< Back to front page Text size +

Sox release Josh Bard

Posted by Chad Finn, Globe Staff  March 18, 2009 11:34 AM
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Josh Bard's second stint with the Red Sox was even briefer than his first.

The Red Sox announced this morning that they have placed the 30-year old catcher on unconditional release waivers. General manager Theo Epstein indicated that Bard's departure means that George Kottaras -- a 25-year-old lefthanded-hitter with power who is out of minor league options -- will probably make the Opening Day roster and catch knuckleballer Tim Wakefield on a regular basis.

"Our young catchers are doing a really good job in camp," said general manager Theo Epstein, who noted that Bard was informed of the decision at 10 a.m. this morning. "George in particular did a nice job with Wakefield the other night. We like the way George is throwing. He's throwing well. Once he showed he could handle Wakefield we decided that is the direction we're going."

Epstein said it was difficult to let Bard go but that Kotteras was the best fit. There is also somewhat of a financial factor to the move. Bard signed a one-year deal with the Red Sox worth $1.7 million in late December, with a team option for a second year. But his contract was not guaranteed, and by releasing him now the Red Sox are obligated to pay only one-sixth ($283,333) of his 2009 salary.

He would have been guaranteed one-fifth of his salary ($340,000) had he remained with the club until tomorrow, and the full amount would have become guaranteed had he been on the Opening Day roster.

"[It's] his job to lose right now," Epstein said of Kottaras. "We hope he continues to do a nice job and Dusty Brown's having a good camp as well. This'll get them some more time. We had to make this move now because we need George and Wake to work together and we need to make sure we know what we have, and prepare for the season."

Bard first came to Boston in 2006 as part of the trade that also brought outfielder Coco Crisp from the Cleveland Indians. He served as a backup to Jason Varitek and played seven games for the Sox, but struggled catching Wakefield's knuckleball.

On May 1, before a Wakefield start against the Yankees, Bard was traded to the Padres along with righthanded reliever Cla Meredith in exchange for Doug Mirabelli, Wakefield's longtime catcher.

Mirabelli remained with the Sox until last spring, when he met a fate similar to Bard's: He was released last March 13 in favor of Kevin Cash. Cash held the backup job last season -- usually as Wakefield's catcher -- but signed with the Yankees in the offseason.

Bard hit just .202 in 57 games for the Padres last season while battling ankle problems, but he was productive in two previous seasons in San Diego. In 2006, he hit .338 with nine homers and 40 RBIs in 231 at-bats, and hit .285 with five homers and 51 RBIs in 389 at-bats in 2007.

Bard batted .462 with six hits in 13 at-bats this spring, with a home run and four RBIs. With catching at premium, it's probable that he will catch on elsewhere.

Kottaras is hitting .286 with one home run in 14 at-bats this spring. He hit .243 with 22 home runs in 395 at-bats last year at Pawtucket.

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

110 comments so far...
  1. ?

    Posted by DuhChief March 18, 09 11:39 AM
  1. Didnt see that one coming....Kottares? or making a move?

    Posted by rdb March 18, 09 11:40 AM
  1. Does this mean they are in the process of acquiring Salty, Teagarden or someone (hopefully not overpaying with Bucholtz and/or Daniel Bard)? I know that 'Tek went 2 or 3 yesterday, but the Sox do still need a "back up" catcher to spell him for a good number of the games.

    Posted by Kate0322 March 18, 09 11:43 AM
  1. Huh? Who's catching Wake now?

    Posted by Tim D March 18, 09 11:48 AM
  1. He was a waste of money anyways!

    Posted by dk March 18, 09 11:52 AM
  1. PLEASE bring Saltamacchia to the Red Sox.....NOW. Even if it means trading Buchholz. The Red Sox desperately need a big bat in the line-up and he would also allow Tek to rest more during the season.

    Posted by MW March 18, 09 11:53 AM
  1. More to come huh...is it a new catcher in the Sox future or is it someone from within who has shown enough that the Sox felt the could release Bard? I'm guessing a trade, possibly involving Kottaras (since he is out of options) and a pitcher...

    Posted by The Truth March 18, 09 11:57 AM
  1. This guy must want to kill Theo at this point.

    Posted by swd1972 March 18, 09 11:57 AM
  1. This makes no sense. He's having a great spring, and seems to be the only major league level hitter the Sox have at catcher. Unless this is a precursor to announcing a trade for some young stud, I'm amazed.

