Tony Massarotti Sports Blog
< Back to Front Page Text size +

New year, new philosophy?

Posted by Tony Massarotti, Globe Staff December 30, 2008 01:01 PM

As we turn the page on 2008, maybe the phrase is only fitting when it comes to the Red Sox:

Out with the old, in with the new.

After all, in 2009, the Sox may have to win with a markedly different approach.

In the wake of the failed pursuit of Mark Teixeira, the Red Sox have indeed reached agreements with pitcher Brad Penny ($5 million guaranteed) and catcher Josh Bard ($1.7 million, non-guaranteed) on one-year contracts, at least partially addressing some of the team’s lesser needs this offseason. The latter suggests the Sox still have every intention of re-signing Jason Varitek, but what is clear now is that they must prepare for the reality that they will have a less-potent offense in 2009, meaning that they will have to win with pitching and defense.

As for the news that the Sox approached the Florida Marlins about Hanley Ramirez, it only magnifies just how costly the Teixeira fallout is. Ramirez isn’t going anywhere after signing a six-year, $70 million extension that begins next year, meaning that the Marlins have him locked up at an average salary of $11.67 million over the next six years. Further, because Ramirez’s annual salaries do not begin to explode until 2012 -- his base climbs to $15 million that season -- there is little or no reason for the Marlins to deal him before that time, at the earliest.

So why did the Red Sox approach the Marlins? For the same reason they pursued Teixeira. They know their offense is going to slip in 2009. They know that shortstop, more than catcher, is the position where they can make the greatest offensive upgrade. And they know that they need a productive young hitter for the middle of their lineup after breaking up the tandem of David Ortiz and Manny Ramirez that served as the nucleus for their entire roster for nearly six years.

The more you examine the realities here, the more you cannot help but wonder why the Red Sox got to $170 million and stopped with Teixeira, leading to a scenario where the club was willing to offer prospects like Clay Buchholz and Jacoby Ellsbury in a package for a young player with a $70 million contract.

But we digress.

Let’s take a moment here to look at the teams Theo Epstein has built over the last six years, beginning with the club that set a major league record for slugging percentage in 2003. In Epstein’s six years as general manager, the Red Sox have scored more runs (5,352) than any team in baseball -- the Yankees are a whisker behind at 5,347 -- which only highlights the key to Boston’s success. The Sox believe in building a deep, talented lineup that gets into (and mauls) opposing bullpens, which is a complicated way of saying that they seek to make opposing pitchers less effective.

By consequence, the Sox make their own pitching better.

But now? There are going to be some easier outs in this lineup, independent of the questions surrounding Ortiz and Mike Lowell. Barring a dramatic development at shortstop or catcher, the Red Sox are likely to have relative soft spots at three positions in their lineup, depending on what happens with Ellsbury. For all of the flash that many Sox fans adore in Ellsbury’s dynamic playing style, there is still great question as to just how productive he can be.

From June 2 through Aug. 29 last year, Ellsbury batted .240 with nine walks and .582 OPS in 69 games. When the stock market went into that kind of dive, we called it a recession.

All of this brings us to the pitching and, in particular, to Penny, who is precisely the type of signing many envisioned when the Sox entered this offseason: relatively low risk, potentially high reward. Assuming Penny’s health -- and independent of his effectiveness -- the real benefit here may be that the Sox get to keep Justin Masterson in the bullpen. Unlike many years past -- like, say, the last six -- the strength of the club now appears to be their pitching staff, 1 through 12, where they appear to have the kind of depth that their lineup once possessed.

In theory, that should mean the Sox will need to score fewer runs, and it does raise the question now of whether they will attempt more sacrifice bunts. After all, will they be able to play for the big inning as much?

As for Bard, his acquisition in no way should be regarded as an outright dismissal of Varitek, whose agent, Scott Boras, continues to exchange ideas with the club. At the moment, at least, Bard should be seen as nothing more than an understudy, which is precisely the situation the Sox had hoped for when they acquired him the first time in the Coco Crisp deal with the Indians in January 2006. The Red Sox liked Bard then and they like him now, and they believed he eventually would have been able to handle Tim Wakefield. This time, however, there is the great likelihood that Bard will catch Wakefield and at least one other pitcher as the Red Sox finally make the inevitable transition from one catcher to another.

Does that rule out Jarrod Saltalamacchia or another deal of the like? Of course not, especially when the Sox have made it quite clear (to Florida, at least) that they would indeed part with Buchholz. But despite what Epstein said at the winter meetings, it seems unlikely that the Sox could go with two young, inexperienced catchers when they also have youth (or inconsistency) in center field and at shortstop, not to mention injury/durability issues in right field -- J.D. Drew played 109 games last year -- and third base.

If the Hanley Ramirez talks told us anything, it is that the Sox do have serious questions about Jed Lowrie’s ability to play shortstop every day, at least for a big-market, high-salaried team in the ironclad American League East. (Lowrie would make one heck of a utility man, however, and the Sox believe he could also handle first base in spot duty.)

In the end, the bottom line here is this: The Red Sox are concerned that their offense, as currently constituted, will not be sufficient. The Hanley Ramirez exploration -- which according to the SI report, took place before Teixeira signed with the Yankees -- proves it. The last time the Red Sox entered the season with a suspect offense was in 2006, when just happens to be the last time the Sox missed the playoffs. That club finished sixth in the AL in scoring and won 86 games -- both were the lows of the Epstein Era -- and the 2009 Sox are beginning to bear an eerie resemblance to that club.

The more time that passes this offseason, the more you cannot help but wonder if the 2009 Red Sox will have to win with pitching and defense.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
223 comments so far...
  1. Wait I'm confused. I thought the Red Sox and Marlins called off the trade BECAUSE they wanted Bucholz and Ellsbury plus.... I didn't think that the Sox offered Bucholz and Ellsbury... At any rate I think this is typical Mazz "blah blah blah"

    Posted by Bluesbros December 30, 08 12:19 PM
  1. The Sox stopped at $170m because if they had bid $200m, the Yankees would have gone $210, and so on, and so on.

    Posted by Mark December 30, 08 12:23 PM
  1. I can't help but think that Theo & the Gang royally screwed up this off-season. It's hard not to feel a sense of dejavu:
    04 & 07: World Series win.
    05 & 08: Battled nobly to get to playoffs despite flaws.
    06 & 09(?): Weak team, no playoffs.
    I hope I'm wrong, but it's a depressing trend that seems to be forming.

    Posted by Quaid007 December 30, 08 12:26 PM
  1. Thank you Captain Obvious!!!

    Posted by Manny December 30, 08 12:26 PM
  1. Massarotti - going back to this and your last article, please can you get into your head that New York were ALWAYS going to end up with Teixeira?!?! You seem to believe that if Boston has put a few more million $$ a year on the table he would have signed here and the Yanks would have walked away...If history shows anything, when the Yankees want a player, they just continue bidding until they get him, so if Boston added an extra 2 mill per year, the Yanks would have offered 3 mill, and so on.. Boston put a (huge) offer on the table and drew a line, and I can't criticise them for that... Theo is trying to put the best team he can together, and I for one think he is he is doing it the right way, scouring the market and seeing what deals are there. Don't write off 2009 just yet, because great pitching still beats great offence......

    Posted by Keith1313sox December 30, 08 12:35 PM
  1. Money is the problem I say. Boston doesn't have as much as people suppose. That would explain why they are now willing to shift their young talent and not spend on Teix. Hardvard lost 25% of their endowment. I wonder how much Henry has lost lately?

    Posted by Chris Mister December 30, 08 12:35 PM
  1. The Yankees have shown us over the years that having a big, bad lineup does not guarantee a World Series ring. Pitching and defense is what always wins, especially in the playoffs. I like it!

    Posted by Chris December 30, 08 12:41 PM
  1. Any thoughts on a trade with TX for Hamilton and the catcher the Sox want for Clay and Jacoby?

    Thanks

    Posted by Andrew December 30, 08 12:44 PM
  1. Crazy as it sounds, but Manny is right now the best player available in the free agent market. Why not offer him $18mm for a one year deal? I suspect he will not be yielding much more in the open market as the Yanks are out of the bidding. I also suspect that he would view this as better than holding out a year. With the lack of spending this season, I would think we can even create incentives to get him up to $25mm (behavior, MVP, World Series MVP, etc.). It seems like cheap money to get that bat. We know what he can do at the plate and he would have all the right incentives for him (namely money) to perform. Plus, it would be a contract year - which is what he always wanted. If he performs well and is a good teammate...who knows what it could lead too. Think about it....

    Posted by scott December 30, 08 12:48 PM
  1. I'm hoping the Sox turn around and offer Bucholz and Lowrie or Bucholz and Ellsbury to the Twins for Joe Mauer, that would be a blockbuster for the Sox...we shall see who else they can possibly pry away with enough of their prospects, it's time to spend some of this talent to get a big bat!

    Posted by Mike H December 30, 08 12:51 PM
  1. I don't think it's much of a mystery why the Sox stopped at $170 mil for Teixeira. You said it yourself Tony, everybody lies in the free agent process. The Sox were smart enough not to believe Cashman based on the fact that the Yankees had seen their payroll drop by $86 mil from 2008 and had, so far, only spent $40 mil annually for CC and AJ. Figuring the Yankees would top whatever they offered, the Sox weren't going to allow Boras to up the ante on Teixeira. The satisfaction of causing the Yankees to pay an additional $10-15 mil, which is almost meaningless to them, would be more than offset by knowing they had been used by Boras. The $2 mil increase in the Sox' offer tells you the message they were sending to Boras.

    Posted by Rookie December 30, 08 12:52 PM
  1. tony...i'm not sure that i agree with your premise that there will be some easier outs in the lineup....i wouldn't exactly call the combination of varitek...lugo...lowrie...crisp and sometimes ellsbury a latter day murderers row....bay is an easier out than manny and that's about it...i would sign ivan rodriguez before varitek....and i would take a chance on tejada at short....and if i was really desperate for offense, i'd investigate whether barry bonds can play 1st base....

    Posted by RogelioMoret December 30, 08 01:04 PM
  1. Here is something that I don't think you seem to understand about the Sox pursuit of Texiera. You are excoriating the Sox for "stopping" at $170 million whne $180 million would have gotten the job done. Don't you realize that if the Sox went $180, the Yanks would have gone 190 and if the Sox went 200 the Yanks would have been at 210?. Yeah, the Sox are a big market team, but they, like every other team in the MLB is simply not in the same financial status as the Yanks. Theo and crew wisely cut the cord when it became readily apparent that they were merely being used to drive up the price.

    Posted by Kev December 30, 08 01:05 PM
  1. Why is it such a mystery for the media that the Red Sox quit bidding for Teixteira at $170 million? Clearly, the Yankees were playing a waiting game (encouraged perhaps by Scott Boras?) to see where the price point for Teixteira would be. Once that was established, the Yankees plan was to swoop in and offer him more money. By then, other teams were exhausted by their negotiations with Boras, and, basically had final offers on the table. Even if the Red Sox had decided to top the Yankees' offer, does anyone doubt the Yankees would have continued to up the ante? It made no sense for the Red Sox to continue the negotiations.

    Posted by Howaboutthat? December 30, 08 01:10 PM
  1. Yes....Why did the Sox stop at $170 mil for Teixeira? The Sox may need to realize that sometimes they may have to make a deal that does not 100% favor them. This was one of those times. Is Theo still "picking and choosing" or is he a little paniced now. The Sox better pull something out of their sleeve to help the offense or 2009 may be a long year. What are the odds that Papi, Lowell and Drew stay healthy all season? That is why the Sox need to get a young slugger. That is why the Sox went after Teixeira. However, the Sox left the door open for the Yanks by holding firm at $170 mil. I still don't know why they stopped there. Did they really think the Yanks were out of it? The Sox could have at least driven up NY's cost more. NY held firm at $180 mil. Maybe Teix would have come to Boston for 8 years/$188-192 mil. I am not sure that Teix would have left money on the table, if only the Sox would have offered it. It's ARod all over again - Sox try to save money and he winds up in NY. We got lucky that ARod is a choker, we may not be lucky this time.

    Posted by RC December 30, 08 01:10 PM
  1. I think your take on the Hanley Ramirez talks is unnecessarily negative. It is not proof of desperation following the Texiera Yankee-signing. Ramirez would be a great fit, and really a better move than signing Texiera because he would fill a slot that is a glaring weakness and improve the lineup without displacing Lowell or Youkilis. I am not an insider so I may not understand this as well as you, but if I were the Red Sox, I would not give up on the Ramirez thing. In fact, I wouldn't rule out moving Buckholz AND Elsbury to get him. I know it would be a risk, but I was concerned about what I saw from both of those guys this season. Buckholz could be worthless by this time next year, and even if Elsbury fulfills his promise, will he be as valuable as Ramirez with his power numbers? I know it creates a new hole at center field, but if Elsbury doesn't pan out, we are going to have one anyway.

    Posted by Rob40 December 30, 08 01:12 PM
  1. Tony - the HanRam takes where prior to the Teixeira signing w/ NY, no?

    Posted by bosox December 30, 08 01:16 PM
  1. I think Theo and company have a strong team going into the season and will most likely make a big trade before the trading deadline. Holliday is a free agent at the end of the year and you know Billy Beane has no intentions of signing him for big money. The Sox have always had a strong interest in him so I could see them going after him or packaging some of our young talent for another big bat.

    Posted by Sox Talk December 30, 08 01:19 PM
  1. we still have plenty of time until the regular season starts and the sox have plenty of time and resources to still make a move for the pieces they need. this boston media over-dramaticizes every situation to try and keep readers interested. mark texeira was not worth the salary the sox offered and the world will not end as a result of him not signing with the sox. please stop writing this crap mazz. this is not the national enquirer and the drama created by irresponsible writers like you is detrimental to the team you claim to love. these things take time to work out; it's not a fantasy league. theo and company have to negotiate with real human beings who have families and issues of their own to take into consideration when contemplating deals to make the team stronger. lets all take a deep breath and stay excited for spring training. no more overreacting, no more armchair gm opinions, and no more yankee fear. we have won two championships this century and made a pretty impressive run with a roughed up team in 2008.

