Belichick Q&A
Patriots coach Bill Belichick spoke with reporters this afternoon at Gillette Stadium, touching on such topics as Matt Cassel's running ability, the contributions of linebacker Pierre Woods, and the opportunities that slipped away during last night's 34-31 overtime loss to the Jets.
To read the full transcript of Belichick's press conference, as provided by the Patriots media relations staff, click "full entry" at the bottom of this post.
Belichick: [When] you go through a game like that, you look back at 20, 25, 30 plays, I don’t know. Any one of them could have made a little bit of a difference or maybe a big difference. I think everybody feels probably about the same way this morning as they did last night, that if I could have just done one thing differently or done one thing better or not done one thing or whatever. That’s the way I feel. I’m sure that’s the way all the players and assistant coaches feel. That’s probably the case, so we just have to get over that and put this game behind us after today and move on and start getting ready for Miami. But there’s still a lot of football left to play this season. I think that our biggest thing right now is just to improve and each of us keep working harder at doing a little bit better job. We’ve lost two real competitive games here in the last three weeks. We just need to do a little bit more to put those on our side of the ledger. That’s what our focus will be this week and every other week.
Have you had time to savor what Matt Cassel was able to do last night in that last drive of the game?
Belichick: Yeah. It was tough situation with no timeouts and having to go over half the football field. The offensive team did an outstanding job of really putting ourselves in position to where we could be throwing for the end zone in that last play, even though it was fourth down which made it a little bit more challenging. Had it been third down with eight seconds, we probably would have had time for two plays. But it was a good throw, good catch. [Cassel] was scrambling around, running out of the pocket. It was a good play.
When Cassel makes a play like that in a Tom Brady-like situation, does that make you think you can maybe open up the play book a little more with him?
Belichick: I think it’s been very open. We’ve been doing what we do all year, whether Tom was in there or not in there in preseason. Then as Matt has taken the regular-season snaps, we’ve been running our offense all year. So I’m not really sure which plays you’d be referring to that we don’t have, but we game plan each week for how we feel the best way to attack our opponent is and those are the plays that we put in and run. That’s the way it’s been all year, I don’t really see that changing.
Cassel ran the ball well last night, do you hold your breath at all when he takes off?
Belichick: No. I think it is a little bit of the nature of the position – trying to get what you can and protect the ball. I think he has done a good job of sliding. He has taken a few hits along the way that you would always like to see him avoid but sometimes that is part of the game. It is a contact sport. Against a team like the Jets that played a lot of man underneath coverage when the receivers run their routes and the guys chase him and the pass rushers get up the field, there is a lot of space there. Really, that is a good decision by Matt to see that, recognize it and he turns into the sixth receiver in those kinds of situations. There are always exceptions but that is not always the best play against some other coverages, zone coverages where there are a lot of guys standing there. But the coverages the Jets were playing, there were some opportunities for him to run. He made good yardage on them.
Was part of that designed in preparation, figuring the Jets would play man coverage?
Belichick: Yes. That is similar to the way they played us in the first game. As you go through the course of the game you can see how they were playing and that was pretty consistent through the course of the game. He got a couple of those early, not that he is looking for that, he is looking to throw the ball down the field but if it opens up, which a couple of times it did, it opened up pretty wide then step up in the pocket and that is an option for him.
Do you encourage him to slide more or do you think he has the sense on when to do it?
Belichick: I think there is a place to put your head down and get the first down. I think there is a place to slide, get what you can and protect the ball [and] let the other guys handle it.
Is that an aspect of Matt Cassel’s game that you need to see to realize how much of a weapon it would be?
Belichick: We have seen it for four years. He did that his rookie year. I don’t think his running ability or his athletic ability has really been a question. I wouldn’t say that at all.
How about Jerod Mayo and his performance?
Belichick: Jerod has been pretty active in all of the games, he was active last night. He’s instinctive. He has a nose [for] where the ball is, he gets to it and he is a good tackler. He doesn’t miss many. So, he has been productive for us all year and was productive for us last night.
On adjustments made in the second half . . .
Belichick: In all honesty we really didn’t make a lot of adjustments. We played a lot of the same things in the third quarter that we played in the first half. Some of them we played a little bit better, or they matched up a little bit differently or we recognized a couple of the Jets plays quicker. But really it wasn’t a big adjustment game.
Sammy Morris had five carries, was that by design or just how the game played out?
Belichick: Yes, you saw how the game played out. We were in 2-minute offense for 2 1/2 quarters. So that we just felt like was partially due to the score but the way it went there in the second quarter, we felt like that was the best mode to be in last night as the game unfolded. We started that way in the third quarter. I thought we moved the ball well in the third quarter, we just had three plays that stopped us up a little bit but moving the ball really wasn’t a problem. Like I said, those three plays stalled those drives or stopped them. That was the mode we were in because that is what we thought was the best to attack them with. Had we been in a different mode I am sure Sammy probably would have gotten more carries, as BenJarvus [Green-Ellis] and Kevin [Faulk] probably would have been in the game a lot less.
Can you talk about the confidence that you have in Cassel’s passing game especially on third and short?