    Posted by Mike March 18, 09 11:58 AM
  1. I hope a trade is in the works because Dusty Brown as the backup isn't acceptable.

    Posted by glenn March 18, 09 11:59 AM
  1. Well I have to say this move really confuses me. Varitek was hitting under .100 and Bard was batting over .350 with a couple homers I think. I am not huge into spring stats, but this was a move I didn't expect. Neither Kottaras or Brown were tearing it up...well Brown was doing ok in limited playing time...

    Posted by Scott March 18, 09 12:00 PM
  1. Kottaras is a left-handed hitter, not a switch hitter. That said, I've been hoping he'd make the club all along. I'd like to see what he can do with 250 ABs at the major league level.

    Posted by Neil March 18, 09 12:03 PM
  1. as well as Bard was hitting this spring, I dont know if it makes sense to release him in favor of Kottaras... So I wonder if an announcement will be comming at some point that they have acquired Saltalamacchia or one of the other young catchers they have been persuing.

    Posted by Travis Liles March 18, 09 12:04 PM
  1. It's pretty clear to me now that Bard was brought aboard initially to be insurance in case the Sox couldn't retain Jason Varitek. With Varitek returning the backup position is best served being filled by the catcher the Sox hope to mold into his permanent replacement. Whether they ever viewed Bard taking that role in the organization is questionable.

    Posted by MarshallDog March 18, 09 12:06 PM
  1. Could we please just get rid of Wakefield instead? Every year we hear how valuable he is and in the end he is around .500 with a deplorable ERA. Bard has proven he can hit, excluding last year when he was injured, and catch, and seems to be a good guy. How about dumping Wakefield and letting someone with some upside take his spot?

    Posted by Jack Lamabe March 18, 09 12:07 PM
  1. Maybe with Daniel Bard looking so good, Sox are trading Bucholz for young catching help? Can't believe they think Kottaras is long term answer.

    Posted by joe johnson March 18, 09 12:08 PM
  1. I thought Kottaras hit soley lefty??

    I dont mind the move so much Kottaras hit 26 Homers in the minors even though he only hit somewhere around .240. Maybe some of that power will translate to the majors.

    Posted by Manny March 18, 09 12:08 PM
  1. Does anyone know what Kottaras' numbers are this spring?

    Posted by Jeff March 18, 09 12:15 PM
  1. Pudge Rodriguez would be a fine addition.

    Posted by Talkshowhost March 18, 09 12:17 PM
  1. a little suprised by this move but I guess Kottaras proved he can play @ the major league level this spring.

    Posted by Tay March 18, 09 12:33 PM
  1. Is "briefer" a word?

    Posted by Homer March 18, 09 12:35 PM
  1. No - it won't be Kotteras, they want some offense from the catcher, they resigned Tek as a mercy good will old timers tour. They want one of the platoon guys from Texas, Teagarden or Salti - this isn't news - this just got back burnered

    Posted by johnpanzer@aol.com March 18, 09 12:36 PM
  1. No, the Sox can't use a catcher who is batting .462 ... even if it's just a spring training average.

    Posted by euclid March 18, 09 12:51 PM
  1. What the heck are they thinking? I thought the plan was to platoon him with Varitek with the idea of Bard getting more than just the Wakefield starts and really get some serious playing time? Don't tell me their plan is the same with Kottaras cause from what I hear, his catching skills are iffy at best.
    The only thing that makes sense is that they weren't convined that Bard's skills were good enough and that a Salty trade is happening soon with Texas so that he can be groomed now by Varitek.

    Posted by Poochi March 18, 09 12:58 PM
  1. Post #9: Yeh, he wants to kill Theo for putting 350k in his pocket for 10 exhibition games of which he played a total of 35 innings?

    Thank you sir, may i have another.

    Posted by pope john paul 1 (deceased) March 18, 09 12:58 PM
  1. Pudge signed - with the Houston Astros - yesterday I think

    Posted by Geoff March 18, 09 01:04 PM
  1. Let's all hope Kottaras can make an inpact and be groomed as Tek's replacement.

    Posted by Fred Flintstone March 18, 09 01:04 PM
  1. "Could we please just get rid of Wakefield instead? Every year we hear how valuable he is and in the end he is around .500 with a deplorable ERA."

