line vote was far closer than it would have otherwise been because 10 black caucus members did not vote.
"The president's top priority is economic recovery and we understand the profound impact that the recession is having on the African-American community," White House spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki said in a statement. "We welcome a continuing dialogue with the CBC on how we can collaborate to implement the president's agenda to support economic growth and opportunity for all Americans."
UPDATE: The White House this afternoon released more details about the jobs forum, which it called "an opportunity for the president and the economic team to hear from some of the leading CEOs, small business owners, labor leaders, nonprofit heads and thinkers about ideas for continuing to grow the economy and put Americans back to work."
The schedule is below:
Kirk skeptical of Obama's Afghan plan
The junior senator from Massachusetts, Paul G. Kirk Jr., is more wary of President Obama's troop build-up in Afghanistan than his colleague John F. Kerry.
While Kerry has offered his qualified support and is a key ally for the president in building congressional support, Kirk today asked how adding 30,000 more troops.
"We have been at war in Afghanistan for eight years. 849 men and women in our Armed Forces have paid the ultimate price and over 4,500 more have been wounded. October was the deadliest month yet, with 59 troops killed, including 4 from Massachusetts. Today, 68,000 brave U.S. men and women are fighting there, the highest number so far in the eight-year conflict, and as of last night, we will be sending 30,000 more in the coming months," Kirk said in his opening statement at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which is hearing today from Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Rear Admiral Michael G. Mullen.
"All of us listened carefully to the President last evening, but I’m eager to hear more from each of you on what precisely the mission of these troops will be, how you see our path to success, the obstacles we will face along the way, and when and how that path will lead our troops home," Kirk added.
"As one general said, we have been fighting the war there 'for one year, eight times in a row' and some have said the war is a 'quagmire.' I’m interested to hear how 30,000 more troops in Afghanistan will accomplish our goal."
In a statement Tuesday night immediately after Obama's speech, Kirk said, “I’m encouraged by the President’s plans to ultimately disengage us from Afghanistan in a responsible and timely fashion. I remain skeptical, however, about a significant troop build-up when the legitimacy of our Afghan partner is in serious question."
Biden touts stimulus report
The Obama administration has some new numbers to defend its economic stimulus package, under fire after a barrage of reports of inflated job creation statistics.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reports that the $787 billion stimulus created or saved between 600,000 and 1.6 million jobs through the end of September.
The report, released Monday, said that the total economic output was 1.2 percent to 3.2 percent higher than it would have been without the stimulus and the unemployment was between 0.3 percentage points and 0.9 percentage points lower.
The range is so wide because the numbers are so squishy -- it is difficult to show that a job was "saved" by the stimulus spending.
But Vice President Joe Biden, in charge of the recovery package, made the most of the CBO report.
“This new report from the Congressional Budget Office is further evidence of what private forecasters and government economists have been saying: the Recovery Act is already responsible for more than 1 million jobs nationwide," he said in a statement today.
"From independent economists to Congress’s own nonpartisan research body, the experts have spoken and the debate is no longer whether the Recovery Act is creating and saving jobs, but how we provide even more opportunities to drive growth and support American workers. This early progress less than halfway through the program is encouraging, but we’re just getting started. In the coming months, we’ll break ground on thousands of infrastructure projects, launch multi-billion dollar broadband and high speed rail initiatives and make critical investments in our nation’s schools and businesses through the Recovery Act that will help put America back to work and lay a foundation for long-term economic growth.”
Representative Darrell Issa, the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, questioned the "multiplier effect" that the CBO report used.
“The CBO report provides very little comfort to the 15.7 million Americans currently unemployed,” Issa said in a statement. “We know that the economy has lost more than four million jobs since passage of the stimulus. The CBO report does not account for how many of those jobs were lost as a result of $787 billion in deficit spending that takes money out of the private sector. What we have is a stimulus that is paying for government jobs with private sector jobs and has failed to lower unemployment.”
Issa also chided Biden, asserting that he was continuing the Obama administration's propaganda on the stimulus.
"Vice President Biden claims ‘more than 1 million jobs’ were created by the stimulus, yet nowhere in the CBO report does it state that ‘more than 1 million jobs were created.’ ” Issa said in his statement. “And where do the dollars spent come from? They come from borrowing against the future, running up record deficits, which Americans and their children and grandchildren will have to pay for in the future through confiscatory taxes and a weakened dollar. It’s time for the Obama Administration to stop using wasteful government spending programs and misleading statistics to substantiate their mythical jobs ‘created or saved’ numbers. Instead, they should work on a bipartisan basis with Congress to implement pro-growth policies that will reduce the tax burden, lower the deficit, improve Americans’ long-term economic well-being and put the economy back on a sustainable footing.”
Also today, the White House released a letter (read it here) from Ed DeSeve, senior adviser to the president for the stimulus plan, replying to House GOP leader John Boehner.
Boehner had blasted the administration's jobs "saved or created" numbers as entirely made up, but DeSeve said there is "nothing mysterious, ephemeral, or uncertain" about the role the recovery package has played in saving the jobs of teachers, firefighters, police officers, and others who would have been laid off by cash-strapped state and local governments.
Boehner was unconvinced.
"The Obama administration is trying to scam the American people by continuing to repeat their phony 'stimulus' claims, including the number of jobs 'saved or created' -- a metric it seems to have made up out of thin air," Boehner said in a statement. "As the CBO states on page one of their report, 'it is impossible to determine how many of the reported jobs would have existed in the absence of the stimulus package.' "
UPDATE: Americans United for Change, a labor-liberal group, capitalized on the CBO report to say that Republicans should now be eating crow.
“After enabling eight years of disastrous economic policies that left our nation on the brink of depression, Congressional Republicans not only shrugged off any responsibility but stood shoulder to shoulder in opposition to the president’s plan to get the economy moving again. And they have cynically rooted for the president’s jobs and economic plan to fail every day since," Tom McMahon, the group's acting executive director, said in a statement. "It’s now clear that if the Party of NO would have had their way, up to 1.6 million American people would be out of work today. When will Congressional Republicans stop rooting for failure and start working with the President and the Democratic Leadership in Congress to continue moving the economy in the right direction?”
Republicans go after ACORN in forum
House Republicans are holding a forum this afternoon on ACORN, the controversial community advocacy group, but complaining that it should be a full-fledged congressional hearing where witnesses could be compelled to testify under oath.
“I regret that this has to be a forum, because the American people deserve an official hearing into ACORN. It is important for the Oversight and Judiciary Committees to look into ACORN’s corruption," Representative Darrell Issa, the ranking Republican on the oversight committee, plans to say in his opening statement.
"Members of Congress have repeatedly requested hearings to get to the truth about ACORN. We have consistently kept the majority informed of our findings during the course of this investigation and have asked them to participate in this investigation -- time and again, they have declined. In the absence of subpoena power, and with the Democrats refusal to assist us in investigating ACORN’s corruption, we decided that allegations about a corrupt organization and political cronyism were too important not too investigate."
Republicans believed they had cut off federal funding for ACORN with a bill that was passed and signed into law congressional vote after hidden camera videos taken by conservative activists appeared to show employees providing advice on how to skirt the law. But last week, the Justice Department ruled that the law did not prevent the group from being paid under existing federal contracts.
In the forum, Republicans plan to hear from Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita, Louisiana attorney general's office official David Caldwell, and purported whistleblower Anita MonCrief about allegations of voter registration fraud and other political activities that could jeopardize ACORN's tax exempt status.
ACORN is in the midst of its own investigation of the undercover videos, led by former Massachusetts Attorney General Scott Harshbarger, but has also railed against what it calls a partisan witch hunt by Republicans.
“Allegations against ACORN continue to pour in—now it appears that the organization actively targeted incumbent Republican members of Congress in the 2008 election," Representative Lamar Smith, the ranking Republican on the judiciary committee, said in a statement. "This kind of political activity is a clear violation of ACORN’s nonprofit status. With more than a dozen investigations nationwide, federal law enforcement agencies can no longer ignore the shady actions of ACORN. Until then, not a single penny of taxpayer dollars should go to fund an organization that time and again has abused federal funds and the American people’s trust.”
Kerry pushes for more climate change aid
Senator John F. Kerry today urged the State Department to consider increasing the US financial commitment to support international climate change priorities as officials prepare for the Copenhagen summit starting next week.
President Obama's 2009-10 budget includes about $1.2 billion, but Kerry wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that $3 billion in 2010-11 is needed.
A Senate bill, like the bill passed by the House in June, sets aside about 7 percent of proceeds from selling pollution credits "to international efforts to promote clean energy technologies, reduce emissions from deforestation, and address adaptation needs," Kerry wrote in a letter released by his office.
"The global community has agreed that $10 billion is required annually in fast-start financing to support immediate international climate change priorities. The United States must be prepared to contribute its fair share of this obligation," he added.
The Massachusetts Democrat is a lead author of the climate change bill he is trying to shepherd through the Senate and as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee has emphasized global warming as a national security issue.
His full letter is below:
FULL ENTRYPatrick Kennedy holds his fire
By David Abel, Globe Staff
PROVIDENCE -- In his first news conference since his war of words with the Catholic bishop of Rhode Island, US Representative Patrick J. Kennedy declined to address the controversy today at a health care forum.
“These are personal issues of faith for me,” he said after the forum at Brown University. “I’m not going to indulge in this debate anymore. It’s really for me about what my constituents are most interested in now, and that is getting a health care bill passed that helps improve their lives.”
Earlier this month, Bishop Thomas J. Tobin said he was disappointed that Kennedy had revealed to the Providence Journal that the congressman had been forbidden from receiving communion in Rhode Island because of Kennedy's support of abortion rights. The bishop also said Kennedy, the son of the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy. had prolonged their public feud.
The bishop told reporters he wrote to Kennedy on Feb. 21, 2007, but intended it to remain confidential because it "sought to provide solely for his spiritual well-being."
After today's forum, Kennedy stuck to the comments he made during the gathering, about the importance of expanding access to health care and reducing the costs of the system. Police removed one person from the audience after he heckled the congressman about his pro-choice position.
“Outside of the one outburst, everyone was most interested in the issues that affect everybody, and the issues that haven’t gotten near the kinds of coverage that this one issue has,” he said. “I think at the end of the day the American people are exhausted by the debate by the extremes. They want to know about what meets their needs and addresses their issues and concerns about quality and coverage, and that at the end of the day affects most people.”
Americans against health bill
Americans remain inclined against the health care overhaul in Congress as debate began on the Senate floor today.
The USA Today/Gallup poll released today found 49 percent saying they would tell their representative to vote against the bill and 44 percent saying they would urge a yes vote. That's about the same split as in the survey earlier this month, but a change from 51 percent support and 41 percent disapproval in October.
While Republicans are predictably opposed and Democrats in favor, the big change is among political independents.
Gallup says: "Republicans are overwhelmingly opposed to new healthcare legislation -- 86% would advise their member of Congress to vote against it, while 12% would want their member to support it. Democrats, on the other hand, favor it by a 76% to 17% margin. Independents oppose passage of a bill by 53% to 37%. Support among all three party groups has declined since the early October high -- falling by 6 points among Democrats, 8 among independents, and 12 among Republicans."
Since then, the House narrowly passed its version of the legislation, with only one Republican in support, and the Senate barely mustered enough votes to advance debate. It's unclear whether Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid can cobble together 60 votes again to pass a bill -- and it appears very doubtful that Congress will accede to President Obama's goal to have a bill on his desk by the end of the year.
Not that the White House is giving up. It posted a new video today in which Vice President Joe Biden urges Americans to back the plan.
"Do you trust the defenders of the status quo -- the people who say you’d be better off if you left things the way they are? Or would you rather hear from the folks who actually know something about what’s happening in the health care system, because they work in it every day?" Biden asks.
UPDATE: On the other side, Conservatives for Patients Rights launched a new ad against the public insurance option, aiming at 14 moderate senators, including Republican Olympia Snowe of Maine and Independent Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut.
"These individual senators hold the key to the fate of the public option," Rick Scott, chairman of Conservatives for Patients' Rights and a former health insurance executive, said in a statement. "They will decide whether America follows in the footsteps of Britain and Canada with government-run health care, or whether we reject those failed systems and focus on what Americans really want - lower health care costs. Given the news out of Britain, it's clear that government-run health care is doomed to fail."
Republicans stay on warpath against ACORN
The world's attention on Tuesday will be on President Obama's speech on Afghanistan.
But in a corner of Capitol Hill, Republicans will be doing their best to keep alive the controversy over ACORN, the community advocacy group.
Republicans on the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees announced today they will host a forum at 2:30 p.m. Tuesday "examining new details that have come to light regarding the inner workings of ACORN."
Prompted mostly by Republican outrage over videos showing ACORN staffers advising how to skirt the law, Congress believed it had cut off federal funding to ACORN. But President Obama's Justice Department ruled last week that because of technicalities with the wording of the bill, ACORN would continue to be paid from existing government contracts, mostly helping low-income people find affordable housing.
Republicans have railed against allegations of voter registration fraud by ACORN organizers during the 2008 presidential campaign.
Now, Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican who is the ranking Republican on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is pointing to an internal ACORN memo obtained by Politico in which officials with the group's California affiliate discuss changing their name to get past the controversy.
"The more we learn about the inner-working of ACORN and its affiliates, the more apparent it becomes that this organization is intentionally structured to deceive and mislead the American people. Despite their claims to operate independently, our investigation has uncovered additional documents that reveal the lack of firewalls that exist between ACORN, CCI and the ACORN Institute. There simply is no legitimate way that ACORN can account for or distinguish its political work with its taxpayer-subsidized activities," Issa said in a statement.
The scheduled witnesses at the forum are: Gregory Hall, a former ACORN organizer and founder of Truth to Power; David Caldwell, deputy director of the Criminal Division for the Louisiana Attorney General’s Office; Todd Rokita, Indiana Secretary of State; and Hans A. von Spakovsky, former member of the Federal Election Commission and Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation.
Republican blasts ACORN reprieve
A top House Republican today blasted a ruling by the Justice Department that allows the Obama administration to pay ACORN for services provided under contracts signed before Congress passed a law banning the community advocacy group from receiving taxpayers money.
Republicans have been on the warpath against ACORN since its voter registration efforts came under scrutiny during the 2008 presidential campaign. After conservative activists, who posed as a prostitute and pimp, released videos appearing to show ACORN staffers advising them how to skirt the law, Democrats joined in the outrage, leading to the congressional funding ban that Obama signed on Oct. 1.
Since 1994, ACORN, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, has received about $53 million in federal aid, much of it in grants to help poor people obtain affordable housing. The Justice Department asked whether the funding ban applied to prior contracts. In a ruling first reported by the New York Times, a department lawyer said the payments under prior contracts should continue because the language of the law did not expressly wipe them out.
But Representative Darrell Issa, the top Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said "the bipartisan intent of Congress was clear -- no more federal dollars should flow to ACORN."
"It is telling that this administration continues to look for every excuse possible to circumvent the intent of Congress," Issa said in a statement. "Taxpayers should not have to continue subsidizing a criminal enterprise that helped Barack Obama get elected president. The politicization of the Justice Department to payback one of the president’s political allies is shameful and amounts to nothing more than old-fashioned cronyism."
GOP gives thanks, trashes Obama
Republicans say that Americans should be thankful for their blessings today -- but also very worried about the economy and the path that President Obama and Democrats are charting for the country.
"Millions of families have seen jobs and careers vanish in the midst of this recession," House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence of Indiana says in the weekly GOP radio-Internet address, timed this time for Thanksgiving.
“Many are asking, ‘When will things get better?’ Many more are asking, ‘Where are the jobs?’ " he adds. "In the city and on the farm, as millions of American families struggle to balance their checkbooks this holiday season, they watch in astonishment as Washington spends billions of dollars it doesn’t have."
After trashing Obama's $787 billion economic stimulus package, which he said has failed utterly given the national unemployment rate has risen to a "heartbreaking" 10.2 percent, he ridicules the president's plans for a jobs summit next Thursday.
The likely product, Pence says: “Another proposal to grow government, raise taxes and place more debt on the shoulders of our children and grandchildren. The American people know we can’t borrow and spend and bail our way back to a growing economy. The Obama administration and the Democratic majority in Congress have taken our economy from bad to worse with their failed economic agenda and big government plans."
And he says the proposed health care overhaul -- especially a government-run public insurance option -- would make the situation worse.
Pence, however, does not offer any specific solutions from Republicans, beyond the tried-and-true letting "Americans keep more of their hard-earned money."
"With many families hurting during this holiday season, now is the time for us to focus on what makes America great, to join hands and work together on common sense solutions to the problems ailing our nation," he concludes. “Let us resolve to help where we can help, let’s give where we can give, and let’s work together to get this economy moving on the time-honored principles of fiscal responsibility, equality of opportunity and growth."
The full address is below and can be viewed here.
Biden, Kerry decry violence against women
US leaders are urging Americans to join in the international call to stop violence against women on the 10th anniversary of a day set aside to raise awareness.
"Violence against women is found in every culture around the world. It is one of our most pervasive global problems, yet it is preventable. When gang rape is a weapon of war, when women are beaten behind closed doors, or when young girls are trafficked in brothels and fields - we all suffer. This violence robs women and girls of their full potential, causes untold human suffering, and has great social and economic costs," Vice President Joe Biden, who championed the issue while in the US Senate, said in a statement.
Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John F. Kerry -- joined by Senators Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Barbara Boxer of California, and Ben Cardin of Maryland -- also marked the day. Kerry said that before year's end, he will introduce a bill to officially put the US on record backing the global effort.
“The International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women is an important reminder of just how many women and girls continue to be subjected to violence and discrimination around the world. I applaud the UN Secretary-General’s efforts to involve boys and men in this effort; women’s safety cannot be guaranteed without their involvement,” Kerry said in a statement. “Societies where women are safe and can pursue their aspirations will realize their full social and economic potential.”
Republicans tell Biden: Stop using jobs numbers
Keeping up their attack on the Obama administration's stimulus plan, top House Republicans today urged the man in charge to stop claiming jobs that haven't been confirmed.
House GOP leader John Boehner and Representative Darrell Issa, the senior Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sent a letter to Vice President Joe Biden telling him to stop using jobs "saved or created" figures. The administration claimed nearly 650,000 saved or claimed by last month, and said that figure put the stimulus on track to reach Obama's goal of 3.5 million by the end of next year. Read the letter here.
"Washington Democrats claimed the $787-billion ‘stimulus’ would keep unemployment below eight percent and create jobs ‘immediately.’ Instead, three million more Americans have lost their jobs, and unemployment is over ten percent. The American people are asking, ‘where are the jobs?’ but rather than work with Republicans on common-sense solutions to get our economy moving again, the White House is pressing ahead with a job-killing agenda, including a ‘cap-and-trade’ national energy tax and a trillion-dollar government takeover of health care." Boehner said in a statement.
"Worse, they are attempting to disguise the fact that the ‘stimulus’ isn’t working by releasing a stream of questionable - or outright inaccurate - statistics, including the number of jobs ‘saved or created’ – a metric the Obama Administration seems to have made up out of thin air. It’s time to bring facts back to this debate, and a good first step would be for Vice President Biden to stop citing these fictitious figures."
UPDATE: For their part, Democrats are pointing out that more than a few House Republicans -- 67 and counting, they say -- have tried to reap the political benefits of stimulus projects, though they all voted against the package.
"Given that House Republicans helped create the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and not a single one voted for the Recovery Package, it's hardly surprising that they root for failure while working to distract from the mess they created. We will continue going District by District to set the record straight and expose House Republicans and their Right Wing allies' shameless hypocrisy," Ryan Rudominer, a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman, said in a statement.
The administration's jobs count from the $787 billion stimulus has been widely questioned, with some numbers inflated and others impossible to verify and recipients of grants complaining that the forms are difficult to fill out.
Independent congressional watchdogs testified last week that while the stimulus has helped, they could not confirm any count. Many economists also agree that the stimulus has helped slow job losses, though it is exceedingly difficult to quantify.
Abortion rights groups step up lobbying
Abortion rights groups today announced a lobbying campaign to strip restrictions out of the health care legislation in Congress.
They plan a national week of action next week, including a lobbying day in Washington on Dec. 2, to stop the provision, sponsored by Representative Bart Stupak, in the bill that the House passed this month that would not only ban a government-run public plan from covering elective abortion services, but would also ban any private insurer accepting federal subsidies from doing so. The bill being considered by the Senate includes a less restrictive provision.
Supporters of the Stupak provision say it would guarantee that current law barring the use of taxpayers money for abortion would stay in place during a health overhaul, but abortion rights groups say it would go much further, stopping women from using their own money for elective abortions.
"The Stupak amendment is a radical proposal that upends current law on abortion coverage in the United States," the Coalition to Pass Health Care Reform and Stop Stupak said in a statement. "It goes far beyond the Hyde amendment, which has unfairly prohibited the use of federal funds for abortion in most cases for more than 30 years. The Stupak amendment goes beyond Hyde because it would restrict abortion coverage by private health insurance plans in an unprecedented and dangerous manner."
The list of coalition members is below:
FULL ENTRYGOP slams key Democrats
The partisan posturing continues apace from Saturday night, when Senate Democrats barely rounded up enough votes to open formal debate on the health care overhaul.
Three moderates -- Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, and Ben Nelson of Nebraska -- were the last holdouts to get Democrats to the magic 60 votes. And it took quite a bit of arm-twisting -- and even then all three made clear they're not on board to vote for the current legislation.
In Landrieu's case, she won provisions that would funnel millions of dollars to her state, a form of legislative extortion Capitol Hill wags are calling the "Louisiana Purchase."
To Republicans, the three Democrats and others violated their principles and sold out their constituents -- and the GOP tries to make the point in a new web video that assigns all sorts of nefarious motives.
“On Saturday night, a number of moderate Senate Democrats sacrificed their principles to bring America dangerously closer to government-run health care," Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele said in a statement. "Ben Nelson sold out his conscience and voted in favor of federally funded abortions. Blanche Lincoln sold out her principles by voting in favor of a government-run insurance plan, something she previously said she opposed. And Mary Landrieu simply sold her vote to the highest bidder after Harry Reid added a $300 million earmark just for Louisiana. Voters elected these Senators to represent their best interests. Instead they voted in the dead of night for a health care experiment that will increase taxes, raise premiums, cut Medicare, and use taxpayer dollars to fund abortion. This is not the representation Americans deserve. It’s time for these senators to take a long hard look in the mirror and ask themselves who they really work for – their constituents or liberal Democrats like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.”
The video says that Democrats acted in the "dead of night," but that's not actually true. The vote came at about 8 p.m. Saturday. That accusation would have been more appropriate for the House vote on health care on Nov. 7, which came after 11 p.m.
Republicans tell Obama time to decide on Afghanistan
House Republicans are trying to ratchet up the pressure on President Obama to decide the new strategy -- including the number of troops -- for Afghanistan.
The commander he sent to turn around the eight-year war is asking for as many as 40,000 more US troops. Obama has held eight war councils -- at the most recent, he rejected all the plans on the table -- but is not expected to announce his decision until after Thanksgiving.
In a letter dated Thursday and released this afternoon, the Republicans back General Stanley McChrystal's counterinsurgency strategy that requires the additional forces.
They don't use the word "dithering" -- as did former Vice President Dick Cheney -- but they come awfully close, while at the same time tacitly acknowledging the criticism of Obama and Democrats that the Bush administration neglected Afghanistan.
"For over two months you have been engaged in a strategy review that has left the country, our military, and allies uncertain about your commitment to the war in Afghanistan and unsure about your will to do what it is necessary to win this conflict. Worse, we fear this process has emboldened our enemies," they write.
"We believe that it is long overdue for our military to be in the execution stage of the strategy instead of the evaluation phase. While no one disputes that a Commander-in-Chief should deliberate before making decisions, particularly in matters involving life and death, we believe this review is having a detrimental impact on our efforts in Afghanistan. While 68,000 U.S. forces are fighting on the battlefield, your strategy review in Washington has returned the country to the policy drift that undermined our efforts in Afghanistan for much of the war."
The full letter is below:
Democrats getting more blame for economy
A new poll out this morning suggests that Americans are starting to shift blame on the jobless economic recovery to Democrats from Republicans.
The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey found that 27 percent of respondents say Democrats are mostly responsible for the economic woes, while 38 percent say Republicans are mostly to blame. In May, by contrast, the same survey found only 21 percent blaming Democrats and 53 percent faulting Republicans.
The poll also found that the gap between those who believe that President Obama's policies have improved economic conditions and those who think his policies have worsened the economy has shrunk -- from 14 percentage points in May to only 8 percentage points this month.
Despite the rebounding stock market and other positive signs, the survey found unrelenting pessimism about the economy: 82 percent rated conditions as somewhat or very poor, while only 18 percent said they were somewhat or very good.
The new survey was conducted Nov. 13-15 and has an overall margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Some of the president's own Democratic allies have begun to turn against him on the economy, saying that the administration hasn't done enough, despite the $787 billion stimulus, to reverse rising unemployment.
UPDATE: Republicans are pouncing on the dissension in Democrats' ranks, the unemployment numbers, and growing doubts about the jobs supposedly saved or created by the stimulus spending.
“Continued double-digit unemployment is not what Ohioans were promised. The White House, with the support of Governor Strickland, pledged that the ‘stimulus’ would create jobs immediately and keep the national unemployment rate from going above 8 percent. Not only has the 'stimulus' not produced jobs the Administration promised, but now we continue to discover numerous cases of waste, fraud, and incompetence in Ohio and across the country,” the House GOP leader, Representative John Boehner of Ohio, said in a statement today after word that Ohio's unemployment rate had risen to 10.5 percent last month.
“Struggling families and small businesses in our great state deserve better. In all, over the past nine months since the ‘stimulus’ was enacted, nearly 150,000 Ohioans have lost their jobs. Immediate action is needed to create jobs and provide relief. House Republicans will continue to offer fiscally responsible solutions to create jobs by putting money back in the hands of the true drivers of economic growth: American families, small businesses and entrepreneurs.”
Obama group targets Palin on health care
President Obama's grassroots organization is targeting Sarah Palin by name, showing how large a public figure she has become and hinting perhaps that it sees her as a potential rival in 2012.
Organizing for America sent an email to supporters this morning seeking to raise $500,000 to counter Palin's criticisms of Obama's health care plan. The former Alaska governor and 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee has drawn huge audiences for her TV appearances on her media blitz accompanying the nationwide tour for her best-selling memoir.
Earlier this fall, she was the one who popularized the contention -- later debunked -- that the Democratic health care bills would create panels of bureaucrats who would decide end-of-life care.
"Right now, Sarah Palin is on a highly publicized, nationwide book tour, attacking President Obama and his plan for health reform at every turn," national director Mitch Stewart wrote.
"It's dangerous. Remember, this is the person who coined the term "Death Panels" -- and opened the flood gates for months of false attacks by special interests and partisan extremists. Whatever lie comes next will be widely covered by the media, then constantly echoed by right-wing attack groups and others who are trying to defeat reform."
Kennedy's legacy on health bill
The late Senator Edward M. Kennedy's legacy goes on and on in the health care debate.
The legislation that top Senate Democrat Harry Reid unveiled Wednesday night includes a bill that Kennedy had championed for years. Known as the CLASS (Community Living Assistance Services and Supports) Act, it would give the elderly at least $50 a day for long term care and allow them to stay at home if they want.
"The CLASS Act was immensely important to Senator Kennedy because, as he said, ‘It makes a simple pact with all Americans - if you work hard and contribute, society will take care of you when you fall on hard times.’ The Act gives the elderly and people with disabilities opportunities to continue living at home, function in their communities, and obtain the long-term care and support they need," Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr., who is carrying the health care baton for Kennedy as his temporary replacement, said in a statement today.
He and other supporters say it would save money in the long run by keeping people off Medicaid, but critics have questioned the cost.
A summary of the proposal, provided by Kirk's office, is below:
Abortion rights group wants fewer restrictions
A leading abortion rights group said today that the Senate health care bill, while less objectionable than the House version, would still unfairly burden women.
The House bill bans a proposed public insurance option from covering abortion, and also prevents private insurers that accept federal subsidies from offering plans that cover abortion.
The bill unveiled by Senate majority leader Harry Reid is less restrictive, allowing insurers to use money from employers or consumers -- but not federal subsidies -- to cover abortions.
But NARAL Pro-Choice America said the legislation "includes a compromise that continues existing laws that unfairly single out abortion care, including a ban on federal funding."
“America’s pro-choice majority is speaking up loudly and clearly,” the group's president, Nancy Keenan, said in a statement. “Our goal is to ensure that women do not lose ground in the new health-care system and that attempts to expand existing restrictions on abortion are defeated.
"Some anti-choice politicians, such as Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), will follow Rep. Bart Stupak’s example and inject anti-abortion politics into health reform. However, we believe that senators understand that the Stupak amendment in the House bill goes far beyond the status quo and prohibits women from using their own money to buy the insurance coverage they want in the new system. Our activists will continue to remind senators that we’re expecting cooler heads to prevail at this stage of the process and that means the Stupak language is not an option.”
Making sense of House health bill
The health care debate is complicated enough to confuse even policy wonks.
So the House health committee has built a web application to help Americans figure out how the bill approved by the House earlier this month would affect them. The Senate is working on its own version, and if it passes legislation, a conference committee would try to reach a compromise that can pass both chambers and win President Obama's signature.
It's designed to answer questions including how someone would get coverage, who would be eligible for the new insurance "exchange," what would happen to a worker who gets coverage through their employer, and what would happen to Medicare.
The interactive graphic can be accessed here.
Big labor happier with health bill
One of the most important interest groups in the health care debate -- Big Labor -- gave a qualified endorsement today to the bill finally unveiled by top Senate Democrat Harry Reid.
Union support is crucial to Democrats and President Obama to push through the bill, but AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said the nation's largest labor federation is still not happy with a tax on the most generous insurance plans, though it would hit fewer workers than the Senate Finance version. Labor argues that many employees bargained for such benefits to make up for lower or nonexistent pay increases.
Trumka did praise another financing method -- raising payroll taxes on the upper income to help pay for Medicare.
"We commend Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for bringing forward a health care bill that moves us closer to the historic goal of health care for America – high quality, affordable health care for all in our rich nation. The Senate leadership bill takes the strongest steps yet to bring down costs. But the bill is not perfect. It retains a version of the excise tax from the Senate Finance Committee bill. We continue to believe that a tax on working families’ benefits is the wrong way to finance health care and we will work hard to eliminate this provision as the bill heads to the floor," Trumka said in a statement.
"The bill’s inclusion of a public insurance plan option to hold private insurance companies accountable is a tremendous step. And the legislation should be praised for its other fair financing plans, including an increase in the Medicare tax on the wealthiest and an employer responsibility requirement, which we believe should be expanded to include more employers. The bill would expand access by covering 94 percent of Americans and reduce the deficit by $130 billion over 10 years. Today another hurdle is cleared and we are optimistic that good, affordable care for working families will soon be law."
Reid unveils health bill
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- The health care overhaul bill that top Senate Democrat Harry Reid hopes to bring to the floor as soon as Saturday would cost $849 billion over 10 years and would reduce the ranks of the uninsured by 31 million Americans.
A senior leadership aide provided those figures as Reid unveiled his bill, which he has spent weeks working on, melding major elements of the versions passed by the Senate finance and health committees.
The preliminary price tag from the Congressional Budget Office would bring the bill in under the $900 billion that President Obama has set as a ceiling. According to the preliminary CBO analysis, the legislation would reduce the federal deficit by $127 billion over the first decade and by $650 billion over the second decade.
The bill would cover an estimated 94 percent of Americans. Reid bragged that the bill would save lives and protect Medicare, the government program for the elderly.
The bill would set up new insurance exchanges, where consumers could choose plans. It would include a public option that includes a provision for states to opt out of the system -- an exemption that is upsetting liberals who say that a strong government plan is needed to compete with private insurers to ensure affordable coverage.
Like the other bills, Reid's measure would require most Americans to buy insurance coverage with subsidies for those who can't afford it, and would require larger companies to provide coverage to their workers or face fees. It would ban insurance company practices such as denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions.
The bill would be financed by cuts in projected Medicare payments and by higher payroll taxes on upper income taxpayers. Under current law, the Medicare payroll tax is 1.45 percent of income. Under Reid's legislation, it would rise by half a percentage point on individuals' income above $200,000 a year and couples' income above $250,000.
The bill also includes a version of the tax on the most generous "Cadillac" insurance plans. The Senate Finance Committee bill proposed to tax health insurance plans costing more than $8,000 annually for individuals and $21,000 for families. Unions and others had strongly opposed that idea.
The bill the House passed earlier this month would be financed in large measure by a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge on individuals making more than $500,000 a year and households making more than $1 million.
The bill also includes a far less restrictive provision on abortion coverage than the House bill, which would ban the public plan from covering abortion and also ban private plans that accept federal subsidies from doing so. Republicans say the provision is needed to ensure that tax money does not fund abortions, but liberals and abortion rights say it would treat women unfairly and have threatened to vote against the final legislation if it includes it.
Reid's bill calls for the exchange to cover plans with and without abortion coverage, giving consumers a choice.
Reid had been waiting for the CBO numbers before unveiling his bill, for which he is still seeking to round up 60 votes to start floor debate. This afternoon, he met privately with three wavering moderate Democrats, Senators Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, and Ben Nelson of Nebraska.
UPDATE: President Obama this evening issued a statement praising Reid's bill, calling it "another critical milestone in the health reform effort."
"I was particularly pleased to see that the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill will reduce the deficit by $127 billion over the next ten years and as much as $650 billion in the decade following, saving hundreds of billions while extending coverage to 31 million more Americans," Obama said in a statement.
"From day one, our goal has been to enact legislation that offers stability and security to those who have insurance and affordable coverage to those who don’t, and that lowers costs for families, businesses and governments across the country. Majority Leader Reid, Chairmen Baucus and Dodd, and countless Senators have worked tirelessly to craft legislation that meets those principles," the president added.
"Just yesterday, a bipartisan group of more than 20 leading health economists released a letter urging passage of meaningful reform and praising four key provisions that are in the Senate legislation: a fee on insurance companies offering high-premium plans, the establishment of an independent Medicare commission, reforms to the health care delivery system, and overall deficit neutrality. The economists said that these provisions ‘will reduce long-term deficits, improve the quality of care, and put the nation on a firm fiscal footing.’ Those are precisely the goals we should be seeking to attain.
"The challenges facing our health care system aren’t new – but if we fail to act they’ll surely get even worse, meaning higher premiums, skyrocketing costs, and deeper instability for those with coverage. Today, thanks to the Senate’s hard work, we’re closer than ever to enacting solutions to these problems. I look forward to working with the Senate and House to get a finished bill to my desk as soon as possible.”
Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. of Massachusetts, who replaced the late Edward M. Kennedy who had made universal health care his final cause, also praised Reid's bill.
“This is a bill that would make Ted Kennedy proud,” Kirk said in a statement. “We’re a giant step closer to his long-held dream that quality, affordable health care is available to Americans. I’m especially pleased that the bill includes Senator Kennedy’s CLASS Act, so that the elderly and people with disabilities can obtain the support and services they need to continue living at home and participate in their communities.
“I particularly commend Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senator Dodd and Senator Baucus for their extraordinary leadership on this historic legislation, and for doing so in a way that contains costs for families and reduces the deficit over the long run. I look forward to its passage by the Senate.”
Kirk honors Byrd on Kennedy's behalf
It was somehow fitting that Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. joined in the tributes today for Senator Robert Byrd, who became the longest-serving member of Congress ever.
Byrd, a West Virginia Democrat, was on Capitol Hill for all 47 years that the legend that Kirk is temporarily replacing -- Edward M. Kennedy -- was in the Senate. Byrd and Kennedy disagreed on civil rights and other issues, but later became close friends.
Byrd wept openly this year and last as he talked on the Senate floor about his friend's battle with brain cancer.
"I pay tribute to Senator Byrd on behalf of myself and the people of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, but I also pay tribute on behalf of my predecessor and a great friend of Senator Byrd’s, former Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts," Kirk said today on the Senate floor.
"It is true that Senator Kennedy and Senator Byrd didn’t always see eye to eye on every issue. Senator Kennedy used to joke that it was Senator Byrd who taught him how to count votes in their whip race in 1971. Actually, he taught us both how to count votes because I was a young aide to Senator Kennedy in his whip’s office at the time and it turned out that Senator Byrd clearly could count votes more accurately than we could.
"Over the years since, Senator Kennedy was always proud to be in this chamber when his friend Senator Byrd would speak. As Senator Kennedy once said, he knew that Senator Byrd was an expert on the Roman Senate and he was sure that Senator Byrd's wisdom and oratorical skills would make even Cicero envious," Kirk added. (His full remarks are below.)
UPDATE: When Byrd spoke, he wept and shook a little. "I've loved every precious minute of it," he said.
Afterwards, Kirk shook his hand, and several other Democrats also congratulated him.
President Obama, who served with Byrd in the Senate before running for president, added his congratulations.
"Countless colleagues, myself included, have looked to him for advice, guidance and leadership over the years," Obama said in a statement. "He is one of the most steadfast defenders of the United States Constitution, and he never lets us forget the guiding values and principles that make our nation great."
And the winner is..
President Obama's grassroots group late this afternoon announced the winner of its health care video contest -- a bunch of cute kids at a playground listing medical problems and saying that they deserve health care.
Organizing for America said it received more than 1,000 entries (some of which are mashed together at the beginning of the YouTube video with the winner) before narrowing them to 20 finalists and picking one.
"The winning video shows that our supporters' creativity and passion is more than a match for the slick ads and partisan spin doctors on the other side. In the next few days, we'll be using this video as the basis for a new television ad that will air across the country -- and you can help, by ensuring we have the resources to make the biggest impact," Obama's campaign manager David Plouffe says in an email to supporters soliciting contributions.
"With Congress wrapping up its last round of negotiations and closely gauging the public's mood in these crucial final weeks, now is the exact time to get this grassroots message out far and wide."
Republicans bash Obama on jobs
The White House and its Democratic allies in Congress are refocusing on jobs. To which Republicans say: It's about time.
"I say you gotta be kidding me. They have for months now been about more spending, leaving a wake of deficits in their trail, and now they want to focus on what’s important," Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the No. 2 Republican in the House, told reporters today.
"Sometimes it is difficult for us to take the other side seriously, but if they are serious we welcome this news. Republicans have been working for months now trying to forge solutions as to how to get Americans back to work. We urge Speaker Pelosi to take into consideration some of the Republican solutions for job creation and look forward to working together so that we can get this economy back on track,” he added.
UPDATE: WASHINGTON -- Continuing his focus on swine flu, Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. today questioned why it's taking so long to get the vaccine to states.
At a hearing of the Senate homeland security committee, the Massachusetts Democrat noted that there have been about 22 million cases of H1N1 nationwide and 3,900 deaths, including more than 1,500 confirmed cases in the Bay State since April.
State officials said last month that vaccine deliveries were running three weeks behind and that shortages were being reported.
"Many of us are seriously concerned that far more individuals will come down with the virus, and far more lives will be lost, before sufficient quantities of the vaccine arrive," Kirk said in his opening remarks. (His full prepared opening statement is below.)
UPDATE: Representative John Boehner added his criticism, noting that the national debt has passed a mindboggling $12 trillion.
"A $12 trillion national debt is just the latest fallout from Washington Democrats’ unprecedented spending binge. The American people are asking ‘where are the jobs?’ but all they are getting from out-of-touch Washington Democrats is more unsustainable spending and debt to be paid by our kids and grandkids. Instead of taking immediate, bipartisan action to cut spending, Washington Democrats are preparing to double down on their trillion-dollar ‘stimulus’ with a $1.3 trillion government takeover of health care and a promise to address fiscal responsibility sometime next year," he said in a statement.
“The American people deserve better than a government that kicks the can down the road. It is past time for Congress to adopt strict budget caps that limit federal spending on an annual basis, which was a critical plank in the budget alternative Republicans proposed earlier this year.”
Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland, Cantor's Democratic counterpart, said Democrats will try to pass a job-creation plan this year that could include money for highway construction and tax credits for small businesses.
Hoyer told reporters today that it wouldn't be as sweeping as the $787 billion economic stimulus enacted in February, saying, “We need to act in a way that does get to the creation of job opportunities of people in the short term.”
Just before President Obama departed on his Asia trip, he announced a jobs forum to come up with any and all ideas to stem rising unemployment, at 10.2 percent nationally last month.
The White House announced Monday night that the forum will be Dec. 3. “During these difficult economic times, we have a responsibility to consider all good ideas to encourage and accelerate job creation in this country. At the forum next month, I am looking forward to hearing from the private sector, from CEOs and small business owners and from Americans struggling to make ends meet on how we can work together to create jobs and get this economy moving again,” Obama said in a statement.
The White House also announced that the following day, Obama will kick off a "Main Street Tour" in Allentown, Pa., "that will take him to cities and towns across the country over the course of the next few months" to "take the temperature on what Americans are experiencing during these challenging economic times."
Poll: Deep divisions on health bill
Americans remain divided about the health care overhaul and skeptical that it will make their lives better, according to new polling.
In the Washington Post/ABC News survey published today, 49 percent oppose and 48 percent support the proposed changes overall. But tellingly, 52 percent say they expect their own care to become more expensive, and 56 percent say the overall cost of health care in the country increasing. And among the majority of Americans who have insurance, 39 percent believe their coverage will worsen while only 13 percent said they expect it to improve.
On the contentious issue of abortion, 61 percent support banning coverage using public subsidies, but 56 percent say if private money were used to pay for abortions, even insurance for those receiving government aid should be allowed to include coverage.
Meanwhile, a poll conducted for the Associated Press found that Americans prefer taxing the high earners to taxing so-called Cadillac plans to pay for the overhaul bill.
Under the bill passed by the House, there would be a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge on individuals making more than $500,000 a year and couples earning more than $1 million. The poll found 57 percent support a surtax, even it hit individuals making more than $250,000 a year.
The bill passed by the Senate Finance Committee would tax insurance plans costing more than $8,000 annually for individuals and $21,000 for families. The survey found 56 percent opposed to that approach.
UPDATE: A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released this afternoon found 46 percent in favor and 49 percent opposed to the House-passed bill. Those opposed included 34 percent who said the bill was "too liberal" and 10 percent who said it wasn't liberal enough.
Of respondents, 30 percent said that the Senate should make relatively minor changes to the House bill before passing it, 22 percent said the Senate should make major changes, 28 percent said the Senate should start over with a new bill next year, and 18 percent said the Senate should stop working on any major changes to the health care system.
Americans are also divided on whether they believe a health care bill similar to the House version will be passed by Congress this year: 49 percent said it is very or somewhat likely, but 50 percent said it is very or somewhat unlikely.
Markey bullish on China talks
President Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao didn't agree today on much substantial on climate change.
But these days, even goodwill among the two biggest energy producers is apparently cause for hope.
“This agreement shows that economic competition and cooperation are not mutually exclusive, especially when solving the grave threat of climate change is at stake," Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts said in a statement.
“This significant agreement offers a blueprint for international clean energy cooperation between the U.S. and China, and for the rest of the world. With crucial international climate negotiations in Copenhagen just weeks away, the U.S. and China have proven today that the international community can find common ground on key energy issues," added Markey, co-author of the climate change bill passed by the House in June.
“In just a month, the conventional wisdom on US-Chinese climate politics has been turned on its head, and not a moment too soon. With just days to go before nearly 200 countries meet in Copenhagen to forge a new way forward on climate and clean energy, this agreement shows that the last remaining roadblocks are being pushed aside.”
Abortion rights groups state their case
A leading abortion rights group delivered petitions today to try to squash the funding ban when the Senate takes up its health care overhaul bill.
NARAL Pro-Choice America said it and its partners, including People for the American Way, collected 97,218 signatures in 72 hours calling on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to resist pressure from anti-abortion groups to include the controversial provision in the House-passed bill. It would ban a new public insurance option from covering abortion and would also bar private insurance plans that accept patients receiving federal subsidies from offering that coverage.
“America’s pro-choice majority is speaking up loudly and clearly,” NARAL President Nancy Keenan said in a statement. “As the fight for health reform moves forward, we are making sure Sen. Reid and his colleagues understand that adding the anti-choice Stupak-Pitts language to the Senate bill is not an option.”
While supporters of the abortion funding provision say it would just keep in place the current ban on federal funding of abortions -- except in the cases of rape, incest, and danger to the mother's life -- abortion rights groups say it would go well beyond that, effectively denying women the right to use their own money to buy insurance with abortion coverage.
UPDATE: Another abortion rights group is up with a new ad airing on cable in Washington, D.C., and on the Internet.
In the spot from the Center for Reproductive Rights, a female stand-up comic is shown telling a joke: "A woman walks into her doctor’s office and says: ‘Doc, I’m 11 weeks pregnant. My baby has anencephaly, which means parts of her skull and brain are literally missing. It’s fatal. Does my insurance cover an abortion?’ The doctor says: ‘No it does not.' "
The joke is met with dead silence, then the announcer says, "Don’t let Congress ban abortion coverage millions already have.”
Measuring, influencing public opinion on health care
There are two interesting developments today in the health care debate as top Senate Democrat Harry Reid tries to get his ducks in a row to start floor debate this week.
First, the Washington Post reports that the US Chamber of Commerce, a leading business group that is trying to build support against the Democratic bills, is soliciting money for a study that could be used to cast the legislation as a threat to the nation's economy. In an e-mail obtained by the Post, the Chamber's senior health policy manager proposes spending $50,000 to hire a "respected economist" to study the bill.
Also, a new poll released by the Associated Press found Americans split almost right down the middle about the health care bill and worried about the fine print.
According to the survey, 43 percent of respondents oppose the health care bill being debated by Congress, while 41 percent support it, and 15 percent remain neutral or undecided.
The poll, conducted by Stanford University with the nonprofit Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, found broad support for President Obama's goals, but concerns about the details to reach those goals. For example, while Americans support a ban on insurers denying coverage because of pre-existing medical problems, when told that such a prohibition would probably increase costs for many, 43 percent said they would still support the ban, but 31 percent said they would oppose it.
GOP still on warpath against health bill
It has been a week since the House passed the sweeping health care bill, but Republicans remain on the warpath against it.
Representative Mark Kirk of Illinois, an Afghanistan war vet, rails against the legislation in the weekly GOP radio-Internet address today.
He says the bill -- approved with only one Republican "aye" -- would increase taxes, would worsen the record federal deficits, would put government in control of health care, and would threaten Medicare.
"In the teeth of the Great Recession, the Pelosi bill would impose ten new taxes on the American economy. The top combined tax rate for my state of Illinois would be four percentage points higher than France," he says. "The Democrat bill levies new taxes on health insurance, income and even pace makers. The bill also cuts health care for seniors – my parents and many of yours – with $500 billion in cuts for Medicare doctors, hospitals and advantage patients. The bill even cuts Medicare for skilled nursing, wheelchairs and hospices.
“In sum, the bill opens a new trillion-dollar entitlement just as our national debt tops $12 trillion. Ignoring the future needs of Social Security and Medicare, the bill creates a new massive spending program, supported by heavy taxes and cuts to senior health care," Kirk adds.
The House Democratic bill does not trim Medicare, itself. But more than 10 million seniors enrolled in an enhanced, private version known as Medicare Advantage -- including 175,000 in Massachusetts -- could see their plans shrink or be replaced with traditional coverage under the health care overhaul plans proposed by Democrats in Congress.
Kirk also outlines the Republican alternative, with a heavy weight on curbing medical malpractice lawsuits, allowing people to take their coverage across state lines, and encouraging states to experiment. That plan, however, would come nowhere close to extending coverage to the millions of Americans without health insurance.
His full address is below, and can be viewed here.
Tierney: Tough love for Pakistan
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- As Pakistan is rocked with daily attacks, Representative Congressman John F. Tierney, who heads a House subcommittee on national security and foreign affairs, traveled to there this week to meet with military and political leaders, as well as private citizens who have fled the violence.
Tierney, a Salem Democrat who has pushed for more accountability on military aid to the troubled south Asian country, said he will continue to press for strict oversight of funds, even though Pakistan's military is under daily attack by insurgents who threaten both Pakistan and the United States.
In the past, "whenever the request was made, the bill was paid," he said of the funds that the Bush administration gave to Pakistan's military to cover costs of deploying its soldiers in the lawless tribal areas. "Now you are going to find out there has to be substantial verification before the funds are paid."
Tierney vowed similar oversight on $1.5 billion in non-military aid funding for Pakistan approved by Congress this year.
It is not clear how welcome his message of strict oversight was received in Pakistan, where many complained bitterly on conditions that he had placed on military assistance in the $1.5 billion aid package.
Today Tierney presided over the US donation of $430,000 worth of medical supplies to the North West Frontier Province, a region that has been hard hit by suicide bombings. He told reporters in a conference call that Pakistan's fragile political situation is "tenuous" but that the elected government appears to be stable for now.
Tierney also met with Pakistani military leaders, and leaders of opposition parties -- both groups whom are believed to be displeased with the government of current Pakistani president Ali Asif Zardari. But Tierney said both the military and the opposition said they were not trying to push Zardari out, either with a military takeover or a parliamentary action.
"The military is quite clearly indicating that there is no intention of a coup," he told reporters in a conference call from Islamabad. "In conversations with the opposition, their statements were that they have no intention of trying to push Zardari out . . . I don't know how long that lasts."
GOP jettisons abortion coverage from own insurance
The GOP is doing its darndest to quickly move on from an embarrassing revelation -- that even as congressional Republicans insist that the health care overhaul does not cover abortions, the national party's own health plan covers elective procedures.
Late Thursday night, the Republican National Committee acknowledged that its health plan, as far back as 1991, included some coverage for elective abortion. Chairman Michael Steele instructed the RNC's director of administration to opt out of any coverage for elective abortion services in its health insurance policy, the party said.
"Money from our loyal donors should not be used for this purpose. I don't know why this policy existed in the past, but it will not exist under my administration. Consider this issue settled," Steele said in a statement.
The situation was first reported by Thursday by Politico, which cited two sales agents for Cigna who said that the RNC's policy covered elective abortion and that the RNC didn't opt out of abortion coverage when given the opportunity.
Abortion has emerged as a key issue in the health care debate after the bill approved by the House last weekend included a provision that would ban a new government-run public insurance plan from offering coverage and that would also bar private insurers that accept federal subsidies from doing so.
Supporters, including Republicans, say the provision preserves the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal money for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother. But opponents say the provision goes far beyond that and would result in many women either being denied coverage or having to pay more.
RNC tries to tie another Democrat to Kerry
For the second time this week, Republicans are using the example of Senator John F. Kerry to pressure moderate Democrats on health care.
This time, it's a web video targeting Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska for reportedly considering a vote to send the health care overhaul bill to the floor, but then voting against the bill. His vote could be crucial as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tries to reach the 60 votes to overcome a GOP filibuster and begin debate.
The Republican National Committee is calling it a "flip-flop" reminiscent of Kerry, who during his 2004 presidential campaign said of an Iraq war funding bill, “I actually did vote for the $87 billion, before I voted against it.” (He was inartfully saying he voted for an earlier version of an Iraq war appropriation because it would have repealed many of President George W. Bush's tax cuts, but opposing the spending because he would not have gone to war without more international support.)
A similar web video went after Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas on the same grounds.
“Ben Nelson has taken part in the classic Potomac two-step of telling his constituents one thing in Nebraska and doing another thing back in Washington, D.C.," RNC Chairman Michael Steele said in a statement. "Politicians cannot have it both ways -- just ask John Kerry. Nebraskans can spot a phony politician when they see one and they know that any vote to move the Democrats’ health care bill forward is a vote for a government-run health care experiment.”
Pelosi endorses Capuano for Senate
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced this afternoon that she will endorse Representative Mike Capuano for the US Senate seat vacated by the death of Edward M. Kennedy.
Capuano, a Somerville Democrat, is the only sitting member of Congress seeking the seat. He and Pelosi are to appear together in Boston Friday morning to formalize the endorsement.
While Pelosi is popular with Democrats, she is a target of Republicans and conservatives. So while her backing could help Capuano, particularly against Attorney General Martha Coakley, in the Dec. 8 Democratic primary, it could hurt him among Republicans and independents if he wins the nomination and moves to the Jan. 19 special election.
“Saturday the House of Representatives passed a historic health care bill that was a great victory for the American People. Mike Capuano not only cast a courageous vote for this historic legislation, but was a constructive force in improving this bill and moving it to the Senate. Whether taking on the CEOs of the financial services industry, supporting marriage equality, or voting against the Iraq War because he didn’t believe Bush Administration made the case to take military action, Mike Capuano has a proven record of standing up for progressive values and what he believes is right. I am proud to endorse Mike Capuano for U.S. Senate,” Pelosi said in a statement released by Capuano's campaign.
Pelosi has championed Capuano's political career before. In 2006, after Democrats won a majority in the House, she put Capuano in a key role in the Democrats’ transition to the majority. She later picked him to lead a task force on ethics.
Pro-business group urges rethink on health care
A business-friendly group said this afternoon that on Thursday it will launch a $10 million nationwide TV ad blitz warning against doing too much, too fast on the health care overhaul.
The Employment Policies Institute joins the US Chamber of Commerce and others weighing in against the legislation that Democrats are trying to push through Congress and to President Obama's desk.
The ad -- to air before likely like-minded viewers on Fox News Channel as well as CNN and CNBC -- features June O’Neill, former director of the Congressional Budget Office, arguing that the bill would deepen the national debt and hurt job creation.
"Our country is facing an enormous debt crisis. Many of the plans to reform health care will make this crisis worse. As an economist and former director of the Congressional Budget Office, I’m deeply concerned about these health care reforms," she says in the ad.
"They will add hundreds of billions of dollars to the already $12 trillion national debt. We are paying $500 million a day in interest alone. This growing debt is unsustainable. It will have huge negative effects on jobs, taxes and our economy. Unfortunately, some politicians are using accounting gimmicks to hide the cost of these changes. And many seniors on Medicare will pay the price. Changes are necessary. But I fear these reforms are definitely not the answer."
Clinton gives pep talk on health care
By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Former President Bill Clinton, who has painful personal experience with failure on health care reform, urged Senate Democrats this afternoon to get a bill passed.
"It's not important to be perfect. It's important to move. The worst is to do nothing,'' he said after a private luncheon.
The former president didn't specifically discuss his failed effort in 1993-94, senators in the lunch said afterwards. It was more of a pep talk, he said.
"He was upbeat. Positive with every chromosome in his body,'' said Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat.
Kerry warns against revisionist Vietnam history
Senator John F. Kerry, who came to national prominence when he testified before Congress as a Vietnam war hero turned anti-war activist, is now warning against those pushing for a troop surge in Afghanistan by asserting that the same could have turned the tide in Vietnam.
"Let me be clear: more than 58,000 American troops died because they were sent into battle based on false assumptions, flawed goals, and faulty strategies. Yes, we adopted smarter tactics near the end, but by then the die was cast. History has definitively branded Vietnam for the mistake it was—no one should believe that the deaths of nearly 60,000 Americans and at least 1.5 million Vietnamese were somehow not quite enough," Kerry, who is now chairman of the same committee he addressed in 1971, writes in the Nov. 16 issue of Newsweek magazine.
The Massachusetts Democrat, who is among those cautioning President Obama against sending the full allotment of 40,000 additional US troops sought by the top commander in Afghanistan, says there are some similarities with Vietnam.
"We are once again fighting an insurgency in a rural country with a weak central government," he writes. "Once again, our enemy blends in with the local population and finds sanctuary in a neighboring country. Once again, the danger of being perceived as an occupying force by a war-weary population remains perilous."
But he says it is dangerous to draw too many parallels with Afghanistan -- a "very different country -- vastly different history, culture, and geography—in a different era."
"The main lesson that Obama must absorb from Vietnam is the necessity to explain our goals in Afghanistan, and to choose clear and realistic strategies to meet them," Kerry adds.
"I pledged to myself long ago to be informed by Vietnam, not imprisoned by it," he concludes. "The easiest way to make a mistake is to tolerate a debate that sells our country short. In the case of Afghanistan, politics has reduced a difficult mission in a complex country to a simple, headline-ready 'yes or no' on troop numbers. What we need is a realistic assessment of our strategy, military and civilian combined. One of the architects of the Vietnam War, Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, confessed decades later that he knew victory was no longer possible well before the American death toll had reached half its eventual total. He offers a horrific lesson that the time to voice concerns is now."
The full piece is available here.
Kerry seeks help for reservists and small firms
Senator John F. Kerry is cosponsoring a bill he announced today he will introduce to give more aid to small businesses that have military reservists on their payrolls.
Authored with Representative Ron Klein of Florida, the legislation would provide tax incentives for small businesses that make up the difference in salary between military and civilian pay while reservists are serving in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Many large businesses offer the supplements, but many small business owners, who employ 20 percent of reservists, can't afford to do the same.
“Our legislation supports the small businesses that stand by our men and women in uniform when reservists are deployed. It keeps our service members employed and small businesses open for business. In the face of a tough economy, we can do more to support the employers and reservists who make such profound contributions to our economy and national defense,” Kerry said in a statement.
Markey presses for Cape Wind decision
The long-debated Cape Wind project is a significant measure of US commitment to alternative energy, Representative Edward Markey said today, urging a federal decision before the global warming conference in Denmark early next month.
Markey wrote a letter today to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, whose department has already completed an environmental review of the proposal. Read the letter here.
“Approving the Cape Wind project as the nation’s first commercial offshore wind project before the start of the U.N. conference would send a strong message to international negotiators about the United States’ commitment to developing sources of clean energy and reducing global warming pollution,” Markey, a co-author of the climate change bill that passed the House in June, said in a statement. “I strongly support the development of clean, renewable energy, and I believe that wind projects both onshore and offshore hold tremendous promise for our nation and for New England.”
With the Senate unlikely to complete action on a climate change bill before the Copenhagen conference, supporters are trying to line up any and all actions to demonstrate the US is serious on the issue.
Lone GOP vote for health bill draws attention
While the 39 Democrats who voted against the health care bill have received quite a bit of notoriety, the lone Republican who supported it is getting his share of attention.
Representative Anh Cao, a freshman from New Orleans, is a Vietnamese-American who represents a largely African-American district that had been the fiefdom of Democrat William Jefferson, was under indictment when Cao ousted him last November.
Cao said he decided vote aye after a call from President Obama on Saturday, a conversation during which he sought assurances of more federal aid for Hurricane Katrina recovery. A devout Catholic, Cao also wanted the language that was added further restricting abortion services from the bill.
"I felt last night's decision was the proper decision for my district even though it was not the popular decision for my party," Cao told CNN on Sunday. "A lot of my constituents are uninsured, a lot of them are poor. It was the right decision for the people of my district."
Cao also responded to Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, who after last week's election threatened to "come after" lawmakers who didn't toe the party line.
"He has the right to come after those members who do not conform to party lines, but I would hope that he would work with us in order to adjust to the needs of the district and to hold a seat that the Republican party would need," Cao said.
GOP slams Lincoln with Kerry comparison
Republicans are going aggressively after one of the key moderate Democrats who could decide the health care bill's fate in the Senate -- accusing Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas with an attempted "flip-flop" worthy of John F. Kerry.
A web video from the Republican National Committee slams Lincoln for a reported plan to vote for the bill to reach the Senate floor before voting against passage of the bill. Her vote could be crucial as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tries to round up 60 votes to overcome a GOP filibuster.
It repeatedly shows Kerry saying during one of his worst moments of his 2004 presidential campaign, “I actually did vote for the $87 billion, before I voted against it.”
He was explaining why he voted for an earlier version of an Iraq war appropriation because it would have repealed many of President George W. Bush's tax cuts, before opposing the spending because he would not have gone to war without more international support. But Republicans used the clip to portray him as wishy-washy.
"Democrat leaders want Senator Blanche Lincoln to use the same tactic,” the announcer says in the web video. "To pass President Obama’s government-run health care experiment with a vote to move a bill forward with tax increases, cuts to Medicare, and rising premiums. Then, once it comes up for a final vote, they will allow her to vote against it.”
“But any vote to move the bill forward,” the announcer continues. “is a vote for Obama’s government-run health care experiment. They want Senator Lincoln to tell voters in Arkansas: ‘I voted for government-run health care for my party boss, before I voted against it to save my job.’ Americans don’t respect politicians who try to have it both ways. They want to know exactly where their leaders stand. Senator Lincoln, tell Harry Reid Arkansans know a flip-flopper when they see one.”
Frank zings 'tea party' protestors
Representative Barney Frank has let loose another zinger on health care.
During the raucous town halls in August, the Newton Democrat had this response to a woman who asked why he was supporting a "Nazi policy:" "Ma’am, trying to have a conversation with you would be like trying to argue with a dining room table."
Frank was apparently accosted as he tried to walk through a protest Thursday of thousands of opponents of the Democratic health care bills, including many "tea party" anti-tax activists who showed up at the town halls. He told an audience today that being at the rally was like being trapped inside a furniture warehouse, the Associated Press reports.
He also slapped Representative Michelle Bachmann, the Minnesota Republican who instigated the rally and who has become beloved by conservatives and hated by liberals for her outspoken attacks on President Obama and the Democrats.
"Some of the people [at the rally] that wanted to engage me in conversation appeared to have been the losers in the 'Are you smarter than Michele Bachmann contest?' " Frank said, according to AP.
House vote on health care could be delayed
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- The No. 2 Democrat in the House said this morning that Democratic leaders are "very close" to getting the 218 votes they need to pass their sweeping health care bill.
But House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said they have put the rank-and-file on notice that the voting could spill over to Sunday afternoon and possibly Monday and Tuesday if necessary.
"My expectation is that time will not be needed, and we will get this done by Saturday night," Hoyer said in a conference call with the liberal health care consumers group Families USA. But a bit later he acknowledged that the leadership is still looking to solidify the support needed for passage.
"There are many people who are still looking to get a comfort level that this is the right thing to do," he said.
House leaders are trying to rush the bill -- one of the largest and most complex pieces of legislation considered in recent years -- through the lower chamber quickly. They fear that with every passing hour, more issues could arise and create obstacles to passage.
Hoyer said discussions are ongoing over two side issues, abortion and immigration. Conservative Democrats don't want public money to indirectly subsidize abortion, and they also don't want illegal immigrants to benefit from insurance subsidies.
If the House and Senate both pass legislation, Hoyer said -- rather ominously -- that he expects a "relatively lengthy and difficult conference" given the major differences between the House and Senate and the complexity of the bill.
UPDATE: White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters that the administration regrets the likely delay in the vote, but President Obama still plans to go to Capitol Hill on Saturday and sees it as "an important step forward."
He also acknowledged the tense discussions over abortion and illegal immigrants. "Congress, obviously, is working through a process that will ultimately, we believe, before the end of the year get a bill to the president's desk," he said.
GOP jumps on jobless rise, Obama signs benefits extension and asks for patience
Republicans are using the new unemployment numbers out today to pummel President Obama and the Democrats on their record on the economy -- the top issue for voters in Tuesday's election that gave the GOP the governor's offices in New Jersey and Virginia.
The Labor Department reported that the national jobless rate has exceeded 10 percent for the first time since 1983. The rate rose to 10.2 percent last month from 9.8 percent in September. Nearly 16 million people can't find jobs, and counting those who have settled for part-time jobs or stopped looking for work, the rate would be 17.5 percent, the highest on records dating from 1994.
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele again attacked the $787 billion economic stimulus package, whose benefits cited in Obama administration reports have come under scrutiny.
"Since President Obama’s inauguration, the nation has watched the unemployment rate continue to climb, and unfortunately the month of October was no different," Steele said in a statement. "With so many families looking for work, it is time the Obama administration stop spreading their phony ‘saved or created’ talking points and start creating the dependable jobs America needs. President Obama promised jobs during his campaign for president, and the elections in Virginia and New Jersey on Tuesday were a clear referendum on his failure to deliver on this promise.”
And Representative Eric Cantor, the second-ranking Republican in the House, cited the new numbers to argue against the health care overhaul that House Democrats plan to push through as soon as Saturday.
"As unemployment tops 10 percent this holiday season, Republicans have put jobs and the economy first, and are focused on developing real solutions that will put Americans back to work. Increasing taxes on small business, as Democrats will do to pay for government run health care, is the wrong approach. Instead, we should work to empower small businesses to hire more workers, not penalize them further, costing even Americans their jobs," Cantor said in his statement.
“Americans, particularly those with friends, neighbors, and family out of work, are pleading with leaders in Washington to focus on jobs and the economy. From coast to coast, people are concerned with the direction that Washington is heading, and are tired of the spending, tired of the waste, and are pleading for their leaders to focus on jobs and the economy. With millions of Americans desperately seeking work, I ask the President put the economy first, and sit down with Republicans to develop bipartisan solutions that will change the direction of this economy and get people working again.”
Obama this week has touted his administration's efforts to rebuild the economy, while at the same time warning that unemployment would continue to rise until the recovery takes hold.
Today, Obama did sign an extension of jobless benefits -- 14 more weeks for those who have used up their benefits or will do so by the end of the year about 2 million nationwide, including as many as 40,000 in Massachusetts. Those in states such as Massachusetts where the jobless rate is 8.5 percent or above get an additional six weeks. It is the fourth such extension in the past 18 months. (The White House release on the bill is below.)
In a Rose Garden appearance this morning after signing the bill, Obama said the "sobering" jobless numbers underline the "economic challenges ahead."
He noted that the economy grew in the third quarter, but that "job growth always lags behind economic growth."
Obama vowed not to let up on creating jobs and said his administration is looking at additional incentives, tax cuts for businesses, and more measures to free up credit.
He said while it "will take time and patience," he's confident the economy will recover and the country is headed in the right direction. (His full remarks are below.)
Responding to the new numbers, the White House issued a statement this morning from Christina Romer, chairwoman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers, putting the best spin on them.
“Today’s employment report contained both signs of hope for recovery and painful evidence of continued labor market weakness," she said.
"Payroll employment declined 190,000 in October, continuing the steady trend of moderating job loss that began last spring. Furthermore, the employment loss in both August and September was revised down substantially. Importantly, employment in temporary help services, typically one of the first industries to see job gains, increased by 33,700. The motor vehicle industry also posted employment gains. These are hopeful signs that the unprecedented policy actions are working to stabilize the economy and put us on a path toward recovery.
"The unemployment rate, however, rose four-tenths of a percentage point, to 10.2 percent. That this occurred despite the rise in real GDP last quarter reflects both the typical lag between GDP growth and unemployment decline, and the recent exceptional increases in productivity. Having the unemployment rate reach double-digits is a stark reminder of how much work remains to be done before American families see the job gains and reduced unemployment that they need and deserve.”
Poll: Majority says health bill not ready
As House Democrats prepare to push through their health care overhaul this weekend, a new poll suggests that most Americans aren't satisfied with the sweeping measure and want Congress to keep working on it.
In the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released this morning, 33 percent of respondents said they wanted Congress to pass the final legislation only after "major changes" are made, another 24 percent said Congress should start from scratch and seek passage next year, and 15 percent said Congress should stop work on an overhaul altogether.
Only 26 percent said they wanted Congress to proceed with only minor changes to the proposals.
The poll also found 55 percent in favor of the public option -- a government-run plan to compete with private insurers -- though that support was down from 61 percent two weeks ago. Support for President Obama's health care plan has also declined to 45 percent from 49 percent in mid-October.
And the poll found that health care is far behind the economy in importance to Americans -- and that gap has grown in the past two weeks. Now, 47 percent rank the economy as the most important issue facing the nation, compared to 17 percent for health care -- a 30-percentage-point difference compared to 21 percentage points two weeks ago.
The new survey was conducted Oct. 30 to Nov. 1 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Health care fight heats up
The political jockeying is ramping up as the House prepares to vote on its sweeping health care bill as soon as Saturday.
Not a single Republican is expected to vote for the Democratic bill, which would cost $1.2 trillion bill over 10 years, require employers to insure their employees, and prohibit insurance companies from dropping coverage for sick people.
Instead, House Republicans are promoting their own belated bill -- including in a marathon online town hall today -- that focuses far more on cutting costs than covering uninsured Americans.
(Democrats, meanwhile, issued a dismissive slap at the online town hall. "We're planning a twelve second town hall to explain every last detail of the GOP health care plan," Democratic National Committee spokesman Hari Sevugan said in a statement. "According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the Republican 'plan' would do no nothing to stop insurance companies from denying care to Americans with pre-existing conditions or other profit protecting practices, do less to reduce the deficit and leave more people without insurance than there are today. They might as well call it the Do Nothing Act of 2009.")
House GOP Leader John Boehner is bragging about an independent analysis by the Congressional Budget Office that says the Republican health care plan will lower premiums by as much as 10 percent and reduce the federal deficit by $68 billion over 10 years.
“When it comes to reforming health care, controlling skyrocketing costs is the American peoples’ top priority. Now CBO has confirmed that the Republican plan will lower health care costs for American families, and that’s good news for everyone struggling in today’s economy. The choice now could not be clearer: Speaker Pelosi’s plan raises costs. Our plan lowers them," Boehner said in a statement.
“Not only does the GOP plan lower health care costs, but it also increases access to quality care – including for those with pre-existing conditions – at a price our country can afford. The cost of the Speaker’s bill, now at $1.3 trillion and counting, is a debt that will be paid for by our kids and our grandkids. The American people deserve a better solution, and Republicans’ smart, fiscally-responsible plan gives them exactly what they want."
Boehner, however, does not mention that the CBO analysis found that the Republican plan would only decrease the number of uninsured Americans by about 3 million by 2019, leaving about 50 million without coverage. The Democratic bill, by contrast, would cover an estimated 96 percent of Americans.
UPDATE: Also, thousands of protestors, many of them "tea party" anti-tax activists, are holding a rally outside Congress in opposition to the Democratic bill and President Obama's plan. They say it would extend government control over health care and lead to higher taxes.
Speaking to the rally, Boehner called the Democratic health care bill "the greatest threat to freedom" he had seen in his 19 years in Congress.
He warned that it would lead to a government takeover with bureaucrats making health care decisions.
"I'm going to stand with you and all freedom-loving Americans," he said, holding up a copy of the Constitution and reading from the preamble about the "right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
According to the Associated Press, protestors' signs included one that said "Waterboard Congress," along with echoes of the rallying cry at August town halls with lawmakers, "Vote no to government-run health care."
One protester carried a placard reading, "Bury Obamacare with Kennedy," a reference to Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, who died of brain cancer in August and who called universal health care the cause of his life.
A liberal-labor coalition is rebutting the GOP plan with a new TV ad that slams it as a bill to protect insurance company profits.
"This just in: Republicans in Congress have introduced the Health Insurance Industry Profits Protection Act," the announcer says in the ad from Americans United for Change.
"The Republican bill lets insurance companies continue denying care for preexisting conditions," the announcer continues in the faux newscast. "Republicans will still let insurers raise premiums four times faster than wages. And health care will remain unaffordable for most Americans."
"Well folks, it looks like when it comes to health care, the party of no is now, the party of no change."
The AARP, a powerful lobby for seniors, officially announced its endorsement today of the House Democratic bill, despite concerns about potential cuts for members enrolled in Medicare "plus" plans.
The group, however, focused on the provisions that it says will "curb insurance companies’ discrimination against older Americans and Medicare improvements that strengthen benefits while protecting the program for future generations."
“Our goals have always been to make health coverage more affordable for our younger members, those aged 50 to 64, and to protect Medicare for seniors,” Deborah Banda, AARP Massachusetts state director, said in a statement. “Having reviewed the Affordable Health Care for America Act, we believe it meets these goals by improving benefits for people in Medicare – including closing the Medicare prescription drug coverage gap, the dreaded “doughnut hole” – and making health insurance market reforms to help ensure affordable health coverage for every American.”
Obama highlights AARP, AMA endorsements
President Obama, in a surprise appearance during the regular press briefing, bragged this afternoon about the support for the Democratic health care bill by the AARP and the American Medical Association, saying the endorsements bring reform closer than ever.
"This is no small endorsement," he said of the AARP support, saying it should rebut criticism that the proposals would hurt seniors.
"We're thrilled they're standing with us," Obama, who plans to visit Capitol Hill on Friday in support of health reform, told reporters.
The AMA's backing is also important, he said, because "the doctors of America know what needs to be fixed with our health care system." (His full remarks are below.)
The AMA backed the Democratic bill, plus a companion bill that would shield doctors from cuts in Medicare reimbursements.
"The time to make health system reform a reality is now,” J. James Rohack, AMA president, said in a statement. "These two bills were introduced together, and they need to be passed together. Both are essential to achieving meaningful health system reform this year."
While the health bill is "not perfect," on balance it "is consistent with our principles of pluralism, freedom of choice, freedom of physician practice and universal access," he added. "It will significantly expand health insurance coverage to Americans to empower patient and physician decision making; institute meaningful insurance market reforms; make substantial investments in quality; institute prevention and wellness initiatives; provide incentives to states that adopt certificate of merit and/or early offer liability reforms, and reduce administrative burdens."
Earlier today, the AARP officially announced its endorsement despite concerns about potential cuts for members enrolled in Medicare "plus" plans.
The group, however, focused on the provisions that it says will "curb insurance companies’ discrimination against older Americans and Medicare improvements that strengthen benefits while protecting the program for future generations."
“Our goals have always been to make health coverage more affordable for our younger members, those aged 50 to 64, and to protect Medicare for seniors,” Deborah Banda, AARP Massachusetts state director, said in a statement. “Having reviewed the Affordable Health Care for America Act, we believe it meets these goals by improving benefits for people in Medicare – including closing the Medicare prescription drug coverage gap, the dreaded “doughnut hole” – and making health insurance market reforms to help ensure affordable health coverage for every American.”
Patrick huddles with Mass. delegation
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Governor Deval Patrick and House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo met with the state's congressional delegation at the Capitol this morning to discuss a variety of issues, including the national health care overhaul the House may begin voting on this weekend.
Patrick said the economic woes confronting Massachusetts were also a primary focus of the talks, which those who participated in them said also covered education, transportation and global warming.
"We are trying to project a reality to the public that is so in our working relationship -- we are working closely together, trying as best we can, with the tools we have, to bring some relief to people who are suffering and some hope to everybody," he said.
Patrick, who met with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius Wednesday, said he was trying to make sure that the federal health care bills taking shape would not harm the state's health care system, which depends heavily on support from the federal government and provides far more generous subsidies for low-income people than the federal proposals on the table, and would provide the state the flexibility it needs to work on cost containment.
Representative Edward Markey, a Democrat from Malden and the dean of the delegation, said he is certain the House version of the legislation, which is scheduled to be voted on Saturday evening, would benefit Massachusetts.
"Our delegation is supporting the legislation because we know it does help Massachusetts," he said.
On his whirlwind two-day visit to Washington, Patrick is also meeting with other top administration officials, top Senate Democrat Harry Reid, and Massachusetts wounded at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. The governor is scheduled to have a brief audience this afternoon with his friend and ally, President Obama.
Senate panel passes climate bill
The Senate environment committee this morning passed a sweeping climate change bill co-sponsored by Senator John F. Kerry.
The vote came without any Republican support -- in fact, no GOP senators were present because they were boycotting the proceedings until a fuller economic analysis of the legislation.
The panel did not consider any amendments to the bill, which will now be merged with bills being written in other Senate committees, the Associated Press reports.
In the face of the GOP boycott, Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, announced Wednesday that he, Republican Lindsey Graham, and Independent Joe Lieberman are trying to find a compromise that could draw a modicum of bipartisan support and pass the Senate. In June, the House passed its own version, co-authored by Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts.
UPDATE: Even though he's working on a more bipartisan deal, Kerry today applauded the committee's Democrat-only 11-1 vote.
“Congratulations to Chairman Barbara Boxer who this morning advanced landmark legislation out of her committee. She did so under the toughest of circumstances, after months of meetings, deliberations, and vigorous debate. This wasn’t easy, but her commitment was resolute. Today’s step in the process sends a clear message to the world that the United States is serious about tackling climate change and securing our clean energy future," he said in a statement.
“Working with the leaders of five other committees, building support from Democrats and Republicans across the ideological spectrum, the hard work continues on the path to 60 votes in the Senate under the leadership of Majority Leader Reid. We should remember that the 2008 Republican presidential nominee called for strong, mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions, and Sen. Lindsey Graham has joined us in this year’s fight. We can rediscover bi-partisan progress once again. Chairman Boxer and I are determined to see this Congress pass a strong climate bill for the President to sign. This is and has always been a big lift, but heading into Copenhagen, we have momentum on our side.”
Kirk pushes better tracking of health spending
Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. took to the Senate floor today to highlight a rather wonky provision in the health care overhaul legislation -- a national data collection organization to track spending on health programs and its effectiveness.
"We need measures to identify what is wrong with our current health care system, including what is driving the increasingly high cost of care," Kirk said, noting that the industry now totals a mind-boggling $2.33 trillion a year.
"Abundant research and reports have analyzed such questions. What is desperately needed, however, is a central, independent organization that can analyze all of the research performed by various organizations, and make that information readily available to Congress, the Executive Branch, and the American people. That’s an indispensable part of successful health reform. It will give decision-makers easier access to all the knowledge available and eliminate wasteful spending of the hard-earned dollars of American families," the Massachusetts Democrat said.
He noted that the lawmaker he replaced, the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy, proposed the Key National Indicator System to provide it. "It will be a non-partisan, independent agency with a public/private partnership. It will foster better relationships between members of the legislative, statistical and scientific communities, and will lead to greater transparency and accountability for spending on national health programs," Kirk said.
His full prepared remarks are below:
Frank says he will reconsider derivatives rules
By Michael Kranish, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, under fire from some fellow Democrats and consumer groups for carving out what they call loopholes in legislation designed to prevent another economic meltdown, said in a letter released tonight that "there may be a problem here'' and that he wants to reconsider.
The Globe reported on Saturday that an array of Democrats, consumer groups, and the chairman of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission were concerned that legislation pushed through the committee by Frank was not strict enough on the trading of derivatives.
Senator Maria Cantwell, a Washington Democrat, said in the article that loopholes played a major role in last year's meltdown and would continue under the bill backed by Frank. Gary Gensler, the CFTC chairman, called for tightening the oversight of derivatives trading would lower the risk of financial problems. A consumer group representative charged that Frank had "walked away" from concerns of unions and other organizations.
On Tuesday, Frank met with representatives of one of the consumer groups that had complained it was not allowed to present its concerns. Following the meeting, Frank sent a letter to Gensler and Mary Schapiro, the chairman of Securities and Exchange Commission, telling them he heard concerns about the bill and wanted "to further clarify the exception" allowing certain types of derivatives trading. The letter was released tonight.
Heather Booth, director of Americans for Financial Reform, said in an interview that she raised concerns about loopholes in the legislation and she said Frank responded that he would try to tighten such exemptions. Booth said she left the meeting encouraged. Booth stressed, however, that her group still has concerns about whether all of the loopholes will be closed.
"It's not over," she said.
The derivatives measure has already passed through Frank's committee. Frank said in his letter that he would try to amend the legislation when it reaches the House floor.
The trading of derivatives is one of the most controversial elements of financial reform. Derivatives are financial instruments whose value is based on underlying assets, such as real estate. They are used to bet or hedge on how those assets will change in value. The collapse of one type of derivative, an insurance product for subprime mortgages called credit-default swaps, played a major role in last year's financial crisis.
Frank has long said that he wanted to crack down on financial institutions that engage in derivatives trading, but he was concerned that he didn't want to hurt "end users" such as corporations that use the financial product to hedge against day-to-day business risks, such as currency fluctuations. As a result, certain end users were exempted from some of the oversight.
But critics of the legislation said they were concerned that the exemptions were so large that they could lead to risky trading that could put the economy at risk. Concerns were also raised that financial institutions could take advantage of the loopholes to avoid scrutiny.
Kerry, Kirk laud jobless benefits
Senators John F. Kerry and Paul G. Kirk Jr. praised the passage this afternoon of extended unemployment benefits expected to help as many as 40,000 Massachusetts residents.
The two Bay State senators had written top Senate Democrat last month urging him to bring the bill to the floor as quickly as possible, before the benefits ended. More information on the benefits is available here.
“Families across Massachusetts are hurting,” Kirk said in a statement. “With the unemployment rate unacceptably high and the winter months approaching, impossible decisions about whether to turn on the heat or put food on the table loom in many households in the Commonwealth. Passage of the Unemployment Insurance benefits extension will provide greater hope to those who continue to search for work during these harsh economic times.”
“This extension of a critical safety net will make it easier for families across Massachusetts to hang on in the toughest economy since the Great Depression,” Kerry added. “I am pleased that my Senate colleagues have joined Senator Kirk and I in recognizing the urgent need to protect our families.”
Study: Parallels between 1994 and now on health care
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Americans' opinion of the health care proposals now before Congress is eerily similar to public opinion of the Clinton health reform initiatives in 1994, according to an analysis published in the New England Journal of Medicine today -- and that may not bode well for Democrats.
In theory, Americans think the health care system needs to be fixed and they like many of the ideas Democrats are promoting. But they don't like the specific proposals taking shape because they do not think they will benefit them personally.
The report, an in-depth look at more than 30 polls conducted this fall and during the same period in 1994, when the Clinton health reform effort was gasping its last breaths, was co-authored by Robert J. Blendon, a Harvard professor and a leading specialist on health care and public opinion whom congressional leaders of both parties have consulted.
Critics are likely to point out that it is impossible to compare the two periods -- in the fall of 1994, Clinton had been president for a year longer than President Obama has now. Obama has had much more cooperation from Congress than Clinton has had, thanks partly to a difference in strategy. Obama allowed Congress to handle the details of the lawmaking process, while Clinton created resentment among lawmakers by employing a secretive process within the executive branch.
At this time in 1993, the parallel point in the Clinton presidency, Clinton had not yet even introduced bills; this time, five congressional committees have passed legislation, and all of the bills approach the problem of how to insure nearly 50 million Americans without coverage in basically the same way.
But Blendon's analysis hones in on a key point that Democrats are likely to pay increasing attention to, particularly after this week's elections put them on notice that voters remain deeply concerned about the economy and restless with their political leadership.
Republicans offer familiar health proposals
After months of bashing the Democratic bills, House Republicans have come up with their own health care proposal.
The near-final draft focuses more on cutting costs than on covering the uninsured. And it comes in at 230 pages, compared to the 1,990-page behemoth that Democrats plan to bring to the House floor for a vote this week.
UPDATE: Late this afternoon, Republicans announced that party Chairman Michael Steele, House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence and other House members will hold a 12-hour online town hall marathon -- from 1 p.m. EST Thursday to 1 a.m. EST Friday.
"This online health care forum named 'Pelosi Plan Exposed' will ... expose the 12 truths of Nancy Pelosi’s health care bill. House Republicans will also promote and discuss the GOP health care legislation introduced in the House this week," the announcement said.
Republicans plan to offer their bill as an alternative on the floor. It does not require employers to offer coverage and does not require individuals to obtain, and does not ban insurers from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions. It most certainly does not include any kind of "public option" government plan to compete with private insurers.
Rather, the GOP plan incorporates some tried -- and Democrats would argue tired -- prescriptions: more health savings accounts, limits on pain and suffering awards in medical malpractice cases, and more leeway to sell health insurance to be sold across state lines.
"Americans want a step-by-step, common-sense approach to health care reform, not Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s costly, 1,990-page government takeover of our nation’s health care system. Republicans’ alternative solution focuses on lowering health care premiums for families and small businesses, increasing access to affordable, high-quality care, and promoting healthier lifestyles – without adding to the crushing debt Washington has placed on our children and grandchildren," House Republicans said in releasing their plan.
House Republicans this morning released the full text of their plan, available here. (Their summary of the plan is below.)
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs quickly noted how long it took Republicans to roll out their health care alternative and that it does not include "banning insurance companies from discrimination against sick people."
But Gibbs went on to say during his daily briefing that the Obama will continue to try to work with Republicans.
Congressional Democrats were even more dismissive of the GOP plan.
The No. 2 House Democrat, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, told the Associated Press that the Republican alternative "does little to provide security and stability to all Americans, doesn't provide insurance availability for all Americans, does little to expand access to coverage."
"Ours is vastly superior and we think the American public will think that," Hoyer added.
The Democratic National Committee called the GOP bill the "Health Insurance Company Protection Act.”
“It’s appalling that John Boehner and Republicans in Congress would rather maintain the status quo and allow insurance companies to continue engaging in unfair practices that boost their profits at the expense of consumers than pass the health insurance reform American families and businesses so desperately need," Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, a DNC co-chairwoman, said in a statement.
"We have said for some time that Republicans are more interested in protecting the health insurance industry than in helping consumers - and the plan Republicans are putting forward is all the proof anyone would need to know we've been telling the truth. The Republican plan amounts to a ‘Health Insurance Company Protection Act’ and shows once and for all that Republicans don’t want real reform and will fight to protect the status quo every step of the way. At a time when health insurance costs are skyrocketing and families fear losing their coverage if someone gets sick, the last thing we need is to give insurance companies another break. Passing the Republicans’ bill would be worse than passing no reform at all," she added.
“It’s time for Republicans to get the message: Americans want real reform. Instead of handing out favors to big insurance companies, Republicans should work with President Obama and Democrats in Congress to pass the health insurance reform our country needs.”
"This is it?" asked Americans United for Change, a liberal-labor coalition supporting the Democratic bills. "Only 139 days after promising a better proposal for health insurance reform, the Republican House Leadership are today proudly waving in the air a thin outline of a bill that ought to be named the ‘Perpetuate the Status Quo to Protect Insurance Industry Profits Act of 2009.’
"Congressional Republicans say their bill will show they mean business -- except that business is the health insurance industry, and their bill is all about protecting its massive profits. And demonstrating just how serious congressional Republicans are about reform, they’ve decided to omit reforms the American people support the most -- namely the GOP bill does nothing to end the unscrupulous insurance industry practices of denying coverage to Americans who are sick or have ‘pre-existing’ conditions," the group added.
Pakistani press spins conspiracy theory about Kerry intern
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Newspapers in Pakistan love conspiracy theories, and the most recent one concerns an unpaid intern who worked for Massachusetts Senator John F. Kerry: Zain H. Qureshi, the son of Pakistan's foreign minister.
Word of the young Qureshi's internship in Kerry's office during the negotiations over a $7.5 billion aid package to Pakistan spawned a flurry of speculation that the 19-year-old college student might actually have helped author the controversial legislation. The aid bill has also led to criticism of Pakistan's ambassador to the US, Husain Haqqani, who is on leave from Boston University.
One columnist for The News, a Pakistani newspaper, blasted the internship as a special privilege for the elite. She criticized Kerry as a "Boston Brahmin" and compared his aristocratic roots to Qureshi's powerful tribe.
"These guys claim to fame is blue-blooded ancestry, wealth, influence and the right to rule," she wrote.
The News columnist speculated that Qureshi had "gone into hiding" since she couldn't reach him on the phone number on a business card. The Pakistani embassy told the Globe that he simply returned to university in London. (Attempts to reach the young Qureshi via Facebook were unsuccessful.)
Another publication, Pakistan Daily, asked whether the internship made Pakistan's foreign minister beholden to Kerry and weakened his ability to defend Pakistan's interests.
"If you are a father, you develop a soft corner for the powerful man who has given your son an entry job in a powerful place," Pakistan Daily wrote.
A spokesman at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said that Qureshi "had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do" with the aid package "or any other piece of legislation" and that he played no part in any topic related to Pakistan, India, or Afghanistan.
He said the young Qureshi worked in Kerry's Senate office, not the office of the Foreign Relations Committee that Kerry leads. The only thing he had to do with South Asia was drafting a memo at his own initiative about Sri Lanka for one of Kerry's staffers.
Reading the tea leaves from Tuesday
The highest-profile elections around the country on Tuesday anointed obvious winners and losers, but the races also brought some collateral political damage.
While Republicans celebrated their wins for governor in New Jersey and Virginia, the White House is licking its wounds.
It had basically written off Democrat Creigh Deeds, who was beaten badly by Republican Bob McDonnell in Virginia, where the electorate that turned out on Tuesday looked far different than the one that a year ago made President Obama the first Democratic presidential candidate to carry the state since 1964.
But the White House invested more in New Jersey, where incumbent Democrat Jon Corzine was ousted by Republican Chris Christie despite several appearances by President Obama and an effort by his grassroots organization to rekindle the magic of 2008.
And in both New Jersey and Virginia, exit polls suggested that many of the independent voters who flocked to Obama went toward Republicans.
UPDATE: White House spokesman Robert Gibbs gave its spin today, insisting that the New Jersey and Virginia results reflected "very local issues that didn't involve the president."
Voters were worried about the economy, Gibbs told reporters, adding, "I don't think the president needed an election or an exit poll to come to that conclusion."
Predictably, Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele sought to make the most out of the wins. He noted that it was the first time since 1997 that Republicans had swept the races for governor, lieutenant governor, and attorney general in Virginia. "The Republican Party’s overwhelming victory in Virginia is a blow to President Obama and the Democrat Party. It sends a clear signal that voters have had enough of the president’s liberal agenda," Steele said in a statement.
Steele saw even more import in the New Jersey result: “In a state that overwhelmingly voted in favor of President Obama, this stunning defeat of Corzine sends a clear message to Democrats across the country. Americans have grown sick and tired of big government and reckless spending, and this vote is a sound rejection of the far-left policies that are hurting our nation. While the White House sent their political machine to New Jersey in full force – President Obama and Vice President Biden each campaigning in the state 3 times – even that was not enough to convince voters to ignore the realities of their harmful liberal agenda. I fully expect this trend to continue in the coming months, and President Obama and Democrats should have reason to fear the upcoming elections in 2010.”
His Democratic counterpart, Tim Kaine, downplayed the results and their national significance. "In both Virginia and New Jersey we had strong candidates who were running against a significant historical tide and faced uphill battles from the start of this campaign. In New Jersey, the party in power in the White House hasn't won the governor's office since 1985 and the party in power in the White House hasn't won the governor's office in Virginia since 1977. It would have been historic if not unprecedented to win one or both of these races given historical trends," Kaine said in a statement. "These races turned on local and state issues and circumstances and on the candidates in each race - and despite what some will certainly claim - the results are not predictive of the future or reflective of the national mood or political environment."
But in the special congressional election in upstate New York, Bill Owens became the first Democrat to win in more than a century -- after Republican fratricide that exposed deep divisions in the party.
The official GOP candidate withdrew from the race at the last minute because conservatives including Sarah Palin backed third-party Conservative Doug Hoffman. Palin and those others who bucked the GOP are now out on the limb.
Democrats argued that election would have more meaning going forward.
“This election represents a double-blow for national Republicans and their hopes of translating this summer’s ‘tea party’ energy into victories at the ballot box," Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen said in a statement. "Not only did eight extreme right-wing groups spend more than $1 million to drive the moderate Republican – and the NRCC’s chosen candidate – out of the race. Now, after losing a seat that was held by Republicans for nearly 120 years, they have to deal with an emboldened and well-funded far right-wing that refuses to tolerate moderate Republicans with differing opinions."
Senate Republicans boycott climate bill
Republicans followed through this morning on their threat to boycott a Senate committee's work this week on a sweeping climate change bill.
The only one to show up, the Associated Press reports, was George Voinovich of Ohio, the ranking Republican on the environment committee, and he only attended to explain why the GOP is staying away. He said the tactic "is not a ruse" to block the bill, but reflects concern that the full economic impact of the bill has not been studied or made clear.
Many Republicans deride the cap-and-trade system at the heart of the legislation's heart as a job killer and energy tax hike. And a high-profile Republican whom Democrats had hoped would cross the aisle -- Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who co-authored an op-ed on climate change with Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, a lead sponsor of the bill -- is now vocally opposed.
That dims the prospects of the Senate passing a bill. The Democratic-controlled House passed its version in June.
President Obama's grassroots group sent an email to supporters whose senators sit on the environment committee urging them to contact their lawmakers.
"It's essential that we demonstrate that voters across the country strongly support bold action to build America's new energy future,"
wrote Organizing for America political director Addisu Demissie.
Kerry on Monday called for Republicans to stay engaged.
“Over the years, whether it was with the leadership of Sen. Jack Heinz, Sen. John McCain, or Sen. John Warner, we’ve made progress on climate change when we’ve been able to overcome partisan divisions. We’ve never needed to do that more than today," he said in a statement. "We should remember that the GOP’s 2008 presidential nominee called for strong, mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions as part of his campaign, and Sen. Lindsey Graham has joined us in this year’s fight. Chairman Boxer is determined to see this Congress pass a strong climate bill for the President to sign. I’d urge everyone to come back to the table, reengage, and work together to move the process forward. ”
Game time on health care
It's gut check time, a liberal-labor coalition is telling wavering members of Congress.
The latest TV spot on health care from Americans United for Change tries to remind lawmakers that some of the biggest advances did not come until after lots of controversy -- and that it's time to buck up as the House prepares to vote this week on the health care overhaul.
"A great American once said that you can’t have the rain without the thunder and lightning," the announcer says over an animation of a big storm. "Social Security, child labor laws, Medicare, even the creation of the national parks. They were all born in controversy."
As the skies clear in the image, the announcer continues: "But after the storm they all became essential parts of the American landscape. Ask your members of Congress to take a vote they will be proud of for generations to come. Ask them to vote yes to make health care a right for every American."
GOP representative says health bill scarier than terrorists
Republicans have criticized the Democratic health care overhaul in a lot of ways: as a government takeover, as a huge tax increase, as a job killer, as rationing by death panels.
But worse than terrorism?
That's a new one -- and it came out of the mouth today of a Republican congresswoman from North Carolina.
"I believe that the greatest fear that we all should have ... to our freedom comes from this room, this very room, and what may happen later this week in terms of a tax increase bill masquerading as a health care bill," Representative Virginia Foxx said on the House floor. "I believe we have more to fear from the potential of that bill passing than we do from any terrorist right now in any country."
The Democratic National Committee quickly pounced: "It is outrageous that anyone would compare the action of terrorists to efforts to help American families get secure, stable and affordable health insurance," said DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse.
Kerry, Obama hope for best on Karzai
Senator John F. Kerry, who played a key role in persuading Afghan President Hamid Karzai to accept a run-off election, is trying to put the best face on the Nov. 7 revote being called off after challenger Abdullah Abdullah withdrew over the weekend.
Abdullah's decision -- he complained that there would be as much fraud by Karzai's forces as what marred the first round -- made Karzai the winner by default. But it does nothing to help build Karzai's legitimacy as President Obama makes a fateful decision on whether to send more troops to Afghanistan.
"This is one of many critical moments for Afghanistan. President Hamid Karzai deserves credit for his willingness to engage in the runoff election, and Dr. Abdullah Abdullah deserves credit for showing restraint throughout this difficult period. I applaud Dr. Abdullah for urging his supporters to avoid violence, and for refraining from actions which could tear the country apart rather than help bring it together. With the election concluded, it is an opportunity for the government of President Karzai to demonstrate genuine progress in combating corruption, establishing rule of law, and bringing measurable improvement to peoples' lives,” Kerry, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement.
"It is my hope that all Afghans -- those who supported President Hamid Karzai, those who supported Dr Abdullah, and those who supported other candidates during the election -- will now join together to build a better future for their nation. This is a moment when fundamental change is not only possible, but absolutely essential."
UPDATE: President Obama called Karzai today to congratulate him -- but also to press for reform.
"Although the process was messy, I'm pleased to say that the final outcome was determined in accordance with Afghan law, which I think is very important, not only for the international community that has so much invested in Afghan success, but most importantly, is important for the Afghan people that the results were in accordance with and followed the rules laid down by the Afghan constitution," Obama told reporters.
"I did emphasize to President Karzai that the American people and the international community as a whole want to continue to partner with him and his government in achieving prosperity and security in Afghanistan. But I emphasized that this has to be a point in time in which we begin to write a new chapter based on improved governance, a much more serious effort to eradicate corruption, joint efforts to accelerate the training of Afghan security forces so that the Afghan people can provide for their own security. That kind of coordination and a sense on the part of President Karzai that after some difficult years in which there has been some drift, that in fact he's going to move boldly and forcefully forward and take advantage of the international community's interest in his country to initiate reforms internally, that has to be one of our highest priorities," the president said, recounting the conversation.
"He assured me that he understood the importance of this moment, but as I indicated to him, the proof is not going to be in words, it's going to be in deeds. And we are looking forward to consulting closely with his government in the weeks and months to come to assure that the Afghan people are actually seeing progress on the ground."
Short memory for Republicans
If nothing else, the Republican National Committee knows how to adjust on the fly.
Until Saturday, it was firmly behind New York assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, the official GOP candidate in the special election Tuesday in the upstate 23rd Congressional District.
But Scozzafava dropped out, in the face of an insurgent campaign by Conservative Doug Hoffman, who drew backing from Sarah Palin and others on the right wing of the party. Then on Sunday, she endorsed Democrat Bill Owens for the seat, which was vacated when President Obama tapped John McHugh for Army secretary.
Democrats are chortling over the happenings, asserting that it shows how divided the Republican Party is.
UPDATE: Vice President Joe Biden campaigned today for Democrat Owens, appealing to moderate Republicans and taking some shots at Palin and other conservatives.
"We aren't asking you to switch your party," Biden said at a rally in Watertown, N.Y. "We are just saying join us in teaching a lesson to those absolutists who say no dissent is permitted within your own party."
Today to keep the traditionally GOP seat, the RNC put up a radio ad with a full-throated endorsement of Hoffman -- with nary a mention of the mid-course correction.
"The eyes of the nation are on the North Country,” the announcer says. “What we decide on Tuesday, will echo from Albany to Washington.”
“Whose side are you on?” the narrator continues. “The Pelosi/ Patterson tax and spend train wreck? Or do you believe in Republican conservative values, like thrift, personal responsibility, and family. Let’s tell the liberals, enough is enough. No more bailouts, taxes and budget busting spending. It’s time to create jobs, with proven conservative ideas like lower taxes. Let your voice be heard, join the movement to bring real conservative change. Tell the politicians, no more, we won’t let you bankrupt America.
"We need conservative leaders who stand up for our values. Fight Back! Vote conservative, it matters like never before.”
Democratic National Committee spokesman Hari Sevugan responded to the GOP radio ad:
"We are honestly baffled as to why the GOP would want to shine the national spotlight on a race that shows how their party is being hijacked by its extreme right flank. Regardless of the outcome, the RNC has already lost this race at the point where the candidate they backed was driven-out by a faction of their party that seems to be operating with unchecked, unbridled power. With its knee-jerk reaction to the chaos in the NY-23, the RNC has shown that they are just along for the ride, powerless to stop the Limbaughs and Palins of the party who seek to narrow the GOP to only those who agree with their far-right ideology."
Debate over stimulus rages
The Obama administration said this afternoon that more than 640,000 jobs have been saved or created under President Obama's economic stimulus plan at state and local governments, nonprofit groups, and universities.
The 640,329 are in reports covering approximately $160 billion, which represents a little less than half of the funds spent through Sept. 30. Counting jobs linked to $288 billion in tax cuts, White House officials say the $787 billion stimulus plan has already created or saved more than 1 million jobs.
“These reports are strong confirmation that the Recovery Act is responsible for over one million jobs so far and we are on-track to create and save 3.5 million jobs through the Recovery Act by the end of next year. This is another encouraging sign of progress following yesterday’s news that the economy has begun to grow again for the first time in more than a year, but the President and I will not be satisfied until monthly reports show net job growth. We are working every day to create more jobs and we will continue to report on our progress doing so with the Recovery Act in the same transparent way we did today,” Vice President Joe Biden, who is overseeing the stimulus, said in an event with Governors Arnold Schwarzenegger, the California Republican, and Martin O’Malley, the Maryland Democrat.
The official numbers were posted late this afternoon on the website of the independent board overseeing the stimulus. The state-by-state breakdown can be viewed here.
A separate report released today by Jared Bernstein, Biden's chief economist, asserted that the new data confirms the administration is on-track to meet its goal of creating and saving at least 3.5 million jobs by next year. The report also found that the states with the highest unemployment rates nationwide reported 25 percent more jobs created and saved per capita than the nation as a whole.
The government numbers include 23,533 jobs that officials say were retained as a result of spending $1.9 billion in federal stimulus money over the past eight months in Massachusetts. Governor Deval Patrick announced that estimate on Wednesday, but then on Thursday announced he would eliminate nearly 1,000 state jobs to help close a $600 million budget gap.
But the Republican National Committee is aggressively disputing the numbers, citing an Associated Press report this week that an earlier stimulus status report had overstated the jobs numbers.
"Today's release from the White House will be the fourth job report in the last two months," it said today. "With a pattern of these White House 'jobs created or saved' reports being published in close proximity to releases of real data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (showing continuing job loss and rising unemployment), it is clear the Obama administration is trying to cover up economic reality by manufacturing job numbers out of thin air."
Kerry praises Honduras deal
Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John F. Kerry is welcoming the apparent deal in Honduras that could return President Manuel Zelaya to office.
The agreement, announced late Thursday by the Organization of American States, could help end the dispute over the June 28 coup in the Central American nation that ousted Zelaya from power and put Roberto Micheletti into office. The agreement would create a power-sharing government and pledge both to recognize the results of the Nov. 29 presidential elections.
There has been a rollicking debate in Washington and foreign policy circles about how aggressively the US should be pushing for Zelaya's reinstatement .
“I welcome the agreement ending the crisis in Honduras," Kerry said in a statement. "The restoration of democracy is an historic accomplishment for the Honduran people . The accord provides a roadmap for elections on November 29, but success will depend on rigorous international monitoring of the accord’s implementation.
“I also want to congratulate Costa Rican President Arias, OAS Secretary General Insulza, and Assistant Secretary Tom Shannon and his team. With this crisis resolved, I look forward to the speedy Senate confirmation of Mr. Shannon as our Ambassador to Brazil and Dr. Arturo Valenzuela as Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere Affairs,” the Massachusetts Democrat added.
Delahunt: Parks office staying in Boston
Representative Bill Delahunt said late today that the National Park Service has decided to keep its Boston regional office open.
“The federal government’s presence in New England has been reduced significantly during the past eight years, and the recent plan to dismantle the National Park Service Regional office made no sense at all,” Delahunt said in a statement. “The National Parks of New England are important conservation areas and need to be supported by a well staffed and fully functioning regional office.”
A proposal would have closed the Boston office at 15 State St., and moved its operations to Philadelphia, reducing the number of Boston jobs from 107 to 45. Delahunt and other members of the Massachusetts delegation wrote Parks Service Director Jonathan Jarvis in protest.
Kirk echoes Brooke's call for bipartisanship
In a speech today, Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. seconded former Senator Edward W. Brooke, who even as he received Congress's highest civilian honor Wednesday admonished lawmakers for partisan warfare.
"I am proud that Massachusetts sent Ed Brooke to Washington, and we saw yesterday what our state long ago saw in him: his strength, his wisdom, his decency, and his deep commitment to meeting the needs of the American people," Kirk said. "Ed Brooke was elected as a Republican, but the people of Massachusetts didn’t see him as a party man. They saw him as a great American, and a model politician. They supported him because they understood that difficult times require statesmen who can work across party lines."
And that bipartisan spirit should start with the health care overhaul, Kirk told his colleagues.
"We are poised to enact the most significant domestic legislation since the civil rights era. I know that each and every senator has deeply held beliefs about how we can best reform our health care system -- and that those deeply held beliefs will sometimes collide. We should and we will have a vigorous debate in this chamber," said the former Democratic Party chairman.
"But that debate should reflect a level of the civility and the cooperation that is equal to the magnitude of what is at stake for American families. It should reflect the spirit of teamwork and collaboration that we always saw in statesmen like Ed Brooke -- and Ted Kennedy. Our times, and our nation, demand nothing less."
His full prepared remarks are below:
House Democrats unveil health bill
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi this morning unveiled the health care overhaul bill that is to go the floor next week for a vote.
At a pep rally-style event in front of the Capitol, she said that Congress is "about to deliver on the promise" of making affordable health care available to all with a bill that would extend coverage to 36 million more Americans and ban insurers from denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing conditions.
On a major point of contention, the bill includes a "public option" that would let the government sell insurance in competition with private insurers.
The bill, pegged to cost $894 billion over 10 years, would require nearly all Americans by 2013 to obtain coverage, either through their employer, a government program, or new purchasing exchanges. The plan also calls for a significant expansion of Medicaid, the federal-state health program for the poor. And it would impose a requirement on employers to offer insurance to their workers or face penalties.
The bill has been posted online and is available here.
If the House passes a bill, it would have to be melded with the version that comes out of the Senate, where top Democrat Harry Reid is still trying to round up the votes to bring his version -- which includes a public option from which states could opt out -- to the floor.
Republicans and other critics quickly attacked the House Democrats' bill as a recipe for government control of health care and for higher costs. Americans for Tax Reform released a list of what it said was more than a dozen new or increased taxes or fees in the bill.
"Over the last several months, the American people have spoken, and it's pretty clear that our Democrat colleagues have not listened. Through the month of August and September, the American people let members of Congress from both sides of the aisle know that they wanted no part of a government-run health care plan," Representative John Boehner of Ohio, the top House Republican, told reporters on Capitol Hill.
"But nothing really has changed over these last couple of months, and yet the Democrats come forward with a bill that really is a government takeover of our health care system. It's not just the so-called government option. It's the over 50 new mandates, bureaucracies, tax hikes, commissions, all of this is going to require tens of thousands of new federal employees, which is clearly designed for a government takeover of our health care system," Boehner added.
"So no listening and 1,990 pages. Now, tell me how -- how we're going to fix our health care system with 1,990 pages of bureaucracy. This is what the American people have been saying over the last few months: Enough is enough."
UPDATE: The AFL-CIO came out this afternoon in praise of the House Democrats' bill, which it much prefers to the one being worked on in the Senate, which would tax high-cost "Cadillac" health plans to help pay for covering more people. Labor says that would hurt working people, who gave up pay raises for those more generous health benefits.
"Today’s release of a progressive health care reform bill by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi puts America’s working families one big step closer to getting quality and affordable health care, and it’s a model for fair financing. The leadership in the House has crafted a fiscally responsible bill that will provide coverage to 96 percent of Americans and successfully works to lower costs, increase choice, expand coverage and stop insurance company abuses. It will reduce our deficit by $30 billion over the next 10 years," AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka said in a statement.
"The inclusion of a public plan option ensures that we reduce skyrocketing health care costs by holding insurance companies accountable and forcing them to compete. The public option also ensures that all Americans can get coverage no matter what," he added. "The bill does not attempt to finance reform on the backs of the working middle class. In addition, the employer responsibility provision ensures a fair share of financing from employers and prevents employers from increasing costs for everyone by dumping people into subsidized programs. We look forward to working with the leadership in both the House and the Senate to continue to strengthen these provisions as we move forward to pass real health care reform. We strongly believe that these fair financing elements should be included in the final legislation in order to ensure that we are not asking those who struggle to pay for health care to pay even more."
President Obama issued a statement congratulating House Democrats on their bill, calling it "another critical milestone in the effort to reform our health care system."
"This legislation is the product of unprecedented cooperation and countless hours of hard work by Speaker Pelosi, Chairmen Waxman, Rangel, and Miller, Congressman Dingell, and scores of House members who share my conviction that we can’t wait another year for health insurance reform. They have forged a strong consensus that represents a historic step forward," he said in his statement.
"The House legislation includes critical reforms to the insurance industry, so that Americans will no longer have to worry that they will be denied coverage, or that their coverage will be dropped or watered down when they need it most. I’m also pleased that the bill includes a public option offered in an exchange. As I’ve said throughout this process, a public option that competes with private insurers is the best way to ensure choice and competition that are so badly needed in today’s market. And the House bill clearly meets two of the fundamental criteria I have set out: it is fully paid for and will reduce the deficit in the long term.
"While we know there will may more steps and much spirited debate before a bill reaches my desk, I congratulate the House on their work so far, and I’m confident that members will continue to work together to deliver meaningful reform for America’s families and businesses.”
Meanwhile, Obama is pressing his case for health care reform, speaking this morning to invited small business owners and members of the US Chamber of Commerce and National Federation of Independent Business.
"If we’re serious about strengthening small businesses; if we’re serious about creating a climate where our entrepreneurs can succeed; if we’re serious about giving you the chance to prosper and grow, then we need to pass health insurance reform in the United States of America," he plans to say, according to remarks released in advance by the White House.
"Few have a bigger stake in what happens than all of you. Few have a bigger stake than the men and women who own a small business, work at a small business, or rely on someone who does. Few have a bigger stake in what happens because few are struggling more under the status quo."
His full remarks are below:
Kerry calls for clarity on Afghan president brother's role
Senator John F. Kerry, a key player in the Afghanistan debate, responded this afternoon to a New York Times report that Ahmed Wali Karzai, the Afghan president's brother, is suspected of involvement in the opium trade and is on the CIA payroll.
Kerry said he fears that he and other members of Congress have been misled about Ahmed Karzai's role in drug trafficking, which helps fund the operations of the Taliban insurgents who are taking an increasingly bloody toll on US troops.
“Senior American officials have told me repeatedly that there is no hard evidence linking Ahmed Wali Karzai to drug trafficking. However, after reading press accounts which allege that Mr. Karzai has been on the payroll of the CIA, one of the agencies gathering intelligence about narcotics trafficking in Afghanistan, I have serious questions about the information that Congress is receiving. On questions this serious, it is imperative that we receive reliable, current and accurate information," Kerry said in a statement.
“Reducing corruption and stopping the bribes from drug traffickers are absolutely essential to developing an effective Afghan government. Just this week, three DEA agents gave their lives in the fight against drug trafficking, a chilling reminder of the sacrifices American civilians and troops make in Afghanistan," added Kerry, who helped persuade Afghan President Hamid Karzai to accept a Nov. 7 run-off election.
“We should not condemn Ahmed Wali Karzai or damage our critical relations with his brother, President Karzai, on the basis of newspaper articles or rumors. But the appropriate congressional committees must be immediately provided with the most comprehensive and untainted information about his alleged entanglements.”
In ceremonies, Obama honors Kennedy legacy
President Obama's to-do list today includes two ceremonies that add to the legacy of the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
The president spoke at the Congressional Gold Medal ceremony this morning for former Senator Edward W. Brooke -- an honor that Kennedy pushed persistently for the first African-American elected to the US Senate.
Then this evening, Obama will speak at a reception marking the passage of a hate crimes bill that Kennedy pushed for a decade. That bill expands current federal law to include crimes based on gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability and is named for Matthew Shepard, a gay Wyoming college student murdered 11 years ago.
UPDATE: Shepard's parents and Kennedy's family, including his widow Vicki, attended the bill signing ceremony. Obama said he was proud of the work that Kennedy did to make the law possible.
Abraham H. Foxman, Anti-Defamation League national director, also attended the signing ceremony and later issued a statement: “The passage of this important, comprehensive and inclusive federal hate crimes law was long overdue. For 12 long years we have worked hard with coalition partners to build the case in Washington that this law was not just necessary, but vital to ensure that all victims of hate crimes would be covered, and that local and federal officials would have the tools they need to prosecute these horrific crimes to the fullest extent of the law. The passage of this bill is a monumental achievement, and a great day for America.”
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, who is also seeking Kennedy's seat, said the new hate crimes law fills a gap in enforcement. She joined 25 other attorneys general from across the country who wrote to congressional leaders to support the legislation.
“The Matthew Shepard Hate Crime Prevention Act provides federal authorities with critical tools to fight violent acts motivated by bias and hate, and I am very pleased that President Obama has signed it into law,” she said in a statement. “Although it is the states’ primary responsibility to enforce criminal law in our respective states, federal assistance is critical in fighting hate crimes and their effects on victims and communities. The HCPA provides a valuable backstop for situations in which local authorities are either without jurisdiction or resources to act. It also takes an important step in protecting our civil rights by expanding the federal law to protect categories of gender, disability, sexual orientation and gender identity.”
The Senate gave final approval to the bill last week by attaching it to a defense appropriations bill that Obama signed.
Before the signing of the defense bill, Obama and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said it is a major first step toward reforming military spending so that it focuses on the biggest threats facing the country and rooting out waste and unnecessary projects.
Obama declared it a victory over the special interests -- and some lawmakers -- who have protected those projects.
His full remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYEdward Brooke receives high honor
By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- A legendary Massachusetts senator -- backed by another legendary Bay State senator -- today received the highest honor Congress can bestow. Edward W. Brooke was given the Congressional Gold Medal.
Brooke, the first African-American to be elected to the Senate by popular vote, was feted by President Obama and congressional leaders in the Capitol Rotunda, two years after the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy collected the 67 Senate votes required to give the medal.
“Ed Brooke eminently deserves this distinguished award for his extraordinary life and commitment to public service. As an outstanding public official and true statesman, he’s fought for equal opportunity and equal justice for all throughout his brilliant career. He broke down many barriers and reached across party lines to do so, and I congratulate him on this special tribute by Congress,” Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr., who took Kennedy's seat in the Senate until the January special election, said in a statement today.
Obama said that Brooke "moved the arc of history" and that many, including him, followed in his legacy.
Brooke was truly a pioneer, successfully facing segregation in the Army and in Boston's legal community, as well as in politics, Obama said.
"Ed was unfazed," the president said, never giving up on the belief that people would ultimately judge him not on the color of his skin, but on his character, judgment, and policies.
Obama noted that Brooke drew support from across the political spectrum, including feminist Gloria Steinem and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.
"That's a coalition builder," Obama said, drawing applause. (His full remarks are below.)
In his opportunity to speak, Brooke chided his former colleagues about working together across the partisan divide. He said there are issues more important than partisan politics: the hungry, the homeless, and diplomacy, among them.
