< Back to Front Page Text size +

It's not fair!

Posted by Rona Fischman December 17, 2007 10:03 AM

Is it fair that some people got rich in the real estate run-up at the same time others lost their shirts? Should we bail out those who have been economically hurt, both people and corporations? People who are shut out of the housing market are mad, so are those who got in over their heads. Anyone who makes median income should be able to buy a house, but they can't...It’s not fair!

But, what does “fair” mean? If we can’t agree about what is fair, how can we agree on a fair solution? I found three types of fairness.

Fairness is equity: Everyone gets their equal share. All get equal part of the pie and equal treatment under law.

Fairness is mercy: Everyone gets what they need, so they have a level playing field. Parents attend to a baby at 3 A.M., but expect their ten year old to go back to bed. Disabled people get adapted equipment to keep a job.

Fairness is justice: Everyone gets what is coming to them. People are paid fairly for their work. People are punished for their wrongdoings.

Is fairness equity, mercy or justice? What kind of fairness do you believe in and how does it shape your ideas about the real estate market?


2 comments so far...
  1. This is a wonderful post and raises very good questions.

    Unfortunately, it was beyond the level of conversation enjoyed by most of the readers of this blog.

    Merry Christmas, Rona, and thanks for a wonderful year of blog posts. You and the rest of the Globe real estate blog team have done a wonderful job and I have enjoyed each and every post, even those that I disagreed with (vehemently!).

    Posted by John A Keith December 18, 07 10:11 PM
  1. "Anyone who makes median income should be able to buy a house, but they can't"

    That is an interesting premise... we already have more than 60% home ownership, so, by definition, the median income does own a home. I believe a better statement is that “Anyone should be able to find clean, safe and affordable housing”.

    As for you three type of “Fairness”

    Equity: everyone should have good housing available to them, this does not mean everyone should own a home, renting is an option.

    Mercy: If you cannot afford good housing there are options available to you, section 8 vouchers for example.

    Justice: Everyone is treated fairly, and you treat everyone fairly. That means brokers do not tell you to put a higher income on your application, and if they do, you tell them you will not sign.

    Let’s look at your questions…
    “Is it fair that some people got rich in the real estate run-up at the same time others lost their shirts?”
    Well, if you got “rich” or “lost your shirt” you were investing in the real estate market not looking for a home. Same as the people in the dot.com bubble. How many people that lost their shirt in real estate were “fair” to the people lending them money? Did they state an income that was untrue?

    “Should we bail out those who have been economically hurt, both people and corporations?”
    Personally I do not believe people or corporations should be bailed out.

    There will always be people who purchased a house and cannot continue to make payment due to health, job loss or other issues. Unfortunately, these people can go thru bankruptcy/foreclosure and will lose their homes, but that has always been true. Don’t forget, if you have equity in the home you are allowed to keep it thru the homestead exemption.

    It seems that a lot of the questions revolve around people who are in trouble with their mortgage. I believe you have to look at why they are in trouble, if their financial situation is the same as when they bought the house, they should be fine… right? Nobody would ever accept a loan they could not repay. If they did take out a loan they could not repay the house will be foreclosed on. Is this fair? The banks do not want the house; they want the money they lent. Was it fair that you took out a loan you could not afford?

    When I purchased my first place in 1990 I had to have 20% down, they required 2 years of tax returns and they called my employer two weeks before my closing to confirm my salary and that I still had the job. They knew I could/would repay my loan.


    “People who are shut out of the housing market are mad.”
    They should wait, prices are coming down and eventually, if they continue to save, they will be able to purchase a house with 20% down and at a decent price. If they are unable to save anything every month they will probably never be able to purchase. I believe that housing prices will stabilize at a point where if you put 20% down and take out a qualifying loan, your monthly PITI payment will equal the monthly rent you would receive if you decided to rent your property.

    “People who got in over their heads are mad.”
    Why, were they cheated? Treated unfairly? My guess is they got into a property that they could never afford and were hoping that the property would appreciate so they could sell and make a killing. They invested in something and lost.

    I believe the only thing that should be done is congress should pass a law stating that that any new mortgages will have to be a non-recourse loan to qualify for the mortgage interest deduction. That way banks would not lend money if they were not confident they would get their money. And if you did take out a loan and felt you are in over your head and cannot sell you could always return your keys to the bank.

    Posted by Chilipepr December 19, 07 10:23 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About boston real estate now
Scott Van Voorhis is a freelance writer who specializes in real estate and business issues.
Rona Fischman is a buyer's agent who provides a look at the local housing scene, from basements to attics.
archives