2008 MCAS RESULTS   Search for scores * About MCAS
 Rankings
District rankings:
3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 10th
School rankings:
3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 10th
 Individual district and school results
Choose from this menu:   [ or see entire list ]

Lynn Public Schools

These results for Lynn Public Schools, released in September 2008, are for the MCAS exams taken in the spring of 2008. Source: Massachusetts Department of Education.

District summary

 All Students


 Spring 2008 Exam
% of students at each performance level No. of
students
tested
Advanced/
Above
Proficient
Proficient Needs
Improv.
Warning/
Failing
  Grade 3
English District 6 33 41 20 980
  State 14 41 33 11 70,282
Mathematics District 16 35 28 21 982
  State 25 36 25 14 70,397
  Grade 4
English District 3 26 49 22 1025
  State 8 41 39 13 71,159
Mathematics District 10 24 44 22 1027
  State 20 29 38 13 71,454
  Grade 5
English District 6 40 40 14 877
  State 13 48 30 9 70,644
Mathematics District 13 25 37 25 879
  State 22 30 30 17 70,748
Science & Tech District 5 23 51 21 879
  State 17 33 38 12 70,689
  Grade 6
English District 7 46 35 13 925
  State 15 52 24 8 71,572
Mathematics District 15 29 30 26 925
  State 23 33 26 18 71,678
  Grade 7
English District 2 44 37 17 896
  State 12 57 23 8 72,782
Mathematics District 5 20 33 42 895
  State 15 32 29 24 73,167
  Grade 8
English District 4 56 29 11 975
  State 12 63 18 7 73,267
Mathematics District 7 22 30 41 972
  State 19 30 27 24 73,367
Science & Tech District 0 11 43 46 969
  State 3 36 39 22 73,205
  Grade 10
English District 10 47 33 9 960
  State 24 51 21 4 71,478
Mathematics District 27 30 27 15 945
  State 43 29 19 9 71,176
Science & Tech District 2 27 42 29 870
  State 14 43 31 12 72,219

Note: "Placement overall" ranks schools by combining the percentage of students who were either "Advanced" or "Proficient" and comparing that number for each subject and grade with schools across the state. The ranking was done by Boston.com.
Aborn
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 14 45 38 2 42 465 of 1,002
3rd Math 24 57 10 10 42 138 of 1,001
4th English 3 45 45 8 38 483 of 985
4th Math 24 42 26 8 38 209 of 985
5th English 5 46 46 2 41 618 of 912
5th Math 15 29 39 17 41 566 of 912
5th Science 10 54 37 0 41 249 of 912

A. Drewicz Elementary
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 2 24 49 25 55 897 of 1,002
3rd Math 11 35 29 25 55 781 of 1,001
4th English 0 19 58 23 52 864 of 985
4th Math 10 13 58 19 52 860 of 985
5th English 2 31 48 19 42 792 of 912
5th Math 10 12 55 24 42 829 of 912
5th Science 0 14 55 31 42 812 of 912

Brickett Elementary
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 12 21 65 3 34 829 of 1,002
3rd Math 12 41 41 6 34 680 of 1,001
4th English 7 44 44 5 41 441 of 985
4th Math 8 48 40 5 40 372 of 985
5th English 3 33 56 8 36 771 of 912
5th Math 8 28 56 8 36 685 of 912
5th Science 6 17 61 17 36 733 of 912

Julia F. Callahan
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 4 32 52 13 56 799 of 1,002
3rd Math 11 48 29 13 56 573 of 1,001
4th English 5 37 49 10 82 580 of 985
4th Math 15 28 46 11 82 591 of 985
5th English 8 43 45 3 60 618 of 912
5th Math 8 25 53 13 60 711 of 912
5th Science 5 22 68 5 60 691 of 912

Cobbet Elementary
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 6 17 62 15 66 913 of 1,002
3rd Math 5 25 35 35 65 914 of 1,001
4th English 0 15 59 26 73 898 of 985
4th Math 4 16 40 40 73 886 of 985
5th English 2 37 45 16 49 742 of 912
5th Math 21 8 44 27 48 756 of 912
5th Science 2 21 60 17 48 733 of 912

