LONDON — Lawmakers say it would be the perfect wedding gift: changing Britain’s rules of succession so any daughter born to Prince William and wife-to-be Kate Middleton would enjoy an equal right to the throne.
Lawmaker Keith Vaz led a brief House of Commons debate yesterday calling for an overhaul of the 300-year-old procedures, which many call antiquated and sexist.
“Sex discrimination has been illegal in the UK since 1975 and those who break the law are rightly punished,’’ he told Parliament. “This rule attempts to bring gender equality into our succession rules.’’ He said a series of newspaper polls shows strong support for this change to the rules.
The system currently gives sons an automatic preference over older female siblings to succeed to the British throne. That means if Middleton had a daughter and then a son, the daughter would be passed over and the son would become king when William dies or vacates the throne.
Vaz said yesterday that William’s April 29 wedding offers a once-in-a-generation chance to make the change, which has previously been discussed but never approved.
“Prince William looks like a very modern prince,’’ Vaz said in a statement. “If he has a daughter first, it is only right that she become queen of England.’’
Any legal change would not affect Prince Charles — heir to the throne — or William, since neither of them has an older sister who claim the throne if new rules are adopted. And the issue would be moot for another generation if Middleton’s first child is a boy.
But rules specifying who inherits the throne are not easy to change, particularly because doing so involves all 16 Commonwealth countries where Queen Elizabeth II is head of state.
Prime Minister David Cameron’s office said it could be a lengthy process for any change to be approved.
“Amending the Act of Succession is a complex and difficult matter that requires careful and thoughtful consideration,’’ a Cameron spokesman said.