< Back to Front Page Text size +

New York vs. Boston

Posted by Rona Fischman August 6, 2009 03:00 PM

In honor of the Red Sox playing them this week, The Red Sox are in New York, so let's enjoy a little local real estate. Today, I share with you another reason why Boston is better than New York.

In New York, interior decoration shows love of their transit system. It's New York, so of course, it's over-the-top.

I really love the Red line. I use it quite a lot for someone with a car-centered job. I always stop to look at the tiles in Davis Square or the gloves in Porter. But I wouldn’t design my house to match it. Would you?

Is there any landmark or spot in Massachusetts that you would want to create in your own home? I can think of a few that would be candidates: The planets from the Museum of Science, the ducks from Make Way for Ducklings, the arch in Chinatown, Fenway Park.

Who needs The Gates of New York when we had the Gates of Somerville?

May the Red Sox return home safely after a winning series in that town.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
6 comments so far...
  1. Rona, nothing against you (this happens quite often here), but I always find it amusing when the New York vs. Boston debate comes up. Having lived in both cities, I can say New Yorkers never even feel the need or insecurity to randomly talk to their friends about why New York is better than Boston. The city of Boston rarely even comes up in conversation, even when the Yankees are playing the Sox. In Boston, however, I hear a NY vs. Boston conversation EVERY WEEK. It's starting to drive me crazy how Bostonians are so unsecure about their city that they always have to come up with reasons on why it's better than NY, DC, or Chicago!

    Posted by Mike August 7, 09 09:14 PM
  1. Its the difference in scale of cities. You are comparing apples to oranges. New York, Chicago, London, Tokyo are examples of Alpha class cities. Boston is is more of a Gamma class. Nothing wrong with being a much smaller city. The size of the city means it is more walkable, you can get a sense of all it has to offer in a short period of time. Huge cities seem infinite in what they offer, but are also more crowded and more expensive.
    The proper comparison would be to other Gamma sized cities. Maybe Seattle, Portland or Montreal.
    I have lived in both cities. I prefer the scale of Boston.

    Posted by bubbleboy August 10, 09 06:29 AM
  1. I have lived in both cities, too, and prefer it here. What amuses me about New Yorkers is the stereotype that New Yorkers recognize no civilization outside of Manhattan. No one in Greater Boston would decorate to match a local subway stop.
    Not my deepest piece of work, I admit.

    Posted by Rona August 10, 09 10:03 AM
  1. No one in Greater Boston would decorate to match a local subway stop.

    No. But a lot of people spent the past few years covering their upscale kitchens in New York subway tile.

    Posted by Marcus August 10, 09 10:30 AM
  1. Maybe we should have a comparison between Boston and a random 2 blocks in Manhattan? They're about the same size and are comparable in terms of economic scale. Boston is a nice, civilized little city with many suburbs.

    Posted by lama August 10, 09 10:39 AM
  1. Good point bubbleboy ... you can't really compare Boston and NY. I do like it better here; NYC is too overwhelming for me. Downtown Boston is the perfect size.

    Posted by Mike August 10, 09 09:00 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About boston real estate now
Scott Van Voorhis is a freelance writer who specializes in real estate and business issues.
Rona Fischman is a buyer's agent who provides a look at the local housing scene, from basements to attics.
archives