    Tim Wakefield's ERA+ has been at least 100 every year since 2001. I'm not sure the word deplorable means what you think it means. Either that or you're talking out your backside.

    Posted by DLewOnRoids March 18, 09 01:05 PM
  1. Doug Mirabelli is at home waiting for his state police escort.

    Posted by yg bluig March 18, 09 01:08 PM
  1. Doug Mirabelli is at home waiting for his state police escort.

    Posted by yg bluig March 18, 09 01:08 PM
  1. I heard that the sox are going after Rich Gedman or Rick Cerrone. This would be a great move for the sox and make them the front runner in the division. This is why the sox got rid of Bard, for way better talent that is surprisingly still available.

    Posted by DieHardSoxFan March 18, 09 01:09 PM
  1. I heard gedman has been working out...

    Posted by Jerk March 18, 09 01:13 PM
  1. Jezz, a quarter million for a month's work- not too shabby!

    Posted by Kevin Brown2004alcs March 18, 09 01:17 PM
  1. Pudge Rodriguez would be a fine addition.
    Posted by Talkshowhost March 18, 09 12:17 PM
    Pudge got signed by the Houston Astros, so this is not an option. However, I am a bit perpexed by this move. Does beg the question, do the Red Sox have a trade in the works to fill the other catcher position? I find it difficult to believe that the Red Sox are going to use George Kottaras as the back up catcher, so I have to believe a trade is in the works. I guess we have to wait and see.

    Posted by Pierre March 18, 09 01:20 PM
  1. DO NOT TRADE BUCHHOLZ!
    especially for a decent hitting catcher who is not even a good catcher!

    Posted by oilcanfloyd March 18, 09 01:21 PM
  1. I'd be miffed if I was Josh Bard...

    Posted by Nick C. March 18, 09 01:22 PM
  1. Shoot, I'd catch for $500k!

    Posted by Rich G- Worcester March 18, 09 01:23 PM
  1. So he made $300,000 and some change for catching a few knucleballs in the Florida sun?

    .......not too shabby!

    Posted by Dr. Numbers March 18, 09 01:24 PM
  1. Imagine hitting .462 in ST and getting cut anyway

    someone will surely pick him up and he'll hit a home run against the Bosox to steal a game sometime this season...just hopefully not in game 7 of the WS

    Posted by dbmedia March 18, 09 01:26 PM
  1. "Could we please just get rid of Wakefield instead? Every year we hear how valuable he is and in the end he is around .500 with a deplorable ERA."

    Your definition of "deplorable" is far away from the actual definition, friend. You seem to forget that Wakefield is the 4/5 starter, back end of the rotation. His numbers may seem rough when you've got a team featuring Lester, Beckett and Matsuzaka, but Wakefield has consistently been one of the better back of the rotation guys in baseball this decade. He's the mark of consistency back there and that's something exceptionally hard to come by. Would you prefer a guy like Sidney Ponson back there? Perhaps bring back Julian Tavarez for the spot? Maybe Daniel Cabrera would better suit your standards?

    Face facts, man. The back end of the rotation is not a spot you're going to see a sub-4 ERA. Wakefield is a guy who will guarantee you at least ten wins and a league average ERA pretty much any given season, and inexpensively to boot. He's never going to light it up, but he's a valuable piece of the puzzle.

    In terms of Bard, I have to think the answer's obvious: Kottaras is five years younger and making around a fourth as much money as Bard. Odds are that the two will be a push at the plate, so why not go with the cheaper option? Before anyone pulls out spring stats, I would like to remind you all that Julio Lugo was batting .400+ and a thirty year old career AAAA player is leading the team in average.

    Posted by Jonathan March 18, 09 01:27 PM
  1. Yet another in a long line of votes of confidence for Good Ol' J. Varitek. Captain Tek wows the Sox fanboys and front office with a rocking 2 for 3 performance yesterday, so the Sox outright waive the only other MLB proven catcher in the organization.

    I simply cannot wait to watch Tek bring the dirt dog mentality to the park each day, call a gosh-darn good game, struggle to hit his weight and slug his way out of a wet paper bag, and sulk when his buddy Tito occasionally gets the sack to PH for him.

    Go Tek! The Sox are the best!! I can't wait to get my new alternate jersey with Varitek's name on the back and a replica "C" on the front for our captain!!! Yippee!!