Continuing his advocacy for the District of Columbia, he said he'd trade his medal if it meant voting rights to district residents, who are now represented by a non-voting delegate.
Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts also spoke to honor Brooke.
"The man Massachusetts sent to the Senate was known for his independence, a public servant whose compass was guided not by party, but by conscience," Kerry said. "He was one of the first advocates of legislation to provide affordable housing. And when it was especially difficult, he stood up for affirmative action, desegregation, privacy rights, minority business development, an increase in Social Security benefits and the extension of the Voting Rights Act."
Kerry also noted that Brooke had a long relationship with civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. and was one of the first to suggest a national holiday when King was assassinated. (Kerry's full prepared remarks are below.)
Brooke, a Republican who served from 1967 to 1979, was praised by Kennedy in 2007 for an "extraordinary career of breaking down the barriers of race and reaching across party lines to bring people together around common-sense solutions.''
In building support for Brooke's medal, Kennedy reminded his colleagues that Brooke -- despite breaking important racial barriers -- never campaigned as an African-American candidate. When running for attorney general, Kennedy noted in 2007, Brooke said, "I'm not running as a Negro. I never have. I’m trying to show that people can be elected on the basis of their qualifications and not their race."
The ceremony program included a quotation from Brooke. "America's greatness lies in its wondrous diversity. Our magnificent pluralism has made our country great. Our ever-widening diversity will keep us great."
District of Columbia Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton campaigned for Brooke's honor on the House side, lauding the former senator for his work on behalf of full voting rights for District of Columbia residents.
The ceremony "will help drive home the disempowerment of DC residents as Congress gives its highest honor to our native son, who left his hometown, unable to vote for president, mayor, House representative, or senator, and became our nation;s first popularly-elected African-American senator,'' Holmes Norton said in a statement.
Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele, the first African American to lead the national party, sent his kudos.
“I want to extend my sincere congratulations to former Senator Brooke on being recognized by Congress with this distinguished award," Steele said in a statement. "As the first African-American elected to the Senate, he is symbolic of efforts by the Republican National Committee to expand our Party among Americans of diverse backgrounds. Senator Brooke’s distinguished accomplishments have greatly contributed to the Republican Party’s history of trailblazers who have made a difference in the lives of Americans through policy and public service. I salute Senator Brooke for his leadership and dedication to our country.”
Congressional leaders decided to hold the ceremony now to ensure that the 90-year-old former lawmaker would be able to attend in person, leadership aides said.
The Congressional Gold Medal started in 1776 as an award to military leaders and has been awarded to such luminaries as Sir Winston Churchill and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair; civil rights leaders Martin Luther King, Jr., Dorothy Height, and Rosa Parks; actors Bob Hope and Frank Sinatra; humanitarians Nelson Mandela and Mother Teresa; and athletes Joe Louis and Jackie Robinson.
FULL ENTRYKirk stays on health care
A day after giving his first floor speech -- on the need for bipartisanship on the health care overhaul -- Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. returns to the chamber this morning to talk about how the version passed by the Senate health committee would help the elderly and disabled.
Kirk is one of nine freshman Democrats scheduled to give back-to-back speeches, his office said. Each will touch on a different issue or program that "exemplify how health care reform will work and how it is working already."
Kirk's topic is the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act, also championed by his mentor and the man he is temporarily replacing, the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
"Here’s how the CLASS Act will help the middle class," Kirk said. "Under the act, a worker in Massachusetts or any other state can choose to pay into a voluntary insurance program through affordable payroll deductions. After five years of those deductions, they would be eligible for a daily cash benefit of $50 if they became disabled. That money can make a huge difference in allowing a disabled person to live with independence and with dignity. For example, it can pay for having a ramp installed in their home or pay for needed transportation or purchase a commuter to work from home and remain self-sufficient."
His full remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYMcCain to Obama: Send troops now
Senator John McCain, President Obama's Republican foe last year, has largely supported his rival since the election.
But now, the Vietnam War hero and Iraq troop surge supporter is putting increasing pressure on Obama to send more troops to Afghanistan -- and do it soon.
The president has held six war councils and counting to decide the strategy going forward, and some expect him to wait on deciding on his top commander's request for as many as 40,000 additional troops until after the Nov. 7 Afghan presidential run-off election.
But McCain said on "The Early Show" on CBS this morning that the war policy in Afghanistan "has been reviewed time and again" and it's time to act because the long delay "is not helpful to our effort" and is frustrating military commanders and making allies nervous.
And in an op-ed posted online on CNN today, McCain calls on Obama to move as quickly as possible to grant General Stanley McChrystal's request for additional troops.
McCain notes that he supported the Afghanistan strategy that Obama laid out in March, when he announced his decision to dispatch 21,000 more US troops. And the senator also stresses that he backed Obama's appointment of McChrystal as the top US commander on the ground -- so the president should listen to the general now.
"I agree with our commander's assessment of the security situation as 'deteriorating' and that our civilian and military leaders urgently need more resources, including more combat troops, to turn the tide toward success," McCain writes. "I sympathize with our president, because sending men and women into harm's way is the most difficult decision that a commander-in-chief must make. However, Americans are already serving in harm's way in Afghanistan, and the sooner we can provide the reinforcements and resources they need, the safer and more successful they will be."
(Read the full opinion piece here.)
Tsongas to back Coakley for Senate
By Matt Viser, Globe Staff
Representative Niki Tsongas, a Lowell Democrat, is endorsing Attorney General Martha Coakley on Wednesday for the Senate seat formerly held by the late Edward M. Kennedy.
Tsongas is the first member of the Massachusetts congressional delegation to endorse someone other than their colleague, Representative Michael Capuano, in the Dec. 8 Democratic primary.
Capuano has been endorsed by three other congressional members from Massachusetts: Barney Frank, Jim McGovern, John Tierney, and Stephen Lynch.
The Tsongas endorsement is scheduled to take place at 2:30 p.m. at the VFW Post 662 in Lowell.
Massachusetts has never elected a female US senator, and Tsongas is currently the only female member of the state's congressional delegation.
Grayson causes another ruckus
Republicans are trying to tar and tie President Obama with the latest eyebrow-raising remarks from a Florida congressman.
Representative Alan Grayson called a senior Federal Reserve adviser a "K Street whore" in a radio interview last month that is now circulating on Capitol Hill.
Grayson was objecting to opposition to more government oversight from Linda Robertson, a former Enron lobbyist now working for Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, and was referring to K Street, where many lobbyists have their offices in the nation's capital.
"Here I am the only member of Congress who actually worked as an economist, and this lobbyist, this K Street whore, is trying to teach me about economics," Grayson said.
UPDATE: Late this afternoon, after criticism from across the political spectrum, Grayson issued a statement of apology, the Associated Press reports.
"I offer my sincere apology," Grayson said in a statement, just hours after his spokesman had defended his comments. "I did not intend to use a term that is often, and correctly, seen as disrespectful of women."
The Republican National Committee noted that Obama, at a Democratic fund-raiser in Miami Monday night, lumped Grayson in with other members of Congress as "outstanding."
"Alan Grayson's latest comments are disgraceful, inappropriate and disrespectful to women. Last night at the Democratic Party's South Beach fundraiser, President Obama proudly named Grayson an 'outstanding member of Congress.' Americans across Florida and the entire nation can agree that Grayson's comments are not characteristic of an 'outstanding member of Congress.' President Obama should immediately rescind his accolades and condemn Grayson's shameful comments, and Congressman Grayson should issue an apology," RNC Co-Chairman Jan Larimer said in a statement.
Grayson caused an uproar last month by saying on the House floor that the GOP health care plan is that it wants Americans to “die quickly’’ if they get sick. He refused to apologize and became a darling of liberals, appearing several times on MSNBC.
Poll: support growing for public option
Public support for a public option in health care appears to be growing, according to a new poll.
The NBC/Wall Street Journal survey found that 48 percent support a government-run plan to compete with private insurers and 42 percent oppose it -- the strongest support ever in the survey. Last month, opinion was basically divided with 46 percent in favor and 48 percent against.
The new poll, conducted Thursday through Sunday, has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points.
The top Senate Democrat, Harry Reid of Nevada, revived the possibility of a public option being in the final bill by announcing Monday that he would include one in the version he plans to bring to the full Senate -- albeit with a big exception in that states would be able to opt out.
But at the same time, Reid's move might have cost him a vote of a Senate moderate.
The Associated Press is reporting that Senator Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut independent who caucuses with Democrats, is saying that while he's "strongly inclined" to vote to bring Reid's health care plan to the Senate floor for debate, he would ultimately vote no because it includes a public option.
Lieberman told the AP that he's worried a public option would be costly to taxpayers and drive up insurance premiums.
UPDATE: But Lieberman told Politico that he would join a Republican filibuster if the bill includes a public option.
"We're trying to do too much at once," Lieberman told Politico. “To put this government-created insurance company on top of everything else is just asking for trouble for the taxpayers, for the premium payers and for the national debt. I don’t think we need it now."
And Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine, the only Republican to support any of the health bills so far, is saying she would vote with fellow Republicans to block the Democratic bill if changes are not made to the version that Reid outlined, the AP reports.
Counting Lieberman, Democrats control 60 votes -- just enough to overcome a possible GOP filibuster -- so Snowe's vote could be crucial.
Democrats, labor sound populist call
A populist economic message -- and perhaps a little class warfare -- is alive and well today among Democrats and their allies.
In Washington, Senators John F. Kerry of Massachusetts and Max Baucus of Montana and Representatives Richard Neal of Massachusetts and Charles Rangel of New York introduced bills today that would crack down on wealthy Americans and businesses that hide assets in offshore tax havens.
"A small number of individuals and businesses hide their assets overseas solely in order to shirk their responsibilities, even as the vast majority of hard-working Americans honor the obligations of citizenship and fulfill their responsibilities," President Obama said in a statement cheering them on.
“Shortly after taking office, I laid out a set of proposals to crack down on illegal overseas tax evasion. The legislation introduced today would fulfill that promise, putting a stop to billions of dollars worth of abuses. I look forward to working with Congress to turn these proposals into law so that honest Americans no longer shoulder the burden of the few individuals and businesses that put profit before responsibility,” the president added.
Meanwhile in Chicago, the AFL-CIO is protesting outside the convention of the American Bankers Association.
"We're gathered here today to send a message to the bankers meeting inside, and the message is this: Business as usual is over. We are shutting it down. You work for us-not the other way around," AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka said. "Your job is to be stewards of our savings-to put and keep working families in homes, to lend the money companies need to create jobs. And you have failed. You've turned the American economy into your own private casino, gambling away our financial future with our money, driving us to the brink of a second Great Depression, then sticking out your hand for taxpayers to bail you out."
His full prepared remarks are below:
Kirk calls for unity on health care
Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. delivered his first major floor speech today, and he chose a subject close to the heart of the legendary lawmaker he replaced.
And Kirk sounded a theme woven through the late Edward M. Kennedy's 47 years in the Senate -- reaching across the aisle in search of bipartisan compromise on the most important issues facing the nation.
“Of all the issues on which he led the Senate and our nation, the one Ted Kennedy called the cause of his life was the battle for affordable, quality health care," Kirk told his colleagues. "At this moment, we are closer to realizing the long held dream that all Americans have access to quality, affordable health care than at any time in our nation’s history."
But, he added, "At this moment, when America’s families are imperiled by economic hardship and uncertainty, it provides them no comfort to see the United States Senate so politically polarized over an issue that should be bringing us together on their behalf."
When he was sworn in last month, Kirk became the 60th vote in the Senate allied with Democrats, theoretically giving his party enough votes to overcome Republican procedural hurdles and to get a health care bill through the chamber.
Today, Kirk stressed, "This debate should not be about one party reaching 60 votes; it should be about 100 Senators reaching out to each other to reform a health care system so that it better reflects the true values and character of our nation.”
Kirk, a former Kennedy aide and Democratic Party chairman, noted that the late senator gave his first major health care speech 40 years ago, and that Capitol Hill has been littered with unsuccessful efforts at reform since as the estimates of uninsured Americans has ballooned from 25 million to 46 million.
"As this debate continues, I hope we will pause for a moment – to hear Ted Kennedy’s voice in the quiet of our hearts. You and I know, he will urge us to seize this moment – to come together in this common cause, and to make sure, at long last, that all Americans will have access to the quality, affordable health care they have long deserved and so urgently need," said Kirk, standing at the desk where Kennedy's booming voice advocated for civil rights and help for the poor as well as universal health care.
But Kirk, who is serving until a special election on Jan. 19 decides who will serve out Kennedy's term, said he will advocate for a proposal that is causing much of the partisan divide -- a public option.
Republicans say that a government-run plan to compete with private insurers will drive insurance companies out of business and give government too big a role in the health care system.
But Kirk agreed with top Senate Democrat Harry Reid, who announced Monday that a public option would be in the bill that comes to the floor. A public option will "stimulate competition and reduce costs in the health care marketplace," Kirk said.
Kirk also defended the landmark health insurance law in Massachusetts, saying that it is "regrettable" that "special interests who have a financial stake in our failing health care system" have attacked the reform bill and "the success of our reform in Massachusetts."
"Well, let me set the record straight," he is telling the Senate. "First, because of our bipartisan reforms, less than 3% of the Massachusetts population is without health insurance -- lower than any other state. Second, the state’s most respected independent fiscal watchdog concluded that Massachusetts implemented reform in a fiscally responsible and financially sustainable way. Third, unlike every other state, employer-based health insurance is increasing in Massachusetts. Finally, according to a recent statewide poll by the Harvard School of Public Health, 79% of the public -- and practitioners in every sector of the Massachusetts health care system -- including physicians -- strongly support our bipartisan reform."
Fellow Massachusetts Senator John F. Kerry and top Senate Democrats, including Dick Durbin of Illinois and Reid, were in the chamber for the speech. Senator Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia came up to Kirk afterwards and congratulated him.
Kirk's full prepared remarks are below:
Kerry pushes climate change bill
After days of focusing on his top foreign priority, Senator John F. Kerry returns today to an issue atop his domestic agenda -- global warming and alternative energy.
Kerry, who has emerged as an influential voice in the debate over the US mission in Afghanistan, is pushing for his bill on climate change, which he has portrayed as a national security issue as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.
“Today, we have an opportunity to lead the world in rolling back the urgent threat of climate change,” Kerry told the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, which today is starting its debate and revisions to the legislation. The panel's chairwoman, Senator Barbara Boxer of California, is the chief cosponsor of the bill.
“Climate change and our dependence on foreign oil are a threat to our national security. There’s nothing conservative about remaining indebted to hostile regimes for our energy. It’s time for the Senate to lead and – with an eye toward our best traditions -- find common ground to move the country forward, keep our country safe and strong, and lay the groundwork for decades of economic growth to come.”
More information on the bill is available here, and Kerry's full opening statement is below:
Reid backs public option
After weeks of uncertainty, the top Senate Democrat announced this afternoon that he wants to include a government-run option as part of the health care overhaul, though it's not clear he has the votes to get it through the Senate.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said at a news conference that he favors the contentious public option, which is included in the versions passed by the Senate health committee and three House panels but not the one from the Senate Finance Committee, according to several media organizations.
"While the public option is not a silver bullet, I believe it's an important way to ensure competition and to level the playing field for patients with the insurance industry," Reid said.
Reid threw his support behind a version that would allow states to opt out of offering government-run coverage to compete with private insurers. Under his proposal, states would have until 2014 to do so.
"Under this concept, states will be able to determine whether the public option works well for them and will have the ability to opt out, if they so choose," Reid said. "I believe that a public option can achieve the goal of bringing meaningful reform to our broken system. It will protect consumers, keep insurers honest and ensure competition."
But the opt-out will not please liberal Democrats, who say the public option should be available nationwide and is essential to keeping the insurance industry honest.
President Obama has said he prefers a public option, but is not demanding it as part of a bill he could sign.
Reid said the bill that goes to the Senate floor will also include a provision for nonprofit co-ops as another option for affordable coverage.
He said he is sending his proposal -- which combines elements of the Senate Finance and Senate health bills -- to the Congressional Budget Office for an analysis of how much it would cost. He and Obama are aiming for a plan that comes in at $900 billion over 10 years or less.
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs issued a statement on Obama's behalf congratulating Reid, Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, and Senate Christopher Dodd, who shepherded the health committee bill.
“Thanks to their efforts, we’re closer than we’ve ever been to solving this decades-old problem," Gibbs said. "And while much work remains, the President is pleased that at the progress that Congress has made. He’s also pleased that the Senate has decided to include a public option for health coverage, in this case with an allowance for states to opt out. As he said to Congress and the nation in September, he supports the public option because it has the potential to play an essential role in holding insurance companies accountable through choice and competition.”
Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, a Finance Committee member, also applauded Reid for including a public option.
“This is big news, and it’s very good news. Majority Leader Reid is taking the gutsy and appropriate road in fighting for the right policy, something the American people want and an issue on which every Senator should be held accountable," Kerry said in a statement.
"That’s why I voted for it in the Finance Committee and why I’ve advocated for it since day one. Leader Reid has laid out a plan that is reasonable and fair and will help achieve quality, affordable healthcare for all Americans. Ted Kennedy once told me there were many ways to arrive at health care reform, and he always knew that the first step was in finding every possible avenue to fight for the best policy. That’s the tradition the Majority Leader is carrying on today.”
Obama, Kerry plot Afghan strategy
President Obama and his point man in Congress for foreign policy are both focusing on Afghanistan today.
Obama met this morning with his national security team to discuss US policy in Afghanistan and neighboring Pakistan as pressure builds on the president to decide on his top commander's request for as many as 40,000 more troops.
The White House said expected attendees included Vice President Joe Biden (via videoconference), Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, National Security Adviser General James Jones, Deputy National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, counterterrorism adviser John Brennan, and Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
They met as word comes from Afghanistan that 14 American military members and civilians were killed in two helicopter crashes.
This afternoon, Obama traveled to Jacksonville, Fla., where he will speak to and meet with sailors and Marines.
UPDATE: In his speech at Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Obama did not give any significant hints on his Afghanistan decision. But he did mention that debate as he pledged anew not to send US forces into combat unless absolutely necessary.
"While I will never hesitate to use force to protect the American people or our vital interests, I also promise you this -- and this is very important as we consider our next steps in Afghanistan: I will never rush the solemn decision of sending you into harm’s way," he said. "I won’t risk your lives unless it is absolutely necessary. And if it is necessary, we will back you up. Because you deserve the strategy, the clear mission, the defined goals and the equipment and support you need to get the job done. That’s the promise I make to you."
Instead, the president spent most of his address thanking the sailors and Marines for their service, mentioning the loss of 14 Americans in separate helicopter crashes in Afghanistan.
"You are the best-trained, best-prepared, best-led force in history. You -- our people -- are our most precious resource," he said.
"We were reminded of this again, with today’s helicopter crashes in Afghanistan. Fourteen Americans gave their lives. And our prayers are with these service members, their civilian colleagues and the families who loved them. And while no words can ease the ache in their hearts today, may they find some comfort in knowing this: like all those who give their lives in service to America, they were doing their duty and they were doing this nation proud."
Obama also promised to make sure members of the military are taken care of when they return home.
"We’re improving care for our wounded warriors, especially those with Post-Traumatic Stress and Traumatic Brain Injuries. We’re funding the Post-9/11 GI Bill to give you and your families the chance to pursue your dreams. And we’re making the biggest commitment to our veterans -- the largest percentage increase in the VA budget -- in more than 30 years," he said.
"These are the commitments I make to you; the obligations that your country is honor-bound to uphold. Because you’ve have always taken care of America, and America must always take care of you. Always."
(His full remarks are below.)
About an hour after Obama's strategy session began this morning, Senator John F. Kerry delivered a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations entitled “Afghanistan: Defining the Possibilities” to examine the way forward for US strategy in Afghanistan.
Kerry was on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan during a seven-day trip that ended last Wednesday and that culminated in the Senate Foreign Relations chairman playing a key role in persuading Afghan President Hamid Karzai to accept a Nov. 7 runoff election that US officials hope provides legitimacy to the Afghan government.
In his speech, Kerry said that the Afghanistan debate has been oversimplified and that Obama is right to take his time to decide what to do next.
"With certainty, we all know why we invaded Afghanistan. It was not a mistake to go in. We now have to choose a smart way forward so that no one is ever compelled to ask whether we've made a mistake in staying," he said.
"The easiest way to make a mistake, frankly, is to tolerate a debate that sells our country short. In recent weeks, politics has reduced an extraordinarily complex country and mission to a simple, headline-ready “yes or no” on troop numbers. That debate is completely at odds with reality. What we need, above all, what our troops deserve-- and what we haven’t had-- is a comprehensive strategy, military and civilian combined.”
Kerry said that he believes the troop request by General Stanley McChrystal is too expansive. “I am convinced from my conversations with General Stanley McChrystal that he understands the necessity of conducting a smart counterinsurgency in a limited geographic area. But I believe his current plan reaches too far, too fast. We do not yet have the critical guarantees of governance and development capacity. I also have serious concerns about the ability to produce effective Afghan forces to partner with, so we can ensure that when our troops make heroic sacrifices, the benefits to the Afghans are clear and sustainable.”
The senator also hit back at former Vice President Dick Cheney, who said last week that the White House was "dithering" and endangering US troops by taking so long to decide.
"After eight years of neglecting Afghanistan as vice president, Dick Cheney has now come out of retirement to criticize President Obama for taking time to examine assumptions before sending troops into war, this from the man who in 2002 told America, quote, 'The Taliban regime is out of business permanently.' I think this is one time I wish Dick Cheney had been right, but tragically, he wasn't, and he isn't today, and that's why we have to make the tough choices about Afghanistan now," Kerry said.
"Make no mistake: Because of the gross mishandling of this war by past civilian leadership, there are no great options for its handling today. One American officer captured well our lack of a strategy when he said, We haven't been fighting in Afghanistan for eight years. We've been fighting in Afghanistan for one year eight times in a row. That is our inheritance."
His full speech is below:
FULL ENTRYCantor: Bipartisan deal still possible on health care
The No. 2 Republican in the House says there's still daylight for a bipartisan deal on health care.
But what Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia says the GOP would support falls far short of what Democrats and the White House want -- making even more clear how deep and wide the partisan divide is on health care.
"Given the heated rhetoric and sharp partisan divides that have characterized this year's debate, it's easy to forget that there are several key reforms in health care that Democrats and Republicans can agree on," Cantor says in an opinion piece published online on CNN.
He says both parties agree on providing more affordable health coverage, especially for Americans who change jobs; barring insurers from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions; and going some distance on medical malpractice reform.
"Congress can accomplish the dual goals of improving the quality of care in America and trimming the ranks of the uninsured if we focus on what Democrats and Republicans can agree on, rather than on our differences. It's not too late for the majority to change course," he writes.
But Cantor says Democrats' proposals for a public option -- a government plan to compete with private insurers -- is a "poison pill" that would guarantee Republican opposition. And he accuses Democrats of a bill that "dishonestly resorts to a host of budget gimmicks to give the veneer of deficit neutrality over the next decade."
Liberals push Obama on public option
Liberals are trying to intensify their pressure on President Obama for a full-fledged public option as part of the health care overhaul.
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee has a petition, website, and a new TV ad urging Obama to insist on a government-run plan to compete with private insurers -- and to stop kowtowing to Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine, the only Republican to support the health reform bill so far. She has made clear the most she would support is a public option "trigger" that would go into effect only if private insurers don't provide coverage and cut costs.
The petition, YesWeStillCan.org website, and ad all seek to remind Obama of his campaign pledges that attracted a huge grassroots groundswell that put him in the White House.
In the TV spot, an activist notes that Maine went heavily for Obama last November and that polls show a majority of Maine residents support a public option. "We worked hard for it," the activist says. "We worked hard for you."
The petition echoes, "Every day, insurance companies deny care and let people die. Getting one Republican senator's vote is not worth delaying reform -- too many real lives are at stake. We need you to fight and state clearly that anything less than a strong public option is not change we can believe in."
And Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, criticizes Obama for not putting more pressure on top Senate Democrat Harry Reid for a public option and for telling his grassroots Organizing for America group last week that they should be happy with the bill that doesn't include the government plan. "Understand that the bill that you least like in Congress right now. The one you least like, of the five that are out there, would provide 29 million Americans health care," the president lectured.
Green retorts: "Yay insurance for 29 million people -- by mandating they buy insurance from rip-off artists with no choice of a public option!"
"Here's what the White House needs to understand: Expressing a preference for the public option is not the same as fighting for the public option. Telling Harry Reid 'good luck with that' is not the same as the president saying, 'I am there helping Reid fight for those final votes,' " Green said in a statement.
"Americans clearly favor a strong bill over a bipartisan bill and are clamoring for President Obama to make good on the mandate for sweeping change that was given to him in the 2008 election. President Obama will be judged by many of his biggest 2008 supporters on whether he fights for a strong public option at this critical moment."
Health reform and the deficit
A senior White House economic adviser is trying today to make the economic case for a health care overhaul.
Republicans and other critics are warning that the president's proposals to remake such a significant portion of the US economy could hurt growth, balloon the federal deficit, and pinch recession-weary families.
But Christina Romer, chairwoman of White House Council of Economic Advisers, plans to tell the liberal Center for American Progress this afternoon that the only way to get the deficit under control is to trim health care costs, particularly in the government Medicare and Medicaid programs.
"Given the central role of rising health care expenditures, any solution to our long-run budget problem will simply have to include slowing the growth rate of health care costs,” Romer will say, according to advance excerpts released by the White House.
"Some have argued that it is irresponsible to reform our health care system at a time when the budget deficit is so large and our long-run fiscal problems are so severe. I firmly believe the opposite: it is fiscally irresponsible not to do health care reform.
State and local governments and private businesses alike would benefit from the health overhaul, she asserts. "Slowing the growth rate of health care costs will enable firms to once again give raises in the form of take-home pay rather than more expensive health insurance,” Romer plans to say.
“[F]iscally prudent health care reform that expands coverage to tens of millions of Americans and transforms our health care system to one that is higher quality and lower cost is possible.”
Markey goes to Copenhagen on climate change
Representative Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts, a main author of the climate change bill the House passed this summer, announced today that he will go to Copenhagen this weekend for talks in advance of the major global summit in December.
"Markey will meet with other legislators from around the world as part of GLOBE International (Global Legislators Organization for a Balanced Environment) to discuss how other countries are progressing towards creating an effective and fair international climate agreement," his office said.
Many in Congress, however, remain concerned about the cap-and-trade system at the heart of the House bill and a version introduced in the Senate, and it appears unlikely that Congress will pass and President Obama will sign a climate change bill until next year, after the Copenhagen summit.
“These meetings show that political consensus can be reached by the countries integral to reaching an international climate agreement. And though the final global warming treaty will be negotiated by environmental ministers, it will be implemented by legislators," Markey said in a statement.
“When it comes to US participation in international negotiations, House passage of the Waxman-Markey bill, and Senate action on similar legislation, are vital to America’s ability to reach a final agreement. I look forward to helping the Obama administration and other countries reach our ultimate goal of success in Copenhagen and beyond.”
Senate passes bill for Medal of Honor coins
The Senate has passed a bill allowing as many 100,000 $5 gold coins and 500,000 $1 silver coins to be issued to commemorate the 150th anniversary of Congress authorizing the Medal of Honor, the nation's highest award for valor.
The most recent recipient was Sergeant Jared C. Monti of Raynham, who died in Afghanistan trying to save his men.
The commemorative coins could raise as much as $8.5 million for the Congressional Medal of Honor Foundation, the office of Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, a primary sponsor of the bill, said today. The nonprofit foundation distributes information on the medal and has produced more than 100 video histories of recipients, along with educational programs and museum exhibits.
“The Medal of Honor represents men and women in uniform at their very best, courage and patriotism, grit and guts personified,” Kerry said in a statement. “This vote was a humble offering of thanks to Jared Monti and the thousands of American service members who have given so selflessly out of love for their country.”
"We are grateful to all those who wear the uniform of our Armed Forces and serve and sacrifice on behalf of our great nation," added Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and the other main bill sponsor. "The Medal of Honor Commemorative Coin honors those who have distinguished themselves courageously by going beyond the call of duty. We owe these heroes a debt of gratitude that our nation can never fully repay. We must never forget their sacrifice and will always keep the fallen and their families in our thoughts and prayers."
Liberal group makes fun of insurer for denying coverage to chubby toddler
A liberal-labor coalition pushing the health care overhaul is going for a little humor in its attack on the insurance industry.
Americans United for Change today unveiled a satirical web video featuring the story of a four-month-old, 17-pound toddler in Colorado who was denied coverage because he was deemed obese -- a pre-existing condition -- by Rocky Mountain Health Plans, a member of America’s Health Insurance Plans the health insurance industry lobby
“Too fat?!?! You cannot be serious!” a character called "Patriot Baby" says in the video, reminiscent of the E*Trade TV commercials with an adult voice coming out of an infant. “He’s a baby! What’s he supposed to do -- go on 'The Biggest Loser'?”
Public option gains momentum
The public option -- one of the most contentious proposals in the health care fight -- might end up in the Senate health overhaul bill after all.
Several media organizations, including the New York Times and the Associated Press, are reporting this evening that there's no done deal, but there is movement toward including a provision for the federal government to sell insurance in direct competition with private insurers with individual states permitted to drop out of the system.
The Times says that the top Senate Democrat, Harry Reid, is leaning toward including the government-run health insurance plan in the bill he will soon take to the Senate floor. While Republicans and some moderate Democrats oppose the public option, those in favor of it are pushing Reid to force a vote to strip it out of the bill. "The idea is that it's better to show some fight," a senior Democratic aide told the Times.
Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine, the only Republican to support the health care bill in the Senate Finance Committee, has made clear she would only support a public plan if it is triggered by private insurers not cutting costs and extending coverage enough.
House Democrats have the public option in the bill they are finalizing, without a provision for states to opt out.
Polls have also shown public support for a public plan to keep private insurers honest, but Republicans and other critics say it would lead to a government takeover of health care.
Obama hails approval of consumer agency
It's not quite as powerful as he wanted, but President Obama this afternoon praised the approval of a new consumer protection agency designed to prevent abuses by banks, lenders, and others.
The House Financial Services Committee, on a 39-29 vote, endorsed the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, one of the most contentious parts of a financial regulation overhaul that lawmakers hope will avert another meltdown like last year.
Republicans and the industry opposed the new agency and won many exemptions to the agency's oversight, including retailers, auto dealers, real estate brokers, and accountants. The committee's chairman, Barney Frank of Massachusetts, said the exceptions would make clear that the agency will monitor financial products and not every financial transaction of Americans. But he drew the line at Republican proposals, including one that would have exempted student loan providers.
The agency proposal will now be part of the bill that goes to the full House.
"I congratulate the House Financial Services Committee and Chairman Barney Frank on passing a bill out of Committee to establish the Consumer Financial Protection Agency," Obama said in his statement. "The Consumer Financial Protection Agency will prevent predatory lending practices and other abuses and will ensure that consumers get clear information they can understand about financial products like credit cards and mortgages.
"This bill has now passed a major hurdle and this step sends an important signal to the American people that we will not stand by and allow big financial firms and their lobbyists to mobilize against change," the president added. "They are doing what they always do -- descending on Congress, using every bit of influence they have to maintain the status quo that has maximized their profits at the expense of American consumers, despite the fact that recently those same American consumers bailed them out as a consequence of the bad decisions that they made."
Democrats go after Steele
Democrats picked a big, highly visible target for the latest in their series of "call 'em out" missives -- GOP chief Michael Steele.
The Democratic National Committee today announced a multimedia effort aiming at the Republican Party chairman for "continuing to spread lies about health insurance reform."
It is using a website and a web video and urging supporters to use Facebook and Twitter to go after Steele, whom the DNC says is spreading misinformation by claiming, among other assertions, that the health care overhaul being pushed by President Obama and congressional Democrats would "dump" millions of Americans out of their insurance and would cut Medicare.
Kerry steadfast for NATO
Senator John F. Kerry, just back from a diplomatic mission in Afghanistan, said today that seeing NATO forces fighting alongside Americans convinces him even more of the importance of the alliance born of World War II.
"Let me tell you, whatever our differences, our allies have made enormous sacrifices in Afghanistan. They, too, are serving heroically," Kerry said in his opening statement at a Foreign Relations Committee hearing today on the future of NATO.
"While questions remain on both sides of the Atlantic about the future of our Afghan mission, our confidence in the idea and the cohesion of NATO remains strong. Our commitment to defend our NATO allies is unwavering," he added.
"NATO turned sixty this year. As we all know, there have been times when NATO’s critics called it an alliance in search of a mission. Today, as new challenges multiply and old ones resurface, it has become clear that as long as NATO continues to adapt, it will remain essential going forward."
His full prepared statement is below:
FULL ENTRYReport: Local, state officials not adapting to climate change
The federal government's watchdog says that most local and state governments have yet to take steps to deal with global warming and its effects.
The report released today by the Government Accountability Office, requested by Representative Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts, says that officials are facing competing priorities, don't have localized information on the impact of climate change, and unsure of local, state, and federal roles. (Click here to read the report.)
“A robust answer to the threat of climate change includes preventing the worst impacts and preparing for the reality that global warming impacts are already occurring,” Markey said in a statement. “If we are going to avoid the worst effects of global warming, we must pass comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation. However, we also must prepare for the effects of global warming that will realistically occur.”
Markey, as chairman of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, is holding a hearing on the issue today.
The sweeping climate change bill -- sponsored by Markey and Representative Henry Waxman of California and that was approved by the House in June -- would create programs and services to encourage adaptation efforts and provide nearly $25 billion.
Kerry advises Obama to wait after runoff on troop decision
By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Senator John F. Kerry, fresh from a diplomatic coup in Afghanistan, said this afternoon that President Obama should wait until after the Afghanistan presidential run-off before deciding whether to send more US troops.
After briefing Obama in a private 45-minute one-on-one meeting, Kerry said it wouldn't be "common sense" to determine the best US strategy without knowing how the election goes and who will be in charge of the country.
"You need to know what kind of government is coming out of it," Kerry told reporters at the White House. "I would absolutely counsel [Obama] to wait until after the run-off."
While Kerry said he did not discuss the issue with Obama, "I'd be surprised if he wasn't on the same wavelength..."
The president, however, told NBC News today that it's possible that he will announce before the Nov. 7 run-off his decision on a request by the top US commander for as many as 40,000 additional troops.
"I think it is entirely possibly that we have a strategy formulated before a runoff is determined. We may not announce it," Obama said in the NBC interview.
"I think we're still in-- finding out how this whole process in Afghanistan is gonna unfold. I thought that the steps that President Karzai took yesterday, agreeing to the certification of a second round was positive. What we've said is that it is important to make sure that we understand the landscape and the partner that we're gonna be dealing with," the president added.
"Because our strategy in Afghanistan is not just dependent on military forces. It's also dependent on how well we're doing with our civilian development efforts, how well we're doing in stemming corruption. So this is part of a comprehensive strategy; it always has been. And our basic attitude is that we are going to take the time to get this right. We're not gonna drag it out, because there is a sense that the sooner we get a sound approach in place and personnel in place, the better off we're gonna be. But we also want to make sure that we don't put resources ahead of strategy."
Kerry said since it would take months to actually get additional forces in place, if that is what Obama decides, a two-week delay would not interfere. "Two weeks is a very short span of time, folks, to determine whether you have a government to work with during a war."
Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, who supports a troop increase, said there's no need to wait until after the run-off.
“We’re there not to advocate or protect any particular leadership of Afghanistan; we’re there really to secure the people of Afghanistan and to help them determine their own future," Lieberman said on Fox News Channel. “If the president makes this decision to increase troops before Election Day it’s going to give more Afghans the confidence to come out and vote.”
Kerry, who is being lauded for his role in persuading Afghan President Hamid Karzai to accept a run-off election in hopes of removing the taint of balloting fraud in the first go-round, also dismissed suggestions that he had eclipsed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was given the job Kerry wanted.
"That's an unfair characterization," Kerry said, noting that he was in frequent touch with Clinton during the talks with Karzai.
Earlier today, the top Senate Democrat heaped praise on Kerry. Though it remains unclear whether the run-off can happen on schedule or without more shenanigans, Karzai's decision, announced Tuesday with Kerry at his side, averted an immediate crisis.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on the Senate floor this morning that Kerry's diplomatic success is the latest example of his "service to our country" -- as a decorated Vietnam War veteran, 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, and now as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.
"What he's doing in Afghanistan is something that is vitally important to not only our country, but to the world," Reid gushed.
Americans divided on Obama health plan
The political pendulum has swung slightly away from President Obama on health care, though a majority of Americans still want an overhaul, and still want a public insurance option, a new poll says.
According to the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released this afternoon, 49 percent favor and 49 percent oppose the health overhaul. That's down from 51 percent support last month, though better than the 48 percent in late August after protestors at town halls railed against the president's plan.
The rest of the poll had better news for Obama.
A majority -- 53 percent -- said it would be better for the country to pass a bill along the lines proposed by the president instead of leaving the current health system in place.
The poll also found that 61 percent support a public option -- a government-run plan to compete with private insurers -- up from 55 percent in August. And 40 percent said they would support the overhaul bill only if it included the public option.
And respondents trust Obama far more than Republicans -- mocked by Democrats as the "party of no" -- on health care; 50 percent said they trust Obama more to deal with major health care changes, while 34 percent picked congressional Republicans.
The poll, conducted Friday through Sunday, has an overall margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Obama group passes 300,000 calls for health care
Pro-Obama groups said this morning they ended up at 315,023 calls to Congress on Tuesday pushing the health care overhaul, tripling the original goal of 100,000.
The massive effort was put together by Organizing for America, the president's grassroots group from the campaign. (Click here for updates.)
"As you know, we set a big goal: 100,000 calls to Congress placed or committed to in a single day by OFA supporters and allied organizations. By 2:30 p.m., you had crushed it. So, we gulped and said let's go for 200,000, not knowing what would happen. But the calls just kept pouring in -- keeping phones ringing off the hook in congressional offices in D.C. and your representatives' district offices around the country," the group's national director, Mitch Stewart, told supporters this morning.
"Then, OFA supporters gathered in over 1,000 living rooms and community centers from Macon, Georgia to Missoula, Montana. You called hundreds of thousands of key voters in your community and got them to agree to call Congress and speak out for reform, too. President Obama joined in at a call party in New York -- and he had some amazing words of support for the folks like you who make this movement possible."
Obama, himself, addressed thousands of supporters who are making calls via live webcast Tuesday night from the Hammerstein Ballroom in New York City, where 2,500 people will be making similar calls in support of reform.
"You know why this is so important," he told them. "You know premiums have doubled over the past decade."
Obama, Kerry laud Karzai accepting runoff
President Obama praised Afghan President Hamid Karzai this morning for agreeing to a runoff election -- balloting that the US hopes gives legitimacy to the regime in Kabul and is expected to free Obama to decide whether to send more US troops.
"I welcome President Karzai’s statement today accepting the Independent Electoral Commission’s certification of the August 20 election results, and agreeing to participate in a second round of the election. This is an important step forward in ensuring a credible process for the Afghan people which results in a government that reflects their will," Obama said in a statement issued through the White House.
"While this election could have remained unresolved to the detriment of the country, President Karzai’s constructive actions established an important precedent for Afghanistan’s new democracy. The Afghan Constitution and laws are strengthened by President Karzai’s decision, which is in the best interests of the Afghan people," Obama added. (His full statement is below.)
Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, helped persuade Karzai to accept an independent commission's findings that there was enough voter fraud in the first round of balloting to push him below a majority and force a runoff, expected on Nov. 7.
Kerry stood next to Karzai today when he announced he would accept the runoff, and said that Karzai's move had transformed a crisis into a "moment of great opportunity."
(Kerry's full prepared remarks are also below.)
FULL ENTRYRepublicans rake in cash, slam Reid
The Republican National Committee announced today that it is getting donations from a record number of small donors.
The RNC said that it raised $8.74 million in the month of September and had $18.9 million cash on hand at month's end with no debt. It averaged 2,400 new donors a day during the month, an off-year record and an increase of about 2,000 new donors per day since February, the RNC said.
The average donor contribution in September was $36, with a year to date average donation of about $41.
The RNC also unveiled its latest web video, slamming top Senate Democrat Harry Reid for negotiating the details of the health care overhaul in private.
The video has Reid promising transparency, saying, "No longer can we allow special interests and lawmakers to conspire behind closed doors." It also shows Obama making similar pledges.
But now, the video points out, Reid is working closely and privately with the White House to meld the version the Senate Finance Committee approved last week, and a more liberal version that the Senate health committee passed earlier.
They're talking in secret because they don't want the public to realize the health care bill would raise costs and mean a far greater government role, the announcer says.
"It may be Halloween, but the Democrats' intentions cannot be disguised," the announcer concludes.
Insurance industry defends study
The chief spokeswoman for the nation's private insurance companies is defending a report that many saw as the industry trying to kill the health care overhaul.
America's Health Insurance Plans issued the report just before the Senate Finance Committee voted last week, asserting that the bill would dramatically raise premiums. The report has been widely pilloried for not accounting for cost-saving measures in the bill. (To reach the entire bill, click here.)
In an opinion article in today's Washington Post, Karen Ignagni, president and CEO of AHIP, writes, "Let me be clear and direct: Health plans continue to strongly support reform. In fact, last year we proposed new insurance market rules and consumer protections to achieve universal coverage, remove restrictions on preexisting conditions and end the practice of basing premiums on health status or gender. We firmly believe that all the cost concerns the report raised can be resolved."
She adds, "The report's central finding has long been noncontroversial in health policy and economic circles: namely, that implementing reforms of the insurance market without a strong requirement that everyone participate will cause adverse selection and significantly increase costs for individuals and small businesses. This finding echoes the message President Obama delivered in his address to Congress last month."
But liberal groups supporting the health bills are continuing their assault on the insurance industry.
Americans United for Change released its latest ad today featuring an insurance horror story -- this one about a woman who purportedly was told she would have to be sterilized to keep coverage.
"The new spot is our latest salvo against the shameful practices of the health insurance industry, which finally dropped the ‘we want reform, too’ façade last week with AHIP’s release of that amazingly disingenuous “report” asserting of all things that reform would mean 'higher premiums' – laughable stuff coming from the folks that raised premiums three to four times faster than wages the last ten years," Americans United for Change said.
Poll: Concern among liberals on Obama health care stands
A new poll finds support rebounding for a public option and some discomfort with President Obama among his liberal allies.
The Washington Post/ABC News survey released this afternoon found that 57 percent of Americans favor a public insurance option, while 40 percent are opposed. But opinion continues to be split -- 45 percent for, 48 percent against -- for the overall health overhaul bills being debated in Congress.
Obama's aides repeated over the weekend that while the president prefers a bill that includes the public option -- a government-run plan to offer affordable coverage and to compete with private insurers -- he isn't wedded to it.
While 7 in 10 Democrats back the plan being put together, Obama's strong approval ratings on health care from fellow Democrats have dropped 15 percentage points since mid-September.
More broadly, while 57 percent approve of the way Obama is handling his job as president, "strong approval" among liberal Democrats is down 16 percentage points over the past month.
Kirk presses for jobless benefits
New Senator Paul G. Kirk Jr. of Massachusetts plans to join several colleagues Tuesday in pushing for passage of a bill to extend unemployment benefits.
"Unemployment insurance benefits began exhausting for jobless workers at the end of September, and nearly 2 million Americans will lose these benefits by the end of this year. Legislation to extend unemployment insurance for these workers has been held up in the Senate for nearly 2 weeks, despite repeated attempts by the Democratic leadership to pass this critical legislation," Kirk's office said.
Last month, the Massachusetts jobless rate rose to 9.3 percent, exceeding the peak during the early 1990s recession.
"In Massachusetts alone, more than 15,000 of our constituents have exhausted their UI benefits since the end of August. Another 4,000 are expected to run out of benefits before Thanksgiving, and as many as 40,000 individuals will have exhausted their benefits by the end of the year," Kirk and Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts wrote earlier this month to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
"Americans have already suffered severe repercussions from the current deep recession, and they deserve better than to be stranded without any assistance. It is essential that an extension be passed without delay."
Kirk will be joined by Senators Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, as well as Charles Schumer, Debbie Stabenow, Sherrod Brown, Bob Casey, Amy Klobuchar, and Al Franken.
But in this case, it's not Republican opposition that is gumming up the works. Instead, a bill that the House passed last month to give another 13 weeks of unemployment benefits to people from states where the jobless rate is at least 8.5 percent has bogged down because of resistance from lawmakers representing 23 states that have lower unemployment rates and would be left out.
Shaheen has been pushing for a bill that would extend unemployment benefits nationwide.
Liberals pressure Reid on public option
Liberals are ramping up the pressure on top Senate Democrat Harry Reid, one of the key players in the negotiations over the health care overhaul.
Trying to craft a plan that can draw at least 60 votes in the Senate, Reid, the White House, and other moderate and conservative Democrats are waffling on whether a "public option" -- a government-run plan to offer affordable coverage and compete with private insurers -- should be in the final bill. Worried liberals say that health reform without it would be less than half a loaf.
Today, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee unveiled a TV ad in Nevada, where Reid face re-election next year, and sent an email to 225,000 activists nationwide seeking to raise at least $100,000 online to air the spot 200 times.
It features Nevada nurse Lee Slaughter, who says she has spent 20 years providing critical care -- and seeing patients cut off because of insurance. "Now, it's happening to me," she says, saying that she broke both her hips and that her insurer isn't providing all the care she needs. broke both hips insurers
Slaughter says she's a swing voter for supported Reid and President Obama, and says that in 2010, she will vote on only one issue.
"I'm watching to see if Harry Reid is strong and effective enough as a leader to pass a public health insurance option into law," she says.
Obama slams insurers on health care bill
A health care bill within sight, President Obama aggressively takes on his critics who he says are trying to stop the overhaul by misleading and scaring Americans with dire warnings of higher premiums and other damage.
In his weekly radio-Internet address, Obama targets insurance companies, one-time allies who have gone on the attack, blasting a bill approved by the Senate Finance Committee this week.
"In fact, the insurance industry is rolling out the big guns and breaking open their massive war chest -- to marshal their forces for one last fight to save the status quo," Obama says. "They’re filling the airwaves with deceptive and dishonest ads. They’re flooding Capitol Hill with lobbyists and campaign contributions. And they’re funding studies designed to mislead the American people."
"It’s smoke and mirrors. It’s bogus. And it’s all too familiar," the president adds. "Every time we get close to passing reform, the insurance companies produce these phony studies as a prescription and say, “Take one of these, and call us in a decade.” Well, not this time. The fact is, the insurance industry is making this last-ditch effort to stop reform even as costs continue to rise and our health care dollars continue to be poured into their profits, bonuses, and administrative costs that do nothing to make us healthy – that often actually go toward figuring out how to avoid covering people. And they’re earning these profits and bonuses while enjoying a privileged exception from our anti-trust laws, a matter that Congress is rightfully reviewing."
Asserting that Americans voted for change when they made him their president, Obama urges Congress "to stand against the power plays and political ploys – and to stand up on behalf the American people who sent us to Washington to do their business."
The full address is below and can be viewed here.
Democrats bash insurance industry
The Democratic National Committee said today it is going after the insurance industry in the latest of its “Call ‘Em Out” series targeting those who it says is trying to mislead the public on the health care overhaul.
Democrats are criticizing an industry-funded study that said insurance premiums would rise under the bill approved Tuesday by the Senate Finance Committee and assailing an insurance industry ad campaign warning seniors of cuts in Medicare.
"After fighting health reform with lies, deceit, and multi-million dollar ad campaigns, the health insurance lobby -- America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) -- just released a report on the 'effects of health reform.' Surprise! It's full of flawed claims that reform would increase costs," the DNC told supporters in a email accompanying a video.
"We're not going to take it sitting down. So this week, we're calling out the health insurance lobby. The lobby has invested millions trying to convince Congress to oppose reform. So this week, we're not simply debunking lies: The best way to Call 'em Out is to cut through the spin and tell our representatives to say 'no' to deceitful lobbyists and 'yes' to reform. "
Obama calls on grassroots
President Obama is activating his grassroots army again, trying to get 100,000 of them to call Congress on a single day to push for health care.
Organizing for America's national director, Mitch Stewart, announced today that Obama will join thousands of "Time to Deliver" events on Oct. 20 via a live webcast
"These call parties couldn't come at a more important time -- the final Senate committee just passed their version of the plan, so the debate is about to move to the full Congress for the first time. And the insurance industry lobby is throwing everything they've got at us to distort the issues and derail progress. Our voices must be heard," Stewart said in an email to supporters.
Organizing for America, housed within the Democratic National Committee, is the post-election iteration of Obama's vaunted campaign organization.
Obama signs Pakistan aid bill
President Obama today signed a bill, championed by Senator John F. Kerry, that increases US aid to crucial, but volatile ally Pakistan to $1.5 billion a year.
"This law is the tangible manifestation of broad support for Pakistan in the U.S., as evidenced by its bipartisan, bicameral, unanimous passage in Congress," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement.
"As President Obama said on March 27, the United States wants to engage Pakistan on the basis of a strategic partnership, 'grounded in support for Pakistan's democratic institutions and the Pakistani people.' This Act formalizes that partnership, based on a shared commitment to improving the living conditions of the people of Pakistan through sustainable economic development, strengthening democracy and the rule of law, and combating the extremism that threatens Pakistan and the United States."
On Wednesday, Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, held a joint news conference with Pakistan's foreign minister to clarify that the conditions attached to the aid aren't meant to delve into the country's internal affairs.
League of Women Voters weighs in on health care
The nonpartisan, normally genteel League of Women Voters is taking the unusual step of airing a TV ad taking a tough issue position -- urging Americans to support the Democratic-supported health care overhaul.
The League said it is airing the 30-second spot in the home states of key senators, including Maine, where Olympia Snowe was the only Republican on the Finance Committee to support the bill on Tuesday and where fellow Republican Susan Collins suggested she might go along.
“Health care reform is a critically important issue for Americans – an issue that requires action from all of us,” League President Mary G. Wilson said in a statement. “After watching opponents of health care reform repeatedly attempt to scare people with lies and disorderly conduct, the League decided that we must speak up.”
“This is an unusual step for us. But as a nonpartisan membership organization that believes in reasoned and civil debate we felt compelled to take a stand against the lies and the distortions,” Wilson added.
“Health care is too important to let the nay-sayers and the special interests stand in the way of real reform. We have an obligation to get the facts straight.”
Kerry tries to soothe Pakistan's ruffled feathers
Senator John F. Kerry did a little diplomatic two-step today to reassure Pakistan that a foreign aid bill he championed does not impinge on the precarious nation's independence.
As chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry held a joint press conference with House Foreign Relations Chairman Howard L. Berman and Pakistani Foreign Minister Qureshi to release a "joint explanatory statement."
"It affirms that the primary intention of the Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act is to demonstrate the American people’s long-term commitment to the people of Pakistan. It will be placed in the Congressional Record today along with the final version of the legislation that the President will be signing," Kerry said.
“It affirms that the United States values its friendship with the Pakistani people and honors the great sacrifices made by Pakistani security forces in the fight against extremism. And it also makes absolutely clear – and I want to emphasize this point – that the legislation does not seek in any way to compromise Pakistan’s sovereignty, impinge on Pakistan’s national security interests, or micromanage any aspect of Pakistani military or civilian operations.
Both the Senate and House have passed the bill, which would provide Pakistan with $1.5 billion a year over the next five years to spend on democratic, economic and social development programs. The bill awaits President Obama's signature.
Pakistan's military has objected to provisions in the bill that links money for counterterrorism assistance to a crackdown on militants and other conditions.
The full explanatory statement is below:
Insurers, unions criticize Finance health bill
Two major players in the health care debate -- Big Insurance and Big Labor -- are both registering their objections to the bill passed by the Senate Finance Committee.
But they're coming at it from far different vantage points.
America's Health Insurance Plans, which represents the big insurers, is airing a TV ad that criticizes the bill's provision that would trim Medicare Advantage, the premium coverage that seniors get through private insurers.
"Most people agree we need to reform health care but is it right to ask 10 million seniors on Medicare Advantage for more than their fair share," the announcer says.
The Democratic bills would cut Medicare Advantage by more than $120 billion over 10 years, meaning that 10 million seniors -- including 175,000 in Massachusetts -- could have their health plans shrink or be replaced with traditional coverage.
On the other hand, a dozen of the largest labor unions are taking out full-page ads in Washington and national newspapers complaining that the Finance bill does not include a public option -- a government-run plan to compete with private plans -- and does call for penalties on people who do not obtain coverage.
The ad, entitled "Our Bottom Line for Health Care Reform," says that "Unless the bill that goes to the floor of the U.S. Senate makes substantial progress to address the concerns of working men and women, we will oppose it."
When does a bill become bipartisan
The White House and Democrats were thrilled that Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine broke ranks with Republicans to give a bipartisan patina to the Senate Finance Committee's approval of a health care overhaul.
But Republicans predictably are not as impressed.
“One Republican vote out of 40 in the Senate does not bipartisan make,” GOP chairman Michael Steele said today on Fox News Channel.
“You’ve got a long way to go Mr. President before you get to bipartisanship in terms of really putting together a bill that makes sense,” he added.
Meanwhile, the Associated Press reports that there could be a second Republican vote for the health care bill -- Snowe's fellow Mainer, Susan Collins.
Collins said that the bill approved on a 14-9 vote Tuesday by the Finance Committee needs substantial improvements. "My hope is we that can fix the flaws in the bill and come together with a truly bipartisan bill that could garner widespread support," Collins said in the AP interview. "I think this bill is far superior to the ones passed by the Senate [health]) committee and the three House committees, but it needs substantial additional work."
Steele said the health package would have to be far different to draw more Republican support. “If it doesn’t have triggers for a government plan, if it doesn’t have little hidden mechanisms and features that Congress is famous for doing that ultimately gets us on a road to government controlled health care, I think you will see a lot of Republican support,” he said on Fox.
Obama gets back to health care
Back from a failed bid to bring back the 2016 Summer Olympics to Chicago, President Obama returns today to the issue he initially said would keep him too busy to go to Copenhagen to make the sales pitch in person.
In his weekly radio-Internet address, Obama asserts that his health care overhaul would help America's small businesses, which he says a crucial job engine but are being "overwhelmed by rising health care costs."
Obama, who also plans a health care event on Monday, bringing doctors from across the country to the White House, says health costs are stopping budding entrepreneurs from going out on their own because they're afraid to lose their health coverage and preventing firms from growing and hiring more workers.
The health care legislation before Congress will allow small businesses to buy health insurance through a new exchange where they can compare policies and will offer tax credits to help them pay for it, the president says
"These small businesses are the mom and pop stores and restaurants, beauty shops and construction companies that support families and sustain communities. They’re the small startups with big ideas, hoping to be the next Google, or Apple, or HP. Altogether, they create roughly half of all new jobs." he says.
"So we know that reforming our health insurance system will be a critical step in rebuilding our economy so that our entrepreneurs can pursue the American Dream again, and our small businesses can grow and expand and create new jobs again."
The full address is below and can be viewed here.
Liberal group goes after Boehner
A liberal-labor coalition is trying to keep up its support for a "public option" in the health care overhaul -- and going after House Republican leader John Boehner in the bargain.
Americans United for Change unveiled a new TV ad airing on cable TV in Boehner's district in Ohio that attacks what they call his "laughable claim" that “I’m still trying to find the first American to talk to who is in favor of the public option” as part of health insurance reform.
It says that Boehner is out of touch with his constituents, noting a recent Quinnipiac University poll showing that 57 percent of Ohio voters support the idea of a government-run option as part of the health care overhaul.
“Maybe Congressman Boehner should spend a little less time schmoozing with lobbyists on golf courses in Florida and a lot more time talking to his constituents back home about the kind of health insurance reform they are demanding," Tom McMahon, acting executive director of Americans United for Change, said in a statement.
Obama lauds Senate Finance action on health bill
President Obama hailed the Senate Finance Committee's endorsement early this morning of a health care overhaul that follows most of his principles -- a major step in his push for reform.
“Thanks to the unyielding commitment of Senator Baucus and members of the Senate Finance Committee, we have reached another milestone in our effort to pass health insurance reform," the president said in a statement. "Over the past two weeks, the Committee has engaged in long hours of thoughtful deliberation and vigorous debate. They have considered hundreds of amendments, and incorporated many of the best ideas from both parties. And they have shown a spirit of civility, a seriousness of purpose, and a willingness to compromise that embodies our democratic process at its very best.
“The Finance Committee’s work is the culmination of tireless efforts over the better part of this year by the five committees and many members of Congress involved in health reform -- holding numerous hearings and bi-partisan meetings; reaching out to stakeholders across the spectrum; and striving to find common ground. As a result of this work, we are now closer than ever before to finally passing reform that will offer security to those who have coverage and affordable insurance to those who don’t. We have a long way to go, but I am confident that as we move forward, we will continue to engage with each other as productively as the members of the Finance Committee, and will get reform passed this year,” Obama added.
The Finance Committee put off a final vote until next week so congressional budget officials can certify the $900 billion bill does not add to federal deficits. Then, Senate Democrats and the White House will have to try to meld the bill with one passed earlier by the Senate health committee.
Kerry calls hearing on Afghanistan and Pakistan
WASHINGTON -- Senator John F. Kerry made clear today that, while he is weighing the wisdom of adding additional troops to Afghanistan, he does not believe that withdrawal is an option.
"I don't see that as on the table," he said. "I don't think that there is anyone up here who is talking about that."
Kerry spoke at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing -- the third in a series he has called on Afghanistan -- that probed what the impact of additional troops would be on stability in Pakistan, a fragile, nuclear-armed neighbor.
Maleeha Lodhi, former Pakistani ambassador to the United States, said an increase in US combat troops in Afghanistan could lead to an increase in suicide attacks, militant groups, and support for extremism in Pakistan.
"A further military escalation in Afghanistan is unlikely to succeed," she said.
Lodhi, Milt Bearden, who served as the CIA station chief in Pakistan during the 1980s, and Steve Coll of the New America Foundation, said the Obama administration should put the emphasis on brokering a political solution to the fighting.
"I think we are going to have to start understanding who they are and deal with them," Bearden said. "There will always be enough Pashtuns to meet our troops in the field."
Kerry's opening statement is below.
As the Globe reported Wednesday, Kerry is trying to carve out a significant role on US policy in Afghanistan as Obama comes up with a new strategy and decides whether to approve a military request for more reinforcements.
Kerry has also weighed in on Pakistan. Thursday, the House gave final approval to a bill that he championed in the Senate that would give Pakistan $1.5 billion in aid a year over the next five years focused on democratic, economic, and social development programs. Obama is expected to sign the bill into law.
Kerry issued a statement congratulating the House on its vote. “The final version of the bill is the product of several months of intense consultation and compromise between the Chambers, and I am delighted that we were able to forge this landmark piece of legislation on a bipartisan, bicameral basis," he said. "This bill reaffirms the depth of America’s long-term commitment to the people and Government of Pakistan. By tripling past years’ level of non-military aid to $1.5 billion a year for fiscal years 2010 to 2014, we demonstrate our steadfast support for Pakistani efforts to combat violent extremism, defeat al-Qaeda and solidify democratic government."
FULL ENTRYKerry: Give diplomacy a try with Iran
As the US and its allies begin high-stakes talks today with Iran to demand an end to its nuclear weapons program, Senator John F. Kerry put in his two cents on what he calls "the most important American diplomatic engagement with Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution."
In Geneva, officials from the US and five other world powers are meeting with representatives of Iran, a week after President Obama called out Iran at the G-20 economic summit, disclosing intelligence that it had been secretly building a new uranium enrichment plant.
In an op-ed piece published in today's Financial Times, Kerry says that the Western powers enter the talks from a position of strength. "Consider the view from Tehran," he writes. "It is on the defensive – caught red-handed in another nuclear deception. In contrast to the rancorous run-up to the war in Iraq, America and Europe are increasingly reading from the same script and Russia is signalling an openness to further sanctions."
The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee says that for the diplomatic overtures to work, " two things are vital. First, if Iran is not willing to negotiate in good faith, it must understand the consequences. Pressure is not an alternative to engagement; the two strategies complement each other."
"Second," Kerry adds, "we must be willing to take yes for an answer. An important lesson of Iraq is that intrusive inspections can work. Our ability to detect and monitor the Qom enrichment facility for years before publicly revealing it is encouraging."
The Massachusetts Democrat acknowledges that diplomacy could very well fail.
"And yet, it remains vital to seek a diplomatic solution to the stand-off," he concludes. "The international community is finally in a position to force Iran to choose either pariah status or a more constructive relationship with America and the world. Certainly the real possibility of either military conflict or a nuclear-armed Iran compels us to give diplomacy a chance."
Representative Eric Cantor, the second-ranking Republican in the House, is less optimistic that the negotiations will be fruitful.
"The unfortunate reality for President Obama is that there is absolutely no evidence that Iran is willing to reach any agreement acceptable on U.S. terms – much less use negotiations for any purpose other than to buy more time for its illicit nuclear enrichment activities," Cantor writes in an op-ed published today in Politico.
The congressman says that Obama should not delay in winning international support for "crippling sanctions" to force Iran to comply.
"The key point is that we have been down this road before – and it has reached a dead end. This time around we simply don’t have the luxury of time," Cantor says, adding that Obama "must treat Iran’s government as the oppressive and unyielding engine of terror that it is, not as the trustworthy and compromising rational actor we all wish it could be. Should he expeditiously follow through on the heavy sanctions Iran deserves, the president will have the support of a clear majority of Congress."
Obama convenes high-stakes Afghanistan meeting
Mr. President, meet General McChrystal. General, meet your commander-in-chief.
President Obama huddled privately with his entire national security team for three hours this afternoon -- and spoke directly for only the second time with the top US commander in Afghanistan. And even this time, Stanley McChrystal wasn't be there in person, but via a secure videoconference link.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs tonight issued this report of the private session:
"In today’s meeting, the President engaged his national security team in a candid assessment of the progress that has been made and the challenges we still face in Afghanistan and Pakistan since the President's strategy was announced in March. As a part of this review, the President will consult with his national security team, including his military commanders, civilian leadership, and Ambassadors in the region. He will also consult closely with our Allies and with the United States Congress.
"As the U.S. aggressively confronts al Qaeda and its leadership around the world, the President has set a clear goal in Afghanistan: to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al Qaeda and their extremist allies. When it come to decisions as important as keeping this country safe and putting our troops into harm’s way, the President has made it clear that he will rigorously assess our progress. That is why he held this meeting today and will take the next several weeks to review our strategy.
"This was the second of five scheduled intensive sessions with National Security Council as well as field commanders and regional ambassadors. The President has also directed his inter-agency team to provide regular consultation sessions with Congress, during this period, starting with Gen. Jones’ briefing of all US senators this evening."
Gibbs said Obama will meet again with his national security team to discuss Afghanistan and Pakistan on Oct. 7.
The Associated Press reports that Obama made no decisions during the meeting.
The AP quotes a senior administration official saying that the president pushed for specifics and details, focusing on what the goals of the US strategy should be. The official, who was involved in the session, said no decisions about increased troop levels were discussed.
The other top officials who were supposed to be in attendance, either in person or via video hookup: Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, special envoy Richard Holbrooke, Joint Chiefs chairman Michael Mullen, Central Command General David Petraeus, Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair, CIA Director Leon Panetta, National Security Adviser James Jones,
US ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry, and US ambassador to Pakistan Anne Patterson.
It was an unusual gathering in the White House situation room -- the top-secret retreat seen only in movies and TV, where the president is responding to one world crisis or another.
Obama is trying to find the right US strategy after eight years of war in Afghanistan -- even as he is buffeted from the left and the right over a pending request from McChrystal for thousands more US troops, on top of the 21,000 the president has already dispatched.
Senator John F. Kerry, a fellow Democrat and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is trying to prevail on Obama to take as long as it takes for the review of the Afghanistan mission.
"I am arguing that the president has the time and we have the time," Kerry told the Globe Tuesday.
But Senator John McCain of Arizona, the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, urged Obama today to quickly approve the request for additional troops.
"Time is not on our side so we need a decision pretty quickly," McCain, who is likening the request to the troop surge that turned around the situation in Iraq, said on ABC's "Good Morning America." "I think history is pretty clear that when the Taliban took over, it became a base for attacks on the United States and our allies."
The overheated rhetoric continues
Can't they all just get along, or at least turn down the volume and vitriol?
Representative Joe Wilson, a South Carolina Republican, started the string of heated rhetoric by shouting "You lie!" at President Obama during his health care speech to Congress earlier this month. He apologized to Obama, but the House passed a resolution of disapproval after he refused to repeat the mea culpa on the House floor.
Another Republican followed up over the weekend by calling Obama an "enemy of humanity." Representative Trent Franks of Arizona offered only a tepid apology on Tuesday, saying that he should have made clear that he was talking about Obama's policies on abortion.
And now comes a Democrat who is refusing today to apologize for a harsh attack on Republicans, the Associated Press reports. On the House floor Tuesday night, Representative Alan Grayson of Florida criticized Republican health care proposals by saying, "If you get sick, America, the Republican health care plan is this: Die quickly. That's right. The Republicans want you to die quickly if you get sick."
That accusation completely turns around debunked Republican claims that the Democratic bills would create "death panels" of bureaucrats who would decide which elderly patients would receive care -- and who wouldn't.
Republicans say that if Grayson doesn't apologize, he should be reprimanded just like Wilson.
Representative Tom Price of Georgia, who heads the conservative Republican Study Committee, drafted a "resolution of disapproval" that mirrors the one Democrats approved against Wilson, saying Grayson's conduct was "a breach of decorum and degraded the integrity and proceedings of the House," the AP says.
UPDATE: Responding to the Republican threats of a reprimand, Grayson stood firmly behind his comments today.
"People like elected officials with guts who say what they mean," Grayson told reporters. "I stand by what I said."
Kerry tries to rally support for warming bill
Senators John F. Kerry and Barbara Boxer rallied in front of the US Capitol today to launch their version of climate change legislation.
Kerry, as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, has taken on global warming as a national security issue, while Boxer is chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
“This is a security bill that puts Americans back in charge of our energy future and makes it clear that we will combat global climate change with American ingenuity. It is our country’s defense against the harms of pollution and the security risks of global climate change,” Kerry said in a statement. “Our health, our security, our economy, our environment, all demand we reinvent the way America uses energy. Our addiction to foreign oil hurts our economy, helps our enemies and risks our security. By taking decisive action, we can and will stop climate change from becoming a ‘threat multiplier’ that makes an already dangerous world staggeringly more so.”
Boxer said in her statement, “We know clean energy is the ticket to strong, stable economic growth -- it's right here in front of us, in the ingenuity of our workers and the vision of our entrepreneurs. We must seize this opportunity, or others will move ahead. This is our time. Global warming is our challenge. Economic recovery is our challenge. American leadership is our challenge. Let's step up right now. Let's not quit until we have fulfilled our responsibility to our children and our grandchildren."
Click here for a summary of the bill, and here for a more detailed look.
President Obama praised the bill in a statement this afternoon. “I applaud Chairmen Kerry and Boxer for their leadership on comprehensive energy reform. With the draft legislation they are announcing today, we are one step closer to putting America in control of our energy future and making America more energy independent. My Administration is deeply committed to passing a bill that creates new American jobs and the clean energy incentives that foster innovation. I commend Senators Boxer and Kerry for their work and look forward to signing comprehensive energy legislation that addresses this urgent challenge.”
Their bill, according to drafts circulating Tuesday, calls for an even more ambitious goal than the version the House passed in June -- a 20 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2020, compared to 17 percent in the House version.
Like the House bill, it envisions a cap-and-trade system that would limit carbon emissions and allow companies to trade pollution credits. Republicans say that would raise costs for consumers and kill jobs.
Representative Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts, a main sponsor of the House-passed bill, highlighted the common ground with the Senate version.
“With the release of this Senate draft bill, there is now Congress-wide movement to pass a comprehensive clean energy and climate bill. Given the Senate draft’s structural similarity to the House-passed Waxman-Markey bill, a legislative solution that can pass both chambers of Congress is finally within sight," Markey said in a statement.
“Just as in Waxman-Markey, the Senate draft bill includes many provisions to help America make the transition away from foreign oil and to a clean energy future, including robust consumer protection and worker training measures. As the bill moves through the Senate process, I will continue to work with Senators Kerry and Boxer, and any other Senators, to ensure that the final legislation we send to President Obama creates a future with more clean energy and less global warming pollution.”
This afternoon, Kerry responded to what he described as inaccurate attacks on the bill -- such as that it includes tax increases and would raise costs for consumers and businesses alike.
“The ink wasn’t even dry on the The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act before the same tired attacks and bold face distortions were launched by those committed to inaction. We predicted long ago that those on the other side would adopt the misleading jargon of oil companies, lobbyists, and special interests, which maximize their profits at the expense of progress," he said in a statement. "Let’s be clear: The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act will put America back in control of our energy future. It invests in coal, natural gas, nuclear, and renewable energy companies that make America great, while vigorously protecting the American consumer. It can finally put us on a path to energy independence, in spite of the misleading campaign that would keep us hostage to foreign and unreliable governments.”
The Kerry-Boxer bill, titled The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act, will be the subject of intense lobbying by industry and other groups. So to formally introduce it. the two Democrats are calling on Democrats on the environment committee and other senators, as well as business, faith, national security, energy, and environmental leaders, and local and state officials to offer their support.
Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, praised the bill, saying in a statement that "it's time for America to again take charge and make sure that we have more jobs, less pollution and greater security.”
David Foster, executive director of the Blue Green Alliance, also applauded the bill. "To truly achieve our goals of a cleaner environment and a prosperous and fair clean energy economy, we must pass comprehensive legislation that protects workers and ignites our clean energy economy," he said in a statement. "The Copenhagen negotiations are just around the corner, and it is critical that the U.S. Senate move on this legislation to send a strong message to the world.”
The Alliance for American Manufacturing said today that industries supporting over four million jobs could be at risk unless any climate change bill protects the competitiveness of energy-intensive, trade-sensitive manufacturers. It cited a new report from the Economic Policy Institute that calls for provisions including rebates for compliance costs and a "border adjustment fee" on the carbon content of goods from countries that fail to regulate greenhouse gases.
Labor leaders are taking more of a wait-and-see attitude. Leo W. Gerard, international president of the United Steelworkers said “a long, tough process" lies ahead.
“To get this right, it is critical that this bill not only tackle the challenges we face in addressing climate change, but also come to the aid of workers across the U.S. by creating and maintaining jobs that strengthen America’s manufacturing base, and prevent the leakage of jobs to nations who fail to take action on climate change," he said in a statement.
The white coat calvary
President Obama has had doctors and nurses by his side as he pitches his health care plans.
Now, his political group wants to put the medical professionals in new TV ads to rebuild public support for an overhaul of the health care system.
"The cavalry is here -- and they're in white coats and scrubs: More than a half a million doctors and millions of nurses are joining forces to help pass real health reform. Americans listen to their nurses and doctors when it comes to health reform -- and for good reason. If we can help them amplify their voices, it'll be a huge boost to our campaign for change," Mitch Stewart, national director of Organizing for America, told supporters in a fund-raising solicitation today.
Stewart said the group is trying to come up with $300,000 by Thursday for the ad, which would note that the reform effort has the backing of the American Medical Association and a dozen other physicians groups representing 500,000 doctors, plus the American Nurses Association and other organizations representing millions of nurses.
Liberal web ad mocks GOP health plan
A liberal-labor group supporting President Obama and the Democrats on health care has a new web ad that uses a more humorous, tongue-in-cheek approach to make the case that Republicans don't have a plan to offer.
The video from Americans United for Change puts together clips of various Republican lawmakers to argue that the GOP plan for those without insurance is to go to emergency rooms and seek charity care; for those seeking better benefits to get a federal government job; and for those trying to cut costs by dropping maternity care.
"This has been Republican Party health care solutions," the video ends.
Democrats call out Republicans for scaring seniors
Democrats are keeping up their assault on Republicans for what they say is scaring seniors by warning of cuts in benefits that would come from the health care overhaul.
The new TV ad today from the Democratic National Committee cites news reports that question the truthfulness of the Republican critiques and the AARP conclusion that Republicans are using "scare tactics." The spot is clearly aimed at the elderly set, down to the key points appearing on a billboard and on a piece of paper inserted into an ancient Royal typewriter.
The ad asserts that instead of cuts, seniors will benefit from lower prescription drug costs and premium payments.
While Republican accusations that the Democratic bills could lead to rationing of care have been largely debunked, independent analysts say that the GOP does have a point when it comes to a portion of the Medicare program. Under the Democratic proposals, more than 10 million seniors enrolled in an enhanced, private version of Medicare known as Medicare Advantage could have their coverage shrink or be replaced with traditional plans.
Kirk gets committee slots
By Joseph Williams, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- The new junior senator from Massachusetts today received his committee assignments, joining panels overseeing major issues of importance to the Bay State.
Paul Kirk was assigned to the Armed Services Committee, which supervises the military and plays a role in defense spending.
He will also be on the Homeland Security Committee, and vowed to play a key role on the health care overhaul, though he will not be on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy had chaired.
"With Massachusetts' sons and daughters courageously serving on the front lines overseas, and our first responders bravely protecting our citizens at home, I'm deeply honored to serve the people of Massachusetts on these committees," Kirk said in a statement today. "In addition to the important committee work, there is significant work to be done on health care reform on the Senate floor, and I will be a strong voice and a vote during that vital debate."
Wednesday, Kirk will participate in his first hearing of the homeland security committee, "Eight Years After 9/11: Confronting the Terrorist Threat to the Homeland," Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and FBI Director Robert Mueller III will testify.
Kirk was sworn in Friday after a controversial appointment by Governor Deval Patrick. He will serve until after a Jan. 19 special election when voters will decide who will serve out the remaining three years in Kennedy's term.
Halloween coming early on health, liberal group says
As the Senate Finance Committee today voted against including in the health care overhaul a government-run public option to compete with private insurers, the back-and-forth continues over an existing government program.
After Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus complained about a mailer sent by Humana, one of the nation's largest insurers, warning seniors that they could lose important Medicare benefits under the Democratic health care bills, Health and Human Services ordered Humana and other private companies that contract with Medicare to stop sending customers information about the overhaul's potential effects on their benefits.
While Democrats deny that the bills would cut Medicare benefits, the Congressional Budget Office and independent analysts said some seniors could lose some enhanced benefits under the Medicare Advantage program .
Republican leaders responded late last week by warning HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius that they will block confirmations of any agency appointees until she lifts what they call the "gag order" on insurers.
Today, the liberal-labor coalition Americans United for Change unveiled a new TV spot going after Humana and the Republicans.
The Halloween-themed ad accuses the insurance industry and its GOP allies of resorting to fear tactics.
"This year Halloween comes early for health insurance giant Humana," the announcer says. "Humana is sending letters to its senior citizen policy holders intended to frighten them into opposing health insurance reform. The letters say health insurance reform threatens their Medicare benefits. AARP says: that’s just not true."
"But we shouldn’t be surprised," the announcer says as images of Republican leaders in various costumes flit across the screen. "Whether it’s the insurance companies or their Republican allies, the case against health insurance reform always gets down to one word."
"Boo!" it says on screen.
Baucus did not include a public option in his draft plan, largely because he does not believe that a bill that includes it would pass the Senate. Liberal groups launched a new TV ad this week in his home state trying to pressure him to change his mind.
But Senator Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, is proposing a public plan modeled on Medicare, the government program for the elderly.
President Obama has said he prefers a public option, but is not firmly wedded to it, as long as there is competition for private insurers.
Poll: Support rebounding for health overhaul
The latest health care poll is also the most recent to suggest that the battering the Democratic bills took during the protests and shouting that met August congressional town halls has dissipated as the focus returned to Capitol Hill.
According to the sixth tracking poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation, 57 percent of Americans believe that tackling health care reform is more important than ever, up from 53 percent in August. The proportion of Americans who believe their families would be better off after an overhaul is up six percentage points to 42 percent and the proportion who think that the country would be better off is up eight points to 53 percent.
Also according to the survey, most Americans support the principles at the core of the bills supported by President Obama and congressional Democrats, including a requirement that individuals obtain coverage (68 percent), a mandate that most employers offer coverage (67 percent), and an expansion of Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (82 percent).
Majorities also back "having health insurance companies pay a fee based on how much business they have” and “having health insurance companies pay a tax for offering very expensive policies,” according to Kaiser.
The Kaiser poll, which has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points, was conducted Sept. 11-18 -- just after Obama gave a nationally televised address to Congress to lay out what he wanted in a health care bill. He has kept up the drumbeat for reform since with rallies and repeated TV appearances.
Other polls have also shown rebounding support for reform after the drumbeat of criticism led by conservative activists and Republicans in August drove down the numbers.
Liberals press Baucus on public option
Liberal groups are trying to intensify the pressure on Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus on the eve of his panel's vote whether to include a "public option" -- a government-run plan to compete with private insurers -- in its bill.
Seeking support from moderate Democrats and Republicans, Baucus did not include it in his draft. The finance committee is expected to vote Tuesday.
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Democracy for America are airing an ad in Baucus's home state of Montana and in Washington, D.C., featuring a Billings man as a real-life example of the need for a public option.
Bing Perrine says he had to have heart surgery, but didn't have insurance. While friends and strangers held bake sales and other fund-raisers, he still owes $100,000, he says in the ad.
Perrine goes on to assert that Baucus has received nearly $4 million in campaign contributions from health care interests.
"Senator Baucus, when you take millions of dollars from health and insurance interests that oppose reform, and oppose giving families like mine the choice of a public option, I have to ask: 'Whose side are you on?' the Montana farmer asks.
GOP, Democrats trade charges on health plan
A new GOP web ad aims straight for the sensitive spot in the health care overhaul from President Obama and Democrats -- that the proposals would mean higher taxes.
The ad claims that the bills would mean taxes on tests, scans and X-rays; on medical supplies; and on charities and small businesses. “Hundreds of billions in new taxes, all of it passed right back to the consumer,” the announcer says over images of a laughing Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and top Senate Democrat Harry Reid, juxtaposed with worried consumers.
The GOP ad then notes that the bill calls for a penalty for those who don't obtain health insurance, though it doesn't mention that there would be subsidies to help them: “And if you think you can’t afford it, you can’t afford not to, because they’ve even proposed a tax for not having health insurance.”
Obama has insisted that the penalty does not amount to a tax increase, but many independent observers disagree and the ad shows the dictionary definition.
"Obama health care taxes,” the announcer concludes. “Wrong for health care. ”
“For months, President Obama has tried to convince the American people that his government-run health care experiment will be all gain and no pain, but they aren’t buying it," Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele said in a statement. "The fact is, his plan contains huge new taxes that will harm the economy and cost more jobs. Democrats are paying for their dangerous experiment with higher taxes on small business owners, charitable giving, and even middle-class families who can least afford it. I encourage President Obama to abandon these health care taxes and set a course for a truly bipartisan bill that embraces reforms Americans actually want and need.”
Democrats, however, argue that the Senate Finance bill does not include any mandate on employers and that both businesses and individuals would end up eventually benefiting from lower health care costs.
"Apparently undeterred by the facts, the RNC is again relying on scare-tactics to ‘kill’ health insurance reform in a new web video released today," the Democratic National Committee said in its response. "The RNC’s latest attempt to mislead voters accuses the President of being 'in denial' over 'new taxes' that the RNC claims would result from reform. The only person guilty of that charge, however, is the Republican Party’s own Chairman who just this morning on Fox News denied that this country’s 'health care system' was 'going broke.' ”
For its part, the Democratic National Committee today sent out an email bashing House Republican leader John Boehner -- the second missive in its "Call 'em out" campaign targeting Republicans for repeating "falsehoods" about the Democratic proposals.
"As the Republican leader in the U.S. House of Representatives, John Boehner could use his important position to forge honest consensus around reforms that most Americans overwhelmingly support. Sadly, Boehner is choosing to be a leading peddler of health reform lies instead," says the email to supporters, urging them to criticize Boehner on social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter and to write letters to the editor.
"When Boehner repeated his claim that reform would result in a government takeover of health care, it was clear he's been too busy trying to score political points to read the overwhelming evidence -- including a post from the non-partisan FactCheck.org -- debunking this claim," the email continues. "And cruelly scaring seniors with lies about benefit cuts, even though his own party voted to gut Medicare? On his side of the aisle, that's become standard operating procedure. Then of course there's Boehner's blatant lie that reform will provide taxpayer-funded abortions, a claim rejected even by groups that oppose abortion. His lies have been thoroughly debunked, but John Boehner just won't stop -- so we're calling him out."
Boehner responded to the Democrats' attack: "There's a reason why the majority of Americans oppose the Democrats' government takeover of health care, $500 billion in Medicare cuts, tax hikes, and mountains of new debt on our kids and grandkids. It's because they are in their bill. Try as they might, Democrats have a major credibility problem. Americans don't trust them with their health care, and they shouldn't."
Kerry points to Vietnam lessons on Afghanistan
Senator John F. Kerry, an influential adviser to President Obama on Afghanistan, is bending his ear about the lessons of Vietnam.
The Massachusetts Democrat is asking whether a more limited counterterrorism mission in Afghanistan would be a better strategy than than sending thousands more US troops for a full-blown counterinsurgency operation.
Obama is taking another look at the US strategy as General Stanley McChrystal, the top US commander on the ground, has asked for more forces.
Kerry, who came to politics as a Vietnam War veteran turned antiwar protestor, has called several hearings of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to explore those arguments. And he makes them again in an op-ed published in today's Wall Street Journal.
"We in Congress have our own assignment: to test all of the underlying assumptions in Afghanistan and make sure they are the right ones before embarking on a new strategy," Kerry writes. "For example, one assumption of the proposed counterinsurgency plan is that our troops and civilians will be working in partnership with a legitimate and reliable government in Afghanistan. After the deeply flawed presidential election last month, we must ask whether we can succeed if our partner is weak and viewed with deep suspicion by his own people.
"We also need to know whether a full-blown counterinsurgency, with its increased footprint and inevitably higher casualties, is a fundamental part of our plans to go after al Qaeda and avoid destabilizing Pakistan. Could a far smaller, well-honed counterterrorism strategy work as well or better?" Kerry asks.
He goes on to assert that "one of the lessons from Vietnam—applied in the first Gulf War and sadly forgotten for too long in Iraq—is that we should not commit troops to the battlefield without a clear understanding of what we expect them to accomplish, how long it will take, and how we maintain the consent of the American people. Otherwise, we risk bringing our troops home from a mission unachieved or poorly conceived."
Republicans warn HHS on Medicare mailers
Senate Republicans ratcheted up their assault today on the Health and Human Services Department for cracking down on an insurance company for a mailer the agency said was scaring seniors.
The GOP leaders warned HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius that they will block confirmations of any agency appointees until she lifts what they call a "gag order" on insurers that is "without apparent justification or basis in law."
"America’s seniors and the health plans that serve them deserve to have their free speech rights respected," they wrote. "Their rights should not be subject to the whims of any administration, and the health plans that serve them should not be threatened with punishment if they speak out on a matter of public concern simply because the administration disagrees with their position."
(The full letter is below.)
According to the office of Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell, there are at least 10 vacant posts covered by the hold: Surgeon General, Assistant Secretary for Resources, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Assistant Secretary for Legislation, Commissioner of the Administration for Children, Commissioner of the Administration for Native Americans, Administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Administrator for Substance Abuse, and General Counsel.
"They have ten vacancies of people they are trying to get appointed to the administration," McConnell said on Fox Business Network this afternoon. "None of those people will get through the Senate easily until they lift the gag order."
He also accused Democrats of skirting the truth on Medicare. "I think the Democratic majority is undeterred by the facts. The facts are that they are trying to cut Medicare. They are certainly cutting Medicare Advantage...It's astonishing."
Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus had complained about the mailer sent by Humana Inc., warning seniors that they could lose important benefits under the Democratic health care bills. HHS launched an investigation and ordered Humana and other private companies that contract with Medicare to stop sending customers information about the overhaul's potential effects on their benefits.
While Democrats deny that the bills would cut Medicare benefits, the Congressional Budget Office and independent analysts said some seniors could lose some enhanced benefits. The Globe reported today that more than 10 million seniors enrolled in Medicare Advantage could see their plans shrink or be replaced by traditional coverage.
Senate passes Pakistan aid bill
Senators John F. Kerry and Richard Lugar praised their colleagues today for passing a bill that triples foreign aid to Pakistan, an ally with a nuclear arsenal that is beset by internal divisions and Islamic militants.
The bill they championed includes $1.5 billion a year over the next five years for democratic, economic, and social development assistance. It could win House passage as early as Friday, sending it to President Obama for his signature, the Associated Press reports.
Kerry broke the news of the Senate vote to Pakistan's foreign minister in a telephone call during a meeting in New York of senior diplomats pledging support for Pakistan. The room broke out into applause, reports the Globe's Farah Stockman.
President Obama also attended that meeting, where he said he wanted to "reaffirm my country’s deep commitment to the people of Pakistan."
(His full remarks are below.)
"This Act represents a collaboration between both Democrats and Republicans, in both Senate and the House, to forge a new long-term relationship between the people of America and Pakistan. The fact that President Obama was able to announce this at the United Nations sends an important message to Pakistan and the world of our strengthened commitment to this relationship," Kerry said in a statement.
“I am delighted by the action of my colleagues today—and by the unanimity displayed in the Senate vote. This landmark piece of legislation is the product of careful consultation between both Chambers, and both sides of the aisle: I salute my friends Dick Lugar and Howard Berman for their leadership. It is my hope and expectation that the House will pass this bill speedily, so that the President can sign it into law without delay.”
Lugar added, “The United States has an intense strategic interest in Pakistan and the surrounding region. The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate last year painted a bleak picture of the converging crises in Pakistan. A growing al-Qaeda sanctuary, an expanding Taliban insurgency, political brinksmanship, and a failing economy are intensifying turmoil and violence in that country. These circumstances are a threat to Pakistan, the region, and the United States.
“We should make clear to the people of Pakistan that our interests are focused on democracy, pluralism, stability, and the fight against terrorism. These are values supported by a large majority of the Pakistani people. If Pakistan is to break its debilitating cycle of instability, it will need to achieve progress on fighting corruption, delivering government services, and promoting broad based economic growth. The international community and the United States should support reforms that contribute to the strengthening of Pakistani civilian institutions.”
Biden touts stimulus report
Vice President Joe Biden jumped all over the congressional watchdog's report on the Obama administration's economic stimulus plan, saying the report shows that the stimulus is working.
“Today’s report from the Government Accountability Office confirms what I have been hearing from people across the country: the Recovery Act is working to jump-start critical infrastructure projects, cushion the impact of record state budget deficits and provide new job opportunities for hard-hit communities," Biden, who has been put in charge of making sure the stimulus money is not wasted, said in a statement.
"As the GAO notes, Recovery Act funds are being put to work ahead of schedule, and project bids are frequently coming in under-budget -- with the millions of dollars of cost-savings often redirected to communities that need the economic boost the most. The fact that a survey of nine major Recovery Act programs across sixteen states by the government’s top watchdog, showed such significant progress is a testament to the care with which we have put taxpayer dollars to work.”
“We look ahead to receiving the first reports directly from recipients of Recovery Act funds next month on what it has meant for their business or organization. We appreciate the GAO’s recommendations for carrying out that process. I am also stressing to agencies the importance of responding to the GAO’s other recommendations for improvements in execution and oversight of this highly complex effort.”
Biden didn't mention, however, that the GAO also warned that a government's plans to measure the success of a $1.2 billion jobs program for teenagers are so lax that they "may reveal little about what the program achieved.
The Associated Press reports that many teens didn't get jobs, partly because unemployed adults sought the same low-wage, entry-level positions. Youth unemployment rates hit 18.5 percent in July, the highest rate measured among 16- to 24-year-olds in that month since 1948, the AP notes.
Republicans have also kept up a barrage of criticism of the stimulus, saying it hasn't created the promised jobs.
Republicans call for more focus on Afghanistan, not health care
House Republican leaders added their voices today to those who say the focus on health care on Capitol Hill is crowding out other crucial issues, namely what to do in Afghanistan.
“With Afghanistan now becoming such a very troublesome issue, we should be making progress on health care so it doesn’t get in the way of a very, very important national security issue,” Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the No. 2 House Republican, told reporters after a private GOP meeting. “Central Asia is the Persian Gulf of the 21st century. We are foolish to be ignoring that threat right now."
"Health care in this building has made it so that it seems we can't get anything else done. We have burning issues out there is this country," Cantor added.
Obama, who is weighing a revamped strategy for Afghanistan and whether to send even more reinforcements than the 21,000 he has already dispatched, is likely to need Republican support for whatever he decides because the vast majority of Democrats are opposed to any escalation of the US mission.
"With all the attention there is on health care, the attention that needs to be paid to what is happening in Afghanistan isn’t happening,” added Representative John Boehner, the House Republican leader.
He and other key lawmakers have demanded that General Stanley McChrystal, the top US commander in Afghanistan, appear before House and Senate committees to explain his report to the White House that calls for additional troops.
"What strategy does he believe is going to be necessary in order to secure Afghanistan so that we deny the Taliban and al Qaeda a safe haven from which to train, operate and organize to come after Americans again? And so, we need General McChrystal up here as soon as possible to help members understand. I think the President ought to take his request as soon as possible,” Boehner added.
“I do believe that there is a lot of danger in the delay. First, with insufficient troops in the field, we put the troops that we do have there at greater risk. Secondly, if the President doesn’t come to a decision soon—what will happen is— we will miss the window of getting more troops into the theater as the spring thaw occurs, when the additional troops are going to be necessary. And so, I would hope that the timetable that’s been discussed by the Administration gets sped up, and gets sped up rapidly.”
As the Globe reported on Monday, some lawmakers and advocates are chafing that the sluggish pace on a health care overhaul has backed up priorities including climate change, transportation, and financial regulation.
On Fox Business Network this afternoon, Boehner said House Democrats should realize that their plan, with a government-run public option, is not going to get through.
"They're still moving in the direction of those big government plan, high taxes and big deficits. At some point it's going to become clear that this can't pass. I don't know whether that's three weeks from now, four weeks from now, six weeks from now, but at some point it's going to become clear," Boehner said.
"And then they're going to have to make a decision - do they accept the defeat or do they hit the reset button and scrap all these big government ideas and work with Republicans to make our current system work better."
Kerry strikes back at GOP complaints on health care
Senator John F. Kerry, who has picked up some of the health care mantle from the late Edward M. Kennedy, lashed out today at Republicans complaining that the issue is being rushed.
“Only in Washington could people argue that we’ve rushed this process,” Kerry said in a statement. “This has been America’s battle for decades, and those suffering in a broken system cannot afford the political gaming of stall and delay – they simply will not survive it. We are going to get this done. I’ve been confident of that all along, and I’m confident of it now. We’re going to do it because we have to and because it is the right thing to do. And in the end, I think, we will show something about the character and the compassion of the American people.”
As the Senate Finance Committee started deliberating and amending a proposal from Chairman Max Baucus, Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the panel's senior Republican, said the mid-September deadline preempted bipartisan talks. "I find it utterly and completely appalling," he said.
Baucus unveiled his bill last weeks after months of negotiations toward a possible bipartisan deal proved fruitless.
Kerry's full statement to the committee is below:
Biden sounds warning on health premiums
In one of his first forays into the thick of the health care debate, Vice President Joe Biden today used a new White House report on premium increases to warn that without an overhaul, families will face higher and higher costs.
"The status quo of rising premiums is simply unsustainable for families, for businesses, for state budgets, and for our national economy," Biden told state insurance commissioners.
According to the White House report, the national average annual family premium for employer-sponsored health insurance rose to $13,375 in 2009, up 5.5 percent during a recession when overall inflation fell by 0.7 percent. The report found that families’ premiums have gone up between 90 percent and 150 percent over the last decade, depending on the state, far faster than wages and inflation.
In Massachusetts, premiums jumped 119 percent between 1999 and 2009, nearly three times the 35 percent increase in wages, according to the report.
Click here for the full report.
Biden's full remarks are below:
Trial lawyers fight back on malpractice
With President Obama opening the door a crack to tort reform as part of a health care overhaul, the nation's trial lawyers are trying to slam it shut again.
The American Association for Justice announced today it is launching what it called the first phase of a nationwide ad campaign "to educate lawmakers about the epidemic of preventable medical errors and how tort law changes won’t lower costs or cover the uninsured."
The ads, running in Washington publications and on online news sites, say the estimated 98,000 deaths from preventable medical errors is “like two 737s crashing every day for a whole year.”
But the ad concludes: “Would we blame the passengers or the airlines?”
The group, formerly known as the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, also has a website on the issue.
“Our health care system is clearly broken, and if we are serious about improving it, we need to fix preventable medical errors,” AAJ President Anthony Tarricone said in a statement. “This new ad campaign gives Congress 98,000 reasons why they should put patients’ health first – before the profits of insurance companies. If we work to improve our health care system and reduce medical errors – rather than strip people of their rights – there would be far fewer victims that need legal recourse.”
Obama, in his speech to Congress earlier this month, said while he didn't see malpractice reform as a "silver bullet," he was open to looking at ways to decrease "defensive medicine," when doctors order extra tests and procedures to avoid malpractice lawsuits.
Last week, the White House followed up by announcing $25 million in grants to help states and health care systems test models designed to compensate patients for malpractice but also reduce frivolous lawsuits and lower insurance premiums paid by doctors.
Obama vows action on climate change
Kicking off four days of meetings with world leaders, President Obama declared this morning that the international response to global warming will determine how history views their success.
"Our generation’s response to this challenge will be judged by history, for if we fail to meet it – boldly, swiftly, and together – we risk consigning future generations to an irreversible catastrophe," he said at a climate change summit in New York hosted by United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.
"It is true that for too many years, mankind has been slow to respond to or even recognize the magnitude of the climate threat. It is true of my own country as well. We recognize that. But this is a new day. It is a new era. And I am proud to say that the United States has done more to promote clean energy and reduce carbon pollution in the last eight months than at any other time in our history," he bragged.
The president cited new fuel efficiency standards for vehicles, clean energy investments in the economic stimulus package, and energy efficiency initiatives. He also noted that in June, the US House passed a landmark climate change bill that calls for a cap-and-trade system that includes a limit on carbon emissions and a market for pollution credits.
"We understand the gravity of the climate threat," Obama said. "We are determined to act. And we will meet our responsibility to future generations." (His full remarks are below.)
But with health care backing up legislation in the Senate -- and vehement opposition from Republicans and others to cap-and-trade, it is uncertain at best that Obama will be able to deliver a signed, sealed, and delivered climate change law in time for a major global warming summit in December in Copenhagen, where advocates hope a groundbreaking agreement is approved.
Indeed, Obama is being upstaged at today's UN meeting by news that China will unveil plans to aggressively increase its energy saving programs to combat climate change.
Obama has a busy schedule on the world stage the rest of the week.
Today, he huddles separately with the leaders of Israel and the Palestinian Authority, then brings together Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for a trilateral meeting. Later, he meets with Chinese President Hu Jintao.
Wednesday, Obama delivers his first speech to the UN General Assembly and meets with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev. Thursday, the president presides over a UN Security Council session on nuclear proliferation. And on Friday, Obama hosts the main session of the G-20 economic summit in Pittsburgh.
FULL ENTRYHealth care, the four-minute version
The health care bills in Congress run to the hundreds of pages -- not surprising since they would remake a huge chunk of the US economy.
But in a new video today, the White House that suggests that all Americans need to know can be summarized much more briefly.
"The Obama Plan in Four Minutes" shows the president explaining the basic benefits -- both for those with and without insurance -- in his speech this month to a joint session of Congress. The video ends with Obama's clarion calI for action, with him imploring lawmakers, "Now's the time to deliver on health care."
Meanwhile, with Obama busy at the United Nations on Wednesday, giving a major speech to the General Assembly, Vice President Joe Biden will pick up the slack on health care.
Biden, joined by Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius and White House health reform Director Nancy-Ann DeParle, will lead a discussion in Silver Spring, Md., on "how health insurance reform will lower costs, cut waste, and improve health care quality for seniors across the country," the White House announced this afternoon.
With Biden taking a larger role in the health care debate, Republicans gleefully reminded that earlier this month, the vice president joked, "I do foreign policy, I don't do health care."
In his remarks at the Brookings Institution, Biden went on to say that one reason why is that foreign policy is "a lot easier than health care, and a lot less complicated." "And that's not a joke," he said.
Obama calls for new consumer agency
Following up on his speech on Wall Street earlier this week warning that financial firms can't return to business as usual, President Obama uses his weekly address to put on the hard sell for his proposal to create a new agency to oversee consumer loans.
The Consumer Financial Protection Agency is a centerpiece of the financial regulation overhaul sought by Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress. But it is strongly opposed by much of the financial industry.
"Part of what led to this crisis were not just decisions made on Wall Street, but also unsustainable mortgage loans made across the country. While many folks took on more than they knew they could afford, too often folks signed contracts they didn’t fully understand offered by lenders who didn’t always tell the truth. That’s why we need clear rules, clearly enforced. And that’s what this agency will do," Obama says in his weekly radio and Internet address.
"Consumers shouldn’t have to worry about loan contracts written to confuse, hidden fees attached to their mortgages, and financial penalties – whether through a credit card or debit card -- that appear without a clear warning on their statements. And responsible lenders, including community banks, trying to do the right thing shouldn’t have to worry about ruinous competition from unregulated and unscrupulous competitors."
Obama notes the opposition, but argues, "We cannot let the narrow interests of a few come before the interests of all of us. We cannot forget how close we came to the brink, and perpetuate the broken system and breakdown of responsibility that made it possible."
In the address, the president also pledges to continue to work on the economic recovery with other world leaders, whom he will meet at the G-20 summit in Pittsburgh next week.
The full remarks are below, and can be viewed here.
Hillary Clinton predicts success for Obama health plan
On the same day that current first lady Michelle Obama jumped into the fray on health care, the last first lady to take on the issue expressed optimism that President Obama's plan will be approved.
Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose "Hillarycare" was soundly rebuffed in the mid-1990s, promoted her experience on health care in her campaign against Obama in the Democratic primaries, saying she had the scars to prove it.
"It won't be pretty. It's like sausage-making. But we will end up with a bill for the president to sign that will be an advance," Clinton, now Obama's secretary of state, said today at the Brookings Institution. "We all have to calm down here, take two aspirin, go to bed, think about it in the morning."
First lady joins health care fight
President Obama called on his better half today to help make his sales pitch on health care as his overhaul plan faces brickbats from both the left and right.
First lady Michelle Obama spoke to a family-themed event sponsored by the White House Council on Women and Girls after women had told their stories of health care hardship.
According to the press pool report, the testimony came from a widow with a teenage son who had trouble finding affordable coverage, a cancer survivor who had to declare bankruptcy due to her copay and out-of-pocket costs, and a woman who has a non-cancerous lump in her breast but no insurance and who sat in the first lady's box for the president's health care speech to Congress last week.
Similar stories are happening all over the country because women are " being crushed -- crushed -- by the current structure of our health care," Michelle Obama said. "Crushed."
"This is why we are fighting so hard for health insurance reform," the first lady declared. "This is the face of the fight....People are hurting in this country right now."
And women "know the pain, because we are the ones dealing with it," she added, noting that in most families, mothers are dealing with the health care of their children, relatives, and often their husbands, as well, drawing laughter from the audience that included members of the Business and Professional Women, the YWCA, the Women’s Chamber of Commerce, and the National Council of Negro Women.
The first lady also told the story of her daughter Sasha, who at four months old contracted meningitis, and said she often wonders what would have happened if the Obamas didn't have a good pediatrician and generous insurance.
She said it's "still shocking to me" and it keeps her up at night that women are denied coverage or charged more for insurance, and that many policies don't cover basic services that women need.
"The status quo is unacceptable. It is holding women and families back," Michelle Obama said, then going on to explain major elements of the president's plan.
"I think this is a pretty reasonable plan, I don't know about you," she said, urging the audience to "mobilize like you've never mobilized before" over the next few weeks to educate people about the plan and to rebut false allegations.
"No longer can we sit by and watch the debate take on a life of it own. Now, more than ever, we have to channel our passions into change."
Also according to the press pool report, the first lady plans similar health care events, though not in the next two weeks, when she will be busy with United Nations General Assembly gathering in New York, the G-20 economic summit in Pittsburgh, and the International Olympic Committee meeting in Copenhagen, when the executive committee will choose the host for the 2016 Summer Olympics.
The first lady, who previously has made helping military families her signature issue, has a significantly higher favorability rating these days than her husband.
In the most recent poll measuring both, Gallup found in April that 72 percent of Americans had a favorable impression of Michelle Obama and only 17 percent unfavorable, compared to a 69 percent favorable-28 percent unfavorable split for her husband.
The president's favorability rating has dropped since, during the heated battle over health care, to 63 percent in a Washington Post/ABC News survey earlier this month.
Her full remarks today are below:
Calling out health critics
In his recent stump speeches on health care, one of President Obama's big applause lines has been a warning to his opponents:
"I won't stand by while special interests do the same old tricks to keep things exactly the way they are....If you misrepresent what’s in the plan, we'll call you out. We will call you out," he told a rally at the University of Maryland on Thursday.
Today, the Democratic National Committee followed up by launching a new "Call ‘Em Out” campaign to help "set the record straight on GOP lies, scare tactics, and mistruths on health insurance reform" with emails and other missives to activists.
The target of the first call to action is Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, a potential Republican challenger to Obama in 2012, who the DNC says is embracing the "salacious and thoroughly debunked charge of death panels" -- committees of bureaucrats who would decide end-of-life care under the health overhaul. The DNC also put up a web video slamming Pawlenty.
"The message to Tim Pawlenty and the opponents of change who would lie or misrepresent the truth should be clear: you are not going to get away with it," DNC spokesman Hari Sevugan said in a statement. "We are going to respond forcefully and consistently with the facts and you will no longer be able to peddle your lies with impunity. Through tools like 'Call 'Em Out,' you will be met with aggressive push back from our supporters who will be armed with the facts and who will hold you accountable for playing politics with the most important issues facing our country today.”
But even many Democrats acknowledge that Republican and other critics of the health care bills got the upper hand during the August congressional recess, making it more difficult to pass a bill.
Also today, Organizing for America, Obama's grassroots political arm housed within the DNC, launched a new TV ad that uses footage from the Thursday rally where the enthusiastic crowd joins the president's chant of "Fired up, ready to go."
Obama scraps Europe missile shield
President Obama, who vows to "reset" the tense relationship with Russia, announced this morning he is removing a major point of dispute, scrapping plans for an elaborate missile defense system in Europe.
But the decision is being met with disappointment among some NATO allies -- and is sure to lead to more accusations from the president's conservative critics that he is soft on national defense.
In a hastily-called White House announcement, Obama said his new approach will provide "stronger, smarter, and swifter defenses" of US forces and the US mainland.
He said is committed to deploying strong missile defenses -- but those that respond to 21st century threats that are adaptable, utilize proven technology, and are cost effective.
(Obama's remarks are below, followed by the White House "fact sheet" on the new approach.)
Obama's move overturns another Bush administration policy -- it announced in 2007 planned to put 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and a radar system in the Czech Republic. While the US insisted that the system was not aimed at Russia but instead at Iran and other potential rogue nuclear states, Russia adamantly opposed the missile shield and issued bellicose threats against the countries that would have hosted it.
The US also needs Russia's help in diplomatic moves to persuade Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions.
Obama said that a seven-month review concludes Iranian short- and medium-range missiles are a greater threat than long-range missiles, and those missiles could be defended with other systems.
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates followed up Obama's announcement by telling reporters that better sensors and interceptors allow the US to more quickly deploy a missile defense system in southern Europe (reports suggest Turkey) and on Aegis ships.
Gates said the new approach is better than the one he recommended to President George W. Bush nearly three years ago and that it means deployment six or seven years earlier, filling in the gap until 2015 when an upgraded missile shield can be deployed in Poland and the Czech Republic.
Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, backed Obama on the change.
“President Obama’s decision to restructure missile defense in Europe is correct and timely," Kerry said in a statement. "Proven technologies and responsible diplomacy must be at the core of missile defense in Europe, and now is the time to press forward with the more flexible missile defense architecture that the President and Secretary Gates have chosen. NATO is the bedrock of our security, whether a country is at the geographic heart of the alliance or on its frontiers. The President’s new proposal will provide a stronger and more effective defense for American forces and our NATO allies."
Representative Ike Skelton of Missouri, the Democratic chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, also generally endorsed Obama's move.
“While I look forward to reviewing the details of the President’s plan, it appears the new missile defense strategy for Europe is a comprehensive approach that will counter the most immediate missile threats from Iran and protect our allies and our troops in the region," he said in a statement.
“As a practical matter, deployment of the European third site was still a long way away. This new approach, which has the support of both the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, focuses our resources where they will do the most good. The plan is also consistent with NATO’s policy that the deployment of ballistic missile defenses be prioritized according to the imminence of the threat and the level of acceptable risk.”
But Senator Jon Kyl, an Arizona Republican, called the decision "dangerous and short-sighted."
"Not only does this decision leave America vulnerable to the growing Iranian long-range missile threat, it also turns back the clock to the days of the Cold War, when Eastern Europe was considered the domain of Russia. This will be a bitter disappointment, indeed, even a warning to the people of Eastern Europe," Kyl said in a statement.
"The message the administration sends today is clear: the United States will not stand behind its friends and views 're-setting' relations with Russia more important. This is wrong!"
Representative John Boehner, the top House Republican, also blasted Obama's decision.
“Scrapping the US missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic does little more than empower Russia and Iran at the expense of our allies in Europe," Boehner said in a statement. "It shows a willful determination to continue ignoring the threat posed by some of the most dangerous regimes in the world, while taking one of the most important defenses against Iran off the table. Since taking control of Congress, House Democrats have cut our missile defense budget by $1.2 billion, undermining our commitment to our allies and weakening our national security. I urge the President to reconsider this ill-advised decision, stand with our allies, and do what’s right for the safety and security of the American people.”
Another Republican, Representative Roy Blunt of Missouri, went as far as to accuse Obama of appeasement.
“Seventy years ago today, the Soviet Union invaded Poland. And, today, at the Russians’ request, the Obama Administration has agreed to abandon the missile defense shield developed to protect our close allies in Eastern Europe," Blunt said in a statement.
“The administration’s decision to scrap the missile defense plan is incredibly shortsighted and comes at the expense of our allies in the War on Terror....Appeasement of dangerous nations does not inspire peace. We must stand firm and send the signal that we will not back down when the safety of Americans and our allies is at stake.”
Obama tries to rally young behind health care
President Obama took his health care pitch to a college campus today, telling a cheering crowd at the University of Maryland that he is keeping his promise to not just clean up the messes he inherited, but build a better future.
In a message tailored for the young people who powered his campaign, Obama said his domestic agenda is designed to "ensure your generation" has the same opportunities as his.
He specifically mentioned that Congress is on the cusp of overhauling the student loan system to make it simpler and cheaper for students. "That's the change you worked for, that's the change you voted for, that's the change I will deliver," he said.
The president said another defining struggle for the younger generation is his push for sweeping changes to the nation's health care system. While young people might think they're immune from health problems, one third have trouble paying their medical bills, he said.
Despite all the machinations on the details of the health care bills, Obama said the bottom-line issue is simpler:
"It's about what kind of country you want to be. You gave time to this campaign because you believe America can still do great things.
"I may not be the first president to take up the cause of health care reform," he said. "I am determined to be the last -- with your help."
His full remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYAn experiment on malpractice reform
The part of President Obama's health care speech last week that many Republicans liked most was when he suggested he'd be open to changes on medical malpractice.
"I don't believe malpractice reform is a silver bullet, but I've talked to enough doctors to know that defensive medicine may be contributing to unnecessary costs," Obama told Congress. "So I'm proposing that we move forward on a range of ideas about how to put patient safety first and let doctors focus on practicing medicine."
Today, the White House followed up, announcing a $25 million demonstration project to help states and health care systems test models with the following goals: "Put patient safety first and work to reduce preventable injuries; foster better communication between doctors and their patients; ensure that patients are compensated in a fair and timely manner for medical injuries, while also reducing the incidence of frivolous lawsuits; and reduce liability premiums."
"This is an area we know we can do better," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told reporters today. "As many as 98,000 Americans die every year from medical errors. And though malpractice premiums themselves count for only a small percentage of total medical costs, many doctors report that they practice costly defensive medicine because they are fearful of lawsuits."
Tort reform has long been a goal of Republicans and doctors -- and long opposed by trial lawyers who are among the most generous donors to Democrats.
The trial lawyers association immediately weighed in with its concerns.
“Any changes to the malpractice system must focus on patient safety and preventable medical errors, not limiting patients’ legal rights," American Association for Justice President Anthony Tarricone said in a statement.
“The goals outlined by the White House – such as reducing the number of injuries, fostering better communication, compensating patients quicker, and reducing doctors’ premiums – move the debate in the right direction. However, 46 states have already enacted tort reform and health care costs continue to hurt the pocketbooks of American families. Because of these tort reforms, patients injured through no fault of their own are often unable to seek justice.
“It is critical that these demonstration projects preserve Americans’ 7th Amendment right to a trial by jury. The details matter significantly, but any efforts to limit patients’ rights are not acceptable. Promoting greater patient safety and reducing preventable medical errors are tenets doctors, attorneys, hospitals, and all Americans can support.”
UPDATE: "I don't think it's a silver bullet, but I want to explore the ideas," Obama told a health care rally today at the University of Maryland.
But Republicans are skeptical, to say the least.
"The half-trillion in Medicare cuts, the tax hikes, expansion of government health care and nearly a trillion dollars in spending—all real, all supported by the administration. But the 'bipartisan outreach” on medical liability reform is a “demonstration project?' Really?" Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell's office said in a statement.
"And looking over their proposal, it’s difficult to find any reference to any of the typical medical liability provisions, such as: limits on punitive damages, appropriate standards for awarding punitive damages, limits on non-economic damages, limits on attorneys’ fees, requirements for proportional or 'fair share' liability (no joint and several liability), reasonable statute of limitations."
Obama's proclamation on the initiative can be viewed here, and the White House background paper is below.
FULL ENTRYWhite House briefs on Afghanistan measurements
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Even as President Obama said today that he won't make a quick decision on an expected Pentagon request to send more US troops to Afghanistan, senior White House officials gave a long-awaited confidential briefing to members of Congress on the benchmarks that the administration intends to use to measure the success of the military mission there.
The metrics, which Obama promised in a high profile speech in March, were meant to send the message that the White House has narrowly tailored its objectives in Afghanistan to focus on terrorism. At the time, Obama announced that he was sending 21,000 more US troops, bringing the force to about 68,000 by year's end, and said he would demand measurable progress.
But some of the 40 or so lawmakers who attended today's briefing complained that the administration's benchmarks describe a far more open-ended commitment in Afghanistan.
"The stated goal is rhetorically narrowing the missions but it is anything but that," said Senator Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "There is no question in my mind based on the metrics that have been laid out that this is nation-building."
Senator Robert Casey Jr., a Pennsylvania Democrat who serves on the same committee, offered a more generous assessment, but said he, too is "not yet satisfied."
He also said the White House should make the metrics public as soon as possible. "They need to be out there," he said. "The American people need frequent reporting."
The list of 46 metrics, obtained by the Globe and first posted online by Foreign Policy, includes some obvious measures of success, such as the percentage of the population living under insurgent control and the capabilities and size of the Afghan national army. But the list also contained some nontraditional measures, such as support for human rights, the ability of the Afghan government to collect taxes, and the ability to hold credible elections.
Click here to see the metrics.
Baucus unveils health care bill
He doesn't have any Republican support, and many Democrats aren't all that thrilled, either. But Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus stuck to his deadline and this morning formally unveiled his plan to overhaul the nation's health care system.
The bill would cost about $856 billion over the next 10 years, require all individuals to purchase coverage or pay a fine, and ban insurers from charging more or denying coverage to people with health problems. It does not include the public option -- a government plan along the lines of Medicare -- but does call for nonprofit coops to compete with private insurers.
The bill would create a new exchange where consumers could compare and buy insurance plans. Medicaid, the government health care program for the poor, would be expanded.
Baucus would pay for the expansion of care with $507 billion in cuts to government health programs and $349 billion in new taxes and fees, including a new tax on generous insurance plans -- so-called Cadillac coverage -- and new fees on insurance companies and medical device manufacturers.
Click here to see "America's Healthy Future Act of 2009."
The Senate Finance bill is expected to be the vehicle for the proposals sought by the White House and described by President Obama in his speech to Congress last week.
"We will act and pass health reform legislation this year," Baucus declared as he promoted his bill in a Capitol Hill news conference this afternoon, saying that it would expand coverage, slow the rise in health care costs, and keep insurers honest.
"It follows the criteria laid out by President Obama," Baucus said, adding that the bill will eventually draw bipartisan support.
"This is a good bill, this is a balanced bill," Baucus said, calling it "a common-sense bill that can pass the Senate."
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs called the legislation an "important building block" that "gets us closer to comprehensive health care reform."
The legislation protects Medicare and preserves patients' right to keep their doctor, he continued, while keeping the deficit under control by offering the most generous coverage possible while keeping the price tag under Obama's target of $900 billion over 10 years.
Still, he acknowledged that there are "honest and principled differences" on the proposals and that his plan "may not represent all of our first choices."
UPDATE: The top House Republican wasn't buying the Baucus plan.
