BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — Argentina has finally run out of wiggle room in a billion-dollar showdown over foreign debts unpaid since the country’s world-record default a decade ago, and the stakes couldn’t be higher for President Cristina Fernandez.
A U.S. federal judge in New York late Wednesday ordered Argentina to pay immediately and in full everything it owes to what Fernandez calls ‘‘vulture funds’’ that she blames for much of her country’s troubles. That adds up to $1.3 billion, due by Dec. 15.
The judge also barred Argentina from paying other bondholders until it satisfies this judgment, putting the president’s back against the wall: If she doesn’t reverse her longstanding position and pay up, she risks triggering another historic Argentine debt default, this time totaling more than $20 billion.
‘‘It is hardly an injustice to have legal rulings which, at long last, mean that Argentina must pay the debts which it owes. After ten years of litigation this is a just result,’’ U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa concluded.
Griesa’s orders were delivered just before the long Thanksgiving holiday closed markets in New York.
Argentine Economy Minister Hernan Lorenzino responded to the judge Thursday by pledging to battle ‘‘judicial colonialism.’’ Lorenzino said Argentina would defend its stance using all legal means and would take the ruling to the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday.
‘‘Paying the vultures is not only unfair but illegal following our internal rules,’’ Lorenzino told reporters, referring to Argentina’s ‘‘ley cerrojo,’’ or ‘‘lock law,’’ which bans the reopening of debt restructuring.
‘‘We'll fight all decisions that are against the interests of our country,’’ Lorenzino said, adding that Argentina is also ready to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court and take its case before any international body.
‘‘We still believe the U.S. justice system will fix this in a way that won’t affect Argentina, its legitimate creditors and, in an international context where the importance of these decisions is patent ... in terms of the financial international architecture,’’ he said.
Earlier in the day, Sen. Augustin Rossi, who leads the governing party’s bloc in Congress, told local radio that he thinks Argentina’s government would be within its rights to reject Griesa’s orders, ‘‘on behalf of all the Argentines, after we've made such an enormous effort to get out of default.’’
Argentina’s president had insisted earlier this week that her administration wouldn’t pay a single dollar to the plaintiffs. But the judge gave Fernandez no room to maneuver meanwhile, lifting his stay and ordering that the money be put in an escrow account for the plaintiffs to collect.
‘‘These threats of defiance cannot go by unheeded,’’ the judge wrote. ‘‘The less time Argentina is given to devise means for evasion, the more assurance there is against such evasion.’’
If Fernandez refuses, the judge said that the Bank of New York, which processes Argentina’s bond payments, will find itself in violation if it doesn’t hold up payments to all other bondholders.
‘‘It’s a mess. This does not help Argentina. Default could happen,’’ Goldman Sachs analyst Alberto Ramos in New York said Thursday. ‘‘The markets will react negatively to this.’’
The remedy also sent jitters through the legal departments of the most powerful financial institutions in the United States.
The U.S. Federal Reserve and the Clearing House, a trade group representing the world’s largest commercial banks, told the judge to make sure his order won’t affect the U.S. funds-transfer system, which automatically moves an average of $2.6 trillion a day in a half million transfers between more than 7,000 banks.
The entire system depends on transfers being ‘‘immediate, final and irrevocable’’ when processed. Requiring intermediaries to identify, stop and divert payments according to court orders ‘‘would impede the use of rapid electronic funds transfers in commerce by causing delays and driving up costs.’’
The judge dismissed these concerns Wednesday night, saying among other things that ‘‘if Argentina complies with the rulings of the Court of Appeals, there will be no problem.’’
As with so many other things involving Argentina, this case is rooted in the bloody dictatorship that ruled in 1976-1983. The military junta more than tripled the country’s foreign debts. By 2001, the burden had become unsustainable and the economy collapsed. Argentina’s $95 billion default still stands as a world record.Continued...