< Back to Front Page Text size +

QB Patrick Ramsey visits

Posted by Mike Reiss, Globe Staff March 4, 2009 07:00 PM

The Patriots have made headlines this offseason at the quarterback spot – with Tom Brady saying he’s optimistic about being ready for the 2009 season opener, and Matt Cassel traded to the Kansas City Chiefs.

Albeit to a much lesser degree, the Patriots showed up on the NFL’s quarterback radar again today as the team hosted veteran Patrick Ramsey on a free-agent visit.

Ramsey, 30, has been with the Redskins (2002-2005), Jets (2006) and Broncos (2007-2008). After starting 23 games over the first three years of his career, he’s started just one contest over the last four seasons.

The visit with Ramsey could indicate that the Patriots are considering adding a veteran backup, similar to 2005 (Doug Flutie) and 2006 (Vinny Testaverde).

The Patriots currently have Brady, second-year man Kevin O’Connell (2008 third-round draft pick) and third-year signal-caller Matt Gutierrez on the roster at quarterback.

In addition to Ramsey, the Patriots also hosted free-agent guard Scott Young at Gillette Stadium. The 6-foot-4, 312-pound Young has suited up for the Eagles (2005-2007) and Browns (2008), appearing in 14 games (0 starts). The Patriots have shown interest in Young in the past.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
18 comments so far...
  1. Ramsey is fine as a 3rd stringer (at or near the league minimum) but he's not the same as bringing in Flutie or Testaverde. Those guys actually played once in a while. Ramsey is quite used to holding a clipboard.

    Posted by Tom March 4, 09 07:27 PM
  1. Why? Is Rohan Davey not available?

    Posted by southie77 March 4, 09 07:43 PM
  1. Ramsey is no Flutie or Testaverde. I would actually prefer the two old timers in 2009 over Ramsey. Hopefully they're just updating the emergency list.

    Posted by Ritchie March 4, 09 08:31 PM
  1. HAHA Really? Practice squad maybe? can he long snap?

    Posted by Steve March 4, 09 08:50 PM
  1. How about looking at Kelly Holcomb, Brad Johnson, Tim Rattay, Elvis.....anyone would be better this Ramsey. At least they have starting experience.

    Posted by Whitey March 4, 09 09:13 PM
  1. Young is very strong, he benched 225 43 times at 2005 scouting combine.

    Posted by Nikos March 4, 09 09:21 PM
  1. We have Brady > O'Connell > Guittierez. Honestly, if we go through all of those three options, I'd actually prefer to see Rodney Harrison take a stab at playing QB rather than take up an extra roster spot and salary cap with a professional bench warmer.

    That said, there is a good reason I don't coach in the NFL.

    Posted by Justin-R March 4, 09 09:40 PM
  1. BB also values versatility, Scott Young can play guard and carry the teams' equipment by being so strong.

    Posted by southie77 March 4, 09 10:27 PM
  1. Yeah!!!
    Rodney Harrison is probably better than Ramsey!!! Last time I saw him he came in and ended up on IR after one throw!!! We might win more games with Troy Brown!!!

    Posted by Tom March 4, 09 10:38 PM
  1. Not to defend Ramsey, but he does have some starting experience. Bringing him in to compete for a spot with Gutierrez would be good for the team. That being said, I would think O'Connell is #2 and Ramsey, if he made the team, would be the #3 QB.

    However, if a 3rd stringer is what they're looking for, what about bringing back Damon Huard? I would prefer Huard over Ramsey.

    Posted by Jamie March 4, 09 10:44 PM
  1. Huard signed with San Francisco. I wanted him and Chris Simms. Both are gone. (Simms signed with Denver)

    Posted by Michael March 4, 09 11:02 PM
  1. Damon Huard signed with the 49 Niners.

    Posted by southie77 March 4, 09 11:05 PM
  1. I look at these moves as much as about appearances & camp competition as to actually sign talent. Smoke & Mirrors. By now, Brady's either ready or will be or won't be. With a year under O'Connell's belt & three under Gutierrez's, they're either viable options or they aren't. Bringing in a guy like Ramsey, is just to put a little extra direct pressure on either of them to really have to earn that #2 spot. And to foster doubt .

    If they're actually gonna take 4 Qb's into the season; I'd to see at least one that's totally different from the rest; in the way that that, as a back-up, a young Flutie or (the type of player the Pats were looking for in) Rohan Davey would present the defense with a different kind of look, a different set of strengths to contend with.

    Depending on how far Stafford or Sanchez fall, I would definitely be intrigued at the idea of taking a Pat White or a Josh Freeman, if still available, in the fourth round.
    But I doubt that could really happen....or could it?!?

    Posted by VerDisqo March 5, 09 12:21 AM
  1. If someone has followed Ramsey's career closely they would realize he had a decent start with Redskins until his foot injury. Since then has not been given a a chance. I would put my money on him... He has brains and character. Team player. Can do the job with a little confidence from the coaches and the opportunity.

    Posted by Dennis Henderson March 5, 09 08:54 AM
  1. You need 4 arms for camp. Then you get rid of the worst of the 4 on the first roster cutdown. It's not a big deal.

    Posted by MarkZ March 5, 09 09:50 AM
  1. Brady, O'Connell & Guitierez...doesn't sound too shabby...I'd be really surprised if BB doesn't actually know for sure that Brady is back & ready - otherwise they'd have done something else with Cassell.
    Even if it was signing him to a long-term now then worikng a trade down the road.

    Posted by stop Newport, RI corruption March 5, 09 09:56 AM
  1. maybe they just need a back-up to the Quarterbacks Coaching spot??

    Posted by Eddie C March 5, 09 01:50 PM
  1. As someone who has watched Patrick Ramsey since his college days at Tulane, I can tell you that he is a solid quarterback. While his decision making has been questionable at times, he has a cannon for an arm and great mobility. All he needs is an opportunity to start. If he can work through a 16 game season then, I guaruntee you that he would stand a great chance of taking any team he plays for to the playoffs. Quite frankly, I hope he doesn't go to the Patriots because New England doesn't deserve a player of his caliber. I hope he goes to Buffalo next year and smokes the Patriot secondary for 6 touchdowns and 400 plus yards. And whole we are on the subject of New England, WHY THE HELL DID YOU TRADE MATT CASSEL FOR A DRAFT PICK?

    Posted by Mike April 1, 09 01:00 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Mike Reiss, Christopher L. Gasper and the rest of the Globe team provide regular updates –and a behind-the-scenes look– on the daily happenings of the Patriots.

ask reiss

Questions will be considered for Mike's mailbag
Name:
E-mail:
Your question/comment:
archives

browse this blog

by category