    Posted by dontpanic December 30, 08 01:19 PM
  1. In the end, the bottom line here is this: Don’t underestimate the impact of the Teixeira loss in the minds of Sox officials. The Hanley Ramirez exploration proves it.
    -------------------------------------------------------------
    To All Who Thought It Wasn't Necessary To get Teixeira....(I can't believe I am about to say this)....but Mazz is 150% right in this article.
    Going after Hanley Ramirez immediately after Red Sox Nation puked at the feet of Theo Epstein "PROVES" that they know they blew it and our offense will suffer for it.

    Posted by Kevin P December 30, 08 01:22 PM
  1. Mazz -- please stop beating up the Sox about Texeira.....

    Tex did not WANT to sign with the Sox. There isn't anything that could be done.

    Posted by michael_in_va December 30, 08 01:26 PM
  1. I think the exploration of Hanley Ramirez speaks more to the uncertainty of Mike Lowell, NOT Jed lowrie. A healthy Mike Lowell really makes a huge difference in the lineup. Lowrie has and can play 3rd base and Youkilis is a great insurance policy at that position going forward. With Youk's contract situation steady albeit year to year, it is much easier to find or convert a first baseman (maybe even within the organization). Youkilis until recently has not been your prototypical slugging 1st baseman (not a knock). The exploration into Han-Ram scares me a little about Lowell's injury/recovery. If you put it into perspective Manny's departure was filled partially by Bay and added production by Lowrie at short. That same production this year (if you can assume that) with a healthy Lowell will help, but it all hinges on the health or options available by/for Mike Lowell

    Posted by Jon December 30, 08 01:31 PM
  1. I just don't buy the Teixeira loss as that significant to management. The Sox payroll is only at $100M as it stands now. If Tex was that important to the future of the franchise, why wouldn't the Sox overpay if necessary? Something stopped them and it wasn't money. The Yanks recent tactics (Contreras, A-Rod, & Damon) wouldn't have snuck up on the Sox again.

    The Hanley Ramirez thing is also a stretch. This guy averages around 25 errors per season. Do you really leave a hole in CF (Elsbury) and sacrifice a young starter (Bucholz) to get an upgrade at short? Who would make that deal? The Sox probably kicked the tires and that's all. Lowrie had one error and that was at third. The reason his offense dropped was due to an injury. I'll stick with defense, thank you.

    Are the winter meetings the only period of time when fake reports are "leaked"? Come on Tony...

    Posted by JB December 30, 08 01:34 PM
  1. Tony is half right...they are improving the pitching. I don't think the Red Sox line-up slips next year at all.

    Papi was injured and actually hit better when he returned - where's that drop off?

    Varitek not getting 500 abs improves the production from the catcher spot.

    Lowrie was better than Lugo.

    Lowell will be healthy all year

    Maybe it's time Tony realized he changed jobs and isn't working for the Boston FishWrap anymore?

    Posted by Gino December 30, 08 01:41 PM
  1. Man Mazz you really had a huge man crush on Tex huh? Get over it, the yankees outbid the sox, if the sox upped the anti, they still would not have gotten it done. Plus... maybe again, just maybe, can you fathom that it was not the sox fault and that Tex did not want to go to BOSTON? GET OVER IT ALREADY.

    Posted by adam December 30, 08 01:41 PM
  1. Your discussion gives the impression that the Sox pursued Hanley Ramirez AFTER the situation with Teixeira fell through. According to si.com, the Sox were having discussions with Florida weeks ago about a potential trade to bring Ramirez back to Boston. Regarding your final point, pitching and defense are what win championships! Your pieces, although you catergorize them as "realistic", seem to have a very negative quality. It's no great disaster if the Sox don't make the playoffs this year. I'd rather that than to still be waiting for them to finally win a World Championship!!!

    Posted by dkl123 December 30, 08 01:44 PM
  1. Mazz is bordering on becoming irrelevant.....win with pitching & defense (and a pinch of chemistry) , what a concept!! Henry & Co. already know this (see states evidence - two ws rings in four years).....Mazz is just realizing this....the Yankmees will fail because they have no defense up the middle and NO team chemistry.

    Posted by ZNammer December 30, 08 01:45 PM
  1. I'd have pulled the trigger on getting Hanley back in a heartbeat. For TacoBellsbury and Buck? Uh, no problems there...there are plenty of mid-grade outfielders around. Clay had a meltdown last year, it could have been too much time with the Playmate. Jacoby is currently just an average outfielder. He has upside, but we'll have to see how that plays out this year with him playing 150 games or so.

    Posted by Shawn December 30, 08 01:45 PM
  1. Tony Massarotti belongs back with the Herald with articles like this. He complains and wines more than anything. Is there any chance we could trade Mazz and a writer to be named later for Borges?

    Posted by MLD37 December 30, 08 01:46 PM
  1. If in fact the Hanley Ramirez story is true I think the Sox would be interested in him playing in the OF, not at SS. He is not a very good defensive shortstop. Florida has been thinking about moving him to the OF, a la B.J. Upton.

    Posted by Dan Riker December 30, 08 01:47 PM
  1. LETS ALL FREAK OUT!! Jeez people. You'd think this team hadn't won sine 1918. Have a little faith in our ownership group and our baseball ops folks.

    Mazz doesnt know what hes talking about, we all know this. A Sox offense, as contructed today of:
    Ellsbury
    Pedroia
    Papi
    Youk
    Drew
    Lowell
    Bay
    Lowrie
    Catcher

    Is still a hecjk of a lineup. Take a look at our pitching 1-12 and you'll see why real fans like myself are still not too worried. Jeez people, get a grip, its not always doom and gloom.

    Posted by jimbo December 30, 08 01:51 PM
  1. All you commenters apparently missed that NY held firm at $180 mil for Teixeira and were surprised that they landed him for that. Wish I saved the link. I think it was Heyman that reported in detail how it all went down. If only the Sox had upped their bid! I'm not sure that Teix would have left any money on the table.

    Posted by CD December 30, 08 01:52 PM
  1. Jeez, I wish I could figure out what Massarotti's nickname is.....

    Posted by hateputas December 30, 08 01:52 PM
  1. The only thing the Ramirez talks tell us is that Theo & Co. are doing what they say every year, "We will explore all possible avenues to put the best baseball team on the field next season." If they didn't explore the Hanley Ramirez option, they wouldn't be doing their due dilligence now would they?

    Posted by EnoughDrama December 30, 08 01:53 PM
  1. Maz, published reports indicate that these talks for Hanley happened long ago, perhaps as far back as the winter meetings, which kind of blows a hole in your theory that the Sox are desperately trying to upgrade in the wake of losing Tiexiera. If they got Hanley, I bet that they wouldn't have even explored Tiexiera, other than to drive up his price. In fact, with Lars Anderson in waiting, I wouldn't rule out being in the Teixiera talks in part to drive up the price for the Yankees. Anyone who didn't think they would swoop in at the last minute has their head up thier but! The Sox management is smarter than that.

    Posted by Ed Janx December 30, 08 01:53 PM
  1. By new philosophie, Do they mean cash in on the fans before they sell the team in 2 years?

    Or do they mean to put offers on the table they KNOW will be trumped?

    Get ready for a 4th place finish, Sox Nation. Is Dan Duquette available? We need a GM that will actually make good moves, see Manny & Pedro & Damon. Do not see Lugo, Clement,. Crisp, and Drew. How would Kelly Shoppach look now?

    Posted by I hate Theo December 30, 08 01:56 PM
  1. Anyone know what Massarotti's nickname is?

    Posted by hateputas December 30, 08 01:57 PM
  1. Back up the truck for Hanley. Clay, Jacoby and anyone else. If not, go get Michael Young and Salty from Texas for same package.

    Posted by Riles December 30, 08 01:57 PM
  1. Resign Manny !!!!

    Posted by RedSoxTrue1 December 30, 08 02:01 PM
  1. "The more time that passes this offseason, the more you cannot help but wonder if the 2009 Red Sox will have to win with pitching and defense."

    Is is just me or is the "post steroid era" a prescription for winning around pitching and defense? Old school baseball?

    Posted by Bill H. December 30, 08 02:01 PM
  1. Everyone - just calm down - we won't have to wait another 80+ years for another championship. The Red Sox are appropriately taking their cue from the sub-prime mortgage mess and NOT mortgaging their future for a number of over-priced commodities. It really is ok if we have a down-ish year this year if it means we're building smartly for the future.
    In any case, pitching and defense wins championships, and we have a wealth of both.
    CC - come se dice "wall ball" en Espanol?
    Punch and Judy has gotten the Twins at or near the top of the division for years, and they did not have the pitching staff that the Sox have going into '09.

    Posted by Bob December 30, 08 02:01 PM
  1. i like the idea of going after hanley ramirez and would quickly send both buchholz and ellsbury to miami for him. i would immediately think of playing ramirez in centerfield where it seems that many professional baseball people think that he will play sooner or later.

    ramirez is signed to a large (and reasonable) contract that has about 6 years remaining, he is a quality bat regardless of what position he will play defensively, has better than average speed on the bases and allows the red sox to be happy with lowerie's steady defense at shortstop.

    Posted by charlie darling December 30, 08 02:02 PM
  1. Teixeira went to NY. GET OVER IT, Tony

    Posted by Foles December 30, 08 02:03 PM
  1. HI

    Posted by kass December 30, 08 02:03 PM
  1. Tony almost always finds the most negative spin to put on RS moves and motives. No one should be surprised at the tone of his writing. It's been this way for years.

    Posted by BarneyBedford December 30, 08 02:04 PM
  1. If Lowrie could play as well as he did with an injured hand, it stands to reason that he can improve. Please be reminded: This is a guy that paid attention to all of the little things as he was credited with playing time.

    Perhaps, the Sox should keep an eye out for middle-of-the-season players (e.g. big bats) that can translate into a more productive team? In fact, this might be more fruitful than an over-priced Texeira.

    Pitching, pitching, pitching. Improve the middle of the bullpen and watch 5-10 potential losses get moved to the win column. (It's a lot cheaper than Texeira and might translate into more play-off wins, as well.)

    Don't discard the guys from Pawtucket; don't place unfair expectations on them, either. Personally, I'd love to see a few of them challenge for some playing time at Fenway next year. An injured JD and/or outfielder will have the phone ringing. Hopefully, these guys will approach the upcoming season as though they are going to get called up.

    Posted by DjM December 30, 08 02:07 PM
  1. This team is in trouble offensively? This *is* the same team that went to game 7 of the ALCS isn't it? Albiet probably healthier this year. The Red Sox have been the most successful team BY FAR in the last six years and people still doubt the F.O.?

    Give me a break.

    Posted by Dale Sams December 30, 08 02:08 PM
  1. I've been disappointed with Mazz as a commentator on all things Red Sox:
    far too negative dude. Sox are winners now. Mazz brings the attitude that
    existed before the Sox won, and those attitudes tend to the self-fulfilling.
    If you do love the Sox, Mazz, why do are continually tearing them down?

    Posted by sox fan in new mex December 30, 08 02:10 PM
  1. Are you still talking about the same Mark Teixeira who has never been on a team that won a playoff series? The same Mark Teixeira who has never finished in the top 6 in MVP voting?

    At some point, emotion needs to take a backseat to logic. Teixeira is not the type of player that is worth the money he will be getting paid in relative terms to other professional baseball players. Boston Red Sox Incorporated deemed that it just didn't make good sense from a value perspective to bid more than $168 million. It's that simple. Let's move on.

    Posted by Hoss December 30, 08 02:13 PM
  1. How about using some of the money they were willing to give Teixeira and sign Lowe? Bet Lowe will take the town discount (13 mill?)! That would really make thier starting pitching strong and still allow them to deal for H. Ramirez.. Then, get Kapler back and sign Tek for 2 years at 6 million.

    Posted by Anonymous December 30, 08 02:14 PM
  1. Saltalamacchia would be a marketing blitz for Red Sox, jersey sales, etc. People would be calling him "Salty" as if he were the next door neighbor's kid. Not only that, the kid can FLAT OUT HIT! Theo needs to stop the nonsense and trade Buckholz for Salty. Remember, they traded Hanley Ramirez and got 2 World Series Championships in return. (Now Hanley is the best position player in the NL.) No question. Clay Buckholz isn't Hanley Ramirez, and trading him for Salty might turn out to be just as productive as the Slochum for Varitek trade (minus Derek Lowe. Make the deal.

    Posted by DrewDCapeCoral December 30, 08 02:14 PM
  1. I'd deal Buckholtz and Ellsbury for Rameriz. Sign Kotsay to play center field for a year or two an the Sox lineup would be much stronger. Rameriz steals 50 bases a year so that would replace Ellsbury's speed. The Sox have other Pitchers that will be ready within a year that can replace Buckholtz. They just signed a pitcher from Japan, Masterson, Boiden, Bard etc.

    Posted by Paul December 30, 08 02:15 PM
  1. You keep pointing out that the pursuit of Ramirez shows that the Red Sox have concerns about offense at shortstop. That completely ignores the fact that it is mentioned in the article that they may have considered moving Ramirez to center since he isn't a great defensive shortstop.

    And aren't you Boston writers tired of getting scooped by the national writers? There wasn't any hint of these talks from any Boston writers. Big surprise. Boston writers are too busy interviewing Jay Payton about a possible return to Boston.

    Posted by tom December 30, 08 02:18 PM
  1. Once again, Mazz has totally missed the point. Theo and company not only gave themselves a spending limit in Texeira, but they also did NOT cave on one of their big issues - the no-trade clause. I applaud them for sticking to their guns.

    And anyone who thinks that the Yankees weren't in this from the beginning are crazy. They basically went to Boras and said, "Tell us when you have the final offers and we'll beat them all."

    Posted by soxxyfan December 30, 08 02:19 PM
  1. To me the only negative this offseason was running up the price on Youk as a by-product of the Teixi8era sweepstakes.

    Posted by Adrianheh December 30, 08 02:20 PM
  1. Mazz, you're overreacting.
    Like many responders have pointed out, the Yanks would have continued bidding if the Red Sox had increased their offer, and there's no way the Red Sox could win a bid battle with them. If the Yankees want someone, and that someone is just interested in $$, that someone will sign with the Yankees.
    It just shows how little we needed someone like Teixeira in the first place. He would have been the A-Rod of the Red Sox, and the team can easily do without him. One player does not a team make. The offense will be stronger this year without Manny: the Red Sox scored more runs per game without him than they did with him!

