< Back to front pageText size +

About last night ...

Posted by Christopher L. Gasper, Globe Staff  August 27, 2010 02:07 PM
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

brady607.jpg

Tom Brady has a word and a smile with an official after a challenge is upheld for a Patriots touchdown. (Jim Davis / Globe Staff)

FOXBOROUGH -- The good news for the Patriots is that NFL owners haven't rammed home an "enhanced" 18-game season yet, so last night's uninspiring 36-35 loss to the St. Louis Rams doesn't count, sort of like the players' opinion on an extended regular season.

Still, it was certainly disconcerting to watch a decidedly un-enhanced Patriots team make rookie quarterback Sam Bradford and the retooling Rams look like a playoff team. The only thing shorter than the responses of a dour and disappointed Patriots coach Bill Belichick after the game were the Patriots' first four offensive drives, which lasted a total of 5 minutes and 55 seconds and yielded one first down.

If you hit fast-forward on the DVR you missed entire Patriots possessions.

Before Tom Brady hit Wes Welker on a 39-yard catch-and-run with 3:26 left in the half, the Patriots had a total of 25 yards of offense. And between the offense and the defense, Brady and offense were the unit that was performing most effectively. The Rams rolled up 20 points and 241 yards of offense in the first half against the New England defense, which struggled to get off the field. St. Louis ran 42 first-half plays to the Patriots' 18.

"Terrible execution across the board. That’s the worst of it really," said running back Sammy Morris.

The Patriots better hope so.

After a pair of encouraging efforts against the defending Super Bowl-champion New Orleans Saints and the Atlanta Falcons it was not what anyone was expecting from the Patriots in the third preseason game, which is supposed to be the most meaningful of the meaningless games. What does last night's game mean? Not anything more than the encouraging previous preseason performances.

It's easy to push the panic button, roll out the I-told-you-so's and write obituaries after a game like last night's.

However, if the Patriots had gone out and pounded the Rams, shutting out Bradford and lighting up Steve Spagnuolo's defense then the pronouncement would have been that they just beat up on a rookie quarterback and a rebuilding team that is coming off a 1-15 campaign. That wouldn't have proved the Patriots were improved, just like last night doesn't prove they're not.

It would have been no more reasonable to hail such a blowout as a sign the Patriots were a dominant team than to signal that last night's clunker indicates they're a terrible one. The Patriots were in a bit of a no-win situation playing the Rams, and they not only lost, they lost in poor form and fashion. For that they have no one to blame but themselves.

This game was a reminder that reading too much into preseason football -- good or bad -- is an exercise in futility. The Patriots are somewhere between the team that fell flatter than a blueberry pancake against a cupcake opponent and the one that showed promise against the Saints and Falcons. My guess is they're closer to the latter than the former, lest anyone would be willing to bet the declining value of their home on the Rams finishing with a better record than the Patriots this season.

Building up to the season is a step-by-step process and the Patriots stumbled, tripped and fell on their face last night. That doesn't mean they've fallen and they can't get up. They'll get up, dust themselves off and continue to prepare for the season-opener Sept. 12 against the Bengals. By then, hopefully, rookie cornerback Devin McCourty will not be biting on double-moves, rookie linebacker Brandon Spikes will react faster to a tight end lined up as a fullback coming out of the backfield, and Belichick will drum up some sort of way to generate a pass rush.

Brady, who is now in his 11th season, lent some perspective to last night's proceedings by pointing out where in the season the Patriots are now. If the season were a day, then Brady said the Patriots are at 6 a.m.

"I certainly didn't play perfect out there. There are some things I need to do better," said Brady. "It's early, it's really early. It's really early. It's the third preseason game, so what it means is there is a lot more to evaluate tomorrow. Kind of another game in the books, and we'll see how everybody competes."

Someday soon a game like last night's will count -- under an 18-game season last night would have been the season-opener -- but for now it doesn't.

It's simply a garbage performance in a throw-away game.

Nothing more and nothing less.

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

The word

Christopher L. Gasper riffs on the news

Diva

...that's the word former Patriots linebacker and current NFL Network analyst Willie McGinest used to describe the attitude of Patriots wide receiver Wes Welker. Slapped with the franchise tag by the Patriots, Welker implied Tuesday he would not be attending the team's mandatory mini-camp in June if he didn't have a new long-term contract. Part of McGinest's rationale was that Welker's earning power and production -- really one and the same -- are the product of playing for the Patriots and playing with Tom Brady. Since joining the Patriots in 2007, Welker leads the NFL in receptions (554) and is fourth in receiving yards (6,105). It's fair to debate how much of his success and value as a slot receiver is tied to being Brady's favorite target in a pass-happy offense. (By the way, Willie, Welker did catch 111 balls in 2008, when Brady was out for the year.) It's not fair to denigrate Welker's attitude, work ethic or commitment. Grossly underpaid almost since the moment he joined the Patriots, Welker has desired and deserved this new contract since 2009. However, he has not once withheld his services or publicly lashed out at the Patriots, traditionally the only ploys that get the team's attention. He returned from a torn ACL in seven months in 2010, when he could have babied the injury to protect his value. Last year, in training camp he said he felt the best he had in his career and backed it up by setting a franchise record for receiving yards (1,569). Welker is the antithesis of a diva wide receiver. He is a player who is understated, underpaid and has over-performed.

Comments »

Christopher L. Gasper video

Chris Gasper on Twitter

    waiting for twitterWaiting for twitter.com to feed in the latest...
archives

More columnists