William P. Connery
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 0 18 29 53 73 952 of 1,002
3rd Math 1 21 34 44 73 959 of 1,001
4th English 0 9 51 40 65 943 of 985
4th Math 5 12 49 34 65 913 of 985
5th English 1 26 41 32 69 838 of 912
5th Math 12 23 17 48 69 697 of 912
5th Science 1 22 39 38 69 733 of 912

E. J. Harrington
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 3 23 44 31 62 897 of 1,002
3rd Math 11 24 32 33 63 876 of 1,001
4th English 0 8 44 49 80 946 of 985
4th Math 5 5 44 46 79 958 of 985
5th English 0 27 42 31 52 838 of 912
5th Math 0 15 25 60 52 878 of 912
5th Science 0 2 48 50 52 900 of 912

Robert L. Ford
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 13 48 27 13 79 442 of 1,002
3rd Math 39 39 16 5 79 180 of 1,001
4th English 4 22 65 10 83 788 of 985
4th Math 4 24 52 20 83 809 of 985
5th English 10 54 37 0 63 428 of 912
5th Math 17 38 40 5 63 410 of 912
5th Science 11 41 44 3 63 417 of 912
6th English 3 49 39 9 76 440 of 565
6th Math 20 35 33 12 75 301 of 565
7th English 8 63 22 8 78 245 of 464
7th Math 4 29 39 29 77 322 of 463
8th English 4 69 22 5 114 277 of 462
8th Math 8 27 30 35 114 336 of 462
8th Science 0 15 45 40 114 366 of 462

Hood
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 4 32 44 19 68 799 of 1,002
3rd Math 18 29 37 16 68 769 of 1,001
4th English 3 23 48 26 62 788 of 985
4th Math 2 16 56 26 62 901 of 985
5th English 5 40 48 8 40 683 of 912
5th Math 3 13 44 41 39 874 of 912
5th Science 0 15 54 31 39 800 of 912

Ingalls
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 4 24 45 27 75 874 of 1,002
3rd Math 12 39 27 22 74 722 of 1,001
4th English 1 13 45 40 77 908 of 985
4th Math 9 27 38 26 77 705 of 985
5th English 5 30 38 27 63 778 of 912
5th Math 5 25 35 35 63 751 of 912
5th Science 3 22 49 25 63 719 of 912
7th English 1 0 of 464
7th Math 1 0 of 463
8th English 4 0 of 462
8th Math 4 0 of 462
8th Science 4 0 of 462

Lincoln-Thomson
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 11 34 55 0 38 703 of 1,002
3rd Math 26 55 18 0 38 138 of 1,001
4th English 9 38 50 3 32 501 of 985
4th Math 0 31 63 6 32 778 of 985
5th English 9 66 25 0 32 230 of 912
5th Math 41 38 19 3 32 71 of 912
5th Science 13 25 53 9 32 585 of 912

Lynn Woods
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 0 36 50 14 22 799 of 1,002
3rd Math 5 18 50 27 22 951 of 1,001
4th English 6 36 48 9 33 580 of 985
4th Math 6 15 67 12 33 877 of 985
5th English 10 48 41 0 29 531 of 912
5th Math 0 24 62 14 29 811 of 912
5th Science 3 24 66 7 29 691 of 912

William R. Fallon
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 13 33 29 25 24 690 of 1,002
3rd Math 25 13 38 25 24 855 of 1,001
4th English 7 43 43 7 28 454 of 985
4th Math 7 32 54 7 28 657 of 985
5th English 19 56 25 0 16 230 of 912
5th Math 31 38 31 0 16 193 of 912
5th Science 0 13 75 13 16 820 of 912

Sewell-Anderson
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 8 32 47 13 38 759 of 1,002
3rd Math 14 35 35 16 37 749 of 1,001
4th English 0 49 44 7 43 467 of 985
4th Math 14 43 31 12 42 353 of 985
5th English 13 56 31 0 32 342 of 912
5th Math 16 44 31 9 32 325 of 912
5th Science 6 25 66 3 32 649 of 912

