THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Health workers vote for industrial action

Email|Print|Single Page| Text size + By Charlie Taylor
April 29, 2008

As many as 28,000 healthcare workers have voted to take industrial action over the Health Service Executive's (HSE) recruitment freeze and its impact on services.

The employees,who are members of the Impact trade union, voted by 85 per cent to 15 per cent to sanction industrial action. The union members, who include health professionals and therapists, social care workers and administrative and managerial staff, said it will refuse to co-operate with HSE advisors or the Executive's 'transformation programme' from 21st May. The employees will also block non-emergency overtime and out-of-hours work and refuse to cover work and posts affected by the recruitment freeze. The union was warned that, as a result of the recruitment freeze, promised improvements in areas like primary care, disability services, mental health services and care for older people have been seriously delayed. The union said this morning it also plans other forms of action, including work stoppages. Impact says its action will minimise the effect on patients and services, as the action focuses on the HSE's top management. In September 2007, the HSE announced a recruitment embargo in response to spending overruns in hospitals and refunds for drugs and medicines. Although the spending overrun was not related to staffing costs, the embargo banned any new appointments of staff, temps, agency workers, locums, relief staff and overtime, as well as promotions, new acting up arrangements and career break returns. The HSE's recruitment embargo, introduced without any consultation with trade unions or staff representatives, was officially ended last Christmas. However, it was replaced in January by a new strict employment control process under which only critical frontline vacancies which arose before 2008 could be filled - and only if other posts which became vacant were suppressed. Impact national secretary Kevin Callinan said the union was seeking an end to the current recruitment restrictions and respect for existing agreements and third party recommendations about staff working conditions. "The staffing freeze is having a devastating effect on services and staff. The effect of the cuts has so far varied, depending on where vacancies have arisen, but it's only a matter of time before all services and staff are affected. "As well as curtailing existing services, the freeze has delayed promised improvements in areas like primary care, mental health services and care for older people. Our members find this intolerable, and experience tells us that more cuts in services and staffing are likely unless we take a stand," he said. The union also accuses the HSE of ignoring, or refusing to implement, staff agreements and that this has undermined a wide range of working conditions including cover for absences, promotions, acting up, career break returns, and access to term-time and other schemes. "Unless the HSE changes its approach, staff will have no guarantee against further imposed changes in their terms and conditions of employment," said Mr Callinan.

more stories like this

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
 
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Del.icio.us Save this article
  • powered by Del.icio.us
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: Boston.com does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.