THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
< Back to front page Text size +

Consultants include gas plant, marine terminal as options to replace Salem Power Station

Posted by Amanda Stonely  October 5, 2011 08:16 AM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

SALEM – Many environmentalists cheered last spring when the owners of the coal-burning Salem Power Station announced that the site was too costly to operate and said it would close the plant in 2014.

Some thought the 62-acre site would make a great wind turbine or solar panel site. And while those options were included in an assessment study released Tuesday night by consultants working for the city, the study pointed to a natural gas plant as one of the most viable redevelopment options.

“For us, it’s something that we’d be open to,” Mayor Kim Driscoll  told about 100 people at a public meeting in Salem Tuesday night. The meeting was led by four consulting companies – who were commissioned nine months ago to prepare a state-subsidized $200,000  report to assess the redevelopment prospects for the site.

While the consultants from Jacobs, Sasaki Associates,  La Capra Associates and Robert Charles Lesser & Company are expected to release a final report later this month, the group released preliminary findings that show that a natural gas plant, along with light industrial and manufacturing plants and a new marine terminal that would include a port for cruise ships, could bring in more than $3.6 million in tax revenue a year. That was the best economic scenario presented by the consultants. Even if it was implemented, the plan would still fall short of the $4.75 million annual fee paid by Dominion,  the current power plant owner and the city’s largest taxpayer.    

Consultants say a natural gas plant could match the current plant’s output of 750 –megawatts  and operate on just 10  acres. That would far exceed putting wind and solar renewable energy systems on the site, which would combine to a 21-megawatt  plant.  

Also, Dominion could be preparing to sell the plant to an alternative fuel use company. Dan Genest,  a Dominion spokesman, said several parties have expressed interest in the land but he declined to offer more details.

Since Dominion owns the land, it will have the final say on how the property is redeveloped. Driscoll said the energy giant is cooperating with the city, and has allowed the consultants to study the property. It also has agreed to be part of a working group that will include Driscoll, Salem state Representative John Keenan,  state Senator Frederick E. Berry  and Attorney General Martha Coakley.

During the meeting, Driscoll said she would support a multi-use project that would include a natural gas plant and a cruise ship terminal. She stressed that the project would take years to take shape, and would be implemented in phases.

Besides third-party ownership, consultants say other redevelopment challenges include finding an economic formula that will match the property’s current $4.75 million tax revenue. Also, any new owners will be responsible for cleaning up the site – a process, say the consultants, which could run as high as $85 million.

At the meeting, several people voiced their objections to a natural power plant and a cruise terminal.

Pat Gozemba,   who lives near the plant at Salem Willows,  said she was tired of paying to subsidize fossil fuel plants. “We’ve underwritten Dominion for years, I don’t want to underwrite another private company,” she said.

Linda Haley  believes the city should lobby to attract a marine research center instead of cruise ships. “I’m concerned we will replace what we have now with something bad or worse,” she said.

Tom Furey, a Salem city councilor, called it an historic opportunity to clean up one of the premiere coastal parcels along the North Shore. Furey envisions a redeveloped site that mixes commercial, retail and manufacturing. Still, the property’s future depends on what Dominion decides to do.

“They’re the power broker and we can’t tell them what to do,” he said.

Steven A. Rosenberg can be reached at srosenberg@globe.com.

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article