What color
do you bleed?
< Back to front page Text size +

In Bill we trust

Posted by Chad Finn, Globe Staff November 27, 2008 05:59 AM

I came into this season believing that Bill Belichick and the Patriots needed to win the Super Bowl to secure their legacy, or at least the perception of their legacy. It was difficult to admit from a fan's standpoint, but the painful truth seemed obvious: SpyGate was a stain that could be removed only with a fourth championship.

Although it certainly would be a lovely affirmation, now I’m not so sure another Lombardi Trophy is a requirement. Perhaps this is all Belichick needed: an unexpected way to restore his and his franchise’s good names. Belichick and the 2008 New England Patriots, to the dismay of their countless skeptics, have greatly exceeded expectations without their MVP quarterback, not to mention countless other fallen members of the cast. It is a remarkable story of resilience, and Belichick’s accomplishments during this relentlessly compelling season should be enough to repair whatever dings and dents his reputation suffered a year ago.

Talk about your redemption songs. In the immediate aftermath of franchise quarterback Tom Brady’s devastating knee injury 7 minutes and 33 seconds into the new season, the pundits, experts, and multi-concussed ESPN analysts practically sprinted to declare the wicked witch in the gray hoodie dead. The tone of the moment was downright snide, almost gleeful. I’ve never understood the blatant and widespread animosity toward Belichick — it’s just so personal.

Sure, he’s about as glib as a chalkboard, and sometimes it seems he’s unforthcoming just for the sport of it. Perhaps he’s more of a bear and a bully behind the scenes than we know, but the collective vindictiveness when he fails or catches a bad break is just so unbecoming. I’ll never get it.

I imagine these statistics might be seared onto your brain given how frequently the networks hammered us with them in the season’s early weeks: With Brady directing his offense, Belichick is 87-24 as a head coach during the regular season, and 14-3 in the postseason. Without Brady, Belichick is 41-57 in the regular season and 1-1 in the playoffs. The point did not need to be spelled out: Now we’ll see how good of a coach he is, went the common refrain. The implication was clear: He was nothing before Tom Brady, and he’ll be nothing without him.

There’s no disputing that Brady enhanced Belichick’s standing in the game’s history. Of course he did. You cannot exaggerate Brady’s importance in the franchise’s five AFC title game bids, four Super Bowl appearances, and three championships in seven seasons. If he never takes another snap — and I apologize for even suggesting such a scenario — he will be in the argument about the greatest quarterback of all time. But it’s somewhere between foolish and disingenuous to suggest the relationship wasn’t mutually and equally beneficial.

Another common twist on this is just as misguided: The perception that Belichick lucked into Brady. (If they thought he was so special, why’d they draft washout tight end Dave Stachelski a round earlier? Huh? Huh?) There’s little doubt that Brady was essentially a Dick Rehbein-endorsed quarterback flier during the 2000 draft, but it’s apparent that the Patriots saw characteristics in him — uncommon preparation, leadership, and desire, for starters — that told them very early on that they had discovered something considerably more valuable than training-camp roster fodder.

Belichick wouldn’t have let a skinny sixth-round pick occupy a coveted roster spot as fourth quarterback in 2000 if he hadn’t recognized encouraging traits in him. He wouldn’t have elevated him above a respected backup such as Damon Huard in training camp a year later if the signs that he was eminently capable of doing the job weren’t there. And I will remain forever convinced that Brady was on the verge of winning the starting job from Drew Bledsoe even before Mo Lewis so viciously made the decision for everyone.

In retrospect, Belichick clearly recognized something we didn’t, and something few other coaches would have noticed. That theme seems to be recurring seven seasons later, as understudy Matt Cassel writes a tale that rivals Brady’s in its improbability. While we savor Cassel’s emergence, we can’t help but recall the words of one of the few national media voices who dares to heap praise on the Patriots’ coach. “Belichick thinks he has something special in Matt Cassel,” said Phil Simms of CBS just one week after the sky seemed to fall in Foxborough. Funny how no one is pining for Daunte Culpepper or yelping about the Patriots’ lack of a proven backup now.

Yes, Belichick knew best. Again. And although I disagree with the new conventional wisdom that this might be his best coaching job — he gets demerits for channeling Rich Kotite in the costly loss to the Colts, and nothing will ever top winning Super Bowl XXXVI with that limited roster — I can offer no higher praise for Belichick than this: Given equal talent and with something of tremendous importance at stake, I would not hesitate to choose him to coach my football team over every last one of his current peers and perhaps over everyone in the game’s history.

In Bill we trust? You’d damn well better believe it. Still.

But you know how this tired game is played. Matt Cassel’s ascent to stardom will be official only when the network blowhards start gobbling that he made Bill Belichick. And not the other way around.

OT columnist Chad Finn is a sports reporter for Boston.com and can be reached at finn@globe.com

11 comments so far...
  1. Great article.....Thank you for writing what many of us believe.