    Posted by Rube Sox Fanboy March 18, 09 01:29 PM
  1. I'm inclined to trust Sox mgt on this. Despite Theo not calling me for my opinion, I don't believe this move will deny the Sox the chance for success.

    Posted by Peter March 18, 09 01:29 PM
  1. What do we need Epstein for? Dozens of people making comments here apparently know more than he does!
    (Sheesh!!)

    Posted by JimLoomis March 18, 09 01:31 PM
  1. We need Dougie Mirabelli now more than ever!!!!!!!

    Posted by Frannie March 18, 09 01:32 PM
  1. epstein has got his head up his ass on the catcher position....varitek posts .220 last year, can't even reach .100 this spring....epstein hands him 5 million dollars....and then releases bard who's at about .467 this spring....and rodriguez is signed for 1.5? epstein, get over the mesmorization with varitek, he sucks....try to improve your ballclub, don't try to ruin it...

    Posted by RogelioMoret March 18, 09 01:33 PM
  1. Can Julius Peppers catch ?

    Posted by outofoptions March 18, 09 01:34 PM
  1. First, you don't trade Buchholz for Saltamacchia, who might become an above-average catcher but is unproven. Both players are at the same level of development and a tremendous upside. If both reach the top of the upside, I'd rather have it in a pitcher.

    Second, don't start quoting spring stats. Yeah, Bard is having a good spring but his stats have gone down steadily since 2006 -- he batted .202 last year -- and hardly has Tek's pedigree. I would have liked to see the Red Sox keep Bard because he's a good guy who you can root for. But if he can't catch Wakefield, you need someone else behind Varitek.

    And yes, you keep Wakefield. His 4.13 ERA was more than respectable and it's hardly a given that the Red Sox have two pitchers to start the season in the 4 and 5 spots. Penny might not be ready when the Sox need a No. 4 so Buchholz might have to go. Having at least three pitchers for the two spots is great insurance. Buchholz was supposed to be the No. 5 last year and look what happened.

    Posted by Roy March 18, 09 01:34 PM
  1. What the hell?!?!?!

    Posted by hateputas March 18, 09 01:36 PM
  1. Let's see... Bard was hitting .462 when he was cut. I saw him hammer a monster line drive HR vs the Pirates in Bradenton last week. Nothing wrong with his bat. I guess it was the catching part. Maybe we can find another Haywood Sullivan (joke for old-timers)...

    Posted by Perplexed in Sarasota March 18, 09 01:37 PM
  1. If I was Theo - I'd keep an eye out for Bard sneaking up behind me & knocking me senseless LOL. The RS had plenty of time to decide they didn't want Bard in '06. I was wondering what changed. I think there is more to it than making Theo want a second look. He only batted .202 in 08 for the Padre's. Must be a trade emmient.

    Posted by Tom In CT March 18, 09 01:37 PM
  1. I would have preferred Bard and Kottaras....no Jason Watney (that is before even considering the money)!

    Posted by Jim March 18, 09 01:38 PM
  1. Do. Not. Trade. Buchholz. Theo.

    Posted by SoPoJim March 18, 09 01:39 PM
  1. goes to show how using wakefield, with the highest post seaon ERA in history, continues to hurt the red sox, he takes up 2 roster spots! Do you want wakefield on the mound in a big game? I don't

    Posted by celtic17 March 18, 09 01:40 PM
  1. He was the only catcher we had that could hit. Stupid move, unless there is a trade on the way.

    Posted by steve March 18, 09 01:43 PM
  1. I've said it before and I'll say it again: Theo Epstein has no idea how to manage the catching position.

    Letting go of Shoppach, the Mirabelli fiasco, Javier Lopez, allowing Cash to sign with the Yankees. Bard here, Bard gone, Bard here again, Bard gone again.

    Incredible.

    Posted by Mitch March 18, 09 01:46 PM
  1. It's as if signing Varitek tied the hands of the team - will they regret it? I'd rather have Bard than Kottaras, because I think they need a somewhat proven major leaguer to share the catching with a possibly washed-up Varitek. (Though Kottaras is just speculation at this point.)

    Posted by OCB March 18, 09 01:53 PM
  1. Another shining example of ownership scroooo'ing a guy. This time for the second time in one career !!
    We all get that Bard wasn't going to be a starting catcher....but they sign him in 2006; ship him away to San Diego. They sign him in 2008; cut him in Spring Training while he's batting .429 ??
    I know Kotteras is a switch-hitter and catches knuckle-balls....but....

