boston.com Sports Sportsin partnership with NESN your connection to The Boston Globe

Jury leaning against Knicks' Thomas

Note indicates decision in sexual harassment suit

Isiah Thomas may be found liable in a $10 million sexual harassment lawsuit. Isiah Thomas may be found liable in a $10 million sexual harassment lawsuit. (LOUIS LANZANO/ASSOCIATED PRESS)

NEW YORK - A jury indicated yesterday that it believes New York Knicks coach Isiah Thomas and Madison Square Garden committed sexual harassment against a former team executive who brought a $10 million lawsuit that quickly turned into a public relations disaster for the once-proud franchise.

There was no official verdict, but the wording of a note to the judge by the jury - and instructions on a verdict form it was using - suggested it had reached decisions against Thomas and the other defendants, Madison Square Garden and MSG chairman James Dolan.

The four women and three men on the panel said they reached a decision on eight of the nine questions on the verdict form. They were deadlocked on the other question, which asks whether Thomas should have to pay punitive damages.

The jury was instructed only to address the question on Thomas if it found that he and Madison Square Garden committed harassment against the former executive. Similarly, it was told to answer other remaining questions only if it decided that the defendants retaliated against Anucha Browne Sanders by firing her from her $260,000-a-year job.

The judge sent the jurors home for the day, asking them to deliberate again on the deadlocked question today in federal court in Manhattan.

Lawyers for both sides declined to comment on the development, which came on the second full day of deliberations.

The note likely means the jury has decided "against the Garden, against Thomas, and against Dolan," said Jerry Reisman, an employment attorney with the Long Island firm Reisman, Peirez, and Reisman.

Like many legal observers, Reisman said a verdict against MSG "would be demonstrative of its arrogance in not settling this matter" with Browne Sanders and risking the embarrassment of letting it go to trial.

Browne Sanders's case presented the Garden as an "Animal House" in sneakers, a place where nepotism, sexism, crude remarks, and crass language were part of the culture.

The plaintiff, a married mother of three, spent four days on the witness stand laying out her case against the Garden and Thomas, who is married with two children.

Browne Sanders, a former Northwestern college basketball star, characterized Thomas as a foul-mouthed lout who initially berated her before his anger gave way to ardor, with Thomas making unwanted advances.

Thomas, who was hired in December 2003, followed her to the stand and denied all her allegations. Attorneys for Thomas and the Garden also portrayed Browne Sanders as incompetent and unable to adapt once the NBA great arrived as the Knicks' president.

"That's not about sexual harassment," MSG attorney Ronald Green said in his closing argument. "That's about team politics."

Thomas acknowledged trying to kiss Browne Sanders in December 2005, asking her "No love today?" when she recoiled. MSG president Steve Mills said he spoke with Thomas about the incident and Thomas said it wouldn't happen again.

In her closing argument, Browne Sanders's attorney Anne Vladeck made note of Thomas's charismatic style and incandescent grin.

"There is no question Mr. Thomas can be charming and flash an engaging smile," she told the jury. "That does not give him the right to treat Browne Sanders like she is his woman."

More from Boston.com

SEARCH THE ARCHIVES