    Posted by eekman63 December 30, 08 02:21 PM
  1. In response to comment number three. How is that depressing? Two championships (and 4 playoff appearances) every 5-6 years. I'd take it.

    Posted by Anonymous December 30, 08 02:24 PM
  1. I would call florida and reopen the talks. I would give them elsbury, bucholtz, and bowden. I would even throw in 2 other lesser prospects to sweeten the deal. Then I would sign lowe and you are back in business.

    Posted by rickb101 December 30, 08 02:26 PM

  1. Tony I don't understand your assertion that the Sox are going to see a drop in production from the offense in 2009 based upon them being "soft" at 3 positions(Catcher, CF, SS).

    The Red Sox scored the 2nd most runs in the american league last year getting below avg. production from Tek, Cash, Coco, Ellsbury, Lugo, Lowrie in those 3 positions. I would expect that Ellsbury and Lowrie will put up AT LEAST as good numbers as we got from SS and CF last year based on that they are young still improving players. Regardless what we do at Catcher it would be tough for whoever we have out there to put up worse offensive stats than our catchers did last year. The rest of the lineup should be about equivalent to what it was last year and still has upside if we get bounceback years from Ortiz and/or lowell. Also the loss of Manny did not hurt the Lineup last year as we scored more than half a run a game more AFTER we traded Manny than before. I just don't understand where this projected dip in offense is suppose to come from.

    Your speculation that the sox management has a new "philosophy" just because YOU see a possible downturn in runs is absurd. Its also absurd to think the sox question Lowries ability to play SS everyday just because they are looking into Hanley Ramirez. Hanley is a top 5 player in the game and best SS in the game......of course the sox have interest trading for 1 of the best players in the game in the early prime of his career! That has nothing to do with Lowrie but more to do with the greatness of Hanley Ramirez . If they thought Lowrie couldn't play SS they wouldn't be trying to dump Lugo the 1st chance they can get!

    One more thing(your wrong alot)............Bard is not the "inevitable transition from one catcher to another" that you talk about. He is a nice signing with offensive upside at a great price. What he isn't is a "catcher of the Future". He also isn't "young and inexperienced" when he will be 31 to start the season. Hopefully he is the experienced veteran backup catcher that will be the guy that is paired with the young catcher of the future.

    Posted by Steve E. December 30, 08 02:27 PM
  1. Tony, good article. Isn't it possible that the Red Sox, if they did trade Ellsbury, Buccholz and a few prospects to FL for Hanley AND kept Lowrie, that the Sox could have moved Hanley to CF since his defense at SS is shakey at best? It looks like Lowrie can be at the very least an average everyday defensive SS and scouts that have seen him hit don't question his bat. After all Jed was playing the 2nd half of last season with a broken bone in his wrist.

    Posted by Jordan December 30, 08 02:28 PM
  1. MAN Crush. Get over Tex. Please. We did not get him. he went for bigger bucks and more flexible terms. OK. The guy was supposed to guarantee the Braves and the Angels succes, and that didn't happen. Please, enough whining about Tex. If Theo does not deserve the benefit of the doubt by now, he never will....

    Posted by kc December 30, 08 02:28 PM
  1. Would like to understand the particulars of those Hanley discussions...what is too much for the Sox to give up....for me none of the kids except for Lester and Masterson are untouchable....guessing they wanted Ellsbury, Buchholz, Bowden and maybe Lars and that is where the price was getting too high...We will have to overwhelm teams to give up guys like Hanley or Joe Mauer...they will have to overpay and that is just the way it is when you decide to lowball your primary free agent target.....honestly maybe the Sox and Henry in that famous Texas meeting learned right there that NY was where Tex wanted to be all along...but we could of made it difficult for the Yanks we offer 200 to 210 right off the bat maybe the Yanks never enter the picture....it is much easier even for the Yanks to enter the bidding and win at 180 than it is at 220....In any case the Sox are being naive if they thing the team and offense as built right now is no better than 3rd place....they need something....maybe they go one level down and try to expand a Texas deal to get Michael Young for ss and the catcher we need...he is a gold glove guy and add some pop at SS not as much as Hanley but it may be a more acceptable price.

    Posted by dube December 30, 08 02:29 PM
  1. I am condused on why it is presumed that our offense is going to be so bad next year. Weren't we one of the better teams offensivly last year? And that was with injuries to Lowell and Papi. This year we have the same exact guys coming back (assumingly), Papi and Lowell healthy, but our offense is going to struggle?

    Doesn't make sense

    Posted by stephen defiore December 30, 08 02:29 PM
  1. If we still had Coco to play center, I'd make the Clay and Jacoby for Hanley trade in a heartbeat.

    Posted by AJ in WV December 30, 08 02:30 PM
  1. My take on it from what I've read is, the Sox offered Ellsbury, Buchholz and more, with the Marlins yawning. What a deal that might still be.
    The Sox DO need an offensive upgrade. Why not explore JJ Hardy from the Brewers, who need pitching? He's a fine 2 way player, with a low salary.
    As for Manny, um, where would he play on this team? We already have a left fielder, who plays the game as it should be played, and is 6 years younger.
    Unless Ortiz broke down, there's no place for Manny.

    Posted by rodfromcranston December 30, 08 02:37 PM
  1. Tony, can’t you write about the Celtics or something? Why are you worrying about 2009 when it’s only December 30 – hell, the way you’re writing you might as well program your keyboard to pound out the tune to ‘Taps’ with each keystroke. GET A GRIP!

    And seriously, does 2006 have ANYTHING to do with 2009? In 2009 the Sox have an established Kevin Youkilis and MVP Dustin Pedroia in the line-up, JD Drew in RF rather than a rapidly declining Trot Nixon, and also, Ellsbury and Lowrie we would expect to outperform Coco Crisp and Alex Gonzalez of the ’06 team. Sure, Manny isn’t hear but Bay is a solid ballplayer … and another thing – isn’t this the same offense that got to GAME 7 of the ALCS IN OCTOBER? Oh yeah, and they were minus a healthy Mike Lowell, a healthy David Ortiz and a healthy Josh Beckett. Sure, Lowell and Papi’s recovery is a question mark, but show me ONE team that doesn’t have a question mark as we approach spring training. This media propaganda BS and ‘whoa-is-me’ type of slant you’ve taken lately is downright pathetic and ridiculous. Sure, I would’ve loved Teixiera, but he’s not coming, move on, and why wouldn’t Theo look at Hanley Ramirez – if they were stupid enough to say ‘Yes,’ what’s to lose. Who doesn’t want to improve always? Does that mean Theo thinks this team can’t win? I don’t think so by any means.

    Maybe the Yanks get better, maybe Tampa digresses, maybe Toronto has a strong run, maybe-maybe-maybe-maybe-maybe … what kind of articles were being written in February ’04 when A-Rod went to the Yankees? I’m guessing they weren’t too glowing in this part of town, and guess what, he’s 0-5 in getting a ring in pinstripes. So if you want to play the ‘year-to-year’ comparison, let’s look at what the Yankees have let go vs. what they gained:

    A) 52 HR-196 RBI-.859 OPS
    B) 57 HR-190 RBI-.852 OPS

    They’ve essentially replaced Abreu and Giambi with Teixiera and Nick Swisher … the latter is group (B), so while Teixeria is the best of the four players, the Yankees NEEDED him a lot more than Boston. I don’t see their line-up as ‘significantly’ better than Boston’s. Also, Sabathia is a great regular season pitcher, but one with a 1-3 postseason record, with a 7.59 ERA and 2.20 WHIP. And what do those numbers mean going into 2009? Nothing. Nobody has won anything yet, a lot can and will happen between now and October … the games are not played now, there are too many variables that can happen and I know there’s not much else to write about this time of year when we’re right in between the holidays and the start of spring training which is why I’m pleading with you to write about the Celtics or at least gain some perspective about the words you’re writing about the Sox and quit being the conductor of ‘Taps’ from the keyboard.
    Kyle

    Posted by Anonymous December 30, 08 02:37 PM
  1. Andrew (post 8), there is no way Texas would ever agree to that trade. Josh Hamilton had an amazing year, and looks like he could be one of the elite players for the next decade. And I don't think he wants to leave the team that gave him a 2nd chance when no one else would. Throw in Saltalamacchia, and the combo of Buccholz and Ellsbury is laughable. It would take a lot more to get Hamilton.

    Posted by Kevin December 30, 08 02:40 PM
  1. Come on I can't believe my ears Mark wasn't worth this or that, Yes He Was.
    The Sox brass flew down there with peanuts instead of signing him, They could have easly gave him a 200 mill contract they tried to be shrewd and got screwed by who else the Yankees who stepped in 10 minutes later and got it done.
    If they want to keep the farm system intact you make these deals. Henry came back crying like a big baby and presented weakness. Like Manny they TANKED on the team and fans.

    Posted by Joe Souza December 30, 08 02:45 PM
  1. Theo and Co. are looking for good deals, not simply the best players. Thus, they tried to get Hanley (and probably would have moved him to CF) who is a GREAT deal right now. Texeira was not a good deal, once the amount it took to sign him was in the ARod area. The Red Sox are in position to win 90 games. With a little luck, they'll win 95. WIth a little bad luck, they'll win 85. Even when they were scoring LOTS of runs, it was pitching that keyed the championships once they got to October. If they can get to the post-season again, I like their chances against anyone. The big bats, however, help get to October because they destroy average and worse pitching. I think Mazz is being a little too harsh, here. Theo and co., have earned the benefit of every doubt and I don't care if he messed up with Lugo and Renteria.

    Posted by Ben December 30, 08 02:54 PM
  1. Not only is it clear that the Yankees would have outbid us, but also that Teixeira wanted to be a Yankee all along. While the Sox were engaging in good faith negotiations, Boras and Teixeira, aided and abetted by the Yankees, were playing games with them, hoping to embarrass them. I believe John Henry figured this out when he and Theo went to Texas, and that's why he stated that the Sox were not a factor.

    Posted by oldredsoxfanPB December 30, 08 02:54 PM
  1. I sure wish Peter Gammons still wrote for the Globe....

    Posted by parasiliti December 30, 08 02:57 PM
  1. I don't think they are down on Lowrie...I thought they were gonna used Hanley in center. Lowrie can be an above average shortstop. Most shortstops are garbage with the bat.

    Posted by wintersej December 30, 08 02:59 PM
  1. After reading some of the comments as well as the article I'm wondering what happened to the Pre-World Series Red Sox fans. The Yankees always get the guy we try to get our hands on and we hope to make the playoffs. We all sound like a bunch of spoiled New York Yankee fans. I was disappointed we didn't get Mark Teixeira but we were one game from going to the world series last year and the only person we've lost so far is Coco Crisp. Hopefully with a healthy Lowell, a healthy Ortiz, and the additions of Brad Penny as well as Josh Bard I think we'll do as well if not better than last year.

    Remember - Keep the Faith!!

    Posted by Jeffrey December 30, 08 03:00 PM
  1. I've been reading the post today and once again I'm flabbergasted that anyone would even think to bring Manny back to Title Town . Now the Sox going after Joe Mauer from the Twins would be awesome , I think thats why the offer to Bard is not without a trade cluase . It's not really binding . So the Sox can trade Bucholz ,Lowrie and Bard to the Twins and possible some cash . Mauer is young with an outstanding bat. It does make you think about what i just mentioned. Remember if we had a healthy Lowell we would of reached the Series and won .

    Posted by Kansas Bob December 30, 08 03:10 PM
  1. from what i have read the sox talked to the marlins about hanley prior to the Tex signing with the yanks. just shows that Theo will always check to see how he might improve the team. the garciaparra trade was for defensive purposes and had much to do with winning the world series. pitching , defense, and some speed will take you a long way. the sox have been changing their philosophy about how to play for a few years now.

    Posted by steve December 30, 08 03:14 PM
  1. C'mon Maz
    You're beginning to sound like a lot of posters on the Red Sox board. They're not going to be winners in free agency every year. What about the Brewers, Pirates, Royals, Rays, A's etc? I think they'd love to be able to have the cash to buy a team, but they can't and do it the old fashioned way. Let's not cry too much for the Sox.

    Posted by Rob December 30, 08 03:15 PM
  1. If it were me, I think I'd let Veritek go and keep the 2 draft picks. It was clear as a bell that he should have taken arbitration and he wasn't hip enough to his own valuation to do that. Maybe he's not the genius we make him out to be. That decision is going to cost him millions before he's done.

    The Sox owners must have been hit by this stock market meltdown, especially since Henry is someone who played options and sophisticated stock market instruments so much to obtain his fortune. If that is the case let's support him and understand why the team is not on a spending spree. The economy could be down for a long time, hurting attendance and ad revenues BADLY. The Redsox are not immune to this. Do you think the ownership group is stupid? Look at what they have done. These are extremely bright people. Let's take the draft picks and continue to develop for the long haul. Maybe we will be in a position for Mauer and Pujols in the future but we should keep building the farm as they have done the past few years.

    Posted by Boomerangs.com December 30, 08 03:22 PM
  1. Can we hold on to Bucholtz for one more season. Why is he being rumored in every deal. Lets see what he does this year. A top propsect like that should be hands off.

    Posted by Barry Canada December 30, 08 03:26 PM
  1. We all know their are question marks with Ortiz and Lowell? Teixeira would have made the Sox a formidable offensive lineup. I'm inlcined to agree with making the deal with the Marlins for H. Ramirez, can Pat Burell play left field maybe move Bay to center? We need another bat!

    Posted by Mike December 30, 08 03:28 PM
  1. You want a blockbuster BECKETT/ELLSBURY/ANDERSON for MORNEAU/SPANN/BAKER

    Posted by MR T December 30, 08 03:28 PM
  1. Ney York was always Boras' ace in the hole. They desperately needed a first baseman and bat. They were always in the mix. Boras plays the Yankees and Red Sox like a pair of Stradivarius. Just remember the only time the Sox successfully negotiated with Boras is when the Yankees couldn't sign or didn't need the player (Matsuzaka, Drew, Varitek) the Sox ended up signing.

    Posted by Wally by Golly December 30, 08 03:35 PM
  1. Maz-

    I usually like your writing a lot, but this gloom and doom stuff has to stop. We missed out on Tex, it stinks, lets move on. I'm not willing to write off a season before it's started. A little optimism would be much appreciated, and I think, warranted.