    I "WORSHIP" at the altar that is The Red Sox (Team & Players)....but this ownership has shown it's true-colors to me at this point.

    That's my 2 cents on it.

    (Watch, Ortiz is next.... Ownership has their pet "Youkilis" mouthing off about Ortiz during the WBC. Laying groundwork for Ortiz's dismissal - "Ortiz isn't a team-player since we traded Manny....CANCER in the clubhouse") -- My God !! I can only see the nonsense now.

    Posted by Kevin P March 18, 09 01:54 PM
  1. Pudge signed with the Astros.

    Posted by Bloody Sock March 18, 09 01:56 PM
  1. Tek hits one HR and Bard is gone?

    Posted by baseballdiamond March 18, 09 01:56 PM
  1. Kotteras & Buccholtz for Teagarden.... Saltalamachia has been announced by Texas Rangers as the starter for Opening Day.

    Posted by Kevin P March 18, 09 01:57 PM
  1. Talkshowhost: Since Pudge Rodriguez signed with The Astros; it may be hard to get him signed here....CLOWN !! -- Pudge is a selfish-catcher anyways; let him stay where he goes.

    Posted by Kevin P March 18, 09 01:58 PM
  1. pudge has signed already.....

    Posted by fil March 18, 09 02:02 PM
  1. Kottaras actually is a decent hitter. He got off to a lousy start in Pawtucket but came around the second half.

    Posted by JoeTheDrunk March 18, 09 02:06 PM
  1. Wow,

    They sure screwed him on the money. Everyone makes a big fuss about players being greedy. Hell if they weren't the teams would just screw them over.

    Business is business and the players (especially the 2nd tier guys) should take every penny they get and give a damn about club loyalty.

    You need to look out for #1 like Manny, Arod, etc because no one else is sure looking out for you.

    Posted by Mike T March 18, 09 02:07 PM
  1. There must be something else going on here?
    Or did we just want to save the $1M?

    Posted by gc March 18, 09 02:11 PM
  1. Pudge Rodriguez would NOT be a fine addition. The fact that he already signed with the Astros on Monday notwithstanding...

    Posted by md March 18, 09 02:12 PM
  1. Wow, if the sox make no more moves as far as catchers go, they will arguably along with the yankees have the weakest backstop position in the majors. Please tell me there is a trade in the works because I would roll the dice for Bard over Varitek at this point.

    Posted by saswanson March 18, 09 02:12 PM
  1. Jack, don't trash Wake. We wouldn't have beat the Yankees in 2004 if Wake hadn't been willing to take one for the team in the horrendous game 3 of the ALCS. And while Wake was around .500 last year, (10-11), his ERA was below the league average at 4.13, and for those of you who understand WHIP, Wake's was 1.18 last year. Yes, that's not a misprint. Those WHIP and ERA numbers are Wake's best in five years. Pretty good for a #5 starter with a 68 mph fastball when there's a tailwind.

    Posted by Dave March 18, 09 02:32 PM
  1. Bring Back Manny!!!!

    Immediately.

    Thank You.

    Posted by Sarah March 18, 09 02:32 PM
  1. Lamabe...you're just wrong. Wake had a terrific year last season. With decent relief, he would have won 15-16 games; the bullpen blew half his leads. He as the toughest pitcher to hit on the staff, and was second in innings pitched. Wake's ERA is never bad, and it is always misleading, because when he gets hammered, he really gets hammered, and his ERA is distorted by about four bad innings. And he's a terrific bargain at only 4 million a year.

    Posted by Jack Marshall March 18, 09 02:38 PM
  1. #15 - Deplorable ERA? Tim Wakefield's ERA has been better than the league average for each of the past eight years. How many pitchers can say that?

    Posted by Kevin March 18, 09 02:44 PM
  1. In response to Jack: Get rid of Wake?! If the Sox gave him some run support once in a while (like they do with Dice-K), Wake would be a 20-game winner every year. Even in his 40s, Wake pitches more innings than anyone. He is the backbone of the pitching staff.

    Posted by QA March 18, 09 02:48 PM
  1. .462 batting average and gone??? I hope we don't regret this one!!!!!

    Posted by Always second guessing. March 18, 09 02:53 PM
  1. .462 in about 14 at bats or six games....cannot base your decision on this. I will trust the guys that are there every day in camp...

