THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
< Back to front page Text size +

Kinnon makes case for local meals tax in Malden

Posted by Matt Byrne September 30, 2010 10:04 AM

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

A proposal to levy an additional local meals tax was introduced to citizens last night at the first in a series of public meetings on the plan held by the City Council.

If approved, the measure would add .75 a percentage point to the state meals tax, which stands at 6.25 percent. 

This "local option" is a feature added to the tax code when legislators on Beacon Hill revisited the state tax on dining out last year.

If adopted in its current form, the additional fraction of a percent is expected to bring in upwards of $500,000, said Ward 6 Councilor Neil Kinnon, who introduced the legislation and gave a brief slideshow presentation outlining the impacts and context of the tax.

The bump in revenue could help the city pay for upgrades to ailing infrastructure, fund the acquisition of open space, and restore previously cut public safety personnel, among a host of other possibilities, Kinnon said. 

The city has struggled to close a budget gap left this fiscal year by reductions in local aid from the state.

But some in the audience last night spoke out against the tax, saying that it would hurt local restauranteurs who struggle enough with the 6.25 percent meals tax the state collects.

Shane Smith, the proprietor of O'Neill's in Malden, said the additional 1.25 percentage points the legislature approved last year costs him about $6,500 a year. The additional local tax could increase that yearly bill by about $4,000, he said. 

"We're providing employment in town," Smith said. "This money would come directly out of their pockets." 

Kinnon listed seven neighboring cities or towns that have adopted the measure. 
Ward 4 Councilor James Nestor, who chairs the Finance Committee, said in an interview after the hearing that the tax was tabled in June during the budgeting process, and was taken up again in September by Kinnon on the condition that the money generated by the tax would fund specific projects and not land in the general fund where its use would be difficult to track.

If the revenue is deposited into the general fund, it could be dispersed like any other chunk of cash, including going toward salaries at the fire and police departments, among other uses. 

Kinnon said the public hearings were called as a safeguard against the type of public backlash generated by a controversial deal to lease a city park to the Mystic Valley Regional Charter School, a deal which critics in Malden have said was not proffered in the open and circumvented the public input process.

Brian Parow, spokesman for the union that represents firefighters and officers, was first to address the council about the meals tax boost and urged using the money to restore staffing levels at the Fire Department.

Ten firefighters were laid off after a shortfall in state aid to cities and towns forced Mayor Richard C. Howard to renegotiate contracts with many of the city's unionized employees. Police and fire unions rejected city offers, which would have changed their health care coverage and increased premiums and out-of-pocket costs. Police were spared the bulk of the layoffs after the mayor cobbled together money from other parts of the budget at the 11th hour. 

At least eight in the audience donned red Malden Fire Department shirts, and at least one was in uniform. A few spoke to the council, expressing in brief and direct language the need to restore the department to its former staffing levels. 

One retired firefighter, Donald Boyce, who said he served for 34 years, delivered a similar message in perhaps the starkest tone:

 "You just lost 14 men. At some point this has got to cease. It's getting to a point where it's ridiculous," Boyce said. "Whatever the council has to do ... What ever the heck it takes, get these guys back to work. If you've got to find the money somewhere else, then find it." 

By a show of hands requested by Kinnon, a large majority of the approximately 40 audience members indicated they would prefer the tax to fund specific projects such as capital investments.

Among the suggestions made last night was for the city to purchase open space or invest in infrastructure, which Kinnon said in his presentation was badly needed.

"We do our operating budget, and we're always broke because we spend it all," he said in the presentation. "It's more like crisis management when we try to fix things in the city."

Others at the meeting advocated for the acquisition of open space such as the High Rock area, an approximately 8-acre patch of woods that some residents said is an invaluable natural oasis.

One resident, who said he lives across from the High Rock area, said he supports the tax because he said the city needs the open space.

"Malden is becoming more and more a suburb of Boston. It's getting to be one big hot top parking lot," the man said.
    waiting for twitterWaiting for Twitter to feed in the latest...