It’s official: No admissions test at Boston exam schools for incoming fall class

The controversial decision was voted in at nearly 2 a.m. after committee members listened to over 100 different testimonies.

On Oct. 18, Counter protesters stood across the street from a rally outside of Boston Latin School that called for Boston schools to keep the admission exam in place for entry into elite exam schools. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

Related Links

After more than eight hours of public comment and discussion, the Boston School Committee early Thursday morning unanimously voted to approve a controversial proposal to suspend the admissions test for the city’s three esteemed exam schools for the incoming class next fall, in part to address racial disparities in the district’s decades-old testing policies, and in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

The meeting, which was held via Zoom, began at 5 p.m. Wednesday and reportedly ended with the 7-0 vote just before 2 a.m. Thursday morning. Over 100 parents and former students spoke in favor of and against the plan, which drops the admissions exam and instead decides eligibility based on grades, 2019 MCAS scores, and students’ zip codes. 


Under the approved proposal, zip codes will be ranked based on median household income, and eligible students from the lowest-income ZIP codes will be given first choice on which school they would like to attend — whether that be the O’Bryant School of Mathematics and Science, Boston Latin Academy, or the Boston Latin School. 

The change spurred plenty of debate on Boston’s exam schools’ reputation for exclusion and upholding merit, coming just days after parents held dueling rallies that called for both support and reconsideration of the plan. 

Since Thursday night, competing petitions on have still been gaining traction, showing a lingering divide as signatures continue to stack up: at the time of publication, 5,309 people said they wanted to keep the test, and 5,347 called on the School Committee to discard it.

The final decision was backed by many public officials — from Mayor Marty Walsh, to Superintendent Brenda Cassellius, to Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley. 

In this moment of national reckoning on systemic racism and racial injustice, we must continue to be unapologetic in our efforts to examine and address the ways in which our institutions contribute to and exacerbate our gravest inequities and disparities—our education system is no exception,” Pressley said in a statement Thursday. “For too long, many of our most entrenched inequities have been fueled by an education system that continues to limit opportunity based on a child’s privilege and access to resources. Here in Boston, these inequities are made clear by the barriers faced by many Black, brown, immigrant and non-English speaking families in accessing our city’s most prestigious exam schools.”


Pressley praised the committee for the temporary suspension of the test, but said “we must continue to push for permanent reforms that will truly ensure equity for all students, informed by a robust and continued community engagement process to center the voices of students and families.”

Many city councilors said the nine-member working group behind the new recommendations didn’t do enough to seek families’ input on the proposal, specifically in households that don’t speak English, though local officials largely echoed Pressley’s thoughts. 

Boston City Councilor At-Large, Julia Mejia, took to Twitter to detail her own experience growing up attending Boston Public Schools and never knowing that exam schools existed until she began working in education later in life. 

Boston City Council President Kim Janey, alongside other councilors including Mejia, Ricardo Arroyo, and Andrea Campbell, also supported the measure. 

Ibram X. Kendi, a Boston resident, parent, and the recently appointed director of the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University, also offered a testimony of support to approve the “antiracist policy proposal.” 

“We know a policy is creating more equal opportunity if it is closing racial and economic inequity. We know a policy is not creating equal opportunity if it is maintaining racial and economic inequity,” Kendi wrote. “And the data is indisputable on the effects of this plan: it will close racial and economic gaps.”


Standardized tests, Kendi also noted, “have become the most effective racist weapon ever devised to objectively degrade Black and Brown minds and legally exclude their bodies from prestigious schools.”

The NAACP Boston branch also commended the committee for taking “a big step toward a more just, fair and equitable BPS.” 

We have much more work to do to make BPS work for all kids,” the organization added, “but tonight we celebrate.”

Get's browser alerts:

Enable breaking news notifications straight to your internet browser.


This discussion has ended. Please join elsewhere on