    We whined when we lost out on A-Rod. We whined when Damon left. Last time I checked, we've done just fine for ourselves.

    Posted by AG December 30, 08 03:45 PM
  1. we were one oblique and 1 game from the world series. Chill out

    Posted by Anonymous December 30, 08 03:47 PM
  1. I would guess that an acquisition of Hanley Ramirez would be with the intent of moving him to centerfield, especially if Ellsbury is involved. The Marlins are considering the very same move if they keep Hanley. With a well stocked roster and farm system of pitchers, including Buchholz in the deal along with even another player/prospect would be worth it. Hanley is actually a few months YOUNGER than Ellsbury. Compare their bodies of work. The Sox get a young player with a much more proven bat who is nearly as fast as Ellsbury. Lowrie can play SS and Tek, even with his diminishing offensive skills would be less of a liability in the lineup.

    Posted by fredtrem December 30, 08 03:49 PM
  1. Fellow Red Sox fans: Mark Teixeira was never--repeat--never--going to Boston. He blames the present administration for something that happened a decade ago--on Dan Duquette's watch. The New York newspapers have published stories to the effect that whatever John Henry offered, Teixeira (not Scott Boras) was going to tell them "we have better offers." Tex said he "always wanted to be a Yankee," so I think we should get over it and resign ourselves to the fact that we were going to get played--no matter what. We'll never get Hanley Ramirez back, so we've got to make do with Jacoby Ellsbury on the deep perimeter. I hate to see Clay Buccholz go, but after a disastrous 2008 campaign, it's clear that his sparkling debut in 2007 was without any substance--and he looked so good in just about every start. I don't know he lost his confidence--but it's gone--and without that, no pitcher can be effective. If the Marlins were crazy enough to accept Buchholz and "trash" for Ramirez, sure, take that to the house--but it won't happen. Pray for good health for both Mikey Lowell and David "Big Papi" Ortiz! The Sox'll be fine, and I would pencil in the Yankees for the A.L. East title yet. It will be interesting to see if C.C. Sabathia is taking the hill every five days next August.

    Posted by Alan Peters December 30, 08 03:59 PM
  1. There was never any intention of signing Texeria. The minute you hear the name Boras you should know "opt-out" and "no-trade" cannot be far behind, and the Boston Red Sox do not meet such demands.The "interest" in Hanley was nothing but spin control as a result of the Texeria fallout. It's called a diversion, people. Don't you see that they just did this to appease "The Nation's" desire to get big name players?? Just because they asked about a guy doesn't mean there was even a REMOTE CHANCE of the team getting him.But now "The Nation" can buzz about Hanley from now until April 1. Any coincidence this is leaked just AFTER the football season- when the Pats future/Brady's health/Pioli/Cassell/McDaniel should be all we're reading about?

    Instead, the Red Sox Marketing machine is cranked up for the New Year!!

    WHY AREN'T YOU PAYING ATTENTION?????

    Posted by John H. December 30, 08 04:00 PM
  1. tony,

    don't you get it? Teixeira wasn't coming to Boston for any price...EVER! as someone who knows his family, i can assure you he was never coming here.

    Posted by guy December 30, 08 04:01 PM
  1. If the fear is Lowell not being 100%, and the need for a hot bat.... why not Giambi for a year at 1B, moving Youks back to 3B? Save tradebait for a C?

    Personally, I don't like it so much due to his personality, but he'd fit a need.

    Posted by diamond1924 December 30, 08 04:02 PM
  1. Most of the comments on here are from delusional fans. Mazz speaks the truth on most of his points. Although I was not a fan of getting Teixeira, if what everyone says is true, they should have bid up the price to make the Yanks pay more. I've said that Lowrie is better suited as a utility man and that Ramirez would have been a great addition....but not at the expense of Ellsbury; in that point I disagree with Mazz. Everyone who is down on Ells needs to remember that this guy is essentially still a rookie, and keeping him will eventually pay great dividends.
    Face it, we are weaker offensively, and while pitching and defense is important to winning games, you still have to put runs on the board. Here are the areas the RS are weak in:
    Starters (4 of 5 starters RHP; need another quality LHP)
    RH bat off the bench (outfielder to spell Drew)
    SS (Lugo-bat: Lowrie-range)
    C (Very little offense and avg defense)
    BP (other than Masterson, no long relief; control problems)

    Some other issues: Will Papi return to form? What about Lowell? Can Drew play more than 100 games and hit for power and Avg? Youk and Ped carried the team last year, will they be as productive, lots of pressure on those guys? Can Lugo hit the ball out of the infield next year, will his Avg w/RISP be above .170. Can Beckett return to form? Can Dice-K go more than 5 innings per start?

    Offensively, the only players I'm not concerned with are Bay, Youkilis and Pedroia
    Those guys are solid. The rest are a big ?

    It's great to be optimistic and have confidence in your team but there are just too many questions yet to be answered and too many holes to be filled.

    Posted by Harv53 December 30, 08 04:08 PM
  1. There is NO WAY that I would trade Ellsbury in any deal.
    I have way too-much faith in this kid.
    I watched Fred Lynn play....and this kid reminds me of him.
    He will be a major-player in our team for the next 10 years..... Fred Lynn all over again.
    Ellsbury goes nowhere !!!!
    Watch how well he plays "playing every day" without sittin gout 98 games to let Coco play.

    Now, Buchholtz I'd move for Hanley Ramirez....and maybe someone else....but Ellsbury NO WAY !!

    Posted by RedSoxTrue1 December 30, 08 04:09 PM
  1. Scott, do you UNDERSTAND that Manny was voted off the island by HIS FREAKING TEAMMATES? Get over it will you. The Sox are NOT going to bring Manny back. It has nothing to do with money, incentives or anything else. They don't want him back, and neither do any of the fans with a BRAIN. HE QUIT ON THE TEAM.

    Posted by Susan December 30, 08 04:09 PM
  1. Re-Sign Manny, please.... !!!!

    Posted by RedSoxTrue1 December 30, 08 04:09 PM
  1. I do feel that the offer the Sox gave to Teixeira was a good offer (170 mil) and legit. However, if what everyone is saying is true, and the Yankee's would have topped the Sox offer no matter what, why didnt the Sox make a higher offer, essentially driving up the price for the Yankees? They could have cost the Yankee's another 4 million per year if they wanted to. Therefore I dont know if the theory is true that the Sox had no chance...I think they set a limit to what they wanted to spend for this guy, and the Yankee's trumped it....simple as that.

    Posted by steven December 30, 08 04:10 PM
  1. Also, didn't the Yanks give Texieria a full no trade clause? Sox would never do that. They set a value on a player and that's it. If some other team goes higher than their projection for said player, well, they can have that player. 2 championships, very close 2 other times, AND some fiscal responsibility? C'mon, whats wrong with that? Yankees won the offseason...Big Whoop. Non-story, Mazz.

    Posted by Anonymous December 30, 08 04:20 PM
  1. Mazz, you seem like you hate the fans and the Sox, you little bitter puke.

    "Out with the old, in with the new.". What? We have the same players as last year, how is it out with the old in with the new.
    Also, you say that our offense will definitely slip. How do you know that. Ortiz and Lowell had bad years last year. They could again. If they do, then we'll be the same.. And hilarious article about the four owners, it made me long for the bitter puke Mazz.

    Posted by Dave December 30, 08 04:24 PM
  1. Folks, take it easy on Tony. He's got to write about the Sox almost everyday. What the heck else is there to say...
    ... however, I disagree that this team is beginning to look like the 2006 team. That team had a left fielder who quit on them late in the season. I don't think that will happen in 2009.

    Posted by Vermonter17032 December 30, 08 04:26 PM
  1. Hanley,at almost any price,would be a great addition to the lineup.Youth,power,speed, and the price is right.It would be a better financial deal than Teixeira.I hope somehow this could manifest.The Sox have to be willing to surrender something.They can't hide it forever......Logically,the Sox are going down the right avenues to fix needful problems.Everbody jumped on the Teix deal.I think this deal makes more sense.Go get Hanley,Theo!

    Posted by Jack ....Melbourne,Fla December 30, 08 04:36 PM
  1. LIARS FIGURE AND FIGURES LIE! The Red Sox play 81 games in hitter friendly Fenway Park. Red Sox have scored more runs (5,352) than any team in baseball -- the Yankees are a whisker behind at 5,347 -- which only highlights the key to Boston’s success. How about highlighting the success of their pitching staff in 2003, 2004 and 2007?

    Posted by Greg in Lincolnshire December 30, 08 04:52 PM
  1. Why don't we seriously consider trading Buchholz and Ellsbury for Hanley, and then go sign Bobby Abreu for a few years at 10 million/year. Drew can play center, and Abreu is no slouch in the outfield. In the end, we still are paying about the same money (if not less) we would be paying Tex. And, our lineup would be rediculous. Picture this: 1)Pedroia 2)Ramirez 3)Ortiz 4)Youk 5)Abreu 6)Bay 7)Drew
    8)Lowell 9)Catcher

    Posted by Anonymous December 30, 08 04:55 PM
  1. Bunch of Chicken Littles

    Let's play the season before we start saying how bad a season it is.
    I hope everyone bounces back and the young players have careers years. Then MAZZZZZZ can shut his pie hole.

    Posted by strassberg December 30, 08 04:56 PM
  1. jimbo's right.
    and mazz, can you write something interesting for a change?

    Posted by billy December 30, 08 05:07 PM
  1. This Hanley Ramirez story is a nonstory. It's a way for the front office to leak this to show the fan base they are still pursuing top level players. However, in the end, the Sox aren't getting Hanley Ramirez. Next Theo can leak out he went after Albert Pujols. The Sox aren't getting him either. Theo seems to be in on alot of quality players. In the end, he gets very very few of them. If you look at the 2004 and 2007 offense, Theo drafted very few of those players.

    Posted by Sweetness December 30, 08 05:13 PM
  1. Theo needs to call the Twins. Lets go big and get Mauer, Morneau and Gomez. Give them Ellsbury, Buchholtz, Bowden and Lars Anderson. We get an all star catcher and first baseman both with power and a CF with as much potential as Ellsbury. Gomez would need to work on the strikeouts but he can run and possibly steal 50. The Twins get young blue chip prospects and they cut payroll. This would make the Sox lineup look like this:
    1. Gomez - CF
    2. Pedroia- 2B
    3. Ortiz- DH
    4. Youkills - 3B
    5. Morneau - 1B
    6. Bay - LF
    7. Mauer - C
    8. Drew - RF
    9. Lowrie - SS
    I'd take that lineup against anyone in the American or National leagues especially those free spending Yankees. Great combination of speed and power. Time to work the phones. Get Twins GM Bill Smith on the phone and lets make a deal.


    Posted by Dave December 30, 08 05:20 PM
  1. Teixeira wanted to play for the Yankees all along, so can we stop talking about how the Red Sox messed up by not signing him? No matter what they offered, he was going to New York, end of story.

    Posted by Jim December 30, 08 05:28 PM
  1. If the Marlin would trade Hanley Ramirez, then I would probably never watch another sports game EVER

    Posted by Zack Lovas December 30, 08 05:39 PM
  1. Think the "Puruit Of Hanliness" was a few weeks before Teixera...Which make this article a Moot Point

    Posted by dlev December 30, 08 05:41 PM
  1. If he is so uniteresting why do you read?

    Posted by Zane December 30, 08 05:47 PM
  1. Man, there are a lot of people with Yankee-itis. "Let's just trade whatever we need to from our prospects to get an all-star (with extremely shady defense by the way). That will always work out great" Umm, no. You want to get rid of Bucholz ( I'm not in total disagreement with this one. So far, his winter league numbers didn't really show him regaining his form) and Ellsbury (give the poor kid a break- this was his real rookie season and he split half of it with Coco. Of course, most of you knew Pedey wasn't the answer at 2nd because of his horrible numbers in the first half of '07. Sox should have traded him too huh?). Keep Anderson. He might be the future at first once Lowell has to hang it up at 3rd, or DH if Papi can't turn it around. My point is don't be too anxious to give away the farm (i.e 2-4 future all-stars) for a player (especially a one-dimensional one)

    Posted by Bluesbros December 30, 08 05:50 PM
  1. When are we gonna get over this Mark Teixeira thing and move on?
    You people are crying like a teenager crying over a girl who picked his worst enemy as a boyfriend instead of him, why cry over spoiled milk?
    please grow up!!!
    The Red Sox are in a very good shape for years to come, and we should let Theo do his thing, so far, our pitching is awsome from 1 to 12 and if we can sign Lowe and Pettite, Teixeira and the rest of hte Yankees hitters would look like peewee hitters, so why not invest that money on those two pitchers?
    if we can trade for Hanley Ramirez and Saltalamacchia and add a power hitter (Hamilton, Giambi, Albert Pujols...) then we would have the best pitching and best lineup in the american league.
    it's not over but you gotta let Theo do his job and forget about the the fool Teixeira.
    be patient Red Sox Nation and don't under-estimate Theo and the people in charge of the Red Sox, they have their own way of doing things unlike the Yankees.

    Posted by Zack December 30, 08 05:53 PM
  1. Let the yankees throw away all their money early. The Sox will be ready to trade for/sign to an extension top players who become available as soon as their teams have horrible starts? Ordonez? Fielder? Buchholz will see spot duty and bounce back to give them some young arms to trade - if Penny is a productive part of the rotation the Sox wil be able to make a big move well before the trade deadline. And by then they'll know exactly what they need. I think Theo and Tito have Varitek and Lowrie in their opening starting lineup right now, but if they can find an upgrade they'll go for it (Hanley). Theo rebuilt his reputation on mid-season trades (remember 2004) and is sitting pretty.

    Posted by Mike in Fort Myers December 30, 08 06:03 PM
  1. This is dumb! rely on pitching and defense?
    yeah youk, pedro, papi, lowell , drew and Bay can't hit?

    tex is overated you guys are oblivious. He would have made little if
    any difference. Get another quality starter

    Posted by Theo December 30, 08 06:19 PM
  1. Money wasn't the final straw for Mark Teixeira. He and his family were averse to Boston from the start. Pounding the sand and tilting at windmills can't change that fact. He wanted to go to NY. Good luck and godspeed, no? I like the team the way it stands now. I think they can win even without landing Teixeira.

