boston.com Sports Sportsin partnership with NESN your connection to The Boston Globe
Do you agree with the article that says the Pats have one of the deepest LB corps in the league? I think they are good, but top five? Come on.
-- John Murray, Weymouth Nick Cafardo August 1, 2003 -->

Kicking off a new season

Page 6 of 15 -- Nick, Last year you offered an impressive positional analysis of where the Pats needed to upgrade through the draft and free agency. It differed from the conventional wisdom and I felt it was insightful. I thought you had listed offensive guard as the number one position to upgrade. Do I remember that correctly? What is your feeling on the current status of the offensive line? I realize Bill & Co. could not have known that Stephen Neal would still be injured.
-- Dave Pomerantz, Marshfield

A: I think guard is a key position because they have older players in Mike Compton, and Andruzzi who has had some injuries there. I like the veteran pickups of Bill Conaty and Brendan Stai, from the standpoint that they are serviceable veterans who can step in and play if need be. I think Neal was coming on to the point where he could have been special. I think he's a big loss.

Nick: What's the current status of Antwoine Womack? Do you think if they knew in April 2002 what they know now they'd still use that pick for him again? Is his knee OK? Can he cut on it? Did he take the conditioning test? pass it? Is he not practicing for medical reasons, conditioning reasons, or phsycological reasons? Rehab / PT? Maybe I'm too impatient but it seems like Robert Edwards came back faster from a worse injury.
-- Marc Stringer, Connersville, Ind.

A: Womack was worth the gamble. I don't know how good he can be, and I'm not sure the Patriots know. They're being cautious with him, and why not? He's come off a big injury and right now with Smith, Faulk, and Redmond ahead of him, better to be sure than sorry. I know they used him a bit at fullback during the June mini-camp and seem to like what he can do out of that position.

Nick, Certainly the Pats have improved on defense. The real question is have they improved their offensive line enough to run the ball consistently. Any thoughts?
-- Tim Hurlburt, Cambridge

A: I can't say they have improved. I think Smith is very serious (after failing the conditioning run) this camp. I think he's working hard. As I wrote earlier, just return to the form of two years ago and that will be enough.

I don't see how the most glaring need from last season -- nose tackle -- has been addressed. Warren, Seymour, Green, Pleasant, and Hamilton are all optimal ends in the 3-4. Klecko and Kelley are true but longshot rookies. Clearly, with the massive upgrade in team speed and quickness on both sides of the ball there is some plan, but how can it make up for this hole in the middle of the D?
-- Timothy Cardozo, New York, N.Y.

A: You're right. There isn't one guy who solved the problem for them. So, unless a nose tackle falls from the sky, they'll use a bunch of guys (led by Jarvis Green) and hope they can use their ability to scheme to cover up what they may lack in size and experience in the middle of the line.   Continued...

 Previous    1   ...  3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...  15    Next 

Patriots mailbag
Every Thursday during the season, the Globe's Nick Cafardo will answer your questions about the Patriots and provide an inside look at the team. You can send your questions anytime.
 Ask Nick archive
Nick's mailbag will return later this summer
SEARCH GLOBE ARCHIVES
   
Today (free)
Yesterday (free)
Past 30 days
Last 12 months