    Posted by Jillian November 27, 08 11:09 AM
  1. "multi-concussed ESPN analysts"
    Great comment. Dead on.
    Why do they hate? Haters hate. Their hate must not give us hate.
    I feel for them, especially Tom Jackson. Tom Jackson bought into something, decades ago, maybe even in pop warner. The Pats, Bill B., and Co., first thing they did, in 2000, was create a culture of accountability. The pats went 5-11, in 1999 they were 8-8, at first it looked like failure, or at least backward motion.
    I don't want to digress.
    The " Haters" are critics that can no longer "do", or could never "do". If their opinions are wrong, then they lose credibility. Their, opinions, may be the only thing keeping them attached top the game.
    This is more than a comment, this is a statement.
    "In a world of mediocracy,.... those who who choose to be exceptional , those who take pride and JOY in the process of excelling, those who see ten moves ahead while the rest dwell on yesterday,....... those are the motivated.

    Posted by Pierre` November 27, 08 07:08 PM
  1. Tom Jackson is the number one analyst that need to stick his foot in his pathetic Pats hating mouth. I hope he has been putting his money where his mouth is and lost his shirt. He will lose more as the Pats roll,,

    Posted by atrain November 28, 08 03:27 PM
  1. Great article!
    I hope someone has the sense to send this to ESPN.

    Posted by Gene O'Neil November 29, 08 09:35 AM
  1. It still never ceases to amaze me that the Denver Broncos could win two Super Bowls with what amounted to an illegal roster in 1997-98 (salary cap cheating), yet nobody ever talks about those Super Bowl wins as being "tainted."

    The Pats were taping signals as part of their overall scouting and film study operation, which is something that had been a common practice in the NFL for years until Godfather Goodell became commissioner. These were signals that the Pats' coaching staff KNEW were in all likelihood going to have changed by the next time they faced that same team months later, or even a year or two later. Yet that minor offense was blown up into the scandal of the century, and Denver's major offense wasn't, all because the Broncos' head coach is nice to the media, and the Pats' head coach isn't. It still amazes me that anyone took that "scandal" seriously. The Pats' legacy is just fine, thank you. It never needed any rehabbing--not if you actually understand the game of football that is.

    Posted by Anonymous November 29, 08 11:25 AM
  1. Thank you for this article.
    You have nailed it!

    Posted by Lynn November 29, 08 09:24 PM
  1. "You cannot exaggerate Brady’s importance in the franchise’s five AFC titles, four Super Bowl appearances, and three championships in seven seasons. "
    Is this a typo? If you win an AFC title you get to go to the Super Bowl right?
    Kind of hard to believe a coach wouldn't get credit for three Super Bowl titles, the first with essentially, a rookie quarterback. You're right. Belichick deserves better.

    Posted by Robert November 29, 08 09:53 PM
  1. Keep up the good work

    Posted by jc November 30, 08 10:43 AM
  1. I agree wholeheartedly with your analysis of Bill B. From the narrow perspective of professional football, you have said it all and quite correctly so.

    As to your wonderment about the personal negativity toward Belichick, it comes from two sources: 1. Those that can't stand the success of others, media-types that want themeselves to be treated as kings and don't like the irrelevance with which Belichik views them, and so on--things other commenters have already noted and 2. Those who correcftly believe that the truly elevated ought to, in addition to ascending the mountain of professional success, be at least 3/4 of a decent person. Those who believe that personal traits matter in the rarified air that many want to thrust Belichick into. Ah, there's the rub. Those folks, who rightly have standing in this debate, may have tired of seeing the evidence that Belichick does behave as if he writes his own rules ( SpyGate wasn't a collective hallucination-it happened), tired of seeing him, when asked by a 12 year old adoring fan for a handshake, says nothing, turns on his heel and walks away, tired of Bill's apparent confusion about wives and girl friends, etc. Both groups are in the mix; #1 more dominant than #2 to be sure. But, both are at play.

    Posted by Jim November 30, 08 11:11 AM
  1. yes yes and more yes
    i can remember when everyone was saying they wouldn't give up a number one pick to get him as coach.
    Thank god for mr. kraft.
    We have three chanpionships.
    Its sooooo sweet.
    Bill is a great guy and a great coach
    Other coaches know how great he is and his players love him.

    Posted by kdeiss December 1, 08 01:58 AM
  1. Terrible Towel: $5.00

    Ward #86 or Polamalu #43 Jersey: $30

    Ticket to the Playoffs: $250

    Sight of Bellichick standing miserable in the rain as his team implodes: Priceless

    Posted by Joe B December 2, 08 08:40 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

This week's OT cover

OT cover image

OT Columnists

Charles P. Pierce writes for the Boston Globe Magazine. A long-time sportswriter and columnist, Pierce is a frequent guest on national TV and radio.
Tony Massarotti is a Boston Globe sportswriter and has been writing about sports in Boston for the last 19 years. He is currently spotlighted as a featured columnist on Boston.com.
;
Tom Caron serves as studio host for NESN's Boston Red Sox coverage.
;
Bob Lobel was a WBZ-TV sportscaster for 29 years, anchoring more than 10,000 sports reports.
Chad Finn is a sports reporter at the Globe and founder of the Touching All The Bases blog. Before joining the Globe, he was an award winning columnist at the Concord Monitor.

OT beat writers

Maureen Mullen brings you Red Sox information and insights.

Tom Wilcox covers the Patriots.

Scott Souza is all over the Celtics.

Danny Picard is on the ice with the Bruins.

Mike McDonald takes a look at the humorous side of Boston sports

Archives

Browse this blog