Positional groupings
A look at the positional groupings utilized by the Patriots' offense in their 24-20 victory over the Colts (not including four kneel-downs):
ANALYSIS: Ultimately, the Patriots tried a lot of things early and the key was making the decision to go no-huddle in the 3 WR/1 TE/1 RB package with 9:35 left in the fourth quarter. The Patriots stayed in that grouping, upped the tempo, and turned a 20-10 deficit into a 24-20 advantage. ... Then, after pounding the ball on first and second down with its 1 WR/2 TE/1 FB/1 RB package in an attempt to run out the clock, the offense went back to the 3 WR/1 TE/1 RB package on the play that sealed the win -- a 10-yard catch by Wes Welker. ... In recent years, the Patriots have utilized more 2 WR/2 TE/1 RB sets against the Colts -- mainly to combat the rush of ends Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis -- but the approach this year meant that tackles Matt Light and Nick Kaczur were left with less help from tight ends. ... With less 2-TE packages, RB Kevin Faulk was often utilized to chip the ends and was generally effective executing those responsibilities. ... QB Tom Brady's first interception, to Donte' Stallworth, came on an unusual no-back 3 WR/2 TE package which the Patriots used for the first time this year -- and perhaps won't use again. ... One package that didn't produce the desired results was the jumbo 3 TE/1 FB/1 RB grouping, which couldn't pick up the necessary yardage on third and 1 from the Colts 14 late in the third quarter (Bob Sanders tackle). ... The eight different positional groupings were a season high. ... The Patriots have run the majority of their offensive plays from the 3 WR/1 TE/1 RB grouping in six of their last seven games.
TUESDAY LOOK-AHEAD: Patriots players have meetings at Gillette Stadium today and the media will have access to the locker room at approximately 3 p.m. We'll plan on passing along an update after the access period.







Hi Mike,
What grouping caused those initial two sacks of Brady - those were frigging scary. It is a good thing that both Freeney and Mathis were quality guys not bent on giving Brady a concussion - but other teams which have been humiliated in the past may not be so giving in dealing with "the Franchise". Regds, Ram
I don't follow other teams' personnel as closely as I perhaps should, but I'm doubtful that there are many (if any) teams that can field that fast and fearsome a pair of ends. I'm glad they're off the radar until January.
Ram...On the first sack, it was the 3 WR/1 TE/1 RB grouping and Kaczur got beat in a one-on-one situation with a spin move to the inside. On the second sack, by Mathis, it was the 2 WR/1 TE/1FB/1 RB package.
If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.
ask reiss
Questions will be considered for Mike's mailbagbrowse this blog
by category