Just win, baby
The gap in the NFL hierarchy between the New England Patriots and the Oakland Raiders is as vast as the distance between Foxborough and Oakland. So it's tough to fault Richard Seymour's present choice of football purgatory over joining the NFL's literal Black Hole.
But by no means does that suggest the Patriots made the wrong decision by coldly sending him to Oakland for a first-round pick in 2011. I suppose there's a chance that public opinion is correct and the Patriots will dearly miss Seymour this year, much in the way the Deion Branch deal in 2006 might have directly cost the Patriots a shot at a fourth Lombardi Trophy. But history and logic tells me that trading Seymour now will become one more article of evidence for those who believe the "In Bill We Trust" mantra, and we'll all be gloating in two years when Belichick cashes in the winning lottery ticket, courtesy of the delusional and dilapidated Al Davis Empire
Besides, who says liking this trade and being bummed to see Seymour must be mutually exclusive? The man was easily admired as a football player. So many of the Patriots accomplishments since 2001 wouldn't have been possible without his contributions. From afar, he seems like a good and decent man. He is the best lineman in the franchise's 50 years, everything that Ken Sims was supposed to be but wasn't, and all I need to do is pop in from the trio of Super Bowl DVDs to watch Big Sey at his dominating best again.
But I do have to admit, I'm not quite sure what his best is at this point. The stat sheet suggests he had a quality season last year, leading the team with eight sacks. And those who are confident that they recognize the subtleties of the NFL tell me that his main job was to occupy blockers, thus allowing the team's linebackers to enjoy the sunlight and the glory.
I'm not going to grab my stopwatch and put on my whistle and pretend to be of those people. I couldn't confidently tell you if Seymour had a great season, a good season, or a mediocre season a year ago. I recall seeing him make sporadic big plays. I definitely recall him constantly tangling with offensive linemen, sometimes two at a time. But I don't recall noticing him making those wrecking-ball plays of his youth. Maybe that was by Belichick's design. Maybe my memory is on the fritz. Or maybe he's just not that player anymore.
The gap between what sportswriters and fans think they know and what well-trained coaches truly know is wider in the NFL than in any other sport. Some of that is due to the obsessive and the ridiculous -- do the Pats really need a 500-page playbook? Seems a bit excessive to me. But I don't think I'm talking out of turn to say there are complexities taking place on the field every Sunday that elude the vast majority of those peering down from the press box.
My hunch -- and that's all it is -- is that Seymour enjoyed his prime earlier than most, and his early 30s won't come close to being as professionally rewarding as his early 20s. But again, it's just that -- a hunch. Ultimately, I trust that Bill Belichick's assessment is correct here, because virtually every controversial decision he has made during his nine-year run in New England -- particularly the ones that leave the harpies howling "He's going to regret this! The arrogance! How could he do such a thing?!" -- has turned out in the favor of the franchise.
I wrote about this (transparent plug alert!) in the Maple Street Press Patriots season preview book, but here is a condensed version of Belichick decisions that were widely panned at the time: Benching Drew Bledsoe for Tom Brady. Trading Bledsoe to the Bills for a first-round pick, which eventually became Ty Warren. Letting Adam Vinatieri leave via free agency, and replacing him by drafting Stephen Gostkowski. Trading for perceived malcontents Corey Dillon and Randy Moss. Keeping Matt Cassel over Matt Gutierrez. Turning to Cassel when Brady got hurt rather than signing Byron Leftwich, Tim Rattay, or Chris Simms. And on it goes.
The most obvious comparison to the Seymour move, and one that has been made frequently in recent days, is to Belichick's shocking decision to cut popular safety Lawyer Milloy five days before the 2003 season opener. Milloy, like Seymour now, was 29 and had the hard-earned reputation as an integral member of the Patriots' defense, though the statistics in Milloy's case told a story of a player who was filling a uniform but not accomplishing much else.
Milloy haunted them for exactly one week, the first one of that season, a hideous 31-0 whupping at Buffalo, the proud safety's new employer. You might recall that the Patriots went on to win the Super Bowl that season. And the next.
