It's hard not to look into the mirror these days, thinking these vile thoughts, without wondering whether I've somehow broken through a time warp, or staggered onto the set of the next Geico caveman commercial, to find that I am indeed the caveman.
But here goes . . .
Note to NHL: Bring back the fighting, as fast as possible, I'm begging you.
In the spirit of full disclosure, it is without question that my sentiments are influenced by watching what most often has been an emotionally bankrupt Bruins team here in 2006-07. Even when there is the rare case of group indigestion along the boards, I have taken to murmuring in the press box, "Please, don't anyone get mad down there. Whatever you do, don't throw a punch! Gentlemen, above all -- manners."
They must be listening, because, golly gee, I've yet to even hear a discouraging word uttered, never mind witness a right cross to someone's kisser. Did all the skating suits lose their spit and vinegar when they walked away from the humiliating beating they took at the collective bargaining table? Sure looks that way.
Honestly, isn't the politeness of the product killing you? If you are of a certain age, maybe 30 or older, you must remember when every lineup had at least a couple of guys who showed up each night just aching for a fight. Bob Probert come to mind? Terry O'Reilly? Tiger Williams? Games had a pulse, oozed passion.
No doubt, the whole thing got carried away, to the point that we had to witness the sad spectacle of staged bouts that really had no context within the, uh, battle. The whole fight theme got beaten to death, if you will, and wasn't so much disgusting as it was downright silly and boring. A true fight was a spectacle. A staged bout was a farce. If you watched enough, you knew the difference, as sure as you knew art from pornography.
So the Lords of the Boards went about cleaning it all up, tossing the boxers out with the turnbuckle, with the hope that the game would capture the imagination of America's TV-viewing public. To do that, the Lords believed, they couldn't have the cavemen carrying cudgels and beating one another into the ice surface. And that thinking had some merit around 1990.
But look where American TV has gone since then. There is no taste standard. There is no dignity factor. The uglier and the gorier, the more outlandish and the more prurient, the better. Hate entices, blood simply sells. And we can't wait to watch. (Save yourself the e-mail, because you don't have an argument, unless your clicker got frozen on Cartoon Network or Animal Planet.)
Think anyone down here in the Lower 50 today would turn away from one of the buckets o'blood we witnessed in the early '70s? Can you imagine the ratings that something like the Bruins' first-round sweep of the Maple Leafs in 1969 -- Pat Quinn's likeness hanged from the second balcony after his hit on Bobby Orr -- would bring today? Absolute guarantee: that kind of NHL would not be on the Vs. network. No, sir. We'd be watching that kind of hockey strictly via pay-per-view. And the third period might cost more than the first.
That said, at the time it was the right decision to try to sanitize the game. We all know TV drives the bus, and by the end of the '80s, we still held some sensibilities and talked about social rights and good taste. But, folks, TV drove the bus right off the road, much to our entertainment and approval, and that now should be Gary Bettman & Co.'s mandate to follow the party right over the Jersey barrier. No time like the present to take the Coolest Game on Ice and allow it to simmer and sizzle again.
To open the emotional floodgates, and boost the ratings and attendance beyond imagination, the Lords of the Boards would have to amend the rulebook and once again allow bench-clearing brawls. That is not going to happen. In fact, given the tenor of times in sports labor, the NHLPA might step in and prevent its rank and file from playing in what could be fairly portrayed as an unsafe work environment.
But the easiest fix, right here and right now, would be to thin the rulebook out just enough to bring back one of the game's charming attributes: the third man in.
Once was the time when the game allowed a teammate to stick up for another teammate. And because the game allowed it, rosters were built, in part, on that principle. And when a teammate was able to stick up for another teammate, lo and behold, esprit de corps was increased, tempers raised, and fists flew. It was some kind of wonderful, I'll tell you that.
In today's game, to be a third man in is also to be a quick exit, stage right. Because of that, night after night, period after period, politeness rules and passion fades deeper . . . and deeper . . . and deeper into the background.
Skill is a great thing. The NHL today, as in decades past, is full of dazzling skaters and brilliant stickhandlers. They provide some great entertainment. But the greatest entertainment of all, which is what the NHL can be, and in fact once was, is when dazzling skill and raw passion skate side by side, on a sheet of ice ringed by boards that act as the frame of a heaving, emotional pit.
At its best, the NHL is a bouquet of both roses and thorns. Today, with the barbs plucked from the product, the scent is not nearly the same.
Going south in Atlanta
There is nothing wrong with Atlanta goalie Kari Lehtonen, but his game the last couple of weeks has left plenty to be desired.
Considered one of the game's top young goaltenders, the 23-year-old Finn, a sensational 7-1-1 out of the gate this season, entered last night's game in a 1-6-0 slump. His goals-against mark was a slightly bloated 3.06, and his save percentage a pedestrian .894. What happened to the Finnish goaltending mystique?
On a club that tends to struggle when its power play is muted (not the case during Boston's last visit, when Atlanta went 3 for 11), a Lehtonen letdown can lead to grim results. The Thrashers were stumbling along at 4 for their last 31 on the power play after Friday night's 3-2 loss in Tampa.
Into the fray comes Jason Krog, the former University of New Hampshire star and 1999 Hobey Baker winner. Krog, 31, was the AHL's top scorer (18 games/39 points) when the Thrashers summoned him Friday from the Chicago Wolves, and he scored against the Lightning. Krog, who had limited success with the Islanders and Ducks, spent the last two years in Europe (Austria, Switzerland, Sweden) before hitching on with Atlanta in July as a free agent.
Atlanta has three of the game's most potent offensive performers in Ilya Kovalchuk, Marian Hossa, and Slava Kozlov (all among the league's top 10 scorers last week). But beyond those three, scoring becomes a real challenge.
Meanwhile, Boston pivot Marc Savard is on a pace to eclipse the career-high 97 points he notched last season with Atlanta, refuting opinions that he was more a givee than a giver with the Thrashers.
Dealing from a position of strength
The Blackhawks aren't actively shopping prime defenseman Brent Seabrook, according to one veteran general manager, but with the loss of Michael Handzus (blown knee), they have to find Martin Havlat a running mate when the dynamic Czech forward returns from his ankle injury. He should be back in a week or two.
Chicago has enough underlying talent on defense with the likes of Duncan Keith and Cam Barker that it can consider -- must consider? --wheeling the 6-foot-3-inch Seabrook. His combination of talent, age (21), salary ($942,000 for this season and 2007-08), and the fact that he is a coveted righthanded shot, make him extremely easy to move.
With their two prime point men, Andrei Markov and Sheldon Souray, free to walk as of July 1, the Canadiens could get very interested in Seabrook. Perhaps this is the deal that finally will bring Sergei Samsonov back to Chicago, where he would be reunited with Rick Dudley, his close pal from their Detroit Vipers days. Dudley is the Hawks' assistant general manager.
Etc.
Kevin Paul ![]()