    Posted by ThePrize December 30, 08 06:28 PM
  1. have you seen my baseball?

    Posted by skynch December 30, 08 06:37 PM
  1. It would be sooooo cool to have hanley ramirez back. Id give them a bucholtz and lowrie for him. It's worth it.

    Posted by Anonymous December 30, 08 06:46 PM
  1. If they are going to rely on the pitching and defense they have right now, they are done. Both the Yanks and Rays have better defense and pitching than the Sox.

    Posted by b December 30, 08 06:47 PM
  1. I hope they trade for Hanley (Buchholz, Ellsbury and another prospect, just not Lars Anderson). They can afford to trade clay, they have enough pitching with Penny and they have Bowden, Tazawa, Hagadone, etc. in the minors (and Masterson and Daniel Bard). Put Hanley in center, he stinks defensively at shortstop. Lowrie will be fine.
    Lineup: Hanley, Pedroia (or switch them) Ortiz, Youk, Drew, Lowell, Bay, Lowrie, (catcher). Pretty good already.
    BUT: Does anyone actually think the Marlins will trade a 25 yr. old superstar with 6 years left on his contract? I didn't think so..... Hiwever, DO IT, THEO!

    Posted by Trade for Hanley!!!! December 30, 08 06:54 PM
  1. Mazz, you are fast approaching becoming every bit the Tool that CHB is. That is pretty poor! How far up your butt is your head, anyway? Is there anything that you can write about that is not filled with second guessing and warped invective? I guess the Herald was staffed with more losers than I thought!

    Posted by Pete G. a.k.a. "Sofachi" December 30, 08 06:58 PM
  1. DONT TRADE ELLSBURY

    Posted by m December 30, 08 07:38 PM
  1. the sox could have signed tex when they went out for that meeting they were told the number of what it would have taken to sign him on the spot and henry stormed off like a senior with his coupons trying to get a bargain...and wrote an angry email!! GREAT tactic genius... cheapskate henry tried a bargaining ploy that blew up in his face just like when he tried to get arod! So for 1 million a year or so we lost tex to the damn Yankees just like how they got arod... Henry needs to stay away from the damn negotiating table and let theo do his job! He keeps trying to knock down the price of the most coveted players in the league and then loses them to a higher bidder. It was best said in a recent article that with tex we would have had a very balanced lineup and without him we have a bunch of no. 5 hitters! We need another proven bat I'd have loved hanley but you could have got tex for just money no prospects! Should have made it happen with tex and traded for peavey! And ive been saying for years that wake is the perfect reliever! Becket mid 90's to wakes knuckle back to paps mid 90's in theory batters would have NO timing! Why? Is sheets still available? Isn't he a better risk than penny? I wish I could run the damn team for one year! LOL dont even have to pay me! =)

    Posted by kris... f the Yankees December 30, 08 07:40 PM
  1. getting varitek back would be a massive mistake unless it was MAYBE a 1 year 4 million dollar deal. he is old and terrible now, you people need to be less nostalgic for JASON "MR.220" VARITEK! yeah he did alot for our team but that doesnt mean we should put up with his PATHETIC offense. blah blah he has a good eye for the ball, shut up. just shut up.

    trade clay suckholtz (this season was just as much an abomination for him as it was for mr.220) for saltamancia ASAP.

    Posted by -DO NOT SIGN VARITEK- December 30, 08 07:58 PM
  1. Blind followers of the church of Theo, Listen UP. This team is going to lose a LOT this year, that is the new philosophy, to become Twins east. Sucker your loyal fans until they revolt then make an attempt to win after making billions for Henry co.

    Wise up, this team is designed to lose this year and for the next couple to maximize profits. Sounds like Jeremy Jacobs is a silent partner with the Dead Sox.

    Posted by Fenian1697 December 30, 08 08:04 PM
  1. Ya Mazz is over the top. Its easy to get caught up in trying to match step with the Yankees. If the injured are OK (Lowell and Papi) the team is at least better than the rest of the AL, the Yankees excepted. On paper, the Yankees may be the team to beat in the AL, so what else is new. If necessary, the Sox are one big bat/trade away from having the best roster in the game.... what's wrong with that?

    Posted by joe December 30, 08 08:08 PM
  1. kris...

    I have a bridge for sale. Interested???

    Posted by jj December 30, 08 08:26 PM
  1. the bosox should never talk to Scott
    boras about any player again.... I don't care if it was Yaz.
    Someone has to put a stop to this kind of nonsense

    Posted by Anonymous December 30, 08 08:33 PM
  1. Mazz is dead on
    The ownership screwed up - BIG TIME! Tex would have given the team a potent offense and flex with Lowell. I can not think of another offensive force to help aid this lineup
    They( current ownership) have the luxury of the typical Boston fan worrying about how much money the team spends on players. Guess what it is not our money . we are just the suckers who buy the tv package, the shirts , hats, etc
    These owners are the people who would sell the urinal cakes from the rest room if they could get paid. Pink hats - red sox nation membership c'mon. Katie Couric and John Kerry - do you think they have the same passion as the typical Red Sox fan- Kerry does not even know the dif between Manny and Big Papi "Manny Ortez" give me a break. This is an investment for ownership . Their field of dreams. They know a good thing and realize(dont build it) and They (We) will come. Even with an inferior product. Why did n't Joe O'Donnell get the team , again??

    What would it take to pry Lance Berkman away from Houston?

    Posted by Furious in Florida December 30, 08 08:34 PM
  1. Signing Mauer is not the best move, even though Red Sox needs a catcher but Mauer is a contact hitter and we allready have the best contact hitter in the american league (Pedroia). Han-Ram would be the perfect fit for boston, and remember building a good farm system is always good for trading prospects for all-stars players.

    Posted by Nirro December 30, 08 08:48 PM
  1. This club scored the third most runs and had the second-best run diff. in all of MLB last year. What has so drastically changed about this lineup that would expect this offense to suddenly fall off the map? Someone will have to help me here.

    Posted by Chris December 30, 08 08:49 PM
  1. Mazz, when YOU write an article, YOU digress. Don't add the readers to YOUR thoughts. I know the title of this "blog" is in the form of a question, and maybe you get paid for your "Enquirer" level writing, but I'd hardly say the Sox "failed" attempt at Teixeira and a quick blip with Hanley Ramirez means they're done or satisfied. The fact that they were even trying with Hanley, to me, is a sign of just the opposite of what your title implies. The fact that you put it in the form of a question is weak. say what you mean to say, but I digress...

    Posted by baseballdiamond December 30, 08 09:05 PM
  1. What is their to imagine about the Manning boys in the SB.? It's what Goodell wants every year. The faces of the NFL, who couldn't win the big one, get a little help from the refs, & the NFL is self- justified. Maybe womens professional tennis should have done that with Anna Kournakova, instead of letting her fail & admitting they made a mistake.

    Posted by JT December 30, 08 09:36 PM
  1. No need to worry.....Youk his 20+ homers. Lowell hits 20+ homers. Ortiz hits 40-50 Homers. Drew hits 20+homers. bay hits 20-30 homers.......all this with out Tex. The pitching staff is great.....3 legit number 1 starters. The D is great.......No worries.


    Posted by wade December 30, 08 09:38 PM
  1. Tony M is the person who wanted to sign Tex more than anyone else. The Yanks would have trumped any offer we made, so we wisely bowed out. The Yanks had a glaring hole at 1b and 40+ million burning a hole in their pockets. What were they going to do, spend it on a SS, 3B, 2B, C or OF/DH....dont think so. They were going after pitchers and a 1b all offseason.
    The sox can make the most difference at ss and c, and with pitching, and that is where their focus has been. I'd like to see us go after Lowe for up to 12mm for 3 years. We got a good RP for Coco and Kept masterson in the pen, so the pen is strong. Maybe sign another good RP there (like the Mets with Putz/Krod). And while C is a hard place to make up ground, SS is a place where we can get a ton of upgrade. JJ Hardy was who I thought we would get, and Hanley Ram is a great idea. he's under control the same length as a rookie for cripes sakes. Any other offensive ss would be a great move for the sox, and make Lowrie the utility guy.
    Overall a mixed piece for mazz....im just tired of the tex moaning, so let's move on big guy.
    A

    Posted by keith quinn December 30, 08 09:54 PM
  1. Hard not to like those Rays, our Sox will be fine and the hell with the Yankees. Does anyone know why they just don't throw a few prospects to the Padres for Jake Peavy? Beckett, Lester, Dice, Peavy and Penny. Yikes. Heck, Khalil Green is gone, include Lugo to the Padres. Give Lowrie a chance. Lowell will be healthy and being from Portland, Lars Anderson will surprise many. Teixeria is only a slight upgrade to Abreu, so chill out. Pitching wins, close your eyes, tap your feet together, pitching wins.

    Posted by Jimmynads December 30, 08 10:08 PM
  1. Mazzaroti really needs to stop crying about Teixeira. No, really.

    Posted by Ed December 30, 08 10:13 PM
  1. Could Bay play centerfield? Why not go out, sign Abreu then trade Ellsbury & Bucholz. The you'd be adding two p-retty good bats to the line-up. Just a thought.

    Posted by Craig December 30, 08 10:18 PM
  1. Why so many unsupported suppositions? For instance, going after Hanley Ramirez does not mean they dislike Lowrie's abilities (Ramirez is a star player for christ sakes), nor does there willingness to to trade Bucholtz and Ellsbury either (one is very much unproven, the other still has plenty of room to grow). Wouldn't you take H.R. for these two guys? Likewise, I am finding all of this stuff about the offense tiresome -- the last couple of years Manny was in Boston it seemed like many people in media and otherwise saw him on the downside, but now his offense is gone it is like he is indispensable. Does anyone remember his numbers in 2007? (.296 batting average, 20 home runs, and 88 runs). Who won the WS that year? Even if the Sox do not upgrade the offense it is still very good. On what basis could it possibly be considered suspect? Most teams' managers would love to have the offensive resources Tito has? All teams need to win with pitching and defense -- balance, balance, balance.

    Posted by Marc December 30, 08 10:23 PM
  1. Like I said before, Theo thank you for 3rd place in the AL East for the 2009 season!!!!!! Maybe next year??? Sound familiar???

    Posted by Wassabi December 30, 08 10:33 PM
  1. So many of you so called "fans" have your heads rammed in your bums. The Sox will be for sale within 2 years, and between now and then, watch the team shead payroll to make it an attractive for a potential buyer.

    We have been duped by Boy Jewbag and his bosses. Dan Duquette won those world series, Theo hasn't made a good move since 2003 offseason. Really.. Can anyone think of one good move he's made since then??? and Beckett doesn't count since that sniveling little girl took his ball and went home. That was Jed Hoyer. I have never seen someone take so much credit for another man's work. IF this was college, Theo would be expelled for plagurism.

    Will I for one, am all set with this group of bums and question marks. And by the way, Lester is not an ace. Aces dont' get crushed in game 7 of the ALCS.

    Posted by Theo is a bum December 30, 08 10:58 PM
  1. Boston is cooked without him. WITH him, they have a chance, a very good one at that. I don't have to say who "him" is. Most know who. He needs to come home.

    Posted by Sherri December 30, 08 11:16 PM
  1. >> I hope I'm wrong, but it's a depressing trend that seems to be forming.

    HA!! Ill risk depression to win a World Series title every 3 years!

    Posted by Johnson December 30, 08 11:34 PM
  1. Tex as a hitter, is a step below A-Rod, Manny, or even Giambi's caliber at their big contracts. I am not so sure losing him to the Yankee for 184MM is a mistake.

    Posted by gzsox December 31, 08 12:41 AM
  1. The Padres are reloading for the future (and reducing payroll) and have been great trade partners with the Sox. Maybe they will be willing to trade Adrian Gonzales and either Kahlil Greene or Jake Peavy for a package of younger, less expensive Sox prospects.

    Posted by Rob December 31, 08 12:58 AM
  1. This is more Mazz Drivel.

    Posted by Chaiah December 31, 08 01:21 AM
  1. trade hanley for bucholz elsburry and lugo/lowrie and after that sign adam dunn or abreu to replace elsburry even though i love elsburry and i think hes going to be amazing hanley is so much better

    Posted by eli December 31, 08 01:41 AM
  1. Ok, first things first, Jed Lowrie WILL be a good player for the Red Sox for years to come.
    He played well with an injured hand and he was a rookie! I can't wait to see him after a year of working on his weak areas, working out and coming back strong.
    Next if the Sox move Ellsbury for Hanley then Hanley will have to play CF which is where the Sox flirted with having him play when he was in the minors plus he had more than his fair share of errors (22 in 150 games played).
    If the Sox need to trade for a catcher I suggest calling the Dodgers about Russell Martin, he's a good defensive catcher, hits well, he just needs to work on his game calling.
    Offer Clay, Mastersonand the ever popular player to be named later in exchange for Martin.
    The Dodgers have 2 kids in the minors they are high on and I would rather have him than them.
    Let's also not forget that Martin is a dirtdog, he's tough,hardnosed heck he blocked the plate in the All Star game, tell me Sox fans wouldn't love that?
    Sign Tek for 2 years or a year plus cluib option for the second, have him and Martin split the catching while Tek tutors him on game calling and his way of preparing and we'd be set!
    Mark my words, Tek is going to have a much better offensive season this year, he was going throuhg a messy divorce last yuear and I don't care if he is a pro ball player, he's still human and that kind of thing is going to affect ANYONE and those of you who say that you'd be abgle to block it out are just plain lying.
    I also think that if we had another catcher he could split time with like Martin I think he'd stay healthier and be able to hit that much better too.
    I'm not saying he's going to become a silver slugger but he will hit for more than his.220 avg from last year.
    No bringing Manny back, No Lowe, if we need another bat why not Adam Dunn but then again he'd just be a bench player but he'd give you some pop.
    I say let's not overreact and go and make a knee jerk trade just because we lost out on Teixeira, he's not the first noirr the last free agent the Sox will have missed out on.

