< Back to Front Page Text size +

Ron Brace analysis

Posted by Mike Reiss, Globe Staff April 25, 2009 08:12 PM

ANALYSIS

In selecting Ron Brace of Boston College, the Patriots acquire one of the few players in the draft who fits the nose tackle position in the 3-4 scheme. At 6-foot-3, 330 pounds, he is considered a strong run defender.

The Patriots starting nose tackle, Vince Wilfork, enters the final year of his contract. In selecing Brace, the Patriots give themselves a fallback plan -- and perhaps a little leverage -- if things don't work out contractually with Wilfork.

The Patriots have five of their eight defensive lineman entering the final year of their contract, so it was time to start feeding the pipeline.

Prior to the selection of Brace, the Patriots' top backup nose tackle was Mike Wright. While Wright can still serve in that role, this will likely kick him out to end on a more consistent basis.

  • Intelligence/character: From Burncoat High School in Worcester, to Chestnut Hill, to Foxborough … Is adept at playing up front in a 4-3 scheme or playing the nose in a 3-4 setup … Second-team all-ACC last season after being honorable mention in 2007 … Diligent in film work … Too nice in the trenches? … Won back-to-back state shot put titles in high school … Born Dec. 18, 1986, and grew up in Springfield.
  • Stopping the run: An essential cog in a BC defense that ranked fifth nationally in total yards and seventh against the run … Eleven of his 27 tackles last season were behind the line of scrimmage … Showed he can handle double-teams at BC.
  • Rushing the passer: Had a career-best three sacks last season, and finished career with nine … Nothing fancy, just hard, powerful pass rush … Once he’s on the ground he’s pretty much out of the play.
  • Size/strength/durability: Started 37 straight games despite recurring back issues … Don’t let his sizable gut mislead you. He’s pretty quick in his lateral movements … More of an avalanche than an athlete … Bench-pressed 32 reps (at 225 pounds) at the draft combine.

Sources: National Football League, Globe research, and draft analysts from Pro Football Weekly, Ourlads’, and The War Room.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
26 comments so far...
  1. i get the reasoning but I would have loved Barwin or Gilbert here. Steep price to pay as well to move up just 7 spots.

    Posted by jaredk April 25, 09 08:20 PM
  1. Love this pick, fits perfectly in the middle for spot duty and to keep Wilfork fresh!

    Posted by phil April 25, 09 08:26 PM
  1. Time to go to a 4-3 and then see if anyone can run against us. @ big DT's in the middle, Wilfork and Brace. That would allow Seymore and Warren to blitz more.

    Then with AD on one side Mayo in the middle, and Crable, Bantcain, Woods, Alexander, or one of the other OLB's on the roster to play the other side.

    Posted by John April 25, 09 08:28 PM
  1. This guy is in no way shape or form going to be a nose tackle in the NFL. He doesn't have the size, strength, or moves for it. I'm not sure if I like this pick at all, especially what they gave up to move up 7 spots to get him. I'm not sure what they think is so special about this guy but he doesn't show up against good O lines, I watched him enough this year and last.

    Posted by Steve April 25, 09 08:48 PM
  1. DTs are hard to come by. Might be a good developmental player and if Wilfork decides he wants mad cash they can play out the string with him. Franchise him then trade him for a #1 pick in 2010 draft.

    They have gotten younger and faster in the secondary the past two drafts. Won't have to address this in the next few drafts.


    Still wondering what they are going to do with ILB and OLB positions though.

    Posted by rob April 25, 09 08:49 PM
  1. Thanks Steve, maybe next year Belichick will ask you to join the front office so you can let him know how to do his friggin job..

    Posted by CJ April 25, 09 09:03 PM
  1. "This guy is in no way shape or form going to be a nose tackle in the NFL. He doesn't have the size, strength, or moves for it."

    Steve, Ron Brace is 6'3'' 330 lbs so that pretty much debunks your theory about size limitations..

    Posted by Claude Cashmere April 25, 09 09:06 PM
  1. LOL at Brace not have size or strength. Idiot.

    Brace is one of the steals of this draft.

    Posted by Nick April 25, 09 09:11 PM
  1. BB has never, ever, messed around when picking a defensive line. Brace at least has a possibility of filling the bill.

    Posted by PaulK April 25, 09 09:15 PM
  1. Great. A 330-pounder with recurring back problems. Good thing back problems don't get worse when you're a 330-pounder and play a contact sport.

    Posted by Tony April 25, 09 09:21 PM
  1. Yeah, I mean BB's horrible record on the D-Line.....(sarcasm).

    Give him the benefit of the doubt. They don't trade up for fun. They wanted him and believed that he wouldn't be there when they were going to pick next.

    Posted by Rob in Central MA April 25, 09 09:32 PM
  1. Is Everetter Brown going to appear on this week's episode of "To Catch a Predator"? If not, I have no idea why we didn't take him at 23, nevermind 34. 13.5 sacks, smart, high character. Let's get a fat, underachieving nose tackle to replace our best player on the d-line instead though. Neither the Pope nor Belicheck is infallible, please keep that in mind. This is our third mediocre draft in four years (last year being the lone exception).

    Posted by Sean Ryan April 25, 09 10:26 PM
  1. Vince WIlfork is 325, there is no way that Brace is 330.

    Nick - Be careful.