Belichick: I think we have confidence in Matt passing on all downs, in all situations: first down, second down, third down, red area, two minute. If the situation is there where we feel like we need to throw the ball based on what they are doing, if that is the preferred call then we make it. I don’t think there is any hesitation about that -- any of Matt’s throws or plays. I think he has made all the throws that he can make: tight ends, backs, receivers, inside, outside. I don’t really see that as a problem. Most of that is a function of what we feel like is the best play in that situation and it is whatever he has been called on to do. We have confidence in him and if we need to run the ball in those situations or draw it or screen it then we call those plays. We have confidence in them, too.
How do you think Pierre Woods held up in his first real extended action?
Belichick: I think probably like all the defensive players. There were some positive things, there were some good things and there is always a play or two that every player would like to have back and I am sure Pierre feels that way too. But, I thought he did a decent job in the running game, got a little pressure on the quarterback, was in on some tackles, good pursuit player. There were some positive things there. But, just like the whole game the positive things were outweighed by the final score and a couple critical plays in the game. There is certainly room for improvement all the way around – that goes for all of us.
What kinds of strides has Woods made in terms of playing strength?
Belichick: I think that the technique and all of that has helped him but I think that he started out there that is how he made the team. He made the team based on his speed, his athleticism, his power and explosion for his size and like any player doing it for three years and being in the weight room in the offseason program and working at it and reacting quicker and so forth. All of those things help. He has certainly gotten better and improved over the course of that time. He came in with enough of that to make the team and create a role for himself on the team. I think that has been a pretty big aspect of his game and it has improved.
How do you think the defensive line held up without Ty Warren?
Belichick: Well, Mike Wright played most of the game there at left end. But Jarvis [Green] played and we rotated all of them in there a little bit. But I thought Mike did a solid job for is. We would love to have Ty out there but unfortunately last night we didn’t. We would loved to have him out there but I think Mike is a good player for us. He gives us good depth both inside and outside, playing the run and rushing the passer. He is a good versatile player that played a lot of snaps last night and we needed him.
On the no huddle offense run by Cassel, other than the missed snap, do you think he performed how you think he would?
Belichick: I would say 550 yards of offense with one fumble, I thought that was . . . But we still missed some opportunities. There were still some things that we would have liked to have done out there that we didn’t do. I thought we moved the ball well and that Matt did a good job running it, absolutely. I just wish we had a little more to show for it that’s all.
How do you feel about Mike Vrabel’s defensive holding call now that you have had the chance to look at it again?
Belichick: It doesn’t really matter what I think.



These comments seem to be the most candid and detailed from BB that I've read or seen in a while. Tough loss last night to take but gives you hope...better than laying down in the Miami game. I have a good feeling about the rest of the year...I think the Pats are going to finish strong.
BenJarvus Green-Ellis was used a lot in Buffalo game. Vary sparingly in Jets game. I wonder why ball control game plan was not used to limit Jet possessions! It would have been great to see Brett Favre sitting idle on the side lines while Patriots kill the time on each long 9-10 minute drives!
BB tactfull avoids the $20K fine with his answer to the question on the holding call on Vrabel. However, the commissioner can't fine me. I don't think the call was horrible. They could call holding on every play if they wanted to. However, the timing of a very questionable and knit picking call was horrendous. You don't make those stupid little calls when a game is on the line and the call has a major impact on the outcome of the game. That is BS. That being said, the Pats had ample other opportunities to win that game so it shouldn't have come down to that.
SBJ, I think the NYJ defense would have killed the run. They are in the top 7 or something like that in the defense against the run category. It was smart of the pats to cut back the run and try to exploit their secondary. Penalties, calls, drops and mistakes killed them, unfortunately.
Mike, whats with all these questions about "opening up the playbook"? Do reporters want to see 5 wide shotgun spread every down or something?
I'll say the holding call was terrible. The flag was late and that dubious penalty alone was the difference between a field goal and a touchdown.
The refs could have called illegal contact, if they thought Vrabel had hit the TE more than 5 yards downfield. But I didn't see any holding.
Garry,
I could not have said it better. This idea that one call cost the team the game is just crying. That call and the one against the Colts were bad calls at critical point of the game. But if you are not dropping balls (Gafney and Watson) those calls are not a factor.
I disagree completely. Those calls (colts and jets) where major factors in the outcome of the game. It's not crying to state that. It's a fact. When the jets got that nonexistent call there was plenty of time left on the clock and the pats had all their timeouts left. They were forced to use them and because of that who knows what the outcome might have been. There is also no guarantee that the jets would have made the field goal. Lots of things could have happened. I am sick and tired of referee's determining the outcome of games in this league. They havent only cost the pats games but other teams also.
Why was he not asked why they decided to play a soft defense, with no pass rush, when they had the Jets 3rd and 15 from their own 15 yard line in overtime. Dean Pees, or Bill Belichick, whoever called that defensive play cost the team the game. You can not allow an experienced Qb oike Favre to sit with no one in his face in that kind of situationl. Pees bloew the game, as he has done many times before.
I seldom complain about the reffing. They are human and will make mistakes. A team needs to be in position not to let a ref's mistake cost them the game.
The real culprit for us losing the the way we did is how overtime is handled. The NFL needs to take a good look at how overtime is handled. Win the coin toss and your chances of winning the game is 60%. Pretty good odds.
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
Patriots Twitter
ask reiss
Questions will be considered for Mike's mailbagbrowse this blog
by categoryINside Boston.com