“It looks like the same kind of plan we’ve seen in House," said Representative John Boehner of Ohio. "It’s got a little different language, but it’s still a big government plan, it still calls for higher taxes and more spending and I don’t think it is going to get enough support to get very far in the United States Senate.”
Despite months of negotiations, however, Baucus was unable to get the three Republicans in the so-called Gang of Six to sign on. One of them, Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, bemoaned what he called an "artificial deadline."
"I’m disappointed because it looks like we’re being pushed aside by the Democratic leadership so the Senate can move forward on a bill that, up to this point, does not meet the shared goals for affordable, accessible health coverage that we set forth when this process began. In addition to concerns about costs to taxpayers and affordability for individuals, there are still some serious outstanding issues that have yet to be resolved like preventing taxpayer funding of abortion services and the enforcement against subsidies for illegal aliens," Grassley said in a statement.
"On top of all that, there’s no guarantee that a Finance Committee bill, even if it becomes bipartisan, will stay that way after it leaves the committee. An overriding issue for some time has been the fact that members of the Democratic leadership haven’t made a commitment to back a broad bipartisan bill through the entire process," added Grassley, who negotiated along with Republicans Mike Enzi of Wyoming and Olympia Snowe of Maine.
But in an op-ed published in today's Wall Street Journal, Baucus said he couldn't wait any longer.
"Health care is a complicated and deeply personal issue; it takes time and effort to get reform right. Legislating every piece of this puzzle would be impossible and counterproductive," he wrote. "What we can do is seize this opportunity to put America back on a fiscally sustainable path. The Senate Finance Committee proposal builds on what already works and fixes what threatens to break the bank for future generations."
Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina, the No. 3 Democrat in the House, said he considers the Baucus bill "a draft" for subsequent negotiation. He said on MSNBC that the House will pass a bill that offers more protections and more coverage -- and that would also be more expensive than the Senate bill, closer to $1 billion.
UPDATE: A key Democratic group criticized Baucus's plan, saying it "absolutely fails to meet the most basic health care needs of working families and it fails to meet the expectations we have set for our nation."
"It fails to put pressure on private insurers to control health care costs. There is no history or logic behind the claim that health care co-ops would provide real competition for the giant private insurers that have a stranglehold on health coverage today," AFL-CIO president John Sweeney said in a statement.
"If you're an individual who does not purchase private health coverage, it sticks you with a hefty tax penalty even though it fails to provide sufficient subsidies to make plans affordable for low and moderate income families. But if you're an irresponsible employer who does not provide coverage, you get off scot free," he continued.
"Outrageously, the plan imposes a 35 percent tax on high-cost health care plans without prohibiting insurers from passing on the tax to consumers who happen to be in groups that are older or sicker than average or live in high cost areas.
"The Senate Finance proposal, sadly, is little more than a throwback to the failed policies of the last three decades that advantaged corporations over taxpayers and bestowed special breaks on the wealthy while ignoring the middle class. The proposal does include the important insurance reform and health care delivery system improvements adopted by earlier congressional committees, and it builds on these by reforming the way we pay for health services to focus on the quality of services instead of the quantity. But the proposal's strong points are nowhere near sufficient to outweigh its problems. However well intentioned the attempts at bipartisanship, the final product reflects the bankrupt policies of the past more than the forward-looking policies needed to drive meaningful health care reform.
"We are counting on finance committee Democrats to fix the bill and side with working families, not insurance companies."
Obama says he wants to get it right on Afghanistan
President Obama signaled today that he won't make a quick decision on an expected Pentagon request to send more US troops to Afghanistan.
"My determination is to get this right," Obama said after meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, whose country is part of the coalition fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Obama has already sent 21,000 more US troops, bringing the force to about 65,000 by year's end. But the top US commander in Afghanistan is expected to formally seek more reinforcements, and the nation's top military officer told a Senate committee yesterday he will support that request.
But several key Democrats in Congress have said in recent days that they are very wary of sending more troops.
"When I came in, I had to make a series of immediate decisions about sending additional troops to ensure that the election could take place during the fighting season. But I was crystal clear at the time that post-election we were going to need to do an additional assessment," Obama told reporters.
"General McChrystal has carried out his own assessment on the military's strategy, but it's important that we also do an assessment on the civilian side, the diplomatic side, the development side, that we analyze the results of the election, and then make further decisions moving forward."
And if there were any doubt, Obama went on, "I just want to be absolutely clear, because there's a lot -- been a lot of discussion in the press about this, that there is no immediate decision pending on resources.
"Because one of the things that I'm absolutely clear about is you have to get the strategy right and then make the determinations about resources. You don't make determinations about resources, and certainly you don't make determinations about sending young men and women into battle, without having absolute clarity about what the strategy's going to be."
The president also said he was "extremely grateful" to the Canadian armed forces for fighting with staying power and suffering losses.
While welcoming the additional US presence, Harper said he was concerned by the strength of the insurgency.
(Their full remarks are below.)
UPDATE: Senator John F. Kerry, presiding over a hearing today on Afghanistan, voiced the concerns of many Democrats.
"Frankly, I am concerned by where we are today in Afghanistan -- about the rising number of casualties among our troops and those of our allies, about the deeply flawed presidential voting that took place, about the impunity with which drug traffickers operate, and about the rampant corruption undermining the faith of Afghans in their government and ours," he said at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing.
"And most of all, I am concerned because at the very moment when our troops and our allies’ troops are sacrificing more and more, our plan, our path and our progress seem to be growing less and less clear."
(His full prepared remarks are below.)
FULL ENTRYLaptops as counterinsurgency tool
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- The One Laptop Per Child Foundation, the Cambridge-based computer company, is now billing itself as a tool in the counter-insurgency campaign against Islamic extremists in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Today on Capitol Hill, its founder, Nicholas Negroponte, is appearing with the ambassadors of both Afghanistan and Pakistan to the United States and with Senator John McCain to make a pitch for spreading the low-cost, child-friendly computers across the Pashtun belt. (Click here
to see the flier.)
In the past, the foundation was best known for its efforts in Africa as it works with governments of developing countries to bring laptops to poor schoolchildren. Negroponte originally aimed for $100 computers, but last year had to raise its price to more than $200 because of rising costs.
Solomont, White move closer to ambassadorships
By Stephanie Vallejo, Globe correspondent
WASHINGTON -- President Obama's nominees for ambassador to Spain and Norway -- Massachusetts residents Alan Solomont and Barry B. White -- touted their commitment to public service and leadership before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today as they moved a step closer to confirmation.
Democratic fund-raiser Alan Solomont of Weston, nominated as the chief US envoy to Spain, highlighted his roots in community organizing and his experience as the chairman of the Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service, which oversees national service programs.
“I am grateful to have served at a time when support for national and community service has never been greater,” Solomont testified at the confirmation hearing presided over by Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire. “I hope to showcase this important American tradition at embassy Madrid.”
White, the nominee for envoy to Norway and an executive board member of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce and director of the Massachusetts Alliance for International Business, noted his work as chair of Lex Mundi, an association of independent law firms, in developing its pro bono foundation serving social entrepreneurs worldwide.
White also spoke of Norway’s role in promoting human rights and democracy internationally, its healthy trade relationship with the United States, and its potential as a partner in energy and environmental matters.
Obama vows to help workers
President Obama is in union country today to talk up his economic agenda, and get in a plug for his health plan as well.
In a campaign-style speech this morning at the GM plant in Lordstown, Ohio, Obama vowed to stand up for working people who helped put him in office.
He acknowledged the long-running economic crisis in the industrial Midwest, but said he's not willing to accept it.
"There are some who see this pain and suggest that it's all somehow inevitable -- that the only way for America to get ahead is for communities like yours to be left behind. But I know better. We know better," Obama said. "We know that our success on a nation depends on the success of communities just like this one. We know that the battle for America's future is not just going to be won in the big cities, not just on the coasts, but in towns like Elkhart, Indiana, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Warren, Ohio, and Youngstown.
"You deserve better than the attitude that's prevailed from Washington to Wall Street to Detroit for too long; an attitude that valued wealth over work, selfishness over sacrifice, and greed over responsibility. And that's why I want you to know that every day I step into the Oval Office, I am thinking about you, I am working for you, and I am fighting on your behalf," he added.
Obama said his administration has already been doing so, with the government support for GM and other automakers, the cash-for-clunkers program, and the push for more fuel-efficient vehicles.
"There's little debate that the decisions we've made and the steps we've taken have helped stop our economic freefall. In some places, they've helped us turn the corner. Home sales are up, business investment is starting to stabilize, for the first time in 18 months, we are actually seeing growth in American manufacturing instead of decline. I know that's small consolation when so many people you know are still out of work. It's going to take some time to achieve a complete recovery. But I want you to know: I will not rest until anyone looking for a job can find one - and I'm not talking about just any job; but good jobs that give every family decent wages, decent benefits, and a fair shot at the American Dream. That's what I'm fighting for every day," Obama said.
"And yes, just in case you were wondering, we are fighting for an America where no American should have to worry about going without health insurance or fear that one illness could cost them everything. We're going to reform the system to provide more security and stability to those of you who have health insurance; we're going to offer quality, affordable choices to those who currently don't have health insurance; and bring health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government under control."
(His full remarks are below.)
UPDATE: This afternoon, Obama was greeted with rapturous applause and cheers at the AFL-CIO national convention in Pittsburgh.
"You guys are making me blush," the president said. "The White House is pretty nice, but there's nothing like being back in the house of labor."
Obama paid tribute to outgoing AFL-CIO president John Sweeney and incoming chief Richard Trumka and said that being with union members reminds him of what's important in Washington and why he ran for president.
He wants to help working families reach the American dream, he said, telling of a union member choking up when talking about not being able to afford health coverage for his wife.
"When our middle class succeeds, that's when the United States of America succeeds," he declared.
He won some of his biggest applause when he expressed support for labor's biggest legislative priority -- a bill that would make it easier for workers to organize.
The bill is vehemently opposed by business groups and Republicans, and has languished in Congress. Labor leaders have hinted that they would accept a compromise that would force quicker elections, rather than the original bill that would remove the requirement for secret union elections.
He also gave an impassioned pitch for his health care overhaul, saying that union members know well that many families are one medical emergency away from financial ruin and need coverage that they can count on.
"How much longer do we have to wait?" Obama asked. "We can't wait."
"We can't wait!" the crowd chanted in reply.
(His full remarks to the AFL-CIO are below.)
Big labor was a big reason why Obama won the presidency, and the Republican National Committee sent out a research paper suggesting that he's still beholden to unions with policies that will damage the US economy.
Military chief grilled on Afghanistan
The nation's top military officer, seeking another term in the job, will face some tough questions on Afghanistan before the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is preaching patience, telling the Globe recently that it will take 12 months to 18 months to turn around the mission after it received short shrift during the war in Iraq.
But patience appears to be running out in Congress and in the public as the US death toll rises eight years into the war.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Armed Services chairman Carl Levin both made highly public statements last week to express deep skepticism about an expected request to send more US troops, beyond the 21,000 that President Obama has already dispatched.
A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released this morning found public support for the war at its lowest point. In the survey, conducted Friday through Sunday, 39 percent of respondents said they favor the war and 58 percent said they oppose it.
As recently as May, a majority supported the war in the CNN poll. But July and August were each the bloodiest of the war for US forces.
UPDATE: Mullen told the committee that winning in Afghanistan "probably means more forces," though he said he does not know how many troops the top military commander in the country will seek.
"It's very clear to me that we will need more resources," to carry out the new counterinsurgency strategy, Mullen said, according to the Associated Press.
Liberals not giving up on public option
The much fought-over public option -- a government-run plan along the lines of Medicare that would be widely available -- is looking less likely as part of a sweeping health care overhaul.
But a liberal group is not giving up.
Health Care for America Now launched a new ad airing on national cable today slamming insurers for getting rich by jacking up premiums and denying treatment and overpaying CEOS -- and urging supporters to tell Congress that a public plan is the only way to keep insurance companies in check.
"If the insurance companies win, you lose," the announcer says.
President Obama has been walking a thin line on the public option, trying to reassure his allies that it is his preference, but also bowing to political reality by suggesting it's not a deal-breaker. In a Washington Post/ABC News poll published Monday, support for a health care overhaul rose significantly if a public option was deleted.
A public option is not in the plan that Senate Finance chairman Max Baucus is putting together -- and that is likely to be the vehicle for Obama's plan in Congress.
Also today, a faith-based coalition that is helping Obama make the "moral" case for health reform -- he spoke to them in a webcast last month -- is urging its members to call their members of Congress today. And on Wednesday, clergy, advocates, and others will lobby lawmakers personally.
In recent weeks, the coalition said, "the faith community demonstrated widespread support for affordable quality health care for all — 300,000 people listened to the August 19th health care web-cast and call-in with faith leaders and President Obama, clergy in congregations across the country preached about health care reform and called for a civil and honest debate, and the faith community held large public events to build support for affordable health reform nationwide."
Kerry joins skepticism on Afghan troop increase
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- After a string of high-profile skepticism from Democrats in Congress about the war in Afghanistan, Senator John F. Kerry will also express concern in an interview airing Tuesday on PBS and in hearings he will preside over on Wednesday ("Countering the Threat of Failure") and Thursday ("Exploring Three Strategies for Afghanistan") as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Key Democrats have done their best to preempt any potential request for more troops from Obama. At a press conference on Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she did not believe there was much support for sending more troops. In a floor speech on Friday, Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Carl Levin said he wants to see an increase in Afghanistan's armed forces before committing more US troops.
Tuesday on "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer," Kerry will express his own "long-standing concerns" about whether the current military footprint in Afghanistan is the best way to achieve US goals, according to Kerry communications director Frederick Jones.
But Jones said that Kerry, who first made his name opposing the Vietnam war, will "reserve final judgment on troop levels and our policy writ large until he hears from the administration and military leaders."
Public still divided on health care
A liberal-labor coalition is up with a new TV ad arguing that opposition President Obama's health care overhaul could cost members of Congress at the polls next November.
The spot from Americans United for Change shows a political consultant apologizing to a losing candidate at 11:03 p.m. on Election Day, Nov. 2, 2010.
"Congressman as your political consultant," he says to the camera. "I’m sorry you lost. I was wrong. Turned out the voters hated the stranglehold the insurance companies have on health care, raising premiums, cutting off people with pre-existing conditions, making health care decisions instead of doctors. And they didn’t much like the millionaire insurance CEO’s you were hanging with either. Guess your vote against health insurance reform turned out to be bad politics.”
But a new poll shows why some lawmakers are so skittish about jumping aboard the Obama health care bandwagon.
The Washington Post-ABC News survey published today found that while opposition has eased somewhat since the August town halls, Obama still faces deep skepticism about key elements of the Democratic plan.
In the poll, 48 percent oppose the proposals, while 46 percent favor them, and 48 percent of respondents approve Obama's handling of the issue, while 48 percent disapprove.
The public is also evenly divided -- 51 percent in favor, 47 percent against -- on whether people should be required to have health insurance.
UPDATE: A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released this afternoon also showed the public still largely divided on Obama's health care plan: 51 percent said they favored it and 46 percent opposed it, a slight improvement for the president from 48 percent in favor and 51 percent against in late August.
The survey also showed an uptick in how Americans view Obama's handling of the issue to 51 percent approval and in his overall job performance to 58 percent approval.
The CNN survey, conducted Friday through Sunday, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Obama calls for new financial regulations
Speaking one year to the day from when the collapse of Lehman Brothers threatened the entire US financial system, President Obama declared today that it's time for the federal government to extract itself from rescue efforts.
But he also asserted that to prevent a similar meltdown, the government needs to impose stricter and more sweeping regulations.
He started what the White House billed as a "major" speech by reminding Americans how close the economy came to the brink.
"This was no longer just a financial crisis; it had become a full-blown economic crisis, with home prices sinking, businesses struggling to access affordable credit, and the economy shedding an average of 700,000 jobs each month," Obama said.
Thanks to the government support to Wall Street, the loosening of credit, and the $787 billion economic stimulus package, the economy is on the road to recovery, the president said.
"Eight months later, the work of recovery continues. And though I will never be satisfied while people are out of work and our financial system is weakened, we can be confident that the storms of the past two years are beginning to break," Obama said.
"In fact, while there continues to be a need for government involvement to stabilize the financial system, that necessity is waning," he added. "After months in which public dollars were flowing into our financial system, we are finally beginning to see money flowing back to taxpayers. This doesn’t mean taxpayers will escape the worst financial crisis in decades entirely unscathed....While full recovery of the financial system will take a great deal more time and work, the growing stability resulting from these interventions means we are beginning to return to normalcy."
"But here's what I want to emphasize is this: normalcy cannot lead to complacency," Obama argued.
And that means new and improved regulation -- what he called "the most ambitious overhaul of the financial system since the Great Depression" -- that includes a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency to enforce new rules safeguarding the public and an oversight council to bring together regulators from across markets so problems don't slip through the cracks.
His audience at Federal Hall in the heart of New York's financial district included Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, the president's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, leaders of consumer advocacy groups, Wall Street CEOs, and members of Congress, including Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, who with Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut is shepherding financial regulatory reform.
"We will not go back to the days of reckless behavior and unchecked excess that was at the heart of this crisis, where too many were motivated only by the appetite for quick kills and bloated bonuses," Obama vowed. "Those on Wall Street cannot resume taking risks without regard for consequences, and expect that next time, American taxpayers will be there to break their fall."
The president said he believes in free markets and wanted to work with the financial industry to come up with the regulations. But he also said the firms receiving help owe a debt to American taxpayers and that those who oppose government intervention do so at their own peril.
"I certainly did not run for president to bail out banks or intervene in the capital markets," he said. "But it is important to note that the very absence of common-sense regulations able to keep up with a fast-paced financial sector is what created the need for that extraordinary intervention. The lack of sensible rules of the road, so often opposed by those who claim to speak for the free market, led to a rescue far more intrusive than anything any of us, Democrat or Republican, progressive or conservative, would have proposed or predicted," he said.
"What took place one year ago was not merely a failure of regulation or legislation; it wasn't just a failure of oversight or foresight. It was also a failure of responsibility -- it was fundamentally a failure of responsibility -- that allowed Washington to become a place where problems – including structural problems in our financial system – were ignored rather than solved," he chided. "It was a failure of responsibility that led homebuyers and derivative traders alike to take reckless risks they couldn’t afford. It was a collective failure of responsibility in Washington, on Wall Street, and across America that led to the near-collapse of our financial system one year ago....
"One year ago, we saw in stark relief how markets can spin out of control; how a lack of common-sense rules can lead to excess and abuse; how close we can come to the brink. One year later, it is incumbent upon us to put in place those reforms that will prevent this kind of crisis from ever happening again; reflecting the painful but important lessons that we’ve learned; and that will help us move from a period of recklessness and one of crisis to one of responsibility and prosperity. That is what we must do. And I’m confident that is what we will do."
(His full remarks are below.)
Republicans immediately warned against a bigger government role in the markets, saying that taxpayers will ultimately pay.
“For the average American, the best measure of the economy is whether or not they have a job so they can pay the mortgage, make the car payment and put food on the table. For more than 3 million Americans who have lost their jobs this year, the president’s policies have been a failure," Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele said in a statement.
"His $787 billion stimulus bill has led to wasteful spending but hasn’t created the jobs he promised. And every time he has wanted to expand the government’s influence over the economy and our daily lives, from his takeover of GM and banks to his proposed government-run takeover of our health care, it has meant spending more money we don’t have and digging America deeper into debt. Those are the real results of the president’s experiments on our economy, and no amount of speeches will convince the American people otherwise.”
The top House Republican, Representative John Boehner of Ohio, faulted Obama for not saying more clearly how taxpayers will be taken off the hook for the financial bailouts.
"Missing from the President’s remarks today was a clear exit strategy for the federal government’s involvement in the private sector. American taxpayers have had enough of open-ended bailouts that have left them stuck with an eye-popping tab in the form of trillions in new debt. This generational theft must end. If the President wants to restore consumer and investor confidence, he should work with Republicans in Congress to craft policies that help hard-working families and small businesses weather this storm and get back to creating good-paying jobs," Boehner said in a statement.
“With consumer spending just about frozen and unemployment near double-digit levels, the last thing we need are new layers of bureaucracy and burdensome regulations that restrict access to financial products and discourage economic growth. House Republicans have delivered a to reform our financial system smartly by bolstering anti-fraud protection efforts, streamlining the hodgepodge of confusing federal agencies, and strengthening transparency and accountability so that consumers can make informed choices. We hope Democrats will work with us on responsible solutions as Congress moves forward on this issue.”
President warns of more uninsured -- without health overhaul
President Obama points today to a new Treasury report to warn that many Americans could face the loss of health insurance -- a plight that could be prevented with his health care overhaul plan.
In his weekly radio and Internet address, Obama says he's continued to hear from worried Americans since his speech to Congress on Wednesday night -- and for good reason since during the last year of economic turmoil, "nearly six million more Americans lost their health coverage – that’s 17,000 men and women every single day.
"We’re not just talking about Americans in poverty, either – we’re talking about middle-class Americans. In other words, it can happen to anyone," says Obama. "And based on a brand-new report from the Treasury Department, we can expect that about half of all Americans under 65 will lose their health coverage at some point over the next ten years. If you’re under the age of 21 today, chances are more than half that you’ll find yourself uninsured at some point in that time. And more than one-third of Americans will go without coverage for longer than one year."
(Click here to read the report.)
"I refuse to allow that future to happen," declares the president, who holds a health care rally later today in Minneapolis. "In the United States of America, no one should have to worry that they’ll go without health insurance – not for one year, not for one month, not for one day. And once I sign my health reform plan into law – they won’t."
Obama then runs down his plan, and vows again to get a bill passed this year.
"Affordable, quality care within reach for the tens of millions of Americans who don’t have it today. Stability and security for the hundreds of millions who do. That’s the reform we seek," he says.
"We have had a long and important debate. But now is the time for action. Because every day we wait, more Americans will lose their health care, their businesses, and their homes – but also the dreams they’ve worked for and the peace of mind they deserve. They are why we have to succeed."
Click here to watch the address. The full remarks are below:
Obama takes health care pitch on road
Fresh off his health care speech to Congress that polls suggest reassured the public and that reenergized some fellow Democrats, President Obama takes his health care pitch on the road.
Saturday, he will hold a rally at the Target Center in Minneapolis. On Tuesday, he will speak in Pittsburgh to the convention of the AFL-CIO, one of his biggest backers on health care. And on Thursday, Obama will hold another health care rally in College Park, Md., the White House announced this evening.
When he arrives in Minneapolis, he will be greeted by a TV ad from the Minnesota GOP.
The spot shows Obama vowing to "change the world" at a campaign rally last year in the same arena -- before the announcer says he is proposing a "risky" health care plan, citing news reports to assert that Obama's plan would cut Medicare, ration care, raise taxes, and explode the federal deficit.
"Mr. President, let's slow down and do health care reform the right way," the announcer says.
The bipartisan "Gang of Six" -- three Democrats and three Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee -- are trying to reach a compromise by early next week.
The Senate Finance bill appears to be the most likely legislative vehicle for the blueprint Obama laid out to Congress on Wednesday night. Chairman Max Baucus's plan dovetails with Obama's on most major issues and has the same general cost of $900 billion over 10 years, while bills passed by House Democrats include measures the president has not embraced.
Steele questions Obama's use of Kennedy letter
Republican Party chief Michael Steele is raising eyebrows again -- this time for questioning President Obama's use in his health care speech of a letter the president received from the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
Making it public for the first time, Obama quoted from it near the end of his speech Wednesday night to urge lawmakers pass health care as a moral issue that showed the country's character.
But Steele called it a "political tool."
Questioned this afternoon on CNN about that characterization, Steele backtracked a little.
"I'm not slamming the president on this," he said. "I just thought something like that was so personal in many respects, and particularly so soon after the senator's death -- I just didn't think it was the right time to reveal that or have that conversation or to say it. That was all. It was just an opinion."
Acknowledging that Kennedy might have wanted the letter read publicly since he championed health care reform, Steele added, "Be that as it may, the reality of it is, that to me is more of a diversion and a distraction from the underlying speech itself. Which, in my view, the president, I think, missed an opportunity to clearly define in a common-sense, straightforward way, exactly how we should go about the business of reforming those aspects of our health care system that we have particular problems with."
Democratic Congressional Campaign Chairman Chris Van Hollen blasted Steele.
“Last night, President Obama called on us to replace acrimony with civility, yet Republican Chairman Steele’s outlandish comments only serve to increase the acrimony and deny the American people the substantive debate on health insurance reform that this critical challenge merits," Van Hollen said in a statement.
“The late Senator Kennedy devoted his life to reforming health care in America and he would have been proud of President Obama’s eloquent call for action last night. Michael Steele’s time would be better spent condemning Congressman Joe Wilson’s outrageous outburst, rather than further poisoning the political discourse by attacking the heartfelt intentions of a dedicated American who spent his life working on health care reform.”
David Axelrod, a senior adviser to Obama, told the Globe Wednesday night that Kennedy's widow had informed the White House of the letter that the senator wanted delivered after his death and that Obama was so moved by it that he wrote the closing part of the speech mentioning it himself.
Senate pays another tribute to Kennedy
By Joseph Williams, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Senators from both parties spent more than five hours today paying bittersweet tribute to Senator Edward M. Kennedy, recalling their late colleague as the chamber's generous elder statesman, a passionate liberal, and a fierce, well-schooled politician who never shied away from a tough political fight.
But when the legislative skirmishing was over, his fellow senators recalled, Kennedy never held a grudge and knew the difference between a political adversary and an enemy. And, they noted, he had nearly as many close friends among Republicans as he did among his Democratic allies.
A day after President Obama invoked Kennedy's memory in a forceful address on health care to a highly-charged joint session of Congress, however, some tributes to Kennedy were tinged with politics.
Several Democrats echoed the call to fulfill Kennedy's vision of accessible, affordable healthcare, while Republicans mourned him as perhaps the last Democrat willing to negotiate with them in good faith on difficult legislation.
Still, nearly all lionized a man they described as a one-of-a-kind lawmaker, a Senate legend whose good humor, leadership, selflessness, and encyclopedic knowledge of the chamber in which he served for nearly a half-century may never be replaced.
"The impact he etched into our history will long endure," Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said. "The liberal lion's mighty roar may now fall on deaf ears, but his dream shall never die."
In his tribute, Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut proposed that the caucus room in the Russell Senate Office Building -- just down the hall from Kennedy's office -- be renamed in honor of the Kennedy brothers. The historic room was host to the Watergate hearings and more recently where the Senate health committee, which Kennedy chaired, wrote the health care bill in his absence; it's also where both John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy announced their presidential candidacies.
"This was Teddy's wish and desire. I asked him,'' Dodd said on the Senate floor. "He said, 'I'd like you to recognize my brothers as well.' ''
Kennedy, 77, died Aug. 25 after a 15-month battle with brain cancer. He is buried in Arlington National Cemetery beside his two slain brothers.
The heartfelt, at times emotional tributes began shortly after 9:30 a.m. and were scheduled to end two hours later, but the session was extended to 2:30 p.m. so more colleagues could speak. By the end of the day, 23 Democrats and 10 Republicans had taken the floor to hail Kennedy, representing the ideological spectrum that Kennedy had often bridged since taking office in 1962.
Senator Jeff Sessions -- a conservative Republican from Alabama whose nomination to the federal bench Kennedy helped scuttle in 1986 -- paid tribute to Kennedy's passion for civil rights. Senator Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, recalled Kennedy got a hero's welcome during a layover in Ireland on an overseas Senate trip, and Irish passers-by followed him through the airport like the Pied Piper. A frail Senator Robert Byrd, a West Virginia Democrat who at nearly 92 is the longest-serving member, eulogized his good friend with a reading from a book of poetry the late senator gave him years ago.
After hailing Kennedy as a civil rights champion who changed history and "touched lives," Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat, walked to Kennedy's desk, draped with a black velvet shroud, a vase of white flowers and a copy of his favorite poem, "The Road Less Traveled." Levin stood at Kennedy's chair, bowed his head for several moments and left the chamber.
Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa, a Democrat, recalled a loud shouting match with Kennedy, their apology, and a quip the late senator made to a worried aide afterward: "That's just the way two Irishmen celebrate St. Patrick's Day."
Republican Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee remembered his freshman term, when Kennedy offered to find sponsors for Alexander's very first bill. Senator Barbara Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat, said she donned a Jackie Onassis costume for one of Kennedy's renowned costume parties, then asked him if she could pass for his late sister-in-law.
"He said, 'Nice try,' " Mikulski said.
Senator Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican and a close friend, said Kennedy was skilled in political infighting, and knew how to use his bluster and booming voice to good effect to pass a bill. But "he had a sixth sense of when the time was right" for a compromise in the best interests of the nation.
"He was almost always effective, but rarely very quiet," Hatch said. "There were always adversaries, never enemies."
In Kennedy's memory, Hatch said, "I hope that more of us adopt his approach to the legislative process."
Susan Milligan of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Obama continues health care offensive
Following up his more assertive pitch Wednesday night for a sweeping health care bill, President Obama focused this morning on insurance fixes, saying Americans live "at the whims" of insurance companies.
"I will not allow reform to be imperiled or postponed," he told members of the American Nurses Association. "We've talked this issue to death."
Obama cited new Census figures out today that the number of uninsured Americans rose slightly to 46.3 million last year and said that surveys shows that 6 million have joined the ranks of the uninsured during the economic recession.
Then saying, "just in case people weren't tuned in last night," he did a quick rundown of the changes he wants to prevent insurers from denying coverage for preexisting conditions and other changes.
A nonpartisan Massachusetts research group noted this afternoon that the Census estimates showed that Massachusetts had the lowest percentage of uninsured, about 5.4 percent, compared to about 15 percent nationally.
MassBudget credited the state's landmark health care law, which mandated that indivdiduals get coverage and offered state help for those who couldn't afford it. It noted that when the health reform legislation took effect in April 2006, about 9.8 percent of the commonwealth's population did not have health insurance.
Many of the proposals that Obama supports are modeled, at least in part, on the Massachusetts law.
Obama also praised America's nurses for their compassion and skill, noting their care for his daughters Malia and Sasha and for his mother and grandmother in their final days. "I love nurses," he said. "You're the bedrock of our medical profession."
(His full remarks are below.)
He also plans a series of rallies across the country, starting Saturday in Minneapolis, to put more pressure on Congress.
Vice President Joe Biden, making the rounds of morning new shows, predicted that the bill will be done by Thanksgiving, thanks to an emerging bipartisan consensus and the impact of Obama's speech to Congress.
The president "re-centered" the debate and "also debunked a lot of the myths out there, the idea of death panels, that we were going to insure undocumented aliens," Biden said.
Republicans remain unimpressed and unmoved.
“We appreciated having the President here last night. Unfortunately, what the American people got wasn’t a new health care plan, it was just another lecture. He had a chance to really put the government-run plan to bed, but unfortunately he didn’t do it. … When it’s all said and done; when you listen to the President’s speech and thought about it, there was nothing new in the President’s speech last night,” said Representative John Boehner, the top House Republican.
At a Capitol Hill news conference this afternoon, Boehner disputed some of Obama's key assertions. He told reporters that the Democratic bill could force people to change their insurance plans, could offer access to illegal immigrants, and could slash Medicare benefits.
And, Boehner asserted, Americans are angry and worried about sweeping changes to their health care.
Congress, he said, can find "common ground on sensible changes" to the existing system.
UPDATE: Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele followed up this afternoon with an email to supporters urging them to send a "Declaration of Independence" electronic postcard to Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress.
"Once again, President Obama stepped in front of the prime time TV cameras to attempt to sell the Democrats' leftist health care scheme to legislators and anyone else who might still be paying attention," Steele wrote in the fund-raising solicitation. "The charm offensive isn't working. Americans no longer feel the need to give Barack Obama the benefit of the doubt.
"They have seen through the hype and media adoration to understand that the Obama Democrats are determined to push their far-left agenda on our country whether the American people like it or not," Steele added.
"You can feel the rising mood of freedom-loving Americans across this country. Not afraid, but incensed and determined, that their government not be a menace to our hard-earned liberty and prosperity. They are extremely concerned that the President and his congressional allies are launching an unprecedented assault against the principles upon which America was built."
Obama accepts Wilson apology
President Obama is willing to let bygones be bygones, and so is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
But at least one member of Congress wants Representative Joe Wilson censured for yelling at the president "You lie!" during his health care speech Wednesday night.
Wilson, a South Carolina Republican, quickly apologized for his outburst, which stunned colleagues, prompted boos from some Democrats, and caused Obama to respond by saying "It's not true."
"This evening I let my emotions get the best of me," he said in a statement. "While I disagree with the president's statement, my comments were inappropriate and regrettable. I extend sincere apologies to the president for this lack of civility."
But Wilson stood by the subject for his shout, which he described today as "spontaneous" -- the assertion that illegal immigrants could benefit from the health care overhaul.
Even so, Obama told reporters today that he accepted Wilson's apology.
"Yes, I do," he said after a cabinet meeting. "I'm a big believer that we all make mistakes. He apologized quickly and without equivocation, and I'm appreciative of that.
"I do think that, as I said last night, we have to get to the point where we can have a conversation about big, important issues that matter to the American people without vitriol, without name-calling, without the assumption of the worst in other people's motives.
"We are all Americans; we all want to do best for our country," Obama added. We've got different ideas, but for the most part, we have the same aims, which is to make sure that people who work hard in this country and who act responsibly are able to get good jobs, good wages, raise their families, make sure those kids have a good education; that they are protected from misfortune or accident by having health care and retirement security in place....Our goals are generally the same, whether we're Democrats or Republicans, and in fact, most Americans don't even think about those labels all that much. They are turned off when they see people using wild accusations, false claims, name-calling, sharply ideological approaches to solve problems. They want pragmatism; they want people to stay focused on the job. And I hope that some of the fever breaks a little bit."
Pelosi also told reporters that she's not interested in sanctioning Wilson. "As far as I'm concerned, the episode was unfortunate. Mr. Wilson has apologized. It's time for us to talk about health care and not Mr. Wilson," she said today.
But according to the Washington Post, Senator Arlen Specter, the Republican-turned-Democrat from Pennsylvania, tweeted, "Rep. Wilson apologized immediately afterward but I don't think that's adequate. There ought to be a reprimand or censure of Rep. Joe Wilson to discourage that kind of conduct in the future."
White House economists: 1 million-plus jobs saved or created by stimulus
President Obama's economists asserted today that the economic stimulus package he championed had created or saved "slightly more" than 1 million jobs so far.
The White House Council on Economic Advisers said that the $787 billion stimulus bill has had "particularly strong effects in manufacturing, construction, retail trade, and temporary employment services." While the benefits have been spread across the country, states most hurt by the recession have been helped most, it said.
The council also said that about $151 billion has been spent so far, and that the stimulus added 2.3 percentages to the real growth of the economy during the second quarter. (Click here to read the report.)
The council's first quarterly report to Congress on the stimulus represents the latest salvo in the war of statistics on the $787 billion stimulus bill.
Obama promised it would create or save 3.5 million jobs by the end of next year. But critics have questioned the figures as far too rosy and said that it is extremely difficult to determine whether a job has been "saved."
The administration has acknowledged that the recession was deeper than it believed when it pushed Congress to pass the plan in January. Unemployment is still hovering near 10 percent nationally, and the Labor Department reported last week that since the recession began in December 2007, the jobless rolls grew by 7.4 million Americans.
Republicans kept up their stimulus skepticism in response to the council's report.
“Today’s White House jobs report is one more example of this administration’s use of smoke and mirrors to mask the failure of the Democrats’ costly $787 billion stimulus bill," Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said in a statement.
"The reality for countless Americans whose jobs have not been ‘saved’ is they get to join the ranks of the three million neighbors, friends and family members who have become unemployed since President Obama took office," he added. "We have watched the unemployment rate increase to 9.7 percent and seen more than 216,000 workers lose their jobs in the past 30 days. The president’s economic stimulus experiment clearly isn’t working as promised. Another report to claim phantom jobs have been ‘saved or created’ won’t convince people otherwise.”
Obama: 'Time for bickering is over'
President Obama tried tonight to thread the proverbial political needle on health care: keep enough liberals on board to pass a bill, reach out to moderates and even some Republicans -- and all the while convince an increasingly skeptical public that an overhaul would make their medical care better and less expensive, not worse and more costly.
Delivering a nationally televised, high-stakes speech on his top domestic priority to a joint session of Congress, Obama laid down his markers for what he wants in a bill and to say he will accept ideas from Republicans as well as Democrats -- as long as a bill gets done.
"I am not the first president to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last," he said, drawing a standing ovation from lawmakers.
"Our collective failure to meet this challenge – year after year, decade after decade – has led us to a breaking point," he added. "Everyone understands the extraordinary hardships that are placed on the uninsured, who live every day just one accident or illness away from bankruptcy. These are not primarily people on welfare. These are middle-class Americans. Some can’t get insurance on the job. Others are self-employed, and can’t afford it, since buying insurance on your own costs you three times as much as the coverage you get from your employer. Many other Americans who are willing and able to pay are still denied insurance due to previous illnesses or conditions that insurance companies decide are too risky or expensive to cover. We are the only democracy, the only advanced democracy on Earth -- the only wealthy nation -- that allows such hardships for millions of its people."
"The time for bickering is over," Obama declared. "The time for games has passed. Now is the season for action. Now is when we must bring the best ideas of both parties together, and show the American people that we can still do what we were sent here to do. Now is the time to deliver on health care."
"The plan I’m announcing tonight would meet three basic goals: It will provide more security and stability to those who have health insurance. It will provide insurance to those who don’t. And it will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government. It’s a plan that asks everyone to take responsibility for meeting this challenge – not just government and insurance companies, but everybody, including employers and individuals. And it’s a plan that incorporates ideas from senators and congressmen; from Democrats and Republicans – and yes, from some of my opponents in both the primary and general election."
Obama repeated his proposals to ban insurers from denying coverage based on preexisting conditions, to limit out of pocket expenses, and to require insurance companies to cover routine checkups. He also calls for a new exchange where individuals and small businesses can buy affordable coverage.
Obama disputed "bogus claims" by those trying to kill reform that there would be "death panels" of bureaucrats who would decide end-of-life care, that illegal immigrants would receive benefits, and there would be a government takeover of health care.
On one of the most controversial issues -- the so-called public option, a government-run plan along the lines of Medicare, Obama said it was only one part of his plan and "only a means" to the end of creating needed competition to private insurers to hold down costs and improve policies -- "and we should remain open to other ideas that accomplish our ultimate goal."
"Let me be clear – it would only be an option for those who don’t have insurance. No one would be forced to choose it; it would not impact those of you who already have insurance," he said.
Trying to appeal to Republicans, he said while he does not believe that medical malpractice reform is "a silver bullet," "I have talked to enough doctors to know that defensive medicine may be contributing to unnecessary costs" and he's willing to "move forward on a range of ideas about how to put patient safety first and let doctors focus on practicing medicine."
While he said he'll work toward a bipartisan deal, Obama also warned that his patience has a limit.
"I will not waste time with those who have made the calculation that it’s better politics to kill this plan than improve it," he said. "I won't stand by while the special interests use the same old tactics to keep things exactly the way they are. If you misrepresent what's in this plan, we will call you out. And I will not accept the status quo as a solution. Not this time. Not now.
"Everyone in this room knows what will happen if we do nothing. Our deficit will grow. More families will go bankrupt. More businesses will close. More Americans will lose their coverage when they are sick and need it most. And more will die as a result. We know these things to be true. That is why we cannot fail. Because there are too many Americans counting on us to succeed – the ones who suffer silently, and the ones who shared their stories with us at town halls, in emails, and in letters."
Obama called on Edward M. Kennedy's legacy and memory as part of his call to action on health care, especially for bipartisan cooperation for the greater American good.
He said one of the letters he had received recently was from Kennedy, in which the late senator "expressed confidence that this would be the year that health care reform – 'that great unfinished business of our society,' would finally pass. He repeated the truth that health care is decisive for our future prosperity, but he also reminded me that 'it concerns more than material things.' 'What we face,' he wrote, 'is above all a moral issue; at stake are not just the details of policy, but fundamental principles of social justice and the character of our country.' ”
"I’ve thought about that phrase quite a bit in recent days – the character of our country," Obama said.
"On issues like these, Ted Kennedy’s passion was born not of some rigid ideology, but of his own experience. It was the experience of having two children stricken with cancer. He never forgot the sheer terror and helplessness that any parent feels when a child is badly sick; and he was able to imagine what it must be like for those without insurance; what it would be like to have to say to a wife or a child or an aging parent – there is something that could make you better, but I just can’t afford it.
"That large-heartedness -- that concern and regard for the plight of others -- is not a partisan feeling. It is not a Republican or a Democratic feeling. It, too, is part of the American character. Our ability to stand in other people’s shoes. A recognition that we are all in this together; that when fortune turns against one of us, others are there to lend a helping hand. A belief that in this country, hard work and responsibility should be rewarded by some measure of security and fair play; and an acknowledgement that sometimes government has to step in to help deliver on that promise."
(His full remarks are below.)
The official Republican response came from Representative Charles Boustany Jr. of Louisiana, a former heart surgeon.
In excerpts released in advance by House Republicans, Boustany said that "Republicans are pleased that President Obama came to the Capitol tonight. We agree much needs to be done to lower the cost of health care for all Americans. On that goal, Republicans are ready -- and we’ve been ready -– to work with the President for common-sense reforms that our nation can afford.”
But Boustany also said it's time to start over, not cobble together the bills already passed by Democratic-controlled committees in the House and Senate.
“It’s clear the American people want health care reform, but they want their elected leaders to get it right," he plans to say. "Most Americans wanted to hear the President tell Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader Reid and the rest of Congress that it’s time to start over on a common-sense, bipartisan plan focused on lowering the cost of health care while improving quality. That’s what I heard over the past several months in talking to thousands of my constituents. Replacing your family’s current health care with government-run health care is not the answer. In fact, it’ll make health care much more expensive.”
Boustany repeated the Republican assertion that the Democratic bill would mean bigger government and higher taxes, saying that it " creates 53 new government bureaucracies, adds hundreds of billions to our national debt, and raises taxes on job-creators by $600 billion. And, it cuts Medicare by 500 billion dollars, while doing virtually nothing to make the program better for our seniors.”
(His full prepared remarks are below.)
Democrats spent much of today trying to trash Boustany, pointing out that at one point he seemed to support the "birther" movement that questioned whether Obama was born in Hawaii (despite a verified birth certificate) and thus ineligible to be president, that he supported end-of-life counseling (that have been mischaracterized as "death panels') and that he had been sued for malpractice (though not an unusually high number of times).
Senator Kennedy's legacy invoked, his children, widow watch Obama
Senator Edward M. Kennedy didn't live to see an universal health care bill pass in Washington.
But when President Obama spoke tonight to Congress to plead with them to pass a bill, he was there in spirit.
President Obama called on Kennedy's legacy and memory as part of his call to action on health care, especially for bipartisan cooperation for the greater American good.
He said he had received a letter recently from Kennedy. "He had written it back in May, shortly after he was told that his illness was terminal. He asked that it be delivered upon his death.
"In it, he spoke about what a happy time his last months were, thanks to the love and support of family and friends, his wife, Vicki, and his amazing children who are all here tonight," Obama continued. "And he expressed confidence that this would be the year that health care reform – 'that great unfinished business of our society,' would finally pass. He repeated the truth that health care is decisive for our future prosperity, but he also reminded me that 'it concerns more than material things.' 'What we face,' he wrote, 'is above all a moral issue; at stake are not just the details of policy, but fundamental principles of social justice and the character of our country.' ”
"I’ve thought about that phrase quite a bit in recent days – the character of our country. One of the unique and wonderful things about America has always been our self-reliance, our rugged individualism, our fierce defense of freedom and our healthy skepticism of government. And figuring out the appropriate size and role of government has always been a source of rigorous and sometimes angry debate," the president said.
"For some of Ted Kennedy’s critics, his brand of liberalism represented an affront to American liberty. In their mind, his passion for universal health care was nothing more than a passion for big government. But those of us who knew Teddy and worked with him here -- people of both parties -- know that what drove him was something more. His friend, Orrin Hatch, knows that. They worked together to provide children with health insurance. His friend John McCain knows that. They worked together on a Patient’s Bill of Rights. His friend Chuck Grassley knows that. They worked together to provide health care to children with disabilities.
"On issues like these, Ted Kennedy’s passion was born not of some rigid ideology, but of his own experience. It was the experience of having two children stricken with cancer. He never forgot the sheer terror and helplessness that any parent feels when a child is badly sick; and he was able to imagine what it must be like for those without insurance; what it would be like to have to say to a wife or a child or an aging parent – there is something that could make you better, but I just can’t afford it.
"That large-heartedness -- that concern and regard for the plight of others -- is not a partisan feeling. It is not a Republican or a Democratic feeling. It, too, is part of the American character. Our ability to stand in other people’s shoes. A recognition that we are all in this together; that when fortune turns against one of us, others are there to lend a helping hand. A belief that in this country, hard work and responsibility should be rewarded by some measure of security and fair play; and an acknowledgement that sometimes government has to step in to help deliver on that promise."
UPDATE: Obama's senior adviser David Axelrod told the Globe that Victoria Reggie Kennedy called to say the senator had written the letter in May he wanted delivered to Obama after his death.
"The president read it and it became the basis of the closing" section of the speech that Obama wrote himself in longhand, Axelrod said in a brief interview. "It was something that moved him a lot."
The full letter is below.
Several of Kennedy's children and his widow were in places of honor in the House chamber.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced this afternoon that Congressman Patrick Kennedy of Rhode Island would escort Obama to the well, then watch from the gallery.
Ted Kennedy, Jr., and Kara Kennedy and her two children, Grace and Max, will watch from the front row of the speaker's box.
Kennedy's widow, Victoria Reggie Kennedy, sat with First Lady Michelle Obama in her box.
Others invited for those primo seats are patients who illustrate the problems of health care and the benefits of an overhaul, along with doctors and other health professionals. Among the latter category is Dr. Wayne Myers, an organic farmer and pediatrician from Waldoboro, Maine, who the White House said "has been active in rural health care for many years" and "understands the health care challenges present in accessing care and affordable insurance in rural areas."
The full guest list is below:
FULL ENTRYObama appeals to grassroots group
President Obama reacted to his own speech by sending out an appeal tonight to the 13-million-strong email list of his grassroots group, Organizing for America.
"I just finished laying out my plan for health reform at a joint session of Congress. Now, I'm writing directly to you because what happens next is critical -- and I need your help," Obama wrote in the email. "Change this big will not happen because I ask for it. It can only come when the nation demands it. Congress knows where I stand. Now they need to hear from you."
"We've come closer to real health reform in the last few months than we have in the last 60 years. But those who profit from the status quo -- and those who put partisan advantage above all else -- will fight us every inch of the way," he added.
"We do not seek that fight, but we will not shrink from it. The stakes are too high to let scare tactics cloud the debate, or to allow partisan bickering to block the path. Your voice, right now, is essential."
UPDATE: In an instant CNN/Opinion Research poll, 56 percent of respondents said they had a "very positive" overall reaction to Obama's speech, and another 21 percent "somewhat positive," while 12 percent said "somewhat negative" and 9 percent "very negative."
Also, 70 percent said Obama's proposals would move the country in the right direction, up from 60 percent in a similar poll conducted Saturday through Tuesday, and 67 percent said they favored Obama's plan to reform health care, up from 53 percent before the speech.
The new poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points, and 18 percent of the respondents identified themselves as Republicans, 45 percent as Democrats, and 37 percent as independents.
Other reaction to his address to Congress divides, not suprisingly, along party lines.
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele: “The president has proven his ability again to speak very well and say very little. He continued to try and sell his government-run health care experiment even though it will increase costs, increase taxes and increase the deficit. He said he wants to work with Republicans, but Nancy Pelosi and liberals in the House have opposed Republicans every step of the way. If the Democrats are serious about passing health care reform this year, they should stop pointing fingers and truly start working with Republicans to pass common-sense bipartisan health care reform that Americans want and deserve.”
Brad Dayspring, spokesman for Representative Eric Cantor, the second-ranking House Republican: “Tonight the President failed to say anything different or offer clear specifics, and with that in mind the reason for this overhyped speech is strangely unclear. The President has now delivered over 100 speeches where he’s discussed health care and said the same thing. He's held prime time press conferences, hosted television specials from the White House, and addressed a joint-session of Congress and only thing he’s made explicitly clear is that the status quo is unacceptable, a fact that we all agree on. While the President continues to blame unnamed special interests and Republicans, the fact is that the Democrats overwhelmingly control both the House and the Senate. The President and his party have failed to lead by offering reform that Americans are comfortable with. Families understand that a costly government-run plan will force them to pay more and get less.”
Senator John F. Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat: “Tonight President Obama regained the initiative in a debate that must be won this year - not for a party, but for people who desperately need relief. This was a presidential moment and real presidential leadership. Americans need a real debate -- no more distortions, no more political games, no more scare tactics, it’s time for leaders everywhere to find the common ground to do what’s right for our country.
It won’t be easy, it will require tough decisions and hard-fought compromise, but letting another year go by without reforming health care is not an option. Now is the moment to achieve affordable insurance for those who don’t have it, stability for those who do, and cost controls for the businesses struggling to provide it to their workers.
"I was pleased to see the President made a compelling case for one of the ideas I’ve advanced on the Finance Committee – a meeting in the middle to control costs by placing an excise tax on insurers who offer high cost plans – a proposal that should be targeted to protect hard working Americans. Now we need to find Republicans willing to find those kinds of compromises for the greater good. That’s what our friend Ted Kennedy did at times like these, and there’s no greater action we can take now to honor his legacy than to deliver on the cause of his life.”
Representative Edward J. Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat: “Tonight the President offered a strong case for comprehensive health care reform, and I commend him on an excellent speech,” said Markey. “President Obama’s plan will offer stability and security for those with health insurance. No one should have to fight off a deadly disease while also fighting with their insurance company. The President’s plan puts a stop to denial of coverage based on a pre-existing condition and contains other vital reforms to protect Americans who already have coverage. President Obama’s plan also will finally enable the more than 45 million Americans without health insurance to get quality, affordable health coverage by creating a new insurance exchange where individuals and small businesses can shop for health insurance at competitive prices.
“We are now entering a new phase in the debate. Our current system is broken and in urgent need of an overhaul. Now is the time to heed the President’s call and pass comprehensive health care reform. The stakes are too high and the costs of inaction are too great to delay any longer.”
Expectations high, pressure intense for Obama speech
All sides are furiously trying to set expectations in advance of President Obama's big health care speech tonight to a joint session of Congress.
It's not clear how much the address, scheduled for 8 p.m. EDT, will be highlighted by new specifics -- or will be a more coherent restating of what the president wants in a health care overhaul.
Obama will "speak clearly to the American people about what's in health care reform; for those that are fortunate to have insurance, to demonstrate for them that his plan will bring them security and stability; and for those that don't have health insurance, that we'll provide an affordable way for them to get accessible insurance," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters on Air Force One as Obama headed to New York to speak at a memorial service for revered newsman Walter Cronkite.
On one of the most contentious issues, Obama will make his case for why he believes a government-run option is the best way to create more competition to private insurers, but he isn't expected to say he would veto a bill without it, a senior administration official told the Associated Press.
Obama, himself, in an interview aired today on ABC's "Good Morning America," offered few specifics, but did outline this preview of his address: "So, the intent of the speech on is to, A, make sure that the American people are clear exactly what it is that we are proposing. B, to make sure that Democrats and Republicans understand that I’m open to new ideas, that we’re not being rigid and ideological about this thing, but we do intend to get something done this year.”
The challenge facing Obama tonight -- as he tries to mollify liberals and not give up on a bipartisan deal -- was put in starker relief by a new poll out today.
The Associated Press-GfK survey says that 52 percent of Americans disapprove of Obama's handling of health care, up from 43 percent in July. The poll also shows that 49 percent disapprove of his overall job performance, an increase from 42 percent in July.
Also in the poll, 49 percent said they oppose the bills under consideration in Congress, while only 34 percent favor them, and respondents were evenly split over whether lawmakers should keep trying to pass a bill this year or start over again.
The survey, conducted Thursday through Tuesday, has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.
UPDATE: Even before his speech, the White House announced this afternoon that Obama will take his health care pitch on the hustings.
He plans a "rally" -- not the town hall format he has been holding -- on Saturday in Minneapolis where he "will discuss what’s at stake for the American people in this debate – why we need health insurance reform and why we need to act now."
Republicans expect the president not to stake out much new ground tonight.
Representative John Boehner, the House GOP leader, said today the real question is whether Obama has been listening to the American public.
“I think the American people have made it pretty clear that they don’t really want another lecture, they want a new plan. They understand that we have a good system that works well for many people. Everybody understands that we’ve got problems in the current system that can be addressed. But to replace the entire current system with a big government-run plan is not what the American people want and certainly isn’t what I want.”
And the government-run public option isn't the only problem with the Democratic bills, Boehner said.
"It’s not the only bitter pill in their plan," he said. "They have a mandate on every employer to offer insurance and if they don’t there is a big tax. At a time when we are trying to create jobs this will make it more difficult to create jobs, and, as a matter of fact, probably cost our economy jobs. This $3,800 tax that has been proposed in one of the Democrat plans on individuals if you don’t buy health insurance is another non-starter. And so it really is time to stop, hit the reset button, and sit down in a bipartisan way and begin to deal with what we can deal with to help make our current health care system work better.”
Meanwhile, the American Medical Association issued an open letter to Obama and Congress urging them to reach a health care deal. "As our nation's elected leaders, you have an historic opportunity to improve the health and well-being of the American public," wrote J. James Rohack, the AMA's president. (Click here to read the letter.)
But it does not appear that the best hope for a bipartisan compromise will be in place before Obama speaks.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus had set a deadline of sorts of this morning for the "Gang of Six" to weigh in on his proposal, which would cost about $900 billion over 10 years, financed in part by new fees on insurers, drug companies and others in the industry, and does not include the public option.
But the key Republican in the negotiating group -- Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine -- is in no hurry to sign on to the Baucus plan before hearing from the president. "That's the cart before the horse, as they say in Maine," she said, according to the AP.
After Baucus met privately with Democrats on the committee, the chairman told reporters this afternoon that while he still hopes for a bipartisan deal, he will formally introduce his bill next week -- with or without Republican assent -- and have his panel debate it the week after that.
"I very much hope and do expect Republicans will be on board," he told reporters. "I don't know how many, but if there are not any, I will move forward anyway."
Capuano says he will definitely seek Senate seat
By Susan Milligan, Globe staff
WASHINGTON -- Representative Michael Capuano is definitely running for the US Senate seat vacated by the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy, saying he is the only ``progressive'' in the current field who could continue the legendary senator's agenda.
``I'm doing it,'' Capuano told the Globe in an interview today off the House floor.
Capuano strongly signaled on Tuesday that he would run, obtaining his nomination papers and promising an announcement next week.
The Somerville Democrat said he wanted to ``make sure that my view of this is shared by others whose opinion I respect,'' and that ``so far, the answer seems to be a resounding yes.''
``At the moment, I'm the only progressive'' running for the seat, and the one best able to carry on Kennedy's liberal tradition in the Senate, he said.
Capuano described Attorney General Martha Coakley as ``the favorite'' in the Democratic primary, but said he has ``never been the favorite'' in his campaigns. With $1.2 million in his campaign chest, Capuano said he will have enough cash to run a strong campaign, but added that money would not decide the winner in the race.
``I want to be anointed. I don't think that will happen,'' he quipped.
Dodd stays at Banking, Harkin takes health helm
In the game of musical chairs occasioned by the death of Edward M. Kennedy, Senator Christopher Dodd announced this afternoon that he will stay as chairman of the Banking Committee and not take over the health panel, where he had filled in for Kennedy during his illness.
Instead, Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa will move from Agriculture to the health committee. Harkin, as was Kennedy, is firmly in the liberal wing of the Democratic party.
Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas will rise to the chairmanship of Agriculture.
"We all had hoped that Teddy would be able to come back to see this through," Dodd said in a statement. "Unfortunately, that wasn’t possible. But I intend to keep the promise I made. And so, I am pleased that I will able to continue the role he asked me to take on as the HELP Committee’s leader on health care reform."
"But we have important work to do on the Banking Committee, and I intend to see it through as chairman. The Banking Committee is of vital importance to Connecticut, responsible for issues central to the economic security and prosperity of the people of my state."
Dodd's perch on Banking, where he will work on financial regulation overhaul with House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts, will give him continued access to campaign cash in his tough reelection fight next year.
But it also got him in political hot water when critics accused him of getting too cozy to Wall Street during the meltdown.
Meanwhile, Service Employees International Union quickly applauded Harkin's move, saying that it is counting on his help to pass a health care bill, as well as a bill to make it easier for unions to organize, and an immigration overhaul.
"America’s working families have learned to count on Senator Harkin to stand up and fight for the issues that will help to ensure the American Dream is alive and well for their children and grandchildren. As the son of a coal miner, Senator Harkin understands how Congress and organized labor can work together to pass legislation that ensures quality and affordable healthcare, a fair economy, a safe workplace and a secure retirement," SEIU Secretary-Treasurer Anna Burger said in a statement.
John Sweeney, president of the AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor federation, also praised the leadership changes.
"It is great news for America's workers that a longtime friend of working families is taking the helm at the Senate Labor Committee. Although no one can replace Senator Kennedy, Tom Harkin brings just the right balance of passion and skill to the job of protecting working men and women, educating our children and looking out for our health," Sweeney said in a statement.
"We are also pleased that Senator Dodd will stay on as Chair of the Banking Committee to continue the important work of cleaning up Wall Street and putting in place sensible regulations to make sure we do not have a repeat of the recent financial meltdown. Both Senators Harkin and Dodd face great challenges as they work to make meaningful progress on the issues that affect the lives of working people, and we look forward to working closely with both of them in the months and years ahead."
Palin warns of 'death panels' again
The idea of "death panels" -- hardhearted government bureaucrats who would decide when to pull the plug on terminally ill patients -- has been rather thoroughly debunked.
But former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin raises their specter again in an op-ed piece published in the Wall Street Journal today, on the eve of President Obama's much-anticipated health care speech.
"In an interview with the New York Times in April, the president suggested that such a group, working outside of 'normal political channels,' should guide decisions regarding that 'huge driver of cost . . . the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives . . . .' Palin writes.
"Given such statements, is it any wonder that many of the sick and elderly are concerned that the Democrats' proposals will ultimately lead to rationing of their health care by—dare I say it—death panels? Establishment voices dismissed that phrase, but it rang true for many Americans. Working through 'normal political channels,' they made themselves heard, and as a result Congress will likely reject a wrong-headed proposal to authorize end-of-life counseling in this cost-cutting context. But the fact remains that the Democrats' proposals would still empower unelected bureaucrats to make decisions affecting life or death health-care matters."
After the firestorm of controversy over the "death panels" in Democratic bills, bipartisan negotiators on the Senate Finance Committee agreed to drop the end-of-life provision.
But the Democratic National Committee hit back this morning at Palin, last year's Republican vice presidential nominee.
“The way Sarah Palin is trying to scare Americans you'd think it's Halloween already," DNC spokesman Hari Sevugan said in a statement. "But, by continuing to peddle what Pulitzer Prize winning independent fact checkers have found to be ‘pants on fire’ lies and doubling down on the GOP recommendation to end Medicare for future generations, the only thing that's in costume here is Sarah Palin's supposed concern for the health care of Americans. What the American people find truly scary is that insurance rates have doubled this decade and continue to rise at a rate three times faster than their wages, and that rather than take on the insurance industry Republicans have become their biggest defenders. And what Sarah Palin should find truly scary is that her reputation as a serious leader can in fact sink even lower than it already has when she continues to stand by such outlandish claims.”
The rest of Palin's piece is far less controversial -- more of the Republican mantra that too much government would make health care worse, not better.
"Common sense tells us that the government's attempts to solve large problems more often create new ones. Common sense also tells us that a top-down, one-size-fits-all plan will not improve the workings of a nationwide health-care system that accounts for one-sixth of our economy. And common sense tells us to be skeptical when President Obama promises that the Democrats' proposals "will provide more stability and security to every American," Palin writes.
"With all due respect, Americans are used to this kind of sweeping promise from Washington. And we know from long experience that it's a promise Washington can't keep.
In biography, Frank expresses interest in cabinet job
Senator Edward M. Kennedy's posthumously published memoir got all the ink last week, but he's not the only Massachusetts lawmaker profiled in a new book.
A biography of Representative Barney Frank is to be published this month by the University of Massachusetts Press.
In "Barney Frank: The Story of America's Only Left-Handed, Gay, Jewish Congressman," the Newton Democrat tells author Stuart Weisberg that a capstone to his political career would be to join President Obama's cabinet, USA Today reports on its political blog.
But he would only be interested in leading the Department of Housing and Urban Development (where the secretary is now Shaun Donovan, a former New York City housing commissioner) under certain conditions. "We are only partly there with affordable housing … I want at least two years with President Obama and a solidly Democratic Senate so that we can get the federal government back in the housing business," Frank says in the book.
The book is available for pre-order on Amazon.com ($19.77) and according to the jacket, Weisberg interviewed more than 150 people, including 30 hours with Frank, to capture the congressman in "all his quirkiness, irreverence, and complexity."
"Above all, this book shows Frank to be a superb legislator -- a pragmatic politician who had dedicated his career to an unabashedly liberal agenda and whose depth of intellect and sense of humor have made him one of the most influential and colorful figures in Washington," the blurb says.
Louisiana doctor to deliver GOP prescription
President Obama's health care speech to a joint session of Congress on Wednesday night has many of the trappings of a "State of Union" address, and perhaps more at stake with his top domestic priority in the lurch.
So the opposition party is treating it as such, announcing today that a doctor who is also a congressman will deliver the Republican response immediately afterwards.
Representative Charles Boustany of Louisiana has been tapped to make the speech. The GOP says that he has more than 20 years of medical experience and has long advocated for changes that lower health care costs and maintains the doctor-patient relationship.
“As a doctor, I know we must lower costs and improve care, which we can accomplish by focusing on strengthening the doctor-patient relationship and working in a bipartisan way,” he said in a statement. “Health care is a kitchen table issue that affects all Americans, and I believe we need an honest discussion about how we come together to fix what’s broken, while building on what works. That’s why I’m pleased the President will speak to Congress tomorrow night, and I look forward to presenting commonsense reforms that Republicans and all Americans can stand behind.”
“Dr. Boustany has been a tireless advocate for reform that lowers health care costs and expands access for the American people at a price our nation can afford,” Representative John Boehner, the top House Republican, said in a statement. “He understands why a Washington bureaucrat – as Democrats have proposed – should never get between a doctor and his patient. I’m pleased Charles has agreed to speak to the American people about a Republican vision for reform and the need for both parties to come together to craft a responsible proposal at a time when people across the country are focused on jobs.”
UPDATE: Health professionals, as a group, are the most generous donors to Boustany's campaigns. They gave him $240,250 for the 2008 election and $48,300 so far for the 2010 election, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee said Boustany was a "fitting choice" for Republicans opposed to a health care overhaul, noting his votes against expanding the children's health insurance program and funding community health centers.
Boustany is a "credible voice for special interests, but not for hardworking Louisianians who struggle with health insurance companies,” Jessica Santillo, the southern regional spokeswoman for the DCCC, said in a statement. “Louisianians deserve an honest debate on how to rein in health cares costs, improve care, and increase access, not more of Congressman Boustany’s attempts to block solutions and protect the status quo.”
Also, the Republican National Committee plans to respond minute by minute to Obama's speech, announcing this afternoon a "live blog will offer 'real-time' fact-checking during President Obama's address concerning his proposed government-run health care experiment and how it will impact all generations of Americans."
GOP: Start over on health care
Republicans use their Labor Day weekend radio-Internet address to try to pound it into Americans' heads that President Obama's health care plan would be a job killer that would balloon the federal deficit.
Obama, who plans to make his case before a joint session of Congress on Wednesday night, is being buffeted by liberals in his own party as well as Republican opponents on what he should insist be in a health care bill.
Representative John Kline of Minnesota talks about what he heard from constituents in the town halls he hosted during the August congressional recess.
"What I hear from them is what my colleagues are hearing from Americans all across this great nation -- a sense of uncertainty about the health care legislation moving through Congress like a runaway freight train. They ask: 'What will happen to my coverage, and my choice of doctors? Will I have to stand in line to receive treatment? Or get approval from someone in Washington before getting a knee replacement or filling a prescription for the latest diabetes medication?' " Kline says.
"Access to quality care and the comfort of a familiar physician isn’t the only thing on my constituents’ minds. With trillion dollar price tags becoming almost commonplace in Democrat-controlled Washington, American families are worried about what all this spending means for their jobs -- and their children -- and their children’s children.
With so many worries, Kline says it's time to start over -- and to try to draft a truly bipartisan bill.
"Democrats have crafted this legislation behind closed doors, creating a partisan blueprint that – at last count – clocked in at more than 1,000 pages. It’s complicated, it’s convoluted, and it’s quite simply not going to work.
"It’s time to press the ‘reset’ button," Kline says. "Health care reform doesn’t have to be a partisan battle. It doesn’t have to take away coverage from Americans who like what they have. It doesn't have to put federal bureaucrats in charge of what procedure is covered and what medication is not.
"Our goal must be to fix what’s broken in our health care system while preserving those features that work well. We can drive down costs without sacrificing quality. We can expand coverage without orchestrating a government takeover. And we can do all of these things without squeezing small businesses and destroying more jobs at a time when our economy needs them most."
His full address is below and can be viewed here.
Democrats say GOP wants to kill Medicare
Republicans have their senior's bill of rights, trying to win the elderly to their side in the health care debate.
Democrats retaliated this evening with a new TV ad that accuses the GOP of wanting to kill Medicare, the main government health program for seniors.
The Democratic National Committee cited a vote earlier this year in the House in which 137 Republicans voted for a budget proposal offered by the Republican leadership that the DNC says would have ended Medicare for Americans under age 55. Instead, the proposal called for younger workers to enroll in private plans and receive subsidies equal to the average Medicare benefit.
"Republicans want to end Medicare," the announcer says in the spot. "You heard right, Republicans actually voted to abolish Medicare for future generations -- one of the most important programs for seniors.
"America's seniors have relied on Medicare for over 40 years -- and Democrats are working to strengthen Medicare," the narrator continues, over images of smiling seniors. "But the plain truth is, Republicans have opposed Medicare from the start.
"Their leaders have called for cutting Medicare -- and now for killing it. The Republican Party -- no friend of seniors," the announcer concludes over photos of House Republican leader John Boehner and Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele.
The DNC says the ad will air on national cable in and in 10 the districts of 10 Republican members of Congress, including Boehner, his No. 2 Eric Cantor, and favorite liberal target Michele Bachmann of Minnesota.
In unveiling the seniors' bill of rights earlier this week, the RNC vowed to protect Medicare, which it asserted was in jeopardy under the proposals of President Obama and Democrats to find savings and efficiencies.
“Let’s agree in both parties that Congress should only consider health reform proposals that protect senior citizens,” Steele says in his ad. "For starters, no cuts to Medicare to pay for another program. Zero."
Obama grassroots tour hits Boston
President Obama's grassroots group is bringing its health care overhaul push to Boston on Labor Day, with newly minted US Senate candidate Martha Coakley and a possible competitor, Representative Michael Capuano, featured at the rally.
Organizing for America announced this afternoon that the rally will be at 11 a.m. Monday at the Parkman Bandstand on Boston Common. It plans to present 30,000 declarations of support for Obama's proposals from Massachusetts residents to the Bay State congressional delegation.
"The rally will be an opportunity for supporters of reform to show their backing for President Obama’s principles for health insurance reform which have been simple and consistent -- reform will lower costs, protect choice and ensure all Americans have access to quality, affordable health care," the announcement said.
Besides Coakley, now Massachusetts attorney general, and Capuano, Representative John Tierney and leaders of the Service Employees International Union and Health Care for America Now! will attend.
Organizers said there will be a moment of silence for the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy. Coakley announced Thursday she is seeking the seat, and Capuano is also considering a run.
Organizing for America says it held more than 2,000 health care events during August, culminating in a two-week bus tour that ended Thursday and stopped in Phoenix, Albuquerque, Denver, Des Moines, St. Louis, Indianapolis, Columbus, Pittsburgh, and Charlotte.
Republicans jump on jobless rise
Republicans immediately sought today to capitalize on the new unemployment numbers to press their argument that President Obama's economic stimulus package is failing.
The Labor Department reported today that the jobless rate rose to 9.7 percent last month from 9.4 percent in July after 216,000 more Americans lost their jobs. It is the highest rate since 1983, and analysts say it shows that while the economy is improving, a sustained recovery will be difficult at best.
UPDATE: Vice President Joe Biden, who on Thursday led the cheerleading for the $787 billion stimulus package, said this afternoon that the administration will not be satisfied until "we're adding, not losing, thousands of jobs a month."
He cited an analysis that the stimulus package saved or created at least 500,000 jobs in its first 200 days, a milestone that hits Saturday -- or in other words, that another 500,000 jobs would have been lost without the recovery package.
Biden spoke as he announced a $535 million loan guarantee for a Fremont, Calif., company that makes solar panels. “This announcement today is part of the unprecedented investment this Administration is making in renewable energy and exactly what the Recovery Act is all about,” Biden said in a statement. “By investing in the infrastructure and technology of the future, we are not only creating jobs today, but laying the foundation for long-term growth in the 21stcentury economy.”
But Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele beat him to the punch.
“Yesterday, Vice President Biden gave yet another speech to try to convince the American people that President Obama’s stimulus bill is creating the jobs he promised. In fact, Vice President Biden said that he believes the Administration has ‘met or exceeded’ their goal to create or save 600,000 jobs in the past 100 days. Today’s unemployment report proves that this Administration is ignoring reality," Steele said in a statement.
"The unemployment rate jumped to 9.7 percent. More than 216,000 Americans lost their jobs in the month of August alone. That means more than 3 million Americans have lost their jobs since the president took office. The president’s economic experiment simply isn’t working, and Americans shouldn’t expect his government-run health care experiment to work, either.”
Not a single House Republican voted for the stimulus bill, and Representative John Boehner, the GOP leader in the House, chimed in with his own statement that also tried to use the jobless numbers to continue his assault on Obama's health care overhaul plans.
"Where are the jobs? Approximately 2.4 million private-sector jobs have been destroyed since February 2009. In light of these numbers, it is more clear than ever that the President and the leaders of his party in Congress need to abandon their plans for a job-killing government takeover of health care and work with Republicans for a more responsible approach to health care reform. The Democrats' bloated 'stimulus' isn't working, and we can't afford another trillion-dollar mistake on the backs of our children and small businesses," Boehner said.
"It is increasingly clear that as a consequence of this administration's misguided policies, any economic recovery that lies ahead will be a jobless one hampered by massive new debt. This is not what the American people were promised; nor is it what they deserve. Better solutions were offered in good faith by Republicans but rejected by the Administration in favor of what has proven to be a trillion-dollar mistake. The Administration said its bloated 'stimulus' would create millions of jobs and keep the unemployment rate from going above 8 percent. Instead, unemployment has now soared to nearly 10 percent, millions of jobs have disappeared, and massive new debt has been needlessly piled on future generations," Boehner continued.
"Washington Democrats must listen to the American people and abandon their plans to impose a job-killing government takeover of health care and a new job-killing national energy tax. Both will inflict further harm on small businesses and wipe out millions of additional American jobs, compounding the costly mistake of the flawed 'stimulus.’ It’s time for the President to hit the reset button and work with Republicans for better solutions, before more debt is piled on our children and more American jobs are destroyed."
Democrats hit back on health care
Democrats, ramping up their rebuttal to GOP attacks on health care, unveiled a web video today going after Representatives John Boehner and Michele Bachmann and commentators Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh.
The video shows the critics repeating debunked claims, including that the health care bill would create death panels of bureaucrats who would decide who lives and dies, and using terms such as "communist" to describe the plan.
“Since Congressional Republicans and their right wing allies can’t win with the facts on health care, they’ve resorted to using fear, fiction, and scare tactics of the worst kind to shamelessly try and ‘kill’ health insurance reform,” Ryan Rudominer, spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said in a statement. “This new web video is just another way that we are exposing their lies and over-the-top rhetoric while empowering our grassroots supporters to hold them accountable for trying to deny families quality, affordable health care.”
The video is part of Democrats' strategy of advertising, phone calls, letters to the editor, fact checks, and telephone town halls in targeted Republican districts to try to regain momentum.
Republicans and other critics have taken the upper hand during the August congressional recess, one reason why President Obama plans to give an unusual "State of the Union"-like speech to a joint session of Congress next Wednesday to make his case for a health care overhaul.
Obama plans to address Congress on health care
President Obama will address a joint session of Congress next Wednesday as he tries to regain momentum on the health care debate.
With a bipartisan deal looking less likely and many Americans confused by the debate, the White House has been signaling that Obama will try to sharpen his message on what exactly he wants Congress to put in a health overhaul.
Obama has held a series of town halls, and a prime time news conference, but senior adviser David Axelrod said in a series of interviews late Tuesday and early today that the president was considering giving a major health care speech soon after he returns from his Camp David vacation and Congress reconvenes next week.
"We're entering a new season," Axelrod told CNN today. "It's time to synthesize and harmonize these strands and get this done."
So far, Obama has left the details of bill drafting to Democrats in Congress. But as the Globe reported today, Democrats are increasingly dismayed by Republican recalcitrance and are considering using the "nuclear option" of a parliamentary maneuver to ram through a health care bill with a simple majority in the Senate. And as the Globe reported last week, Obama has stepped on his own message at times.
A CBS News survey released Tuesday said that two in three respondents said they were confused by the proposals before Congress, and 60 percent said that Obama has not clearly explained his health proposals.
The address, scheduled for prime time Wednesday night, will be only Obama's second as president to a joint session of Congress. His first, in late February, amounted to his "State of the Union" address and focused on the financial crisis and deepening recession.
"The weight of this crisis will not determine the destiny of this nation," Obama said then. "Those qualities that have made America the greatest force of progress and prosperity in human history we still possess in ample measure. What is required now is for this country to pull together, confront boldly the challenges we face, and take responsibility for our future once more."
Congress gets lowest marks in 24 years
While President Obama's poll numbers are dropping, it could be worse.
A national survey out today gives such low favorability marks to Congress that it's at its lowest mark in the 24-year history of the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press.
Only 37 percent of respondents had a favorable opinion of Congress, down from 50 percent in April, and 52 percent had an unfavorable view.
While the displeasure with Republicans (40 percent favorable) is still higher than for Democrats (48 percent favorable, the Democratic number has dropped 11 percentage points since April.
And Pew says there are warning signs for Democrats heading into the 2010 mid-term election.
"Voters are about evenly divided when asked how they would vote if the election for Congress were being held today," Pew says, with 45 percent saying they would vote for a Democratic candidate in their district, or lean Democratic, while 44 percent say they would vote for a Republican or lean Republican.
"At about this point four years ago, Democrats led in the generic congressional ballot by 52% to 40% and went on to win a majority of the popular vote and regain control of Congress the following November," Pew notes.
Most of the shift is among independents, who had overwhelmingly backed Democrats but now say they would back Republicans in their districts by 43 percent to 38 percent.
The poll, conducted Aug. 20-27, has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.
Most Americans confused by health plans
The war of words and ads over health care has left most Americans confused, according to a new poll released today.
The CBS News survey found that two in three respondents -- including 69 percent of Republicans and 58 percent of Democrats -- call the proposals before Congress confusing, while only 31 percent said they have a clear understanding of the proposed changes.
Moreover, 60 percent of Americans say that President Obama has not clearly explained his health proposals, though he has held a series of town halls and other events. (Click here to see the entire poll.)
The at-times heated town hall meetings during the August congressional recess didn't help matters, and 49 percent of those who said they heard of the sessions said angry protestors featured on cable TV did not reflect the views of most Americans.
Not surprisingly, there was a partisan division, with 66 percent of Republicans saying the protestors did speak for most of the public, but 73 percent of Democratic respondents said they did not.
The poll, conducted Thursday through Monday, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Republicans immediately jumped on the poll findings. "Over a month ago, President Obama changed his message from 'health care reform' to 'health insurance reform.' Though the message changed, the underlying product didn’t," Brad Dayspring, a spokesman for Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 Republican in the House, said in a statement. "New polling from CBS shows that the American people weren’t fooled."
Girding for war on health care
The truce during the mourning for Senator Edward M. Kennedy is a memory, Congress returns to work in a week, and the calendar has turned to September.
So it's time to rejoin the battle over the health care overhaul.
Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, the top Republican on the Budget Committee, is warning that he has lots of objections ready if Democrats try to push a health care bill through the Senate with a simple majority.
Democrats might need to resort to the procedural maneuver, known as reconciliation, because with Kennedy's seat vacant, they control 59 votes -- one shy of what is needed to overcome potential filibusters.
Gregg told The Hill newspaper in an article published online today that Republicans could file "hundreds" of points of order objections, each one requiring 60 votes to overcome.
"We are very much engaged in taking a hard look at our rights under reconciliation," Gregg told The HiIl. "It would be very contentious."
The Republican National Committee this morning unveiled a new TV ad that promotes its "seniors' bill of rights" for any health care changes -- aiming squarely at a constituency worried what reform would bring and at a voting bloc least supportive of President Obama.
“Let’s agree in both parties that Congress should only consider health reform proposals that protect senior citizens,” RNC Chairman Michael Steele says in the ad. "For starters, no cuts to Medicare to pay for another program. Zero.
"Make it illegal to ration health care based on age,” he continues. "Prevent any government role in end-of-life care. And stop bureaucrats from getting between seniors and their doctors. A few things we should all agree on. The Seniors’ Bill of Rights. Stand with us and stand with senior citizens. After all, they’ve earned it.”
Democrats, however, point out that Steele has seemingly contradicted himself in recent days over whether he supports savings (or cuts, according to critics) in Medicare -- the government health program for seniors -- to help bring health spending under control.
Democrats also note that the AARP declared that “nothing in the bills that have been proposed would bring about the scenarios the RNC is concerned about.”
"Michael Steele and the Republicans are unbelievable," Democratic National Committee spokesman Brad Woodhouse said in a statement today responding to the RNC ad. "After failing to stop the President on the Recovery Act, the budget, equal pay for women and children's health care, Republicans have decided that they have no other choice when it comes to blocking health insurance reform than to lie to the American people and try to scare seniors - all in their admitted effort to 'break' the President on this issue and 'kill' reform for political gain.
"The RNC's 'Senior's Bill Of Rights' is nothing more than a scare tactic built on a foundation of lies about the effort to reform health insurance. Which begs the question, why can't Republicans debate health insurance reform on the merits instead of making stuff up out of whole cloth? Because they know the crux of what President Obama has proposed -- lowering costs, preserving choice, expanding access and reversing decades of unfair insurance industry practices -- is popular with the American people and they don't stand a chance of blocking reform if they deal with the issue honestly."
Democrats -- in the form of President Obama's grassroots group Organizing for America -- are continuing their "Health Insurance Reform Now: Let’s Get it Done!" bus tour today in Columbus, Ohio, and Wednesday in Pittsburgh. The events, in part, are designed to hammer home the message of Obama's eight health "guarantees" for Americans who already have health insurance: "1) no discrimination for pre-existing conditions, 2) no exorbitant out-of-pocket expenses, deductibles, or co-pays, 3) no cost-sharing for preventive care, 4) no dropping of coverage for the seriously ill, 5) no gender discrimination, 6) no annual or lifetime caps on coverage, 7) extended coverage for young adults, and 8) guaranteed insurance renewal."
Will Kennedy's death be catalyst on health care?
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
President Obama, in a message overnight to his 13 million-strong grassroots group, said that Senator Edward M. Kennedy "a true leader who challenged us all to live out our noblest values."
"I personally valued his wise counsel in the Senate, where, regardless of the swirl of events, he always had time for a new colleague. I cherished his confidence and momentous support in my race for the Presidency. And even as he waged a valiant struggle with a mortal illness, I've benefited as President from his encouragement and wisdom," Obama added in his message to members of Organizing for America. (His full message is below.)
Obama did not mention the issue that he and Kennedy were most closely working on in the months before his death and that his grassroots group is now crusading on -- a health care overhaul.
But Vice President Joe Biden says that Kennedy's death -- and the outpouring of tributes -- could break the partisan gridlock on Capitol Hill.
"God willing maybe his loss and all about him will be the catalyst to make people come around and, you know, begin to compromise to get something done," Biden said in an interview aired this morning on NBC's "Today" show.
The vice president, however, also acknowledged that the impact could go the other way -- that Kennedy's absence will make a bipartisan deal even more difficult. Several key Republicans, including last year's presidential nominee, Senator John McCain, have argued in recent days that a health care deal would be closer if Kennedy had been in the Senate the last few months.
Biden said that Kennedy's attitude and persistence should be an example.
"Everything was about possibilities. I never, ever, ever in 36 years of being with him ever saw him down in terms of, 'We can't get this done,' 'things aren't going to get any better,' 'the deficit's too big,' 'we can't get this passed' -- never, never, never," Biden said.
"I watched him on the renewal of the civil rights legislation. I watched him on hate crimes legislation. I watched him go back at it and go back at it, and I watched him change people's minds."
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said today that Kennedy's death would "make things more difficult" on health care legislation, MSNBC reports.
Asked about the possibility of naming the bill in Kennedy's honor, she said that would be an appropriate tribute, but said "it would be best to pass health care."
But conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh took a decidedly different stance.
"Placing [Kennedy’s] name on a health-care bill, in memoriam, or using his name as a sympathy ploy to advance a health care bill that would deny Americans the choices Senator Kennedy had is an insult and is supreme hypocrisy,” he said on his show Wednesday. "The senator's passing is going to give them the opportunity to use the sympathy play to get as much done in his name as possible."
Meanwhile, a second group opposing Democrats' health care plan announced today it is withdrawing its TV ads out of respect for Kennedy.
The Associated Press reports that the US Chamber of Commerce said it is suspending its $7.5 million, 21-state campaign, which criticizes the government-run coverage that many Democrats favor, until early next week.
On Wednesday, Conservatives for Patients Rights also said it was temporarily halting its ads, including one running in the Boston area that was aimed at Obama vacationing on Martha's Vineyard.
UPDATE: Asked today about how President Obama looks at some liberal groups' "win one for Kennedy" push on health care, White House spokesman Bill Burton replied, "Our country lost a beloved leader and the politics and implications of that are the last thing on the president's mind right now."
Pressed on whether Kennedy's death is being used in a "political way," Burton said, "We've all experienced a pretty big loss and Americans are going to have different reactions and find different ways to memorialize his life. [The president]'s not going to make a comment on what every single person does to memorialize or remember or talk about Senator Kennedy and his passing. There will be a time when it's appropriate to have discussions on different ramifications, but I don't think anybody thinks that now is it."
FULL ENTRYRed ink as far as the eye can see
The White House, issuing its new budget deficit projection this morning, said the numbers look better in the short term but worse in the long run.
Budget Director Peter Orszag said that the deficit for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30 is now projected to be $1.58 trillion -- or 11.2 percent of gross domestic product -- down $262 billion from a previously projected $1.84 trillion or 12.9 percent of GDP. That's still an all-time record by far.
And the red ink looks worse in the next decade because of updated economic data that show that "we inherited a deeper recession than projected in February," Orszag wrote in his message. (Read it here.)
The White House is projecting that the deficit for 2010-2019 will be $2 trillion higher than it forecast in February, now an eye-popping $9.05 trillion.
"During an economic downturn, one wants to allow the deficit to increase, so deficit reduction should be focused on the out-years -- after the economy has recovered," Orszag writes. "That said, the out-year deficits hover in the range of 4 percent of GDP, which is higher than desirable. Getting the out-year deficit under control is a top priority of the Administration."
Republicans are accusing the administration of fudging the numbers to make the deficit appear smaller for the current year, largely by changing assumptions about the costs of the financial bailout.
"Let’s be clear, this is spin and nothing more," economic adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin wrote in a memo to House GOP Leader John Boehner. "The lower estimate is strictly the result of the Administration massaging their budget assumptions, not reality. The reality is, putting these gimmicks aside, that the FY 2009 deficit is larger. And, even the Obama Administration will have to admit that the deficit for every year after 2009 is even worse than they admitted earlier this year. (Read his memo here.)
But the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office put out is own figures this morning, and they closely track the White House's in the short term and are actually lower in the long term.
The CBO estimated that the deficit will be $1.59 trillion in fiscal 2009 and $1.38 trillion in fiscal 2010 as the economy recovers. It also lowered its projection of the 10-year budget deficit to $7.14 trillion.
One reason for the CBO's lower 10-year number: It assumes that the tax cuts put into place by the Bush administration will expire as scheduled by 2011, but Obama's projection keeps the tax cuts for families earning less than $250,000 a year.
Republicans are also warning that Obama's agenda will mean even higher deficits, threatening to bankrupt the country.
"The mushrooming federal debt poses a grave danger to America’s prosperity, threatening to plunge our economy and future generations into the abyss of stagnant growth and national decline. But given the reckless way the administration is spending your money, you’d never know that the debt is a cause for concern. Staggering sums of money have been tossed around so casually that the very notion of dishing out 'trillions' of dollars is no longer a shock to many in Washington," Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 House Republican, writes in an op-ed for Politico.
American can't afford Obama's health care plan, estimated to cost $1 trillion over the next 10 years, Cantor argues.
"In this economy, as families review their own budgets and adjust accordingly, they expect their government to act in a manner that reflects the challenging times we are in. Much of the public frustration with Washington has been evident in town halls across the country, and many Americans believe the administration’s top priority should be cutting the federal deficit in half by the end of his first term," Cantor writes.
"Instead, the administration seeks to force a massive new government health care program that most people don’t want and certainly cannot afford. And they will do so even if it means imposing new taxes on the middle class and small business job creators. Now is not the time to double down on a deficit that is $2 trillion more than the administration projected, but instead to moderate spending, and move forward responsibly."
Boehner added his criticism in a statement:
“Today’s reports confirm what the White House has been trying to hide: the Democrats’ out-of-control spending binge is burying our children and grandchildren under a mountain of unsustainable debt. Instead of putting the brakes on Washington’s spending habits as they promised they’d do, Democrats have stepped on the accelerator and spent taxpayer dollars with reckless abandon all year, refusing to make tough choices and putting all the sacrifice on future generations. That’s not leadership; it’s negligence.
“The costly government-run health care plan put forth by President Obama and Speaker Pelosi is just the latest in a long line of expensive Democratic experiments that will add to the deficit, raise taxes on families and small businesses, and cost more American jobs. It’s time for the Administration and congressional Democrats to face the consequences of this dangerous fiscal agenda and change course."
UPDATE: Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, however, blamed the Bush administration for running up the deficits and following policies that led to the need for costly rescue measures, including the $787 billion economic stimulus package that passed without a single Republican vote in the House.
"Today's deficit projections are a legacy of Bush Administration fiscal policies that turned our surpluses into deficits and led the way toward an economic and financial crisis that has required historic short-term intervention. If pay-as-you-go principles had been in place for the last 8 years, this deficit would be $5 trillion smaller over the next decade," she said in a statement.
"We are working with President Obama to restore fiscal responsibility and to ensure that statutory pay-go, already passed by the House, is signed into law. Under President Obama's leadership, we have ended the Bush-era practice of hiding the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan -- gimmicks and accounting tricks that have no place in our budget process. And working with the President, Congress has laid out a budget blueprint that reduces our deficit, lays a new foundation for job creation and economic growth, and invests in more broadly shared prosperity for all Americans. "But we cannot reduce the deficit in the long-term without getting health care costs under control. Nor can health care reform add to the challenge. That is why our health insurance reform is fully paid for and will not increase the deficit.
"These deficit projections send a clear message: fiscal discipline must be the order of the day as we come out of this recession. Our economic recovery efforts are starting to pay dividends for America's families. Today's announcement that consumer confidence and home prices are on the rise represent new signs that our economy is moving in the right direction. And now, we must remain on-track to tackle our fiscal challenges, advance policies to promote job growth, reinforce the foundation of our prosperity, and return the United States to the days of financial stability."
Republicans warn seniors about Obama plans
In their latest assault on President Obama's health care plans, Republicans are aiming for a vulnerable spot -- the fears of seniors that their care will get worse or more costly.
"Republicans want reform that should, first, do no harm, especially to our seniors," Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele writes in an opinion piece in today's Washington Post. "That is why Republicans support a Seniors' Health Care Bill of Rights, which we are introducing today, to ensure that our greatest generation will receive access to quality health care. We also believe that any health-care reform should be fully paid for, but not funded on the backs of our nation's senior citizens."
The bill of rights for seniors includes protecting Medicare from major cuts, preserving the doctor-patient relationship, banning any rationing of care or interference in end-of-life decisions, guaranteeing that seniors can keep their current coverage, and protecting current veterans' health care programs.
Obama and Democrats plan on substantial savings in Medicare, but insist that those changes would not mean less care. They also support more research to determine the most cost-effective treatments, but adamantly deny that would lead to rationing of care -- which they argue is being done by private insurers already.
"Barack Obama campaigned on 'post-partisanship,' " Steele concludes. "As president, however, Obama has shown that he is beholden to his party's left-wing ideologues. It's not too late for him to honor his pledges for bipartisan health-care reform. Reversing course and joining Republicans in support of health care for our nation's senior citizens is a good place to start. Doing so will help him restart the reform process to give Americans access to low-cost, high-quality health care." (Read his full op-ed here.)
The Democratic National Committee responded by saying that the health overhaul would help seniors by holding down costs and closing the so-called donut hole in prescription drug coverage under Medicare Part D. It also said that Republicans are continuing to mislead the public in their attempt to kill the overhaul.
“It should be no surprise that the Republican Party - which whipped many Americans into a frenzy at town hall meetings on health care this month by spreading one lie about reform after another - has now taken to scaring seniors who have nothing to fear and much to gain from reform," DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse said in a statement. "But what's really incredible is that this feigned interest in Medicare and the plight of seniors is coming from the Republican Party -- the very party which opposed Social Security and only four years ago tried to dismantle it -- and the very Republican Party which opposed the creation of Medicare to begin with. Republicans are fighting against reform for one reason - to 'break' President Obama and gain political advantage. As a result, when it comes to their arguments against reform -- for Republicans it's any port in a storm.”
Obama slams 'outrageous myths' on health care; Republicans say president 'plays fast and loose' with facts
He may be on vacation, but through the magic of prerecorded video and audio, President Obama is keeping up his health care campaign today.
In his weekly radio and Internet address, Obama both tries to debunk what he calls "outrageous myths" and seeks to rally support.
Taking on his critics, he says that while he welcomes a vigorous debate, "it also should be an honest debate, not one dominated by willful misrepresentations and outright distortions, spread by the very folks who would benefit the most by keeping things exactly as they are."
In the Republican response, Representative Tom Price of Georgia, a doctor by trade, says while that the status quo on health care is unacceptable, giving the government too much control -- represented by the "one-size-fits-all approach" of Obama and congressional Democrats -- would make the situation worse.
"Now whether it’s the government choosing what should be in your family’s health care plan, or a bureaucratic board deciding what treatments are appropriate and who should receive them, the president’s plan is a 1,000-page expression supporting the notion that Washington knows best when it comes to your family’s health care," Price says. "And that’s simply not true."
Obama ticks off some false claims by opponents: "Let’s start with the false claim that illegal immigrants will get health insurance under reform. That’s not true. Illegal immigrants would not be covered. That idea has never even been on the table. Some are also saying that coverage for abortions would be mandated under reform. Also false. When it comes to the current ban on using tax dollars for abortions, nothing will change under reform. And as every credible person who has looked into it has said, there are no so-called 'death panels' -- an offensive notion to me and to the American people. These are phony claims meant to divide us.
Obama also says he does not support a "government takeover" of health care, and tries to clarify the "public option" -- a government plan along the lines of Medicare to compete with private insurers. "It would be just an option; those who prefer their private insurer would be under no obligation to shift to a public plan," he says.
The president, who has used his weekly address to state his case on health care for more than a month now, then goes on to list the help that he wants to give people who already have insurance, including protections from being denied coverage for preexisting coverage and being charged exorbitant out-of-pocket expenses.
"Taken together, the reforms we’re seeking will help bring down skyrocketing costs, which will mean real savings for families, businesses, and government," he says, trying to rally more support.
"It has never been easy, moving this nation forward. There are always those who oppose it, and those who use fear to block change. But what has always distinguished America is that when all the arguments have been heard, and all the concerns have been voiced, and the time comes to do what must be done, we rise above our differences, grasp each others’ hands, and march forward as one nation and one people, some of us Democrats, some of us Republicans, all of us Americans," Obama adds, perhaps somewhat more hopefully than realistically.
In rebuttal, Price says that as opposition to Obama's plan has grown, the president says he wants to "stamp out some of the disinformation floating around out there.
"The problem is the president, himself, plays fast and loose with the facts," Price says." So as someone who’s taken care of patients, I’d like to take a moment to clear up a couple of the President’s worst offenses."
He asserts that while Obama says Americans can keep their insurance plan, a provision in the bill would require every plan within five years to meet new guidelines "that your current plan might not match, even if you like it."
Price also says that a public option plan, "when the government is setting the rules and is backed by tax dollars," will "destroy – not compete – with the private sector.
"But perhaps the most striking misinformation the president has put forth is that there are only two options out there for America -- that it's his way or the highway. That it's either the government running the show -- or insurance companies. The truth is there is a third way -- a better way, a patient-centered way to reform health care," Price says.
And Republicans are offering that approach, he says: "We have plans to increase coverage and lower costs without putting a bureaucrat between you and your doctor. We believe that what’s good for patients is good for American health care."
Obama's full address can be viewed here and is below.
Price's full address can be viewed here and is below.
Obama seeks advice from Daschle
Would President Obama's health care push be going more smoothly if his first choice for health reform czar was working for it?
It's a Washington parlor game hypothetical, but it's also interesting that the last person that Obama talked to today on the topic before starting his 10-day vacation was Tom Daschle, the former Senate majority leader who was the nominee to be both health and human services secretary and health czar.
His nomination was derailed by tax issues, and Obama split the job between Kathleen Sebelius as health secretary and Nancy DeParle as health czar. While accomplished in their own right, neither has the combination of congressional clout and political savvy Daschle possesses.
"The president invited Senator Daschle to the White House for a quick check-in on the health insurance reform process and to exchange views on the process moving forward," the White House said in a statement after today's private session.
"Senator Daschle is one of the foremost experts on health care and on the legislative process, and has been a friend and sounding-board for the President for several years. The two agreed that substantive reform that lowers costs, reforms the insurance industry, and expands coverage is too important to wait another year or another administration, and they agreed to stay in touch over the coming weeks and months as this critical effort moves forward.”
Ad tries to press key Republicans
Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine and the two other Finance Committee Republicans in the "Gang of Six" trying to come up with a bipartisan health bill are under pressure from the right not to give away the store.
The conservative Club for Growth launched TV ads targeted at Snowe, Mike Enzi of Wyoming, and Charles Grassley of Iowa.
The spot notes the key role the three senators are playing. "There's no harm in talking," the announcer says.
But the announcer then warns that what Democrats are talking about includes a government-run health plan, bureaucrats deciding coverage, new regulations that would kill small business, and tax hikes.
"Tell Senator Snowe not to cave in to the liberals on health care," the announcer concludes.
The Gang of Six had a conference call Thursday night, and according to the Washington Post, they agreed to continue working toward a bill that could win support from the rank-and-file in both parties, despite increasing reports that Democrats and President Obama are prepared to go it alone, if need be.
The group agreed to talk again on Sept. 4, three days before Congress reconvenes after its August recess, the Post said.
Conservative ad aims at Obama on Vineyard
If President Obama turns on the TV while on holiday on Martha's Vineyard, he likely won't escape attacks on his health care plan.
Conservatives for Patients' Rights, the group founded by former health executive Rick Scott that has helped organize protests at congressional town halls, is putting up a TV ad called "Surf's Up."
"The beach is nice this time of year," the announcer says over a seaside scene. "But while President Obama vacations, concerns mount about his health care plan."
The announcer criticizes the public option that Obama prefers -- a government plan like Medicare that would compete with private insurers -- and says it would lead to government-run health care, higher taxes, and higher deficits.
"Let's get on with real reform to lower costs and protect patients rights," the announcer concludes.
The group plans to spend $150,000 airing the spot in the Boston-area TV market, including on NESN during games next week between the Red Sox and Obama's beloved Chicago White Sox, CNN says.
Liberal group hits 'real death panels'
A liberal-labor coalition is trying to turn the contretemps over "death panels" on its head with its latest TV ad that says the real death panels are the insurance company committees that deny coverage.
The ad from Americans United for Change, which it says will start airing next week, points out that opponents' claims that Democratic health bills would create committees of bureaucrats who would decide who would receive life-saving care have been widely debunked. (But a key negotiator in the Senate says it won't be in the bill because of the room for misinterpretation.)
"Unfortunately, there are real death panels in America," the announcer says.
Linda Peeno, a former medical director for both Humana Insurance and Blue Cross/Blue Shield, is shown testifying at a congressional hearing, "In the spring of 1987, as a physician, I denied a man a necessary operation that would have saved his life and thus caused his death…and I am haunted by the thousands of pieces of paper on which I have written that deadly word, 'denial.' "
"We need health insurance reform now," the announcer concludes.
“Conservative politicians and pundits will do anything to keep the 'death panels' fantasy alive and well as part of an unscrupulous and concerted effort to kill health insurance reform. But where’s the hysteria from these same conservatives over the real death panels that exist right now in America with the big insurance companies denying millions of Americans the care they need by citing 'pre-existing'’ conditions?” Jeremy Funk, Americans United for Change's communications director, said in a statement today.
It is among the groups supporting President Obama and congressional Democrats in their health overhaul push -- and fighting Republican and conservative groups running ads and organizing protests as members of Congress hear from their constitutents during the August recess.
Obama ramps up again on health care
President Obama is making his health care pitch today to two very different audiences -- one friendly, one not so much.
Obama is on the air with Philadelphia-based talk radio host Michael Smerconish, who is broadcasting his program from the Diplomatic Room in the White House. Smerconish's audience is generally conservative and will likely include quite a few foes of the president's health care proposals, though the host endorsed Obama last year.
Smerconish, who said he has received more than 5,000 emails in the last 24 hours, asked whether Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of health and human services, misspoke when she said on
"She didn't really misspeak," Obama replied, asserting that his message has stayed the same -- that a public option is one way, but not the only way, to control costs. "The press got a little excited and some folks on the left got a little excited."
Obama also disputed that he favors a government takeover of health care. "I would love the private marketplace to handle this without any government intervention," he said. "The problem is, it's not working."
The president said he wants to preserve the private market, but add consumer protections.
In response to a listener's question, Obama strongly disputed claims that the Democratic health care bills would provide coverage to illegal immigrants.
"No one has talked about giving health insurance to illegal immigrants. I want to make that absolutely clear," he said.
But he said it will continue to be the case that if an illegal immigrant shows up in the emergency room, he or she will get treated.
Obama said he doesn't want a situation that a child with tuberculosis isn't treated, then returns to the playground and threatens to infect "our kids."
Plus, he said, there should be "a basic standard of decency" to provide care when someone faces a life-threatening illness or injury.
Another listener asked whether Obama's "knees were buckling a little bit" even with Democrats controlling Congress and the White House.
"I guarantee to you Joe that we're going to get health care reform done," Obama declared, bemoaning what he called "hand-wringing" and media fascination with every legislative twist and turn. "Passing a big bill like this is always messy."
He also said he wants to give Republicans a chance to be part of a compromise, but won't compromise his core principles on health care. (The full transcript of the interview is below.)
Representative Eric Cantor's office responded to Obama's interview by questioning the sincerity of his bipartisan push.
"We would love to know when, exactly – time, date, place – the President or his staff reached out to Republican Leaders?" Brad Dayspring, spokesman for the No. 2 House Republican, said in an email.
"In fact, the White House blatantly ignored our outreach effort. In May, House Republican Leaders sent the President a letter detailing Republican principles, asking to work together on meaningful, bipartisan reform that Americans could support. And the President’s response? Meeting? Nah. Work together? No thanks. Further discussion? Nope. Instead, they went with, ' Thanks for the letter.' ”
Later this afternoon, Obama held an online-phone strategy meeting with Organizing for America, the current iteration of his presidential campaign that is armed with 13 million or so email addresses.
UPDATE: Obama did the pep rally in a small room at the Democratic National Committee, where about 50 volunteers chanted "Yes, we can," Obama's campaign slogan.
According to the press pool report, Obama talked about the hardships of his longshot campaign, and compared them with his push for health care reform.
"Now, we all know this has been an emotional debate. We've seen tempers flare. Accusations have been hurled. And sometimes it seems like one loud voice can drown out all the civil, sensible voices out there," Obama said.
"But remember one thing: Nothing's more powerful than millions of voices calling for change. That's how we won this election. You know this. And that's why, since OFA launched its health reform campaign in June, you've hosted 11,000 events in more than 2,500 towns in every single state and every single congressional district, which is remarkable."
"We are not going to give up now," Obama said after answering questions. (Listen to the event here.) The full transcript of the event is below.
He needs to rally his troops, whom Democratic officials acknowledge have not been as energized by the complex health care debate as by Obama's "change we can believe in" campaign last year. Valerie Jarrett, a top Obama adviser, warned liberal bloggers last week that the health care push is "an uphill battle, and it won't happen unless we energize our base."
David Plouffe, Obama's campaign manager, told supporters in the email invitation for today's huddle that "the special interests and partisan attack groups who oppose reform will not let up, and they will tell whatever lies they can to spread fear. There's a lot more work for all of us to do."
Late Wednesday, the group told backers it has launched its own truth-squadding website (the White House already has one) called "Setting the Record Straight."
"It feels like a new lie about health insurance reform crops up each day. Government taking over all health care? Not true. Euthanasia for seniors? Couldn't be more false. Rationing of care? Reform will stop rationing, not increase it," wrote Organizing for America director Mitch Stewart.
"These lies create fear and anger, and we're seeing the results around the country....It's time to set the record straight -- and, more importantly, expose the special interests and partisan attack organizations behind the lies and misinformation."
Romney: Obama bowing to liberals on health care
Mitt Romney is probably one of the last people President Obama is looking to for advice on how to get a health care bill done.
But the former Massachusetts governor, who sought the GOP presidential nomination last year and could very well run again in 2012, offered some guidance anyway this morning.
Romney said on CBS's "Early Show" that the president is to blame for the slowing momentum on the bill, faulting Obama for giving too much say to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic liberals.
"If the president wants to get something done, he needs to put aside the extreme liberal wing of his party," Romney said.
While Obama has been stumping for a sweeping health care bill, he has left the details of the drafting to Congress, where majority Democrats are divided. Members of the Blue Dog coalition of conservative Democrats have balked at some provisions, and more moderate Democrats in the Senate are still trying to cut a deal with Republicans. The intraparty divisions emerged clearly this week when it appeared that Obama was backing away from insisting that a public option be part of any bill.
Kennedy looks to set stage for successor

Jason Reed/Reuters
Kennedy flashed a trademark smile in April after President Obama signed the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act at a Washington school.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, in a poignant acknowledgment of his mortality amid a critical time in the national health care debate, has privately asked the governor and legislative leaders to change the succession law to guarantee that Massachusetts will not lack a Senate vote in the event of his death.
In a personal, sometimes wistful letter sent Tuesday to Governor Deval L. Patrick, Senate President Therese Murray, and House Speaker Robert DeLeo, Kennedy asks that Patrick be given the authority to appoint someone to the seat temporarily while voters choose a new senator in a special election.
While Kennedy, who is battling cancer, does not specifically mention his illness or the health reform debate raging in Washington, the implication from his letter is clear: He is trying to make sure that the leading cause of his life -- better health coverage for all -- advances in the event of his death.
Kennedy said in his letter, which was obtained by the Globe, that he supports the current law, which gives voters the power to fill a Senate vacancy. But he said the state and country need two Massachusetts senators.
"I strongly support that law and the principle that the people should elect their senator,” Kennedy wrote. ''I also believe it is vital for this Commonwealth to have two voices speaking for the needs of its citizens and two votes in the Senate during the approximately five months between a vacancy and an election.''
FULL ENTRYFaith groups weigh in on health care
Wanting their voices heard in the health care debate as well, two religious-based groups are holding events today -- but only one will get a cameo appearance by President Obama.
Faith in Public Life had Obama plus a senior administration official for a live webcast call-in this afternoon called “40 Minutes for Health Reform."
UPDATE: The coalition said that an estimated 140,000 people listened in on the call.
In the conference call with the liberal religious leaders, Obama called health insurance coverage for all Americans a "core ethical and moral obligation." He disputed claims that Democratic bills fund abortions, give benefits to illegal immigrants, or create "death panels" that would decide who gets expensive end-of-life treatment.
"I know that there's been a lot of misinformation in this debate and there are a some folks out there who are, frankly, bearing false witness," Obama said. "I need you to spread the facts and speak the truth."
The group says that "people of faith who have experienced the consequences of our broken system will share their stories" and that "clergy working in their own communities to reform health care will highlight ways they are impacting the debate. "
The group, which is sponsored by more than 30 religious denominations and organizations, says it includes lay leaders, clergy, and others from across the political spectrum and from different ideologies, religious traditions, and races.
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele put his own spin on the meeting with faith leaders, who talk about the moral dimension of health care.
“President Obama was hoping to be on offense during the month of August to travel the country and put on the hard sell for government-run health care," Steele said in a statement this afternoon. "Instead, President Obama is frantically struggling to shore up his base. The religious left talks about their desire for ‘social justice.’ No bill that funds abortion or strips health care services away from seniors and low-income Americans can or should be considered just, and that is precisely what the president’s plan does.”
Meanwhile, another organization will hold a counter-conference call later tonight to offer an anti-abortion alternative and mobilize its voters on health care. More than 320,000 pro-life voters will be invited to take part in the teleconference.
“Tens of thousands of pro-lifers across America have already contacted their legislators to urge the preservation of our long-standing tradition of limiting taxpayer funds for abortion, but now is the time to turn up the heat," Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser said in a statement. "Without language to explicitly exclude an abortion mandate, the legislation will result in Americans footing the bill for abortion on-demand in the largest expansion of government-backed abortion since Roe v. Wade.”
UPDATE: That group claimed that 160,000 took part in its conference call.
Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, added in a statement:
“The call for reform as a ‘moral imperative’ rings hollow with Americans because the overwhelming majority firmly oppose taxpayer funding for abortion coverage. Abortion is not healthcare. Real healthcare respects life. As the Hippocratic Oath reminds us, health care grounded in a moral imperative protects the most vulnerable among us including the unborn and the elderly. Real healthcare does not fund the destruction of unborn children and it does not delay or deny care to the sick, elderly and weak among us, but that is the prospect we currently face.”
And Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, said in a statement:
“The Religious Left, that has blindly put their faith in this Administration’s attempted takeover of health care, has repeatedly said they do not want to get into the weeds on the policy aspects of health care reform. Instead they say their focus is on the moral mandate that all people have health care. Ensuring that taxpayer are not forced to fund abortions and that the conscience rights of health care workers are protected is not getting into the weeds, but rather it is ensuring that health care reform is kept on a higher moral plain.”
Democrats renew threat to go it alone
There's quite a bit of buzz today that Democrats might go it alone on a health care overhaul, giving up on a bipartisan bill because of Republican intransigence and unwillingness to compromise.
But that prospect isn't all that new.
In April, congressional Democrats reached a deal that would let the Senate pass a bill with a simple majority of 51 votes, rather than the 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster. Under that agreement, the parliamentary maneuver -- known as reconciliation -- would be used only if the Senate fails to pass a bill by Oct. 15.
The New York Times and CNN, among others, are reporting that there is more focus on just getting enough Democrats' votes to pass a health care bill after the Republican criticism during the town halls being held by members of Congress during the August recess.
But the White House is already pushing back, with spokesman Robert Gibbs telling reporters this morning that it's still only mid-August and there is plenty of time to shape a bill that could win broad support.
Gibbs told reporters this afternoon that the White House still wants a bipartisan deal and believes that key Republicans are still working toward one in good faith.
"The president believes strongly in working with Republicans and Democrats, independents, any that seek to reform health care, that want to see costs cut, coverage increased, insurance reforms implemented that no longer discriminate against families and individuals," he said.
But asked whether that preference trumps Obama's oft-stated goal of getting a bill passed this year, Gibbs replied, "It does not."
And Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus said he's still optimistic that his bipartisan "Gang of Six" is on track to produce a compromise bill by Sept. 15.
Republicans, instead of going ballistic about being frozen out, are treating the possibility as old news. The office of Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 House Republican, said today that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has made it clear for a while now that Democrats would pass a bill without GOP support and that the White House has not made much effort at reaching out to Republicans.
“The announcement that Democrats will abandon bipartisanship in order to pass their costly government takeover of health care is nothing new," House Republican leader John Boehner said in a statement today. "From day one, the White House has taken a go-it-alone approach on health care. Months ago, Republicans sent the president a letter noting areas of potential common ground on health care reform and requesting a meeting with him to discuss a bipartisan way forward. The administration rejected our efforts to work together, choosing instead to craft a costly government takeover of health care and to march forward on a partisan basis solely with Democrats in Congress.
“Now, Democratic leaders find themselves all alone in support of a plan that will drive health care costs higher than ever, increase the federal deficit, slash Medicare, and let government bureaucrats make personal medical decisions that only patients and doctors should make," Boehner added. "The more the American people learn about this plan, the less they like it. It’s time for President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, and congressional Democrats to scrap this costly plan, start over and work with Republicans on reforms that make health care more affordable and accessible for middle-class families and small businesses.”
Poll: Obama gets more blame for partisan fight
As the health care overhaul seems increasingly stuck in partisan gridlock, a new poll shows that the public is down on Washington.
And the survey released today from the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press says that more Americans are starting to blame Democrats and President Obama, who promised over and over to change Washington.
In the poll, 63 percent of respondents said that Obama and GOP leaders are not working together on important issues facing the country, up from 45 percent in February soon after he took office. And while a plurality -- 29 percent -- blame Republicans, 17 percent now fault Obama, up from 7 percent in February.
Obama's own job approval rating is down to 51 percent, down from 54 percent last month and 64 percent in February.
The survey also found that Americans have a dimmer view of the Democratic Party, which had a 62 percent favorability rating just before Obama was inaugurated, but now has a 49 percent favorability rating. The GOP, meanwhile, remains stuck at a 40 percent favorability.
The poll was conducted Aug. 11-17.
Frank turns tables on health care critic
A town hall held by Representative Barney Frank has joined the pantheon of at-times rowdy face-offs on health care this month.
But instead of a shouting critic getting the best of the congressman, this time it was a zinger from the Newton Democrat that drew the most notice and was featured on CNN.
His town hall Tuesday night in Dartmouth drew more than 500 people, who asked how the nation could afford a health care overhaul and who protested a bigger government role. He admonished the protestors, saying that shouting prevented a serious debate on the issue.
He reserved his most biting response, however, for one questioner, a woman who went to the microphone carrying a poster of President Obama with a Hitler-style mustache. The exchange has been replayed repeatedly on cable TV today.
"Why do you continue to support a Nazi policy?" she asked Frank.
"On what planet do you spend most of your time?" he shot back, as the crowd applauded.
Blasting the woman -- apparently a supporter of fringe presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche -- for comparing a bid to improve health care to the Nazis, Frank went on to say that it was "a tribute to the First Amendment that this kind of vile, contemptible nonsense is so freely propagated."
And for good measure, he added, "Ma'am, trying to have a conversation with you would be like trying to argue with a dining room table. I have no interest in doing it."
Kerry speaks on Afghan election
The US is closely watching the presidential election Thursday in Afghanistan, where more than 60,000 American troops are taking on the Taliban, trying to root out al Qaeda, and seeking to further a stable society.
Senator John F. Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, issued his own statement today about what's at stake.
“The Afghan people are demonstrating tremendous courage in defying threats of violence and pursuing democracy in their elections. The fact that dozens of candidates, including two women, are competing for President and thousands of candidates, including about 300 women, are running for provincial council seats is a testament to Afghans’ commitment to having a democracy that works," the Massachusetts Democrat said.
“Ultimately, the success of the elections will be judged by the Afghan people. Americans share Afghans’ hopes for a credible, legitimate, and inclusive process where all those that want to vote, including women, have the opportunity to do so safely. The United States does not support any one candidate in tomorrow’s contest; we will continue to work with the elected representatives of the Afghan people to help bring peace and stability to their country.”
Poll: Americans split on 'public option'
With the health care fight focusing on the so-called public option, a new poll shows that Americans are divided on the issue.
According to the NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey released today, 47 percent of Americans oppose a government plan to compete with private insurers, while 43 percent support it. That's the reverse of last month, before it became such a big issue, when 46 percent backed the idea and 44 percent were against it.
The poll also found that 48 percent agreed with opponents' argument that a public plan would reduce choice of doctors and limit treatment options, while 45 percent agree with supporters' description that the public plan would help lower costs and extend coverage to the uninsured.
UPDATE: The poll also found that Obama's marks on the handling of health care are dropping to 47 percent disapproval and 41 percent approval. But that's still better than Republicans, who earned 61 percent disapproval on the issue.
But 54 percent of respondents said they were worried about the health care overhaul "going too far." And majorities said that the overhaul would cover illegal immigrants, mean a government takeover, and lead to tax-funded abortions -- though the bill sponsors dispute that. A minority, 45 percent, said the changes would mean "death panels" -- the widely debunked notion that a provision would create committees of bureaucrats who would decide when to stop medical care to the elderly.