    Posted by cbfrogger March 18, 09 02:54 PM
  1. "Could we please just get rid of Wakefield instead? Every year we hear how valuable he is and in the end he is around .500 with a deplorable ERA. "

    He has won twenty-six games over the last two seasons. His 4.13 ERA last year was well below the league average of 4.36.

    Facts are stubborn things.

    Posted by Harrybosch March 18, 09 02:54 PM
  1. Ditto on poster 15...let's hold a wake for Wakefield...I have a bet with a friend that he will not make it to 10 wins this year...he should have retired after 2007 season

    Posted by ABSoxFan4Life March 18, 09 03:11 PM
  1. Theo is going to be embarassed by this move again. Watch the Skankees or Tampa Bay get him and he hits 320 with power.

    Posted by davey34 March 18, 09 03:15 PM
  1. Wow. It is a sad day when someone gets cut from the roster because of Tim Wakefield.

    Posted by Max March 18, 09 03:19 PM
  1. Theo will regret this move again. Watch him hook up with the Yankees or Tampa Bay and hit 320 with power.

    Posted by davey March 18, 09 03:24 PM
  1. i think it may be a good move. kotteras caught zink last year and did fine. why not give him a chance instead of rushing for salty or teagarden which we only know off cause the media made them look like saviors. give kotteras a chance i say.

    Posted by ken March 18, 09 03:39 PM
  1. i think it may be a good move. kotteras caught zink last year and did fine. why not give him a chance instead of rushing for salty or teagarden which we only know off cause the media made them look like saviors. give kotteras a chance i say.

    Posted by ken March 18, 09 03:41 PM
  1. Kottaras is out of options, so he makes the team or someone else snatches him up. It's actually kind of simple - Keep Bard and lose a young, cheap catcher, or keep Bard and lose that young guy. Bard's good, not great.

    Posted by Dwayne March 18, 09 03:57 PM
  1. I suspect Kottaras was catching ZInk a lot (and with some success), and that was key to the Sox' thinking. Just a hunch.

    Posted by Mister Snitch March 18, 09 03:58 PM
  1. Rodriguez signed with Houston on Monday.

    Posted by Archimedes March 18, 09 04:03 PM
  1. Sure it's a word brief, briefer, brieferer, briefest, then you go to mostbriefer only in the Boston globe.

    Posted by globe proof reader March 18, 09 04:09 PM
  1. A lot of comments for a backup catcher.

    Posted by Guy Incognito March 18, 09 04:18 PM
  1. This guy can't catch a break in Boston (no pun intended).

    Posted by Katie March 18, 09 04:23 PM
  1. Talkshowhost - Pudge signed with the Astros yesterday.

    Joe Johnson - Bard is a reliever and Buchholz is a starter, I don't think the performance of the former has any effect on the status of the latter.

    That said, I'd hate to see either of them go for Salty or Teagarden.

    I liked the Bard signing a lot - he was 1 injury-filled year removed from 2 very solid seasons in San Diego. I was expecting good things from him and he was having a very good spring. Let's hope Kotteras can get it done, because it looks like he'll be starting 60+ games.

    Posted by Evan March 18, 09 04:26 PM
  1. the tribe will take him back today if the $'s are right

    Posted by buckeye March 18, 09 04:28 PM
  1. "in the end he is around .500 with a deplorable ERA"

    When your 4 or 5 starter goes .500 you are pretty good. When he goes 17-12 you can win a WS. His ERA is usually league average too, not deplorable for back of the rotation at all. Learn about baseball.

    Posted by F Manny March 18, 09 04:39 PM
  1. Poor Josh the yo yo. We hardly knew ya. I think you would have done fine. I don't buy the lefty hitter rationalization. I think it's obvious...they were unsure about Tek because he stopped hitting last year, and that's why they left him on the vine so long...and signed Bard as a replacement when they couldn't get the deal they wanted for Salty. Then they made a cutrate offer to Tek as he was still the best thing on the market, and surprise surprise he took it. He's apparently convinced them he's listening to Magadan, changing his approach, and making progress. Bard is the fall guy because they didn't want to lose the cheaper, younger Kotteras. If indeed they do make a trade for Salty or some other, do they carry 3 catchers, or is Kotteras part of the trade?

    Posted by SJ March 18, 09 04:45 PM
  1. What about Gary Allanson? What a tandem he'd make with Gedman.

