< Back to Front Page Text size +

Patriots, economics & management

Posted by Mike Reiss, Globe Staff July 13, 2009 04:15 PM

ANALYSIS

Reviewing some NFL-related content from the last two weeks, this piece by Andrew Brandt of the National Football Post caught my eye. I thought the article was excellent and could be applied directly to the New England Patriots in describing part of what makes them a successful organization.

Brandt, a former front-office executive for the Green Bay Packers who currently consults for the Philadelphia Eagles, makes the point that spending doesn't necessarily result in winning in the NFL. He uses specific examples from his time with the Packers to reinforce the thought.

Brandt also clears up a common misperception that unused salary cap space is a reflection of a team that is not spending, while comparing the NFL's salary cap system to Major League Baseball.

As I read Brandt's piece, I thought about the importance of strong management, which led me to remarks that Patriots owner Robert Kraft recently made to The Times newspaper of Britain.

This comment from Kraft -- who was speaking about why he didn't purchase a Premier League soccer team in Liverpool -- stood out to me from the article:

"I’m happy to compete if the rules are the same for everybody, and then we’ll see how we well we manage against other people. I think we’re pretty good business people and we’ve gone through the learning curve of knowing what to do to build a winning organization – in any sport.”

All told, I found Brandt's piece informative, and thought there was a connection to the Patriots. Statistics show the Patriots spend their fair share of cash, but from a pure business perspective, it's their strong management and cap acumen that has helped set them apart from much of their competition.

EXTRA POINT: The Patriots formally announced the signing of cornerback Darius Butler today. Butler is one of the team's four second-round draft choices (41st overall). The team previously announced on Twitter that an agreement had been reached.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
4 comments so far...
  1. They haven't won a super bowl in 5 years and missed the play-offs last year. I think their economic plans require a change in philosophy. Check with the Steelers for a model franchise.

    Posted by realist July 13, 09 06:30 PM
  1. Heh! Even with 2 Super Bowl wins, it's amazing how many Steelers fans are still beset with such a toxic inferiority complex that they actually spend time on Patriot boards, lashing out at us!

    Any Patriot fans bother going to Steelers boards to Hate on the Steelers?

    I didn't think so.

    And that's because we remain the Alpha Team in this rivalry...and everyone on both sides KNOWS it! The wailing and gnashing of teeth in Steeler town, next year, is gonna be pretty damned funny, I think!

    Posted by Fanatical Yankee July 14, 09 02:56 AM
  1. Yes, shame on them for not winning a Super Bowl in five whole years. Time for sweeping changes.

    Posted by Scott July 14, 09 06:04 AM
  1. I'm not sure just any team can mimic the steeler model of having many terrible calls all go your way against Seattle or face teams with a combined 28-20 record while squeaking out a win against the 9-7 Cards with yet again more bogus calls. That's just hard to duplicate.


    But the Pat's model that has put them in four of the last eight Super Bowls is a damned good one.

    Posted by BP July 14, 09 03:03 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Mike Reiss, Christopher L. Gasper and the rest of the Globe team provide regular updates –and a behind-the-scenes look– on the daily happenings of the Patriots.

ask reiss

Questions will be considered for Mike's mailbag
Name:
E-mail:
Your question/comment:
archives

browse this blog

by category