    Posted by Steve April 25, 09 10:28 PM
  1. Brace has reoccuring back problems? Says who Mel KIper? For christ sake every player that was drafted he said was questionable because of durabilty issues. This isn't checkers, its football and people get hurt. We stunk to high heaven last year on defense. Seymour and Jarvis Green are not the players they used to be. Warren is starting to slow down too. When you get the chance to take a run stopping DL prospect you take them.

    Posted by RICEINTHEHALL April 25, 09 10:29 PM
  1. CJ - Yo act like BB is a draft wizard. He's made good picks, don't get me wrong, but he's made more that didn't pan out than he has ones that have. Thats the reason they are in a tight spot with the defense. And it's also the reason they needed to go out and get Moss and other receivers, their drafts were busts on WR. Just like they have been a bust for TE and running backs.

    Posted by Steve April 25, 09 10:31 PM
  1. Brace's true value can only be judged when you look at what Raji had to say about the team in his absence--"it was very humbling to realize they could win without me-"

    Posted by jczxohn1 April 25, 09 10:40 PM
  1. Ron Brace is 6'3 and weighs almost 330 pounds, he clearly has the size and power to be an effective DT in the NFL. The question on him is technique, which can be taught. Otherwise he was terrific. Brace had 1 season where he struggled with a sore back. And as memory serves he only missed 2 games as a result of it in 4 years. Yeah, that certainly indicates recurring back problems. People, please don't comment on players who you haven't watched. While BJ Raji was out on academic suspension in 2007, BC was the #2 ranked run defense in THE COUNTRY. I'll give you 1 guess who anchored the D-Line that season. Brace is a tremendous addition to the team...

    Posted by Dave April 25, 09 11:15 PM
  1. Hi Steve

    Bethel Johnson and Chad Jackson?

    Deion Branch and David Givens say hi.

    Step away from the interweb.

    Posted by Ghost of Lombardi April 25, 09 11:41 PM
  1. They gave up very little to move up for him. In fact, I'm surprised they did not trade up for a LB at any point. Certainly they could have offered more than other teams that traded up did. Still, getting the best pure nose tackle in the draft as insurance is wise. Everything starts with the DL on the Patriots defense. They need to protect against injury and Wright is just passable.

    Posted by M.E. April 25, 09 11:50 PM
  1. I don't get this pick at all. Wilfork is arguably the best Pats defender. OLB is a huge need. Seymour's and Wilfork's contracts are both up next year and you look for leverage on Wilfork or to let him go? Are you nuts? I love the Butler pickup. Chung fills a potential need and should be an upgrade over Sanders. But BRACE over Barwin? Or countless other options and to move up to get him? After walking away from a chance at Laurinaitis at 23 or 26? Sigh... Guess we miss Pioli more than I expected. I HATE THIS PICK

    Posted by drkwanda April 25, 09 11:53 PM
  1. Wilfork will be be next year and wants Haynesworth money. This is more than just keeping Vince fresh. Good pick...but what are they going to do about the OLB position?

    Posted by Gino April 26, 09 05:54 AM
  1. How can any of you really believe that you know more about drafting players than Coach BB? If four SB appearances with three wins and an undefeated season haven't convinced you, I can't imagine what would. Trading down into the second round and still picking up solid players means that the Pats will have that much more cap space to resign guys like Wilfork. Of course if Wilfork proves to be too expensive, then Brace can fill the spot at a lower cost. Considering how difficult it'll be for a rookie to crack the current line-up, all of these picks represent future insurance against injury and free agency at a much lower cost than picking a player in the first round without 1st round talent.

    Posted by Rick Kovar April 26, 09 06:46 AM
  1. Rick ...Well said....Pats need to have an eye on the big picture here when it comes to next years free agents....This is a "great value" move for the NE Patriots. As far as everyones concerns about OLB...We have 3 solid options that could turn out to be better then average NFL OLB's...Crable has to be comparable to Barwin...Redd looks to be very promising and probably not much value difference between him and a Brown from Fla State. I think we will see one of those 2 emerge as significant contributors this year barring injury...Do not think Banta-Cain will make the team when all is said and done

    Posted by Tim April 26, 09 09:33 AM
  1. How do you say Ron Brace? Mike Ruth!

    Posted by bill lederman April 26, 09 09:47 AM
  1. What is wrong with some of the people here? the 3-4 defense is about DL holding up two gaps so LB can run around and be playmakers. In that mold Brace is an excellent pick. Darius Butler has shut down corner potential that was taken in the 2nd round. And to compare Brace to Mike Ruth is idiocy! Brace is a much bigger man, ready-built for the NFL. Ruth was undersized with stubby arms..

    Posted by Konsumers April 26, 09 07:01 PM
  1. Brace is a true monster in the middle, and a VERY smart guy to boot (went to school with him). Prototypical nose tackle; I don't see him playing a lot next year, but BB is always looking to the future. I think the Pats got a steal here. Obviously Wilfork's contract looms over this pick, but considering NT is a much easier position to pick up than the Pats LB schemes (look at Wilforks rookie and 2nd year production), we may not have to pay big bucks to get the same production in 2011.

    Posted by Mark D. April 27, 09 09:50 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Mike Reiss, Christopher L. Gasper and the rest of the Globe team provide regular updates –and a behind-the-scenes look– on the daily happenings of the Patriots.

ask reiss

Questions will be considered for Mike's mailbag
Name:
E-mail:
Your question/comment:
archives

browse this blog

by category