They recovered from the trauma of losing Milloy, and they'll recover from Seymour's departure, assuming he doesn't end up back here in some convoluted ruling by Roger Goodell. And I hope he doesn't. Yes, dealing him might make the Patriots weaker this season. It almost certainly will, though I also suspect Belichick has recognized an attribute in someone -- Myron Pryor? Ron Brace? Derrick Burgess? -- that is yet to be recognized by you and me.
Only the Branch move -- he was traded after a contentious holdout to the Seahawks for a No. 1 pick that became Brandon Meriweather -- had a lasting negative impact, primarily because the Patriots lacked a suitable replacement, and no, you do not count, Mr. Caldwell. Losing Milloy proved irrelevant since the man who filled his spot was a superior version of himself, Rodney Harrison.
While I sometimes wish there was a little more room for sentimentality and accountability within the Patriots organization -- I don't see how it could hurt to explain why they made the trade, if not to us jackals in the media, then to those diehards in the No. 93 jerseys sitting in the "inexpensive" $65 dollar upper-level seats -- I admire that this franchise is unyielding in doing what it believes is right, conventional wisdom be damned.
Robert Kraft has said the Patriots are trying to follow the model of the dynastic San Francisco 49ers, who extended their reign into the '90s by turning over the roster, oftentimes with unpopular decisions. And I'm yet to find someone who disagrees with the notion that the Patriots defense needs to get faster and younger. Hey, Ronnie Lott might be the best safety the game has known, but he wasn't around for the Niners last championship.
Go ahead, call me an apologist if you must. Call me a toady, a lemming, or even a Belichicklet. I'm cool with that.
Because when the dust settles, the confetti is fluttering in the air in Miami, and the 2009 schedule has been completed, there's a reasonable chance the harpies will be wondering how the man in the gray hoodie was right again.
About Touching All The Bases
|
Irreverence and insight from Chad Finn, a Globe/Boston.com sports writer and media columnist. A winner of several national and regional writing awards, he is the founder and sole contributor to the TATB blog, which launched in December 2004. Yes, he realizes how lucky he is.
|

Chad Finn on video


The best of Touching All The Bases
- Vote for Pedro
- The best day ever
- Sports talk radio-active
- David Ortiz has done it again!
- Better man
- End of the idiots
- U gut male
- Questions we'd have asked the Texas Con Man
- Anniversary of an Angel
- The Air Coryell Chargers
- The top 10 Maine Guides
- The 1985 L.A. Clippers
- The day Yankees fans discovered TATB
- 'Without a doubt, I'll be part of the Celtics' tradition'
- The empire strikes out
- Shortstops: The boy band
- For Greenie, and Brian Denman, too
- The Big Ticket comes to Boston
- Do not bat this man second
- TATB Live: World Series, Game 4
- Josh Beckett, and that time I was right about everything
- Eau de Intangibles
- The loneliest number
- Sleep through the static
- Shining moments
- This place is meant for me
- I don't like the drugs but the drugs like me
- Red Sox All-Time Dirtbag Team
- Live from Ft. Myers
- Quiz me
- Turn, turn, turn
- Fireworks on Cloud 10
- Two great seasons
- Happy trails, No. 11
- The enemies list
- Ultimate Patriots Quiz, Part 1
- Ultimate Patriots Quiz, Part 2
- Guess that '70s Ballplayer, Part 1
- Guess that '70s Ballplayer, Part 2
- Guess that '70s Ballplayer, Part 3
- Guess that '70s Ballplayer, Part 4
- Reeling in the years
- Daddy's girl
- It was the best of times . . .
- As Teixeira turns
- Dave Bourque
- The 20 most important Red Sox
- Tito's parting thoughts
- About last night
- A brief tribute to ancient pitchers
- Manny moments
- Pied Papi
- Superiority complex
- Seventeen so sweet
- Lefthanded compliment
- I'm a believer
- Greed is god
- The truth hurts
- Buckle up
- Sweet and glow
- Into the sunset
- Reed it and weep
- A mere immortal
- In Bill we trust
- Good, better, best







