< Back to Front Page Text size +

Dean Pees's scorecard

Posted by Mike Reiss, Globe Staff September 12, 2008 11:48 AM

FOXBOROUGH -- Patriots coach Bill Belichick (10:45 a.m.) and defensive coordinator Dean Pees (11 a.m.) held press conferences and media members had access to the locker room (11-11:45 a.m.) today at Gillette Stadium.

One of the interesting nuggets was Pees breaking down his weekly scorecard for the defense. Pees had been asked about the team's performance on third down last week, when the Chiefs were a solid 8 of 16.

Pees then explained that he has a weekly win-loss scorecard for the defense. He breaks it down by first down, second down and third down.

  • First down: A win is 3 yards or less, setting up second-and-7 or more.

  • Second down: A win is anything that makes it third-and-4 or more.

  • Third down: A win is stopping the offense short of the first down.

    As for last week, Pees said "it was probably the best we've done in a long time on first down; our win percentage was very, very high."

    The problems came on third down.

    "There were a couple situations where we were very competitive on the routes but the guy made the catch, basically [Tony] Gonzalez," he said. "Regardless of that, we have to do a better job on third down. ... We have to a little better job of playing our techniques and doing some things to get off the field. We have to get that number lower."

    • CommentComment
    • EmailEmail
    8 comments so far...
    1. Hey Dean, use my system:
      On any first down, if you can limit the other team to 1/3 of the distance to the first down marker, you win. Round to the nearest yard.
      On any second down, if you limit them to 1/2 of the distance, you win.
      Third down is less than all of the distance.
      Under my system, if the other team has 1st and 20 and your guys give up 12 yards, that's not a win at all. If the other team has 2nd and 2 and they get an incomplete pass, that's really a win.
      For offense, any of the above plus 2 yards counts as a win.

      Posted by PaulK3 September 12, 08 12:32 PM
    1. Thanks Mike, That is really a great piece of information. I would love to know more. Does he mark what type of defense he called against a certain offense? Maybe you could include the scoring on your game analysis when you put out other things like Offensive Participation.

      Posted by Chris C September 12, 08 12:51 PM
    1. Football games are won or lost on third down.

      Posted by brian September 12, 08 12:56 PM
    1. Agreed Brian - the Pats are great at getting people into 3rd down, but then don't close the deal. 3rd down D was a problem last year also - its something we need to get a handle on.

      Cheers,

      Davo

      Posted by David September 12, 08 01:07 PM
    1. The Pats are simply going to have to "sell out" on the pass rush on third downs more often....bring pressure and bring it hard.

      Their secondary is not what it used to be, and the new "Polian rules" of playing pass defense, where just breathing on a WR after 5 yards could draw a flag, are a hinderance for all NFL DBs now.

      The Pats were ranked just 11th in defensive passer rating last season, and their pass defense on 3rd down has left a lot to be desired the past few seasons, actually.

      They simply need to bring more pressure, as Brian is correct: football games are won or lost on 3rd down. And increasingly, since the "Polian Rules" went into effect, passing games are stopped up front, by the Front 7, not by the secondary.

      Posted by tony September 12, 08 01:13 PM
    1. Basically what he is saying is that his run defense was fine(first and second downs) but that his pass defense9third down) stinks as we know from last year.

      Posted by Chuck Mantia September 12, 08 01:30 PM
    1. Sure am glad none of you are Patriots coaches.

      Posted by Nooner September 12, 08 01:34 PM
    1. The defense played well. Stout against the run and decent against the pass. Gonzalez made some plays, but that is going to happen - what was encouraging is that unlike last year, he was not running free in the middle of the field. There was good coverage on him.

      Posted by NoNoNobama September 14, 08 10:16 AM
    add your comment
    Required
    Required (will not be published)

    This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

    Mike Reiss, Christopher L. Gasper and the rest of the Globe team provide regular updates –and a behind-the-scenes look– on the daily happenings of the Patriots.

    ask reiss

    Questions will be considered for Mike's mailbag
    Name:
    E-mail:
    Your question/comment:
    archives

    browse this blog

    by category