The poll, conducted Saturday through Monday, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
Obama's grassroots army invited to step up
President Obama's grassroots organization will hold a forum on Thursday with the president on the health care fight and how it can help.
"The President will update us on the fight to pass real health insurance reform -- what's happening in D.C. and what's happening around the country. He'll lay out our strategy and message going forward and answer questions from supporters like you. And we'll unveil the next actions we'll organize together," Obama's former campaign manager, David Plouffe, wrote the 13 million members of Organizing for America this afternoon.
"This is a critical time in this President's administration, and in the history of our country. I hope you can join us," he said in the invitation to take part by phone or via the web.
In the email, Plouffe says that Organizing for America has organized nearly 12,000 events since it began its health care push in June and that about 60,000 members visited members of Congress during their recess. But the New York Times reported over the weekend that many members aren't as excited and involved in health care as they were during the campaign.
Angry letters on health care
It's a tale of two letters as the health care debate continues apace today.
Sixty House Democrats have written a letter of protest to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who prompted a rebellion by liberals, by saying Sunday that the "public option" -- a government health plan to compete with private insurers -- was not an "essential element" of a health care overhaul as far as the Obama administration was concerned.
Their letter (first reported by the firedoglake.com and Plum Line blogs) is signed by the co-chairpersons of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus. (Read it here.)
"The opportunity to improve access to health care is a onetime opportunity," they wrote. "Americans deserve reform that is real-not smoke and mirrors. We cannot rely solely on the insurance companies’ good faith efforts to provide for our constituents. A robust public option is essential, if we are to ensure that all Americans can receive health care that is accessible, guaranteed and of high-quality."
UPDATE: Sebelius, herself, tried to get back on message today, repeating the White House line that Obama hasn't changed his position and still prefers a public option, though the administration is open to other ways to offer competition to private insurers.
"All I can tell you is that Sunday must have been a very slow news day because here's the bottom line: Absolutely nothing has changed. We continue to support the public option. That will help lower costs, give American consumers more choice and keep private insurers honest," she said during a speech on Medicare to the US Commission on Aging.
"If people have other ideas about how to accomplish these goals, we'll look at those, too. But the public option is a very good way to do this. I've seen it work for state employees in states like Kansas where a public option is side-by-side with private insurers, offering competition and choice for state employees. It's what it does when it provides choice in markets that are often dominated by one insurance company, a monopoly that can charge what it wants because it has no competition."
On the other side, House GOP leader John Boehner has written to Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) President and CEO Billy Tauzin, urging him to reconsider the powerful drug industry's support of Obama's overall thrust, or as Boehner puts it "Washington Democrats’ government takeover of health care." (Read it here.)
The drug industry agreed to kick in $80 billion in savings over 10 years to help pay for the overhaul and help fund a pro-reform ad campaign. In return, the White House agreed not to push for additional concessions.
"Appeasement rarely works as a conflict resolution strategy," Boehner writes. "This is as true in the arena of policymaking as it is in schoolyards across America. When a bully asks for your lunch money, you may have no choice but to fork it over. But cutting a deal with the bully is a different story, particularly if the “deal” means helping him steal others’ money as the price of protecting your own."
"The simple truth is, two wrongs don’t make a right. And the short-sighted health care deal PhRMA struck with the Obama Administration at your urging provides confirmation of this time-tested maxim on an epic and tragic scale."
"PhRMA would do well to halt this short-sighted, misguided campaign and listen to the American people, rather than continue to collaborate on an effort to spin them," Boehner adds.
Liberals urge Obama to keep public option
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
The liberal backlash is already starting.
Seeking Republican support for its healthcare overhaul, the White House suggested over the weekend that it would be open to dropping the so-called public option -- a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers and keep them honest on price and quality.
The Obama team hinted that it would consider a nonprofit health cooperative -- being proposed by key senators -- as an alternative to a government plan.
Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor and Democratic Party chief during last year's campaign, urged the president today to stay firm with a public option.
"You can't really do health reform without it," Dean, a leader of the party's liberal wing, said on morning news shows. He called a direct government role "the entirety of health care reform."
On MSNBC, Dean said this afternoon that a while a few small coops have worked in places like Washington state, "it doesn't work" nationally.
The problem, he said, is it was tried in the form of Blue Cross/Blue Shield, which started as a nonprofit and which now acts like a private insurer.
Without a public option, the overhaul bill would just funnel more money to an industry that has acted "abominably," Dean said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi renewed her support for a public option, quoting Obama's own words.
“As the President stated in March, ‘The thinking on the public option has been that it gives consumers more choices and it helps keep the private sector honest, because there's some competition out there.'
“We agree with the President that a public option will keep insurance companies honest and increase competition," Pelosi said in a statement. "There is strong support in the House for a public option. In the House, all three of our bills contain a public option, as does the bill from the Senate HELP Committee. A public option is the best option to lower costs, improve the quality of health care, ensure choice and expand coverage. The public option brings real reform to lower costs over the 10-year period of the bill.”
Representative Anthony Weiner, a New York Democrat who has compared leaving private insurers in charge to "making a pyromaniac the fire chief," predicted that the bill won't win a majority in the House without the public plan.
"I would love to be one of the big supporters of the Obama plan, but I've got to know that it includes a public option." he said this afternoon on CNN.
"Look, the president has to lead on this and he has to say very clearly a public option is important that we could -- that we hold these insurance companies accountable and provide some competition," Weiner added. "I would love to be the one carrying the ball for him, but unless he says a public option is the way to go, I'm going to be a no and so will a lot of people."
Senator Russ Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat, weighed in with his own statement:
"A public option is a fundamental part of ensuring health care reform brings about real change. Opposing the public plan is an endorsement of the status quo in this country that has left tens of millions of Americans uninsured or underinsured and put massive burdens on employers. I have heard too many horror stories from my constituents about how the so-called competitive marketplace has denied them coverage from the outset, offered a benefit plan that covers everything but what they need or failed them some other way. A strong public option would ensure competition in the industry to provide the best, most affordable insurance for Americans and bring down the skyrocketing health care costs that are the biggest contributor to our long-term budget deficits. I am not interested in passing health care reform in name only. Without a public option, I don't see how we will bring real change to a system that has made good health care a privilege for those who can afford it.”
The AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor federation that has been a loyal Obama ally, also said it would "forcefully" urge the White House and Senate to keep the public option in the bill.
"A quality public health insurance option is a crucial part of health care reform to keep private insurance companies honest, hold down costs and ensure that everybody has a health care choice available. Key to holding down costs for families, for businesses, and for the federal budget is forcing insurance companies to compete. And the only way to force real competition on the insurance companies is a strong public plan option," president John Sweeney said in a statement.
"Unfortunately, the usual suspects opposed to reform are trying to hijack the reform process and attacking the public health insurance plan option because they are afraid of competition and they want to keep gouging working families. But unless we take decisive steps to stop the crippling rise of health costs, we will have squandered this moment of opportunity."
UPDATE: Though many observers heard a change in the language that Obama used at a town hall on Saturday and that Sebelius used, the White House insisted today that Obama's position had not shifted significantly.
"His preference is a public option," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters on Air Force One returning from the president's four-day Western trip. "If there are other ideas, he's happy to look at them....I think this is true not only for the issue of health care, but for virtually every other issue that he'll ever deal with in public life is he has goals about what he wants to accomplish and he's not necessarily wedded to only one way of getting there. I think he's said that a hundred times."
Gibbs added, "I challenge you guys all to go back and see what we've said about this over the course of many, many, many, many months, and you'll find a boring consistency to our rhetoric."
Republicans, meanwhile, are not welcoming the possible concession.
Instead, the Republican National Committee sent out a list of comments from Democrats to back up its case that co-ops could be a disguise for another form of the public option.
" 'Public option' by any other name is still government-run health care," the RNC said, adding that the reports of the demise of the public option are "greatly exaggerated."
Still, the issue could divide the Democratic coalition that has been united behind Obama on health care.
Even as Kathleen Sebelius, the health and human services secretary, was saying on CNN Sunday that the public option was not an "essential element" for reform, the Democratic National Committee was all over Dick Armey, a former House Republican leader and now head of the conservative group FreedomWorks, for saying on NBC that a government insurance option would amount to tyranny.
"If you give a government program and let me choose to be in or choose to be out, that's generosity. If you force me in, irrespective of my desires, that's tyranny," Armey said.
DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse responded, “If Dick Armey thinks government involvement in health care is tyranny, he must be forgetting or ignoring the fact that Medicare is a government plan that has been praised as one of the most successful programs ever -- a plan which is popular among seniors and runs better and with lower administrative costs than virtually any private insurance plan. If Republicans like Dick Armey are going to continue to rail against government involvement in health care, they should come forward to call for the abolition of Medicare and Medicaid and if not, just admit that their rhetoric is just part of their political strategy to 'break' the President and derail reform.”
Poll: Americans skeptical of stimulus
The economy appears to be finally on the road to recovery, and on the hustings President Obama has been celebrating that turnaround and crediting the $787 billion economic stimulus plan he championed.
But a new poll out today suggests that most Americans disagree.
Six months after Obama signed the package of tax cuts and spending, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll found that 57 percent of respondents say the stimulus package is having no impact on the economy or making it worse --33 percent said no effect and 24 percent worse. Just 41 percent said the stimulus is making the economy better.
Over the long term, 38 percent of respondents said the stimulus will make things better and 38 percent said it would make it worse.
For respondents personally, only 18 percent said the stimulus has improved their situation while 13 percent said worse and 68 percent said no impact. And more respondents -- 34 percent -- said they expect the stimulus will make things worse for them personally over the long term than better -- 29 percent.
House Republicans -- not a single one of whom voted for the stimulus package -- jumped on the poll results to continue their attack.
“By any objective standard, the Democrats’ trillion-dollar ‘stimulus’ isn’t working," House GOP leader John Boehner said in a statement today. "The administration promised the ‘stimulus’ would provide a ‘jolt’ to our economy and create jobs immediately, but 2.8 million more Americans have lost their jobs since the ‘stimulus’ became law. The American people are asking, ‘where are the jobs?’
"The administration’s insistence on spending, taxing, and borrowing more than ever is not the answer they’re seeking. Instead, it is burying our children and grandchildren under an unmanageable mountain of debt. Families and small businesses expect and deserve far better. Rather than pursuing more job-killing policies like a government takeover of health care and a national energy tax, Democrats should work with Republicans on better solutions that create jobs, curb spending, and control the debt.”
Obama, Hatch tussle on health care
The war of words over health care continues today in dueling radio/Internet addresses.
In one corner, President Obama, who in his weekly remarks, said that with health care overhaul close, the special interests are doing their best to scare and mislead Americans.
In the other corner, Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, who delivering the Republican address, says that Democrats are rushing through a health care bill and that their solution is mostly throwing taxpayers' money at the problem.
They're both trying to win the public as members of Congress spend the month of August at home listening to their constituents before returning next month to resume work on legislation that Obama wants on his desk this year.
Obama directly addresses one Republican claim that a provision to offer counseling on hospice care and other end-of-life issues amounts to government "death panels" that would decide who deserves medical treatment -- and who doesn't . Though the claim has been widely debunked, a bipartisan group of senators have agreed to drop the provision, which is in House Democrats' bill, from the Senate draft.
"That rumor began with the distortion of one idea in a Congressional bill that would allow Medicare to cover voluntary visits with your doctor to discuss your end-of-life care -- if and only if you decide to have those visits. It had nothing to do with putting government in control of your decisions; in fact, it would give you all the information you need – if you want it – to put you in control of your decisions," says Obama, who said "it's disappointing, but it’s not surprising" that reform opponents are resorting to such tactics.
"Those who would stand in the way of reform will say almost anything to scare you about the cost of action," Obama adds. "But they won’t say much about the cost of inaction. If you’re worried about rationed care, higher costs, denied coverage, or bureaucrats getting between you and your doctor, then you should know that’s what’s happening right now. In the past three years, over 12 million Americans were discriminated against by insurance companies due to a preexisting condition, or saw their coverage denied or dropped just when they got sick and needed it most. Americans whose jobs and health care are secure today just don’t know if they’ll be next to join the 14,000 who lose their health insurance every single day. And if we don’t act, average family premiums will keep rising to more than $22,000 within a decade."
But for his part, Hatch pushes back at Democrats who have called the much-publicized protests at some town halls "un-American."
"Although I strongly encourage the use of respectful debate in these town halls, we should not be stifling these discussions," he says. "There is nothing ‘un-American’ about disagreements. In fact, our great nation was founded on speaking our minds."
The reason people are protesting is that they have legitimate worries about the proposals being offered by Obama and congressional Democrats.
"A big reason for this concern is that nearly 85 percent of Americans have coverage and they are really worried about what reform means for them. Especially our seniors," Hatch says.
“Republicans in Congress agree with the majority of Americans who believe that just throwing more taxpayer dollars at a problem will not deliver meaningful reform. Telling the American public that the solution for solving a $2.5 trillion health care system is to simply spend another trillion dollars in our current economy, just does not make sense," Hatch adds.
Instead, any overhaul should focus on making coverage more affordable, banning insurers from denying coverage due to a pre-existing condition, and giving states more flexibility to cover the uninsured, he says.
Obama's speech can be viewed here, and his full address is below. Hatch's speech can be viewed here, and his full remarks are below.
Obama hits insurers in second town hall
President Obama, trying to regain momentum on his health care plan, took to Montana this afternoon to continue his critique of insurers.
In the second of three town halls this week designed to convince Americans who have insurance that an overhaul would benefit them, Obama blasted insurance companies that revoke or water down coverage when patients get seriously ill.
"They get sick, and suddenly that's when they get dropped," he said, saying that responsible Americans are being held hostage by rogue insurance firms.
"It's wrong....We're going to fix it when we pass health insurance reform this year," he told a crowd of about 1,300 in an airplane hangar in Belgrade, just outside Bozeman.
When Americans hear such horror stories, he said, they should think, "There but the grace of God go I."
Obama addressed what he called the emotional debate and the tempers flaring at some congressional town halls.
"TV loves a ruckus," he said. But what people aren't seeing on television and what "makes me proud" are many constructive meetings across the country where people are having difficult conversations about health care issues.
"That's how democracy is supposed to work," the president said.
"For all the scare tactics out there, what is truly scary ... is if we do nothing," Obama said, imploring, "Fight the fear."
Obama made a point of saying none of the questions had been pre-screened for the town hall.
But the initial questions were as friendly as they were in New Hampshire earlier this week.
A young single mother of two, including a disabled son with diabetes and epilepsy, asked whether he would lose Medicaid under Obama's plans.
The president said savings in the Medicaid program would not lower benefits. "You are a heroic mom," Obama added. "Your son's lucky."
The first semi-combative question came from a man who identified himself as a National Rifle Association member and who asked how Democrats plan to pay for health care without a tax increase.
Obama said if the bill costs $800 billion to $900 billion over 10 years, two thirds can come from savings and eliminating subsidies to insurance companies. The other third will have to come from some form of tax increase.
The president said he still prefers his proposal to limit income tax deductions for higher-income Americans. The congressional bills have different ideas, but he said he will keep his campaign commitment not to raise taxes on families making less than $250,000 a year.
For his last questions, Obama asked for a skeptic.
He got an insurance salesman who asserted that insurers have good ideas for health reform, and asked why Obama is "vilifying" insurance companies.
Obama acknowledged that insurers are offering some good proposals, but some insurers are funding campaigns against any kind of reform. He said he wants to keep private insurers, but he also wants to ban certain practices that are unfair to Americans.
Obama, sans tie to be Western casual and since his trip is also partly family vacation to national parks, joked that it was nice to be in a state with moose, elk, and bull: "In Washington, you mostly have just bull. So this is a nice change of pace."
(His full opening remarks and answers to questions are below.)
To emphasize the message of the day, Obama was also introduced by Katie Gibson, a cancer survivor who was told in 1995 that she had less than a year to live and lost her coverage when she and her husband moved to Montana.
Setting up the town hall, Obama's grassroots group from his campaign, Organizing for America, released a web video this morning that details the story of one woman whose coverage was dropped after she was diagnosed with breast cancer.
The web video shows Robin Beaton of Waxahachie, Tex., testifying last month before the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations about how her insurer retroactively dropped her coverage three days before she was scheduled to have surgery to remove tumors.
Saturday in Colorado, Obama's message of the day is expected to be insurers that charge exorbitant out-of-pocket costs.
In the first town hall this week, Tuesday in Portsmouth, N.H., Obama highlighted insurers who don't cover preexisting conditions. He was introduced by Lori Hitchcock, a 52-year-old, single, self-employed Portsmouth resident who could not get insurance after being diagnosed with Hepatitis C in 2003.
Obama's healthcare plan, and bills drafted by congressional Democrats, would ban all three insurer practices.
Montana is the home state to a key player in the congressional debate, Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, a Democrat. He spoke breifly before Obama, saying that he's going around the Big Sky state busting myths and telling the truth.
But unlike New Hampshire, which Obama won last November, Montana is a Republican state that went for GOP nominee John McCain.
And Obama will be greeted with a TV ad running in the state and financed by Conservatives for Patients' Rights, an advocacy group led by a former healthcare executive that has been helping organize protests at congressional town halls.
The spot shows a patient talking with her doctor, then a bespectacled, bow tie-wearing government bureaucrat appears with a clipboard labeled, "FEDERAL HEALTH POLICE."
The announcer urges viewers to oppose the public insurance option that Obama and many Democrats in Congress want as part of the overhaul. "It's not too late to put patients first," he says.
FULL ENTRYSenate panel drops end-of-life provision
Though the idea that the health care overhaul bills call for "death panels" that would decide end-of-life care has been widely debunked, the Senate Finance Committee is dropping the controversial provision from its version.
Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, the panel's top Republican and one of six committee members trying to negotiate a bipartisan bill, said in a statement today that the provision "could be misinterpreted and implemented incorrectly."
The provision in the House bill would allow Medicare to pay doctors for voluntary counseling sessions on end-of-life issues, including living wills and hospice as an option for the terminally ill. It is supported by the American Medical Association and the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization.
But the provision has generated a huge uproar, particularly after Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, called it "downright evil."
In a Facebook posting late Wednesday night, Palin argued that the elderly and ailing could be coerced into accepting minimal end-of-life care to reduce health care costs. "With all due respect, it's misleading for the president to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients," she wrote. "It's all just more evidence that the Democratic legislative proposals will lead to health care rationing."
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said today that "death panels" are the biggest misconception the administration is trying to rebut.
In an email to Obama supporters and a letter posted on the White House website, senior adviser David Axelrod included the claim that the health care proposals would encourage "euthanasia" among eight "common myths."
"It does not. It’s a malicious myth that reform would encourage or even require euthanasia for seniors. For seniors who want to consult with their family and physicians about end-of life decisions, reform will help to cover these voluntary, private consultations for those who want help with these personal and difficult family decisions," Axelrod wrote.
In his town hall on health care on Tuesday in Portsmouth, N.H., President Obama took on the issue head-on.
"The rumor that's been circulating a lot lately is this idea that somehow the House of Representatives voted for 'death panels' that will basically pull the plug on grandma because we've decided it's too expensive to let her live anymore," he told the crowd.
"It turns out that I guess this arose out of a provision in one of the House bills that allowed Medicare to reimburse people for consultations about end-of-life care, setting up living wills, the availability of hospice, et cetera. So the intention of the members of Congress was to give people more information so that they could handle issues of end-of-life care when they're ready, on their own terms. It wasn't forcing anybody to do anything. This is I guess where the rumor came from.
"And somehow it's gotten spun into this idea of 'death panels.' I am not in favor of that....I want to clear the air here."
In his statement, Grassley said, "On the end-of-life issue, there's a big difference between a simple educational campaign, as some advocates want, and the way the House committee-passed bill pays physicians to advise patients about end of life care and rates physician quality of care based on the creation of and adherence to orders for end-of-life care, while at the same time creating a government-run program that is likely to lead to the rationing of care for everyone.
"On the Finance Committee, we are working very hard to avoid unintended consequences by methodically working through the complexities of all of these issues and policy options. That methodical approach continues. We dropped end-of-life provisions from consideration entirely because of the way they could be misinterpreted and implemented incorrectly. Maybe others can defend a bill like the Pelosi bill that leaves major issues open to interpretation, but I can't."
White House makes its case
The White House asserted again today that the screaming at health care town halls all over cable TV is not representative of what's happening across the country.
To buttress that point, the Democratic National Committee sent out a list of reports in local newspapers about less heated events.
"Outside the echo chamber of 24-hour cable news, Americans all across the country are attending town halls, holding coffee shop conversations and engaging in respectful, honest debates about the best way to achieve health insurance reform. As the president continues to forge ahead, making historic progress in his effort to reform America’s broken health insurance system, please see below for coverage of the conversations you haven’t been hearing," the DNC said.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said today there are more reasoned discussions on health care going on in the town halls.
"I think people are getting the feedback that they're having very good conversations about what's in the legislation -- what people would like to see, what options they want to have, why they think it's important," he said.
"I said this yesterday, I'll say this again: while I appreciate that you all have decided that every town hall meeting ends in pushing, shoving and yelling...they're not completely indicative of what's going on in America."
Still, the administration will continue trying to rebut attacks on Obama's proposals, he said.
"I think he believes very strongly, as we talked about yesterday, that it is important to address misconceptions or misimpressions that have been left out there about the bills. I do believe that the president feels strongly that when he makes his case, it helps the case for overall health care reform," Gibbs told reporters during his daily briefing.
"So he felt very satisfied with what happened in New Hampshire. He was able to address concerns that people had."
Meanwhile, White House senior adviser David Axelrod sent an e-mail to Obama supporters listing eight reasons why an overhaul of the health care system is essential and listing what he called eight “common myths” about the overhaul effort. The e-mail asks supporters to forward the message to someone who “has a question about reform.”
“Let’s start a chain e-mail of our own” to counter “the viral e-mails that fly unchecked and under the radar,” Axelrod wrote.
Follow the money
Two nonpartisan watchdog groups in the nation's capital announced today they have joined forces to create a database showing campaign cash to members of Congress and the earmarks (otherwise known as pork barrel projects) that they requested.
Taxpayers for Common Sense provided the data documenting more than 20,000 earmarks totaling more than $35 billion. The Center for Responsive Politics provided data detailing $227 million in campaign donations and lobbying expenses.
"At a minimum, earmarks granted to lawmakers' friends and supporters merit scrutiny and indicate potential conflicts of interest," Sheila Krumholz, the center's executive director, said in a statement. "This information will help Americans decide for themselves whether their congressional representatives are beholden to the voters who elect them -- or to elite interests bankrolling their campaigns."
The online databases (available here and here) allows the public to see how much their elected officials secured in earmarks during the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years and who benefited from their largess -- then track how much those beneficiaries contributed to lawmakers' campaign war chests.
"Earmarks and campaign contributions are part and parcel of the pay-to-play system that permeates Washington," Ryan Alexander, president of the taxpayers group, said in a statement. "Companies making thousands of dollars in campaign contributions get millions of dollars of earmarked taxpayer dollars from lawmakers."
Republicans strike back on health care
President Obama is on the campaign trail for his health care plan, trying to fend off what he calls "wild" accusations and rumors.
But Republicans are trying to turn the tables.
The Republican Naitonal Committee has launched a new website that includes material accusing Obama and Democrats of making inflated claims that under the overhaul anyone can keep their doctor or coverage if they want, and that middle-class Americans won't see higher taxes under the proposals.
"There is no place for outlandish rumor or outrageous rhetoric in the debate for the affordable and accessible health care reform we all want," RNC Chairman Michael Steele wrote supporters today in a fund-raising email.
"The Republicans want an honest and open debate about how to reform health care, but it is the Democrats who do not want to have a legitimate discussion on the issues. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and their liberal special interest cronies are resorting to calling concerned citizens who have questions about their health care schemes 'astroturf,' 'un-American,' and even 'political terrorists.' "
The RNC also has a web video that asserts that health care is Obama's latest experiment, after the economic stimulus package, and America can't take the risk. "Now we face his most dangerous experiment of all -- government takeover of health care," the announcer says.
Meanwhile, 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin is fighting back against Democrats (and independent fact-checkers) who have assailed her claims that the healthcare bills call for "death panels" that would decide end-of-life care. The bills do offer end-of-life counseling that is voluntary.
"Yesterday President Obama responded to my statement that Democratic health care proposals would lead to rationed care; that the sick, the elderly, and the disabled would suffer the most under such rationing; and that under such a system these ‘unproductive’ members of society could face the prospect of government bureaucrats determining whether they deserve health care,” she wrote on her Facebook page Wednesday night.
"With all due respect, it’s misleading for the president to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients.”
Major new ad for health care overhaul
A powerful, deep-pocketed new coalition is launching a $12 million TV ad campaign today in support of a health care overhaul.
Calling themselves Americans for Stable Quality Care, the group includes three vested interests in the debate: PhRMA, the drug companies' lobby; the American Medical Association, the big doctors' group; and the Federation of American Hospitals. It also includes two groups supportive of President Obama, FamiliesUSA and the Service Employees International Union.
Notably, the coalition does not include the insurance industry, which has been increasingly cast by Obama and Democrats as the bad guy in the debate.
"What does health insurance reform mean for you?” asks the ad’s narrator. “It means you can’t be denied coverage for a pre-existing condition, or dropped if you get sick. It means putting health-care decisions in the hands of you and your doctor. It means lower costs, a cap on out-of-pocket expenses, tough new rules to cut waste and red tape, and a focus on preventing illness before it strikes. So what does health insurance reform really mean? Quality, affordable care you can count on."
Stalemate on healthcare, poll suggests
The battle for public opinion on a healthcare overhaul appears to be at a stalemate.
A new Gallup Poll released today found that support for President Obama's handling of the issue has stayed status quo over the past three weeks -- as conservative activists have swarmed congressional town halls to register their opposition and as the White House has stepped up its sales pitch.
In a poll conducted Aug. 6-9, 49 percent of Americans said they disapproved of the president's handling of healthcare and 43 percent approved -- compared to 50 percent disapproval and 44 percent approval in a survey done July 17-19.
Obama's marks on healthcare are the lowest of four issues, with the others being education, foreign affairs, and the economy. And his approval ratings on issues are lower than his overall job approval rating of 54 percent.
The president held a town hall in Portsmouth, N.H., on Tuesday to hit back at his critics and try to clarify what his healthcare proposals don't include. He has two more scheduled this week, in Bozeman, Mont., and Grand Junction, Colo.
The new survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
UPDATE: A USA Today/Gallup Poll released later today about the protests found that 57 percent of Americans believe genuine concerns were behind them, while 48 percent said organizing by activists was also a factor.
While 51 percent said angry attacks represented "democracy in action," 59 percent said shouting down others attending the town halls was an "abuse of democracy."
All the shouting is having limited impact. Thirty-six percent of respondents said the protests haven't made any difference in how they view the healthcare debate, while 34 percent said they were more sympathetic toward the protesters' views and 21 percent were less sympathetic.
The poll, conducted Tuesday, has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
A sedate town hall raises questions
Why wasn't President Obama's town hall on healthcare in New Hampshire Tuesday as much of a shouting match as some held by members of Congress?
At one point, Obama, himself, sought out a question from someone skeptical or suspicious of his plans, with limited success. Critics have suggested that the audience was, if not hand-picked, heavily stacked in the president's favor, even though anyone could sign up for the free tickets through the White House website and it says the winners were picked randomly by computer.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs gave his own explanation today -- a combination of a skewed picture of how raucous the congressional town halls have actually been, plus respect for the presidency.
"I doubt we're seeing a representative sample of any series of town hall meetings despite the food fight on cable every day," Gibbs said at his daily briefing .
"People want to take the opportunity to find out from the president -- to have him answer their questions about why he's doing what he's doing and the concerns they may have on the legislation," he added. "I think most people took that opportunity as something that was positive.
"I think some of you were disappointed yesterday that the president didn't get yelled at," Gibbs told reporters, chiding them for paying too much attention to the back-and-forth between protestors outside.
"The president wanted to have -- what I think what happened -- which was a rational discussion about health care reform legislation. I think that's what ensued. Did everybody agree? I think the answer to that is obviously no."
UPDATE: Meanwhile, conservative activists are questioning how an 11-year-old girl from Malden was called on by Obama to ask a question -- and noting the political activities of the girl's mother. Read about it on our sister blog.
Asked what the biggest obstacle was to passing a healthcare overhaul bill, Gibbs replied, "The people that want to keep the status quo. The people that believe that somehow what we have is working for the millions of Americans who are watching their healthcare premiums skyrocket every day, who are watching small businesses drop their coverage, who are part of the 12.5 million people over the past three years that have been told by an insurance company in seeking to buy insurance on a private market that they're not eligible because of what somebody has decided there's a pre-existing condition.
"I think that would be what the president would believe is the greatest obstacle and has been for 40 years, are people that -- that have a vested, in some senses monetary interest, in keeping things as they are."
Speaking of which, a new TV ad funded by the US Chamber of Commerce launched today. The business lobby opposes a proposal favored by some congressional Democrats to generate money to cover the uninsured by taxing the most generous employer-provided health benefits.
The spot shows an expanding red balloon as the announcer says, "Inflated taxes, swelling deficits, and expanded government control over your health."
The balloon bursts. "Tell Congress: 'Let’s slow down and reform healthcare the right way,' " the announcer says.
Both sides clamor to be heard at N.H. town hall
By Nandini Jayakrishna, Globe correspondent
PORTSMOUTH, N.H. -- President Obama's town hall on healthcare today -- his first since shouting matches and heckling met lawmakers trying to talk to their constituents -- was civil and sedate in comparison.
But activists on both sides sparred outside Portsmouth High School, some using bullhorns to get heard.
The hundreds of people were herded by police to either the pro-overhaul side or the anti-reform side. One overhaul supporter yelled, “You’re on the wrong side, you’re confused!”
But Greg Meyer, 39, of Hampton Falls, N.H., did not want to choose a side. He said if he could, he would stand in the middle of the street between the two sparring groups.
"If we did not believe in that separation, maybe we'd find a way to work together," Meyer said. "I'm on the side of the dialogue."
Supporting the proposals from Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress were AFL-CIO members, Planned Parenthood representatives, and others, dancing to the beat of African drummers.
“I am here because fairness and equality dictate it, we need the public option for health insurance, there should be no restrictions for pre-existing conditions," said Stuart Russell, 66, of Concord, N.H., wearing a sticker that said “I am a healthcare voter.”
Terry Lochhead, 62, of Canterbury, N.H., representing the New Hampshire Alliance for Retired Americans, also said that she supports a public insurance option that Obama is pushing and said that prescription drug prices are too high for the elderly. “It’s ridiculous, people can’t get discounts,” she said.
Mark Mackenzie, president of the AFL-CIO's New Hampshire branch, said the price of healthcare is going through the roof. "We need to begin the process of reining in costs that are out of control.”
He said there is a lot of hype and misinformation in the public and the myths about the Democratic proposals need to be debunked. "If it were a program that would destroy healthcare for people in this country, we wouldn’t stand here," he said.
On the other side of the street from the school, Republicans and other opponents played music including "Proud to be an American."
One opponent, William Kostric, who said he was in his 30s and from Manchester, had a handgun strapped to his leg. Kostric -- who was holding up a sign declaring, "It is time to water the tree of liberty," a slogan popular with anti-government activists -- said he was licensed to carry a gun.
"It’s a political statement,” Kostric said, adding "If you don’t use your rights, then you lose your rights.”
Police asked him to move away from school property, where guns are not allowed, but he was not arrested. He moved to church property a short distance from the school.
Portsmouth police spokesman Lt. Frank Warchol said that as long as a weapon is not concealed and is not carried on the school property, a person is not breaking state law.
"We can't do anything about it," he said. "Obviously he's on our radar screen at this time."
UPDATE: Kostric was interviewed later this afternoon on MSNBC, where under questioning from "Hardball" host Chris Matthews he defended his right to bring a weapon to the event.
Asked about the history of presidential assassinations, Kostric said he was not threatening violence by bringing a gun to a presidential event.
David Call, 60, of Scandish, Maine, said that the healthcare system does not need to be overhauled and that Obama is pushing his proposals too fast.
“If it took the president six months to pick a dog, shouldn’t he spend six months on healthcare?" Call asked. "Slow down, what’s the rush?”
Call also reacted against the top two House Democrats asserting in an opinion piece published Monday that it was "un-American" to disrupt the town hall meetings. “We’re not un-American because we speak up against our government," he said.
Laurie A. Turner, 44, of Manchester, N.H., a history teacher, also said she opposes the reform plans. “It’s gonna take a lot of power out of the hands of the people,” she said.
Hal Posselt, 62, of Concord, N.H., for one, is hoping for real dialogue instead of shouting between the two sides.
"I’m so tired of hearing all the noise out there -- too much noise, not enough thinking and reasoning,” he said. The various plans need to be explained to the public better, he said.
UPDATE: After the event, Lisa Gravel, 39, of Manchester, N.H., a foe of Obama's healthcare overhaul plans, said she was disappointed she could not get into the meeting.
“Everyone coming out of there was clearly an Obama supporter,” she said, holding a sign that read ‘Stop Trashing Our Constitution.’ “He’s not having a healthy debate. He really doesn’t want to hear what I have to say or what any of the people on this side of the street have to say. I find that dishonest.”
As he came out of the gym, Bruce Gottlieb , 56, said he favored the overhaul and and thought the president made a strong case for it, but added that he would have liked Obama to delve into specifics about the program he envisions.
"It was too general,” said the West Hartford, Conn. native. “I’m leaving a little disappointed.”
In N.H., Obama promotes help for insured
President Obama told a civil, restrained town hall meeting this afternoon in Portsmouth, N.H., that his healthcare overhaul will be good for Americans who already have insurance as well as those who don't.
With polls showing deep skepticism about some of Obama's proposals, he talked in opening remarks about how the plan would prevent insurers from denying coverage for preexisting medical conditions, from dropping coverage when someone gets seriously ill, and from charging exorbitant out-of-pocket costs.
Americans are being "held hostage" by insurers, he told about 1,800 people at Portsmouth High's gym, framed by a huge American flag behind the stage.
"I believe it is wrong," he added, and it is bankrupting families and businesses.
"Your health insurance should be there for you when it counts -- not just when you're paying premiums," he declared, adding that it will be once the health overhaul passes. "Nobody in America should go broke because they get sick."
"This is what reform is about" -- not all the chatter and shouting, the president added.
The long vigorous debate is part of democracy, he said. But, he said, "I hope we talk with each other and not over each other," adding "where we disagree, let's disagree over what's real," not falsehoods and rumors.
Greeted by a cheering crowd, he said it was great to be back in New Hampshire -- though he joked that most of his memories of the state "were cold."
He was introduced by a "real person" embodying the preexisting condition message of the day -- Lori Hitchcock, a 52-year-old, single, self-employed Portsmouth resident who was diagnosed with Hepatitis C in 2003. Because no insurance company will sell health coverage to her because of her pre-existing condition, she has been uninsured for two years, the White House said.
Obama said her story is the same one he reads in letters every day.
Obama reprised his argument that the stimulus package and other steps are lifting the country out of recession and "the jobs picture is beginning to turn," but that healthcare reform is one of the pillars needed to "lay a new foundation for economic growth."
He also repeated his debunking of "myths," saying that Americans won't have to give up their insurance if they like it and that he isn't for a government takeover of the healthcare system.
"I don't think government bureaucrats should be meddling, but I also believe that health insurance bureaucrats shouldn't be meddling," he said to applause.
No one, he asserted, is holding insurers accountable for unfair practices. So while an estimated 46 million uninsured Americans need help, it's just as important to achieve reform for those with insurance, he said.
He said that health reform is closer than ever, but the special interests are gathering force to try to stop it.
"Now is the hard part," he said.
Asking for help knocking on doors and convincing neighbors, Obama said, "I never said change would be easy....Change is hard. And it doesn't start in Washington. It starts in places like Portsmouth."
"Yes we can," the crowd chanted, a reprise of Obama's campaign rallies.
"I remember that," Obama replied.
Asked by a state legislator whether he would pass a healthcare bill over Republican objections if necessary, Obama said some Republican friends on Capitol Hill are sincerely trying to find a bill that they can support, naming Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine, among others.
But given Americans' plight and the healthcare's impact on the federal budget deficit, he said, "We have to get it done."
While he hopes for a bipartisan bill, "the most important thing is getting it done for the American people," the president said.
He used humor to dispute claims by 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin and others that "death panels" will decide end-of-life care that will basically "pull the plug on Grandma." The truth, he said, is that there is a provision in the House bill to offer end-of-life counseling, but only for those who want it.
The first sort-of unfriendly question came from a Maine man who identified himself as a Republican and who said he was worried about a public insurance plan putting private insurers out of business.
"I think it's an excellent question, so I appreciate the opportunity to respond," the president replied, before explaining his opposition to a single-payer system like in Canada and to his support for improving the current system of employer-based coverage.
He asked for a question from someone who is "skeptical or suspicious" of his plans, saying he didn't want people to think that the crowd was full of plants.
It took until the very last query before the town hall ended after nearly an hour of questions.
A Derry, N.H., man said he had turned himself in on the portion of the White House website where people could report false emails and rumors.
Obama jumped to say that was another example of the media distorting what was happening. The reporting feature is not a way to compile an enemies list, the president said.
"Come on guys," he said. "All we're trying to do is answer questions.
The man's question was why Obama hadn't chastised Congress because there are two forms of healthcare -- one for members of Congress and one for the public.
Obama replied that without healthcare reform, the gap between the plan members of Congress get and what most Americans get will continue to be wide. But the health overhaul would give Americans an option of a plan very similar to the one that members of Congress get, he said.
"The status quo is not working for you," Obama said. (His full remarks, and the question-and-answer session is below.)
The town hall was Obama's first since the raucous spectacles during events that members of Congress have been having -- including one that Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania is hosting this morning, where one man has already been escorted out and there has been shouting and heckling.
The Democratic National Committee is backing up Obama's slightly retooled message with a new national cable TV ad. Showing images of happy families, the announcer says, "Your family's care comes first....There's something in it for all of us."
Organizing for America, Obama's grassroots group from the campaign, also echoed his message, releasing a web video this afternoon entitled "Coverage Denied."
In the video, Kristen Palmer of Minneapolis, who was featured in a previous video by the group, tells of how she has been denied health insurance coverage due to a pre-existing medical condition -- polycystic kidneys, a genetic disease she shares with her father -- despite the fact that she is healthy and currently suffers no consequences as a result of her medical history.
The White House release on the town hall is below:
FULL ENTRYPalin: Obama health plan 'evil,' but town halls shoud be civil
Sarah Palin, getting in her two cents on the healthcare overhaul debate, has been of two minds lately.
The former Alaska governor and 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee turned up the volume late last Friday with a posting on her Facebook page that suggested that President Obama's plan would lead to a "death panel" that would ration care.
"And who will suffer the most when they ration care?" she wrote. "The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil."
That claim was immediately and loudly disputed by Democrats. (A fact-checking website, Politifact.com, also disputes Palin's characterization.)
"She just made that up,” Howard Dean, the former Democratic National Committee chairman and Vermont governor who is a doctor, said Sunday on CNN. “Just like the ‘Bridge to Nowhere’ that she supposedly didn't support.
“There's nothing like euthanasia in the bill," he added. "I practiced medicine for a long time, and of course you have to have end of life discussions — the patients want that.”
Later Sunday, Palin posted another comment on her Facebook page, urging opponents of Obama's healthcare proposals to be civil at the town hall meetings that members of Congress are having, lest their message be lost in the controversy.
"There are many disturbing details in the current bill that Washington is trying to rush through Congress, but we must stick to a discussion of the issues and not get sidetracked by tactics that can be accused of leading to intimidation or harassment," Palin wrote. "Such tactics diminish our nation’s civil discourse which we need now more than ever because the fine print in this outrageous health care proposal must be understood clearly and not get lost in conscientious voters’ passion to want to make elected officials hear what we are saying. Let’s not give the proponents of nationalized health care any reason to criticize us."
Health reform advocates fight back
President Obama's allies are ramping up their efforts for healthcare overhaul as the battle moves full bore back into local congressional districts and out of Washington.
Opponents of the healthcare bills being pushed by congressional Democrats have been raging at town hall meetings held by members of Congress, protests organized in part by conservative and business groups and cheered on by Republicans.
So Obama's grassroots group from the campaign, Organizing for America, sent an email out to the millions on its list, urging supporters to visit their members of Congress in their offices. The email names each supporter's representative and offers help on the message.
"All throughout August, our members of Congress are back in town. Insurance companies and partisan attack groups are stirring up fear with false rumors about the President's plan, and it's extremely important that folks like you speak up now," writes Mitch Stewart, director of the group.
"So we've cooked up an easy, powerful way for you to make a big impression: Office Visits for Health Reform. All this week, OFA members like you will be stopping by local congressional offices to show our support for insurance reform. You can have a quick conversation with the local staff, tell your personal story, or even just drop off a customized flyer and say that reform matters to you."
Community activists, organized by Massachusetts Communities Action Network, also plan to go Tuesday to home offices of six members of Congress: Senators Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry, and Representatives Michael Capuano, Barney Frank, Stephen Lynch and Jim McGovern.
Even though Massachusetts has its own landmark healthcare law that has extended coverage to 97 percent of residents, the network says a national healthcare overhaul could still help the Bay State by providing federal assistance to allow the state to cover more moderate-income families, by improving Medicare for seniors, and by helping subsidize coverage for 30,000 legal immigrants.
Meanwhile, faith groups backing a health overhaul that provides universal care are launching a 40-day lobbying campaign.
The effort by People of Faith for Health Reform includes a new national cable TV ad in which several clergy talk about special interests fighting reform. "But God has given us a spirit not of fear, but of love and action," says the Rev. Stevie Wakes of Olivet Institutional Baptist Church in Kansas City, Kan.
"Millions of people of faith are supporting health insurance reform," adds the Rev. John Hay of Indianapolis. "Members of Congress: Will you?"
The campaign also includes prayer events in local districts, sermons on healthcare Aug. 28-30, and events in Washington in September as Congress resumes work after its August recess.
UPDATE: The White House, itself, officially launched a "reality check" website that features videos of top administration officials debunking "myths" about Obama's proposals. They include the claims from opponents about healthcare overhaul forcing the rationing of care, euthanasia of the critically ill, cuts in care for veterans, burdens on small businesses, and cuts in Medicare benefits.
Obama rallies support on healthcare
In his weekly Internet and radio address, President Obama uses the hopeful jobs numbers to make his case again for a healthcare overhaul.
He says the July unemployment rate of 9.4 percent, the first decline in 15 months, shows "that we’ve begun to put the brakes on this recession and that the worst may be behind us."
"But we must do more than rescue our economy from this immediate crisis; we must rebuild it stronger than before. We must lay a new foundation for future growth and prosperity, and a key pillar of a new foundation is health insurance reform – reform that we are now closer to achieving than ever before," Obama declares.
While Congress did not meet his original timetable of both the House and Senate passing bills before leaving for the August recess, Obama puts the best face on the progress so far. "Four committees in Congress have produced legislation – an unprecedented level of agreement on a difficult and complex challenge," he says.
And with opponents of the healthcare overhaul taking over town hall events that members of Congress are holding in their districts, Obama takes on his critics, saying that they are misleading Americans.
"That is why it is important, especially now, as senators and representatives head home and meet with their constituents, for you, the American people, to have all the facts," Obama says.
"So, let me explain what reform will mean for you. And let me start by dispelling the outlandish claims that reform will promote euthanasia, cut Medicaid, or bring about a government takeover of health care. That’s simply not true. This isn’t about putting government in charge of your health insurance; it’s about putting you in charge of your health insurance. Under the reforms we seek, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan. And while reform is obviously essential for the 46 million Americans who don’t have health insurance, it will also provide more stability and security to the hundreds of millions who do."
Obama's address can be viewed here, and the prepared remarks are below:
Obama signs 'clunkers' bill
President Obama this morning signed into law a bill replenishing the "cash for clunkers" program with another $2 billion.
The Senate passed the bill Thursday night to keep the program going, after an unexpected flood of car buyers used up the first $1 billion in rebates, as much as $4,500 for trading in gas guzzlers for more fuel-efficient vehicles.
"Now, more American consumers will have the chance to purchase newer, more fuel efficient cars and the American economy will continue to get a much-needed boost," Obama said in a statement after the Senate vote. " ‘Cash for Clunkers’ has been a proven success: the initial transactions are generating a more than 50% increase in fuel economy; they are generating $700 to $1000 in annual savings for consumers in reduced gas costs alone; and they are getting the oldest, dirtiest and most air polluting trucks and SUVs off the road for good. Businesses across the country – from small auto dealerships and suppliers to large auto manufacturers – are putting people back to work as a result of this program. I want to thank Leader Reid and the members of the Senate who moved quickly to extend a program that benefits our recovery and our auto industry while reducing our economy’s dependence on oil.”
Labor weighs in on healthcare
One of President Obama's biggest allies -- Big Labor -- is coming to his aid on healthcare.
The AFL-CIO, the nation's largest union federation, announced today that it will mount an intensive 30-day grassroots effort to back a sweeping healthcare overhaul, timed during the recess when members of Congress will be home listening to their constituents.
AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, in a call-to-arms memo to union leaders, put the choice starkly: "The question for us is: will we let them make health care 'Obama's Waterloo' or will we make it the next big step in our march to Turn Around America?"
Sweeney said unions must fight for healthcare legislation that helps working people, not insurance companies. (His full memo is below.)
The AFL-CIO also put out a statement assailing the tactics of conservative groups, which are sending activists to congressional town hall meetings to criticize members of Congress.
"Every American has the inalienable right to participate in our democratic process. Our politics is passionate, heartfelt and often loud -- as was the founding of our nation. But that is not what the corporate-funded mobs are engaging in when they show up to disrupt town halls held by members of Congress," said the federation's secretary-treasurer, Richard Trumka.
"Major health care reform is closer than ever to passage and it is no secret that special interests want to weaken or block it. These mobs are not there to participate. As their own strategy memo states, they have been sent by their corporate and lobbyist bankrollers to disrupt, heckle and block meaningful debate. This is a desperation move, meant to slow the momentum for change," the statement continues.
"Mob rule is not democracy. People have a democratic right to express themselves and our elected leaders have a right to hear from their constituents -- not organized thugs whose sole purpose is to shut down the conversation and attempt to scare our leaders into inaction. We call on the insurance companies, the lobbyists and the Republican leaders who are cheering them on to halt these ‘Brooks Brothers Riot’ tactics. Health care is a crucial issue and everyone - on all sides of the issue - deserves to be heard."
UPDATE: The Service Employees International Union is urging attendees at townhall meetings to sign a pledge not be disruptive and to listen to those with whom they disagree.
“At the same time that America’s families are seeking relief from fast-rising and unaffordable health care costs, extreme radicals and corporate front groups are trying to derail health insurance reform by disrupting public meetings. While SEIU and allies across the country are staging more than 400 events to promote a real discussion on the country’s need for healthcare reform, these ‘Astroturf’ organizations, are spreading ludicrous, discredited myths designed to scare people away from much-needed reform," SEIU Healthcare Chairman Dennis Rivera said in a statement this afternoon.
“America’s families want a serious and civil discourse about health insurance reform. They want to know how health insurance reform will protect them and their loved ones.
“We, therefore, challenge everyone attending public meetings about health insurance reform to sign a pledge that they are prepared to engage in a civil dialogue so that the American people can better understand how reform, and the absence of such reform, will affect their lives.
“We are convinced that such a serious and civil discourse – tied to facts, not myths – will substantially increase the public’s support for reform."
Obama huddles on healthcare with key senators
With time running out before the Senate starts its August recess, President Obama turns his focus back to healthcare today.
He huddled with the so-called Gang of Six -- the bipartisan group of Senate Finance Committee members trying to make a deal on a healthcare overhaul bill.
UPDATE: White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said that Obama urged the senators to keep seeking a compromise.
"The president invited the group to come to the White House today to provide an update and a status report of sorts on their negotiations amongst themselves and the committee. The president's message to them is to continue to work and find consensus on an issue that we know they've been working hard on, and is very important to the American people," Gibbs told reporters at his daily briefing.
"The president wants them to continue to work and make progress, and wanted to hear directly from them on where they were. It wasn't a negotiating session."
Finance Chairman Max Baucus has set a Sept. 15 deadline for the negotiators to strike a bargain. The Washington Post reports this morning that an emerging bill would come in at about $900 billion over the next decade and eventually cover 94 percent of Americans.
But it would not include the government insurance option that Obama and House Democrats support and, for the first time, tax healthcare benefits provided by employers under the most generous plans -- an idea Obama so far has shunned.
Obama is also hoping for a bipartisan deal, but if one isn't reached Democrats could use a parliamentary maneuver to move ahead without GOP support in the Senate.
"I am glad that in the Senate Finance Committee there have been a couple of Republicans … who've been willing to negotiate with Democrats to try to produce a bill," Obama told NBC News on Wednesday. "But they haven't yet. And I think at some point, some time in September, we're just going to have to make an assessment."
"I would prefer Republicans working with us on that, because I think it's in the interest of everybody. It shouldn't be a partisan issue," he added in the interview. "The bottom line is the American people, the American economy, and the federal budget, have to have some sort of reforms in the health-care system. And failure is not an option this year."
Three House committees led by Democrats passed healthcare bills before starting their recess last Friday, but Democrats are being hammered in town hall meetings in their districts, shouted down by conservative activists and others.
Democrats have hit back, saying Republicans are inciting "mob rule."
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which is trying to reelect next year those representatives who are being hassled, formally announced today the launch of a new truth-squadding website dedicated, it said, "to exposing the truth-twisting attack by Republicans and their fringe right-wing groups on health insurance reform."
“Republicans are trying to poison the debate on health insurance reform with lies, misleading ads, and scare tactics so we’re launching healthcarefactcheck.com to set the record straight and empower our supporters to fight back with the truth,” Jon Vogel, the committee's executive director, said in a statement. “This website is just another way that we are holding Republicans and their fringe groups accountable for trying anything and everything to protect the profitable status quo for big health insurance companies at the expense of affordable health care for families.”
But the GOP shows no signs of backing down.
Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele sent a "Dear Friend" fund-raising solicitation overnight, telling supporters that "Obama Democrats" are trying to demonize them as "right-wing extremists.
"We saw this sort of vitriolic rhetoric this past April when Democrats smugly dismissed grassroots protests against their out-of-control spending. These Tea Parties were ruthlessly mocked by the liberal elites and the mainstream media," Steele wrote.
"Now as public support for the Obama Democrats' government-run health care plan unravels, they're using this fear-and-smear tactic to silence ANY American who disagrees with their risky scheme to nationalize one-fifth of our economy and limit your health care choices. It's a page out of their standard playbook of name calling and outright lies to stifle all debate."
Sanders goes viral video
Bernie Sanders, the iconoclastic US senator from Vermont, is launching his own series of weekly "webisodes" where he will answer questions from constituents.
Sanders, the only avowed Socialist in Congress, is partnering with Brave New Films in the venture, called "Senator Sanders Unfiltered."
A trailer shows Sanders railing against greed and economic inequality, arguing that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are costing too much money, and assailing insurance companies for lobbying Congress to stop healthcare overhaul that provides universal, affordable coverage.
The first webisode will be available on his Senate website on Monday, then subsequent ones regularly on Thursdays.
Constituents can submit video questions via Twitter on twitvid.com by using the #sanders tag, and Sanders' office is encouraging them to share the trailer video via Facebook and other social networking sites.
Democrats slam 'mob rule;' Republicans call it democracy
The Democratic National Committee today launched a web ad slamming the GOP and allied conservative groups for sending activists to healthcare town halls where they are shouting questions and criticisms.
"The right wing extremist Republican base is back," the announcer intones, over scenes of disruptions at gatherings starting over the weekend as the battle over healthcare moves out of Congress and into home districts.
After losing congressional battles on the budget and after eight years of failed economic policies during the Bush administration, the narrator says, desperate Republicans are organizing "angry mobs."
"Their goal: Destroy President Obama and stop the change that Americans voted for overwhelmingly in November," the announcer says. "They have no plans for moving the country forward so they've called out the mob."
Michael Steele, a spokesman for House GOP leader John Boehner, responded to the ad:
"Out-of-touch Washington Democrats would love to blame their problems on Republicans, but they can't. Their problem in Washington is Democrats fighting against Democrats. Their problem across the country is Democrats fighting against the American people, by backing job-killing tax hikes and regulations in the middle of the deepest recession in decades."
UPDATE: The Republican National Committee also responded, sending out a list of polling results showing doubts about the Democrats' healthcare plans, and asserting that what Democrats call "mob rule" is merely small-d democracy.
"Today the White House and Democrats continue their callous and arrogant campaign to reduce the concerns and opinions of millions of Americans as 'manufactured' -- and have labeled them as 'angry mobs' and 'rabid extremists,' for voicing their opposition to President Obama’s government-run health care experiment," the RNC said.
"This 'mob' the Democrats are referring to include millions of American families, small business owners, doctors, veterans, seniors – and even House and Senate Democrats – who have real concerns over the president’s risky and costly government-run health care experiment. And they should be concerned – as this costly experiment will raise taxes without decreasing costs, increase the deficit, will lead to less choice and lower-quality health coverage.
"Before heading into recess, the Democrats should have read the dozens of public opinion polls showing that a majority of Americans believe President Obama’s government-run health care experiment is a bad idea. It’s no secret that Democrats aren’t even on board. Chaos in Washington has reigned over health care in the last several weeks. Are Democrats so out of touch that they are shocked to find concern among their constituents over their $1.6 trillion government-run health care experiment? Or are the Democrats once again waging a campaign of distraction to shift the focus away from their widely unpopular, big government policy?
"The bottom line? Americans, including Independents and some Democrats, do not like President Obama’s government-run health care experiment – and they are going to show up to say so. It’s called democracy."
Recent polls show that Americans are divided about the healthcare plans proposed by Obama and congressional Democrats. A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released this morning found 50 percent backing Obama's plan, but 45 percent opposed.
While 30 percent said Obama's proposals would help them and 40 percent said it would help other families, 20 percent said the proposals would not help anyone.
In the survey, 71 percent said they were very likely or somewhat likely to attend a town hall even on healthcare hosted by their member of Congress.
As part of the counter-offensive, Obama's grassroots groups is organizing its own healthcare events and getting its members to the town halls.
"This is the moment our movement was built for," the president, himself, told Organizing for America supporters in an email this afternoon.
"For one month, the fight for health insurance reform leaves the backrooms of Washington, D.C., and returns to communities across America. Throughout August, members of Congress are back home, where the hands they shake and the voices they hear will not belong to lobbyists, but to people like you.
"Home is where we're strongest. We didn't win last year's election together at a committee hearing in D.C. We won it on the doorsteps and the phone lines, at the softball games and the town meetings, and in every part of this great country where people gather to talk about what matters most. And if you're willing to step up once again, that's exactly where we're going to win this historic campaign for the guaranteed, affordable health insurance that every American deserves.
"There are those who profit from the status quo, or see this debate as a political game, and they will stop at nothing to block reform. They are filling the airwaves and the internet with outrageous falsehoods to scare people into opposing change. And some people, not surprisingly, are getting pretty nervous. So we've got to get out there, fight lies with truth, and set the record straight."
Democrats deride 'astroturf' efforts by healthcare foes
Democrats are striking back at conservative groups that are taking the credit for helping opponents show up at healthcare meetings around the country.
Town halls with constituents hosted over the weekend by Representative Lloyd Doggett in Texas and by Senator Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania were disrupted by opponents of the healthcare overhaul plans promoted by President Obama and congressional Democrats.
The Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sent out missives today arguing that groups such as Conservatives for Patients' Rights and FreedomWorks and are creating fake grassroots enthusiasm -- "astroturf" in political circles -- by stacking meetings with outside activists.
"The Republicans and their allied groups - desperate after losing two consecutive elections and every major policy fight on Capitol Hill - are inciting angry mobs of a small number of rabid right wing extremists funded by K Street lobbyists to disrupt thoughtful discussions about the future of health care in America taking place in congressional districts across the country," DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse said in a statement this afternoon.
"However, much like we saw at the McCain-Palin rallies last year where crowds were baited with cries of 'socialist,' 'communist,' and where the birthers movement was born – these mobs of extremists are not interested in having a thoughtful discussion about the issues – but like some Republican leaders have said - they are interested in ‘breaking’ the president and destroying his presidency," Woodhouse added.
"These mobs are bussed in by well funded, highly organized groups run by Republican operatives and funded by the special interests who are desperately trying to stop the agenda for change the President was elected to bring to Washington. Despite the headline grabbing nature of these angry mobs and their disruptions of events, they are not reflective of where the American people are on the issues – or the hundreds of thousands of thoughtful discussions taking place around kitchen tables, water coolers and in homes. The right wing extremists’ use of things like devil horns on pictures of our elected officials, hanging members of Congress in effigy, breathlessly questioning the President's citizenship and the use of Nazi SS symbols and the like just shows how outside of the mainstream the Republican Party and their allies are. This type of anger and discord did not serve Republicans well in 2008 – and it is bound to backfire again."
The town hall episodes were discussed at a White House lunch today among Obama and Senate Democrats, said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.
He said Obama won several standing ovations and gave a coach-like pep talk that revved up the rank-and-file.
"We're ready to take on the world," Reid told reporters.
Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut, who is shepherding healthcare legislation in the absence of Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, said that while senators want a bipartisan deal, time is of the essence.
During the monthlong recess that starts Friday, 500,000 more Americans will lose their health insurance, Dodd said.
"We need to come back with a renewed sense of purpose," he said.
Obama grassroots group on the air
With House members back in their districts, President Obama's grassroots group is airing radio ads pushing key representatives on healthcare and thanking others on the economic recovery package.
Organizing for America announced that the health ad, entitled "Standing Up," will run in 19 districts. Listen to it here.
The economic ad, entitled "To the Rescue," will run in four districts, the group said. Hear it here.
"These members have been part of one of the most ambitious, historic and successful opening months of a Congressional session in our nation's history," said OFA Director Mitch Stewart. "From expanding health insurance to millions of vulnerable children, to passing a recovery act that rescued our economy from certain disaster, to passing a budget that halves our deficit over the next decade while making critical investments in health care, energy and education, these members have all helped bring about the change President Obama promised to bring to Washington. They are now standing up to the special interests, the lobbyists and the naysayers and working for big solutions to our nation's toughest problems - including fixing a broken health insurance system that costs too much, leaves too many people lacking coverage and puts insurance industry profits ahead of patient care. Thanks to the support of these members and others like them - we will reform the health insurance system in this country and make other critical policy changes to get our economy back on track."
The group is up against conservative organizations that have been finding activists to attend town halls on healthcare that members of Congress have been having with their constituents.
Angry crowds on healthcare
Some members of Congress aren't exactly being welcomed home with open arms as they try to take the temperature of constituents on healthcare.
The New York Times reports that Representative Lloyd Doggett was shouted down by an angry crowd in Texas, who yelled, "Just Vote No."
And the Associated Press reports that Senator Arlen Specter and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius were booed and jeered at a healthcare town hall at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia.
Democratic congressional leaders and the White House were pushing for votes in the full House and Senate before the monthlong recess, in part because they knew that opponents would mobilize. The House adjourned last Friday after three committees passed legislation, and the Senate plans to go home this Friday after a second committee passes a plan.
Obama, Senate Democrats to talk healthcare, clunkers
Following up on a retreat with Cabinet officials and others over the weekend at the six-month mark of his new administration, President Obama plans to huddle Tuesday with all 60 Senate Democrats.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the unusual gathering is meant to take stock of where legislative priorities stand -- and two are likely to be at the forefront: healthcare overhaul, since a full Senate vote has been put off until after the August recess, and the "cash for clunkers" bill.
"I don't doubt that healthcare will be discussed," Gibbs said at his daily briefing. "I believe the economy will also be heavily discussed; the numbers that we've been talking about, numbers that we'll see throughout the week, unemployment, manufacturing reports -- just in general where the economy is. I think we'll probably -- they'll go through and discuss energy legislation.
Gibbs also said that a topic will be the House-passed bill to pump $2 billion more into the unexpectedly popular program giving car buyers stipends for trading in gas guzzlers for fuel-efficient vehicles. "Without some help from the Senate, in terms of moving the $2 billion from the Recovery and Reinvestment plan's energy efficiency programs into this account, [it] will likely mean that the program will have to be stopped by the end of the week.
Asked why Republicans weren't invited, Gibbs replied, "I would look at this as the president speaking to the Democratic caucus. They have a regularly scheduled caucus lunch that happens every Tuesday. It's just we're having that lunch here at the White House rather than up on Capitol Hill. So I think that explains talking to the -- to Senate Democrats."
Democratic group targets insurer
With House members already back in their districts and senators in their last week before heading home for a month, a liberal-labor coalition pushing President Obama's healthcare overhaul is squarely on message with Democrats.
A new national cable TV ad unveiled today tries to put the focus on Big Insurance, which Democrats are increasingly targeting as they try to fend off criticism from Republicans about the overhaul's cost and complexity.
While Obama has promoted cooperation from insurers, they are opposing a public insurance option that the president and Democrats say is needed to control costs and offer consumers a choice of coverage.
"Why do the health insurance companies and Republicans want to kill President Obama’s health insurance reform?" the announcer asks in the 30-second spot. "Because they like things the way they are now."
The ad then pictures the CEO of one major insurer, as the announcer says, "Ed Hanway, CEO of insurance giant Cigna, makes $12. 2 million a year. That’s $5,883 an hour. Ed makes more in one day, than the average worker makes all year long."
"Now Ed’s retiring with a seventy three million dollar golden parachute," the announcer adds over an image of Hanway's face attached to a parachute and floating down. "The Republican prescription for the health insurance crisis – be as rich as Ed … you’ll be happy too."
UPDATE: Responding to the criticism from Democrats, namely House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Janet Trautwein, CEO of the National Association of Health Underwriters, issued a statement.
"It's unfortunate that Speaker Pelosi has resorted to petty name-calling in the debate over health care reform. We all have a stake in achieving meaningful reform that both preserves Americans' freedom to choose their doctors and lowers long-term health care costs. A public option will accomplish neither," said Trautwein, whose group says it represents more than 100,000 licensed health insurance agents, brokers, consultants and benefit professionals nationwide.
"A new government-run health plan will raise costs for Americans with private insurance. By systematically underpaying doctors and hospitals, our country's existing public plans -- Medicare and Medicaid -- raise the average family's premiums by $1,800 a year. A public option will only exacerbate this problem -- and make insurance more expensive."
Romney, Pawlenty spar on healthcare
Tim Pawlenty and Mitt Romney agree in their disdain for the healthcare overhaul plan Democrats and President Obama are trying to push through.
But they have been sparring in recent days over the right approach -- a preview, perhaps, of the 2012 Republican presidential sweepstakes.
The Minnesota governor and former Massachusetts governor, who were both on Senator John McCain's short list for vice president last year, both appear to be laying the groundwork for possible 2012 bids.
Pawlenty, in an opinion piece published in the Washington Post over the weekend and in a letter last week to Minnesota's congressional delegation, not surprisingly promoted his state's plan.
"In Minnesota, our state employee health-care plan has demonstrated incredible results by linking outcomes to value. State employees in Minnesota can choose any clinic available to them in the health-care network they've selected. However, individuals who use more costly and less-efficient clinics are required to pay more out-of-pocket," he wrote.
But more interestingly, he took some pointed swipes at the healthcare overhaul in Massachusetts, one of Romney's biggest accomplishments as governor, though he ran away from the parts most objectionable to conservatives during his presidential campaign.
"Massachusetts's experience should caution Congress against focusing primarily on access. While the Massachusetts plan has reduced the number of uninsured people, costs have been dramatically higher than expected. The result? Increased taxes and fees. The Boston Globe has reported on a current short-term funding gap and the need to obtain a new federal bailout," Pawlenty wrote in the Post. "Imagine the scope of tax increases, or additional deficit spending, if that approach is utilized for the entire country."
Romney, in an op-ed piece in USA Today, even as he accused Obama from rushing through a bad plan, defended the Massachusetts plan against Pawlenty's critique.
"Massachusetts also proved that you don't need government insurance. Our citizens purchase private, free-market medical insurance. There is no "public option." With more than 1,300 health insurance companies, a federal government insurance company isn't necessary. It would inevitably lead to massive taxpayer subsidies, to lobbyist-inspired coverage mandates and to the liberals' dream: a European-style single-payer system. To find common ground with skeptical Republicans and conservative Democrats, the president will have to jettison left-wing ideology for practicality and dump the public option," Romney wrote.
"When our bill passed three years ago, the legislature projected that our program would cost $725 million in 2009. At $723 million, next year's forecast is pretty much on target. When you calculate all the savings, including that from the free hospital care we eliminated, the net cost to the state is approximately $350 million. The watchdog Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation concluded that our program's cost is 'relatively modest' and 'well within initial projections.' "
GOP video warns of government deciding care
In his healthcare pitch, President Obama has been trying to explain in simple terms the benefits to patients and consumers.
But a new Republican web video, released today by House GOP leader John Boehner, tries to use some of his own words against him, raising the specter of government control of the care that people would receive.
Over the strains of the theme song from the long-running daytime soap "Young and the Restless," a pitchman circa 1970s says, "I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV."
The video then shows Obama suggesting that if a blue pill is the half the price of the red pill and does the same thing, maybe patients should take the blue pill. It also shows him positing that drugs might be better than surgery.
On screen at the end is a faux prescription form headlined "Obamacare." "We aren't doctors, but we know what's best for you."
Democratic National Committee spokesman Hari Sevugan responded to Boehner's video:
"John Boehner isn't an insurance company executive, but he sure plays one in the U.S. House of Representatives. That's the only explanation for admittedly working to 'kill' health insurance reform while premiums for the average American family are rising three times faster than their wages, while small businesses are choosing between offering coverage and creating jobs, and when controlling runaway health care costs is necessary to get the economy fully back on track. John Boehner and the Republicans that would follow him may not officially be insurance agents, but in working to 'kill' reform they are proving that they are certainly agents of the status quo."
White House sees hope in economy, races to replenish 'cash for clunkers' fund
President Obama said new, better-than-expected gross domestic product numbers show that the country is headed in the right direction, and that "the recession we faced when I took office was even deeper than anyone thought at the time."
The president also said the massive, $700 billion economic stimulus package "helped pull the nation back from the brink."
The economy "has done measurably better that we had thought -- better than expected. And as many economists will tell you, that part of the progress is directly attributable to the Recovery Act," Obama said this afternoon. "This and other difficult but important steps that we've taken over the last six months have helped us put the brakes on the recession."
But the president added that the good economic news is cold comfort for those withouth jobs and families struggling to make ends meet.
"When we receive our monthly jobs report next week, it's likely to show that we're still continuing to lose far too many jobs. As far as I'm concerned, we won't have a recovery as long as we keep losing jobs," Obama said. "And I will not rest until every American who wants a job can find one."
Nevertheless, "history does show that you need to have economic growth before you have job growth," Obama said. "And today's GDP is an important sign that the economy is headed in the right direction and that business investment, which had been plummeting in the last several months, is showing signs of stabilizing. This means that eventually, businesses will start growing and they'll start hiring again. And that's when it will truly feel like a recovery to the American people."
The Commerce Department reported that the economy shrank by 1 percent in the second quarter of the year, giving hope that the longest recession since World War II is easing.
"Obviously that's the right direction," Christina Romer, one of the president's top economic advisers, said on MSNBC. "We've got a long way to go."
The revised number in the first quarter was down 6.4 percent, the biggest decline in nearly three decades -- showing that the recession was even worse than believed at the time and proving that the $787 billion stimulus plan and other government spending was necessary, said Romer, chairwoman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
"We absolutely had to rescue this economy," she said.
For the economy to truly rebound, she said, there needs to be 2 percent to 3 percent real growth.
Obama and Romer also tried to reassure Americans that one initiative won't be a victim of its own success.
The "cash for clunkers" program has been so popular that consumers have already emptied the $1 billion fund.
"Not more than a few weeks ago, there were skeptics who weren't sure that this "Cash for Clunkers" program would work," Obama said. "But I'm happy to report that it has succeeded well beyond our expectations and all expectations, and we're already seeing a dramatic increase in showroom traffic at local car dealers."
"And I'm encouraged that Republicans and Democrats in the House are working to pass legislation today that would use some Recovery Act funding to keep this program going -- funding that we would work to replace down the road," the president said. "Thanks to quick bipartisan responses, we're doing everything possible to continue this program and to continue helping consumers and the auto industry contribute to our recovery."
"If you wanted to buy a car this weekend, go do it," Romer told Reuters Television. "The program is still there. It has not been suspended, and I can tell you there is a real flurry of activity working with the agencies, the Congress, to ensure we can continue this and get the funds there."
The Associated Press is reporting that Democrats in both the House and Senate are exploring votes as early as today to add $2 billion into the rebate program.
Representative Sander Levin of Michigan revealed the bill after he and other lawmakers were assured by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood that the program would continue at least through today while the Obama administration looked for more money, the AP says.
Obama praises food safety bill
President Obama this evening lauded the House for passing a sweeping food safety bill designed to prevent repeats of the wide outbreak of salmonella in peanuts that killed at least nine Americans.
The legislation approved today over objections from some farm-state lawmakers would require more government inspections of manufacturers, give the Food and Drug Administration new powers to order recalls, and require the FDA to develop a system for better tracing food-borne illnesses.
"This action represents a major step forward in modernizing our food safety system and protecting Americans from foodborne illness," Obama said in a statement. "Those are the goals of the Food Safety Working Group I convened in March and charged with making recommendations to improve our food safety system. And that is why we announced a new rule to control Salmonella contamination in eggs and are working to reduce the presence of harmful pathogens such as E. coli in meat and produce; strengthen our capacity to trace the source of outbreaks; and update our emergency operations procedures.
"I commend the House of Representatives for its action today and look forward to working with the Senate to enact critical food safety legislation.”
House spikes more F-22 jets
The House today confirmed a key victory for President Obama's bid to get a handle on Pentagon spending, joining the Senate to kill additional funding for F-22 fighters.
The 269-165 vote against building more of the top-line Air Force combat jets, on top of the 187 in the pipeline, followed a similar Senate vote last week on the $600-plus billion defense funding bill.
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates put the hard sell to persuade lawmakers to reject expanding the F-22 program, over objections from members of Congress who wanted to protect jobs supported by the program. Obama has threatened to veto a defense bill that include the money.
The White House and Pentagon say the F-22 -- designed for aerial dogfights with Soviet jets during the Cold War -- is not suited to the military's current needs, pointing out that it has never been deployed over Iraq or Afghanistan.
But despite veto threats, the $636 billion Pentagon spending bill passed by a 400-30 vote includes money for other programs Obama didn't want, including a much-criticized new presidential helicopter fleet, cargo jets, and an alternative engine for the next-generation F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the Associated Press reports.
Carrots and sticks for Sudan?
President Obama's special envoy to Sudan told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today that US sanctions on the country as a state sponsor of terror is hurting efforts to bring peace and ease suffering in the war-torn nation.
Scott Gration called the sanctions a "political decision" and said that the United States was going to have to "unwind" them.
Advocacy groups for the people of Darfur, where hundreds of thousands have been made refugees or killed, were cautious in their reaction.
"We were encouraged to hear unequivocally from Gen. Gration that he and the Obama administration are pursuing a balanced approach which includes both carrots and sticks as levers to change Khartoum's behavior," Jerry Fowler, president of the Save Darfur Coalition, said in a statement. "We are, however, seriously doubtful of Khartoum's true intention and ability to make good on their promises, and urge Senators to follow up swiftly with Gen. Gration on the classified details of this plan to ensure that it's sufficiently robust to get the job done."
Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, the committee's chairman, also called for a comprehensive approach.
"Many discussions of US-Sudan policy here in Washington continue to center on the question of whether we should use carrots versus sticks -- i.e. rewards or punishments -- to influence Sudan’s leaders in Khartoum.
When I visited Sudan in April of this year, I came away convinced that we need to build a strategic framework that moves beyond simple oppositions like carrots versus sticks or the South versus Darfur. Instead, we need a nuanced, comprehensive strategy for Sudan as a whole," Kerry said in remarks opening the hearing.
His full prepared remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYObama stresses consumer protections in healthcare bill
President Obama takes his healthcare road show today to two Southern states that proved pivotal to his election in November.
And with healthcare overhaul bills mired in legislative muck and public support dropping, he's retooling his message to speak directly to consumers.
The president held a town hall at Broughton High School in Raleigh, N.C., then another Q&A with employees at the Kroger supermarket in Bristol, Va. Obama became the first Democratic presidential candidate to win both states in more than a generation, contributing to his electoral landslide.
In his primetime news conference last week and in appearances since, Obama has reached out to Americans who already have insurance or Medicare, trying to reassure them that they won't be hurt by the overhaul, either by losing care or getting smacked by higher costs.
Today, in both stops, he stressed the protections for consumers that he will insist be in any overhaul bill.
"First of all, nobody is talking about some government takeover of healthcare," Obama told the crowd in Raleigh. "I'm tired of hearing that.... Under the reform I’ve proposed, if you like your doctor, you keep your doctor. If you like your healthcare plan, you keep your healthcare plan. These folks need to stop scaring everybody."
"But what a lot of the chatter out there hasn’t focused on is the fact that if you’ve got health insurance, the reform we’re proposing will also help you because it will provide more stability and security," he added. "Because the truth is, we have a system today that works well for the insurance industry, but it doesn’t always work well for you. What we need, and what we will have when we pass these reforms, are health insurance consumer protections to make sure that those who have insurance are treated fairly and insurance companies are held accountable."
(His full remarks and answers to questions are are below.)
The consumer protections include:
-- Banning insurance companies for refusing to offer coverage due to pre-existing medical conditions.
-- Capping how much insurers can charge annually for out-of-pocket expenses, deductibles, or co-pays.
-- Requiring insurers to fully cover regular check-ups and tests, including mammograms and eye and foot exams for diabetics.
-- Prohibiting insurers from dropping or reducing coverage for those who become seriously ill.
-- Banning insurers from charging people based on gender.
-- Stopping insurance companies from placing annual or lifetime caps on benefits.
-- Making sure that young adults as old as 26 can be covered under family insurance policies.
-- Requiring insurers to renew policies as long as premiums are paid in full, even if the policyholder becomes ill.
Obama, en route to Virginia, issued a statement noting the progress in Congress today.
In the Senate, key negotiators said they had pared the costs of a plan to cover 95 percent of Americans by 2015 to about $900 billion over 10 years, putting the price tag under the unofficial $1 trillion target the White House has set. In the House, the leadership, the White House, and fiscally conservative Blue Dog Democrats worked out a deal that will allow a bill to move forward in committee, but will delay a floor vote until September.
“I want to thank the members of both the Senate and House of Representatives for continuing their work on health reform to provide more stability and security for Americans who have insurance, and quality, affordable coverage for those who don’t," Obama said. "I’m especially grateful that so many members, including some Blue Dogs on the Energy and Commerce Committee, are working so hard to find common ground. Those efforts are extraordinarily constructive in strengthening this legislation and bringing down its cost.”
Another poll out this afternoon says that Americans are divided about Obama's healthcare plan.
In the Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey, 46 percent said they disapprove of Obama’s handling of healthcare, while 41 percent approved and 13 percent weren’t sure.
The Journal says those numbers are similar to former President Bill Clinton's of 52 percent disapproval and 40 percent approval in July 1994 before his healthcare overhaul plan crashed and burned in Congress.
UPDATE: Republicans, however, are still opposed to the Democratic bills, and House Republicans introduced a plan today that relies on tax credits to help people buy insurance and that also addresses medical malpractice reform.
The top House Republican, John Boehner of Ohio, said on CNN this afternoon that the legislation would create "a giant government bureaucracy that's going to drive up the cost of health care, drive up the cost of health insurance, deny millions of Americans their choice of doctor, and eventually lead to rationing of health care in America. This is not the kind of plan that Americans want."
"I believe that it's time to hit the reset button," Boehner added. "Let's scrap this plan. Let's sit down in a bipartisan way. And let's build on the current system, which is the envy of the world.
"You know, 93 percent of the American people have access to high quality, affordable health insurance. Let's help them be able to hold on to that, reduce the cost of it, and expand access to those Americans who don't have good access."
Democrats: Republicans broke economy, won't fix it
With Republicans citing the continuing economic distress to bash the economic stimulus plan pushed through by President Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress, the Democratic National Committee is hitting back with a media campaign blaming Republicans for creating the mess to begin with.
In a new TV ad announced today, the DNC goes after the top four congressional Republicans -- Senators Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Jon Kyl of Arizona, and Representatives John Boehner of Ohio and Eric Cantor of Virginia -- by saying they "supported the Bush policies that sank our economy into recession. They broke it - now they refuse to fix it."
"Tell Republicans to stop playing politics with our economy," the announcer urges viewers.
Besides the media campaign, the DNC is organizing news conferences or conference calls with reporters in their home states this week with local elected officials and others to testify to the impact of the $787 billion stimulus plan. Not a single House Republican voted for it, and only a handful of Senate Republicans did.
"Republicans supported the policies that sank our economy into the worst recession in nearly a century and have refused to work with President Obama to turn things around," DNC Communications Director Brad Woodhouse said in a statement. "They followed Rush Limbaugh and played politics with the Recovery Act - and now that it is showing signs of progress - they are distorting the truth about its success so no one will notice that they were the ones who got it wrong before and who are getting it wrong now. In each of these states there are real projects, providing and saving real jobs and laying a foundation for long-term economic growth. The Republican leadership may not want to admit the truth because it will expose their own mistakes and hypocrisy, but we're not going to hesitate setting the record straight."
UPDATE: Obama, himself, addressed what he called "a lot of misinformation out there" about the stimulus bill, which he said has helped stem job losses though "the tough times aren't over."
"Let me just lay out the facts," he said in a town hall in Raleigh, N.C., today, saying he had passed protestors on the way to the event: "Roughly a quarter of the Recovery Act’s funding has been committed, over 30,000 projects have been approved, and thousands have been posted online."
One-third of the money is going to tax cuts for families and small businesses, another third is for emergency relief including unemployment benefits, and the final third is for investments such as infrastructure projects, he said.
"Now, I know that some critics in Washington ... they are saying we’ve been slow to get these projects started. They are saying we should have broken ground on all our highway projects on the first day. That’s impossible, especially because I wanted to be sure we did our homework and invested tax dollars only in those projects that actually created jobs and jump-started our economy. We knew it would take a few months for these projects to get online," he said.
"So it will take time to achieve a complete recovery, we're not going to rest until anyone who’s looking for work can find a job. But there should be little debate that the steps we took, taken together, have helped stop our economic freefall."
Obama talks healthcare to AARP
President Obama reached out this afternoon to a key constituency on his healthcare overhaul plan, seeking support from the 55-plus set.
"We've got to get a better bang for our healthcare dollar," he told a town hall hosted by the AARP.
There needs to more preventive care, and unnecessary subsidies need to be taken away from Medicare providers, the president said.
But, he pledged, "We certainly won't cut corners to cut costs. That doesn't work."
(His full remarks and answers are below.)
The town hall was Obama's latest event in an aggressive push to get a healthcare bill signed this year.
UPDATE: Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 Republican in the House, dismissed Obama's pitch.
"I heard what the President was saying, and frankly, he hasn't said anything different today than what he said at last week's press conference," he said on CNN. "The fact is that most Americans are very concerned about what they are learning of the Obama health care reform bill. I don't think that the people of this country feel it is appropriate for us to hear the President say, you know, ‘It's my way or the highway.’ There are plenty of other approaches and I think we can gain a comfort level if we take the time to get it right and not say that we must have full-on this government takeover of our health care system.”
FULL ENTRYConservative groups attack healthcare bill
Liberal and labor groups who favor the healthcare overhaul plans of President Obama and congressional Democrats don't have the airwaves to themselves.
Groups opposed to healthcare "reform" are also airing ads on cable TV, trying to win the hearts and minds of the public as negotiations continue in Congress.
Here's one from the conservative Patients United Now that questions the rush to action in Congress.
And here's one from Conservatives for Patients' Rights, which asserts that Americans could be squeezed by the healthcare bill four different ways: higher taxes, a bigger federal deficit, increased insurance premiums, and more government control of healthcare.
Labor ad says healthcare moving at snail's pace
A pro-Democratic labor coalition has a reply to Republicans who say the healthcare overhaul push in too much, too fast.
The new cable TV spot released this morning by Americans United for Change says that by calling for delay, Republicans are really trying to kill reform, again.
"The Republicans claim the health insurance reform debate has been moving at lightning speed," the announcer says over an animated snail inching past sign posts starting with the year 1993. "In fact for 15 years, it’s hardly moved at all. Meanwhile premiums have gone up 3 times faster than wages, health insurance profits have soared and 14,000 Americans lose their health insurance everyday."
"Now the Republicans say Congress should slow down? That’s because when something goes slow enough it’s easy to kill it dead in its tracks," the announcer says as a dress shoe squashes the snail.
"Tell Congress you want health insurance reform now," the announcer concludes.
Another liberal group, MoveOn.org, also has a new healthcare ad up.
This one goes after Republicans, quoting them as saying they want to defeat President Obama on the issue, including Senator Jim DeMint's much-cited remark that healthcare could be Obama's "Waterloo."
While Obama is pushing reform, Republicans are "doing nothing -- actually worse than nothing" by turning the issue into a political football, the announcer says as a football is shown spiraling through the air -- then shattering a window.
"Tell Congress this isn't a game," the narrator concludes.
The Democratic National Committee piled on this afternoon with a web video of its own, hammering Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell for claiming that every GOP senators favors a healthcare bill. Titled "Are you serious?" the ad argues that Republicans have showed they don't want change.
“The Republican playbook on health insurance reform is now plainly clear and it’s well past time for Mitch McConnell to acknowledge that his Party’s strategy is to try and use the health insurance reform debate to score a political win on the backs of struggling American families and small businesses. Now that members of his own caucus are stating publicly their desire to see the President ‘fail’, McConnell’s attempts to profess bipartisanship are falling more than a little flat,” DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse said in a statement.
“The status quo that the Republican Party is championing is breaking American families, small businesses and state budgets across the nation and only stands to get far worse in the years ahead if nothing is done - as they propose. By standing in the way of health insurance reform, Republicans are protecting their special interest friends and ignoring their duty to serve the interests of their constituents.”
Americans United for Change also launched a radio spot on nine Maine stations today aiming at persuading Senator Olympia Snowe, a key moderate Republican, to support the healthcare bill.
“Americans have been waiting for meaningful health care reform since Truman was president and. Sen. Snowe is a critical voice on the Senate Finance Committee,” Frank Gallagher, the Maine state director of Americans United for Change, said in a statement. “Health care is not going to reform itself. The insurance industry will not suddenly stop lobbying to kill reform or quit raising our premiums, and the Republican leadership has stated repeatedly that they are actively trying to kill it. Sen. Snowe has a long record of going against her party’s leadership to do what’s right for Maine. It’s time for her to do that again.”
Kerry teams with cable channel to protect sharks
Senator John F. Kerry's office announced today that he’s joining forces with the Discovery Channel to help end the illegal practice of shark finning.
Throughout the channel's 22nd annual "Shark Week" of programming, it will run public service announcements and push an online petition to support a bill Kerry introduced in April that would close a loophole for shark fin transport and strengthen enforcement to ensure sharks are transported with their fins attached.
In shark finning, fisherman slice off a shark’s fin primarily for use in shark fin soup. But critics say the practice has led to a seventy-five percent decrease in certain shark populations over the last fifteen years.
“Huge demands on the foreign fin trade have fueled massive population declines and a serious disruption of our waters,” Kerry said in a statement. “We need much stronger solutions to finally end this illicit trade, and current protections haven’t gotten the job done. We need to get serious, and I’m thrilled to see Discovery Channel’s willingness to roll up its sleeves and help get the job done.”
The letter from Discovery Channel to Kerry is below:
Democrats blast GOP on healthcare
Democrats kept up their assault on Republicans on healthcare, announcing a new national TV ad today calling them out for trying to stop healthcare overhaul.
The ad asserts that without sweeping change, insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses will continue rising and more people will be denied coverage at all.
"Tell Republicans the cost of doing nothing is just too high," the spot concludes.
“For eight years the Republican Party ignored skyrocketing health insurance costs and American families and small businesses paid a devastating price for their negligence. Now, the ‘Party of NO’ admits their true intention is to ‘kill’ health insurance reform, putting their special interest friends over the people they were elected to serve. Already, families across the country are faced with insurmountable burdens: premiums that are rising at a rate three times faster than wages, insurance companies who are free to deny coverage to those who need health care the most, and rapidly rising co-pays that are forcing families to choose between paying their mortgage and paying their health care bills,” Democratic National Committee spokesman Brad Woodhouse said in a statement.
“The status quo that the Republican Party is championing is breaking American families, small businesses and state budgets across the nation and only stands to get far worse in the years ahead if nothing is done - as they propose. And still, the GOP continues to see health insurance reform as an opportunity to score a political win for their ailing party. This time, however, the stakes are too high, the cost of doing nothing too great, for the Republican Party to engage in the same partisan political games we’ve come to expect from them.”
On the road again for healthcare, as Senate delays
President Obama hit the road again today in his healthcare push, going to Cleveland to tour a clinic he calls a model for the nation and meet the public in a campaign-style appearance at a high school.
UPDATE: In his opening remarks before taking questions from the audience at Shaker Heights High, Obama reprised his campaign mantra of change.
"I know there are those who like to focus on the political back-and-forth in Washington," he said. "But my only concern is the people who sent us there: the families feeling the pain of this recession; the folks I’ve met across this country who have lost jobs and savings and health insurance, but haven’t lost hope; the citizens who defied the cynics and the skeptics -- who went to the polls to demand real and lasting change. This change was the cause of my campaign, and it is the cause of my presidency."
He continued trying to reassure Americans who like their current insurance, while promising improvements.
"I want to be clear: reform isn’t just about the nearly 46 million Americans without health insurance.... If you already have health insurance, the reform we're proposing will give you more security. It will keep the government out of your health care decisions, giving you the option to keep your coverage if you’re happy with it....And it will keep the insurance companies out of your health care decisions, too, by stopping insurers from cherry-picking who they cover, and holding insurers to higher standards for what they cover," he said.
"You won’t have to worry about receiving a surprise bill in the mail, because we’ll limit the amount your insurance company can force you to pay out of your own pocket. You won’t have to worry about pre-existing conditions, because never again will anyone in America be denied coverage because of a previous illness or injury. And you won’t have to worry about losing coverage if you lose or leave your job, because every American who needs insurance will have access to affordable plans through a health insurance exchange, a marketplace where insurance companies will compete to cover you, not to deny you coverage."
Obama also took on his Republican critics, including GOP chairman Michael Steele for saying that the healthcare overhaul was happening too soon.
"I think that's a little odd. We’ve been talking about health reform since the days of Harry Truman. How can it be too soon?" Obama asked, increduously.
"I don’t think it’s too soon for the families who’ve seen their premiums rise faster than wages year after year. It’s not too soon for the businesses forced to drop coverage or shed workers because of mounting healthcare expenses. It’s not too soon for taxpayers asked to close widening deficits that stem from rising healthcare costs, costs that threaten to leave our children with a mountain of debt," the president added.
"Reform may be coming too soon for some in Washington, but it’s not soon enough for the American people."
(His full remarks are below, along with the question-and-answer session.)
But it doesn't appear the overhaul will happen as fast as Obama wants.
The top Democrat in the Senate said today that his chamber won't vote until after the August recess -- and beyond Obama's hoped-for timetable.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told reporters that the Senate Finance Committee will act on its portion of the bill before the monthlong break, but the bill won't be combined with separate legislation passed by the Senate health committee and sent to the full Senate until September, after the recess.
Reid said the decision to delay a vote was made Wednesday night in the hopes of getting a final bipartisan bill, the Associated Press reports.
Obama downplayed the Senate delay. "That's OK, I just want people to keep working," he said, departing from his prepared remarks and saying he still wants a bill on his desk this year.
"I don't want a delay just because of politics," he told the town hall crowd.
Earlier, Obama toured the Cleveland Clinic, which in his prime-time news conference on Wednesday he said has "set up a system where patient care is the number-one concern, not bureaucracy, what forms have to be filled out, what do we get reimbursed for.
"Those are changes that I think the American people want to see," he added. "....Cleveland Clinic is simply a role model for some of the kind of changes that we want to see.
He said he wasn't expecting an endorsement from the clinic for his healthcare overhaul plan.
But he also probably doesn't want a slap, either, as Democrats received on Monday from the Mayo Clinic, another
The famous nonprofit clinic in Minnesota said Monday that the House Democratic plan "misses the opportunity to help create higher quality, more affordable health care for patients."
"In fact, it will do the opposite," clinic officials said, because the proposals aren't focused enough on patients and results. "The real losers will be the citizens of the United States."
Republicans eagerly jumped on the statement to bash Democrats, but the clinic signed on Wednesday to a more measured letter to Congress. (Read it here.)
"I think it's important to note that the Mayo Clinic was initially critical and concerned about whether there were enough changes in the delivery system and cost-saving measures in the original House bill," Obama said Wednesday night.
"After they found out that we had put forward very specific mechanisms for this MedPAC idea, this idea of experts getting the politics out of health care and making decisions based on the best evidence out there, they wrote in their blog the very next day that we actually think this would make a difference. Okay?"
Obama makes his case
President Obama, seeking public support for his healthcare plan, is trying tonight to answer a key question on the minds of Americans: What's in it for me?
"I realize that with all the charges and criticisms being thrown around in Washington, a lot of Americans may be wondering, “What’s in this for me? How does my family stand to benefit from health insurance reform?' ” he said, opening his fourth primetime news conference at a pivotal moment early in his presidency.
"Tonight I want to answer those questions. Because even though Congress is still working through a few key issues, we already have rough agreement on the following areas: If you already have health insurance, the reform we’re proposing will provide you with more security and more stability. It will keep government out of healthcare decisions, giving you the option to keep your insurance if you’re happy with it. It will prevent insurance companies from dropping your coverage if you get too sick. It will give you the security of knowing that if you lose your job, if you move, or if you change your job, you will still be able to have coverage. It will limit the amount your insurance company can force you to pay for your medical costs out of your own pocket. And it will cover preventive care like check-ups and mammograms that save lives and money.
"Now, if you don’t have health insurance, or are a small business looking to cover your employees, you’ll be able to choose a quality, affordable health plan through a health insurance exchange -- a marketplace that promotes choice and competition. Finally, no insurance company will be allowed to deny you coverage because of a pre-existing medical condition," Obama said to a nationwide television audience.
"I have also pledged that health insurance reform will not add to our deficit over the next decade -- and I mean it."
The president also asserted that health reform is "central" to rebuilding the US economy "stronger than before."
"This is not just about the 47 million Americans who don't have any health insurance at all. Reform is about every American who has ever feared that they may lose their coverage if they become too sick, or lose their job, or change their job. It’s about every small business that has been forced to lay off employees or cut back on their coverage because it became too expensive. And it’s about the fact that the biggest driving force behind our federal deficit is the skyrocketing cost of Medicare and Medicaid.
"So let me be clear: If we do not control these costs, we will not be able to control our deficit. If we do not reform healthcare, your premiums and out-of-pocket costs will continue to skyrocket. If we don't act, 14,000 Americans will continue to lose their health insurance every single day. These are the consequences of inaction. These are the stakes of the debate that we’re having right now.
He also took on his critics directly, accusing them of putting political games ahead of the country.
"I understand how easy it is for this town to become consumed in the game of politics -- to turn every issue into a running tally of who’s up and who’s down. I’ve heard that one Republican strategist told his party that even though they may want to compromise, it’s better politics to 'go for the kill.' Another Republican senator said that defeating health reform is about 'breaking' me," he said.
"So let me be clear: This isn’t about me. I have great health insurance, and so does every member of Congress. This debate is about the letters I read when I sit in the Oval Office every day, and the stories I hear at town hall meetings….This debate is not a game for these Americans, and they can't afford to wait any longer for reform. They are counting on us to get this done. They are looking to us for leadership. And we can't let them down. We will pass reform that lowers cost, promotes choice, and provides coverage that every American can count on. And we will do it this year."
(His full prepared remarks are below.)
Asked first which specific proposals being talked about in Congress he would support, especially on financing, Obama declined, instead outlining broad principles.
After finding as much savings as possible, he said he proposed what he believed would work best -- limiting income tax deductions for higher-earning families -- but Congress has not accepted that idea. He said he was not foreclosing other options, as long as they don't burden middle-class families. "I want to wait to see what emerges from these committees," he said.
Obama said he understands public skepticism, given the recent history of what Washington has produced.
But if the country just reduced healthcare costs by $2,000 or $3,000 a year -- not the $6,000 difference between the United States and other Western countries -- the help for most families would be significant, he said.
Asked why he was pressing so hard for Congress to act before the August recess, he said he is "rushed" because he gets letters from families every day who say they are being "clobbered by healthcare costs."
"In a country like ours, that's not right," he said.
He also said that without deadlines, nothing happens in Washington. "Inertia is the default position," he added, because change always upsets one special interest or another.
But he also said he won't sign a bill that isn't ready, just to meet a deadline.
"I do think it's important to get this right," he said.
Asked whether the health overhaul will cover all 47 million uninsured, he replied, "I want to cover everybody."
But he acknowledged that without a single-payer system where all Americans are automatically enrolled, some will choose not to get insurance even if they are required to do so and even if there are subsidies, so some will go uncovered.
A good plan should cover 97 or 98 percent of the population, he said.
Asked about infighting among Democrats and whether they would be to blame if a bill isn't passed, Obama said there are legitimate regional differences and concerns. "This is part of the normal give and take of the legislative process," he said.
He also said that Republicans have good ideas that should be incorporated and named in particular Senators Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Olympia Snowe of Maine for their contributions to the bill drafting.
Asked about what sacrifices Americans would have to make to cut healthcare spending, Obama said they would have to give up care that doesn't make them healthier, such as unnecessary tests. "You're wasting money," he said. "We just can't afford what we're doing right now."
He did not touch the controversial issue of healthcare rationing, such as limiting the amount of care for the terminally ill.
He hit back at those who say the healthcare proposals would worsen the record federal deficits. Directly addressing those in the public who he said had been "ginned up" by the accusations, he said that he inherited the vast majority of the deficit and that healthcare reform "is designed to lower it."
Asked about whether he is violating a pledge on openness on the healthcare deliberations and other issues, Obama rejected the charge. He said that the identities of health executives visiting the White House have been public and that the kickoff healthcare event was televised on C-SPAN.
Asked by a reporter for a newspaper in Cleveland, where Obama plans a town hall on Thursday, about the public insurance option, the president said it would be similar to what members of Congress get.
He repeated that the public plan is needed to keep private insurers honest, saying that several firms recently reported record profits even as families pay more for their care.
Asked by the same reporter whether he would accept the public plan, Obama said he would, but pointed out that as president, a White House doctor follows him everywhere.
FULL ENTRYGOP videos slam Obama, Democrats; Dems hit back
The political skirmishes and name-calling over healthcare show no signs of ending.
Senator Jim DeMint, a South Carolina Republican -- who raised President Obama's hackles by saying that a defeat on healthcare could be the "Waterloo" for his presidency -- didn't back down today. He might have upped the ante, saying it's time to "put the brakes" on Obama because he is on a dangerous spending spree.
"It's not personal," DeMint said this morning on NBC's "Today" show. "We've got to stop his politics."
UPDATE: Going after DeMint, the Democratic National Committee unveiled a hard-hitting TV ad this afternoon that will run in Washington and his home state.
"Jim DeMint will break families & small businesses," the ad says. "Putting special interests first, putting South Carolina last."
"The only health care plan Jim DeMint supports is no plan at all," the ad concludes.
“The politicization of health care reform by Senator Jim DeMint and Republicans is a desperate and shameful ploy by the ‘Party of NO’ to score a political win on the backs of struggling American families and small businesses," DNC Communications Director Brad Woodhouse said in a statement. "What’s worse is that this strategy originates from the same Republican Party who ignored health care reform for the past eight years, letting costs spiral out of control while protecting their special interest friends."
Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 Republican in the House, continued his assault with a web video that accuses Obama and congressional Democrats of jeopardizing the healthcare system.
Democrats "are in a hurry, a reckless rush and still can't answer some fundamental questions," the announcer says, including how much the overhaul would cost. The video also accuses Obama of opening the door to reneging on his pledge not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year, though Democratic plans don't propose that.
“We won't be lectured by Eric Cantor and Republicans on being reckless," responded Democratic National Committee spokesman Hari Sevugan. "While the President is offering a constructive way forward to get something done after we've been trying to reform health care for decades, Eric Cantor and Republicans are offering nothing more than partisan obstruction, the status quo and more cries of ‘NO.’
“What's reckless is saying you want to ‘kill’ health care reform when American families have seen 80 percent hikes in premiums this decade alone. What's reckless is saying you want to ‘break’ the President on health care when small business are going broke paying for insurance. What Eric Cantor and the Republican Party don't understand is that the most reckless thing we can do, as they propose, is nothing.”
The Republican National Committee is up with a web video of its own, a take-off on those TV ads for all kinds of prescription drugs.
With idyllic images of couples frolicking in fields of flowers, the video says that Obama and Democrats are trying to sell "Reforma" on healthcare.
But it warns of dangerous side effects, including government control of healthcare, higher medical costs, and bureaucratic gridlock.
"Not recommended for people who may need actual medical care," it says.
Obama praises House on budget vote
President Obama has been battered in recent weeks by Republicans over the ballooning federal deficit, which this year is already well past the previous record.
So this afternoon he quickly lauded the House vote for so-called pay-as-you-go legislation that would require Congress and the president to offset new tax cuts or new benefit programs with tax increases or spending cuts elsewhere in the budget. If the law is broken, automatic spending cuts would kick in to make up the difference.
“With this vote, the House of Representatives demonstrated strong support for fiscal discipline. I appreciate the House’s quick response to my call for pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) legislation, a central budget-reform priority," Obama said in a statement.
“Let me be clear: all new mandatory initiatives and all new tax cuts must be paid for. It is time to stop the practice of passing today’s costs onto future generations. PAYGO was a driving principle behind the move from deficit to surplus in the 1990s, and must be so again today.
“For several years, the federal government was stalled in a pattern of fiscal irresponsibility. No more. We are making tough decisions on funding priorities. We are tackling the biggest threats to our long-term fiscal stability. And we are restoring greater discipline to how we spend taxpayers’ dollars.
“I thank Speaker Pelosi and Leader Hoyer, Chairman Spratt and Chairman Miller, Representatives Hill, Cooper, Boyd, and Welch, the Blue Dog coalition, and all of the 167 cosponsors of the PAYGO legislation. We will continue to work together to strengthen fiscal discipline. I urge the Senate to approve PAYGO so I can sign this bill into law this year.”
Obama backers in Mass. pointed to Maine
It's like most national elections -- when Massachusetts is a slam dunk for Democrats, so activists instead go to more competitive states to make a difference.
With both Democratic Senators Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry of Massachusetts firmly on board with the healthcare overhaul, President Obama's grassroots supporters in the Bay State are being urged to help sway Maine's two Republican senators, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, who are key moderates in the debate.
Organizing for America sent an email this afternoon with a link and encouragement to call voters in Maine and get them to call Collins and Snowe.
"With the health care debate coming down to the wire in Congress, we need every vote we can get. Both of your Massachusetts senators are fighting hard for reform, but the two senators from nearby Maine -- Senator Olympia Snowe and Senator Susan Collins -- are under tremendous pressure to cave to special interests. They need to hear from constituents who want them to stand with the President -- and you can help," wrote Jeremy Bird, deputy director of Organizing for America.
"There are voters in Maine who want to fix our health care system as much as you do, and they may not know how much power they have to make it happen. Let them know, and help bring our country one big step closer to the reform we need."
Pelosi tries to pitch in on healthcare
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, trying to rally her troops and help President Obama on his healthcare push, is holding a news conference this morning to brag on the House Democratic bill.
She brought with her "real Americans," including a cancer patient from Norwood, Mass., who would benefit from the legislation and are telling their personal stories.
House Democrats' bill would pay for extending insurance coverage with a surtax on Americans with annual incomes of $280,000 or more. But fiscal conservatives, known as the Blue Dog coalition, have objected to the financing and have stalled the legislation after it passed two committees last week.
In response, Pelosi is floating the prospect of imposing the surtax starting with those making $1 million or more a year.
UPDATE: House Republicans said this afternoon that by their count, at least 42 House Democrats have expressed qualms or outright opposition to the bill. (Click here to see the list.)
But Representative Steny Hoyer, a Maryland Democrat in the party's leadership, said today that he's "very hopeful" that the House will pass the bill next week.
“Very frankly, every member of the Caucus, every member, from Blue Dog to Progressive and everybody in-between says ‘they want to vote for healthcare reform bill’ and the American public wants to see one,” he said on Fox News Channel.
“We want to get it right, but, we don’t think simply considering it for another next 16 years will necessarily be the solution to getting it right. We need to get it done.”
Kerry panel looks at climate change and national security
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Massive crop devastation, melting glaciers, water shortages, millions of displaced people -- all of these will drag the US military into conflict if global climate change goes unchecked, a Senate panel was warned today.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, convened by Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, focused on what so far has received only modest attention in the climate change debate: the effect it is bound to have on national defense.
"Addressing the consequences of changes in the Earth's climate is not simply about saving polar bears or preserving the beauty of mountain glaciers," retired Navy Vice Adm. Lee F. Gunn, president of the American Security Project, told the panel. "Climate change is a threat to our national security."
Gunn and other military specialists said that climate change could have broad effects on how the US military operates. It will likely expand the number of humanitarian missions the Pentagon will have to undertake, they said, and even change how it deploys its fighting forces.
For example, they warned that rising sea levels could swamp critical US military bases in the Indian Ocean and even the headquarters of the Atlantic Fleet in Norfolk, Va., which could be under water after just a one-meter rise in the ocean level.
From Africa to the Middle East and South Asia, dramatic changes in the weather will stress already unstable nations, creating what Gunn called "climate conflicts."
"International conflicts over resources, due to migrants, and/or as a means of distraction are not only likely," he added, "but likely to exacerbate the underlying climate change problem."
Kerry, since he took the helm of the committee earlier this year, has made addressing climate change a top priority. Several specialists said today that elevating the security aspect will help garner the kind of support necessary to make the difficult changes in energy and other global policies to stabilize the climate.
Sharon E. Burke, vice president for natural security at the Center for a New American Security, testified that the hearing was "an important demonstration of the fact that global climate change is now taken seriously as a strategic challenge."
Kerry, for his part, pledged to keep the shining the light on the issue.
"If we fail to connect the dots -- if we fail to take action -- the simple, indisputable reality is that we will find ourselves living not only in a ravaged environment, but also in a much more dangerous world," he said.
Correction: This item has been revised because of a reporting error that misstated the title for Sharon E. Burke, vice president for natural security at the Center for a New American Security.
Kerry's full opening statement is below:
Obama: All healthcare, all the time
President Obama is firmly, stubbornly staying wih his persistent push on healthcare.
But for good reason: While the fate of the sweeping legislation might not be the "Waterloo" turning point of his presidency -- as some Republicans hope from defeating him -- Obama has staked a huge pile of his political poker chips on victory.
This afternoon, in his almost daily remarks healthcare, Obama took on his opponents, saying that they would rather "score political points" than help families struggling with healthcare and that some will try to delay health reform until the special interests kill it.
While acknowledging that there is work to do for a final deal, he went on to tick off the areas of agreement in the working Senate and House versions and the broader consensus with health industry groups.
"We have traveled long and hard to reach this point," Obama said, through decades of Washington failing to fix healthcare. (His full remarks are below.)
UPDATE: Backing up Obama, the Democratic National Committee released a new web video today bashing Republican critics of the president's healthcare plan. It juxtaposes Republicans saying they want Obama to fail, with Obama's response.
“Over the last few days we've learned the true intentions of the Republican party when it comes to health care, and those intentions, while not surprising, are disturbing. Let's be clear - the same Republican party that let health care costs spiral out of control over the last eight years while protecting their special interest friends, is now expressly saying that they want to ‘kill’ health care reform and that their interest is to ‘break’ the President politically," DNC Communications Director Brad Woodhouse said in a statement.
“The Republican approach of working to kill health care reform when so many American families are struggling is not only broken, it's also irresponsible. Republicans would be better served if they focused on killing off this callous attitude within their party that puts fixing their own political problems ahead of fixing problems for American families.”
Republicans countered by saying that Obama is trying to move too fast with a plan that could derail the economic recovery. "Healthcare reform is too important to rush through and get wrong," Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky argued in a floor speech today.
They also asserted that House Democrats have been told not to cooperate with Republicans on healthcare legislation and that Democrats are making a mountain out of the molehill of Senator Jim DeMint's quotation that a healthcare defeat could be Obama's Waterloo.
"The White House and Democrats are jumping on one quote to set up Republicans as a straw man to mask over their internal party divisions which are delaying their drive for government-run healthcare," Joe Pounder, spokesman for the No. 2 House Republican Eric Cantor, said in a statement.
"However, we recall one remarkable quote from a key House Democrat, Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), who wrote that House Democrats are being 'explicitly told not to work with Republicans.' Just to be clear: the White House and Democrats are using a fake straw man argument. Democrats don’t want to work with Republicans but at the same time, want to blame Republicans for their failures."
Obama plans to return to the subject in a primetime news conference Wednesday and a town hall in Cleveland Thursday.
Obama also plans to meet this afternoon with Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which hasn't passed the healthcare bill. Two other House panels approved their portions of the bill last week, but fiscally conservative Democrats on the Energy committee are balking at the bill's financing, among other issues.
The House Ways and Means Committee voted last week to pay for healthcare by imposing an income surtax on couples making as little as $350,000 a year and individuals earning as little as $280,000. To try to get conservative Democrats on board, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is proposing to limit the income tax increases to couples making more than $1 million a year and individuals making more than $500,000.
In an interview aired this morning on NBC's "Today" show, Obama defended his insistence on Congress passing healthcare overhaul legislation before its August summer recess. "If you don't set a deadline in this town, nothing happens," the president said, adding, "And the deadline isn't being set by me. It's being set by the American people."
FULL ENTRYDemocrats scold Obama on signing statements
President Obama is taking a hit from fellow Democrats on another issue -- the use of signing statements on bills passed by Congress.
In a letter today to Obama, four senior House Democrats scolded him, saying he is being too much like former President George W. Bush in using the statements to ignore legislation he thinks oversteps the Constitution, the Associated Press reports.
The House members said they were "surprised" and "chagrined" by Obama's statement in June accompanying a war spending bill that he would ignore restrictions placed on aid provided to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The letter was signed by Representatives David Obey of Wisconsin; chairman of the House Appropriations Committee; Barney Frank of Massachusetts, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee; and Nita Lowey and Gregory Meeks of New York, who chair subcommittees on those panels.
Congressional Democrats were harshly critical of Bush's signing statements, which they argued violated the constitutional separation of powers. Critics contended Bush used such statements to expand his power, particularly on national security, by ignoring the intent or certain provisions of bills properly passed by Congress. (Charlie Savage, then with the Globe, won the 2007 Pulitzer Prize for national reporting for documenting Bush's actions."
Obama also assailed Bush on the issue during the presidential campaign.
In March, he vowed not to use signing statements to disregard parts of laws because he disagrees on policy grounds, but only when he strongly believes provisions are unconstitutional. "There is no doubt that the practice of issuing such statements can be abused. Constitutional signing statements should not be used to suggest that the president will disregard statutory requirements on the basis of policy disagreements," wrote Obama.
But he has issued a series of signing statements since, though not nearly as many as Bush.
Obama under fire on healthcare
President Obama continued his full-court press today for sweeping healthcare legislation, holding a roundtable discussion with providers at the Children's National Medical Center in Washington.
Trying to get healthcare overhaul back on track, Obama took a populist bent, asserting that big insurers and pharmaceutical firms and other special interests are reaping huge benefits from the existing healthcare system, while American families struggle.
Unless healthcare is reformed, he said, families will pay more and more of their income for less and less care.
Obama also took on his Republican opponents, incredulously citing South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint's remark last week that a defeat on healthcare would be Obama's "Waterloo" -- undermining his presidency.
"This isn't about me, this isn't about politics, this about a healthcare system that is breaking," the president said
He said the "politics of delay and defeat" should not be allowed to succeed -- and the nation needs a healthcare overhaul this year.
"Let's fight our way through the politics of the moment," he said.
"We've talked this problem to death," he added. (His full remarks are below.)
UPDATE: Senator Mitch McConnell, the top Republican in the Senate, added his criticism of Obama, saying that the healthcare push looks a lot like the push for the $787 billion stimulus package, which he asserted has been a failure.
“By any standard upon which it was sold to us, not that it would do some good two or three years from now, but now, by that standard it has been a failure,” McConnell said this afternoon on Fox News Channel. “People feel like they got burned on the Stimulus vote, there were a few people that voted for it who feel like they got burned. A lot of the rest of us are saying, you know, we told you this might not have been the right thing to do.”
“The American people are now looking at this healthcare proposal and are saying this sounds a lot like what we were just told a few months ago on the stimulus, 'You got to get it done tomorrow or bad things are going to happen,' ” he added. “There is suspicion that this is a do over from the stimulus that we had just a few months ago, being sold to us as something we have to do immediately, that may not work.”
But as various versions of the bill wend their way through Congress, Obama is spending most of his time on the defensive against critics of the reform proposals even as he stakes the early success of his presidency on passing healthcare this year.
Perhaps for good reason -- a new Washington Post/ABC News poll published today showed that the public's approval of Obama's handling of the issue has dropped below the 50 percent threshold for the first time.
In the poll, 49 percent approve of his healthcare proposals and 44 percent disapprove. The approval number is down 8 percentage points from April and the disapproval number is up 15 percentage points as more attention -- and more criticism -- has focused on the proposals.
The poll also found that the president's approval ratings on other major issues, such as the economy and the federal budget deficit, have also slipped in recent months. His overall approval rating is higher than his marks on specific issues -- 59 percent positive and 37 negative -- but it's still the first time since he took office that his overall rating dropped below 60 percent in the Post-ABC poll, and is down six percentage points from just last month. The survey, conducted July 15-18, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
UPDATE: A second poll out today also found public skepticism about Obama's healthcare plan.
In the USA Today/Gallup survey, conducted Friday through Sunday, Americans by 50 percent to 44 percent disapprove of his handling of healthcare, and by 49 percent to 47 percent disapprove of his handling of the economy.
Sensing some vulnerability, Republicans are on the attack.
GOP Chairman Michael Steele, in a speech this morning at the National Press Club, accused Obama of "risky experimentation" with his healthcare proposals and asserted that Democrats want to impose government-run healthcare.
Asked whether the plans amounted to socialism, Steele said yes.
"Many Democrats outside of the Obama-Pelosi-Reid-Waxman cabal know that voters won't stand for these kinds of foolish prescriptions for our health care. We do too. That's why Republicans will stop at nothing to remind voters about the risky experimentation going on in Washington," Steele said, according to the Associated Press.
Obama wants a public insurance option to compete with private insurers and, he says, keep them honest, but has repeatedly said he does not favor a government-run health care system.
Republicans are backing up Steele's criticisms with a new TV ad that derides Obama's economic stimulus plan as a "massive spending experiment" that has failed to produce jobs. Featuring an ominous voiceover and images of children, the 30-second spot warns that his healthcare plan would "risk everything."
UPDATE: Democratic National Committee chairman Tim Kaine this afternoon issued a lengthy response to Steele, accusing Republicans of being far more interested in scoring political points than helping Americans with their healthcare.
“This morning, Chairman Steele delivered a speech announcing a ‘new’ Republican campaign against the President’s efforts to reform America’s broken health care system. Republican opposition to health care reform, however, is anything but new. In his speech, Chairman Steele spoke at length about the potential risks to reforming our failed health care system. It's sad, but not surprising, that the Republican Party, which for so long has supported the very policies and vested interests that helped get us to this crisis point, are unable to recognize the that the real risk is to do nothing at all, as they propose," Kaine said.
“Despite the crisis that confronts American families, the GOP continues to argue for the status quo on behalf of the special interests. If we do nothing as the Republican ‘Party of NO’ would have us do, we not only will ensure more of the same, but guarantee a growing crisis that will put a burden on our children that they will never overcome," Kaine added.
“It was also stunning - and sad - to hear that Chairman Steele agreed with Senator DeMint's comments that stopping health care reform would ‘break’ the President politically. What's ‘broken’ is a health care system where costs continue to explode, working families can't afford their premiums, small business can't compete, and where the Republican Party is interested in ensuring that we do nothing about these problems purely for their own political gain."
While Republican attacks are to expected, even some of Obama's allies are not happy with the direction the healthcare legislation is going.
Some Democrats, notably Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, want to tax the most generous employer-provided health benefits -- an idea Obama hasn't endorsed. But in an op-ed piece in Sunday's Washington Post, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney rails against the proposal.
Unions oppose the idea, arguing that employees have given up salary increases over the years and accepted better health benefits in return.
"Persistent misconceptions about the 'tax-favored treatment' of employer-sponsored coverage are that it (1) leads to overconsumption of health services and (2) favors the wealthy," Sweeney's piece says.
