WADA president John Fahey derided Armstrong’s defense that he doped to create ‘‘a level playing field’’ as ‘‘a convenient way of justifying what he did — a fraud.’’
‘‘He was wrong, he cheated and there was no excuse for what he did,’’ Fahey said by telephone in Australia.
If Armstrong ‘‘was looking for redemption,’’ Fahey added, ‘‘he didn’t succeed in getting that.’’
USADA chief Travis Tygart, who pursued the case against Armstrong when others had stopped, said the cyclist’s confession was just a start.
‘‘Tonight, Lance Armstrong finally acknowledged that his cycling career was built on a powerful combination of doping and deceit,’’ Tygart said. ‘‘His admission that he doped throughout his career is a small step in the right direction. But if he is sincere in his desire to correct his past mistakes, he will testify under oath about the full extent of his doping activities.’’
Livestrong issued a statement that said the charity was ‘‘disappointed by the news that Lance Armstrong misled people during and after his cycling career, including us.’’
‘‘Earlier this week, Lance apologized to our staff and we accepted his apology in order to move on and chart a strong, independent course,’’ it said.
The interview revealed very few details about Armstrong’s performance-enhancing regimen that would surprise anti-doping officials.
What he called ‘‘my cocktail’’ contained the steroid testosterone and the blood-booster erythropoetein, or EPO, ‘‘but not a lot,’’ Armstrong said. That was on top of blood-doping, which involved removing his own blood and weeks later re-injecting it into his system.
All of it was designed to build strength and endurance, but it became so routine that Armstrong described it as ‘‘like saying we have to have air in our tires or water in our bottles.’’
‘‘That was, in my view, part of the job,’’ he said.
Armstrong was evasive, or begged off entirely, when Winfrey tried to connect his use to others who aided or abetted the performance-enhancing scheme on the USPS team
When she asked him about Italian doctor Michele Ferrari, who was implicated in doping-related scrapes and has also been banned from cycling for life, Armstrong relied, ‘‘It’s hard to talk about some of these things and not mention names. There are people in this story, they’re good people and we've all made mistakes ... they’re not monsters, not toxic and not evil, and I viewed Michele Ferrari as a good man and smart man and still do.’’
But that’s nearly all Armstrong would say about the physician that some reports have suggested educated the cyclist about doping and looked after other aspects of his training program.
He was almost as reluctant to discuss claims by former teammates Tyler Hamilton and Floyd Landis that Armstrong told them, separately, that he tested positive during the 2001 Tour de Suisse and conspired with officials of the International Cycling Union officials to cover it up — in exchange for a donation.
‘‘That story wasn’t true. There was no positive test, no paying off of the labs. There was no secret meeting with the lab director,’’ he said.
Winfrey pressed him again, asking if the money he donated wasn’t part of a tit-for-tat agreement, ‘‘Why make it?’’
‘‘Because they asked me to,’’ Armstrong began.
‘‘This is impossible for me to answer and have anybody believe it,’’ he said. ‘‘It was not in exchange for any cover-up. ... I have every incentive here to tell you ‘yes.'’’
Finally, he summed up the entire episode this way: ‘‘I was retired. ... They needed money.’’
The closest Armstrong came to contrition was when Winfrey asked him about his apologies in recent days, notably to former teammate Frankie Andreu, who struggled to find work in cycling after Armstrong dropped him from the USPS team, as well as his wife, Betsy. Armstrong said she was jealous of his success, and invented stories about his doping as part of a long-running vendetta.
‘‘Have you made peace?’’ Winfrey asked.
‘‘No,’’ Armstrong replied, ‘‘because they've been hurt too badly, and a 40-minute (phone) conversation isn’t enough.’’
He also called London Sunday Times reporter David Walsh as well as Emma O'Reilly, who worked as a masseuse for the USPS team and later provided considerable material for a critical book Walsh wrote about Armstrong and his role in cycling’s doping culture.
Armstrong subsequently sued for libel in Britain and won a $500,000 judgment against the newspaper, which is now suing to get the money back. Armstrong was, if anything, even more vicious in the way he went after O'Reilly. He intimated she was let go from the Postal team because she seemed more interested in personal relationships than professional ones.Continued...