After he won last week's Car of Tomorrow debut in the Food City 500 at Bristol (Tenn.) Motor Speedway, Nextel Cup driver Kyle Busch, a star of tomorrow, climbed out of his No. 5 Chevrolet and offered the following assessment of the COT: "I'm still not a big fan of these things. I can't stand to drive them."
Not exactly what you would call a ringing endorsement of NASCAR's initiative to phase in the COT in 16 races this season, including all 10 of the Chase for the Nextel Cup Championship, before fully implementing it in 2008.
Acknowledging Bristol revealed some issues that had to be addressed immediately -- most notably exhaust system failures, which, in some cases, resulted in elevated carbon monoxide levels in the cockpit and caused protective foam barriers in the driver's side door panel to melt -- NASCAR officials were not as quick to rush to judgment, preferring instead to build a broader body of evidence, which will include tomorrow's Goody's 500 at Martinsville (Va.) Speedway.
"We came out of Bristol with a list of things to look at," said John Darby, director of the Nextel Cup Series, during a teleconference yesterday with Robin Pemberton, NASCAR's vice president of competition.
"Obviously, there was some exhaust system failures," Darby said. "We've talked to the teams that experienced those failures and have addressed them, or the teams have addressed them and are working on the problems."
Darby indicated some teams experienced tailpipe failures as a result of trying to use a "thinner overall material," he said. "In fact, when you apply the heat of the exhaust and everything, [the tailpipes] did crack and they did fail."
As for the overall performance of the car? "From a competition standpoint," Darby said, "my side of it is I don't know if we'll see that until we get to some bigger tracks, maybe Darlington [May 12] specifically, in regards to all the cars."
Asked what letter grade he would give the COT's debut, Pemberton initially gave it an A, but then said A-minus.
"The only reason there's a minus in there is potentially a couple of the problems with just the parts and pieces, whether it's the tailpipes or things of that nature," he said. "But that's where I'll put it."
Said Darby: "I'm going with a B because I want to incorporate into that whole process the garage operations, the inspection process, and what we expected it to do and anticipated and how the end result was, you know, everything that surrounds the entire weekend more than just the race."
And so it seemed curious that NASCAR gave Greg Biffle and his Roush Fenway Racing team what seemed to amount to a free pass after postrace inspections at Bristol revealed Biffle's No. 16 car to be a quarter-inch low.
NASCAR took Biffle's car to the Research and Development Center in Concord, N.C., for further study and found the right side of Biffle's car had settled because of a spring failure, resulting in no penalty.
"NASCAR understands now that with all of the things that we've had go on, I think that they kind of jumped to conclusions that we had figured out some way to beat the system," Biffle told Marty Snider and David Poole, hosts of "The Morning Drive" earlier this week on Sirius NASCAR Radio. "So we've been kind of accused by, let's say, the public, held in public court, that we cheated or whatnot, and that's not the case and NASCAR knows that."
Material from personal interviews, wire services, various sanctioning bodies, race teams, sponsors, and track publicity departments was used in this report. ![]()