    Posted by Jason F December 31, 08 01:59 AM
  1. For all of you geniuses who think it was so clear the Yankees were going to keep upping the ante for Teixeira, why wouldn't the Sox or other teams then engage in a bidding war so that the Yanks would continue to spend more money? If it was so clear the yankees were going to get Teixeira all along, why wouldn't other teams want to make him as expensive as possible?

    Posted by Chuck VN December 31, 08 02:53 AM
  1. Mazz, you keep writing columns where you're saying Theo Epstein has not gotten the job done with this roster yet you won't come right out and say Theo Epstein has not gotten the job done with this roster.
    When, IF EVER, will the Boston media's love affair and velvet glove treatment with Theo end?
    Manny and Varitek were inherited by this GM. He seems to be having one hell of a hard time replacing them.

    PS - Is quite ironic for Theo to be after Hanley Ramirez now since Theo never wanted the Beckett/Lowell for Hanley trade begin with. Had Theo not done his gorilla suit schtick in '05 that trade never would have happened and consequently the 2007 WS championship would never have been won by the Red Sox. Amazing how things work out isn't it? I've come to the conclusion that Theo is far more lucky than good.

    Posted by Mike66 December 31, 08 05:13 AM
  1. Captain obvious why did I even bother reading this blah blah blah...Most of the bloggers here should be wrtiting this column. They seem to have more insight, focus and strategy. Yankees would have outbid the Sox period for Tex. No one knows what is going to happen during the season, by the trade deadline etc. Yankees may win the East, Sox get wild card. Tampa didn't do much to upgrade either keep in mind.

    Posted by CTSoxFan December 31, 08 06:49 AM
  1. The Red Sox, as currently constituted, are a third- or fourth-place team in the AL East for 2009. Good pitching, decent defense, but weak offensively.

    Posted by John Shannon December 31, 08 07:26 AM
  1. Theo, once again thanks for 3rd place in the AL East, Lets wait till Next Year.....WOW that sounds familiar......

    Posted by Wassabi-71 December 31, 08 08:05 AM
  1. It's hard to believe that they replaced Gordon Edes with this clown.

    Posted by Jim Gosger December 31, 08 08:15 AM
  1. Yes, dump on the Sox for 2006, you know, the season where pretty much every star player went on the DL for an extended period of time (most of which went down in August or after).

    Posted by nyys December 31, 08 08:46 AM
  1. I think that Tony is wrong about a number of things. 1 lowry was hitting really well before he hurt his wrist. 2nd jacoby was in his rookie season there will be up and downs. 3rd lowell injury was a bit of a rare he will still hit around .300 with 20hr and Ortiz may be getting older but he will be back in full health next year.

    Mark my words Jed lowry will be rookie of the year, and josh becktte will be cy young winner.

    Posted by Andrew Gray December 31, 08 08:48 AM
  1. The ownership and management just pay lip service to the Sox fans.
    Remember the A-Rod mess the Sox wouldn't step up, the Yankees did.
    Remember the Damon mess the Sox wouldn't step up, the Yankees did.
    Remember the Santana mess the Sox wouldn't step up, the Mets did.
    Now we have the Texeria mess the Sox wouldn't step up, the Yankees did.
    The score is now New York 4---Boston 0
    But don't worry Sox fans we still have Buckholtz

    Posted by apple12 December 31, 08 09:13 AM
  1. Tony - why do you insist on beating the front office up over Texeira? I think almost everyone EXCEPT YOU seems to understand that it didn't matter what the Red Sox bid, the Yankees would've outbid them. No matter what the Sox offered, Boras knew he could go back to NY and get a few million more. Please, PLEASE stop accusing the front office of screwing up. They didn't.

    Posted by PennSoxFan December 31, 08 09:17 AM
  1. Reading the posts to the Mazz article is troubling. All I here is 'hope" and "pray" that Lowrie& Ellsbury will improve, that Ortiz & Lowell will return to form and that Beckett is a sure thing to rebound. Mazz is absolutely right to question the offense (although crazy over the Teixiera loss). No team of our caliber can continue to have three dead spots in their lineup. Hanley Ramirez would be a great addition but Joe Mauer would be better. Let's see what the FO does before being so critical.

    Posted by Vincent La Iacona December 31, 08 09:18 AM
  1. Hey Mazz asusually I wanted to keep my breakfast in so I did not read this s.But I did read some of the comments from the readers.As usual you seem ti irk the fans.I hear there is an opening in the Figi Enterprise,they woul welcome you.Try it please by the way I read the Herald more since you left.

    Posted by Art Alves December 31, 08 09:18 AM
  1. Tony,
    Tex was not coming to Boston, please get over it!
    The Ramirez exploration tells me that the Sox are working on something, and working on something BIG!
    In Theo we trust......................................

    Posted by Tufeek1 December 31, 08 09:19 AM
  1. Everyone makes it sound like there are a bunch of chumps playing for the Sox. Jason Bay hit 30homers lastyear and JD can do the same. Yes, I would have loves to have Tex; but that didn't happen and we go on. I think a lineup of:
    Ellsbury-Pedroia-Youk-Ortiz-Bay-Drew-Lowell-Lowery-?catcher? doesn't sound too bad. With the pitching...we can compete. Theo won't let us down.

    Posted by Mike Vaughn December 31, 08 09:45 AM
  1. "Where have you gone Gordon Edes, red sox nation turns its lonely eyes to you. What's that you say Boston Globe, well informed Gordie has left and gone away."
    How did this happen. Tony, you just don't "get it". The Yankees were going to get Texeira no matter what Boston offered. Yes, the red sox could use some more offense. So couldn't everyone else. Right now, the sox pitching, with Penny added looks the best in baseball to me from top to bottom.
    Please come back Gordie.

    Posted by Bill White December 31, 08 09:53 AM
  1. I've been a diehard Red Sox fan ever since Williams' return from Korea (pretty lonely when you lived in West Virginia). Given Boston's record over the last decade or so versus the Don Buddin/Pumpsie Green/Arnold Earley years, can't you people (Bosox fans from New England) put up with one non-playoff/rebuilding year? Sheesh!

    Posted by Marty Jones December 31, 08 10:34 AM
  1. I still don't understand the drop off in offense. Lugo was our shortstop for most of the year last year and did nothing except make errors. Lowrie hit the cover off the ball until he hurt his hand. Ortiz gave us just about nothing. We hope we chaulk it up to his wrist injury. Last years catcher couldn't hit the ball out of the infield. Bard posted an over .300 batting average and a .285 batting average before last year where he was also hurt. Add in Drew was hurt, lowell was hurt and Ellsbury took a step back which is normal for a second year player. The bottom line is that the offense wasnt explosive last year either. Not sure why the chicken little form Mazz. We lost last year because the bullpen leading up to Papelbon was terrible. should be improved this year

    Posted by Marc December 31, 08 10:34 AM
  1. There is no "hoping" & "praying" that Lowrie & Ellsbury will get better because they will.
    Both these guys have limitless potential and have shown it, let's not forget they're still very young and they willgo through growing pains.
    I don't think of the Sox as a 4th place team, not in the least, the pitching looks great, defense looks great and I think with an offseason to get well, rest and work out the guys are going to come back strong and ready for another world series run in '09.
    Will the Sox hit as many HR's without Manny in the lineup? No, not at all but can they score just as many runs through strong hitting, high OPS and being patient at the plate as the organization preaches ABSOLUTELY!
    I'm excited to have Jason Bay for a full season, excited to see what Jed Lowrie will do over the course of a full season and can't wait to see the dazzling pitching outings that Jon Lester shows us this year.
    The team will add some pieces here and there leading up to spring training and it's going to be an awesome season!
    Let's go Sox fans, no crying over Teixeira, no "woe is us" hand wringing let's get out there and get behind the guys!
    GO SOX!!!!!

    Posted by Jason F December 31, 08 10:46 AM
  1. Who else is out there for the Sox to add in the lineup? Is there any possibility or would it make any sense to try to trade for Russell Martin? Miguel Tejada? Adrian Beltre? Marcus Thames?

    Posted by Pat December 31, 08 11:01 AM
  1. okay first "jj" how much for the bridge? Cause you're CLEARLY a journalist with you're "wanna buy a bridge?" corney comment... All I want to add is that bucholtz is our current casey fossum we lost out on an in his prime bartolo colon cause we wouldnt give up fossum and now were holding onto bucholtz like he's the second coming of cy young. Move him and his "potential" for proven skills (peavy) or sign sheets and move him for a big bat and Is anyone else concerned that we still dont have a true lead off hitter?? Ellsbury and who ever it might take to convince cleveland to move sizemore?? Theyre in sell mode right? Just a pipe dream I guess. LOL I also hope they are kicking the tires on martin that would be great!

    Posted by Kris...F the yankees! December 31, 08 11:13 AM
  1. "leading to a scenario where the club was willing to offer prospects like Clay Buchholz and Jacoby Ellsbury"

    Are you for real? I thought that the reason that the deal didn't happen was because Florida asked for these two, and the Sox said no.

    Haven't we learned anything, folks? You just saw a team full of young, untested players (Tampa) go to the WS. Young players typically struggle in year 1 (Ellsbury). Not everyone plays like Petey and struggles for 30 days and then plays like a HOF.

    Tex and Hanley are SPECIAL players. You go out of your way to acquire that kind of talent, but you don't give up everything. Did we HAVE to have Tex? No. We have two veteran gold glove players who can hit 25 HRs at 1B and 3B. But if we could have had Tex at our price would we have done it? Absolutely.

    Jed Lowrie is going to be a good player. He was the minor league offensive player of the year two years ago. He will hit - and well. And I was pleasantly surprised by his defense this year. He isn't a flashy defender, but he is a solid player. He'll be fine while we watch the market and make a move with our deep minor league system. And he makes the minimum, giving us budget flexibility. Just watch how that plays out. San Diego would like to dump Peavy... there will be others as the economy stays bad for another year.

    And I would love to see them trade for Salty, without giving up the entire farm. It's dissapointing to see a sportswriter say that they don't want too much youth on the team - and cite 3 positions. Look at the successful teams of the last 8 years - teams with youth win. We have enough veteran talent on the team to balance it out. Especially since the pitchers are vets - you can afford to bring along a young catcher - especially one that can hit. Varitek was a young catcher once, don't forget.

    Posted by EB December 31, 08 11:17 AM
  1. It's hard to believe that they replaced Gordon Edes with this clown.

    Posted by Jim Gosger December 31, 08 08:15 AM

    It's also hard to believe that there are so many clowns on this forum who are screaming like a bunch of little girls because the Sox didn't get Teixeira, or why didn't we try to get HanRam back, blah blah blah.....you all make me as nauseous as Mazz himself. What, are all of you pink hatters new to Boston? Did you just start following the Red Sox in 2003? This team is already a solid contender, with the best manager in MLB and arguably one of the best fron offices. But all you crybabies and spoiled brats want to do is bash Theo, bash the players, etc. Tell me who else has won 2 World Series in the past 5 years? How long has it been since the Yankees and their $500M payroll won or appeared in a World Series? How many teams are lining up to sign MannyRam, while you all whine about his leaving Boston? What has Judas Damon done since he left the Sox? But all most of the idiots on this forum can do is second guess and complain because the Sox don't win the AL every year or appear in the WS every year. So contending and appearing in the playoffs 4 times in the past 5 years, with 2 WS Championships means nothing? You all should have been here in 1983!

    Yeah, all of you can join Mazz and the CHB on the loser bandwagon. Go root for the Mets: they already have a bunch of pathetic, whining brats for fans.

    Posted by Pete G. a.k.a. "Sofachi" December 31, 08 11:21 AM
  1. Lets sign Giambi - he still has power and a good eye. He will provide a back up to both Ortiz and Lowell (w/Youk swinging over). He will also provide a top bat off the bench at a time when 1/3 of the lineup should be pinch hit for in late innings.

    Posted by rch84 December 31, 08 11:51 AM
  1. OK, so Yanks make big signings. Remember, they were FORCED TO, given last season, and lest no one go to new Yankee Stadium new year (take it from a transplanted New Englander who lives upstate NY...you don't know how much cryin' I heard last summer).

    Sox are gonna' remain competitive under this ownership. I don't expect 'em to win the Series every year. Don't want 'em to...it'd be boring. Don't forget that the Curse of the Yanks is their success of the past. Creates expectations that just cannot be met. You really don't want that in Boston.

    Posted by PatchyFog December 31, 08 12:03 PM
  1. This guy Mazzoratti is a "WIND BAG" ... I don't take anything he reports as fact - everything he reports is suspect at best - he's nothing more than a wash Woman gossip hound, no facts, no clue, no how...

    Posted by Cobra ops December 31, 08 12:12 PM
  1. Hi Mazz,
    I just can't accept your conclusion: "...it's becoming clear that the Red Sox will no longer be a team built around a relentless offense, but one that will depend on pitching and defense to win in 2009. "
    It's not that I believe that's unreasonable, but that I simply can't accept that the Sox would abandon their offensive philosophy, even for a year. For 5 years, the Sox have built a team of high-OBP batters, who need power hitters to take advantage of all those base runners and score the runs and wear out of the other teams pitching staff. More power is essential. Otherwise that high team OBP is all wasted.

    Posted by Rick December 31, 08 12:40 PM
  1. Keith1313sox & Bill White criticize Mazz for "just not getting it" and not realizing that the Yankees were always going to get Tex. Wait a minute! That's exactly what Mazz has been saying for a month or more. Although he always put Tex at the top of his wish list, he likewise always said he thought the Yankees would eventually prevail. I think he said that at least once a week.

    Posted by Anonymous December 31, 08 01:19 PM
  1. Any chance the Sox would be interested in Chris Coste from the Phillies if Tek does not come around? He would provide some experienced leadership for a couple of years until the next generation catcher is ready. He can also swing the bat pretty well at times

    Posted by ELF December 31, 08 01:33 PM
  1. I can't wait to see the yankees start the saison like the Tigers did last year, 0-7 and not reach the .500 mark til the 80th game of the saison..
    Imagine Texeira hitting (1.80), A-Rod (2.20), Jeter (2.50), Matsui (1.75), Damon (1.25), Cano (2.20)...
    And the pitching, C.C (6.5 ERA), Brunett (8.5 ERA), Mussina (9.5 ERA)...
    i don't know if you believe in KARMA? i do.
    Steinbrenner would fire his own kids before he starts with the players and the management while having a heart attack in the process...then we put this Teixeira chapter to rest.
    The Empire of the Devil shall never rule earth.

