< Back to front page Text size +

Q&A with John Henry

Posted by David Lefort, Boston.com Staff  January 15, 2009 09:41 AM
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

In this week's edition of OT, NESN personality Tom Caron traded e-mails with Red Sox owner John Henry about building the 2009 team, watching the Yankees commit nearly half a billion dollars this winter, and what the current recession means to the Sox and Major League Baseball.

OT coverHere is the full Q&A exchange, excerpted from OT ...

TC: What was your immediate reaction when you learned the Yankees had signed Mark Teixeira?

Henry: This was another typical negotiation with [agent] Scott Boras. The Yankees were going to get the last call. We felt that was going to be the case from the beginning and didn’t like our chances — particularly after hearing from the player that Boston was not his preference and [from] the agent that we were the low bidder among clubs. The New York Daily News reported that the player told the Yanks he preferred playing for them from the beginning. So it wasn’t surprising.

TC: That signing was part of a commitment by the Yankees totaling more than $400 million to three free agents this offseason, and they are moving into a new ballpark. Can other teams compete with them in the free agent market?

Henry: Not at that level.

TC: In the wake of the Mark Teixeira signing, you said the Red Sox “have to be even more careful in deploying our resources” in light of the financial gap between the Yankees and the rest of baseball. Is this a change in philosophy or a continuation of how the Red Sox have always operated under your ownership?

Henry: The timing of that quote was misleading. I gave that quote months ago concerning the impact of the new Yankee Stadium. Right after the Teixeira signing, the Associated Press ran the quote and it appeared to be current. In fact, [Yankees president] Randy Levine responded to it as if it were about the signing — which it wasn’t.

TC: At least one other owner has said this is further proof that the sport needs a salary cap. Do you see that happening?

Henry: It’s difficult to predict the future in baseball or in anything. A salary cap would certainly be great for competitive balance within baseball.

TC: Was Tampa Bay’s run to the American League pennant good for baseball? Do more teams have a chance now than in recent years? And, if it’s good for baseball, is it good for the Red Sox to have that much more competition?

Henry: Tampa Bay’s turnaround was due to an excellent management team now running the club from top to bottom. It was also a triumph of revenue sharing. People seem to think I am opposed to revenue sharing, but that has never been the case. What I have said is there have to be limits when it comes to transferring assets and there have to be incentives for all clubs to invest in their teams.

TC: The Red Sox have done a very good job augmenting the development of prospects with free agent additions. We’ve heard it called “the Red Sox Way.” How would you describe the Red Sox Way?

Henry: Well, we’ve taken an approach of building from within as much as is practicable. It isn’t easy to move from a very good team getting older to a very good team getting younger. [Executive vice president and general manager] Theo [Epstein] and baseball operations have done a great job in this regard.

TC: How much have you changed as an owner in your time at the helm of the Red Sox? Two championships later, do you still get the same enjoyment from the team?

Henry: I don’t take any of it for granted. Life goes by too rapidly. You have to take time every day to appreciate and realize the value of each day, every month and every season. I remember saying in 2003 and 2004 to people in the organization that we have to make every day of the season enjoyable — as much as we are able in this challenging sport — because if we end up winning the World Series, it would be a shame to have spent a championship season stressed out or unhappily. My philosophy is that if we don’t win a championship, I’ll be upset about it over the offseason. We only have so many seasons to enjoy. I’m really looking forward to 2009. The Yankees and Rays will be very challenging. We’ll have our work cut out for us.

TC: What is the best part about being the principal owner of the Red Sox?

Henry: There are a lot of great parts. But one of the best aspects is the camaraderie we have within and throughout the organization — the ability to work closely with people you respect, admire and like — there’s nothing like that.

TC: How will the recession affect baseball? If there is an effect, what is your forecast for the financial health of the game?

Henry: There will be an effect. No one will escape this Great Unwinding. The Red Sox, our fans and MLB as a whole will be impacted. We just don’t know the extent of it yet at this point.

TC: The Red Sox are still a very hot ticket. How do you keep the business growing in this difficult economy?

Henry: At this point, with the economy where it is, we’re very happy just to try to continue our sellout streak. That demands doing everything we can to be competitive.

TC: Theo Epstein and manager Terry Francona have often pointed out that championships are won in October, not in the middle of winter. That said, do you feel good about your current team’s ability to compete for another championship?

Henry: Yes. It’s hard to predict how one player and especially a group of players will do from one year to the next. The recent history of the Cleveland Indians is illustrative of that point. They have a great organization and a great group of players, but recently they’ve only been able to put things together successfully only every other year. We have a young team and that bodes well for the future, but as the Indians, Yankees, Tigers, Rays and others have shown recently — the game is changing. It’s getting harder and harder to predict who is going to do well.

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

5 comments so far...
  1. I appreciate what the Red Sox are doing in signing Smoltz and others; however, the Red Sox need to find a way to keep Jason Varitek on the staff; if not as a full-time or part-time catcher, as least retain him in some kind of coaching or mentoring position. He has been around since 1997 and has helped the team reach post-season BEFORE 2004 and since then. Please don't make a grave mistake like the team did when Fisk left.
    I have been a Sox fan for amost 40 years and saw them win 2 World Series Championships in this century and millenium.
    I am going to get in trouble for saying this, but please talk directly to Jason. I wish I could e-mail him myself and tell him how much he means to Red Sox fans like myself and millions of others.

    Posted by Bob Wasserman January 15, 09 11:13 AM
  1. A column in the Boston Globe RS Section......mentions the Yankees 10 TIMES!!!! Including the 1st question...which, of COURSE .....is on Mark Teixeira. Not about Jim Rice, or the status of Veritek, or the Health of David Ortiz....Teixeira. And the whining of the NYY payroll. UGGH! Who Cares!!? Do the Red Sox suddenly have a payroll of the Marlins or the Royals?? Last I saw, the Sawx were 4th in Payroll.....crying the blues cuz ya have a 2009 Roster of Has Beens. HA!

    Posted by George January 15, 09 01:57 PM
  1. I sent in a comment about Jason Varitek this morning; I don't know if it's been posted or where it is.

    Posted by Bob Wasserman January 15, 09 02:16 PM
  1. cool thing about j henry is, he actually comes across as a compelling, well rounded, and grounded baseball personality. and while the article does make mention of the yankees quite repeatedly, isn't that what the yankees are about in the first place, gratuitous headlines and intrusive attention grabbing? or do you think they, or teixeira for that matter, pulled the con job they did in order to NOT be talked about obsessively?
    what else do you ask a wealthy sports owner who actually reasons on an intellectual level, and does not succumb under the silver-spoon fed pressure of his daddy's living ghost every time the record button is pushed?
    i for one believe the sox media discuss the yankees as they because, well, it keeps new york... being new york! it preserves the status quo between the two organizations, which is to say of course, new york keeps shooting itself in the foot (the yankees have certainly NOT been the more successful of the two franchises since henry took over in boston, have they?).
    and no, i do not believe henry ever truly wanted teixeira.
    proof? how 'bout a three year deal to a solid 3b (lowell) about to enter his twilight last year, a four year deal to a younger, also solid 1b/3b (youkilis) just announced today, and a rather too conspicuous reluctance to discuss an even younger stud 1b prospect down in their farm system?
    sounds like a darn good, long term BASEBALL plan to me!

    Posted by keru January 16, 09 02:10 AM
  1. Thanks John Henry! You are the Man! What a class act and Boston couldn't ask for a better principle owner!

    Posted by Boomerangs.com January 16, 09 04:56 AM
News, analysis and commentary from the following Boston Globe and Boston.com writers:
archives

browse this blog

by category