"With rising health costs burdening businesses and families alike, does anyone really believe that employers or workers lack incentive to hold down costs? The tax treatment of health benefits no more contributes to high health-care costs than the deduction for mortgage interest is responsible for housing costs. Clearly, both are affected by far more complex factors."
Kennedy: 'We can't afford to wait' on healthcare
Senator Edward M. Kennedy -- absent in person during the healthcare debate in Congress, but there "in spirit," as President Obama says -- says in a new first-person magazine article that the push for reform is the "cause of my life."
"Last year, I was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor. Surgeons at Duke University Medical Center removed part of the tumor, and I had proton-beam radiation at Massachusetts General Hospital. I've undergone many rounds of chemotherapy and continue to receive treatment. Again, I have enjoyed the best medical care money (and a good insurance policy) can buy," Kennedy writes in the new edition of Newsweek.
"But quality care shouldn't depend on your financial resources, or the type of job you have, or the medical condition you face. Every American should be able to get the same treatment that U.S. senators are entitled to."
The Massachusetts Democrat says the time is now for a comprehensive bill that offers universal coverage. Incremental measures won't suffice anymore. We need to succeed where Teddy Roosevelt and all others since have failed. The conditions now are better than ever. In Barack Obama, we have a president who's announced that he's determined to sign a bill into law this fall. And much of the business community, which has suffered the economic cost of inaction, is helping to shape change, not lobbying against it."
Kennedy takes on the skeptics of the cost of reform: "I've heard the critics complain about the costs of change. I'm confident that at the end of the process, the change will be paid for—fairly, responsibly, and without adding to the federal deficit. It doesn't make sense to negotiate in the pages of NEWSWEEK, but I will say that I'm open to many options, including a surtax on the wealthy, as long as it meets the principle laid down by President Obama: that there will be no tax increases on anyone making less than $250,000 a year. What I haven't heard the critics discuss is the cost of inaction. If we don't reform the system, if we leave things as they are, health-care inflation will cost far more over the next decade than health-care reform. We will pay far more for far less—with millions more Americans uninsured or underinsured," he writes.
And he argues, the perfect should not be the enemy of the good: "Everyone won't be satisfied—and no one will get everything they want. But we need to come together, just as we've done in other great struggles—in World War II and the Cold War, in passing the great civil-rights laws of the 1960s, and in daring to send a man to the moon. If we don't get every provision right, we can adjust and improve the program next year or in the years to come. What we can't afford is to wait another generation."
Obama, Republicans spar on healthcare
The high-stakes battle over healthcare takes today to dueling Internet and radio addresses.
In his weekly address, President Obama tells Americans that the status quo is unacceptable and the chance for fixing healthcare might not come again for years.
"This is an issue that affects the health and financial well-being of every single American and the stability of our entire economy," he says, after a week during which doubts grew in Congress about how to pay for the overhaul, the official budget keeper warned that the legislation would not control public spending on healthcare, and calls became louder for slowing down the process.
"It’s about every family unable to keep up with soaring out of pocket costs and premiums rising three times faster than wages. Every worker afraid of losing health insurance if they lose their job, or change jobs. Everyone who’s worried that they may not be able to get insurance or change insurance if someone in their family has a pre-existing condition.
"This is the system we have today. This is what the debate in Congress is all about: Whether we’ll keep talking and tinkering and letting this problem fester as more families and businesses go under, and more Americans lose their coverage. Or whether we’ll seize this opportunity – one we might not have again for generations – and finally pass health insurance reform this year, in 2009."
Obama also directly takes on his critics, asserting that it's "simply not true" that the overhaul will lead to record government deficits and saying that it's not true that the plan calls for government bureaucrats instead of families picking doctors.
"Finally, opponents of health reform warn that this is all some big plot for socialized medicine or government-run health care with long lines and rationed care. That’s not true either. I don’t believe that government can or should run health care," the president says. "But I also don’t think insurance companies should have free reign to do as they please."
In the Republican response, Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona warned about "a government takeover of the healthcare system," new "job-killing taxes" on small businesses, and "rationing" of care.
He also accused Democrats of trying to rush through legislation "because the more Americans know about it, the more they oppose it. Something this important needs to be done right, rather than done quickly."
"Republicans have put forward common-sense ideas, including rooting out Medicare and Medicaid fraud, reforming medical liability laws to discourage frivolous lawsuits, strengthening wellness and prevention programs that encourage healthy living, and allowing small businesses to band together and purchase health insurance like large corporations do," said Kyl, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate leadership.
“We know Americans would prefer us to work together to ensure access to affordable quality healthcare for all. But Americans do not want a government takeover of health care that will jeopardize their current coverage, ration care, and create mountains of new debt and higher taxes.
Obama's address can be viewed here, Kyl's can be seen here, and both their remarks are below:
Obama circles the wagons on healthcare
Despite a series of setbacks this week, President Obama declared this afternoon that there has been "unprecedented progress" toward a healthcare overhaul.
In a hastily scheduled, then delayed appearance at the White House designed to reseize momentum on his top domestic priority, Obama urged everyone to "step back" from the "24-hour news cycle."
He spoke a day after the official, nonpartisan bean counter in Congress warned that House Democrats' healthcare bill would increase public spending on healthcare and worsen the federal deficit, adding to the sense that the legislation might be in trouble.
But Obama noted that hospitals and drug companies have pledged givebacks to help pay for the bill, and that the American Medical Association and American Nurses Association endorsed legislation this week. He also asserted that there is broad agreement on major elements of health reform.
"Now we've got to get over the finish line," he said, largely by figuring out how to pay the full cost of health overhaul without adding to the federal deficit.
"The last few miles of any race are the hardest to run," he added, but that doesn't mean slowing down or giving up and he remains "absolutely convinced" that legislation will be passed this year.
It must be passed because if healthcare overhaul isn't done, everyone's health coverage is at risk, the president said.
Obama, who met in recent days with key Senate moderates and Republicans, argued that savings in Medicare and Medicaid, and other efficiencies in the healthcare system would pay for about two-thirds of the cost, estimated at $1 trillion over 10 years.
Obama's chief economic adviser, Lawrence Summers, also made the argument in a speech today defending the administration's economic policies. Summers said the savings projected by the administration are based on wellness and prevention programs that are difficult to figure into the Congressional Budget Office's estimates.
While Obama wants a health overhaul that both extends coverage to the nearly 50 million Americans without insurance and cuts healthcare spending, Douglas Elmendorf, director of the CBO, told a Senate committee Thursday that the legislation drafted so far would fall far short on the second goal.
"We do not see the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending by a significant amount. And on the contrary, the legislation significantly expands the federal responsibility for healthcare costs," he said.
Despite that warning, two House committees advanced the Democratic bill early today on party-line votes.
The Ways and Means Committee voted to help pay for the measure by imposing a surtax on higher-income taxpayers to raise $544 billion over 10 years. The vote was 23 to 18, with three Democrats joining all Republicans in opposition, the Associated Press reports. The Education and Labor Committee approved its portion of the bill on a vote of 26-22.
In the Senate, however, a group of six Democrats and Republicans urged the White House to pull back from its schedule to get a bill through Congress before its August recess. "We believe that taking additional time to achieve a bipartisan result is critical," the group wrote in a letter obtained by the AP.
The letter was signed by Democratic Senators Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Ron Wyden of Oregon, and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Republicans Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, and Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, an independent who usually caucuses with Democrats.
Kennedy praises hate crimes bill
Senator Edward M. Kennedy lauded the Senate for endorsing a bill that he has championed for more than a decade to expand federal hate-crimes laws to protect people attacked because of their sexual orientation or gender.
The bill, named for Matthew Shepard, a gay Wyoming college student who was murdered in 1998, was attached to a defense spending measure expected to pass next week. The House approved a similar hate crimes bill in April and President Obama supports it.
The "action by the Senate finally closes the flagrant loopholes that for too long have prevented effective prosecution of these shocking crimes that terrorize entire groups of communities across America," Kennedy said in a statement. "The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act gives federal, state, and local law enforcement authorities the power they need to combat these brutal acts of domestic terrorism.
"This legislation would not have been possible without the tireless advocacy of Matthew’s mother, Judy Shepard, and I commend her for her achievement. The rule of law is stronger in America today because of her."
Fate of healthcare up to Senate moderates
Could it be a reprise of the stimulus on healthcare?
There are certainly hints that moderate US senators of both parties could determine the fate of President Obama's agenda yet again.
Obama is holding separate private meetings this morning to discuss healthcare overhaul with Senators Olympia Snowe, a Maine Republican, and Ben Nelson, a Nebraska Democrat. They are among the senators being targeted by new TV ads, launched by Obama's grassroots organization, that say "it's time" for healthcare reform.
Nelson and Snowe's fellow moderate senator from Maine, Susan Collins, played a key role in negotiations to win Senate approval in February for the $787 billion economic recovery package championed by Obama. The stimulus bill passed the House without a single Republican vote, and the administration's horse-trading focused on satisfying Nelson and Collins, who pushed for a smaller package.
After meeting with Obama, Snowe said the president repeated his wish for Congress to pass a bill before its August recess. "He's determined to have that happen," she said on MSNBC.
But Snowe said it's more important to get bipartisan consensus in the Senate Finance Committee, especially on how to pay for the bill. Supporting a Senate vote in September, she also said she wants to give ample time for all senators and the public to review the bill.
"This deserves a thoughtful process," she said.
Asked about Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus saying today that Obama had hindered his efforts to reach a bipartisan deal by opposing a tax on some employer-provided health insurance benefits to help pay for the deal, Snowe said it would be helpful if Obama endorsed a financing approach.
The panel is "working mightily" to find "offsets" and other savings to reduce the cost of the bill. "It's all part of building a consensus," she said.
Asked to respond to Baucus, deputy White House press secretary Bill Burton told reporters on Air Force One today, "Nobody said it was going to be easy. And there are obviously bumps along the way to getting to final passage of legislation in both the House and the Senate. But we think that we've been able to make a lot of progress. And those comments notwithstanding, this week has been a very great week, if you consider that the House bill and the bill that passed through the HELP Committee are very, very similar. They're about 80 percent exactly the same."
Burton refused to say which version of the healthcare bills the president favors, and said Obama remains hopeful for a bipartisan compromise.
"We're only about midway through this. But he feels very positive about the progress we've been able to make," Burton said. " And once we get something through the House and through the Senate, we'll be able to go to conference and really put the rubber to the road and get something done."
With the power equation in the Senate so tenuous -- just last week Al Franken became the 60th Democratic vote, potentially enough to overcome Republican filibuster -- Snowe and Collins play an outsized role.
Obama and Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts are still holding out hope for a bipartisan deal this year on healthcare.
But those prospects appear to be dimming. The Senate health committee passed its $615 billion plan on a strictly party-line vote on Wednesday.
In the House, little, if any Republican support, is expected in votes planned today in the Education and Labor and the Ways and Means committees on a $1.5 trillion plan that House Democrats presented this week. It would be financed in large measure through a tax surcharge on the highest-income Americans.
"It is extraordinary, the breadth of the bill that is being pushed through and the cost associated with it," Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 Republican in the House, told reporters this morning. "And ultimately, really, the cost is going to be borne by the people of this country -- the middle class, the wealthy, those who can least afford it, all of us are going to be paying an astronomical cost at a time that we just cannot afford this ambitious grab."
Obama, who during the campaign proposed paying for healthcare by limiting tax deduction for high earners, has not endorsed a specific financing plan. But on CBS's "Early Show" this morning, he said, "Personally, I think the best way to fund it is for people like myself, who've been very lucky, to pay a little bit more."
UPDATE: Today, the American Medical Association endorsed House Democrat's bill, saying it "includes a broad range of provisions that are key to effective, comprehensive health system reform."
“I am grateful that the doctors of the AMA have chosen to support health insurance reform that will lower costs, expand coverage, and assure choice and quality health care for all Americans. Along with the nation’s nurses, these doctors are joining the chorus of Americans who know that the time to reform what is broken about our health care system is now,” Obama said in a statement.
The insurance industry, however, said it opposes key elements of the bill, saying a government plan "will cause millions of patients to lose their current coverage."
Taking it to the streets
With President Obama's goal of a sweeping healthcare bill hanging in the balance, his grassroots group plans a weeklong series of events across the country designed to turn up the heat on Congress.
Organizing for America, Obama's campaign organization now part of the Democratic National Committee, announced this afternoon that it plans door-to-door canvasses, phone banks, roundtable discussions, and community gatherings from Monday through next Sunday, all "designed to build grassroots support for President Obama’s plan and amplify the his call for the House and Senate to pass health care reform bill before the August congressional recess."
The events include door knocks and a phone bank led by State Representative Chris Hamm in Hopkinton, N.H., next Saturday, and signature collecting in Exeter, N.H., next Sunday.
“Presidents since the time of Teddy Roosevelt have called for reform of our health care system - now comprehensive reform is finally within our reach,” Mitch Stewart, the group's director, said in a statement. “The number of Americans who have declared their support for the President’s three principles of reform has been overwhelming and continues to grow each day. During this Week of Action, we’ll continue to build support - person-by-person and block-by-block - for passing a plan this year that lowers costs, guarantees choice – including the choice of a public option and ensures all Americans have access to quality, affordable care.”
Cantor, White House trade barbs on stimulus
The war of words over the economic stimulus is getting louder today in Virginia.
Vice President Joe Biden is in Richmond, the home district of Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 Republican in the House and one of President Obama's harshest, most persistent critics.
Biden plans to blast Cantor, according to the Washington Post. "To those who say that our economic decisions 'have not produced jobs, have not produced prosperity, and simply have not worked, I say, 'Take a look around,' " Biden will say, according to prepared remarks obtained by Post. "I ask those critics, 'Would they not help the states prevent lay off thousands of teachers, firefighters, cops? Would they not give a tax cut to 95 percent of the American people? Would they sit back and do nothing as our economy collapsed?' "
Cantor's office, for its part, is on the case of Tim Kaine, Virginia's governor and Obama's hand-picked chairman of the Democratic National Committee.
Kaine sent out a statement today saying that Obama's $787 billion stimulus package -- which not a single House Republican supported -- is sparking a recovery and creating jobs.
"For Governor Kaine's DNC to flatly state that there is an economic recovery misses the current and increasing double-digit unemployment in Richmond and the 8.1% unemployment in Central Virginia. To declare an 'economic recovery' when so many Virginian families are being negatively impacted by this Administrations economic policy is a truly shocking statement that should be retracted," Cantor spokesman Brad Dayspring said in a statement.
"A stimulus bill should have an immediate economic impact and create real, long term jobs, and this stimulus has not created jobs or fixed our economy."
Obama: Kennedy 'there in spirit' on healthcare
It must be a bittersweet time for Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
His most cherished legislative goal -- a healthcare bill that offers universal coverage -- is perhaps closer than ever before.
But his own health -- he is more than a year into treatment for aggressive brain cancer -- is keeping him from being in the thick of the action. He was not present when the Senate health committee became the first congressional panel Wednesday to pass a healthcare overhaul bill.
President Obama, who benefited immensely from Kennedy's endorsement during the Democratic primaries, said on ABC's "Good Morning America" this morning that he had talked to Kennedy last week.
But the president noted that is a difficult time for Kennedy, whom he lauded at a White House healthcare summit in March.
"Obviously, it's painful for Senator Kennedy, who's fought all his life for this moment, not to be there in the heat of battle. But he's there in spirit," Obama said. "Obviously, right now, we just want to make sure that he's taking care of himself and he's healing. But his spirit looms large over this entire process."
Big day for Kennedy
Even without him there in person, it was a big day on Capitol Hill for Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
His bill to extend federal hate crimes protections to gays and the disabled made it to the Senate floor with its best prospects since Kennedy, who is fighting brain cancer, first introduced the bill in 1997.
Democrats control both the Senate and House, which passed a version in April, and President Obama supports the legislation as well. The bill, named for Matthew Shepard, the gay Wyoming college student who was beaten to death, would add gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability to current hate crimes law, which applies to acts of violence motivated by prejudice against a person's race, color, national origin, or religion.
Earlier in the day, the Senate health committee became the first congressional panel to pass a healthcare bill this year -- a measure designed to expand insurance coverage, rein in costs, and stop private insurers from discriminating against people based on their medical history.
“This is an historic day for the cause of health care reform that is the cause of Senator Kennedy’s life," Senator John F. Kerry, Kennedy's fellow Massachusetts Democrat, said in a statement.
"Each day I work beside Ted Kennedy is an honor, a privilege, and an education in what it means to be a legislator, and of those thousands of days, none have been sweeter or longer in coming than today’s giant step forward in providing affordable healthcare to all Americans. The HELP Committee under Ted and Chris Dodd’s extraordinary guidance passed a plan that will help all those struggling under the weight of mounting costs by encouraging competition and offering a robust public choice that empowers consumers and keeps the big interests honest. The Senate under Ted Kennedy’s leadership is committed to a healthcare plan that drives down costs, strengthens coverage, and preserves personal choice. This is Teddy’s mission, and we’re committed to making his dream a reality.”
Obama: Health reform closer than ever
With Congress getting back on track on a healthcare overhaul, President Obama declared this afternoon that "we are now closer to the goal of health reform than we have ever been."
During his foreign trip last week, leaders of the healthcare push ran into a series of roadblocks. But on Tuesday, the House Democratic leadership unveiled a comprehensive bill. And this morning, the Senate health committee passed its version.
"Both proposals will take what’s best about our system today and make it the basis for our system tomorrow -- reducing costs, raising quality, and ensuring fair treatment of consumers by the insurance industry," the president said in the Rose Garden.
"Both include a health insurance exchange, a marketplace that will allow families and small businesses to compare prices, services, and quality so they can choose the plan that best suits their needs; and among the choices available would be a public health insurance option that would make healthcare more affordable by increasing competition, providing more choices, and keeping insurance companies honest. Both proposals will offer stability and security to Americans who have coverage today, and affordable options for Americans who don’t," Obama added.
"This progress should make us hopeful -- but it can’t make us complacent. It should instead provide the urgency for both the House and the Senate to finish their critical work on health reform before the August recess."
Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, who is seeking a landmark healthcare bill as the capstone of his legislative career while fighting brain cancer, missed the health committee vote.
Still, Obama praised the "unyielding passion and inspiration" provided by "our friend Ted Kennedy," as well as the "bold leadership" of Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, who has been shepherding the bill in Kennedy's absence.
Taking on critics he described as the "naysayers and the cynics," Obama repeated his argument that the country can't wait to fix the healthcare system, and renewed his vow to sign a comprehensive healthcare bill this year.
"We are going to get this done," said Obama, who was joined by Dodd and leaders of the 2.9-million-member American Nurses Association, saying that "few understand why we have to pass reform as intimately as our nation’s nurses." "It's time for us to buck up.... It’s up to us now. We can do what we’ve done for so long and defer tough decisions for another day -- or we can step up and meet our responsibilities. In other words, we can lead. We can look beyond the next news cycle and the next election to the next generation, and come together to build a system that works not just for these nurses, but for the patients they care for; for doctors and hospitals; for families and businesses -- and for our very future as a nation."
His full prepared remarks are below:
Winning hearts and minds on healthcare
As Congress races to try to get a healthcare overhaul bill to President Obama's desk before the August recess, both political parties are trying to shape public opinion.
Organizing for America, Obama's grassroots group now housed within the Democratic National Committee, released a new 30 second TV ad today in which five people hurt by the healthcare system all say "it's time" for the sweeping change. The five (their stories are below) are among hundreds of thousands of people who responded to the group's call for personal stories.
“Millions of Americans lose their health insurance when they lose their job, are denied care because of a pre-existing condition, and delay care or skip medication because they can’t afford it,” the group's executive director, Mitch Stewart, said in a statement. “Skyrocketing health care costs are hurting American families and straining already-strapped budgets for businesses and governments. It’s time to reform our health care system to lower costs, preserve patient choice and ensure that all Americans have access to quality, affordable care.”
The ad will run on national cable, on cable in Washington, and on local stations in Arkansas, Indiana, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, North Dakota, Nebraska, and Ohio, calling on moderate senators -- both Republicans and Democrats -- in those states to support the bill.
While Democrats are urging Congress to act, Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele asked "why the rush?" in an email today to supporters urging them to get involved.
"The Democrats have learned from their missteps last time they tried to force Americans into a socialized health care system -- the abysmal failure of the Clinton Administration's 'HillaryCare,' " he says. "So now, they are rushing 'Obamacare' through Congress, hoping it avoids the same fate."
Like Clinton's ill-fated plan, Obama and the Democrats -- with a public insurance option -- are seeking government-run healthcare, Steele argues.
"President Obama and Congressional Democrats think government is the solution to every problem. They're wrong," he says. "The government already runs car companies, banks and mortgage companies. Republicans believe that the last thing the American people want is government telling them when and where -- or even whether -- they can get medical treatment for their families.
"You and the RNC are all that stand between our sensible Republican plan for real healthcare reform and the Democrats' scheme to take more of your hard-earned income to pay for other people's health care while limiting yours."
FULL ENTRYSenate health panel passes overhaul bill
The Senate health committee this morning passed its version of healthcare overhaul on a 13-10 party line vote, the first congressional panel to pass a healthcare bill this session.
The $600 billion measure would expand health coverage to nearly all Americans by requiring individuals to get insurance and employers to contribute to the cost. Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, who is shepherding the bill in the absence of Senator Edward M. Kennedy, told reporters it is time to pass a comprehensive reform bill. Kennedy, who is battling brain cancer, missed the vote.
"We have done the hard work that the American people sent us here to do," Kennedy said in a statement. "We know, however, that our work is not over -- far from it. As we move from our committee room to the Senate floor, we must continue the search for solutions that unite us, so that the great promise of quality affordable health care for all can be fulfilled."
“For the past months, Rhode Islanders have told me that we need to fix health care in this country. I’ve heard from people struggling under skyrocketing costs and fearful that their coverage will disappear; people living with illness or injury because they can’t afford to see a doctor; people suffering from needless, preventable medical errors. All they’re asking for is health care they can rely on, and afford. As of today, we’re one step closer," Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat on the committee, said in a statement.
“The reform bill we passed today will let you keep the health insurance you have, if you like it – and if you can’t afford your coverage or you’re uninsured, you’ll have new choices. Its emphasis on quality improvement, disease prevention, and a public insurance option will mean high-quality, efficient health care that invests not only in treating you when you’re sick, but in keeping you well. And never again will an insurance company be able to deny you coverage because of a pre-existing condition."
But Senator Judd Gregg, a New Hampshire Republican, told reporters that Democrats on the committee had "struck out" on healthcare by passing a bill that leaves millions of Americans uncovered and that could cost workers their jobs by burdening businesses.
He and other Republicans complained that the Democratic majority ignored their proposals and amendments.
On Tuesday, House leaders unveiled a $1.5 trillion healthcare bill that would raise taxes on the highest-income Americans and penalize businesses that don't offer coverage and individuals who don't get insurance.
The House bill calls for federal income surtax starting with individuals making more than $280,000 a year and rising to 5.4 percent on those making more than $1 million a year. Employers who don't provide coverage would be hit with a penalty equal to 8 percent of workers' wages, though small businesses would be exempt. Individuals who skip coverage would pay 2.5 percent of their incomes as a penalty, up to the average cost of a health insurance plan.
President Obama, who is ramping up his push to get a healthcare overhaul bill on his desk before the August congressional recess, has scheduled another speech on healthcare this afternoon in the Rose Garden.
Obama responded to the panel's passage with a statement praising elements that he supports, but as he did when House leaders unveiled their bill without fully endorsing it.
“Today, thanks to the unyielding passion and inspiration provided by Senator Edward Kennedy, the HELP committee he chairs has produced a proposal that will finally lower health care costs, provide better care for patients, and ensure fair treatment of consumers by the insurance industry," the president said.
"Like the legislation produced by the House of Representatives, this proposal would offer Americans quality, affordable health care that is there when they need it. No longer will insurance companies be able to deny coverage based on a pre-existing medical condition. No longer will Americans have to worry about their health insurance if they lose their job, change their job, or open a new business.
"This proposal will bring down costs, expand coverage, and increase choice. Through a health insurance exchange, families and small businesses will be able to compare prices and quality so that they can choose the health care plan that best suits their needs. Among the choices that would be available in the exchange would be a public health insurance option that would make health care affordable by increasing competition, providing more choices, and keeping the insurance companies honest.
"This proposal would also control rising costs by investing in preventive care and wellness programs, rooting out waste and fraud in the system, and changing the incentives that automatically equate the most expensive care with the best care.
"When this proposal is combined with other proposals that the Senate Finance Committee is working on, it’s estimated that health reform will cover 97% of all Americans.
"The HELP committee’s success should give us hope, but it should not give us pause. It should instead provide the urgency for both the House and Senate to finish their critical work on health reform before the August recess. I want to commend Senator Kennedy, Senator Dodd, as well as Senators Harkin, Mikulski, Bingaman, and Murray on the leadership they’ve shown and the foundation they’ve laid to reform our health care system.”
House unveils healthcare overhaul bill
President Obama this afternoon praised the healthcare overhaul bill unveiled by Democratic leaders in the House.
Patterned in significant measure after the 2006 Massachusetts law, it would penalize employers who fail to provide health insurance for their workers and individuals who refuse to obtain coverage.
The legislation would be paid for by a federal income surtax -- up to 5.4 percent on the income of taxpayers making more than $1 million a year -- plus hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts in projected Medicare and Medicaid spending.
Obama urged Congress on Monday to get back on track to send him a bill before its August recess, after healthcare legislation went off the rails over disagreements on financing during the week he was abroad.
But in his statement, he did not endorse the surtax as a way to pay for healthcare.
"For decades, Washington failed to act as healthcare costs continued to rise, crushing businesses and families and placing an unsustainable burden on governments. But today, key committees in the House of Representatives have engaged in unprecedented cooperation to produce a health care reform proposal that will lower costs, provide better care for patients, and ensure fair treatment of consumers by the insurance industry," Obama said in a statement issued by the White House this afternoon.
"This proposal controls the skyrocketing cost of health care by rooting out waste and fraud and promoting quality and accountability. Its savings of more than $500 billion over 10 years will strengthen Medicare and contribute to our goal of reforming health care in a fiscally responsible way. It will change the incentives in our health care system so that Americans can receive the best care, not the most expensive care. And it will offer families and businesses more choices and more affordable health care," he added.
"This proposal will also prevent insurance companies from denying people coverage because of a pre-existing medical condition. It will ensure that workers can still have health insurance if they lose their job, change their job or start a new business. And it includes a health insurance exchange that will allow families and small businesses to compare prices and quality so they can choose the health care plan that best suits their needs. Among the choices that would be available in the exchange would be a public health insurance option that would make health care affordable by increasing competition, providing more choices, and keeping the insurance companies honest.
"The House proposal will begin the process of fixing what’s broken about our health care system, reducing costs for all, building on what works, and covering an estimated 97% of all Americans. And by emphasizing prevention and wellness, it will also help improve the quality of health care for every American.
"I thank Chairmen Rangel, Waxman, and Miller for their hard work on this bill that fundamentally reforms the health care system. As this process moves forward, I look forward to continuing to work with all House members in ensuring this legislation helps all Americans and plays an essential role in reducing deficits and bringing fiscal sustainability to our nation.”
UPDATE: Critics say the well-off are being unfairly targeted and would be discouraged from making more money and creating jobs.
The Tax Foundation calculates if the House plan became law, taxpayers in 39 states would face a combined top tax rate of more than 50 percent. Residents of Rhode Island (56.2 percent) and Vermont (55.8 percent) would be among the hardest hit.
"That means government would be taking more than half of every additional dollar from high-income taxpayers," Tax Foundation President Scott Hodge said in a statement.
The House proposal would impose a surtax of 1 percent on married couples with adjusted gross incomes of between $350,000 and $500,000 a year and singles who earn between $280,000 and $400,000; 1.5 percent on couples with incomes between $500,000 and $1 million and singles earning between $400,000 and $800,000; and 5.4 percent on couples earning more than $1 million and singles more than $800,000.
Obama still confident on healthcare
President Obama said today he still hopes that Congress can vote on a healthcare overhaul bill before its August recess, despite a series of setbacks this week for his top domestic priority.
House leaders hoped to unveil their bill today, but have put that off until at least Monday while they try to bring conservative Democrats, known as the Blue Dog Coalition, back into the fold. Democrats in both the House and Senate are scrambling to come up with a way to pay the estimated $1 trillion cost over the next decade.
UPDATE: In the latest approach to financing the overhaul, House Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel told reporters this afternoon that the House bill to be unveiled on Monday would raise $540 billion over the next decade by imposing a 1 percent surtax on Americans with an annual income of more than $350,000. A higher surtax is proposed for people earning $500,000 and $1 million, he said.
Combined with savings promised by hospitals and pharmaceutical companies, including cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, the tax revenue is designed to be enough to pay for a bill costing about $1 trillion.
"Our team is working with members of Congress every day on this issue, and it is my highest legislative priority over the next month," Obama told reporters at the close of the G-8 summit in Italy.
He insisted that Washington is closer "at any time in recent history" to "achieving serious health care reform that cuts costs, provides coverage to American families, allows them to keep their doctors and plans that are working for them."
As both parties and both chambers work through the legislation, the president said, his job is to set "clear parameters" -- cutting costs, emphasizing prevention, covering the nearly 50 million uninsured, and doing it in a way that does not add to the federal deficit.
"There are going to be some tough negotiations in the days and weeks to come, but I'm confident that we're going to get it done," Obama added. "What I'm trying to keep focused on are the people out in states all across the country that are getting hammered by rising premiums. They're losing their jobs and suddenly losing their healthcare."
His full answer at the news conference is below:
Springfield mom testifies on bullying
By Stephanie Vallejo, Globe correspondent
WASHINGTON -- In the three months since Sirdeaner Walker’s 11-year-old son, Carl Walker-Hoover, committed suicide, the Springfield mother has channeled her grief into action. Walker appeared on "The Ellen DeGeneres Show" and "The Oprah Winfrey Show" to speak out on the dangers of bullying.
But that was just a warm-up.
Walker, once a self-described “ordinary working mom,” has become a persistent advocate for safer schools, and she’ll stop at nothing less than federal legislation. Appearing today before the House subcommittees on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education and Healthy Families and Communities, Walker related Carl’s story once again.
“What could make a child his age despair so much that he would take his own life?” Walker asked during a panel on “Strengthening School Safety Through Prevention of Bullying.” “I will probably never know the answer. What we do know is that Carl was being bullied relentlessly at school.”
Walker had known for months of her son’s situation, and, so did the staff at the New Leadership Charter School in Springfield.
She was unhappy with their course of action, and attributes it to a lack of training. The last week of Carl’s life, he had been assigned to sit with his tormentors at lunch as part of a mediation process. “Obviously there needs to be some professional development and instruction, because that’s not a solution,” she said.
While school officials acknowledge they knew of the bullying, they say they handled the situation appropriately.
Walker supports a bill that would require states that receive grants for safe and drug-free schools to invest in bullying prevention programs. She plans to speak with staff in the offices of Massachusetts Senators John F. Kerry and Edward M. Kennedy while in Washington.
“Everyone at the hearing listened to Carl’s story,” Walker said afterwards. “I really feel like now is the time that we look to the federal government for guidelines and leadership. Our children are suffering every day, in school.”
Jobs debate heats up
While President Obama discusses the global economy in Italy with other world leaders, the volume is getting dialed up on job losses at home.
The unemployment rate is at 9.5 percent -- the highest in 26 years -- and headed into double digits. Employers laid off another 467,000 workers last month, bringing to 6.5 million the net job losses since the recession began in December 2007. And criticism is growing of the $787 billion economic stimulus plan that Obama championed -- and why it isn't creating jobs quicker.
The epicenter of the debate this week is Ohio, the traditional presidential bellwether state where Obama spent quite a bit of time campaigning and where a new poll this week had worrisome numbers for Obama.
Respondents in the Quinnipiac University survey were evenly divided over Obama's handling of the economy -- 48 percent approved, 46 percent disapproved -- and his approval rating had dropped to 49 percent from 62 percent in May while his disapproval number rose to 44 percent from 31 percent.
Quinnipiac called Obama's numbers "lackluster," and said they were the lowest in any national or state poll it had conducted since his inauguration.
Representative John Boehner of Ohio, the top Republican in the House, caused a ruckus over the weekend by claiming that none of the contracts had been let for infrastructure projects funded by the stimulus.
The Democratic National Committee released a web video and is holding a news conference today in Ohio to rebut Boehner, who it says is being hypocritical since the House GOP stimulus plan had no infrastructure projects.
“Given that he championed and continues to advocate the very same economic policies that got us into this mess to begin with, perhaps John Boehner just doesn't know what creating new jobs looks like. Or perhaps he was willfully misleading the public about the effect of the President's economic recovery package to score political points,” DNC spokesman Hari Sevugan said in a statement. “Either way, considering that the Republican 'alternative' included ZERO funding for construction projects, it's the height of hypocrisy for Boehner to criticize the status of these projects at all.”
Michael Steel, a Boehner spokesman, responded: "Ohio was very nearly the last state to get the first 50 percent of its stimulus construction money obligated for construction projects, which is ridiculous. As of late May, approximately, no
contracts had been signed.
"Since that time, some contracts have been belatedly set in motion, but the entire process has been absurdly slow-moving -- just as Republicans warned it would be last winter when we called for an economic recovery bill based on fast-acting tax relief for small businesses and working families rather than spending on slow-moving government programs. It's embarrassing that the DNC can't defend its own indefensible trillion-dollar stimulus that isn't working
and resorts to desperate tactics like this."
The Obama administration concedes that the continuing job losses are unacceptable, but says that the stimulus package was always going to take some time to have measurable impact.
Vice President Joe Biden said over the weekend that the White House might have "misread" the depth of the recession; he plans to visit the state on Thursday to trumpet the stimulus.
But Labor Secretary Hilda Solis said on Fox Business Network that all the stimulus needs to be spent before serious consideration of a second stimulus package.
Solis said she can't predict when the unemployment rate will begin declining.
"We're not looking at just a quick fix here, we're looking at something that is going to take us out of this bad economy for the next decade," she said. "And we have to make these investments that were neglected in the last eight years."
Biden unveils deal with hospitals
Subbing for President Obama, who is at the G-8 economic summit in Italy, Vice President Joe Biden this morning formally announced the latest deal with the industry on a healthcare overhaul.
The nation's hospitals have tentatively agreed to forego about $155 billion in government payments for Medicaid and Medicare over the next decade -- about 20 percent of the $1 trillion projected to be needed to extend health coverage to about 47 million uninsured Americans.
Hospitals are cracking under the weight of uninsured patients getting treated in emergency rooms, Biden said, flanked by several hospital CEOs.
The deal follows some concessions by pharmaceutical firms, retail giant Wal-Mart's announcement last week that it would support an employer requirement to help pay for healthcare. The Obama team hopes such agreements build momentum for sweeping healthcare changes; the president wants to sign a bill this year.
"Reform is coming. It is on track. It is coming," Biden said.
Drug companies, doctors, and others are interested in healthcare overhaul. "We have the American public behind us," Biden added. (His full remarks are below.)
But even fellow Democrats in Congress are having qualms about the complexities of how to pay for a healthcare overhaul -- including whether to tax health benefits provided by employers -- and whether to create a new government insurance plan.
FULL ENTRYFranken takes oath, gets plum committee spots
By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- As Washington ponders Al Franken's role as comedian or statesman, the Senate's newest member revealed another side of his persona today: He's a hugger.
Moments after Franken was sworn in as Minnesota's Democratic junior senator, he gave a big bear hug to Massachusetts Senator John F. Kerry (himself not much of a public hugger), followed by hearty embraces of Democratic Senators Barbara Boxer of California, Tom Harkin of Iowa, and Amy Klobuchar, who has been carrying the load for Minnesota alone during the months of fighting over the seat.
Franken was declared the winner by the Minnesota Supreme Court last week, Republican incumbent Norm Coleman conceded, and Franken formally took the oath of office this afternoon.
As fans in the visitors' gallery cheered, Franken pumped his fist in victory, still holding the Bible he used for his swearing-in.
"There are people who see Al Franken in a very narrow concept, and it's understandable,'' since Franken gained fame as a comedian and radio talk-show host, said Senate Assistant Majority Leader Dick Durbin of Illinois. "But there's a lot more to this person. He's a very bright person. He's very well-informed.''
"Many expect that every time Al opens his mouth, it's going to be a comedy routine -- it's not,'' Durbin added.
Franken won plum assignments on the Senate Judiciary, Aging, and Health committees. Franken will not officially join the latter panel, however, until after it finishes work writing the healthcare overhaul bill.
Durbin noted that the committee is considering hundreds of amendments Franken had not participated in debating; a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, added that it would be unfair to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat who has been working on the panel temporarily, to replace him with Franken during a time of such intense legislative activity.
Franken brings the Democratic caucus's count to 60 -- the number needed to stop filibusters. But since senators rarely vote in party lockstep -- especially on non-procedural votes -- the Democratic leadership's agenda is not assured passage.
"Most senators aren't sheep. They didn't come here to be told what to do by someone else,'' said Senator Evan Bayh, Democrat of Indiana.
UPDATE: Franken, himself, has played down the 60th vote, saying he'll represent practical Minnesotans and not automatically back the Democratic leadership.
But the National Republican Senatorial Committee wasted no time posting a web video warning of unfettered Democratic power.
"With 60 senators, Democrats have total control. No checks, no balances," it says on screen, over images of a fist-pumping Franken.
"They own everything, and have no one to blame now," it says on screen at the end.
Obama applauds healthcare progress
The White House just issued a statement this morning reacting to word of a deal with hospitals to help finance a healthcare overhaul.
"I am pleased by the progress we're making on health care reform and still believe, as I've said before, that one of the best ways to bring down costs, provide more choices, and assure quality is a public option that will force the insurance companies to compete and keep them honest. I look forward to a final product that achieves these very important goals," said the statement from President Obama, who is in Moscow for day two of his first Russian summit.
Administration and industry officials told several news organizations late Monday that after talks involving the White House and key Senate Democrats, the nation's hospitals were on the verge of signing off on a deal to reduce their anticipated payments from Medicare and Medicaid by about $155 billion over the next decade.
The government could use that money to help provide health coverage to millions who now lack it. The cost of healthcare overhaul is projected at $1 trillion or more over the next decade.
Kerry praises new nuke treaty
Senator John F. Kerry this afternoon praised the signing by President Obama and Russia's leader of a follow-up nuclear arms reduction treaty to START.
“I applaud President Obama and Russian President Medvedev for agreeing to negotiate an arms control treaty that will reduce the size of our two countries’ arsenals of deployed strategic nuclear warheads and strategic delivery vehicles to the lowest levels in decades. This is a very important early step toward the nonproliferation and long-term disarmament goals that President Obama set out in his April speech in Prague," Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement.
"With the START Treaty due to expire in December, it is vital that negotiations on the new treaty proceed urgently. The Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate will closely examine the new treaty once it is finalized, but I am confident that the treaty envisioned by this Joint Understanding will ultimately win Senate approval and enter into force.
“I also welcome and endorse President Medvedev’s comments on the state of our bilateral relationship. Russia is a essential partner in meeting the global challenges of the twenty-first century. Nuclear nonproliferation, climate change, international terrorism, and pandemic public health threats can only be addressed with our comprehensive cooperation.”
Franken says he's a practical Minnesotan
As Congress returned from its July Fourth recess, Al Franken held his first news conference as senator-elect -- and again warned fellow Democrats that he won't be an automatic 60th vote.
Introduced by Senator Harry Reid, the top Democrat, Franken said, "I look forward to working under your leadership.
Still, Franken said while there has been much discussion of the number 60 -- the potentially filibuster-proof numbers of votes Democrats would have if all are present and accounted for -- he is focusing on the "number two" -- as in being the second senator from Minnesota.
"Minnesotans are a very practical people," he said, and want to make sure the work that is done in the Senate makes sense and that any spending brings a "strong return on investment."
Franken, who won the seat last week after Republican incumbent Norm Coleman conceded following a state Supreme Court ruling, said he will focus on healthcare, jobs, and clean energy.
"I'm ready to get to work," said the former "Saturday Night Live" comedian, who will be officially sworn into office on Tuesday.
Senate health panel tries again
The new and improved version of the Senate health committee's healthcare overhaul would be cheaper and cover more Americans, its leaders claim.
The plan is estimated to cost $611 billion over 10 years, and offer coverage to 97 percent of Americans. It includes a $750-a-year fee on companies with more than 25 employees for each full-time worker they don't offer coverage, and $375 per part-time worker. It also includes an option for government insurance to compete with private insurers.
"Like the president and a strong majority of Americans, we believe that a strong public option is an important component of any health reform bill that keeps costs down, expands coverage and offers American families a wide variety of affordable options," Senators Chris Dodd of Connecticut and Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts wrote in a letter to committee members that was obtained by the Associated Press.
Dodd, who is taking the lead as Kennedy undergoes treatment for brain cancer, briefed reporters this morning on the new proposal, joined by Senators Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and Sherrod Brown of Ohio.
(The committee's release is below.)
The committee's original draft bill was essentially dead on arrival after the Congressional Budget Office -- the official scorekeeper on the costs and benefits of legislation -- concluded last month that it would cost $1 trillion over the next decade, but would leave millions still uninsured.
While the proposal would extend coverage to 39 million people, the CBO estimated, 15 million who had coverage through their employer would lose it, as would 8 million others.
Dodd and Kennedy say in the letter that the revised proposal "virtually eliminates" the likelihood that many companies would drop coverage for their workers.
UPDATE: President Obama praised the new bill, saying it "reflects many of the principles I’ve laid out," and said that when combined with a Senate Finance Committee version, will enable the Senate to vote on "health reform legislation that does not add to the deficit, reduces health care costs and covers 97% of Americans."
His full statement this morning: "For decades, Washington has failed to act as health care costs continued to rise, crushing businesses, families and placing an unsustainable burden on governments. Today the Senate HELP committee has produced legislation that lowers costs, protects choice of doctors and plans and assures quality and affordable health care for Americans. The Congressional Budget Office has now issued a more complete review of this bill, concluding that it will cost less and cover more Americans than originally estimated. It also contains provisions that will protect the coverage Americans get at work.When merged with the Senate Finance Committee’s companion pieces, the Senate will be prepared to vote for health reform legislation that does not add to the deficit, reduces health care costs and covers 97% of Americans.
"The HELP Committee legislation reflects many of the principles I’ve laid out, such as reforms that will prohibit insurance companies from refusing coverage for people with pre-existing conditions and the concept of insurance exchanges where individuals can find affordable coverage if theylose their jobs, move or get sick. Such a marketplace would allow families and some small businesses the benefit of one-stop-shopping for their healthcare coverage and enable them to compare price and quality and pick theplan that best suits their needs.
"Among the choices that would be available in the exchange would be a public health insurance option. The public option would make health care affordable by increasing competition, providing more choices and keeping the insurance companies honest.
"The legislation also improves the quality of patient care, improves safety for patients and strengthens the commitment to preventive health care – preventing people from getting sick in the first place.
"I thank chairman Kennedy, Senator Dodd, and all the members of the HELP Committee for their hard work on health reform."
Consumer groups out-lobbied on healthcare
President Obama has been urging the public to speak out on healthcare, warning that if they don't, their voices will be drowned out by special interests.
A watchdog group today put some numbers behind that admonition, reporting that health industry groups are vastly outspending consumer groups in lobbying Washington.
The Center for Responsive Politics says that consumer groups that favor Obama's proposals, including a public insurance plan to compete with private insurers, are being "decidedly outspent and out-lobbied by drug manufacturers, insurers, HMOs, and doctors' associations."
In the first three months of 2009, the US Chamber of Commerce, which has spent more money on lobbying since 1998 than any other group, and the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America paid lobbyists a combined $22.5 million to promote their interests.
In contrast, Families USA, a consumer group on healthcare has spent $10,000 on lobbying this year after spending only $32,000 total in 2008, the center says.
Obama has work to do selling health plan
President Obama is seeking to build more public support for his healthcare agenda, holding an online town hall meeting this afternoon at Northern Virginia Community College in Annandale.
But newly released poll results show he has some work to do.
The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey found that 51 percent of Americans support Obama's health reform plans, while 45 percent oppose them. Those numbers, however, lag well below his overall job approval standards.
And the vast majority of Americans believe Obama's plans would cause their own medical costs to rise -- 54 percent in the poll said their costs would go up, while 17 percent said their bills would decrease, and 26 percent said costs would stay the same. More worrisome perhaps, only 20 percent of Americans said they would be better off with the healthcare overhaul, while 35 percent said they would worse off, and 44 percent said they would come out about the same.
Also, the number who believe that the healthcare system needs a "great deal" of reform has dipped slightly, to 55 percent now from 62 percent just before the November election.
Still, Americans trust Obama on healthcare more than congressional Republicans or Democrats. When Congress returns next week from its July Fourth recess, key Senate committees plan to resume detailed work on their proposals.
And so far, the poll suggests, Americans aren't buying the arguments of healthcare overhaul critics -- that the proposals would force patients to leave their doctors and that the plans would force private insurers out of business. Only 31 percent believe the former, and 42 percent the latter.
The poll, conducted June 26-28, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
At the town hall, Obama is answering questions from a live audience, as well as and online communities including Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.
Kicking off the event, Obama called healthcare one of the most important issues facing American families -- and one of the keys to long-term economic prosperity.
"We are at a defining moment for this nation," he said, reprising a reform theme from his campaign and confronting critics who say he is taking on too many ambitious proposals.
"America has waited too long," he said, to seriously deal with healthcare, as well as education and clean energy.
The president also addressed the concern that a healthcare overhaul designed to extend coverage to every American will cost too much -- more than $1 trillion over the next decade, according to most estimates.
"The costs of inaction, of doing nothing, are even greater and are unacceptable," Obama said, with healthcare inflation rising dramatically and increasing the federal deficit.
Beyond macroeconomics, healthcare problems are hurting real families every day, he said.
Obama vowed to get an overhaul plan through Congress this session.
"We are going to pass it this year," he said to applause. "That is my commitment. We are going to get it done."
But he cautioned that the most difficult work to passing a plan lies ahead. Naysayers are coming up with "every excuse and scare tactic in the book" to stall reform, he said.
To critics, he said he asks, what's their alternative and what they say to Americans who are without insurance or at risk of losing it.
"All of us are in this together," he said.
He urged the public to join the fight, saying that if Congress doesn't believe that Americans want real change, the lobbyists and special interests will carry the day.
(His full remarks, and the question-and-answer session, are below.)
Obama has mobilized his grassroots army to get the word out on healthcare. The post-election vehicle for Obama's campaign, Organizing for America, held a series of service-related healthcare events last week. And today, it sent supporters an email bragging about the turnout, including a video of highlights and a reference to a Boston Globe report about it.
"Last weekend, you were part of something big," wrote Jeremy Bird, the group's deputy director. "Americans like you came together across the country -- in community health centers, outside of supermarkets, in local schools -- to serve together and improve health care in your community. While serving your neighborhoods, you raised your voice and built momentum to finally fix this broken health care system. Thank you for your work."
Obama allies push energy bill
A pro-Obama, Democratic grassroots group unveiled a new TV ad today, lauding the House for passing a landmark climate change bill and urging supporters to call their senators to do the same.
The spot, from Americans United for Change, is to air in Washington this week and asserts that the legislation will create millions of clean energy jobs. "It’s a foundation for America’s long-term economic success, making us world leader in clean energy," the announcer says. "The challenge is global. And the solution uniquely American."
After lots of arm-twisting by President Obama and his aides, and quite a bit of horse-trading, the House on Friday narrowly passed the bill on a 219-212 vote. It is designed to lower how much carbon is pumped into the atmosphere through a "cap-and-trade" system in which carbon emissions are capped and permits to pollute are given away or sold by the government.
But the bill faces tough sledding in the Senate, and some observers don't believe it will pass this year, though Obama wants final passage before he attends an international global warming conference in Copenhagen.
Obama and his allies are ramping up their grassroots efforts to put pressure on senators.
“Thanks to the extraordinary leadership in Congress, America has taken a giant leap towards becoming the global standard for clean energy while creating millions of new jobs in the process," Tom McMahon, acting executive director of Americans United for Change, said in a statement. "This historic legislation will help build a solid foundation for long-term economic prosperity by meeting President Obama’s challenge to reduce our nation’s dependence on foreign oil and curbing pollution that causes global warming. This ad is designed to encourage Congress to continue standing up to the forces of ‘status quo’ and move this historic clean energy jobs bill to the President’s desk as quickly as possible.”
UPDATE: Organizing for America, the current iteration of Obama's grassroots campaign organization, is sending an email today to thousands of members in Representative Ed Markey's district, urging them to call the Massachusetts congressman with thanks for his leadership on the energy bill.
"We know that historic change is always tough, and enacting clean energy legislation is no exception," wrote Addisu Demissie, the group's political director. "But, with your help, on Friday the House passed a historic energy bill -- a critical first step toward rebuilding our economy with good green jobs, reducing harmful pollution, and breaking our dependence on foreign oil."
Coleman concedes Senate race to Franken
The long-running political saga known as the Minnesota US Senate election is finally over.
After the state's Supreme Court today ended the recount and affirmed Democratic challenger Al Franken as the winner, Republican incumbent Norm Coleman conceded. That cleared the way for Franken to be seated, giving Democrats a potentially filibuster-proof 60-vote majority in the Senate -- and giving a boost to President Obama's agenda.
"It's over," Coleman said, congratulating Franken.
"Sure I wanted to win, not just for myself but for my supporters," Coleman told reporters.
But he said that further litigation would damage the state. "We have to focus on the future, and the future is that we have a new US senator," he said.
In his own news conference about an hour after Coleman's, Franken said he was "so thrilled" that he could finally celebrate his victory and excited to start work for Minnesotans.
"We have a lot of work to do in Washington, but that's why I signed up for this job in the first place," said the new senator-elect.
He said he would work on healthcare, education, renewable energy, and the economy.Franken said Coleman called and was gracious in defeat.
Franken said he expects to be seated next week, when Congress returns from its July Fourth recess.
But he cautioned that he wouldn't always toe the party line.
"I know there's been a lot of talk about the fact that when I'm sworn in I'll be the 60th member of the Democratic caucus, but that's not how I see it," Franken told reporters outside his downtown Minneapolis town house. "The way I see it, I'm not going to Washington to be the 60th Democratic senator. I'm going to Washington to be the second senator from the state of Minnesota, and that's how I'm going to do this job."
"I promise to do my best, to work hard, to stand on principle when I believe I must, and, yes, to compromise when I believe that that is in the best interests of the people of Minnesota," he added.
Minutes after Coleman's concession, the White House issued a statement from Obama: "I look forward to working with Senator-Elect Franken to build a new foundation for growth and prosperity by lowering health care costs and investing in the kind of clean energy jobs and industries that will help America lead in the 21st century.”
The unanimous ruling (read it here) affirmed a trial court's decision that after the recount, Franken received 312 more votes than Coleman out of more than 2.4 million cast last November.
While the result has been tied up in the courts, Minnesota has been without its second US senator as Congress has tackled major legislation on the economy and other issues.
Before Coleman's concession, allies of Obama and Democrats quickly called on Coleman to concede and allow Franken, a former "Saturday Night Live" comedian, to be seated.
“On behalf of the Democratic National Committee, I congratulate Al Franken on his election to the United States Senate. Senator-Elect Franken must be seated as soon as possible. The people of Minnesota rightfully elected Al Franken to serve in the Senate and there is far too much work to be done for the state and the nation to drag this process on any longer,” Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine said in a statement.
“Today’s ruling from the Minnesota Supreme Court marks the end of the line for Norm Coleman's legal battle. For too long, Minnesotans have been denied their proper representation in Congress while Norm Coleman pursued his political ambitions. In light of today's decision, Norm Coleman should concede and Governor Pawlenty should sign the election certificate which Al Franken is entitled to, and which he pledged to do upon guidance from the court. Doing so will finally put this saga to an end and give Minnesotans their full voice in the U.S. Senate."
“Now that the Minnesota Supreme Court has made its final ruling, it is time to recognize Al Franken as the duly elected Senator from Minnesota. As is appropriate after any extremely close election, Minnesotans took the time to conduct an extensive and thorough recount process, but now that all reasonable legal options have been exhausted, Minnesota deserves its full representation in Congress. We call on Governor Pawlenty to pursue the state’s best interests and end this contest instead of favoring those who would allow the recount to continue for purely partisan reasons," Anna Burger, chairwoman of the Change to Win labor coalition, said in a statement.
"America’s workers congratulate Al Franken – and the people of Minnesota who have gone 226 days without a second Senator – for their unanimous victory today in the Minnesota Supreme Court," added AFL-CIO president John Sweeney.
"Working families are facing many challenges including a tough economy, lack of health care coverage and an out of balance economic system where workers do not have a voice at their job. With these colossal issues at stake it is essential that Minnesotans have both their senators to represent them and we urge Governor Pawlenty to immediately sign the election certificate so Franken can get to work.
Liberal pastors push healthcare overhaul
With members of Congress back home this week for the July Fourth recess, left-leaning religious groups today announced a series of radio ads promoting the moral argument for a healthcare overhaul.
In the ads, local pastors say that the status quo on healthcare is “not who we are as a nation” and that “America can do better.” They will air on Christian and mainstream radio in Arkansas, Colorado, Indiana, Louisiana, Nebraska, and North Carolina -- the home states of key senators in the healthcare debate.
The faith-based push also includes meetings with members of Congress, sermons on healthcare, and a new guide to the healthcare debate for people of faith. The groups sponsoring the campaign are PICO National Network, Faith in Public Life, Faithful America, Sojourners, Gamaliel Foundation, and Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.
Nader nags Obama on healthcare
Consumer activist Ralph Nader has a simple message for liberals feeling less warm and fuzzy about President Obama: "I told you so."
"Millions of Americans are feeling betrayed. They thought Obama as President meant change we can believe in. They thought Obama as President meant withdrawal from Iraq. They thought Obama as President meant standing up to Wall Street fat cats. They thought Obama as President meant a living wage," Nader, who ran a presidential campaign last year far less successful than his 2000 bid, said in an email to supporters today,
"But for those of you who stood with us during the 2008 Presidential campaign, you knew the score. You do not feel betrayed. You are immune to Obama Betrayal Syndrome," Nader continues. "Because you knew, as we pointed out repeatedly during the campaign, that Obama was the corporate Democrat. Beholden to large campaign contributors from Wall Street. From the military industrial complex. And from the health insurance pharma complex."
Nader's missive seeks donations for Single Payer Action, a new advocacy group pushing a healthcare plan along the lines of the national insurance plan in Canada.
Supporters of such a plan say it is the only way to cover everyone while cutting costs, but Obama is not among them, saying that while it might make sense if starting from scratch, it makes more sense now to build upon the current system, under which most Americans get their health coverage through their employer.
To combat critics who call his plan socialized medicine, the president reassures that he would not force anyone to change their coverage.
But Nader's new group isn't giving up. Single Payer Action members have confronted members of Congress in their home districts to press them on the issue.
"Let's break through the corporate barriers and make single payer for all a reality," he says in the email. "Together, we can make the difference. Onward to a life-saving, cost-saving single payer."
Kennedy touts student loan program
Senator Edward M. Kennedy sent a letter today to Massachusetts college leaders, urging them to make sure students know about a new program that makes it less expensive to repay student loans.
Under the program that starts Wednesday, monthly payments are capped based on a graduate's income and remaining balances are wiped clean after 25 years. Those who take public service jobs can get their loans forgiven after 10 years.
"A college degree has never been more important. Yet it’s increasingly difficult for students to afford. In particular, the prospect of heavy loan burdens is discouraging more and more students from attending the college of their choice, or pursuing jobs in the public interest. More than two-thirds of college students graduate with federal loan debt averaging $20,000 after graduation," wrote Kennedy, chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee .
"College affordability has long been a major concern of mine in the Senate and I’m writing now to draw your attention to a new option – Income Based Repayment – that will make loan repayment easier for students, no matter what job they take after graduation. If you haven’t done so already, I urge you to inform your students about it."
His full letter is below:
Obama brags on energy measures
President Obama held an event this afternoon to trumpet one of his biggest legislative victories so far -- the narrow House passage late Friday of the first-ever bill to tackle global warming.
The sweeping legislation, passed on a 219-212 vote, would rewrite US environmental policy in the most significant way since the 1970s Clean Air Act and would create a controversial cap-and-trade system that would limit carbon emissions and under which the government would sell or give away permits to emit limited amounts.
Obama said it is time for bold action to build on what he called more action on clean energy in the last few months than in the past few decades, including new fuel efficiency standards for all vehicles and green jobs in the economic stimulus plan. He also announced new efficiency standards, including compact fluorescent light bulbs. (His full remarks are below, followed by the White House release.)
He called the climate change bill "extraordinary," saying it will open the door to a clean energy economy, end US dependence on foreign oil, and create thousands of jobs. but he also has quibbles with the House version.
During his campaign, Obama called for all the pollution permits to be sold to help raise money for other priorities, but went along with House Democrats' plan to give many of them away to help lower the cost to industry.
On Sunday, Obama also acknowledged reservations about a provision that would punish trading partners that don't work to curb pollution. "At a time when the economy worldwide is still deep in recession and we've seen a significant drop in global trade, I think we have to be very careful about sending any protectionist signals out there," he told reporters.
House Republicans railed against the bill, saying it amounted to an energy tax on Americans -- and Senate Republicans quickly indicated they will use the same line of attack to try to stop the bill.
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said on "Fox News Sunday" that the measure would lead to "significant increases" in electricity costs across the country.
But in his weekly Internet and radio address on Saturday, Obama urged the Senate not to listen to the naysayers. "We cannot be afraid of the future," he said. "And we must not be prisoners of the past. Don’t believe the misinformation out there that suggests there is somehow a contradiction between investing in clean energy and economic growth. It’s just not true."
While Obama and supporters say the bill is a historic advance, some liberal allies say it doesn't go far enough.
MoveOn.org, the major advocacy group, sent a fund-raising missive to members today asking for a vote whether to fight the bill in the Senate.
"The US House passed a huge energy bill Friday. Lots of good people are applauding the passage of this legislation. But here's the ugly truth: Big Oil and Coal lobbyists, working in cahoots with some conservative Blue Dog Democrats, weakened the bill terribly—it now falls far short of President Obama's campaign vision to transition America's economy to clean energy and create millions of new jobs," the email said.
"In fact, the bill repeals a key part of the Clean Air Act and doesn't do nearly enough to shift America to renewable energy -- so instead of a boom in solar and wind, the bill locks us into dirty coal power for another generation.... o win in the Senate, we need to make sure everyone understands that the Clean Air Act is under attack and highlight the other big problems with the bill. If we decide to proceed with this campaign together, we'll boost progressive champions like those who fought in the House, and expose conservatives who do the bidding of the oil and coal industry."
Bay State lawmakers dive into fight over the F-22 fighter jet
By Bryan Bender
GLOBE STAFF
WASHINGTON _ Taking a leading role in the brouhaha over proposed weapons cuts, two Massachusetts lawmakers are urging fellow House members not to force the Pentagon to buy more F-22 fighter jets over the objections of Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates and the top Air Force brass.
Reps. Barney Frank and John Tierney are both offering amendments that would reverse the decision last week by the influential House Armed Services Committee to allocate $369 million next year to buy materials for 12 more of the stealth fighter jets.
The Obama administration's decision to end production of the high-priced jets at 187 planes has set off an uproar among powerful members of Congress in both parties who stipulate that curtailing the Lockheed Martin project will cost thousands of jobs and could harm national security.
But Democrats Frank, of Newton, and Tierney, of Salem, believe the fate of the F-22 is a test case for whether Obama's attempts to cut Cold War-era projects to free up money for pressing wartime needs can overcome the entrenched interests in the defense industry and their politically powerful boosters on Capitol Hill.
"If we cannot hold the line on this it is very bad news for trying to hold down any excesses in Pentagon spending," Frank told reporters today in a conference call organized by the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning Washington think tank. "This is a major assault on the president's effort to control military spending."
He said if Congress reverses the administration's decision on the F-22 supporters of other weapons that the Pentagon has concluded it doesn't need could be emboldened to fight back as well. "That is just going to fuel their appetite."
Frank said he was particularly ticked off that the House committee, which approved the F-22 funding by just one vote, took the funds from the administration's request for environmental cleanup at military bases. He said it is disingenuous to say the move is therefore not adding money to the federal budget because ultimately the cleanup will have to be undertaken.
He chided his colleagues who he said "apparently think the Pentagon is funded with Monopoly money that doesn't count."
Gates, who was asked by Obama to stay on as Pentagon chief at the close of the Bush administration, has staked his reputation on a budget plan that reshapes Pentagon priorities so that counter-insurgency and other irregular warfare capabilities in shorter supply are given adequate resources.
Gates, asked by reporters last week about congressional attempts to upend his plan, bristled at the suggestion by some that he is harming national security by cutting back on some weapons that could be needed to defend against potential future enemies.
He noted that according to the new plan the Pentagon will spend an estimated $1 trillion on another fighter jet, the F-35, as well as replace the Ohio-class of nuclear ballistic missile submarines.
"So the notion that we are not taking seriously the range of potential future conflicts, I think, frankly is just a misunderstanding of what we're trying to do," Gates said.
As for the F-22, he made no bones about what he thinks about the House committee's move.
"To be blunt about it, the notion that not buying 60 more F-22s imperils the national security of the United States I find completely nonsense."
House Dems urge Obama to halt gay discharges from the military
By Bryan Bender
GLOBE STAFF
WASHINGTON _ In the most vocal plea yet for the White House to take the lead in pushing for gays and lesbians to be allowed to serve openly in the military, 77 Democratic lawmakers today urged President Obama to use his executive powers to order a halt to military discharges under the controversial "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" law and work aggressively with Congress to pass new legislation to overturn what they describe as a discriminatory policy that harms national security.
"We urge you to exercise the maximum discretion legally possible in administering Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell until Congress repeals the law," states the letter, organized by Rep. Alcee Hastings, a Democrat of Florida. "To this end, we ask that you direct the Armed Services not to initiate any investigation of service personnel to determine their sexual orientation, and that you instruct them to disregard third party accusations that do not allege violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice."
A recent study by the Palm Center, a public policy think tank at the University of California, Santa Barbara, argued that Obama has the authority as commander-in-chief to suspend the gay discharge process through an executive order.
But only Congress can make a permanent change, by overturning the 1993 law that established the current policy -- which stipulates that gays and lesbians can serve in uniform only if their sexual orientation remains secret.
And so far, virtually no Republicans in the House of Representatives or Senate have expressed a willingness to overturn the law, while many conservative Democrats are also considered wary of doing so.
Obama aides have said the president still plans on acting on his campaign pledge to work for the law's repeal but have outlined a very deliberative process of study and consultation with the top military brass that could take months, if not years.
Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, asked about the policy last week, made it clear that he believes it is ultimately up to the Congress to reverse it and that the administration has few options unless it repeals the law.
"Until the law is changed, our ability to change the policy is extremely limited, if not nonexistent," Gates said.
Still, those who back repeal say the nation cannot afford to wait until 2010 or 2011, contending that thousands of qualified personnel needed in a time of war have been kicked out of the military unnecessarily, including those will skills such as foreign language proficiency that are in short supply.
"...Our country's national security will continue to suffer if action is delayed," the lawmakers, including four members of the Massachusetts delegation, told Obama today.
Obama outlines healthcare savings
President Obama today offered part two of his healthcare overhaul pitch, and provided more detail on his pledge to find another $300 billion in savings to help pay for it.
Last week, in a detailed two-page letter to key senators laying out his core principles for a healthcare bill, Obama said he wanted to cut an additional $200 billion to $300 billion from Medicare and Medicaid over the next decade, on top of the $309 billion reduction he had already proposed in the government's two main healthcare programs for the poor, elderly, and disabled.
In his weekly radio and Internet address today, he says, "I am announcing an additional $313 billion in savings that will rein in unnecessary spending, and increase efficiency and the quality of care – savings that will ensure that we have nearly $950 billion set aside to offset the cost of health care reform over the next ten years."
"These savings will come from commonsense changes," he adds. "For example if more Americans are insured, we can cut payments that help hospitals treat patients without health insurance. If the drug makers pay their fair share, we can cut government spending on prescription drugs. And if doctors have incentives to provide the best care instead of more care, we can help Americans avoid the unnecessary hospital stays, treatments, and tests that drive up costs."
The proposals include incorporating "productivity adjustments" into Medicare payment changes, reducing subsidies to hospitals for treating the uninsured, getting lower prices on Medicare prescription drugs, adjust payment rates for CT scans, adopting an independent panel's recommendations on payments to nursing homes and other long-term care facilities, and the old standby of cutting "waste, fraud, and abuse."
(To see a White House fact sheet on the proposal, click here.)
"These savings underscore the fact that securing quality, affordable health care for the American people is tied directly to insisting upon fiscal responsibility. And these savings are rooted in the same principle that must guide our broader approach to reform: we will fix what’s broken, while building upon what works. If you like your plan and your doctor, you can keep them -- the only changes that you’ll see are lower costs and better health care," the president says.
Obama, who held a town hall meeting this week on healthcare and has mobilized his grassroots organization to lobby Congress, acknowledged that many in Congress, which is working on drafting healthcare bills, and elsewhere "question whether we can afford to act this year."
"But the unmistakable truth is that it would be irresponsible to not act," he says. "We can’t keep shifting a growing burden to future generations. With each passing year, health care costs consume a larger share of our nation’s spending, and contribute to yawning deficits that we cannot control. So let me be clear: health care reform is not part of the problem when it comes to our fiscal future, it is a fundamental part of the solution."
The full address is below, and the video can be viewed here.
Obama meets with Zimbabwe democracy leader
President Obama met today with Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai of Zimbabwe, who is touring Western countries to seek badly needed aid for his country and convince leaders that his country is undergoing democratic reform.
Tsvangirai, himself, was arrested and abused by the regime of President Robert Mugabe, but in February joined him in a power-sharing coalition. Western leaders have isolated Zimbabwe and assailed Mugabe and are demanding widespread reforms.
After their meeting, Obama praised Tsvangirai, saying he admired his "courage and the tenacity that the Prime Minister has shown in navigating through some very difficult political times in Zimbabwe."
And the president seemed to offer hope for US aid.
"There was a time when Zimbabwe was the bread basket of Africa and continues to have enormous potential. It has gone through a very dark and difficult period politically. The President -- President Mugabe -- I think I've made my views clear, has not acted oftentimes in the best interest of the Zimbabwean people and has been resistant to the kinds of democratic changes that need to take place," Obama said.
"We now have a power-sharing agreement that shows promise, and we want to do everything we can to encourage the kinds of improvement not only on human rights and rule of law, freedom of the press and democracy that is so necessary, but also on the economic front."
(Their full remarks are below.)
Thursday, Tsvangirai met with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Senator John F. Kerry and the Foreign Relations Committee.
“It was my pleasure to welcome Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today. Prime Minister Tsvangirai and the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) have made real progress in stabilizing runaway inflation and trying to begin to create the conditions for democracy in Zimbabwe," Kerry said in a statement afterwards.
“The challenge before us now is how to help Zimbabwe’s agents of change in their efforts to promote democracy while still maintaining proper accountability. I believe that we should explore our options to increase assistance for reform. Failure to act now may squander this opportunity for change, and the greatest beneficiaries will be Robert Mugabe and the other architects of Zimbabwe’s destruction.”
McCain hits Obama on healthcare
Senator John McCain, hurt during the presidential campaign by his differences with President Obama on healthcare, is trying to turn the tables.
McCain today criticized Obama's insistence on a public insurance option to compete directly with private insurers.
“State run plans have driven the private insurers out…it ends up being more and in some cases prohibitively expensive,” the former GOP presidential nominee said on Fox News Channel.
McCain also pointed out that Obama is at least open to considering a tax on employer-paid healthcare benefits to pay for expanding access -- an idea that the president eviscerated McCain about during the campaign.
“The important thing is we wanted to give American families a $5,000 refundable tax credit which would have more than covered their healthcare insurance needs,” McCain said. "He spent tens of millions of dollars attacking me on that.”
“Life isn’t fair, elections have consequences and its interesting how there’s been numerous shifts on the president's positions on a number of issues since the election,” he added.
On the road again, for healthcare
President Obama took to the road again today, hosting another town hall meeting, this one on healthcare.
He is trying to build public support behind a goal that has eluded his predecessors for decades -- an overhaul of the healthcare system to cut costs and expand access. It is not only his top domestic legislative priority for the rest of the year, but success is also crucial to getting the federal deficit under control so he can pay for other ambitious initiatives.
And in his opening remarks to the crowd in Green Bay, Wisc., he tried to state the case for healthcare overhaul as simply and clearly as possible.
"Every day in this country, more and more Americans are forced to worry not simply about getting well, but whether they can afford to get well. Millions more wonder if they can afford the routine care necessary to stay well," he said.
"If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan," Obama added, urging the crowd not to listen to those who want to try to scare the public otherwise.
"But in order to preserve what’s best about our health care system, we have to fix what doesn’t work."
"Healthcare reform is not just something I just cooked up when I took office," Obama added. "It is central to our economic future – it's central to our long-term prosperity as a nation."
Several bills are starting to wend their way through Congress, but Obama made clear last week that there are principles on which he will not compromise -- lowering costs, expanding access, and offering a public insurance plan to compete with private insurers.
"The question now is, how do we finish the job? How do we permanently bring down costs and make quality, affordable healthcare available to every single American?" Obama asked in the town hall. "My view is that reform should be guided by a simple principle: we fix what’s broken and we will build on what works."
The first question came from a self-employed woman who asked why Obama isn't considering a so-called single-payer system, similar to the government health plans in Canada and Britain.
Prefacing his answer, Obama said there had been confusion in the press and public. He said he opposes what critics call "socialized" medicine -- an entirely government-run system. He said while there are some advantages to a single payer plan, where there are private doctors but they are paid from one source -- the government -- to minimize disruptions and to do what is politically possible, he supports building on the existing system, where most people get their insurance through work.
"We're not starting from scratch," he said.
Obama also said that he's not "ideologically" tied to any solution and is more than happy to steal good ideas.
He also made time to write a school absence excuse note for Kennedy, the daughter of another questioner, and handed it to her. (Will it be on eBay by this afternoon?)
Obama picked Green Bay for the town hall because by several measures, it is a model for controlling medical spending while improving the health of patients.
"We have to ask why places like Geisinger Health systems in rural Pennsylvania, or Intermountain Health in Salt Lake City, or communities like Green Bay can offer high-quality care at costs well below average, but other places in America can’t," Obama said. "We need to identify the best practices across the country, learn from the successes, and then duplicate those successes everywhere elsewhere. And we should change the warped incentives that reward doctors and hospitals based on how many tests or procedures they do, even if those tests or procedures aren’t necessary or result from medical mistakes.
"Doctors did not get into the medical profession to be bean counters or paper pushers; they're not interesting in spending all their time acting like lawyers or business executives," he added. "They became doctors to heal people. And that’s what we must free them to do." (Read his full remarks, including the question-and-answer, below.)
But many doctors also went into the profession to make a good living, and many of the proposals being bandied about could cut into their income, particularly those of highly-paid specialists.
So Monday in Chicago, Obama will face a far less friendly audience for his case for a healthcare overhaul. He plans to speak to the American Medical Association, which with about 250,000 members is the nation's largest group of physicians and which opposes the public insurance option.
Asked about the AMA's stand, White House spokesman Bill Burton told reporters today: "He knew at the beginning of this process that people would oppose and support different elements that were on and off the table, and this is just one part of the process. He's going to talk to the AMA on Monday, and thinks that we'll be able to have an open and honest dialogue about the issues that we're all very concerned about.
"Well, he is going to continue to work with everybody, people who even oppose a lot of the things that we're for right now," Burton added. "But what's important is that we come to the table with a lot more common ground than there has been in the past, giving some momentum to health care reform happening this year."
Kennedy tobacco bill about to pass
Senator Edward M. Kennedy isn't there in person, but his presence still looms large as the Senate prepares to vote today on a bill that would give the Food and Drug Administration authority to regulate the production, sale, and marketing of tobacco products to protect the public health.
"It has been a long and arduous path with many political obstacles. Fortunately, the legislative journey is nearing a successful conclusion," Kennedy, who has championed the legislation for more than a decade, said in a statement that is being entered into the Senate record.
"Passage of the legislation is much more than a victory for those of us who have long championed this cause. It is a life saving act for the millions of children who will be spared a lifetime of addiction and premature death," Kennedy, who is absent from Capitol Hill while undergoing treatment for brain cancer, added in the statement.
"The need to regulate tobacco products can no longer be ignored. Used as intended by the companies that manufacture and market them, cigarettes will kill one out of every three smokers. Yet, the federal agency most responsible for protecting the public health is currently powerless to deal with the enormous risks of tobacco use." (His full statement is below.)
UPDATE: The Senate voted 67-30 today to limit debate on the bill, and Democrats say they have enough votes to win final passage. But a final vote is not expected until Thursday, Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut, who is pushing Kennedy's priorities while the senator undergoes treatment, told Bloomberg News.
The House passed a very similar bill earlier this year and resolution of the minor differences would send the bill to President Obama, who supports it.
A major hurdle to passage was cleared away Tuesday when the Senate rejected a competing bill from the two senators from North Carolina, the nation's biggest tobacco producer.
Health panel announces witness list
The Senate health committee, which on Tuesday released its first take at a healthcare overhaul, today released the list of witnesses for a public hearing Thursday.
The roster includes a couple of key figures from Massachusetts, given that many of the proposals are in effect under the Bay State's landmark 2006 law. Katherine Baicker, a professor of health economics at the Harvard School of Public Health, and Jonathan Gruber, a health economist at MIT will share their views.
The others who are scheduled to testify: Margaret Flowers, the Maryland co-chairwoman of Physicians for a National Health Program; Ron Williams, the CEO of Aetna Inc.; Randel Johnson, a vice president of the US Chamber of Commerce; William Dennis, senior research fellow at the National Federation of Independent Business; Mary Andrus, co-chairwoman of the healthcare task force at the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities; Samantha Rosman, a trustee of the American Medical Association; Ray Scheppach, executive director of the National Governors Association; Gerald Shea, assistant to the president of the AFL-CIO; Dennis Rivera, chairman of SEIU Healthcare; Janet Trautwein, executive vice president and CEO of the National Association of Health Underwriters; Sandy Praeger, the Kansas Insurance Commissioner; Scott Gottlieb, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute; and Steve Burd, president and CEO of Safeway, Inc.
On the second panel: Gary Raskob, dean of the University of Oklahoma College of Public Health; Jeffrey Levi, executive director of the Trust for America’s Health; Fay Raines, president of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing; Wayne Jonas, president and CEO of the Samueli Institute; Delos Cosgrove, CEO of the Cleveland Clinic; Brent James, executive director of the Institute for Health Care Delivery Research at Intermountain Health Care; Charles Kahn, president of the Federation of American Hospitals; John Rother, an executive vice president for AARP; and Judith Palfrey, president-elect of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Kennedy panel introduces health bill
After a year of deliberation, the Senate health committee led by Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts today formally unveiled its healthcare overhaul bill.
But it's only one of several competing bills that Congress and President Obama will eventually try to reconcile. House Democratic leaders today offered their own proposal that includes a new tax on employer-provided health benefits to help pay for expanding coverage to the uninsured, and a requirement for all individuals to purchase affordable coverage, with an unspecified penalty for those who refuse and a waiver for those who cannot cover the cost.
And the Kennedy panel bill -- the "Affordable Health Choice Act" -- does not for now include one of the most controversial proposals that the committee's Democrats and Republicans are still haggling over -- a public insurance plan that would directly compete with private insurers.
The Kennedy bill also leaves out, pending further negotiation with Republicans, a requirement that employers provide health benefits to workers.
The legislation would require all individuals to have health insurance, ban insurers from refusing to cover pre-existing conditions, and establish online "exchanges" where the uninsured and employees of small companies could shop for affordable insurance.
“Our health care system is a crisis for American families and President Obama and members of Congress of both parties recognize the urgency of the problem. Our goal is to strengthen what works and fix what doesn’t. Over the next few days, we will continue working with our Republican colleagues on common sense solutions that reduce skyrocketing health care costs, assure quality care for all and provide affordable health insurance choices. Much work remains, and the coming days and weeks won’t be easy. But we have a unique opportunity to give the American people, at long last, the health care they need and deserve,” Kennedy said in a statement.
The committee plans a public hearing on the bill on Thursday. To read it, click here. A summary is below.
During Kennedy's battle with brain cancer, Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut has been deputized to push the legislation. He announced today that Kennedy, who is undergoing treatment, would be unable to attend the committee's working sessions on the bill next week.
“Health care reform cannot and must not wait. Today, we will introduce legislation that will strengthen what works and fix what doesn’t. If you like the insurance you have today, you can keep it. If you don’t like what you have today, we’ll give you better choices, including a public option for health care. This does not symbolize the end of the game or even the end of the first quarter. We still have a lot of work ahead of us and are looking forward to working with our colleagues on a bipartisan basis to resolve the remaining issues and move forward with a mark-up of this legislation next week,” Dodd said in a statement.
The House efforts are being led by three powerful Democrats: Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New York, Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman of California, and Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller of California. To see an outline of their legislation, click here.
“Our Committees are working as one to develop a uniquely-American solution to the health care crisis that is endangering the financial security of individuals and businesses," they said in a joint statement. "This solution will fulfill President Obama's commitment to provide quality, affordable health care for all. This framework will build upon what works by ensuring that patients can keep their health coverage if they like it, preserve patients’ choice and reduce costs. We will also fix what is broken through marketplace reforms, sliding scale credits to make coverage more affordable, and provisions to combat waste, fraud and abuse, strengthen Medicare and Medicaid, and invest in the health care workforce and public health. By improving the current system and offering a public health insurance option to promote honest competition with private insurance plans, we will provide individuals and small businesses with better, more affordable choices.
“We will continue to seek input and work closely with our colleagues, outside stakeholders, and the Administration and are on track to introduce legislation shortly. We anticipate Committee action on health reform in the coming weeks, with legislation on the House Floor prior to the August district work period. Reforming America’s health care system is critical to our country’s long-term economic recovery and long-term fiscal health. We are confident that we will achieve reform that will give Americans peace of mind and return our great nation to a path of prosperity for generations to come.”
Obama met this afternoon with Democrats on the Ways and Means Committee about the healthcare bill. Afterwards, the White House released this statement:
"The President had a productive meeting with Democrats from the House Ways and Means Committee, in which they agreed that health reform legislation must lower costs and expand coverage and must not add to the deficit. The President told the members that he will be spelling out additional savings for Medicare and Medicaid soon. He reiterated his support for his revenue-raising proposal, which would return the itemized deduction rate for the wealthiest Americans back to what it was when Ronald Reagan was President. The President and the members discussed some of the important components of reforming America’s health care system, such as emphasizing primary care, prevention and wellness. They agreed to aim for a timetable in which final passage of the bill would take place in October."
Obama tackles public doubts on spending
Barack Obama is president, but he's also still a politician.
So after trying to shore up his support on how he's handling the economy with a high-profile pledge on Monday to ramp up the impact of the $787 billion stimulus package, today he's focusing on his weakest area -- federal spending.
With the deficit this year headed to a record $1.8 trillion -- four times the previous high -- Obama outlined new rules that would require Congress to pay for any new tax cuts or spending, including an overhaul of the healthcare system.
He spoke at the White House on what is known as "PAYGO" -- as in pay as you go.
"The 'pay as you go' rule is very simple," he said. "Congress can only spend a dollar if it saves a dollar elsewhere. This principle guides responsible families managing a budget. And it is no coincidence that this rule was in place when we moved from record deficits to record surpluses in the 1990s -- and that when this rule was abandoned, we returned to record deficits that doubled the national debt. Entitlement increases and tax cuts need to be paid for. They are not free, and borrowing to finance them is not a sustainable long-term policy.
"Paying for what you spend is basic common sense. Perhaps that's why, here in Washington, it has been so elusive."
Obama said he is sending Congress a bill to turn the proposals into law.
(His full remarks are below, followed by a White House release on the proposals.)
Obama announced rules -- similar to those used by President Bill Clinton to produce budget surpluses -- that would ban lawmakers from expanding entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security, creating new entitlement programs, or cutting taxes unless they are paid for with spending cuts or tax increases. If lawmakers fail to do so, entitlement programs would be automatically cut.
Obama invited members of Congress, including fiscally conservative Democrats in the "Blue Dog Coalition," whose support he needs on healthcare and other parts of his ambitious agenda.
A new Gallup Poll reinforces that while Obama's job overall approval rating remains high at 61 percent, and he gets high marks on his handling of foreign affairs, his disapproval number is at the highest of his presidency, at 34 percent, eroded by increasing doubts on some of his policies. Disapproval of how he is handling the economy has risen from 30 percent in February to 42 percent in late May.
And more Americans now disapprove than approve how he is handling the federal budget deficit (46 percent approval, 48 percent disapproval) and how he is controlling federal spending (45 percent approval, 51 percent disapproval).
"This latest Gallup Poll shows that the US public has significantly differentiated views on various dimensions relating to Obama. Americans are most positive when asked about their basic opinions of Obama as a person. They also are positive when asked to assess his overall job performance, and on aspects of his performance relating to foreign and international issues. Americans have become increasingly less positive about Obama's handling of the economy in recent months, and are most negative when asked to say whether they approve of his handling of the federal deficit and federal spending," Gallup says.
"The good news for Obama is that the public continues to be quite positive when asked to rate him as a person and to rate his overall job performance -- both of which are presumably summaries of Americans' views of their president across all of the ways in which he could be evaluated."
The new poll, conducted May 29-31, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Obama presses case for healthcare overhaul
President Obama, who this week staked out his clearest guideposts yet of what he wants in a healthcare overhaul, uses his weekly radio and Internet address to reinforce the point.
"We must attack the root causes of skyrocketing healthcare costs," he says, adding that "any healthcare reform must be built around fundamental reforms that lower costs, improve quality and coverage, and also protect consumer choice."
Obama told Congress that Americans should have the option of a new public health insurance program -- something that Republicans and private insurers oppose, that he is open to requiring individuals to obtain insurance as long as there is a hardship waiver for those who can afford it, and that he wants to cut $200 billion to $300 billion more from Medicare and Medicaid over the next decade.
In his address today, he puts the best face on the state of play in Washington, asserting that an "unprecedented coalition" has "come together for change. Unlike past attempts at reforming our health care system, everyone is at the table – patient’s advocates and health insurers; business and labor; Democrats and Republicans alike."
With Congress just starting the nitty-gritty work of drafting detailed bills, then trying to reach compromise, the president says that fixing the healthcare system cannot be postponed any longer. His grassroots campaign group, Organizing for America, is holding thousands of house parties and other events across the country to kick off a lobbying effort behind his healthcare proposals.
"All across America, our families are making hard choices when it comes to health care. Now, it’s time for Washington to make the right ones," he concludes. "It’s time to deliver. And I am absolutely convinced that if we keep working together and living up to our mutual responsibilities; if we place the American people’s interests above the special interests; we will seize this historic opportunity to finally fix what ails our broken health care system, and strengthen our economy and our country now and for decades to come."
His full speech is below, and can be viewed here.
Dodd invites healthcare fixes
Senator Chris Dodd, the lead negotiator on the health committee for now on a healthcare overhaul, is asking for ideas from constituents, who not so coincidentally will decide whether he keeps his job after what looks like a tough election next year.
Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, has a video on his Senate website inviting viewers to submit suggestions to the Senate YouTube channel.
"It's clear everybody the current system isn't working," Dodd says in the video. The healthcare system needs major fixes for economic reasons -- it's costing more and more -- and the "human condition" -- the estimated 50 million uninsured, he said.
But Dodd also made clear a principle also espoused by President Obama -- that those who get their insurance through their employer won't lose it. "If you like what you've got, you can keep what you've got," Dodd said.
"I look forward to your idea, let us hear from you," he concludes.
He is filling in for Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, the health committee's chairman who is undergoing treatment for brain cancer.
Republicans outline budget cuts
Answering a challenge from President Obama, House Republicans today outlined what they called "common-sense" savings totaling $375 billion over five years.
In a letter and proposals to Obama, the Republicans listed a host proposals -- many of them familiar -- including consolidating federal arts funding, ending "ineffective" and "duplicative" education programs, and terminating other small-bore federal agencies. (Click here to read them.)
"The President challenged us to come up with budget savings, and today House Republicans encourage him to not only look over our proposed list of $375 billion common-sense taxpayer savings, but to join our effort," Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 Republican in the House, said in a statement. "For the sake of our young people and America’s long-term fiscal viability, Congress simply cannot keep spending money that the President himself admits we don’t have. We have an opportunity to work together to finally start to bring some accountability to the way Washington spends taxpayer dollars, and I hope it’s taken seriously by the Administration and the Democrat majorities in Congress."
That would be far more than the $100 million in budget savings that Obama outlined at his first cabinet meeting in April. The president said those trims would set a new tone, but acknowledged they amount to a "drop in the bucket" when the federal deficit is projected to reach a record $1.84 trillion this year -- four times the previous high.
Obama's $3.6 trillion budget for the fiscal year that starts Oct. 1 has been criticized, by some Democrats as well as Republicans, because it would mean a projected $9.3 trillion in deficits over the next decade.
Obama urges Kennedy, Baucus to press ahead on healthcare
President Obama, in a lengthy letter to the key bill writers in the Senate, presses his case for a healthcare overhaul this year, reinforcing that legislation should both expand access and cut costs.
"We simply cannot afford to postpone health care reform any longer," Obama wrote to Senators Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts and Max Baucus of Montana. "In short, the status quo is broken, and pouring money into a broken system only perpetuates its inefficiencies."
The White House released the letter -- the clearest summary yet of what Obama wants in a healthcare plan -- today (read it here), a day after Obama summoned key senators to the White House to urge them to find common ground.
But an united front might be easier to say than accomplish. Though they insist they will come up with a single compromise bill, Kennedy, chairman of the health committee, and Baucus, chairman of the finance committee, have been squabbling over whether legislation should include a public insurance plan that would directly compete with private insurers.
Obama's letter repeats his goals for healthcare overhaul, and his hope that a bill reaches his desk by October.
He reiterated his support for allowing people to keep the plans they get through their jobs if they want, but also to offer the new public health insurance plan to compete against private insurers. "This will give them a better range of choices, make the health care market more competitive, and keep insurance companies honest," Obama wrote.
He also says he is "open" to proposals on requiring individuals to obtain coverage, but calls for a "hardship waiver" like the one in Massachusetts for those who can't afford it and says more needs to be done to make coverage affordable.
On top of $309 billion he wants to cut from overall healthcare spending over 10 years, he says he wants to cut an additional $200 billion to $300 billion from Medicare and Medicaid over 10 years.
The letter does not address the issue of taxing healthcare benefits to help finance the bill, which he opposed during his campaign but which senators said he suggested he was open to considering in Tuesday's meeting. The White House quickly clarified that it was not his first choice.
Obama, Kerry urge relief for Pakistan
President Obama is asking Congress for $200 million to help the estimated 2.5 million Pakistanis displaced by the fighting in Swat Valley, where the Pakistan government is trying to root out Taliban militants at the urging of the United States.
"These funds will provide displaced people in Pakistan with urgent relief and resettlement assistance," he said in the request to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi released Tuesday night by the White House.
Senator John F. Kerry, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, is also urging more humanitarian aid for Pakistan.
“The humanitarian crisis in Swat gets worse every day, which is why it’s so critical that the government of Pakistan and the Obama Administration undertake immediate joint relief operations modeled on our successful efforts following the 2005 Kashmir earthquake," the Massachusetts Democrat said in a statement today. "The United States must commit military assets, such as Chinook heavy-lift helicopters, combat engineers and uniformed medical personnel, that the Pakistani government needs to facilitate these efforts without further delay. When terrorist groups such as Jamaat-ud Dawa are reportedly already operating relief camps in Swat, there is no basis for turning back the far more capable assistance of the United States military.
“The statistics underscore the emergency: between two and three million civilians have been displaced and have little or no access to adequate shelter, food or medical care. In a few weeks, the summer monsoons will turn ramshackle camps into fetid swamps, incubators for a host of preventable epidemics. History has already taught us that poorly-resourced refugee communities are prime breeding grounds for extremist movements; the Taliban itself had its genesis in the Afghan refugee community driven into Pakistan during the 1980s and 1990s. We don’t need to repeat that disaster when instead we can show America’s true commitment to the Pakistani people.”
Obama's supplemental budget request also includes $2 billion "out of an abundance of caution" to fight the swine flu outbreak. To read it, click here.
Obama presses for action on healthcare
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Just before leaving for his trip to the Middle East and Europe, President Obama summoned key Senate Democrats to the White House this afternoon to rally the troops for a healthcare overhaul.
Before the meeting, Obama said getting a healthcare bill passed is "not a luxury," and said the period between now and Congress's monthlong recess in August is the "make-or-break period."
He also said a bill must not only cover more people, but also reduce the cost of healthcare, according to the press pool report. "If we don't get control over costs, then it is going to be very difficult for us to expand coverage," he said. "These two things have to go hand in hand."
(His full remarks are below.)
But in the last several days, differences have emerged between the two main architects of the healthcare legislation in the Senate, Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts and Max Baucus of Montana.
Kennedy, chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, is leaning toward creating a widely available Medicare-style public insurance option. But Baucus, the Finance Committee chairman, wants a bipartisan solution -- and Republicans consider Kennedy's public plan an intolerable threat to the private insurance industry.
The White House and Baucus also publicly disagreed today over how the bill should be financed, with the administration opposing Baucus's proposal to tax a portion of healthcare benefits provided by employers.
The list of senators expected to attend the White House meeting is below:
FULL ENTRYKennedy, Baucus say 'common ground' on healthcare
Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Max Baucus are trying to rebut several media reports of dissension on a healthcare overhaul.
They and their staffs have been working for months on a healthcare overhaul, but according to the reports, Kennedy is pushing a version that would includes a government-run insurance plan that would compete with private plans, while Baucus is reportedly leaning toward a bipartisan measure without such a public plan.
President Obama also favors a public plan, but the insurance industry vehemently opposes it.
Over the weekend, however, Kennedy, chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee, and Baucus, chairman of the Finance Committee, issued a joint statement "affirming their commitment to seek common ground on health reform legislation, despite some media reports to the contrary:"
"For both of us, reforming the nation's health care system to cut cost, improve quality and provide affordable coverage remains the top priority on our two committees. We have worked together closely over many months and will continue to do so. We intend to ensure that our committees report similar and complementary legislation that can be quickly merged into one bill for consideration on the Senate floor before the August recess."
UPDATE: Meanwhile, a coalition of liberal and labor groups announced this afternoon that they plan to spend as much as $82 million to lobby for universal healthcare.
The effort includes the AFL-CIO and Change To Win labor federations, MoveOn.org, and more than other 1,000 other groups representing more than 30 million members.
"Over the past few years, we have worked together to build a progressive infrastructure and a movement that helped to elect President Obama and begin to undo the damage of the last eight years. But it was just the beginning," said Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor and chairman of the Democratic National Committee during last year's campaign. "As the health care reform debate makes clear, America needs a strong progressive movement; now is not the time to become complacent."
Delahunt at El Salvador inauguration
Representative William Delahunt, a Massachusetts Democrat, will be part of the official US delegation today at the inauguration of Mauricio Funes, president-elect of El Salvador.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will lead the delegation, the White House announced.
The other delegation members are: Robert Blau of the US embassy in El Salvador; Representatives Eliot L. Engel and Gregory W. Meeks of New York; Thomas Shannon, assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere Affairs; Dan Restrepo, special assistant to the president and senior director for Western Hemisphere Affairs on the National Security Council; and Alonzo Cantu, president and owner of Cantu Construction and Development Co. and a major Democratic campaign donor.
Romney speaks out against labor bill
Mitt Romney today joined the battle over a bill that would make it easier for unions to organize, coming down on the side of business, which vehemently opposes the legislation.
Romney, the former venture capitalist who went on to be Massachusetts governor and GOP presidential contender, spoke at forum organized by the Workforce Fairness Institute with some Virginia business leaders.
Romney described the bill as “dangerous legislation” that is “political payback” to unions, according to the institute.
“America is the product of decade upon decade of free enterprise. The costs to the nation would be so severe that elected officials have to back away from it and do what’s right for the country,” said Romney. “The Employee ‘Forced’ Choice Act would have a negative impact on our ability as a nation to compete globally and it would place a huge damper on new business.”
The AFL-CIO, which has made the bill its top legislative priority, quickly responded to Romney.
"The idea that Mitt is a voice who is concerned about workers is hilarious considering he spent his career buying companies, firing the workers, and then breaking them up," it said in a statement. "Mitt lecturing anyone about the Employee Free Choice Act and 'politics' is as credible as taking marriage advice from Newt Gingrich. The only reason he is junketing around the country trashing workers is to get the old Romney 2012 train rolling."
The measure would require employers to recognize a union as soon as a majority of employees sign authorization forms or cards saying they want to unionize. While business groups say the measure would all but end secret ballot elections on whether to unionize, labor groups say it would prevent employers from intimidating workers during elections.
The bill is supported by President Obama, but is not a top priority, and is floundering on Capitol Hill.
Time is now on healthcare, Obama says
It's now or never on healthcare, President Obama told his millions of grassroots backers today, urging them to organize and lobby their senators and representatives.
In a call from Air Force One as he returned from a western fund-raising swing, Obama said that if Congress doesn't pass a healthcare overhaul this year, the opportunity will be lost, perhaps forever, the Associated Press reports.
"If we don't get it done this year, we're not going to get it done," Obama told supporters. "The election in November, it didn't bring about change. It gave us an opportunity for change."
Organizing for America, the group housed within the Democratic National Committee that is his presidential campaign from last year and his re-election campaign in waiting, plans a June 6 kickoff on healthcare with house parties across the country.
It has been 16 years since the last sweeping effort, during the Clinton administration, which failed partly due to opposition from the insurance industry. This time, the insurers are offering concessions to head off a public insurance plan that would directly compete.
Obama's remarks on the conference call with supporters is below:
Kerry in China on climate change
Senator John F. Kerry is in China during the congressional recess, and today he applauded that nation's moves on alternative energy.
As the new chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry has made climate change a priority, and his office said today that China’s leaders have indicated they will begin immediate bilateral negotiations on clean energy technologies and possibly more substantive discussions on global warming before the December summit in Copenhagen.
Congress is working on its own climate change bill that would create a new cap-and-trade system to limit emissions of pollution blamed for global warming through the granting and sale of pollution credits.
“There are immediate opportunities for the United States and China to collaborate on climate change and clean energy issues,” Kerry said at a Beijing news conference, according to his office. “In my meetings this week, Chinese leaders assured me that China will play a positive and constructive role in the Copenhagen negotiations. China recognizes the need to address climate change as a critical component of the nation’s economic development and national security strategy. If the United States and China – which together produce almost half of global emissions – can demonstrate concrete progress in the weeks ahead, we will lay the foundation for success at Copenhagen and beyond.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and key House legislators on the energy bill are also touring China and have met with Prime Minister Wen Jiabao and President Hu Jintao. In a speech in Beijing on Tuesday, Pelosi called the climate change issue "a game-changer" in the US-China relationship, the New York Times reported.
The Times also reported today that Chinese officials have drafted vehicle fuel efficiency requirements that are even more ambitious than those outlined by President Obama last week.
Representative Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat who along with Henry Waxman pushed a bill through committee last week, also sounded a note of optimism.
"We leave here encouraged that progress can be made heading towards Copenhagen," Markey told a news conference in Beijing, Reuters reported.
But James Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican on the trip, said he was "less than optimistic" about a deal in Copenhagen, according to Reuters. "The message that I received was that China was going to do it their way regardless of what the rest of the world negotiates in Copenhagen."
Analysis: Confirmation battle could complicate healthcare push
By Peter S. Canellos, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor, a candidate more likely than some on President Obama's short list to arouse Republican opposition, could complicate the president's task on another major agenda item -- healthcare.
Over the next two months, while the Senate will be debating Sotomayor's views on affirmative action, the applicability of foreign judicial rulings, and the right to privacy -- all hot-button issues guaranteed to provoke resentment on the ideological edges of both parties -- it will also be trying to come together in a spirit of compromise on healthcare.
"I really think that the stars may be aligned here and we potentially can get it done if everybody comes at it with a spirit not of ideological rigidity," Obama told C-SPAN over the weekend, referring to healthcare. He expressed the hope that "we can really negotiate and compromise and get something done for the American people."
But much of the negotiating on healthcare is slated to take place during the debate over the Sotomayor nomination. The two Senate committees handling the healthcare overhaul expect to have legislation in place well before the August recess; Obama wants his Sotomayor confirmed by then as well so she can prepare for the Supreme Court's next term in October.
That makes for a busy two months on Capitol Hill, and while it's reasonable to expect that the Senate can pursue its dual responsibilities without much procedural interruption, a battle royal over the Supreme Court could consume time and sap the president's political momentum.
"If [Sotomayor's confirmation] takes a month, it does bump things up against the adjournment time," said Dartmouth College political scientist Linda Fowler. "The worry for Obama is less the loss of bipartisan spirit than the time constraints. An acrimonious nomination fight just eats up a lot of time."
Supreme Court appointments have been the main battleground for the two parties' sharply different views on social issues, especially abortion and racial preferences. And while it is unclear whether the Sotomayor nomination will run into strong opposition, early signs are that the GOP is girding for battle.
Many conservative groups released statements expressing concern about her support of "identity politics" -- a line of attack that may succeed in raising questions about both her selection for the high court and her recent ruling against white firefighters who were denied promotions despite scoring higher than minorities on an exam.
Some Republicans consider her more of a liberal activist than federal Judge Diane Wood, former Harvard Law School Dean Elena Kagan, or Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, who were the other three names on Obama's short list.
But as the first Hispanic nominee to the Supreme Court, Sotomayor also has the pride and support of an increasingly large ethnic group behind her.
Back in 1986, when President Ronald Reagan tapped the conservative Antonin Scalia for the court, many liberals chose not to oppose the nominee because of the deep pride of the Italian-American community, from which he would be the first justice.
"The fact that Obama chose the first Hispanic nominee will be a big hindrance to those who want to oppose her," said Mickey Edwards, former GOP representative from Oklahoma, who noted that the states most important to the Republicans electorally -- Texas, Arizona, and Florida among them -- have large Hispanic populations.
"Pick your fights and this is one you don't want to do," advised Edwards.
As for doing healthcare in the midst of a Supreme Court nomination, he said, "I think the two things can move along on different tracks."
Obama can at least hope so. With Massachusetts Senator Edward M. Kennedy having given up his seat on the Senate Judiciary Committee to concentrate on healthcare, there is relatively little overlap between the senators focused on Sotomayor and those working on healthcare.
The real question is whether Obama comes out of the Sotomayor nomination with enough political capital to wage one more historic battle.
House parties for healthcare
It worked on the $787 billion economic stimulus package.
So President Obama's grassroots group is scheduling house parties on June 6 to help push through a healthcare overhaul. Obama, himself, plans to join in via conference call that Saturday.
"In thousands of homes across the country, we'll gather to launch our grassroots campaign for health care. We'll watch a special message from the President. We'll build the teams and draw up the plans for winning health care reform the same way we won the election: Building support one block, one neighbor, one conversation at a time. And we'll put those plans into action," David Plouffe, Obama's campaign manager last year, wrote to supporters on the email list of Organizing for America.
"These gatherings on June 6th are just the beginning of a battle between those who fought and believe in change and those who would protect a broken status quo. The stakes for our country could not be greater," Plouffe added. "Some call this strategy pie-in-the-sky. They say we'll never have enough volunteers to make a real impact; that you need insiders and Washington lobbyists to make a difference. But you and I know firsthand how wrong they are. Starting June 6th, it's once again time to show this country how bottom-up change is done."
Obama seeks help on healthcare push
President Obama today sent out a personal appeal -- well, at least as personal as a blast email to millions can be -- to his grassroots supporters to push Congress on healthcare.
The message saying, "I need your voice," was sent through Organizing for America, the group housed in the Democratic National Committee that inherited Obama's campaign apparatus.
"The chance to finally reform our nation's health care system is here. While Congress moves rapidly to produce a detailed plan, I have made it clear that real reform must uphold three core principles -- it must reduce costs, guarantee choice, and ensure quality care for every American," the president writes.
"As we know, challenging the status quo will not be easy. Its defenders will claim our goals are too big, that we should once again settle for half measures and empty talk. Left unanswered, these voices of doubt might yet again derail the comprehensive reform we so badly need. That's where you come in. When our opponents spread fear and confusion about the changes we seek, your support for these core principles will show clarity and resolve. When the lobbyists for the status quo tell Congress to hold back, your personal story will give them the courage to press forward."
Obama promises to read some of the personal stories, then repeats one of his own, seeing his mother die of ovarian cancer while worried about insurance.
"Last November, the American people sent Washington a clear mandate for change. But when the polls close, the true work of citizenship begins," Obama concludes. "That's what Organizing for America is all about. Now, in these crucial moments, your voice once again has extraordinary power. I'm counting on you to use it."
Republicans face uphill battle
As Republican leaders gather to find the way forward, a new poll shows the tough sledding ahead.
While 63 percent of Americans say President Obama's policies would move the country in the right direction -- and 57 percent say that of Democratic leaders in Congress -- only 39 percent say so of GOP congressional leaders, according to the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey.
The poll found that 53 percent of respondents believe the policies being proposed by Republicans would put the country on the wrong path. And 53 percent also blame Republicans and only 21 percent Democrats for the economic swoon.
Meanwhile, 37 percent say Obama's prescriptions have improved the economy, while 23 percent say his policies have made the economy worse, and 40 percent say they have had no impact.
UPDATE: This afternoon, the party leaders trashed a proposal to start calling their opponents the "Democrat Socialist" party.
The Associated Press reports that instead, they plan to vote on a resolution urging Americans to oppose the Democrats' "socialist" agenda. GOP Chairman Michael Steele and others had opposed the resolution urging the Democrats to change their name, calling it absurd.
Obama signs mortgage bills
President Obama this afternoon signed two significant bills that he hopes will help fix the struggling housing market.
“These landmark pieces of legislation will protect hardworking Americans, crack down on those who seek to take advantage of them, and ensure that the problems that led us into this crisis never happen again,” Obama said.
One is designed to clamp down on mortgage fraud and would set up a $5 million independent commission to investigate the cause of the worldwide financial meltdown.
The $265 million a year from the bill, which supporters say will pay for itself through additional fines and penalties, would go to hire about 160 more FBI agents and 200 more Justice Department prosecutors to work on mortgage fraud cases.
The other encourages banks to help homeowners avoid foreclosure by expanding a $300 billion program that pushes lenders to write down an individual's mortgage if the homeowner agrees to pay an insurance premium.
His full remarks are below, followed by a White House.
Because of the current strict eligibility requirements, only about 50 homeowners are refinancing through the program, compared to the 400,000 it was supposed to help. The bill does not include the so-called cram-down provision that would have allowed bankruptcy judges to reduce mortgage payments. Obama wanted the proposal, but banks and other lenders vehemently opposed it.
Earlier today, Obama huddled with more of his economic brain trust, attending the first quarterly meeting of the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board.
Afterwards, Obama thanked its chairman, former Federal Reserve chief Paul Volcker, for the panel's "extraordinary work."
The committee has an "impressive" though not unanimous consensus on the potential of clean energy jobs, Obama told reporters. It is also helping advise him on an overhauled financial regulation plan the administration plans to put before Congress this year, Obama said.
Rep. Tsongas seeks lighter body armor for troops
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Representative Niki Tsongas has introduced legislation that would require the Pentagon to develop lighter body armor for soldiers in an effort to reduce the thousands of orthopedic injuries reported each year as a result of lugging heavy gear.
The Lowell Democrat, a member of the Armed Services Committee, introduced the bill Tuesday and has enlisted the support of other key lawmakers, including Representative Neil Abercrombie, the Hawaii Democrat who chairs the panel's Air and Land Forces Subcommittee, her office said today.
The legislation would set up a special task force to evaluate various personal protection technologies that could provide the same level of defense as current body armor, but with reduced weight, according to the bill.
Tsongas told the Globe that in the course of her investigation of the issue, including in committee hearings and discussions with an Army captain who serves on her staff, she found that the amount of gear that troops must carry is sometimes too much to bear.
"There is a tendency to take it off," she said in a brief phone interview.
And many soldiers exhibit lasting health effects from wearing their personal gear for long periods of time.
In 2007, the Army reported 257,000 injuries attributed to the stress of bearing heavy loads during repeated deployments. The service's vice chief of staff, Gen. Peter Chiarelli, estimates that such injuries are currently sidelining 20,000 soldiers.
"With the increased emphasis on Afghanistan in the coming years the load that soldiers must carry will no doubt become more of an issue," said John Noble, a spokesman for the two-term congresswoman.
Tsongas' bill would also establish a separate program in each branch of the military dedicated to the research and procurement of body armor. Such efforts are now included in multi-billion dollar research accounts that cover all types of military equipment.
By establishing a stand-alone funding stream Tsongas believes Congress will be able to monitor how much money is being spent on body armor and better identify shortcomings.
"This is so we know exactly what is there and that it is being spent appropriately," she said.
Senate Foreign Relations on Sri Lanka
The leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee issued a joint statement today to mark the apparent end of the decades-long civil war in Sri Lanka with the government's victory over the rebel Tamil Tigers.
The statement is from Committee chairman John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, ranking Republican Richard Lugar of Indiana, and Senators Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Sam Brownback of Kansas, and Patrick Leahy of Vermont.
“We welcome the news that Sri Lanka’s long-running civil war has been brought to a close. For the past twenty-six years, the people of Sri Lanka have suffered enormously from a conflict that appeared intractable. Some 70,000 were killed, many more injured, and countless others were uprooted and forced to flee the violence. In recent months, civilians in the north-eastern part of the island have faced terrible hardship, and exceptionally difficult conditions still persist for hundreds of thousands that have been internally displaced. The scale of the suffering has been obscured by denial of access to humanitarian workers, journalists, and most other outside observers.
“Today can be a turning point for the people of Sri Lanka. The government has a chance to forge a long-term political solution, one that acknowledges the legitimate aspirations of all Sri Lankans, including Sinhalese, Tamils, and other groups. This means taking steps toward reconciliation and justice, including devolution of power to local bodies as provided for by the constitution of Sri Lanka. It will not be easy, but we are looking to the leaders of the Government of Sri Lanka to move the country forward in peace after more than a quarter-century of conflict.
“In the short term, we urge the Government of Sri Lanka to take immediate steps to alleviate the humanitarian crisis in the north for hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons by facilitating humanitarian access to the government camps and by fulfilling its promise to return the majority home by the end of the year. We call on the Government to protect all of its citizens, including those still trapped in the conflict zone such as Doctors Varatharajah, Shanmugarajah, and Sathiyamurthy and other religious and secular leaders who have provided vital humanitarian services.”
Kennedy to introduce sick days bill
Senator Edward M. Kennedy plans today to introduce another bill that he has long championed, but that languished under a Republican presidency.
The legislation would guarantee paid sick days to workers, as many as seven a year if they, a child, or other close family member falls ill. Supporters say it will help stop the spread of viruses, such as the recent swine flu outbreak.
Though it has the support of President Obama, it is not a slam dunk.
Business groups vow to oppose the bill, saying it would only make times tougher for employers during the economic downturn.
Obama: Yes we can, agree on major issues
President Obama declares today that, yes, we can all get along.
In his weekly Internet and radio address, he says that advocates for opposing interests are coming to the table and negotiating in good faith on healthcare and energy -- to name two major issues being debated in Washington.
On climate change and clean energy legislation, "utility companies and corporate leaders are joining, not opposing, environmental advocates and labor leaders to create a new system of clean energy initiatives that will help unleash a new era of growth and prosperity."
On a healthcare overhaul, "representatives of insurance and drug companies, doctors and hospitals, and labor unions who are pledging to do their part to reduce health care costs. These are some of the groups who have been among the fiercest critics of past comprehensive health care reform plans."
"I have always believed that it is better to talk than not to talk; that it is far more productive to reach over a divide than to shake your fist across it. This has been an alien notion in Washington for far too long, but we are seeing that the ways of Washington are beginning to change," Obama added.
"This is how progress has always been made. This is how a new foundation will be built. We cannot assume that interests will always align, or that fragile partnerships will not fray. There will be setbacks. There will be difficult days. But we are off to a good start."
His full remarks are below, and the address can be viewed here:
FULL ENTRYKerry and Lugar criticize Burmese junta
The leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee issued a statement this morning calling for the release of Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
“The Obama Administration and Congress are reviewing America’s policy toward Burma. At this critical time, some in the junta are trying to leverage the recent alleged unauthorized entry into Aung San Suu Kyi’s compound to extend her detention. This action sends precisely the wrong message to the citizens of Burma, the people of Southeast Asia, and all those in the global community who seek for the Burmese people the opportunity to live in a country where universal human rights are respected, not trampled," said committee Chairman John F. Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, and the ranking Republican, Richard Lugar of Indiana.
“Now is the time for reform-minded leaders within the military junta to step forward and be heard. Releasing Aung San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners would signal the start of a constructive dialogue with the United States.”
UPDATE: President Obama this afternoon told Congress he is continuing the US sanctions against Burma. To see his declaration, click here.
Mass. would gain from climate change bill
By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Massachusetts is poised to receive about $200 million in federal money for energy research and efficiency programs under a sweeping climate change bill to be unveiled Friday, according to one of the measure's chief negotiators.
About half of the money would be directed at local energy savings programs now subsidized by the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a 10-state program the Bay State helped form. The new federal cash would effectively replace the $100 million Massachusetts expects to lose when the regional plan is eventually supplanted by a nationwide carbon emissions control system.
In addition, Massachusetts is very well positioned to become one of eight "clean energy innovation centers" where energy technology research would be conducted. That program would bring another estimated $100 million into the state, said Representative Edward Markey, a Malden Democrat who secured the funding in the legislation.
"This is what we do best. If you looked up the word 'innovation' in the dictionary, there's be a picture of Massachusetts,'' Markey said today. "This will create an incredible opportunity for MIT, Harvard, Tufts, Brandeis, and BC to begin to reinvent the way in which the United States and the world generates energy.''
Markey is chairman of both the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming and the Energy and Commerce Committee's subcommittee on Energy and the Environment, making him a key player on the climate change package.
Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Representative Henry Waxman, a California Democrat, today announced a general deal on the climate change legislation, which would create an historic new set of standards to reduce global warming by 17 percent by the year 2020. The panel is scheduled to begin drafting its final version of the bill next week, and leaders expect the measure to be approved and sent to the House floor. Concessions -- such as lowering the goal for emissions reductions from 20 percent to 17 percent -- helped bring reluctant lawmakers on board.
Under the bill, industries would be subject to a "cap-and-trade'' system regulating how much they can pollute, and requiring them to obtain allowances' to emit pollutants. Some of the allowances will be auctioned, bringing in money to the federal government to spend on energy efficiency and related programs. Those allowances could be sold or traded to other companies.
The cap-and-trade system is similar to the regional program begun by 10 northeastern states in response to the Bush administration's refusal to set emissions reduction rules to address global warming. Under the program, power plants must buy allowances to pollute; states then use that money for local energy-saving programs.
The climate change bill would make RGGI obsolete. While state officials and environmentalists are eager to have a national standard, they worried that the energy efficiency programs begun this year would suffer, since Massachusetts would no longer get the estimated $100 million in allowances under RGGI. The language Markey inserted into the bill ensures that the commonwealth would get that money from the federal government, allowing the state to keep those programs going.
"The RGGI was and is extremely innovative, and we should be proud of it, but a strong national program is required,'' said Nick D’arbeloff, president of the New England Clean Energy Council. Still, he said, "we absolutely need to ensure that energy efficiency dollars continue to flow in this region.''
Massachusetts is also very likely to be selected for one of the eight innovation centers slated for funding in the bill, said Kelly Sims Gallagher, director of energy technology innovation policy at the Belfer Center at Harvard's Kennedy School.
Since the Boston area has major research universities such as Harvard and MIT -- plus a strong tech industry nearby -- the region is well positioned to host one of the centers, which aim to connect academic research with the commercial energy technology sector.
"It's terrific,'' said Ian Bowles, Massachusetts secretary of the Executive office of Energy and Environmental Affairs. "We are going to be the disproportionate beneficiary of the transition to a clean energy economy.''
New England reps split on war funding
The New England delegation divided on the issue today as the House approved funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as the US winds down its involvement in the former and increases its push in the latter.
The $97 billion measure includes President Obama's war funding request as he promises to withdraw most combat troops from Iraq by August 2010 and sends 21,000 more troops and military trainers to Afghanistan and It adds nearly $12 billion, including money for new weapons and military equipment and more foreign aid. The bill also includes a pledge that any Guantanamo Bay detainees will not be released on US soil.
Among Massachusetts representatives, Michael Capuano, Barney Frank, Edward Markey, James McGovern, Richard Neal, John Tierney, and Niki Tsongas voted no. Stephen Lynch and John Olver supported the funding and William Delahunt did not vote.
Both Maine representatives, Michael Michaud and Chellie Pingree, voted no, while both of Rhode Island's, Patrick Kennedy and Jim Langevin, voted yes.
New Hampshire's delegation split, with Paul Hodes voting yes and Carol Shea-Porter opposing the funding.
Vermont's Peter Welch also voted no.
The overall tally was 368-60, with 200 Democrats and 168 Republicans voting yes and 51 Democrats and 9 Republicans voting no.