    Posted by Zack December 31, 08 01:46 PM
  1. Sign Abreu if he's willing to be realistic about money...they need some power plus he's a 4th OF.

    Posted by bill December 31, 08 01:51 PM
  1. Why are there so many of you complaining about missing out on TEIXEIRA? None of us know what happened in those meetings with BORAS/TEIXEIRA. As for all of these Yankee signings, sure it looks bad for us now, but they have these players locked up for 6-7-8 years with no-trade clauses. They will be good now, but a few years down the road they will have the same problem they had last season.

    I have faith in Theo and Company, we do need a big bat but so do a lot of other teams, but they don't have the pitching and the pitching depth that we have. Who knows what this season will hold, players get hurt and some just can't make it in big market areas. It will be a fun season, and interesting to see how it plays out.

    Posted by Dave P. December 31, 08 01:56 PM
  1. I find it perplexing that people don't consider potential moves that might be made during the season. In addition, the Pawtucket Red Sox have some candidates, as well. (Many great Red Sox came through Pawtucket.)

    Posted by DjM December 31, 08 01:59 PM
  1. If I were the Yankees, I would be listening to all these Hanley talks, digest it, and make the trade themselves (remember the A-Rod debacle). Now THAT would sting....Hanley plays CF for NY

    Posted by Danimal December 31, 08 02:21 PM
  1. The ownership and management just pay lip service to the Sox fans.
    Remember the A-Rod mess the Sox wouldn't step up, the Yankees did.
    Remember the Damon mess the Sox wouldn't step up, the Yankees did.
    Remember the Santana mess the Sox wouldn't step up, the Mets did.
    Now we have the Texeria mess the Sox wouldn't step up, the Yankees did.
    The score is now New York 4---Boston 0
    But don't worry Sox fans we still have Buckholtz

    Posted by apple12 December 31, 08 09:13 AMT Please tell me how many World Series either NY team has won since each of those? The score is Boston 2, Yanks 0, Mets 0. Who stepped up???

    And

    Posted by MHA December 31, 08 03:01 PM
  1. You guys are high if you think Lowrie will be anything more than steady...At SECOND BASE. He is not an everyday, major league short stop. Not that Lugo is...

    Imagine crap bum Epstein just either kept Freddy Sanchez or resigned Cabrera? The SS position would have been just fine, instead of the musical chairs we have now.
    Any of the TRUE fans out there, like me, do you think we are going to see all of the pink, green and brand new hats this year when they finish in 4th? I am so happy that the Sox ownership sold out the diehards for a bunch of chicks looking for penis.

    Posted by Over the Red Sox. Not wasting my life December 31, 08 03:22 PM
  1. I have to agree with Quaid 007, there does seem to be that kind of pattern, or trend emerging...although you cant argue with winning it all every 3 years...especially after an 86 year drought.

    Posted by TC December 31, 08 03:23 PM
  1. 1. Ellsbury
    2. Pedroia
    3. Ortiz
    4. Youkilis
    5. Drew
    6. Lowell
    7. Bay
    8. Lowrie
    9. Vatritek/Bard

    wheres that lineup going to rank in the AL in runs scored? 2nd, 3rd?
    any rational, informed observer realizes the sox will still have a top-notch offense in 2009, which coupled with probably the best pitching staff in baseball will result in another year of serious contention for a world series championship...that much is clear

    the real question of the moment is, was Tony Masserotti always this bad? having not read the Boston Herald all these years, I really dont know the answer...he's just bad, really bad, at his job covering the Boston Red Sox...

    I mean, serious people now know that Sean McAdam is now the premier baseball writer in the city and the herald is now the go-to for serious baseball news

    Posted by Dante December 31, 08 04:25 PM
  1. Hanley to replace Lowrie at SS ?" Lowrie is a much better defensive SS than Hanley. If acquired he more than likely would have been moved to the OF

    Posted by mike December 31, 08 06:03 PM
  1. If the Sox have moved into a team build on pitching and defense they need to land another big starting pitcher. Remember the relied on a solid offense last year with the staff that they had. They have a decent staff but without another top of the line rotation guy their offensive line up will struggle to get them the wins they will need to compete with the Yankees and Rays. I'm not saying they can't do it, but if they are moving in a new direction of pitching and defense, they better add some more pitching!

    Posted by Erick December 31, 08 06:04 PM
  1. There's two points you keep harping on Mazz, of which I vehemently disagree. First, that Red Sox management desperately wanted and absolutely needed Texeira and "lost out" because they wouldn't pony up a few more million a year. And, secondly, that the Boston Red Sox offense will slip as much as you seem to think and be "closer to average", than very good. If the Red Sox needed Texeira as desperately as you say, where is the proof? Why, because they made him an enormous and very fair, offer. Fine, yes, they wanted him...but not desperately, meaning, they weren't prepared to give him whatever he and Boras demand. They determined a value for his services and drew the line. As we all know, the Yankees don't draw lines and maybe, just maybe, the Yankees needed him more than the Sox feel they do. Maybe they don't feel that now they're in big trouble

    Posted by Anonymous December 31, 08 06:07 PM
  1. I dont like the idea of parting with Buchholz and Ellsbury just yet. Yes, i remember how god awful Buchholz was last year and how mediocre Ellsbury was, but what about the year before. Jacoby batted .353 in 33 games and then .360 in the postseason. And last year, in his first full season, he batted .280 and stole 50 bases. As for Buchholz, he may have the best stuff of any young pitcher in the league. Even though he had difficulties last year, his fastball was as high as 97 mph, up from the low 90s of 2007. I think that both of these guys will continue to develop and have enormous potential to be superstars in the near future.

    Posted by SoxfanNH December 31, 08 06:17 PM
  1. Hey MHA
    I'm only talking about players here.
    If I was talking about championships you would be CORRECT.
    You need a chill pill.

    Posted by apple12 December 31, 08 06:30 PM
  1. You guys complaining about the quality of sports writing here, let me tell you it's a big step up from the New York rags. I wish the Mets had this quality of coverage, at least in the mainstream media.

    As for Teixeira, I'm not sure the Yankees would have simply outbid any Sox offer. Neither team knew what the other was doing. Boras being Boras, it seems like each team was operating under the assumption that Boras was bringing in phantom offers and mystery teams, and therefore drew a line in the sand at a certain number.

    I conclude this because of certain reports: One that the Yankees balked at a Boras play to increase their offer (the one he eventually signed ). Boras responded by saying Teixeira will likely sign with Boston. The other report was Boras coming back to the Red Sox and saying Tex would accept their 170 mil offer if they add 2 option years, which could have made the total package 10/$220 mil. Supposedly, the Sox balked and Boras called back the Yankees to accept their offer.

    Also an important factor in this is Manny Ramirez. The Yankees most likely had him as plan B. So it makes sense that, in this case, the Yankees had a certain number in mind and would not go higher.

    Posted by nic January 1, 09 12:50 AM
  1. Can't we just wait for the A's to drop out and get holliday, like we should have from the rockies. He is the perfect 3 or 4 man for this line up. If not lets take a flyer on Milton Bradley

    Posted by brady January 1, 09 02:56 AM
  1. Hey, Mazz, why are we still so Yankee obsessed? Shouldn't we be worried about the Rays? Or the Phillies? I like this team. Besides, its not about the money, it's about the mix. (chemistry)

    Posted by Dean Sousa January 1, 09 07:24 AM
  1. So what about a bigger trade with Texas? Someone above mentioned Josh Hamilton - seems unlikely Texas would want to trade him, but who knows. Michael Young? Texas would love to deal him, with Elvis Andrus in the wings. How about Buchholz and Lugo for Saltalamacchia and Michael Young? We pay for Lugo's contract. That's a lot of dollars Texas is saving - Young has a big deal starting now for the next 4-5 years.

    Posted by lawhamel January 1, 09 10:05 AM
  1. If the reason behind losing Texeira to the Yankmes is the Red Sox stopped at 170 mil because no matter what the Red Sox offered it never would be enough and the Yankmes would keep bidding until they got him anyways, then why stop at 170 mil? Seems like a perfect opportunity to tweak them all, Boras and Texeira included, by overbidding, then backing out. From what the press says, Texeira wasn't being honest because he really didn't want to play in Boston anyways and he and Boras were just leading Henry and Theo on. Fine. Gradually bid it up until even the Yankmes don't want to top it, then back out. Either the Yankmes get him at the new, even more exorbitant amount they bid previously or Texeira gets nothing from either party. Nothing wrong with changing your mind.

    Posted by Stone January 1, 09 11:33 AM
  1. 06 team failed due to injuries and is not a valid parallel to 09 as presently constituted.
    The 4th OF on 09 team is a critical spot. Kotsay type is needed.

    Posted by robertowalker January 1, 09 02:34 PM
  1. I don't think Lowrie can handle Shortstop, the WHOLE season.

    Posted by Dave January 1, 09 03:35 PM
  1. This is a very disappointing offseason and not just because of Tex. The Sox freed up $40-$50 mil. over the offseason, possibly more depending on Varitek, and saved $ going forward by locking up Pedroia at a good salary. At least 1/3 of their roster is comprised of low $ quality players under their control long-term - Lowrie, Masterson, Ellsbury, Bucholz, Delcarmen, Lester, Pauley, etc. So the game-plan for this offseason was very simple to keep them on par with the Yankees/Tampa - add 1 serious bat, 1 alternate OF, 1 serious SP, 1 good RP and 1 emerging catcher, all with the $ they saved from Ramirez, Varitek and Curt. Zero for 5.

    Posted by Tim January 1, 09 05:23 PM
  1. I like the Hamilton and Salty comment for Jacoby and Buccholz....

    Posted by JB January 1, 09 05:49 PM
  1. I love the Red Sox bury your head in sand approach this year. As a Yankee fan I couldn't be happier with the team the Sox will put on the field. You guys have 3rd place behind the Rays and Yankees sown up. Keep up the good work!

    Posted by Louis January 1, 09 08:02 PM
  1. Why not to get Barry Bonds? No risk there.

    Posted by Melody Shao January 1, 09 09:49 PM
  1. Trade Buchholz for Saltalamacchia or Teagarden. Trade Bowden Ellsbury Lowrie for Hanley. U still keep Lars Anderson...who in my mind can possibly pan out like Morneau. You keep Daniel Bard, and Hagadone....and stil have Almanzar to progress while Lowell finishes his career. And you cant be too afraid of giving up our pitching prospects..... Beckett 28, Matsuzaka 27, Lester 24, Penny 29, Wakefield 449, and a great combination of young and veteran pitchers in the bullpen.... and as to fill in for Jacoby you sign Burrell for this year who is a perfect fit in Boston.... and you sign Holliday at years end..... now, are there any flaws in what I just said???? If so let me know

    Posted by Tony Mac January 1, 09 10:32 PM
  1. What is wrong with you people?
    Ortiz has the same injury Nomar had and Nomar was never the same. Lowell began to slip before the injury and I bet it has take a toll on him. Lowrie an Ellsbury we abysmal from August on and Varitek is a disaster at the plate. That pretty mcuh leaves Youk, Bay and Pedroia. Bay and Pedroia I have a lot of faith in. But Youk gets fatter and fatter every year and this may be the year that it all blows up on him. Plus he's got to shave the go-tee. It's awful.

    Face it. The Red Sox won two WS with a nucleus of mostly Duquette players. Unfortunately most of you idiots seem to forget that. Theo, on the other hadn, really has done nothing to upgrade this team in two years. They are really turning in to the Boston Bruins of the 80's and 90's just like that poster on bostonherald.com (yepyepyep- something) keeps posting ad nausem. I'm starting to believe it now.
    (Tony Massarotti: Actually, Garciaparra and Ortiz had very different injuries. In Garciaparra's case, he had injuries to both the tendon and the sheath surrounding it, the injury to the tendon being far more worrisome. His problem required surgery. In Ortiz' case, he injured only the sheath and did NOT require surgery. Players with injuries more comparable to Ortiz' - like Pat Burrell, for instance - generally have made full recoveries.)

    Posted by Fred Zout January 1, 09 10:56 PM
  1. I think I've got "off season overload." Sox didn't get Tex - darn it, but oh well, get over it. I kind of feel better about it. Yankees have proven that you can't necessarily buy a World Series. I'm glad the Sox didn't sign A-Rod. And the Yanks haven't won squat with him on the team. Yeah, the combo of A-Rod, Tex, CC & co. is intimidating. But, have we forgotten so soon that the Sox beat them all, twice en route to WS titles? And we beat them with players like Nixon, Mueller, & Bellhorn, none of whom you ever see in league-wide headlines. Yes, the big name guys contributed greatly to success too. But, don't write off players like those guys, or Buccholz and Ellsbury just because they're taking longer to mature than Pedroia and Youk did. Who cares if Bay isn't Ramirez? Aren't you relieved, from a team chemistry standpoint? "Gas is up and so am I" . . . . . what an A-hole.

    I think persistence, creativity and re-signing Varitek will be the key for the Sox this year. I'll go on record stating Varitek will have a bounce back season and the Sox would be foolish not to re-sign him. And I think they can / will be very competetive. I think the lineup can be just as productive as the Ortiz-Ramirez 3-4 years with some re-working. And I appreciate the Sox' tact of not mortgaging their future. This will not be a repeat of '06. That was a freak injury bug year. AL East is getting tougher every year, so who knows where the Sox will land. But I expect them to be one of the premiere teams in the league again this year. GO SOX!!


    Rikcy



    Posted by Ricky G January 2, 09 09:12 AM
  1. Tony,what about Andreuw Jones.Great defense.He's 31 years.Maybe he could be had for a song.He certainly has pop,if he could rediscover it.He'd be ideal with Ortiz,two of a kind,who get along......May be worth an obvious look

    Posted by Jack ....Melbourne,Fla January 2, 09 11:25 AM
  1. Hey MHA
    I'm only talking about players here.
    If I was talking about championships you would be CORRECT.
    You need a chill pill.

    Posted by apple12
    Would you have preferred losing with those players or winning without them?