Capt. William G. Shoemaker
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 8 56 24 11 62 380 of 1,002
3rd Math 29 37 21 13 62 437 of 1,001
4th English 2 37 49 12 51 632 of 985
4th Math 24 41 27 8 51 228 of 985
5th English 12 60 22 6 67 296 of 912
5th Math 33 40 21 6 67 138 of 912
5th Science 16 46 31 6 67 277 of 912
6th English 1 0 of 565
6th Math 1 0 of 565

Edward A. Sisson
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 9 68 22 1 77 136 of 1,002
3rd Math 25 60 13 3 77 81 of 1,001
4th English 18 57 21 3 61 106 of 985
4th Math 32 40 24 5 63 135 of 985
5th English 15 60 25 0 60 230 of 912
5th Math 22 37 33 8 60 343 of 912
5th Science 5 30 58 7 60 611 of 912

Tracy
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 4 31 38 27 26 809 of 1,002
3rd Math 11 41 19 30 27 697 of 1,001
4th English 0 15 61 24 33 898 of 985
4th Math 12 30 39 18 33 608 of 985
5th English 0 14 66 21 29 894 of 912
5th Math 10 28 34 28 29 657 of 912
5th Science 0 10 45 45 29 835 of 912

Washington Community
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 7 24 45 24 29 847 of 1,002
3rd Math 10 14 52 24 29 942 of 1,001
4th English 0 11 66 24 38 930 of 985
4th Math 11 13 58 18 38 853 of 985
5th English 6 23 46 26 35 824 of 912
5th Math 9 3 40 49 35 887 of 912
5th Science 3 6 57 34 35 841 of 912

Welcoming Alternative School
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
3rd Reading 2 0 of 1,002
3rd Math 2 0 of 1,001
4th English 4 0 of 985
4th Math 6 0 of 985
5th English 8 0 of 912
5th Math 8 0 of 912
5th Science 8 0 of 912
6th English 6 0 of 565
6th Math 6 0 of 565

Thurgood Marshall Middle School
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
6th English 9 43 29 19 217 440 of 565
6th Math 12 25 26 38 216 461 of 565
7th English 0 32 36 31 235 433 of 464
7th Math 2 13 31 53 233 419 of 463
8th English 2 43 35 19 247 419 of 462
8th Math 2 12 22 64 247 432 of 462
8th Science 0 3 35 62 245 431 of 462

Welcoming Middle School
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
7th English 2 0 of 464
7th Math 2 0 of 463
8th English 3 0 of 462
8th Math 2 0 of 462
8th Science 2 0 of 462

Breed Middle School
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
6th English 4 45 42 10 373 457 of 565
6th Math 15 30 31 24 373 390 of 565
7th English 1 44 44 11 333 397 of 464
7th Math 4 18 39 40 334 388 of 463
8th English 3 59 31 7 362 361 of 462
8th Math 8 22 36 34 359 363 of 462
8th Science 0 13 47 40 359 371 of 462

Pickering Middle School
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
6th English 11 58 25 5 201 304 of 565
6th Math 21 33 32 14 201 314 of 565
7th English 5 59 31 5 193 301 of 464
7th Math 13 34 27 26 194 219 of 463
8th English 9 68 19 3 204 244 of 462
8th Math 12 34 33 21 203 264 of 462
8th Science 0 16 52 33 203 363 of 462

Career Development Center
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
10th English 0 73 27 0 22 215 of 349
10th Math 13 27 47 13 15 320 of 346
10th Science 0 20 40 40 10 297 of 340

Classical High School
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
10th English 12 49 30 8 257 277 of 349
10th Math 35 27 26 12 256 264 of 346
10th Science 2 36 43 18 217 265 of 340

Lynn English High School
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
10th English 15 54 28 3 393 239 of 349
10th Math 35 40 20 5 390 171 of 346
10th Science 4 36 45 15 368 255 of 340

Lynn Alternative High School
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
10th English 5 0 of 349
10th Math 3 0 of 346
10th Science 1 0 of 340

Lynn Voc Tech Institute
Grade/
Subject
% Advanced % Proficient % Needs
improving
% Warning/
Failing
Students
tested
Placement
overall
10th English 2 38 45 15 218 323 of 349
10th Math 10 22 40 28 219 327 of 346
10th Science 0 8 40 52 194 320 of 340