Blair testifies on Mideast
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair is testifying this afternoon on the Middle East peace process, on the eve of President Obama's one-on-one meetings starting next week with the leaders of Israel, Egypt, and the Palestinian authority.
Blair, a close ally of former President Bush whose support for the Iraq war cost him politically at home, has been leading the effort by the Middle East Quartet (the European Union, the US, the United Nations, and the Russian Federation) for a two-state solution.
“Since ending his decade of service as Britain’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair has continued to lead on global challenges from development in Africa to interfaith tolerance to climate change. Tony Blair left office and volunteered for another tough assignment: Middle East Quartet Representative. I look forward to hearing his thoughts on the prospects for peace in the Middle East,” Senator John F. Kerry said in a statement announcing Blair's appearance before the Foreign Relations Committee.
Kerry's prepared opening statement is below:
McGovern fights Afghan war funding
against sending more troops to Afghanistan. (By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff)
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Representative James McGovern of Massachusetts, who has launched the only effort in the US House to oppose President Obama's plans for the Afghan war, received an unexpected boost of support today from a group of Afghan and Iraqi war veterans, who raced around Capitol Hill lobbying for his bill.
Congress is expected on Thursday to swiftly approve the $94.2 billion war funding bill, which would support the 21,000 additional combat troops and military trainers that Obama plans to deploy. But McGovern's bill, which he plans to file Thursday, would require the Pentagon to come up with an exit strategy by the end of the year.
The veterans, who are part of a small but growing group of Americans who oppose the Afghan war, traveled to Washington this week, shadowed by the Brave New Foundation, a California-based nonprofit film company that produces social justice documentaries and has launched a campaign called Rethink Afghanistan.
Realizing that it could not stop the supplemental, the group focused instead on getting more support for McGovern's bill.
"Without an exit strategy, then the mission is doomed to fail," said Jake Diliberto, who fought in Afghanistan in 2001 as a Marine. Diliberto, who said he is now getting his master's degree in ethics from Fuller Seminary in Pasadena, Calif., said that he strongly believed in the mission, but that the US presence has grown extremely unpopular among Afghans, as civilian casualties have increased.
Former Marine Corporal Rick Reyes, who also served in Afghanistan shortly after the US invasion, said he never thought he would lobby Congress. But by midafternoon, he had met with representatives from 20 offices. The group planned to fan out and meet with 100 more.
"So far the response has been positive, but you never know how they will vote," said Reyes, who believes that the United States was made less safe by the operations in Afghanistan. He said his team was ordered to break down doors and beat people who later turned out to be innocent.
Still, many members of Congress are reluctant to question a war that is directly linked to an attack on the United States, not to mention a popular president.
Representative Raul M. Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat who chairs the Progressive Congressional Caucus and shares skepticism about the troop increase, told the veterans that their message is still a hard sell.
"I think there is a sense that there is no other option," he said, adding that people routinely ask him "'What do we do if we don't do this?' "
Grijalva told the vets that an atmosphere of fear of opposing the president has permeated Capitol Hill over the past eight years. But he said he has not faced much backlash for his anti-war stance, despite the fact that 15 percent of his constituents are veterans.
"I support Barack very much but I think sometimes we tell our friends and colleagues that we have to part ways," he said.
But so far, the only member of Congress to introduce legislation to restrain Obama's actions on Afghanistan is McGovern, a Worcester Democrat and an outspoken opponent of the Iraq war. (Click here to read the bill.)
So far, 60 members of Congress have already signed onto the bill, which McGovern opted to file as stand-alone piece of legislation, not linked to the supplemental.
"After 8 years, he is getting a sinking feeling that we are getting in deeper and deeper into Afghan without any idea how we are going to get out," said Michael Mershon, a spokesman for McGovern. "He feels very strongly that no matter who the president is, or whether he has a 'D' or an 'R' next to his name, if you believe our military efforts need to have a clearly defined strategy, then that's what you have to fight for."
Obama optimistic on healthcare
President Obama held a pep session this morning to rally House Democratic leaders behind his healthcare overhaul plan.
"We've got to get it done this year," he said.
"And we don't have any excuses," he added. "The stars are aligned."
And, Obama said, he is "deeply encouraged" that a bill can emerge before Congress leaves for its August recess, pointing to health industry leaders who opposed sweeping change in the 1990s offering this week to cut costs by $2 trillion over the next decade.
"We're starting to see a shift," Obama said. "They recognize the time is now."
He met in the Oval Office with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel, House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, and House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller.
Obama's full remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYObama rallies grassroots support on healthcare
With momentum appearing to grow for a healthcare overhaul, President Obama is calling once again on his grassroots army to push Congress over the finish line this year.
Obama's backers received an email appeal overnight to sign an online declaration of support for his Obama's core principles: reduce costs, guarantee choice, and ensure all Americans have quality, affordable healthcare.
Mitch Stewart, director of Organizing for America, noted that on Monday healthcare industry leaders offered to cut costs by $2 trillion over 10 years.
"The health care crisis is not new, but it's getting worse," Stewart wrote the 17 million supporters. "For decades, real health care reform has been blocked by special interest lobbying and political point-scoring. We simply cannot go any further down this dangerous road of delay and denial. But we don't have to.
"The most important reason this round of health care reform will be different is you. Last fall millions of regular people came together and did the impossible. Now, we've got to roll up our sleeves, join hands with those new to our movement, and do it again," he added.
"Congress is already hammering out the details of the health care package, and it could still go any number of ways. Our representatives need to understand that when the President lays out these three bedrock principles, Americans of every stripe are standing with him."
Kerry rips attack on Afghan schoolgirls
Senator John F. Kerry responded with outrage this afternoon to reports that school girls in Afghanistan are being targeted by poison gas to scare them away from going to class.
The Associated Press reported that Afghan officials accused extremist militants of launching a poison gas attack today in the northeastern part of the country that caused dozens of schoolgirls to collapse with headaches and nausea. The Taliban and other Islamic fundamentalists have regularly attacked girls schools in Afghanistan and the second apparent poisoning in two days has raised concerns that they have now found a new weapon to scare girls, the AP said.
“I am deeply troubled by reports of poison attacks on school girls in Afghanistan, endangering hundreds of students and teachers," Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement.
"Today’s attack on girls in a school in Kapisa province follows two recent attacks on school girls in the nearby town of Charikar in Parvan province. This should be a wake-up call that girls and women in Afghanistan are still under physical threat and their security must be a top priority. Girls in Afghanistan should not have to risk their lives just to attend school. This is non-negotiable. My thoughts are with these brave young girls, their families, their teachers and principals, and I commend their courage for continuing to go to school. I urge the Afghan authorities to do all they can to stop these horrific attacks on innocent children.”
Carter addresses energy security
Ask most Americans about former President Jimmy Carter and energy, and they'll probably recall the long gas lines during the 1970s Arab oil embargo and the 1979 "malaise" speech in which he outlined his plan for energy efficiency and reducing oil imports.
Today, he is being called upon to offer a "historical review"of US efforts to address energy security before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Carter testified that there has been "a long period of energy complacency" and that the US is now lagging behind "many other nations in the production and use of windmills, solar power, nuclear energy, and the efficiency of energy
consumption."
"Our inseparable energy and environmental decisions will determine how well we can maintain a vibrant society, protect our strategic interests, regain worldwide political and economic leadership, meet relatively new competitive challenges, and deal with less fortunate nations. Collectively, nothing could be more important," he said, according to prepared remarks.
“President Carter has an unparalleled understanding of the depth and scope of the energy security challenges facing our nation, and we are honored to welcome him to the committee,” committee Chairman John F. Kerry said in a statement announcing Carter's appearance.
“This hearing will launch a series of targeted investigations into the manifestations and implications of our dependence on foreign oil, as well as the geopolitical challenges associated with current patterns of global energy flows.”
Kerry's opening statement at the hearing is below:
FULL ENTRYKerry-led panel holds hearing on new Pakistan plan
Richard Holbrooke, the special US envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, is testifying today before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee as it consider President Obama's new strategy for the intertwined nations.
Obama is sending 21,000 more troops to Afghanistan, agreed to the replacement of the top US general in Afghanistan, announced Monday, and supports a bill being pushed by Senator John F. Kerry to increase aid to Pakistan's government to $1.5 billion a year.
Holbrooke testified that "a stable, secure, democratic Pakistan is vital to US national security interests."
"We must support and strengthen the democratic government of Pakistan in order to eliminate once and for all the extremist threat from al-Qaeda and affiliated terrorist groups," he continued in prepared remarks.
Relations between the US and Pakistan have been "inconsistent," he added. "In Pakistan, many believe that we are not a reliable long-term partner and that we will abandon them after achieving our counterterrorism objectives. Many in the U.S. question the dedication of some elements of the Pakistani government to ending safe haven for terrorists on Pakistani soil. But our engagement has to be aimed at putting our relationship on a better long-term footing."
(His full prepared remarks are below.)
In his opening statement at the hearing, Kerry, the committee's chairman, declared that "with its nuclear arsenal, terrorist safe havens, Taliban sanctuaries and growing insurgency, Pakistan has emerged as one of the most difficult foreign policy challenges we face."
The Massachusetts Democrat said that Obama's meetings last week with Pakistani President Asif Zardari and Afghan President Karzai were "a significant step forward," but much work remains to succeed with a "bold new strategy."
"Since President Obama called on Congress to pass a Pakistan aid bill, the dangers of inaction have risen almost by the day. The government has struck an ill-advised deal that effectively surrendered the Swat Valley to the Taliban. Predictably, this emboldened the Taliban to extend their reach ever closer to the country’s heartland. In recent days we have seen encouraging signs that Pakistan’s Army is finally taking the fight to the enemy, but much remains to be done," Kerry said, according to prepared remarks released by the committee.
"Even as we help Pakistan’s government to respond to an acute crisis, we also need to mend a broken relationship with the Pakistani people. For decades, America sought Pakistani cooperation through military aid, while paying scant attention to the wishes of the population itself. This arrangement is rapidly disintegrating. Today an alarming number of Pakistanis actually view America as a greater threat than Al Qaeda. Until this changes, there’s little chance of ending tolerance for terrorist groups— or persuading any Pakistani government to devote the political capital necessary to deny such groups sanctuary and covert material support."
The additional aid is an important first step, Kerry said. " Our aid to Pakistan aims to achieve more than just good deeds: It will empower the civilian government to show that it can deliver its citizens a better life.
His full opening statement is below:
FULL ENTRYFederal deficit rises even higher
That $1.3 trillion deficit that President Obama likes to say he inherited whenever questioned on his spending?
Well, it has ballooned to a projected $1.8 trillion. And Obama has no one to blame but himself -- and the economic crisis, which has helped force the federal government to borrow about 50 cents of every $1 it forks out.
The deficit figure for the current budget -- which ends Sept. 30 -- is about quadruple last year's number. And that figure was an all-time record.
Since George W. Bush left office, the economy has gone further in the tank, and Obama and Democratic allies in Congress have pushed through a $787 billion stimulus package and a $410 billion supplemental budget bill.
The White House is now predicting the deficit will be $87 billion higher than expected for the 2010 budget year that begins Oct. 1, rising to $1.3 trillion.
Obama pushes for credit card reform
President Obama uses his weekly Internet and radio address today to pressure Congress to pass a credit card reform bill by Memorial Day.
"Americans know that they have a responsibility to live within their means and pay what they owe," the president says. "But they also have a right to not get ripped off by the sudden rate hikes, unfair penalties, and hidden fees that have become all-too common in our credit card industry. You shouldn’t have to fear that any new credit card is going to come with strings attached, nor should you need a magnifying glass and a reference book to read a credit card application. And the abuses in our credit card industry have only multiplied in the midst of this recession, when Americans can least afford to bear an extra burden."
Obama called in the heads of major credit companies to the White House last month. Afterwards, industry representatives said those in the meeting discussed the need for a balance between protecting consumers and keeping credit available during the recession.
The House last week passed legislation to restrict abusive credit card practices and eliminate sudden increases in interest rates and late fees. The Senate is expected to vote next week.
"It is past time for rules that are fair and transparent," Obama says in his address. "That is why I have called for a set of new principles to reform our credit card industry. Instead of an 'anything goes' approach, we need strong and reliable protections for consumers. Instead of fine print that hides the truth, we need credit card forms and statements that have plain language in plain sight, and we need to give people the tools they need to find a credit card that meets their needs. And instead of abuse that goes unpunished, we need to strengthen monitoring, enforcement, and penalties for credit card companies that take advantage of ordinary Americans."
His full address is below. To see the web video, click here.
Obama wants stepping stone for jobless
With the new jobless numbers offering that "glimmer of hope" he has been pitching, President Obama today to offered more help to the unemployed.
The lower figures, he said, are no "solace" to the laid-off who can't find jobs and struggle to support their families. And to emerge stronger from the recession, the nation's workforce must come out stronger out of the downturn.
So he laid out proposals to allow people without work to enroll in community college and other education and training programs without sacrificing their unemployment checks. He also wants to make it easier for the jobless to qualify for financial aid for colleges by not basing their eligibility on their prior year's income when they had a job.
The current rules are "senseless" when workers need to prepare themselves for jobs that often require more training. He cited the case of a Maine woman who did get help because the state already has such regulations.
"That's what our unemployment system should be, not just a safety net, but a stepping stone to a new future," Obama said.
Obama also announced a new website (click here) where laid-off workers can find out more about educational opportunities. He also announced that Jill Biden, the vice president's wife who has taught at community colleges, will lead an effort to raise awareness of what they offer.
Obama spoke hours after the Labor Department reported that the pace of layoffs slowed in April, when employers slashed 539,000 jobs, the fewest in six months. But after revised, higher numbers of layoffs in February and March, the unemployment rate rose to 8.9 percent, the highest in more than a quarter century. And since the recession began in December 2007, the economy has lost 5.7 million jobs
The layoffs are "still a sobering toll" and it could take years to recover from the recession, the president said. (His full remarks are below.)
The National Employment Law Project praised Obama's initiatives, saying in a report that despite federal law barring states from denying unemployment benefits to workers in “state-approved training,” many states only allow limited access to benefits.
“In a time when unemployment is at near-unprecedented levels, with long durations of joblessness and substantial job loss -- and with the federal government picking up the tab for 20 to 53 weeks of extended jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed, it is critical that states adopt this change to give workers the chance to develop skills that will help them find sustained work and stay afloat while they do so," the group's policy co-director, Maurice Emsellem, said in a statement.
Representative John Boehner, the House Republican leader, also jumped on the numbers, using them to criticize Obama's game plan. "About two and a half million jobs have been lost since the beginning of the year, yet some here in Washington continue to believe that we can borrow and spend our way back to prosperity," Boehner said in a statement. "Rather than working across the aisle on plans to create more jobs, rebuild Americans' savings, and reinvigorate the housing market, the spending, taxing, and borrowing binge that the Administration and Congress have set out on in the first four months of this year isn't helping our economy."
Latino group disappointed in Obama budget cuts
Predictably, Republicans bashed President Obama's budget, the details of which were submitted on Thursday.
But Democrats, too, are questioning some of the $17 billion or so in cuts. And so are Democratic-leaning advocacy groups.
Add to that list today the National Council of La Raza, the largest national civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States, which joined Republicans in noting that some of the proposed trims were unsuccessfully pushed by former President Bush, but from a different political perspective.
“What we have seen so far with the budget is discouraging and suggests that some of the key priorities of the Latino community are not those of the administration. I am very surprised that the Obama administration in its first budget would mirror similar cuts made by the Bush administration,” Janet Murguía, the council's president and CEO, said in a statement.
She cited the funding for health programs serving Latinos, and unemployment programs, even though the jobless rate among Hispanics has reached 11.4 percent. The council also expressed concern in "the lack of investment" in programs for parents, family literacy, and English learners.
“We realize this is just a proposal and Congress has the opportunity to deliver a budget that works for all Americans and we will continue to work with the Administration and Congress to achieve that,” Murguía added.
A Mother's Day gift list
A liberal-labor coalition takes a whimsical approach in a new Mother's Day-themed web video urging Americans to support President Obama's economic agenda.
The video from Americans United for Change -- a major ally for the president in organizing grassroots support -- features old-timey organ music and a series of scenes of children offering their mothers what they really want.
"Equal pay (and flowers)," it says on screen as a young girl holds out a bouquet.
Then, "more college aid for our kids (and less laundry)" as kid throws clothes out of a basket.
And finally, "health care we can count on (and breakfast in bed)" as two kids hold out a tray.
The spot ends with a call to call Congress: "Tell them to support President Obama's agenda for families."
Kennedy praises FDA nominee
Senator Edward M. Kennedy this afternoon praised President Obama's pick for Food and Drug Administration commissioner, saying that a respected scientist is needed to restore morale at the agency that oversees the nation's food and drug safety.
Dr. Margaret Hamburg, a Harvard Medical School graduate and bioterrorism expert who served as New York City's health commissioner, also told the Senate committee considering her nomination that she wants to restore public confidence in the FDA.
"Dr. Hamburg is widely respected for her expertise in community health, bio-defense, and nuclear, biological, and chemical preparedness," Kennedy said in a statement entered into the record for the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing. "Her expertise is valuable for problems we now face, such as combating food-borne illness, cooperating with other agencies to address the new flu outbreak and drug-resistant diseases, and protecting our food and drug supplies."
If confirmed by the Senate, one of her first duties will be overseeing development of a vaccine for the new swine flu.
UPDATE: Hamburg breezed through the hearing, with no committee members expressing opposition, the Associated Press reports.
"The agency is facing a range of new and daunting challenges," Hamburg told senators. "These include the globalization of food and drug production, the emergence of new and complex medical technologies, and the risk of adulteration or deliberate terror attacks on our food and drug supplies."
"It’s been clear for some time that the agency has been chronically underfunded," Kennedy said in his statement. "Its budget per American citizen each year amounts to little more than the cost of a fast food meal. The regular intake of fast food is not the well balanced diet we need to be healthy, and it can’t be good for the FDA either.
"The agency needs more than additional funds, however. Morale is low. In recent years, science has often taken a back seat to political pressure. It’s a sad state of affairs when a court rules that the “FDA acted in bad faith and in response to political pressure” and orders the agency to base a decision on science."
Obama: Budget cuts add up to 'real money'
The relatively paltry size and breadth of his budget cuts are getting widely panned so far, but an undaunted President Obama declared this morning that he is streamlining government to get rid of wasteful or ineffective spending.
He formally unveiled a list of 121 proposed budget cuts totaling nearly $17 billion -- barely a dent in the $3.4 trillion federal spending plan that Congress has approved for the fiscal year that starts Oct. 1.
Obama acknowledged some of the cuts he wants are less than $1 million. That might be considered a pittance in Washington, he said, but most Americans still see the dollar amounts as significant -- and the savings "add up."
"Even by Washington standards, that should be considered real money," he said.
"We have to admit that there is a lot of money that's being spent inefficiently, ineffectively, and, in some cases, in ways that are actually pretty stunning," he said.
"Some programs may have made sense in the past -- but are no longer needed in the present. Other programs never made any sense; the end result of a special interest's successful lobbying campaign. Still other programs perform functions that can be conducted more efficiently, or are already carried out more effectively elsewhere in the government.
As an example of obsolete programs, he cited a long-range radio navigation system that costs $35 million a year. "Now there's GPS," he said.
About half the trims would come from defense programs and the other half from domestic programs, but at the same time Obama is proposing significant increases in some domestic priorities. About 80 of the targeted programs are new to the cut list, and some of the cuts, Obama conceded, will be painful.
That list is only a start, he and his top budget aides argue, but they also acknowledge that much bigger savings are more likely through the healthcare overhaul that the president wants.
"We recognize that there remain looming challenges to our fiscal health beyond that -- challenges that will require us to make healthcare more affordable and to work on a bipartisan basis to address programs like Social Security," Obama said. "So what we're proposing today does not replace the need for large changes in non-discretionary spending."
But Republicans are deriding the cuts as insignificant.
On the Senate floor, Senator Judd Gregg said the savings would have no impact on the federal deficit, projected at $1.5 trillion this year, especially when Obama is adding back "massive spending."
He likened what Obama proposes to taking a "few pieces of sand off the desert."
Obama's full prepared remarks are below, followed by a White House fact sheet on the cuts:
Obama to detail budget cuts
President Obama plans on Thursday to unveil a list of 121 budget cuts totaling nearly $17 billion, the latest installment of his pledge to scrub the federal budget "line by line" for wasteful spending.
A senior White House official told reporters that the cuts would total nearly $17 billion in the fiscal year that starts Oct. 1 and more in subsequent years, with about half the cuts from defense programs and the other half from domestic programs.
"This is an important step in the process, but it's only a step in the process," said the senior administration official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity to discuss the proposals before they are made public. "In many cases we have multiple programs that are doing the same thing, and that drives up administrative costs unnecessarily....We are searching for things that work and trying to cut back on things that do not work."
One example the official cited is a long-range radio navigation system that costs $35 million a year but has been made obsolete by the prevalence of global positioning systems. "It's not used, it's unnecessary, it costs us $35 million a year, and we perpetuate it just through inertia," the official said.
Another is saving $142 million by no longer making payments to states to clean up abandoned mines that have already been cleaned up, and a third is to have the Department of Education use email and videoconferencing instead of stationing an attaché in Paris. That would save $632,000 a year, the official said.
The official said that about 80 of the targeted programs are new and that much bigger savings are possible through the healthcare overhaul that the president wants.
The $17 billion, however, is only a drop in the proverbial bucket when the federal deficit that's likely to exceed $1.5 trillion this year.
And Republicans quickly pooh-poohed the list, asserting that former President Bush proposed even larger cuts last year -- $1 billion and 30 cuts more, by one accounting.
Back of the line for Specter
He probably should have gotten it in writing.
When Senator Arlen Specter defected from the Republican party and joined the Democrats last week, he suggested he had assurances that his 29 years of seniority would transfer over, putting him ahead of many new colleagues.
But his new compatriots balked, and on Tuesday night, the Senate passed a resolution that made him the most junior Democrat on the committees on which he serves.
In a statement today, Specter sought to lessen any political damage, expressing confidence that beginning in 2011, "my seniority will be maintained."
Some Democrats, he added, "have raised concerns about my seniority so the caucus will vote on my seniority at the same time subcommittee chairmanships are confirmed after the 2010 election."
Today, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said it will all work out and the seniority issue will be reconsidered after the 2010 elections. Specter is up for re-election next year and a major reason for his switch was that he was likely to lose the Republican party.
Since announcing his switch, Specter has raised eyebrows by voting against President Obama and Democrats and suggesting in an interview that will appear in Sunday's New York Times magazine that he favored Republican Norm Coleman in the contested Senate race in Minnesota.
Reid said on MSNBC he asked Specter, " 'What's this all about? And he said, 'Well, that isn't really what I meant,' words to that effect. So I accept that."
"He's a moderate person," Reid added. "I think that he'll fit in very well with the caucus and on procedural votes he'll be with us all the time. If he -- I think there's just a lot for him to get used to and kind of a lot for us to get used to. But we're glad he's with us."
On CNN this afternoon, Reid said that when he asked Specter about the Coleman remark, Specter said, "I forgot what team I was on."
"I think everyone should just kind of relax and understand he's a Democrat," Reid said. "We're doing our best to try to make him happy as a Democrat. I think he is."
Ad spoofs funeral directors on Obama health plan
A liberal advocacy group goes for some gallows humor in its latest ad support President Obama's healthcare proposals.
The MoveOn.org spot focuses on the push by Obama and many Democrats for a government healthcare plan that would compete with private insurers. The insurance industry is dead set against it, saying it would put insurers out of business and offering a series of concessions to stop the proposal in its tracks.
Tuesday, the industry's main lobbying group told the Senate Finance Committee it would do away with an insurance surcharge that affects 5.7 million women and offered to accept new consumer protections.
In the ad, two men complain about the public plan option.
"It'll be a disaster for us," one says.
"A public healthcare plan means affordable healthcare for everyone," the second says. "You know what that means.
"Healthy people living longer," the first answers.
"This guy's killing us," the second chimes in.
The camera pans out, and it turns out the men aren't insurance lobbyists. Instead, they're funeral directors.
Women short-changed in health insurance, Kerry says
Senator John F. Kerry today introduced a bill that would stop insurers from charging women higher premiums, or denying or limiting coverage based on whether they are pregnant.
Kerry cited a September 2008 report by the National Women’s Law Center that found insurance companies can reject applicants for reasons that affect women; that it is difficult and costly for women to find health insurance that covers maternity care; and that women often face higher premiums than men for identical coverage.
“The disparity between women and men in the individual insurance market is just plain wrong and it has to change,” Kerry said in a statement. “With Mother’s Day around the corner, there’s no better gift to American women than discrimination-free, affordable and accessible insurance that meets their health needs.”
Coincidentally, the main health insurer group said today it would end its practice of charging higher premiums to women if all Americans are required to obtain coverage, the industry's latest concession as it tries to stave off the creation of a government plan that would directly compete with private insurers.
"We don't believe gender should be a subject of rating," Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health Insurance Plans, told the Senate Finance Committee, the Associated Press reports. "We are ready to be accountable to those rules."
A summary of Kerry's bill is below:
Biden, Kerry offer support, tough love for Israel
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Vice President Joe Biden today said a viable Palestinian state, existing peacefully with Israel, "must be achieved" -- sending a strong signal that the Obama administration will push Israel's new right-wing government to move towards peace with Palestinians.
In a speech before 5,000 delegates to the annual conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, one of Washington's most powerful lobbying groups, Biden said: "Israel has to work toward a two state solution and -- you are not going to like my saying this -- but [do] not build more settlements, dismantle existing outposts, and allow the Palestinians freedom of movement . . . This is a show-me deal. Not based on faith. Show me."
Biden's tough love on Israel took up one line in a speech that was otherwise devoted to reiterating Obama's commitment to Israel's security, and Biden's own decades-long personal connection to Israel, starting from the day he met the chain-smoking Golda Meir, Israel's fourth prime minister, when he was a young senator.
But Biden's words could signal rough times ahead for Israel's new right-wing prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, who has backed away from endorsing the creation of a Palestinian state. Netanyahu is slated to meet Obama at the White House for the first time on May 18. Today, Obama met with Israeli President Shimon Peres.
At AIPAC, Senator John F. Kerry, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, also called on Israel to stop building settlements on Palestinian territory occupied after the 1967 war.
"Nothing will do more to show Israel's commitment to making peace than freezing new settlements activity," the Massachusetts Democrat told the audience, to slight applause. "Settlements make it more difficult for Israel to protect its own citizens. New settlements...don't just fragment a future Palestinian state. They also fragment what the Israeli defense forces must defend, they undercut [moderate Palestinian president Mahmoud] Abbas, and strengthen Hamas by convincing the Palestinians that there is no reward for moderation."
Kerry warned that the " window of opportunity for a two-state solution is fast closing."
Both Kerry and Biden sweetened their message with pledges of unflinching support for Israel's security.
Kerry received his most sustained applause when he suggested that Israel should not be expected to pull out of the West Bank any time soon.
"Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon, only to face Hezbollah; Israel withdrew from Gaza, only to face Hamas rockets. Israel is not about to let the same thing happen in the West Bank, nor should they," Kerry said.
Kerry, who recently traveled to Gaza and Syria, also said he pressed during his trip for the release of kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit and a halt to rocket fire on Israel.
In his speech, Biden also warned that if diplomacy fails to curb the "grave danger of a nuclear-armed Iran," then the United States will have greater international support to "consider other options."
Biden also urged Israel's Arab neighbors to show they are serious about an Arab proposal to normalize relations with the Jewish state if Israel gives up occupied land.
"Now is the time for Arab states to make meaningful gestures to show the Israeli leadership and the people to show that the promise...is real and genuine," Biden said.
Their full remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYBattle lines drawn on climate bill
Trying to shore up support for his climate change proposals, President Obama called three dozen House Democrats into the White House today.
More than a month ago, Representatives Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Henry Waxman of California introduced a sweeping bill that would set strict new limits on greenhouse gases, cutting emissions by 20 percent by 2020 and by 85 percent by 2050.
The bill -- which calls for pollution credits to be given or auctioned off to utilities and businesses -- has stalled because of industry opposition, criticism from Republicans, and concerns from some Democrats over the so-called cap-and-trade system.
While Obama's spending blueprint calls for generating $650 billion by auctioning off the credits and using most of the windfall to help with higher energy prices, some are pushing to give away many of those permits to ease the cost on business.
Republican critics, meanwhile, call cap-and-trade an energy tax that will hurt families and small businesses. House Republicans held their own session on global warming and released a list of at least 31 congressional Democrats either concerned or opposed outright to the proposal.
Kerry comments on Georgia mutiny
Senator John F. Kerry issued a statement today in support of the government of the republic of Georgia after what appears to be an isolated mutiny.
“It is our understanding that the mutineers have been apprehended and the situation is now calm. Georgia is an independent, democratic republic and any attempt to change the government of that country through non-democratic means is unacceptable. The Georgian people are committed to live in a sovereign, democratic nation and their will must be respected,” Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement.
According to the Associated Press, Georgia said it had ended a brief mutiny at a military base near the capital and thwarted a plan to disrupt NATO exercises.
The Interior Ministry first declared that the mutiny was part of a Russia-supported plot to overthrow the government, but later backed off and said the plotters were intent mainly on disrupting NATO military exercises set to begin Wednesday, the AP said.
Russia, which fought a brief war with Georgia last year, has criticized the NATO exercises.
Kerry and Lugar call for new Pakistan policy
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman John F. Kerry and ranking Republican Dick Lugar today introduced a bill that would triple nonmilitary assistance to Pakistan to $1.5 billion annually for the next five years in a bid to help stabilize the democratically-elected government of president Asif Ali Zardari, who is besieged with a festering insurgency and a domestic financial crisis.
The aid plan, which Kerry attempted to get passed last summer, would fund roads, schools, and clinics at a time when many average Pakistanis have grown disillusioned with their government and the US-prompted war against Taliban militants who have taken control of large parts of the country.
When asked at a news conference whether the funding would come too late to help Zardari, Kerry acknowledged that "we have lost a lot of time."
But the Massachusetts Democrat said the money would be an important signal of America's long-term commitment to Pakistan, where many see the United States as a fair-weather friend who will withdraw its aid as soon as its goals are accomplished.
"This legislation is the first time we have made a longer-term commitment," Kerry said. "While governments may change, I don't believe the country itself is about to fall apart."
"The dangers of inaction are rising almost by the day," Kerry added in a speech on the Senate floor. Kerry said that the bill "will empower the moderates, who will have something concrete to put forward as evidence that friendship with America bring rewards as well as perils."
Zardari is due to meet President Obama for the first time Wednesday as part of a trilateral summit with Afghan president Hamid Karzai aimed at countering growing violence in the region. On Thursday, Kerry and Lugar, of Indiana, will host a 70-person lunch at the Capitol for Zardari, Karzai, and the US special envoy to the region, Richard Holbrooke, to discuss the plan.
Aides said that the bill was aimed at giving the Obama administration and USAID wide discretion, given the rapidly-changing situation on the ground.
Kerry urged the administration to use "the vast majority of these funds" on nonmilitary economic assistance, but left the door open for some of the money to be used for military purposes, if necessary.
Congress will not dictate which institutions, or even which parts of Pakistan, would receive the funds, leading some analysts to doubt that the money will reach the federally-administered tribal areas, the home of Pakistani Taliban, which has long been starved of development funding.
A similar aid bill introduced in the House that included nearly two-dozen pages of detailed conditions drew scathing criticism from Pakistani officials who said they could not accept aid with such strings attached. But the Kerry-Lugar bill, which has been endorsed by the Obama administration, contains only a few modest conditions -- such as the requirement that Obama certify that the Pakistanis are fighting terrorists -- although Obama can also waive the conditions.
Husain Haqqani, Pakistan's ambassador to the United States, could not be immediately reached for comment.
But Mark A. Siegel, a partner at Locke Lord Strategies, a lobbying firm retained by the Pakistani government, praised Kerry for introducing the bill.
"The world has a lot at stake in the success of the government of Pakistan in defeating terrorism," he said. "If Pakistan wins, the world wins."
The full bill summary is below, followed by Kerry's prepared speech on the Senate floor:
FULL ENTRYObama unveils tax crackdown
In all the 100-day polls that gave him generally high marks, President Obama found himself faulted in one area -- not being tough enough on Big Business and Wall Street.
So both for political and budgetary reasons, it makes sense that this morning he unveiled a crackdown on corporate tax loopholes and offshore tax havens -- plus 800 more tax agents to enforce the changes.
Introduced by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Obama said that while nobody likes paying taxes, most do their duty, but some shirk their responsibility -- "aided and abetted by a broken tax system."
The current tax system rewards US companies for moving jobs to other countries and for moving profits offshore, the president said.
(His full remarks are below.)
His proposal would eliminate some tax deductions for companies that earn profits in countries with low tax rates. It would also make it illegal for US citizens to use tax havens in the Bahamas or Cayman Islands.
The changes, which require congressional approval and would not take effect until 2011, would increase the Treasury's take by about $210 billion over the next decade. They represent only a first step toward an overhaul of international financial regulations Obama has promised.
Though Obama offers to offset the corporate tax change by making permanent a research tax credit, the proposal is likely to face stiff opposition from business groups and their allies in Congress.
Americans for Tax Reform called it a "job killing" tax increase, asserting that US corporate taxes are already the highest among industrial countries and that US companies face double taxation on their profits.
Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, citing his own legislative efforts to close offshore tax shelters, praised Obama's proposals.
“For five years we’ve been pushing to reform the tax code to end deferral and reward companies that create jobs at home not those that hide money offshore,” Kerry, a senior member of the Finance Committee, said in a statement. “I’m glad President Obama is taking action on an issue that has long needed attention and I will work closely with the administration to simplify and reform our international tax system.”
A White House summary of the proposal is below:
Obama wins one, loses one
President Obama this afternoon praise the House's passage of a bill designed to protect consumers from sudden increases in interest rates and late fees.
The legislation, which House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts helped shepherd, passed by a bipartisan vote of 357-70.
"Today, under the leadership of Representatives Barney Frank, Carolyn Maloney, and Luis Gutierrez, members of both parties in the House of Representatives came together to protect American consumers, paving the way toward real, meaningful credit card reform," Obama said in a statement.
"While Americans have a responsibility to live within their means and pay what they owe, credit card companies have a responsibility to set rules that are fair and transparent. The principles I have long supported would help ensure that these responsibilities are met: strong and reliable consumer protections; credit card forms and statements that have plain language in plain sight; tools that can help people make an informed choice about what credit card to use; and beefed up monitoring, enforcement, and penalties. And building on what we have achieved today, I will work with Congress in the weeks to come so that I can sign a credit card reform bill into law that upholds these principles and upholds the interests of the American people."
Over in the Democratic-controlled Senate, however, a bill -- which Obama backed but didn't spend a ton of political capital pushing -- to spare hundreds of thousands of homeowners from foreclosure through bankruptcy was defeated.
A dozen Democrats joined Republicans in the 51-45 vote to shelve the legislation.
Vermont ship captain testifies on piracy
The ship captain from Vermont who survived a harrowing hostage ordeal testified this afternoon before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which is examining the threat of piracy off the Horn of Africa, and possible solutions.
Captain Richard Phillips, 53, who was freed earlier this month after US Navy snipers killed three Somali pirates, testified on a panel with John Clancey, Chairman of Maersk, Inc., the ship's owner. Stephen D. Mull, acting assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs, also testified.
Phillips testified that the "most desirable" solution to piracy is putting military escorts aboard US vessels.
But given the logistical issues, ships' defenses could also be strengthened, he said.
Arming crews should be only one component and only a limited number of crew members should have access to weapons, and should be well trained, Phillips said. Read Phillips' full remarks below.
In his opening remarks, committee Chairman John F. Kerry noted that piracy is claiming innocent lives and costing significant amounts of money.
"To make matters worse, we know that pirates use much of their ransom money to buy better weapons and bigger engines to make it even easier to overtake larger vessels. They also use ransom money to arm and equip private militias. This is a dangerous and vicious cycle," he said in prepared remarks.
"Piracy goes to the heart of our national security and economic interests. America has always been a seafaring nation, and securing the world's sea lanes has been a source and a symbol of our strength. In the face of instability and crises around the globe, our ability to project naval power and to help ensure the free passage of goods and humanitarian aid is as important as ever." Read Kerry's full opening statement is below.
Modern-day piracy, the experts were to testify, is the product of lawlessness in places like Somalia and is motivated by money more than ideology. It's a dangerous business nonetheless, with pirates carrying small arms and rocket launchers.
The International Maritime Bureau recorded 111 attacks in the waters off the Horn of Africa in 2008, almost double the number of the year before. The bureau has recorded at least 84 attacks in the first quarter of 2009.
About 300 non-U.S. crew members remain in Somali captivity aboard 18 hijacked vessels, according to the Senate panel.
The problem requires a complex regional response between the United States and other powers such as China, India and Russia, Ambassador Mull told the House Foreign Affairs Committee. He said U.S. officials are working with other countries to deny pirates whatever they might gain from taking ships and crews.
I am Captain Richard Phillips. I am a graduate of the Massachusetts Maritime Academy, I have been a member of the International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots Union since 1979, and I am a licensed American merchant mariner. I was the captain of the MAERSK ALABAMA when it was attacked by pirates off the coast of Somalia on April 8th. Thankfully, that episode ended with the successful return of the ship, its cargo of US food aid for Africa and, most importantly, my crew. All of us have returned home safely and for that my entire crew and I are deeply appreciative of the actions taken by the Administration, the Department of Defense and, most specifically, the US Navy, the Navy SEALS and the crew aboard the USS Bainbridge. All of the US military and government personnel who were involved in this situation are clearly highly trained and motivated professionals and I want to use this opportunity to again say "thank you” to everyone involved in our safe return.
I want to thank the management of Maersk and Waterman Steamship Corp. who handled the situation, the crew and our families with great care and concern.
And equally important, I want to publicly commend all the officers and crew aboard the MAERSK ALABAMA who responded with their typical professionalism in response to this incident. The Licensed Deck Officers who are members of the Masters, Mates & Pilots Union, the Licensed Deck Officer and Licensed Engineers who are members of the Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association, and the unlicensed crew who belong to the Seafarers International Union are dedicated merchant mariners, typical of America's merchant seamen who are well-trained and who are ready and able to respond when necessary to protect the interests of our country.
I am honored to come before this Committee today to discuss my views on making commercial shipping safer, and worldwide sea lanes more secure from the threat of piracy.
I need to make clear at the outset that I am unable to discuss the incident itself because of the ongoing investigation and pending legal action against one of the pirates. But I've had a lot of time to think about the difficult and complex issues of protecting vessel, cargo and crew in crime-ridden waters. So instead of a recount of the MAERSK ALABAMA incident, the focus of my comments will be my beliefs, based on my years of experience at sea, as to what can or should be done to respond to piracy and to protect American vessels and crews.
I should also say at the outset that I realize that my opinions may differ in some ways from other recommendations you have heard before and may hear today from others on the panel. Nevertheless, I do believe that all of us in the maritime industry understand that it is imperative that we work together to address this complex problem, and I believe we are in general agreement on the main principles of keeping crew, cargo and vessel safe.
First, I believe it is the responsibility of our government to protect the United States, including U.S.-flag vessels that are by definition an extension of the United States, their U.S. citizen crews, and our nation's worldwide commercial assets. So, it follows then that the most desirable and appropriate solution to piracy is for the United States government to provide protection, through military escorts and/or military detachments aboard U.S. vessels. That said, I am well aware that some will argue that there is a limit to any government's resources - even America's. In fact, due to the vastness of the area to be covered – and the areas of threat are continually growing larger - our Navy and the coalition of other navies currently positioned in the Gulf of Aden region may simply not have the resources to provide all the protection necessary to prevent and stop the attacks.
So what other things can be done?
In my opinion, the targets – the vessels – can be "hardened” even beyond what's being done today and made even more structurally resistant to pirates. In addition, more can be done in terms of developing specific anti-piracy procedures, tools and training for American crews. I do however want to emphasize that contrary to some reports that I've heard recently, American mariners are highly trained and do receive up-to-date training and upgrading at the private educational training facilities jointly run by the maritime unions and their contracted shipping companies. I believe that discussions are underway now between the industry and government on the details of specific proposals to harden the vessels (the specifics of which should remain secret) and I am confident that we will soon have additional methods for protecting vessel and crew. And while they will be an improvement, there is no way they can be foolproof.
I've also heard the suggestion that all we have to do to counter piracy is "just arm the crews”. In my opinion, arming the crew cannot and should not be viewed as the best or ultimate solution to the problem. At most, arming the crew should be only one component of a comprehensive plan and approach to combat piracy. To the extent we go forward in this direction, it would be my personal preference that only the four most senior ranking officers aboard the vessel have access to effective weaponry and that these individuals receive special training on a regular basis. I realize that even this limited approach to arming the crew opens up a very thorny set of issues. I'll let others sort out the legal and liability issues but we all must understand that having weapons on board merchant ships fundamentally changes the model of commercial shipping and we must be very cautious about how it is done.
Nevertheless, I do believe that arming the crew, as part of an overall strategy, could provide an effective deterrent under certain circumstances and I believe that a measured capability in this respect should be part of the overall debate about how to defend ourselves against criminals on the sea.
As for armed security details put aboard vessels, I believe, as I indicated earlier, that this idea could certainly be developed into an effective deterrent. My preference would be government protection forces. However, as long as they are adequately trained I would not be opposed to private security on board. Of course, I realize that very clear protocols would have to be established and followed. For example, as a captain, I am responsible for the vessel, cargo and crew at all times. And I am not comfortable giving up command authority to others… including the commander of a protection force. In the heat of an attack, there can be only one final decision maker. So command is only one of many issues that would have to be worked out in for security forces to operate effectively.
While there are many new ideas and much discussion going on about how to deal with piracy, I would respectfully ask the Committee to be mindful that the seafarers I've met and worked with over my career are resourceful, hardworking, adventurous, courageous, patriotic and independent. They want whatever help you can offer to make the sea lanes more secure and their work environment safer. But we realize that while preparation is absolutely critical, not every situation can be anticipated. And we accept that as a part of the seafarer's life. So, I will just close with a request for you to please proceed carefully and to please continue to include us in your discussions and debates.
Thank you for this opportunity to speak and I look forward to answering your questions.
FULL ENTRYTackling immigration
A Senate panel today begins the hard slog toward an overhaul of immigration policy -- the goal that Congress punted during the Bush administration and the issue that animated the rank-and-file during last year's Republican presidential primaries.
The Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Citizenship will hold a hearing titled, "Comprehensive Immigration Reform in 2009: Can We Do It and How?"
Advocates hope it is the first step to a change that includes a path to citizenship for some of those already in the country illegally.
"For far too long, our state and local governments have been plagued by an out-of-date and broken federal immigration system. Now more than ever, Congress must take the necessary steps to reform our immigration system in a way that honors our laws, rewards honesty and hard work, and fosters economic prosperity," Benjamin Johnson, executive director of the American Immigration Law Foundation, said in a statement.
"The upcoming hearing marks a new day in the conversation on immigration. Rather than dwell on the problems of our broken system, we will hear a discussion that focuses on solutions....This is a discussion that must take place throughout the country because resolution of our immigration crisis will require all sectors of American society to work together to create an immigration system that works for our nation."
The National Council of La Raza, the nation's largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization, also praised the hearing. “For far too long, we have allowed a bullying minority to block the road to solutions and seed intolerance, yet recent elections have demonstrated that Americans want leaders who will solve tough problems, including immigration,” Janet Murguía, NCLR president and CEO, said in a statement.
The group wants the overhaul to include: Getting the 12 million undocumented people in our country to come forward, obtain legal status, learn English, and assume the rights and responsibilities of citizenship; creating smart enforcement policies that uphold national security; cracking down on unscrupulous employers and take away their incentives for hiring undocumented workers; widening legal channels that reunite families and allow future needed workers to come to the U.S. with the rights and protections that safeguard our workforce and prevent the dramatic increase in deaths along the border; and enacting proactive measures to advance the successful integration of new immigrants into our communities.
Pressed on the issue during his news conference Wednesday night, President Obama confirmed his support for comprehensive reform, but said that his administration must lay the groundwork first -- most notably improving border security so Americans are confident that illegal immigrants won't flood the country.
"We can't continue with a broken immigration system. It's not good for anybody," Obama said. "It's not good for American workers. It's dangerous for Mexican would-be workers who are trying to cross a dangerous border. It is putting a strain on border communities who oftentimes have to deal with a host of undocumented workers, and it keeps those undocumented workers in the shadows, which means they can be exploited at the same time as they're depressing US wages."
He said he expects to convene a working group "to start looking at a framework of how this legislation might be shaped. In the meantime, what we're trying to do is take some core -- some key administrative steps to move the process along to lay the groundwork for legislation, because the American people need some confidence that if we actually put a package together we can execute."
"If the American people don't feel like you can secure the borders, then it's hard to strike a deal that would get people out of the shadows and on a pathway to citizenship who are already here, because the attitude of the average American is going to be, 'Well, you're just going to have hundreds of thousands of more coming in each year.' On the other hand, showing that there's a more thoughtful approach than just raids of a handful of workers -- as opposed to, for example, taking seriously the violations of companies that sometimes are actively recruiting these workers to come in -- that's again, something that we can start doing administratively," Obama continued.
"So what we want to do is to show that we are competent in getting results around immigration, even on the structures that we already have in place, the laws that we already have in place, so that we're building confidence among the American people that we can actually follow through on whatever legislative approach emerges. I see the process moving this first year, and I'm going to be moving it as quickly as I can."
UPDATE: As part of the administrative changes, the Department of Homeland Security issued policies today that put more emphasis on going after employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants, though it will still continue to arrest illegal workers.
The Bush administration was criticized by advocacy groups after a series of large raids that resulted in the arrests of about 6,000 workers last year.
"This is a good first step in realigning enforcement priorities," the Immigration Policy Center said. "However, DHS's ability to truly focus on abusive employers is limited by the fact that our current immigration system doesn't provide immigrants or legitimate employers the protections and tools they need to comply with the law. Rather than trimming around the edges, real reform must involve an overhaul of the entire system to ensure that enforcement of our immigration laws is effective, fair, and humane."
Republicans, including Romney, launch new group
Reeling congressional Republicans today launched a new effort days after their latest setback -- the defection of Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, putting Democrats within reach of potentially being able to push legislation through the Senate without a single Republican vote.
House GOP Whip Eric Cantor announced that the National Council for a New America will hold its first event on Saturday with former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who ran last year and could run again in 2012; Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, another possible 2012 contender; former Governor Jeb Bush, the former president's brother; and Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, a former national GOP chairman.
The council appears a way to rebut Democratic portrayals of the GOP as the "party of no" by pulling together a cohesive policy strategy by the opposition.
While acknowledging the GOP's image and electoral problems, Cantor and Senator John McCain, the GOP presidential nominee last year, disputed that the effort is a "rebranding" of the party.
On a conference call, Cantor told reporters that "what we're aiming to do is to join together in a conversation with the American people" on major looming issues such as healthcare, energy, and national security.
McCain called it an effort to include Americans across ideological spectrum -- Republicans, independents, and like-minded Democrats -- to come up with solutions to issues such as healthcare. "We're going to spread a wide tent," he said.
"This is not a Contract with America," McCain added, referring to the campaign promises that Newt Gingrich and Republicans used to win a House majority in 1994. "This is a conversation with America."
McCain also addressed reports that Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, his vice presidential pick last year, was not invited, saying that she could be involved.
"We've reached out to her," he said.
The letter announcing the council is below:
Congress passes budget, a boon for Obama
Congress this afternoon handed President Obama another big victory to mark his 100th day in office by passing a spending blueprint that incorporates many of his major policy goals ahead on healthcare, energy, and other issues.
But the votes on the budget outline belied Obama's plea for bipartisanship.
The Senate voted 53-43 for the spending plan, with no Republican support, after the House voted 233-193 earlier today, again without a single Republican vote.
In his prepared opening statement for tonight's press conference, Obama says the budget "builds on the steps we’ve taken over the last one hundred days to move this economy from recession to recovery and ultimately to prosperity."
Newly-turned Democrat Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania voted "no," as he did earlier this month when it initially passed the Senate. Three other Democrats also voted no: Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Robert Byrd of West Virginia, and Evan Bayh of Indiana.
And, still, Obama's allies declared victory.
"America’s workers applaud Congress for passing President Obama’s budget resolution that is a transformational blueprint for growing the middle class and making the economy work for everyone again," John Sweeney, president of the AFL-CIO, said in a statement.
"Now, more than ever, it is crucial that we build an economy that works for working Americans. President Obama’s budget includes a huge down payment on national healthcare reform, investment in growing green jobs and addressing climate change and more funding for education. The budget also moves away from the failed economic policies of the past and includes tax cuts for middle-class working families, rather than for the wealthy and Big Business. "
“Facing the worst economic crisis in decades, President Obama took the oath of office 100 days ago with a bold agenda to turn our economy around, get Americans back to work and lay a solid foundation for future economic growth and prosperity. And he has done just that. The budget passed today by Congress affirms and supports that vision and addresses the President’s fundamental priorities: halving the deficit over the next four years, providing quality, affordable health care to Americans, improving education investing in the clean energy revolution while reducing our dependence on foreign oil,” added Democratic National Committee chairman Tim Kaine.
Tom McMahon, acting executive director, of the labor-liberal coalition Americans United for Change, said in a statement: “While President Obama inherited a crushing recession and the largest deficit in history, 100 days later the nation is on a clear path to economic recovery paved through the transformational budget Congress passed today. In addition to returning fairness to our tax code and beginning to take control of the federal deficit, the President’s budget recognizes that without fixing our broken health care system, without reducing our dependence on foreign oil, and without investing in tomorrow’s educated workforce, America’s struggling middle-class families will never get ahead. The investments called for in this budget for health care reform, education, and clean energy are essential for long-term economic prosperity. It also remains disappointing that many of the same conservatives members of Congress that enabled the very failed economic policies that got us into this mess once again turned their backs on middle-class families and just said ‘no’ today.”
The bill includes a parliamentary maneuver, which if a healthcare plan isn't passed by Oct. 15, would allow Democrats to push through a plan with a simple majority in the Senate, instead of the 60 votes normally required for such major legislation.
House passes hate crimes bill
The House this afternoon passed an expanded hate crimes bill that would protect gay victims, and its chief sponsor in the Senate called for prompt final action.
The measure passed 249-175 over the objections of conservatives, the Associated Press reports.
The bill -- named for Matthew Shepard, the gay college student who was beaten to death in Wyoming in 1998 -- is a stronger version of a bill that died two years ago under a veto threat from President Bush.
By contrast, President Obama supports it. The chief sponsor in the Senate is Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, who issued a statement this afternoon:
“I commend the House for its action to strengthen the inadequate existing federal law on hate crimes. No members of society – none – deserve to be victims of a violent crime because of their race, their religion, their ethnic background, their disability, their gender, their gender identity, or their sexual orientation. It’s long past time for Congress to do more to prevent hate crimes and insist that they be fully investigated and prosecuted when they occur. This important legislation is supported by a broad coalition of over 300 law enforcement, civic, religious and civil rights organizations and I look forward to prompt action by the Senate.”
Democratic National Committee chairman Tim Kaine chimed in:
“The House of Representatives took an important step today to close gaps in federal hate crimes law and ensure further protections for all American citizens who fall victim to violent crimes of intolerance. The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act allocates crucial federal resources to assist states and local law enforcement in their efforts to prevent and prosecute hate crimes, while also maintaining individuals’ rights to freedom of speech and association. More than 300 organizations representing law enforcement, civic, civil rights and religious groups have voiced their strong support for this long-overdue legislation. I congratulate the House of Representatives, and I urge the Senate to take swift action on this important civil rights issue so that the President may sign the bill into law.”
Kennedy panel to weigh in on swine flu
A powerful Senate committee held a hearing today on the swine flu epidemic.
The Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee will hear from Richard E. Besser, acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
The commitee's chairman is Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, whose remarks entered into the record are below.
Sebelius confirmed as health chief
The US Senate this afternoon confirmed Kathleen Sebelius as health and human services secretary, completing President Obama's cabinet, after Democrats pointed to the swine flu crisis as showing the need for action.
She flew immediately to Washington and was quickly sworn in. Obama's remarks are below.
The 65-31 vote followed hours of debate on the Kansas governor's nomination, which had been held up by Republicans over concerns by her record on abortion, her views on a healthcare overhaul, and unpaid taxes.
Nine Republicans joined the Democratic majority in pushing Sebelius over the 60 votes she needed. They included Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Judd Gregg of New Hampshire.
Her backers said that her confirmation was essential now to help coordinate the government's response to the swine flu outbreak, which has been led so far by Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, who is helping lead the charge for a healthcare overhaul, said Sebelius's confirmation would jump-start the work. She is expected to play a key role, though not as extensive as Obama's first nominee for the job, former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, who was also supposed to be head of the White House office of healthcare reform before he withdrew over unpaid taxes.
“With the confirmation of Governor Sebelius, the commitment of the Administration and Congress to passing health care reform this year now moves into high gear," Kennedy said in a statement.
“In his first 100 days in office, President Obama has taken large steps toward putting America back on track. His leadership has produced a strong new investment in education, established the principles needed to guide the United States into a more energy efficient world, and made opportunities for national and community service far more available to all Americans. In the next 100 days, I’m confident that President Obama will have us well on the way to the landmark enactment of quality, affordable health care as a right for all Americans.”
Billy Tauzin, president and CEO of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, added his plaudits.
“Gov. Kathleen Sebelius is a wise choice to guide the President on shaping healthcare reform," he said in a statement. "Sebelius combines the vital combination of skills that it will take to accomplish this challenging job: Toughness and an intimate understanding of the healthcare challenges that face our nation during these tough economic times.
“We applaud the Finance committee’s endorsement of Sebelius and are pleased that the Senate as a whole quickly followed its lead. Clearly, achieving meaningful healthcare reform will be difficult, making it imperative for Sebelius to be confirmed in a timely manner," Tauzin added. "“It’s equally important for Congress to act rapidly to put a full-time Commissioner in place to head the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Consumers count on the FDA to help assure the safety of a myriad of products – including the life-saving anti-virals contained within the Strategic National Stockpile, which could be deployed in the event of an influenza pandemic."
"Today's confirmation of Gov. Kathleen Sebelius is a tremendous step forward in the effort to address comprehensive health care reform and in turn put our economy back on track," John Sweeney, president of the AFL-CIO, said in a statement.
"Gov. Sebelius is highly qualified and throughout her career, she has shown a unique ability to work with members of both parties to find solutions to pressing problems. As Governor and former health insurance commissioner of Kansas, she is a proven fighter for the rights of patients and consumers. We look forward to working with Secretary Sebelius for real solutions to the problems of working families who deserve quality and affordable health care."
Marcia Greenberger, co-president of the National Women's Law Center, applauded the Sebelius's confirmation.
“Governor Sebelius has a strong record on protecting women’s legal rights, child care and early education, and healthcare," Greenberger said in a statement. "Her stellar career and track record provide reassurance to the American public that she is highly qualified to lead HHS, and that she will make meeting the needs of women and children a priority of the Department. As health care reform moves forward, the country now has a strong HHS Secretary who understands the needs of women and their families, and can bring the particular barriers faced by women to the table."
Anti-abortion groups had marshalled their resources to oppose Sebelius, a Catholic who personally opposes abortion but who vetoed a series of abortion restrictions as governor.
Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, commended the Senate vote.
“We applaud the Senate’s vote to confirm the eminently-qualified Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to serve in this critical position,” Keenan said in a statement. “Anti-choice advocates tried every desperate trick in the book to derail her confirmation, but this vote shows that a majority of senators understand that Americans are tired of the antagonistic politics of the past. As our country faces challenges on a number of fronts, especially on the issue of affordable health care, we look forward to ensuring that women’s health and sound science are a priority, rather than the failed political maneuvering that damaged this agency during the previous Bush administration.”
Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, added in a statement:
“We applaud Gov. Kathleen Sebelius’ confirmation as secretary of health and human services. She is an excellent choice to lead HHS and has a proven track record of increasing access to affordable care. As countless women and their families struggle to afford quality health care during these difficult economic times, the need for health care reform that improves health outcomes is immediate. Her ability to work in a bipartisan fashion will serve her well as the Obama administration and Congress tackle the critical issue of health care reform for American families. We look forward to working with her and the administration to expand access to care and lower health care costs.”
While they lost this fight, anti-abortion activists said it had energized their supporters.
“Despite the results of tonight’s vote, we’re finding that more and more Americans are waking up to the danger of President Obama’s nominations of extreme abortion advocates to serve in his administration,” Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of th Susan B. Anthony List, said in a statement.
“The high profile Sebelius confirmation battle has generated new interest and brought thousands of new activists on board for the pro-life cause. This grassroots energy will only increase our momentum as we confront the next round of President Obama’s extreme pro-abortion nominees, beginning with former NARAL Legal Director Dawn Johnsen. We expect all pro-life Senators will oppose Dawn Johnsen’s nomination for Office of Legal Counsel, and their support will be critical to keeping her extreme abortion views out of the White House.”
FULL ENTRYSpecter switching parties
Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, facing a tough reelection battle, announced today that he is switching from Republican to Democrat to seek reelection in 2010.
The stunning move could swing the balance of power in the Senate, giving Democrats the control of 59 seats. And if Al Franken, as expected, is seated in the Minnesota race, it would give Democrats a potentially filibuster-resistant majority of 60 seats and would help President Obama push through his agenda.
Specter said he has had growing differences with the Republican Party and when he was one of only three Republicans to support the president's $787 billion stimulus plan, the differences became irreconcilable.
"I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans," Specter said in a statement on his campaign website.
"When I supported the stimulus package, I knew that it would not be popular with the Republican Party. But, I saw the stimulus as necessary to lessen the risk of a far more serious recession than we are now experiencing."
"Since then, I have traveled the State, talked to Republican leaders and office-holders and my supporters and I have carefully examined public opinion. It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable," he added. "On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate. I have not represented the Republican Party. I have represented the people of Pennsylvania."
Specter goes on to say that he won't be a party-line vote for Democrats, just as he wasn't for Republicans.
"While each member of the Senate caucuses with his Party, what each of us hopes to accomplish is distinct from his party affiliation," he said in his statement. "The American people do not care which Party solves the problems confronting our nation. And no Senator, no matter how loyal he is to his Party, should or would put party loyalty above his duty to the state and nation."
At 79 and in his fifth term, Specter is one of a handful of Republican moderates remaining in Congress in a party now dominated by conservatives. Several officials told the Associated Press that secret talks that preceded his decision reached into the White House, involving both Obama and Vice President Biden, a longtime colleague in the Senate. Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, a Democrat, as well as Democratic leaders in Congress also were involved, added the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose details.
At a news conference this afternoon, Specter reiterated his statement, saying that the "Republican party has moved farther and farther to the right" and he found himself "more at odds" with Republicans and more in tune with Democrats.
He acknowledged that his prospects for winning the Republican primary were "bleak," but also emphasized that there are many priorities he wants to push, including more money for medical research, immigration reform, and Middle East peace.
"This is a painful decision," he told reporters.
He said he understands the dismay of some supporters, but said he's dismayed by some of the criticism pointed his way. "Disappointment runs in both directions," he said.
Specter also declared that he will not give up his independent thinking.
"I will not be an automatic 60th vote," he said, citing his continuing opposition to a Democratic bill to make it easier for unions to organize.
The AFL-CIO's legislative director, Bill Samuel, said that the labor groups looks "forward to continuing an open and honest debate" on the bill.
"This is a new day for the Employee Free Choice Act and labor law reform," Samuel said in a statement. "Sen. Specter has said all along that he recognizes the need to reform our broken labor law system and we will continue to work with Congress to give workers back the freedom to form and join unions..."
Angry Republicans said Specter was just looking out for his own political future.
Mitch McConnell, the top Republican in the Senate, told reporters that the "defection" threatens to leave Obama's power unchecked by Congress.
He also noted that a recent poll found a majority of Americans want Congress to provide a check on Obama's agenda
Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele also warned of what Specter's shift could mean.
"Well, It has a big impact," he said on CNN. "There's no doubt about it. I mean, certainly in the Senate, this puts the Democrats one step closer to 60 votes, which is a huge problem, not for the party per se but for the country. To give one party control absolutely without the appropriate checks and balance in the Senate is problematic."
Steele also said that Specter did not give him advance notice which is "another form of disrespect that I don’t countenance. I mean, you know, at least give me a call or give the party leadership a call and let us know, this is what I'm thinking, this is where I'm going, so that, you know, it can be repaired."
He portrayed Specter's decision as purely one of political survival. "Senator Specter had very few options at this point," Steele told CNN. "He had stepped on the toes of a lot of Republicans with his vote to on the stimulus bill, which was a core principle for us in terms of our views on economics.
"And you know, admittedly, a lot of Republicans weren't happy about the end of the Bush administration in terms of putting in motion this bailout process. But to have the senator confirm that, really, you know made it tough. And so, I think he saw that tough primary challenges coming ahead for him. I think he also saw a tough re-election in a general election."
Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine cast Specter's move as more evidence that Republicans have lost touch with Americans.
“Over nearly three decades in the United States Senate, Senator Specter has represented the people of Pennsylvania with honor, conviction, and an allegiance to deeply held principles that I know will continue to inform his decisions as a member of the Democratic caucus," Kaine said in a statement this afternoon. "Senator Specter courageously supported the President's economic recovery package while most Republicans played politics with our nation's economy. The Senator's willingness to set politics aside and be part of finding solutions to our nation's problems will find a welcome reception in the Democratic Party. Coming on the heels of Democrat Scott Murphy's victory in a Republican leaning congressional district in New York state, Senator Specter's decision is additional proof that the Republican Party is in serious trouble because it has lost touch with the American people and their desire for change which was so on display in November.
“As Senator Specter noted, the Republican Party has drifted far to the right and seems more interested in ideology, conflict and obstruction than in working constructively to address the nation's problems, and no longer appeals to moderates, including Senator Specter," Kaine added. "I commend Senator Specter on his decision to work with President Obama and Senate Democrats to help turn our economy around, create jobs and put the country back on the right track. We are thrilled to welcome Senator Specter into the Democratic fold and he can count on our full support."
Kaine later sent an appeal to 253,000 grassroots activists on the DNC email list in Pennsylvania asking them to welcome Specter, and sent similar requests via Facebook and Twitter.
"This is big," the DNC chairman wrote. "Senator Arlen Specter has just switched from the Republican Party. He's now a Democrat. A Republican for 43 years, Senator Specter has chosen to leave a party that he says has moved far to the right and join Senate Democrats as they work with President Obama to turn our economy and our country around."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Specter's move "very exciting, very exciting for the American people, because now we can get things done without explaining process."
"It shows that the country is going in a new direction," Pelosi said on CNN. "And we would hope to do that in a bipartisan way now with all of the diversity of thinking within our very independent-thinking party."
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Obama talked to Specter this morning and told him he was "thrilled" to have him join the Democrats. Specter said the president has agreed to campaign for him in the Democratic primary.
Vice President Biden issued a statement late this afternoon: “I welcome my old friend to the Democratic Party. Senator Arlen Specter is a man of remarkable courage and integrity. I know he will remain a powerful and independent voice for Pennsylvania and the country.”
UPDATE: The White House announced tonight that Obama, Biden, and Specter will make a joint statement at the White House on Wednesday morning.
Senator John F. Kerry welcomed Specter to the Democratic caucus.
"This is a big moment. When Jim Jeffords left the Republican Party, he was the canary in the coal mine warning of Bush era ideological excess, and Senator Specter’s decision eight years later signals its tipping point. This is now officially a Republican Party where moderates need not apply, and a Democratic Party under President Obama that welcomes all perspectives and is determined to find consensus to move America forward," Kerry said in a statement.
“Arlen Specter is guts and grit personified, and he remains as independent as ever. He’s always been a thoughtful voice on everything from science and research to twenty first century infrastructure, and I look forward to working with him in our Caucus.”
Americans United for Change, a labor-liberal coalition that is helping push Obama's agenda, also enthusiastically greeted Specter.
“Senator Specter’s announcement today ought to send a piercing message to the Limbaugh-Led Party of No that doing nothing but stand in the way of President Obama’s efforts to turn the economy around is serving only to further dwindle their numbers," the group's acting executive director, Tom McMahon, said in a statement. "Why? Because amid the worst economic crisis in generations, the American people want positive and constructive solutions from their representatives – not bitter “revenge” politics and more of same failed polices of the past. Senator Specter understands that. That’s why, despite the grumbling from his Republican colleagues, he put middle-class Pennsylvania families first and supported the President’s jobs and economic recovery plan.”
But some Pennsylvania Democrats aren't fully embracing their new colleague.
Representative Joe Sestak, who was preparing to run for the Senate nomination, didn't say he's giving up those plans now and said repeatedly that he wants to know what principles and goals Specter is running for, not what he is against.
"I'm going to have to wait," Sestak said on MSNBC. "Is that the type of individual we want to move us forward."
FULL ENTRYSwine flu outbreak emerges in immigration debate
Some advocates of tighter immigration rules are jumping on the swine flu public health emergency to call for the closing of the border with Mexico, including a ban on all air and ground traffic and importation of products.
"The Obama administration's failure to secure our borders against a possible pandemic is putting American lives at risk at a time when days and hours matter," said William Gheen, head of the Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, accusing the Obama administration of "treating Mexico like a 51st state, instead of separate nation."
The group also pointed out that Obama does not have a secretary of Health and Human Services -- though that is due to Republican opposition to his nominee, Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius -- and has not appointed a surgeon general or head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
"Obama was playing golf Sunday. Instead, he should have been addressing the nation, securing the borders, and filling the gaps in our government leadership from an emergency command center!" Gheen said. "He refuses to send troops to the border to stop the violence from spilling over or the Mexican flu from crossing into America. Instead we get second tier bureaucrats telling Americans to wash our hands and cover our mouths when we cough like a bunch of 1st grade students."
UPDATE: White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said during his regular briefing that the government response is "in no way" hampered by the absence of a permanent health secretary or CDC chief.
The CDC did say this morning that closer border monitoring has started, with officials asking those crossing the border about their health. There have been more 1,600 swine flu infections and dozens of deaths reported in Mexico.
The Senate Judiciary Committee, meanwhile, plans to start hearings Tuesday on comprehensive immigration reform, including a path to citizenship for some of those who entered the country illegally.
UPDATE: The National Council of La Raza, the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States, today condemned the assertions by groups linking the swine flu outbreak to the immigration issue.
“As an organization that works to improve health outcomes for all Americans, we believe that Americans are right to be concerned about reports of swine flu outbreaks in Mexico, California, New York, and Texas. The administration's declaration of a public health emergency this weekend was a prudent, routine step,” Janet Murguía, NCLR president and CEO, said in a statement.
“Public health experts are unanimous about key measures required in situations like this,” Murguía's statement continued. “If affected individuals are driven underground and deterred from seeking treatment or reporting their illness, it will hamper the authorities' ability to accurately track the disease's progress or develop the most effective vaccines.
“It's unfortunate that certain individuals with an obvious axe to grind are shamelessly exploiting a public health emergency for their own purposes. It's not surprising that some are implying that all immigrants are a threat to our health—that's standard fare on the hate group circuit. Ironically, the very act of attempting to demonize and stigmatize entire groups, and even entire countries, is likely to impede these and other critical steps that the authorities are taking to protect all Americans from the spread of the flu.”
Kerry committee delves into war powers
Senator John F. Kerry is holding a hearing today on clarifying how the nation should declare war.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is hearing testimony from former secretaries of state Jim Baker and Warren Christopher and former Representative Lee Hamilton, who all favor repealing the 1973 War Powers Act, passed after uncertainty over the role of Congress in authorizing the Korea and Vietnam conflicts.
"There fundamental tension in the way America decides to go to war: the President is commander in chief of the armed forces while Congress has the power to declare war. How these constitutional powers interact is the subject of much debate," Kerry said in his opening statement, without endorsing a particular solution.
His full prepared opening remarks are below:
Partisan fight over healthcare
As congressional negotiators resume today putting the final touches on a spending blueprint, the biggest bone of contention is Democrats' intent to include a fast track for a healthcare overhaul.
Republicans are incensed by the maneuver, known as reconciliation, that would allow Democrats to push through a healthcare bill with a simple majority vote in the Senate, rather than the 60 votes typically required for such major legislation.
Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, who was President Obama's pick for commerce secretary until his last-minute withdrawal, compared Obama to Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez in accusing him of strong-arming the Congress.
“I can understand shaking Hugo Chavez’s hand, but I can’t understand embracing his politics,” Gregg, the senior Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said today, according to the New York Times.
NBC, meanwhile, reports that the top Senate Democrat, Harry Reid, is trying to calm Republicans. Under the Democrats' plan, they would only use the fast-track tactic if a bill isn't passed by Oct. 15.
"Make no mistake -- we are determined to reform health care this year." Reid said in a letter today to Republican Leader Mitch McConnell. "Our strong preference is to do so by working alongside you and your caucus."
McGovern, other lawmakers arrested at Darfur protest

(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Rep. Jim McGovern is arrested by US Secret Service agents in front of the Sudanese Embassy while demonstrating against the genocide in Darfur.
WASHINGTON -- Representative James McGovern was locked up on misdemeanor charges today after demonstrating against the "crimes against humanity'' that Darfur activists blame on the Sudanese government.
After a brief series of speeches in front of the Sudanese embassy, the Massachusetts Democrat and four other members of Congress stood quietly and refused to move to the other side of yellow police tape -- a deliberate act they knew would get them arrested. After giving the small group of demonstrators three chances to move, police approached the lawmakers and activists and bound their wrists loosely behind their backs with plastic restraints.
The protestors were taken to a police station in northwest Washington, where they were expected to be fined $100 and released within a few hours.
UPDATE: McGovern was released this afternoon on a charge of crossing a police line.
McGovern -- forgoing a tie and belt, which would have been confiscated before his lock-up -- noted that he had been arrested three years ago for demonstrating for action in Darfur, where millions have died from sectarian violence and where the State Department has declared a genocide is underway.
"I don't want to be here in 2012, calling on the Sudanese government to stop the killing,'' McGovern said. "We need to care. We need to act. Every life is of equal value.''
The lawmakers -- who also included Democratic Representatives John Lewis of Georgia, Donna Edwards of Maryland, Lynn Woolsey of California, and Keith Ellison of Minnesota -- want the Sudanese government to allow international aid organizations back into Darfur to ease the escalating humanitarian crisis there. Further, the group wants President Obama to pressure the international community -- including China, which has influence in Sudan -- to force the Sudanese government into action.
Sudanese President Umar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir "has a choice," McGovern said. "He can choose to let the humanitarian groups return; he can choose to end the violence and the killing; and he can choose serious negotiations for a just and lasting peace. Or he can continue to commit crimes against humanity -- crimes with which he is already charged -- and charges that will one day catch up with him and bring him down."
Jerry Fowler, head of the Save Darfur Coalition, added in a statement: "We know President Obama and members of his administration care passionately about ending the Darfur crisis and promoting peace in Sudan. As President Obama nears his 100th day in office this week, he can demonstrate that Sudan is a strategic priority for the United States by committing to build a multilateral coalition for peace and investing in the diplomacy necessary to achieve an equitable and lasting solution for Darfuris and all Sudanese."
Conservative group warns on healthcare
Opponents of Democrats' healthcare proposals today launched a $1 million TV ad that asserts that President Obama and his allies are on the path to more government control and less patient choice.
The ad from the Conservatives for Patients' Rights Action Fund says that a provision in the $787 billion economic stimulus package to measure the effectiveness of care and treatment would copy national health plans in Canada and Britain.
The spot then features opponents of the government health plans in those countries warning of patients losing their choice of doctors, and some actually dying as they wait for care.
The ad ends with the announcer urging viewers to call Congress "you won't trade your doctor for a national board of bureaucrats."
In the budget outline they plan to pass this week, Obama's Democratic allies in Congress plan a parliamentary maneuver that would make it easier to pass a healthcare overhaul by requiring only a simple majority vote.
Also, the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee announced this afternoon that a working group will hold a hearing on Tuesday about the lessons learned in the states, specifically on covering residents.
Those scheduled to testify include Jon Kingsdale, executive director of the Massachusetts Health Insurance Connector; Eileen McAnneny, senior vice-president of Associated Industries of Massachusetts; Susan Besio, director of the state Office of Vermont Health Access; and Barry Chen, board member of the Vermont Program for Quality in Health Care.
Democrats near budget deal
A working federal budget deal would end President Obama's $400 middle-class tax cut after next year, but would make it easier to pass a healthcare overhaul, according to press reports.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and congressional aides are telling the Associated Press and Bloomberg News today that the tentative agreement to use a parliamentary procedure, known as reconciliation, that would allow the healthcare plan to pass with a simple majority vote, rather than the 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster.
The decision is sure to anger Republicans, who oppose many of Obama's health proposals, but it makes it much more likely that a sweeping plan will pass.
Democrats do not plan to use the tactic on another controversial proposal -- so-called cap-and-trade legislation to cut carbon emissions.
Negotiators for the House and Senate, both controlled by Democrats, are pulling together a compromise from the slightly different versions of the $3.6 trillion spending blueprint that each chamber passed and that both preserved most of Obama's agenda.
Gore gives blessing to climate change bill
Former Vice President Al Gore, who won a Nobel prize for his crusade on climate change, gave his stamp of approval today to House Democrats' bill to tackle global warming.
He is testifying before a House committee holding hearings this week on a bill introduced by Representatives Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Henry Waxman of California.
Gore urged lawmakers to overcome partisan differences and take action to reduce greenhouse gases, calling the climate issue the most important ever before Congress.
"We are, along with the rest of humanity, facing the dire and growing threat of the climate crisis," he testified, according to the Associated Press. Gore argued that Congress must act to "restore America's leadership of the world and begin, at long last, to solve the climate crisis."
The legislation would seek to cut carbon emissions by 20 percent by 2020 and by 85 percent by 2050 and also create a renewable energy standard that requires wind, solar, and other renewable sources to meet 25 percent of US energy needs by 2025. One of its most controversial components is to establish a cap-and-trade system to push utilities and industry polluters to meet those goals.
The Obama administration supports many aspects of the bill, but told the committee this week that it wants to work with Congress to fine tune it. Republicans and some Democrats say the legislation would cause dramatically higher energy prices.
Industry leaders warned in testimony yesterday that consumers would be hit with higher prices if the measure does not give electric utilities allowances to emit greenhouse gases.
Harvard's Carter confirmed to top Pentagon post
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Harvard professor Ashton Carter has won confirmation as the Pentagon's top acquisitions official, after weeks of delay caused by two Alabama senators looking out for a home-state defense program.
Carter's nomination was approved on a voice vote by the Senate late Thursday, said a spokeswoman for the Senate Armed Services Committee, which held his confirmation hearing.
Republicans Richard Shelby and Jeff Sessions, who used the Senate prerogative of putting a "hold" on the nomination, dropped their objection after seeking assurances that Carter will not change the specifications for the $35 billion refueling tanker contract being sought by Northrop Grumman Corp., which would build the plane in Mobile, Ala.
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who hand-picked Carter, met earlier Thursday with Shelby on the issue.
Carter comes to the job with no weapons-buying experience or ties to the arms industry. Rather, he is a long-time academic and leading authority on arms control. He replaces John Young, who has served as undersecretary of defense for acquisitions since November 2007.
Supporters criticize Sebelius delay
Republican opposition is holding up Kathleen Sebelius taking office as health and human services secretary and completing President Obama's cabinet.
And her supporters are none too happy.
The Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday sent the Kansas governor's nomination to the full Senate, but when the top Senate Democrat, Harry Reid, tried to bring up the nomination today, Republican leader Mitch McConnell objected, pushing the vote into at least next week.
Republicans have criticized Sebelius's ties to a Kansas abortion doctor and her views on healthcare reform. Anti-abortion groups have lobbied against Sebelius, a Catholic who personally opposes abortion, for her actions as governor on the issue.
NARAL Pro-Choice America today sent out an email alert to supporters urging them to contact their senators.
"Just a couple of hours ago, Gov. Kathleen Sebelius’ nomination to lead the Department of Health and Human Services hit a serious road block," the email says.
"Anti-choice senators blocked a vote today in response to pressure from the big 10 of the anti-choice movement. James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, Wendy Wright of Concerned Women for America, and seven other anti-choice groups sent a letter yesterday calling on the Senate to block Gov. Sebelius’ nomination. There’s no way we can allow far-right radicals like James Dobson or Wendy Wright to obstruct this critical nomination."
John Sweeney, president of the AFL-CIO, also criticized the delay.
"Senate Republicans are obstructing the confirmation of Gov. Kathleen Sebelius and ignoring the American voters' mandate for new leadership and an end to the status quo, especially when it comes to our nation's broken healthcare system," he said in a statement. "Gov. Sebelius is part of that new leadership, and she will bring to the position of Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services new vision rooted in experience.
"Throughout her career and as health insurance commissioner of Kansas, Sebelius has shown a commitment to fighting for consumers' and patients' rights. As governor of Kansas, Sebelius has a proven record of working with leaders on both sides of the aisle to solve problems."
UPDATE: Late today, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele called on Obama to withdraw Sebelius's nomination unless she answers more questions on abortion, saying that she has not been forthcoming about her ties to a Kansas abortion doctor, George Tiller.
"Significant questions remain about Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' evolving relationship with a late-term abortion doctor as well as about her position on the practice of late-term abortions," Steele said in a statement, the Associated Press reports. "If Gov. Sebelius and the Obama administration are unwilling to answer these questions, President Obama should withdraw her nomination."
The White House declined to comment. A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid dismissed Steele's complaints.
"This is nothing more than a baseless attack from someone desperate to stake a claim as the leader of the leaderless Republicans and get right with the right-wing of his party," said Reid spokesman Jim Manley.
Afghan vets give senators first-hand accounts
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- One held the hand of a dying fellow soldier and told himself that the sacrifice would not be in vain. Another watched an Afghan tribal leader risk his life to seek American protection for his village -- only to be told that it was not possible. A third interviewed insurgents who expect American troops to get tired and go home. A fourth beat suspected terrorists, only to find out later that they were innocent.
The veterans of the Afghan war testified today before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about a seven-year conflict that has attracted little debate, even as President Obama sends reinforcements to take on the Taliban.
The hearing took place as instability in Afghanistan spreads through neighboring Pakistan, and a day after the 38th anniversary of committee chairman John F. Kerry's testimony -- as a Vietnam veteran -- against that war in 1971.
Today, the young veterans gave a sobering picture of the failures of US policy, but none advocated a complete withdrawal.
However, one veteran -- Rick Reyes, a former corporal in the US Marines -- called Obama's decision to send 17,000 additional combat troops to Afghanistan "a mistake."
"At a minimum, this occupation needs to be rethought," he said.
Reyes, who was among the first US forces sent to Afghanistan after the 2001 terrorist attacks, said he arrested suspected Taliban and Al Qaeda in their homes based on tips by paid informants.
"Almost 100 percent of the time, we would find that the suspected terrorists were just innocent civilians," he said. "We began to feel we were chasing ghosts. How can you tell the difference between members of the Taliban from an Afghan civilians? The answer is: You can't."
In his written testimony, Reyes said he and his fellow Marines sometimes broke "hands, arms, legs" and wrecked homes during their midnight raids. But he did not describe these incidents to the committee today, saying later that he did not want to distract from his message of opposition to a troop increase.
However, three other Afghan vets argued passionately for a stepped-up US commitment, saying the mission could be saved by more troops and smarter tactics.
Westley Moore, a former Army captain who led a program that persuaded moderate Taliban to pledge allegiance to the new Afghan government, called the 17,000 additional troops "a paltry number" compared with what is required to protect the population in the rural areas.
"We are underfunded and undermanned in Afghanistan," he told the senators. "We asked two brigades to have coverage over a 1,600-mile area that is. . the most dangerous terrain in the world."
Moore said it would send the wrong message to the world if the United States were to simply leave.
"[The Taliban's] entire strategy depends on our political and national will faltering," he said. "Many of them are fond of saying, 'The Americans have the wristwatches, but we have the time.' "
Obama calls in credit card industry
President Obama waded back in today into the issue of credit cards, which would seem to be a political winner but which the industry warns could backfire in the tattered economy.
He met privately with leaders of the credit card industry, pushing to cut costs for consumers and rein in practices that squeeze people into paying much higher fees or interest rates than anticipated.
After the private session, Obama told reporters that as the administration tries to free up credit and prevent a similar economic crisis, the credit card industry needs to become "more stable, more effective, more consumer-friendly."
"We want to preserve the credit card industry,but we also want to do away with abuses," he said, pausing, then declining to even characterize the "discussion" with the executives.
Those include interest rates being jacked up, undisclosed fees being imposed, and consumers not getting enough information, he said.
He said he delivered a message to the industry leaders: "There's going to be action in Congress. Our administration is going to be pushing for reform."
Any reform, he said, should include measures to stop the abuses and more accountability. (Read the White House rundown on the principles below.)
Both the House and Senate are considering a credit card "bill of rights" to limit the ability of credit-card companies to raise interest rates and fees and to require greater disclosure. The House Financial Services Committee, led by Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, approved its version on Wednesday.
But the banking industry is warning that the push for legislation could make even less credit available during the economic crisis.
"President Obama has been a strong proponent of cleaning up the practices of the credit card industry since he was a Senator and he called for measures to strengthen consumer protection in the credit card market during the campaign," the White House said.
It also released a list of attendees: Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, economic advisers Larry Summers and Christina Romer, policy adviser Valerie Jarrett; David Bohne, President, USAA Savings Bank, USAA; Patrick Burke, Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer, HSBC Card and Retail Services; Paul Galant, CEO, N.A. Cards, Citi; Pamela Joseph, Vice Chairman, Payments, US Bancorp; Christopher McWilton, President, US Markets, MasterCard Worldwide; David Nelms, CEO, Discover Financial Services; Kevin Rhein, Division President, Wells Fargo Card Services and Consumer Lending, Wells Fargo and Company; Ryan Schneider, President of Cards, Capital One Financial Corporation; Lawrence Sharnak, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Cards, American Express; William Sheedy, Global Head of Strategy, VISA U.S.A., Inc.; Gordon Smith, CEO, Chase Card Services, JPMorgan Chase & Co.; Richard Struthers, President, Global Card Services, Bank of America; Lloyd Wirshba, Chief Executive Officer, Barclaycard US; and Edward L. Yingling, American Bankers Association.
100 days of partisanship
With President Obama primed to hit 100 days in office on Wednesday, Democrats and their allies are already seeking to crow about accomplishments -- and assail the Republican opposition as obstructionists.
The Democratic National Committee released a web video that says Republicans have delivered "100 days of no."
As each date appears on screen, one Republican leader after another is shown speaking against Obama and Democrats on various economic and other bills. At one point, Republican members of Congress are shown on the steps of Capitol Hill in unified opposition.
“Unfortunately, instead of joining President Obama in forging a new foundation for change, the Republicans have openly employed the same obstructionist, just-say-no approach that helped create the problems we currently face,” DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse said in a statement. “As long as Republicans continue to rely on Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, and Rush Limbaugh for their inspiration, Americans can only expect more of the same recycled Republican talking points and baseless criticisms from the party of no new ideas and no new leadership.”
A TV ad being unveiled this afternoon by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees and Americans United for Change takes a somewhat more positive tack.
The spot, which is to appear starting Friday on national cable outlets, lists Obama's priorities passed by Congress and signed into law -- an expansion of health insurance for children, an equal pay law for women, the $787 billion economic stimulus package -- while noting that most Republicans opposed them.
"There have always been those who said no to progress," the narrator concludes. "But in times of crisis, Americans have never taken no for an answer."
UPDATE: House GOP leaders, meanwhile, sent a letter today to Obama complaining about their Democratic counterparts. Obama and Vice President Biden are scheduled to meet this afternoon with congressional leaders of both parties.
"Democratic leaders in Congress have so far ignored your call for a new era of bipartisanship in Washington -- however, the next 100 days can be different," the Republicans wrote. "We know that by working together, we can face our challenges and renew our nation, and we respectfully request that our meeting tomorrow serve as the beginning of a meaningful bipartisan conversation about the challenges we face."
Kerry panel listens to Iraq, Afghanistan vets
Senator John F. Kerry, opening a hearing with Iraq and Afghanistan veterans today, said while he resists comparisons to the Vietnam War, the conflicts in the two nations now do hold some parallels.
Once again, we are fighting an insurgency in a rural country with a weak central government. Our enemy blends in with the local population and easily crosses a long border to find sanctuary in a neighboring country. Our efforts to win the loyalty of the locals are hampered by civilian casualties and an inability to deliver the security that we promised more than seven years ago," he said, presiding over the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
"We ignore these similarities at our peril."
"There are fundamental differences, too," he added. "We have a responsibility to the men and women fighting in Afghanistan to understand those differences and adapt to them.
"First and foremost, the North Vietnamese never posed a direct threat to our country. The extremists we are fighting today in Afghanistan and across the border in Pakistan do represent a direct threat to the security of the United States.
They planned the attacks on New York and Washington that killed 3,000 Americans. They have killed hundreds of other innocents in terrorist attacks worldwide since then. And they are preparing new attacks on the United States and our interests even as we sit here today."
Unlike the divisive Vietnam conflict, Kerry said, there is universal support for the troops. "We are all standing on common ground now: We are saying thank you to the soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines who have served. We are not confusing the war with the warriors. So I want to thank you, your fellow veterans and those who are still serving," he said.
And while Kerry told USA Today earlier this week that he has concerns about the Obama administration's new strategy in Afghanistan and neighboring Pakistan, he sounded more optimistic today.
"There is much still to be done in Afghanistan and Pakistan, but our new focus creates a sense of determined optimism for us and our coalition allies," he said. "Better defined objectives should lead to a better battle plan for our troops. But this remains an immensely complicated task, one that leaves our troops simultaneously on the front lines of the struggle against extremists and in the absolute middle of nowhere."
As the Globe reported earlier this week, while Kerry and other antiwar veterans testified in 1971 before the committee, he did not invite members of the analogous group of critics to this hearing.
Kerry's full prepared remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYDemocrats push for torture inquiry
Democrats are seizing on a newly declassified report on harsh interrogations conducted by the military of terror suspects to push for a full inquiry of the Bush administration's use of what critics call torture.
The 232-page report released Tuesday by the Senate Armed Services Committee concluded that the military's use of interrogation tactics -- such as stripping detainees, placing them in stressful body positions, and depriving them of sleep -- were authorized at the top levels of the Bush administration, including Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
"This exhaustive report offers more evidence of failures within the Bush Administration that allowed officials to set history and the law aside to torture detainees despite evidence such methods don’t work," Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, said in a statement today. “Our country is turning away from this dark moment. But we cannot afford to leave it behind until we fully understand what went wrong, and do what we can to ensure that America never again loses sight of its most sacred principles."
"This report is just one in a number of ongoing efforts to learn the whole truth about the Bush Administration's detention and interrogation program. I am an active participant in the investigation underway in the Senate Intelligence Committee, and I continue to believe that we will eventually need an independent commission of inquiry to provide unassailable recommendations to the nation.”
Besides the Intelligence Committee's investigation, Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont has been calling for a "truth commission." On Wednesday, President Obama appeared to open the door to an bipartisan congressional probe.
Top Bush officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, steadfastly claim that the interrogations produced information that helped prevent terrorist attacks. Cheney is seeking the declassification and release of memos that he says would show that.
UPDATE: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi today also endorsed the establishment of a formal "truth commission" to investigate Bush administration anti-terrorism policies, including an examination of the Justice Department lawyers who wrote the memos justifying the interrogations, the San Francisco Chronicle reports.
The release last week of the four Justice Department memos has re-energized the push for an investigation or possible prosecution. "Our members are upset about it," Pelosi said of Democrats.
But Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement that he opposes such a commission "because all of the facts are readily available to the Department of Justice."
"As I have said before, once the administration has a key to the front door, which they've had for several months, all they have to do is find the right filing cabinets and open them, which they're already doing," Specter said.
Meanwhile, Senators John McCain, Joseph Lieberman, and Lindsey Graham sent a letter to Obama today strongly urging him not to prosecute government officials who provided the legal advice on interrogations.
“Pursuing such prosecutions would, we believe, have serious negative effects on the candor with which officials in any administration provide their best advice, and would take our country in a backward-looking direction at a time when our detainee-related challenges demand that we look forward," they wrote.
“Some of the legal analysis included in the OLC memos released last week was, we believe, deeply flawed," the senators added. "We have also strongly opposed the overly coercive interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, that these memos deemed legal. We do not believe, however, that legal analysis should be criminalized, as proposals to prosecute government lawyers suggest."
They concluded: “As you have made clear, we are a nation at war. Appreciating that reality, we look forward to working with you on the panoply of detainee issues, ranging from interrogation standards to the disposition of detainee cases, which will engage our country going forward. In the interest of national security, it is the future, rather than the past, on which we believe America's gaze must be fixed.”
Clinton questioned on abortion, torture
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- House Republicans grilled Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton today on renewed US support for abortion overseas and on recently released memos detailing harsh interrogation techniques against terrorist suspects in CIA custody, prompting frank and often feisty exchanges with the nation's top diplomat.
At Clinton's first appearance before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Representative Dan Burton, an Indiana Republican, told Clinton that the harsh interrogation techniques -- which included mock drownings known as waterboarding -- "were cleared with the leadership of both the House and the Senate," apparently referring to classified briefings that some members received on the tactics.
"They knew about them," he said, adding that the CIA officials involved in the interrogations should not be prosecuted.
"We need both hands untied with our intelligence agencies to really stop terrorism."
Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican, repeatedly asked Clinton whether the administration would declassify documents that former Vice President Dick Cheney has said paint the CIA interrogators in a more heroic light and show the important information produced from the interrogations.
Clinton said she had no knowledge of such documents. "It won't surprise you that I don't consider him a particularly reliable source," she said, to some laughter.
The Obama administration has walked a fine line on the issue, last week releasing the documents detailing the torture and declaring that those techniques would not be used again. But Obama has said he would not prosecute CIA officials who followed techniques they believed were lawful, although he left the door open for the investigation of those who went beyond the legal guidance and the Bush lawyers who gave the guidance.
Republicans also repeatedly attacked Clinton for repealing Bush-administration-era rules that prohibited US support for family planning overseas to abortion providers.
Representative Chris Smith, a New Jersey Republican who is strong anti-abortion advocate, criticized Clinton for recently accepting an award in the name of Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, saying the group had "killed over 305,000 children by abortion in the US and millions more worldwide."
Clinton told Smith she respected his views, but gave a vigorous defense of the new family planning policy, to applause from the gallery. "We obviously have a profound disagreement," she told him.
Representative Jeff Fortenberry, a Nebraska Republican, asked Clinton if "forcing US taxpayers to fund abortion [overseas] is in keeping with the highest values of America," while Representative Bob Inglis, a South Carolina Republican, asked why Clinton had not been more outspoken during her visit to China about forced abortions.
Clinton said that she deeply opposes China's policy on forced abortion, and has been on record opposing that policy since her time as first lady.
"Why didn't you say it as Secretary of State?" Inglis asked.
"I just did," Clinton replied.
Clinton also promised not to deal with a power-sharing Palestinian government that did not recognize Israel's right to exist and did not renounce violence, although she said the administration wanted to "leave the door open" to Hamas participating in a unity government.
Clinton also said that, while the Obama administration wants to reach out to Iran to solve the impasse over its nuclear program, Tehran would face "crippling sanctions" if such talks do not succeed.
But Clinton reserved some of her most urgent statements for Pakistan, the troubled ally in the war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and the border region straddling the two countries.
"Pakistan poses a mortal threat to the security and safety of Americans and the world," Clinton said.
She urged Pakistani-Americans to "speak out more forcefully against a policy that is ceding more and more territory to the insurgents" who have advanced to territory that is "within hours" the Pakistani capital, Islamabad. She said the "existential threat" posed by the extremists to the state of Pakistan should not be underestimated, painting the picture of a nuclear-armed state that is in danger of collapsing.
Kerry says clock ticking on climate change deal
Senator John F. Kerry, opening a hearing on global warming on Earth Day, says this is a "make-or-break" year on the issue and calls on the United States to spearhead the effort.
Covening the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the Massachusetts Democrat notes that a key international conference on climate change is later this year in Copenhagen, Denmark.
"The clock is ticking on the best chance the countries of the world will have to marshal an effective global response," he said in his prepared opening remarks.
"All policymakers involved in this process need to realize that if we aim too low, America and the global community will fail to do what is necessary to meet this challenge. It’s that simple."
He added, "We here in Washington must realize that the world is taking its cues from us. In my meetings over the past several months with environment ministers from Germany to China to Bangladesh, I have been struck by the extent to which the eyes of the world are focused on the U.S. Congress and our domestic policy process. Without a clear signal from Congress on the scope, format and ambition of our domestic program, our negotiators will lack the leverage to secure the participation of all the major contributors to climate change. Ultimately, the strength of our domestic policy will be a critical factor in galvanizing the world to enter into a global agreement."
Kerry also asserts that the crucial debate will revolve on what steps the United States takes -- and what is required of China, which passed the US inb 2007 as the largest carbon emitter.
"While China is implementing policies to address its energy use – in some cases more ambitious than our own– their emissions trajectory continues to pose a grave risk to the global climate," he said. "We have to find a way to reconcile two imperatives: on one hand, China requires a treaty that gives it room to develop; on the other hand, unless we can convince the world’s most populous nation to pursue a sustainable, low-carbon development path, we cannot hope to solve climate change. These two constraints define the scope and structure of any viable agreement."
Kerry's full prepared statement is below:
Hill confirmed as envoy to Baghdad
The US Senate this afternoon confirmed Christopher Hill as the new US ambassador to Iraq, setting aside Republican objections about his lack of experience in the Middle East.
The vote was 73-23 for Hill, a veteran diplomat who hails from Rhode Island and who was an envoy to North Korea during the Bush administration.
“It took much longer than it should have, but I am pleased that Chris Hill has finally been confirmed as President Obama’s ambassador to Iraq," Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement. "He is one of the best diplomats we have in our country. Despite the significant security improvements, Iraq remains in a precarious state, and we need our Ambassador on the ground immediately. Ambassador Hill has personally assured me he will get to Baghdad as quickly as he can, and I look forward to working with him and supporting his efforts in any way I can.”
Some conservatives, notably Republican Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas, attacked Hill's record on North Korea, accusing him of ignoring human rights abuses and negotiating a flawed nuclear disarmament pact.
Obama stresses national service
The White House is giving the full roll-out treatment for President Obama's signing today of a bill, named for Senator Edward M. Kennedy, that expands national service.
The $5.7 billion bill would triple the number of slots for AmeriCorps from 75,000 now to 250,000, as well as create new groups to help the poor, veterans, and others.
This morning, Obama announced the nomination of Maria Eitel to be CEO of the Corporation for National and Community Service, which oversees AmeriCorps, plus programs for senior and student volunteers. Obama requested $1.1 billion for the corporation in his 2010 budget, up about 25 percent, and included $200 million for AmeriCorps in the stimulus package.
“Maria brings a unique blend of skills and management experience that will help her successfully lead the corporation during our administration’s bold expansion of national service programs," Obama said in a statement. "Maria is genuinely passionate about the role of national and community service as a vehicle for engaging and mobilizing citizens in social change, and will bring new, creative thinking to the growth and mission of the corporation.”
Eitel is a vice president of Nike Inc., and president of the Nike Foundation, the company's charitable arm where she has led work to increase opportunities for disadvantaged girls around the world.
She also worked at Microsoft Corp., the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and MCI Communications Corp. From 1989 to 1992, she served in the White House of President George H.W. Bush as deputy director of media relations and later as special assistant to the president for media affairs.
In a conference call with reporters, Obama's domestic policy adviser, Melody Barnes, said that the president wants to "empower Americans to work alongside the government to solve our education and health care, energy independence problems and challenges."
Alan Solomont, the corporation's chairman and a major Massachusetts fund-raiser for Democrats, said the bill "comes at a pivotal moment for this nation because of the economic crisis, in particular, which is causing a hardship for millions of Americans."
Also, he said, the bill "comes at a time when a new generation known as the millennial generation is coming of age and looking to participate in something larger than themselves by serving communities and their country. And we have an earlier generation of baby boomers who are wanting to give back."
This afternoon, Obama and Vice President Biden plan to meet in the Oval Office with Kennedy and former President Bill Clinton, who started AmeriCorps in his administration. Then, they'll all go to the SEED school in Washington, where Kennedy is to introduce Obama for remarks calling on Americans to step up their volunteerism and community service. Following the signing, Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama will go to a service event, reportedly a tree-planting involving AmeriCorps volunteers.
The White House released the full guest list for the bill signing. The audience of approximately 200 people will include members of Congress, volunteers, and representatives from the corporation. Among the other dignitaries: former First Lady Rosalyn Carter, Caroline Kennedy, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, retired General Colin Powell; House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
UPDATE: "This is a wonderful day for our country, and for all Americans who will now have the opportunity to give back to their communities and to this nation we love so much," Kennedy said.
Introducing Obama, he said, "Today, another young president has challenged another generation to give back to their country....You have inspired a new generation of Americans with your own example and your call to service. You have walked the walk --and today, you pave the way for others."
(Kennedy's full prepared remarks are below.)
With Kennedy seated just to the right of Obama's lectern, the president departed from his prepared remarks to pay tribute to the senator, saying, "There are very few people who have touched the life of this nation in the same breadth."
"This is just an extraordinary day for him," Obama said, saying he is honored to call Kennedy a friend and colleague.
Kennedy rose to accept a standing ovation led by Obama, himself.
The president called the bill the "boldest expansion" of national service since the founding of AmeriCorps nearly two decades ago.
Obama handed the first pen he used to sign the bill to Kennedy. (The president's full remarks are below.)
Battle over carbon emissions
Leading Democrats are touting an Environmental Protection Agency preliminary analysis of their sweeping climate change bill, saying that the study shows that the legislation would succeed in “moving the U.S. to a clean energy economy.”
The analysis also found that the bill's proposed cap on carbon emissions would accelerate the use of alternative energy by 150 percent over the next two decades, and that energy efficiency measures will significantly decrease energy demand. The draft bill calls for a reduction of greenhouse gases by 20 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, and 83 percent by mid-century.
The EPA analysis was requested by the bill's co-authors, Representatives Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Henry Waxman of California.
"This analysis confirms that the Waxman-Markey legislation will create a clean energy economy that will continue economic growth and cut harmful pollution," Markey said in a statement today. "When you combine this analysis with cost-saving measures from updated energy efficiency measures and weatherization, the savings will pile up for consumers."
But Republicans argue that the carbon cap would dramatically increase energy costs for consumers.
Members of the Energy and Commerce Committee said the panel's Democratic leaders are moving too quickly to try to push the legislation through and that the draft bill, which calls for broad limits on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions, was not ready for serious discussion because it doesn't say how emission permits would be distributed, the Associated Press reports.
"The manner in which you will address this issue is the cornerstone of the legislation," the 23 GOP committee members wrote in a letter to Waxman. "Without it, the bill is simply not finished and not ripe to be marked up or accurately discussed in the context of hearings."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, however, said she's determined to pass legislation addressing climate change this year.
Noting that Wednesday is Earth Day, she told reporters taht when the next Earth Day comes around "we want to celebrate what we've done this year" to address climate change and shift the nation toward greater use of clean energy.
Panel tackles global health
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- A high-level commission will develop a blueprint this year for how to get the most out of record levels of global health aid, enlisting lawmakers, pharmaceutical executives, and a wide array of specialists to recommend ways the US government can better coordinate what organizers say is now a fragmented approach to helping the world's most vulnerable people.
The bipartisan Commission on Smart Global Health Policy, whose members include Senators Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and Olympia Snowe of Maine, was given a mandate today to identify a more comprehensive strategy for spending the estimated $10 billion dedicated each year to assisting the world's most disease-plagued nations.
"How does the US capitalize on current investments? What should we be doing more of? What should we be doing differently?" Helene D. Gayle, president of the humanitarian organization CARE and a former assistant US surgeon general, said in outlining the objectives of the study she will help lead.
Perhaps a more important challenge, she added, is, "How do we better measure our impacts?"
The commission, which plans to issue its recommendations to the Obama administration early next year, has also enlisted an unlikely figure to spearhead the effort: retired Navy Admiral William J. Fallon, who was commander US military forces in the Middle East and Asia and is now a professor at MIT's Center for International Studies.
Fallon told reporters at a kickoff breakfast that he hopes to bring to the effort 40 years of experience witnessing first-hand the haphazard, short-term course the United States often takes in helping meet the basic needs of at-risk populations in what are often already unstable parts of the world.
Fallon, who oversaw the US military response to the Asian tsunami in 2004, said that in relative terms the amount the United States spends on global health each year is significant but could be far better utilized over the long term -- including for what he called "preventative maintenance" in Muslim countries where a deep distrust of American motives breeds extremism.
"If we could ever get our act together and come up with a comprehensive plan to pool resources...we can probably get some stuff done," Fallon said. "When you start slicing and dicing this thing to see where the money is actually going, it's a thousand places. And what's the effect?"
The commission is sponsored by the nonpartisan Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. Organizers say it is prepared to take on some controversial subjects, including whether there is too much focus on Africa and whether the major emphasis on treating HIV should be balanced with greater efforts to meet basic needs such as clean drinking water that could prevent diseases such as malaria that affect far larger numbers of people than HIV.
J. Stephen Morrison, who runs CSIS' Global Health Policy Center, and Jen Kates of the Kaiser Family Foundation, wrote in a paper released today that one "delicate task" of the commission will be to "decide on the correct balance between HIV and other areas."
"That will involve complex choices, potentially involving winners and losers or at least the perception of such," they wrote.
The commission's 26 members include several members of Congress; former top diplomats and intelligence officials such as John Negroponte; leaders of nonprofits such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; former Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala; the president of Barnard College; and executives from major corporations such as Exxon Mobil, Coca Cola, and drug giant Merck and Co.
"We have an unprecedented opportunity," Gale said, "to think about this issue in a way that I think has not been done before."
Shaheen told the Globe in a statement that the commission's work is critically important, not just for the foreign nations most in need.
“Creating a long-term, strategic policy to address global health care challenges will strengthen our national security, our economy, and our standing as a moral leader in the world," she said.
Sebelius moves closer to health post
President Obama's cabinet is nearly complete after the Senate Finance Committee voted this morning to send to the full Senate the nomination of Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius as health and human services secretary.
The vote was 15-8, a division caused in part by displeasure among some GOP senators about Sebelius' inaccurate response to the committee about how much campaign cash she received from George Tiller, a Wichita abortion doctor who is under investigation by Kansas' medical board over late-term procedures he performed.
According to the Associated Press, Sebelius told the committee that Tiller, who was acquitted of criminal charges involving the late-term abortions, had given her $12,450 between 1994 and 2001. But the AP found that Tiller and his abortion clinic donated an additional $23,000 between 2000 and 2002 to a political action committee Sebelius established to raise money for fellow Democrats. Sebelius apologized and called it an oversight.
Only two of 10 Republicans on the committee supported Sebelius. They were Pat Roberts from her home state of Kansas, and Olympia Snowe of Maine.
Obama's initial pick for the post, former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, withdrew after tax discrepancies arose that forced him to pay more than $100,000 in back taxes and penalties. Sebelius had her own tax problems, acknowledging mistakes in three years of tax returns and paying more than $7,000 in back taxes to fix improper deductions.
The president wanted Daschle to lead a healthcare overhaul by also leading a new White House office of healthcare reform, but after his nomination foundered, Obama split the two jobs. Still, Sebelius will play a key role in remaking the health system
Democrats: Republicans do-nothings and hypocrites on budget
Rejoining the battle over President Obama's $3.6 trillion budget, Democrats are stressing another line of attack -- that Republican foes, besides not offering a real alternative, are being hypocrites.
In a new web video, the Democratic National Committee says that while the two top House Republicans -- John Boehner of Ohio and Eric Cantor of Virginia -- are accusing Obama and the Democrats of so much deficit spending that it threatens to bankrupt the country, they both voted for President Bush's budgets that vastly increased the national debt.
“Over eight years, Republicans nearly doubled the national debt,” it says on screen. “John Boehner and Eric Cantor were with Bush every step of the way. Now, Washington Republicans want you to forget what they did.”
"From the Party of No to the Party of Hypocrites?" the video ends.
Responded Antonia Ferrier, a spokesperson for Boehner: "We missed the part of the video where they defend their massive, fiscally-irresponsible budget that will double the debt in five years and triple it in 10. When the President's Budget Director concedes they are raising the deficit to unsustainable levels, I guess they have to do everything they can to blame everyone else."
"As we close in on President Obama's first 100 days, I would ask Virginia's Governor Tim Kaine if his partisan attack ads and disinformation campaigns are a calculated rejection of the President's attempts to change Washington,” added Brad Dayspring, a spokesman for Cantor.
Before leaving on their Easter recess early this month, the House and Senate each passed different versions of the spending blueprint that largely preserved Obama's priorities on healthcare, education, and energy. The leaders of the Democratic-controlled chambers are expected today to name members of a conference committee that will iron out a compromise version.
Obama to sign service bill on Tuesday
President Obama on Tuesday will sign the landmark national service bill named for Senator Edward M. Kennedy, White House announced this afternoon.
The bill-signing event will take place at The SEED School of Washington, D.C., a public school with students who face challenges in school and at home. Kennedy is expected to attend, along with former President Bill Clinton.
"The president will give remarks on the bipartisan service legislation which will open up new opportunities for millions of Americans. He will call on people across the country to serve their communities and work together to tackle the nation's tough challenges," the White House said.
Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Senator Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, pushed through the bill, which would increase the ranks of AmeriCorps to 250,000 from 75,000 positions over eight years and also create five groups to help poor people, improve education, encourage energy efficiency, strengthen access to healthcare, and assist veterans.
When Congress approved the legislation, Obama earlier praised Kennedy's role, saying that "it is fitting that this legislation is named after Ted Kennedy, a person who has never stopped asking what he could do for his country. This legislation is not just a tribute to the service to which he has dedicated his life, it is a call to action for the rest of us."
Kennedy, Baucus stay on course on healthcare
As Congress returns today from a two-week recess, Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Max Baucus reaffirmed their intention to push through a healthcare overhaul this year.
Baucus, a Montana Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat who leads the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, have been leading the charge so far. In a letter to President Obama, they announced what they called an "aggressive" schedule for their committees to draft comprehensive healthcare legislation in early June.
"We must act swiftly, because the cost of inaction is too high for individuals, families, businesses, state and federal governments," the senators wrote. "Comprehensive health care reform legislation will responsibly contain costs, improve quality, enhance disease prevention, and provide coverage to all Americans. We are committed to working with you, and with our colleagues in Congress, to enact legislation to achieve these long-overdue reforms without delay."
Obama has convened a White House summit on healthcare, where Kennedy, who is battling brain cancer, made an emotional appearance. He has also set aside a "downpayment" on healthcare in his $3.6 trillion proposed budget.
The full text of the letter is below:
Gates set to announce 'fundamental' changes in Pentagon spending
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates will announce "a fundamental shift" in the military's weapons budget on Monday, unveiling a series of cuts to big-ticket programs that he deems ill-suited to meeting current national security threats, the Pentagon said today.
"These are not changes to the margins. This is a fundamental shift," Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters.
Indeed, some press reports suggest the pruning of the Pentagon's $180 billion-a-year weapons acquisition plan will be more extensive than anticipated and potentially impact dozens of programs, including warships, aircraft, and combat vehicles, as well as missile defense systems and a new fleet of presidential helicopters.
New England-based defense firms such as Raytheon and United Technologies have been expected to take a hit from cuts in several high-profile programs -- potentially forcing layoffs of thousands -- but the full package of terminations and delays could be even more extensive than expected.
For example, defense trade publications are reporting that several warships as well as submarine construction could be affected -- cutbacks or delays that would harm the business of General Dynamics' two major shipbuilding facilities in New England: Bath Iron Works in Maine and Electric Boat in Connecticut.
As news of the decisions began leaking out late this week, Wall Street analysts were warning investors to expect a "bold" plan that would likely prompt a sell-off of major defense stocks.
"We believe [Gates'] proposal regarding these 40-plus programs will likely include proposed cancellations and bold, substantial cuts," Morgan Stanley's research division told investors in a note late Thursday. "Programs almost certain to be covered," the analysts predicted, citing "sources and trade press" reports, include all three major fighter aircraft programs, the F-22, F-35, and F/A-18, as well as the Littoral Combat Ship, a small warship designed to operate close to shores and is under contract to Bath.
The plan will have to go before Congress, which is under heavy pressure from lobbyists and constituents concerned about job losses to reverse some of the decisions.
Morgan Stanley predicted that announcing the cuts ahead of President Obama's full federal budget in May could take some of the heat off the new president and make Gates, who served as George W. Bush' defense secretary, the plan's chief salesman.
Gates, a former CIA director and deputy national security adviser who has served eight presidents, is highly respected by both parties and considered a particularly convincing advocate for why the cuts are in the best interest of the country. He has insisted that some conventional weapons programs must be cancelled or delayed in order to afford the tools needed to address terrorism and guerilla insurgencies, which he believes will pose far greater danger to the United States in the foreseeable future than opposing armies, navies or air forces.
What next on jobs?
Democrats, having succeeded in pushing through President Obama's sweeping budget blueprint Thursday night, are seizing on the new job loss numbers to suggest that more needs to be done to turn the economy around.
But after setting the stage for bruising battles on healthcare and alternative energy by passing the $3.5 trillion outlines, and after already passing the $787 billion stimulus plan, there's no consensus on what to do next. And Congress is about to start a two-week recess, leaving a leadership vacuum in Washington unless the leadership calls the rank-and-file back into session.
The US economy lost another 663,000 jobs last month -- raising the total this year to 2 million -- and the unemployment rate jumped to 8.5 percent, the highest since late 1983, the Labor Department said.
“Month after month, America’s working families have been bearing a heavier and heavier brunt of this recession, and now, even more families need our help," Senator Edward M. Kennedy, chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, said in a statement. "Our first priority in Congress is to do what’s required to create jobs and lend a real helping hand to as many struggling citizens and their families as possible. We’re firm in our resolve to meet these challenges and restore prosperity for all Americans.”
UPDATE: In a joint news conference with German leader Angela Merkel, Obama noted the jobs numbers and asserted that the G-20 agreement will aid the recovery, though there is no guarantee that more steps won't be needed.
"None of us can isolate ourselves from the global market," Obama said. "If we don't have concerted action, we will have collective failure."
The budget resolutions passed on party-line votes in the Democratic-controlled chambers. When they return from recess, House and Senate negotiators will have to reconcile the different versions, which both incorporate much of Obama's agenda.
“The sobering news today that 663,000 more Americans received pink slips last month signals that the economy is in even worse shape than we thought," Tom McMahon, acting executive director of Americans United for Change, a pro-Obama liberal-labor coalition, said in a statement. "President Obama inherited the nation’s worst economic crisis in generations and the thousands of Americans continuing to lose their jobs each day underscores the urgent to need for Congress preserve his transformational budget plan - a blueprint for rebuilding and renewing America’s economy and creating jobs - as it moves toward final passage.”
“The unemployment line is grower longer and longer every day. There could not be a worse time for the same old partisan games in Washington when so many people are losing their healthcare, their livelihood and dignity. We don’t need politics as usual; we need bold solutions from our leaders.”
AFL-CIO President John Sweeney raised the possibility of a second stimulus package.
"We need to get our economy back on track, create good paying jobs, and restore balance to the fundamental building blocks of our economy," he said in a statement. "President Obama’s budget is an important first step that includes a serious down payment on national healthcare reform, investments in growing green jobs and addressing climate change, essential funding for education and other programs that are crucial for working families.
"But we also must make broad-based economic changes to have sustained economic growth and an economy that works for everyone," he added. "At the G20 meeting President Obama attempted to get world leaders to be more aggressive in addressing their economic problems to make the United States’ stimulus package more effective. It was a successful meeting in many ways but in order to counter what is a global recession world leaders will need to do more and the United States may well need to pass a second stimulus package."
House passes Obama budget
This evening, the US House approved its $3.6 trillion budget outline, largely in line with President Obama's ambitious blueprint on healthcare, alternative energy, education and more -- after defeating a Republican alternative that slashed spending and taxes.
The vote in the Democratic-controlled House was 233-196, along party lines.
Obama called the passage "another step toward rebuilding our struggling economy.
"This budget resolution embraces our most fundamental priorities: an energy plan that will end our dependence on foreign oil and spur a new clean energy economy; an education system that will ensure our children will be able to compete in the economy of the 21st century; and health care reform that finally confronts the back-breaking costs plaguing families, businesses and government alike. And by making hard choices and challenging the old ways of doing business, we will cut in half the budget deficit we inherited within four years. With this vote comes an obligation to pursue our efforts to go through the budget line-by-line, searching for additional savings. Like the families we serve, we must cut the things we don't need to invest in those we do,” he said in a statement.
Democratic National Committee chairman Tim Kaine congratulated House Democrats for passing a very close cousin to the president's budget -- "a plan to help turn our economy around by slashing the deficit in half, making health care more affordable, reducing our dependence on foreign oil and investing in education. This vote today is a victory not only for this generation of Americans, but generations to come."
"Unfortunately, the unanimous vote by the House Republicans against the budget does not represent the principle of loyal opposition upon which this country was founded, but opposition purely for political gain," Kaine said in a statement. "While Republicans continue to cling to the failed policies of the past that created the current economic crisis, President Obama and Democrats have taken bold steps to restore stability and prosperity for all Americans. Today's vote affirms that the Party of No is more interested in playing politics than working with the Democrats and the President to solve our nation's problems on a bipartisan basis."