    Posted by MHA January 2, 09 11:25 AM
  1. Check your 2006 standings again........the Sox finished 8th in the AL, not 6th

    Posted by Sprtsfreke January 2, 09 12:50 PM
  1. It went like this. Steinbrenner and Cashman have the "first" meetng (before the winter meeting as I remember) with Texeria and basically tell Tex and the JERK (what's his agent's name?) to go into the world, seek and come back to us with their best offer and they'll up it by one or two million a year. The told them, "we're going to sign you for at least $10 Million more than any one else. {Afterall, the Yankees do not what to appear as stuipd as we did when we over-bid by about $15M for DiceK.} So Tex/Boras go into the world and seek. They found it wasn't as bountiful as first thought. Flys dropped out and we made our offer---not realizing the Yanks were willing to outbid everyone. And so the fairtale ends with the Yankees winning their fourth game of chicken in a row from the Bean Town Dudes. They wiill sign Manny next and win 120 games, without any complete games by their pitching staff. They'll beat everyone up by a run differential of 10/game. "M being M" would like nothing better than to hammer us. Who can blame him? Were headed for third or fourth place in the AL East..

    Posted by SouthHaven'sSmiffman January 2, 09 01:55 PM
  1. I don't understand the doom and gloom about Tex? They were obviously being played by Boras, he wasn't a perfect fit in the sense we'd have to get rid Mike Lowell, pay a good chunk of his salary and in the short term the Sox don't gain all that much offensively or defensively. I don't think this helps the Yanks all that much, especially when you consider he's their only great defensive player and how glaringly bad most of the rest of that team is in that department. Also the Sox have hit CC and Burnett pretty well with this line up.
    Otherwise, since the Sox are pretty much set with pitching (nobody is immune from "ifs'"), they should really just concentrate on what we actually need. A young catcher with some pop and D, a 4th outfielder who can play center and right and shoring up their minor league system offensively. Soon there will be needs for a corner outfielder - most likely rightfield unless Bay is a bust, thirdbase - Lowell is done after 2010 and of course shortstop - unless Lowrie turns into the great overachiever.
    My personal choices are Taylor Teagarden and Jim Edmonds.
    Unless the Sox can unload Lugo for someone else's signing disaster he's going to be with us for at least this season. The only upside of that would be having some speed on the bench.

    Posted by Tom January 2, 09 01:56 PM
  1. Why is the Red Sox Front Office completely unwilling to SPEND ANY MONEY to improve this club?

    Josh Bard was a COMPLTE DISASTER in 2006, bad enough the Sox gave Doug Mirabelli a POLICE ESCORT back to Fenway after trading him a month into the season.

    Speaking of Tim Wakefield, are we going to see mostly the "2.2 Inning, 10.00+ ERA" Pitcher he proved to be late last season? He simply DOESN'T HAVE IT anymore, just like Mike Timlin in recent years.

    Finally, there's Brad Penny, a cheap, "low risk, high reward" signing who may or MAY NOT pan out. Wat happens if Brad Penny proves to be as effective as Kyle Synder and Jason Johnson were in 2006?

    The bottom line is the 2009 season is looking VERY SCARY on paper, bad enough that the Red Sox may even have a better chance at finishing BELOW .500 (something that almost happened in 2006) than they do at making a real Playoff run. All because Theo Epstein, John Henry, and Larry Lucchino simply ARE NOT WILLING TO INVEST ANY MONEY to fix the holes in the 2009 Red Sox.

    I hear Derek Lowe is still available. So is Jason Varitek. And so will some power hitting by the July 31st deadline... if the Sox are actually willing to INVEST ENOUGH MONEY in their 2009 campaign to stay competative that long.

    Posted by Harry Sinden, Too Cheap To Compete January 2, 09 02:14 PM
  1. Here's hoping that the 09 yankees turn out to be the 08 Tigers.

    Posted by Rocket January 2, 09 03:11 PM
  1. To Tony Mac: The Yankees have $25 mil coming off their payroll after the 2009 season (Damon & Matsui's salaries). The Yanks can use that to get Holliday if they want. The Yankees have more revenue than the Red Sox, BUT can the Red Sox still afford a $160-200 mil payroll? That is the question. The Sox had a $143 mil payroll in 2007 and revenue has likely gone up since then, maybe by a lot. Some people say not to worry about the Yanks signing free agents such as Teixeira, but does that make sense?

    Posted by CD January 2, 09 03:23 PM
  1. Maz, I know some reporters write things for the sole purpose of getting a reaction from their readers vs. being insightful or even (in some cases) accurate. So if the reason the Sox didn't get Teixeira was because they "screwed up" - does that mean you think they should have signed him at all cost. If not, what is the limit you would have set for him and at what point do you start thinking that it wasn't a Sox screw-up but rather the yankees wanting him at all cost?

    Posted by Marty in chicago January 2, 09 03:32 PM
  1. Wow....reading some of the comments. Some of you can't be serious.....Andruw Jones hit about .160 for the Dodgers and is flat out done.Manny coming back??? What year is this?? Are we living in a parallel universe? Forget last July ? Giving up on Jacoby because of lastyear's playoffs? What did he do in 2007 post season?? ...Look, Sox lost out on Teixiera. We move on. Still need a bat by trade or FA. Abreu can help, but unless he is a DH, won't help our defense that much. The problems are Papi and the health of Lowell. Hard to expect Lowell to put up huge #'s at 37 withf injury. Love the guy and hope he does, but better have plan B. Papi has lost a great deal of bat speed. Unless a miracle happens, we still need a bat. Will have to trade some yoputh for a good bat unless they think Abreu is the answer. Please...no Burrell.Hits for no average and can't play defense. We already have someone like that named Ortiz.Sox need a bat...not named Manny or A Jones.

    Posted by Bill January 2, 09 05:05 PM
  1. Thanks for the clarification, Tony, but, the other reality is that Ortiz's swing was greatly affected by the injury all year. I'm not sure if he can remedy that.

    As for Theo, I've never been a big fan. It seems to me that they are keeping some of the guys around that have won to make it look like they are together. But, they are not and the team hasn't improved in 2 years.

    Posted by Fred Zout January 2, 09 06:44 PM
  1. Poor Mike lowell keeps getting older with each post . He is not 37. He is still 34 and will be 35 at the end of February- not exactly ancient. While his hip injury is serious, from news accounts it sounds like he is working incredibly hard to recover and be back better than ever.

    Posted by lobo January 2, 09 11:30 PM
  1. How about Montero/Byrnes trade with Arizona. We could probably get them cheap as they want to dump Byrnes salary. I know Byrnes is a scrappy vet, got great speed and would be a nice addition to the outfield if he's recovered from whatever had him miss most of last year. Montero looks like a good, young catcher that can hit. This trade would only make sense if they came cheap, as far as low level prospects from the Sox, but would fill vital needs.

    Posted by Ben Ben the Fisherman January 3, 09 08:36 AM
  1. Saving the $50 milion in payroll while reducing ticket prices would be a sign of unity between the fans and front office. The current nucleus is there and give the kids a chance to develop.

    There are no stupid teams willing to give up MVP types (ramirez, hamilton) for unproven dissapointing BoSox (Buchholz, Ellsbury). The Marlins would consider a Beckett/Youkolis/Masterson trade for Ramirez. Want to make that trade??? The ridiculous offers I read here are just as dumb.

    Posted by scooby January 3, 09 12:44 PM
  1. Bard and Tek are not the future of Sox catching. The Sox need to address the catching now. Sign Tek for 2 years at 9m and then give him a personal service contract for 10yrs. He can be a coach/scout/advisor, not at 9m, but at what ever the going price is for that type of contract. He has earned it and deserves it. Now the Rangers want Buckholtz, then give them Buckholtz and Lugo for Salty and Young. Now you have Bard to deal with which brings up another question, why did they sign him?
    There are still a number of good 4/5 pitchers out there such as Garland/Smoltz use Wake and Masterson in the pen.

    MHA
    Iagree

    Posted by apple12 January 3, 09 02:39 PM
  1. I love the Sox for their bury their head in sand approach for the 2009 season. Lowell is 36 and coming off hip surgery, Neither Lugo or Lowrie can hit at short, Drew is sure to go on the DL at some point, Ortiz has a bad wrist and no one in the lineup to back him up like Manny did, and neither Bard or Varitek (if resigned) can hit. This looks like they have a good lock on 3rd place behind the Rays and Yankees. Congrats to Theo and Henry for their off season work.

    Posted by louis January 3, 09 05:20 PM
  1. Tek and Bard are not the catching future for the Sox.
    The Rangers want Buckholtz, give them Buckholtz, Lugo,and a lower rank prospect for Salty and Young.
    Then sign Tek for 2 years at 9m, then give him a personal service contract for 10 years, at what ever the going price is for that position, and let him become a coach/scout/advisor, he has earned it and deserves it.
    That brings up another question why did they sign Bard?

    MHA
    I agree with you.

    Posted by apple12 January 3, 09 06:26 PM
  1. The Sox writers have said that the Red Sox drew a line in the sand when it came to the Teixeira negotiations. I think it was more of a case of burying their head in the sand. There is no longer a reason to pitch to Ortiz, bad wrist or not, nobody is around to back him up. Big Problem. Accept it Sox fans, it will be a long summer.

    Posted by Louis January 3, 09 10:05 PM
  1. Let me see if I got this right, the Rangers are going to give up Michael Young for Buckholtz and Lugo. By the way who is Salty? Anyway, why don't you ask them to throw in Josh Hamilton? I think you need to stop drinking.

    Posted by Louis January 3, 09 10:20 PM
  1. Hey Louis
    You are obviously a yankee fan.
    Why don't you take your comments to a yankee website.

    Posted by apple12 January 4, 09 08:33 AM
  1. Hey apple12
    I am a Yankee fan. At some Yankee web sites I found some Sox fans putting their two cents in, so I figured the Sox web sites needed a Yankee fan perspective. Just so we can maintain a proper balance and analysis of the AL East.

    Posted by Louis January 4, 09 05:49 PM
  1. Mazz, normallly i like your writing, but this article makes you sound like a moron. We all knew that one day the Manny/Papi combo would be broken up, and that we would have to rely on pitching and defense in the future. So we broke that tandem up a year or so early. We have a great pitching staff and a defense that can match any in the league. Is there anyone out there that feels that the team we went to the playoffs with last year would have advanced if either papi or lowell had been healthy (not even both, but one of them). I think everyone believes that we would have. Assuming that either (or both) should be healthy, in the end all we are missing is Manny and this team is still stronger than the one that missed the WS by one game last year. Sure, papi will not be as effective with Yook behind him, but Papi wont be as effective with ANYONE behind him short of Manny. We dont have to have a masher at every position to be a potent offense. We just need consistency. We have able, near .300 hitters at three infield positions (three gold gloves, i might add) along with very good defenders in all three outfield positions (two of whom are near .300 hitters as well.. Add one good bat in the outfield and we can weather the storm of V-tek or lugo (ugh) or both for another season. To spend the kind of money we would have spent on Texiera would have been foolish. As good as Tex would have looked in a Sox uniform, i have to say it will be even more satisfying to watch the Yankees try and win under the scrutiny of the Steinbrenner duo. Girrardi is no Torre and he never will. If Torre couldn't win with all that talent, i doubt that Girrardi will. Save your breath,. The Sox will be fine. I am certain that the braintrust (not you) have a plan. They always do. You have to assume that it was not just about money - it never is. There is something on the horizon that is even more appealing than we fool-hearted fans could ever immagine. You are pressing the panic button for the sake of pressing the panic button.

    Posted by Vermont_skiing_fool January 5, 09 01:26 PM
  1. Hey Mazz. I actually wrote my last post before reading all of the other posts - most of which are far more inciteful than any revelations you have made in this article. I copy/pasted this entire string of comentary into a file, which i will email to you on a daily basis throughout the summer as the Sox prove every point you have made wrong - as usual. The first email should come, oh,around the first of May as the poorly managed and over-paid Yankees toil (along with the O's and Jays) numerouse games below .500. Be prepared.

    Posted by Vermont_skiing_fool January 5, 09 03:14 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Tony Massarotti

is taking a few days off to celebrate the arrival of summer.

0 Comments »
Updated: Jun 20, 10:42 AM

About Mazz

Tony Massarotti is a Globe sportswriter and has been writing about sports in Boston for the last 19 years. A lifelong Bostonian, Massarotti graduated from Waltham High School and Tufts University. He was voted the Massachusetts Sportswriter of the Year by his peers in 2000 and 2008 and has been a finalist for the award on several other occasions. He'll be using this forum to provide information, insight, and analysis on the Boston sports scene.

Tony's Top 5

Things to eat during the summer

5
Ice cream. Obvious, right? But we’re not talking about Haagen-Dazs. Go to a local stand and forgo the chain stores.
4
Spaghetti al limone. Do a Google search for the simple recipe and use linguine. Fast. Refreshing. Different.
3
Corn on the cob. Brush it with a little olive oil or butter and lightly salt. Then grill it. Trust me on this one.
2
Clams. Bellies or strips, steamed or fried. We prefer the steamahs, but go to your local shack and choose.
1
Lobster. If have a gas grill, buy the lobster pot attachment. Melt your own butter. Add some lemon. Nothing better.
0 Comments »
Updated: Jun 20, 11:10 AM

Featured Comments

No rush to anoint Rondo
Actually Tony is on-target here! Rondo has a great up-side, but there are still parts of the game where he is AWOL. He is extremely unique with his ball-handling skills and his rebounding is also a strength. The D is also eye-opening most of the time. He is a very confident athlete, hopefully not overconfident. The C's have never had a player quite like him! However, if he thinks he's indispensible, he better think again. This team has to win now while keeping an eye on the future!

CelticFanSinceRussell

In Boston, Bay stars
A four year $60 million dollar contract with a team option of a 5th year is not unreasonable to offer. The Yankees are in need of a left fielder after this season so it's imperative they get him signed because the rate will go up regardless at the end of the season because Steinbrenner will throw stupid money Bay's way even if it's just to drive the cost up for the Sox. Bay has earned it and proven he can play in a big market as well as the post season.

Mhaze

Featured blogs

Extra Bases
Francona on Lowell, Lowrie and more
Terry Francona said during his weekly conversation with WEEI's "Dale and Holley Show" that Mike Lowell, sidelined with a hip injury, will probably return to...
archives

Browse This Blog

by category

Talk to Mazz

Name:
E-mail:
Your question/comment: