THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

India's household workers push for rights, to organize

Pushpa Alamalai, 45, is among the many working poor in India who have sparked a movement to unionize household workers and push for better pay, sick days, and benefits. Pushpa Alamalai, 45, is among the many working poor in India who have sparked a movement to unionize household workers and push for better pay, sick days, and benefits. (Emily Wax/ Washington Post)
By Emily Wax
Washington Post / November 9, 2008
  • Email|
  • Print|
  • Single Page|
  • |
Text size +

CHENNAI, India - On the day she asked her employer of 16 years for a raise, Pushpa Alamalai put on her best sari and wove a traditional string of jasmine flowers into her neatly oiled braid. But Alamalai, a housekeeper, was so worried that she had trouble breathing.

"I needed so much confidence to ask for more pay," said Alamalai, 45, a mother of four who scrubs the floors, washes the dishes, and cuts vegetables for a middle-class family here for the equivalent of $22 a month. "I was working for so many years to their satisfaction. All those years I had not asked for anything."

For Alamalai and other household workers in India, asking for a pay increase was once seen as risky. It often led to confrontations and, occasionally, firings. Household workers have no government protections, no minimum-wage guarantees, no health benefits, no paid holidays, and, usually, no days off.

Hindered by traditional prejudices against their low-caste status, many domestic workers say they have been forced to the sidelines as the middle and upper classes prospered during the country's decadelong boom.

But that appears to be slowly changing. The rising expectations of India's legions of working poor have sparked an unprecedented movement to organize household workers and push for their rights.

The effort is being made as the supply-demand ratio for domestic workers shifts in their favor: India's economic rise has spurred more and more families to hire more servants. Increasingly, household help is seen as a necessity for India's busy families, as well as a sign of status in this class-conscious country.

Alamalai's employer recently decided that her work ethic had improved and that she deserved a raise. Her pay was doubled.

Then again, the employer also doubled her workload. Still, Alamalai said she has gained dignity.

"I dress neatly now," she said. "I realize that I want to do my job properly because cleaning houses is a good profession."

There are at least 100 million domestic workers in India - 50 times the number of people working in the software industry. Domestic labor constitutes one of the country's largest job categories, behind farming and construction.

The growing confidence of this shadow workforce is reflected in the proliferation of domestic worker unions across the country. They are challenging deep-rooted prejudices about caste, class, and labor and calling on India's government to extend to domestic workers the rights, benefits, and protections afforded to workers in other industries.

Several organizations are drafting a domestic workers bill, which would mandate the creation of a central agency where the household help can file charges of abuse. The bill is likely to include minimum-wage requirements, mandatory benefits, holiday and overtime pay. It would also set up a social security fund and healthcare account for the workers.

"The heart of the issue is that society doesn't respect their labor as real work," said Josephine Amala Valarmathi, coordinator of the Tamil Nadu Domestic Workers Welfare Board in Chennai. "Even the workers themselves took a long time to see that there was actual labor and dignity in their jobs. We have a long battle ahead. But it's starting."

As part of their campaign to change the law, domestic-worker organizations have begun holding street protests to demand salary increases, sick pay, and a weekly day off. Unions are also urging a change in the lexicon - replacing commonly used words such as "servant" and "owner" with more neutral terms such as "employee" and "employer."

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
 
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Del.icio.us Save this article
  • powered by Del.icio.us
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: Boston.com does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.