Later tonight, the Senate is expected to pass its modified version of Obama's $3.6 trillion blueprint.
The two Maine moderates, Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, provided key votes to pass Obama's stimulus package in February. And today, they reprised their role in rejecting an alternative to Obama's budget proposed by his Republican presidential rival, John McCain.
The Senate voted 60-38 to kill McCain's plan, which would have capped domestic spending and eliminated the income tax increases on people earning more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000 by letting Bush tax cuts expire. One other Republican and every Democrat present voted against McCain's plan.
The McCain amendment was one of the last major hurdles to passage tonight.
Anti-abortion forces go after Sebelius
So far, abortion has not emerged as a huge issue in the confirmation of Kathleen Sebelius for health and human services secretary.
But as she goes today before the Senate Finance Committee, which will vote whether to forward her nomination to the full Senate, conservatives are trying to put abortion front and center, while also highlighting her tax trouble -- she acknowledged paying about $7,000 in back taxes after "unintentional" errors in three years of returns.
UPDATE: Senators decided to wait to vote on Sebelius's nomination until they return from a two-week recess that starts Saturday, so that lawmakers have more time to review her responses on tax and other issues.
"Gov. Sebelius may not pay her own taxes, but has no qualms about using tax dollars to pay for others’ abortions. Even before she reported her tax issues Gov. Sebelius was manifestly unqualified to run America's health care system, as illustrated by her coddling of the abortion industry at the expense of Kansas women's safety. With her background, Gov. Sebelius can only be expected to politicize the office of HHS. Gov. Sebelius's difficulties illuminate an emerging pattern: that Obama nominates non-experts who cannot be relied upon to solve their own tax problems, let alone govern effectively," said a statement issued today by a who's who of anti-abortion conservatives.
They include Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council; Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America; David Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union; Marjorie Dannenfelser, president, Susan B. Anthony List; Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform; Tom Minnery, vice president of government and public policy, Focus on the Family; and Don Wildmon, president, American Family Association.
"More acute than her tax problems, Gov. Sebelius is not to be trusted with any aspect of citizens' healthcare. As a member of the Kansas House of Representatives in the 1980s and 1990s Gov. Sebelius voted to weaken or eliminate even such modest measures as parental notification, waiting periods and informed consent. As governor, she twice has vetoed bills attempting to protect the health and safety of women by more tightly regulating abortion clinics. Gov. Sebelius has been endorsed by Planned Parenthood and they have conducted fundraising activity on her behalf. Clearly, Gov. Sebelius has a track record of politicizing common-sense health issues," they added.
Sebelius, a Catholic who personally opposes abortion, has not gone along with further limits as Kansas governor, though she did sign a bill on Friday requiring doctors to allow women to see ultrasound images of their fetuses before performing abortions.
In her prepared testimony, Sebelius said she wants to focus on prevention and primary care to help slow the rising costs of Medicare and Medicaid. On Tuesday, she told another Senate panel that she would make healthcare overhaul her mission.
Lieberman proposes Army reinforcements
Senator Joe Lieberman, the Connecticut independent, offered a budget amendment this afternoon to increase the Army's ranks even more than already planned.
Increasing the active-duty Army by 30,000 to 577,400 will reduce the strain on the military, which is fighting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, along with its other commitments around the world, said Lieberman, who was joined by cosponsors John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, Mark Begich, an Alaska Democrat, John Thune, a South Carolina Republican.
“We must act now to reduce the strain on the men and women who bravely serve our country,” Lieberman said in a statement. “Although the Army has completed the Grow the Force Initiative that Congress authorized three years ago, our soldiers still spend only one day at home for every day they spend in the theater. The number of our deployed troops is likely to rise through the middle of next year, and we need to support them by continuing to grow the force.”
“Growing the Army’s active duty force to 577,400 will allow the Army to take immediate steps to reduce the strain on the force and better plan for its future personnel requirements,” Lieberman added. “The number of young men and women who are willing to serve their country has never been higher. We should use this opportunity to build a larger, more capable Army.”
President Obama's budget proposal already includes increases of 65,000 in the Army and 27,000 in the Marines, to 547,400 and 202,000, respectively, by the end of 2010.
Both military branches are ahead of schedule: As of Feb. 3, 2009, the active ranks of the Army were at 542,600, and as of Jan. 31, there were 200,979 Marines.
House passes bill to regulate tobacco
The US House approved a bill today that would let the federal government regulate -- but not ban -- cigarettes and other tobacco products for the first time.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, who is expected to introduce his version of the legislation later this month, immediately applauded the House passage,
“I am extremely pleased that a strong bipartisan majority of the House of Representatives has passed legislation empowering the Food & Drug Administration to regulate tobacco products. FDA regulation of cigarettes – the most lethal of all consumer products – is long overdue. I am confident that the Senate will approve it expeditiously, and send it to President Obama for his signature,” Kennedy said in a statement.
The Massachusetts Democrat and Representative Henry Waxman of California have pushed the legislation since the US Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that the agency did not have that authority.
The vote was 298-112, the Associated Press reports, overcoming years of opposition from tobacco-state lawmakers and other critics. President Obama supports the bill, which Bush administration threatened to veto.
All 10 Massachusetts Democrats in the House voted for the bill.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also called for full approval by Congress.
"Every day, Americans benefit from the oversight the FDA provides on the foods we eat and the medicines we take. Despite the fact that tobacco is one of the deadliest products in America, the FDA has no authority to regulate it. That is just not right," she said in a statement.
"Incredibly, tobacco is exempt from standards that apply to a can of soda or a box of pasta. Tobacco makers are exempt from critical and basic consumer protections, such as ingredient disclosure, product testing, and restrictions on marketing their dangerous and addictive product to children. By granting the FDA the authority to regulate tobacco products, we will protect public health, prevent disease, and stop tobacco companies from hooking America's children on their deadly product. This legislation also requires detailed disclosure of tobacco product ingredients, and restricts tobacco marketing and sales to youth, among other things. And this legislation does all of this in a fiscally responsible way -- funding FDA tobacco activity through a user fee on tobacco manufacturers."
Senator Richard Burr, R-N.C., is expected to lead the opposition, but supporters are confident they can clear the 60-vote threshold needed to break a filibuster.
"This vote brings us closer to putting a deceitful and dangerous industry under the watchful eyes of government regulators," American Heart Association CEO Nancy Brown said in a statement.
Opponents from tobacco-growing states such as top-producing North Carolina argued that the FDA had proven through food safety failures that it's not up to the job. They also said that instead of unrealistically trying to get smokers to quit or prevent them from starting, lawmakers should ensure they have other options, like smokeless tobacco.
That was the aim of an alternate bill offered by Rep. Steve Buyer, R-Ind., who would leave the FDA out and create a different agency within the Health and Human Services Department. His proposal failed on a 284-142 vote.
"Effectively giving FDA stamp of approval on cigarettes will improperly lead people to believe that these products are safe, and they really aren't," Buyer said. "We want to move people from smoking down the continuum of risk to eventually quitting."
Major public health groups, including the American Lung Association and the American Medical Association, wrote to lawmakers asking them to oppose Buyer's bill, contending it would leave tobacco companies without meaningful regulation and able to make untested claims about the health effects of their products.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., also was unsuccessful in changing a provision that allows the FDA to tap its general fund for about six months to get the new program started. He argued that money would be diverted from the agency's already overstretched food inspection and disease research budgets. Waxman countered that the user fees from the tobacco industry would pay for the new FDA office and that any money borrowed from the general fund would be paid back without affecting other programs.
Buyer pointed out that Waxman's bill is supported by the nation's largest tobacco company, Marlboro maker Philip Morris USA. Officials at rival tobacco companies contend the Waxman bill could lock in Philip Morris' market share.
Material from the Associated Press was used in this report.
Warring over warming
The political war over global warming legislation is getting louder on Capitol Hill.
Just two days after leading House Democrats, including Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts, unveiled a climate change bill that will be the starting point for debate, the staff of Markey's committee issued a response today to what it called the "inevitable attacks from entrenched special interests and obstructionist Republicans."
"And just as they did in last year’s fight over energy policy--when they made countless false statements, like no oil was spilled during Hurricane Katrina--they are now spreading misinformation about clean energy legislation," said the staff of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming.
"The Republican campaign to kill clean energy legislation uses the names of respected organizations like the Congressional Budget Office and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and then distorts their trusted analyses. It takes the gloom and doom predictions from Big Oil and their hired consultants like Charles River Associates to prey on fears of hard-working Americans over the future of our economy."
(The full staff report is below.)
One particular issue is Republicans' assertion that a cap-and-trade system on greenhouse gases would mean a "light switch tax" on consumers because utilities would pass on the cost of buying emissions credits to households.
That is disputed by John Reilly, an energy, environmental and agricultural economist at MIT and one of the authors of the report cited by the House Republicans, according to Politifact, an independent fact-checking group.
"It's just wrong," Reilly said. "It's wrong in so many ways it's hard to begin."
He goes on to explain that while cap-and-trade might increase the price of carbon-based fuels, it would also lower consumer costs through increased energy conservation and more availability of alternative fuels.
FULL ENTRYKerry seeks to restore diplomacy money
In his new Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy, President Obama last week highlighted and incorporated the proposal by Senators John F. Kerry and Richard Lugar to send $1.5 billion a year in humanitarian aid to Pakistan, conditioned on more help from Islamabad taking on terrorists.
Today, the Massachusetts Democrat and Indiana Republican stood up for Obama, introducing an amendment to restore $4 billion cut from the president's international affairs budget, specifically money to beef up the US civilian presence abroad as the administration tries to ramp up diplomacy.
UPDATE: The Senate voted this afternoon to approve Kerry's amendment.
"Returning diplomacy and development to their rightful place cannot be achieved through words alone: It takes money to drive civilian foreign policy -- and if it keeps us safer, as I believe it will, then that is money well spent," Kerry said on the Senate floor, according to prepared remarks released by his office.
"Full funding of the President’s international affairs budget is a vital step toward greater civilian capacity, and I urge my colleagues to support it," added Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
His full prepared remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYBudget battle ramps up
The battle over President Obama's budget is intensifying today with his grassroots army descending on Washington and congressional Republicans holding an event of their own.
In an unusual move, House and Senate Republicans joined together to unveil an alternative to Obama's $3.6 trillion blueprint, which they say will drive the economy further into the ditch and possibly bankrupt the country.
This time, Representative Paul Ryan, the top Republican on the House Budget Committee, took the wraps off an alternative that includes details and numbers. Democrats and the White House mocked the GOP when last week it produced a 19-page outline that was rather vague and had few numbers.
UPDATE: The GOP alternative calls for freezing non-defense discretionary spending for five years, for more tax cuts, and for starting to make changes to entitlement programs such as Social Security.
The plan would rescind the $787 billion stimulus plan next year, except for unemployment spending, and also rescind the additional money in the $410 billion spending plan Congress passed. It also rejects a cap-and-trade policy to cut greenhouse gases and move the country toward alternative energy, instead calling for more domestic oil and gas drilling.
With Democrats in control of both the House and Senate, the Republicans' plan will likely go nowhere. Democrats are already dismissing it. White House economic adviser Austan Goolsbee said on MSNBC that it's appropriate that the plan was unveiled on April 1 because "this is the biggest April Fool's joke in history."
Senator Judd Gregg -- the New Hampshire Republican who was once Obama's nominee for commerce secretary but is now one of his most vocal critics -- said the GOP alternative is no joke, but a serious attempt to trim back the federal deficits.
He said on MSNBC that under the deficits projected under Obama's budget, the United States would not qualify for European Union membership.
Gregg also said that Republicans are offering a series of amendments in the Senate.
But the alternative is a political document, a way for Republicans to assault the economic policies of Obama and the Democrats.
"America is in the midst of a fiscal and an economic crisis. And, yes, the president did inherit this fiscal crisis. But the question is, is he fixing it or is he making it worse?" Ryan said at a news conference this morning.
"We believe that the president's budget, which comes to the floor of the House of Representatives today, makes our fiscal crisis much, much worse," Ryan said.
"Rather than getting spending under control, it sends spending out of control. Rather than keeping taxes low to create jobs, it chases ever higher spending with ever higher taxes and results in ever higher debt; not just a modest increase in our national debt, but an unprecedented, unsustainable increase in red ink," he said. "The president's budget is little more than a thinly veiled attempt by Washington to spend its way into prosperity, tax its way into tax relief, and borrow its way into debt reduction. This simply cannot work."
Democrats held a news conference in response, telling reporters that they remain united behind their tweaked version of Obama's budget, which they say will help rebuild the economy.
They also said the Republican alternative is not realistic.
"Going down the list, it gets to the point where even the Republicans, for the most part, will find it hard to live with something like this," said Representative John Spratt, chairman of the House Budget Committee. "I find it -- I find it very improbable that this can be put together in anything that would really have enough appeal to carry ever in the House or elsewhere on the Hill in either party, but that's what they will be leading with today."
Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine added his disdain.
“The House GOP budget would be just an April Fool’s day joke if it didn’t actually reflect the true priorities of House Republicans and what they would do if they had the votes in Congress to pass their own plan. Their budget relies on the failed economic policies that drove the U.S. economy into its deepest spiral in decades," he said in a statement.
“If House Republicans had their way and the budget they outlined today were adopted, President Obama’s economic recovery program, which is already saving and creating jobs throughout the country, would be gutted, Medicare as we know it would all but be all but eliminated, Social Security checks would be slashed and a proposed spending freeze on discretionary programs would cut essential services – from health care and support for veterans to education to job training - that Americans most depend on when the economy is in crisis."
Americans United for Change, one of the major labor-liberal groups backing Obama, lambasted the GOP budget.
“The Republican ‘alternative’ to the President’s budget aims to rewind and redo the same failed economic policies from the Bush-era that got us into this economic mess to begin with," the group's acting executive director, Tom McMahon, said in a statement. "House Republicans have come forward on April Fool’s Day with a budget that in all seriousness cuts new money from programs benefiting cops, teachers, and veterans so they can pay for more tax cuts for multi-millionaires and corporations that outsource American jobs. They could not have offered a more counterproductive, unstimulative “alternative” to the investments in healthcare, education, and clean energy the President is proposing – investments that will do far more to lay a solid foundation for growing the economy and creating jobs than tax breaks for millionaires ever have.”
Meanwhile, Organizing for America, the post-election Obama grassroots group, is dispatching dozens of volunteers today to the Democratic National Committee to deliver 642,000 pledges of support for the president's budget. The group is also urging supporters to call Congress.
And a new pro-Obama advocacy group has ads today in the Politico and Hill newspapers urging support for his budget, which sets ambitious goals on alternative energy, healthcare, and education.
"For the first time in years, we have an honest, fair and transparent blueprint to extend opportunity and security for families in all walks of life by expanding healthcare coverage, making college more affordable, developing clean sources of energy that reduce global warming and create good paying jobs to rebuild our middle class," says the ad placed by the Rebuild and Renew America Now coalition. "We believe these steps will set our nation on a responsible path -- making long-term investments in our nation's future while gradually reducing the deficit."
Kennedy backs Sebelius at hearing
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, citing his own battle with brain cancer, came out forcefully this morning for Kathleen Sebelius's nomination as health and human services secretary.
"Few debates in Congress touch our lives as profoundly and personally as health care. Over the past ten months, I’ve seen our health care system up close," he said at the confirmation hearing for Sebelius.
"I’ve benefitted from the best of medicine. But we have too many uninsured Americans. We have sickness care and not health care. We have too much paperwork and bureaucracy. Costs are out of control. But today we have an opportunity like never before to reform healthcare."
His full prepared statement is below.
In her prepared testimony, Sebelius vowed to make healthcare reform her "mission.
"Inaction is not an option. The status quo is unacceptable, and unsustainable," the Kansas governor said in her testimony.
UPDATE: Sebelius was Obama's second choice for the job, after former Senator Tom Daschle was derailed by tax issues.
Now, the Associated Press reports that Sebelius has corrected three years worth of tax returns after finding "unintentional errors" involving charitable contributions, the sale of a home, and business expenses.
Sebelius alerted senators in a letter dated Tuesday that was obtained by The AP. She says she and her husband paid a total of $7,040 in back taxes and $878 in interest for 2005 to 2007.
FULL ENTRYArt imitating life, Washington style
Some TV occupants of the White House are getting in the middle of the high-stakes fight over a bill that would make it easier for unions to organize.
Today, actors from "The West Wing" will join workers and members of Congress to unveil a new ad and grassroots campaign called “Faces of the Employee Free Choice Act."
Then, the actors -- Martin Sheen, Bradley Whitford, and Richard Schiff -- will join in lobbying on Capitol Hill for the legislation, according to the labor coalitions pushing it.
UPDATE: "It's a human rights issue," Sheen, who played president Josiah Bartlet, said, according to the Associated Press. "It's just bottom line fair that workers should be paid for their labor fairly."
Whitford, a union member and board member of the pro-labor group American Rights at Work, said he was behind the event. "I call this process celebrity lubrication," Whitford joked to reporters.
The pro-business Workforce Fairness Institute responded with this missive: “Today’s event on Capitol Hill with actors who played fictional political powerbrokers addressing a fictional problem is like a work of fiction that would be better suited for a comedy if their proposed ‘solution’ wasn’t so devastating to our nation’s economy,” said Katie Packer, executive director of the Workforce Fairness Institute. “Job creators don’t need policy prescriptions from out-of-touch, Hollywood elite who want to drive up costs and encourage a hostile takeover of American small businesses.”
Congress passes service bill
The US House this afternoon gave final congressional approval -- and sent to President Obama for his signature -- a bill that would dramatically expand public service opportunities.
The legislation is named for Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, who cowrote the initial version of it with sometime political ally Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah.
Kennedy returned to Washington last week, in part to vote for the bill, and received a standing ovation from his colleagues at the conclusion of the vote.
“Today’s House vote again demonstrates the high priority Congress gives to encouraging citizens of all ages in all communities across America to participate in public service," Kennedy said in a statement. "This legislation will enable many more Americans to do something for their country to meet the many challenges facing us. I look forward to the President signing this bill into law so that a welcome new era of national and community service can begin.”
UPDATE: President Obama issued a statement applauding the bill's passage.
“I congratulate the House on passing the bipartisan Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act. This is legislation that will usher in a new era of service in America, and I look forward to signing it into law when I return to Washington.”
“Because of this legislation, millions of Americans at all stages of their lives will have new opportunities to serve their country. From improving service learning in schools to creating an army of 250,000 Corps members a year dedicated to addressing our nation's toughest problems. From connecting working Americans to a variety of part-time service opportunities to better utilizing the skills and experience of our retirees and baby boomers. This legislation will help tap the genius of our faith based and community organizations, and it will find the most innovative ideas for addressing our common challenges and helping those ideas grow. But while our government can provide every opportunity imaginable for us to serve our communities, now it is up to each of us to seize those opportunities. I call on all Americans to stand up and do what they can to serve their communities, shape our history and enrich both their own lives and the lives of others across this country.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also applauded the bill's passage.
"Just one month ago, in his address to Congress, President Obama called upon Congress to pass legislation 'to encourage a renewed spirit of national service for this and future generations.' Today, The Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act is on its way to his desk to become law," she said in a statement.
"In times of great challenge, Americans always rise to the occasion. In these times, our economy, our healthcare system, and our schools need the help of the generous Americans who are willing to serve. And in so doing, our volunteers will save lives, heal disease, and create brighter futures for our children. By creating 175,000 new service opportunities - more than tripling the number of volunteers nationwide, and rewarding those who volunteer with real investments in their education, we are launching a new era of service. This new era of service will create a stronger nation for all Americans."
At a cost of $5.7 billion over five years, the bill would triple the size of AmeriCorps, started in 1993 under President Clinton, from 75,000 to 250,000 slots over eight years. It would also expand incentives for students and seniors to volunteer and create five groups to create service options in helping poor people, improving education, encouraging energy efficiency, widening access to healthcare, and assisting veterans.
The House vote was 275-149, with all 10 Massachusetts Democrats supporting the measure .
The measure won bipartisan support, though some Republicans criticized it as unnecessary government involvement in volunteerism.
After the Senate passage last week, Obama said in a statement that "our work is not finished when I sign this bill into law -- it has just begun."
"It is up to each of us to seize those opportunities," added the president, who says his time as a community organizer in Chicago in his early 20s helped give his life direction. "To do our part to lift up our fellow Americans. To realize our own true potential. I call on all Americans to stand up and do what they can to serve their communities, shape our history and enrich both their own lives and the lives of others across this country."
Panel endorses Afghanistan, Iraq envoys
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee today sent to the full Senate the nominations of some key members of President Obama's team.
By voice vote, the committee endorsed Karl Eikenberry to be ambassador to Afghanistan, Christopher Hill to be ambassador to Iraq, Esther Brimmer to be Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs, Philip Gordon to be Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, Rose Gottemoeller to be Assistant Secretary of State for Verification and Compliance, Richard Verma to be Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs, and Melanne Verveer to be ambassador at large for global women’s issues.
Democrats unveil global warming bill
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- House Democrats today are unveiling their climate change legislation, a bill that would seek to cut carbon emissions by 20 percent by 2020 and by 85 percent by 2050.
The bill would also establish a cap-and-trade system to push utilities and industry polluters to meet those goals, according to a document obtained by the Globe.
The bill, which is being introduced by Representatives Henry Waxman of California, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Ed Markey of Massachusetts, chairman of the Energy and Environment subcommittee, would also create a renewable energy standard that requires wind, solar, and other renewable sources to meet 25 percent of US energy needs by 2025. And it would create an energy efficiency resource standard that requires utilities to achieve a savings of 15 percent of electricity and 10 percent of natural gas by 2020.
The legislation, which is on track for a committee vote in May, leaves open one of the most controversial aspects of the cap-and-trade system, which is how many pollution credits will be auctioned off and how many will be doled out for free. That would be settled in the coming weeks, as lawmakers weigh in on what they would be willing to accept.
Environmentalists are urging Congress to adopt a global warming policy in advance of international climate talks in Copenhagen scheduled for December, where leaders have agreed to update the Kyoto Protocol, which the Bush administration refused to sign.
In his first week in office, President Obama overturned Bush policy on climate change, ordering environmental regulators to reconsider allowing California, Massachusetts, and other states to set stricter auto emissions standards.
“This legislation will create millions of clean energy jobs, put America on the path to energy independence, and cut global warming pollution.” Waxman said in a statement. “Our goal is to strengthen our economy by making America the world leader in new clean energy and energy efficiency technologies.”
Markey added in a statement, “This legislation will create clean energy jobs that can’t be shipped overseas, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and make America the global leader in energy technology. We will create jobs by the millions, save money by the billions, and unleash energy investment by the trillions. Chairman Waxman and I will work with our colleagues to ensure that we are protecting American consumers and that our clean energy future helps all parts of the country.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi offered measured support, calling the Waxman-Markey bill "a strong starting point."
"The President has called for landmark legislation to launch a clean energy economy that will build prosperity and balance the needs of the American people and industry," she said in a statement. "As was the case with the Energy Independence and Security Act in 2007, House leaders will work closely with the committees of jurisdiction to advance this critical legislation.
"The final legislation will: create millions of new, green jobs; increase our national security by reducing our dependence on foreign oil; increase American competitiveness by making us a technology leader; meet the climate crisis with sound science; and reduce overall energy costs for consumers and businesses. We will continue to hear the best ideas about how to tackle the challenge from a broad range of stakeholders, with the intention of having legislation on the House floor this year. The scope of this effort is historic and overdue."
The US Climate Action Partnership -- a coalition of businesses and environmental groups -- also called the bill a good starting point.
"The discussion draft provides a solid foundation to create a climate strategy that both protects our economy and achieves the nation's environmental goals. It recognizes that many of these issues are tightly linked and must be dealt with simultaneously. We appreciate the thoughtful approach reflected in the draft and the priority the Chairmen are placing on this important issue," the partnership said in a statement.
"The draft addresses most of the core issues identified by USCAP in our Blueprint for Legislative Action and reflects many of our policy recommendations. Any climate program must promote private sector investment in vital low-carbon technologies that will create new jobs and provide a foundation for economic recovery. Legislation must also protect consumers, vulnerable communities and businesses while ensuring economic sustainability and environmental effectiveness."
The partnership includes some big corporate names, including Boston Scientific, that favor action on global warming.
Scott Paul, executive director of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, had some praise for the bill.
"We are pleased that the Waxman-Markey draft bill recognizes the need to stop carbon leakage and ensure the competitiveness of our domestic industries," he said in a statement. "The right combination of rebates and border adjustments can help fulfill the mission of the bill: lowering carbon output while strengthening the domestic economy. As the legislative process moves forward, we are eager to work with Congress to make sure the rebate and border adjustment features are strong enough to hold other countries accountable for their contributions to greenhouse gas emissions. Greenhouse gases are a global problem and a global solution is an imperative. The last thing Congress should want to do is offshore jobs and production to foreign manufacturers that have significantly larger carbon footprints, undermining the aim of climate change policy."
The summary of the bill and schdule is below. For more detail, click here.
FULL ENTRYObama shores up Democratic backing on budget
Before he leaves for Europe, President Obama urged congressional Democrats late today to have his back on his ambitious budget.
According to the White House account, he praised Democrats for passing the $787 billion stimulus package, then reinforced the high stakes of the votes this week on his $3.6 trillion budget.
"Calling his budget 'a distillation of core Democratic values,' he urged members of Congress to pass his blueprint for sustained economic growth," the White House said. After answering questions for about 30 minutes about his budget priorities, Obama again asked for support on his budget.
While Republicans have railed against Obama's plan, saying it risks bankrupting the country, some Democrats have also raised doubts about some of the spending and the deficits.
Kerry in solidarity with Mexico in drug fight
Opening a field hearing on Mexican drug violence, Senator John F. Kerry called this morning for reinstituting a ban on the importation of assault-style weapons and criticized calls for sending the National Guard to the southwest border as " premature and possibly counterproductive."
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee, led by Kerry, is holding a hearing today in El Paso, Tex.
The assault weapon ban, passed under President Clinton in 1994, was taken off the books under President Bush in 2004. Law enforcement officials say that the vast majority of the high-powered guns used by Mexican drug cartels come from north of the border.
"Stopping the guns also requires a strong US-Mexico partnership," Kerry said in his prepared opening statement. "Just a few miles from here is the Bridge of the Americas, one of the busiest border crossings in the country. Drivers coming north from Mexico are stopped by US agents and subjected to a thorough examination for drugs and other contraband.
This doesn’t happen to southbound traffic. We do not have the barriers and booths in place to stop vehicles headed into Mexico. Four lanes of traffic from US Highway 54 speed over the border. An agent who gets intelligence about a car carrying contraband would risk life and limb stepping into traffic to stop the suspect vehicle."
Kerry also voiced support for the plan that the Obama administration announced last week to send more resources to the border, and voiced support for the Mexican government.
To those who say that Mexico is in imminent danger of becoming a "failed state," Kerry retorted, "We have to be very careful about that kind of rhetoric – not just because it is simply untrue, but because it makes cooperation more difficult. Mexico is a functioning democracy, with a vibrant and open economy and stable institutions and civil society. I commend President Felipe Calderon for his courage and determination in challenging the cartels. He and the Mexican people must know that we stand beside them in this fight, not that we’ve written him off."
"Make no mistake: right now, Mexico’s institutions are under enormous stress from the rising level of violence," Kerry added. "....Drug trafficking and the ruthless violence it spawns know no borders. So far, the United States has largely been spared. But it is in our national interest, and it is our solemn obligation, to take steps today to help curtail the killing in Mexico."
Kerry's full statement is below:
FULL ENTRYCommunity health centers get money
Senators Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry todayunveiled a fuller list of 36 community health centers in Massachusetts that will receive a total of $8.6 million in economic stimulus money.
"At a time when families across the Commonwealth are losing their jobs and struggling with health care costs, this funding for our community health centers is desperately needed and will greatly benefit the vital work they do so well,” Kennedy said in a statement. “The first community health center was created here in Massachusetts, and I’ve long been an advocate for the outstanding services they provide in our neighborhoods. I commend President Obama for his commitment to ensuring health centers are a centerpiece of our nation’s health care system so they can continue to serve those who would not otherwise have access to such quality care.”
“This investment is a lifeline for people struggling to pay their bills and those desperate for a job,” added Kerry. “It will create jobs modernizing and renovating the health centers that our seniors, pregnant women and families depend on and will relieve some of the strain on an already overburdened public health system.”
James W. Hunt Jr., president of the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, said in a statement, “This is an extraordinary step led by our Members of Congress and Senators to work with the Administration to reinforce the role community health centers play in providing access to health care and creating and maintaining jobs. A special thanks to Senator Kennedy for his consistent leadership in making health centers a key element in protecting our most vulnerable residents of the Commonwealth and nation. As the nation struggles, we’re seeing an increased demand for services, and community health centers will continue to be a key priority. We’re ready to serve.”
The list of grants is below:
FULL ENTRYDemocrats mock GOP on budget
Democrats have been giddily calling Republicans the "party of no," accusing the GOP of opposing President Obama's budget and economic plans without offering proposals of their own.
Now, they're chortling over the alternative budget outline that House Republicans unveiled on Thursday. The GOP is warning that Obama's $3.6 trillion plan will bankrupt the country and worsen the recession with tax hikes.
But Democrats are mocking the plan for its lack of detail.
"This DNC ad is brought to you by the number 0," a new web ad by the Democratic National Committee t says on screen.
"That’s how many numbers are in the GOP’s budget: 0," painting the number in bright red.
With whimsical music, the video then shows a series of cable talking heads remarking on the absence of detail. But Republicans will see more evidence of media bias.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs joined in the mocking on Thursday. Asked whether he had perused it, he replied, "I did. It took me several minutes to read it." The White House press corps laughed.
"I will note that ... there's one more picture of a windmill than there is of a chart of numbers. There's -- just for your knowledge, there's exactly one picture of a windmill."
Dissent in Congress to Obama's Afghan plan
While most members of Congress agree with President Obama that US military might and diplomacy needs to refocus on Afghanistan, there are some dissenters.
A group of 14 House members, including Representative Jim McGovern of Massachusetts, wrote to Obama late last month to object to his plan to send 17,000 more combat troops to the war-torn country.
They asserted that a continuing counterinsurgency war conflicts with the congressional resolution authorizing military action to prevent terrorist acts against the United States, and argued that the operation could harm US security.
"Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000 Russian soldiers -- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send 17,000 additional troops and to resist pressure to escalate even further," wrote the group, which also includes Ron Paul of Texas, who sought the Republican presidential nomination last year.
Read the letter here.
Sebelius hearing set
The Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee announced this afternoon that it will hold the confirmation hearing on Tuesday for Kathleen Sebelius as secretary of health and human services.
Sebelius, the Democratic governor of Kansas, was President Obama's second pick for the post after tax troubles derailed former Senator Tom Daschle.
Obama also wanted Daschle to double as the health reform czar, but after his withdrawal separated the two jobs. Sebelius, however, will stay play a key role in the president's effort to pass a healthcare overhaul this year.
Kennedy, Hutchison call for new war on cancer
Calling for a renewed war on cancer, Senators Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts and Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas introduced legislation today designed to improve research and treatment.
In a joint article, the two senators point out that since the United States declared the original war on cancer in 1971, the mortality rate has decreased by only 6 percent, far less than for heart disease and stroke.
"The solution isn’t easy, but there are steps we should take now if we hope to see the diagnosis rate decline substantially and the survival rate increase," they write.
That includes earlier screening and diagnosis when cancer is more curable, a more coordinated approach to research, raising awareness of clinical trials, and more comprehensive care during remission, they say.
Kennedy, who is battling brain cancer himself, has championed healthcare during his long Senate career and authored the 1971 bill to fight cancer.
A summary of the bill is below.
Dr. Edward J. Benz, Jr., president of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston and president of the Association of American Cancer Institutes, issued a statement praising the bill:
"We are extremely grateful for the leadership of Senators Kennedy and Hutchison in bringing this important legislation forward. Despite the great progress that has been made against cancer in the past quarter century, the burden of the disease on patients and their families around the world remains unacceptably high.
"This legislation holds significant promise. It stands to improve access to latest advances in cancer care. It places much needed focus on national initiatives in cancer prevention. It outlines a strong set of priorities to improve patient participation in clinical trials. It acknowledges that more people are surviving cancer and addresses the need for greater cancer survivorship care and services. It calls for reducing disparities in cancer mortality. It provides the resources for workforce development to help ensure that we have the highly skilled caregivers needed to expertly and compassionately care for patients. It also recognizes that current research has immense potential to lessen that burden for future generations and provides a powerful impetus for continued progress. We will be working closely with Senators Kennedy and Hutchison and their staffs to refine the bill and work for its passage."
Following is the full article from the senators:
Renewing the War on Cancer
By Edward M. Kennedy and Kay Bailey Hutchison
Cancer is a relentless disease. It doesn’t discriminate between men and women, wealthy or poor, the elderly or the young. In 2008, over 1.4 million Americans were diagnosed with some form of the disease. If it wasn’t you, it may have been a spouse or sibling, a parent or a child, a friend or a coworker. We, too, have known the challenges of cancer diagnoses for ourselves or our family members or friends. And while there are many stories of survival, this disease still takes far too many lives. More than half a million Americans lost their battle with cancer last year.
Since the War on Cancer was declared in 1971, we have amassed a wealth of knowledge about the disease. Advances in basic and clinical research have improved treatments significantly. Some of the most important progress has been made in prevention and early detection, particularly screening, including mammography and colonoscopy. Behavior modifications, such as smoking cessation, better eating habits, regular exercise, and sunscreen have been found to prevent many cancers. Continued focus must be placed on prevention, which will always be the best cure.
Though heightened awareness and prevention should be emphasized, alone they don’t translate into adequate progress for those with cancer. Since 1971, the cancer mortality rate has decreased by only 6 percent. In the same period, by contrast, mortality rates have dramatically declined for heart disease (by 56 percent) and stroke (by 66 percent). Today, cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, exceeded only by heart disease. If the current trend continues, the National Cancer Institute predicts that one in every two men and one in every three women will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetimes, and that cancer will become the leading killer of Americans.
The solution isn’t easy, but there are steps we should take now if we hope to see the diagnosis rate decline substantially and the survival rate increase. To do so, we must identify and remove the numerous barriers that obstruct our progress in cancer research and treatment.
First, it is essential that cancer be diagnosed at an initial, curable stage. One of the most promising breakthroughs is the monitoring of biomarkers, which leave evidence within the body that alerts clinicians to hidden activity indicating that cancer may be developing. Identification of such biomarkers can lead to the earliest possible detection of cancer in patients.
Second, even if we significantly improve early detection, lack of health insurance and other impediments to care will preclude many Americans from undergoing routine screening. With early screening, the disease may be detected at a treatable stage and dramatically increase the rate of survival. Greater outreach is clearly needed to make screening more available to all, and especially to underserved populations.
Third, we must adopt a more coordinated approach to cancer research. Establishing an interconnected network of biorepositories with broadly accessible sources of tissue collection and storage will enable investigators to share information and samples much more effectively. Integrated research will help accelerate the progress of lifesaving research. The search for cures should also be a cooperative goal. The current culture of isolated career research must yield to more cooperative arrangements to expedite breakthroughs. Our national policy should encourage all stakeholders in the War on Cancer to become allies and work in concert toward cures.
Fourth, as our nation’s best and brightest researchers seek new ways to eradicate cancer, we must improve treatment for those who have it today. Raising awareness of clinical trials would result in more patients and their doctors knowing what promising trials are available. Doing so will expand treatment options for patients, and enable researchers to develop better methods for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Today, less than five percent of the 10 million adults with cancer in the United States participate in clinical trials. Disincentives by the health insurance market, preventing patients from enrolling in clinical trials, must be eliminated.
Finally, as our knowledge of cancer advances and patients live longer, we need a process that will improve patient survivorship through comprehensive care planning services. There is great value in equipping patients with a treatment plan and summary of their care when they first enter remission, in order to achieve continuity of therapy and preventing costly, duplicative, or unnecessary services.
We have introduced bipartisan legislation to bring about these necessary changes, and we hope to see the bill enacted in the coming weeks and months. These policy initiatives cannot be fully implemented without broad support and sufficient resources, and we are committed to leading this effort to completion.
It’s time to reinvigorate the War on Cancer, and more effective coordination of policy and science is indispensable for rapid progress.
FULL ENTRYAfghanistan ambassador hearing set
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee announced this afternoon that it will hold the confirmation hearing Thursday for President Obama's pick to be ambassador to Afghanistan.
If confirmed, Lieutenant General Karl Eikenberry would play a key role in carrying through on the new path forward that Obama is expected to outline this week, which includes 17,000 more US troops but also more regional diplomacy.
“At this crucial moment, after too many years of policy drift, we simply must get our Afghanistan strategy right. With the Taliban resurgent and U.S. troops increasingly at risk, we cannot afford a continuation of the status quo,” the panel's chairman, Senator John F. Kerry, said in a statement. “At such a time, Karl Eikenberry brings exceptionally valuable skills to the table. After two much-lauded tours of duty there, he knows the military side of the equation as well as anyone can. In his new civilian capacity, he is uniquely placed to get the civil-military balance right. I’m looking forward to hearing his testimony.”
The committee also announced that new Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire will preside Thursday for the confirmation hearings for Rose Gottemoeller as Assistant Secretary of State for Verification and Compliance and Philip Gordon as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.
Shaheen is chairwoman of the subcommittee on European Affairs, which has jurisdiction over NATO, the European Union, Russia, Turkey, Kosovo, NATO efforts in Afghanistan, and energy security issues.
Kerry warns of global instability
Senator John F. Kerry is weighing in today on the global economic crisis, with a focus on the security threats that it could pose.
Opening a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Kerry quoted national Intelligence Director Dennis Blair's recent warning to Congress that the financial crisis and its geopolitical implications present the “primary near-term security concern of the United States" and that the longer the crisis lasts, the greater the likelihood for damage to US security interests.
"That is an amazing statement given the ongoing risks we face from terrorism, two wars, and rogue nuclear programs in Iran and elsewhere," Kerry said, according to prepared remarks.
"We will have to confront the potential for increased political instability; large-scale failures of other countries’ financial systems; escalating financial protection or trade wars that could help to deepen the crisis; increased poverty and hunger in the developing world; and competitors exploiting financial instability in ways that diminish our influence," Kerry added. "And these problems are not confined to traditionally unstable corners of the globe: Europe too is in deep financial trouble, and Turkey, Indonesia, and Pakistan, three of our most important partners in the Muslim world, today face acute balance of payments crises.
"We must also confront the fact that there is a great deal of anger out there among people who blame the model we exported. Even as we restore confidence in our markets, we will also need to find a strategy to project leadership, share burdens, and spread stability as this crisis continues to reverberate worldwide."
Kerry's full opening statement is below:
FULL ENTRYTexas two-step for Kerry panel
Jumping on a hot issue these days, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is hitting the road next week for a hearing on US-Mexico border violence.
Senator John F. Kerry, the committee's chairman, announced today that the forum will be Monday morning at the University of Texas at El Paso.
“The drug-related violence at the border has sent shock waves through both countries, and we need to increase cooperation between the United States and Mexico to combat it before it reaches a tipping point,” Kerry said in a statement. “President Calderon has bravely taken on these lawless cartels at great cost to his government and the Mexican people. We have a responsibility on our side of the border to work more closely with our Mexican counterparts to stem the flow of weapons from the United States and deal with a drug problem festering for decades.”
The Obama administration on Tuesday outlined a plan to send dozens more agents and other law enforcement resources to the southwest border to take on the Mexican drug cartels and to make sure violence doesn't spill into the United States.
Congressman Silvestre Reyes of El Paso, chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and a former Border Patrol officer, will also take part in the hearing.
“I commend Senator Kerry for convening this critical hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in El Paso,” Reyes said in a statement. “While I am pleased that Congress has held hearings on Mexico’s drug-related violence in Washington, D.C., it is imperative that our top congressional leaders get a first-hand account of the situation on the ground.”
Major ad push behind Obama's budget
A major liberal-labor advocacy group announced today it is launching its biggest TV ad blitz yet, trying to shore up support for President Obama's budget as it comes under assault from members of both parties.
While Obama gave a steadfast defense last night in his press conference, arguing his $3.6 trillion plan is the best prescription to real prosperity, congressional budget writers are busily paring it back, largely to cut projected deficits.
Obama, himself, is going to meet this afternoon with Senate Democrats on Capitol Hill to build support for the budget. In advance, the president also is having his budget director, Peter Orszag, to hold a conference call with reporters to talk about the congressional proposals.
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, a fellow Democrat, wants to let Obama's core tax credit of $400 for most workers and $800 for couples expire at the end of next year. Those tax breaks, part of the $787 billion stimulus package, are to show up in paychecks the week of April 1.
UPDATE: Despite the changes, Orszag told reporters that the working versions of the budgets mirror the president's priorities.
"We are very pleased that the House and Senate budget committees are taking up resolutions that are fully in line with the president's key priorities for the budget,'' he said.
"They are 98 percent the same as the budget proposal the president sent up in February. The resolutions may not be identical twins to what the president submitted, but they are certainly brothers that look alike."
(Orszag's full remarks are below.)
The ad by Americans United for Change puts the blame on former President Bush, and promotes Obama's blueprint to fix the economy.
"For eight years, the Bush Administration turned our economy into a house of cards," the announcer says. "Last fall that house came tumbling down.
"Now President Obama has drawn up a budget blue print that will rebuild our economy on a solid foundation. Jobs, health care, education, clean energy – reform. On this foundation we can build real, long term economic prosperity – for all Americans," the announcer continues. "Call Congress. Tell them you support President Obama’s budget. Let’s all get to work rebuilding America."
The group says it will spend more than $700,000 starting today to air the spot on national cable, in Washington, and in markets home to key members of Congress, including Maine and Manchester, N.H.
“The work that begins this week on President Obama’s budget is by far the most significant in shaping the President’s transformational commitments to healthcare reform, education and clean energy – investments that will rebuild and renew America’s economy and lay a solid foundation for long-term prosperity," Tom McMahon, the group's acting executive director, said in a statement. "This ad is designed to engage the American people in the process of bringing about the transformational change they voted for in November by contacting their elected representatives and asking for their help in putting our country on the road to prosperity. It is our hope that Congress gets the boost it needs to stand up to the special interests that will do anything to maintain the failed policies of the last eight years that were entirely stacked in their favor and that turned our economy into a house of cards.”
Kerry touts Obama's nominee for Iraq envoy
Senator John F. Kerry is giving a full-throated defense of Christopher Hill's credentials as the Foreign Relations Committee opens a hearing this morning on Hill's controversial nomination as ambassador to Iraq.
While some Republicans have questioned Hill's lack of experience in the region, Kerry, the panel's chairman, highlighted Hill's resume of tackling tough problems.
"Often, the reward for diplomats who succeed in difficult postings with long odds is tougher assignments with longer odds. Ambassador Hill has made a career, now entering its fourth decade, of tackling seemingly intractable diplomatic challenges," Kerry said in his opening statement, according to prepared remarks released by the committee. "And make no mistake: Iraq today still presents extraordinary challenges."
Kerry also implored his Republican colleagues not to delay a vote on the nomination. "Of course, senators have every right to vote against Ambassador Hill. But I believe that using Senate procedures to delay his arrival to Baghdad at a critical time in this war would do a serious disservice to our efforts there," he said.
Kerry's full opening statement is below:
FULL ENTRYLocke in at Commerce
The third time was the charm for President Obama and his choice for commerce secretary.
The Senate today confirmed former Washington state Governor Gary Locke for the post after Obama's first two selections withdrew before they even came up for a vote -- Democratic New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson because of a state investigation and Republican New Hampshire Senator Judd Gregg because of policy differences.
Locke, who was approved by voice vote, "will ensure American workers can prosper, our businesses can thrive and the economy can grow," said Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, the Associated Press reports.
Senators announce housing money
Public housing programs across Massachusetts will get nearly $82 million from the federal economic stimulus package, Senators John F. Kerry and Edward Kennedy announced this afternoon.
Local housing agencies can use the money improve public housing units, create jobs, and increase energy efficiency by replacing plumbing and electrical systems.
"The housing crisis has walloped Massachusetts, and mayors everywhere are looking for relief," Kerry said in a statement. "This investment will create jobs today, build affordable housing so struggling families can get back on their feet, and put plumbers and electricians to work improving energy efficiency and updating plumbing and electrical systems."
“Countless families across our Commonwealth have been devastated by the housing crisis and have no place to turn,” added Kennedy. “It’s essential to provide this necessary assistance so that housing authorities across Massachusetts can keep up with the increased need, and reduce costs for families who would otherwise have no place to call home.”
A key vote for business
Big business won a key ally today in its high-stakes fight against the "check-card" bill that would make it easier for unions to organize workplaces.
Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who was the only Republican to support the bill two years ago, told business groups that he will oppose the measure.
Unions were counting on him as the 60th vote to overcome an expected GOP filibuster. Democrats and two independents who usually vote with them control 58 seats.
“We applaud the Senator for taking a principled stand to support Main Street employers and workers in Pennsylvania," Thomas J. Donohue, president and CEO of the US Chamber of Commerce, said in a statement.
“There will likely be many attempts to push other forms of labor law reform with similar goals, and we urge the senator to continue to oppose these misguided efforts. We also urge all senators to oppose any efforts that would take away the protection of the private ballot, impose binding interest arbitration on America’s small businesses and other employers, or create one-sided remedies."
The bill would allow workplace organizers to form a union by signing up a majority of employees -- without allowing companies to demand a secret ballot.
Earlier today, the AFL-CIO released a poll it commissioned that showed 72 percent of Americans favoring the bill, including majorities of both Democrats and Republicans.
UPDATE: AFL-CIO president John Sweeney called Specter's decision "frankly a disappointment and a rebuke to working people, to his own constituents in Pennsylvania and working families around the country."
"We do not plan to let a hardball campaign from Big Business derail the Employee Free Choice Act or the dreams of workers," Sweeney added in a statement.
"There are deep flaws in our labor laws, as Sen. Specter acknowledged today. The freedom to join together and bargain with employers for fair wages and better benefits is critical to rebuilding our middle class – and now is exactly the time to do it, as we begin to revive our economy in a way that works for everyone. In the coming weeks, we will be escalating our campaign and finding the best ways forward to a balanced, strong economy."
Anna Burger, chairwoman of the Change to Win labor coalition, said in a statement, “The Employee Free Choice Act is a vital component to restoring our economy, rebuilding the middle class and renewing the American Dream for America’s workers. Allowing workers the choice to join together, free from intimidation and harassment, to bargain for job security, better wages and health care will stimulate our economy and put working families back on the path of prosperity. We will continue to work with Democrats and Republicans, including Sen. Specter, to pass this critical legislation and make our economy work for everyone.”
In a speech on the Senate floor, Specter called it a "very emotional issue with labor looking to this legislation to reverse the steep decline in union membership and business expressing great concern about added costs, which would drive many companies out of business or overseas," according to the Associated Press
Specter called the secret ballot "the cornerstone of how contests are decided in a Democratic society."
Money for vets on the way
Senators Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry announced this afternoon that federal economic stimulus money will provide nearly $25 million for veterans facilities in Massachusetts, along with a $250 one-time payment to qualifying vets.
The tax-free grant will go to residents of the United States and its territories who received veterans payments at any time between November and January. The money is part of $1.4 billion that the Veterans Administration is receiving from the stimulus package to assist veterans, hospitals, and care centers nationwide.
"We owe an enormous debt to the courageous men and women who have sacrificed so much to keep our nation free and strong, and we must care for their needs when they come home from war. Now more than ever, veterans and the facilities that serve them, urgently need this support, and I commend President Obama for making it a priority to help those who have served America so well,” Kennedy said in a statement.
“This investment creates jobs and helps keep faith with our veterans at the same time,” added Kerry. “The renovation and remodeling of these veterans centers and medical facilities will help thousands of veterans, including many just returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring our veterans and putting people back is a win-win proposition every American should celebrate.”
Hill confirmation hearing set
Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John F. Kerry announced this afternoon that the panel's hearing on the contentious nomination of Christopher Hill as ambassador to Iraq will be Wednesday morning.
“I have every confidence that Ambassador Hill is the right person to represent the United States in Baghdad,” Kerry said in a statement. By nominating Ambassador Hill to serve in Baghdad, President Obama has chosen one of our very best to help bring lasting peace to Iraq. I look forward to his nomination hearing, and am confident that those of my colleagues who may not yet be familiar with his service to the nation will be as impressed by his skill and dedication as I have been.”
But Republicans, notably GOP presidential nominee John McCain, have blasted the nomination, saying that Hill is not qualified because he lacks experience in the Middle East. Some also criticize Hill's role in negotiating with North Korea on its nuclear program.
"The next ambassador should have experience in the Middle East and in working closely with the U.S. military in counterinsurgency or counterterrorism operations. Mr. Hill has neither,” McCain said in a statement after President Obama announced his selection of Hill.
Kennedy calls for health insurance change
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, back on Capitol Hill to pursue his political dream of universal healthcare, is declaring in a hearing today that the insurance market is broken and must be fixed.
"As the economic crisis worsens and the unemployment rate rises, the number of uninsured citizens will grow. In February 2009, more than eight percent of Americans were unemployed and 1.1 million of them will become uninsured with each one percent increase in unemployment. To guarantee that all Americans have access to quality medical services, we clearly must reform the current health insurance market," Kennedy said in a statement entered into the record before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.
Kennedy says that Congress should look at the healthcare overhaul in Massachusetts for "sensible reform." The Bay State plan includes an individual mandate -- something that President Obama opposes.
"A key component is the requirement that all individuals must have health insurance and that insurance must meet a minimum standard of coverage," Kennedy says in his statement. "To assist those who have difficulty finding affordable health insurance, a state-wide “Insurance Connector” was created to pool individuals together. The plan assists low-income residents with a sliding-scale subsidy to ensure affordability. Although the nation has many diverse health insurance markets, Massachusetts’ reform shows that insurance market reforms can make a large difference – insurance coverage has risen from 94% percent to when the plan took effect in 2006 to over 97% percent today."
His full statement, provided by his Senate office, is below:
Kerry focuses committee on global food crisis
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee, under the gavel of chairman John F. Kerry, is holding a hearing today on what the United States can do to help alleviate the global food crisis.
“We’re faced with two disasters—soaring food prices leaving millions hungry every year and an ailing economy. The challenges are overwhelming, but we have to do much more than send emergency food aid to countries facing scarcity,” Kerry said in a statement.
“We live in a world where nearly one billion people suffer from chronic food insecurity,” Senator Richard Lugar, the panel's ranking Republican, added,. “Hungry people are desperate people, and desperation often sows the seeds of conflict and extremism."
He is a cosponsor of a bill designed to improve US and global efforts to increase crop yields, create rural economic opportunities, broaden trade relations, and improve scientific cooperation.
The scheduled witnesses are: Daniel R. Glickman, former Secretary of Agriculture during the Clinton administration; Catherine Bertini, former executive director of the World Food Program; David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World; Robert Paarlberg, professor of political science at Wellesley College; Edwin C. Price, associate vice chancellor and director of Norman Borlaug Institute for International Agriculture; and Gebisa Ejeta, professor of agronomy at Purdue University.
Kerry's opening statement is below:
FULL ENTRYKennedy returns to Washington
WASHINGTON -- Senator Edward M. Kennedy is back in Washington this week to shepherd a bipartisan bill to greatly expand funding for national service and to hold a series of meetings on healthcare as part of a broader effort to draft a massive overhaul plan this summer.
It would be the longest stint on Capitol Hill of the Obama administration for the veteran Massachusetts lawmaker, who has been in Florida recuperating and undergoing treatment for brain cancer. He returned to Washington earlier this month for a White House healthcare forum, and before that returned briefly to cast a key vote last month on the economic stimulus package. On inauguration day, he suffered a seizure at a congressional luncheon and was held overnight for what doctors said was fatigue.
Kennedy has been a passionate advocate of the national service legislation, which build on initiatives to boost public service that began during his brother's presidency. The measure was the first major piece of legislation the ailing Massachusetts lawmaker brought forward after being diagnosed with a brain tumor last May.
Written with Utah Republican Orrin Hatch, the plan would provide $5 billion over five years to fund 250,000 volunteers in energy, environmental, healthcare, and education programs. A similar measure passed overwhelmingly last week in the House, 321-105, with 70 Republican votes, and President Obama highlighted the effort in his first joint address to Congress.
Kennedy was part of a 74-14 vote this evening to bring the bill to the Senate floor. A final vote is likely this week.
Kennedy will also hold meetings on healthcare, according to a spokesman.
He and his staff have been working closely with Max Baucus, a Montana Democrat and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, who laid out a breakneck schedule for a healthcare overhaul, including a review of healthcare delivery in April, an examination of ways to expand coverage in May, and an examination financing options before drafting the proposed legislation by June.
"Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and I have set up regular meetings with those Senators who will play a role in health reform, to inform and oversee the process as our staffs work closely together to craft a bill," Baucus wrote today in Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper. "In the coming weeks and months, the Senate Finance Committee and the entire Congress will try, try again to pass comprehensive health reform. And this time, there is a better chance than ever to succeed."
Frank optimistic about gay agenda, hits Scalia
Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, one of a handful of openly gay members of Congress, says he believes that Congress will soon pass laws protecting transgender people from hate crimes and granting them benefits and that President Obama will this year overturn the "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gay members of the military.
But he told the website gay365.com that he doubts that the law defining marriage as between a man and a woman will be overturned. And Frank said he doesn't believe the Supreme Court will overturn the Defense of Marriage Act, either, using a harsh description of Justice Antonin Scalia.
"I wouldn't want it to go to the Supreme Court now because that homophobe Antonin Scalia's got too many votes on this current court," Frank said.
Also, Frank said that the wide attention he is getting on the economic crisis as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee helps the gay community because his personal life has not been a "hindrance" to being trusted by the president and others.
"It is helpful," he said.
The video of the interview is available on the political blog of USA Today, which first reported the remark about Scalia.
N.E. members of Congress try to protect destroyer
New England members of Congress are banding together to protect a new Navy destroyer program that promises jobs in the region, but could be on the chopping block.
Senators Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, and Jack Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, and Congresswoman Niki Tsongas of Massachusetts, along with some House colleagues, sent a letter to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates urging him to support the DDG-1000 destroyer in the president’s budget.
Gates is expected to soon propose a series of major cuts so the money can be spent instead to fight terrorists and insurgents. The new destroyer would be built at the Bath Iron Works in Maine and a second shipyard in Mississippi, while contractors in Rhode Island and elsewhere would supply components.
“I urge President Obama to include full funding for DDG-1000 destroyers in his budget in the coming fiscal year. Over the past years, $11 billion has already been invested in the program," Kennedy said in a statement today. "If the Navy wants to start building a different type of destroyer, it needs to make a persuasive case to Congress that such a major shift makes sense. The Navy, so far, has failed to provide that information.”
“Support for this request is critical to the timely delivery of needed capabilities to our Navy through the DDG-1000 and future generation surface combatants. This plan leverages the technologies developed on DDG-1000 to efficiently and effectively provide technologies to the next generation of ships,” Reed added.
Their letter is below:
Et tu, Judd?
When Senator Judd Gregg stunningly withdrew as President Obama's choice for commerce secretary, the New Hampshire Republican blamed "irresolvable conflicts" on policy.
He wasn't kidding.
Since giving Obama the heave-ho last month, Gregg has been one of the Democratic president's harshest critics. In recent days, he has been blasting Obama's proposed $3.6 trillion budget, saying it would bankrupt the country. Gregg, the ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, got some more ammunition on Friday, when the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected that Obama's game plan would generate unsustainable deficits averaging almost $1 trillion a year for the next decade.
In an interview on MSNBC this afternoon, Gregg said if he were in charge, he would excise from Obama's budget the healthcare expansion ($634 billion over 10 years) and the government takeover of student loans, would freeze discretionary domestic spending, and would tackle entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security.
He also stood by his eye-opening remarks about the moves by some Democrats to limit debate -- and require only a bare majority for passage -- on major tax proposals in Obama's budget plan, including carbon and healthcare taxes.
While Democrats say that Republicans did the same when they were in control, Gregg and other Republicans say that puts a lie to Obama's pledge of bipartisanship and changing how Washington does business.
"That would be the Chicago approach to governing: Strong-arm it through," Gregg said last week. "You're talking about the exact opposite of bipartisan. You're talking about running over the minority, putting them in cement, and throwing them in the Chicago River."
An alternative view to budget deficit
Republicans and some Democrats are saying that scary new deficit figures today argue for dialing back President Obama's ambitious budget plans for healthcare, alternative energy, and education and more.
But his most liberal allies are asserting the opposite, saying they show the need for the sweeping change that Obama's $3.6 trillion blueprint represents.
"The best way to reduce the deficit is to grow our economy; the best way to grow our economy is to act on the priorities in the president's budget," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement. "President Obama's budget will transform our economy and create jobs by cutting taxes for 95 percent of Americans, making healthcare more affordable and accessible, creating a new, clean energy economy, and modernizing our schools to prepare our workforce for global competition.
"Over the next two weeks, I expect the House Budget Committee to produce, and the entire House will approve, a budget resolution that reflects the President's priorities and will help usher in a new era of job creation and lasting prosperity for the American people."
The Congressional Budget Office projected today that Obama's budget would produce federal deficits totaling $9.3 trillion between 2010 and 2019, $2.3 trillion more than the administration predicted last month. The CBO says the deficit under Obama's policies would never go below 4 percent of the size of the economy, a level that most economists say is dangerously high.
But USAAction, an advocacy group pushing Obama's budget, said the way to dig out from all the red ink is to make the costly investments.
“This revised report delivers a stark message that the economy is in even worse shape than previously thought," Program Director Alan Charney said in a statement. "It reinforces why it's even more critical to pass the initiatives on healthcare, education and the economy laid out the President's budget. The solutions must be adequate to match the depth of the problems. If we don't deal with the major underlying problems with the economy and make it possible for job creation, our deficits will continue to skyrocket."
"We cannot achieve sustainable economic growth without fixing our broken healthcare system, reducing our dependence on foreign oil, and investing in an educated workforce for tomorrow," he added. "The President's budget accomplishes these objectives and we cannot let the naysayers keep sending this country down the wrong direction.”
Tom McMahon, acting executive director of Americans United for Change, which is advocating Obama's budget with nearly 100 labor, environmental, and progressive organizations, agreed:
“The sobering new deficit projections deliver a stark message that the economy is in even worse shape than was previously thought,. It also underscores the urgent need to pass the bold initiatives on healthcare, education, energy and the economy laid out the President’s budget. If we don’t deal with the major underlying problems with the economy and make it possible for business to create jobs, our deficits will only continue to explode. We simply cannot achieve sustainable economic growth without fixing our broken health care system, reducing our dependence on foreign oil, and investing in tomorrow’s educated workforce. Bottom line: the most effective way for Congress to begin to regain control of the federal deficit is to support the President's budget plan that is blueprint for rebuilding and renewing America.”
Palin turns down stimulus cash
Democrats are blasting Alaska Governor Sarah Palin for announcing that she will reject nearly half of the economic stimulus money coming to her state from Washington, accusing her of putting national political ambitions ahead of her constituents.
Palin, the Republican vice presidential nominee last year, announced Thursday that she will accept 55 percent of the estimated $930 million in stimulus cash, leaving it up to legislators to decide if they will request any of the rest.
Palin said she would accept money that is "timely, targeted and temporary" and does not create strings that will bind the state in the future, she said, according to the Associated Press. "I can't attest to every fund that's being offered the state in the stimulus package will be used to create jobs and stimulate the economy, so I'm requesting only those things that I know will."
Democratic National Committee spokesman Brad Woodhouse called Palin's decision "appears to be nothing more than political posturing."
"At a time when her state is suffering, Alaska's working families cannot afford a governor that puts her political future ahead of the needs of the state and its families," he added.
Alaska Democratic Party head Patti Higgins and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Bob Poe plan a conference call this afternoon to pile on.
Some Republican state legislators have also questioned Palin's choice. A Democratic state representative, Les Gara of Anchorage, said he was shocked the governor would consider turning away money, especially for schools and new teachers when the state has a 40 percent high school dropout rate, according to the AP. He accused the governor of thinking only of her own national political prospects.
Palin, who joins a few other GOP governors in rejecting some stimulus money, said she was acting in the best interests of Alaskans.
Dodd defends himself on bonuses
Under fire for his role in allowing the AIG bonuses, Senator Chris Dodd mounted a strong self-defense today, telling constituents that he had no idea that a change in language in an executive pay provision would permit them.
"No one is angrier than I am," he said in Enfield, Conn.
Dodd said during the drafting of the final version of the $787 billion stimulus bill, he led the charge on including "strong language" to limit executive compensation. "I felt it was needed," he said, because too many time people try to take advantage of such situations.
He reiterated that he was asked by Treasury Department officials to change the language to protect some already-contracted bonuses to avoid legal issues.
"It seemed rather technical and innocuous at the time," said Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.
He said if he had known it would allow the $165 million in AIG bonuses, "I would have rejected it out of hand."
Dodd, who faces reelection next year, said he was "disturbed" that those who sought the change didn't stand up and take the blame as soon as the controversy emerged earlier this week.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who is on the hot seat himself over the bonuses, said Thursday that his staff did talk to Dodd about their concerns and accepted at least part of the responsibility.
House passes tax bill on AIG bonuses
The US House passed a bill this afternoon to tax back those AIG bonuses, even with questions about its legality.
"We want our money back and we want our money back now for the taxpayers," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said before the vote, according to the Associated Press.
Republicans called it a legally questionable ploy to paper over mistakes by the Obama administration in allowing the bonuses in the first place.
Representative John Boehner, the top House Republican, said the bill was "a political circus."
UPDATE: In a statement issued this evening, President Obama endorsed some version of the bill, though he declared that the bonuses are a "symptom of a larger problem."
“Today's vote rightly reflects the outrage that so many feel over the lavish bonuses that AIG provided its employees at the expense of the taxpayers who have kept this failed company afloat. Now this legislation moves to the Senate, and I look forward to receiving a final product that will serve as a strong signal to the executives who run these firms that such compensation will not be tolerated," said the statement from the White House.
"In the end, this is a symptom of a larger problem – a bubble and bust economy that valued reckless speculation over responsibility and hard work. That is what we must ultimately repair to build a lasting and widespread prosperity.”
House Republicans found themselves in a tough spot on the vote, but enough of them voted yes for the bill to sail through.
They, too, want to respond to the public anger over the $165 million in bonuses, which went to the very same traders in London who nearly drove the insurance giant into bankruptcy. But philosophically, they also oppose higher taxes, particularly on higher-income taxpayers they say create most jobs.
Boehner said he would oppose it, but told his rank and file to vote their conscience.
Earlier today, Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, in charge of rounding up Republican votes, was rather wishy-washy. Asked whether his party had finally found a tax it could support, Cantor said on MSNBC that the bill would get bipartisan support, but he also promoted a "sense of Congress" resolution and added to Republican criticism of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.
"I want to get the bonus payments back in," Cantor said, but he refused to say -- despite repeated questions -- whether he plans to vote for the bill.
The Democratic bill would levy a 90 percent tax on bonuses paid to employees with family incomes above $250,000 at companies that have received at least $5 billion in government bailout money.
Because it is being expedited, the bill required two-thirds approval for passage.
The bill passed on a 328-93 vote. In the end, 243 Democrats and 85 Republicans supported the bill, while six Democrats and 87 Republicans opposed it.
More pressure on Geithner
The drumbeat for Timothy Geithner's head -- or maybe it's more like a drip-drip -- is slowly building.
Representative Connie Mack, a Florida Republican, yesterday became the first to publicly call for the treasury secretary to resign in the wake of the AIG bonus fiasco.
Today, Senator Jim Bunning, a Kentucky Republican, said Geithner should resign or be dismissed, saying the former New York Fed chief has "an incestuous relationship with Wall Street.”
“Either one – either way," Bunning said on Fox Business Network. "First of all, I didn’t think he was qualified for the job because of his involvement in TARP and a seat at the table. And then of course, he hasn’t done anything to ease the burden. Where’s the plan? You know, he was going to bring the plan to the banking committee. We still haven’t seen the plan and he’s been in office for six to eight weeks.”
Geithner's boss, President Obama, has stood steadfastly behind him so far, saying Wednesday that he has "complete confidence" in Geithner, who the president said is the hardest working man in Washington.
"I know Washington is all in a tizzy and everybody is pointing fingers at each other and saying it's their fault, the Democrats' fault, the Republicans' fault," Obama said at a town hall meeting in southern California on Wednesday night. "Listen, I'll take responsibility; I'm the president. We didn't grant these contracts, and we've got a lot on our plate, but it is appropriate, when you're in charge, to make sure that stuff doesn't happen like this....So for everybody in Washington who's busy scrambling, trying to figure out how to blame somebody else, just go ahead and talk to me, because it's my job to make sure that we fix these messes, even if I don't make them."
UPDATE: In an interview airing today on CNN, Geithner defended himself, even as he accepted responsibility.
He said that he did not know about the "full scale" of the bonuses until March 10, two days before he informed the White House, "but, you know, it's my responsibility, I was in a position where I didn't know about those sooner, I take full responsibility for that."
"We moved very actively to explore every possible avenue -- legal avenue to address this problem, to make sure that, again, the assistance we were providing was not going to unduly benefit these people," he said.
"And, you know, we moved very quickly. We've made it clear that the payments going forward had to be renegotiated and we're going to make sure that the taxpayer is compensated for any payments we can't recoup. And we're exploring all legal means to recoup those payments."
Geithner also acknowledged that his staff had talked to Senator Chris Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, about an executive pay provision in the economic stimulus bill that was changed so that it ended up not blocking the AIG bonuses.
"We expressed concern about this specific version," he told CNN. "We wanted to make sure it was strong enough to survive legal challenge. But we also worked with him to strengthen the overall framework and his bill has this very important provision we’re relying on now to go back and see if we can recoup payments that were made that
there was no legal ability to block."
Geithner said that he, himself, did not speak to Dodd directly about the provision, "but I’m not sure that’s relevant because Treasury staff did express concern about whether this provision was vulnerable to legal challenge."
Geithner brushed off the calls to resign, saying, "I think this just comes with the job.
"If this was not challenging, it wouldn't be consequential. And I feel this deep sense of personal responsibility and obligation and really opportunity to work with this president, this Congress, to try to make this economy stronger, to make sure our financial system never goes through this again," he said.
"People are going to disagree with some of the choices we make, but we have to act. We have no choice but to move."
Lawrence vets group gets lifeline
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Congress has thrown a lifeline to a nonprofit organization in Lawrence that helps veterans start their own businesses, setting aside annual operating funds that the group's president says will save it from having to shut its doors.
The Northeast Veterans Business Resource Center has provided services to more than 3,000 veterans in Massachusetts and across the Northeast since it opened in 2004, but has struggled to maintain stable funding for the training classes and workshops it offers veterans who are seeking to become entrepreneurs.
"We have not been funded since January," Louis J. Celli, the center's president, said today, noting that he recently had to lay off his three employees for lack of funds. "I am a little bit behind in my bills right now."
Celli added that if it were not for some emergency funds provided last year by the Boeing Co. and the federal government, the center would have been shuttered months ago.
But the $410 billion spending bill recently approved by Congress sets aside nearly $500,000 for the remainder of this fiscal year to support the Lawrence center and two others like it in St. Louis and Flint, Mich.
Meanwhile, to ensure a stable funding stream for years to come, lawmakers also want the Small Business Administration, which is responsible for doling out the funds, to fold the three centers into its existing network of veterans outreach centers that are run by the agency's Office of Veterans Business Development.
The Lawrence center was initially funded by the National Veterans Business Development Corp., which is subsidized with government money. But the corporation did not always receive the funding it requested from Congress and came under criticism for mismanaging some funds -- in the process orphaning the Lawrence center and its two counterparts.
"Returning military personnel have historically and are increasingly relying upon self-employment in order to maintain a stable income, particularly those who are disabled or between deployments," Representatives Nydia M. Velazquez of New York and Sam Graves of Missouri, the chairwoman and ranking Republican on the House Small Business Committee, told acting SBA Administrator Darryl Hairston in a letter on Monday.
It is particularly important, they wrote, that veterans who want to start their own businesses have access to resources close to home.
"They can benefit from the location of resources in local communities, ensuring that they are accessible and affordable over the long term," the lawmakers wrote in urging Hairston to ensure the Lawrence center is a recipient of sustained funding. "By drawing on these resources, they can strengthen their businesses and ensure that they successfully compete in the market."
Kerry holds hearing on resetting Russia relationship
Senator John F. Kerry convened a hearing today on US-Russia relations, saying that he "wholeheartedly" agrees with President Obama that it's time to "reset" the relationship.
"In recent years, America’s relationship with Russia has reached arguably its lowest and least productive phase in two decades," the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said, according to prepared remarks released by his office. " While it is not yet clear what this new chapter in our relations can bring, it is clear that our common interests demand that we try to work together more constructively.
"Our differences are real, but so too is our potential to cooperate and even lead together on global challenges," Kerry added. "From Iran’s nuclear program to human rights in Burma to our presence in Afghanistan, there is scarcely an issue of global importance which would not benefit from greater cooperation with Russia. Our challenge will be to ensure that, to the extent possible, we enlist Russia to act not just as a great power but also as a global partner."
In recent months, Russian and US leaders have sparred over the Russian incursion into Georgia last August, a proposed US anti-missile system in Poland, and other issues.
Witnesses scheduled to testify at the hearing include Andrew Kuchins, director and senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies; Ariel Cohen, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation; and Stephen Sestanovich, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Kerry's full prepared remarks are below:
Dodd fesses up on bonus provision
Senator Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, acknowledged today that his staff agreed to dilute an executive pay provision in the economic stimulus bill that would have applied retroactively to recipients of federal aid -- and possibly blocked the controversial AIG bonuses.
Dodd told CNN the request came from officials at the Treasury Department, whom he did not identify and who said it would cause numerous lawsuits.
Republicans have complained they were frozen out of the final negotiations over the $787 billion stimulus plan. "The fact is that the bill the president signed, which protected the AIG bonuses and others, was written behind closed doors by Democratic leaders of the House and Senate. There was no transparency," said Senator Charles Grassley, the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee.
In the CNN interview, Dodd sought to explain what happened: "We wrote the language in the bill to deal with bonuses, golden parachutes, excessive compensation -- executive compensation, that was adopted unanimously by the United States Senate in the stimulus bill.
"That's what I would have liked to have seen maintained in the bill, but for that language there would have been no language in the bill to deal with any of this at all, including language that allowed them to reach back. The administration, it has been widely reported, had problems with that amendment, as others did as well. And they came and said, we'd like to modify that amendment. The alternative, frankly, was that happened to my amendment, what happened to the Wyden-Snowe amendment, and that is it be dropped altogether....
"I was vehemently opposed to that....But again, I want to make the point, there many who were highly critical of the Dodd amendment on executive compensation, excessive compensation. I find it ironic that the very people who were critical of me putting that bill in a month-and-a-half ago are now being critical saying we went too far."
Service bill passes Senate panel, full House
The Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee today approved a public service bill with bipartisan backing from panel chairmen Edward M. Kennedy and Orrin Hatch.
The legislation, supported by President Obama with his call for more volunteerism, is designed to expand service opportunities, providing $5 billion over five years with the goal of funding 250,000 volunteers in areas including energy conservation, healthcare, and education.
“This legislation represents the best of America’s ideals – offering a helping hand to our neighbors and to our country. Today’s action brings us closer to our goal of giving Americans of all ages greater opportunities to serve their communities and their nation. I commend Senator Mikulski, Senator Hatch and Senator Enzi for their effective bipartisan leadership in moving this important measure forward,” Kennedy said in a statement.
“Volunteer service is the lifeblood of our nation. It brings out the best in our people and strengthens our communities. That is why the Serve America Act is so important. This historic legislation will inspire civic-minded Americans across the nation to raise the bar of service and meet every challenge,” Hatch added.
UPDATE: This afternoon, the House passed similar legislation on a 321-105 vote and sent it to the Senate. The House version would cost $6 billion over five years, with the goal of increasing service programs by 175,000 people.
Obama praised the bill's passage, saying it would "usher in a new era of service in this new century."
"This legislation will help create new opportunities for millions of Americans to serve their communities and help us meet our most pressing challenges, from rebuilding our schools to providing opportunity for those in need, from helping America’s veterans to helping get us on the path to energy independence," he said in a statement. "At this moment of economic crisis, when so many people are in need of help and so much needs to be done, this could not be more urgent.
"We know that government alone is not the answer to the challenges we face," the president added. "It will take all of us taking our share of responsibility. And while government can provide the opportunities to give back to our communities, as I hope it will through this legislation, it is up to each and every citizen to seize those opportunities. It is up to every one of us to do his or her small part to make the world a better place."
Liddy: some 'distasteful' bonuses will be returned
Edward Liddy, chairman and CEO of AIG, told a congressional panel this afternoon that this morning he asked those who received more than $100,000 in highly controversial bonuses to step up and return half of their payments.
Departing significantly from his prepared testimony, Liddy said that some employees have already agreed to give up their entire bonus.
Liddy said that he shares the public and political anger at the "distasteful" bonuses given to the employees who almost drove the insurance giant to ruin.
But trying to calm the furor over the bonuses, Liddy said the payments were necessary to keep the people who can best extract the company from the risky bets that nearly bankrupted it -- and to make sure that taxpayers get repaid the $170 billion and counting in federal aid and that there is not another financial meltdown.
"No one knows better than I that AIG has been the recipient of generous amounts of government aid," Liddy testified.
The unit that caused the problems has taken $1 trillion off the books, but there is still $1.6 trillion to go, he said.
"I'm trying desperately to prevent an uncontrolled collapse of that business."
AIG paid $220 million in retention bonuses in the troubled financial products division, including $165 million in payments Friday that ranged from $1,000 to $6.4 million. New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo reported that 73 people received at least $1 million.
Before leaving for California, President Obama said the AIG bonuses have been consuming attention and "rightfully so."
"They represent what all of us consider an inappropriate use of taxpayer funds," he said on the South Lawn of the White House.
But he said that just as outrageous is the "culture of greed" that led to the bonuses and the meltdown that is forcing the federal government to "clean up AIG's mess."
He said he has spoken to Representative Barney Frank and met with economic team to fast-track legislation to create a body -- similar to the FDIC for banks -- that would protect consumers and creditors of financial firms like AIG.
Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, asked Liddy to submit the names of those receiving the bonuses, but the CEO said he would only do so if they stayed confidential.
Frank replied that he would not agree with that restriction and would ask the committee to issue subpoenas for the information.
Liddy said he wanted to comply, but feared for the employees' safety, reading one of the threats he said had been received that talked of executing the workers with piano wire.
Representative Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts was among the most aggressive in grilling Liddy.
When Liddy said he took offense at the attacks, saying he wasn't at AIG when the retention bonus contracts were set last March and he would have done them differently -- Lynch replied that offense was intended.
Lynch said many of his constituents have lost nearly the entire value of their retirement plans and are appropriately outraged that some of those responsible for the market meltdown are receiving extra pay.
Earlier, Frank didn't sound too optimistic that angry members of Congress will get what they want.
"Well, I don't have a lot of confidence in Mr. Liddy's view at this point," Frank said this morning on CNN. "When he said that first he couldn't get the money back because they had contractual rights but also that he was worried about not retaining them, it left me unconvinced he's really going to be trying.
"The notion that we want to retain these people, that we want to pay the people who messed it up in the first place so they don't leave, is just backwards to me. I think we would probably be better off if they did leave," the Massachusetts Democrat added.
Frank instead is pushing the idea of suing AIG to get the bonus money back, pointing out that the federal government owns a nearly 80 percent stake in the company after giving it more than $170 billion in aid.
"I still believe that we have a right legally to recover this, because we can assert our ownership rights and say, yes, you may have had a contractual right to a bonus but your rotten performance means you should forfeit it," he said.
He also complained about the bonus system at AIG, which he says rewarded employees who made the company money but didn't penalize them for huge losses -- the equivalent, he said, of heads you win, tails you break even.
Other members of Congress are promoting bills to tax the bonuses to recoup the money.
And Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who is facing tough questions of his own, told congressional leaders Tuesday night that one option is to deduct the bonus money from the latest $30 billion in federal help to AIG.
On CBS, Frank called that inadequate.
In an op-ed piece published in today's Washington Post, Liddy, who took over AIG last September, says he has seen "the bad side of capitalism" and says that "mistakes were made at AIG, and on a scale that few could have imagined possible."
In the article, which he is expected to echo in his testimony to a Financial Services subcommittee today, he acknowledges the anger at the bonuses but says they were necessary. "Make no mistake, had I been chief executive at the time, I would never have approved the retention contracts that were put in place more than a year ago. It was distasteful to have to make these payments. But we concluded that the risks to the company, and therefore the financial system and the economy, were unacceptably high."
Liddy also says that under his watch, total 2008 compensation for the top 47 executives at AIG was 56 percent lower than their total 2007 compensation. "My annual salary is $1," he writes. "My only stake is my reputation."
Top trade official confirmed
President Obama added a senior aide today when the Senate confirmed former Dallas mayor Ron Kirk as US trade representative.
The Senate vote was 92-5 for Kirk, who has promised to push other countries to live up to fair trade.
Partly because of tougher vetting and stricter ethics rules, the upper reaches of the administration remains largely unfilled.
The review of Kirk uncovered a tax issue that involved failing to report speech income he donated to his college alma mater, but the issue did not derail his nomination as tax problems did some others.
Obama seeks grassroots help on budget
As President Obama heads back out on the road to sell his economic plans, he tells his grassroots army that his election wasn't change but only the chance to make change.
In a video released today, he urges them to canvass their neighborhoods this weekend to build support for his $3.6 trillion budget that he says will "lay a foundation for lasting growth and prosperity" by investing in healthcare, education, and renewable energy.
"Passing this budget won't be easy....I'm asking you to head outside this Saturday to knock on some doors, talk to some neighbors, and let them know how important this budget is to our future," he says.
Obama, who plans a town hall meeting later today in Costa Mesa, Calif., also implores his backers to write letters and make phone calls to make their views known. His ambitious spending blueprint has run into skepticism in Congress from both sides of the aisle.
The video was sent in an email by David Plouffe, Obama's former campaign manager who now oversees Organizing for America, the keeper of a nearly 14 million-name e-mail list of supporters that is working out of the Democratic National Committee.
"The budget President Obama has proposed isn't the same old document Washington has come to expect year after year," Plouffe writes in the e-mail. "Right now, we have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to finally confront the systemic problems that have held America back for far too long in energy, health care, and education. But it's up to you to get involved and make it happen."
While Obama has repeatedly defended his ambitious agenda against those who argue he should focus on the economy, a majority of Americans in a newly released poll say he is taking on too much.
According to the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey, 55 percent said the president has tried to handle more issues than he should, while 43 percent says he has not.
On the other hand, the poll found that 58 percent say Obama's proposals are "about right," while 36 percent say they are "too liberal."
His approval rating in foreign affairs -- 66 percent -- is higher than for his handling of the economy -- 59 percent.
Grassley: Suicide call was 'rhetoric'
In all the outrage over the bonuses paid to the American International Group executives who almost buried the company, the usually mild-mannered Senator Chuck Grassley went the furthest.
In a radio interview Monday, the Iowa Republican called on AIG executives to follow the Japanese approach toward accepting responsibility for the near collapse of the insurance giant, which has already cost taxpayers more than $170 billion in federal aid.
"I would suggest the first thing that would make me feel a little bit better toward them if they'd follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, 'I'm sorry,' and then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide," Grassley said.
Today, Grassley is the one apologizing, sort of.
Asked about the suicide remark on MSNBC, he suggested that it was more of a rhetorical flourish. "You ought to be able to tell rhetoric when you hear it," he said.
Grassley said the point he was making is that he wants the AIG executives to show remorse and contrition for nearly bankrupting their company -- not to accept bonuses.
"I think taxpayers are entitled to that," he said.
Meanwhile, Senator Harry Reid, the top Democrat in the Senate, said today that he will pursue legislation to force the executives to pay back at least some of the $165 million in bonuses.
Congressional Democrats are crafting bills to tax up to 100 percent of bonuses awarded by companies rescued by taxpayer money.
Senator Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, criticized Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for not blocking the bonuses, saying that Geithner either knew or should have known about the payments bonuses.
"I don't know if he should resign over this," Shelby said, according to the Associated Press. "He works for the president of the United States. But I can tell you, this is just another example of where he seems to be out of the loop.
President Obama joined the outrage on Monday, ordering Geithner to pursue every legal avenue to block the payments. The administration is talking about using a pending $30 billion federal loan to recoup or block the bonuses.
Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican, said today that top White House officials knew about the bonuses ahead of time.
"So they were aware they were going to be paid and it wasn’t until they were paid and the press got wind of it, and obviously made a weekend of it, that they suddenly were outraged,” he said on Fox Business Network.
UPDATE: New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo said today that AIG paid retention bonuses last week of $1 million or more to 73 employees, including 11 who no longer work for the company. The biggest bonus was more than $6.4 million, and the top seven received more than $4 million each.
Contracts written last March guaranteed employees 100 percent of their 2007 bonus amounts for 2008, "despite obvious signs that 2008 performance would be disastrous in comparison to the year before," Cuomo said in a letter today to Representative Barney Frank, the Massachusetts Democrat who is chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, the Associated Press reports.
Cuomo asked the panel to take up the issue at a hearing scheduled for Wednesday, when AIG's CEO, Edward Liddy, is scheduled to testify.
"AIG also claims that retention of individuals at Financial Products was vital to unwinding the subsidiary's business," Cuomo wrote. But AIG has been unwilling to provide their names, despite a subpoena, making it impossible to see if that's true, Cuomo said.
The AP says that Cuomo asserted that despite their contracts, Financial Products employees agreed to take 2009 salaries of $1 in exchange for receiving their retention bonus packages. He said the fact AIG could negotiate the terms of the payments "flies in the face of AIG's assertion" that it had no choice but to make the contractual bonus payments.
Obama defends his budget
Facing discomfort and some dissension in his own ranks, President Obama huddled this morning with top Democratic budget writers about his sweeping $3.6 trillion spending plan.
In extraordinary times, his budget is the "economic blueprint for our future," Obama said after meeting at the White House with Senator Kent Conrad, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, and Representative John Spratt, chairman of the House Budget Committee.
While some Republicans have been accusing Obama of using the economic crisis to lay out a budget that moves the country toward socialism, some Democrats are also fretting about some major components of Obama's plan. Among them: carbon emissions limits that would lead to higher energy bills, and restrictions on how much in charitable donations that higher-income taxpayers could deduct.
Republicans noted that Conrad, himself, said last week that he worried that the budget would mean more red ink.
"When I look at this budget, I see the debt doubling again," Conrad said during a hearing. "And that gives me great concern... I believe that buildup of debt fundamentally threatens the economic security of this country. I believe it in my bones."
The president, however, focused on his pledge to cut the federal deficit -- projected to hit well more than $1 trillion this fiscal year -- in half by the end of his term. Because of the deficit he said he inherited and the cost of the financial rescue, he said his spending plan does not try to solve every problem or address every issue.
But, he said, he will not cut back spending that will lead to real prosperity.
To those who say the budget is too ambitious, "I say the challenges we face are too big to ignore," Obama said.
Obama also said he welcomes good ideas from both Democrats and Republicans, but lashed out at Republicans who are opposing his budget without proposing alternatives.
"Just saying no," the president said, is the right advice to give to teenagers about using drugs -- not a credible approach to the budget debate.
Findings released today from a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll suggest that Americans back the general drift of Obama's economic plans, but not all the specifics.
According to the survey, 65 percent support Obama's "overall economic plan," but support for the $787 billion economic stimulus package he championed has dropped from 60 percent last month to 54 percent now. Only 32 percent back a second stimulus bill, a possibility that some administration supporters have floated.
Also, support for helping homeowners facing foreclosure -- which Obama has proposed doing -- has fallen from 63 percent last month to 56 percent. Only 18 percent back the middle path that the White House has taken on beleaguered banks -- giving them billions to shore them up -- while 39 percent say the government should take them over temporarily and 41 percent say they should be allowed to go out of business.
His full remarks, provided by the White House, are below:
Obama gears up for budget battle
Facing strong Republican opposition to his budget, President Obama is harnessing much of his campaign operation to push it through Congress.
He is enlisting Organizing for America, the post-election vehicle for his millions of grassroots supporters, plus the Democratic Party and its allies in labor and advocacy groups, to build support for the $3.6 trillion blueprint that includes ambitious proposals on healthcare, energy, education, and more.
Mitch Stewart, director of Organizing for America, urged supporters to go out in their neighborhoods this weekend to build backing for Obama's budget.
"The current debate in Washington over President Obama's budget has made one thing clear -- ensuring our long-term prosperity won't come without a fight," Stewart wrote today in an email.
"Partisan voices and special interests are showing real resistance to President Obama's call for making the necessary reforms and investments in energy, health care, and education. That's why we need to bring the conversation back into homes and communities across America."
Americans United for Change, a coalition of labor and liberal groups, started running a national cable TV ad on Sunday that attacks Republicans for not offering anything but opposition.
"President Obama has proposed a budget plan to turn the page on the failed economic policies of the past – creating jobs and changing the way things are done in Washington," the announcer says. "The Republican response? 'No, no, no.'
"So what kind of budget have the Republicans proposed to get us out of the mess they created? Here are the details," the announcer continues.
There's a blank screen and the sound of crickets chirping.
"That’s right – nothing," the announcer says. "Tell the Republicans that Americans won’t take NO for an answer. Tell them we want our President – and America – to succeed."
Over the weekend, the Democratic National Committee took a similar tack in a new web ad that accuses Republicans of "sitting on the sidelines" during the economic crisis and that jumps on comments that Representative John Boehner, the top House Republican, made to the New York Times saying that his party doesn't have offer an alternative and “ought to get the idea out of their minds that they are legislators.”
"John Boehner’s claim that his Party has no responsibility to legislate or offer any plans of their own - despite the economic crisis facing our country - are exactly the kind of typical Washington political games the American people rejected last November,” DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse said in a statement.
Last week, the DNC took a page out of the Republican playbook during the presidential campaign and launched a “Party of No” clock that highlights how long Republicans have said “no” instead of offering an alternative to Obama’s budget.
As of today, the clock was at 17 days and counting.
A spokesman for Boehner disputed the DNC ad, saying that Republicans did offer an alternative to the $787 billion stimulus package and blaming Democrats for freezing Republicans out of the legislative debate.
"This web ad may be the most poorly-researched piece I’ve ever seen, especially since the New York Times story the DNC cites completely discredits its entire premise," spokesman Kevin Smith said in a statement. "Mr. Boehner said Republicans will be the party of better solutions on the opening day of this Congress before he handed the gavel to the Speaker, and we have followed through on that promise by offering better alternatives on SCHIP and the stimulus. We will do so again on the budget. Good try, but it doesn’t pass the straight-face test.”
Frank disgusted by AIG bonuses
Representative Barney Frank today blasted the bonuses that are going to AIG executives whose bad decisions pushed the insurance giant to the edge of going under before a federal bailout.
The $165 million in bonuses was to be paid to the executives by Sunday, and most are going to AIG Financial Products, the unit that sold credit default swaps, the risky contracts that caused massive losses for the insurer. AIG, which lost $61.7 billion for the fourth quarter of last year -- the largest corporate loss in history -- has received more than $170 billion in a series of federal rescues.
Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat who is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, suggested that if the federal government, which now owns an 80 percent stake in the company, can't rescind the bonuses, it could force some dismissals.
"These people may have a right to their bonuses. They don't have a right to their jobs forever," Frank said on NBC's "Today" show.
"[I]t does appear to me we're rewarding incompetence," he added. "Forget about the legal matter here for a second. These bonuses are going to people who screwed this thing up enormously, who made terrible decisions."
A disgusted Frank said that "some of these people, maybe they should choose between keeping their bonus and keeping their jobs. You can't fire a man for having his legal rights, but I'm ready to look and say, this guy gets a bonus? This is a guy who cost us x billion dollars. Let him live off his bonus and no salary for the future."
Frank said not enough conditions were put on AIG, and dismissed concerns expressed by other financial institutions about strings attached to government aid.
"My answer is good-bye, please leave quickly and send back the money," he said.
Big bucks labor battle
The battle over an union organizing bill introduced this week is shaping up to be one of the most expensive on Capitol Hill in recent years.
Just how potentially costly was made clearer today by a campaign finance watchdog group, which looked at both how lobbying and campaign donations from Big Business and Big Labor could play a role in the fate of the bill, which would let workers check a card to show they want to join a union and would give employers less power to force a secret ballot election.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which opposes the "Employee Free Choice Act," spent $144.4 million on lobbying in the 2007-08 election cycle, compared to less than $84 million for all of labor, the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics says.
Meanwhile, members of Congress who voted in favor of the bill in 2007 collected 10 times more on average from union political action committees during their careers ($862,065) than those who didn't ($86,538), and those who opposed the bill received more on average from business PACs ($2.5 million), than those who supported the legislation ($1.7 million), the center says.
MoveOn turns to healthcare
MoveOn.org is moving on from the Iraq war to healthcare.
The powerful grassroots group, which was a key early supporter of Barack Obama, got its start in 1998 when it pushed for a censure of President Clinton and end to impeachment proceedings over the Monica Lewinsky scandal, and made a name with its vehement opposition to the Iraq war.
But now that Obama is president and has announced a withdrawal plan from Iraq, the group is expanding into other legislative priorities.
Starting Thursday, MSNBC reports, it plans to run a national cable TV ad on Obama's healthcare overhaul plan.
The spot takes on insurance companies, which MoveOn says will oppose a public insurance plan because it would cost them money. Obama has not committed to such an option, though it is under consideration in Congress.
"You know what the insurance companies see when they look at you?" the announcer asks. "Money -- which is why they're against the president's healthcare reform."
"Don't let the insurance companies get away with it," the announcer says, urging viewers to call their members of Congress to "put people before profits."
Obama calls for earmark reform
After days of being hammered for not opposing a business-as-usual, pork-filled spending bill, President Obama rededicated himself this morning to reforming the budget process to weed out wasteful or politically-driven projects.
Obama, who during the presidential campaign vowed to limit earmarks, did not stand in the way as lawmakers of both parties put some 8,000 of them into the $410 billion bill given final congressional approval Tuesday night.
"I am signing an imperfect omnibus bill because it is necessary for the ongoing functions of government," he said this morning, arguing that "the nearly 99 percent that you probably haven’t heard much about" in the bill is not earmarks but funding necessary to keep the government running.
"But I also view this as a departure point for more far-reaching change."
"The future demands that we operate in a different way than we have in the past," Obama declared before signing the bill this afternoon. "So let there be no doubt: this piece of legislation must mark an end to the old way of doing business, and the beginning of a new era of responsibility and accountability that the American people have every right to expect and demand.
"If we are going to solve our economic crisis; if we are going to put Americans back to work; if we are going to make the investments required to build a foundation for our future growth, then we must restore the American people’s faith that their government is working for them, and that it's on their side. That's the government I promised. That's the government I intend to lead."
Obama said, however, that not all earmarks are wrong. "Done right, earmarks have given legislators the opportunity to direct federal money to worthy projects that benefit people in their districts, and that’s why I have opposed their outright elimination," he said. "I also find it ironic that some of those who railed most loudly against this bill because of earmarks actually inserted earmarks of their own – and will tout them in their own states and their own districts."
Still, he acknowledged, "earmarks have been used as a vehicle for waste, and fraud, and abuse. Projects have been inserted at the eleventh hour, without review, and sometimes without merit, in order to satisfy the political or personal agendas of a given legislator, rather than the public interest. "
Going forward, starting with next year's budget, Obama said, any earmarks should be required to meet strict standards. They should be aired at hearings and posted on lawmakers' websites in advance for public scrutiny. Any earmark for a for-profit private company should be subject to competitive bidding because they are most corrupting kind. "Furthermore, it should go without saying that an earmark must never be traded for political favors," he said.
"And finally, if my administration evaluates an earmark and determines that it has no legitimate public purpose, then we will seek to eliminate it, and we will work with Congress to do so," Obama vowed.
Besides limiting earmarks, the president called on Congress to pass appropriations bills separately and in an "orderly way" so that "massive, last-minute" omnibus bills such as this one aren't necessary.
Senator John McCain, Obama's Republican presidential rival and perhaps the loudest voice against earmarks, was not impressed by Obama's speech.
“The President's rhetoric is impressive, but his statement affirms we will continue to do business as usual in Washington regarding earmarks in appropriations legislation," McCain said in a statement. "The President could have resolved this issue in one statement – no more unauthorized pork barrel projects – and pledged to use his veto pen to stop them. This is an opportunity missed.”
Senator Russ Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat, also said Obama isn't going far enough. He promoted the bill he and McCain are sponsoring that would require a 60-vote supermajority in the Senate to keep unauthorized or undisclosed earmarks in spending bills.
Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts said he opposed the McCain-Feingold bill, saying that budget committees can review the projects and the vast majority are worthy.
Kerry said on MSNBC that while there were some "horrible" projects in the bill, but he defended the earmarks he inserted. (For a list of many of the Bay State projects, click here).
"You never have a perfect bill," Kerry said. "Then you're held accountable for your vote."
Obama's full remarks are below:
Earmark-filled bill passes Congress
In the end, most senators held their nose, gulped hard, and voted for a $410 billion bill to keep the federal government running.
The spending measure passed on a voice vote this evening after a motion to cut off debate passed 62-35, by two more votes than necessary.
The bill became a huge political headache for Congress and for President Obama because of days of publicity about 8,000 or so local projects, called pork-barrel by critics.
Obama plans to sign the measure Wednesday, but will also announce steps to limit earmarks, the White House said.
Without apology, Massachusetts lawmakers inserted dozens of earmarks for projects across the state, including $30 million for the Fitchburg commuter rail line and $22 million for an addition to the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library.
But in approving the measure, the Senate did agree with the House to skip an automatic cost-of-living pay increase they otherwise would have received next Jan. 1. Members of Congress make $174,000 a year.
Kennedy promotes national service bill
By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- A national service bill aimed at drawing Americans from elementary school children to retirees won bipartisan plaudits today from key senators, who said they are hoping to get the measure passed before Easter.
The measure -- a joint effort by Senators Edward M. Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican -- would provide $5 billion over five years to fund 250,000 volunteers in energy, the environment, healthcare, and education. President Obama mentioned the Serve America Act in his address to Congress last month.
While US soldiers are serving overseas, "Americans should be able to serve on the homefront as well, addressing the national problems of our times,'' Michael Brown, CEO of the Boston-based City Year community service program, told the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Kennedy was not present at the hearing, but several of his colleagues -- as well as those who testified in favor of the measure -- lauded the Massachusetts lawmaker for his authorship of the bill. Senator Barbara Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat who presided at the hearing, said she would push to get the bill approved before the Easter-Passover break, which begins April 6.
Kennedy did have a statement entered into the record.
"Many years ago, on the fifth anniversary of the Peace Corps, I asked one of those young Americans why they had volunteered, and I will never forget the answer: 'It was the first time someone asked me to do something for my country,' " Kennedy said in the statement.
"Now it’s time to ask again. Americans young and old are looking for new ways to serve their communities and give back to their country."
The full statement and summary of the bill, provided by Kennedy's office, is below:
FULL ENTRYUnion battle royal begins
Big labor has had a good run so far under President Obama, whom it supported with thousands of volunteers and millions in campaign cash.
Congress passed and the president signed a bill making it easier for workers to sue over pay discrimination. Over Republican objections and despite yet another tax issue, ally Hilda Solis was installed as labor secretary. The $787 billion stimulus package includes a "Buy American" provision and otherwise should create thousands of jobs for union members.
But today starts the real test of unions' newfound power.
Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Tom Harkin, and Democrats in the House, introduced a bill that would let workers check a card to join unions instead of going through elections in which companies often play a major role. Critics say it would allow unions to largely bypass secret-ballot votes.
Unions hope the so-called check-card bill, backed by Obama, will reverse a long slide in membership. But business groups vehemently oppose the bill. Both sides have launched advertising and dispatched armies of lobbyists to Capitol Hill.
Harkin told the New York Times today that there are enough votes in the Senate to pass the bill -- but not the 60 likely to be required to overcome Republican procedural hurdles.
Unions, however, see this as their best chance to get the legislation. "Today is a banner day for working Americans, a milestone on the road to rebuilding our nation’s middle class -- and it couldn’t come at a more crucial time," AFL-CIO president John Sweeney said in a statement.
"The introduction of this bill so early is a strong message that Congress is ready to move forward to help working families build an economy that works for everyone. It is common sense legislation that makes good on a simple promise: If a majority of employees in a workplace want a union, they should be able to have a union and bargain
for a better life."
Anna Burger, chairwoman of the Change to Win labor coalition, also sought to portray the bill as part of the economic recovery.
“The Employee Free Choice Act is a key part of a larger economic plan," she said in a statement. "It is vital to restoring our economy and putting workers back on a path of prosperity. Right now, millions of working families are struggling -- losing their jobs, their health care, and their retirement benefits. They’re working harder than ever before, yet they’re not able to share in the wealth they helped create. To really fix this economy, we must rebuild the middle class. The solution is simple: create good jobs that support a family so workers can again buy homes, cars and the necessities for their families -- and put money back into our economy."
Kerry offers boost to mentoring
Senator John F. Kerry announced this morning that he and Republican Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania are introducing a bill to strengthen mentoring for youths at risk of getting into trouble.
According to the Massachusetts lawmaker's office, three million young Americans, including more than 19,000 in Massachusetts, are being mentored, but another 15 million could benefit from such programs.
“Mentoring programs can bring together at risk young people with positive role models who can help them gain the skills they need to lead successful lives. Thousands of young people here in Massachusetts have much to gain from having a mentor. I strongly urge my colleagues to join Senator Specter and me in recognizing the value of a mentor in a young person’s life and to fully support this legislation when it comes before the Senate,” Kerry said in a statement.
In a statement released by Kerry's office, David Shapiro, CEO of Mass Mentoring Partnership, endorsed the legislation, saying, “this multi-faceted investment in youth mentoring strives to increase critical youth connections to caring adults but ensure that this quantity is in lockstep with quality so that our youth and our society receive the full return on this investment in mentoring."
The summary of the legislation is below:
Massachusetts really is liberal
This should come as little surprise to Massachusetts voters, but the Bay State had the most liberal delegation in the US House last year, according to the latest National Journal rankings.
The House delegations from Rhode Island, Vermont, and Connecticut also ranked in the top five most liberal, and Maine and New Hampshire made the top 10.
The magazine looks at key votes on economic, social, and foreign policy issues to compile the annual rankings.
In the House, Bay State Democrats John Olver and John Tierney were among nine representatives who tied for the most liberal, while Barney Frank and Richard Neal tied for 13th most liberal of the 435 House members.
In the Senate, John F. Kerry of Massachusetts ranked the 29th most liberal, while Edward M. Kennedy did not have enough votes last year -- while he was being treated for brain cancer -- to be ranked.
Nonprofits need national service boost, report says
National service advocates plan to tell a Senate committee on Tuesday that a surge in volunteerism could be a lifeline for overburdened nonprofit groups.
The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, whose chairman is Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, is to hear from Michael Brown, CEO of City Year, on the next generation of national service.
At the hearing, the Democratic Leadership Council's Bruce Reed, director of domestic policy in the Clinton administration, and John M. Bridgeland, who held the same job under President George W. Bush, plan to submit a report titled, "The Quiet Crisis: The Impact of the Economic Downturn on the Nonprofit Sector."
"As Americans struggle through the current recession, the nation's nonprofit organizations are facing a triple whammy: the evaporation of wealth has decimated charitable donations; the state and local budget crunch is costing nonprofits their foremost paying clients; and the human need for nonprofit help is skyrocketing while nonprofit resources shrink," the DLC says.
Among other recommendations, the report calls for Congress to pass a national service bill drafted by Kennedy and Senator Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, and supported by President Obama, to triple to 250,000 the opportunities for Americans to perform national and community service.
Billionaire Buffett warns of 'muddled' message on economy
Another high-profile backer of President Obama added his voice today to those fretting publicly that the administration is not doing enough -- or taking the right actions -- to shore up the financial system and turn around the economy.
Billionaire investor Warren Buffett said on CNBC that the Obama team is sending mixed some signals about its approach, hurting consumer and market confidence.
"The message has to be very, very clear as to what government will be doing," Buffett said. "And I think we've had, and it's the nature of the political process somewhat, but we've had muddled messages and the American public does not know. They feel they don't know what's going on, and their reaction then is to absolutely pull back."
As the Globe reported on Saturday, there are some Obama supporters and others who say the government should more aggressively take on failing banks, putting them into federal receivership and following the response to the 1980s savings and loan crisis.
Buffett also admonished Republicans for unnecessarily beating up Obama, saying they "have an obligation to regard this as an economic war and realize you need one leader."
UPDATE: White House spokesman Robert Gibbs asserted that Buffett was criticizing Washington as a whole, not Obama in particular. He emphasized instead Buffett's call for Democrats and Republicans to cooperate for the good of the country.
In his daily briefing, Gibbs said that while there's always room for improvement in communicating the right message on the economy, "we have to continue to give people a realistic sense of where this economy is, but also ...we've got to make sure people understand that brighter days are ahead."
"But I think Mr. Buffett would agree that ... that this problem isn't going to be fixed overnight," Gibbs added. "The problems that we dealt with starting in sort of early to mid- September of last year didn't start last summer. Many of those problems started years ago. Many of the systemic problems that were rooted in what ultimately failed took place a while ago."
Limbaugh draws more partisan fire
A liberal-labor advocacy group has jumped on Rush Limbaugh's latest eyebrow-raising remark --about Senator Edward M. Kennedy's health -- as part of its crusade to tie the conservative radio show host around the neck of the Republican Party.
On his show Friday, Limbaugh talked about President Obama trying to shift attention to healthcare because he is failing to turn around the economy -- then suggested that Kennedy would be dead before a healthcare overhaul gets done.
"Before it's all over, it'll be called the Ted Kennedy Memorial Healthcare Bill," Limbaugh said.
Americans United for Change, calling the remark "disgusting," has joined the Democratic Party in demanding an apology.
"That's really clever, Rush -- picking on the senator with a brain tumor," the group told its supporters. "We can't let the Republican Party stay silent about Rush's wildly offensive remark. Demand an apology now."
"Senator Kennedy has spent his entire life fighting for policies to put America back on track -- policies like ending the war in Iraq, raising the minimum wage, and ensuring every American has access to quality, affordable healthcare," the group's missive continued. "The only thing Rush Limbaugh has fought for is himself. Now that Rush Limbaugh is the undisputed leader of the Republican Party, we want to know: will Congressional Republicans defend or demonize their leader's latest antics against their friend Senator Kennedy?"
No word from Limbaugh as yet, though he could address the controversy on his show today.
Americans United for Change, meanwhile, launches its latest cable TV ad asserting the Limbaugh is now the GOP's titular leader. The Republican Party, it says, has adopted Limbaugh's “I Hope he Fails” strategy towards Obama and has become the “Party of No:” "No to the jobs package, no to the Obama budget, no to healthcare reform and no to bipartisanship."
Limbaugh: Healthcare bill will be named in Kennedy's memory
Senator Edward M. Kennedy drew a standing ovation when he appeared at the White House healthcare summit on Thursday.
But radio show host Rush Limbaugh gave him another kind of greeting today, suggesting that the healthcare bill will be named in memory of Kennedy, who is battling brain cancer.
Continuing his criticism of President Obama, Limbaugh said Obama is failing to fix the economy "so he's moved on to healthcare. This is highly visible, it's news-leading, gets a great focus, plus it has the great liberal lion, Teddy Kennedy, pushing it."
"Before it's all over, it'll be called the Ted Kennedy Memorial Healthcare bill," Limbaugh said on his show.
Neither Kennedy nor Limbaugh have responded to the situation.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee quickly launched a petition drive urging Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele to denounce Limbaugh. The committee's executive director, Brian Wolff, called the remark "reprehensible" and "truly outrageous."
"Leader Limbaugh minimizes the struggle of hardworking Americans without access to affordable health care and demonizes a patriotic Senator who has spent his life fighting so that every person has the opportunity to live the American dream," Wolff said in a statement, calling the radio host by the moniker Democrats are using to suggest that Limbaugh is the leader of the GOP.
"Leader Limbaugh crossed the line. National Republicans must stand up to their leader, Rush Limbaugh, and tell him that enough is enough."
Americans United for Change, a liberal-labor coalition, added its outrage.
Jeremy Funk, a spokesman, said in a statement: “Even for someone with a long, sordid history of spewing sexist, racist, and disgusting rhetoric, Rush Limbaugh has really outdone himself this time with this wildly uncalled for and tasteless remark about ailing Senator Ted Kennedy. But as the undisputed leader of the Republican Party, the question is: will Congressional Republicans defend or admonish their leader’s latest antics? No one is holding their breathe for the latter.”
House GOP rails against bankruptcy changes
Republicans on Capitol Hill are on the warpath about a bill that would allow bankruptcy judges change mortgages to help homeowners stay in their houses.
The Democratic-controlled House today approved the measure, which would let judges reduce the principal owed, cut the interest rate, or extend the length of the loan.
House GOP leader John Boehner's office calls the legislation a "textbook example" of why Americans are increasingly fed up by the series of bailouts and rescues coming out of Washington.
"Disingenuously called the 'Helping Families Save their Homes Act,' the measure forces those who have acted responsibly to subsidize scam artists, speculators, and those who knowingly made bad decisions," Boehner's office said in an e-mail alert. "And it repeals a century-old rule that prohibits what is commonly called “cramdown.” Cramdown allows bankruptcy judges to rewrite the mortgage terms on an individual’s primary residence, and lifting the prohibition is expected to add even more uncertainty to a housing market already in turmoil and will increase mortgage costs at a time when homeowners can afford it least."
The message from Boehner's office gets in a slap at fellow House members, who could be allies on some issues: conservative Democrats, mostly from the South, known as the Blue Dog coalition. They had balked at the bill last week.
"However, as is often the case, Democratic leaders made a few cosmetic changes to bill, and the Blue Dogs heeled, proving once again that they are all bark and no bite."
UPDATE: After the House voted 234-191 this afternoon to approve the bill, Boehner issued a withering critique, saying the measure "forces taxpayers to reward irresponsible behavior...and will prolong the housing crisis."
“Owning a home is the heart and soul of the American Dream, and Republicans believe that we need to help families who acted responsibly stay in their homes. But this legislation doesn’t do that. What it really does is punish those who played by the rules to subsidize those who didn’t. Democrats even defeated a Republican proposal that would have protected taxpayers from bailing out those who lied on their mortgage applications. No wonder we are seeing more and more ‘taxpayer tea parties’ taking place all across America. Taxpayers are fed up with what they are seeing in Washington," he said in a statement.
“Nine out of every 10 homeowners are playing by the rules and making their payments. Republicans believe those who acted responsibly and need help should get it, but we should not bail out scam artists by forcing taxpayers to subsidize irresponsible behavior. It’s time for Democrats and Republicans to work together on a better solution to preserve the American Dream for those who play by the rules.”
Kennedy returns to weigh in on healthcare
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, who has declared healthcare as his final mission, appeared at the close of today's White House summit.
Kennedy drew a lengthy standing ovation and cheers.
"To Sir Edward Kennedy. That's the kind of greeting a knight deserves," President Obama said, noting that British Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced Wednesday that the Massachusetts lawmaker is receiving an honorary knighthood.
"It is thrilling to see you here, Teddy," the president added. "We are so grateful for you taking the time to be here and the extraordinary work that your committee has already started to do."
Obama also gave Kennedy the first question. Taking the microphone, Kennedy called the summit a "very special gathering."
"I join with all of those that feel that this is the time, now is the time, for action," Kennedy said. "I think most of us who have been in this room before have seen other times when the House and the Senate have made efforts, but they haven't been the kind of serious effort that I think that we're seeing right now.
"If you look over this gathering here today, you see the representatives of all the different groups that we have met with over the period of years," he added. "I mean, you have the insurance companies, you have the medical professions -- all represented in one form or another. That has not been the case over the history of the past, going all the way back to Harry Truman's time. But it is the case now. And it is, I think, a tribute to your leadership in bringing all these people together and really a leadership of so many that are gathered here today.
"What it does is basically challenges all of us to really do the best we can.....I just want to say that I'm looking forward to being a foot soldier in this undertaking. And this time, we will not fail."
Obama also made sure to shake hands with Kennedy first after his concluding remarks and wrapping up the summit.
It was the veteran Massachusetts lawmaker's first return to the nation's capital since casting a key vote on the economic stimulus package last month. Kennedy, who is battling brain cancer, has been recuperating in Florida since suffering a seizure on Inauguration Day.
Kennedy and his staff have been working closely with Senator Max Baucus, chairman of the Finance Committee, on legislation for a healthcare overhaul.
'Thelma and Louise,' not 'Harry and Louise'
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island fired off one of the best lines at today's White House healthcare summit.
As relayed by President Obama at the wrap-up session, Whitehouse argued during a small group session that it's time for an overhaul by saying it's not a "Harry and Louise" moment -- referring to the couple in the insurance company TV ads that helped scuttle health reform during the Clinton administration -- but a "Thelma and Louise" moment, alluding to the 1991 movie starring Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis whose characters drive off a cliff at the end.
"We're in the car headed toward the cliff and we must act," Obama quoted Whitehouse, before adding that while Thelma and Louise did go over the cliff, "that's not our intention here."
Kerry: Clean energy revolution coming
Senator John F. Kerry, who has added global warming atop the Foreign Relations Committee's to-do list, told industry officials and others today that a clean energy revolution is coming -- and they need to get on board.
"We are in the midst of a fundamental shift in our national and governmental priorities that could one day be remembered—alongside the presidencies of Roosevelt, Johnson, and Reagan—as truly transformational," Kerry said at a forum sponsored by Hitachi and featuring panels organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Brookings Institution.
Kerry noted that the economic stimulus package includes $80 billion for alternative energy. He also pointed out that President Obama, in his address to a joint session of Congress last week and in his proposed budget, called for capping carbon emissions and creating a market for the sale of pollution credits.
"Cap-and-trade is no longer an academic question," Kerry said, according to prepared remarks. "The President and leadership in both houses of Congress are on board to make it a reality, and you need to start preparing to take advantage of it."
"If passed, this will constitute the most significant realignment of our energy system in US history," the Massachusetts lawmaker added. "For the first time ever, America will put a price on carbon that will light a fire under our green entrepreneurs, drive development of new clean technologies, re-energize our economy, and tackle global climate change—all at the same time. This should not be frightening. Far from it: the change and the challenge may both be tremendous, but so are the possibilities. I truly believe that the next four or five Googles are in the energy sector, staring us in the face."
His full prepared remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYGuess who came to dinner
He's had key members of Congress over for cocktails. He invited them to watch the Super Bowl. He went to their turf on Capitol Hill to show he's serious about consultation.
In his latest outreach to the legislative branch, President Obama had the leaders of congressional committee and their spouses over for dinner Wednesday night.
The menu: celery soup, mushroom crisps, steelhead salmon, saffron couscous, crispy spinach and greens, and milk chocolate velvet cake.
And a big serving of humble pie from the president.
"We just want to say welcome on behalf of Michelle and myself. We're so glad all of you could join us," Obama told his guests.
"Obviously the country is going through an extraordinarily difficult time, and we are going to have some monumental debates taking place over the next several months and years," he added. "We also know that we're not always going to agree on everything. But given how hard so many of you are working on both sides of the aisle, day in, day out, we thought it was important for us to be able to step back for a moment, remind ourselves that we have things in common -- family, friends, laughter -- and hopefully, we'll have a chance to appreciate each other a little bit, take a time-out before we dive back into the game."
Congress has given Obama his $787 billion economic stimulus plan, but his emissaries are getting grilled on the banking system rescue and home foreclosure aid, and his first budget is drawing fire from both sides of the aisle.
"So we hope you have a wonderful evening -- not to mention the fact that this is a pretty big house, so we get lonely. So -- and it's hard for me to move around out there sometimes so I've got to bring the world to me," he said in closing his remarks. "But, anyway, I'm grateful for all of you coming. Michelle is thrilled that you're here. And we hope you just have a wonderful evening. Thank you."
Kerry sees opening in Syria
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Senator John F. Kerry, who recently returned from a Middle East trip that included stops in Syria and Gaza, called today for loosening sanctions on Syria, which he praised a for opening a stock market and sending an ambassador to Iraq.
"Loosening certain sanctions in exchange for verifiable changes in behavior can actually benefit US businesses," Kerry, the new chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee told a packed auditorium at the Brookings Institution. "The sanctions can always be tightened again if Syria backtracks."
In his speech, the Massachusetts Democrat urged the Obama administration to play a role in mediating ongoing peace talks between Syria and Israel -- a move that he said Syrian President Bashar Assad would welcome.
The Bush administration shunned Syria for more than four years, accusing the regime of fostering the insurgency in Iraq, meddling in Lebanon's affairs by assassinating its elected leaders, and supporting anti-Israeli militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas.
But the Obama administration has signalled a thaw in relations, in an attempt to encourage Syria to make peace with Israel and to pry the regime from its close alliance with Iran. Syria's ambassador to the United States, Imad Moustapha, who attended Kerry's speech yesterday, met last week for two hours at the State Department after years of relative diplomatic silence. Under Obama, the Treasury Department has also authorized the transfer of $500,000 of Syrian funds which had been frozen to a Syrian charity and the repair of aircraft with US parts.
