A jury unanimously convicted David Swain on Oct. 27 of murdering his wife, Shelley Tyre, off Tortola
Judge denies leniency for husband in scuba slaying
TORTOLA, British Virgin Islands - A British Virgin Islands judge ruled yesterday that a former Rhode Island dive shop owner must serve at least 25 years of a mandatory life sentence for killing his wife on a Caribbean scuba outing in 1999, rejecting his lawyers’ bid for leniency.
Justice Indra Hariprashad-Charles said the premeditated nature of the crime bound her to deny a defense request that David Swain become eligible for parole after 18 years in prison.
“It is my view that this murder was carefully planned and premeditated and calls for stiff punishment,’’ the judge said.
The judge granted Swain about two years credit for time served.
The 53-year-old is to serve his sentence at Her Majesty’s Prison at Balsam Ghut on Tortola, a mountainous island about 90 miles east of Puerto Rico.
A jury unanimously convicted Swain on Oct. 27 of murdering Shelley Tyre in what authorities portrayed as a near-perfect crime.
Tyre’s drowning near an isolated shipwreck at a depth of 80 feet was initially ruled an accident, but authorities in the British Virgin Islands charged Swain with murder after a 2006 civil trial in Rhode Island found him responsible for her death.
The civil jury awarded Tyre’s family $3.5 million; Swain filed for bankruptcy and has not paid the sum.
In the criminal trial, prosecutors argued that Swain killed Tyre to pursue a romance with another woman and get his wife’s money.
Swain’s lawyers plan to appeal the verdict.
No eyewitnesses or DNA evidence linked Swain to the murder. The prosecution’s case rested largely on specialists who testified they believed Swain wrestled his wife from behind, tore off her scuba mask, and shut off her air supply while they swam near the shipwreck. Her mask was damaged, the mouthpiece of her snorkel was missing, and her fin was found embedded in a sandbar - all signs of a struggle, prosecution witnesses said.
The defense called it a weak case that lacked physical evidence and was built on speculative theories and circumstantial evidence designed to roil the emotions of the jury.