    Posted by Elijah Pumpsie Green Yawkey March 18, 09 05:09 PM
  1. Do you people even read before you post?
    To the 5 people who got what we pad Josh Bard for his services wrong. He made ecactly $283,333.
    AND!!!!
    To the people who could not read the bottom of the article, and would rather ask what the hitting stats were. Here:
    Bard batted .462 with six hits in 13 at-bats this spring.
    Kottaras is hitting .286 with one home run in 14 at-bats this spring. He hit .243 with 22 home runs in 395 at-bats last year at Pawtucket.

    Posted by WeReallyDoHaveDumbFans:( March 18, 09 05:22 PM
  1. Dear Teo,
    I think you released the wrong guy. I think you should release Mr. Wakefield. He is 42? I think its time to think about the better good of the "team" then good old Tim. Tim has struggled the last 2 seasons with age related problems. He also takes up 2 roster spots. You need to be thinking about the future at catcher. Pleaese think about the big picture. I'd like to see Tim work with younger guys in the organization on throwing the kneckler ball, keep him in the organization, but not on the active 25 man roster. He is a great guy and had a great career, but he needs to know its time to go.

    Posted by B Sandler March 18, 09 05:27 PM
  1. WANTED: Spring Training Catcher. Must be able to play 4 innings. 350k.

    Send Inquiries to P.O. Box 1967, Yawkee Way, Boston MA 02134

    Posted by Haywood Sullivan March 18, 09 05:29 PM
  1. Helloooo...he got cut because he has an arm like a rubber chicken.

    Posted by Matt H March 18, 09 05:43 PM
  1. Can we get updated on Youk's injury? Apparently he left Team USA to get an MRI on an ankle injury????

    Posted by mk March 18, 09 06:00 PM
  1. Everyone calm down. I have seen this panic attack before from Sox fans. In 2007, everyone freaked because the Sox didnt sign Loretta at 2nd and they were going with some rookie named Pedrioia...."Pedrioia cant hit, his swing is too big for a little guy, whats wrong with the front office...blah blah blah." Yeah, he had a killer year, ALCS and WS, ROY...then followed that with MVP. Kotteras has been chosen because Tito, Theo and the Ownership know what the F%*@ they are doing. 2 world series trophies in 4 years, only team in MLB that has 2 in the 21st century.....I am writing a prescription for a Chill Pill.....take it and call me after the sox win the 2009 WS.

    Posted by Seattle Sox Fan March 18, 09 06:08 PM
  1. do you guys really feel bad for a guy who made $350,000 for one month of work?!?! Bard will sign somewhere for a million dollars for the season. In this economy I would be happy to receive $350,000 for a month, hell, I'd take a mere $35,000 and still feel pretty frisky.

    Posted by Kato March 18, 09 06:15 PM
  1. Everyone calm down. I have seen this panic attack before from Sox fans. In 2007, everyone freaked because the Sox didnt sign Loretta at 2nd and they were going with some rookie named Pedrioia...."Pedrioia cant hit, his swing is too big for a little guy, whats wrong with the front office...blah blah blah." Yeah, he had a killer year, ALCS and WS, ROY...then followed that with MVP. Kotteras has been chosen because Tito, Theo and the Ownership know what the F%*@ they are doing. 2 world series trophies in 4 years, only team in MLB that has 2 in the 21st century.....I am writing a prescription for a Chill Pill.....take it and call me after the sox win the 2009 WS.

    Posted by Seattle Sox Fan March 18, 09 06:30 PM
  1. Cripes! It’s apparent that many here don’t even bother to read the body of the story before posting. Let’s take it at face value. The Sox think Kottaras (5 years younger) has more upside and happens to be out of minor league options. I’m sure the search for the “catcher of the future” will continue. Nothing appears imminent, and there is no panic.
    Bard wasn’t ripped off here. He signed the contract and knew the score. And he gets >280k for spring training. Not bad. And now he’s free to try and sign on with another club.
    “Mike T”.... I wouldn’t use Manny as an example of “business is business”, or “looking out for #1". Most players actually live up to the contracts they willingly sign. And I don’t mind any player getting the best deal they can sign. But when you sign the deal, don’t cry about it afterward, live up to it. What Manny did was well beyond self interest. He was very well treated in Boston, both financially and by the supportive fans. He sh*t on the fans, and his teammates just to get 2 option years ( at a mere 20 million dollars each) removed from the contract he willingly signed, because he thought he could do better elsewhere. The contract Bard signed was tiered as many are. If he didn’t like it, he shouldn’t have signed it.( Note: I haven’t heard Bard crying about it, have you?)

