< Back to Front Page Text size +

Canseco's new book lacks substance

Posted by Nick Cafardo, Globe Staff March 25, 2008 06:52 PM

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. - I asked Yankees star Alex Rodriguez last week in Tampa if he was worried about being mentioned in Jose Canseco's new book, "Vindicated." He said, "No, not at all." Now we know why.

We also understand why respected author Don Yaeger dropped the project, believing Canseco had very little to say and very little evidence to back up claims in his sequel to "Juiced."

Freelance writer Joe Lavin wrote in his blog - joelavin.com - that he stumbled across the book at a Cambridge book store (several days before its April 1 release), and he wrote about the contents. It appears A-Rod is right, there is nothing to worry about.

Canseco writes about steering A-Rod toward a steroids dealer but has no proof that Rodriguez ever took steroids. Certainly A-Rod does not appear in the Mitchell Report and has not, to anyone's knowledge, ever failed a drug test. Canseco does say he injected Magglio Ordonez with steroids when they were teammates with the White Sox in 2001. The New York Times reported that Canseco had told Ordonez he would leave him out of his book if he funded a movie project. Canseco said this isn't true, and while Ordonez contends it was, the Tigers slugger did not file a formal complaint with the FBI.

Canseco is about to embark on a tour to promote the book soon. While the first book seemed credible and somewhat shocking, this one lacks the meat needed to make the charges significant.

Scott Boras, who represents both Ordonez and Rodriguez, wanted to stay as far away from this issue as possible so not to give the book or the charges any credence. He essentially gave a "no comment" and added, "I think in a case like this it's best served to ask the parties involved."

Lavin indicated the "evidence against Roger Clemens is somewhat flimsy, and Canseco even admits that he's not completely sure that Clemens used steroids. After a home run, Clemens would just make jokes like, "Man, you must have had your juice this morning!" Other times, he would say that he was off to take his "B-12 shots," which, Canseco says, is how players often refer to steroids. He does later state that Clemens did not attend the much-discussed barbecue at Canseco's house that was mentioned in the Mitchell Report."

Canseco also writes that his suspicions about Clemens were "edited out" of his book, but he contends:

"Roger Clemens was from Texas. He went to play for the Astros, to be close to his family. George W. Bush, a former owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team, is, like Clemens, a proud Texan. Clemens is a personal friend of Bush Sr. and his wife, Barbara. Clemens still has a standing invitation from Bush Jr. to visit the White House anytime. Getting the picture? Maybe the president of the United States, or his daddy, the ex-president, made some calls and took care of things for good ole Roger."

Canseco also writes that the Mitchell Report had "pro-Red Sox" bias because there weren't current big name Red Sox players named (Eric Gagne went to Milwaukee and Brendan Donnelly was released).

Canseco reiterates that Clemens was not at the infamous barbecue at his Weston, Fla. home in 1998 when Clemens supposedly first spoke to personal trainer Brian McNamee about steroids. That fact is in dispute. It's one of the things federal prosecutors want to talk to Canseco about - and his relationship with Clemens - sometime next week.

When asked about the book by New York reporters in Florida today, A-Rod said, "I really, absolutely, have no reaction." When told that Canseco had said that A-Rod, then single, had a romantic interest in Canseco's ex-wife, Jessica, and that A-Rod would "ogle" her when he was working out with Canseco at his house, A-Rod said, "I don't know how to answer that."

Good answer.

7 comments so far...
  1. After reading "Juiced," though his writing (or whoever he ghostwriter is) is poor and his prose is even poorer, "Juiced" reads like a history book of players who took steroids at this point.

    So I'm inclined to believe Canseco; he seems oddly truthful and forthright.

    Posted by Michael Gibbons March 25, 08 07:24 PM
  1. "I don't know how to answer that"

    Note to ARod - it's simple, pal. Either "yes" or "no." What's the big mystery?

    Posted by Jim Monaghan March 25, 08 08:12 PM
  1. Arent these the exact same things that the media said about the first book? Which turned out to be almost entirley true

    Posted by Bob March 25, 08 08:21 PM
  1. I would like to see Nick Carfardo's comments when Canseco came out with his first book. I did not believe him then but he turned out to be telling the truth. Now, he has to be given some credence.

    Posted by Chas March 25, 08 08:33 PM
  1. The point is that Canseco, presumably worried about libel, doesn't come out and say that he knows for a fact that anyone "new" took steroids except Magglio Ordonez. There are a lot of insinuations, guesses, things that he believes - but unlike in the first book, there are very few real revelations. It's not a matter of whether you give what he says credence, because he actually says very little.

    Posted by Greg Andrew March 26, 08 10:45 AM
  1. Jose is correct 100% and more, this guys are the one's he knew they did take Roids, Dont you think we can add to Canseco's list players like....
    Ivan Rodriguez
    Mike Lowell
    Alex Gonzalez
    Nomar Garciaparra
    Brady Anderson
    Luis Gonzalez
    Albert Belle and many many more.......bottom line is more than 60%/70% of MLB used the Crap and only a few had the Cojones to say they did, all odf the rest are sissies and they lack of Manhood and other things.

    Posted by Mario M Escoto March 26, 08 01:54 PM
  1. When will we see this pompous snitch for what he is?
    Don't buy the book, Don't interview him!!
    If you stop feeding rats, they go away.

    Posted by fenway frank March 26, 08 09:26 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

The Boston Globe and Boston.com will keep you updated on the Red Sox all season long.

E-mail your question

Or if your comment or question is non-specific to a particular reporter, enter it in the form below:
Name:
E-mail:
Your question/comment:
archives

browse this blog

by category