< Back to front page Text size +

Ask Nick: Optimistic about Iglesias

Posted by Chad Finn, Globe Staff  April 2, 2013 12:55 PM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

I asked earlier in the preseason about an Andrew Bailey/Rick Porcello swap but since Porcello has pitched like a five-year veteran with great stuff that is probably off. Would the Sox revisit the idea with the Tigers, since Bruce Rondon got sent down, and maybe swap a Drew Smyly in the deal?
-- Mark, Pasadena, California

Porcello has pitched well so I doubt that they would entertain a deal. If they have closer issues by the trading deadline, I could see it. But the Red Sox, who seemed to have a lot of depth with their relievers, saw that diminish a tad when Franklin Morales and Craig Breslow came up lame and Bard imploded. The Red Sox have seven good relievers right now. Weíll see if that continues.

Why are so many saying that the Yankees should be in the mix for the playoffs? Is it because they've done it so many times for so many years? Look at the team for what it actually is: old, injury-plagued, and missing four major pieces that saved their face last year? (Rafael Soriano, Nick Swisher, Eric Chavez, and Raul Ibanez.) Don't even get me started on their catching position.
-- Jason, Los Angeles

I think their salvation is their pitching staff. Itís very solid. CC Sabathia didnít look that great Opening Day, throwing only 91, but heís done that before where his velocity gradually builds up as he gets more starts. He only allowed four runs so if thatís a bad day Iím sure heíll get better. Any team with four All-Stars out of the lineup is going to feel it. They will. Little things show up, like two of their guys taking called third strikes on pitches right down the middle of the plate. But I do believe they should stick to putting their best players on the field rather than this right-left lineups. Their righthanded lineup stinks. They need Travis Hafnerís power and Lyle Overbayís stick.


In the Yawkey years the Red Sox had a set policy for retiring numbers -- play on the team 10+ years, make the Hall of Fame, finish career in Boston. They made exceptions with Carlton Fisk and more recently with Johnny Pesky. This policy seems to be a thing of the past so looking at the list of players to follow which are likely to have their number retired in the future and which number will be the next one to be added to the facade? Roger Clemens (21), Wade Boggs (26), Jason Varitek (33), David Ortiz (34), Pedro Martinez (45), Tim Wakefield (49).
-- Patrick, Amherst

The policy should be what makes the most sense. Wade Boggs should be the first since heís already in the Hall of Fame as a Red Sox. If weíre into this sophomoric "Oh he played for the Yankeesí garbage," weíre really being petty. When Pedro gets inducted into the Hall after 2014, 45 should be retired. Clemens still has the steroid stigma around him, so I donít think that will happen anytime soon, but I do respect the fact the team does not hand out No. 21. They should have the same policy with No. 26 in respect to Boggs. I have problems retiring numbers of players who werenít Hall of Fame players. Varitek, Ortiz and Wakefield fall short.

It looks to me like Daniel Bard has Steve Blass disease. Do you have any thoughts about that possibility?
-- Chuck, Southington, Connecticut

Donít know. Bard is around the plate. Blass was nowhere near it, so I always associate Blass Disease with complete inability to throw it near the plate. Donít think he has that, but he definitely has something close to that.

If Jon Lester and Clay Buchholz are back to their old form, I think that the Red Sox have an edge over Baltimore (comparable lineups, but better pitching) and Tampa Bay (comparable pitching, but better hitting). With New York hobbled by injuries and age, is it reasonable to think that the Red Sox have a good chance to finish second in the division? Have you revised your outlook for the team after witnessing a pretty impressive spring?
-- Ben, Phoenix

Yes, I revised from fifth to fourth. Maybe itíll be better. As you pointed out, if Lester and Buchholz are nails, thatís a great sign. But then you have the issues of Felix Doubront, Ryan Dempster and John Lackey. Thatís three more guys who have to keep the team in the game every fifth day. Still a lot of things need to come together. Canít get too crazy about one Opening Day victory against a Yankee team that had four starters out of the lineup. Then again, it was an impressive win.

I remember when playing hurt was a badge of honor, respected by teammates fans and managers. When did that change to "we don't want him back until he's 100 percent?" What I'm leading to, of course, is why David Ortiz can't DH with sore (not structurally damaged) heels? It seems ridiculous. He's not in the field. He's not stealing bases. Why isn't he being pushed? What a terrible example for younger players. Ortiz at 75 percent is better than the alternatives.
-- Randy, Albuquerque, New Mexico

Usually I would agree with that. But in his case, you donít want to do anything to that would potentially damage the Achilles to the point of rupture. While the current inflammation is in the heel area and not the Achilles, you have to be careful. He is 37 years old. The doctors have told me, this is a sensitive area. I donít think thereís a young player on the Red Sox who doesnít respect David Ortiz. Criticism of him is so misguided.

Do you think Victor Martinez would be available in a trade? He could DH if Ortiz is out for a while and help out at first base and catching
-- Lou, Chester, Virginia

Love Victor Martinez. And so do the Tigers. You can always trade for anyone if the price is right. But doubt Ortiz will be out all season.

Wouldn't this be a good time for the Red Sox to abandon "Sweet Caroline" since the sellout streak is expected to end soon. It may even generate some interest in picking a replacement.
-- Patrick, Livermore Falls, Maine

Well, Pat, while I receive more and more sentiment about killing ďSweet CarolineĒ I think there would be an uproar if that happened. I just remember one day in spring training when the song wasnít played fans actually looked up to the press box and with their hands up in the air, distraught.

If Will Middlebrooks is going to stick at third base and the Red Sox love the defense of Iglesias, proven he can hit , then where does that leave Xander Bogaerts?
Has anyone talked about moving either Middlebrooks to first and play Bogaerts at third? Or moving Boegarts to first, keeping Middlebrooks at third, Iglesias at short, and Dustin Pedroia at second.
-- Don, Rensselaer, New York

If Iglesias starts to hit, I canít see any reason to move him from that position, so theyíll have to find a new sport for Bogaerts and third base is the place. Yes, Middlebrooks could easily move to first base. No one in the organization will come close to saying thatís how itís going to go, but thatís just a common sense look at it will probably go.

What are the chance that Jacoby Ellsbury will ask for a midseason trade to avoid the potential qualifying offer and resulting draft-pick forfeiture that hindered Scott Boras clients Michael Bourn and Kyle Lohse this past offseason?
-- Kelly, Hillsboro, Oregon

None. He likes playing in Boston. Whether the offer he receives from Boston is to his liking is another matter. He can ask for a trade, but why would Boston have to accommodate him?

Is Bradley a good bunter?
-- Allen, Hays, Kansas

Of course. Thereís nothing he canít do.

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

archives

browse this blog

by category