    Posted by Steve Gee March 18, 09 06:38 PM
  1. After Theo's work this week, the team looks pretty solid to me:

    1B: All set.
    2B: All set.
    SS: I might be wrong, but I'm suspecting Lugo will have a fire under his ass in spring training and will win the starting job. If not, the combination of Lowrie and Lugo should be OK, although the offensive output could be subpar.
    3B: All set. Even if Lowell goes down, Youk and Lowrie can play 3B and Kotsay can play first.
    IF Utility: Lowrie or Lugo, and Kotsay. That's OK. Lowrie and Kotsay are good defensively. No offensive dynamite here, though.
    OF: Bay is solid, J. D. is solid when healthy, and Jacoby...not sure. Very good defense, excellent wheels...I can't tell if he'll ever hit.
    OF Utility: Kotsay and Baldelli - OK. This is one of the better defensive outfields I've ever seen the Sox have in place.
    C: When it's all said and done, Tek will be there, in a reduced role, with Bard picking up the slack. I'll be surprised if the Sox end up with Teagarden or Salty - I don't think Theo wants to let his young guns go...and I agree with him.
    SP: Really, pretty well squared away - Beckett, Lester, Dice K, Wakefield, and Penny. (Sorry to the Wake-haters, but the guy is extremely valuable; he's cheap and he gives the team innings.) I'm not sure what Smoltz will have to offer: we'll see. I trust this rotation more than I would trust the Yanks rotation.
    RP: All set.

    The only glaring hole I see is a big, Manny-type bat behind Big Papi. But...you win baseball with pitching and defense, and the Sox are well squared away. And Lowell or Youk can probably bat behind Papi and protect him.

    I don't see that, with regard to FA acquisition, Theo is any better or any worse than, say, Dan Duquette (who honestly should get a LOT of credit for that 2004 WS victory) but he deserves major kudos for his management of low-cost but slightly risky acquisitions and especially the development of talent. I agree with other posters who say that a non-WS season for 2009 with continued development of youth would be just fine. But, I think this team - if healthy - will play well and contend.


    Posted by John Shannon March 18, 09 07:08 PM
  1. wake is a postseason disaster

    Posted by r carr March 18, 09 07:47 PM
  1. The right answer is that Bard can't catch, or correctly can't throw a lick. The Padres gave up on him completely last year because of his rag arm and if the Sox had to make a choice, Dwayne at #77 got it right. They were going to lose Kotteras if he didn't make the club so they took a chance on the younger, cheaper guy.

    Posted by Chuck Pro March 18, 09 07:52 PM
  1. And in the end
    The Glove you Take is
    Equal to the Glove
    You Make.

    Posted by Ringo March 18, 09 10:36 PM
  1. 1918-2003 - Zero Championships

    2004-2008 - Two Championships

    Hmnn. I guess it's just a coincidence that Theo and the ownership took over the team in 2003.

    As for Ortiz, he should shut up. I love him, but he's done. He's over 30, hurt, fat and can't risk taking the steroids. And Youkilis hit AL pitching better than Manny last year, was third in the MVP voting, clutch as can be... should I go on?

    Posted by steveouttatown March 18, 09 10:52 PM
  1. What's the point of having Clay Bucholz rot in the minors? Why not trade him for a catcher?

    Posted by Jay March 18, 09 11:38 PM
  1. I thought it was Red Sox policy to keep players that may need some sort of surgery or physical rehab that would sign a multi million dollar contract and not play for 3/4 of the season.

    Posted by Sr Munchero March 18, 09 11:59 PM
  1. Who says Buchholz is going to rot in the minors, Jay? Right now, with Penny still throwing at minor leaguers, he's the #5 starter. And even if Penny gets it together and takes his spot in the rotation, Buchholz is first in line when someone gets hurt or needs a day off.

    Posted by Evan March 19, 09 09:28 AM
  1. DOUGIE'S GOING DEEP TONIGHT.
    Mirabelli's ready for his escort.

    Posted by Rumpwell March 19, 09 10:19 AM
News, analysis and commentary from the following Boston Globe and Boston.com writers:
archives

browse this blog

by category