US laws still discourages trade with Syria. Medicine and food can be sent to Syria, but other goods must apply for special permission.
Critics called it premature to loosen sanctions. David Schenker, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a conservative-leaning think tank, said that Syria is still "actively undermining every US interest in the Middle East."
In today's speech, Kerry also described his visit to the town of Izbet Abed Rabo in Gaza, a rare trip for US officials who have avoided the territory for years because of the danger of militant attack, and because it is controlled by Hamas, which the United States considers a terrorist organization.
"I saw little Palestinian girls playing in the rubble where, just months ago, buildings stood," Kerry said. Upon seeing the ruins of the American school there, he said: "I was moved by the enormity of the humanitarian challenge."
Kerry called for a regional "road map" based on a 2002 Saudi peace initiative in which Arab states would commit to specific actions -- such as ending support for Hamas -- to bring about a regional peace with Israel.
He said he believes that Israeli prime minister-designate Benjamin Netanyahu, despite his hard-line reputation, is prepared to do "important things" for peace. Kerry also called on the Obama administration to take measures to ensure that Israel freezes settlements in the West Bank.
"Nothing will do more to make clear our seriousness about turning the page than demonstrating - with actions rather than words - that we are serious," Kerry said. "For decades, American presidents, Democrat and Republican alike, have opposed new settlement activity and recognized that the settlements are an obstacle to peace. But in our honest moments we would all acknowledge that this policy has usually existed on paper alone."
Liberal-labor coalition launches drive for Obama budget
A coalition of liberal and union advocacy groups that lobbied aggressively for President Obama's economic stimulus package announced today that it will mount a similar effort to push through his budget.
The groups plan similar grassroots events, phone banks, and e-mails campaigns targeting members of Congress, as well as paid advertising. More than 40 major organizations have so far signed onto the $5 million to $7 million campaign, Americans United for Change said.
"Make no mistake: the Obama budget is real change – the change that Americans voted for in November," Chuck Loveless, legislative director for the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, said in a statement. "As we were during the economic recovery plan, AFSCME will be a leader in the fight to pass the Obama agenda. Our members make America happen. And America deserves nothing less.”
Obama's $3.6 trillion spending outline is facing stiff opposition in Congress because of tax hikes on the wealthy, expansions of a range of government programs, and projected trillion-dollar deficits.
The joint statement for the "Rebuild and Renew America Now!" campaign and the list of participating groups is below:
FULL ENTRYMcCain continues battle against earmarks
Senator John McCain is not giving up his fight against earmarks, even though the Senate rejected his attempt on Tuesday to strip them from the spending bill going through Congress.
Teaming up with Democratic Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, the Arizona Republican and former presidential candidate announced this morning they're introducing legislation to give the president a line-item veto to block earmarks.
McCain said earmarks -- which critics call pork-barrel projects -- represent a "corrupt practice" that has infiltrated Congress.
"I don't use the term corruption lightly," McCain said.
Feingold noted that White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said last week that President Obama might want to "test drive" a line-item veto, different versions of which have been declared unconstitutional by federal courts.
It's time to "walk the walk," Feingold said.
UPDATE: Feingold said he believes this legislation would pass constitutional muster because Congress would have to vote whether to agree to the earmark cuts the president wanted. If either the House or Senate voted by a single majority against the cuts, the projects would be funded.
Gibbs said while the administration needs to study the details of the bill, Obama wouldn't turn down a line-item veto that is approved by the courts.
"I think what the president wants is to be able to, as he outlined today, with Democrats and Republicans, work with Congress to reduce the amount of wasteful spending that we have each year," Gibbs told reporters at his daily briefing. "That's the best way to go out and do this, to continue to look for the inefficiencies and the waste, to follow prescribed solutions for this that in many cases have been identified and just simply not acted on."
The $410 billion spending measure includes more than 8,500 earmarks totaling $7.7 billion, watchdog groups say. The Senate voted 63-32 on Tuesday against the attempt by McCain to remove them.
So far, the White House has cast the earmarks as last year's business, since the bill would finish out the budget that started last Oct. 1, before Obama became president.
Frank aide signing on at HUD
Representative Barney Frank's chief of staff is joining the Obama administration, the White House announced this afternoon.
Peter Kovar, a veteran Capitol Hill aide, is being nominated as assistant secretary for Congressional and intergovernmental affairs in the Department of Housing and Urban Development. He worked on Frank's 1982 reelection campaign and subsequently joined the Massachusetts Democrat's Washington office as a junior staffer. He later worked for Senator John F. Kerry, then returned to Frank’s office, where he has been chief of staff since 1991.
President Obama said he also plans to nominate Brian Kennedy as Assistant Secretary for Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs in the Department of Labor; Dana Gresham as Assistant Secretary for Governmental Affairs in the Department of Transportation; and Sherburne Abbott as Associate Director of Environment, Office of Science and Technology Policy.
“These individuals have not only shown talent and expertise in their respective fields, but have also proven their commitment to public service. I know that they will serve their fellow Americans well during these challenging times,” Obama said in a statement.
Their mini-biographies, as provided by the White House, are below:
FULL ENTRYObama targets fraud and waste in contracts
President Obama this morning announced a retooling of how government contracts are awarded to ramp up competition, changes that the White House says would save taxpayers about $40 billion a year.
He said while huge investments are needed to get the economy turned around, the government must make sure it spends all its money wisely.
"It starts with reforming our broken system of government contracting," he said.
Government spending on goods and services increased from $200 billion in 2000 to more than $500 billion in 2008 and too much of that spending was plagued by cost overruns or outright fraud, the president said.
Obama signed a presidential memo ordering his budget director, Peter Orszag, to work with Cabinet and agency chiefs to come up by July 1 with a way to review existing contracts for waste or fraud.
By the end of September, Orszag is to come up with new rules designed to make it more difficult for contractors to cheat taxpayers by strengthening oversight and ending unnecessary no-bid contracts and "cost-plus" contracts that allow their price tag to escalate.
Obama shared the stage with his Republican presidential rival John McCain, who highlighted the contracting problems last week by pointing out that the new fleet of presidential helicopters could cost as much as Air Force One.
Obama said he endorsed the goals of the bipartisan effort on defense procurement reform led by McCain and Democratic Senator Carl Levin. Obama noted that a study last year by the Government Accountability Office of 95 major defense acquisitions projects found cost overruns of 26 percent, totaling $295 billion over the life of the projects.
Obama said that William Lynn III, the former Raytheon lobbyist who is now deputy defense secretary, will help lead the procurement reform in the Pentagon.
Ironically, McCain helped lead the opposition to Lynn, who had to receive a White House waiver from ethics rules and to pledge to recuse himself from decisions affecting the Waltham-based defense contractor to win confirmation.
The White House fact sheet is below, followed by the president's remarks:
McCain loses earmarks battle
Senator John McCain's latest bid to strip earmarks from spending bills failed today.
On a 63-32 vote, the Senate rejected a proposal to remove nearly 9,000 earmarks from the $410 billion spending bill to fund government operations through the end of September. The proposal would have also frozen spending at last year's levels.
Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, who also broke from the party on the stimulus package, were among the eight Republicans who voted against McCain.
McCain has criticized President Obama for what he says is going against his campaign pledge against earmarks -- what critics call pork-barrel projects.
Key healthcare players to do lunch
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Senator Max Baucus said this morning he plans to have lunch with Senator Edward M. Kennedy this week to discuss a major healthcare overhaul, the top priority for both senators, who chair the Finance Committee and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, respectively.
The news is significant because Kennedy, who is suffering from brain cancer, has mostly been in Florida since Inauguration Day, when he experienced a seizure during a Senate luncheon. He returned to Capitol Hill briefly to cast a key vote on the economic stimulus package.
Baucus, speaking to reporters at a Kaiser Family Foundation breakfast, said he has been speaking frequently with Kennedy about healthcare, which is the subject of a summit President Obama is convening on Thursday. He did not say whether Kennedy would attend the summit, but he said the two are working together closely. They recently co-authored a Wall Street Journal opinion piece about the need for a health overhaul.
Obama, making healthcare a priority, put $634 billion in his 10-year budget plan as a downpayment and on Monday named two key aides to push an overhaul: Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius as health and human services secretary, and former Clinton administration official Nancy DeParle as director of the White House Office of Health Reform.
McCain blisters Obama on earmarks
Top aides to President Obama continue to dismiss criticism of a $410 billion spending bill -- laden with more than 8,500 pet projects -- as "last year's business."
Technically, it's true since the bill would finish out the current federal fiscal year, which started last Oct. 1.
But Senator John McCain, Obama's Republican presidential rival, is having none of it.
"That's insulting to the American people," McCain said on the Senate floor today as he blistered Obama for agreeing to sign the bill once it gets through the Senate.
McCain pointed out that Obama promised during their campaign to get rid of earmark spending as part of changing the culture of Washington. "So much for the promise of change," McCain sniffed, according to the Associated Press.
Ad ties Republicans to Limbaugh
A labor union and progressive group launched a new national cable TV ad that tries to protect President Obama from Republican attacks by arguing that the GOP takes it marching orders from conservative radio icon Rush Limbaugh.
The spot from AFSCME and Americans United for Change says that congressional Republicans followed Limbaugh's lead in nearly unanimously opposing the $787 billion stimulus package, and are now echoing his opposition to the budget outline Obama unveiled Thursday.
The ad shows a succession of Republican leaders saying, "No" to Obama's proposals, then shows Limbaugh saying on his radio show that he wants Obama "to fail."
Alex Conant, spokesman for the Republican National Committee, responded: “The Democrats are running a permanent campaign rather than doing the bipartisan work of governing. These ads are part of the Democrats’ larger strategy to do something, anything to try to take the focus of their massive spending binge.”
A rebellion on Iraq
President Obama is holding an unscheduled huddle this afternoon with Senate Democrats, trying to quell a rebellion in the ranks over his Iraq plan he is expected to unveil Friday.
At Camp Lejeune, the huge Marine base in North Carolina, Obama is widely expected to confirm plans for a withdrawal by August 2010, though as many as 52,000 of the 142,000 troops now in Iraq could remain and some could retain combat roles.
"I have been one for a long time who has called for significant cutbacks in Iraq," Harry Reid of Nevada, the top Senate Democrat, told reporters. "I’m happy to listen to the secretary of defense and the president but when they talk about 50,000, that’s a little higher number than I anticipated."
The senators, along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, are questioning whether 50,000 is too many to actually "end the war," as Obama promised.
Some liberal critics have already been raising concerns about the 19-month timetable -- three months longer than what Obama pledged during the campaign.
In an CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll last week, 67 percent of Americans said they opposed the Iraq war, up slightly from December, and 69 percent supported removing most troops, while Americans were evenly divided whether the United States is "winning."
In the same survey, however, 63 percent favored Obama's plan to send 17,000 more troops this spring to Afghanistan, though a majority oppose the war. Also, only 31 percent said the US is winning the war in Afghanistan, though 62 percent said the US can win.
Kennedy, Baucus back Obama on healthcare
President Obama told Congress and the nation that a healthcare overhaul can't wait -- and backed up his words by calling today for a $634 billion reserve fund as a down payment on the changes.
The two key US senators working on healthcare have Obama's back as well, jointly penning an op-ed piece in today's Wall Street Journal.
"Some argue that repairing the health-care system now is impossible, given the urgency and high cost of ending the financial crisis. The claim is that we can fix one problem or the other -- but not both. In truth, the two are inextricably intertwined: Solving the nation's health-care crisis is a fundamental part of healing our economy," write Senator Edward M. Kennedy, chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, and Senator Max Baucus, chairman of the Finance Committee.
The two Democrats add that "there is also a moral imperative to follow economic recovery efforts with health reform. If Congress can bail out the nation's banks, surely we can help families get the quality, affordable health care they deserve."
They conclude, "Health is a public good worthy of major, long-term investment. Our starting point will be the down payment of more than $600 billion that the president included in the budget released today. The challenge of crafting this public policy is certainly large. But just as Congress and the president met the first challenges of restoring our nation's economy, we must also keep our commitment to reforming health care -- now."
A tough slog ahead in Afghanistan
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator John McCain come at the subject of Afghanistan from vastly different viewpoints.
But they agreed today that the Obama administration, which is sending 17,000 more US troops this spring to the war-torn country, faces a tough slog there.
"I have to give straight talk and that is I think things are going to get worse in Afghanistan before they get better," McCain said this afternoon at the American Enterprise Institute. "And so I think that it's very important that the president and members of Congress and other people in leadership and respected positions inform the American people that it's going to be a long and hard and tough."
Pelosi, who just returned from leading a congressional delegation to Afghanistan, called it "a tragedy."
In an interview airing tonight on MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show," Pelosi said the Bush administration, while waging war in Iraq, was "without a plan, adrift" for 7 1/2 years on Afghanistan, where Al Qaeda is believed to have re-established havens on the border with Pakistan.
"Everyone in the military says this cannot be accomplished militarily only. So it's about how we work with our allies in NATO for a military presence there that will be effective in our defeating the Taliban and eliminating Al Qaeda," she added. "It's about governance. It's about the government of Afghanistan and how legitimate, and reducing corruption and the whole poppy trade, the drug trade, the rest of that."
Obama convenes meeting on financial rules
Following up on his exhortation to fix the fundamental causes of the economic crisis, President Obama plans to huddle today with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and key members of Congress to discuss "the critical need for financial regulatory reform."
He plans to meet in the Oval Office with the chairmen and ranking members of the Senate Banking and House Financial Services committees, which have overseen the financial rescue that is costing taxpayers $700 billion and counting. Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut leads the banking panel and Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts the financial services panel.
UPDATE: In prepared remarks obtained by the Associated Press, the president offers no specific regulations he wants, but talks of "core principles," including consumer protections and accountability for executives.
"Let me be clear: the choice we face is not between an oppressive government-run economy and a chaotic and unforgiving capitalism," Obama says, according to the remarks. "Rather, strong financial markets require clear rules of the road, not to hinder financial institutions, but to protect consumers and investors."
An administration official told the AP that Obama wants Congress to work on the regulatory overhaul in the next several weeks, before April's meeting of the world's 20 major economies. "We must recognize that the challenges we face are not just American challenges, they are global challenges," Obama says, according to the prepared excerpts. "So as we work to set high regulatory standards here in the U.S., we must challenge the world to do the same."
In his speech Tuesday night to a joint session of Congress, Obama talked of a "day of reckoning" after "an era where too often short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity; where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next quarter, or the next election....Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn't afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day."
Obama said that "to ensure that a crisis of this magnitude never happens again, I ask Congress to move quickly on legislation that will finally reform our outdated regulatory system."
"It is time -- it is time to put in place tough, new common-sense rules of the road so that our financial market rewards drive and innovation, and punishes short-cuts and abuse," he added.
Even as he tried to raise the nation's sights to take on ambitious and costly initiatives in energy, education, and healthcare, he warned that more taxpayer aid will be needed to get banks on sounder footing and credit flowing again to consumers and businesses.
"It's not about helping banks; it's about helping people," he said. "Because when credit is available again, that young family can finally buy a new home. And then some company will hire workers to build it. And then those workers will have money to spend. And if they can get a loan, too, maybe they'll finally buy that car, or open their own business. Investors will return to the market, and American families will see their retirement secured once more. Slowly, but surely, confidence will return, and our economy will recover."
"So I ask this Congress to join me in doing whatever proves necessary. Because we cannot consign our nation to an open-ended recession."
Obama's remarks after the meeting are below:
Solis in as labor secretary
President Obama finally has a labor secretary, leaving his picks at commerce and health and human services still to go to complete his cabinet.
The Senate late this afternoon voted 80-17 to confirm California congresswoman Hilda Solis at labor, two months after Obama nominated her. Her nomination was held up by Republican concerns over her pro-union activities, then by reports of tax liens against her husband's business.
Labor groups have been aggressively pushing for Solis, and immediately applauded her confirmation.
"The confirmation of Rep. Hilda Solis is a huge victory: finally Americans will have a Secretary of Labor who represents working people, not wealthy CEO’s. It is also a historic moment as Rep. Solis becomes the first Hispanic Secretary of Labor," AFL-CIO president John Sweeney said in a statement.
"The delay of Rep. Solis’s nomination for partisan and ideological reasons was overcome by the grassroots support of millions of Americans who are struggling and desperately need a secretary of labor who will be their voice," he added, calling her "uniquely qualified to help struggling families through these difficult economic times because she knows firsthand what they are going through."
"She grew up in a working class family and understands what programs our nation’s workers need the most. She will fight to improve skills development and job creation programs, including development of 'green collar' jobs," Sweeney added. "She will work to assure that workers get the pay they have earned and that they work in safe, healthy, and fair workplaces. She’s ready to address the retirement security crisis and will work hard to protect every worker from job discrimination, regardless of race, sex, veteran status, or disability."
"In the midst of this economic crisis – when thousands of jobs are lost every day – it is crucial to make the economy work for working people again. Americans need a plan to help put families back to work, back in their homes, and back on the path of prosperity. In addition to bold economic recovery plan, America’s workers need a strong Department of Labor," added Anna Burger, chairwoman of the Change to Win coalition.
“Hilda Solis is the right person to lead that charge. She has long been a champion of working families. She has fought for fair pay for women, health care for children, green jobs and the right for workers to have a voice in the workplace to improve wages, conditions and benefits. We applaud Congress for their confirmation of Hilda Solis as U.S. Secretary of Labor and look forward to working alongside her. We are confident that she will help restore the economy, rebuild the middle class and renew the American Dream for America’s workers.”
The Communications Workers of America, along with other unions, highlighted her support for a bill that would make it easier for workers to organize.
“Secretary Solis has long been an effective voice for workers’ rights,” said CWA President Larry Cohen.
Ellen R. Malcolm, president of EMILY's List, which supports female candidates who back abortion rights, added her congratulations.
"Today, I congratulate Secretary Hilda Solis and wish her well as our new Secretary of Labor. Along with the thousands of EMILY’s List members who petitioned Senate Republicans standing in her way, I am heartened to see the Senate confirm Solis and put progress ahead of partisan politics. It is critical that the Department of Labor have a strong, intelligent, and effective leader like Secretary Solis to advocate for our nation’s workers during these tough economic times,” she said in a statement.
Tom Daschle withdrew at health and human services over tax problems, and though reports have suggested Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius is in line for the appointment, Obama has yet to announce it.
As soon as Wednesday, Obama is expected to nominate former Washington Governor Gary Locke as his third try at Commerce. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson withdrew over an investigation into state contracts, then Republican Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire jilted Obama at the political altar, saying he had too many policy differences with the new Democratic president.
Kerry, Frank target 'excess' by bailout recipients
Jumping on taxpayer anger over junkets and other lavish spending by firms receiving federal aid, Senator John F. Kerry announced today that he plans to introduce legislation to end such extravagance.
The Massachusetts Democrat, a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, said his "TARP Taxpayer Protection and Corporate Responsibility Act" would prevent any recipient of financial bailout funds from hosting, sponsoring, or paying for conferences, holiday parties, and entertainment events. Any TARP recipient that misused the funds would be fined and required to reimburse the government.
Kerry’s office said he was responding to reports that Northern Trust Bank, which received $1.6 billion in bailout assistance, hosted hundreds of employees and clients at expensive hotels in Beverly Hills and threw Hollywood parties that featured performances by Chicago and Sheryl Crow. The bank recently laid off almost 450 workers.
Northern Trust issued a statement saying that the event is an important part of its marketing and was not paid for using government money.
“I’m sick and tired of picking up the newspaper and reading about another idiotic abuse of taxpayer money while our country is on the brink,” Kerry said in a statement. “Americans who play by the rules are losing their jobs and struggling to pay their mortgages. The companies that came to Congress in desperate need of help to stay afloat become their own worst enemies when they pull stunts like this. It’s an embarrassment that this legislation is necessary, but some companies clearly need a reality check to get their priorities straight so taxpayer money is used to get their house in order and not to pay for lavish parties. Congress has zero tolerance for this kind of excess.”
Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts added his outrage as well.
As chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, he and 17 other Democrats wrote to Northern Trust, demanding that it repay money spent on the parties, hotel rooms, and golf tournament.
"At a time when millions of homeowners are facing foreclosure, businesses and consumers are in dire need of credit, and the government is trying to keep financial institutions -- including yours -- alive with billions in taxpayer funds, this behavior demonstrates extraordinary levels of irresponsibility and arrogance," the lawmakers said in the letter to Northern Trust Chief Executive Frederick Waddell, Reuters reports.
D.C. representation clears hurdle
District of Columbia advocates' hope that President Obama will be the one to finally give Washington a full voting representative in Congress moved a big step closer today.
The US Senate voted 62-34, two more votes than needed, to begin debate on a bill that would grant heavily-Democratic D.C. a seat in the House, while balancing it by giving Republican Utah a seat, growing the chamber to 437 members.
Obama was an original cosponsor of the bill when he was in the Senate and is expected to sign it if it reaches his desk. His election in November renewed hopes among D.C. boosters.
Republicans blocked the bill two years ago and could seek to filibuster it again, but now Democrats control seven more seats in the Senate.
"I find it unimaginable that 600,000 Americans have no voice and no vote in the United States Congress," the Senate's second-ranking Democrat, Dick Durbin of Illinois, said in urging support for the measure, according to the Associated Press.
Americans not confident in leaders, oppose more bailouts
Americans are scared witless about the economy and their own finances.
But newly released poll findings show they also have little confidence in government and business leaders -- other than President Obama -- to make things better.
According to the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey, 40 percent are very confident and 35 percent somewhat confident that the Obama administration "will make the right decisions to help the country overcome its current economic problems."
Only 19 percent are very confident in congressional Democrats and 9 percent in congressional Republicans, 11 percent for labor leaders, only 5 percent each for auto executives and bank executives, and a mere 4 percent are very confident in Wall Street investors.
The poll also suggests there's little appetite for forking over more taxpayer money to help bail out the struggling auto industry or Wall Street. Only 37 percent favor, and 61 percent oppose, more aid to the automakers. Only 36 percent favor, and 62 percent oppose, shelling out the remaining $350 billion in financial rescue funds.
But Americans support more direct help -- 63 percent favor government assistance to homeowners who can't pay their mortgages and 72 percent favor "a program that would increase the federal government's influence over the country's health care system in an attempt to lower costs and provide health care coverage to more Americans."
After Afghanistan visit, Markey critical of truce
Representative Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts met with US troops over the weekend in Afghanistan, where the Obama administration plans to send 17,000 more this spring.
In a statement today, Markey criticized the truce between the government and a Taliban group in the Swat Valley.
“I saw many encouraging signs on the trip. However, inside Pakistan, a truce declared between the government and a Taliban group inside the Swat Valley is totally unacceptable. This truce represents a capitulation by the Pakistani government and a refusal to provide basic security to the people of the Swat Valley. We have to acknowledge that the security situation in Pakistan is critical in order to succeed in Afghanistan, and we need a strategy that reflects that reality.”
He made the visit as part of a congressional delegation led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that visited Italy. In Afghanistan, Markey and the delegation went Camp Eggers in Kabul and were briefed by US Ambassador William Wood, and US and allied military commanders, Markey's office said today. The delegation also met with Afghan President Hamid Karzai to discuss the political and security situation in Afghanistan.
“I am grateful for the sacrifice and dedication of all of our brave men and women serving in Afghanistan,” Markey said in the statement. “I am honored to witness firsthand, their commitment, valor and sacrifice in the name of America's security.”
Romney helps stimulus foes
Mitt Romney's political action committee announced today it is sending financial help to Republican US House members who have been targeted by Democrats for their votes against the $787 billion stimulus package.
The $1,000 checks from the former Massachusetts governor's Free and Strong America PAC are going to Representatives Judy Biggert and Mark Kirk of Illinois, Ken Calvert and Dan Lungren of California, Michael Castle of Delaware, Charlie Dent and Jim Gerlach of Pennsylvania, Blaine Luetkemeyer of Missouri, Thad McCotter of Michigan, Dave Reichert of Washington, and Pete Sessions of Texas.
House Republicans unanimously opposed the package, as did Romney.
“What Republicans wanted was a bill to strengthen the economy," Romney said in a statement. "What the Democrats passed was a bill to stimulate government. We are committed to helping these courageous Republicans defend their position and fend off political attacks.”
Billionaire gave big bucks to pols
Billionaire R. Allen Stanford, under investigation for allegedly running an $8 billion CD fraud, was generous to politicians of both parties, a watchdog group reports today.
Stanford's political action committee gave $31,750 to President Obama's campaign, the third biggest donation for the 2008 election cycle, the Center for Responsive Politics says. An Obama aide told Bloomberg said that the money was donated Wednesday to charity.
Republican presidential candidate John McCain received $28,150 from Stanford, and also says he has given back the money.
In all, Stanford's PAC distributed about $134,000 to 2008 candidates, the center says. Stanford's company also spent $2.2 million last year for lobbying.
Despite about-face, Gregg gets White House invite
President Obama is apparently not one to hold grudges.
Senator Judd Gregg, a New Hampshire Republican, didn't help Obama -- and actually embarrassed him -- by pulling a stunning about-face last week and withdrawing as the new president's nominee for commerce secretary.
But Obama is inviting him back to the White House anyway for a "fiscal responsibility summit" on Monday that will tackle issues dear to Gregg, such as entitlement reform.
"I've been asked by the President, along with a number of other Members of Congress, to join him next Monday," Gregg said in a statement. "My goal for the summit will be to address the long-term fiscal tsunami that is headed our way as a result of the cost of making payments to the Baby Boom Generation through health and retirement entitlement programs."
"Reform is urgently needed, especially as long-term entitlement spending threatens to strangle our economy, and action must be taken sooner rather than later," Gregg added. "I will certainly do everything I can to work with the President and others in Congress to set a course for the long-run that addresses the issue of how we pass on to our children a government they can afford."
In withdrawing his name, Gregg said he concluded he had too many policy differences with Obama, including on the stimulus plan that the president signed on Tuesday.
"Our country is facing one of the greatest economic challenges of our lifetime, and I believe sizable action is needed to help our economy begin moving forward again. Today, the American people are worried about their jobs, home values, retirement savings, and Main Street businesses, and we need an economic plan that brings immediate relief, creates jobs, and strengthens American production to get our nation back on course," Gregg said in a statement on his office's website.
"However, I am concerned that this so-called stimulus bill falls short of what is needed. What was initially advertised as a well-intended effort to boost economic growth has become sidetracked by misplaced spending and lack of attention to the true problems facing the nation, especially housing. Massive amounts of money will be spent years after this bill is signed into law, thereby undermining claims that it is stimulative. Also, the bill’s tax relief provisions will not adequately spur investment and business activity, which are critical for job creation and economic growth.
"This bill, therefore, is not timely, targeted, and temporary, which is what a stimulus bill should be. And with a deteriorating budget situation, we cannot afford a proposal that will saddle future generations with massive amounts of debt with little to show for it in return.”
Partisan spat continues on stimulus
Democrats are crowing over the signing of the stimulus bill, not surprising that they provided all but three votes in Congress for its passage.
“Today, we’ve taken a big step toward digging out this dismal economic downturn,” Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts said in a statement. “This bill is an essential down payment towards a comprehensive economic recovery. But it won’t work unless we immediately solve our bedrock economic problems starting with recapitalizing our banking system and repairing our housing market.”
Governor Tim Kaine, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, issued a statement: “By signing the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act today, President Obama took the first step towards keeping his promise to pass a responsible plan that saves or creates four millions jobs, provides tax relief for hard-working American families, and invests in our long-term economic future. At a time when hundreds of thousands of Americans are losing their jobs each month, President Obama called on our leaders in Washington to come together to find practical solutions that prevent this economic crisis from deteriorating even further. I applaud those who answered that call by putting partisanship aside to pass a bill that provides the practical solutions America’s working families need, expect and deserve. But this is only the beginning. Moving forward, we need more leaders in Washington to follow their example as we continue the hard work of getting our economy back on track.”
But Representative John Boehner of Ohio, the top Republican in the House, reiterated his opposition.
“Our nation is in recession, and responsible action is required to help our economy protect and create jobs. This isn’t it.," he said in a statement.
“The flawed bill the President will sign today is a missed opportunity, one for which our children and grandchildren will pay a hefty price. It’s a raw deal for American families, providing just $1.10 per day in relief for workers while saddling every family with $9,400 in added debt to pay for special-interest programs and pork-barrel projects. It will do little to create jobs, and will do more harm than good to middle-class families and our economy.
“In response to the President’s request for input, Republicans offered a better solution that would create twice as many jobs at half the cost. Instead of delivering a responsible, transparent, bipartisan bill to create ‘jobs, jobs, jobs,’ the Democratic Congress produced a trillion-dollar, special-interest pork-laden, partisan backroom deal that will do little to get our economy back on track.
“Upon his election, President Obama expressed a desire to govern from the center and to be a President for all Americans. I have cautioned that the President’s party would not always make it easy for him to meet this goal. Sadly, this proved to be the case with the economic recovery legislation. Despite this missed opportunity, Republicans stand ready to work with the President for better solutions to the challenges facing our country. We can do better, and we must.”
John Sweeney, president of the AFL-CIO, said in a statement:
"President Obama’s signature on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act today is an important down payment on a more hopeful and secure future for America’s workers and their families.
"While it will still take many months for our economy to recover, this plan is a crucial first step that will put people back to work now, save and create good jobs, rebuild our crumbling roads, bridges, and schools and invest in a stronger economy at a time when there’s nothing more important.
"Now working people need our leaders to focus on setting the foundation of an economy that will begin to work for everyone so that we do not end up in this position again. It’s time to re-regulate the banking and financial industries, prioritize working family issues like health care and retirement security and ensure that all workers have the freedom to
improve their lives by forming unions and bargaining for better wages and benefits. We hope those leaders who opposed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will end party politics as usual and begin to join the forward-thinkers who are seeking solutions to our nation’s problems."
Americans United for Change, a liberal/labor advocacy group that pushed the stimulus plan, quickly unveiled a new cable TV ad hailing its passage.
The spot liberally quotes Obama at the signing ceremony today.
"This ad is designed to celebrate passage of President Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as a major victory for the American people who are seeking relief from the worst economic crisis in a generation," Brad Woodhouse, the group's president, said in a statement. “Passage of the Obama jobs plan will not only play a critical role in turning our economy around and getting people back to work, it represents a transformational and historic moment for our country. This achievement represents a dramatic shift away from the failed trickle down economic policies of the past to a new approach that builds our economy from the bottom up by investing in people and communities. As a result of the leadership of President Obama and Congressional Democrats, our country has taken a major step on the road to recovery.”
More promises, promises
Whether the huge stimulus bill will quickly boost the economy is uncertain.
But by signing the $787 billion bill today, President Obama did keep or advance some 50 of his campaign promises -- what a watchdog website calls a "remarkable number."
Indeed, the 1,071-page bill includes nearly 10 percent of all his pledges, Politifact.com said today. "The accomplishment reflects the extraordinary scope of the bill, which covers everything from tax credits for workers to weatherizing homes," the fact-checking website said.
For instance, Obama gets credit for keeping promise No. 327 by getting $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts in the stimulus plan.
But he gets docked for breaking pledge No. 505 because the stimulus does not include a $3,000 tax credit for businesses for creating each job, which Politifact says now appears dead.
With history and flourish, Obama signs stimulus bill
Signing his modern-day equivalent to the New Deal, President Obama declared that the stimulus bill is the most sweeping economic recovery package in the nation's history -- one that helps keep his campaign promise to preserve the American dream.
"We have begun the essential work of keeping the American dream alive in our time," he said, before affixing his signature to the $787 billion stimulus bill passed by Congress on Friday.
Singing its praises as if the package had not yet passed, Obama continued selling the stimulus to a public that is far more enamored of him than of the bill.
He said the bill will "improve travel and commerce throughout the nation," will put the nation on track to transforming "the way we use energy," and "represents the biggest increase in basic research funding in the long history of America’s noble endeavor to better understand our world.
Combined with an expansion of a children's healthcare program he also signed, "we have done more in 30 days to advance the cause of health reform than this country has done in a decade," he added.
Obama said he signed "a balanced plan with a mix of tax cuts and investments. It is a plan that’s been put together without earmarks or the usual pork barrel spending. And it is a plan that will be implemented with an unprecedented level of transparency and accountability."
Still, Obama acknowledged that much more needs to be done to restore the economy, but said that the economic stimulus bill is the "beginning of the end" of the work.
While the White House says the stimulus bill will save or create 3.5 million jobs in the next two years, the impact will likely take several months to take root. In the meantime, Obama has several crises to deal with: perhaps giving more loans for General Motors and Chrysler to keep them afloat, figuring out the details of version 2.0 of the bank bailout, and Wednesday outlining a plan to stem home foreclosures.
Beneath the lectern were three identical placards saying, "Making America Work."
He spoke at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science after touring the solar panel array that the museum uses for part of its power and that he cited as an example of the "green" alternative energy jobs the stimulus will generate.
Obama was introduced by the head of a solar energy company that has grown from 3 to 55 employees in the past three years, but that had to impose a hiring freeze and slash spending in the economic downturn.
Governor Bill Ritter called Colorado "the home of the new energy economy."
"This is how we rebuild America...." he said. "This is the promise of a better tomorrow."
Obama also issued an official statement on the stimulus bill signing:
"Today I have signed into law H.R. 1, the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009." The Act provides a direct fiscal boost to help lift our Nation from the greatest economic crisis in our lifetimes and lay the foundation for further growth. This recovery plan will help to save or create as many as three to four million jobs by the end of 2010, the vast majority of them in the private sector. It will make the most significant investment in America's roads, bridges, mass transit, and other infrastructure since the construction of the interstate highway system. It will make investments to foster reform in education, double renewable energy while fostering efficiency in the use of our energy, and improve quality while bringing down costs in healthcare. Middle-class families will get tax cuts and the most vulnerable will get the largest increase in assistance in decades.
"The situation we face could not be more serious. We have inherited an economic crisis as deep and as dire as any since the Great Depression. Economists from across the spectrum have warned that failure to act quickly would lead to the disappearance of millions of more jobs and national unemployment rates that could be in the double digits. I want to thank the Congress for coming together around this hard-fought compromise. No one policy or program will solve the challenges we face right now, nor will this crisis recede in a short period of time. However, with this Act we begin the process of restoring the economy and making America a stronger and more prosperous Nation.
"My Administration will initiate new, far-reaching measures to help ensure that every dollar spent in this historic legislation is spent wisely and for its intended purpose. The Federal Government will be held to new standards of transparency and accountability. The legislation includes no earmarks. An oversight board will be charged with monitoring our progress as part of an unprecedented effort to root out waste and inefficiency. This board will be advised by experts -- not just Government experts, not just politicians, but also citizens with years of expertise in management, economics, and accounting.
"So much depends on what we do at this moment. This is not about the future of my Administration. This effort is about the future of our families and communities, our economy and our country. We are going to move forward carefully and transparently and as effectively as possible because so much is on the line. That is what we have already begun to do -- drafting this plan with a level of openness for which the American people have asked and that this situation demands."
Obama's full prepared remarks are below:
The setting for stimulus bill signing
Why Denver?
In picking the Mountain West city for the signing of the historic economic stimulus bill, President Obama returns today to one of the high points of his campaign -- when he accepted the Democratic nomination -- as well.
It also gets him outside the partisan backbiting of Washington and out into the real country as he tries to convince Americans that the $787 billion bill is worth the money.
But the precise setting -- the Denver Museum of Nature and Science -- is curious.
Ostensibly, it is to highlight the potential of "green energy" jobs. Just before signing the bill, Obama will tour the array of 465 solar panels that the museum uses to generate part of its power.
But could it also be something of an in-your-face move to opponents of funding for the arts?
The stimulus bill includes $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts, but it didn't come without a huge fight. Not only was not in the version originally passed by the Senate, but the Senate even passed an amendment that banned stimulus cash going to museums, arts centers, and theaters.
The conference committee's compromise, approved Friday by the House and Senate, restored the NEA money and killed the amendment.
The Denver museum, by the way, reported receiving two government grants of more than $100,000 each -- from NASA and the National Science Foundation -- in 2007, when it drew 1.25 million visitors.
No longer cabinet nominee, Gregg speaks out
A day after stunning official Washington by pulling a "never mind" on his nomination to be commerce secretary, Senator Judd Gregg gave mixed reviews today to two key economic recovery initiatives of the man whose cabinet offer he eventually spurned.
The New Hampshire Republican said on CNBC this morning that Obama is on the right track in trying to shore up the financial system, despite the criticism that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was much too vague in outlining the proposals this week.
"You are talking over a trillion dollars ... to clear off the books in the areas of consumer credit and commercial-backed real estate loans. That's big," Gregg said. "You are talking very strong initiatives in the area of foreclosure abatement. And you're talking a significant commitment to capital into the banks coming in either a direct infusion or through buying bad debt off their books."
But Gregg said that Obama made a "tactical error" made on the $789 stimulus bill, expected to be approved by Congress as early as today, by allowing the budget committee leaders to write most of the bill.
Gregg is expected to vote against the stimulus package, which he said "should be focusing mainly on trying to stabilize the real estate markets, and promoting small business and getting jobs."
Gregg is breaking his silence after taking the unusual move of recusing himself from voting on any and all Senate matters while his nomination had been pending. In announcing his withdrawal on Thursday, he said he concluded he had too many policy differences with Obama.
Obama, meanwhile, has been publicly more understanding of Gregg's change of heart than the initial snippy White House statement, which suggested that Gregg knew that by accepting the nomination, he would have to back Obama on policy.
The president told reporters aboard Air Force One last night that he and Gregg agree on 80 percent of the big issues that Americans care about.
And during a dinner in Springfield, Ill., commemorating the 200th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln's birth, Obama even managed to joke about the turn of events.
"In 1854, Lincoln was simply a Springfield lawyer who'd served just a single term in Congress, possibly in his law office, his feet on a cluttered desk, his sons playing around him, his clothes a bit too small to fit his uncommon frame, maybe wondering if somebody might call him up and ask him to be commerce secretary ..." Obama said, trailing off as the crowd burst into laughter.
Senator John McCain, the GOP presidential nominee last year, opined today on Gregg's decision.
“I’m not sure of the evolution in Senator Gregg’s thinking, but I’m glad to have him back,” he said on Fox News Channel, according to excerpts released by the network.
McCain disputed suggestions that fellow Republicans were angry with Gregg and forced him to withdraw.
“I don’t think Senator Gregg was pressured by anybody," he said. "He’s a bit of a New Hampshire-ite with free will and thinks for himself.”
Stories of the recession
On the eve of the passage of his economic stimulus plan, President Obama's unprecedented grassroots organization -- now housed within the Democratic National Committee -- this morning released the stories of real Americans hit by the recession.
“This week's report that more than 623,000 Americans requested first time jobless claims is a sobering reminder of the impact this economic crisis is having on America’s working families,” Governor Tim Kaine, chairman of the DNC, said in a statement. “The stories we've collected put a human face on the economic crisis and underscore the urgent need for action. These stories are the reason President Obama asked our leaders in Washington to put partisanship aside and pass an economic recovery plan that saves or creates four million jobs and invests in our economic prosperity in the long term. Congress needs to move swiftly toward final passage of the Economic Recovery Plan so the President can sign it into law and we can prevent this economic crisis from becoming a national catastrophe that costs millions more Americans their jobs, homes, and health care.”
Last week, Organizing for America, the post-election iteration of Obama's record-breaking on-the-ground campaign, encouraged meetings and house parties on the economic recovery plan and asked people to submit their stories about how the economic crisis is affecting them and their communities.
From more than 3,600 meetings in all 50 states, Americans submitted more than 31,030 stories -- and there's a sampling posted on its website.
"As of a week ago, our family has joined the ranks of the unemployed and thus uninsured. We have two children, a 6 year old and a 10 month old. With my part time jobs and unemployment, we should be able to keep the roof over our heads, at least one car in the driveway and food in our stomachs for a few months. The state of our health insurance is what truly scares us," said Nichole H. of Columbus, Ohio.
"I live in a small rural community in central Minnesota and have run my own small business for 32 years here. These last 8 years have been a slow steady decline economically. This has caused me to continually find ways to tighten my budget. Our small towns are really struggling with infrastructure and loss of businesses to attract and hold workers in their communities," said Judy T. of Motley, Minn.
"I am a teacher in Florida where we are 50th in the country in spending per student. I feel this generation of students is being cheated out of a quality education. I'm fortunate that I have a job. But our education system is failing our children. There are so many areas of education that are suffering because of massive budget cuts. The bottom line is: as the United States of America we can do better for our children," said Betty Jo A. of Deltona, Fla.
Gregg withdraws as commerce nominee
Senator Judd Gregg, the New Hampshire Republican, withdrew this afternoon as President Obama's nominee for Commerce Secretary, saying he had too many policy differences on the stimulus package and the Census.
“It has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me. Prior to accepting this post, we had discussed these and other potential differences, but unfortunately we did not adequately focus on these concerns. We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy," Gregg said in a statement.
At a news conference on Capitol Hill, Gregg said it became clear to him that he could not be "100 percent behind the team" and that it was "his mistake" to accept the nomination.
Using a football analogy, Gregg said it would be like blocking back who only pulls out to block for every second or third play.
"I've been my own person for 30 years...It really wasn't a great fit," he said. "Bottom line, it was a bridge too far for me."
Gregg acknowledged that "to withdraw at this point is unfair in many ways," but he said staying on would have been a bigger mistake .
Gregg praised Obama for reaching out to Republicans and including diverse views in his cabinet and said he will be an effective president.
The White House response suggested that Gregg was the one who forced the divorce -- and should have known about the policy differences.
“Senator Gregg reached out to the President and offered his name for Secretary of Commerce," press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement. "He was very clear throughout the interviewing process that despite past disagreements about policies, he would support, embrace, and move forward with the President’s agenda. Once it became clear after his nomination that Senator Gregg was not going to be supporting some of President Obama’s key economic priorities, it became necessary for Senator Gregg and the Obama administration to part ways. We regret that he has had a change of heart”.
Obama, himself, told The State Journal-Register newspaper in Springfield, Ill. that Gregg's withdrawal was "something of a surprise."
UPDATE: Later, he told reporters on Air Force One that he was glad Gregg "searched his heart" and changed course before he was confirmed. "Clearly he was just having second thoughts about leaving the Senate, a place where he's thrived," Obama added.
Obama also said Gregg's withdrawal won't deter him from working with Republicans.
Gregg had recused himself from voting on the stimulus, or any other matter before the Senate, while his nomination was pending.
House Republican leaders today had criticized plans for increased White House involvement in the Census, saying that if Obama didn't trust Gregg to oversee the Census, he should find another Commerce nominee. The Census will help determine political power in Washington in the next decade.
Gregg's announcement also ended the short-lived plan for New Hampshire's Democratic governor, John Lynch, to appoint Republican Bonnie Newman to the Senate.
To pave the way for Gregg's nomination, Lynch agreed to appoint a Republican to serve out Gregg's term and not change the balance of power in the Senate, and Newman agreed not to run for the office.
The Associated Press is reporting that Lynch, who spoke to Gregg several hours before the announcement, said he respected Gregg's decision to withdraw and remain in the Senate. He also thanked Newman for her willingness to serve.
Newman issued this statement, according to the Associated Press:
"I spoke with Senator Gregg this afternoon and understand that he has withdrawn as the nominee for Secretary of Commerce. As I said last week, I have the greatest admiration for Senator Gregg. I know him to be a person of extraordinary integrity and ability. I believe as Secretary of Commerce he would have served the country well in these difficult times.
"I expect Senator Gregg's decision was not an easy one nor made lightly. Let me also say how much I appreciate Governor Lynch, his confidence in me, and his steadfast devotion to the people of New Hampshire. For me, it would have been a great honor to serve in the United States Senate, but I will continue in my own, quiet and non-political way to work on behalf of the people of New Hampshire."
The stunning withdrawal is the latest setback for Obama, who announced the nomination Feb. 3 and pledged to bring Republicans into his cabinet.
Tom Daschle stepped aside as health and human services secretary after questions about late tax payments. And Obama's first pick at commerce, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, withdrew amid an investigation of state contracts.
In a statement, Mitch McConnell, the top Republican in the Senate, said Gregg "made a principled decision to return and we're glad to have him. He is among the smartest, most effective legislators to serve in the Senate -- Democrat or Republican -- and a key adviser to me and to the Republican Conference. It's great to have him back."
But Democratic Congressman Paul Hodes of New Hampshire, who plans to run for Gregg's seat in 2010, was critical.
“I am surprised and disappointed at this sudden withdrawal. Senator Gregg would take us back to the years of George W. Bush rather than moving forward with the change agenda that the American people clearly want. I will continue to work with President Obama to create jobs and rebuild our economy for the middle class.
"I will be a candidate for the United State Senate in 2010. I look forward to working every day to stand up for New Hampshire as we come together to confront the economic crisis facing our nation.”
Gregg's full statement:
“I want to thank the President for nominating me to serve in his Cabinet as Secretary of Commerce. This was a great honor, and I had felt that I could bring some views and ideas that would assist him in governing during this difficult time. I especially admire his willingness to reach across the aisle.
“However, it has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me. Prior to accepting this post, we had discussed these and other potential differences, but unfortunately we did not adequately focus on these concerns. We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy.
“Obviously the President requires a team that is fully supportive of all his initiatives.
“I greatly admire President Obama and know our country will benefit from his leadership, but at this time I must withdraw my name from consideration for this position.
“As we move forward, I expect there will be many issues and initiatives where I can and will work to assure the success of the President’s proposals. This will certainly be a goal of mine.
“Kathy and I also want to specifically thank Governor Lynch and Bonnie Newman for their friendship and assistance during this period. In addition we wish to thank all the people, especially in New Hampshire, who have been so kind and generous in their supportive comments.
“As a further matter of clarification, nothing about the vetting process played any role in this decision. I will continue to represent the people of New Hampshire in the United States Senate.”
Dissension on the stimulus
While President Obama and the Senate are fine with the stimulus deal that appears headed for final votes in Congress on Friday and Obama's signature on Monday, the House is another matter.
And it's not just Republicans, who unanimously opposed the bill the first time around and continue to rail against the deal struck by the House-Senate conference committee on Wednesday.
Some House Democrats are upset with some of the changes made to preserve the support of three Republicans in the Senate, who wield virtual veto-power.
And there are reports that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was ticked off that Harry Reid, the top Senate Democrat, announced the compromise Wednesday afternoon before her rank-and-file had signed off.
UPDATE: Pelosi confirmed this afternoon that the House will vote on Friday and glossed over any dissension.
She said that the House version makes up the vast majority of the compromise, that it is a "major accomplishment" for both Congress and Obama, and that Americans are "excited" about the bill.
"This one is historic and transformational," she told reporters at a Capitol Hill news conference.
Meanwhile, top House Republican John Boehner's office released a statement with the accusation: "Democrats pile up the pork, but leave scraps for small business."
"While there are still plenty of unanswered questions as Congress prepares to vote on the Democrats’ trillion-dollar spending bill, here’s what we do know: the legislation is loaded up with plenty of unfocused and wasteful Washington spending – a price to be paid by small businesses, which apparently will see very little tax relief under the as-yet-unseen House-Senate “deal.” In fact, it appears the amount of direct small business tax relief in the legislation amounts to about one-third of one percent of the total bill, just $3 billion in tax relief out of a $789.5 billion bill. So, what’s getting funded at the expense of small business owners and workers across the country?" the statement continues.
"Here are just a few examples: $2 billion for 'Neighborhood Stabilization,' money which will be available to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), an organization accused of perpetrating voter registration fraud numerous times in the last several elections and reportedly under federal investigation; $1 billion for a new “Prevention and Wellness Fund,” which would be available for education programs on sexually-transmitted diseases; and millions for the federal government to buy plug-in cars.
"President Obama set an important goal at the beginning of this process: a bipartisan bill that will create more jobs, more quickly. Which begs the question: How will any of this spending create new jobs? And, since small businesses are the engine of job creation in this country, why are these programs and projects being funded at the expense of those who own and are employed by small businesses?"
A deal on stimulus
Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins spoke about the agreement. (NECN video)
By Sasha Issenberg, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Democratic leaders in Congress reached a compromise on an economic stimulus bill today, excising some tax cuts and new school funding to settle on a package totaling $789 billion to confront the worst recession in decades.
The deal was announced by Senate leaders, who appeared to drive the private negotiations with their House counterparts. They had to navigate competing interests as they worked to deliver a bill to President Obama by his end-of-week deadline, balancing a House majority that sought robust new funding for long-standing priorities and Senate centrists of both parties who had threatened to scuttle any bill that emerged larger than $800 billion.
"We came a long way in a relatively short time," said Senator Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut independent who affiliates with the Democrats and helped broker Republican support for the bill. "Everybody gave something in these negotiations to achieve something bigger for our country and our people."
Barring any last-minute snags, the bill will go to both chambers for an up-or-down vote as soon as Thursday to send it to Obama's desk.
The contours of the compromise plan -- significantly smaller than either the $819 billion plan the House passed on Jan. 28 or the $838 billion version the Senate approved Tuesday -- demonstrated the guidance and prodding of a popular White House, which held off from authoring the original House legislation but orchestrated the final Senate negotiations once the legislation began to teeter last week.
In a statement this evening, Obama thanked "the Democrats and Republicans in Congress who came together around a hard-fought compromise that will save or create more than 3.5 million jobs and get our economy back on track."
The elements that survived reflected the new president's shifting ambitions in what calls the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. He began the year trying to earn broad bipartisan support for the package, but this week his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, worked merely to hold enough votes for final passage.
A middle-class tax cut Obama pledged during his campaign survived largely intact, promising most workers more money in each paycheck.
So did expanded benefits for the unemployed, while costly provisions with backers in each chamber fell away. Negotiators abandoned half of the $79 billion in direct aid to states in the House version, along with tax cuts that had been adopted by the Senate with the support of Republican members who intended to oppose the legislation regardless. A $15,000 tax credit for homebuyers and a deduction for the sales tax paid by purchasers of new cars were both slashed.
"The middle ground we've reached creates more jobs than the original Senate bill and costs less than the original House bill," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
To the end, the leverage was held by three moderate, northeastern Republicans -- including Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine -- who had threatened to withdraw their support for the bill if it did not emerge from the conference committee to their liking. Over the last week, they proved a crucial bridge for an expanded Democratic caucus to reach the 60 votes necessary to pass such a bill in the Senate.
"The Republican moderates were able to see to it that more than $100 billion was cut from this program. Now there are people who like to spend less, some like to spend nothing," said Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter, the third key GOP supporter. "The fact is we hung tough and it was modified only in the case of absolute necessity."
Yet most Republicans, including those in the House who voted unanimously against the bill, said that the changes made it no more appetizing to them, though there not enough of them to stop passage.
House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio told reporters that "it appears that Democrats have made a bad bill worse by reducing the tax relief for working families in order to pay for more wasteful government spending."
Obama, who has insisted that such a bill offers the nation its only path away from economic catastrophe, heralded the congressional negotiations in an appearance this morning designed to build public support for new spending on infrastructure projects.
"We're at the doorstep of getting this plan through Congress, but the work is not over," he said at a suburban Virginia highway construction site.
Indeed, even after Reid's afternoon announcement of a deal, the House-Senate conference committee required to formalize the arrangement was postponed. The move was apparently made by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who held out to expand the bill's funding for school construction.
She emerged this evening from meeting with her rank and file to say they are on board and are proud of the work they did on the bill.
"I think people are pretty happy," she said, though she acknowledged there were items she wished were still in the package.
Raytheon exec confirmed for Pentagon post, but not before Grassley blast
The US Senate this afternoon confirmed Raytheon executive William Lynn III to the No. 2 job at the Pentagon.
But not before Senator Charles Grassley blasted him, challenging Lynn to withdraw from consideration as deputy defense secretary and urging his fellow senators to squash the nomination.
Grassley, an Iowa Republican, and Senator John McCain of Arizona have questioned Lynn on his lobbying for the Waltham-based defense contractor until last year and what they call a dismal record in a previous stint at the Pentagon.
The White House has granted Lynn a waiver from revolving door restrictions on lobbyists, and Lynn has promised to steer clear of for one year from six programs on which he lobbied and to seek written permission from Pentagon lawyers on other matters that directly relate to Raytheon.
"If he is seriously devoted to serving his country and this President, Mr. Lynn should consider withdrawing his nomination and ask to be reconsidered in two years. This country will always need good leaders who lead by example," Grassley is saying, according to prepared remarks provided by his office.
"By doing this, he would set the standard of excellence for all other nominees to follow. It would restore integrity and credibility to President Obama’s new ethic rules. As it stands now, unfortunately, the Lynn nomination is now rolling down the low road at high speed."
But the White House and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates have said Lynn has an unique set of skills and experience and is needed at the Pentagon.
Lynn was confirmed on a 93-4 vote with Grassley voting no, along with fellow Republicans Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and John Cornyn of Texas and Democrat Claire McCaskill of Missouri.
"I thought I’d seen the last of Mr. Lynn when President George W. Bush first took office. I was dead wrong," Grassley added.
"So I had to send my staff out to where the Senate buries old skeletons. It is the Records Center out in Maryland’s scenic countryside about 20 miles from the Capitol. There they dug up the remains of what I came to know about Mr. Lynn some ten years ago. A little word of advice to my colleagues; archive all of your materials. I have found that political nominees, good and bad, come back like Australian boomerangs. Some take longer than others to return, but eventually you’ll see them again."
Grassley's full prepared statement is below:
Bankers defend use of bailout cash
By Michael Kranish, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- The top executives of eight banks that received the bulk of the federal financial rescue money so far, including State Street Bank of Boston, appeared today before an angry House committee that demanded more answers about what has happened to the bailout cash and more accountability for the next round of taxpayer aid.
The executives, seated at one table before the House Financial Services Committee, were pilloried time and again for making poor decisions that led to the economic meltdown, and for paying large bonuses.
Morgan Stanley chief executive John Mack, asked whether the bankers should apologize to the American public, responded, "As an industry clearly we made mistakes...I'm especially sorry for what has happened to shareholders."
In one of the sharpest exchanges of the hearing, Representative Michael Capuano, a Somerville Democrat, compared some of the executives to bank robbers who seek freedom from jail by promising to be good in the future.
"All or most of you engaged in all or some of the activities that created this crisis. America doesn't trust you anymore," said Capuano, who said he himself had so little confidence that he would not deposit "one single penny in one of your banks."
(Capuano's office said later that the congressman's personal banking accounts are at the following institutions: East Cambridge Savings Bank, Winter Hill Federal Savings Bank, the Somerville Federal Credit Union, and the Congressional Federal Credit Union. His campaign accounts are at Winter Hill Federal, Century Bank, Citizens Bank, and Sovereign Bank.)
None of the executives responded directly to Capuano's remarks, but they said during the hearing that they are loaning money provided by taxpayers, and they pledged to repay the federal government with interest.
President Obama, his economic advisers, and many in the financial world have been very critical of the handling and lack of effectiveness of the first $350 billion from the $700 billion rescue plan passed last fall. The eight banks represented received more than $160 billion.
"I urge you going forward to be ungrudgingly cooperative," Barney Frank, a Newton Democrat and chairman of the panel, told the executives. "There has to be a sense of the American people that you understand their anger ... and that you're willing to make some sacrifices to get this working."
Despite the harsh tone of some of the exchanges, much of the hearing was dominated by statements from the executives that they have reformed their practices and are lending more money than would have been possible without the infusion of federal funds.
The executives represented a wide range of banks, from those in poor shape to those that remain profitable. Vikram Pandit, the chief executive of Citigroup, which received $45 billion in bailout money, pledged to take only $1 in annual salary until the bank returns to profitability. Noting that he had canceled the bank's order of a corporate jet after widespread criticism, Pandit said, “I get the new reality and I will make sure Citi gets it as well."
State Street Bank chief executive officer Ronald E. Logue, whose firm received $2 billion in federal assistance, sought to differentiate his company from some of the other banks by noting that his institution is akin to a giant "back office" operation for various investment operations and has a lower risk profile. As a result, Logue told the committee, State Street had a 28 percent increase in revenues and a 25 percent gain in earnings in 2008 compared to the prior year. He said the bank has used the $2 billion to strengthen its capital base and increase lending capacity.
The CEOs of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Bank of America Corp., JP Morgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Co., and the Bank of New York Mellon also testified.
Stimulus pitch stresses infrastructure
Infrastructure was the buzzword today on day three of President Obama's sales tour for his economic stimulus package.
He and Virginia Governor Tim Kaine, his pick to head the Democratic National Committee, visited the Fairfax County Parkway outside Washington, D.C., to highlight how many jobs could be quickly created with highway, bridge, mass transit, and other public works projects.
Kaine said the parkway has been under construction for more than 20 years and needs to be finished to link up to a large scientific facility, but two phases are unfunded.
Obama urged Congress again to finish work on the bill. "Now we have to get a final version to my desk, so I can sign it," he said.
"We're surrounded by unmet needs and unfinished business," he said, with the construction site in Springfield, Va., as a backdrop.
He said the consequences of insufficient investment in infrastructure show up in dramatic ways such as the failed levees in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrian and the deadly bridge collapse in Minneapolis -- and in daily ways such as traffic gridlock that drives down productivity.
(Obama's full remarks are below.)
Also today, Vice President Biden and Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell will visit the Route 34 Bridge over the Conodoguinet Creek in Carlisle -- an example of the thousands of bridges across the country that need repair -- then speak at the State Capitol in Harrisburg about infrastructure.
While the White House says the stimulus plan represents the largest investment increase in our nation’s mass transit systems, roads, and bridges since the creation of the national highway system in the 1950s, some critics have said the package does not include infrastructure spending.
A House-Senate conference committee, with heavy input from the White House, is trying to quickly come up with a compromise that both chambers will approve and that Obama will sign into law.
The Senate's $838 billion version includes about $46 billion for transportation projects, including $27 billion for highway and bridge construction and repair and $11.5 billion for mass transit and rail projects. It also includes $4.6 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers; $5 billion for public housing improvements; and $6.4 billion for clean and drinking water projects.
The $820 billion House plans includes $47 billion for transportation projects, including $27 billion for highway and bridge construction and repair and $12 billion for mass transit. It also includes $31 billion to build and repair federal buildings and other public infrastructure.
The House plan also includes $20 billion for school modernization -- not in the Senate version -- that Democrats and Obama want to restore.
But the three Republicans who voted for the Senate plan -- Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania -- are threatening to take a walk if the conference committee compromise strays too far from the Senate version.
The Associated Press is reporting that Obama's negotiating team had prevailed in restoring some lost funding for school construction projects and had also increased aid to state governments above the $39 billion approved in a compromise with a handful of Senate GOP moderates.
But his signature tax credit would be reduced from $500 per worker to $400, and from $1,000 to $800 for couples, a Democratic aide close to the talks told AP.
UPDATE: The conference committee is reportedly putting together a package of about $790 billion -- less than either the House or Senate version -- in part by trimming back tax cuts for homebuyers and car buyers.
"We're getting closer," Senator Ben Nelson, a conservative Democrat from Nebraska who helped negotiate the Senate package, told reporters.
He said he does not see a "deal breaker" in the negotiations.
Lobbying on the stimulus
As negotiators try to strike a stimulus deal, the rank-and-file in Congress is being buffeted by both sides.
The three Republican senators who voted for the package on Tuesday are being assailed by GOP groups.
Meanwhile, advocacy groups supporting President Obama's stimulus bill is targeting 18 House members and 3 senators in swing districts who voted "no" with new radio ads. The spots are sponsored by Americans United for Change and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees.
"Haven't you ever wished you had a second chance to do the right thing?" the announcer says, naming the member of Congress and saying he or she " has a second chance to get it right when it comes to our economic crisis."
The spot warns that 20,000 Americans are losing their jobs every day and points out that "groups from the US Chamber of Commerce to organized labor are supporting the Obama jobs plan" before urging listeners to call their representative and tell them "we can't let partisan wrangling stand in the way of creating the jobs we desperately need."
AFSCME and Americans United for Change also are airing a national cable TV ad targeting Republican leaders opposing the stimulus.
"Our economy in crisis," the announcer says. "Millions out of work. That’s why 80 percent of Americans support a plan like President Obama’s to create jobs. But Republican leaders? They’re 'just saying no.' No to changing the failed economic policies of the past eight years.
"We’re in an economic crisis and Republican leaders are playing politics instead of doing what's right," the spot continues. "Call the Republican Leadership – tell them no is not an option."
One of those pictured in the ad, Representative Eric Cantor, was apparently none too happy with it. Politico reports that Cantor's spokesman responded with a dubbed-over, profanity-filled 1970s video mocking AFSCME.
That prompted an outpouring of outrage this afternoon from the advocacy groups.
AFSCME President Gerald McEntee: “Eric Cantor may think the greatest economic crisis in seventy years is a joke, but we don’t. He should talk to the people in Virginia who are losing their jobs, health care and homes.”
Brad Woodhouse, president of Americans United for Change: "Does Eric Cantor believe that peddling profanity-laced filth around the Internet is consistent with the values of the people of Virginia or the country? This is childish, inappropriate and disgusting behavior from someone who is supposed to be a leader in Congress and a role model to others. Eric Cantor’s response to one of the most serious crises facing America in our lifetimes is to spread this filth, denigrate government employees and treat the current economic crisis like a joke. This video has been floating around on YouTube for years – but Eric Cantor’s use of it in this context shows how completely and utterly out of touch he is with the current economic crisis and the lives of his constituents. Eric Cantor should be ashamed and he should apologize.”
AFL-CIO President John Sweeney: "During these tough economic times the last thing hard working Americans need is to be ridiculed by a member of the Republican leadership. Rep. Cantor should apologize for insulting America's workers with this profane video."
UPDATE: Cantor's spokesman, Brad Dayspring, issued a statement apologizing for the video: "I would like to apologize for a joke that was in no way an official response from Congressman Cantor, but instead an inappropriate email. I apologize to AFSCME for my inappropriate email containing an old video. Let me be clear, we know people are hurting in these trying times and House Republicans completely agree that we must pass an economic recovery bill that preserves, protects and create jobs for Americans facing these economic challenges."
Citing economic crisis, McCain seeks support for reelection bid
John McCain is telling supporters he is definitely running for another term in the US Senate after the bitter disappointment of losing his presidential bid -- and he's saying that the economic crisis was the clincher.
"The magnitude of the financial crisis that many American families are facing makes it clear to me that I want to continue to serve our country in the Senate," he says in the email, sent Tuesday night and which also serves as a pitch for campaign cash.
McCain joined all but three Republicans in voting Tuesday against the $838 billion stimulus package in the Senate, and has been vocal in his disdain.
"The economic challenges currently confronting our nation are immense and unfortunately, the Democrats in Congress propose addressing these challenges through increased spending that wastes billions of taxpayers dollars and saddles our children and grandchildren with a staggering debt," the email says. "Their proposals will not stimulate economic growth or create jobs. While the leader of the Democratic Party, President Obama, has pledged to change business as usual in Washington and spoken of bipartisanship, I have been saddened to watch as Congressional Democrats try to use their majority to advocate more of the same failed policies and wasteful spending of the past. With so much at stake, now is not the time to step away from my work in the Senate."
"As always, I anticipate a tough re-election challenge. But with your help, we will counter those efforts and put forth an aggressive campaign by registering new voters, reaching out to Democrats, Independents and Republicans, and again earning the support of Hispanic and Native American voters in Arizona."
Offshore drilling put on hold
President Obama's new interior secretary announced today that he is putting on hold a plan approved by the Bush administration in its final days to open up huge stretches off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts to oil and gas drilling.
The areas included the famed Georges Bank fishing grounds off New England.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called for more study and more input from states and coastal communities, saying that he was troubled by the "enormous sweep" of Bush's order, according to the Associated Press. To read his speech, click here.
Democrats, led by Edward Markey of Massachusetts, had tried to put Georges Bank off limits in an energy bill last September.
Obama road trip, day two
President Obama took his economic recovery road show to Florida today for the second in a series of town hall meetings to build public support.
The setting is the Harborside Event Center in Fort Myers, one epicenter of the wave of home foreclosures that was the leading edge of the recession burdening the country. Like many fast-growing Sunbelt cities, there was a home construction boom, fueled in part by cheap loans and speculation. Now, home values have plummeted and many homes have been seized by lenders.
In the town hall meeting, Obama declared that his economic recovery plan is needed asap and tried to remind Congress of the people behind the dire statistics.
"You have seen hardship as well....We're not talking about faceless numbers," said Obama, greeted by the "Yes we can" chants of his historic campaign and introduced by Charlie Crist, Florida's Republican governor, who agreed that it's crucial to push through the stimulus plan.
"We need to do it in a bipartisan way," Crist said.
But when the Senate approved its stimulus plan as he answered questions from the audience, it came with only three Republican votes, after no Republicans voted for the House version.
The vote was 61-37 for the $838 billion Senate version of the stimulus plan, setting up what could be a contentious conference committee negotiation with the $820 billion House version.
After the vote, Harry Reid, the top Democrat in the Senate, announced that the conference committee will start meeting this afternoon.
He said the differences are "relatively minor" with the House version.
"One option we do not have is to do nothing," Reid said. "It's been a long, hard struggle to get where we are, but we're here."
Obama, however, continued hitting back at his Republican critics.
"We can’t afford to posture and bicker and resort to the same failed ideas that got us into this mess in the first place. After all, that’s what this election was about. You rejected those ideas because you know they haven’t worked. You didn’t send us to Washington because you were hoping for more of the same, you sent us there to change things, and that is exactly what I intend to do as President of the United States," he said.
And just before Obama's event, his treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, will formally unveil an overhauled bailout of the financial system, outlining how the administration plans to spend the remaining $350 billion of the $700 billion rescue package started by the Bush administration. The plan counts on encouraging private investors to buy more than $1 trillion in troubled assets from the banks, clearing their balance sheets and freeing them to offer credit to businesses and consumers.
Obama's full prepared remarks are below:
At first primetime press conference, Obama sells stimulus
President Obama, in the first primetime press conference of his young administration, used the huge TV audience to shore up public support for his economic recovery plan.
Noting that last month, the country lost 598,000 jobs -- "nearly the equivalent of losing every single job in the state of Maine" -- he said that only government can provide an adequate response.
"It is absolutely true that we cannot depend on government alone to create jobs or economic growth," he said in opening remarks before taking questions from reporters. "That is and must be the role of the private sector. But at this particular moment, with the private sector so weakened by this recession, the federal government is the only entity left with the resources to jolt our economy back into life."
| Part 1 |
| Part 2 |
He framed the stimulus bill as a jobs plan, with tax cuts targeted to those who will spend the money quickly.
But he acknowledged that the plan working its way through Congress is "not perfect."
"No plan is. I can’t tell you for sure that everything in this plan will work exactly as we hope, but I can tell you with complete confidence that a failure to act will only deepen this crisis as well as the pain felt by millions of Americans."
Asked whether his dire warnings might be hurting the economy, he noted that 3.6 million jobs have been lost since the recession began in December 2007 and the job loss is accelerating.
"This is not your ordinary, run of the mill recession," he said, calling it the worst since the Great Depression.
Asked how Americans should measure the success of the stimulus plan and other initiatives, Obama said the first step is whether jobs are created or saved -- he has set a goal of 3 to 4 million in two years. The second measure is whether credit is freed up for businesses and consumers. The third metric will be whether the housing market is stabilized -- foreclosure rates no longer increasing and housing values not plummeting.
That progress, he said, he hopes will be visible next year. "This year is going to be a difficult year," Obama said.
He directly addressed criticisms of the stimulus plan.
To those who oppose any government intervention, he repeated that only the federal government can break the cycle that is driving down demand for goods and services. He also said that these critics seem to be refighting the philosophical battle over the New Deal, which he said he believed had been resolved.
To those preaching tax cuts, he said while he will accept ideas from across the political spectrum, he resolutely will not return to the "failed theories" of the past eight years, which he blamed for precipitating the crisis.
To those who say some of the spending is unnecessary, he said that the money to make government buildings energy
efficient and to build new schools will create jobs now and pay dividends later.
To those who warn of the rising federal deficit, Obama shot back that he inherited a trillion-dollar deficit this year, plus the economic crisis.
"I didn't come into this ginned up to spend $800 billion," he said. "That is not how I envisioned my presidency beginning."
Asked about whether he is moving away from bipartisanship after only three Republicans in the Senate and none in the House have supported the stimulus bill, Obama said that a lot of bad habits have taken root in Washington and it "will take time" to change them.
On other topics, he reiterated that he wants to focus on diplomacy with Iran, particularly on its nuclear ambitions; he said Afghanistan, where he plans to send more US troops, will be "a major challenge;" and he said Alex Rodriguez's admissions of performance-enhancing drug use tarnishes baseballs and sends the wrong message to children.
And underscoring the rise of the Internet, Obama called on a reporter for the Huffington Post website, who asked whether he agreed with Senator Patrick Leahy's proposal for a "truth and reconciliation" commission to look at alleged Bush administration misdeeds in the treatment of terrorist detainees and other issues.
Obama said he did not know enough about the proposal to answer, but repeated that while "nobody is above the law," he wants to look ahead and fix policies going forward.
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele responded by saying Democrats in Congress had loaded the stimulus bill with wasteful spending:
"The legislation moving its way through Congress bares little resemblance to what President Obama described at tonight's press conference. The spending bill written by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid is filled with unnecessary and wasteful programs that will saddle future generations with massive debt. With so many Americans looking for work, it's important to act quickly, but also act prudently. This bill will fail to have the necessary and direct impact it should - in part - because the Democrats rejected proposals to improve the legislation. The President has called on both parties to work together to solve this crisis; I hope Congressional Democrats will heed his call and listen to all ideas."
Obama's full introductory remarks are below:
FULL ENTRYKennedy votes on stimulus
By Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Leaning on his cane but smiling broadly, Senator Edward M. Kennedy returned today to the Capitol to vote for ending debate on the stimulus bill, a key hurdle for its passage.
Expressing deep concern about the economy, he told reporters waiting outside: "It is time that we take action now." With little fanfare, he walked into the Senate chamber alongside his fellow Massachusetts senator, John F. Kerry, and stayed for only two minutes or so, just long enough to cast his vote and greet a couple of his colleagues.
Senator Barbara Boxer of California looked up as he arrived: "Here comes my hero," she said quietly, beaming.
His appearance was low-key enough, but that he felt the need to come at all underscored the importance of the bill and the unexpectedly tortured politics of getting it through Congress. Kennedy is suffering from brain cancer and had a seizure the last time he was in Washington, for President Obama's inauguration.
Just after the Jan. 20 ceremony, Kennedy collapsed at a Senate luncheon; doctors attributed the seizure to fatigue. He had been recuperating in Florida until late last week, when amid a frantic back-and-forth between Democratic leaders and a few Republicans, senators said Kennedy flew back to Washington to support the stimulus package.
Senator Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia said Kennedy called Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Friday and said: "Kennedy, reporting for duty."
But Kennedy did not appear at the Senate until today.
When he did, he seemed to do his best to avoid attracting attention. Venturing barely 20 feet into the chamber, he extended a trembling hand to Senator Max Baucus, the Finance Committee chairman who managed the floor debate. He greeted Reid, who patted his shoulder. Senator Patty Murray of Washington turned from her conversation and smiled.
Kerry tapped him on the arm, and Kennedy signalled his support for the bill to Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, who was presiding over the vote. A few moments later, he turned and ambled off the floor with Kerry at his side.
"He is a hero," Boxer said after the vote. "Because the fact is, we needed his vote today."
She said the three Republican senators who are backing the stimulus package wanted to have more than 60 votes -- the bare minimum -- to end debate. Kennedy's was number 61.
"So it was very selfless of him," she said. "He's a very selfless person. I'm so grateful to him for doing this."
Kennedy plans to return to cast a final vote on the stimulus bill Tuesday, Kerry said in an interview. An aide said Kennedy planned to travel back and forth between Florida and Washington until the weather gets warmer in the capital.
Kerry said he spoke with Kennedy for about 20 minutes in his office before they went to vote, and Kennedy told him he was frustrated that Congress couldn't have passed a stimulus sooner.
"He's looking forward to continuing to get back, and taking on healthcare," Kerry said.
In a statement, Kennedy said the consequences of not passing a stimulus package would make the consequences of the economy's "free-fall....even more disastrous."
"I returned to the Senate today to do all I can to support our president and his plan to get our country back on track," the statement said. "We face a historic crisis and must act quickly, boldly, and responsibly to enable our economy to begin growing again in Massachusetts and across America."
Leahy calls for truth commission
South Africa used one to try to get past apartheid after the end of white-minority rule.
Now, Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont is proposing one to sift through all the wreckage of the Bush administration.
Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a speech today at Georgetown University that a "truth and reconciliation commission" could investigate abuses of detainees, politically inspired moves at the Justice Department, intelligence before the Iraq war, and other matters, according to the Associated Press.
Leahy said the primary goal of the commission would be to learn the truth rather than prosecute former officials. "I'm doing this not to humiliate people or punish people but to get the truth out," he said.
Human Rights First, which has been calling for an investigation of US detention of terror suspects, applauded Leahy.
“If adopted, Senator Leahy’s proposal would help to ensure that the United States learns the right lessons from past mistakes,” Elisa Massimino, executive director of Human Rights First, said in a statement. “A comprehensive and independent inquiry is essential to determining how the U.S. government came to adopt policies of official cruelty and arbitrary detention, the strategic costs of such policies to our national security, and how we can best guard against such abuses in the future.”
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, also praised Leahy's move.
"Chairman Leahy today summed up a belief shared by millions of Americans: that we need to ‘get the truth out’ about the damage done to this country under the Bush Administration, and what we now must do to repair it," Whitehouse said in a statement released by his office.
"He understands that the trust we hold for future generations can be safeguarded only when honesty, freedom, justice and compassion guide our institutions of government; that where that trust has been violated, the cost is incalculable; and that the path to recovery leads through disclosure," continued Whitehouse, who has said Congress should discharge its "independent responsibility" to investigate.
“The ‘truth and reconciliation’ commission Chairman Leahy proposed today is one way to help us better understand the work ahead of us as we look forward to a brighter future. I support him and will do whatever I can to ensure the American people learn the truth about what has happened in our country.”
Some groups on the left, however, want actual prosecutions, even of President Bush and Vice President Cheney.
Pitched partisan battle on stimulus
It's a partisan battle for the public's hearts and minds as President Obama takes a road trip to sell an economic stimulus plan, while Republicans rail against it as another Democratic spending spree.
Today, Obama heads to Elkhart, Ind., where the unemployment rate hit 15.3 percent in December, more than twice the national average and up nearly 11 percentage points in just a year.
Tonight at 8, the new president holds his first primetime news conference, from the East Room of the White House.
Tuesday, Obama goes to Fort Myers, Fla., among the fast-growing Sunbelt cities slammed by the foreclosure crisis. Wednesday, he heads for northern Virginia.
Obama has added another stop on his tour -- the proverbial Peoria, Ill., on Thursday, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters on Air Force One, according to the press pool report.
In his weekly radio and Internet address on Saturday, Obama made his case gain: "Legislation of such magnitude deserves the scrutiny that it's received over the last month, and it will receive more in the days to come. But we can't afford to make perfect the enemy of the absolutely necessary. The scale and scope of this plan is right. And the time for action is now.
"Because if we don't move swiftly to put this plan in motion, our economic crisis could become a national catastrophe," he added.
But Michael Steele, the new chairman of the Republican National Committee, responded with a message of his own to give the party line.
"Democrats have controlled both branches of government for less than a month. And you have to wonder if all that power has gone to their heads," Steele said. "For the last two weeks, they've been trying to force a massive spending bill through Congress under the guise of economic relief."
Obama heads into the week with an advantage, according to a new Gallup poll.
According to the survey conducted Friday and Saturday, 67 percent of Americans approve Obama's handling of the stimulus bill, while only 48 percent approve how Democrats in Congress have conducted themselves, and only 38 percent approve of what congressional Republicans have done.
Obama has had far higher job approval ratings in general than Congress.
Another poll released today, however, showed far less support for the stimulus bill than for Obama, himself.
The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey found that 54 percent support the package, but that 55 percent believe it would spend too much money; 64 percent say it would help a lot or help the economy some.
The poll also found that while 74 percent believe that Obama is doing enough to cooperate with Republicans in Congress, but only 39 percent believe that Republicans are reciprocating adequately. Obama's overall job approval rating is 76 percent.
The survey, conducted Saturday and Sunday, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
Another survey released today also found dwindling support for the stimulus plan, largely because it has become a more partisan issue.
While 51 percent of Americans still say the package is a good idea, that's down from 57 percent last month, and unfavorable views have risen to 34 percent from 22 percent, according to the survey conducted Wednesday through Sunday by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press.
Among Republicans, 63 percent now say the bill is a bad idea – up 20 percentage points since last month. While Democrats are also more skeptical, 70 percent still view the plan positively, according to the poll.
According to the press pool report, senior strategist David Axelrod pushed back at the idea that public support is slipping for the stimulus plan.
“There is strong support for this,” he said. “I think the Gallup poll this morning reflects everything I’ve seen for the last couple of weeks.”
“One thing that we learned over two years is that there’s a whole different conversation in Washington than there is out here. If I had listened to the conversation in Washington during the campaign for president, I would have jumped off a building about a year and a half ago.”
Not a single Republican supported the $820 billion version passed by the House on Jan. 28. Only three Republicans appear lined up to back the $827 billion version the Senate is expected to approve on Tuesday.
Two of them are Maine's senators, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe. Americans United for Change, a progressive and labor advocacy group, is running a radio ad praising them.
"The clock's ticking - and our economy continues to get worse and worse," the spot says. "That's why it's critical that the Senate pass President Obama's jobs and economic recovery bill right away. Fortunately, Maine's two Senators -- Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins are providing the leadership we need to get the job done. Senators Snowe and Collins have worked with President Obama and other Senators to reach agreement on a plan that has support from a broad range of groups - including the US Chamber of Commerce and organized labor."
Even with Senate approval, the deal could fall apart when a House-Senate conference committee tries to reach a compromise that both chambers would have to pass again before the package reaches Obama's desk. It will take the legislative equivalent of a sprint to give final approval before Congress is supposed to leave for its President's Day recess on Saturday, Obama's deadline.
"This bill is not perfect," Collins said this morning on NBC's "Today" show. "We're not claiming that. But in fact I think this bill will help to create 3.5 million jobs. ... We're facing a crisis and it makes no sense to have a partisan divide."
Senate reaches tentative pact on stimulus bill
By Sasha Issenberg and Lisa Wangsness, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats emerged this evening from days of negotiations to declare that they had reached a deal with at least two moderate Republicans to approve a shrunken version of the economic stimulus package that passed the House last week.
The agreement on what Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called "the Obama plan" promised to deliver the new president his most important legislative victory so far. But the bill still demanded further negotiation and would only become law only after far more wrangling than the administration anticipated and with far less Republican support than it had pledged.
Those involved in negotiations said the deal on what they billed as a $780 billion package -- approximately $40 billion less than the House edition and nearly $160 billion less than an earlier Senate draft -- came about after a working group of centrists agreed to reduce both spending programs favored by Democrats and tax cuts pushed by Republicans. The final Senate bill would likely be around $800 billion, members of both parties said.
"We're going to make sure we’re doing everything we can make sure this severe recession does not become another Great Depression," Reid said on the Senate floor. "That's why we worked all week to come up with a bill."
Reid indicated a vote on the deal by the full Senate is unlikely until at least later this weekend. With every vote potentially crucial, Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts traveled to Washington to vote for the bill, senators said last night, though he was not seen at the Capitol. Kennedy, who is battling brain cancer, has been recuperating in Florida since Inauguration Day, when he suffered a seizure at a luncheon with the new president. Aides to Kennedy did not return calls today.
If the bill were to pass the Senate, a conference committee including members of both the House and Senate would convene to reconcile differences between the two bills, which Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota, chairman of the Budget Committee, said would pose a new set of challenges.
"There are some very significant differences now between the Senate package and the House package," Conrad said. "And with every difference, there's a constituency."
The deal-making was led by Maine Republican Susan Collins and Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson, who shuttled for days between committee rooms in Senate office buildings and unmarked hideaway offices deep in the Capitol. The ranks of negotiators dwindled from as many as 20 -- at one point, deliberations revolved around a "gang of 18" -- down to four.
"This has been an extremely difficult deliberation, but I believe that we have an obligation to start solving the problems facing this country," said Collins, who is, along with fellow Maine Senator Olympia Snowe and Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter, one of three Republican votes that Democrats are counting on to reach the 60 votes necessary to break a potential GOP filibuster.
"The American people don't want to see partisan gridlock," Collins said on the Senate floor. "They don't want to see us divided and fighting. They want to see us working together to solve the most important crisis facing this country."
Tonight, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs responded to the tentative deal:
"On the day when we learned 3.6 million people have lost their jobs since this recession began, we are pleased the process is moving forward and we are closer to getting Americans a plan to create millions of jobs and get people back to work," he said in a statement.
The tentative compromise emerged after President Obama seized today on the latest round of what he called "very troubling" news on jobs to ratchet up the pressure on Congress.
The unemployment rate rose to 7.6 percent nationwide in January, the highest since September 1992. The Labor Department also reported that 598,000 jobs were lost last month, the most since 1974, and that 3.6 million jobs had been lost since the recession began in December 2007.
"These numbers demand action," said Obama, who plans to push for the plan in town hall meetings Monday in Indiana and Tuesday in Florida bracketing a primetime news conference at the White House. "It is inexcusable and irresponsible to for any of us to get bogged down in distraction and delay while millions of Americans are being put out of work."
Throughout the day, Collins said she would not herself vote for anything resembling the House version, which she described as "bloated, expensive, and ineffective." The bill -- composed largely under the direction of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and which passed without a single Republican vote -- was a "Christmas tree upon which every member, virtually, had hung his or her favorite program."
The compromise eliminated $86 billion in spending and $18 billion in tax cuts, senators said. Conrad said the spending reductions were designed to eliminate any spending that was not quick, job-creating, or temporary. He said the spending cuts came from an array of programs, but education "took a big hit."
Other programs prized by Democratic interest groups sustained damage. The compromise lowered subsidies to help the unemployed keep their health insurance by $7 billion -- so the government will pay only half of COBRA premiums rather than 65 percent as originally planned -- and reduced the $20 billion the House appropriated for health information technology.
"Did we get everything we wanted?" asked Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who operates as one of the most liberal members of the Democratic caucus. "No, we did not."
Yet most Republicans appeared unmoved by the compromise, which they said still reflected Democratic priorities and would likely emerge from the Senate at nearly the same size as the House bill.
An aide to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said that with the addition of three amendments approved earlier in the week -- to fund the National Institutes of Health, and offer new tax credits for buyers of new homes and cars -- the bill's total cost would be "north of $800 billion."
FULL ENTRYGregg won't vote on stimulus, or anything else
By Michael Kranish, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- Senator Judd Gregg, the New Hampshire Republican nominated to be Commerce Secretary, once was seen as a key ally in President Obama's effort to win bipartisan support for his economic stimulus bill.
But Gregg's spokeswoman said today that the senator would recuse himself from voting on the bill, and would not even participate in debate on it.
In fact, the spokeswoman said, Gregg will not vote on any bill or other matter, in committee or on the floor.
In recusing himself, Gregg deprived Obama of a potential key vote in support of the package, as well the influence Gregg might have had in persuading other Republicans to follow his lead.
Gregg's spokeswoman, Laena Fallon, would not speak about the senator's decision other than to say, "He thinks this is the most appropriate thing to do right now."
A White House spokesman declined comment, instead referring to the statement from Gregg's office.
When Obama introduced the senator as his Commerce nominee on Tuesday, the president did so by underscoring the importance of passing the stimulus plan in a bipartisan fashion. Gregg then left the impression that he supported Obama's policy, although he did not explicitly endorse the Democratic stimulus proposal before the Senate.
"You've outlined an extraordinarily bold and aggressive, effective and comprehensive plan for how we can get this country moving," Gregg said to Obama at the nomination ceremony. "This is not a time for partisanship. This is not a time when we should stand in our ideological corners and shout at each other. This is a time to govern and govern well."
But now, Gregg's decision to recuse himself from voting is bound to raise questions about why he is remaining in office if he won't perform such an essential duty of a senator -- voting on legislation. It also may raise questions about whether he is seeking to avoid putting himself in the embarrassing position of voting against Obama's top economic priority.
Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond's School of Law, said today that he understood that Gregg wanted to avoid casting votes while his nomination is pending to avoid any appearance of impropriety, but he said it was not necessary. He said that a member of Congress usually recuses himself from voting on a matter when there is a personal or financial conflict with legislation.
"It seems that he could continue to discharge his duties as senator by participating in the debate on the stimulus and voting," Tobias said.
Every senator knows that Gregg has been picked by Obama for the Commerce job, and "they can always discount what he says accordingly."
In an interview last week, shortly before word leaked out that he was to be the Commerce nominee, Gregg said that he hoped to play a key role in helping Obama win passage of the bill. While Gregg said he could not support the bill as it was written by the House, he saw room for compromise if spending was cut and funds were provided to forestall home foreclosures.
"I've talked to the White House, given them some ideas," Gregg said last week. "I think it is good for the nation if we can do a bipartisan, substantive" piece of legislation.
Gregg's work as a deal broker, however, apparently ended as soon as it became clear Obama would make him the Commerce pick.
Gregg has said he won't resign until he is confirmed for the Commerce post. If he were to resign now, Democrats would need only 59 votes to overcome potential Republican procedural hurdles instead of the current 60. There are currently 99 senators, with a Minnesota seat still vacant and being contested in the courts. Under Senate rules, 60 votes are needed to overcome a filibuster when 99 or 100 senators are in office, but only 59 votes would be needed to overcome a filibuster if there are 98 senators, a Senate official said.
New Hampshire's Democratic governor, John Lynch, plans to appoint a Republican, Bonnie Newman, to replace Gregg.
With 56 Democrats and two Independents who caucus with the party, party leaders were searching today for several votes to get to 60 and ensure passage of the bill.
Medical grants headed to Massachusetts
By Jillian Jorgensen, Globe Correspondent
WASHINGTON -- More than $4 million in federal grants for medical research have been awarded to Massachusetts institutions, Senator Edward M. Kennedy's office announced today.
The 16 grants from the National Institutes of Health totaling $4,634,625 will fund research at 12 hospitals, universities, and other institutions into medical technologies and diseases, including neurological disorders, cancer, and HIV/AIDS.
Boston University was awarded $1,162,282, coming from five different grants spread between their main campus and medical campus, which operates Boston Medical Center.
Massachusetts General Hospital will receive two grants totaling $755,730 for the hospital, and Brigham and Women's Hospital was awarded $370,289 to study development, regeneration, and cancer growth in the liver.
Fenway Community Health Center in Boston received $189,483 from the National Institute for Drug Abuse to study the effectiveness of pharmacy-based HIV intervention for intravenous drug users.
“Senator Kennedy commends these institutions on their outstanding achievements in the field of health research,” Keith Maley, a Kennedy spokesman, said in a statement. “Their cutting-edge research is producing vital advances in our understanding and improvement of health care.”
Other institutions receiving grants include Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Children's Hospital Boston, Innovative Chemical/Environmental Tech in Norwood, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and the University of Massachusetts at Worcester.
Patrick calls out Senate on stimulus
By Matt Viser, Globe Staff
Governor Deval Patrick this afternoon blasted the US Senate for not acting more swiftly on approving a federal stimulus package that would benefit state governments.
“That there is this much resistance from people who over a weekend came up with hundreds of billions of dollars for the financial industry is just extraordinarily frustrating,” he said in a conference call with reporters to discuss his West Coast trip to recruit new businesses to Massachusetts. “While this quarreling goes on, people are hurting. The sooner the Senate acts the better for all of us.”
Patrick said he has been speaking with fellow governors, several senators, and officials in the White House.
“I think there’s a deal here to be had,” Patrick said. “But we’re going to have to stop the posturing and get on to results.”
Patrick was among a bipartisan group of 19 governors who issued a letter this week in support of the stimulus package.
But as a bipartisan group of senators try to trim the $900 billion-plus package, one area they are looking at is direct aid to states.
Jumping on jobless numbers
Advocacy groups are also jumping on the job losses, the worst in decades.
The Alliance for American Manufacturing said about one third of the jobs slashed last month were in manufacturing, about 207,000.
“The deteriorating jobs numbers show the urgent need for action on economic recovery legislation. Every day of delay means we are only compounding our nation’s economic challenges. For the sake of America’s manufacturing workers and businesses, the Senate should pass a sizable, strategic, and sustained economic recovery bill with assurances for domestic sourcing. We applaud the Senate’s action so far. Now it’s time to get this legislation to President Obama’s desk,” Scott Paul, the alliance's executive director, said in a statement.
The Laborers’ International Union of North America said that 111,000 construction jobs were lost, increasing the industry's unemployment rate to 18.2 percent and marking the 19th consecutive month with significant job loss in the construction industry. In all, 995,000 construction jobs have been lost since the start of 2007.
"Today’s jobs reports shows another disastrous month for construction jobs. Every month we see massive job loss in the construction industry and every month it gets worse. Nearly a million construction jobs have disappeared in two years, taking paychecks away from struggling families and consumers away from an ailing economy. It’s a no brainer: by building America we can put people back to work taking care of the things our country desperately needs, while turning our economy around and leaving behind a lasting legacy for generations to come," the union's general president Terry O'Sullivan said in a statement.
Americans United for Change, a coalition of progressive and labor groups, ripped Republicans, whom it said are stalling the recovery package.
“Republicans have been staging the equivalent of a filibuster on President Obama’s jobs and economic recovery plan by filling hundreds upon hundreds of frivolous amendments and by nit picking to death small items in the bill when the country is facing its biggest economic crisis in a generation," Brad Woodhouse, the group's president, said in a statement. “Nearly 600,000 Americans lost jobs last month meaning that every day that Senate Republicans stall passage of the bill 20,000 more Americans will lose their jobs. Republicans clearly want to exact a political price on the President for doing what the American people elected him to do – change the tone and policies in Washington and to get our economy moving again. Instead of playing politics – and instead of insisting on the failed trickle down policies of the past eight years that drove the economy into the ditch in the first place – Republicans should listen to the American people and the hundreds of economists from across the ideological spectrum who are calling for urgent and immediate action to stem the downward spiral the economy is in today. Obstruction is not the answer. The more feet dragging Senate Republicans engage in, the more attempts to water the bill down down, the more misguided attempts to replace stimulative spending projects with ineffective tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations – the more Americans will lose their jobs, homes and healthcare. It’s as simple as that.”
Meanwhile, labor groups are citing the jobs numbers to push for the confirmation of Hilda Solis, the California congresswoman whose nomination as labor secretary has been held up because of questions about her husband's business tax liens and her pro-union activities.
"We cannot continue to fiddle as the economy burns. It is urgent for the American people to have an aggressive, emergency economic recovery plan that will put people back to work and keep families in their homes, and a strong Department of Labor," AFL-CIO President John Sweeney said in a statement.
"Enough is enough. Senate Republicans can't just oppose a Secretary of Labor because she supports working Americans and favors curbing excessive corporate power. They need to stop obstructing and confirm Rep. Solis now."
Chris Chafe, head of the Change to Win labor coalition, added:
"A strong Department of Labor is vital to helping American families stay afloat during this severe economic crisis. As our nation hemorrhages millions of jobs -- this morning’s announcement indicates that over one million workers have lost their jobs just since Thanksgiving -- America’s workers are continuing to be denied a leader that can help restore the economy, rebuild the middle class and renew the American Dream because of the partisan politics of a few.
“The Republican obstruction of the nomination of Hilda Solis as Labor Secretary is a slap in the face to America’s hardworking men and women and to the economic recovery our nation so desperately needs. Americans voted for change in historic numbers in November, and today’s economic news speaks to the bold actions needed from our nation’s leaders. Yet, instead of working together to provide relief, Senate Republicans are offering more of the same divisive politics of the past."
Families USA, a health advocacy group, issued a report today saying that millions of workers who lost their jobs are also losing their health insurance coverage.
According to the report, only one out of five unemployed workers who have annual incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty level ($44,100 in annual income for a family of four) have private or military health coverage. These workers represent half of unemployed workers under 65 years of age, the study says.
The House version of the stimulus package includes $40 billion to subsidize health care insurance for the unemployed, and the working Senate version includes $26 billion.
“Losing a job often means losing health coverage,” Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, said in a statement. “Most laid-off workers can’t afford COBRA coverage and do not qualify for public health safety-net programs – and, as a result, millions of middle-class and lower-income workers become uninsured.”
Romney: Obama off to 'rocky start'
Mitt Romney deflects talk of being a candidate for health and human services secretary -- what would be the fourth Republican in President Obama's cabinet.
And in the Q&A with Time magazine, he probably doesn't enhance his prospects, if any, with a rather critical assessment of the new president's performance so far.
"I think President Obama is off to a rocky start. The theme 'Yes, we can' seems to have been replaced with 'Well, maybe we can't,' Romney says. "I believe that with all the challenges America faces, the simple solutions and the hope that were sold by the Obama team are inadequate to the task ahead."
While some Republicans are already talking Romney up for a second presidential run in 2012, he was typically vague when asked about his political prospects.
"I really don't know what the future holds," he said. "Like most Americans, I want to see Barack Obama adopt effective, correct principles and successfully lead our country. And so any discussion of future politics for me is, I think, premature."
UPDATE: Romney also has an opinion piece on CNN.com critiquing Obama's economic recovery plan, saying the "Obama spending bill would stimulate the government, not the economy."
Kennedy, Baucus affirm commitment to health bill, urge Obama to swiftly replace Daschle
WASHINGTON -- Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Max Baucus, in a public letter to President Obama this afternoon, affirmed their commitment to passing a major health care bill this year and urged the new president to move with dispatch to find a replacement for Tom Daschle, who would have been the White House's point-person on that issue.
Daschle, Obama's nominee for Health and Human Services, withdrew his name this week after acknowledging he had failed to pay $128,000 in taxes on a private car and driver lent to him by a Democratic donor. Since he lost his reelection bid in 2004, he had also earned large speaking fees from health care interests whose activities are regulated by HHS.
"We have a moral duty to ensure that every American can get quality health care," the senators' letter said. "Incremental efforts will no longer suffice and we cannot afford to wait any longer. With your continued leadership and commitment, we remain certain that our goal of enacting comprehensive health care reform can be accomplished this year.
Daschle's departure devastated health advocates, who viewed him as uniquely qualified to guide the White House reform effort. A veteran former senator with a low-key demeanor who had won respect on both sides of the aisle, Dashle had recently authored a book on health reform and had the full confidence of the president.
Baucus, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and Kennedy, the chairman of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, have been working steadily since last summer to prepare the way for a bill they hoped to send to the floor in the first 100 days of the new administration.
In their letter, they expressed disappointment about the Daschle situation but said the circumstances demanded immediate bold action.
"As you have emphasized we must act now," the letter said. "The ranks of the uninsured grow larger each day. The cost of health care to families, businesses and government are crippling and, although we spend more on health care than any other country, the quality of care provided by America's health care system is often uneven compared to other industrialized nations."
Health care advocates do not agree on who would the best person to replace Daschle, or whether Obama should have two people take his place -- one to head the department and one to work on the health bill.
Biden highlights infrastructure spending
Vice President Joe Biden, joining in the hard sell for the economic stimulus plan, went today to a commuter rail station in the Washington, D.C., suburb of Laurel, Md., to highlight the infrastructure spending in the bill.
Biden said that President Obama's plan would create 400,000 jobs in the next two years by investing at least $100 billion in mass transit systems, highways, bridges, ports -- what the White House calls the largest increase in infrastructure spending since the creation of the national highway system in the 1950s.
But fellow Democrats in the Senate fell two votes short on Tuesday of adding $25 billion for highways, mass transit, and water projects to the package. Republicans blocked the move, insisiting that any additional infrastructure spending be offset by spending cuts elsewhere in the package.
Critics of the $819 billion version of the stimulus bill passed by the House last week say it falls far short on infrastructure spending -- which many economists say is one of the quickest ways to create jobs -- compared to the pledges the president has made. Analysts computed that only 5 percent of the House legislation would go to highway, mass transit, and rail projects.
Biden's full remarks, and a question-and-answer session -- as provided by the White House -- are below:
The White House report on the infrastructure component of the package is also below:
Cutting a stimulus deal
A bipartisan group of senators is meeting today on Capitol Hill to try to make a deal on the stimulus package -- and possibly set the stage for a vote tonight.
Senator Susan Collins of Maine is among the key negotiators as moderate Republicans like her and conservative Democrats strip out objectionable spending that could streamline the bill in shape that could draw at least 60 Senate votes and overcome procedural hurdles that Republican foes could put in the way.
Before going into the closed-door meeting, Collins told CNN that she met with Senator Ben Nelson, a conservative Democrat from Nebraska, late into the night Wednesday to find "a way to proceed" and to "more carefully focus the bill."
Critics of the bill say the current $900 billion-plus Senate version includes too many projects that would not create jobs quickly and should not be in the package. Those same critics are even more harsh in the opprobrium of the $819 billion version passed by the House last week without a single Republican voting in favor.
Romney to headline high-profile fund-raiser
Mitt Romney is showing no sign of leaving the national political stage anytime soon, or dampening speculation that he's lining up a possible second try for president in 2012.
After ending his presidential campaign last year, the former Massachusetts governor created a political action committee to help Republican candidates -- and also, by the way, to keep his profile high and perhaps collect some chits. He was also one of the most visible surrogates for GOP presidential candidate John McCain.
Now comes word that he will headline an event circled on many political calendars -- the National Republican Senatorial Committee's annual fund-raiser.
Eric Fehrnstrom, a Romney spokesman, confirmed this morning a report in The Hill newspaper that Romney will speak on April 1. In an email to the Globe, Fehrnstrom said that a couple of weeks ago, Senator John Cornyn of Texas, chairman of the committee, asked Romney and he accepted.
"Mitt Romney expects to be helping Republicans running for office in the 2010 cycle," Fehrnstrom added.
Romney will likely match or exceed his schedule last year, when he did events for 33 Republican candidates running for federal office, including five US Senate candidates, Fehrnstrom said.
The Hill quoted one NRSC official calling Romney "one of the most respected and trusted voices in the Republican Party today." "As the Republican Party rebuilds and particularly as our country faces the most serious economic crisis in recent history, our party leaders and Republican faithful across the country will undoubtedly look to Mitt Romney for his leadership and advice," the official added.
Obama signs healthcare bill
A day after he had to jettison the person he hoped would be the architect of a healthcare overhaul, President Obama this afternoon will get to claim a smaller victory.
He signed into law a bill, given final approval by the House today, to extend subsidized coverage to 4 million more children across the country. The bill on the State Children's Health Insurance Program costs nearly $33 billion and covers children whose parents earn too much to qualify for Medicaid, but find it expensive to buy private insurance.
"This is good, this is good," Obama began, as supporters applauded and cheered.
With the bill, "We fulfill one of the highest responsibilities that we have -- to ensure the health and well-being of the nation's children," he said, First Lady Michelle Obama by his side.
But Obama also noted the reality that 8 million children lack health insurance, among an estimated 47 million Americans without health insurance, according to the Census Bureau, about 16 percent of the population..
"This is only the first step," he said, calling it a downpayment on his commitment for universal healthcare coverage.
And, like an event during his campaign, he introduced a "real family" to illustrate the issue, vowing that he will refuse to accept" that some children do not get the basic help they need to reach their full potential.
He also noted that the legislation lifts the ban on states allowing the children of immigrants to enroll in the program, eliciting another big cheer from the invited audience.
Tom Daschle, who was nominated for health and human services secretary and for a new White House office of healthcare reform, withdrew his nomination on Tuesday over tax troubles.
Senator John F. Kerry praised the final passage of the bill, noting that the program covers nearly 100,000 children in Massachusetts.
“It’s about time we take care of our most vulnerable children. We’ve waited far too long for this day,” Kerry said in a statement. “America’s kids should be guaranteed comprehensive care whether they need dental care, mental health, medical or surgical treatment.”
The legislation also includes parity for mental health services under the program. “It’s about time we take care of our most vulnerable children. We’ve waited far too long for this day,” Kerry added. “America’s kids should be guaranteed comprehensive care whether they need dental care, mental health, medical or surgical treatment.”
An anti-tax group, however, argued that by signing the bill, Obama had violated a core campaign promise -- not to raise taxes on those earning less than $250,000 a year.
Americans for Tax Reform said that the tobacco tax hike that funds the expansion -- "a 156 percent increase in the federal excise tax on tobacco, a hike of 61 cents per pack" -- disproportionately hits lower income people.
Obama's full prepared remarks are below:
Lynn offers more concessions
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
WASHINGTON -- If he gains Senate approval to be the second-ranking Pentagon official, Raytheon executive and former lobbyist William J. Lynn III promises not to participate in any decisions for up to a year that involve the weapons programs that he lobbied for on behalf of the Waltham-based defense giant, according to a series of letters the White House and Lynn sent to Capitol Hill this afternoon.
Lynn has come under scrutiny after requiring a special ethics waiver to be President Obama's nominee for deputy secretary of defense, who is responsible for managing the day-to-day operations of the Department of Defense. The administration's new ethics guidelines bar former lobbyists from having jurisdiction over industries they represented in the previous two years.
Lawmakers have questioned Lynn's ability to remain impartial in decisions affecting Raytheon, which receives billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts each year. To address those concerns, Lynn previously said he will seek special authorization from Pentagon lawyers before involving himself in decisions that directly effect Raytheon's bottom line and also agreed to sell all his company stock within 90 days.
But today he went a step further, saying he would not involve himself for at least a year with decisions involving the specific weapon systems -- including a new warship, missiles, and satellites -- that he advocated for during his stint as a top Raytheon lobbyist from 2002 to 2008.
To see the documents, click here.
Lynn is especially trying to satisfy Senator Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican who remains the most vocal critic of his nomination. Lynn's new effort to address the ethics concerns was included in a written response to questions posed by Grassley last week.
Lynn has won wide backing from many in the defense community who believe the 54-year-old, who previously served in high Pentagon positions and on Capitol Hill, is uniquely suited to address the Pentagon's myriad management challenges.
But Grassley still appears to have concerns -- both with Lynn's ties to Raytheon and his past performance as the Pentagon top budget official in the 1990s. Grassley has maintained that Lynn presided over a series of financial decisions in his last Pentagon tour that contributed to wasteful spending and shoddy accounting procedures.
Grassley's office indicated this afternoon that he will continue to raise questions as the Senate takes up the nomination. Senators have the perogative to place a hold on a nomination, delaying it indefinitely.
"Mr. Lynn’s past performance at the Department of Defense raises many concerns for Senator Grassley, let alone the possible conflicts of interest with a big time defense contractor," his office said in a statement. "Senator Grassley will be detailing all of this prior to Senate consideration of Mr. Lynn’s nomination."
Collins having say on stimulus
The predictions that Susan Collins of Maine, a moderate Republican, would play a key role in the Senate bridging the two parties is coming to pass.
Collins has been summoned to meet this afternoon at the White House with President Obama about the stimulus plan, a Collins aide told the Associated Press.
With the blessing of Democratic leaders, Collins is working with other moderate senators including Ben Nelson, a Nebraska Democrat, to cut spending in the plan to get it in a form that would draw broad, bipartisan support.
Republicans oppose much of the spending included in the $819 billion version approved by the House last week without a single Republican vote. Obama is hoping to get some GOP backing in the Senate.
The president used an announcement of new limits on executive pay at firms receiving federal aid to press again today for quick action on the stimulus plan.
"A failure to act, and act now, will turn crisis into a catastrophe and guarantee a longer recession, a less robust recovery, and a more uncertain future. Millions more jobs will be lost. More businesses will be shuttered. More dreams will be deferred."
He hit back at criticisms of the plan from Republicans, which he said "echo the very same failed economic theories that led us into this crisis in the first place – the notion that tax cuts alone will solve all our problems; that we can ignore fundamental challenges like energy independence and the high cost of healthcare."
"I reject those theories," he added, "and so did the American people when they went to the polls in November and voted resoundingly for change. So I urge members of Congress to act without delay. No plan is perfect, and we should work to make it stronger....Let’s not make the perfect the enemy of the essential. Let’s show people all over our country who are looking for leadership in this difficult time that we are equal to the task."
Providence mayor at White House on stimulus
As the White House continues trying to build support for its economic recovery plan, about 20 mayors from across the country will be making a cameo appearance today.
Miami Mayor Manny Diaz is leading the delegation from the US Conference of Mayors, which also includes Providence Mayor David Cicilline.
He leads the capital of a state among the hardest hit by the deepening recession. Rhode Island's unemployment rate hit 10 percent in December, the highest in 30 years. The state is suffering with the same housing and retail downturn as elsewhere, but also failed to replace its manufacturing base like some other states did.
The mayors urged Congress to get past policy and partisan differences and pass a plan.
"We need action now," Akron Mayor Donald L. Plusquellic said.
A bipartisan group of 19 governors, including Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, issued a letter in support of the stimulus plan that the White House released on Tuesday. The Senate is busily drafting its own version that will be significantly different than the $819 billion version passed by the House last week.
Public support for the stimulus package, meanwhile, appears to be dropping as criticism grows louder.
A Rasmussen Reports poll says that 37 percent favor the legislation, 43 percent are opposed, and 20 percent are not sure.
Earlier surveys showed a plurality in favor, 45 percent two weeks ago and 42 percent last week. Opposition has grown from 34 percent two weeks ago to 39 percent last week, Rasmussen says.
Newman named to replace Gregg
New Hampshire Governor John Lynch officially announced this afternoon that Republican J. Bonnie Newman will replace Judd Gregg in the US Senate if Gregg is confirmed as commerce secretary.
The agreement by Lynch, a Democrat, to appoint a Republican to serve out Gregg's term, which ends in 2010, freed Gregg to accept President Obama's offer to take the helm at Commerce since Gregg insisted he would not leave the Senate if that would change the balance of power.
"I think it is great for the country and for New Hampshire," Lynch said of Gregg's nomination, adding that bipartisan cooperation is needed at a time of economic crisis.
Newman, 63, who has not previously held elected office, was an assistant commerce secretary under President Reagan and also worked in President George H.W. Bush's White House. She also worked for Gregg when he was a US representative and supported Lynch for governor.
"Bonnie Newman is one of the true gems in our state," Gregg told reporters in a conference call today after appearing with Obama.
Lynch said he looked not just for a Republican who wasn't a partisan, but someone of high integrity who would "put the interests of New Hampshire above all else."
Newman fits the bill, he said. "Bonnie Newman will be able to hit the ground running," Lynch added.
Lynch said Newman will not run in 2010, and will not endorse any candidate in that race in a state turning more Democratic.
"In my wildest, wildest dreams it never occurred to me that we would be standing here today," Newman said.
She pledged to keep the state her highest priority for the next two years, and vowed to be not just a "caretaker" but an energetic advocate.
Obama names Gregg, both call for bipartisanship
President Obama introduced GOP Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire as his choice for commerce secretary this morning, saying that Gregg is the right person to help create jobs during and after the economic recovery.
Obama said Gregg has "seen from all angles" how the economy works best, starting from when he saw his father Hugh, like him a former governor, run a small business in Nashua, N.H. Gregg is also "famous or infamous" on Capitol Hill for his fiscal discipline, the president said.
While he and Gregg don't agree on everything -- including who should have won the November election -- they agree on the need to lift people out of the recession, Obama said.
"With the stakes this high, we cannot afford to get trapped in the same partisan gridlock," said Obama, who used the opportunity to again make a sales pitch for his stimulus package.
After thanking Obama for what he called a "rather extraordinary step," Gregg praised Obama's "bold" stimulus plan.
"This is not a time for partisanship," Gregg said. "This is a time to govern, and govern well."
Gregg also thanked New Hampshire Governor John Lynch, a Democrat, who is expected to name a Republican to serve out the remaining two years in Gregg's term. The most-mentioned possibility is J. Bonnie Newman, a former Reagan administration official.
Lynch has scheduled a news conference for 4:30 p.m. today to announce his pick to replace Gregg.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs acknowledged that New Hampshire Governor John Lynch talked to the Obama team about the Gregg nomination.
But Gibbs denied that the White House had any role in Lynch's decision of who should replace Gregg.
Meanwhile, Representative Carol Shea-Porter addressed early speculation that she would run for Gregg's seat in 2010.
"It is still very early and I am focused on my work for New Hampshire and the country," Shea-Porter said in a statement.
Obama's first choice for the job, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, a Democrat, withdrew amid an investigation of state contracts and political donations.
If confirmed, Gregg would be the third Republican in Obama's cabinet, following Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who stayed on from the Bush administration, and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, a former Illinois congressman.
Even before his name was bandied about for commerce secretary, Gregg had emerged as a key ally for Obama on economic policy. While many congressional Republicans had slammed Obama's stimulus plan in particular, Gregg had called for a bipartisan approach to the nation's economic crisis.
Gregg, 61, has been in elected office since 1979, the last 16 in the Senate.
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney praised Obama's selection of Gregg.
"Senator Judd Gregg is an excellent choice for Commerce Secretary. He will bring a much-needed sense of fiscal discipline to the affairs of the executive branch, and an appreciation of the need to adopt policies that encourage job growth and creation. Having distinguished himself through a long career of service to the people of New Hampshire, Senator Gregg now has a chance to put that service to work for a grateful nation."
The full remarks of Obama and Gregg, as released by the White House, are below:
McCain goes off on stimulus package
The glad tidings between President Obama and presidential rival John McCain seem to be over.
McCain was very gracious in defeat, they made very nice in the weeks after the election, and McCain publicly praised many of Obama's cabinet picks and initial decisions.
But now McCain is sounding off on the economic recovery plan.
Through his Country First political action committee, the Arizona senator urged supporters today to sign an online petition against the current package. He also had some harsh words about the lack of bipartisan cooperation.
The message to supporters follows:
"Yesterday, the Senate began debate on an economic stimulus package that is intended to get our economy back on track and help Americans who are suffering through these difficult times. Unfortunately, the proposal on the table is big on the giveaways for the special interests and corporate high rollers, yet short on help for ordinary working Americans. I cannot and do not support the package on the table from the Democrats and the Obama Administration. Our country does not need just another spending bill, particularly not one that will load future generations with the burden of massive debt. We need a short term stimulus bill that will directly help people, create jobs, and provide a jolt to our economy.
"I believe we need to evaluate every bit of spending in this stimulus proposal with one important criteria - does it really stimulate the economy and help create jobs - if the answer is no, it does not belong in a so-called stimulus package. Furthermore, the stimulus must include significant direct relief to American workers in the form of payroll tax cuts and programs to help homeowners keep their homes. Finally, we need an end game to this stimulus so that when our economy recovers, these spending programs do not remain permanent and saddle our children with a skyrocketing national debt.
"I appreciate the discussions President Obama is having with my Republican colleagues, but the time for talking has come to an end and we must now begin some serious negotiation. But as of yet, Republicans have not been given the opportunity to be involved. The House of Representatives passed a stimulus bill without a single Republican supporting it. In the Senate, the Democrat leadership is trying to jam the existing proposal through regardless of reservations from a number of members. With so much at stake, the last thing we need is partisanship driving our attempts to turn the economy around.
"I have long been a fighter against wasteful spending in Washington and long an advocate for a balanced budget -- that will never change. I realize we face extraordinary challenges with our economy today, but that is not an excuse for more irresponsibly from Washington. I hope you will join me in saying no to this stimulus package as it currently exists by signing this petition."
Selling the stimulus
As is often the case in Washington, the presentation is just as important as the policy, and so it is with the economic stimulus plan.
President Obama, while his team tries to quietly jettison the most objectionable parts of the version approved by the House last week, is going on the PR offensive today. He is doing a series of interviews in the Oval Office with the major broadcast and cable networks: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and Fox News Channel.
A new Gallup poll suggests why he's pitching the plan anew to the public -- the survey shows that the recovery package that is the signature effort of his early days in office is far less popular than Obama, himself.
According to the poll, 38 percent of Americans want the recovery package passed as is, 37 percent want major changes, and 17 percent want Congress to reject it entirely.
Among those supporting the president are many of the nation's governors. The White House released a letter today from 19 of them, including Democrats Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, Jon Corzine of New Jersey, and Tim Kaine of Virginia and Republicans Arnold Schwarzenegger of California and Charlie Crist of Florida.
"We urge the Congress to reach prompt resolution of all outstanding differences and you to sign the bill when it reaches your desk,” the letter says. “While we all believe in the importance of free markets, we believe that the markets today need stimulating.”
Meanwhile, a major union today launched an effort behind an amendment proposed by Senators Dianne Feinstein of California and Patty Murray of Washington to boost the infrastructure spending in the package by $25 billion. Spending on roads, bridges, and other public works projects is one of the most effective ways to quickly create jobs, many economists say.
The Laborers’ International Union of North America said it is marshaling its members to lobby the Senate for the amendment, which it says would create 655,000 additional jobs.
About Political Intelligence
Glen Johnson is Politics Editor at boston.com and lead blogger for "Political Intelligence." He moved to Massachusetts in the fourth grade, and has covered local, state, and national politics for over 25 years. E-mail him at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen. |










Glen Johnson is Politics Editor at boston.com and lead blogger for "Political Intelligence." He moved to Massachusetts in the fourth grade, and has covered local, state, and national politics for over 25 years. E-mail him at 


